Research article Special Issues

Female immune system is protected from effects of prenatal exposure to mercury

  • Mercury is a ubiquitous environmental toxicant which bioaccumulates and has many biological effects, including detrimental effects on the nervous and immune systems. Because mercury can cross the placenta and concentrates in the fetal compartment, the developing fetus is particularly vulnerable. We hypothesize that developmental exposure to mercury will cause immunological changes, leading to an increased susceptibility to, or exacerbation of, immune disorders later in life. To better understand these changes, we exposed pregnant female mice to low doses of mercury for a short duration and examined the genetic effects related to immune function in the adult offspring. Pregnant BALB/c mice were exposed to mercury (200 µg/kg HgCl2 in PBS by subcutaneous injection) or vehicle control every other day from gestation day 5 to 15. Offspring remained with the dam until weaning and were euthanized at 8 weeks of age with no further exposures to mercury. Splenic RNA was isolated and gene expression changes examined by microarray in a non-random subset of samples and changes confirmed by quantitative PCR. Epigenetic changes were also examined in terms of miRNA levels in the spleen. Although male and female offspring were exposed to mercury in the same in utero environment, the effects on expression of immune-related genes and immune-regulatory epigenetic signals were different dependent upon the sex of the offspring with males, but not females, displaying up-regulation at least two-fold of arginase, interferon-γ, STAT1, vitronectin, and TNFSF18. Epigenetic changes in miRNA levels were differentially expressed in males and females with in utero mercury exposure; miR-191-5p was decreased in males, while miR-1188-3p was increased in females. These gene expression and gene regulation changes modulate the baseline immune response and may impact risks for autoimmunity later in life.

    Citation: Kayla L. Penta, Diego Altomare, Devon L. Shirley, Jennifer F. Nyland. Female immune system is protected from effects of prenatal exposure to mercury[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 448-463. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.448

    Related Papers:

    [1] Romilda Z. Boerleider, Nel Roeleveld, Paul T.J. Scheepers . Human biological monitoring of mercury for exposure assessment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(2): 251-276. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.2.251
    [2] Hyunok Choi, Mark T. McAuley, David A. Lawrence . Prenatal exposures and exposomics of asthma. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(1): 87-109. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.1.87
    [3] Gavin W. ten Tusscher, Marike M. Leijs, Kees Olie, Adri Ilsen, Tom Vulsma, Janna G. Koppe . Findings on prenatal, lactational and later childhood exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like compounds: a review of the Amsterdam-Zaandam cohort 1987-2005. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(1): 1-20. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.1.1
    [4] Theresa Vertigan, Kriya Dunlap, Arleigh Reynolds, Lawrence Duffy . Effects of Methylmercury exposure in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(1): 94-111. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.1.94
    [5] SMJ Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, Maryam Paknahad . Letter to editor: Human biological monitoring of mercury for exposure assessment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(3): 456-457. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.456
    [6] Alma Sobrino-Figueroa, Sergio H. Álvarez Hernandez, Carlos Álvarez Silva C . Evaluation of the freshwater copepod Acanthocyclops americanus (Marsh, 1983) (Cyclopidae) response to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni and Pb. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 449-463. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020029
    [7] Martina Grifoni, Francesca Pedron, Gianniantonio Petruzzelli, Irene Rosellini, Meri Barbafieri, Elisabetta Franchi, Roberto Bagatin . Assessment of repeated harvests on mercury and arsenic phytoextraction in a multi-contaminated industrial soil. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(2): 187-205. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.2.187
    [8] Gytautas Ignatavičius, Murat H. Unsal, Peter E. Busher, Stanisław Wołkowicz, Jonas Satkūnas, Giedrė Šulijienė, Vaidotas Valskys . Geochemistry of mercury in soils and water sediments. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(3): 277-297. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022019
    [9] Patricia Morcillo, Maria Angeles Esteban, Alberto Cuesta . Mercury and its toxic effects on fish. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(3): 386-402. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.386
    [10] Cyril A. Cabello, Nelfa D. Canini, Barbara C. Lluisma . Water quality assessment of Dodiongan Falls in Bonbonon, Iligan City, Philippines. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(4): 526-537. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022031
  • Mercury is a ubiquitous environmental toxicant which bioaccumulates and has many biological effects, including detrimental effects on the nervous and immune systems. Because mercury can cross the placenta and concentrates in the fetal compartment, the developing fetus is particularly vulnerable. We hypothesize that developmental exposure to mercury will cause immunological changes, leading to an increased susceptibility to, or exacerbation of, immune disorders later in life. To better understand these changes, we exposed pregnant female mice to low doses of mercury for a short duration and examined the genetic effects related to immune function in the adult offspring. Pregnant BALB/c mice were exposed to mercury (200 µg/kg HgCl2 in PBS by subcutaneous injection) or vehicle control every other day from gestation day 5 to 15. Offspring remained with the dam until weaning and were euthanized at 8 weeks of age with no further exposures to mercury. Splenic RNA was isolated and gene expression changes examined by microarray in a non-random subset of samples and changes confirmed by quantitative PCR. Epigenetic changes were also examined in terms of miRNA levels in the spleen. Although male and female offspring were exposed to mercury in the same in utero environment, the effects on expression of immune-related genes and immune-regulatory epigenetic signals were different dependent upon the sex of the offspring with males, but not females, displaying up-regulation at least two-fold of arginase, interferon-γ, STAT1, vitronectin, and TNFSF18. Epigenetic changes in miRNA levels were differentially expressed in males and females with in utero mercury exposure; miR-191-5p was decreased in males, while miR-1188-3p was increased in females. These gene expression and gene regulation changes modulate the baseline immune response and may impact risks for autoimmunity later in life.


    1. Introduction

    Mercury is a ubiquitous environmental toxicant that can cause many health defects for humans [1]. There are three distinct species of mercury: elemental, inorganic and organic with different uses and exposure routes, as well as causing different health effects [2]. Methylmercury exposure most commonly occurs from contaminated fish consumption [3]; inorganic mercury is primarily used in industrial settings and results in occupational exposures [4]; and metallic or elemental mercuryis commonly used in dental amalgams and small-scale artisanal gold mining.

    Because mercury and mercuric compounds can cross the placenta and affect the developing fetus, these individuals are particularly at risk. Numerous studies in humans have examined the effects of higher level prenatal mercury exposure, with conflicting conclusions [5,6,7]. At least in mouse models, lower levels of mercury exposure can cause decreased performance in motor Function [8]. Moving beyond the neurodevelopmental effects, research focus is now shifting to the possible broader health complications that can arise from low-level prenatal mercury exposure, including effects on the immune system.

    In our study we focus on mercury exposures, which are below the neurotoxic threshold and are closer to levels encountered by high fish-consumers (more than twice per week) in the United States [9,10]. While human exposures in the United States are primarily to methylmercury, we utilized inorganic mercury for a number of reasons. We have previously shown that both inorganic and organic mercury exposure is immunotoxic in vitro with similar patterns of response when human immune cells were exposed to mercuric chloride [11] or methylmercury [12]. Similarly, we have demonstrated that exposures to both inorganic (elemental) mercury [13] and methylmercury [14] can increase autoimmunity in humans. Finally, we utilized the same dosing protocol (both dose and route) with mercuric chloride in studies which demonstrated that inorganic mercury exposure increased the severity of autoimmune disease in susceptible mice [15,16]. Although these experiments were conducted using mercuric chloride, it should be noted that the chemical form of mercury found in fish is methylmercury cysteine, that is, the methylmercury bound to cysteine likely within a larger protein, which is less toxic than methylmercury chloride in studies on zebrafish [17].

    Therefore, for these studies, we asked whether prenatal inorganic mercury exposure could cause programming changes in gene expression related to immune function. We hypothesize that these programming changes in the immune system might increase susceptibility to or severity of autoimmune disease at adulthood. In this study, we predicted that the gene expression changes that occur after prenatal exposure in these systems are programming changes that are long-lasting and will persist into adulthood with implications for adult health. To test this, we used BALB/c mice and exposed pregnant dams to inorganic mercury every other day from gestation day (GD) 5-15 and examined gene expression changes that occurred in the offspring.

    2. Methods and Materials

    2.1. Mice

    BALB/c mice were purchased from Jackson Labs (Bar Harbor, ME). Animals were kept in specific pathogen-free conditions with standard light-dark cycles and fed a regular diet and water ad libitum. All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of South Carolina.

    2.2. Mercury exposure

    Mice were established in breeding trios (one male, two females). Following the protocol of Silva et al. [18], female mice (n = 6 per treatment group) determined to be plug positive (GD0) were treated with HgCl2 in PBS by subcutaneous injection in the scruff of the neck from GD5 to 15, every other day, at a dose of 200 μg/kg bodyweight in a total volume of 100 μL. Thus, a 20 g dam received a dose of 4 μg HgCl2 every other day for 6 doses. We chose to use inorganic mercury (HgCl2) and the subcutaneous dosing route because this exposure is frequently found in the literature [19] although other studies have utilized HgCl2 in drinking water [20] in different strains of mice. As others have demonstrated differences in mercury toxicokinetics with mouse strains [21], and we routinely work with BALB/c mice and HgCl2 exposures, we deemed it important to keep these variables constant for comparisons within our own studies. This exposure protocol does not result in tissue damage at the site of injection (data not shown).

    Control animals received an equal volume of PBS alone by the same route. Offspring from each dam were weaned at 4 weeks of age with no further mercury exposure. At 8 weeks of age, offspring (n = 6-8 per treatment group per sex) were euthanized by cervical dislocation under deep isoflurane anesthesia. Tissues, including spleen, were harvested for later analyses. Mercury exposure did not result in changes to the number of pups per litter (average was 6 across both treatment groups) or the sex ratio (both treatment groups had 50% male and 50% female offspring).

    The entire experiment including prenatal exposure was replicated in two independent experiments. Since data were similar between replicates, we present results from one of the independent experiments. That is, the data presented here are from 6 dams per treatment group and 6-8 offspring per treatment group per sex.

    2.3. Cytokine measurement

    Half of the spleen was frozen in dry ice immediately after harvest and stored at− 80°C until processing. Tissues were weighed and homogenized in Minimal Essential Media (MEM) supplemented with 2% FBS (1% weight/volume) at 4 °C, and supernatants used for cytokine analysis. According to manufacturer’s instructions, cytokines were measured in tissue supernatants using bead-based multiplex cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Bio-Plex; Bio-Rad). The limits of detection for the panel of cytokines were as follows: interleukin (IL)-1β, 1.70 pg/mL; IL-4, 2.43 pg/mL; IL-6, 1.02 pg/mL; IL-10, 1.04 pg/mL; IL-13, 1.57 pg/mL; IL-17a, 1.44 pg/mL; interferon (IFN)-γ, 1.30 pg/mL; granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), 1.58 pg/mL; tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, 1.73 pg/mL. Cytokine protein levels are expressed as pg/g of tissue ±SEM.

    2.4. RNA isolation and microarray analysis

    Spleens were used for microarray analysis. RNA and miRNA was isolated using miRNeasy Mini kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen) and RNA purity and quantity was determined by 260/280 ratio (Synergy HT, Biotek). RNA integrity was assessed using Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. Individual samples for each treatment group (n = 4 male, 4 female) were selected for high or low responder activity (n = 2 per sex) based on real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of iNOS/arginase expression levels (Figure 1). These individual samples were then analyzed by microarray (Whole Mouse Genome Microarray 4× 44k v2, Agilent; SurePrint G3 Mouse miRNA8× 60k v17, Agilent). Gene and miRNA expression patterns were determined using Genespring GX software. For gene expression analysis, data were log(2) transformed, quantile normalized and the moderated T-test statistic used with a p-value of < 0.05 and fold change 1.5 as cutoffs. For miRNA analysis, data were log(2) transformed, 90th percentile shift normalized and the moderated T-test statistic were used with p-value < 0.05 and fold change 2.0 as cutoffs. Differentially expressed genes between treatment groups were utilized for subsequent qPCR validation and in silico analyses.

    Figure 1. Differential macrophage gene expression. Spleens were isolated from PBS (vehicle control) and mercury (Hg)-exposed offspring (n = 6-8 per treatment group per sex). RNA was isolated and expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and arginase analyzed by qPCR for (A) males and (B) females. Data are expressed as normalized fold change (ΔΔCq) for each gene compared to the other. Based on the modified Thompson tau test, the upper right data point in panel (A) was determined to be an outlier. The samples chosen for microarray analyses are denoted with arrows.

    2.5. In silico analyses of gene expression patterns

    Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Ingenuity Systems, CA, USA) was used to generate IPA network data by inputting microarray data. Ingenuity generates networks by identifying published gene relationships and provides an IPA score (p value) indicating the likelihood that the significantly up or down-regulated genes found in our microarray would be present in a given network. We used these microarray data to inform examination of gene expression changes in the full cohort of male (n = 6-8 per treatment group) and female (n = 6-8 per treatment group) offspring from both treatment groups by qPCR.

    2.6. Real-time PCR (qPCR)

    Custom primers (Table 1) were designed for each target gene using Primer Blast Search (NCBI). RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified using a SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX One Step Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Bioline). Gene expression patterns for each gene were normalized to expression levels of the housekeeping genes. Data are expressed as ΔΔCq based on the equation for normalized expression:

    Table 1. qPCR primers
    Gene Forward Primer Reverse Primer
    iNOS CCACCAACAATGGCAACATCAGGT TAGGTCGATGCACAACTGGGTGAA
    Arginase TGGCTTTAACCTTGGCTTGCTTCG AAAGAACAAGCCCTTGGGAGGAGA
    Adiponectin CCGGGACTCTACTACTTCTCTT TTCCTGATACTGGTCGTAGGT
    Vitronectin GGACGTGTTCACTATGCCAG TCCGTCCGAGGATTTAGGTC
    TNFSF18 TCTGCTTTGAAACTGGCGTT CCTTGGGGTAAAGTCGATGC
    Complement Factor D GTACCATGACGGGGTAGTCA CACGTAACCACACCTTCGAC
    IFN-γ TGATTGCGGGGTTGTATCTG GACATCTCCTCCCATCAGCA
    RPLP0 (housekeeping) CGTTGGAGTGACATCGTCTTTA GGATGATCTTGAGGAAGTAGTTGG
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Normalized Expression (sample gene of interest) =Relative Quantity of a Sample (Sample gene of Interest)/Relative Quantity of a Sample (reference gene)(1/n)

    2.7. Statistical analysis

    Statistically significant differences between treatment groups were analyzed using a two-tailed t-test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Modified Thompson tau test was used to check for outliers.

    3. Results

    3.1. Determining high and low expressors for subsequent microarray analysis based on arginase and iNOS expression

    The goal for our microarray analysis was to not pool samples, but use a small subset of individuals to establish gene expression changes induced by prenatal mercury exposure. In order to select individuals for microarray analysis, we used qPCR for two genes related to macrophage function, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNos) and arginase (Figure 1). The lowest expressors in the PBS treatment group and highest expressors in the mercury treatment group were selected for each sex and the RNA from the spleens of these individuals was used in the subsequent microarray analysis (n = 2 per treatment group per sex, denoted with arrows in Figure 1). We chose not to use the highest expressor from the males (upper right corner of Figure 1A) for the microarray analysis as it was found to be an outlier based on the modified Thompson tau test; however, this sample was included in other analyses presented (cytokines, etc) since it was not an outlier in those analyses.

    3.2. Mercury alters gene expression differently in males and females

    From the total RNA isolated, mRNA expression changes were examined by microarray analysis. Prenatal mercury exposure induced a number of changes to mRNA (Figure 2) expression levels and these changes varied between males and females. In males, out of 24,562 known genes on the array, 446 genes were up or down-regulated at least 1.5-fold with prenatal mercury exposure. However, when examining the number of genes where expression was changed at least two-fold, this number is reduced to 60. In females, the total number of genes changed was much smaller than the males with a total of 138 genes up or down-regulated at least 1.5-fold, with 68 of these changed at least two-fold. There was very little similarity between the genes modulated in males and females, as there were only 6 genes in common modulated more than 1.5-fold and only 2 in common modulated more than two-fold. Interestingly, the gene expression array (Figure 2) did not show a difference in iNOS for either males or females as we would have predicted based on the qPCR analysis (Figure 1).

    Figure 2. mRNA gene expression changes induced by prenatal mercury exposure. Agilent mRNA arrays were utilized for gene expression analysis in a subset of samples (n = 2 for each treatment group and for each sex) specifically chosen based on differential iNOS and arginase expression and denoted with arrows in Figure 1. The heat maps for differentially expressed genes (greater than two-fold difference) are shown for (A) males and (B) females for mercury (Hg)-exposed and control (PBS) offspring. Sample geneclustering analysis was performed on quantile normalized sign values generated after log transformation. Genes up-regulated are shown in shades of red and those down-regulated are shown in shades of green.

    3.3. IPA analysis reveals a number of immunological changes caused by prenatal mercury exposure

    The data from the microarray were visualized in silico using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. With this program, we examined the changes in gene expression using the total dataset from both males and females. While a number of changes were present in gene expression, because of limited similarities between males and females we chose to create a pathway based on the expressor genes arginase and iNOS (Figure 3). From there, we were able to create a pathway that included 12 genes of interest, 11 of which are involved in apoptosis, 9 involved in fibrosis and cell movement of leukocytes, 8 involved in macrophage activation and 5 in bacterial infection (Table 2). These are the genes that we chose to focus on in qPCR validation of the total male and female cohorts (n = 6-8 per treatment group per sex). As noted, the gene expression arrays did not find differences in the subset of samples tested for iNOS, though we would have predicted differences based on the qPCR data (Figure1) for this gene. We included this gene in our pathway, but it is uncolored to denote no difference between treatment groups.

    Figure 3. Interactions of genes modulated in males with prenatal mercury exposure. Genes that were modulated at least two-fold in males exposed to prenatal mercury with relationships to arginase (Arg2) and iNOS (Nos2) were used to create an interaction pathway by Ingenuity IPA online analysis. Genes up-regulated are shown in shades of red and those down-regulated are shown in shades of green. The fold change is indicated below the gene symbol.
    Table 2. IPA pathway genes of interest and related biological processes
    Abbreviations: AdipoQ: adiponectin, Arg1: arginase 1, Arg2: arginase 2, CEBPB:CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta, CFD: complement factor D, IFNg: interferon-γ, IL4: interleukin-4, Nos2: nitric oxide synthase 2, VTN: vitronectin
    Apoptosis Fibrosis Cell Movement of Leukocytes Macrophage Activation Bacterial Infection
    AdipoQ
    Arg1
    Arg2
    CEBPB
    CFD
    IFNg
    IL4
    Nos2
    STAT1
    STAT6
    TNFSF18
    VTN
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.4. Males are more sensitive to gene expression changes with mercury exposure than females

    From the IPA pathway generated, we chose to validate gene expression changes specifically related to the immune system (Table 2). Using qPCR, we found a significant increase in the expression of arginase, vitronectin, TNFSF18, Stat1, and IFN-γ in the mercury exposed males compared to PBS exposed males (Figure 4A). There were no significant changes in the expression of these same genes or others examined in females (Figure 4A). Differentially expressed to focus on comparing gene expression changes between males and females, we calculated a ratio of the average gene expression level in mercury-treated divided by control-treated from each sex. We saw a greater change in males in all genes examined compared to females (Figure 4B).

    Figure 4. Prenatal mercury exposure modulates gene expression in male offspring. Spleens were isolated from PBS (vehicle control) and mercury (Hg)-exposed offspring (n = 6‒8 for each treatment group for each sex). RNA was isolated and expression of genes analyzed by qPCR. Data are expressed as normalized fold change (ΔΔCq) for gene of interest compared to housekeeping gene for each treatment group ± SEM (A). Data are also expressed as a ratio of response to mercury compared to control for each sex for each gene of interest (B). *indicates p < 0.05 between groups.

    3.5. Mercury exposure differentially alters epigenetic (miRNA) regulator levels in males and females

    For the miRNA array a similar trend was observed in that there were no similar miRNAs altered between males and females. Out of 1136 total miRNAs on the array, 43 miRNAs were up or down-regulated at least two-fold with prenatal mercury exposure (Figure 5) in males. As for mRNA, in females the total number of miRNAs changed was much smaller than the males. A total of 5 miRNAs were up- or down-regulated at least two-fold in the females, and none were the same as those changed in males. From those genes selected for qPCR, 3 are affected by 2 different miRNAs. In males, miR-191-5p had a decreased fold change (25.8) and can affect CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (CEBPB). In females, miR-1188-3p was increased (3.6) and has two targets—iNOS and adiponectin.

    Figure 5. Epigenetic (miRNA) regulation changes induced by prenatal mercury exposure. Agilent miRNA arrays were utilized for miRNA level analysis in a subset of samples (the same samples utilized for mRNA analysis shown in Figure 2 and denoted with arrows in Figure 1, n = 2 per treatment group per sex). The heat maps for differentially expressed genes (greater than two-fold difference) are shown for (A) males and (B) females for mercury (Hg)-exposed and control offspring. Sample gene clustering analysis was performed on quantile normalized sign values generated after log transformation. Genes up-regulated are shown in shades of red and those down-regulated are shown in shades of green.

    3.6. Prenatal mercury exposure induced little change in baseline cytokine protein levels

    In an attempt to link changes in gene expression changes to protein levels, we performed a cytokine analysis using spleen homogenates. Interestingly, there were no observed differences in terms of splenic cytokine protein levels in males, but females showed a significant decrease in IL-10 and increase in IL-4 with prenatal mercury exposure (Figure 6).

    Figure 6. Cytokine protein levels in spleen. PBS (vehicle control) and mercury (Hg)-exposed offspring were compared for the level of cytokine proteins in the spleen. Spleens were collected, homogenized, and homogenates analyzed for cytokine levels by bead-based multiplex assay as previously described (n = 6‒8 for each treatment group for each sex). Data are expressed as mean cytokine level pg/g of tissue ± SEM. *indicates p < 0.05 between groups.

    4. Discussion

    Previous studies have focused on the effects of mercury exposure on the nervous system, and in particular, the effects of prenatal exposures on the developing fetus. Prenatal mercury exposure not only causes neurological disorders, but cardiovascular disease and immune modulation [22,23,24]. Most rodent studies have been conducted using doses of mercury that would be considered neurotoxic in humans and at exposures that are generally not achievable in humans through common routes of exposure such as contaminated fish consumption [25,26]. Our study used lower level inorganic mercury exposure, comparable to the upper end of normal methylmercury exposures in the United States [9]. We focused on whether this exposure induced lasting changes in gene expression in the offspring. We predicted that changes in gene expression alter adult response to triggers of immune disorders and might increase severity or susceptibility to autoimmune disease. We have previously demonstrated that adult exposure to these same levels of inorganic mercury alters the disease progression of coxsackievirus-induced autoimmune myocarditis, increasing severity of the disease in both males and females [15,16] and increasing the prevalence of dilated cardiomyopathy in males [15]. If prenatal exposure to mercury results in changes in gene expression, then those individuals who subsequently manifest autoimmune diseases might be at higher risk for exacerbated disease conditions. Our data suggest that there are differences between males and females such that females are protected from the effects of prenatal mercury exposure on the immune system. It must be noted that we utilized a biased selection process in order to choose the samples for microarray analysis. While we validated those genes identified as highly different between the groups with qPCR using all the offspring from the experiments, the biased selection and subsequent microarray analysis could have generated a skewed picture of gene expression differences. Thus, the conclusions presented must be taken in this light.

    We saw many genes that had significant altered expression in the microarray (at least two-fold change compared to baseline) and this number was similar between males and females. However, for most of the genes we examined the overall change with mercury exposure was higher in the males compared to the females. One characteristic that these genes shared was their role in inflammation or being more pro-inflammatory in nature, suggesting that prenatal exposures to mercury could predispose males to exacerbation of response to autoimmune triggers later in life.

    Two well-known pro-inflammatory mediators are IFN-γ and STAT1. Both are important in the stimulation of macrophages toward an M1, or pro-inflammatory, subtype [27]. These macrophages produce inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 [28]. While our cytokine data did not demonstrate differences in these cytokines in the spleen, we did not separate out cell subtypes which may account for some of this discrepancy. Since males had a greater increase in these two genes (IFN-γ and STAT1) with mercury exposure, this gene expression pattern may indicate that males exposed to mercury had a higher percentage of M1 macrophages present compared to controls and to females.

    Another gene that has a role in inflammation and nitric oxide production is TNFSF18. This glucocorticoid induced ligand is expressed on numerous antigen presenting cells including macrophages, dendritic cells and B-cells [29]. Expression of TNFSF18 is mediated by NF1 [30] and expression can be increased by pro-inflammatory stimuli and T-cell activation [31].

    Vitronectin is a glycoprotein involved in multiple biological functions, including complement interactions, coagulation and the innate immune response. It is detected in most cells and tissues and is typically a sign of inflammation or stress [32]. Demonstrated by Seiffert et al. [33], vitronectin is up-regulated by IL-6 in both acute and chronic inflammation, and in vitro exposure to mercury has been shown to increase IL-6—although this was not demonstrated in our model [34]. Along with fibronectin, vitronectin has a role in bacterial colonization, infection, and then phagocytosis [35]. In the complement pathway, it is a known membrane attack complex inhibitor believed to act to protect against unnecessary cell lysis [35]. In the males exposed to mercury prenatally, we saw a larger increase in vitronectin expression compared to females—again hinting that the males have a higher level of inflammation present in the spleen compared to the females.

    The only miRNA altered that has a role in our genes of interest is miR-191-5p, which was decreased in expression 25 fold in males. This miRNA interacts with CEBPB, which is one of the few genes we validated that did not see a large change between mercury and control treatments in males or females. However, miR-191-5p is one of three miRNAs that have been demonstrated to be differentially expressed in the T regulatory cells of patients with Type 1 Diabetes [36]. This could implicate another scenario for increased inflammation in males compared to females.

    Through the analysis of cytokine production, we saw a number of cytokines that were changed, but IL-10 and IL-4 were the only cytokines significantly affected. IL-10, along with IL-4, are anti-inflammatory cytokines that inhibit Th1 T cell responses [37,38]. Reduction in IL-10 in mercury-treated females could be an indicator of increased inflammation, and a similar response was demonstrated by Silva et al. [18], in that splenocytes of adult females prenatally exposed to mercury produced less IL-10 upon in vitro stimulation. However, where Silva et al. witnessed a decrease in the production of IL-4 by thymocytes from prenatally exposed mercury-treated females, we saw a significant increase in IL-4 levels in the spleen. These differences might be due to organ-specific effects of prenatal mercury exposure or to the differences in experimental design; that is, differences in levels of cytokine measured in the tissue versus cytokines produced by stimulated cells in vitro.

    5. Conclusion

    Overall, when comparing the gene expression changes caused by prenatal mercury exposure between males and females, it appears to be that males have a much stronger push toward inflammation to which females are not as susceptible. Previously demonstrated by Silva et al., prenatal exposure to mercury has numerous effects on the immune system that are sex dependent [18]. While there are still a number of genes that need to be validated including the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6, we present evidence demonstrating that the effects of prenatal inorganic mercury exposure can affect the fetus differentially depending on sex. Future studies will utilize oral exposures to methylmercury to more closely model human exposures from contaminated foods such as rice and predatory fish.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health [K99/R00 ES015426 to J.F.N.].

    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this manuscript.

    [1] NRC (2000) Toxicological effects of methyl mercury. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
    [2] Clarkson TW, Magos L, Myers GJ (2003) The toxicology of mercury--current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med 349: 1731-1737. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra022471
    [3] Mergler D, Anderson HA, Chan LH, et al. (2007) Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: a worldwide concern. Ambio 36: 3-11. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[3:MEAHEI]2.0.CO;2
    [4] Langworth S, Elinder CG, Sundquist KG, et al. (1992) Renal and immunological effects of occupational exposure to inorganic mercury. Br J Ind Med 49: 394-401.
    [5] Grandjean P, White RF, Nielsen A, et al. (1999) Methylmercury neurotoxicity in Amazonian children downstream from gold mining. Environ Health Perspect 107: 587-591. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107587
    [6] Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, et al. (1998) Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to "safe" levels of methylmercury. Environ Res 77: 165-172. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3804
    [7] Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Cox C, et al. (1995) Neurodevelopmental outcomes of Seychellois children sixty-six months after in utero exposure to methylmercury from a maternal fish diet: pilot study. Neurotoxicology 16: 639-652.
    [8] Zahir F, Rizwi SJ, Haq SK, et al. (2005) Low dose mercury toxicity and human health. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 20: 351-360. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2005.03.007
    [9] Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP, Bodurow CC (2004) Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999 and 2000. Environ Health Perspect 112: 562-570.
    [10] Buchanan S, Anglen J, Turyk M (2015) Methyl mercury exposure in populations at risk: Analysis of NHANES 2011-2012. Environ Res 140: 56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.03.005
    [11] Gardner RM, Nyland JF, Evans SL, et al. (2009) Mercury induces an unopposed inflammatory response in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Environ Health Perspect 117: 1932-1938. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900855
    [12] Gardner RM, Nyland JF, Silbergeld EK (2010) Differential immunotoxic effects of inorganic and organic mercury species in vitro. Toxicology Letters 198: 182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.06.015
    [13] Gardner RM, Nyland JF, Silva IA, et al. (2010) Mercury exposure, serum antinuclear/antinucleolar antibodies, and serum cytokine levels in mining populations in Amazonian Brazil: a cross-sectional study. Environ Res 110: 345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.02.001
    [14] Nyland JF, Fillion M, Barbosa Jr F, et al. (2011) Biomarkers of methyl mercury exposure immunotoxicity among fish consumers in Amazonian Brazil. Environ Health Perspect 119: 1733-1738. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103741
    [15] Nyland JF, Fairweather D, Shirley DL, et al. (2012) Low-dose inorganic mercury increases severity and frequency of chronic coxsackievirus-induced autoimmune myocarditis in mice. Toxicol Sci 125: 134-143. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr264
    [16] Penta KL, Fairweather D, Shirley DL, et al. (2014) Low dose inorganic mercury heightens early innate response to coxsackievirus infection in female mice. Inflammation Res 64: 31-40.
    [17] Harris HH, Pickering IJ, George GN (2003) The chemical form of mercury in fish. Science 301: 1203. doi: 10.1126/science.1085941
    [18] Silva IA, El Nabawi M, Hoover D, et al. (2005) Prenatal HgCl2 exposure in BALB/c mice: gender-specific effects on the ontogeny of the immune system. Dev Comp Immunol 29: 171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2004.05.008
    [19] Toomey CB, Cauvi DM, Hamel JC, et al. (2014) Cathepsin B regulates the appearance and severity of mercury-induced inflammation and autoimmunity. Toxicol Sci 142: 339-349. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu189
    [20] Zhang Y, Bolivar VJ, Lawrence DA (2013) Maternal exposure to mercury chloride during pregnancy and lactation affects the immunity and social behavior of offspring. Toxicol Sci 133: 101-111. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft023
    [21] Ekstrand J, Nielsen JB, Havarinasab S, et al. (2010) Mercury toxicokinetics--dependency on strain and gender. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 243: 283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.08.026
    [22] Clarkson TW (1997) The toxicology of mercury. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 34: 369-403. doi: 10.3109/10408369708998098
    [23] Thuvander A, Sundberg J, Oskarsson A (1996) Immunomodulating effects after perinatal exposure to methylmercury in mice. Toxicology 114: 163-175. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(96)03486-5
    [24] Virtanen JK, Rissanen TH, Voutilainen S, et al. (2007) Mercury as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 18: 75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2006.05.001
    [25] Nielsen JB, Hultman P (2002) Mercury-induced autoimmunity in mice. Environ Health Perspect 110 Suppl 5: 877-881.
    [26] Pollard KM, Pearson DL, Hultman P, et al. (2001) Xenobiotic acceleration of idiopathic systemic autoimmunity in lupus- prone bxsb mice. Environ Health Perspect 109: 27-33. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s127
    [27] Martinez FO, Gordon S (2014) The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep 6: 13.
    [28] Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, et al. (2004) The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol 25: 677-686. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015
    [29] Chattopadhyay K, Ramagopal UA, Brenowitz M, et al. (2008) Evolution of GITRL immune function: murine GITRL exhibits unique structural and biochemical properties within the TNF superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 635-640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710529105
    [30] Zhou Z, Tone Y, Song X, et al. (2008) Structural basis for ligand-mediated mouse GITR activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 641-645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711206105
    [31] Nocentini G, Ronchetti S, Cuzzocrea S, et al. (2007) GITR/GITRL: more than an effector T cell co-stimulatory system. Eur J Immunol 37: 1165-1169. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636933
    [32] Leavesley DI, Kashyap AS, Croll T, et al. (2013) Vitronectin--master controller or micromanager? IUBMB Life 65: 807-818.
    [33] Seiffert D, Geisterfer M, Gauldie J, et al. (1995) IL-6 stimulates vitronectin gene expression in vivo. J Immunol 155: 3180-3185.
    [34] Villanueva MBG, Koizumi S, Jonai H (2000) Cytokine production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells after exposure to heavy metals. Journal of Health Science 46: 358-362. doi: 10.1248/jhs.46.358
    [35] Preissner KT (1991) Structure and biological role of vitronectin. Annu Rev Cell Biol 7: 275-310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.001423
    [36] Hezova R, Slaby O, Faltejskova P, et al. (2010) microRNA-342, microRNA-191 and microRNA-510 are differentially expressed in T regulatory cells of type 1 diabetic patients. Cell Immunol 260: 70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.10.012
    [37] Moore KW, de Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL, et al. (2001) Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 683-765. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683
    [38] Saraiva M, O'Garra A (2010) The regulation of IL-10 production by immune cells. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 170-181. doi: 10.1038/nri2711
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Anatoly V. Skalny, Thania Rios Rossi Lima, Tao Ke, Ji-Chang Zhou, Julia Bornhorst, Svetlana I. Alekseenko, Jan Aaseth, Ourania Anesti, Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, Aristides Tsatsakis, Michael Aschner, Alexey A. Tinkov, Toxic metal exposure as a possible risk factor for COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases, 2020, 146, 02786915, 111809, 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111809
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6168) PDF downloads(973) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog