Research article Special Issues

Evaluation of the bioenergy potential of agricultural and agroindustrial waste generated in southeastern Mexico

  • The generation of large volumes of agricultural and agroindustrial waste in the state of Tabasco represents a significant waste management challenge. We aimed to determine the bioenergy potential of five types of biomasses: Banana rachis, coconut shell, cocoa pod husk, sugarcane bagasse, and palm kernel shell, generated in agricultural and agroindustrial processes. This research involved characterizing and evaluating the energy quality of these biomasses by determining their calorific values and assessing their viability as fuel alternative sources. Additionally, we explored these biomasses' calorific value potential to reduce the inadequate disposal of wastes, reduce environmental impact, and provide alternative uses for these materials, which are typically discarded or have limited added value in the southeast region. The yield of waste generation per amount of production was estimated, with cocoa pod husk biomass and sugarcane bagasse, banana rachis, coconut shell, and palm kernel shell generating 0.685, 0.283, 0.16, 0.135, and 0.0595 kg of biomass per kg of crop, respectively. The bioenergy potential was evaluated through direct measurements using a calorimeter bomb, and indirect measurements using stoichiometric calculations. Four stoichiometric methods based on predictive equations were employed to determine the energy content of the biomasses from their elemental composition (Dulong, Friedl, Channiwala, Boie). The biomasses with the highest calorific values were coconut shell and cocoa pod husk, with values of 16.47 ± 0.24 and 16.02 ± 1.54 MJ/kg, respectively. Moreover, banana rachis had the lowest calorific value at 13.68 ± 3.22 MJ/kg. The calorific values of the sugarcane bagasse and palm kernel shell were 13.91 ± 0.98 and 15.29 ± 1.02, respectively. The factorial experimental design and statistical analysis revealed trends and magnitudes in the evaluation of energy determination methods and types of waste. The predictive equation of Dulong showed the highest similarity to the experimental values, especially for coconut shell (16.02 ± 0.08 MJ/kg). The metal content in biomasses such as palm kernel shell and coconut shell were below the limits established in ISO 17225:2014. Finally, our results indicated that coconut shell has superior characteristics for potential use as an alternative fuel, whereas banana rachis requires exploring alternative utilization options.

    Citation: Nathaly A. Díaz Molina, José A. Sosa Olivier, José R. Laines Canepa, Rudy Solis Silvan, Donato A. Figueiras Jaramillo. Evaluation of the bioenergy potential of agricultural and agroindustrial waste generated in southeastern Mexico[J]. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(5): 984-1009. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024046

    Related Papers:

    [1] Zeid Al Qaisi, Qais Alsafasfeh, Ahmad Harb . Stability impact of integrated small scale hybrid (PV/Wind) system with electric distribution network. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 832-845. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.832
    [2] K. M. S. Y. Konara, M. L. Kolhe, Arvind Sharma . Power dispatching techniques as a finite state machine for a standalone photovoltaic system with a hybrid energy storage. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(2): 214-230. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.2.214
    [3] Amer Braik, Asaad Makhalfih, Ag Sufiyan Abd Hamid, Kamaruzzaman Sopian, Adnan Ibrahim . Impact of photovoltaic grid-tied systems on national grid power factor in Palestine. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(2): 236-253. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022013
    [4] Katherin Indriawati, Bambang L. Widjiantoro, Ali Musyafa . Design of sensor and actuator fault tolerant control system on wind turbine benchmark for Region II. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(2): 111-126. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.111
    [5] Mohamed G Moh Almihat . An overview of AC and DC microgrid energy management systems. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(6): 1031-1069. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023049
    [6] Rashid Al Badwawi, Mohammad Abusara, Tapas Mallick . Speed control of synchronous machine by changing duty cycle of DC/DC buck converter. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 728-739. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.728
    [7] Carla Viveiros, Rui Melicio, Victor Mendes, Jose Igreja . Adaptive and predictive controllers applied to onshore wind energy conversion system. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(4): 615-631. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.4.615
    [8] Hari Charan Nannam, Atanu Banerjee . A novel control technique for a single-phase grid-tied inverter to extract peak power from PV-Based home energy systems. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(3): 414-445. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021021
    [9] Nagaraj C, K Manjunatha Sharma . Fuzzy PI controller for bidirectional power flow applications with harmonic current mitigation under unbalanced scenario. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 695-709. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.695
    [10] Arqum Shahid, Ahsan Ali, Faheem Ashiq, Umer Amir Khan, Muhammad Ilyas Menhas, Sajjad Manzoor . Comparison of resistive and inductive superconductor fault current limiters in AC and DC micro-grids. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(6): 1199-1211. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.6.1199
  • The generation of large volumes of agricultural and agroindustrial waste in the state of Tabasco represents a significant waste management challenge. We aimed to determine the bioenergy potential of five types of biomasses: Banana rachis, coconut shell, cocoa pod husk, sugarcane bagasse, and palm kernel shell, generated in agricultural and agroindustrial processes. This research involved characterizing and evaluating the energy quality of these biomasses by determining their calorific values and assessing their viability as fuel alternative sources. Additionally, we explored these biomasses' calorific value potential to reduce the inadequate disposal of wastes, reduce environmental impact, and provide alternative uses for these materials, which are typically discarded or have limited added value in the southeast region. The yield of waste generation per amount of production was estimated, with cocoa pod husk biomass and sugarcane bagasse, banana rachis, coconut shell, and palm kernel shell generating 0.685, 0.283, 0.16, 0.135, and 0.0595 kg of biomass per kg of crop, respectively. The bioenergy potential was evaluated through direct measurements using a calorimeter bomb, and indirect measurements using stoichiometric calculations. Four stoichiometric methods based on predictive equations were employed to determine the energy content of the biomasses from their elemental composition (Dulong, Friedl, Channiwala, Boie). The biomasses with the highest calorific values were coconut shell and cocoa pod husk, with values of 16.47 ± 0.24 and 16.02 ± 1.54 MJ/kg, respectively. Moreover, banana rachis had the lowest calorific value at 13.68 ± 3.22 MJ/kg. The calorific values of the sugarcane bagasse and palm kernel shell were 13.91 ± 0.98 and 15.29 ± 1.02, respectively. The factorial experimental design and statistical analysis revealed trends and magnitudes in the evaluation of energy determination methods and types of waste. The predictive equation of Dulong showed the highest similarity to the experimental values, especially for coconut shell (16.02 ± 0.08 MJ/kg). The metal content in biomasses such as palm kernel shell and coconut shell were below the limits established in ISO 17225:2014. Finally, our results indicated that coconut shell has superior characteristics for potential use as an alternative fuel, whereas banana rachis requires exploring alternative utilization options.



    Due to fossil fuel environmental impacts, renewable energy sources (RESs) have been increasingly used across the globe [1]. Solar energy, especially photovoltaic (PV) energy, is considered one of the most attractive renewable energy technologies due to its abundant energy source and availability [2,3]. According to the International Energy Agency Renewable 2021 report, an annual addition of 305 GW per year of renewable energy capacity is expected to be utilized between 2021 and 2026 [4]. The solar PV annual market is expected to grow by 17% to approximately 160 GW in 2021, reaching 200 GW in 2026. Even though renewable energy sources provide better alternatives to conventional power plants, the variation of renewable energy outputs poses major technical issues in integrating these sources into the power grid [5,6]. Moreover, the output nature of these sources, such as DC, AC, and frequency level, makes these sources unsuitable to be interconnected with conventional power generation plants. Distributed generator systems (DGSs) enabled the idea of integrating RESs into the existing power grids. In general, a DGS usually consists of a power generator such as a solar PV or wind generator connected to the utility grid via a power electronic device. Depending on the nature of the systems' output (i.e., DC or AC), the power electronic devices that are utilized for the integration are chosen. These devices provide the opportunity to perform different control tasks, such as flexible power flow, voltage and frequency control, or maximum power point tracking (MPPT) [7,8].

    Different topologies have been used for integrating solar PV systems into existing power grids [10,11,12,13]. One of the most commonly used topologies is the two-stages transformerless [9]. Such topology consists of a DC-DC converter and a DC-AC three-phase two-level inverter. The converter extracts the PV maximum power and boosts the output voltage of the PV generator, while the inverter transfers the DC voltage to AC voltage that is compatible with the power grid voltage level. Other topologies that reduce the leakage current of a single-phase grid connected PV system were introduced in [14,15,16]. These works implemented different power electronics devices such as H5, H6, and HERIC inverters, which show a remarkable reduction of PV solar system leakage current. An H7 three-phase inverter for integrating PV with leakage current reduction was proposed in [17]. Besides leakage current, many issues (e.g., nonlinear load and grid fault) can affect the power grid stability. In the case of grid fault, it requires the system to be capable of restoring the system operation to the normal conditions.

    Various control techniques have been implemented to control the PV systems' outputs such as voltage and power. The classical proportional integral (PI) method has been widely used for integrating PV systems. A fuzzy logic MPPT combined with a PI controller for charging batteries was presented in [18]. A small-signal modeling and designing of a multi-variable PI controller for a voltage source inverter in a high-voltage DC system was introduced in [19]. In [20], an adaptive PI control method to maintain the DC link capacitor voltage balance in a solar-PV-fed grid-connected neutral point clamped inverter was proposed. PI control combined with artificial neural networks for controlling a PV system supplying a direct current water pump was presented in [21]. The authors in [22] proposed an optimal PI tuning method using a genetic algorithm for controlling a single-phase grid-connected PV system. The research work in [23] introduced a PI controller-based active filter for a grid-connected PV system's current harmonics compensation. The previous works show that PI controllers have a fast dynamic response as well as satisfactory steady-state behavior. However, the PI controller requires external signals modulation generation and excessive time and effort for tuning parameters. Moreover, severe faults may deteriorate the system's stability.

    Sliding mode controllers (SMC) offer robustness to uncertainties, upper bounded disturbances and parameter variations, and the derivation of such controllers relies on the availability of system models [24]. These controllers have been frequently reported in renewable energy applications, such as super twisting SMC for grid connected PV systems [25], non integer SMC for DC micro-grid stability problems [26], adaptive non integer SMC for wind energy [27], industrial grade robust controllers [28] and fractional order control for wind energy [29]. Although SMC offer robust performance, however, such controllers compromise robustness when practically implemented using digital processors.

    Another control technique method that has been implemented for controlling grid-connected PV systems is model predictive control (MPC). Compared to other types of controllers, MPC provides some advantages, including ease of implementation, the ability to control different variables at the same time, and the ability to add limitations in the control objective. All these features and others make MPC an attractive control method not only for grid-connected PV systems but also for different applications in power systems. In [30], an MPPT and leakage current reduction technique using MPC for the H5 inverter of the PV system was proposed. Voltage regulation and an MPPT method based on MPC for a two-stage grid-connected PV system were introduced in [31]. The work in [32] proposed a current sensor-less model predictive control of an MPPT algorithm. A new MPPT technique of a PV module based on MPC was presented in [33]. The authors in [34] proposed an MPC strategy and a high-efficiency two-stage topology for a single-phase PV system.

    This paper investigates the performance of the current model predictive control (CMPC) for a two-stage three-phase PV system under grid fault conditions. To verify the CMPC capability, the results of the CMPC under grid fault were compared to the PI controller. Moreover, the results were compared with our previously proposed sliding mode control (SMC) [35]. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the grid connected PV system, section 3 derives the converter controller, and section 4 discusses the simulation results. Finally, the conclusion is drawn based on the presented data and results.

    The PV system considered in this work is shown in Figure 1. A two-stage transformerless topology is implemented to integrate the PV system into the main grid. The system consists of a PV panel connected to a DC-DC converter and then is connected to a DC-AC three-phase two-level inverter which delivers the power to the grid through an RL filter. The DC-DC converter is controlled via an MPPT algorithm to ensure maximum output power during the PV panel operation. Then, the DC link voltage is controlled via a PI controller in the d-q reference frames to generate the reference currents for the CMPC controller. After transferring the current reference values from the d-q frames to α-β, the reference values are then sent to the CMPC, which controls the output current of the three-phase two-level inverter. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the PV system control process implemented in this work.

    Figure 1.  PV system topology and control strategy.

    Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controllers are widely utilized for harvesting peak power from stochastic renewable energy sources using high-frequency power converters interface. In the existing literature, several MPPT methods have been discussed, such as perturb and observed, incremental conductance, ripple correlation, and fuzzy logic based maximum power harvesting methods. However, the incremental conductance algorithm is the most widely utilized technique and is easy to implement. In this work, the incremental conductance algorithm is used to extract maximum power from the energy source. The detailed diagram of the incremental conductance algorithm is shown in Figure 2.

    Figure 2.  Flow chart of incremental conductance algorithm.

    In this subsection, the DC link voltage model is realized from the system block diagram of Figure 1, and then a proportional integral (PI) is utilized to stabilize the DC link voltage to a reference value. As given in Figure 1, a DC link capacitor stores input power from the PV panel in the form of energy and then delivers the stored energy to the inverter. So, the dynamics across the DC link capacitor are expressed as follows:

    ˙Vc=1CVc(Pin32Vgdifd) (3.1)

    where Vc represents DC link voltage, Pin is the PV power stored in the DC link capacitors, Vgd represents grid voltage, and ifd is the grid current.

    In order to control the voltage dynamics of Eq 3.1, a PI controller is utilized and expressed as follows:

    idref=kpeVc+kieVc (3.2)

    where eVc is the voltage error, and kp and ki are the PI proportional and integral gains, respectively.

    The model predictive control strategy for controlling power electronic devices is based on the fact that there is only a finite number of switching states related to the voltage vectors of a specific power electronic device [36]. Through an optimization process, the system model is used to predict the future behavior of the control variables for each voltage vector. Then, the optimal voltage vector that results in the least error between the reference and controlled value is selected. The optimal voltage vector selection is done via a cost function that evaluates all the possible switching states and selects the optimal solution. To implement the MPC strategy, the following steps must be identified:

    ● Continuous-time system model,

    ● Discrete-time system model,

    ● Cost function to select the optimal voltage vector,

    ● Generation of switching signals related to the selected optimal voltage vector.

    The block diagram in Figure 3 illustrates the MPC process. The current values that have been measured x(k) are used in the system model to forecast future values x(k+1). Then, by minimizing the error between the future and reference values, a cost function assesses all future values. Finally, the switching signals are generated by the MPC controller.

    Figure 3.  Model predictive control process.

    The three-phase inverter topology is shown in Figure 4. It is made up of three legs, each having two switches. Since the upper switches are complementary with the lower ones, each leg results in two control actions, which means that the three-phase two-level inverter produces eight different switching state combinations [37]. The three-phase two-level inverter's voltage state-space vector can be written as

    Vx=23Vc(S1+aS2+a2S3) (3.3)

    where Vx is the output voltage of the inverter, and a equals ej2π3. The state-space vectors of the three-phase two-level inverter are illustrated in Table 1.

    Figure 4.  Three-phase two-level inverter.
    Table 1.  Three-phase two-level inverter voltage vectors.
    Mode S1 S2 S3 Vc
    1 0 0 0 0
    2 0 0 1 23Vdc0
    3 0 1 1 23Vdc60
    4 0 1 0 23Vdc120
    5 1 1 0 23Vdc180
    6 1 0 0 23Vdc240
    7 1 0 1 23Vdc300
    8 1 1 1 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The mathematical model of the system AC side in Figure 1 can be derived as

    Vx=VR+VL+Vg (3.4)

    where VL is the voltage across the filter inductor, VR is the voltage across the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the inductor, and Vg is the main grid voltage. The current load dynamics can be expressed as

    Vx=Rif+Ldifdt+Vg (3.5)

    where the current flow from the inverter to the main grid is denoted by if. Eq 3.5 can be rearranged in the following way:

    Ldifdt=Vx(Rif+Vg). (3.6)

    To predict the future values of inverter output current, the system discrete-time must be optioned [38]. Using the approximation derivative equation

    dxdtx(k+1)x(k)Ts (3.7)

    where x(k+1) is the future value, x(k) is the present value, and Ts is the sampling time, the discrete-time of Eq 3.6 is

    Lif(k+1)if(k)Ts=Vx(k)(Rif(k)+Vg(k)). (3.8)

    After rearrangement of Eq 3.8, the future value of the inverter output current is predicted as

    if(k+1)=if(k)+TsL(Vx(k)(Rif(k)+Vg(k))). (3.9)

    Since there are eight voltage vectors of the three-phase two-level inverter Vs (Table 1), the CMPC predicts eight values of the current future value in each sampling time Ts.

    The square error cost function (3.10) is used to evaluate each predicted value and select the optimal solution. In other words, the cost function minimizes the error for each future value of the eight predicted values in Eq 3.9. After that, the best voltage vector is chosen, and the CMPC generates the best switching states to send to the inverter. Note that the CMPC does this procedure every Ts sampling period. Figure 5 illustrates the CMPC strategy algorithm.

    g=(i(k+1)i(k+1))2 (3.10)
    Figure 5.  CMPC algorithm.

    In order to investigate the performance of the CMPC under grid fault, the system in Figure 1 was simulated using a MATLAB/Simulink environment. A comparative analysis between CMPC and PI control was conducted. For further investigation, the results are also compared to our previously proposed SMC. The details of implementing the SMC strategy for the PV two-stage transformerless topology were presented in [29]. The parameters of the system in Figure 1, MPC and PI controller are shown in Table 2. Figure 6 illustrates the input sun irradiance waveform to the PV power generator. A short circuit fault between grids' phase A and ground is applied at t = 1 s. The fault duration is set to one cycle, which approximately equals 40 ms. The fault resistance is set to 1.31 Ω, while the ground resistance is 0.01 Ω.

    Table 2.  System parameters.
    Parameter Symbol Value
    PV Rated Power VPV 5 kW
    DC-link Reference Voltage VDC 800 V
    Filter Inductance L 2.8 mH
    ESR of L R 0.02 Ω
    Utility Grid Voltage Vg 380 VLL,RMS
    Grid Frequency fgrid 50 Hz
    Sampling Time Ts 10 e6
    Proportional Gain Kp 1.6
    Integral Gain Ki 20

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 6.  Irradiance waveform.

    Figure 7 shows the MPPT reference value and the actual PV output power using CMPC, PI, and SMC controllers. As can be seen, using CMPC, the PV output power follows the MPPT reference value smoothly even under grid fault. The CMPC does not produce any overshoot or undershooting of PV output power signals. Even though the PV output powers using PI and SMC controllers follow the reference value, they both suffer from undershooting, which almost equals 15 kW in both cases of PI and SMC controlling strategies. Therefore, Figure 7 proves that CMPC has a satisfactory performance in stabilizing PV output power under grid fault compared to PI and SMC controllers.

    Figure 7.  MPPT reference value and PV output powers.

    Similar to the PV output power, the PV output current tracks the radiation value smoothly using the three controllers. Figure 8 shows the PV output current of the CMPC, PI, and SMC. Under the grid fault, CMPC maintains the PV output current value at the same level without any oscillation, overshooting, or undershooting. In contrast, a jump of 45 A is introduced using PI and SMC during the grid fault.

    Figure 8.  PV output currents.

    The DC link voltage is shown in Figure 9. As is illustrated in the figure, the recovery time for the DC link voltage is approximately 150 ms using all three controllers. However, CMPC results in less overshoot and undershoot of the DC link voltage under grid fault. A zoomed version of Figure 9 is presented in Figure 10. As can be seen, CMPC introduces a maximum of 75 V undershooting, while PI and SMC result in 180 V and 185 V, respectively. Moreover, CMPC produces less overshooting, with 20 V; however, PI and SMC result in almost 65 V overshooting. As a result, Figures 9 and 10 show the capability of the CMPC in stabilizing the DC link voltage compared to both PI and SMC during grid fault.

    Figure 9.  Zoomed version of Figure 8.
    Figure 10.  DC link voltages.

    Figures 11 and 12 present the output active power of the inverter. It is evident that the three controllers are capable of tracking the reference values smoothly. Even though CMPC has a bit more undershoot than the PI and SMC controllers, its recovery time is considered the lowest, at 50 ms. However, the recovery times of SMC and PI controllers are 60 ms and 80 ms, respectively. The inverter's reactive powers are shown in Figures 13 and 14. Since the q axis reference current is set to zero, the three-phase two-level inverter's output reactive power should be zero. It is evident from the figures that both CMPC and SMC are capable of maintaining the reactive power at zero even under the grid fault, while the PI controllers introduce some noticeable oscillations in the reactive power. That is because of the parameters decoupling issues that the PI controller imposes.

    Figure 11.  Active powers of the three-phase two-level inverter.
    Figure 12.  Zoomed version of Figure 10.
    Figure 13.  Reactive powers of the three-phase two-level inverter.
    Figure 14.  Zoomed version of Figure 12.

    The three-phase two-level inverters' output currents using the CMPC, PI, and SMC are shown in Figure 15. The comparative analysis shows that the recovery time of the output current under grid fault is 50 ms, while the recovery times for PI and SMC are 80 ms and 60 ms, respectively. The total harmonic distortion of the three-phase two-level inverter output current using the three control strategies is shown in Figure 16. As can be seen, CMPC results in a lower total harmonic distortion percentage and also a lower settling time compared to PI and SMC.

    Figure 15.  Three-phase two-level output currents.
    Figure 16.  Total harmonic distortion.

    This research work analyzes and investigates the CMPC strategy performance for a PV two-stages transformerless topology under grid fault conditions. A comparative analysis between CMPC, PI, and SMC is conducted under grid fault. The results illustrate that CMPC has a satisfactory performance compared to PI and SMC under faulty conditions. First, CMPC does not result in any overshoot or undershoot for the PV output current and power. In contrast, PI and SMC result in undershoot, with almost 15 kW and 45 A for the PV output power and current, respectively. Second, the settling time of the three-phase inverter's output active power and current is 50 ms using CMPC. However, the settling times of the PI and SMC are 80 ms and 60 ms, respectively. Finally, CMPC results in less voltage dip (75 V) of the DC link voltage compared to a voltage dip of 180 V for both PI and SMC.

    This work was supported by the Research Groups Program funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia, under Grant 1-441-106.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] FAO (2022) FAOSTAT, Land use, 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RL.
    [2] FAO (2022) FAOSTAT, Crops and livestock products, 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
    [3] FAO (2022) FAOSTAT, Value of agricultural production, 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QV.
    [4] FAO (2022) FAOSTAT, Macro indicators, 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/MK.
    [5] SIAP (2022) Statistical yearbook of agricultural production, 2022. Available from: https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/.
    [6] SIAP (2023) Performance of the agri-food GDP in the third quarter of 2023 (2022: Ⅲ–2023 Ⅲ).
    [7] SEDEC (2023) State profile, 2023. Available from: https://tabasco.gob.mx/sites/default/files/users/sdettabasco/Perfil%20del%20Estado.pdf.
    [8] INEGI Quarterly indicator of State economic activity (ITAEE), Tabasco.
    [9] Chauhan A, Upadhyay S, Saini G, et al. (2022) Agricultural crop residue-based biomass in India: Potential assessment, methodology and key issues. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 53: 102552.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102552 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102552
    [10] Tauro R, García C, Skutsch M, et al. (2018) The potential for sustainable biomass pellets in Mexico: An analysis of energy potential, logistic costs and market demand. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 82: 380–389.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.036 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.036
    [11] Peñaloza DF, Laiton LJ, Caballero DF, et al. (2012) Sciencimetric study of trends in the utilization of cocoa by-products (Theobroma cacao L.). Rev Espacio I+D, Innov Desarro 10: 83–94.https://doi.org/10.31644/IMASD.27.2021.a05 doi: 10.31644/IMASD.27.2021.a05
    [12] Balladares CA (2016) Physicochemical characterization of cocoa and coffee leachates from the Ecuadorian coast, as potential sources of bioethanol production. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/22931.
    [13] Lu F, Rodriguez J, Van Damme I, et al. (2018) Valorisation strategies for cocoa pod husk and its fractions. Curr Opin Green Sustainable Chem 14: 80–88.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.07.007
    [14] Vásquez ZS, de Carvalho Neto DP, Pereira GVM, et al. (2019) Biotechnological approaches for cocoa waste management: A review. Waste Manage 90: 72–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.030 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.030
    [15] Campos R, Nieto KH, Oomah BD (2018) Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) pod husk: Renewable source of bioactive compounds. Trends Food Sci Technol 81: 172–184.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.09.022 doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.09.022
    [16] Fernandes ERK, Marangoni C, Souza O, et al. (2013) Thermochemical characterization of banana leaves as a potential energy source. Energy Convers Manage 75: 603–608.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.008 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.008
    [17] Espina R, Barroca R, Abundo MLS (2022) The optimal high heating value of the torrefied coconut shells. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 12: 8605–8610.https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4931 doi: 10.48084/etasr.4931
    [18] Trujillo AF, Arias LS (2013) Coconut, a renewable resource for the design of green materials. Entre Cienc Ing 7: 93–100. Available from:https://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/entrecienciaeingenieria/article/view/637.
    [19] Irawan A, US Latifah, DIP Meity (2017) Effect of torrefaction process on the coconut shell energy content for solid fuel, AIP Conf Proc 1826: 020010.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4979226 doi: 10.1063/1.4979226
    [20] Triana O, León TS, Céspedes MI, et al. (2014) Characterization of sugarcane harvest residues stored in bulk. ICIDCA Sobre Deriv Caña Azúc 48: 65–70. Available from:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id = 223131337010.
    [21] Kalifa MA, Habtu NG, Jembere AL, et al. (2024) Characterization and evaluation of torrefied sugarcane bagasse to improve the fuel properties. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem 8: 100395.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2023.100395 doi: 10.1016/j.crgsc.2023.100395
    [22] Schmitt CC, Moreira R, Neves RC, et al. (2020) From agriculture residue to upgraded product: The thermochemical conversion of sugarcane bagasse for fuel and chemical products. Fuel Proc Technol 197: 106199.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106199 doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106199
    [23] Liew RK, Nam WL, Chong MY, et al. (2018) Oil palm waste: An abundant and promising feedstock for microwave pyrolysis conversion into good quality biochar with potential multi-applications. Proc Saf Environ Prot 115: 57–69.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.10.005
    [24] Ohimain EI, Izah SC (2014) Energy self-sufficiency of smallholder oil palm processing in Nigeria. Renewable Energy 63: 426–431.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.007
    [25] Syamsiro M, Saptoadi H, Tambunan BH, et al. (2012) A preliminary study on use of cocoa pod husk as a renewable source of energy in Indonesia. Energy Sustainable Dev 16: 74–77.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2011.10.005
    [26] Vásquez ZS, de Carvalho Neto DP, Pereira GVM, et al. (2019) Biotechnological approaches for cocoa waste management: A review. Waste Manage 90: 72–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.030 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.030
    [27] Redondo C, Rodríguez M, Vallejo S, et al. (2020) Biorefinery of biomass of agro-industrial banana waste to obtain high-value biopolymers. Molecules 25: 3829.https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173829 doi: 10.3390/molecules25173829
    [28] da Silva JCG, Alves JLF, de Araujo WV, et al. (2019) Pyrolysis kinetics and physicochemical characteristics of skin, husk, and shell from green coconut wastes. Energy Ecol Environ 4: 125–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00120-x doi: 10.1007/s40974-019-00120-x
    [29] Sarkar JK, Wang Q (2020) Different pyrolysis process conditions of South Asian waste coconut shell and characterization of gas, bio-char, and bio-oil. Energies 13: 1970.https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081970 doi: 10.3390/en13081970
    [30] Nadzri SNIHA, Sultan MTH, Shah AUM, et al. (2022) A comprehensive review of coconut shell powder composites: Preparation, processing, and characterization. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 35: 2641–2664.https://doi.org/10.1177/089270572093080 doi: 10.1177/089270572093080
    [31] Dewajani H, Zamrudy W, Irfin Z, et al. (2023) Utilization of Indonesian sugarcane bagasse into bio asphalt through pyrolysis process using zeolite-based catalyst. Mater Today Proc 87: 383–389.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.171 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.171
    [32] Sales A, Lima SA (2010) Use of Brazilian sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete as sand replacement. Waste Manage 30: 1114–1122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.026 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.026
    [33] Abnisa F, Daud WMAW, Husin WNW, et al. (2011) Utilization possibilities of palm shell as a source of biomass energy in Malaysia by producing bio-oil in pyrolysis process. Biomass Bioenergy 35: 1863–1872.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.033 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.033
    [34] Sosa JA, Laines JR, García DS, et al. (2022) Activated carbon: A review of residual precursors, synthesis processes, characterization techniques, and applications in the improvement of biogas. Environ Eng Res 28: 220100.https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2022.100 doi: 10.4491/eer.2022.100
    [35] Pérez M de L, Hernández JC, Bideshi DK, et al. (2020) Agave: a natural renewable resource with multiple applications. J Sci Food Agric 100: 5324–5333.https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10586 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10586
    [36] Borrega M, Hinkka V, Hörhammer H, et al. (2022) Utilizing and valorizing oat and barley straw as an alternative source of lignocellulosic fibers. Materials 15: 7826.https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217826 doi: 10.3390/ma15217826
    [37] Ali AH, Wanderlind EH, Almerindo GI (2024) Activated carbon obtained from malt bagasse as a support in heterogeneous catalysis for biodiesel production. Renewable Energy 220: 119656.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119656 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119656
    [38] Chung WJ, Shim J, Ravindran B (2022) Application of wheat bran-based biomaterials and nano-catalyst in textile wastewater. J King Saud Univ Sci 34: 101775.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101775 doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101775
    [39] Armynah B, Tahir D, Tandilayuk M, et al. (2019) Potentials of biochars derived from bamboo leaf biomass as energy sources: Effect of temperature and time of heating. Int J Biomater 2019: 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3526145 doi: 10.1155/2019/3526145
    [40] Sagastume A, Cabello JJ, Hens L, et al. (2020) The energy potential of agriculture, agroindustrial, livestock, and slaughterhouse biomass wastes through direct combustion and anaerobic digestion. The case of Colombia. J Clean Prod 269: 122317.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122317 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122317
    [41] Mdhluli FT, Harding KG (2021) Comparative life-cycle assessment of maize cobs, maize stover and wheat stalks for the production of electricity through gasification vs traditional coal power electricity in South Africa. Clean Environ Syst 3: 100046.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100046 doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100046
    [42] Appiah NB, Li J, Rooney W, et al. (2019) A review of sweet sorghum as a viable renewable bioenergy crop and its techno-economic analysis. Renewable Energy 143: 1121–1132.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.066 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.066
    [43] Mazurkiewicz J, Marczuk A, Pochwatka P, et al. (2019) Maize straw as a valuable energetic material for giogas plant feeding. Materials 12: 3848.https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233848 doi: 10.3390/ma12233848
    [44] Niju S, Swathika M, Balajii M (2020) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic sugarcane leaves and tops for bioethanol production. Lignocellulosic Biomass Liquid Biofuels, 301–324.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815936-1.00010-1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815936-1.00010-1
    [45] Chala B, Oechsner H, Latif S, et al. (2018) Biogas potential of coffee processing waste in Ethiopia. Sustainability 10: 2678.https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082678 doi: 10.3390/su10082678
    [46] Mekuria D, Diro A, Melak F, et al. (2022) Adsorptive removal of methylene blue dye using biowaste materials: Barley bran and enset midrib leaf. J Chem 2022: 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4849758 doi: 10.1155/2022/4849758
    [47] Kosheleva RI, Mitropoulos AC, Kyzas GZ (2019) Synthesis of activated carbon from food waste. Environ Chem Lett 17: 429–438.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0817-5 doi: 10.1007/s10311-018-0817-5
    [48] Prieto García F, Canales-Flores RA, Prieo-Méndez J, et al. (2022) Evaluation of three lignocellulose biomass materials (barley husk, corn cobs, agave leaves) as precursors of activated carbon. Rev Fac Cienc 11: 17–39.https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.fac.cienc.v11n1.97719 doi: 10.15446/rev.fac.cienc.v11n1.97719
    [49] Araújo L, Machado AR, Pintado M, et al. (2023) Toward a circular bioeconomy: Extracting cellulose from grape stalks. Eng Proc 86.https://doi.org/10.3390/ECP2023-14746 doi: 10.3390/ECP2023-14746
    [50] Martinelli FRB, Ribeiro FRC, Marvila MT, et al. (2023) A Review of the use of coconut fiber in cement composites. Polymers 15: 1309.https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051309 doi: 10.3390/polym15051309
    [51] Elnagdy NA, Ragab TIM, Fadel MA, et al. (2024) Bioethanol production from characterized pre-treated sugarcane trash and Jatropha agrowastes. J Biotechnol 386: 28–41.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.02.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.02.015
    [52] Darmayanti R, Wika Amini H, Fitri Rizkiana M, et al. (2019) Lignocellulosic material from main indonesian plantation commodity as the feedstock for fermentable sugar in biofuel production. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 14: 3524–3534.
    [53] Perea MA, Manzano F, Hernandez Q, et al. (2018) Peanut shell for energy: Properties and its potential to respect the environment. Sustainability 10: 3254.https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093254 doi: 10.3390/su10093254
    [54] Daud WMAW, Ali WSW (2004) Comparison on pore development of activated carbon produced from palm shell and coconut shell. Bioresour Technol 93: 63–69.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.015 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.015
    [55] Abnisa F, Arami A, Daud WMAW, et al. (2013) Characterization of bio-oil and bio-char from pyrolysis of palm oil wastes. Bioenergy Res 6: 830–840.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9313-8 doi: 10.1007/s12155-013-9313-8
    [56] Sable H, Kumar V, Mishra R, et al. (2024) Bamboo stem derived biochar for biosorption of Cadmium (Ⅱ) ions from contaminated wastewater. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 21: 100936.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2024.100936 doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2024.100936
    [57] Manríquez A, Sierra J, Muñoz P, et al. (2020) Analysis of urban agriculture solid waste in the frame of circular economy: Case study of tomato crop in integrated rooftop greenhouse. Sci Total Environ 734.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139375 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139375
    [58] Soares IS, Perrechil F, Grandis A, et al. (2024) Cassava waste (stem and leaf) analysis for reuse. Food Chem Adv 4: 100675.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2024.100675 doi: 10.1016/j.focha.2024.100675
    [59] Gómez E, Roriz CL, Heleno SA, et al. (2021) Valorisation of black mulberry and grape seeds: Chemical characterization and bioactive potential. Food Chem 337: 127998.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127998 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127998
    [60] Al Afif R, Pfeifer C, Pröll T (2020) Bioenergy recovery from cotton stalk. Advances Cotton Res. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88005 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.88005
    [61] Stavropoulos GG, Zabaniotou AA (2005) Production and characterization of activated carbons from olive-seed waste residue. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 82: 79–85.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.03.009 doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.03.009
    [62] Dominguez EL, Uttran A, Loh SK, et al. (2020) Characterisation of industrially produced oil palm kernel shell biochar and its potential as slow release nitrogen-phosphate fertilizer and carbon sink. Mater Today Proc 31: 221–227.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.143 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.143
    [63] Toro JL, Carrillo ES, Bustos D, et al. (2019) Thermogravimetric characterization and pyrolysis of soybean hulls. Bioresour Technol Rep 6: 183–189.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.02.009 doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.02.009
    [64] Marafon AC, Salomon KR, Amorim ELC, et al. (2020) Use of sugarcane vinasse to biogas, bioenergy, and biofertilizer production. Sugarcane Biorefinery, Technol Perspectives, 179–194.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814236-3.00010-X doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814236-3.00010-X
    [65] Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A, et al. (2019) Biofuel production from biomass. Current Dev Biotechnol Bioeng, 79–92.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64083-3.00005-1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64083-3.00005-1
    [66] Solís JA, Morales M, Ayala RC, et al. (2012) Obtaining activated carbon from agro-industrial waste and its evaluation in the removal of color from sugarcane juice. Tecnol, Cienc, Educ 27: 36–48. Available from:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id = 48224413006.
    [67] Medhat A, El-Maghrabi HH, Abdelghany A, et al. (2021) Efficiently activated carbons from corn cob for methylene blue adsorption. Appl Surface Sci Advances 3: 100037.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100037 doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100037
    [68] Abbey CYB, Duwiejuah AB, Quianoo AK (2023) Removal of toxic metals from aqueous phase using cacao pod husk biochar in the era of green chemistry. Appl Water Sci 13: 57.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01863-5 doi: 10.1007/s13201-022-01863-5
    [69] Marín FJ, García RM, Barrezueta SA (2020) Results of the application of biochar obtained from banana and cocoa residues in corn cultivation. Rev Cient Agroecosist 8: 83–88. Available from:https://aes.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/aes/article/view/404.
    [70] Pinzon DA, Adarme CA, Vargas LY, et al. (2022) Biochar as a waste management strategy for cadmium contaminated cocoa pod husk residues. Int JRecycl Org Waste Agric 11: 101–115.https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2021.1920124.1192 doi: 10.30486/ijrowa.2021.1920124.1192
    [71] Nosratpour MJ, Karimi K, Sadeghi M (2018) Improvement of ethanol and biogas production from sugarcane bagasse using sodium alkaline pretreatments. J Environ Manage 226: 329–339.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.058 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.058
    [72] Santos CV, Lourenzani AEBS, Mollo M, et al. (2021) Study of the biogas potential generated from residue: peanut shells. Rev Bras Ciênc Ambient (Online) 56: 318–326.https://doi.org/10.5327/Z21769478765
    [73] Tsai WT, Lee MK, Chang YM (2006) Fast pyrolysis of rice straw, sugarcane bagasse and coconut shell in an induction-heating reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 76: 230–237.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2005.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2005.11.007
    [74] Zheng J, Yi W, Wang N (2008) Bio-oil production from cotton stalk. Energy Convers Manage 49: 1724–1730.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.11.005
    [75] Kim SW, Koo BS, Lee DH (2014) Catalytic pyrolysis of palm kernel shell waste in a fluidized bed. Bioresour Technol 167: 425–432.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.050 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.050
    [76] Robak K, Balcerek M (2018) Review of second-generation bioethanol production from residual biomass. Food Technol Biotechnol 56: 174–187.https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428 doi: 10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428
    [77] Guerrero AB, Ballesteros I, Ballesteros M (2018) The potential of agricultural banana waste for bioethanol production. Fuel 213: 176–185.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.105 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.105
    [78] Kaur M, Kaur M (2012) A review on utilization of coconut shell as coarse aggregates in mass concrete. Int J Appl Eng Res 7: 2063–2065.
    [79] Tomar R, Kishore K, Singh Parihar H, et al. (2021) A comprehensive study of waste coconut shell aggregate as raw material in concrete. Mater Today Proc 44: 437–443.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.754 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.754
    [80] Chávez V, Valencia A, Córdova C, et al. (2017) Banana stem leachates: Obtaining and potential uses. Cuad Biodivers 53: 1–8.https://doi.org/10.14198/cdbio.2017.53.01 doi: 10.14198/cdbio.2017.53.01
    [81] Abdul Wahid FRA, Saleh S, Abdul Samad NAF (2017) Estimation of higher heating value of torrefied palm oil wastes from proximate analysis. Energy Proc 138: 307–312.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.102 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.102
    [82] Florian TDM, Villani N, Aguedo M, et al. (2019) Chemical composition analysis and structural features of banana rachis lignin extracted by two organosolv methods. Ind Crops Prod 132: 269–274.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.02.022 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.02.022
    [83] Granados DA, Velásquez HI, Chejne F (2014) Energetic and exergetic evaluation of residual biomass in a torrefaction process. Energy 74: 181–189.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.046 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.046
    [84] Jirón EG, Rodríguez K, Bernal C (2020) Cellulose nanofiber production from banana rachis. IJESC 10: 24683–24689.
    [85] Balogun AO, Lasode OA, McDonald AG (2018) Thermochemical and pyrolytic analyses of Musa spp. residues from the rainforest belt of Nigeria. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy 37: 1932–1941.https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12869 doi: 10.1002/ep.12869
    [86] Meramo SI, Ojeda KA, Sanchez E (2019) Environmental and safety assessments of industrial production of levulinic acid via acid-catalyzed dehydration. ACS Omega 4: 22302–22312.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02231 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02231
    [87] Guerrero AB, Aguado PL, Sánchez J, et al. (2016) GIS-Based assessment of banana residual biomass potential for ethanol production and power generation: A case study. Waste Biomass Valor 7: 405–415.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9455-3 doi: 10.1007/s12649-015-9455-3
    [88] Ozyuguran A, Akturk A, Yaman S (2018) Optimal use of condensed parameters of ultimate analysis to predict the calorific value of biomass. Fuel 214: 640–646.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.082 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.082
    [89] Titiloye JO, Abu Bakar MS, Odetoye TE (2013) Thermochemical characterisation of agricultural wastes from West Africa. Ind Crops Prod 47: 199–203.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.03.011 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.03.011
    [90] Ghysels S, Acosta N, Estrada A, et al. (2020) Integrating anaerobic digestion and slow pyrolysis improves the product portfolio of a cocoa waste biorefinery. Sustainable Energy Fuels 4: 3712–3725.https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SE00689K doi: 10.1039/D0SE00689K
    [91] Akinola AO, Eiche JF, Owolabi PO, et al. (2018) Pyrolytic analysis of cocoa pod for biofuel production. Niger J Technol 37: 1026.https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.374.1866 doi: 10.4314/njt.374.1866
    [92] Londoño-Larrea P, Villamarin-Barriga E, García AN, et al. (2022) Study of cocoa pod husks thermal decomposition. Appl Sci 12: 9318.https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189318 doi: 10.3390/app12189318
    [93] Tsai C, Tsai W, Liu S, et al. (2018) Thermochemical characterization of biochar from cocoa pod husk prepared at low pyrolysis temperature. Biomass Convers Biorefin 8: 237–243.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0259-5 doi: 10.1007/s13399-017-0259-5
    [94] Adjin M, Asiedu N, Dodoo D, et al. (2018) Thermochemical conversion and characterization of cocoa pod husks a potential agricultural waste from Ghana. Ind Crops Prod 119: 304–312.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.060 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.060
    [95] Channiwala SA, Parikh PP (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81: 1051–1063.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4 doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4
    [96] Kabir R, Anwar S, Yusup S, et al. (2022) Exploring the potential of coconut shell biomass for charcoal production. Ain Shams Eng J 13: 101499.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.05.013 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.05.013
    [97] Borel LDMS, de Lira TS, Ataíde CH, et al. (2021) Thermochemical conversion of coconut waste: Material characterization and identification of pyrolysis products. J Therm Anal Calorim 143: 637–646.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09281-y doi: 10.1007/s10973-020-09281-y
    [98] Said M, John G, Mhilu C, et al. (2015) The study of kinetic properties and analytical pyrolysis of coconut shells. J Renewable Energy 2015: 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/307329 doi: 10.1155/2015/307329
    [99] Rout T, Pradhan D, Singh RK, et al. (2016) Exhaustive study of products obtained from coconut shell pyrolysis. J Environ Chem Eng 4: 3696–3705.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.02.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2016.02.024
    [100] Gani A, Erdiwansyah, Desvita H, et al. (2024) Comparative analysis of HHV and LHV values of biocoke fuel from palm oil mill solid waste. Case Stud Chem EnvironEng 9: 100581.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100581 doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100581
    [101] Nizamuddin S, Jayakumar NS, Sahu JN, et al. (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of oil palm shell. Korean J Chem Eng 32: 1789–1797.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0376-9 doi: 10.1007/s11814-014-0376-9
    [102] Kim SJ, Jung SH, Kim JS (2010) Fast pyrolysis of palm kernel shells: Influence of operation parameters on the bio-oil yield and the yield of phenol and phenolic compounds. Bioresour Technol 101: 9294–9300.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.110 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.110
    [103] Uemura Y, Omar WN, Tsutsui T, et al. (2011) Torrefaction of oil palm wastes. Fuel 90: 2585–2591.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.021 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.021
    [104] Chang G, Huang Y, Xie J, et al. (2016) The lignin pyrolysis composition and pyrolysis products of palm kernel shell, wheat straw, and pine sawdust. Energy Convers Manage 124: 587–597.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.038 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.038
    [105] Marrugo G, Valdés CF, Chejne F (2016) Characterization of colombian agroindustrial biomass residues as energy resources. Energy Fuels 30: 8386–8398.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01596 doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01596
    [106] Ma Z, Chen D, Gu J, et al. (2015) Determination of pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of palm kernel shell using TGA–FTIR and model-free integral methods. Energy Convers Manage 89: 251–259.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.074 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.074
    [107] Liew RK, Chong MY, Osazuwa OU, et al. (2018) Production of activated carbon as catalyst support by microwave pyrolysis of palm kernel shell: a comparative study of chemical versus physical activation. Res Chem Intermed 44: 3849–3865.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-018-3388-y doi: 10.1007/s11164-018-3388-y
    [108] Athira G, Bahurudeen A, Appari S (2021) Thermochemical conversion of sugarcane Bagasse: composition, reaction kinetics, and characterisation of by-products. Sugar Tech 23: 433–452.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00865-4 doi: 10.1007/s12355-020-00865-4
    [109] Kanwal S, Chaudhry N, Munir S, et al. (2019) Effect of torrefaction conditions on the physicochemical characterization of agricultural waste (sugarcane bagasse). Waste Manage 88: 280–290.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.053 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.053
    [110] Chen WH, Ye SC, Sheen HK (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization of sugarcane bagasse via wet torrefaction in association with microwave heating. Bioresour Technol 118: 195–203.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.101 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.101
    [111] Iryani DA, Kumagai S, Nonaka M, et al. (2017) Characterization and production of solid biofuel from sugarcane bagasse by hydrothermal carbonization. Waste Biomass Valor 8: 1941–1951.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9898-9 doi: 10.1007/s12649-017-9898-9
    [112] Beta San Miguel Beta San Miguel, Responsabilidad BSM. Available from: https://www.bsm.com.mx/resp_ambiental.html.
    [113] Oleopalma (2022) 2022 Sustainable ability report.
    [114] American Society of Testing Methods (2002) ASTM D-2974, standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils, 2002. Available from: https://www.astm.org/d2974-14.html.
    [115] Sheng C, Azevedo JLT (2005) Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass Bioenergy 28: 499–507.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.008
    [116] Friedl A, Padouvas E, Rotter H, et al. (2005) Prediction of heating values of biomass fuel from elemental composition. Anal Chim Acta 544: 191–198.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.01.041 doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.01.041
    [117] Wang C, Deng X, Xiang W, et al. (2020) Calorific value variations in each component and biomass-based energy accumulation of red-heart Chinese fir plantations at different ages. Biomass Bioenergy 134: 105467.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105467 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105467
    [118] Yin CY (2011) Prediction of higher heating values of biomass from proximate and ultimate analyses. Fuel 90: 1128–1132.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.031 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.031
    [119] Environmental Protection Agency USA (1996) EPA, METHOD 6010B, Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, 1996.
    [120] Husain Z, Zainac Z, Abdullah Z (2002) Briquetting of palm fibre and shell from the processing of palm nuts to palm oil. Biomass Bioenergy 22: 505–509.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00022-3 doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00022-3
    [121] Sosa JA, Laines JR, Guerrero D, et al. (2022) Bioenergetic valorization of Sargassum fluitans in the Mexican Caribbean: The determination of the calorific value and washing mechanism. AIMS Energy 10: 45–63.https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2022003 doi: 10.3934/energy.2022003
    [122] Demirbas A (2002) Relationships between heating value and lignin, moisture, ash and extractive contents of biomass fuels. Energy Explor Exploit 20: 105–111.https://doi.org/10.1260/014459802760170420 doi: 10.1260/014459802760170420
    [123] López MI, Sosa JA, Laines JR, et al. (2023) Aerobic biotransformation of Sargassum fluitans in combination with sheep manure: optimization of control variables. Chem Ecol 39: 823–842.https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2023.2263427 doi: 10.1080/02757540.2023.2263427
    [124] Vergara GR (2022) Physical and energetic characterization of the fibrous residue from the processing of African palm by varying the percentage of humidity for bioenergy use in the Quevepalma company. Available from: http://repositorio.espe.edu.ec/handle/21000/28641.
    [125] Huaraca JN (2022) Determination of the calorific value of agroindustrial waste from wheat husk and barley straw enriched with cellulose nanoparticles as an energy alternative. Available from: http://dspace.espoch.edu.ec/handle/123456789/20236.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Waleed M. Zapar, Khalaf Gaeid , Hazli Bin Mokhlis Mokhlis, Takialddin A. Al Smadi , Review of the Most Recent Articles in Fault Tolerant Control of Power Plants 2018 – 2022, 2023, 30, 2312-7589, 103, 10.25130/tjes.30.2.11
    2. Mebarek LAHBIB, Mohammed BOUSSAID, Houcine MOUNGAR, Ahmed TAHRI, Analytical assessment of the filed results on the PV system connectors performance under operating temperature, 2023, 11, 2333-8334, 555, 10.3934/energy.2023029
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1745) PDF downloads(248) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog