
Citation: V. V. Thang, Thanhtung Ha. Optimal siting and sizing of renewable sources in distribution system planning based on life cycle cost and considering uncertainties[J]. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(2): 211-226. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.211
[1] | Li Bin, Muhammad Shahzad, Qi Bing, Muhammad Ahsan, Muhammad U Shoukat, Hafiz MA Khan, Nabeel AM Fahal . The probabilistic load flow analysis by considering uncertainty with correlated loads and photovoltaic generation using Copula theory. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(3): 414-435. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.3.414 |
[2] | Sonia Longo, Maurizio Cellura, Francesco Guarino, Vincenzo La Rocca, Giuseppe Maniscalco, Massimo Morale . Embodied energy and environmental impacts of a biomass boiler: a life cycle approach. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(2): 214-226. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.2.214 |
[3] | Abdulrahman Th. Mohammad, Amer Ibrahim Ismael . An equivalent photovoltaic solar system to solve the problems of electricity in Iraqi houses. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(5): 660-670. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.5.660 |
[4] | Ryuto Shigenobu, Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi, Atsushi Yona, Tomonobu Senjyu . Demand response strategy management with active and reactive power incentive in the smart grid: a two-level optimization approach. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(3): 482-505. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.3.482 |
[5] | Mowffaq M. Oreijah, Mohammed Yunus . A parametric analysis to evaluate the performance metrics of power generation system involving Trilateral Flash Cycle using three different working fluids for low grade waste heat. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(4): 483-492. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.4.483 |
[6] | Albert K. Awopone, Ahmed F. Zobaa . Analyses of optimum generation scenarios for sustainable power generation in Ghana. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(2): 193-208. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.2.193 |
[7] | Abshir Ashour, Taib Iskandar Mohamad, Kamaruzzaman Sopian, Norasikin Ahmad Ludin, Khaled Alzahrani, Adnan Ibrahim . Performance optimization of a photovoltaic-diesel hybrid power system for Yanbu, Saudi Arabia. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(6): 1260-1273. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021058 |
[8] | Jinhua Tian, Yueyuan Zhang, Yanan Gao, Yu Qin, Bihan Fan, Cheng Zhang, Qiqi Zang . Distributed optimization and scheduling strategy for source load storage distribution grid based on alliance chain. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(5): 946-967. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024044 |
[9] | Khuthadzo Kgopana, Olawale Popoola . Improved utilization of hybrid energy for low-income houses based on energy consumption pattern. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(1): 79-109. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023005 |
[10] | Matteo Moncecchi, Davide Falabretti, Marco Merlo . Regional energy planning based on distribution grid hosting capacity. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(3): 264-284. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.3.264 |
The spatial structure of chromatin has an important impact on gene regulation [1]. It is closely linked to the positions of nucleosomes in the genome, which are actively regulated by cells [2]. Computer models based on Monte Carlo, Brownian Dynamics or Molecular Dynamics can be applied to investigate the connection between the positions of nucleosomes and the spatial structure of chromatin [3],[4]. Computer models differ with respect to their resolution level, among other properties. For chains with many nucleosomes coarse-grained models are used, whereas molecular models with atomic resolution are more detailed and can represent single nucleosomes. In the present work, we study the usage of coarse-grained models, beginning with experimental determination of the positions of nucleosomes and ending with analysis of data from computer simulations. We focused at the level of a particular locus in the genome of a specific cell type. For all steps in this process, a multitude of bioinformatics and computational biophysics tools are applied that require different input formats and deliver various output formats, which makes the process tedious [5].
For the development of data formats we analysed the workflow used in our research group as an example. We identified three domains; experimental, simulation and analysis (Figure 1). Each domain involves several steps generating different artefacts.
The experimental domain is where chromatin is prepared and experimentally investigated. Nucleosomes are isolated from chromatin by applying e.g., micrococcal nuclease (MNase), and DNA fragments are isolated and sequenced to generate raw data in the form of short reads. Nucleosome positions are determined by mapping the obtained sequences to a reference genome using dedicated software [6]–[8] or existing nucleosome position databases [9],[10].These positions usually overlap, reflecting different positions in different cells from a sample, and experimental shortcomings. For computer models, individual non-overlapping nucleosome positions at a particular locus of interest are identified using appropriate software tools [11].
The simulation domain comprises all steps required to prepare and perform a computer simulation of a locus, and files contain the positions for a genomic region of interest. Additionally, a presetting file contains the settings for the 3D computer simulation model and the simulation process, such as nucleosome geometry, and parameters for potentials and simulations. Locus and presetting parameters are agammaegated into a single blueprint, and the simulation software creates a trajectory that contains the positions and orientations of the model elements for all simulation steps.
In the exchange domain, simulation results are made accessible for other research groups. This can be done by converting the trajectory into an easy to understand exchangeable format, although this requires greater disk space. Published data can then be used for visualisation and analysis.
Computer simulations are performed differently in different research groups [12],[13] utilizing various data formats and different chromatin models [14]–[16]. In the present work, we propose common data formats for presetting and locus parameters, and an exchange trajectory based on the Extensible Markup Language XML [17]. We believe that data can be expressed in a uniform way for different applications since the information contained within is essentially of a universal structure (Figure 2). We demonstrate the viability of the approach herein using a working example. The value for other groups will be corroborated by examples of Extensible Style Language Transformations XSLT [18] for analysis of exchange trajectories and transformation into other data formats. The XML Schema files and examples of XML files are published in open source repositories.
The locus, presetting and exchange trajectory data formats are freely available if (1) the format specification is unrestrictedly accessible, (2) use must not be subject to any fees or licenses, and (3) it must be interoperable (i.e., the data format must be platform-, hardware- and software-independent). A data file must be correct in terms of its structure and content. The clarity and usefulness of data can be assessed by means of a defined syntax and grammar. Data for an exchange trajectory can be validated utilising a schema describing the validity of the type and value range. In order to ensure the usability of data, data formats must not only be machine-readable, but also human-readable (i.e., text instead of a binary format). Broad and advanced software support should be available (e.g., communities, libraries, etc.) to minimise the effort for the processing an exchange trajectory. All the above criteria are met by the Extensible Markup Language (XML [17]), specified by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) [19]). The aforementioned data schema can be defined using an XML Schema.
In software development, object-oriented methods are regularly used to model structure and behaviour. Unified Modelling Language (UML) is a widespread standard [20]. In this article we use UML class diagrams to model classes and their relations as foundation for the XML formats. See the UML standard [20] for details, since most software engineering textbooks and even Wikipedia use the outdated UML 2.0 standard.
A class defines common properties of objects. In this context, objects are also referred to as instances of a class. For example, Figure 3 shows the nucleosome as a class with the properties pos and mpos. The text after the colon describes the type of the property e.g., integer. Instances of a class have its properties with concrete values. A class may be labelled as <abstract> which means that it cannot be instantiated, and only derived classes can be instantiated (s. section Associations between Objects). An example for an abstract class is the class Bead in Figure 6. Here, only DNABead and NuclesomeBead can be instantiated.
In UML different relations between objects can be modelled.
An association denotes a link between two classes and is depicted by a line between the two classes. A filled dot at a class signifies that the other class of the association owns the association. As example in Figure 5 Presetting owns the association to ParameterList. If no numbers or symbols are attached to the end of the line one instance of a class is associated to the other. A star indicates that an indefinite number of instances of that class are associated. As example in Figure 4 the association between Locus and Nucleosome symbolises, that a single instance of Locus can have an association to an indefinite number of instances of Nucleosome.
Inheritance describes a specialisation of an object A to an object B. One also says that B is derived from A. This means, that B inherits the properties and associations of A and has additional properties or associations that are special to B. A line with an open triangle as arrowhead in direction of the generalization represents graphically an inheritance. An example for inheritance in Figure 6 the class DNABead is derived from Bead.
Herein, we propose common data formats for locus, presetting and exchange trajectory files. For illustration purposes, we demonstrate our format for the blueprint.
A locus is located on a chromosome and is delimited by a first and a last nucleotide (base). It contains the positions of identified nucleosomes. The position of a nucleosome is defined by the positions of the two bases that delimit the nucleosome in the genome. The positions are derived experimentally, and these relations can be modelled in a straightforward way using two classes with a one-to-many association, as shown in Figure 3. The results are presented using an XML schema, as shown in Figure 4.
The presetting file defines the settings for the simulation model and the simulation process. These are mostly the geometry of the DNA at the nucleosomes, the parameters of the different energy potentials, and the simulation parameters [12]. The geometry of a nucleosome is defined as the location and orientation of the DNA at the nucleosome, and can be described by seven angles (α, β, γ, δ, ε, φ and ζ), the segment length in the elastically relaxed state, and the distance between the centre of gravity of the nucleosome and the segment centre (Figure 7) [21]. The nucleosome potential is determined by selecting one of the models implemented in our simulation software (e.g., Lennard-Jones or Gay-Berne). To exclude invalid angles or distances, the data schema uses its own data types for floating point values. It is also possible to define additional simulation parameters. The presetting structure is shown schematically in Figure 5.
An exchange trajectory file contains the results of a computer simulation, in particular the type, positions and orientations of all elements for different simulation steps. It includes information about the origin of the data (i.e., the conversion of a particular trajectory format, the time stamp of the conversion, the name and version of the converter, and the version of the data schema on which the exchange trajectory is based). The parameter list contains parameters for simulations as given in the presetting file. Parameters can be changed during the simulation (e.g., the temperature in simulations can be altered by applying simulated annealing) [22]. Altered parameters can be associated to configurations in simulation steps, at which point new parameter values are valid. The resulting structure of an exchange trajectory can be represented as a UML class diagram (Figure 7).
The workflow and the suitability of the schema files are demonstrated using an example locus. Eight nucleosomes are defined, and their positions are included in a locus.xml-file (Figure 8) for which correctness was validated by the corresponding XML-schema file (Figure 4). The simulation conditions are specified in a presetting.xml file (Figure 9).
The locus and presetting files were used to generate a blueprint.xml file (Figure 10). For the generation process, an internal tool from our simulation software was employed. The blueprint was used to generate a trajectory format suitable as an input for our simulation software. All steps described so far were performed prior to the simulation being executed. For the example simulation, 5000 Monte-Carlo steps were performed. The results are in the form of an extended trajectory file containing the generated configurations, and this is converted to an exchange trajectory XML file (Figure 11).
To demonstrate the possible usage of the file format, we show two examples utilising XSLT for analysis and transformation of a trajectory. In the first example, the end-to-end distance of the nucleosome chain is computed (Figure 12). This is the Euclidian distance between the starting point of the first segment and the end point of the last segment.
As a second example, we transformed the exchange trajectory into another trajectory format, VTF [23], which can be used with VMD-Viewer [24]. This can be done also easily with XSLT (Figure 13).
As an example for the whole workflow, we analysed a locus in mouse cells at chromosome 14 from base pair 47589000 to 47593031 (genome mm9). We evaluated experimental data from MNase-seq experiments of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC) (GSM1004653), Neural Precursor Cells (NPC) (GSM1004652) and mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) (GSM1004654) cells (BED-Files, zero based coordinates, right open interval) [25],[26]. Positions of nucleosome were determined applying the software NucPosSimulator using default settings [11] identifying between 22 and 24 nucleosomes (Table 1). We simulated the three cell types according to the described workflow with our simulation software [3] for 1000000 Monte Carlo steps, saved all 2000 steps and transformed each last configuration of the exchange trajectories for visualization with the raytracer POV-Ray [27] (Figure 14). Moreover, we analysed the average end-to-end distances of the chain. From analysis we excluded the first 25 values respectively 50000 steps needed for equilibration [28]. The results are presented in Table 1. Surprisingly, the chromatin model for MEF cells have longest elongation despite the largest number of nucleosomes caused by the positions of the nucleosomes.
Type of Cell | End-To-End Distance in nm | #Nucleosomes |
ESC | 90,50 ± 32,31 | 22 |
NPC | 89,44 ± 29,30 | 23 |
MEF | 97,68 ± 28,67 | 24 |
In this article, we present data formats for use in a workflow for computer simulation of chromatin based on experimental nucleosome positions that are easy to read and process. The formats establish inputs and outputs for the simulation domain as XML schemas. We used an example workflow on a locus to demonstrate the viability of our approach. Specifically, three XSL transformations demonstrated the ease with which the XML format can be processed. XML is superior to other text formats such as JSON [29] since it has standardised schema definitions and permits transformations using XSLT. Sophisticated libraries exist for nearly all programming languages. XML is the standard file format used by the systems biology community, especially the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) [30]. On the downside, XML files tend to require much more disk space than terser formats such as our internal trajectory format or binary formats (Table 2). These data formats are less readable, which hinders analysis by other groups. For publication of trajectories, we recommend only to publish uncorrelated configurations, and to compress the trajectory using standard tools such as bzip2 to minimise disk space.
#Configurations | Block-Trajectory | XML-Trajectory | Compressed |
100 | 2.55 Mb | 26.5 Mb | 895.6 Kb |
1250 | 31.33 Mb | 327.8 Mb | 10.8 Mb |
2500 | 63.00 Mb | 655.1 Mb | 21.9 Mb |
The proposed formats are limited to systems containing DNA and nucleosomes. Next-generation computer models include explicit models of linker histones [31], CTCF or Cohesin [32]. The format will be advanced in the future to include these elements. The proposed file format has possible shortcomings that may inhibit use by other groups. For example, the angles describing the geometry of nucleosomes are very specific for our model. However, chromatin has been investigated for more than 20 years using computer simulations [33], and a common file format for model and simulation results has not yet been proposed. Simulation data are usually not published, and the present work is the first to attempt to establish a common format. We intend to publish all future data in the proposed format and invite other groups to participate in this endeavour.
All mentioned files are included in the supplemental material and are publicly available at https://github.com/HOSTbioinformatics/ExchangeFormats
[1] | Sambaiah KS (2018) A review on optimal allocation and sizing techniques for DG in distributionsystems. Int J Renew Energy Res 8: 1236–1256. |
[2] |
Taner G (2019) Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecology 26: 1–10. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2018.1471012
![]() |
[3] |
Georgilaki PS, Hatziargyriou ND (2015) A review of power distribution planning in the modern power systems era: Models, methods and future research. Electr Power Syst Res 121: 89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2014.12.010
![]() |
[4] | Bhadoria VS, Singh N, Shrivastava V (2013) A review on distributed generation definitions and DG impacts on distribution system. International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies 1–7. |
[5] |
Theo WL, Limb JS, Ho WS, et al. (2017) Review of distributed generation (DG) system planning and optimisation techniques: Comparison of numerical and mathematical modelling methods. Renew Sust Energy Rev 67: 531–573. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.063
![]() |
[6] | Mohandes B, Moursi MSE, Hatziargyriou ND, et al. (2019) A review of power system flexibility with high penetration of renewables. IEEE Trans Power Syst (Early Access) 2019: 1–13. |
[7] | Thang VV, Trung NH (2019) Evaluating efficiency of renewable energy sources in planning micro-grids considering uncertainties. J Energy Syst 3: 14–25. |
[8] |
Bayod-Rújula AA, Yuan Y, Martínez-Gracia A, et al. (2018) Modelling and simulation of a building energy hub. Proceedings 2: 1–6. doi: 10.3390/proceedings2010001
![]() |
[9] | Deng S, Wu Q, Jing Z, et al. (2017) Optimal capacity configuration for energy hubs considering part-load characteristics of generation units. Energies 10: 2–19. |
[10] | Acharya PS, Wagh MM, Kulkarni VV (2019) Intelligent algorithmic multi-objective optimization for renewable energy system generation and integration problems: A review. Int J Renew Energy Res 9: 271–280. |
[11] |
Arriag M, Cañizares CA, Kazerani M (2016) Long-term renewable energy planning model for remote communities. IEEE Trans Sust Energy 7: 221–231. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2483489
![]() |
[12] |
Wong S, Bhattacharya K, Fuller JD (2009) Electric power distribution system design and planning in a deregulated environment. IET Gener Transm. Distrib 3: 1061–1078. doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2008.0553
![]() |
[13] | Abapour S, Khosroshahi AE, Frakho A, et al. (2015) Optimal integration of wind power resources in distribution networks considering demand response programs. 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering 26–28. |
[14] | Sambaiah KS, Jayabarathi T (2019) Optimal allocation of renewable distributed generation and capacitor banks in distribution systems using Salp Swarm algorithm. Int J Renew Energy Res 9: 96–107. |
[15] | Singh R, Bansal RC, Singh AR, et al. (2019) Multi-objective optimization of hybrid renewable energy system using reformed electric system cascade analysis for islanding and grid connected modes of operation. IEEE Access 6: 1–26. |
[16] | Nurunnab M, Roy NK, Pota HR (2019) Optimal sizing of grid-tied hybrid renewable energy systems considering inverter to PV ratio - A case study. J Renew Sust Energy 11: 1–14. |
[17] | Su H, Zhang J, Liang Z, et al. (2010) Power distribution network planning optimization based on life cycle cost. China International Conference on Electricity Distribution 1–8. |
[18] | Liu L, Cheng H, Ma Z, et al. (2010) Life cycle cost estimate of power system planning. International Conference on Power System Technology 1–8. |
[19] | Yi-Song JR, Long-Li JQ (2012) Comparative study of 10kV distribution network structure based on Life Cycle Cost analysis. China International Conference on Electricity Distribution 1–5. |
[20] |
Ristimäki M, Säynäjoki A, Heinonen J, et al. (2013) Combining life cycle costing and life cycle assessment for an analysis of a new residential district energy system design. Energy 63: 168–179. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.030
![]() |
[21] | Zhang T, Song X, Meng X, et al. (2013) A probabilistic load model base on chi-square method for distribution network. 2nd IET Renewable Power Generation Conference 1–4. |
[22] | Liu Z, Wen F, Ledwich G (2010) Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generators in distribution systems considering uncertainties. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 26: 2541–2551. |
[23] |
Montoya-Bueno S, Muñoz JI, Contreras J (2015) A stochastic investment model for renewable generation in distribution systems. IEEE Trans Sust Energy 6: 1466–1474. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2444438
![]() |
[24] | Sadeghi M, Kalantar M (2014) Probabilistic analysis of wind turbine planning in distribution systems. 19th Conference on Electrical Power Distribution Networks 1–6. |
[25] |
Shaaban MF, El-Saadany EF (2014) Accommodating high penetrations of PEVs and renewable DG considering uncertainties in distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29: 259–270. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2278847
![]() |
[26] | Soroudi A, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Rabiee A (2014) Energy hub management with intermittent wind power, In: Large Scale Renewable Power Generation, Green Energy and Technology, Springer, 413–438. |
[27] |
Fan M, Vittal V, Heydt GT, et al. (2012) Probabilistic power flow studies for transmission systems with photovoltaic generation using cumulants. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27: 2251–2261. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2190533
![]() |
[28] |
Atwa YM, El-Saadany EF (2011) Probabilistic approach for optimal allocation of wind based distributed generation in distribution systems. IET Renew Power Gener. 5: 79–88. doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2009.0011
![]() |
[29] | Atwa YM, El-Saadany EF, Salama MMA, et al. (2010) Optimal Renewable Resources Mix for Distribution System Energy Loss Minimization. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25: 360–370. |
[30] | Yu Y, Wen X, Zhao J, et al. (2018) Co-Planning of Demand response and distributed generators in an active distribution network. Energies 11: 2–18. |
[31] |
Santos SF, Fitiwi DZ, Bizuayehu AW, et al. (2017) Impacts of operational variability and uncertainty on distributed generation investment planning: A comprehensive sensitivity analysis. IEEE Trans Sust Energy 8: 855–869. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2624506
![]() |
[32] | Gkaidatzis PA, Bouhouras AS, Sgouras KI, et al. (2019) Efficient RES penetration under optimal distributed generation placement approach. Energies 12: 1–32. |
[33] |
Zheng Y, Jenkins BM, Kornbluth K, et al. (2018) Optimization under uncertainty of a biomass-integrated renewable energy microgrid with energy storage. Renew Energ 123: 204–217. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.120
![]() |
[34] | Konneh DA, Howlader HOR, Shigenobu R, et al. (2019) A multi-criteria decision maker for grid-connected hybrid renewable energy systems selection using multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Sustainability 11: 1–36. |
[35] |
Hosseini S, Sarder MD (2019) Development of a Bayesian network model for optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station. Electr Power Energy Syst 105: 110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.08.011
![]() |
[36] | Longo M, Foiadelli F, Yaïci W (2019) Simulation and optimisation study of the integration of distributed generation and electric vehicles in smart residential district. Int J Energy Environ Eng 8: 1–15. |
[37] |
Pazouki S, Haghifamb MR, Moser A (2014) Uncertainty modeling in optimal operation of energy hub in presence of wind, storage and demand response. Electr Power Energy Syst 61: 335–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.03.038
![]() |
[38] |
Chen ZP, Yan Z (2018) Scenario tree reduction methods through clustering nodes. Comput Chem Eng 109: 96–111. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.10.017
![]() |
[39] | Shi Z, Wang Z, Jin Y, et al. (2018) Optimal allocation of intermittent distributed generation under active management. Energies 11: 2–19. |
[40] | Rosenthal RE (2008) A user's guide. GAMS Dev Corp 1–262. |
[41] | Abdelkader B, Linda S, Tarek B (2014) Analysis of radial distribution system load flow under uncertainties with fuzzy arithmetic algorithm. 3rd International Conference on Information Processing and Electrical Engineering 1–6. |
[42] |
Khodayar ME, Barati M, Shahidehpour M (2012) Integration of high reliability distribution system in microgrid operation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3: 1997–2006. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2012.2213348
![]() |
[43] | IRENA 2018, Renewable power generation costs in 2017, In: International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 1–158. |
[44] |
Muneer W, Bhattacharya K, Cañizares C (2011) Large-scale solar PV investment models, tools and analysis: The Ontario case. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26: 2547–2555. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2146796
![]() |
1. | Nooriya A. Mohammed, Ammar Al-Bazi, Management of renewable energy production and distribution planning using agent-based modelling, 2021, 164, 09601481, 509, 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.159 | |
2. | Abdul Matin Ibrahimi, Mohammad Masih Sediqi, Harun Or Rashid Howlader, Mir Sayed Shah Danish, Shantanu Chakraborty, Tomonobu Senjyu, Generation expansion planning considering renewable energy integration and optimal unit commitment: A case study of Afghanistan, 2019, 7, 2333-8334, 441, 10.3934/energy.2019.4.441 | |
3. | Merlin Sajini M.L., Suja S., Merlin Gilbert Raj S., Impact analysis of time‐varying voltage‐dependent load models on hybrid DG planning in a radial distribution system using analytical approach, 2021, 15, 1752-1416, 153, 10.1049/rpg2.12013 | |
4. | Angelo Raciti, Santi Agatino Rizzo, Giovanni Susinni, Circuit model of LED light bulb suitable for typical voltage THD on LV distribution networks, 2020, 212, 03787788, 109665, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109665 | |
5. | 2020, Bi-Level Distribution Network Planning Integrated with Energy Storage to PV-Connected Network, 978-1-7281-5635-4, 1325, 10.1109/ISIE45063.2020.9152508 | |
6. | Vu Van Thang, Nguyen Hien Trung, 2020, Chapter 61, 978-3-030-37496-9, 534, 10.1007/978-3-030-37497-6_61 | |
7. | V. V. Thang, N. H. Trung, 2021, Chapter 45, 978-3-030-64718-6, 399, 10.1007/978-3-030-64719-3_45 | |
8. | Mahmoud M. Gamil, Mohammed Elsayed Lotfy, Ashraf M. Hemeida, Paras Mandal, Hiroshi Takahashi, Tomonobu Senjyu, Optimal sizing of a residential microgrid in Egypt under deterministic and stochastic conditions with PV/WG/Biomass Energy integration, 2021, 9, 2333-8334, 483, 10.3934/energy.2021024 | |
9. | V. V. Thang, N. H. Trung, Probabilistic optimization of planning and operation of networked microgrids with renewable energy resources considering demand response programs, 2022, 1868-3967, 10.1007/s12667-022-00559-8 | |
10. | Abdolmajid Erfani, Mehdi Tavakolan, Ali Hassandokht Mashhadi, Pouria Mohammadi, Heterogeneous or homogeneous? A modified decision-making approach in renewable energy investment projects, 2021, 9, 2333-8334, 558, 10.3934/energy.2021027 | |
11. | Zahir Barahmand, Marianne S. Eikeland, Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Cost Analysis through the Lens of Uncertainty: A Scoping Review, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 12191, 10.3390/su141912191 | |
12. | Aprajay Verma, K Shanti Swarup, An analysis of distribution planning under a regulatory regime: An integrated framework, 2023, 4, 2634-1581, 179, 10.1049/enc2.12088 | |
13. | Mohammad Ahmad A. Al-Ja’Afreh, Bilal Amjad, Kirkland Rowe, Geev Mokryani, Jorge L. Angarita Marquez, Optimal planning and forecasting of active distribution networks using a multi-stage deep learning based technique, 2023, 10, 23524847, 686, 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.014 | |
14. | Alejandro Valencia-Díaz, Sebastián García H., Ricardo A. Hincapie I., Stochastic optimization for siting and sizing of renewable distributed generation and D-STATCOMs, 2025, 27726711, 101026, 10.1016/j.prime.2025.101026 |
Type of Cell | End-To-End Distance in nm | #Nucleosomes |
ESC | 90,50 ± 32,31 | 22 |
NPC | 89,44 ± 29,30 | 23 |
MEF | 97,68 ± 28,67 | 24 |
#Configurations | Block-Trajectory | XML-Trajectory | Compressed |
100 | 2.55 Mb | 26.5 Mb | 895.6 Kb |
1250 | 31.33 Mb | 327.8 Mb | 10.8 Mb |
2500 | 63.00 Mb | 655.1 Mb | 21.9 Mb |