
Rooftop harvesting of solar energy is a promising method to provide a great portion of household energy requirements in many parts of the world. However, the cost of solar energy systems sometimes makes the exploration of rooftop solar energy systems not attractive to property owners. This study evaluates the economic factors that could affect the decision on whether to consider the installation of solar energy systems using the estimated time that the cumulative solar savings would become positive. The economic implication of increasing the micro-generation capacity of individual households, and the impact of varied interest rates, and subsidies were also evaluated. Among the three factors that were presented, the result showed that increasing the amount of electricity that is allowed to be generated from individual rooftops will result in the highest economic attractiveness for end-users. This is also expected to move the world closer to the goal of sustainable management of non-renewable resources for present and future generations. Increasing the micro-generation capacity of electricity from photovoltaic (PV) rooftops by individual households without increasing the electricity distribution fees results in a reduction of the time to reach positive solar savings. In addition, increasing the micro-generation capacity of electricity from PV rooftops is expected to contribute to a reduction in the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the electricity grid for the entire community. This study recommends the encouragement of policies that allow for the maximization of electricity generation potential from rooftops of residential and industrial buildings.
Citation: Adekunle Olubowale Mofolasayo. Evaluation of economic feasibility of rooftop solar energy systems under multiple variables[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2024, 4(1): 61-88. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2024004
[1] | Sanaz Mehrabani, Mohsen Rastkar, Narges Ebrahimi, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh . Microbiomes and Pediatric onset multiple sclerosis (MS): A systematic review. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(4): 423-432. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023031 |
[2] | Uzochukwu Adabanya, Ayoola Awosika, Anosh Khan, Ejike Oluka, Mayowa Adeniyi . Pediatric multiple sclerosis: an integrated outlook at the interplay between genetics, environment and brain-gut dysbiosis. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(3): 232-251. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023018 |
[3] | Khue Vu Nguyen . β-Amyloid precursor protein (APP) and the human diseases. AIMS Neuroscience, 2019, 6(4): 273-281. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.4.273 |
[4] | Craig T. Vollert, Jason L. Eriksen . Microglia in the Alzheimers brain: a help or a hindrance?. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(3): 210-224. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.3.210 |
[5] | Brian P. Leung, Kevin R. Doty, Terrence Town . Cerebral Innate Immunity in Drosophila Melanogaster. AIMS Neuroscience, 2015, 2(1): 35-51. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.1.35 |
[6] | Khue Vu Nguyen . Special Issue: Alzheimer’s disease. AIMS Neuroscience, 2018, 5(1): 74-80. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2018.1.74 |
[7] | Siddarth R. Ganesh, Orion Yedidia, Krupa Pandey, Carmenrita Infortuna, Charitha Madiraju, Florian P. Thomas, Fortunato Battaglia . Interleukin-6 targeting antibodies for the treatment of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-associated Disease (MOGAD): A review of current literature. AIMS Neuroscience, 2025, 12(2): 113-139. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2025008 |
[8] | Pascale Voelker, Mary K. Rothbart, Michael I. Posner . A Polymorphism Related to Methylation Influences Attention during Performance of Speeded Skills. AIMS Neuroscience, 2016, 3(1): 40-55. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2016.1.40 |
[9] |
Frank O. Bastian .
Is Alzheimers Disease Infectious? Relative to the CJD Bacterial Infection Model of Neurodegeneration. AIMS Neuroscience, 2015, 2(4): 240-258. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.4.240 |
[10] | MD Main Uddin, Karen P Briski . Neuroestradiol regulation of ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase activity and counterregulatory hormone secretion in hypoglycemic male versus female rats. AIMS Neuroscience, 2021, 8(1): 133-147. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021006 |
Rooftop harvesting of solar energy is a promising method to provide a great portion of household energy requirements in many parts of the world. However, the cost of solar energy systems sometimes makes the exploration of rooftop solar energy systems not attractive to property owners. This study evaluates the economic factors that could affect the decision on whether to consider the installation of solar energy systems using the estimated time that the cumulative solar savings would become positive. The economic implication of increasing the micro-generation capacity of individual households, and the impact of varied interest rates, and subsidies were also evaluated. Among the three factors that were presented, the result showed that increasing the amount of electricity that is allowed to be generated from individual rooftops will result in the highest economic attractiveness for end-users. This is also expected to move the world closer to the goal of sustainable management of non-renewable resources for present and future generations. Increasing the micro-generation capacity of electricity from photovoltaic (PV) rooftops by individual households without increasing the electricity distribution fees results in a reduction of the time to reach positive solar savings. In addition, increasing the micro-generation capacity of electricity from PV rooftops is expected to contribute to a reduction in the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the electricity grid for the entire community. This study recommends the encouragement of policies that allow for the maximization of electricity generation potential from rooftops of residential and industrial buildings.
Homeostatic functions at the cellular and systemic level are maintained by cross-talk between the nervous system, endocrine system and immune system. This reciprocal communication among the homeostatic systems is essential for the maintenance of health, and any dysregulation in the communication leads to susceptibility and development of disease [1],[2]. Through several studies, it has been established that the hormonal secretion from the pituitary is tightly regulated by the hypothalamic neuroendocrine system through the release of hormones, neurotransmitters and neuropeptides; targeting endocrine glands to influence psychological and physiological functions including immunity [1],[3]. The immune system in turn also regulates systemic functions, through release of cytokines and chemokines that can cross the blood-brain barrier and thus, regulate the neural functions in the brain [4]. In addition to the indirect effects on immune functions, the nervous system can directly influence immune functions through synaptic associations of sympathetic NA and peptidergic nerve fibers by the release of norepinephrine (NE) and neuropeptides, respectively that innervate the primary and secondary lymphoid organs [5].
Aging is marked by decline in homeostatic maintenance in the neuroendocrine-immune network. Several studies have reported that age-associated dysregulation in the cross-talk between the neuroendocrine and immune system contributes to the development of diseases, in both rodents and humans [1],[2],[5],[6]. Aging in women, as compared to men, is different, evident by the distinct changes in the release of hormones and reproductive cyclicity, which in turn enhances the risk of development of female-specific diseases such as autoimmune disorders, hormone-dependent cancers, osteoporosis etc [7]–[9]. The crucial changes in hormonal secretion and reproductive cyclicity occur during middle age in both rodents and women, as they transition into acyclicity and menopause, respectively [3],[10],[11]. The menopausal transition is characterised by an early phase with delayed cycles and a late phase with more than 60 days of amenorrhea followed by a period of less frequent cycling and the final menstrual period spanning over a decade [12]. Estrogen levels surge during the early menopausal transition followed by a rapid decline spanning a period of 2 years before the final menstrual period is achieved and the levels stabilise again [12]–[14]. Thus the transition from regular cycles to menopause is a gradual process of hormonal changes that span multiple years, during which central and systemic functions are chronologically adapted to effect metabolic, immunological and neurological modulations.
In females, reproductive aging is one of the first hallmarks of age-associated decline in the neuroendocrine-immune network. The depletion of ovarian follicles, hypothalamic deficits and the ensuing decline in the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis and its mediators involving neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, releasing hormones [gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH)] and target organs (ovaries) lead the transition into menopause [1],[3],[15]. This transition in females, begins during middle age before the onset of irregular cycles and a decline in GnRH-positive (GnRH+) neurons by a reduction in the ability of estrogen to induce neurochemical changes associated with pre-ovulatory surge in GnRH and LH [15]–[17]. Changes in the timing of the pre-ovulatory surges during middle age may be traced back to circadian rhythm disruptions due to deficits in the neurons of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus [16]. The ability of estrogen to elicit GnRH/LH surge is attenuated much earlier than the actual reduction in GnRH+ neurons in the hypothalamus through decline in hypothalamic stimulatory molecules such as glutamate, NE, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and increase in inhibitory signals such as gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) and opioids [3]. Proestrus spike in NE levels and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity in the medial preoptic area and the arcuate nucleus were not observed in young and old dioestrus rats implicating estrogen-induced LH surge in central neurotransmitter release [17]–[21]. Thus centrally, estrogen plays a crucial role in the maintenance of neuroendocrine homeostasis in young females by inducing hypothalamic neurons and regulating the hormonal outflow through neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. The presence of estrogen seems vital in the maintenance of hypothalamic and hippocampal neurons that decline with reproductive age thereby highlighting the neuroprotective role of estrogen on central neurons by mediating antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects, modulating neurotrophic signals and promoting crosstalk. Peripherally however, the results are contradictory. The neuroprotective role of estrogen has been well established and yet, the perimenopausal estrogen surge in rodents has been shown to be implicated in the loss of sympathetic NA innervation of lymphoid organs leading to disruption in neuroendocrine-immune homeostasis in the periphery [22],[23]. Treatment of ovariectomised middle-aged Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with estrogen [0.6 µg and 300 µg timed-sustained release (SR) pellets/30 days] significantly decreased the expression of p-TH in the mesenteric lymph nodes [24]. The onset of menopause is characterised by a dramatic decline in circulating levels of estrogen leading to a hypoestrogenic state that have lasting implications on the reproductive and non-reproductive functions of the hormone ranging from loss of rhythmicity in neurotransmitter dynamics in the brain to a decline in peripheral immune responses [25],[26]. Thus in the periphery, the estrogen surge in the perimenopausal/early transition phase is implicated in the loss of sympathetic nerve fibers in the lymphoid organs leading to dysregulation of neural-immune homeostasis. The effects of estrogen can perhaps be understood from a dose-response perspective. The higher circulating levels during menopausal transition in the periphery may be neurodegenerative although centrally, estrogen seems to exert a neuroprotective role.
In women, regular menstrual cycles in the young give way to irregular cycles by middle-age, leading to perimenopausal estrogen surge, onset of menopause leading to the final menstrual period. Rhythmic cyclicity of ovarian hormones including estrogen are implicated in the alteration of cell-mediated immune responses in follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Cell-mediated immune functions including mitogen-induced proliferation and cytokine production were significantly enhanced during follicular phase of the menstrual cycle in young women compared to the luteal phase [25]. In the lymphoid organs, estrogen is involved in the regulation of maturation, differentiation, activation and proliferation of lymphoid cells thereby influencing immune effector molecules like cytokines and antibodies [27]. Estrogen modulates Th1/Th2 cytokine balance in favour of Th2 type and influences humoral responses to diseases [28]–[29]. In murine models, estrus cycle-associated fluctuations in the levels of circulating gonadal hormones have been shown to alter T and B cell proliferation, and localization of immunoglobulin-A (IgA)-producing plasma cells [30]. Immunomodulation by estrogen is concentration dependent and varies according to the nature of the immune stimulus, the receptor subtype profile of the target organ, and the timing of administration [31]–[34]. Preovulatory surge in estrogen inhibits the translocation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) through transcriptional repression of Ikbkg and affect the maturation of dendritic cells in the lymph nodes [32]. On the other hand, low dose estrogen treatment of ovariectomised rats enhanced interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production and antigen-specific T cells [33],[34]. Thus it is implicated in the predominant incidence of autoimmune diseases, hormone-dependent cancer, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular diseases through alterations in T cell functions and cytokines during reproductive aging in females [35]–[37]. Centrally, estrogen mobilises astrocytes and microglia and plays a neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory role through neurotrophin-mediated growth, survival and neuronal plasticity [38]–[40]. Hypothalamic neuronal deficits and peripheral sympathetic denervation share a cause-effect relationship with age-associated decline in estrogen and associated immunosuppression [9],[18],[19],[22]. Thus estrogen plays a clearly defined role in influencing the immune responses in women depending upon the phase of menstrual cycle, reproductive age, levels of circulating estrogen, and influences the type of response elicited by modulating the Th1/2 balance.
The presence of sympathetic NA nerve fibres in synaptic association with immune organs, and the expression of adrenergic and steroid hormone receptors on immune cells renders immune cells susceptible to the immunomodulatory effects of both neurotransmitters and steroid hormones alike. Of interest here is the interesting crosstalk between NE signals released from the sympathetic fibres and circulating estrogen, both of which have shown contradictory effects on immune cells.
The expression of adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes including α1-, α2-, β1-, β2-adrenoceptors have been characterised in several immune cell subsets including splenic lymphocytes (T cells and B cells) and natural killer (NK) cells [2]. Published data from our laboratory has shown that predominantly, adrenergic stimulation of splenic lymphocytes is immunosuppressive. Treatment of splenocytes with α1-AR agonist phenylephrine, significantly decreased splenocyte IFN-γ expression (10−3 M, 10−6 M and 10−9 M) while α2-AR agonist clonidine (10−6 M and 10−9 M) inhibited splenocyte proliferation, phosphorylated-extracellular signal regulated kinase (p-ERK) and phosphorylated-cAMP response element binding protein (p-CREB) expression [41]. β2-AR agonist terbutaline (10−6 M and 10−9 M) significantly decreased splenocyte proliferation and interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression in splenic lymphocytes [42]. Estrogen co-treatment significantly reverses immunosuppression by α1-, α2-, and β2-adrenoceptor agonists. Co-treatment of splenocytes with 10−9 M 17 β-estradiol reverses phenylephrine-mediated decline in IFN-γ expression, clonidine-mediated decline in proliferation, p-ERK and p-CREB expression and terbutaline-mediated decline in proliferation and IL-6 expression [41],[42]. 1-ARs are expressed on neutrophils, mast cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and microglia where they are known to mediate inhibition of neutrophil functions, mast cell histamine release, macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) expression, dendritic cell migration and suppression of microglial activation [43]–[47]. Unpublished data from our laboratory has shown that coincubation of splenic lymphocytes with 1-AR agonist dobutamine, suppresses splenocyte proliferation thereby exerting a similar immunosuppressive effect. These studies have shown that sympathetic modulation of immune cell functions may be crucial for the maintenance of naïve cells in the lymphoid organs. Exposure to estrogen overrides the immunosuppressive role of NE and stimulates immune functions. Reproductive aging is associated with concomitant loss of sympathetic NA fibers and associated naive cells possibly due to compounded effect of prolonged exposure to circulatory estrogen throughout reproductive life and estrogen surge during early menopausal transition.
Intracellular (genomic and non-genomic) effects of estrogen are mediated by specific intracellular and membrane receptors namely ERα and ERβ. ERα is predominantly expressed on CD4+ T cells while ERβ predominantly expressed on B cells, playing a role in maturation and differentiation of thymic T cells and B lymphopoiesis in the bone marrow [48]. Once estrogen binds to these receptors, they control the expression of their target genes by binding to the estrogen response element (ERE) leading to the activation of several downstream signals including NF-κB, activator protein-1 (AP1) or ERK [48]–[49]. Studies from our laboratory have shown that, the effects of estrogen on cell mediated immune functions are concentration dependent and are differentially mediated through specific receptor subtypes through antioxidant enzymes and nitric oxide (NO) [34]. Thus the effects of estrogen on cell-mediated immune functions may be dependent upon the type of immune cells and mediated through ERα and ERβ [50],[51]. ERα mediates the expression of Th1 cytokines and proliferation of CD4+ T cells in normal rodents and experimental autoimmune disease model of myasthenia gravis [33],[52]. ERα-mediated suppression of NF-κB through regulation of let-7a and miR-125b microRNAs have been shown to play a role in estrogen-mediated suppression of inflammatory process in primary macrophages [53],[54]. Expression of ERα-mediated signals in the splenocytes has been implicated in the suppression of inflammation in trauma-haemorrhage through IL-6 and TNF-α [55]. These studies have shown that ERα plays a predominantly anti-inflammatory role favouring Th1 responses and suppressing inflammatory signals. The involvement of both ERα/β have been shown in protection against bacterial infection and sepsis in an animal model of trauma-haemorrhage by reversing the suppression of T cell proliferation and inducing Th1 and Th2 cytokine production [56],[57]. In mouse models of cardiotoxin-induced myoinjury, estrogen exerts anti-inflammatory effects through infiltration of anti-inflammatory M2-macrophages and T-regulatory cells and suppressing Th1 responses through ERβ [58]. Estrogen can exert its effects across immune cell subsets through receptor-dependent and receptor independent mechanisms and mediate specific effects [59].
Crosstalk between estrogen and adrenergic signalling has also been implicated in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines by peritoneal macrophages [60]. In an in vitro study conducted in our laboratory, estrogen [10−6 M] treatment of splenic lymphocytes reversed immunosuppression mediated by adrenergic agonists and enhanced cell-mediated immune functions [41],[42]. Apart from ERs, estrogen can also bind to membrane-bound G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and regulate T cell mediated immune functions [61]. ER-mediated activation of ERK/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), CREB, and Akt pathways have been shown in MCF-cells, immortalised neuronal cultures, Parkinson's disease and glioma models [62]–[65]. Estrogen has been shown to modulate the tumor-immune microenvironment in female mouse models of liver cancer through ERα and ERβ [66].
Centrally, the effects of estrogen are transduced through the activation of ERK and CREB in the hypothalamus and hippocampus, activation of Akt signalling pathways in the striatum or mediating anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of NF-κB [67]–[73]. Estrogen augments TH promoter activity through specific pathways involving membrane-bound ERα in PC-12 neuronal cells and ERβ in mouse locus coeruleus [74]–[76]. The expression of ERβ and ERα in the adult female brain is significantly altered with reproductive age and estrogen supplementation in specific brain areas and their relative expression may modulate downstream signalling responses in order to influence memory, cognitive functions, neuronal plasticity, inflammation and neurodegeneration [77],[78]. Evidence from estrogen replacement therapy studies has shown that the synthetic steroid, Tibolone with weak estrogenic, progestogenic and androgenic activity decreased body weight, glucose tolerance, triglycerides and cholesterol levels in SD rats fed with high-fat high-fructose diet compared to standard diet by modulating the expression of ERs in the brain area [79]. Thus estrogen can influence neuroimmunomodulation both centrally and peripherally through specific intracellular pathways based on the dose, type of receptor subtype activated and presence of co-stimulatory/inhibitory signals.
The role of 17 β-estradiol in neuroprotection in young and old females has been widely explored in a number of studies. We have shown that estrogen exerts a dual role by mediating neuroprotective effects in specific brain areas while causing sympathetic denervation in the periphery esp. lymphoid organs [22],[25]. Administration of a single dose of 17 β-estradiol (10 pg/kg s.c.) or using SR pellets (0.1 pg/pellet/3 weeks), to ovariectomised adult virgin female SD rats similar to proestrus surge in estrogen have both shown significantly decreased sympathetic innervation in the uterine smooth muscles [80]. Similarly, ovariectomised adult female Long Evans hooded rats treated with estrogen dose of 40–55 µg/kg/d orally up to 8 months showed increased TH-positive (TH+) nerve fibers in the medial prefrontal cortex of old rats [81]. In our study, ovariectomised middle-aged female SD rats supplemented with estrogen through SR pellets implanted at the scruff (300 µg) for 30 days showed increased splenic p-TH and nerve growth factor (NGF) expression [82]. However, estrogen (0.6 µg) supplementation of ovariectomised middle-aged SD rats enhanced TH expression in frontal cortex and hippocampus, suppressed NF-κB expression in the frontal cortex and striatum, and decreased NGF expression in the hippocampus [83],[84]. Long-term effects of estrogen exposure in the periphery are implicated in the early onset of peripheral sympathetic denervation of lymphoid organs in females compared to males [22]. Age-associated decline in estrogen is concomitant with the development of cognitive impairment and neurodegenerative diseases through decline in basal forebrain neurons, inhibition of NO and cholinergic functions, loss of trophic factors and onset of neuroinflammation [72],[73],[83]–[89]. Estrogen plays a neurotrophic role promoting plasticity in hippocampal neurons through expression of growth factors, signalling molecules, cholinesterases and boosting metabolism [73],[90]–[91]. Estrogen-induced synthesis of catecholamines through modulation of TH+ fiber density and TH activity in the hippocampus and frontal cortex have been implicated in memory and cognitive functions [73],[92]–[95]. The trophic effects of estrogen begins early in the brain development showing neuroprotective effect that may modulate neurodevelopment of different brain structures as evident with studies reporting differences in men and women with movement disorders [96]. Central neuroprotective effects of estrogen clearly substantiate the claim that estrogen is beneficial for the brain. However, neuroprotection by estrogen cannot be extrapolated to the periphery which is exposed to fluctuating levels of estrogen throughout reproductive life and during menopausal transition.
Aging takes a toll on cellular processes through increased allostatic load of reactive oxygen species and decline in antioxidant machinery leading to impaired functions and cellular distress. Peroxides and superoxide anions can bind to cell membrane lipids through malondialdehyde adducts leading to impaired structural integrity that eventually compromise functional integrity of the cell [97],[98]. Collectively, these changes affect neuroendocrine-homeostasis leading to dysregulation and development of age-associated diseases. Studies using splenic lymphocytes from old rats have shown age-associated increase in lipid peroxidation, accumulation of protein carbonyl compounds leading to enzyme dysfunctions, disruption of cellular functions and immunosenescence [73],[81],[99]. Estrogen (10−12 M, 10−10 M and 10−8 M) plays a potent antioxidant function in splenic lymphocytes by increasing the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in vitro [34]. Ovariectomised female rats showed significantly reduced chemotaxis index, lymphocyte proliferation and NK cell activity compared to their age-matched and young controls [82],[100]–[102]. In ovariectomised animals supplemented with estrogen through SR pellets (0.6 and 300 µg) for 30 days, there was a significant reversal of age-associated decline in antioxidant enzyme activities and accumulation of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxides and protein carbonyls in lymphoid organs and brain areas [73],[82]. Physiological levels of estrogen may promote female longevity through the upregulation of antioxidant signals through survival signalling (MAPK, ERK) or anti-inflammatory signalling (NF-κB) cascades both centrally and peripherally [25],[103]. Further, estrogen confers protection against mitochondrial stress, and ERα has been linked to mitochondrial unfolded protein response [UPR (mt)], that orchestrates several pathways, including antioxidant machinery [104]. In the brain, estrogen-mediated neuroprotective effects in healthy aging, cerebral ischemia and Alzheimer's disease also involve its potent ability to suppress cellular oxidative stress by enhancing antioxidant activities in various brain regions [68],[105]–[106]. Antioxidant effects of estrogen play a crucial role in neuroimmunomodulation in the periphery thereby enhancing immune cell functions and neuronal integrity, suppressing inflammation and maintaining neural-immune homeostasis in the young and in healthy aging.
The brain is a glucose-intensive organ and hence places a huge physiological demand for energy currency on the systemic metabolic process [107]. Estrogen plays a crucial role in meeting this demand by upregulating the expression of glucose transporters to facilitate glucose transport across the blood brain barrier, enhancing the glycolytic process by influencing p53, glycolytic enzymes and regulation of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and enhancing mitochondrial integrity [108]–[112]. Estrogen can modulate the expression and activity of specific isozymes of glycolytic enzymes such as hexokinase, phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase in rat neuronal cells [113],[114]. Hormone replacement studies in women undergoing perimenopause, early menopause and surgical menopause have shown that estrogen enhances glucose metabolism in the brain, attenuates neuroinflammation and prevents cognitive decline [115]–[119].
Another target of estrogen is the Na+/K+/ATPase pump that is energy intensive and is crucial for the maintenance of ionic gradients, resting potentials and triggering action potentials that is also regulated by catecholamines mainly NE and serotonin (5-HT) [110],[111]. Estrogen treatment of ovariectomised female SD rats enhances the activity of Na+/K+/ATPase activity in the frontal cortex and hypothalamus conferring neuroprotection against amyloid-β-induced oxidative stress and suppressing lipid peroxidation [120],[121]. During aging and in age-associated degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, there is a decline in mitochondrial regulation of oxidative phosphorylation primarily due to cytochrome C oxidase leading to an energy-defunct state that aids in the progressive degeneration [112],[122],[123]. Estrogen treatment enhanced the activity of cytochrome C oxidase in the frontal cortex, medial basal hypothalamus and hippocampus and promoted neuronal activity [124]. Thus the regulators of energy metabolism, mitochondrial integrity and transporters by estrogen plays a crucial role in the etiology and pathology of these diseases [125],[126].
The diverse effects of estrogen on the neuroendocrine network and the dependence of the female physiology on the robustness of estrogen-associated regulatory functions during reproductive life and aging places women at risk of developing autoimmune diseases, heart diseases, osteoporosis, neurodegenerative diseases, and breast cancer. While loss of neuroendocrine-immune homeostasis shares a cause-effect relationship with impaired hormone secretion, immunosenescence, peripheral denervation and central neurodegeneration, decline in neurotransmitters etc, the cumulative effects set the stage for age-associated disease pathology (Figure 1). Age-associated disruption of neuroendocrine-immune homeostasis is exacerbated by dysfunctional antioxidant machinery, increased allostatic load, decline in biosynthesis of trophic factors, signal transduction molecules and poor energy metabolism. Although loss of estrogen precludes the deregulation of neuroendocrine-immune homeostasis in females, the answer to restoring homeostasis isn't as simple as estrogen replacement. This is due to the effects of estrogen as a double edged sword beneficial for neuroprotection in the central nervous system while mediating peripheral denervation in the lymphoid organs and enhancing the risk of cardiovascular diseases and breast cancer. Estrogen therefore is pivotal to the maintenance of homeostatic integrity in females and its effects are largely dependent upon the dose, time of secretion, nature of receptors and target organ. Mechanistic effects of estrogen may result in the transcription of genes regulated by specific response elements and contribute to a plethora of functions including cell-mediated immunity, Th1/Th2 cytokine balance, neuroprotection, growth factor biosynthesis, NE release, feed-back regulation of HPG axis, peripheral denervation, all of which may fuel the loop towards regulation or dysregulation in health and disease.
[1] |
Jahangiri M, Soulouknga MH, Bardei FK, et al. (2019) Techno-econo-environmental optimal operation of grid-wind-solar electricity generation with hydrogen storage system for domestic scale, case study in Chad. Int J Hydrog Energy 44: 28613–28628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.130 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.130
![]() |
[2] |
Kumar CMS, Sigh S, Gupta MK, et al. (2023) Solar energy: A promising renewable source for meeting energy demand in Indian agriculture applications. Sustain Energy Technol 55: 102905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102905 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102905
![]() |
[3] |
Zhang Y, Ren J, Pu Y, et al. (2019) Solar energy potential assessment: A framework to integrate geographic, technological, and economic indices for a potential analysis. Renew Energ 149: 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.071 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.071
![]() |
[4] |
Narjabadifam N, Fouladvand J, Gul M (2023) Critical review on community-shared solar〞advantages, challenges, and future directions. Energies 16: 3412. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083412 doi: 10.3390/en16083412
![]() |
[5] |
Chaianong A, Pharina C (2015) Outlook and challenges for promoting solar photovoltaic rooftops in Thailand. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48: 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.042 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.042
![]() |
[6] |
Tan L, Ji X, Li M, et al. (2014) The experimental study of a two-stage photovoltaic thermal system based on solar trough concentration. Energy Convers Manag 86: 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.029 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.029
![]() |
[7] |
Luo W, Khoo YS, Hacke P, et al. (2017) Potential-induced degradation in photovoltaic modules: A critical review. Energy Environ Sci 10: 43. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE02271E doi: 10.1039/C6EE02271E
![]() |
[8] |
Olczak P (2023) Evaluation of degradation energy productivity of photovoltaic installations in long-term case study. Appl Energy 343: 121109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121109 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121109
![]() |
[9] |
Bodis K, Kougias I, Jager-Waldau A, et al. (2019) A high-resolution geospatial assessment of the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in the European Union. Renew Sust Energ Rev 114: 109309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109309 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109309
![]() |
[10] |
Aljafari B, Alqaed S, Mustafa J, et al. (2023) Energy-Economic-Environmental (3E) modeling of a near-zero energy community using the solar-power system: A case study of Najran city. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 148: 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104685 doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104685
![]() |
[11] |
Atasoy AT, Schmitz H, Madlener R (2021) Mechanisms for rebound effects and solar electricity prosuming in Germany. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706396 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4706396
![]() |
[12] |
Fang H, Li J, Song W (2018) Sustainable site selection for photovoltaic power plant: An integrated approach based on prospect theory. Energ Convers Manage 174: 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.092 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.092
![]() |
[13] |
Grimm M, Lenz L, Peters J, et al. (2020) Demand for off-grid solar electricity: Experimental evidence from Rwanda. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 7: 417–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/707384 doi: 10.1086/707384
![]() |
[14] |
Ren H, Xu C, Ma Z, et al. (2021) A novel 3D-geographic information system and deep learning integrated approach for high-accuracy building rooftop solar energy potential characterization of high-density cities. Appl Energy Part A 306: 117985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117985 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117985
![]() |
[15] |
Ren H, Sun Y, Tse CFN, et al. (2023) Optimal packing and planning for large-scale distributed rooftop photovoltaic systems under complex shading effects and rooftop availabilities. Energy 274: 127280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127280 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127280
![]() |
[16] |
Goel M (2016) Solar rooftop in India: Policies, challenges and outlook. Green Energy Environ 1: 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2016.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2016.08.003
![]() |
[17] |
Zheng N, Zhang H, Duan L, et al. (2023) Techno-economic analysis of a novel solar-driven PEMEC-SOFC-based multi-generation system coupled parabolic trough photovoltaic thermal collector and thermal energy storage. Appl Energy 331: 120400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120400 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120400
![]() |
[18] |
Ghose D, Pradhan S, Tamuli P, et al. (2023) Optimal material for solar electric vehicle application using an integrated Fuzzy-COPRAS model. Energ Source Part A 45: 3859–3878. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1668879 doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1668879
![]() |
[19] |
Ren H, Ma Z, Fong AML, et al. (2022) Optimal deployment of distributed rooftop photovoltaic systems and batteries for achieving net-zero energy of electric bus transportation in high-density cities. Appl Energy 319: 119274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119274 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119274
![]() |
[20] |
Kim HJ, Hu J, Kim SM, et al. (2022) A new GIS-based algorithm to estimate photovoltaic potential of solar train: Case study in Gyeongbu line, Korea. Renew Energy 190: 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.130 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.130
![]() |
[21] | Rooij RV, Dutch Solar Bike Path Solar Road Successful and Expanding. 2017. Available from https://cleantechnica.com/2017/03/12/dutch-solar-bike-path-solaroad-successful-expanding/. |
[22] | Singh G, What Are the Disadvantages of Solar Energy? A Full Breakdown. 2024. Available from: https://blog.feniceenergy.com/what-are-the-disadvantages-of-solar-energy-a-full-breakdown/#:~:text=Solar%20panels%20need%20sunlight%20to%20work%20well%2C%20so,cloudy%20days%2C%20are%20expensive%20and%20need%20regular%20upkeep. |
[23] |
Bisengimana E, Zhou J, Binama M, et al. (2023) Numerical investigation of PVT coverage on an integrated building-solar-heat pump system: Technical and economic study. Sol Energy 249: 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.12.005 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.12.005
![]() |
[24] | Duffie JA, Beckman WA (2013) Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 4 Eds., Hoboken: Wiley. |
[25] | Urban R, Solar Power Alberta (2021 Guide). 2021. Available from: https://www.energyhub.org/alberta/#rebates-tax-breaks. |
[26] | Urban R, Solar Energy Maps Canada (Every Province). 2021. Available from: https://www.energyhub.org/solar-energy-maps-canada/. |
[27] | Thakur M, Discount Rate Versus Interest Rate. 2023. Available from: https://www.educba.com/discount-rate-vs-interest-rate/. |
[28] | Bayat H, The Prime Rate Will Rise to 7.2% As the Bank of Canada Increases the Policy Rate to 5%. 2023. Available from: https://wowa.ca/banks/prime-rates-canada. |
[29] | Hseih JS (1986) Solar Energy Engineering, Amsterdam: Elsevier. |
[30] | RI, Canadian Inflation Rates: 1990 to 2023. 2023. Available from: https://www.rateinflation.com/inflation-rate/canada-historical-inflation-rate/#:~:text=Historical%20inflation%20rates%20for%20Canada%20%20%20,%20%200.7%25%20%2025%20more%20rows%20. |
[31] | Peurifoy RL, Schexnayder CJ, Schmitt RL, et al. (2018) Construction Planning Equipment, and Methods. 9 Eds., New York: McGraw-Hill. |
[32] | Marshal A, A Guide to Mortgage Interest Calculations in Canada. Available from: http://www.yorku.ca/amarshal/mortgage.htm. |
[33] | Elias G, Nominal Vs. Effective Rates. Available from: https://www.csun.edu/~ghe59995/docs/Interpreting%20Nominal%20&%20Effective%20Interest%20Rates.pdf. |
[34] | Natural Resources Canada, Canada Greener Homes Loan. 2023. Available from: https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy-efficiency/homes/canada-greener-homes-initiative/canada-greener-homes-loan/24286. |
[35] |
Yoomak S, Patcharoen T, Ngaopitakkul A (2019) Performance and economic evaluation of solar rooftop systems in different regions of Thailand. Sustainability 11: 6647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236647 doi: 10.3390/su11236647
![]() |
[36] |
Ren H, Ma Z, Chan AB, et al. (2023) Optimal planning of municipal-scale distributed rooftop photovoltaic systems with maximized solar energy generation under constraints in high-density cities. Energy Part A 263: 125686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125686 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125686
![]() |
[37] | Mofolasayo A (2024) Evaluating the potential of using solar energy in commercial and residential buildings. SSRN 4599960. https://www.elivabooks.com/en/book/book-191780 |
[38] | EPCOR, Solar Panel and Solar Power for Home and Business. 2023. Available from: https://www.epcor.com/products-services/power/micro-generation/Pages/solar-power.aspx?gad=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIwrWxp5e-_wIVdiqtBh2cVAglEAAYASAAEgJ6h_D_BwE. |
[39] |
Kannan R, Leong KC, Osman R, et al. (2006) Life cycle assessment study of solar PV systems: An example of a 2.7 kWp distributed solar PV system in Singapore. Sol Energy 80: 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.04.008 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.04.008
![]() |
[40] |
Sherwani AF, Usmani JA (2010) Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 540–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.08.003
![]() |
[41] |
Peng J, Lu L, Yang H (2013) Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19: 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035
![]() |
[42] |
Kimura K, Kudo Y, Sato A (2016) Techno-economic analysis of solar hybrid vehicles part 1: Analysis of solar hybrid vehicle potential considering well-to-wheel GHG emissions. SAE Technical Papers 1287. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1287 doi: 10.4271/2016-01-1287
![]() |
[43] |
Li M, Zhang X, Li G, et al. (2016) A feasibility study of microgrids for reducing energy use and GHG emissions in an industrial application. Appl Energy 176: 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.070 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.070
![]() |
[44] |
Marchi M, Niccolucci V, Pulselli RM, et al. (2018) Environmental policies for GHG emissions reduction and energy transition in the medieval historic centre of Siena (Italy): The role of solar energy. J Clean Prod 185: 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.068 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.068
![]() |
[45] |
Awad H (2018) Integrating solar PV systems into residential buildings in cold-climate regions: The impact of energy-efficient homes on shaping the future smart grid. University of Alberta. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BK17567 doi: 10.7939/R3BK17567
![]() |
[46] |
Kaya O, Klepacka AM, Florkowski WJ (2019) Achieving renewable energy, climate, and air quality policy goals: Rural residential investment in solar panel. J Environ Manage 248: 109309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109309 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109309
![]() |
[47] |
Farangi M, Soleimani EA, Zahedifar M, et al. (2020) The environmental and economic analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic power systems with silicon solar panels, in accord with the new energy policy in Iran. Energy 202: 117771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117771 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117771
![]() |
[48] | Canada Energy Regulator, Provincial and Territorial Energy Profiles〞Alberta. 2023. Available from: https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-markets/provincial-territorial-energy-profiles/provincial-territorial-energy-profiles-alberta.html#:~:text=Alberta's%20electricity%20sector%20produces%20more,GHG%20emissions%20from%20power%20generation. |
[49] |
Mofolasayo A (2023) Assessing and managing the direct and indirect emissions from electric and fossil-powered vehicles. Sustainability 15: 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021138 doi: 10.3390/su15021138
![]() |
1. | Oge Gozutok, Benjamin Ryan Helmold, P. Hande Ozdinler, Mutations and Protein Interaction Landscape Reveal Key Cellular Events Perturbed in Upper Motor Neurons with HSP and PLS, 2021, 11, 2076-3425, 578, 10.3390/brainsci11050578 | |
2. | Hanmin Zhu, Qi Liu, Wei Li, Shuming Huang, Bo Zhang, Yumei Wang, Woon-Man Kung, Biological Deciphering of the “Kidney Governing Bones” Theory in Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2022, 2022, 1741-4288, 1, 10.1155/2022/1685052 | |
3. | Hayder M. Al-kuraishy, Ali I. Al-Gareeb, Hani Faidah, Athanasios Alexiou, Gaber El-Saber Batiha, Testosterone in COVID-19: An Adversary Bane or Comrade Boon, 2021, 11, 2235-2988, 10.3389/fcimb.2021.666987 | |
4. | Ibrahim Khan, Kamran Saeed, Min Gi Jo, Myeong Ok Kim, 17-β Estradiol Rescued Immature Rat Brain against Glutamate-Induced Oxidative Stress and Neurodegeneration via Regulating Nrf2/HO-1 and MAP-Kinase Signaling Pathway, 2021, 10, 2076-3921, 892, 10.3390/antiox10060892 | |
5. | Ya-Jie Xiong, ShahidHussain Soomro, Zhong-Hai Huang, Pan-Pan Yu, Jie Ping, Hui Fu, Poly-L-ornithine blocks the inhibitory effects of fibronectin on oligodendrocyte differentiation and promotes myelin repair, 2023, 18, 1673-5374, 832, 10.4103/1673-5374.353493 | |
6. | Hannah P. Priyanka, Rahul S. Nair, Sanjana Kumaraguru, Kirtikesav Saravanaraj, Vasantharekha Ramasamy, Insights on neuroendocrine regulation of immune mediators in female reproductive aging and cancer, 2021, 8, 2372-0301, 127, 10.3934/molsci.2021010 | |
7. | Mona A. El-Bana, Sherien M. El-Daly, Enayat A. Omara, Safaa M. Morsy, Mehrez E. El-Naggar, Dalia Medhat, Nanoemulsion of pumpkin oil-based nanoparticles as a potential estrogen replacement therapy to alleviate neural-immune interactions in an experimental postmenopausal model, 2023, 10988823, 106730, 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2023.106730 | |
8. | Jordan J. Baechle, Nan Chen, Priya Makhijani, Shawn Winer, David Furman, Daniel A. Winer, Chronic inflammation and the hallmarks of aging, 2023, 74, 22128778, 101755, 10.1016/j.molmet.2023.101755 | |
9. | Ishumeet Kaur Bajwa, Parul Sharma, Rohit Goyal, Modulation of tyrosine receptor imposed by Estrogen in Memory and Cognition in Female Rats, 2024, 01664328, 115340, 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115340 | |
10. | Ying Chen, Zhonghua Liu, Yushun Gong, Neuron-immunity communication: mechanism of neuroprotective effects in EGCG, 2024, 64, 1040-8398, 9333, 10.1080/10408398.2023.2212069 | |
11. | Hannah P. Priyanka, Uday P. Pratap, Rahul S. Nair, Ramasamy Vasantharekha, Srinivasan ThyagaRajan, Estrogen-receptor status determines differential regulation of α1- and α2-adrenoceptor-mediated cell survival, angiogenesis, and intracellular signaling responses in breast cancer cell lines, 2024, 41, 1559-131X, 10.1007/s12032-024-02322-8 | |
12. | Zengyu Yao, Li Cai, Aimei Zhao, Lu Yang, Zhiyu Chen, Yu Zhang, Guiming Liang, Meng Luo, Xiuhong Xu, Guoping Zhou, Electroacupuncture Alleviates Neuroinflammation by Regulating Microglia Polarization via STAT6/PPARγ in Ischemic Stroke Rats, 2023, 532, 03064522, 23, 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.09.007 | |
13. | Ruochan Chen, Ju Zou, Jiawang Chen, Ling Wang, Rui Kang, Daolin Tang, Immune aging and infectious diseases, 2024, 0366-6999, 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003410 | |
14. | Rahul S. Nair, Mantavya N. Patel, Thangamani Kannan, Shaili Gour, Murali M. Hariharan, Vijayarengamani Prasanna, Anupriya Thirumalai, Ramanathan Chockalingam, Ramasamy Vasantharekha, Srinivasan ThyagaRajan, Hannah P. Priyanka, Effects of 17β-estradiol and estrogen receptor subtype-specific agonists on Jurkat E6.1 T-cell leukemia cells, 2025, 08872333, 106057, 10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106057 | |
15. | Xiangrui Wei, Longyan Hong, Hao Liang, Ke Ren, Wenqing Man, Yinghui Zhao, Pengbo Guo, Estrogen and viral infection, 2025, 16, 1664-3224, 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1556728 |