Citation: Kelsey M. McArthur, Amber M. Kay, Jenna A. Mosier, Joshua N. Grant, James A. Stewart, C. LaShan Simpson. Manipulating the Plasticity of Smooth Muscle Cells to Regulate Vascular Calcification[J]. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2017, 1(3): 165-179. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2017.3.165
[1] | Kiran Dhaliwal, Muhammad Junejo . Penile Tissue Engineering: a Review of the Current Progress of Penile Reconstruction. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2017, 1(3): 180-190. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2017.3.180 |
[2] | Shihori Tanabe, Kazuhiko Aoyagi, Hiroshi Yokozaki, Hiroki Sasaki . Molecular pathway network of EFNA1 in cancer and mesenchymal stem cells. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2018, 2(2): 58-77. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2018.2.58 |
[3] | Ryota Tamura, Masahiro Toda . Stem cell-based therapies for neurological disorders. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2018, 2(1): 24-46. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2018.1.24 |
[4] | Angela K. Muise, Lisa M. White, Michael S. Badowski, David T. Harris . Rapid enrichment of adipose derived mesenchymal stromal cells for use in cellular therapies. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2018, 2(1): 47-57. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2018.1.47 |
[5] | Toshio Hasegawa, Shigaku Ikeda . Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Skin Diseases. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2017, 1(2): 104-117. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2017.2.104 |
[6] | Shihori Tanabe, Ryuichi Ono . The gene and microRNA networks of stem cells and reprogramming. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2018, 2(4): 238-245. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2018.4.238 |
[7] | Ruhma Mahmood, Mahmood Shaukat, Mahmood S Choudhery . Biological properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue, umbilical cord tissue and bone marrow. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2018, 2(2): 78-90. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2018.2.78 |
[8] | Hannah Grover, Catalina-Paula Spatarelu, Kniya De'De', Shan Zhao, Kevin Yang, Yu Shrike Zhang, Zi Chen . Vascularization in 3D printed tissues: emerging technologies to overcome longstanding obstacles. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2018, 2(3): 163-184. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2018.3.163 |
[9] | Betsy H. Salazar, Kristopher A. Hoffman, Anilkumar K. Reddy, Sridhar Madala, Ravi K. Birla . Noninvasive Measurement of EKG Properties of 3D Artificial Heart Muscle. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2017, 1(1): 12-30. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2017.1.12 |
[10] | Edgar J. Cubillo, Sang M. Ngo, Alejandra Juarez, Joshuah Gagan, Gisel D. Lopez, David A. Stout . Embryonic stem cell therapy applications for autoimmune, cardiovascular, and neurological diseases: A review. AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2017, 1(3): 191-223. doi: 10.3934/celltissue.2017.3.191 |
Abbreviations: VC: vascular calcification; Pi: Inorganic Phosphate; Runx2: runt-related transcription factor 2; BMP2: bone morphogenetic protein 2; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell; MSC: mesenchymal stem cell; SEM: scanning electron microscopy; EDS: energy dispersive spectroscopy; SDS: sodium dodecyl sulfate; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; LRP: lipoprotein receptor related protein; Pit-1: pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1; DMEM: Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium; BCA assay: bicinchoninic acid assay; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ANOVA: analysis of variance
VC has a strong correlation with morbidity and mortality because it reduces aortic and arterial compliance that hinders cardiovascular hemodynamics [1,2,3]. These cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of death for patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes [4,5]. The severity of the calcification promotes hypertension, aortic stenosis, cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial and lower-limb ischemia, congestive heart failure, and compromised structural integrity [2,3]. There are two types of vascular calcification each based on their location. The first is atherosclerotic calcification associated with the intimal layer and relates to atherosclerosis [4,6]. The second is known as medial arterial calcification and is more predominant in patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes [6,7]. Previous studies considered vascular calcification a passive process that resulted from elevated calcium-phosphate interactions [8,9]. However, it is now considered an active cell-mediated process where a phenotypic switch causes vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) to become osteoblast-like cells [1,4]. There are many regulatory bone formation and structural proteins that are expressed in the calcified medial arterial layers and atherosclerotic plaques, which suggest that this is an active process [4].
Unlike other smooth muscle cells, VSMCs are derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and can change phenotype due to their plasticity [10,11]. These MSCs possess the ability to differentiate into a specific, single-lineage based on the induction media [12]. For patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes, the modulatory signals of mesenchymal-derived VSMCs are disrupted and trans-differentiate into osteoblasts in the presence of calcification media [11,12]. This plasticity disruption can lead to atherosclerosis, restenosis, and hypertension [13].
An important pathway for osteogenic differentiation is through the Wnt signaling pathway [14]. A high-phosphate environment activates this signal transduction pathway, where the Wnt proteins bind to the plasma membrane Frizzled and lipoprotein receptor related protein-5/6 co-receptors (LRP 5/6) [14]. After Wnt attaches to its receptors, it activates a downstream signaling cascade that transports β-catenin into the nucleus to up-regulate Runx2 expression [14,15] (Figure 1). The up-regulation of Runx2 leads to hydroxyapatite deposits. There are some known inhibitors for the VC process such as Matrix Gla Protein, Osteopontin, and Fetuin [7,10,14].
Another protein that is capable of preventing the phenotypic switch is known as Sclerostin. Sclerostin is a protein secreted by osteocytes that is a negative regulator of bone formation [16]. It antagonizes the Wnt Signaling pathway by binding to the LRP 5/6, which prevents Wnt from binding to the co-receptors Frizzled and LRP 5/6 and thereby inhibits the up-regulation of Runx2 [16,17] (Figure 1).
The purpose of this study was to manipulate the plasticity of VSMCs to treat vascular calcification, and use a developed in vitro model to prompt vascular calcification to distinguish the phenotypic switch from healthy smooth muscle cells to osteoblast-like cells. Previous in vitro studies concluded that increased serum phosphate and calcium levels contributed to vascular calcification and osteogenic differentiation [18]. Further, phosphate induced calcification relies on the sodium-dependent pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1 (Pit-1) channel, which transports phosphate across the membrane to interact with the nucleus and up-regulate osteogenic transcription factors [19,20]. The in vitro model was optimized by adding sodium and phosphate to activate the Pit-1 channel. After optimization, the model was able to induce vascular calcification (Figure 2). It was then used to examine the Wnt Signaling pathway, and use Sclerostin to block the activation of the pathway.
In Vitro Cell Culture Model. Human primary aortic smooth muscle cells were obtained from ATCC® (PCS-100-012™) and treated with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 10% Fetal Bovine Serum, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The cells were grown to 80% confluence and treated with either a normal or calcification media. The normal media was identical to the growth media; however, the calcification media had an addition of 3-mmol inorganic phosphate. The cells were grown for 7 to 14 days and were maintained by feeding every 2 to 3 days.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS). For SEM, the calcification was viewed on a Zeiss Evo 50 microscope at 10 kV. At day 7 and 14, the cells were fixed in Karnovsky's solution and then placed in storage at 4 ℃. The cells were then removed from storage and processed for imaging at up to 5000× magnification. The same cells for SEM were used for EDS to determine the elemental composition of a region of interest. The elemental composition was determined by using the Buker EDS system.
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. At day 7 and 14, calcium deposition was measured and normalized to protein levels obtained from the Pierce BCA assay. The cells were decalcified for 24 hours with 5 mL 0.6 N HCl. The HCl supernatant was collected. Next, the cell layers were solubilized in 0.1 N NaOH/0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The cell layers were then collected. To prepare the HCl supernatant samples, 1 mL of 20,000-ppm potassium chloride, 1 mL of nitric acid, and 1 mL of prepared sample was added to each tube. The 1 mL of prepared sample was diluted 1:7 in 4 mL of distilled water to bring a total volume of each sample to 5 mL. The calcium content of the samples was measured via flame atomic absorption spectroscopy. The concentration of each sample was derived from the standard curve.
The cellular protein content of the solubilized cell layers was calculated using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce). The calcium content was normalized based on cellular protein content.
Western Blot. At day 7 and 14, the cells were lysed with Modified Hunter's buffer and briefly sonicated. To obtain the protein in the supernatant, the cells were centrifuged and the protein concentration was measured with a BCA assay. A protein gel was used to separate the proteins based on molecular weight. Next, the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was incubated with primary and secondary antibodies as well as horseradish peroxidase conjugate for enhanced chemiluminescence imaging. The samples were analyzed to determine the amount of α-smooth muscle actin present and the protein content was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
PCR. At day 7 and 14, the cells were trypsinized, extracted from the culture dish, and centrifuged in order to receive a whole cell pellet. The genetic material obtained was tested using the RT2 Profiler PCR Array from SA Biosciences for human osteogenesis. Gene analysis was performed for Runx2, BMP2, and GAPDH.
Sclerostin Therapy Methods. When cells reached 80% confluence, the medium for the dibasic (calcified) samples was replaced with calcification media containing 3-mmol inorganic phosphate. At day 7, 80 ng/mL concentration of sclerostin was added to the sclerostin normal and calcified groups. This number was derived from previous studies, which used 50 ng/mL and 100 ng/mL, and their data had little variation of sclerostin's effectiveness at these concentrations [22,23,24]. The sclerostin normal group received calcification media for days 0 through 7 and was replaced with normal media for days 8 through 14. The sclerostin calcification group received calcification media for days 0 through 14. The no treatment group received calcification media for days 0 through 7 and was then replaced with normal media for days 8 through 14. The number of repeats for each experiment performed was n = 4. The calcium content was measured using a calcium kit (O-cresolphtalein method) from Sigma Aldrich.
Statistical Analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with software from StatPlus, AnalystSoft Inc. version v6.
3.1. In vitro model induces calcium deposition in VSMCs
To identify the ability of our group's in vitro model to induce calcification, we studied the calcium content in primary aortic smooth muscle cells. Inorganic phosphate and sodium were used because it is known that they induce calcification in VSMCs [20].
The calcium content was obtained through atomic absorption spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 3, the calcium content for the calcification medium-treated groups was significantly increased compared to the control groups.
To further confirm the model's ability to induce calcification, we performed SEM and EDS. The calcification was increased upon treatment of calcification media. The results from SEM and EDS were visualized and quantified to show the calcification present in the samples (Figure 4).
3.2. Calcified smooth muscle cells exhibit osteogenic markers
MSCs differentiate into osteogenic lineages in the presence of calcification media. MSCs osteogenic differentiation markers such as Runx2 and BMP2 were examined and compared to GAPDH, and the presence was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis (Figure 5). Runx2 and BMP2 were examined because they are earlier markers of osteogenic differentiation and more specific to osteogenic lineages. The results for Runx2 expressed a significant up-regulation between days 7 and 14 when the groups were treated with inorganic phosphate. BMP2 was also up-regulated between day 7 and 14. The up-regulation of these osteogenic markers coincides with a phenotypic switch.
3.3. In vitro model causes down-regulation of α-smooth muscle actin in calcified cells
To confirm the differentiation in VSMCs, the α-smooth muscle actin activity was observed. This actin isoform is prevalent in VSMCs and acts a differentiation marker for this cell type [21]. A western blot was used to examine the difference in expression levels for α-smooth muscle actin in the day 7 and 14 control and dibasic samples and was compared to GAPDH. Our results confirmed a down-regulation of α-smooth muscle actin in calcified cells, signifying an osteogenic switch (Figure 6).
3.4. Sclerostin inhibits Pi-induced calcification in VSMCs
To identify the effect of sclerostin on vascular calcification, we studied the calcium content in primary aortic smooth muscle cells. The calcium content was obtained through atomic absorption spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 7, the calcium content for the calcification media-treated groups was significantly increased compared to the control groups. Further, the sclerostin calcification group exhibited a decrease in calcium content in the presence of Sclerostin as compared to the day 14 calcification group.
3.5. Sclerostin down-regulates the osteogenic marker Runx2
The presence of osteogenic marker Runx2 was determined through real-time PCR analysis and compared to GAPDH. The results show that treatment with inorganic phosphate led to an up-regulation of Runx2 for the day 14 calcification group and the sclerostin calcification treatment group compared to the no treatment group. However, sclerostin was able to down-regulate Runx2 in the presence of calcification media as compared to the day 14 calcification group. Further, Runx2 was down-regulated in the sclerostin normal treatment group compared to the no treatment group (Figure 8).
3.6. Sclerostin recovers α-smooth muscle actin activity in calcified cells
In the in vitro cell culture study, calcified cells exhibit a down-regulation of α-smooth muscle actin activity. The α-smooth muscle actin activity was examined for each group and compared to GAPDH. Consistent with the previous western blot results, the day 14 calcification group experienced a decrease in α-smooth muscle actin activity. However, the sclerostin was able to recover α-smooth muscle actin activity by 45.8% in the presence of calcification media (Figures 9, 10).
4. Discussion
In this study, we found that our in vitro model successfully induced calcification of healthy VSMCs upon the addition of inorganic phosphate and that calcified cells exhibit a loss of α-smooth muscle actin activity. We also revealed that calcified smooth muscle cells exhibit osteogenic markers, such as Runx2 and BMP2. Further, we showed that sclerostin could be used in the future as a potential therapeutic target to treat vascular calcification.
Previous studies showed that increased sodium and phosphate levels successfully induce calcification [18,19,20]. This is hypothesized to activate the Pit-1 channel, which in turn leads to an up-regulation of Runx2 [18,19]. This up-regulation causes an osteogenic switch where smooth muscle cells change their phenotype to osteoblast-like cells thus confirming their plasticity [18,19,20]. Our study coincided with previous research that vascular calcification expresses osteogenic markers such as Runx2 and BMP2 [8,10,14]. These osteogenic markers are up-regulated under calcifying conditions that lead to the phenotypic switch of VSMCs to osteoblast-like cells [8,11,18,19,20].
Recent studies have demonstrated that sclerostin is a therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures [22,23]. Previous groups have utilized sclerostin monoclonal antibody in rodents and primates to increase bone formation and strength due to the increase in osteoblasts and bone formation markers as well as a decrease in osteoclasts [16]. Other studies have discovered that sclerostin plays an important role in tooth movement [24]. The study observed the effects of compression and tension stress on sclerostin expression with mice studies [24]. It was reported that compression and tension have the same effect on sclerostin expression, but in hypoxia conditions for compression sites, the amount of sclerostin is increased. Further, it was discovered that sclerostin knockout mice have increased osteoblastic activity suggesting that sclerostin plays an important role in bone remodeling and osteoclastic activity [24].
Sclerostin is an important factor for regulating bone formation [16,17,22,23,24], but until our study it has not been used as a treatment to decrease vascular calcification. In the past, many researchers have determined there is a correlation between serum sclerostin levels and vascular calcification especially in patients with chronic kidney disease [25,26,27]. Their previous research has shown that increased serum sclerostin levels are heavily associated with patients that have chronic kidney disease and aortic calcifications, but the use of sclerostin as treatment had not been tested [25,26,27,28]. To our knowledge, we for the first time revealed that sclerostin is capable of regulating inorganic phosphate induced VSMC calcification. In our study, we concluded that treatment with sclerostin regulated calcification and down-regulated the osteogenic marker, Runx2, in vitro by preventing Wnt proteins from attaching the Frizzled and LRP 5/6 co-receptors and thus causing a downstream effect that up-regulates Runx2 activity. In our study, sclerostin was capable of reducing inorganic phosphate calcification when compared with the day 14 calcification group.
VMSCs are derived from mesenchymal stem cells and can be differentiated into a single-lineage based on the induction media because of their plasticity [10,11,12,13]. One of the most significant findings from this study was sclerostin's ability to manipulate the plasticity of smooth muscle cells in calcification media to recover α-smooth muscle actin activity. It was able to reverse the effects of lost α-smooth muscle actin activity by the day 14 calcification group by 45.8%.
In conclusion, we have shown that our in vitro model is capable of inducing calcification and that calcified cells express osteogenic markers. Further, our results show that sclerostin can act as potential therapeutic target to treat vascular calcification because of its ability to reduce the calcium content in vitro, to reduce the expression of the osteogenic marker Runx2, and to recover α-smooth muscle actin activity.
The authors would like to thank the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Undergraduate Research Scholars Program at Mississippi State University for funding, the Institute for Imaging and Analytical Technologies at Mississippi State University for technical expertise and assistance with SEM and EDS, and the Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing, and Biotechnology at Mississippi State University for technical expertise and PCR analysis.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
Kee H, Cho S, Kim G, et al. (2014) Gallic acid inhibits vascular calcification through the blockade of BMP2-Smad 1/5/8 signaling pathway. Vasc Pharmacol 63: 71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2014.08.005
![]() |
[2] |
Kelly R, Tunin R, Kass D (1992) Effect of reduced aortic compliance on cardiac efficiency and contracticle function of in situ canine left ventricle. Circ Res 71: 490-502. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.71.3.490
![]() |
[3] | Wayhs R, Zelinger A, Raggi P (2002) High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard events. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 225-230. |
[4] |
Mizobuchi M, Towler D, Slatopolsky E (2009) Vascular Calcifciation: The Killer of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 1453-1464. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008070692
![]() |
[5] |
Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ (1998) Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 32: S112-119. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9820470
![]() |
[6] |
Shroff RC, Shanahan CM (2007) The vascular biology of calcification. Semin Dial 20: 103-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00255.x
![]() |
[7] |
Thompson B, Towler DA (2012) Arterial Calcification and bone physiology: role of the bone-vascular axis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8: 529-543. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.36
![]() |
[8] | Cozzolino M, Dusso A, Slatopolsky E (2001) Role of Calcium- Phosphate Produce and Bone-Associated Proteins on Vascular Calcification in Renal Failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2511-2516. |
[9] | Ganesh SK, Stack AG, Levin NW, et al. (2001) Association of elevated serum PO(4), Ca x PO(4) product, and parathyroid hormone with cardiac mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2131-2138. |
[10] |
Lagna G, Ku M, Nguyen P, et al. (2007) Control of Phenotypic Plasticity of Smooth Muscle Cells by Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling through the Myocardin-related Transcription factors. J Biol Chem 282: 37244-37255. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708137200
![]() |
[11] |
Iyemere V, Proudfoot D, Weissberg P, et al. (2006) Vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic plasticity and regulation of vascular calcification. J Intern Med 260: 192-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01692.x
![]() |
[12] |
Abedin M, Tintut Y, Demer L (2004) Mesenchymal Stem Cells and the Artery Wall. Circ Res 95: 671-676. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000143421.27684.12
![]() |
[13] | Owens GF (1995) Regulation of differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Physiol Rev 75: 487-517. |
[14] |
Cai T, Sun D, Duan Y, et al. (2016) Wnt/Beta catenin signaling promotes VSMCs to osteogenic transdifferentiation and calcification through directly modulation Runx2 gene expression. Exp Cell Res 345: 206-217. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.06.007
![]() |
[15] |
Huang H, Xi H (2008) Wnt/Beta-catenin signaling: new (and old) players and new insights. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.01.009
![]() |
[16] | Li X, Warmington K, Niu Q, et al. (2010) Inhibition of Sclerostin by Monoclonal Antibody Increases Bone Formation, Bone Mass, and Bone Strength in Aged Male Rats. J Bone Miner Res 25: 2647-2656. |
[17] |
Semenov M, Tamai K, He X (2005) Sost is a Ligand for LRP5/6 and a Wnt Signaling Inhibitor. J Biol Chem 280: 26770-26775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504308200
![]() |
[18] |
Byon CH, Chen Y (2015) Molecular Mechanisms of Vascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Link Between Bone and Vasculature. Curr Osteoporosis Rep 13: 206-215. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0270-3
![]() |
[19] |
Chavkin NW, Chia JJ, Crouthamel MH, et al. (2015) Phosphate uptake independent signaling functions of the type III sodium-dependent phosphate transporter, PiT-1, in vascular smooth muscle cells. Exp Cell Res 333: 39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.02.002
![]() |
[20] |
Crouthamel MH, Lau WL, Leaf EM, et al. (2013) Sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporters and phosphate-induced calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells: Redundant roles for PiT-1 and PiT-2. Arterioscler, Thromb, Vasc Biol 33: 2625-2632. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302249
![]() |
[21] |
Skalli O, Pelte M, Peclet M, et al. (1989) α-smooth muscle actin, a differenetitaion marker of smooth muscle cells, is present in microfilamentous bundles of pericytes. J Histochem Cytochem 37: 315-321. doi: 10.1177/37.3.2918221
![]() |
[22] | Suen P, Qin L (2016) Sclerostin, an emerging therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture: A general review. J Orthop Transl 4: 1-13. |
[23] | Shah A, Shoback D, Lewiecki E (2015) Sclerostin inhibition: a novel therapeutic approach in the treatment of osteoporosis. Int J Women's Health 7: 565-580. |
[24] | Shu R, Bai D, Sheu T, et al. (2017) Sclerostin Promotes Bone Remodeling in the Process of Tooth Movement. Plos One 12: 1-16. |
[25] | Behets GJ, Viaene L, Meijers B, et al. (2017) Circulating levels of sclerostin but not DKK1 associate with laboratory parameters of CKD-MBD. Plos One 12: 1-12. |
[26] |
Kirkpantur A, Balci M, Turkvatan A, et al. (2015) Independent association between serum sclerostin levels and carotid artery atherosclerosis in prevalent haemodialysis patients. Clin Kidney J 8: 737-743. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv077
![]() |
[27] |
Asamiya Y, Tsuchiya K, Nitta K (2016) Role of sclerostin in the pathogenesis of chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder. Ren Replace Ther 2: 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s41100-016-0016-4
![]() |
[28] |
Claes K, Viaene L, Heye S, et al. (2013) Sclerostin: Another Vascular Calcification Inhibitor? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 3221-3228. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1521
![]() |
1. | Loan Nguyen-Yamamoto, Ken-Ichiro Tanaka, Rene St–Arnaud, David Goltzman, Vitamin D–regulated osteocytic sclerostin and BMP2 modulate uremic extraskeletal calcification, 2019, 4, 2379-3708, 10.1172/jci.insight.126467 | |
2. | John Tyson, Kaylee Bundy, Cameron Roach, Hannah Douglas, Valerie Ventura, Mary Frances Segars, Olivia Schwartz, C. LaShan Simpson, Mechanisms of the Osteogenic Switch of Smooth Muscle Cells in Vascular Calcification: WNT Signaling, BMPs, Mechanotransduction, and EndMT, 2020, 7, 2306-5354, 88, 10.3390/bioengineering7030088 | |
3. | Yi Zhu, Jing Qu, Li He, Feng Zhang, Zijing Zhou, Shanzhong Yang, Yong Zhou, Calcium in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Elasticity and Adhesion: Novel Insights Into the Mechanism of Action, 2019, 10, 1664-042X, 10.3389/fphys.2019.00852 | |
4. | Gerhard Klingenschmid, Lena Tschiderer, Gottfried Himmler, Gregorio Rungger, Stefan Brugger, Peter Santer, Johann Willeit, Stefan Kiechl, Peter Willeit, Associations of Serum Dickkopf‐1 and Sclerostin With Cardiovascular Events: Results From the Prospective Bruneck Study, 2020, 9, 2047-9980, 10.1161/JAHA.119.014816 | |
5. | Kaylee Bundy, Jada Boone, C. LaShan Simpson, Wnt Signaling in Vascular Calcification, 2021, 8, 2297-055X, 10.3389/fcvm.2021.708470 | |
6. | Amber M. Kennon, James A. Stewart, RAGE Differentially Altered in vitro Responses in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Adventitial Fibroblasts in Diabetes-Induced Vascular Calcification, 2021, 12, 1664-042X, 10.3389/fphys.2021.676727 | |
7. | Maite Caus, Cristina Alonso-Montes, Jose Luis Fernandez-Martin, Manuel Marti-Antonio, Milica Bozic, Jose M. Valdivielso, Vitamin D Receptor From VSMCs Regulates Vascular Calcification During CKD: A Potential Role for miR-145a, 2023, 43, 1079-5642, 1533, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318834 | |
8. | Ana M. Valentin Cabrera, Sophie K. Ashbrook, Joshua D. Hutcheson, Considerations on the Development of Therapeutics in Vascular Calcification, 2025, 12, 2308-3425, 206, 10.3390/jcdd12060206 |