Research article

The impact of personalized recommendation on purchase intention under the background of big data

  • Received: 17 August 2024 Revised: 10 October 2024 Accepted: 15 October 2024 Published: 07 November 2024
  • In order to address the problem of information overload, numerous solutions have been proposed, among which recommender systems stand out as one of the most effective. By reviewing and organizing existing literature both domestically and internationally, this paper evaluated personalized recommendations on the Internet across six dimensions: information layout, recommendation way, recommendation strength, recommendation precision, recommendation timeliness, and recommendation interactivity. Simultaneously, it considered the customer's mind-flow experience and perceived trust as mediating variables, and consumer purchasing intention as the dependent variable of the study. Furthermore, based on relevant theories, this paper constructed a corresponding research model to explore how personalized recommendations influence customers' intention to purchase by affecting their mind-flow experience and perceived trust through this model.

    Citation: Xin Yun, Myung Hwan Chun. The impact of personalized recommendation on purchase intention under the background of big data[J]. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2024, 8: 80-108. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2024005

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xiangmin Zhang . User perceived learning from interactive searching on big medical literature data. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2017, 2(3): 239-254. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017019
    [2] M Supriya, AJ Deepa . Machine learning approach on healthcare big data: a review. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2020, 5(1): 58-75. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2020005
    [3] Elnaz Delpisheh, Aijun An, Heidar Davoudi, Emad Gohari Boroujerdi . Time aware topic based recommender System. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(2): 261-274. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016008
    [4] Marco Tosato, Jianhong Wu . An application of PART to the Football Manager data for players clusters analyses to inform club team formation. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2018, 3(1): 43-54. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2018002
    [5] Nick Cercone . What's the Big Deal About Big Data?. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(1): 31-79. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016.1.31
    [6] Yaguang Huangfu, Guanqing Liang, Jiannong Cao . MatrixMap: Programming abstraction and implementation of matrix computation for big data analytics. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(4): 349-376. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016015
    [7] Ana Jofre, Lan-Xi Dong, Ha Phuong Vu, Steve Szigeti, Sara Diamond . Rendering website traffic data into interactive taste graph visualizations. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2017, 2(2): 107-118. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017003
    [8] Richard Boire . UNDERSTANDING AI IN A WORLD OF BIG DATA. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2018, 3(1): 22-42. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2018001
    [9] Ali Asgary, Jianhong Wu . ADERSIM-IBM partnership in big data. Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(4): 277-278. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016010
    [10] Hamzeh Khazaei, Marios Fokaefs, Saeed Zareian, Nasim Beigi-Mohammadi, Brian Ramprasad, Mark Shtern, Purwa Gaikwad, Marin Litoiu .
     How do I choose the right NoSQL solution? A comprehensive theoretical and experimental survey 
    . Big Data and Information Analytics, 2016, 1(2): 185-216. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016004
  • In order to address the problem of information overload, numerous solutions have been proposed, among which recommender systems stand out as one of the most effective. By reviewing and organizing existing literature both domestically and internationally, this paper evaluated personalized recommendations on the Internet across six dimensions: information layout, recommendation way, recommendation strength, recommendation precision, recommendation timeliness, and recommendation interactivity. Simultaneously, it considered the customer's mind-flow experience and perceived trust as mediating variables, and consumer purchasing intention as the dependent variable of the study. Furthermore, based on relevant theories, this paper constructed a corresponding research model to explore how personalized recommendations influence customers' intention to purchase by affecting their mind-flow experience and perceived trust through this model.



    With the booming development of information technology and Internet technology as well as the continuous evolution and turnover of new media, we have entered the era of big data with information explosion. In this era, we are exposed to a huge amount of information every minute and every second. The larger the amount of information, the greater the cognitive load of consumers searching for products. Acton and Dabrowski [1] pointed out that a large number of product substitutes and a large amount of information about product attributes lead to information overload, so that consumers need to make more effort to make a purchase decision, and the information overload has a negative impact on the user that reduces consumer satisfaction and loyalty to the brand. In this context, many online platforms are analyzing large amounts of consumer behavioral data to bring consumers a better service experience and increase profitability. As a result, personalized services come into play. Personalized recommendation is one of the main applications of personalized services. Personalized recommendation refers to the use of data mining technology by online platforms to collect behavioral data such as consumers' past search, browsing, or purchase history or related data of similar types of consumers, and use these data to analyze the shopping preferences and needs of the target consumers, so as to recommend the goods or services that the consumers may like.

    How we use and analyze big data efficiently and correctly is the focus of every industry. The huge amount of data in the era of big data has far exceeded the amount of information that an individual or a system can receive. Both the user and the network platform are facing the following problems:

    1) Users, in front of a huge amount of information, have difficulty finding their own useful information, and even only in the "information hunger" under the influence of passive to receive a variety of useless information on the network, and cannot correctly realize their core needs.

    2) The layout of the network platform restricts the ability of the platform to provide all the information to the users, so the network platform can only filter out part of the useless information in order to provide useful information to different users. In addition, filtering the information is equivalent to giving up a portion of the users of the network platform who rely on those "useless information", which does not improve the economic efficiency of the platform.

    3) Personalized recommendation is one of the main tools to solve such problems. Personalized recommendation only began to be researched as an independent concept in the 1990s. Resnick and Varian [2] proposed that recommender systems use e-commerce websites to provide users with product information and suggestions to help them decide what products they should buy, simulating the process of a salesperson assisting a customer in completing a purchase. Today's recommender system is not only used for e-commerce. Various platforms can be filtered through the information technology to recommend the goods to the target user, to provide users with personalized recommendation services. The emergence of big data makes this concept more mature and feasible. Personalized recommendation technology is also the most intuitive feeling for ordinary users of the big data era of technology. Nowadays, users are exposed to every application in the product push, and every web page with the content of the advertisement is a personalized recommendation result. personalized recommendation can help users or even replace users in making choices. A good recommendation system can reach a spiritual unity with the user, establish a good relationship with the user, and improve the efficiency of the user's search for information. It can be said that personalized recommendation has deeply affected every Internet user.

    Although personalized recommendation originated in the field of computer science, the personalization and diversification of user needs and the increasing use of online platforms by consumers have prompted personalized recommendation to increasingly reflect the nature of its "people". This paper summarizes the division of recommender system dimensions by scholars in recent years as follows.

    Table 1.  Dimensions of personalized recommendation.
    Scholar Dimensions
    Seddon [3] Convenience, interface consistency
    Xiao and Benbasat [4] Interpretability
    Petter et al. [5] Flexibility, complexity of recommendation algorithm
    Chen and Cai [6] Recommended information ways, information layout, personalization
    Nanou et al. [7] Information layout
    Li and Unger [8] Interactivity, effectiveness
    Bobadilla et al. [9] Precision, differentiation, novelty
    Yang et al. [10] Interpretability, interactivity, precision
    Yang et al. [11] Novelty, interactivity, interpretability
    Kaminskas and Bridge [12] Comprehensiveness, contingency, diversity
    Hong et al. [13] The ability to process data, the time required for the recommendation process
    Xu and Zhu [14] Recommended way, information layout
    Wang [15] Information layout, recommended way, information value, timeliness, user trust, recommended strength
    Chen et al. [16] Relevance, explainability
    Cui [17] Cross-platformity, cross-platform types
    Zou [18] Perceived personalization

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Based on the dimensions of personalized recommendation measurements outlined by the aforementioned scholars, this study first identifies information layout, recommendation way, and recommendation strength as research variables. Second, the primary purpose of personalized recommendation services is to match the recommended products on online platforms with customer needs. Therefore, this study selects recommendation precision and recommendation timeliness as research variables. Finally, the stronger the interaction of the recommendation, the more attractive it is to customers and the more likely it is to generate interest. Therefore, recommendation interactivity is particularly important. Thus, this study will measure personalized recommendation using these six dimensions: information layout, recommendation way, recommendation strength, recommendation precision, recommendation timeliness, and recommendation interactivity. These six output characteristics will be treated as variables in this study to analyze the impact of personalized recommendation on customers' purchase intention in online shopping platforms.

    Li and Wang [19] argued that diverse recommendation approaches during online shopping can generate consumer interest in recommended products. While traditional pop-up advertisements may trigger consumer defensiveness, many other recommendation approaches have gradually been accepted by consumers. This indicates that well-designed and user-friendly recommended ways can be recognized by consumers, helping them save time and effort in browsing online shopping websites, speeding up their search for desired products, and positively influencing their purchase behavior.

    According to Li et al. [20], a product recommendation system can reduce the pressure caused by information overload on consumers. The rationality of information layout in recommendation systems helps to reduce consumers' sensitivity to complex information and lower their perceived risks. Information layout can also affect customers' emotional perception, thereby influencing their initial impression of the webpage. Ouyang and Zhu [21] have confirmed in their research that the reasonable arrangement of recommendation systems significantly affects customer satisfaction and loyalty on shopping websites. One of the main reasons that influence customers' use of recommendation systems during online shopping on e-commerce websites is that their commendation information is not classified and arranged by product categories. Unscientific and unreasonable information layout will reduce customers' perceived usability. A proper visual layout can make previously disordered information appear orderly, adapting to users' reading habits, thus reducing their reading burden and ultimately increasing the readability of interface information. For platform users, complex backend programming languages are difficult to visualize, and what they need is the convenience brought by the frontend interface.

    The research by Zhang and Ma [22] indicated that consumers, driven by curiosity and personal preferences, may actively browse recommended information. The level of involvement with the information increases with the recommended strength. When the involvement reaches a certain level, consumers tend to develop a preference for the recommended information, and if the recommendation is for a specific product, consumers are more likely to have the intention to purchase that product. Dai [23] discovered a positive association between recommendation intensity and consumer flow experience. Higher recommendation intensity enhances consumers' cognitive attractiveness of the recommended products, thereby improving their flow experience level. He found that recommendation intensity has a positive influence on consumers' flow experience. High recommendation intensity can alleviate consumers' cognitive load and enhance their flow experience.

    Wang and Zhang [24] discovered that interactive personalized recommendation has a positive impact on consumers' flow experience. By offering personalized and interactive recommendations, consumers can better engage in the shopping process, thereby enhancing their shopping experience and satisfaction. Wu et al. [25] investigated the influence of interactive personalized recommendation on consumers' flow experience, with a particular focus on the role of system response time. The research results showed that interactive personalized recommendation, along with shorter system response time, can significantly enhance consumers' flow experience.

    Gebeyehu et al. [26] found that the timeliness of recommendations has a positive impact on customers' flow experience. When recommendation information is presented to customers in a timely manner, they are more likely to enter a state of flow and enjoy the shopping process. Priyadarshini et al. [27] revealed that the timeliness of recommendation systems positively influences customers' flow experience. When recommendation information accurately matches customers' needs and is provided at the appropriate time, customers are more likely to experience flow.

    Jung [28] found that recommendation precision has a positive impact on customer flow experience. When the recommendation system accurately understands customers' preferences and provides personalized recommendations that meet their needs, customers are more likely to enter a state of flow. Chau et al. [29] demonstrated that recommendation system precision positively affects customer flow experience. When the recommendation system accurately predicts and meets customers' needs, customers are more likely to experience a smooth and enjoyable shopping journey. Zhang and Ma [22] revealed that recommendation precision significantly influences customer flow experience. By precisely matching customers' needs and preferences, the recommendation system can provide more targeted recommendations, enhancing customers' engagement and satisfaction with the shopping process.

    These studies indicate that the recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, interactivity, timeliness, precision of personalized recommendation have positive impact on consumers' flow experience, thereby enhancing shopping pleasure and satisfaction. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypotheses:

    H1 Recommended way has a positive impact on mind-flow experience.

    H2 Information layout has a positive effect on mind-flow experience.

    H3 Recommended strength has a positive impact on mind-flow experience.

    H4 Interactivity of personalized recommendations has a positive impact on mind-flow experience.

    H5 Timeliness of recommendations has a positive impact on mind-flow experience.

    H6 Precision has a positive impact on mind-flow experience.

    In his study, Cao [30] showed that companies help their customers filter products that match their preferences by deeply mining their personal information, and then choose an appropriate way to push the filtering results to customers, which can improve customers' favorability to the company's recommendation system. Wang [31] argued that diverse recommended ways in the shopping online process are conducive to arousing consumers' interest in recommended products.

    Information layout refers to the content structure and typographical organization of the recommended information presented to us on e-commerce websites, and refers to whether the recommended information is well laid out and clearly organized [32]. Li found that as society evolves, information is spreading at an unprecedented rate. The growth and widespread use of the Internet have made accessing vast amounts of information easier than ever. However, this surge in information also brings the challenge of overload, leading to a growing demand for information that is user-friendly and easily manageable [33].

    Fu [34] argued that the appropriate amount of information and valuable recommendation information can effectively help consumers in product selection and increase their trust in and willingness to use the recommendation system. The findings of Zhang and Ma [22] show that consumers may actively browse recommendation information due to certain curiosity or influenced by personal preference when faced with recommendation information, and this information involvement degree will increase with the increase of recommendation intensity. When the level of involvement increases to a certain extent, consumers will become more and more attracted to the recommended information, and if the recommended information is about a product, consumers are likely to be willing to buy that product.

    Wang [31] believes that recommendation systems can improve the freshness of push services by extracting and timely understanding changes in users' interests and needs based on their historical and real-time online behavior. This study empirically explores the impact of interactivity on consumer trust in e-commerce platforms. The research results indicate that higher interactivity contributes to increased consumer trust in e-commerce platforms, enhancing their willingness to shop and overall satisfaction. In their study, Zhang et al. [35] and Chen et al. [16] pointed out that in recommendation systems, common recommendation rationales include showing similar items to the ones you have collected, items that other customers who bought or viewed this item also bought or viewed, etc. This practice of informing customers about the generated information after interacting with the website increases recommendation transparency, making customers more aware of the reasons behind the recommendations, thus enhancing their trust in the recommendation system.

    The impact of timeliness on consumers' perceived trust is an important research topic. Zhu's study [36] have found that timeliness can significantly increase consumers' trust in recommendation systems or e-commerce platforms. When recommendation information is presented to consumers in a timely and accurate manner, they are more likely to perceive the platform as professional and reliable, thus increasing their trust in the platform. In addition, timeliness can also enhance consumers' satisfaction and acceptance of recommendation information, thereby promoting their purchasing behavior.

    Yang et al. [37] pointed out that the degree of matching between recommended product information and user needs, i.e. recommended precision, has an important impact on user satisfaction, trust and loyalty. From the user's perspective. Zeng [38] defined information quality as the degree to which the recommended goods satisfy the needs, and that the precision of the recommendation results must be improved in order to enhance the user's recognition of the personalized recommendation system, and that the consumer's willingness to use the recommendation system is influenced by the precision of the recommendation results.

    In summary, these studies show that the recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, interactivity, timeliness, precision of personalized recommendation have a positive impact on consumers' perceived trust. Therefore, the following hypothesis is proposed in this study:

    H7 Recommended way has a positive impact on consumers' perceived trust.

    H8 Information layout has a positive effect on consumers' perceived trust.

    H9 Recommended strength has a positive impact on consumers' perceived trust.

    H10 Interactivity of personalized recommendations has a positive impact on consumers' perceived trust.

    H11 Timeliness of recommendations has a positive impact on consumers' perceived trust.

    H12 Precision has a positive impact on the consumers' perceived trust.

    Mind-flow experience is a crucial psychological factor that describes an individual's subjective psychological perception of an activity. When a customer has a mind-flow experience, he or she is drawn into the information, ignores the passage of time and automatically skips over irrelevant information around him or her. Customers who experience a mind-flow experience show more positive subjective experiences than those who do not. A good browsing experience is the key to winning customers over and is an important factor in deciding whether to buy a product or service. Customers value the real experience more than the actual value. The stronger the mind-flow experience generated by customers during online shopping, the more positive the cognitive, emotional and behavioral response to the product or website, such as a good brand or website attitude, repeat purchase or willingness to reproduce and spread the word. In addition, the mind-flow experience can attract customers, focus more on the quality and value information of the product itself, improve information processing and decision-making efficiency, reduce price sensitivity, and in turn generate positive buying attitudes and behaviors.

    Chen and Cai [6] studied the flow states of customers during shopping, including the feelings of pleasure and time perception, and found that flow significantly affects consumers' purchase intentions. In the same year, Hausman and Siekpe [39] conducted relevant research on online shopping behavior and found that online shopping intentions are significantly positively influenced by mind-flow experience.

    Zhang et al. [35] demonstrated through their research that mind-flow experience has a positive impact on customers' purchase intentions. Following that, Wu et al. [25] further confirmed through her study that mind-flow experience positively influences customers' purchase intentions. Then, domestic researchers Wang [15] conducted empirical research and found that users who experience flow are more satisfied with the service provider and more willing to use the service.

    Zhao et al. [32] found through relevant research that mind-flow experience has a positive impact on customers' intention to use. Subsequently, Xia et al. [40] approached the study from the opposite perspective and investigated how customers' purchase intentions would change when their attention is disrupted. The results of this study showed that when customers' attention is disturbed, it reduces their positive experience and negatively affects their purchase intention.

    Based on the relevant research above, this paper proposes the following hypotheses:

    H13: Mind-flow experience has a positive impact on purchase intention.

    In the context of e-commerce live streaming, consumers cannot directly test the quality and suitability of beauty products before purchasing. This lack of ability to try products may negatively affect consumers' perceived trust in merchants and their products, leading to a potential decrease in their purchase intention. Establishing a trust bond between merchants and consumers is crucial, and hosts play a significant role in this process. The professionalism, popularity, and reliability of hosts are important factors influencing consumer trust. Hosts gradually build trust relationships with consumers through daily interactions during live broadcasts, their professional abilities, and positive word-of-mouth reviews from product users.

    Du and Xiang [41] while researching the dynamic formation mechanism of online consumers' purchase intention, divided trust propensity into four dimensions: environmental trust propensity, personal trust propensity, online platform trust propensity, and institutional trust propensity. They also confirmed that trust propensity in these dimensions all positively influences consumers' purchase intention.

    Zhang et al. [42] proposed that under the influence of trust factors, e-commerce live streaming leads to the Matthew effect. Top anchors, such as Li Jiaqi, have more bargaining power and can often negotiate lower prices with merchants, thereby accumulating more fans. The increasing number of fans also enhances the credibility of anchors, and consumers are more willing to trust products recommended by anchors with a large fan base.

    Based on the relevant research above, this paper proposes the following hypotheses:

    H14: Perceived Trust has a positive impact on consumer purchase intentions.

    Mind-flow experience is a psychological state that requires external stimuli to be generated. It is not an instantaneous process but evolves gradually over time. Once mind-flow is induced, it tends to influence specific desires or behaviors.

    Two main factors influencing mind-flow experience are: first, consumer characteristics, and second, characteristics of the live streaming platform. The relationship between mind-flow experience and consumer purchase behavior indicates that the professionalism, authenticity, and interactivity of live streamers can affect the generation of mind-flow experience. The online shopping context is also a significant influencing factor. The more positive the atmosphere in the live streaming room, the more likely consumers are to develop shopping desires. Moreover, higher levels of positive stimuli and attractive content in the live stream can trigger positive mind-flow experiences in consumers.

    Animesh et al. [43] found that mind-flow experience can mediate the relationship between social presence and consumers' purchase intention for virtual products. Jiang et al. [44] conducted an empirical study and pointed out that a positive online store image can generate mind-flow experience, which in turn influences customers' purchase intention. In this causal pathway, mind-flow experience acts as a mediator. In the same year, Wu et al. [25] discovered that mind-flow experience can mediate customers' purchase intention. Subsequently, Li [33] conducted research confirming that mind-flow can mediate the relationship between interactivity and customer satisfaction. Liu et al. [24,25] used mind-flow theory to study how mind-flow experience mediates the relationship between recommendation and customer purchase intention. Li and Wang [19] verified that mind-flow experience acts as a mediator in influencing customers' purchase intention.

    Based on the above studies, the hypothesis is derived:

    H15: Mind-flow experience plays a mediating role between personalized recommendation and purchase intention.

    Compared to offline shopping, consumers are more concerned about safety, quality, and after-sales service when shopping online. In the context of e-commerce live streaming, consumers' perceived trust becomes particularly important. In the e-commerce live streaming environment, prices are often more favorable compared to offline and regular online shopping. Additionally, the video format allows consumers to better understand the products, and the visual aspect provides a more intuitive understanding of product information. The authenticity of live streaming showcases real product parameters and information to consumers, while the interactivity enables consumers to receive feedback from other buyers who have already made purchases. Due to the inability to physically touch the products, consumers' trust is lower in online shopping. However, in the context of e-commerce live streaming, the more detailed the product information presented by the hosts, the stronger the consumers' perceived trust. E-commerce live streaming displays products completely to consumers, and the live chat and product review sections allow consumers to directly see the feedback from other buyers. These aspects make consumers perceive the information quality as genuine and reliable, creating a positive impression and increasing their perceived trust. This trust relationship influences consumers' purchase intentions [47].

    In a study by Zhou [48] on the impact of the quality of real estate online transaction platforms on users' willingness to transact online, it was demonstrated that platform quality significantly influences consumer satisfaction and trust. There is a strong correlation between consumers' trust and their intention to transact. The higher the service quality and level of the real estate platform, the higher the user trust, leading to a stronger intention to transact. Research conducted by Liu [46] established a theoretical model using emotional attitude as an intermediary between personalized recommendation systems and university students' online shopping behavior. It was confirmed that recommendation systems influence online shopping behavior through trust.

    Although the above studies may differ in content, they all indicate the existence of a certain mediating role of user trust between service systems and purchase intention. Given the risks and uncertainties of online shopping, consumer trust is particularly important. The more consumers trust a particular platform, the more willing they are to conduct transactions on that platform. Additionally, higher consumer trust is conducive to maintaining long-term relationships between platforms and users. Based on the above analysis, the following hypothesis is proposed:

    H16: Perceived trust plays a mediating role between personalized recommendation and purchase intention.

    Personalized product recommendation is crucial for improving the marketing strategies of online shopping platforms. Numerous studies have confirmed that personalized product recommendation in online shopping platforms can enhance the user experience and increase purchase intention. In this chapter, we adopt the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory and the mind-flow theory as the foundation. Taking the customer's perspective as the primary focus, we construct the model of this study and propose research hypotheses. Based on existing relevant research, we select measurement indicators for the influencing factors in this study and provide corresponding explanations. The aim is to investigate the impact of personalized product recommendation on customers' purchase intention.

    Based on relevant theoretical foundations, this study investigates the impact of personalized recommendation on the mind-flow experience and subsequently on customers' purchase intention. The aim is to delve into the underlying mechanisms through which personalized recommendation influences customers' purchase intention. The study constructs a research model of customers' purchase intention based on personalized recommendation, using the SOR framework as its foundation.

    In this model, the stimulus variable (dependent variable) is personalized recommendation, the response variable (independent variable) is customers' purchase intention, and the organism variable (mediating variables) are mind-flow experience and perceived trust. Six dimensions are selected to measure the independent variable of personalized recommendation: information layout, recommended way, recommended strength, precision, timeliness, and interactivity.

    In this paper, a model is constructed to explore the relationship and impact of different variables that can help us understand the interactions between personalized recommendations, midstream experience, perceived trust, and purchase intention. In this paper, we will verify whether the midstream experience mediates the relationship between personalized recommendations and customers' purchase intentions. This means that we will look at whether the midstream experience partially explains the effect of personalized recommendations on customers' purchase intention. Mediating effect usually refers to the role of a variable in transferring influence between the independent and dependent variables. The research model is as follows in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Research model.

    On the basis of previous research assumptions and variable measurement, this study extracts the measurement items related to this study, collects and analyzes the data by means of a questionnaire, and obtains the research results. The questionnaire collection process was divided into two stages: prediction testing, are revision and finalization.

    First, the variables related to this study collected in the previous literature were reviewed for screening. Based on the analysis of related literature at home and abroad, this study found that in the existing new research, there are mature measurement scales for variables such as the recommendation method, information layout, recommended strength, and interactivity of personalized recommendation. On this basis, this study chose a measurement scale that is highly recognized and widely used, and modified it based on its own research content, laying the foundation for the preliminary formation of the questionnaire.

    Before sending out the questionnaire officially, we selected 239 consumers to conduct a pre-survey, and based on their feedback on the questionnaire, we focused on revising the content of the questionnaire to make the statements accurate. Individual measurement items have been selectively removed to ensure the overall simplicity of the questionnaire, resulting in a formal questionnaire.

    The specific research methods are descriptive analysis, reliability test validity analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis.

    A total of 937 questionnaires were collected, and the questionnaire recovery rate was 100%. The questionnaires were preliminarily screened. Those samples with mistakes of omitted answers or logical inconsistencies were deleted. A total of 127 samples were deleted, leaving 807 samples. Then, 56 extreme samples were further removed based on the principle of three standard deviations. Finally, 751 valid samples were retained. The effective rate of the questionnaire was 80%.

    The statistical results of the survey sample in terms of occupation, gender, age, education, years of experience, average monthly household income, and shopping frequency in ecotourism are shown in Table 2.

    Table 2.  Demographic analysis results (N = 751).
    Option Frequency Percent (%)
    Gender Male 319 42.5
    Female 432 57.5
    Age < 18 years 4 0.50
    18–25 years 283 37.7
    26–35years 149 19.8
    36–45 years 183 24.4
    > 45 years 132 17.6
    Educational level Middle school and below 68 9.10
    College 166 22.1
    Bachelor's degree 373 49.7
    Masters 129 17.2
    PhD 15 2.00
    Job Student 151 20.1
    Government employee 139 18.5
    Employees of state-owned enterprises 100 13.3
    Private sector employees 132 17.6
    Self-employed/Freelance 110 14.6
    Other 119 15.8
    Average monthly household income (yuan) < 3000 206 27.4
    3001–7000 269 35.8
    7001–10,000 152 20.2
    > 10,000 124 16.5
    Monthly online purchases times ≤ 3 times 229 30.5
    4–10 times 319 42.5
    ≥ 11 times 203 27.0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In terms of gender, the frequency of males was 319, accounting for 42.5%, and females were more numerous than males, occupying 57.5% of the total. In terms of age, the largest number of samples were from 18 to 25 years old, with 37.7%, followed by the 36 to 45 years old group, with a total of 183. The smallest group, 0.5%, was under the age of 18. In terms of education, the majority of respondents were undergraduates, accounting for 49.7%. This was followed by the tertiary level, which accounted for 22.1%. There were only 15 people with a PhD or above, accounting for 2% of the respondents. Overall, the majority of respondents had relatively high levels of education. In terms of occupation, the main group were students, accounting for 20.1% of the total. Next, there were more people working in party and government organizations/institutions and private enterprises, with 18.5% and 17.6%, respectively. State-owned enterprises, on the other hand, had the least, at 13.3%. However, overall, the proportion of groups in each industry was relatively balanced and the differences were not great. In terms of monthly income, the group with income in the range of 3001–7000 yuan had the largest share, with 35.8%, while those with more than 10,000 yuan were relatively few, with only 16.5%. The majority of people's income was below 7000 yuan. In terms of the frequency of online shopping, most of them were 4–10 times/month, occupying 42.5%, indicating that the frequency of online shopping was relatively high among the surveyed group.

    Reliability refers to the consistency, stability, and reliability of measurement data. Generally, internal consistency is used to express the reliability of the test. The higher the reliability coefficient is, the more consistent, stable, and reliable the test results are. This study uses multiple questions to measure, so Cronbach alpha is used as an indicator to test the reliability of the questionnaire. Generally speaking, when the Cronbach alpha value of the scale designed by the questionnaire is lower than 0.7, it means that the internal consistency of the variables of the scale is poor, and the scale needs to be recompiled. When the Cronbach alpha value of the equivalence table is higher than 0.7, it means that the internal consistency of several variables constructed by the scale is good. If the Cronbach alpha value of the scale is higher than 0.9, it means that the internal consistency of the variables designed by the scale is excellent.

    Table 3 shows that the Cronbach alpha values for recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, mind-flow experience, perceived trust and purchase intention were 0.927, 0.943, 0.891, 0.908, 0.966, 0.952, 0.948, and 0.922, the Cronbach alpha for each dimension after the deletion of each question item was also greater than 0.7, indicating good internal consistency, i.e. the scale had high reliability and was suitable for subsequent analysis.

    Table 3.  Results of confidence analysis and exploratory factor analysis.
    Variable Name The alpha coefficient of the deleted item Cronbach's alpha coefficient Factor loading Eigen value Cumulative
    variance
    explained
    Bartlett's
    sphericity significance
    KMO
    RW RW1 0.941 0.927 0.822 3.413 68.26% 0.000 0.879
    RW2 0.914 0.815
    RW3 0.928 0.840
    RW4 0.880 0.837
    RW5 0.882 0.817
    IL IL1 0.940 0.943 0.794 3.316 66.32% 0.000 0.881
    IL2 0.942 0.809
    IL3 0.949 0.840
    IL4 0.907 0.821
    IL5 0.908 0.807
    RS RS1 0.876 0.891 0.785 3.807 66.13% 0.000 0.783
    RS2 0.859 0.782
    RS3 0.893 0.732
    RS4 0.881 0.735
    RS5 0.828 0.709
    I I1 0.909 0.908 0.792 3.055 61.10% 0.000 0.857
    I2 0.906 0.762
    I3 0.918 0.806
    I4 0.849 0.754
    I5 0.848 0.793
    T T1 0.967 0.966 0.798 3.232 64.64% 0.000 0.874
    T2 0.961 0.814
    T3 0.969 0.808
    T4 0.944 0.802
    T5 0.945 0.798
    P P1 0.968 0.952 0.818 3.180 63.61% 0.000 0.867
    P2 0.944 0.808
    P3 0.942 0.784
    P4 0.924 0.78
    P5 0.924 0.797
    ME ME1 0.951 0.948 0.776 2.984 69.69% 0.000 0.854
    ME2 0.946 0.765
    ME3 0.949 0.787
    ME4 0.916 0.765
    ME5 0.916 0.770
    PT PT1 0.937 0.922 0.811 3.270 65.41% 0.000 0.875
    PT2 0.904 0.805
    PT3 0.927 0.807
    PT4 0.874 0.827
    PT5 0.875 0.793
    PIt PI1 0.885 0.897 0.820 3.221 64.41% 0.000 0.876
    PI2 0.862 0.797
    PI3 0.856 0.808
    PI4 0.879 0.798
    PI5 0.887 0.789
    Note: RW: recommended ways, IL: information layout, RS: recommended strength, Ⅰ: interactivity, T: timeliness, P: precision, ME: mind-flow experience, PT: perceived trust, PI: purchase intention.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    This paper will use exploratory factor analysis to test the structural validity of the questionnaire data. Before we formally conduct factor analysis, we first need to conduct the KMO test and Bartlett's spherical test to determine whether the indicators of the variables we select meet the conditions for factor analysis. Kaiser's measurement shows that, in general, when the KMO is greater than 0.7, it can be considered as meeting the conditions for factor analysis.

    Table 3 shows that the KMO values of recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, mind-flow experience, perceived trust and purchase intention are 0.879, 0.881, 0.783, 0.857, 0.874, 0.867, 0.854, 0.875, and 0.876, respectively. For the strength variables, the KMO indicators for all variables were above 0.8. Therefore, the validity level also fully meets the requirements of the study. The explained values of each cumulative variance in Table 3 are all greater than 60%. This means that the information of the research project of the consumer identity feature variable in this paper can be effectively extracted. Combined with the factor load coefficient, it can be seen that the factor dimension obtained by rotating the factor load coefficient matrix matches the corresponding problem item of the consumer identity feature variable defined by the research design, and all the absolute value of the corresponding factor load coefficient are greater than 0.5. Therefore, the consumer identity scale in this paper has good structural validity.

    The results of the combined reliability and validity tests showed that the overall reliability of the scales used in this study was good, and the validity of each subscale also passed the tests. They all met the requirements of the study and could be analyzed and hypothesis tested in the follow-up study.

    Table 4 shows the correlation analysis among the variables. The correlation coefficients of recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, and mind-flow experience were 0.268, 0.195, 0.282, 0.320, 0.286, and 0.295, respectively, all significant at the 1% level, indicating that recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, and recommended timeliness were positively correlated with mind-flow experience. The correlation coefficients of recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, and perceived trust were 0.272, 0.101, 0.262, 0.286, 0.297, 0.305, and 0.484, respectively, all significant at the 1% level, indicating that recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, and perceived trust were significantly correlated at the 1% level, indicating that recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, and perceived trust were significantly correlated at the 1% level. The relationship between recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, recommended interactivity, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, and perceived trust were all positively correlated. The correlation coefficients between mind-flow experience, perceived trust, and purchase intention were 0.455 and 0.538, respectively, which were significant at the 1% level, indicating that mind-flow experience, perceived trust, and purchase intention were positively correlated. Similarly, the correlation coefficient between mind-flow experience and perceived trust was 0.484, also significant at the 1% level, which initially verified the research content of this paper, but the correlation can only serve as a preliminary test of the relationship between the two.

    Table 4.  Pearson correlations.
    RW IL RS I T P ME PT PI
    RW 1
    IL 0.249** 1
    RS 0.154** 0.342** 1
    I 0.286** 0.205** 0.231** 1
    T 0.304** 0.113** 0.160** 0.361** 1
    P 0.336** 0.131** 0.121** 0.360** 0.738** 1
    ME 0.268** 0.195** 0.282** 0.320** 0.286** 0.295** 1
    PT 0.272** 0.101** 0.262** 0.286** 0.297** 0.305** 0.484** 1
    PI 0.245** 0.114** 0.260** 0.305** 0.304** 0.330** 0.455** 0.538** 1
    Note: **The correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). RW: recommended ways, IL: Information layout, RS: recommended strength, Ⅰ: interactivity, T: timeliness, P: precision, ME: mind-flow experience, PT: perceived trust, PI: purchase intention.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In order to further test the proposed hypotheses, this paper uses SPSS25.0 to analyze and test, and the results are show in Table 5.

    Table 5.  Regression results for personalized recommendations and mind-flow experience.
    Unstandardized coefficients Standardized coefficients t Sig. R2 Adjusted R2 F
    B Std. Error Beta
    (Constant) 1.483 0.219 6.784 0.000 0.200 0.194 F (6,750) = 31.077, P = 0.000
    Recommended way 0.094 0.028 0.122 3.359 0.001**
    Information layout 0.049 0.040 0.045 1.246 0.213
    Recommended strength 0.236 0.046 0.184 5.166 0.000***
    Interactivity 0.157 0.034 0.168 4.556 0.000***
    Timeliness 0.049 0.034 0.071 1.439 0.151
    Precision 0.086 0.038 0.113 2.266 0.024*
    D-W value: 1.949
    Note: Dependent variable: mind-flow experience, * refers to p < 0.05; ** refers to p < 0.01; *** refers to p < 0.001.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 5 shows the regression analysis of recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, interactivity, timeliness, and precision on the mind-flow experience. The results show that the adjusted R2 is 0.194, indicating that recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, interactivity, timeliness, and precision explain 19.4% of the variation in mind-flow experience. The D-W value is 1.949, close to with 2, indicating that the model does not have autocorrelation problems.

    The coefficient of recommended way was 0.094, which was significant at the 1% level, indicating that for each unit increase in recommended way, the mind-flow experience increased by 0.094 unit, holding other factors constant. This further supports that recommended way positively affects the mind-flow experience and also shows that hypothesis H1 holds.

    The coefficient of information layout is 0.049, and the P value is 0.213, which is greater than 0.05, indicating that information layout cannot significantly affect mind-flow experience. In Ghani and Deshpande [49], Li [47], Wu et al. [25], Yang et al. [50], Zhao and Shang [51] and other scholars' views: the layout and presentation of recommended information can attract user's attention and enhance users' willingness to use personalized recommendation services, which has not been confirmed in this paper. That is, assumption H2 does not hold.

    The coefficient of recommendation strengths is 0.236, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating that when other factors remain unchanged, the mind-flow experience will increase by 0.236 unit for every unit increase in recommendation intensity. This proves that personalized recommended strength of e-commerce information has a significant positive impact on web page visits, and further proves that the personalized recommended strength has a significant positive impact on mind-flow experience, that is, H3 is established.

    The coefficient of interactivity was 0.157, which was significant at the 1% level, indicating that for each unit increase in interactivity, the cardiac mind-flow experience increased by 0.157 unit, holding other factors constant. This proves that the interactivity of personalized recommendations attracts consumers and makes them unconsciously immersed, which proves that the interactivity of personalized recommendations has a positive effect on mind-flow experience which has a positive influence on the relationship, and H4 is established.

    The coefficient of timeliness is 0.049, and the P value is 0.151, which is greater than 0.05, indicating that timeliness cannot significantly affect mind-flow experience. This cannot prove that timely information can stimulate customers' inner interest and curiosity. That is, H5 does not hold.

    The coefficient of precision is 0.086, which is significant at the 5% level, indicating that when other factors remain unchanged, for every one-unit increase in precision, the mind-flow experience will increase by 0.086 unit. This also proves that the precision of recommendation information will have a positive impact on the behavior and feelings of individuals. The precision of personalized information recommendation positively affects the mind-flow experience, that is, H6 is established.

    Table 6 shows the regression analysis of perceived trust by recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, interactivity, timeliness, and precision. The results show that the adjusted R2 is 0.189, indicating that recommended way, information layout, recommended strength interactivity, timeliness and precision explain 18.9% of the change in perceived trust. The D-W value is 2.122, which is close to 2, indicating that the model does not have autocorrelation problems.

    Table 6.  Regression results of personalized recommendations on perceived trust.
    Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. R2 Adjusted R2 F
    B Std. Error Beta
    (Constant) 1.461 0.226 6.454 0.000 0.189 0.183 F (6,750) = 31.077, P = 0.000
    Recommended way 0.118 0.029 0.149 4.074 0.000***
    Information layout –0.065 0.041 –0.057 –1.583 0.114
    Recommended strength 0.263 0.047 0.199 5.568 0.000***
    Interactivity 0.127 0.036 0.132 3.567 0.000***
    0.059 0.035 0.083 1.672 0.095
    Timeliness Precision 0.101 0.039 0.130 2.590 0.01*
    D-W value: 2.122
    Note: Dependent variable: perceived trust, * refers to p < 0.05; ** refers to p < 0.01; *** refers to p < 0.001.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The coefficient of recommended way is 0.118, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating that for each unit increase in recommended way, perceived trust increases by 0.118 unit, holding other factors constant. This proves that appropriate recommended way can enhance consumer' shopping experience and improve consumer satisfaction, and the higher the consumer satisfaction, the easier it is to trust the recommended service, and the recommended way has a positive influence relationship on perceived trust, i.e., H7 holds.

    The coefficient of information layout is –0.065, with a P value of 0.114, which is greater than 0.05. This indicates that information layout does not significantly affect perceived trust, and thus H8 does not hold. The rationality of the information layout of the recommendation system lies in its ability to weaken consumers' sensitivity to complex information, reduce customers' perceived risk, and enhance customers' perceived trust. This viewpoint has not been confirmed in this article, meaning that H8 is not established.

    The coefficient of recommended strength is 0.236, which is significant at the 1% level. This indicates that, holding other factors constant, for each unit increase in recommended strength, perceived trust increases by 0.236 unit. This proves that recommendation strength has an impact on consumers' psychology or emotions when shopping, and that an increase in recommendation strength is beneficial to the dissemination of recommendation information. It enhances consumers' more comprehensive understanding of a product, reduces consumers' perceived risk, and increases trust in the recommended information. That is, recommended strength positively affects perceived trust, and H9 holds.

    The coefficient of interactivity is 0.127, which is significant at the 1% level. This indicates that, with other factors held constant, for each unit increase in interactivity, perceived trust increases by 0.127 unit. This proves that the practice of informing customers of the information generated after interacting with them clarifies why they are being recommended, improves the transparency and precision of the recommendation, and is a means of enhancing users' trust in the recommendation system. That is, the interactivity of personalized recommendations positively affects consumer perceived trust, and H10 holds.

    The coefficient of timeliness is 0.059, with a p-value of 0.095. Since this p-value is greater than 0.05, it indicates that timeliness does not significantly influence perceived trust, and therefore H11 does not hold.

    The coefficient of precision is 0.101, which is significant at the 5% level. This indicates that, holding other factors constant, for each unit increase in precision, perceived trust increases by 0.101 unit. This supports the view that the more the recommended goods meet the needs of consumers, the more likely consumers are to develop trust. Therefore, the precision of personalized recommendations positively affects perceived trust, and H12 holds.

    Table 7 shows the regression analysis of mind-flow experience and perceived trust on purchase intention. The results show that the adjusted R2 is 0.339, indicating that mind-flow experience and perceived trust explain 33.9% of the change in purchase intention. The F-value is 191.759, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating the overall validity of the model coefficients. The D-W value is 1.716, which is close to 2, indicating that the model does not have autocorrelation problems.

    Table 7.  Regression results of mediator and dependent variables.
    Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. R2 Adjusted R2 F
    B Std. Error Beta
    (Constant) 1.129 0.142 7.963 0.000 0.339 0.337 F(2,750) = 191.759, P = 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.267 0.036 0.254 7.481 0.000***
    Perceived trust 0.425 0.035 0.415 12.22 0.000***
    D-W value: 1.716
    Note: Dependent: purchase intention, * refers to p < 0.05; ** refers to p < 0.01; *** refers to p < 0.001.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The coefficient of mind-flow experience is 0.267, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating that for each unit increase in mind-flow experience, purchase intention increases by 0.267 mind-flow experience units, holding other factors constant. This proves that the mind-flow experience significantly and positively affects purchase intention and mediates between personalized recommendation and purchase intention, and H13 holds.

    The coefficient of perceived trust is 0.425, which is significant at the 1% level, indicating that for each unit increase in perceived trust, purchase intention increases by 0.425 units, holding other factors constant. This proves the view of Ouyang [27] that the important role of perceived trust between online store impressions and purchase intention positively affects purchase intention, and H14 holds.

    We validate the test of mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust in the relationship between recommended way and purchase intention, the results are shown in Table 8. The effect of recommended way on purchase intention is positively significant (B = 0.200, t = 6.917, p < 0.05), and the effect of recommended way on mind-flow experience and perceived trust is also positively significant (B = 0.208, t = 7.625, p < 0.05; B = 0.217, t = 7.724, p < 0. 05). When the mediating variables were put in, the recommended way remained positively significant on purchase intention (B = 0.058, t = 2.276, p < 0. 05), indicating a significant mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust.

    Table 8.  Results of mediating effect test (PW and ME, PT).
    Outcome variable Predict variable R R2 F Coeff t P
    Purchase Intention 0.245 0.06 47.84
    Constant 3.098 29.59 0.000
    Recommended way 0.200 6.917 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.268 0.072 58.15
    Constant 3.329 33.69 0.000
    Recommended way 0.208 7.625 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.272 0.074 59.66
    Constant 2.974 29.3 0.000
    Recommended way 0.217 7.724 0.000
    Purchase intention 0.586 0.344 130.3
    Constant 1.029 6.944 0.000
    Recommended way 0.058 2.276 0.023
    Mind-flow experience 0.254 7.032 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.412 11.7 0.000
    Note: Refers to P < 0.05, the regression results are significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In addition, in Table 9, the upper and lower bounds of the bootstrap 95% confidence interval for the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between recommended way and purchase intention do not contain 0, indicating that recommended way can positively influence purchase intention not only directly, but also indirectly through the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust. The direct effect (0.058) and the mediating effect (0.142) accounted for 29% and 71% of the total effect, respectively. The mediating effects of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between recommended way and purchase intention were partially significant.

    Table 9.  Total, direct, and indirect effects (PW and ME, PT).
    Effect LLCI ULCI Relative effect value
    Total 0.200 0.143 0.257
    Direct 0.058 0.008 0.108 29.00%
    Indirect (Mind-flow experience) 0.053 0.031 0.077 26.50%
    Indirect (Perceived trust) 0.089 0.061 0.120 44.50%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We verified the mediation effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust in the relationship between information layout and purchase intention, and the results are shown in Table 10. The effect of information layout on purchase intention is positively significant (B = 0.132, t = 3.132, p < 0.05) and the effect of information layout on mind-flow experience and perceived trust is also positively significant (B = 0.215, t = 5.437, p < 0.05; B = 0.115, t = 2.791, p < 0.05). When the mediating variables were put in, information layout was not significant on purchase intention (B = 0.027, t = 0.756, p > 0.05). The mediating effects of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between information layout and purchase intention were partially significant.

    Table 10.  Results of the mediating effect test (IL and ME, PT).
    Outcome variable Predict variable R R2 F Coeff t P
    Purchase intention 0.114 0.013 9.807
    Constant 3.244 17.948 0.000
    Information layout 0.132 3.132 0.002
    Mind-flow experience 0.195 0.038 29.562
    Constant 3.151 18.588 0.000
    Information layout 0.215 5.437 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.101 0.010 7.788
    Constant 3.250 18.386 0.000
    Information layout 0.115 2.791 0.005
    Purchase intention 0.583 0.339 127.957
    Constant 1.035 5.496 0.000
    Information layout 0.027 0.756 0.450
    Mind-flow experience 0.263 7.246 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.425 12.210 0.000
    Note: Refers to P < 0.05, and the regression results are significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    To further verify the mediating effect, in addition, in Table 11, the upper and lower bounds of bootstrap 95% confidence intervals for the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between information layout and purchase intention do not contain 0, but the upper and lower bounds of bootstrap 95% confidence intervals on direct contain 0. This indicates that the information layout is fully mediated by the mind-flow experience and perceived trust to influence the purchase intention, i.e., a full mediation effect.

    Table 11.  Total, direct, and indirect effects (IL and ME, PT).
    Effect LLCI ULCI Relative effect value
    Total 0.132 0.049 0.215
    Direct 0.027 –0.043 0.096
    Indirect (mind-flow experience) 0.057 0.029 0.089
    Indirect (perceived trust) 0.049 0.000 0.094

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We verified the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust in the relationship between recommendation strength and purchase intention, and the results are shown in Table 12. The effect of recommended strength on purchase intention is positively significant (B = 0.352, t = 7.383, p < 0.05), and the effect of recommended strength on mind-flow experience and perceived trust is also positively significant (B = 0.361, t = 8.029, p < 0. 05; B = 0.346, t = 7.441, p < 0.05). When the mediating variables were put in, recommended strength remained positively significant on purchase intention (B = 0.748, t = 3.849, p < 0.05), indicating a significant mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust.

    Table 12.  Results of the mediating effect test (RS and ME, PT).
    Outcome variable Predict variable R R2 F Coeff t P
    Purchase intention 0.261 0.068 54.514
    Constant 2.301 11.219 0.000
    Recommended strength 0.352 7.383 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.282 0.079 64.470
    Constant 2.520 13.015 0.000
    Recommended strength 0.361 8.029 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.262 0.069 55.368
    Constant 2.259 11.284 0.000
    Recommended strength 0.346 7.441 0.000
    Purchase intention 0.588 0.346 131.767
    Constant 0.748 3.849 0.000
    Recommended strength 0.120 2.851 0.005
    Mind-flow experience 0.249 6.867 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.410 11.711 0.000
    Note: Refers to P < 0.05, and the regression results are significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In addition, in Table 13, the upper and lower bounds of the bootstrap 95% confidence interval for the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between recommended strength and purchase intention do not contain 0, indicating that recommended strength can not only positively affect purchase intention directly, but also positively affect purchase intention indirectly through the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust. The direct effect (0.120) and the mediating effect (0.232) accounted for 34.09% and 65.91% of the total effect, respectively. The mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between recommended strength and purchase intention was partially mediated.

    Table 13.  Total, direct, and indirect effects (RS and ME, PT).
    Effect LLCI ULCI Relative effect value
    Total 0.352 0.258 0.445
    Direct 0.120 0.037 0.203 34.09%
    Indirect (mind-flow experience) 0.090 0.049 0.138 25.57%
    Indirect (perceived trust) 0.142 0.084 0.205 40.34%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We verified the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust in the relationship between interactivity and purchase intention, and the results are shown in Table 14. The effect of interactivity on purchase intention is positively significant (B = 0.300, t = 8.758, p < 0.05), and the effect of interactivity on mind-flow experience and perceived trust is also positively significant (B = 0.299, t = 9.257, p < 0.05; B = 0.275, t = 8.167, p < 0.05). When the mediating variables were put in, interactivity remained positively significant on purchase intention (B = 0.118, t = 3.798, p < 0.05), indicating a significant mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust.

    Table 14.  Results of the mediating effect test (I and ME, PT).
    Outcome variable Predict variable R R2 F Coeff t P
    Purchase intention 0.305 0.093 76.709
    Constant 2.715 21.455 0.000
    Interactivity 0.300 8.758 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.320 0.103 85.697
    Constant 2.976 24.890 0.000
    Interactivity 0.299 9.257 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.286 0.082 66.692
    Constant 2.740 22.036 0.000
    Interactivity 0.275 8.167 0.000
    Purchase intention 0.593 0.352 134.942
    Constant 0.901 5.892 0.000
    Interactivity 0.118 3.798 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.238 6.543 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.404 11.575 0.000
    Note: Refers to P < 0.05, and the regression results are significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In addition, in Table 15, the upper and lower bounds of the bootstrap 95% confidence interval for the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between interactivity and purchase intention do not contain 0, indicating that the inferred interactivity can positively influence purchase intention not only directly but also indirectly through the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust. The direct effect (0.118) and the mediating effect (0.182) accounted for 23.67% and 37% of the total effect, respectively. Mind-flow experience and perceived trust partially mediated the relationship between interactivity and purchase intention.

    Table 15.  Total, direct, and indirect effects (I and ME, PT).
    Effect LLCI ULCI Relative effect value
    Total 0.300 0.233 0.367
    Direct 0.118 0.057 0.179 39.33%
    Indirect (mind-flow experience) 0.071 0.041 0.104 23.67%
    Indirect (perceived trust) 0.111 0.072 0.153 37.00%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We verified the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust in the relationship between timeliness and purchase intention, and the results are shown in Table 16. The effect of timeliness on purchase intention is positively significant (B = 0.221, t = 8.723, p < 0.05) and the effect of timeliness on mind-flow experience and perceived trust is also positively significant (B = 0.198, t = 8.181, p < 0.05; B = 0.212, t = 8.526, p < 0.05). When the mediating variables were put in, timeliness remained positively significant on purchase intention (B = 0.088, t = 3.877, p < 0.05), indicating a significant mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust.

    Table 16.  Results of the mediating effect test (T and ME, PT).
    Outcome variable Predict variable R R2 F Coeff t P
    Purchase intention 0.304 0.092 76.084
    Constant 3.069 35.151 0.000
    Timeliness 0.221 8.723 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.286 0.082 66.932
    Constant 3.405 40.828 0.000
    Timeliness 0.198 8.181 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.297 0.089 72.689
    Constant 3.035 35.516 0.000
    Timeliness 0.212 8.526 0.000
    Purchase intention 0.593 0.352 135.248
    Constant 1.027 7.190 0.000
    Timeliness 0.088 3.877 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.244 6.779 0.000
    Outcome variable Perceived trust 0.399 11.376 0.000
    Note: Refers to P < 0.05, and the regression results are significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In addition, in Table 17, the upper and lower bounds of the bootstrap 95% confidence interval for the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between timeliness and purchase intention do not contain 0, indicating that pushing timeliness can positively affect purchase intention not only directly but also indirectly through the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust. The direct effect (0.088) and the mediating effect (0.143) account for 39.82% and 60.18% of the total effect, respectively. Mind-flow experience and perceived trust partially mediated the relationship between timeliness and purchase intention.

    Table 17.  Total, direct, and indirect effects (T and ME, PT).
    Effect LLCI ULCI Relative effect value
    Total 0.221 0.172 0.271
    Direct 0.088 0.044 0.133 39.82%
    Indirect (mind-flow experience) 0.048 0.028 0.073 21.72%
    Indirect (perceived trust) 0.085 0.055 0.118 38.46%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We verified the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust in the relationship between precision and purchase intention, and the results are shown in Table 18. The effect of precision on purchase intention is positively significant (B = 0.264, t = 9.566, p < 0.05) and the effect of precision on mind-flow experience and perceived trust is also positively significant (B = 0.224, t = 8.436, p < 0.05; B = 0.238, t = 8.778, p < 0.05). When the mediating variables were put in, precision remained positively significant on purchase intention (B = 0.117, t = 4.669, p < 0.05), indicating a significant mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust.

    Table 18.  Results of the mediating effect (P and ME, PT).
    Outcome variable Predict variable R R2 F Coeff t P
    Purchase intention 0.330 0.109 91.512
    Constant 2.895 29.647 0.000
    Precision 0.264 9.566 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.295 0.087 71.163
    Constant 3.293 35.065 0.000
    Precision 0.224 8.436 0.000
    Perceived trust 0.305 0.093 77.045
    Constant 2.916 30.313 0.000
    Precision 0.238 8.778 0.000
    Purchase intention 0.598 0.358 138.662
    Constant 0.965 6.688 0.000
    Precision 0.117 4.669 0.000
    Mind-flow experience 0.238 6.643 0.000
    Outcome variable Perceived trust 0.393 11.242 0.000
    Note: Refers to P < 0.05, and the regression results are significant.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In addition, in Table 19, the upper and lower bounds of the bootstrap 95% confidence interval for the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust between precision and purchase intention do not contain 0, indicating that the inferred precision can positively influence purchase intention not only directly but also indirectly through the mediating effect of mind-flow experience and perceived trust. The direct effect (0.117) and the mediating effect (0.147) account for 44.32% and 55.68% of the total effect, respectively. mind-flow experience and perceived trust partially mediated the relationship between precision and purchase intention.

    Table 19.  Total, direct and indirect effects (P and ME, PT).
    Effect LLCI ULCI Relative effect value
    Total 0.264 0.210 0.318
    Direct 0.117 0.068 0.166 44.32%
    Indirect (mind-flow experience) 0.053 0.030 0.080 20.08%
    Indirect (perceived trust) 0.094 0.063 0.129 35.61%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    This is demonstrated by the above analysis: Mind-flow experience plays a mediating role between personalized recommendation and purchase intention, and H15 holds.

    Perceived trust plays a mediating role between personalized recommendation and purchase intention, and H16 holds.

    On the basis of theoretical analysis and literature reading, this paper builds a model of the impact of personalized recommendation services on purchase intentions, and puts forward 14 hypotheses: H1, H3, H4, H6, H7, H9, H10, H12, H13, H14, H15, and H16 have been established, and H2, H5, H8, and H11 have not been established. That is, information layout cannot have a significant impact on mind-flow experience and perceived trust, and the timeliness of personalized recommendations cannot have a significant impact on flow experience and perceived trust. Other dimensions of personalized recommendation can have a significant impact on mind-flow experience and perceived trust. mind-flow experience and perceived trust play a mediating role between personalized recommendation and purchase intention.

    This paper explores six dimensions of personalized recommendation: recommended way, information layout, recommended strength, precision, timeliness, and interactivity. The study analyzes how these dimensions affect purchase intention through mind-flow experience and perceived trust. The findings indicate that the recommended way, strength, precision, and interactivity positively impact purchase intention. However, information layout and timeliness do not significantly affect purchase intention in this model.

    The reasons for the non-significant impact of information layout on purchase intention are attributed to the combined effects of interference factors, the precision of personalized recommendations, diverse shopping objectives, and the uncertainty of the online shopping environment. To enhance the effectiveness of information layout, online shopping platforms need to pay more attention to consumers' personalized needs, reduce interference, improve recommendation precision, clarify shopping objectives, and a strengthen the sense of security.

    Similarly, timeliness cannot create a positive impact on purchase intention due to the combined effects of consumer context, difficulty in information retrieval, online shopping uncertainty, network environment factors, and competition and advertising interference. To enhance the impact of timeliness, online shopping platforms need to provide fast and stable network environments, optimize information presentation, reduce advertising interference, and address online shopping uncertainty by enhancing consumer trust and sense of security.

    Overall, the study highlights the importance of considering various factors when designing personalized recommendation systems to effectively influence purchase intention. By focusing on consumers' personalized needs, improving recommendation precision, reducing interference, and enhancing trust and security, online shopping platforms can enhance the flow experience and positively impact purchase intention.

    The paper delves into the implications of personalized recommendation in the realm of online shopping, enriching the research perspective by examining its influence on customers' purchase intention from six dimensions: information layout, recommendation method, recommended strength, recommended precision, recommended timeliness, and recommended interactivity. It introduces the concept of mind-flow experience from psychological research, designing it as an intermediary variable between personalized recommendation and customer purchase intention, thereby constructing a research model and proving its feasibility. This approach realizes innovations in understanding the mechanism of personalized recommendation on customer purchase intention.

    From a practical standpoint, the research holds significance for online shopping platforms, offering targeted suggestions for system improvement and enhancing personalized service quality to boost competitiveness and customer retention. By focusing on optimizing related services accessible to customers, the paper aims to provide the best personalized recommendation service, reducing time spent on online shopping and improving decision-making efficiency during purchases.

    However, the study acknowledges limitations, including issues with the questionnaire content and data quality, which may have impacted the reliability and validity of the research findings. To address these, future research is suggested to involve more rigorous data collection methods, consider multi-platform data, and incorporate additional factors such as product type and price to further explore their impact on customers' purchase intention.

    Furthermore, recognizing the trend of social shopping in China, where customers' online shopping behavior is easily influenced by acquaintances on social networking platforms, the paper suggests that future research on personalized product recommendation could be conducted from the perspective of social shopping, offering a new direction for exploration in this field.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work is supported by the "Double First-Class" Discipline Creation and Cultivation Project of Henan Province (XJBSJJ202404), Graduate Education Reform Project of Henan Polytechnic University (2024YJ12).

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Acton T, Dabrowski M, (2013) The performance of recommender systems in online shopping: A user-centric study. Expert Syst Appl 40: 5551–5562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.022 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.022
    [2] Resnick P, Varian HR, (1997) Recommender systems. Commun ACM 40: 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/245108.245121 doi: 10.1145/245108.245121
    [3] Seddon PB, (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 8: 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240 doi: 10.1287/isre.8.3.240
    [4] Xiao B, Benbasat I, (2007) E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Q 31: 137–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148784 doi: 10.2307/25148784
    [5] Petter S, DeLone W, McLean E, (2008) Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur J Inf Syst 17: 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15 doi: 10.1057/ejis.2008.15
    [6] Chen ML, Cai RM, (2009) The impact of e-commerce product recommendation agent on consumer decision making. J Zhejiang Univ 39: 138–148. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2009.02.131 doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2009.02.131
    [7] Nanou T, Lekakos, SG, Fouska K, (2010) The effects of recommendations' presentation on persuasion and satisfaction in a movie recommender system. Multimedia Syst 16: 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-010-0190-0 doi: 10.1007/s00530-010-0190-0
    [8] Li T, Unger T, (2012) Willing to pay for quality personalization trade-off between quality and privacy. Eur J Inf Syst 21: 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.13 doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.13
    [9] Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Gutiérrez A, (2013) Recommender systems survey. Knowl. Based Syst 46: 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.012 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.012
    [10] Yang YW, Wang Y, Sun GH, (2016) Research on the marketing effect of recommender system on consumers—An technology acceptance model perspective. China Bus Mark 30: 98–107. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2016.02.013 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2016.02.013
    [11] Yang YW, Wang Y, Sun GH, (2016). Research on recommendation systems from the consumer perspective. Enterp Econ 2016: 79–85. https://doi.org/10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2016.09.013 doi: 10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2016.09.013
    [12] Kaminskas M, Bridge D, (2016) Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: A survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst 7: 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2926720 doi: 10.1145/2926720
    [13] Hong L, Ren Q, Liang S, (2016) A comparative study of information service quality of recommendation systems on domestic e-commerce websites: A case study of Taobao, JD, and Amazon. Library Inf Serv 60: 97–110. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.23.013 doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.23.013
    [14] Xu L, Zhu J, (2018) Analysis of the impact of personalized recommendations in mobile e-commerce on consumers' purchase intentions. J Commercial Econ 2018: 54–67. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5863.2018.06.017 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5863.2018.06.017
    [15] Wang H, (2018) Research on the influence of personalized recommendation systems on consumers' purchase intention. E Bus J 2018: 45–56.
    [16] Chen L, Yang Y, Wang N, Yang K, Yuan Q, (2019) How serendipity improves user satisfaction with recommendations? A large-scale user evaluation, In: The World Wide Web Conference, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313469
    [17] Cui S, Research on the Influence of Personalized Recommendation Platform Characteristics on Consumers' Acceptance Willingness, Master's thesis, Capital University of Economics and Business, 2021.
    [18] Zou Y, Research on the Formation Mechanism of Non-Continuous Usage Intention of Recommendation Systems, Master's thesis, North China University of Technology, 2022.
    [19] Li YY, Wang WJ, (2021) Research on the influence of perceived value of online furniture shopping customers on IWOM propagation with mind-flow experience as a mediating variable. Bus Econ 2021: 66–70. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6043.2021.01.023 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6043.2021.01.023
    [20] Li X, Wang MY, Liang TP, (2014) A multi-theoretical kernel-based approach to social network-based recommendation. Decis Support Syst 65: 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.006
    [21] Ouyang J, Zhu WP, (2016) A study on the impact of recommendation system and customer loyalty in e-commerce websites. Mod Bus, 2016: 46–48. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5889.2016.09.024 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5889.2016.09.024
    [22] Zhang X, Ma L, (2017) The effects of offline recommendation on Chinese consumers' online purchase intentions: Based on tie strength theory. J Dalian Univ Technol 38: 15–20. https://doi.org/10.19525/j.issn1008-407x.2017.02.003 doi: 10.19525/j.issn1008-407x.2017.02.003
    [23] Dai HZ, The Integrative Impact of Online Recommendations and Reviews on the Consumption Experience of Digital Content Products and Empirical Sstudy, Ph.D thesis, Zhejiang University, 2014.
    [24] Wang J, Zhang Y, (2013) Opportunity model for e-commerce recommendation: Right product; right time. In: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1145/2484028.2484067
    [25] Wu L, Chuang CH, Hsu CH, (2014) Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective. Int J Prod Econ 148: 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.09.016 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.09.016
    [26] Gebeyehu JN, Japee GP, (2023) The effect of bonding, responsiveness and communication on customer retention: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. J Relat Mark 22: 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2023.2191111 doi: 10.1080/15332667.2023.2191111
    [27] Priyadarshini C, Sreejesh S, Anusree M, (2017) Effect of information quality of employment website on attitude toward the website: A moderated mediation study. Int J Manpower 38: 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2015-0235 doi: 10.1108/IJM-12-2015-0235
    [28] Jung AR, (2017) The influence of perceived ad relevance on social media advertising: An empirical examination of a mediating role of privacy concern. Comput Human Behav 70: 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.008 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.008
    [29] Chau PYK, Ho SY, Ho KKW, Yao Y, (2013) Examining the effects of malfunctioning personalized services on online users' distrust and behaviors. Decis Support Syst 56: 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.023 doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.023
    [30] Cao CJ, (2010) On the B2C mode of precision marketing. J Harbin Univ Commer 2010: 33–36. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7112.2010.03.007 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7112.2010.03.007
    [31] Wang QF, (2016) Research on online feature extraction in recommender systems. Comput Program Skills Maint 2016: 16–40. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-4052.2016.13.008 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4052.2016.13.008
    [32] Zhou F, (2013) Empirical study on e-commerce platform of real estate based on consumer's online transaction intention. J Changsha Univ 27: 38–40. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-4681.2013.01.014 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4681.2013.01.014
    [33] Li M, (2019) Design and application of text arrangement in information visualization design. J Jilin Univ Arts 4: 96–99.
    [34] Fu XY, Research on the Impact of personalized recommendation System on Consumers' purchase intention, Master's thesis, Henan University of Economics and Law, 2016.
    [35] Zhang BS, Zhang QP, Zhao CG, (2021) The influence of webcast characteristics on consumers' purchase intention under e-commerce live broadcasting mode—the mediating role of consumer perception. China Bus Mark 35: 52–61. https://doi.org/10.14089/j.cnki.cn11-3664/f.2021.06.005 doi: 10.14089/j.cnki.cn11-3664/f.2021.06.005
    [36] Zhu L, Research on the Influence of Online Shopping Platform Personalized Recommendation on Consumers' Purchase Intention, Master's thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.
    [37] Yang YW, Wang Y, Sun GH, (2016) The marketing effects of online recommendation systems on consumers: A perspective from the technology acceptance model. Chin J Circ Econ 30: 98–107. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2016.02.013 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8266.2016.02.013
    [38] Zeng L, Research on the Influence of Personalized Product Information Recommendation on Consumers' Willingness to Purchase, Master's thesis, Central China Normal University, 2018
    [39] Hausman AV, Siekpe JS, (2009) The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. J Business Res 62: 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.018
    [40] Xia H, Pan X, Zhou Y, Zhang ZJ, (2020) Creating the best first impression: Designing online product photos to increase sales. Decis Support Syst 131: 113235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113235 doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113235
    [41] Du QY, Xiang D, (2019) A study on the intrinsic mechanism of trust propensity, perceived risk and purchase intention—An empirical analysis based on cross-border import retail e-commerce platforms. Mark Forum 5: 12–22. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8777.2019.05.005 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8777.2019.05.005
    [42] Zhang Y, Chen CX, Gu W, Liu XG, (2018) Impact of recommender systems on unplanned purchase behaviours in e-commerce. In: 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEA.2018.8387066
    [43] Resnick P, Varian HR, (1997) Recommender systems. Commun ACM 40: 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/245108.245121 doi: 10.1145/245108.245121
    [44] Jiang S, Zhao HX, Meng L, (2014) Research on online interaction and consumers' impulsive buying behavior in B2C online shopping. Inquiry Econ Issues, 2014: 64–73. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2912.2014.05.011 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2912.2014.05.011
    [45] Liu JX, Li DJ, Li RY, (2020) The influence of out-of-stock of new products on consumers' willingness to pay price premium: Based on the mediating effect of psychological ownership and relative deprivation. Manage Rev 2022: 184–196.
    [46] Liu ZP, Research on the Influence of personalized recommendation on College Students' Online Shopping Behavior, Master's thesis, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2016.
    [47] Li HX, A Study on the Influencing Factors of E-commerce Live Streaming on Consumers' Purchase Intention of Beauty Products, Master's thesis, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2023.
    [48] Zhao CL, Wang X, Ma CX, (2018) Impact of perceived interactivity on the online learners' continuance intention: Based on S-O-R perspective. Mod Distance Educ 2018: 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8700.2018.03.002 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8700.2018.03.002
    [49] Ghani JA, Deshpande P, (1994) Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human—Computer interaction. J Psychol 128: 381–391.
    [50] Yang Q, Zhang K, Wang XM, Meng L, (2019) Research on the influence of "internet celebrity" information source characteristics on consumers' purchase intention: A moderated mediation model. Manage Adm 2018: 65–68.
    [51] Zhao CL, Wang X, Ma CX, (2018) Impact of perceived interactivity on the online learners' continuance intention: Based on S-O-R perspective. Mod Distance Educ 2018: 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8700.2018.03.002 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8700.2018.03.002
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2935) PDF downloads(241) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog