Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Commentary Special Issues

Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries

  • Received: 14 July 2017 Accepted: 11 November 2017 Published: 26 December 2017
  • In Canada, as elsewhere in the world, caesarean sections are the most common surgical procedure performed in hospitals annually. Recent national statistics indicate 28% of infants in Canada are born by c-section while in the United States that number rises to 33%. This is despite World Health Organization recommendations that at a population level only 10–15% of births warrant this form of medical intervention. This trend has become cause for concern in recent decades due to the short and long-term health risks to pregnant women and infants, as well as the financial burden it places on public health care systems. Others warn this trend may result in a collective loss of cultural knowledge of a normal physiological process and, in the process, establish a new “normal” childbirth. Despite a range of interventions to curb c-section rates—enhanced prenatal care and innovation in pregnancy monitoring, change in hospital level policies, procedures and protocols, as well as public education campaigns—they remain stubbornly resistant to stabilization, let alone, reduction in high-income countries. We explore—through a review of the academic and grey literature—the role of cultural and social narratives around risk, and the responsibilization of the pregnant woman and the medical practitioner in creating this kind of resistance to intervention today.

    Citation: Helga Hallgrimsdottir, Leah Shumka, Catherine Althaus, Cecilia Benoit. Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(6): 615-632. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.6.615

    Related Papers:

    [1] Lili Xiong, Liping Li . Single-vehicle and Multi-vehicle Accidents Involving Motorcycles in a Small City in China: Characteristics and Injury Patterns. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(1): 74-85. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.1.74
    [2] Gerhard Ruedl, Markus Posch, Elena Pocecco, Katja Tecklenburg, Birgit Schliernzauer, Michael D. Kennedy, Martin Faulhaber, Martin Burtscher . Association of personal and equipment-related factors on ACL injury risk in alpine skiers with cautious or risk-taking behaviour: A case-control study. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 348-359. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023026
    [3] Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia, Ali Bani-Fatemi, Aaron Howe, Simrat Ubhi, Mitchel Morrison, Harseerat Saini, Vijay Kumar Chattu . Examining burnout in the electrical sector in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional study. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(4): 934-951. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023060
    [4] Jane Law . Exploring the Specifications of Spatial Adjacencies and Weights in Bayesian Spatial Modeling with Intrinsic Conditional Autoregressive Priors in a Small-area Study of Fall Injuries. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 65-82. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.65
    [5] Jesús Álvarez-Herms, Adriana González, Francisco Corbi, Iñaki Odriozola, Adrian Odriozola . Possible relationship between the gut leaky syndrome and musculoskeletal injuries: the important role of gut microbiota as indirect modulator. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(3): 710-738. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023049
    [6] Guojia Qi, Xiu Dai, Xue Wang, Ping Yuan, Xiahong Li, Miao Qi, Xiuli Hu, Xiuquan Shi . Epidemiological characteristics of post-traumatic stress symptoms and its influence on length of hospital stay in inpatients with traumatic fractures in Zunyi, China. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 835-849. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024042
    [7] Carol L. Stone . A population-based measure of chronic disease severity for health planning and evaluation in the United States. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(1): 44-65. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020006
    [8] Linda Rausch, Mirjam Limmer, Elena Pocecco, Gerhard Ruedl, Markus Posch, Martin Faulhaber . Sex-specific analysis of hiking accidents in the Austrian Alps: a follow-up from 2015 to 2021. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 160-175. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024008
    [9] Md Jahoor Alam, Abdullah Ibrahim Alnafeesah, Mohd Saeed . Inter-correlation of risk factors among heart patients. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(2): 354-362. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020030
    [10] Julia Metelka, Colin Robertson, Craig Stephen . Japanese Encephalitis: Estimating Future Trends in Asia. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(4): 601-615. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.601
  • In Canada, as elsewhere in the world, caesarean sections are the most common surgical procedure performed in hospitals annually. Recent national statistics indicate 28% of infants in Canada are born by c-section while in the United States that number rises to 33%. This is despite World Health Organization recommendations that at a population level only 10–15% of births warrant this form of medical intervention. This trend has become cause for concern in recent decades due to the short and long-term health risks to pregnant women and infants, as well as the financial burden it places on public health care systems. Others warn this trend may result in a collective loss of cultural knowledge of a normal physiological process and, in the process, establish a new “normal” childbirth. Despite a range of interventions to curb c-section rates—enhanced prenatal care and innovation in pregnancy monitoring, change in hospital level policies, procedures and protocols, as well as public education campaigns—they remain stubbornly resistant to stabilization, let alone, reduction in high-income countries. We explore—through a review of the academic and grey literature—the role of cultural and social narratives around risk, and the responsibilization of the pregnant woman and the medical practitioner in creating this kind of resistance to intervention today.


    1. Introduction

    Road traffic injuries are a serious public health problem. According to the World Health Organization report in July 2013, road traffic injuries have increased from 11th in 2000 to 9th in 2011 in cause of death, and will be 5th by 2030 [1]. Although injuries due to road-traffic incidents impose a substantial burden globally, the burden is greatest in low-and middle-income countries [2], particularly in China [3,4]. Motorcycle-related injuries account for the majority of injuries and deaths related to road traffic in China [5,6]. Although motorcycles have been restricted from travelling in large cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen due to their negative effects on society from pollution, traffic congestion and other reasons, motorcycles are used extensively in small and medium sized cities and rural areas, due to ease, convenience, and affordability. The total number of motorcycles owned in China increased from 2.5 million (23% of total motorized vehicles) in 1987 to 50 million (70%) in 2002, to 70 million (54%) in 2005, and to over 100 million in 2010 (46%) [7,8]. Unfortunately, road traffic injuries involving motorcycles often result in severe injuries [9,10,11,12]. For example, motorcycle accidents resulted in 26, 200 deaths and 157, 500 injuries in 2005, and 11, 070 deaths and 59, 455 injuries in 2011 in China [6,8]. The proportion of fatalities and injuries in motorcycle collisions is even higher in some medium-sized cities where motorcycle use is more common, for example over 50% of total traffic injuries in Shantou city [13].

    Many risk factors are associated with the incidence of severe injuries in motorcycle crashes. These include demographic characteristics (age, gender, helmet wearing, behavior), environmental characteristics (traffic flow, traffic control, visibility condition, weather), and crash characteristics (time, rural or urban location, type of collision) [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Risk factors related to severe motorcycle injuries have been investigated worldwide and in larger cities; but the relevant research in medium cities in China has not been well studied. We aimed to identify contributing factors related to severe injuries for inpatients involving motorcycle-related injuries, and to provide references to prioritize programs that would prevent and reduce such injuries.


    2. Methods

    Shantou is a medium-sized city in China, with a population of approximately 5 million habitants at the time of the study, and is one of the five special economic zones and an important port city in the southern region. There are three first-class public comprehensive hospitals, which have a total of 5, 600 beds and treat more than 95% of severe trauma patients in the region.

    Data were collected prospectively over ten months from October 2012 to July 2013. Patients with motorcycle traffic injuries who were admitted to the neurosurgery and orthopedic departments of the three hospitals were included if their hospital stay was greater than 24 hours and they survived, regardless of injury severity. We have established cooperative relations with the six departments. When patients meet the requirements, the head nurse will inform us two days after the patient is in the hospital. In this study, a motorcycle was defined as a two-wheeled motor vehicle; moped injuries were not addressed separately from motorcycle injuries. Motorcycle-related injuries were defined as traffic accidents involving a motorcycle or two. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical college, Shantou University, the first and second affiliated hospital of Shantou University, and Shantou center hospital. Informed written consent was obtained from the patients, their family, or caregivers prior to study enrollment.

    Demographic information, environmental, and crash characteristics were acquired from patients, families, or their caregivers, while injury severity scores were obtained from their doctors. Demographic information included age, gender, safeguards, and road users. Environmental factors included weather, visibility conditions, traffic flow conditions, and manner of traffic control in the area of the crash site. Crash characteristics included the time and location of the crash, type and direction of the collision, unsafe behavior, methods of transport to hospital after the crash, and the admitting department. The dependent variable of injury severity score (ISS) was dichotomous to severe injuries with an ISS of≥16 and non-severe injury with an ISS of < 16.

    Statistical Analysis

    Data were analyzed using STATA software, version 11.2. A descriptive analysis was conducted for each variable. The frequency of distribution was created for patients, counted by the road users among age groups, and patients counted by the crash types among road users in the severe and non-severe injury groups. The chi-squared test was used to define factors affecting injury severity. Variables with a p-value less than 0.05 were entered into the statistical model. Correlation analyses between the affecting variables were performed. In the case when one variable correlated with another with a correlation value of 0.5 or above, only one variable remained in the model based on the best model choice. Then, simple logistic regression was used to get crude odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Finally, multiple logistic regression was conducted to estimate the OR of severe injury for the selected variables, adjusting for all other factors in the model.


    3. Results


    3.1. Demographic Characteristics

    There were 401 eligible patients over a ten month period. We analyzed a total of 349 patients who took part in the survey eventually. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 15.34 with a standard deviation of 9.13. One hundred and fifty patients were classified in the severe injury group and 199 patients were in the non-severe injury group. The patients’ age ranged from 3 to 83 years with a mean and standard deviation of 38.2117.32 years. There were 253 males (72.49%) and 96 females (27.51%), with a male to female ratio of 2.64:1 (Table 1). Motorcyclists are often injured in crashes involving pedestrians or cyclists. The most frequent participant role in road traffic of our cohort was the motorcycle rider (n=241, 69.05%), pillion passenger (n=63, 18.05%), pedestrian (n=29, 8.31%), and cyclist (n=16, 4.58%). There was a statistically significant correlation between participant role and age group (χ2 (12)=68.57, p=0.00). Almost all motorcycle riders and passengers were distributed in 15-29 years (39.83% and 49.21%). Pedestrians and cyclists were distributed in the above 60 year age group (41.38% and 31.25%, Figure 1).

    Table 1. Demographic characteristics between severe and non-severe injury groups.
    VariablesISS ≥ 16ISS < 16χ2p-value
    Gender6.170.01
    Female31 (20.67)65 (32.65)
    Male119 (79.33)134 (67.34)
    Age groups1.930.75
    ≤ 144 (2.67)6 (3.02)
    15–2961 (40.67)70 (35.18)
    30–4433 (22.00)41 (20.60)
    45–5933 (22.00)55 (27.64)
    ≥ 6019 (12.67)27 (13.57)
    Safeguard *25.680.00
    Yes14 (9.33)64 (32.16)
    No136 (90.67)135 (67.84)
    Road users10.710.01
    Motorcycle riders102 (68.00)139 (69.85)
    Passengers23 (15.33)40 (20.10)
    Pedestrians12 (8.00)17 (8.54)
    Cyclists13 (8.67)3 (1.51)
    * Safeguards include mainly helmets for motorcycle riders, passengers, and cyclists.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1. Frequency of patients counted by road users among age groups. The majority of patients were distributed in the 15-29 years (37.54%), 45-59 years (25.21%) and 30-44 years (21.20%) age groups. The highest frequencies of riders and pillions were distributed in the 15-29 years (39.83% and 49.21%) age group. The highest frequency of pedestrians and cyclists was distributed in above 60 years (41.38% and 31.25%) age group.

    Gender, safeguard practices, and road users were associated with the dependent variable (Table 2). Males were associated with severe injury (OR=1.86, 95% CI 1.14-3.05) in the simple logistic model, though there was no statistical significance found in the adjusted model (Table 3). Lack of safeguard precautions was linked to severe injury in the simple logistic model (OR=4.61, 95% CI 2.46-8.61) and adjusted logistic model (ORj=3.32, 95% CI 1.57-7.04).

    Table 2. Crash and environmental characteristics between severe and non-severe patients.
    VariablesISS ≥ 16ISS < 16χ2p-value
    Time of crash34.260.00
    0:00–6:0039 (26.00)25 (12.56)
    6:00–10:00 & 16:00–18:0029 (19.33)63 (31.66)
    10:00–16:0024 (16.00)66 (33.17)
    18:00–20:0012(8.00)8(4.02)
    20:00–24:0040(26.67)26(13.07)
    unknown6 (4.00)11 (5.53)
    Location of crash18.160.00
    Urban56 (37.33)110 (55.28)
    Rural57 (38.00)70 (35.18)
    Unknown37 (24.67)19 (9.55)
    Behavior 1.790.18
    Unsafe *5 (3.33)13 (6.53)
    Safe145 (96.67)186 (93.47)
    Type of collision22.740.00
    Single motorcycle34 (22.67)36 (18.09)
    Motorcycle-pedestrian12 (8.00)17 (8.54)
    Motorcycle-bicycle15 (10.00)3 (1.51)
    Motorcycle-motorcycle17 (11.33)27 (13.57)
    Motorcycle-light vehicle48 (32.00)98 (49.57)
    Motorcycle-heavy vehicle24 (16.00)18 (9.05)
    Transport to hospital7.200.01
    Ambulance121 (80.67)135 (67.84)
    Other means29 (19.33)64 (32.16)
    Department admitted73.160.00
    Neurosurgery 132 (88.00)86 (43.22)
    Orthopedics 18 (12.00)113 (56.78)
    Visibility4.320.03
    Day/street lamps116 (77.33)171 (85.93)
    Without street lamps34 (22.67)28 (14.07)
    Traffic condition5.490.02
    Unobstructed139 (92.67)168 (84.42)
    Obstructed11 (7.33)31 (15.58)
    Traffic control*4.190.04
    Yes30 (20.00)59 (29.65)
    No120 (80.00)140 (70.35)
    Weather condition0.010.91
    Sunny131 (87.33)173 (86.93)
    Rainy19 (12.66)26 (13.07)
    * Unsafe behavior includes alcohol consumption, speeding, running a red light, using a mobilephone, violating traffic, etc. Traffic control refers to traffic light, traffic marking line, policeman direction, etc.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3. Odds Ratio by risk factors in simple and multiple logistic models.
    Risk factorsOR (95% CI)ORj (95% CI)
    Demographic Age(RE: ≥ 60years)
    ≤ 14years0.88 (0.24–3.190.82 (0.04–16.53)
    15–29years1.26 (0.82–1.96)0.50 (0.21–1.22)
    30–44years1.09 (0.65–1.82)0.39 (0.15–1.01)
    45–59years0.74 (0.45–3.05)0.73 (0.29–1.88)
    Gender(RE: Female)
    Male1.86 (1.14–3.05)1.50 (0.74–3.05)
    Road users (RE: Cyclists)
    motorcycle riders0.92 (0.58–1.45)5.10 (3.42–7.58)
    Passengers0.72 (0.41–1.27)4.75 (2.70–8.35)
    Pedestrians0.93 (0.43–2.02)9.95 (3.99–24.84)
    Safeguard(RE: Yes)
    No4.61 (2.46–8.61)3.32 (1.57–7.04)
    Crash Time of the crash(RE: Unknown)
    0:00–6:002.45 (1.40–4.27)4.01 (0.53–30.58)
    6:00–10:00 & 16:00–18:000.72 (0.56–0.93)1.01 (0.36–2.81)
    10:00–16:000.73 (0.61–0.87)0.91 (0.47–1.77)
    18:00–20:000.37(0.31–0.44)0.45 (0.23–2.07)
    20:00–24:002.48 (1.47–4.47)4.34 (0.78–28.78)
    Location of the crash(RE: Others/unknown)
    Urban0.48 (0.31–0.74)0.52 (0.24–1.14)
    Rural1.06 (0.85–1.32)0.94 (0.63–1.40)
    Type of collision(RE: Motorcycle * pedestrian/Motorcycle * heavy vehicle)
    Single motorcycle1.33 (0.78–2.25)0.30 (0.10–0.89)
    Motorcycle-bicycle7.26 (2.06–25.61)94.75 (15.70–57.19)
    Motorcycle-motorcycle0.81 (0.43–1.56)0.17 (0.05–0.53)
    Motorcycle-light vehicle0.48 (0.31–0.75)0.41 (0.14-1.19)
    Transport to hospital(RE: Other transportation)
    Ambulance1.98 (1.20–3.27)1.99 (1.02–3.85)
    Department admitted(RE: Orthopedics)
    Neurosurgery 9.64 (5.46–17.00)9.28 (4.60–18.74)
    Environmental Visibility(RE: Day/with street lamps)
    Without street lamps1.79 (1.03–3.11)1.54 (0.73–3.25)
    Traffic condition(RE: Obstructed)
    Unobstructed2.33 (1.13–4.81)1.98 (0.67–5.92)
    Traffic control(RE: Yes)
    No1.69 (1.02–2.79)0.89 (0.44–1.78)
    * Goodness-of-fit of multiple logistic model: χ2 (323)=407.15, p=0.001; Number of observations=349; Log pseudo likelihood=-161.67; Wald chi2 (22)=328.31, prob=0.00; Pseudo R2=0.32. ORj (adjust odds ratio): adjusted for all other risk factors in the binary logistic model; RE: reference group.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.2. Environmental Characteristics

    Light conditions, traffic flow, and traffic control conditions were the three environmental variables related to severe injury outcome, whereas other road environmental factors such as weather conditions showed no statistical significance (Table 2). In the adjusted logistic model, three environmental factors did not contribute to severe injury.


    3.3. Crash Characteristics

    The most frequent crash types among patients were collisions of a motorcycle with a lightweight vehicle (n=146, 41.83%) and single motorcycle crashes (n=70, 20.06%). There was a statistical significant difference between crash types and injury severity (χ2 (5)=22.74, p < 0.001) and the same association was found between road users and injury severity (χ2 (3)=10.71, p=0.01). The distribution of patients counted by crash types among road users in the non-severe and severe injury groups is shown in Figure 2. The majority of crash types in the non-severe and severe injury groups were both a collision of a motorcycle with a light vehicle (49.25% and 32.00%) and a single motorcycle crash (18.09% and 22.67%). The majority of collisions of a motorcycle with a cycle were distributed in the severe injury group (83.33%), while collisions of a motorcycle with a light vehicle were distributed in the non-severe injury group (67.12%). Crashes of a motorcycle with a cycle occurred for victims of cyclists (n=13, 81.25%) and resulted in severe injury in the 60 years age group.

    Figure 2. Frequency of crash types by road users and injury severity. The majority of patients in non-severe and severe injury groups were distributed as riders (69.85% and 68%); the main crash type in the non-severe and severe injury groups were both a collision of a motorcycle with a car-type (49.25% and 32.00%) and a single motorcycle crash (18.09% and 22.67%). The majority of crash types of a motorcycle with a cycle were distributed in the severe injury (83.33%) group, while collisions of a motorcycle with a car were in the non-severe injury group (67.12%).

    Among the five levels of crash time in a 24-hour period, the times between 20:00 and 24:00 had the highest percentage (n=40, 26.67%) of severe injury, while the period between 10:00 and 16:00 had the highest percentage of non-severe injury (n=66, 33.17%). More patients involved in severe injury were in a rural location (n=57, 38%) compared with those involved in non-severe injury (n=70, 35.18%). The proportion of victims using the ambulance on the way to the hospital (n=121, 80.67%) in the severe injury group was higher than those in the non-severe injury group (n=135, 67.84%) (χ2 (1)=7.20, p=0.01). Two hundred and eighteen (62.46%) patients were admitted to the neurosurgery department, while the remaining 131 (37.54%) patients were admitted to the orthopedics department.

    Collisions of a motorcycle with a cycle were associated with severe injury in the simple logistic model (OR=7.26, 95% CI 2.06-25.61) and adjusted logistic model (ORj=94.75, 95% CI 15.70-57.19). The times of 0:00-6:00 (OR=2.45, 95% CI 1.40-4.27) and 20:00-24:00 (OR=2.48, 95% CI 1.47-4.47) were associated with severe injury. Location was not related to severe injury (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74). Ambulance transportation to the hospital was linked to severe injury (ORj=1.99, 95% CI 1.02-3.85). Compared with the orthopedics department, patients in the neurosurgery department had an increased chance of severe injury of about nine times (ORj=9.28, 95% CI 4.60-18.74).


    4. Discussion

    We found that risk factors involved in severe motorcycle injuries included male gender, lack of a safeguard, the times of 0:00-6:00 and 18:00-24:00, non-urban locations, collision of a motorcycle with a cycle, use of an ambulance for transport to the hospital, admission to the neurosurgery department, lack of traffic control, unobstructed traffic conditions, and poor visibility.

    Most of riders were distributed in the young age group. Young riders are associated with risk taking behaviors and inexperience, which increase their risk of being involved in motorcycle injuries [25,26]. Age was not associated with injury severity in this study. However, as older people tend to have reduced perceptual ability and sensation, their hospital course is more likely to be challenged by complications contributing to their poorer outcomes [27]. Additionally, the relationship between age and severity of motorcycle crashes is controversial. Some studies suggest that older motorcyclists were more likely to sustain severe injuries [28,29], while other reports showed a strong and consistent relationship between increasing age and decreasing injury risk [30]. We found that male gender was associated with severe injury. Most injured persons in motorcycle crashes were typically of the lowest legal age groups, male riders, and demonstrating specific patterns of youth behaviors, such as aggression, negligence of traffic regulations, and lack of helmet use [16].

    The odds of being in a severe injury during the times of 0:00-6:00 and 20:00-24:00 were 2.45 and 2.48, respectively. In general, injuries after midnight have been found to be the most severe because of increased speeds and higher impacts [18,20]. Nighttime crashes may be related to visibility, such as riding without streetlamps, which has been related to severe injury [19,20,24]. In the conditions of no light, the most frequent crash type was a collision of a motorcycle with a car (35.48%). Pai et al. found that the right-of-way violation of motorists in a collision of a motorcycle with an automobile was more likely to occur under diminished light conditions [19]. Haque et al. found that reduced conspicuity of motorcycles at night was particularly hazardous for several situations, such as merging and diverging on expressways, and turning maneuvers at intersections [23]. Thus, the effect of visibility to severe injury may be offset by crash time or location, resulting in statistical significance in the crude analysis but vice versa in the adjusted model.

    Traffic control, not only referring to signalization, may play an important role in road traffic injury. Under un-signalized conditions, motorcycle crashes were about 11.9, 37.5, 2.6 and 2.3 times higher than signalized conditions at three-legged intersections, on single lane roads, and on curb and median lanes, respectively [31]. We had not explored the risk of severe injury under the situation of signalization in different road types; our study showed that without traffic control (such as traffic signals), the direction of traffic police increased severe injuries by 1.7 times. However, this variable did not reveal its association in the adjusted model. The same happens to the variable of traffic flow. Traffic flow was associated with severe injury in the simple logistic model, but its effect had no significance in the adjusted model. In the London charging zone, the congestion charge reduces the total number of car accidents, but leads to an increase in two-wheeled vehicle accidents [32]. We found a negative relationship between traffic flow (congestion) and injury severity of motorcycle casualties [33]. The flow of traffic may be influenced by crash time or location.

    Crash location was one of the major influential factors affecting the probability of severe injury. The prevalence of severe or fatal injuries in rural areas was relatively higher than in urban locations in different traffic environments; rural roads were associated with lack of helmet use, drunk driving, and speeding [15,17,20,21,34]. Regarding safeguard practices, especially the use of helmets, we found that lack of a safeguard resulted in a higher risk of severe injury. Only 29.46% and 11.11% of motorcycle riders and passengers used a helmet. It has been widely established that helmets can reduce the risk of fatal injuries by 42% and the risk of head injury by 69% for motorcyclists [35]. In March 1988, the helmet law was made mandatory for all motorcycle riders in China, and it was enacted in May 2004. However, the proportion of helmet use in motorcycle riders and passengers was 66% and 29% in a roadside observation in 2006 in Shantou city [36]. Enforcement and education prevention need to be strengthened with respect to helmet use, especially in rural areas [37]. We did not observe helmet use in cyclists. A systematic review showed that helmet use results in a 63-88% reduction in the risk of head injuries for all ages of bicyclists [38]. However, there is a debate over bicycle helmet use in China, because this requirement could have a negative effect, such as unsafe behavior [39]. There is no national cyclist helmet law in China.

    Unsafe behavior is not independently associated with a risk of severe injury and only 4.3% of the cohort involved alcohol consumption. Differently, kung fu tea is very popular and has become a local custom instead of drinking alcohol in other places. However, it is often reported that road traffic victims in the hospital had consumed alcohol prior to their accidents [15,40]. Motorcycle riders are more vulnerable than other motor vehicle drivers because of the effect of alcohol on balance, motor coordination, and judgment, and because more basic skills are required to operate an unstable vehicle [41,42]. Alcohol use is a significant risk factor for pedestrians to cross the street unsafely, and to be struck by motor vehicles [43]. Risky behavior has been consistently recognized as a key contributor to road crashes and many studies have observed its association with severe injury, such as speeding motorcycle riders, mobile phone use by pedestrians, and red light infringement by cyclists [25,44,45,46]. In our study, weather conditions were not related to injury severity although motorcycle riding was heavily influenced by weather. 87.11% of all crashes occurred in sunny weather, which is common in the city. However, weather was not found to contribute to accidents and has been reported to be less influential compared to other factors such as safeguard use and types of collision [22,31,47].

    Regarding types of crashes, motorcycle crashes involving cycles contributed to injury severity. The explanation may be that all victims in collisions of a motorcycle with a cycle were cyclists distributed in the older age group.Second, most of patients in collisions of a motorcycle with a car were distributed in the non-severe injury group. Third, the highest frequency of crash types were collisions of a motorcycle with a car and single motorcycle crashes. So far, no consistent conclusion has been made about the severity of single motorcycle crashes and multi-vehicle crashes involving a motorcycle [48,49,50,51]. We did not distinguish the specific crash model from single motorcycle injuries, which included barrier collisions, fixed object collisions, overturn collisions, and rollovers. Different crash models had different traits in single motorcycle crashes [48,49].

    In the three hospitals, most victims injured in road traffic were sent to the neurosurgery and orthopedics departments; each hospital has five to eight subordinate departments. Additionally, head injuries were the most frequent in fatal motorcycle crashes and extremity injury was the most common injury in all motorcycle crashes [35,42,52,53]. In our study, 66.76% of patients and 95% of severe trauma patients suffered head injuries. Head injury was the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes; so patients admitted to the neurosurgery department had a higher injury severity than patients in the orthopedics department. When faced with serious traffic accidents, people often call the emergency telephone number (120) and an ambulance. Thus, ambulance transportation was linked with severe injury.

    Previous studies similar to this topic adopted police report data, hospital data, or both. Police and hospital records used in motorcycle injury studies were often incomplete, in that they usually over-represent severely injured subjects [54,55,56,57,58]. Considering that police report data does not supply information such as alcohol consumption and risky behavior, and hospital data lacks information describing the crash itself, we decided to use interviews to acquire information.

    There are several limitations in this research. Risk factors described in this article are primarily about hospitalization for motorcycle crashes; we did not assess non-fatal injuries that did not require a hospital stay of greater than one day, or fatal injuries. We only investigated hospitalized patients in the neurosurgery and orthopedic departments. Characteristics related to motorcycle crashes were self-reported, and no sources were available to validate the collected information. Additionally, information obtained from family members who may not have been on the scene would influence the reliability of the results. Behavioral factors, such as alcohol consumption, safeguard use, and unsafe behavior may have been under estimated. Also, not all patients were immediately investigated after admission, so there was memory bias. The actual levels of injury severity were vulnerable to misclassification because the judgment standard of injury severity might have been subjected to differences between doctors and between hospitals. According to the motorcycle injuries, there was heterogeneous in road users not just only motorcycle users.

    In summary, we found that males, those without safeguards, morning and night hours, non-urban areas, collision of a motorcycle with a cycle, use of an ambulance, admission to the neurosurgery department, lack of traffic control, unobstructed traffic conditions, and poor visibility were associated with severe injuries in motorcycle crashes. This research highlights some problems, such as less helmet wearing in motorcyclists and cyclists, rural injuries being more serious than urban ones, and head injuries being the main diagnosis in severe injuries. The result of this research is predictable if the safety equipment is forced to be used, such as helmets; the traffic environment is improved, such as traffic flow, medical resources to injuries and deaths is seasonable, then traffic safety will be improved and accidents will be reduced. This research may provide impetus to prioritize programs that prevent and reduce motorcycle-related injuries in medium-sized cities and nationwide.


    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank the staff of the First and Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Center Hospital for providing data for inpatients injured in motorcycle crashes. The authors thank the respondents for their cooperation and participation in this study. The research was supported by the Specific Research Project of Health Pro Bono Sections, Ministry of Health, China (201002014).


    Author Contributions

    XL was involved in data collection, statistical analysis and drafting the manuscript. ZY was involved in data collection. LL was involved in the design the experiment.


    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.


    [1] Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, et al. (2010) The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Rep 30: 1-31.
    [2] Bailit JL, Love TE, Mercer B (2004) Rising cesarean rates: Are patients sicker? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 800-803. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.051
    [3] Cyr RM (2006) Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: Commentary and historic perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194: 932-936. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.199
    [4] Todman D (2007) A history of caesarean section: From ancient world to the modern era. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 47: 357-361. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00757.x
    [5] Petitti DB (1985) Maternal Mortality and Morbidity in Cesarean Section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28: 763-769. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198528040-00009
    [6] Reynolds E (1907) Primary operations for obstetrical debility. Surg Obstet Gynecol 4: 306-318.
    [7] Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. (2015) What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health 12: 57.
    [8] Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, et al. (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS One 11: e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
    [9] McFarlin BL (2004) Elective cesarean birth: issues and ethics of an informed decision. J Midwifery Women's Health 49: 421-429. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2004.tb04436.x
    [10] Leslie MS (2004) Counseling women about elective cesarean section. J Midwifery Women's Health 49: 155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.01.016
    [11] Munro S, Kornelsen J, Hutton E (2009) Decision making in patient‐initiated elective cesarean delivery: The influence of birth stories. J Midwifery Women's Health 54: 373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.12.014
    [12] Esteves-Pereira AP, Deneux-Tharaux C, Nakamura-Pereira M, et al. (2016) Caesarean Delivery and Postpartum Maternal Mortality: A Population-Based Case Control Study in Brazil. PloS One 11: e0153396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153396
    [13] Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, et al. (2006) Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological Study. Birth 33: 270-277. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00118.x
    [14] Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, et al. (2010) Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery 26: 394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.10.011
    [15] CIHI (2006) Giving Birth in Canada: The Costs. In: Research C, editor. Ottawa Ontario: CIHI.
    [16] PHAC (2013) Perinatal Health Indicators for Canada 2013. In: Canada PHAo, editor. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada.
    [17] Van Wagner V (2016) Risk talk: Using evidence without increasing fear. Midwifery 38: 21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.009
    [18] Barer ML, Stoddart GL (1999) Improving Access to Needed Medical Services in Rural and Remote Canadian Communities: Recruitment and Retention Revisited. In: Resources FPTACoHH, editor. Ottawa: Federal/Provincial/Territorial Advisory Committee on Health Human Resources.
    [19] Main E, Morton C, Hopkins D, et al. (2011) Cesarean deliveries, outcomes, and opportunities for change in California: toward a public agenda for maternity care safety and quality. California Medical Quality Care Collaborative White Paper.
    [20] Kennedy HP, Grant J, Walton C, et al. (2010) Normalizing birth in England: a qualitative study. J Midwifery Women's Health 55: 262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.006
    [21] Hartmann KE, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, et al. (2012) Strategies To Reduce Cesarean Birth in Low-Risk Women. In: Quality AfHCRa, editor. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1-65.
    [22] Chaillet N, Dumont A (2007) Evidence‐based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta‐analysis. Birth 34: 53-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00146.x
    [23] Walker R, Turnbull D, Pratt N, et al. (2005) The development and process evaluation of an information‐based intervention for pregnant women aimed at addressing rates of caesarean section. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 112: 1605-1614. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00753.x
    [24] Link BG, Phelan JC (2006) Stigma and its public health implications. Lancet 367: 528. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68184-1
    [25] Kennedy HP, Grant J, Walton C, et al. (2013) Elective caesarean delivery: A mixed method qualitative investigation. Midwifery 29: e138-e144. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.008
    [26] Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, et al. (2007) Identifying barriers and facilitators towards implementing guidelines to reduce caesarean section rates in Quebec. Bull W H O 85: 791-797. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.039289
    [27] Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, et al. (2016) Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    [28] Lynn Bourgeault I, Declercq E, Sandall J, et al. (2008) Too Posh To Push? Comparative perspectives on maternal request caesarean sections in Canada, the US, the UK and Finland. Patients, consumers and civil society. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 99-123.
    [29] Hammer RP, Burton-Jeangros C (2013) Tensions around risks in pregnancy: A typology of women's experiences of surveillance medicine. Soc Sci Med 93: 55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.033
    [30] Armstrong D (1995) The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociol Health Illn 17: 393-404. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10933329
    [31] Krieger N, Fee E (1994) Man-Made Medicine and Women's Health: The Biopolitics of Sex/Gender and Race/Ethnicity. Int J Health Serv 24: 265-283. doi: 10.2190/LWLH-NMCJ-UACL-U80Y
    [32] Giddens A (1998) Risk society: the context of British politics. The politics of risk society, 23-34.
    [33] Beck U (1992) Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Soc Forces 73.
    [34] Jarvis DSL (2007) Risk, Globalisation and the State: A Critical Appraisal of Ulrich Beck and the World Risk Society Thesis. Global Soc 21: 23-46. doi: 10.1080/13600820601116468
    [35] Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, et al. (1988) The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Anal 8: 177-187. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
    [36] Dean M (1998) Risk, Calculable and Incalculable. Soz Welt 49: 25-42.
    [37] Bisits A (2016) Risk in obstetrics–Perspectives and reflections. Midwifery 38: 12-13. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.010
    [38] Kringeland T, Möller A (2006) Risk and security in childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 27: 185-191. doi: 10.1080/01674820600707594
    [39] Westfall RE, Benoit C (2004) The rhetoric of "natural" in natural childbirth: childbearing women's perspectives on prolonged pregnancy and induction of labour. Soc Sci Med 59: 1397-1408. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.017
    [40] Skinner J, Maude R (2016) The tensions of uncertainty: Midwives managing risk in and of their practice. Midwifery 38: 35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.006
    [41] Bauer S, Olsén JE (2009) Observing the others, watching over oneself: Themes of medical surveillance in post-panoptic society. Surveill Soc 6: 116-127.
    [42] Hallgrimsdottir HK, Benner BE (2014) 'Knowledge is power': risk and the moral responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth century. Health Risk Soc 16: 7-21. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2013.866216
    [43] Williams C (2005) Framing the fetus in medical work: rituals and practices. Soc Sci Med 60: 2085-2095. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.003
    [44] Roberts J (2016) The visualised foetus: A cultural and political analysis of ultrasound imagery: Routledge.
    [45] Benoit C, Stengel C, Marcellus L, et al. (2014) Providers' constructions of pregnant and early parenting women who use substances. Sociol Health Illn 36: 252-263. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12106
    [46] Markens S, Browner CH, Mabel Preloran H (2010) Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making. Sociol Health Illn 32: 37-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01197.x
    [47] Burton-Jeangros C (2011) Surveillance of risks in everyday life: The agency of pregnant women and its limitations. Soc Theory Health 9: 419-436. doi: 10.1057/sth.2011.15
    [48] Scamell M (2016) The fear factor of risk–clinical governance and midwifery talk and practice in the UK. Midwifery 38: 14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.010
    [49] Lee AS, M. K (2008) Disciplinary discourses: rates of cesarean section explained by medicine, midwifery, and feminism. . Health Care Women Int 29: 448-467. doi: 10.1080/07399330801949574
    [50] Tully KP, HL. B (2013) Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery. Soc Sci Med 85: 103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.039
    [51] Coxon K SJ, Fulop N. T (2014) What Extent Are Women Free to Choose Where to Give Birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health Risk Soc 16: 51-67.
    [52] Latham SR, Norwitz ER. Ethics and "cesarean delivery on maternal demand"; 2009. Elsevier, 405-409.
    [53] Bryant J, Porter M, Tracy SK, et al. (2007) Caesarean birth: Consumption, safety, order, and good mothering. Soc Sci Med 65: 1192-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.025
    [54] Possamai-Inesedy A (2006) Confining risk: Choice and responsibility in childbirth in a risk society. Health Sociol Rev 15: 406-414. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2006.15.4.406
    [55] Davis-Floyd RE (2004) Birth as an American rite of passage: With a new preface: Univ of California Press.
    [56] Nilsen ABV, WaldenstrÖM U, Hjelmsted A, et al. (2012) Characteristics of women who are pregnant with their first baby at an advanced age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91: 353-362. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01335.x
    [57] Aasheim V, Waldenström U, Hjelmstedt A, et al. (2012) Associations between advanced maternal age and psychological distress in primiparous women, from early pregnancy to 18 months postpartum. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 119: 1108-1116. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03411.x
    [58] Mitchell LM (2001) Baby's first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects: University of Toronto Press.
    [59] Craven C (2005) Claiming respectable American motherhood: Homebirth mothers, medical officials, and the state. Med Anthropol Q 19: 194-215. doi: 10.1525/maq.2005.19.2.194
    [60] Benoit C, Zadoroznyj M, Hallgrimsdottir H, et al. (2010) Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia. Soc Sci Med 71: 475-481. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.005
    [61] Plested M, Kirkham M (2016) Risk and fear in the lived experience of birth without a midwife. Midwifery 38: 29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.009
    [62] Rabinow P (1984) The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [63] Westfall R, Benoit C (2008) Interpreting compliance and resistance to medical dominance in women's accounts of their pregnancies. Sociol Res Online 13: 4.
    [64] Dahlen HG, Homer CS (2013) 'Motherbirth or childbirth'? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery 29: 167-173.
    [65] Rothman BK (2014) Pregnancy, birth and risk: an introduction. Health Risk Soc 16: 1-6. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2013.876191
    [66] Crowe M, Carlyle D (2003) Deconstructing risk assessment and management in mental health nursing. J Adv Nurs 43: 19-27. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02669.x
    [67] Benoit C, Ouellet N, Jansson M (2016) Unmet health care needs among sex workers in five census metropolitan areas of canada. Can J Public Health 107: 266-271. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5178
    [68] Benoit C, Jansson M, Jansenberger M, et al. (2013) Disability stigmatization as a barrier to employment equity for legally-blind Canadians. Disabil Soc 28: 970-983. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.741518
    [69] Stengel C (2014) The risk of being 'too honest': drug use, stigma and pregnancy. Health Risk Soc 16: 36-50. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2013.868408
    [70] Benoit C, Magnus S, Phillips R, et al. (2015) Complicating the dominant morality discourse: mothers and fathers' constructions of substance use during pregnancy and early parenthood. Int J Equity Health 14: 72. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0206-7
    [71] Scamell M (2014) Childbirth Within the Risk Society. Sociol Compass 8: 917-928. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12077
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Hiep Trung Bui, Ismaïl Saadi, Mario Cools, Investigating on-road crash risk and traffic offences in Vietnam using the motorcycle rider behaviour questionnaire (MRBQ), 2020, 130, 09257535, 104868, 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104868
    2. Carlos Lam, Chih-Wei Pai, Chia-Chang Chuang, Yu-Chun Yen, Chia-Chieh Wu, Shih-Hsiang Yu, Kuo-Sheng Hung, Wen-Ta Chiu, Yanyong Guo, Rider factors associated with severe injury after a light motorcycle crash: A multicentre study in an emerging economy setting, 2019, 14, 1932-6203, e0219132, 10.1371/journal.pone.0219132
    3. Russell Seth Martins, Sabah Uddin Saqib, Mishal Gillani, Syeda Ramlah Tul Sania, Muhammad Umer Junaid, Hasnain Zafar, Patterns of traumatic injuries and outcomes to motorcyclists in a developing country: A cross-sectional study, 2021, 22, 1538-9588, 162, 10.1080/15389588.2020.1856374
    4. Dinh Vinh Man Nguyen, Anh Tuan Vu, Evelien Polders, Veerle Ross, Tom Brijs, Geert Wets, Kris Brijs, Modeling the injury severity of small-displacement motorcycle crashes in Hanoi City, Vietnam, 2021, 142, 09257535, 105371, 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105371
    5. Tatyana Mollayeva, Andrew Tran, Vincy Chan, Angela Colantonio, Michael D. Escobar, Sex-specific analysis of traumatic brain injury events: applying computational and data visualization techniques to inform prevention and management, 2022, 22, 1471-2288, 10.1186/s12874-021-01493-6
    6. Aman Goyal, Dev Agarwal, Anbumani Subramanian, C.V. Jawahar, Ravi Kiran Sarvadevabhatla, Rohit Saluja, 2022, Detecting, Tracking and Counting Motorcycle Rider Traffic Violations on Unconstrained Roads, 978-1-6654-8739-9, 4302, 10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00476
    7. Russell Seth Martins, Sabah Uddin Saqib, Mohummad Hassan Raza Raja, Mishal Gillani, Hasnain Zafar, Collision versus loss-of-control motorcycle accidents: Comparing injuries and outcomes, 2022, 23, 1538-9588, 255, 10.1080/15389588.2022.2052284
    8. Bella Hounkpe Dos Santos, Yolaine Glele Ahanhanzo, Alphonse Kpozehouen, Donatien Daddah, Emmanuel Lagarde, Yves Coppieters, Effect of wearing a helmet on the occurrence of head injuries in motorcycle riders in Benin: a case-control study, 2021, 8, 2197-1714, 10.1186/s40621-021-00311-3
    9. Milad Haghani, Ali Behnood, Vinayak Dixit, Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Road safety research in the context of low- and middle-income countries: Macro-scale literature analyses, trends, knowledge gaps and challenges, 2022, 146, 09257535, 105513, 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105513
    10. George Kiwango, Filbert Francis, Candida Moshiro, Jette Möller, Marie Hasselberg, Association between alcohol consumption, marijuana use and road traffic injuries among commercial motorcycle riders: A population-based, case-control study in Dares Salaam, Tanzania, 2021, 160, 00014575, 106325, 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106325
    11. Filbert Francis, Candida Moshiro, Berg Hans Yngve, Marie Hasselberg, Investigation of road infrastructure and traffic density attributes at high-risk locations for motorcycle-related injuries using multiple correspondence and cluster analysis in urban Tanzania, 2021, 28, 1745-7300, 428, 10.1080/17457300.2021.1930060
    12. C. Nandhini, M. Brindha, Transfer learning based SSD model for helmet and multiple rider detection, 2023, 15, 2511-2104, 565, 10.1007/s41870-022-01058-w
    13. Dam Moon, Jae Ho Jang, Jin Seong Cho, Jae Yeon Choi, Jae-hyug Woo, Woo Sung Choi, Sung Yeol Hyun, Seung Hwan Lee, Changes in incidence and severity of commercial motorcycle accidents due to the use of delivery service platforms in Korea: a retrospective cohort study, 2023, 36, 1738-8767, 121, 10.20408/jti.2022.0031
    14. K. Vandael Schreurs, V. Ross, K. Brijs, Investigating the relationship between self-reported (near) crashes, fined traffic offences, and risky riding behaviours among Flemish motorcyclists using the motorcycle rider behaviour questionnaire, 2023, 98, 13698478, 337, 10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.002
    15. Sathish Ayyappan, Sanjay Sukumar, Vinod Ashok Chaudhari, Extremity Injuries in Pillion Riders of Fatal 2-Wheeler Road Traffic Accidents, 2024, 1533-404X, 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000923
    16. Dina Lusiana Setyowati, Yuliani Setyaningsih, Chriswardani Suryawati, Daru Lestantyo, Assessment of Risky Riding Behaviors Using the Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (MRBQ) among University Students, 2024, 17, 1874-9445, 10.2174/0118749445281252240316204804
    17. Yaqiu Li, Junyi Zhang, Haoran Li, Yunpeng Lu, Lon Virakvichetra, Seasonal variations and temporal instability of motorcyclist injury severity in Cambodia: Analyses based on a random parameter logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances, 2024, 24058440, e39722, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39722
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5686) PDF downloads(894) Cited by(4)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog