Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Quasi-monomiality and convergence theorem for the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials

  • Received: 22 December 2019 Accepted: 07 May 2020 Published: 12 May 2020
  • MSC : 33C45, 33C99, 33E20

  • A mixed family of polynomials, called the Boas-Buck-Sheffer family is introduced and their quasi-monomial properties are established in this article. Also, the generalizations of the Szasz operators including this mixed polynomial family are obtained and their convergence is studied.

    Citation: Shahid Ahmad Wani, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar. Quasi-monomiality and convergence theorem for the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4432-4443. doi: 10.3934/math.2020283

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mohra Zayed, Shahid Wani . Exploring the versatile properties and applications of multidimensional degenerate Hermite polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30813-30826. doi: 10.3934/math.20231575
    [2] Jovanny Ibarguen, Daniel S. Moran, Carlos E. Valencia, Rafael H. Villarreal . The signature of a monomial ideal. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27955-27978. doi: 10.3934/math.20241357
    [3] Shaofang Hong, Rongjun Wu . On deep holes of generalized Reed-Solomon codes. AIMS Mathematics, 2016, 1(2): 96-101. doi: 10.3934/Math.2016.2.96
    [4] Antonio Hernando, Gabriel Aguilera-Venegas, José Luis Galán-García, Sheida Nazary . An interlocking system determining the configuration of rail traffic control elements to ensure safety. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21471-21495. doi: 10.3934/math.20241043
    [5] Mdi Begum Jeelani . On employing linear algebra approach to hybrid Sheffer polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1871-1888. doi: 10.3934/math.2023096
    [6] Jongkyum Kwon, Patcharee Wongsason, Yunjae Kim, Dojin Kim . Representations of modified type 2 degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 11443-11463. doi: 10.3934/math.2022638
    [7] Houcine Sadraoui, Borhen Halouani . Commuting Toeplitz operators on weighted harmonic Bergman spaces and hyponormality on the Bergman space of the punctured unit disk. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20043-20057. doi: 10.3934/math.2024977
    [8] Raziya Sabri, Mohammad Shadab, Kotakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Shahadat Ali . A new family of differential and integral equations of hybrid polynomials via factorization method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 13845-13855. doi: 10.3934/math.2022764
    [9] Xue Jiang, Yihe Gong . Algorithms for computing Gröbner bases of ideal interpolation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19459-19472. doi: 10.3934/math.2024948
    [10] Ruifeng Wu . Bivariate multiquadric quasi-interpolation operators of Lidstone type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20914-20932. doi: 10.3934/math.20231065
  • A mixed family of polynomials, called the Boas-Buck-Sheffer family is introduced and their quasi-monomial properties are established in this article. Also, the generalizations of the Szasz operators including this mixed polynomial family are obtained and their convergence is studied.


    The Sheffer sequences sn(x),nN0 are determined by the generating relation [1]:

    A(w)exp(xJ(w))=n=0sn(x)wnn!,x,wR, (1.1)

    where A(w), J(w) are power series such that

    A(w)=k=0βkwkk!,β00, (1.2)
    J(w)=l=1hlwll!,h10. (1.3)

    The Sheffer polynomials are extensively studied with full illustration due to their importance in the field of applied sciences and mathematical physics. Recent research shows stimulated attention on those sequences and their various presentations [2]. In [3], the close relationship between these polynomial sequences and Riordan arrays was established by demonstrating the isomorphism between the Riordan and Sheffer group. Based on these results, the determinant approach has been presented in [4].

    Recently, several mixed special polynomial families connected to the Sheffer sequences are investigated systematically [5,6,7,8,9]. In [10], Roman studied the technique of combining two sequences applying Umbral composition which is a systematic method of forming mixed special sequences. In this work, the composition of Boas-Buck and Sheffer polynomials is taken into account to introduce a vibrant and novel family of special polynomials, called the Boas-Buck-Sheffer family.

    In 1956, Boas and Buck [11] studied a large class of generating functions of polynomial sets, called the Boas-Buck polynomials determined through the following generating relation:

    A(w)ψ(xH(w))=n=0pn(x)wnn!, (1.4)

    where A(w), ψ(w), H(w) are power series such that

    A(w)=k=0akwkk!,a00; (1.5)
    ψ(w)=l=0γlwll!,γl0,l, (1.6)

    with ψ(w) not a polynomial and

    H(w)=m=1hmwmm!,h10. (1.7)

    These sets involve general classes of polynomials, like Brenke polynomials Yn(x) [12] (for H(w)=w), Sheffer polynomials sn(x) [13] (for ψ(w)=exp(w)), Appell polynomials An(x) [14] (for H(w)=w,ψ(w)=exp(w)) and those determined sets like certain constant multiples of the Laguerre, Hermite and Jacobi polynomials.

    The idea of monomiality appeared in 1941 when Steffenson [15] developed the concept of poweroid and later on this method was re-modified by Dattoli [16]. According to the hypothesis of monomiality, the Φ+ and Φ operators occur and perform as the multiplicative and derivative operators for {rn(x)}nN polynomial set:

    Φ+{rn(x)}=rn+1(x), (1.8)
    Φ{rn(x)}=nrn1(x). (1.9)

    The operators Φ+ and Φ exhibit the commutation expression

    [Φ,Φ+]=ˆ1 (1.10)

    and therefore represents the structure of Weyl group.

    If the underlying set {rn(x)}nN is quasi-monomial and its properties can be achieved from Φ+ and Φ, operators. Thus, following properties holds:

    Φ+Φ{rn(x)}=nrn(x). (1.11)

    Throughout this paper, we assume that r0(x)=1, then rn(x) is given by

    rn(x)=Φ+n{1} (1.12)

    and thus the generating expression of rn(x) can be determined in the following way

    G(x,J(w))=exp(J(w)Φ+){1}=n=0rn(x)(J(w))nn!. (1.13)

    The Boas-Buck polynomial set defined in Eq 1.4 is quasi-monomial with the operations of the following multiplicative and derivative expressions [17]:

    Φ+p=A(H1(ς))A(H1(ς))+xDxH(H1(ς))ς1, (1.14)
    Φp=H1(ς), (1.15)

    where ςΛ(1) is given by

    ς(1)=0andς(xn)=γn1γnxn1,n=1,2, (1.16)

    and Λ(j),jZ represents the space of operators operating on analytic functions which increase the degree of each polynomial exactly by j for j0 or j0, respectively.

    The following linear positive operators was developed by Szasz [18]:

    Sm(g;u):=emuk=0(mu)kk!g(km), (1.17)

    where u0 and gC[0,), whenever the preceding sum converges.

    Later, various extensions of the Szasz operators are obtained such as Appell, Sheffer, Brenke, Boas-Buck, and mixed special polynomials, see, for example, [19,20,21].

    In this paper, the Boas-Buck-Sheffer family is proposed and studied through different aspects. In Section 2, an important property quasi-monomiality of this family is established. The extension of Szasz operators is established and their approximation properties are studied in Section 3.

    The Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials are proposed here by the means of generating expression. Further, quasi-monomial and approximation properties of these polynomials are demonstrated.

    First, the generating expression for the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials is demonstrated by the following result:

    Theorem 1. For the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials, the following generating expression:

    A(w)A(J(w))ψ(xH(J(w)))=n=0pSn(x)wnn!. (2.1)

    holds true.

    Proof. Changing w in Eq 1.1 by Φ+p, that is the multiplicative operator of the polynomials pn(x), we have

    A(w)exp(Φ+pJ(w))=n=0sn(Φ+p)wnn!, (2.2)

    which by virtue of Eq 1.13, becomes

    A(w)n=0pn(x)(J(w))nn!=n=0sn(Φ+p)wnn!. (2.3)

    Using Eq 1.4 with w replaced by J(w) in the l.h.s of expression (2.3) and representing sn(Φ+p) in the right hand side by the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials psn(x), that is

    sn(Φ+p)=sn(A(H1(ς))A(H1(ς))+xDxH(H1(ς))ς1)=psn(x), (2.4)

    assertion (2.1) follows.

    Next, we derive the quasi-monomial properties of the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials psn(x).

    The following result is established to frame the psn(x) in the context of monomiality hypothesis:

    Theorem 2. The following multiplicative and derivative operators for the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials psn(x), hold true:

    Φ+ps=xH(H1(ς))J(J1(H1(ς)))Dxς1+A(H1(ς))A(H1(ς))J(J1(H1(ς)))
    +A(J1(H1(ς)))A(J1(H1(ς))) (2.5)
    ΦpS=J1(H1(ς)). (2.6)

    Proof. Notice that Eq 1.16 is equivalent to the relation [17].

    ςψ(xw)=wψ(xw), (2.7)

    so that, we can write

    J1(H1(ς))A(w)A(J(w))ψ(xH(J(w)))=wA(w)A(J(w))ψ(xH(J(w))). (2.8)

    Differentiating (2.1) with respect to (w.r.t) w partially, we obtain the following expression.

    (xH(J(w))H(J(w))J(w)Dx+A(J(w))A(J(w))J(w)+A(w)A(w))n=0psn(x)wnn!=n=0psn+1(x)wnn!. (2.9)

    Using Eq 2.8 and equating the like powers of w on both sides of Eq 2.9, the following expression is obtained:

    (xH(H1(ς))J(J1(H1(ς)))Dxς1+A(H1(ς))A(H1(ς))J(J1(H1(ς)))
    +A(J1(H1(ς)))A(J1(H1(ς))))psn(x)=psn+1(x). (2.10)

    In view of Eq 1.8, we get assertion (2.5).

    Again, from expression (2.8), we have

    J1(H1(ς))n=0psn(x)wnn!=n=0psn(x)wn+1n!,

    Simplifying and then equating the coefficients of like powers of t, we have assertion (2.6).

    Theorem 3. For the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials psn(x), the following differential equation holds true:

    (A(J1(H1(ς)))A(J1(H1(ς)))xH(H1(ς))J(J1(H1(ς)))Dxς1J1(H1(ς))
    +A(H1(ς))A(H1(ς))J(J1(H1(ς)))J1(H1(ς))+A(J1(H1(ς)))A(J1(H1(ς)))J1(H1(ς))n)psn(x)=0. (2.11)

    Proof. Inserting expressions (2.5) and (2.6) in the monomiality expression (1.11), assertion (2.11) follows.

    Remark 2.1. For H(w)=w, the Boas-Buck polynomials pn(x) reduce to Brenke polynomials Yn(x) [12], thus in consideration of H(w)=w, the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials psn(x) reduce to the Brenke-Sheffer polynomials Ysn(x). Accordingly, taking H(w)=w in Eqs 2.1, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.11, the following consequences of results 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 are derived:

    Corollary 2.1. The following generating expression for the Brenke-Sheffer polynomials holds true:

    A(w)A(J(w))ψ(xJ(w))=n=0Ysn(x)wnn!. (2.12)

    Corollary 2.2. The Brenke-Sheffer polynomials Ysn(x) are quasi-monomial w.r.t the following Φ+Ys and ΦYs operators:

    Φ+Ys=xJ(J1(ς))Dxς1+A(ς)A(ς)J(J1(ς))
    +A(J1(ς))A(J1(ς)) (2.13)
    ΦYS=J1(ς). (2.14)

    Corollary 2.3. The Brenke-Sheffer polynomials Ysn(x) satisfy the following differential equation:

    (A(J1(ς))A(J1(ς))xJ(J1(ς))Dxς1J1(ς)+A(ς)A(ς)J(J1(ς))J1(ς)
    +A(J1(ς))A(J1(ς))J1(ς)n)Ysn(x)=0. (2.15)

    Remark 2.2. In consideration of ψ(w)=exp(w), the Boas-Buck polynomials pn(x) reduce to the Sheffer polynomials sn(x) [13]. Accordingly, taking ψ(w)=exp(w) (for this case ς=Dx) in Eqs 2.1, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.11, the analogous results for the two-iterated Sheffer polynomials s[2]n(x) established in [22] are obtained.

    Remark 2.3. In consideration of J(w)=w, the polynomials sn(x) reduce to An(x) [14]. Accordingly, taking J(w)=w (for this case ς=Dx) in Eqs 2.1, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.11, the analogous results for the Boas-Buck-Appell polynomials pAn(x) can be obtained easily.

    The Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials determined by the generating expression (2.1) holding the conditions given by expressions (1.1)–(1.2) and (1.5)–(1.7). Thus restricting to the psn(x), satisfying the assumptions:

    (i)A(1)0,A(J(1))0,J(1)=1,H(J(1))=1,psn(x)0,k=0,1,2,....
    (ii)ψ:R(0,),
    (iii)(2.1)and(1.1)(1.7)convergesfor|t|<R(R>1). (3.1)

    With the above assumptions, we give a new formulation of positive linear operators with psn(x) as:

    Sn(f;x)=1A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxH(J(1)))n=0psn(nx)g(kn), (3.2)

    where x0 and nN.

    Remark 3.1. For J(w)=w, the operator given by (3.2) gives the operators of the Boas-Buck-Appell polynomials.

    Remark 3.2. For A(w)=1 and J(w)=w, the operator given by (3.2) (resp. (2.1)) meets the operators of the Boas-Buck polynomials [21].

    Remark 3.3. For A(w)=1, J(w)=w and H(w)=w the operator given by (3.2) (resp. (2.1)) meets the operators of the Brenke-type polynomials [12].

    Remark 3.4. For A(w)=1, J(w)=w and ψ(w)=ew, the operator given by (3.2) (resp. (2.1)) meets the operators of the Sheffer polynomials [20].

    Remark 3.5. For A(w)=1, J(w)=w, H(w)=w and ψ(w)=ew the operator given by (3.2) (resp. (2.1)) meets the operators of the Appell polynomials [19].

    Remark 3.6. For A(w)=1, A(w)=1, J(w)=w, H(w)=w and ψ(w)=ew the operator given by (3.2) (resp. (2.1)) meets the Szasz operators [18].

    Next, we give the approximation results by means of Sn positive linear operators using Krovokin's theorem.

    Lemma 4. For the operators Sn(f;x) and x[0,), we have

    Sn(1;x)=1 (3.3)
    Sn(s;x)=ψ(nxH(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))x+1n(A(1)A(1)+A(J(1))A(J(1))) (3.4)
    Sn(s2;x)=ψ(nxH(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))x2+(2A(1)A(1)+2A(J(1))A(J(1))+1+J(1)+H(J(1)))
    ×ψ(nxH(J(1)))nψ(nxH(J(1)))x
    +1n2(A(1)A(1)+A(1)A(1)+A(J(1))A(J(1))(1+J(1))+2A(1)A(1)A(J(1))A(J(1))+A(J(1))A(J(1))). (3.5)

    proof. From the generating function of the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials given by (2.1), we have

    k=0sAk(nx)=A(w)A(J(w))ψ(nxH(J(w))). (3.6)

    Differentiating above equation w.r.t. w successively on both sides and then putting w=1 and using J(1)=1 and H(J(1)) we have

    k=0psk(nx)=A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxH(J(1))), (3.7)
    k=0kpsk(nx)=(A(1)A(J(1))+A(1)A(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))
    +A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxH(J(1)))nx, (3.8)
    k=0k2psk(nx)=(ψ(nxH(J(1)))2A(1)A(J(1))+A(1)A(J(1))+A(1)A(J(1))
    +A(1)A(J(1))+A(1)A(J(1))(J(1)+H(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1))))ψ(nxH(J(1)))
    +(ψ(nxH(J(1)))A(1)A(J(1))(1+(J(1))+H(J(1)))+2A(1)A(1)+2A(1)A(J(1))+A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxH(J(1))))
    ×ψ(nxH(J(1)))nx+A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxH(J(1)))(nx)2. (3.9)

    In view of the equalities (3.7)–(3.9), assertions (3.3)–(3.5) are obtained.

    Next, we define the class of E as follows:

    E:={g:x[0,),g(x)1+x2is convergent asx}. (3.10)

    Theorem 5. Let gC[0,)E and suppose

    limyG(y)G(y)=1,limyG(y)G(y)=1. (3.11)

    Then,

    limnSn(g;x)=g(x) (3.12)

    on each compact subset of [0,), uniformly.

    Proof. In view of Lemma 3.1 and and assumption given by expression (3.10), we find

    limnSn(si;x)=xi,i=0,1,2. (3.13)

    The above-mentioned convergences are satisfied uniformly in each compact subset of [0,). The use of universal Krovokin-type property (vi) of Theorem 4.1.4 from [23], desired result is established.

    In order to estimate the rate of convergence, we will give some definitions and lemmas.

    Definition 3.1. Let gˆC[0,) and δ>0. Then w(g;δ), that is, modulus of continuity of the function g is determined by

    w(g;δ):=supu,v[0,)|uv||g(u)g(v)|, (3.14)

    where ˆC[0,) is the space of uniformly continuous functions on [0,).

    Lemma 6. For x[0,), the following identities:

    Sn(sx;x):=(ψ(nxH(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))1)x+1n(A(1)A(1)+A(J(1))A(J(1))) (3.15)
    Sn((sx)2;x):=ψ(nxH(J(1)))2ψ(nxH(J(1)))+ψ(nxH(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))x2
    +(A(1)A(1)+A(J(1))A(J(1)))(2ψ(nxH(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1))))+(1+J(1)+H(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))nψ(nxH(J(1)))x
    +1n2(A(1)A(1)+A(1)A(1)+A(J(1))A(J(1))(1+J(1))+2A(1)A(1)A(J(1))A(J(1))+A(J(1))A(J(1))) (3.16)

    are satisfied.

    Proof. In view of linearity property of Sn operators:

    Sn((sx)2;x)=Sn(s2;x)2xSn(s;x)+x2Sn(1;x) (3.17)

    and applying Lemma 3.1, equalities (3.15) and (3.16) are obtained.

    Theorem 7. Let gˆC[0,)E,Sn operators satisfy the following inequality:

    |Sn(g;x)g(x)|2w(g;μn(x)), (3.18)

    where,

    μ:=μn(x)=Sn((sx)2;x). (3.19)

    Proof. Using Lemma 3.1 and the modulus of continuity property, we get

    |Sn(g;x)g(x)|=|1A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxHJ(1))k=0psk(nx)g(kn)g(x)|
    1A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxHJ(1))k=0psk(nx)|g(kn)g(x)|
    w(g;δ)(1+1A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxHJ(1))1δk=0psk(nx)|knx|). (3.20)

    The use of Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, and taking into account the Lemma 3.2, we have

    k=0psk(nx)|knx|A(1)A(J(1))ψ(nxHJ(1)){k=0psk(nx)|knx|2}12
    =ψ(nxH(J(1)))2ψ(nxH(J(1)))+ψ(nxH(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))x2
    +(A(1)A(1)+A(J(1))A(J(1)))(2ψ(nxH(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1))))+(1+J(1)+H(J(1)))ψ(nxH(J(1)))nψ(nxH(J(1)))x
    +1n2(A(1)A(1)+A(1)A(1)+A(J(1))A(J(1))(1+J(1))+2A(1)A(1)A(J(1))A(J(1))+A(J(1))A(J(1))). (3.21)

    Using Eq 3.21, Eq 3.20 becomes

    |Sn(g;x)g(x)|{1+1δμn(x)}w(g;δ). (3.22)

    On choosing δ=μn(x), we get the required result.

    Definition 3.2. Let gCB[a,b], then the second modulus of continuity g is

    w2(g;δ):=sup0<tδ||g(.+2t)2g(.+t)+g(.)||CB, (3.23)

    where CB[0,) is the class of real valued functions on [0,), bounded and uniformly continuous with the norm

    ||g||CB=supx[0,)|g(x)|. (3.24)

    Lemma 8. (Gavrea and Raşa [24]). Let gC2[0,a] and (Kn)n0 be a sequence of linear positive operators with the property Kn(1;x)=1. Then,

    |Kn(g;x)g(x)|||g||Kn((sx)2;x)+12||g||Kn((sx)2;x). (3.25)

    Lemma 9. (Zhuk [25]). Let fC[a,b]andh(0,ab2). Let gh be the second-order Steklov function to the function g. Then, the subsequent inequalities hold true

    (i)||ghg||34w2(g;h), (3.26)
    (ii)|||gh|32h2w2(g;h). (3.27)

    Theorem 10. For gC[0,a], the following estimate

    |Sn(g;x)g(x)|2β||g||l2+34(β+2+l2)w2(g;l) (3.28)

    holds, where

    l:=ln(x)=4Sn((sx;x)2;x). (3.29)

    Proof. Let gl be the second-order Steklov function linked to g. Considering the identity Zn(1;x)=1, we have

    |Sn(g;x)g(x)||Sn(ggl;x)|+|Sn(gl;x)g(x)|+|(gl;x)g(x)|,
    2||glg||+|Sn(gl;x)gl(x)|. (3.30)

    Taking into the fact that glC2[0,β], it follows from Lemma 3.5

    |Sn(gl;x)gl(x)|||gl||Sn((sx)2;x)+12||gl||Sn((sx)2;x). (3.31)

    On combining the Landau inequality with Lemma 3.6, we have

    ||gl||2β||gl||+β2||gl||,
    2β||g||+3β4l2w2(g;l). (3.32)

    Using the last inequality and taking l=4Sn((sx)2);x, we have

    |Sn(gl;x)gl(x)|2β||g||l2+3β4w2(g;l)+34l2w2(g;l). (3.33)

    Substituting (3.33) in (3.30), hence Lemma (3.6) confers the proof of the theorem.

    Remark 3.7. In Theorem 3.7, for the special case ψ(w)=ew, H(J(w))=w, A(w)=1, A(J(w))=1 and x=0, one can get l=0 from the equality l:=ln(x)=4Sn((sx)2;x). The inequality obtained in Theorem 3.7, still holds true when l=0.

    Several mixed special polynomial families related to the Sheffer sequences are available in the literature. In this line, we established a mixed family of polynomials called the Boas-Buck-Sheffer family and studied their properties. Also, we studied the extension of the Szasz operators involving the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials and gave their approximation properties.

    The author K.S. Nisar expresses his thanks to the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia for providing facilities and support.

    We declare that we have no conflict of interests.



    [1] I. Sheffer, Some properties of polynomial sets of type zero, Duke Math. J., 5 (1939), 590-622. doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-39-00549-1
    [2] A. Di Bucchianico, D. Loeb, A selected survey of umbral calculus, Electron. J. Combin, 2 (1995) 28.
    [3] T. X. He, L. C. Hsu, P. J. S. Shiue, The Sheffer group and the Riordan group, Discrete Appl. Math., 155 (2007), 1895-1909. doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2007.04.006
    [4] W. Wang, A determinantal approach to Sheffer sequences, Linear Algebra Appl., 463 (2014), 228-254. doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2014.09.009
    [5] S. Khan, M. W. Al-Saad, G. Yasmin, Some properties of Hermite-based Sheffer polynomials, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2010), 2169-2183.
    [6] S. Khan, N. Raza, Monomiality principle, operational methods and family of Laguerre-Sheffer polynomials, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 387 (2012), 90-102.
    [7] S. Khan, N. Raza, Families of Legendre-Sheffer polynomials, J. Math. Comput. Modell., 55 (2012), 969-982. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.09.023
    [8] S. Khan, M. Riyasat, Determinantal approach to certain mixed special polynomials related to Gould-Hopper polynomials, Appl. Math. Comput., 251 (2015), 599-614.
    [9] S. Khan, G. Yasmin, N. Ahmad, On a new family related to truncated exponential and Sheffer polynomials, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 418 (2014), 921-937. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.04.028
    [10] S. Roman, The umbral calculus, Academic Press, New York, 1984.
    [11] R. P. Boas, R. C. Buck, Polynomials defined by generating relations, Am. Math. Mon., 63 (1956), 626-632. doi: 10.1080/00029890.1956.11988880
    [12] W. C. Brenke, On generating functions of polynomial systems, Am. Math. Mon., 52 (1945), 297-301. doi: 10.1080/00029890.1945.11991572
    [13] E. D. Rainville, Special functions, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, New York, 1971.
    [14] P. Appell, Sur une classe de polynômes, Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure, 1880.
    [15] J. Steffensen, The poweroid, an extension of the mathematical notion of power, Acta Math., 73 (1941), 333-366. doi: 10.1007/BF02392231
    [16] G. Dattoli, Hermite-Bessel and Laguerre-Bessel functions: A by-product of the monomiality principle, Adv. Spec. Funct. Appl., (1999), 147-164.
    [17] Y. B. Cheikh, Some results on quasi-monomiality, Appl. Math. Comput., 141 (2003), 63-76.
    [18] O. Szasz, Generalization of S. Bernstein's polynomials to the infinite interval, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards., 45 (1950), 239-245. doi: 10.6028/jres.045.024
    [19] A. Jakimovski, D. Leviatan, Generalized Szász operators for the approximation in the infinite interval, Mathematica (Cluj), 34 (1969), 97-103.
    [20] M. Ismail, On a generalization of Szász operators, Mathematica (Cluj), 39 (1974), 259-267.
    [21] S. Sucu, G. İçöz, S. Varma, On some extensions of Szász operators including Boas-Buck-type polynomials, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2012 (2012), 1-15.
    [22] S. Khan, M. Riyasat, 2-iterated Sheffer polynomials, arXiv: Classical Anal. ODEs, 2015.
    [23] P. Korovkin, On convergence of linear positive operators in the space of continuous functions, Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR, 90 (1996), 961-964.
    [24] I. Gavrea, I. Raşa, Remarks on some quantitative Korovkin-type results, Rev. Anal. Numér. Théor. Approx., 28 (1993) 173-176.
    [25] V. Zhuk, Functions of the Lip1 class and SN Bernstein's polynomials, Vestnik Leningrad Univ. Mat. Mekh. Astronom., 1 (1989), 25-30.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ghazala Yasmin, Hibah Islahi, Abdulghani Muhyi, Certain results on a hybrid class of the Boas–Buck polynomials, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02824-5
    2. Shahid Ahmad Wani, Ibtehal Alazman, Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Certain Properties and Applications of Convoluted Δh Multi-Variate Hermite and Appell Sequences, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 828, 10.3390/sym15040828
    3. Ibtehal Alazman, Badr Saad T. Alkahtani, Shahid Ahmad Wani, Certain Properties of Δh Multi-Variate Hermite Polynomials, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 839, 10.3390/sym15040839
    4. Mohra Zayed, Shahid Ahmad Wani, A Study on Generalized Degenerate Form of 2D Appell Polynomials via Fractional Operators, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 723, 10.3390/fractalfract7100723
    5. Şule Güngör, Bayram Çekim, Mehmet Özarslan, Approximation results for the operators involving beta function and the Boas-Buck-Sheffer polynomials, 2024, 38, 0354-5180, 171, 10.2298/FIL2401171G
    6. Mohra Zayed, Shahid Wani, Exploring the versatile properties and applications of multidimensional degenerate Hermite polynomials, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 30813, 10.3934/math.20231575
    7. Marco Seracini, Gianluca Vinti, Sampling by Difference as a Method of Applying the Sampling Kantorovich Model in Digital Image Processing, 2023, 13, 2076-3417, 5594, 10.3390/app13095594
    8. Shahid Ahmad Wani, Two-iterated degenerate Appell polynomials: properties and applications, 2024, 31, 2576-5299, 83, 10.1080/25765299.2024.2302502
    9. Letelier Castilla, William Ramírez, Clemente Cesarano, Shahid Ahmad Wani, Maria-Fernanda Heredia-Moyano, A new class of generalized Apostol–type Frobenius–Euler polynomials, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 3623, 10.3934/math.2025167
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3514) PDF downloads(270) Cited by(9)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog