Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

From 3D models to FDM 3D prints: experimental study of chemical treatment to reduce stairs-stepping of semi-sphere profile

Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Islamic Architecture, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA

Adaptively computing the layers (LH) for FDM 3D printed samples has been the great potential of accomplishing high quality surface finish results while maintaining a reasonably short printing process time. This research paper presents a stairs-stepping effect of a semi-sphere profile fabricated by FDM 3D technology which is a cost-effective and promising additive manufacturing (AM) technique. In the experimental test, two-LHs (0.04 and 0.32 mm) and three different thermoplastic filament materials (PLA, PLA+, and ABS+) were used. The optimum surface roughness (Ra) obtained at 100% solid infill density with the configuration of a minimum LH was around 3.9092 and 53.2628 μm for a maximum LH after and before chemical treatment respectively. The lowest LH value brings the deviation reduction to achieve a minimum value of Ra, while fabrication time would go up with increasing the number of layers. Within the group of (PLA+, PLA and ABS+) for both LHs, ABS+ has shown low density of 1.02 to 1.1 g/cm3, while PLA+ and PLA has shown almost the same values of density ranging from 1.2 to 1.3 g/cm3. Understanding and improving relationships between thermoplastic filament materials, printing process parameters and properties of FDM 3D printed samples will be a key to improve the extrusion AM processes and expanding their applications globally. To sum up, the chemical treatment (using acetone) was an economical and industrially sustainable world-wide method to improve the poor surface quality finish of AM samples.
  Article Metrics

Keywords stairs-stepping effect; surface roughness; FDM; additive manufacturing; density

Citation: Mohammad S. Alsoufi, Mohammed W. Alhazmi, Dhia K. Suker, Mohammed Yunus, Rashad O. Malibari. From 3D models to FDM 3D prints: experimental study of chemical treatment to reduce stairs-stepping of semi-sphere profile. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 1086-1106. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1086


  • 1. Alsoufi MS, Elsayed AE (2017) How surface roughness performance of printed parts manufactured by desktop FDM 3D printer with PLA+ is influenced by measuring direction. Am J Mech Eng 5: 211-222.
  • 2. Alsoufi MS, Elsayed AE (2018) Quantitative analysis of 0% infill density surface profile of printed part fabricated by personal FDM 3D printer. Int J Eng Technol 7: 44-52.
  • 3. Alsoufi MS, Elsayed AE (2018) Surface roughness quality and dimensional accuracy-a comprehensive analysis of 100% infill printed parts fabricated by a personal/desktop cost-effective FDM 3D printer. Mater Sci Appl 9: 11-40.
  • 4. Alsoufi MS, Elsayed AE (2017) Warping deformation of desktop 3D printed parts manufactured by open source fused deposition modeling (FDM) system. Int J Mech Mech Eng 17: 7-16.
  • 5. Li Y, Linke BS, Voet H, et al. (2017) Cost, sustainability and surface roughness quality-A comprehensive analysis of products made with personal 3D printers. CIRP J Manuf Sci Tec 16: 1-11.    
  • 6. Thrimurthulu K, Pandey PM, Reddy NV, et al. (2004) Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tool Manu 44: 585-594.    
  • 7. Byun, HS, Lee KH (2006) Determination of the optimal build direction for different rapid prototyping processes using multi-criterion decision making. Robot Cim-Int Manuf 22: 69-80.
  • 8. Mostafa MAG, Alsoufi MS, Tayeb BA (2015) CAD/CAM integration based on machining features for prismatic parts. Int J Emerging Trends Technol Com Sci 4: 106-110.
  • 9. Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2009) Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts. CIRP Annals 58: 189-192.    
  • 10. Ippolito R, Iuliano L, Gatto A (1995) Benchmarking of rapid prototyping techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface finish. CIRP Annals 44: 157-160.    
  • 11. Armillotta A (2006) Assessment of surface quality on textured FDM prototypes. Rapid Prototyping J 12: 35-41.    
  • 12. Singh R, Singh S, Singh IP, et al. (2017) Investigation for surface finish improvement of FDM parts by vapor smoothing process. Compos Part B-Eng 111: 228-234.    
  • 13. Esun suppliers from China for purchasing 3D filaments, resins for 3D FDM printer, 2019. Available from: http://www.esunchina.net/Products/Filament.
  • 14. Jiang C, Zhao GF (2015) A preliminary study of 3D printing on rock mechanics. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48: 1041-1050.    
  • 15. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement 81: 174-196.    
  • 16. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3: 42-53.    
  • 17. Alsoufi MS, Alhazmi MW, Suker DK, et al. (2019) Experimental characterization of the influence of nozzle temperature in FDM 3D printed pure PLA and advanced PLA+. Am J Mech Eng 7: 45-60.    
  • 18. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, et al. (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyping J 14: 72-80.    
  • 19. Ahn S H, Montero M, Odell D, et al. (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping J 8: 248-257.
  • 20. Lalehpour A, Barari A (2016) Post processing for fused deposition modeling parts with acetone vapour bath. IFAC-Papers OnLine 49: 42-48.
  • 21. Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2010) Quantitative analysis of a chemical treatment to reduce roughness of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. CIRP Annals 59: 247-250.    
  • 22. Kumar BR, Rao TS (2012) AFM studies on surface morphology, topography and texture of nanostructured zinc aluminum oxide thin films. Dig J Nanomater Bios 7: 1881-1889.
  • 23. ISO 4287 (1997). Geometrical product specifications (GPS)-surface texture: profile method-terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, ISO.


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved