Citation: Nagesh K. Tripathi. Porous carbon spheres: Recent developments and applications[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(5): 1016-1052. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.5.1016
[1] | Emil Kowalewski, Małgorzata Zienkiewicz-Machnik, Dmytro Lisovytskiy, Kostiantyn Nikiforov, Krzysztof Matus, Anna Śrębowata, Jacinto Sá . Turbostratic carbon supported palladium as an efficient catalyst for reductive purification of water from trichloroethylene. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(6): 1276-1288. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.6.1276 |
[2] | Yong X. Gan, Yongping Zhang, Jeremy B. Gan . Nanoporous metals processed by dealloying and their applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(6): 1141-1183. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1141 |
[3] | Kah Hon Leong, Azrina Abd Aziz, Yee Li Kang, Sheau Wei Goh, Kulhar Vijay Singh, Lan Ching Sim, Pichiah Saravanan . Synergized mechanistic and solar photocatalysis features of N-TiO2 functionalised activated carbon. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 800-813. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.800 |
[4] | Stephanie Flores Zopf, Matthew J. Panzer . Integration of UV-cured Ionogel Electrolyte with Carbon Paper Electrodes. AIMS Materials Science, 2014, 1(1): 59-69. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2014.1.59 |
[5] | Shuwei Lin, Yitai Fu, Yunsen Sang, Yi Li, Baozong Li, Yonggang Yang . Characterization of Chiral Carbonaceous Nanotubes Prepared from Four Coiled Tubular 4,4-biphenylene-silica Nanoribbons. AIMS Materials Science, 2014, 1(1): 1-10. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2013.1.1 |
[6] | Okechukwu Okafor, Abimbola Popoola, Olawale Popoola, Samson Adeosun . Surface modification of carbon nanotubes and their nanocomposites for fuel cell applications: A review. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(2): 369-414. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024020 |
[7] | Hafizah Naihi, Rubiyah Baini, Ibrahim Yakub . Oil palm biomass-based activated carbons for the removal of cadmium—a review. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(3): 453-468. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021028 |
[8] | Sekhar Chandra Ray . Possible magnetic performances of graphene-oxide and it's composites: A brief review. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(5): 767-818. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023043 |
[9] | Amany Mahmoud, Ehssan Nassef, Hesham Salah, Yehia El-taweel . Use of hydrazide derivative of poly methylacrylate for the removal of cupric ions from solutions. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(4): 420-430. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.4.420 |
[10] | Mahmoud A. Rabah, Mohamed B. El Anadolly, Rabab A. El Shereif, Mohamed Sh. Atrees, Hayat M. El Agamy . Preparation of valuable products from cleaned carbon of fuel ash. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(5): 1186-1201. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.5.1186 |
Activated or porous carbon (AC) adsorbents material like granular activated carbon (GAC), powdered activated carbon (PAC), spherical activated carbon or activated carbon spheres (ACS) and activated carbon fabric (ACF) are widely used for removal of toxic gases and heavy metals from gaseous mixtures and liquid solutions respectively, and in protective clothing for protection from chemical warfare agents (CWA). These materials were also used in gas and energy storage, biomedical application and catalysis [1,2,3,4,5]. Activated carbon based adsorbents have broad pore size in comparison with Zeolites. This property makes activated carbons, a versatile adsorbent.
ACS or porous carbon spheres, an interesting adsorbent materials have excellent properties such as porous structure, large surface area, high micropore volume, controllable pore size distribution, high mechanical strength, high purity, smooth surface, high wear resistance, excellent durability, good fluidity, low ash content and low moisture content [6,7,8]. Due to above mentioned qualities, ACS are commonly used in many applications like catalyst supports, purification of blood, supercapacitors, protective suits against chemical warfare agents and adsorptive removal of gaseous and liquid toxicants [9]. Using polymeric and carbohydrate based precursors, specific surface area of greater than 2000 m2/g alongwith total pore volume of more than 1.0 cm3/g have been obtained and successfully used for removal of various types of toxicants [7,10,11,12]. The application of activated carbon as adsorbents relies on the pore size and its distribution as micropores (<2 nm) and mesopores (2 to 50 nm) that are mostly utilized for the gas phase and liquid phase [3,4].
Production of ACS is also challenging because perfect spherical shape without any cracks with good compressive strength (for some specific applications) is needed to avoid any damage and dust formation. ACS is most widely produced using tubular reactor, rotary kilns or fludized bed furnaces. The raw materials or precursors used for ACS preparation are pitch, polymeric resins, lignocellulosic materials and carbohydrate [8]. The most commonly used polymeric resins include phenol formaldehyde (PF) and sulfonated polystyrene divinylbenzene (PSDVB). These precursors have high carbon content and low ash content that resulted in better compressive strength as compared to other raw material. The different steps for manufacturing of ACS include stabilization (200–300 ℃ in air), carbonization, and physical or chemical activation. Carbonization is mostly carried out at about 800–900 ℃ for most of the polymeric precursors in presence of nitrogen or any other inert gases. In physical activation of ACS, steam or CO2 is used where as in chemical activation alkalis or acids are most widely used [6]. The produced ACS is characterized to ensure physical and chemical surface properties before use as adsorbents for heavy metals and toxic gases removal, various other uses as well as in chemical protective clothings. These properties include pH, surface functional groups or impregnation, Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) surface area, pore size distribution, pore volumes (Total, micropore and mesopore) and Iodine number.
Mostly, industrial effluents are treated by adsorption process using activated or porous carbon produced from various sources such as wood and coconut shells. The adsorption capacity of activated carbon depends on its porous structure, chemical nature of surface, nature of adsorbate and its substituent groups, and pH of the aqueous solution. Various other factors such as adsorbent dose, contaminant concentration and temperature may also affect the adsorption process. Protective clothing for protection against chemical warfare agents plays a very important role in case of chemical warfare scenario. Chemical protective clothing based on PAC, ACS or ACF are available globally [4,13]. ACS based protective clothing can be used even after multiple laundries as compared to PAC based clothing [4,14]. The present work summarizes recent developements in ACS and its application as adsorbent material for toxicants and other uses.
ACS or porous carbon sphere is a carbon-based material having a high surface area and developed internal pores (broad size distribution). A wide variety of precursors with their physicochemical characteristics are responsible for adsorbent properties with structure and textural features. To achieve the desired quality of ACS, selection of suitable precursor is necessary. ACS is prepared from precursor materials such as pitch, polystyrene resin, phenol formaldehyde resin, lignocellulosic materials and carbohydrate. Choice of the precursors used for preparation of ACS depends upon many parameters which include availablity, cost and non-toxic for nature.
Raw pitch is generally obtained during refining operations in petroleum industries. This is a high molecular weight distillation residue with thermoplastic properties and have high carbon yield [15]. Pitch has already been utilized for production of ACS and ACF. Mesophase pitch (an anisotropic material) is prepared using raw pitch (isotropic material) by polymerization and condensation processes. Thermal treatment of pitch at 400–500 ℃ under inert environment or under vacuum resulted in aromatic hydrocarbon spheres [16].
Polystyrene divinylbenzene (PSDVB) resin is also used as precursor for ACS preparation. Styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer resins were prepared by aqueous suspension co-polymerization of styrene and divinylbenzene. The produced beads were further treated with sulfuric acid for functionalization. The elemental analysis of this resin resulted in carbon, oxygen, sulfur, hydrogen, nitrogen in decreasing order (Table 1). Due to the rich carbon content of this polymeric resin with spherical form, it is a choice of precursor used in the production of ACS with high compressive strength. The physical characteristics of this resin can be simply modified by addition of co-monomers or altering various crosslinking strategies.
Phenolic based polymeric resins are also used as precursors for the preparation of activated carbons [18]. It can be made by combining phenols and aldehydes in different compositions which ultimately resulted in either thermosetting or thermoplastic type resins. A thermosetting resin, resole obtained using the base catalyst where thermoplastic resin, novolak formed in the presence of acid catalyst. The structure and mechanical properties rely on the catalyst concentration, process temperature and time as well as ratio of the concentrations of phenol and formaldehyde. Upon carbonization and subsequent steam activation, unique pore structures are developed due to presence of phenol and/or low molecular weight substance [10,18]. The effects of stabilizer (polyvinyl alcohol) concentration, mechanical agitation and ratio of monomer to water on size (0.2–1.8 mm diameter) and yield of crosslinked phenolic beads (PB) in spherical form were studied. The PBs size decreased with increase in stabilizer concentration (2.5–12.5%) and agitation rate, and increased with increase in monomer concentration (22–28%). The conversion percentage of spherical beads increased when agitation rate was increased to 400–700 rpm [19]. In another study, effect of formaldehyde (F) to phenol (P) ratio, initiator (triethylamine), cross linking agent (hexamethylenetetraamine) concentration and temperature on particle size (0.2–2.0 mm) as well as its formation was also investigated. The average particle size increased with increased F/P ratio whereas it decreased when concentration of TEA was increased. Reactions performed at and above 90 ℃ resulted in cured PB [20]. The main features of this resin include low cost, heat and flame resistance, strength, low level of inorganic impurities and negligible ash content.
Lignocellulosic materials are also used as precursors for ACS preparation due to low cost and environmental safety. These are sugar cane, corn stover, rice straw, lettuce, or algae. Carbohydrates (cellulose, glucose, fructose, saccharose, starch or cyclodextrins) are also selected as precursors because these help in understanding the mechanism of carbon spheres formation [7]. For these precursors, hydrothermal treatment (hydrothermal carbonization) has been used for spherical carbon preparation. The influence of different experimental parametes such as temperature, time, carbohydrate type and its concentration was studied and has provided deep insights into the mechanism of spherical carbons formation [7,21]. The CHNS analysis of sulphonated PSDVB resin, phenolic resin and lignocellulosic material is given in Table 1.
The process used for preparation of ACS includes thermal treatment of precursors through carbonization and activation step. Before starting carbonization steps, precursors such as polystyrene resins are subjected to thermal treatment upto 200 ℃ in presence of air to remove moisture content of resins. Some studies also reported that the mixture of air and nitrogen have been used at 200–300 ℃ to achieve better quality of the ACS. Due to exothermic nature of reaction in presence of air, controlled heating is necessary during these steps to prevent excessive burning of precursor and yield enhanced compressive strength [2,8].
For nanoporous carbon spheres, synthesis techniques (including the Stöber method and those based on templating, self-assembly, emulsion and hydrothermal carbonization) were discussed earlier [22]. Hollow carbon spheres also gain enormous importance due to their applicability in various fields. In a review, a comprehensive overview of the preparation and applications was discussed [23]. Various synthetic techniques for preparation of porous carbon spheres, including hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and templating from sustainable biomass and their applications as Li-ion battery anode material was also discussed in a review [24]. Synthesis of carbon nanospheres using various approaches was also discussed in a earlier study with a special focus on sustainable carbon precursors, control of particle size and monodispersity, and mesopores [25]. A typical flow chart for production of ACS from sulphonated polystyrene divinyl benzene resin using physical activation is shown in Figure 1 [8].
Carbonization is a process where the precursors are subjected to a thermal treatment (pyrolysis) to enhance the carbon percentage in the precursors in presence of inert gases such as N2. During this process, low molecular weight volatiles such as sulphur containing compounds, light aromatics and hydrogen gas are removed and resulted in fixed carbonaceous material. During carbonization, pores are filled with tarry residues. Proper optimization of carbonization parameters is very crucial because the quality of final ACS rely on this aspect. These important parameters include carbonization temperature, heating rate, presence of inert gases and its flow rate as well as carbonization time. Generally, 700 ℃ or more temperature resulted in reduced yield with better quality of final product [26].
Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is also utilized for carbon spheres preparation with controlled size, oxygenated functional groups on the surface, high surface area and high thermal stability. It is carried out under mild operating conditions in a sub-critical water medium. During the HTC procedure, the solution of carbohydrate precursors is usually heated to 130–250 ℃ under self-generated pressures. HTC process used for carbon spheres preparation and influence of process parameters on it were well described in a review [21]. Micro-carbon spheres preparation by carbonization of polymer spheres from low-temperature polymerization reactions (as below 250 ℃), various polymerization process, morphology and surface characteristics of the CSs obtained by different synthetic approaches was also described in a review [27].
A novel and facile template-free method referred to as "secondary-crosslinking pyrolysis" to fabricate discrete and dispersible hollow carbon spheres (HCSs) has been successfully developed by using the deformed poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) capsules as precursors. This method resulted in a perfect spherical shape (surface area, 432 m2/g; total pore volume, 0.39 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.15 cm3/g) and used for energy storage with a high specific capacitance up to 192 F/g at 5 mV/s [28]. Paramagnetic mesoporous carbon spheres (diameters of 1‒3 μm) were synthesized through the HTC of carboxymethylcellulose with nickel acetate, followed by high-temperature carbonization in a N2 atmosphere and this CSs (surface area, 586 m2/g and total pore volume, 0.53 cm3/g) was successfully used for vitamib B12 adsorption [29]. Carbonization followed by etching with NaOH solution processes were used to prepare a series of mesoporous carbon microspheres (MCMs; average diameter, 500 nm and mesopore size, 3.2‒14 nm) with surface area of 659‒672 m2/g using resorcinol/formaldehyde polymer microspheres by controlling the size of SiO2 nanoparticles templates and successfully used in electrochemical application [30]. A microfluidic approach to generate porous carbon particles using sucrose/silica precursor was also used and showed that the size of the particle and pores can be tuned by adjusting the deionized water content in droplets and preheating temperature [31]. Synthesis of monodisperse, polyaniline (PANI)-derived mesoporous spherical carbon nanoparticles were done by polymerization of aniline with the aid of (NH4)2S2O8 as oxidant and colloidal silica nanoparticles as templates. Carbonization of the resulting PANI/silica composite material was done at different high temperatures, and finally removal of the silica templates from the carbonized products was carried out. These materials (surface area, 652 m2/g and total pore volume, 1.21 cm3/g) were showed much better catalytic activity in fuel cells reaction. This method was also used for polypyrrole to produce monodisperse, mesoporous carbon nanoparticles [32].
A spherical meso-perforated carbon (SSMPC) was produced from resorcinol-formaldehyde/silica precursor, prepared using colloidal silica-mediated spray drying method followed by carbonization and silica removal. High surface areas and pore volumes were achieved for SSMPC (1050 m2/g and 2.1 cm3/g). This material was then successfully evaluated the charge storage properties in organic media from supercapacitor as well as Li-ion battery (LIB) perspectives [33]. Colloidal, spherical polymer resins synthesized by enhanced copolymerization and polycondensation of resorcinol-formaldehyde resins were further carbonized at 600 and 900 ℃ which resulted in surface areas of 592.4 m2/g and 952.5 m2/g for capacitor applications [34]. Nitrogen-containing carbon microspheres (NCMs) were prepared via directed carbonization of poly(1, 5-diaminonapthalene) at different temperatures which was synthesized from 1, 5-diaminonapthalene with ammonium persulfate as oxidizing agent for electrochemical application. A sample carbonized at 700 ℃ (NCM-700) showed a surface area of 403 m2/g (total pore volume, 0.35 cm3/g) with regular spherical geometry (0.2–0.5 mm in diameter) [35]. Nitrogen-containing ultramicroporous carbon nanospheres (N-UCNs) were prepared using carbonization. Hexamethylenetetramine was utilized to substitute ammonia and formaldehyde to polymerize with resorcinol on the surfaces of the polymer colloids for the preparation of SCs under the Stöber condition. The introduction of phloroglucinol/terephthalaldehyde brings regular ultramicroporous (0.58 nm) to the typical N-UCNs. The N-UCNs has high surface area (1439 m2/g) with total pore volume of 2.12 cm3/g (micropore volume, 0.52 cm3/g) and showed excellent electrochemical performance [36].
Direct pyrolysis was used to prepare microporous carbon spheres using linecaps nanosponges (synthetized by the reaction of the kleptose linecap with the pyromellitic dianhydride) as precursor. This process resulted in surface area of 684 m2/g with 5–17 Å pore size and micropore volume of 0.16 cm3/g [37].
Porous polymer resins and carbon spheres have also been successfully prepared by an extended Stӧber method using phenol derivatives of different functionality. The preparation of phenolic resin spheres from a series of hetero-atoms containing phenol derivatives (such as nitrophenol, aminophenol and halide-substituted phenols), which upon carbonization are converted to heteroatom-doped carbon spheres with surface area of 482 m2/g. These resultant carbon spheres were successfully examined as potential CO2 adsorbents and electrode materials for supercapacitors [38].
There are two types of methods used to activate carbonized materials that are chemical and physical activation. Apart from this, combination of both (chemical and physical) activation is also used as an alternative to improve the performance of the ACS [39,40].
In physical activation, carbonized materials are subjected to the heat treatment at about 700–900 ℃ in presence of oxidizing gases namely, air, steam or carbon dioxide or combination of two (Table 2). During carbonization process, the resulting materials have less surface area with very small adsorption capacity due to presence of tarry products in pores. These oxidizing gases remove tarry products, creates new pores and increases the diameter of pores at high temperatures where weight loss occures. This activation process resulted in a well-developed pore structure with higher BET surface area. The weight loss is proportional to increase in activation temperature and time. Activation of carbonized materials with air or oxygen causes excessive burning due to the exothermic reactions and loss of strength. The endothermic reactions taking place during physical activation with steam or CO2. It is also reported earlier that the H2O molecules diffuse faster into the pores of the carbon due to small size in comparison to the CO2 molecule and the reaction between carbon and steam is faster than that with CO2. Pretreatment of precursor, pyrolysis parameters (temperature and time), selection of activating agents, steam and gas flow rate, activation temperature and activation time have important effects on the surface area, pore volume, strength and porosity of ACS. The following reactions are involved in steam activation process:
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | CO2 | 1266 | 1.13 | [2] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 949 | 0.98 | [2] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1009 | 0.89 | [8] |
CI seed | CO2 | 1616 | 0.64* | [9] |
RA seed | CO2 | 889 | 0.40* | [9] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 3101 | 2.08 | [10] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 2284 | 0.89 | [11] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1160 | 0.478* | [14] |
Pitch | Steam | - | 0.65 | [16] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1280 | 0.91/0.43 | [40] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | CO2 | 2905 | 1.6 | [41] |
Phenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 840 | 0.40* | [42] |
Phenol-formaldehyde beads from bamboo tar | CO2 | 189 | 0.10 | [43] |
3-methylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1501 | 0.72 | [44] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1585.13 | 0.69/0.45 | [45] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1066 | 0.52/0.47 | [46] |
Sucrose | Steam | 824 | 0.37/0.36 | [47] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 1065 | 0.53* | [48] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1128 | 0.45/0.43 | [49] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1555 | 1.29/0.56 | [50] |
Pitch | Steam | 1573 | 0.68/0.50 | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 979 | 0.84/0.31 | [51] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1663 | 20.77 | [52] |
* Micropore volume. |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
where C is a carbon-free active site, C(O) is the oxygen surface complex and C(H2) is the adsorbed hydrogen. The C(O) complexes are energetically more difficult to remove from the surface [26].
The preparation of spherical activated carbons (SACs) has been studied with Rhamnus alaternus (RA), Osyris lanceolate (OL), and Canna indica (CI) seeds. Carbonization followed by CO2 activation procedures resulted in spherical shapes and integrity with reduction in diameter around 48% and 25%, for RA and CI seeds respectively. About 1600 m2/g surface area and similar mechanical strength with commercial activated carbons were achieved using these precursors [9]. The influences of the gasification time, gasification temperature, and flow rate on ACS preparation from resole phenolic beads using CO2 gasification has been studied and resulted in 3101 m2/g of BET surface area and 2.08 cm3/g of pore volume at 950 ℃. The porosity decreased with increasing gas flow rate from 0.25 to 1.0 L/min. The mechanical strength of the ACS varied from 120 to 3 N/mm2 when the extent of burn-off varied from 32 to 88% [10]. They have also studied preparation of ACS from sulphonated polystyrene beads using combination of activation and concluded that the ACS produced from steam and CO2 activation have shown 1266 m2/g BET surface area and 1.13 cm3/g pore volume in comparison to ACS from steam activation with 949 m2/g (BET surface area) and 0.98 cm3/g (pore volume) [2]. In a study of producing iron-containing pitch spheres by adding ferrocene, higher temperature resulted in higher pore (10.0–80.0 nm) volume and the ratio of mesopore. Further, the loading method of iron controlled the catalytic reaction in a wider range [16]. Polymeric based spherical activated carbon (PBSAC) was prepared using single step (steam) as well as two step (steam followed by CO2) activation. Surface area of 1432 to 1996 m2/g with total pore volume of 0.7 to 1.3 cm3/g (micropore volume, 0.52–0.70 cm3/g) was resulted in using one step activation. However, surface area of 1503 m2/g with total pore volume of 0.9 to 1.2 cm3/g (micropore volume, 0.51–0.53 cm3/g) was resulted in using two step activation [39].
Highly porous CSs were synthesized through the emulsion polymerization of resorcinol-formaldehyde followed by carbonization and CO2 activation. Using carbonization (400,600 and 800 ℃) and subsequent activation temperatures (900 and 950 ℃) tuning, monodispersed CSs were prepared with high surface area (1500–2900 m2/g) and narrow pore size distribution (<3 nm) and used for electrochemical capacitors and capacitive flowable suspension electrodes [41]. A facile, aqueous, self-catalyzed polymerization method prepared phenolic resin was used to produce monodisperse carbon microspheres followed by treating the phenolic resin with steam. The resultant carbon spheres with surface area of 840 m2/g and micropore volume of 0.40 cm3/g provided a new avenue for the mass production of monodisperse carbon microsphere [42]. Bamboo tar was mixed with formalin under a weak alkaline condition to form cured phenol-formaldehyde (PF) beads (9–16 mesh) through suspension polymerization and used for ACS preparation followed by carbonization and physical activation using CO2 at 900 ℃ for 2 h. This ACS was successfully used for adsorption and recovery of toluene [43]. Activated carbon spheres (ACSs) from 3-methylphenol-formaldehyde was prepared by suspension polymerization and steam activation. The effects of additives [ethylene glycol and poly(ethylene glycol)], to the textural structure and adsorptive dibenzothiophene (DBT) of ACSs were also investigated. The prepared ACS have surface area of 1501 m2/g and a total pore volume of 0.72 cm3/g [44]. Alkyl phenol and formaldehyde were used to prepare spherical carbon by suspension polymerization and steam activation. The prepared ACS were subjected to oxidation modification by dry air at various temperatures to improve the pore framework and the introduction of oxygen containing functional groups for better element mercury capture that resulted in surface area of 1585.13 m2/g [45]. Further, they have prepared ACS and some metallic oxides were doped to enhance the elemental mercury removal ability. The experimental results indicated that prepared activated carbon spheres (PAC-surface area, 1066 m2/g) and PAC-Cu (surface area, 954 m2/g) presented almost identical with a smooth surface without cracks and showed well-developed pore structure [46].
The sucrose derived spherical carbon prepared by HTC and physical (800 ℃) or chemical activation method was used as adsorbents for pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs). Carbons prepared with steam as activating agent retain the spherical shape of the hydrochar and resulted in 814 m2/g surface area [47].
In chemical activation, both carbonization and activation occurred simultaneously in a single stage for the activated carbon preparation process [26]. This activation is carried out using chemical agents such as ZnCl2, H2SO4, KOH, NH3 and H3PO4 at low temperatures (500–700 ℃) as compared to physical activation. These chemicals are generally dehydrating agents and inhibit the tar formation and also other undesired products in the course of the carbonization process. The highly alkaline chemical agents support to develop the pores structure by dehydration and polymeric structure degradation. The advantages of chemical activation include less energy costs and minimum activation time. The characteristic of ACS produced by chemical activation is given in Table 3. In a study, ACS by chemical activation resulted in surface areas of more than 3000 m2/g with pore volume of greater than 1.0 cm3/g [7]. Some studies also reported the use of mixed (both chemical and physical activation) to improve the surface area of the ACS where single step is not efficient to penetrate inside the material and generate abundant pores. A two-stage process, in which first the precursor is carbonized and then chemically activated, is also used for preparation of ACS. The important parameters which affect the chemical activation include, type of activating agent, ratio of precursor and chemicals, activation temperature, activation time, heating rate. All these parameters should be controlled to achieve better quality of ACS with desired adsorbent potential. The surface area and pore size distribution are influenced by the ratio of the precursor and chemical activating agent. The characteristics of chemical activating agents include water generation instead of carbon oxides (COx) and hydrocarbons from hydrogen and oxygen present in carbonized material. Further, the loss of tars and volatile matter is also inhibited by chemical agents and resulted in more fixed carbon and carbon yield. The surface area of activated carbons prepared using chemical activation is more but also associated with problems of corrosion. Further, washing of activated carbons is also necessary to recover residual chemicals [53].
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | H2SO4 | 976 | 0.68/0.47 | [6] |
Saccharose | H3PO4 | 2120 | 1.0* | [7] |
Glucose | KOH | 3152 | 1.18* | [7] |
Enzymatic hydrolysis lignin | KOH | 1240 | 0.62 | [17] |
Sucrose | K2CO3 | 1375 | 0.63/0.62 | [47] |
Phenolic beads (PR4_800 ACS) | KOH | 1171 | 0.50/0.47 | [49] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1566 | 1.05/0.62 | [50] |
Sucrose | KOH | 2217 | 1.006/0.776 | [54] |
Glucose | KOH | 3003 | - | [55] |
Pectin | KOH | 2440 | 1.28/0.65 | [56] |
Jute | KOH and CO2 | 856.89 | 0.889/0.689 | [57] |
Corncob | KOH | 1652 | 0.948/0.416 | [59] |
F108/resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 703 | 0.645/0.317 | [60] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1096 | 0.97/0.14 | [61] |
m-phenylenediamine and hexamethylenetetramine | ZnCl2 | 1237 | 0.58/0.35 | [62] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1227 | 0.90/0.81 | [63] |
2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor | KOH | 2478 | 1.24/0.99 | [64] |
PAN | KOH | 2134 | 1.41/0.82 | [65] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | [66] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | ZnCl2 | 2437 | 1.37 | [67] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 844.9 | 0.48/0.33 | [68] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1526 | 0.72/0.61 | [69] |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-4-700) | KOH | 1757 | 0.81/0.73 | [70] |
* Micropore volume. |
Spherical carbons were also produced from three carbohydrates (glucose, saccharose and cellulose) using hydrothermal treatment and activated by means of chemical activation using H3PO4, NaOH and KOH (Table 3) or physical activation with CO2 (Table 2). Surface area upto 3100 m2/g was obtained by chemical activation with textural properties. The activation using H3PO4 yielded ACS with higher developed surface areas as compared to others [7]. In another study fast KOH activation via microwave heating using enzymatic hydrolysis of lignin as the precursor for carbon sphere preparation via environmental friendly hydrothermal carbonization was carried out. Carbonization temperature (270 ℃) and time (7 h) resulted in large particle sizes, high sphericity, uniform size, and high dispersity of the carbon spheres. Fast KOH and microwave heating (2450 MHz, 700 W) developed the BET surface area of ACSs upto 1278 m2/g, which occured more efficiently (10 min) than the increase to 1276 m2/g for hemicellulose-based ACS with a KOH/ratio of 1.0 at 800 ℃ for 3.5 h [17]. The sucrose derived spherical carbon prepared by HTC and chemical activation method was also used for use as adsorbents of PhACs. Carbons prepared with K2CO3 as activating agent resulted in 1375 m2/g surface area [46].
ACS prepared from sucrose using HTC and subsequent KOH activation [C-4(char and KOH ratio of 1:2)] resulted in high surface area of 2217 m2/g was also used for adsorptive desulfurization [54]. A simple way to convert glucose to nitrogen-doped carbons by HTC with NH4Cl, followed by KOH activation at 800 ℃ resulted in surface area of more than 3000 m2/g. The extra pores and/or defects generated in this activated N-doped carbon can be ascribed to the chemical etching of nitrogenous groups. This material showed high rate performance and high cycling stability [55]. Porous carbon spheres (PCSs) were prepared via a facile HTC and chemical activation route with pectin as the biomass precursor. The resulted PCSs revealed a large surface area (2440 m2/g), well-balanced micro/mesoporosity with narrow pore size distribution and high content of oxygen-containing functional groups [56].
Activated carbon produced by physico-chemical activation of hydrothermally carbonized material derived from the dried stem of Corchorus olitorius commonly known as jute (JS), using KOH as an activation agent. This study resulted in ACS of 856.89 m2/g surface area and further used for adsorption of Cu(Ⅱ) [57].
Microporous and mesoporous carbon spheres (CSs) were fabricated using resorcinol and formaldehyde as precursors in the presence of Pluronic F127 (for generating mesopores) as porogen and KOH (brought abundant micropores) as the activating agent. This study resulted in surface area of 735.4 m2/g with pore volume of 0.622 cm3/g and used for electrochemical performance [58]. The hierarchical porous carbon microspheres (HPCS) were obtained using corncob as precursor and showed that the pore size and surface area affected by the amount of KOH during the activation process [59]. Carbon nanospheres with distinguishable microstructure were prepared by carbonization and subsequent KOH activation of F108/resorcinol-formaldehyde composites. With addition of F108, the polydisperse carbon nanospheres (PCNS) with microporous structure, monodisperse carbon nanospheres (MCNS) with hierarchical porous structure, and agglomerated carbon nanospheres (ACNS) were obtained. The MCNS sample (surface area, 703 m2/g) showed improved electrochemical performance [60].
A nickel-doped activated mesoporous carbon microsphere (Ni-AMCM) was synthesized by an emulsion-assisted hydrothermal method, followed by a KOH activation process and nickel-doping strategy for high performance electrode material. The Ni-AMCMs has high surface area (~1096 m2/g), uniform mesopore size (4.0 nm), regular microspherical shape (0.5–1.0 μm in diameter), and partially graphitic structure [61].
Nitrogen-enriched carbon spheres (NECS) were obtained after ZnCl2 activation of high nitrogen content polymer spheres prepared by one-pot hydrothermal synthesis using m-phenylenediamine and hexamethylenetetramine as raw materials. This spherical carbon resulted in diameters of about 0.6–1.2 μm and a high surface area (1237 m2/g) and successfully used for removal of Cr(Ⅵ) [62]. Hollow and hierarchical porous carbon has been synthesized by a simple one-step KOH chemical activation process for enhanced pollutant adsorption and energy storage. Porous carbon spheres has exhibited a high surface area of 1227 m2/g and revealed superior VOCs adsorption as compared to non-activated carbon spheres. Furthermore, supercapacitance measurements has also shown high capacitive performance of 353 F/g. TiO2 nanosheets has also been grown on the above mentioned carbon leading to improved photocatalytic degradation [63].
2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor (GAML) as the precursor was used for the preparation of PCS by HTC, carbonization and KOH activation, and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O was used as an oxidizing agent during carbonization. This material showed excellent porosity and high surface area of 2478 m2/g and was successfully used as carbon-based electrode materials for electric double-layer capacitor [64]. Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) carbon nanostructure microspheres (CNM) with the average particle size of 200 nm were prepared in the range of 500 to 800 ℃ using KOH. The results revealed that the CNM has surface area of 2134 m2/g and showed usability as electrode material [65].
Till date, full description of the microstructure and the adsorption characteristics of activated carbon are not determined by X-ray diffraction or high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) [26]. First, precusrsors for ACS may be characterised by surface area analyser (for BET surface area, total pore and micropore volume, and pore size distribution), electron microscopy (for morphology), CHNS analysis (for elemental composition) and thermal analyses [by thermogravimetric analyser (TGA) to evaluate the thermal stability]. All these analysis are also necessary for final product. The adsorption capacity of ACS is determined using iodine number apart from surface area and pore volume [8]. Thermal analysis by TGA of any precursor is necessary when it is used for first time. In TGA graph, first weight loss represent the moisture removal (25 to 150 ℃), second represents the elimination of volatile matters and tars (150–400 ℃) and third the decomposition of a structure (400–550 ℃). Above that the mass loss is less. The ultimate analysis of materials are carried out to analyse the carbon (C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N), sulphur (S), ash and oxygen (O) content. X-ray powder diffraction is used to determine the structure of the activated carbon. Raman spectroscopy is utilized for bulk structure of activated carbon. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is used to analyse the morphology of the precursors as well as ACS. HRTEM resulted in local nanostructure pictures.
The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms analysis is commonly used for determination of the BET surface area, the pore volume and the pore size distribution of ACS. Six types of isotherms are used for the study of porous texture of the activated carbon material. The BET theory is the most commonly used for determining the surface area of activated carbon. In BET theory the relative pressure is from 0.05 to 0.25 for specific surface area and 0.99 for total pore volume. As per new IUPAC report, caution is required in applying the BET method for the assessment of surface area and a recommended procedure improves the reproducibility of the method, when micropores are present. It is now recognised that due to nitrogen quadrupole moment, uncertainty in the value of σm (N2)—possibly ~20% present for some surfaces. For various reasons, argon adsorption at 87 K is considered to be more reliable and is now recommended—particularly for micropore size analysis. It may be impossible to separate the processes of monolayermultilayer adsorption and micropore filling. With microporous adsorbents, the linear range of the BET plot may be very difficult to locate. A useful procedure allows one to overcome this difficulty and avoid any subjectivity in evaluating the BET monolayer capacity. It must be re-emphasised that this procedure should not be expected to confirm the validity of the BET monolayer capacity. Thus, the BET-area derived from a Type I isotherm must not be treated as a realistic probe accessible surface area. It represents an apparent surface area, which may be regarded as a useful adsorbent "fingerprint" [71].
Kelvin equation based pore size distributions are used for characterization of ACS. The micropore size distribution is determined using the Howath-Kawazoe, Dubinin-Radushkevich and Dubinin-Astakov methods. It is now evident that pore size analysis of narrow mesopores cannot be reliably achieved by the application of procedures based on the Kelvin equation, such as the Barrett Joyner Halenda (BJH) method. Density functional theory (DFT) based computational procedures are included in commercially available software and provide a reasonably reliable assessment of the nanopore size distribution (i.e., for both mesopores and micropores), provided that the given nanopore structure is compatible with the chosen DFT kernel [71]. Generally activated carbons have macropores of greater that 50 nm size, mesopores of 2–5 nm and micropores of less than 2 nm. Adsorption is a process used for removal of solutes (from gaseous or liquid mixtures) on solid surface. It is carried out using two ways either physical adsorption or chemical adsorption. Vander-Waals forces are the driving forces for physical adsorption whereas chemical bonding is responsible for chemical adsorption. Generally, iodine number is used for determination of adsorption capacity of the ACS and defined as the number of mg of iodine adsorbed by 1 g of activated carbon from an aqueous solution when the iodine concentration of the residual filtrate is 0.02 N. Characterization of the surface functionalities is done by infrared (IR) spectroscopy. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) gives about the carbon, oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen composition of activated carbons for characterization [26].
In a study, the textural structure was determined by SEM and XRD of ACS based on coal which was prepared using phenolic resin (PR) bonding materials. The iodine number was 720–780 mg/g and best spherical shapes resulted in with AC and PR at a ratio of 60:40 [72]. In another study the detailed characterization in terms of porosity was carried out for ACS prepared using phenolic resin by CO2 activation at 950 ℃. The BET surface area, micropore volume and total pore volume increased from 960 m2/g to 2092 m2/g, 0.3662 cm3/g to 0.7221 cm3/g and 0.4093 cm3/g to 1.159 cm3/g respectively on increasing soaking time from 3 h to 12 h. However, the crushing was found to be greater than 2 kg/sphere at the surface area below 738 m2/g. The crushing was found to be 0.953 kg/sphere at the highest surface area of 2092 m2/g [73]. Scanning electron microscopic image of ACS prepared from sulphonated PSDVB is shown in Figure 2.
The main applications of ACS include the adsorption of heavy metals ions, adsorption of volatile organic matters, dyes, catalyst support, gas storage, energy storage and adsorbent materials in chemical protective clothings.
Heavy metals such as Mercury Hg(Ⅱ), Chromium Cr(Ⅵ), Cadmium Cd(Ⅱ), Arsenic As(Ⅴ) and Lead Pb(Ⅱ) are found in waste generated from industries like textile, mining, tanneries, electroplating and petrochemical industries. These heavy metals have serious effects on human health including animals and crops. Adsorption studies of heavy metals using ACS from different precursors have been carried out by various researchers. Adsorptive removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions was carried out using ACS prepared from polystyrene (PS) resins by chemical activation. This ACS resulted in 976 m2/g surface area and 0.68 cm3/g pore volume (total surface acidity, 1133 meq/100 g and surface basicity, 275.3 meq/100 g). ACS revealed their utility for the adsorption of CN (50%), and Pb(Ⅱ), Mn(Ⅱ), Hg(Ⅱ), Cu(Ⅱ), Cd(Ⅱ), Zn(Ⅱ), and Ni(Ⅱ) (50–90%) from their contaminated solution [6]. Pilot scale produced ACS from sulphonated polystyrene resins using steam activation was also evaluated for the adsorptive removal of Cr(Ⅵ) from aqueous solutions. The ACS produced using this pilot scale process have BET surface area of 1009 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.89 cm3/g. The carbon content of ACS was 92.32% with 1.1 kg/sphere crushing strength. This ACS resulted in 99.1% Cr(Ⅵ) removal from aqueous solution (initial concentration, 50 mg/L; pH, 2; ACS dose, 1 g/L; contact time, 2 h; agitation, 120 rpm and temperature, 30 ℃) [8]. Parameters such as acidic pH significantly affect the adsorption of these heavy metals on activated carbons. The oxygenated surface contributed at both pH either less than 7 or greater than 7. The important factors that affecting adsorption of heavy metals include adsorbent dose, solution pH and its temperature, contact time, agitation speed and heavy metal concentration. It was also reported that the use of same adsorbent to remove two heavy metals behave in differet ways in terms of pH, the contact time and and the adsorption behaviour [26]. The mercury removal efficiency of the oxidized ACS samples presented better performance with the increase in the oxidation temperature. The oxidation-modified ACS at 300 ℃ (ACS-O300) was the optimal sorbent for removal of elemental mercury from simulated flue gas [45]. Further, some metallic oxides were doped to prepare activated carbon spheres (PAC) to enhance the elemental mercury removal ability and resulted that the PAC-Cu have the highest removal ability among doped metallic oxides. Meanwhile, PAC-Cu has an ability of sulfur resistance [46].
Activated carbon produced by hydrothermal carbonization and physico-chemical activation from jute (JS) resulted in 856.89 m2/g surface area and was further used for adsorption of Cu(Ⅱ) [57]. Nitrogen-enriched carbon spheres (NECS) with surface area (1237 m2/g) was used for removal of Cr(Ⅵ) and resulted in the maximum Cr(Ⅵ) removal capacity as high as 279 mg/g at pH 2.0. Further, the NECS adsorbent was shown to maintained over 90% Cr(Ⅵ) removal efficiency after six cycles. Finally, the Cr(Ⅵ) removal efficiency of NECS reached 99.9% with a dosage of 12 g/L for real acidic electroplating wastewater (the initial concentration, 936.68 mg/g and pH, 1.5), clearly showed the potential of this novel adsorbent for treating Cr-containing wastewater [62].
Carboxyl-rich carbon microspheres (CSp) prepared by HTC from hemicellulose-derived by-products of pulp refining was used for adsorption of Pb(Ⅱ) and Cd(Ⅱ) from aqueous solution. This study revealed the adsorption capacities of 380.1 and 100.8 mg/g for Pb(Ⅱ) and Cd(Ⅱ), respectively [74]. Mesoporous carbon microspheres were successfully synthesized by a spraying method for adsorption of Cr(Ⅵ) from waste water. As the adsorption process was pH dependent, it showed maximum removal efficiency of Cr(Ⅵ) at pH 3.0 [75]. Magnetically separated and N, S co-doped mesoporous carbon microspheres (N/S-MCMs/Fe3O4) were fabricated by encapsulating SiO2 nanoparticles within N, S-containing resorcinol/formaldehyde polymer based microspheres and cysteine as the nitrogen and sulfur co-precursors, followed by the carbonization process, silica template removal, and the introduction of Fe3O4 into the carbon mesopores. This material exhibits an enhanced Hg2+ adsorption capacity of 74.5 mg/g, and the adsorbent can be conveniently and rapidly separated from wastewater using an external magnetic field [76]. A colloidal carbon nanospheres (CNS: 400–500 nm in diameter) synthesized via simple hydrothermal treatment of glucose solution was used for adsorption of Ag(Ⅰ) ions from aqueous solutions. The surface of nonporous CNS after activated by NaOH was enriched with –OH and –COO– functional groups. Despite the low surface area (<15 m2/g), the maximum adsorption capacity obtained with CNS activated with 0.5 M NaOH was 152 mg/g with the initial Ag(Ⅰ) concentration lower than 2 ppm and the adsorbent dosage of 1 g/L [77]. Adsorption capacities of some ACS for heavy metals are given in Table 4.
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | pH/ Temperature | Order of the kinetic model | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity/ Recovery with heavy metal | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | H2SO4 | 976 | 0.68/0.47 | - | - | - | Pb(Ⅱ)-96.4%; Hg(Ⅱ)-96%; Cu(Ⅱ)-93% | [6] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1009 | 0.89 | 2 | - | - | Cr(Ⅵ)-99.1% | [8] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1329.11 | 0.62/0.41 | 25 ℃ | - | - | Elemental Hg-71% | [45] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 954 | 0.49/0.42 | 150 ℃ | - | - | Elemental Hg | [46] |
Jute | KOH and CO2 | 856.89 | 0.889/0.689 | 30 ℃ | Pseudo-second order | Langmuir | 31.44 mg/g for Cu(Ⅱ) | [57] |
m-phenylenediamine and hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) | ZnCl2 | 1237 | 0.58/0.35 | 1.5 | Pseudo-second order | Freundlich | 279 mg/g for Cr(Ⅵ) | [62] |
Pentosan | Hydrothermal | 13.7 | 0.026* | 30 ℃ | - | Freundlich and Langmuir | 380.1 mg/g for Pb(Ⅱ) and 100.8 mg/g for Cd(Ⅱ) | [74] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde/SiO2 | - | 1221 | 2.7/0.253 | 3 | Pseudo-second order | Freundlich and Langmuir | 165.3 mg/g for Cr(Ⅵ) | [75] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 542 | - | - | Pseudo-second order | - | 74.5 mg/g for Hg2+ | [76] |
Glucose | NaOH | 12.7 | 0.02 | RT | Pseudo-second order | Langmuir | 144.9 mg/g for Ag(Ⅰ) | [77] |
* Micropore volume. |
Novel energy storage systems have gained enormous importance and activated carbons are the key materials utilised for this applications due to microporosity, lage surface area, electrochemical inertness and relatively high electrical conductivity. It is established that the porous structure and surface area of activated carbon are the most important characteristics that influence the performance of the capacitors. The use of ACS in supercapacitor electrode materials has been studied and found well. The resorcinol-formaldehyde resins carbonized at 600 and 900 ℃ resulted carbon spheres with surface areas of 592.4 m2/g and 952.5 m2/g with specific capacitances of 17.5, and 33.5 F/g (scan rate of 5 mV/s), respectively [29]. Mesoporous carbon microspheres were used as electrode materials for supercapacitor and resulted in specific capacitance of 268 F/g under a current density of 1.0 A/g [30]. Nitrogen-containing carbon microspheres (NCMs) were prepared via directed carbonization and evaluated for the electrochemical properties of the NCMs electrodes. It showed a high specific capacitance of 228 F/g at a current density of 1.0 A/g in 6 M KOH aqueous electrolyte, indicating good capacitive behaviour and also retained 86% capacity after 5000 charge/discharge cycles [35]. Nitrogen-containing ultramicroporous carbon nanospheres (N-UCNs) with high surface area (1439 m2/g) have showed excellent electrochemical performance such as high specific capacitance (269 F/g at 1.0 A/g) and long-term cycle stability (90.3% retention after 10000 charge/discharge cycles) in 6 M KOH aqueous electrolyte [36]. Spherical carbons (SCs) prepared using modified stober method upon carbonization were used for capacitor application which resulted in electrochemical capacitance of 127 F/g under basic conditions using SCs of 482 m2/g surfacre area [38]. A monodisperse carbon microsphere with surface area of 840 m2/g and micropore volume of 0.40 cm3/g exhibited a size-dependent electrical double-layer capacitor performance in which the capacitance increases with decreasing particle size. The nitrogen and oxygen codoped carbon spheres with the smallest size (0.8–0.6 µm) delivered a high specific capacitance (282 F/g at 0.5 A/g) [42].
Porous carbon spheres (PCSs) with narrow pore size distribution and high content of oxygen-containing functional groups were used as electrode material for electrochemical energy storage. For supercapacitors, the PCSs exhibited a high specific capacitance, good rate capacity and cycling stability [56]. KOH activated carbon spheres (CSs) with 0.308 cm3/g of micropore volume and the pore diameter of 3.381 nm endowed good electrochemical performance with a specific capacitance of 182 F/g under a current density of 0.5 A/g, remarkable rate performance, and longterm cycling stability. The excellent electrochemical performance of this ACS was mainly attributed to the micromesoporous structure [58].
The hierarchical porous carbon microspheres (HPCS) derived from corncob and chemically activated using KOH displayed maximum specific capacitance of 384.5 F/g at scan rate of 5 mV/s and ultra-high rate capacitance of 137.3 F/g at the current density of 100 A/g indicated its significant potential application in the field of energy storage [59]. Polydisperse carbon nanospheres (PCNS) with microporous structure, monodisperse carbon nanospheres (MCNS) with hierarchical porous structure, and agglomerated carbon nanospheres (ACNS) were used for electrochemical applications and showed that the MCNS sample has the highest specific capacitance of 224 F/g (0.2 A/g), the best rate capability (73% retention at 20 A/g), and the most excellent capacitance retention of 93% over 10,000 cycles, making it to be the promising electrode material for high-performance supercapacitors [60]. A nickel-doped activated mesoporous carbon microsphere after KOH activation showed a specific capacitance of 361 F/g at 1.0 A/g and also remained an electrochemical capacitance of 301 F/g under a high current density of 20.0 A/g which established as potentially important for supercapacitor applications, where a fast charge/discharge is required [61]. GAML as a kind of waste liquid based PCS prepared by HTC, carbonization and activation was used as carbon-based electrode material for EDLC. It was also established that the Fe(NO3)3·9H2O plays an important role in improving the electrochemical property and resulted in high specific capacitance of 303.7 F/g and a high energy density of 8.54 Wh/kg at 40 mA/g with excellent cycle stability even after 8000 cycles [64]. Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based carbon nanostructure microspheres was also used for supercapacitor and showed its specific capacitance 311 F/g and 179 F/g in 3M KOH and 1 M organic electrolyte, respectively [65].
Mesoporous ACS (MACSs) prepared from resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) resin by chemical activation using ZnCl2 resulted in surface area (up to 2437.1 m2/g), and 1.37 cm3/g total pore volume and revealed the excellent capacitive performance and small internal resistance [67]. In another study, highly monodisperse N-doped microporous carbon spheres prepared using carbonization of polystyrene-based polymer spheres followed by activation resulted in 884.9 m2/g surface area and over 10% N-doping content. Further, the energy storage performance influenced by the micropores and N doping was studied and resulted in a maximum capacitance of 373 F/g at a current density of 0.2 A/g and excellent stability over 10,000 charge/discharge cycles. This study suggested that these CSs prepared from polymeric spheres will be new materials with high electrochemical performance [68]. A hollow spherical carbon (HSC) was prepared from corncob lignin through spray drying and subsequent heat treatment. The HSC produced at 1000 ℃ (surface area, 1261.7 m2/g), delivered high rate capability when it was directly used as electrode material for supercapacitors [78].
A series of porous carbon spheres (~300 nm particle size) with precisely adjustable mesopores (4–16 nm) and 2000 m2/g surface area was synthesized through a facile co-assembly of diblock polymer micelles with a nontoxic dopamine source for use as electrode material for electrochemical capacitors. The capacitance value was 111 F/g and established that large mesopores and a relatively low ratio of micropores are ideal for realizing high surface area normalized capacitance [79]. A pathway to produce tunable and porous spherical carbon materials was devised from sugar waste streams recoverd from biorefineries and used in energy storage application. Emulsion-based synthesis resulted in hollow spheres with abundant microporosity compared to simple hydrothermal synthesis which produces solid beads with micro and mesoporosity. The renewable carbon product has surface area of 872 m2/g with capacitance of up to 109 F/g and the capacitor exhibited nearly ideal capacitive behavior with 90.5% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles [80].
A nitrogen-doped hollow microporous carbon nanosphere was synthesized via the combination of hyper-crosslinking mediated self-assembly and further pyrolysed using polylactide-b-polystyrene (PLA-b-PS) copolymers and aniline monomers as precursor. With surface area of 945 m2/g and at a current density of 1.0 A/g, the resultant specific capacitance was 250 F/g. In addition, it also exhibited high capacitance retention of ~98% after charging-discharging 1500 times at 25 A/g which established that it can be used as promising supercapacitor electrode materials for high performance energy storage devices [81]. A one-pot reductive amination process (an effective route for heteroatom doping of carbon materials) was used to functionalize 2, 3-dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) beads with chitosan and L-cysteine to provide single (N)- and dual (N/S)-doped materials. The electrodes of carbonized carbon beads [chitosan-crosslinked DAC (CS-DAC): Surface area, 167.8 ± 1.93 m2/g] had a specific capacitance of up to 242 F/g at a current density of 1 A/g with electrodes maintained capacitance retention of 91.5% after 1000 charge/discharge cycles, suggesting it can be used as electrode active materials for energy storage [82].
Hollow carbon spheres were also used to design carbonaceous nanotubes (CTs) based nanostructures by encapsulating heteroatom-doping into one carbonaceous nanotube (HCSs@CT). The supercapacitor based on HCSs@CT-60 (surface area, 318 m2/g; pore volume, 0.78 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.09 cm3/g) has exhibited a specific capacitance of 235 F/g at 0.2 A/g. This HCSs@CTs possessed outstanding performances as electrode materials of supercapacitors with excellent cycling life, demonstrating great potential for applications in energy storage [83]. Nitrogen doped mesoporous carbon nanospheres (NMCs), lychee exocarp-like mesoporous carbon spheres (NLEMCs) and core–shell mesoporous carbon spheres (NCSMCs) have abundant mesporous structure, high N-doped content, high surface area and large pore volume [(1126.11 m2/g and 1.09 cm3/g for NLEMCs), (744.18 m2/g and 0.63 cm3/g for NMCs) and (434.53 m2/g and 0.55 cm3/g for NMCs)]. These materials exhibited specific capacitance of 262.4 F/g, 323.2 F/g and 247.06 F/g, respectively, at a current density of 0.2 A/g in 6 M KOH electrolyte solution [84].
A facile encapsulation of NiO nanoparticles in mesoporous carbon nanospheres (NiO/MCNs) is demonstrated and this material has uniform mesopores (5.9 nm) and high surface area (714 m2/g). NiO/MCNs has high specific capacitance of 406 F/g at 1.0 A/g in 6 M KOH electrolyte and it retains ~91.0% of the original capacity at 3.0 A/g after 10000 cycles [85]. Nitrogen-doped hollow mesoporous spherical carbon capsules (N-HMSCCs) was prepared by depositing mesoporous silica on the surface of the polyacrylonitrile nanospheres, followed by a dissolution-capture process occurring in the polyacrylonitrile core and silica shell. After carbonization and etching of silica, N-HMSCCs with uniform mesopore size (surface area, 718 m2/g; total pore volume, 0.87 cm3/g and average pore size, 4.6 nm) were produced which showed a high specific capacitance of 206.0 F/g at a current density of 1 A/g in 6.0 M KOH. In addition, 92.3% of the capacitance of N-HMSCCs still remained after 3000 cycles at 5 A/g [86]. Core/shell-structured SnO2–ZnO/C microspheres was prepared by a one-pot spray pyrolysis process transformed into yolk–shell Sn@C microspheres by heat-treatment at 1000 ℃ under a reducing atmosphere using 10% H2/Ar mixture gas. This microspheres (surface area, 448 m2/g) showed superior cycling and rate performances as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries [87].
Spherical carbon materials were also used for generation of open-ended, worm-like and graphene-like structures and incorporated in organic solar cells and found to give a measurable photovoltaic response [88].
A carbon nanospheres (CNSs) with three heteroatom co-doped (nitrogen, phosphorous and sulfur) were obtained from carbonization of highly-crosslinked organo (phosphazene) nanospheres of 300 nm diameter. It possesed a high surface area of 875 m2/g (total pore volume, 0.43 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.27 cm3/g) and its anode showed remarkable stability and coulombic efficiency in a long charge–discharge cycling up to 1000 cycles delivering about 130 mA·h/g [89]. Hierarchically structured activated carbon (HAC) from pitch and silica activated using chemical activation (simultaneously removed the silica template and increased the pore volume) was prepared. The HAC with a surface area of 1957 m2/g (micropore volume, 3.0 cm3/g), exhibited an extremely high specific capacitance of 157 F/g indicated its superior energy storage capability and was thus suitable for use in advanced ultracapacitors [90]. Spherical nitrogen-doped porous carbons was prepared through a template carbonization method, in which polyacrylamide (PAM) served as carbon and nitrogen sources, and calcium acetate as hard template. The PAM-Ca-650-1:3 sample displayed the best capacitance performance that have surface area of 648 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.59 cm3/g. At a current density of 0.5 A/g, the resultant specific capacitance is 194.7 F/g and it also retained 97.8% after charging-discharging 5000 times [91].
Graphitic porous carbon spheres (GPCS) prepared from spherical resorcinol/formaldehyde resin by Fe-catalysis at 900 ℃ resulted in surface area of 1100 m2/g with average diameter, 450 nm and pore size, 1–4 nm. Porous carbon spheres (PCS) were also prepared using RF resin spheres as the precursor and by calcining at 900 ℃ under a N2 atmosphere. GPCS showed enhanced charge storage capacity, with a specific capacitance of 127.4 F/g in 2 M KOH at a current density of 0.2 A/g that was nearly 3 times larger than that of amorphous porous carbon spheres with 96% retainability after 5000 cycles [92]. Porous silicon/carbon microspheres (GPSCMs) prepared by the ball milling and spray drying methods followed by carbonization and chemical vapor deposition processes resulted in sizes of 8–30 mm with surface areas between 20 and 90 m2/g. As the anode materials for lithium ion batteries, the average charge capacity was 589 mAh/g at a current density of 50 mA/g [93]. Low cost spherical carbon materials with large pore volume (4.0 cm3/g) and surface area (1510 m2/g) were prepared through a simple in-situ steam etching process, for use in sulfur hosts of lithium/sulfur batteries. The resulted material exhibited good capacity output (about 1300 mAh/g-S) and excellent capacity retention (70% after 600 cycles) [94]. The capacitance values of some ACS used as electrode material for supercapacitors are given in Table 5.
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Capacitance (F/g) | Refs. |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 1439 | 2.12/0.52 | 268 | [30] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 687 | 0.59 | 269 | [36] |
Phenolic resin | - | 482 | - | 127 | [38] |
Phenolic-formaldehyde | Steam | 840 | 0.40* | 282 | [42] |
Glucose | KOH | 3003 | - | 349 | [55] |
Pectin | KOH | 2440 | 1.28/0.65 | 231 | [56] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 735.4 | 0.622/0.306 | 182 | [58] |
F108/resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 703 | 0.645/0.317 | 224 | [60] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1096 | 0.97/0.14 | 361 | [61] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1227 | 0.90/0.81 | 353 | [63] |
2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor | KOH | 2478 | 1.24/0.99 | 303.7 | [64] |
PAN | KOH | 2134 | 1.41/0.82 | 311 | [62] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | ZnCl2 | 2437 | 1.37 | 240 | [67] |
Polystyrene beads (N-porous CS) | KOH | 844.9 | 0.48/0.33 | 373 | [68] |
Polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) | KOH | 2320 | 1.24/0.64 | 111 | [79] |
Sugar | KOH | 872 | 0.511 | 109 | [80] |
Polylactide-b-polystyrene (PLA-b-PS) copolymers and aniline | - | 945 | - | 250 | [81] |
PAN | - | 718 | 0.87 | 206 | [86] |
Pitch | KOH | 1957 | 3.0 | 157 | [90] |
Polyacrylamide | - | 648 | 0.59/0.11 | 194.7 | [91] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 1103.4 | 0.71/0.36 | 127.4 | [92] |
* Micropore volume. |
Dyes are organic compounds having resistant to light, water and oxidizing agents. Thus the degradation of dyes is difficult after release into aquatic systems. For dyes removal by adsorption process using ACS, the surface chemical properties of adsorbent plays an important role. It was reported that a polymeric ACS was about four times superior in terms of mechanical strength and about 5% smaller in terms of the micropore volume as compared to CAC. The adsorption capacities for methylene blue were 32 and 14 mg/g with PAC and CAC, respectively. These results suggested that the low mesopore volume was consistent with the values of BJH volume. The Langmuir model fitted better than the Freundlich model. The chemical properties of the activated carbons, solutions pH and the substituents on absorbates were influenced on removal [14]. Hydrothermally processed and chemically activated porous carbon nanosphere (PCNS), was used for adsorption of methylene blue, malachite green and rhodamine B dyes and resulted in the maximum capacity as 3152, 1455 and 1409 mg/g, respectively. In addition, PCNS exhibited a good reusable property after five consecutive cycles [66]. Chemically activated carbon microspheres (CACms), prepared by hydrothermal method were synthesized by sulfonation and carbonization of PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) microspheres and used for removal of methylene blue (MB). The adsorption capacity increased from 474.6 to 602.4 mg/g as the initial concentration increases from 20 to 300 mg/L in a wide pH range. The maximum adsorption capacity was 925.9 mg/g at 45 ℃ and temperature change was found to have a significant effect on the adsorption process [95]. Polydopamine microspheres were used for the removal of a cationic dye (methylene blue, MB) from aqueous solution and also studied the influence of various parameters such as solution pH, temperature, initial concentration, and contact time. This study resulted in adsorption capacity of 90.7 mg/g at 25 ℃ [96]. Carbon nanospheres were fabricated via the pyrolysis of polyacrylonitrile-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PAN-PMMA) core–shell nanoparticles with a diameter of 35–65 nm and a high surface area of 612.8 m2/g. The carbon nanospheres exhibited a large adsorption capacity of 190.0 mg/g for methylene blue, thus making them excellent adsorbents for the removal of organic pollutants from water [97].
Citrus pectin-derived, tunable carbon microspheres with good reusability toward methylene blue adsorption, were prepared by a facile hydrothermal method and resulted in great potential for the treatment of methylene blue wastewater [98]. ACS obtained by KOH chemical activation of spherical carbon (SC) produced from hydrothermal treatment (HT) of sucrose resulted in average diameter of 2.86 μm with surface area of 1534 m2/g and pore volume of 0.765 cm3/g. The maximum adsorption capacity monolayer was of 704.2 mg/g [99]. The characterists of ACS used for removal of organic dye are given in Table 6.
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | Dye | pH/ Temperature | Order of the kinetic model | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity/ Efficiency | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads ACS (M/s Kureha, Japan) | Steam | 1160 | 0.478* | Methylene blue | 3.8–4.4 | Langmuir isotherm | 32 mg/g | [14] | |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Methylene blue | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 3152 mg/g | [66] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Malachite green | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 1455 mg/g | [66] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Rhodamine B | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 1409 mg/g | [66] |
Polyvinyl alcohol | H2SO4 | - | - | Methylene blue | 6.5 | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 602.4 mg/g | [95] |
Polydopamine | - | 13.77 | - | Methylene blue | 25 ℃ | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 90.7 mg/g | [96] |
Citrus-pectin | - | 5.22 | - | Methylene blue | 12 | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 979.3 mg/g | [98] |
Sucrose | KOH | 1534 | 0.765 | Methylene blue | 25 ℃ | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 704.2 mg/g | [99] |
* Micropore volume. |
Adsorption of gases on ACS is important alternative to storage because ACS is hydrophobic and stable in moisture conditions. Capture of CO2 from different sources such as thermal power plants has been identified as better means for reduction of the CO2 present in the atmosphere. The surface properties of ACS influenced the adsorption potential for CO2 removal. Highly microporous carbon spheres prepared from phenolic resin spheres by CO2 activation with high surface area (BET surface area, 2930 m2/g; micropore volume, 1.12 cm3/g and diameter, 200 nm) was used for adsorption of CO2 and resulted in high uptake of 8.05 and 4.55 mmol/g at 0 and 25 ℃ under 1 bar, respectively. Relatively more CO2 uptake capacities resulted at low CO2 pressures as 1.42 mmol/g at 0.2 bar and 25 ℃ [11]. Spherical carbons (SCs) prepared using modified stober method upon carbonization were used for CO2 uptake and resulted in 89 cm3 STP/g (at 273 K and 1.0 bar) using SCs of surface area of 482 m2/g [38].
Activated carbon beads (ACS) prepared by phenolic-based resins beads and surface affinity promoted by N2 incorporation was studied for CO2 uptake in pre-combustion capture applications. Very high (20–45 wt%) CO2 uptakes at 40 bar were achieved suggesting the promising potential of these AC beads to be used where the CO2 pressure is relatively higher such as Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle based power plants [40]. ACS from nitrogen free phenolic resins (0.6–0.8 mm diameter) with high mechanical strength prepared by hydrothermal synthesis and potassium intercalation via a KOH treatment efficacy has been investigated for pulverised fuel post-combustion capture. At 25 ℃ and 0.15 bar partial pressure of CO2, the adsorption capacity of this ACS was about twice from 0.79 mmol/g for the untreated carbons to 1.51 mmol/g [49].
Millimeter-sized sulfur-doped microporous ACS was prepared by the sulfonation, oxidation, carbonization, and KOH activation from PSDVB prfecursor. This ACS was used for CO2 uptake and the SCS-700 ACS resulted in the best CO2 uptake quality at both 25 ℃ (4.21 mmol/g) and 50 ℃ (2.54 mmol/g) under ambient pressure. This is due to the presence of abundant ultramicropores and a high proportion of oxidized sulfur functional groups. The ACS have sulfur content of 0.69 wt%, and a surface area of 1526 m2/g with pore volume of 0.726 cm3/g. This ACS with high microporous volume of 0.617 cm3/g, also revealed high CO2 uptake of 10.66 mmol/g at 8 bar and 25 ℃ [69]. Further they have also studied CO2 removal by nitrogen and sulfur co-doped microporous ACS (NSCSs) synthesized from poly (styrene, ST-vinylimidazole, VIM-divinylbenzene) resin spheres. The NSCS-4-700 sample with a molar ratio of ST:VIM = 1:0.75 showed the best CO2 uptake at various conditions. It is revealed that CO2 uptake at low pressures resulted from influence of surface chemistry and micropores below 8.04 Å. With moderate pressure (8.0 bar), CO2 uptake was dominated by the volume of micropores. ACS (NSCS-1-700) resulted in the highest CO2 uptake of 1.11 mmol/g at 0.15 bar pressure [70].
The activated mesocarbon microbeads (a-MCMBs) with high surface area of 3180 m2/g were prepared And resulted in methane absorption (14.73 wt% at 298 K and 0.99 MPa) and hydrogen adsorption (7.8 wt% at 77 K and 0.95 MPa) [100]. Styrene divinylbenzene based ACS was prepared using KOH activation with surface area of 730–3870 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.44–2.07 cm3/g (micropore volume, 0.30–1.59 cm3/g). The adsorption of methane was 1.68 mmol/g at 20 ℃ [101]. A series of microporous carbons prepared through carbonization and KOH activation from sulfonated styrene divinylbenzene resin resulted in surface areas from 725 m2/g to 3870 m2/g and total pore volumes from 0.44 cm3/g to 2.07 cm3/g (micropore volume, 0.2 cm3/g to 1.16 cm3/g with less than 0.75 nm). Physisorption measurements showed very high uptakes of CO2 and H2 reaching 356 mg/g of CO2 (0 ℃ and 800 mm Hg), 209 mg/g of CO2 (25 ℃ and 850 mm Hg), and 39 mg/g of H2 (196 ℃ and 850 mm Hg) [102]. The nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon spheres have been synthesized via soft-template and hydrothermal synthetic strategies using phenol/formaldehyde resins as carbon sources and melamine as a nitrogen source. This carbon spheres showed high performance for hydrogen storage, and the hydrogen adsorption capacities were in the range of 140–185 cm3/g. The incorporation of nitrogen into carbons was favored for hydrogen uptake in low pressure [103]. Surface modification of hydrothermally prepared activated carbon beads via HNO3 oxidation and subsequent amination at elevated temperatures was investigated for pre-combustion capture CO2. The highest working capacity of 4.9 mmol/g was resulted in with modified sample having surface area of 1106 m2/g [104]. Characteristics of ACS used for gas storage is given in Table 7.
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Gas | Storage capacity/ uptake | Refs. |
Phenolic beads (CS-6-CD-4) | CO2 | 2284 | 0.89 | CO2 | 4.55 mmol/g | [11] |
Phenolic resin spheres | - | 482 | - | CO2 | 89 cm3/g | [38] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1280 | 0.91/0.43 | CO2 | 9.31% | [40] |
Phenolic beads | Steam and NH3 | 978 | 0.41/0.37 | CO2 | 10.33% | [40] |
Phenolic beads (ACS) | Steam | 1128 | 0.45/0.43 | CO2 | 0.79 mmol/g | [49] |
Phenolic beads (PR4_8000 ACS) | KOH | 1171 | 0.50/0.47 | CO2 | 1.25 mmol/g | [49] |
Polystyrene beads (SCS-700) | KOH | 1526 | 0.72/0.61 | CO2 | 4.21 mmol/g | [69] |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-4-700) | KOH | 1757 | 0.81/0.73 | CO2 | [70] | |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-1-700) | KOH | 1269 | 0.58/0.53 | CO2 | 1.11 mmol/g | [70] |
Pitch | KOH | 3180 | 1.9 | CH4 | 14.73% | [100] |
Pitch | KOH | 3180 | 1.9 | H2 | 7.8% | [100] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07/1.59 | CH4 | 1.68 mmol/g | [101] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07 | CO2 | 356 mg/g | [102] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07 | H2 | 39 mg/g | [102] |
Phenol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1200 | 1.51 | H2 | 185 cm3/g | [103] |
Phenolic resin (novolac) | - | 1106 | 0.49/0.41 | CO2 | 4.9 mmol/g | [104] |
VOCs such as benzene, toluene, and o-xylene are recognized as a source of air pollutants. Adsorption of VOCs using AC has been carried out by various investigators to remove them from the environment. Activated carbon spheres (ACSs) derived from 3-methylphenol-formaldehyde and using poly(ethylene glycol) additives was used for removal of dibenzothiophene from model diesel fuel and proposed that the adsorptive capacity of samples had a good linear correlation with the volume of specific micropores (0.6–1.2 nm) [44]. In toluene adsorption, the importance of the narrow micropores and large bed density at low pressure has been studied and resulted in better adsorption capacity with ACS as 38 g toluene/100 g for GE31C and 46 g toluene/100 g for GE60C [48]. PS based ACS (PACSK up to 2022 m2/g surface area and more than 0.78 cm3/g total pore volume) were produced using KOH activation and studied the adsorption of dibenzothiophene (DBT). The prepared PACSK resulted in better mechanical strength and 153 mg/g adsorption capacity. ACS after using as adsorbent for DBT was washed in shaker bath or ultrasonic bath with toluene for regeneration at 80 ℃ [50]. Further they have also studied adsorption performance of a sulfur-containing dibenzothiophene (DBT) using steam activated PACS with BET surface areas up to 979–1672 m2/g. The maximum adsorption capacity of PACS to DBT was 109.36 mg/g [51]. ACS prepared from sucrose with 1430 m2/g surface area [C-2(char and KOH ratio of 1:2)-total pore volume, 0.618 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.516 cm3/g] was also used for the adsorption of thiophenic compounds. It possessed high adsorption capacity (41.5 mgS/g for 300 ppmwS model oil), fast adsorption rate (97% saturated within 5 min) as well as relatively good selectivity for the adsorption of benzothiophene, dibenzothiophene or 4, 6-dimethyldibenzothiophene due to the abundant small micropores, suitable mesopore fraction and various oxygen functionalities present in the carbon [54].
Hollow and hierarchical porous carbon prepared through the KOH activation was used for adsorption of ethanol, methanol and isopropyl alcohol. This study revealed superior VOCs adsorption as compared to non-activated carbon spheres [63]. The influence of surface oxygen groups of adsorbent on the irreversible adsorption of a mixture of OCs was studied using treated beaded activated carbon and established these groups on adsorbate-adsorbent interactions [105]. The high adsorption capacity and high mesopore fraction of beaded activated carbon were also required for organic vapor use requiring extended adsorption/regeneration cycling [105]. Styrene divinylbenzene ion-exchange based ACS was also used for the uptake of benzene apart from methane. The adsorption of benzene was 19.6 mmol/g at 20 ℃ [101].
Adsorption studies of ethanol using ACS was carried out at relative pressure range from 0.001 to 1. Oxidation (in HNO3 solution or air) and/or by thermal treatment in N2 was used to modify oxygen surface contents of the activated carbons. At 225 ppmv ethanol concentration, oxidized samples resulted in good adsorption. With increase in relative pressure of ethanol the role of microporosity was most important [106]. The role of surface oxygen groups to irreversible adsorption (aka heel formation) during cyclic adsorption/regeneration (5 cycles) of organic vapors (a mixture of nine organic compounds) has been studied with three chemically modified ACS, including two oxygen-deficient (hydrogen-treated and heat-treated) and one oxygen-rich sample (nitric acid-treated). This study suggested that the pore size distribution played role in heel formation such as narrow micropores (<7 Å) in the oxygen-deficient samples and midsize micropores (7–12 Å) in the oxygen-rich sample [107]. Porous carbon beads (PCBs) of about 1.5 mm were prepared by phase inversion and subsequent carbonization from PVDF solution containing phenolic resins. PCBs-2 obtained after moderate phase inversion resulted in highest surface area (1166 m2/g) with 0.249 cm3/g mesoporous pore volume and 2.87 nm pore size. PCBs-2 resulted in adsorption capacities for benzene (1.467 g/g), toluene (1.229 g/g), n-hexane (0.600 g/g) and acetone (0.770 g/g) under static adsorption and higher adsorption kinetics for benzene vapour on dynamic adsorption [108]. The characteristic of some ACS used for removal of VOCs is given in Table 8.
Precursor/Product | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | Volatile | Temperature | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | Refs. |
Phenol-formaldehyde beads from bamboo tar | CO2 | 189 | 0.10 | Toluene | 50 ℃ | Langmuir | 29 mg/g | [43] |
3-methylphenol and formaldehyde | Steam | 1501 | 0.72/0.25 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Langmuir-Freundlich | 21.83 mg/g | [44] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1566 | 1.05/0.62 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 153 mg/g | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1555 | 1.29/0.56 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 102 mg/g | [50] |
Pitch | Steam | 1573 | 0.68/0.50 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 93 mg/g | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 979 | 0.84/0.31 | Dibenzothiophene | - | Freundlich | 109.36 mg/g | [51] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 1065 | 0.53* | Toluene | 25 ℃ | - | 236 mg/L | [48] |
BAC from pitch (M/s Kureha, Japan) | - | 1291 | 0.55* | Ethanol | 25 ℃ | - | 0.51 cm3/g | [106] |
BAC4 oxidized with HNO3 | - | 1212 | 0.53* | Ethanol | 25 ℃ | - | 0.49 cm3/g | [106] |
BAC-O from Pitch (M/s Kureha, Japan) | - | 1189 ± 11 | 0.50 ± 0.01/ 0.43 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-O-400 | - | 1360 ± 5 | 0.56 ± 0.01/ 0.50 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-H-400 | - | 1335 ± 24 | 0.56 ± 0.01/ 0.49 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-400 | - | 1315 ± 15 | 0.55 ± 0.01/ 0.49 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
* Micropore volume. |
The importance of carbon spheres as support materials is well known in catalysis community. In a review carbon nanospheres as support was also described earlier [109]. In catalytic applications, PBSAC was used as catalyst support for platinum and ruthenium in direct methanol fuel cells, in ethylbenzene dehydrogenation, ionic liquid phase (SILP) catalysts using homogeneous Rhodium, catalysts for the hydroaminomethylation of ethylene and decomposition of 2-chloroethylethylsulfide using copper as supported active material or in photocatalysis as support for titanium dioxide nanoparticles. PBSAC are used as catalyst support because it is dust free and has excellent fluid dynamic characteristics. It also takes less post processing times and facilitated catalyst recycling. The Palladium-PBSAC catalysts having ACS of 50,200 and 500 µm size with surface area of 1159–2350 m2/g (total pore volume, 0.61–1.67 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.37–0.92 cm3/g) were used in the hydrogenation of cinnamic acid and resulted in full conversion at 0.122 m3· kg/Pd·s of an optimum effective rate constant [12]. Monodisperse, mesoporous carbon nanoparticles (PAMCs) prepared from polymer/colloidal silica self-aggregates using a facile synthetic route have been demonstrated to serve as effective electrocatalysts for the hydrogen peroxide reduction reaction (HPRR) and the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), both in acidic and alkaline solutions. These findings encouraged further investigation of other carbon-based, metal-free materials for electrocatalysis of HPRR, a reaction that is relatively underexplored [32]. Pt nanowires (PtNWs) grown on the porous carbon spheres (PCSs) interconnected with each other to form a porous nanowires network structure was used as a catalyst. The three-dimensional (3D) hybrid catalyst material consisting of PtNWs network supported on PCSs exhibiteds superior catalytic activity and stability towards both methanol and ethanol electro-oxidation in acidic media [56]. In another study PBSAC of surface area of 1755 m2/g (total pore volume, 1.07 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.78 cm3/g), 1714 m2/g (total pore volume, 1.03 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.76 cm3/g) and 1717 m2/g (total pore volume, 1.04 cm3/g and micropore volume, 0.77 cm3/g) of 500 μm diameter has been used to prepare many Pd/PBSAC (1 wt%) catalysts and utilized in the hydrodechlorination (HDC) of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) in aqueous phase. The catalyst resulted in a high stability for long use (100 h on stream) continuous application [110].
The catalytic activity of the hollow mesoporous carbon spheres (surface area, 187 m2/g and the pore volume, 0.2 cm3/g) derived from cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and prepared by templating CNCs onto sacrificial silica spheres followed by heat treatment was successfully used for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-aminophenol (4-AP) by sodium borohydride (NaBH4) with superior performance compared to that of metal nanoparticle and metal nanoparticle-carbon hybrid based catalysts [111]. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur co-doped hierarchical porous carbon spheres (NPS-HPCs) were synthesized by combining the polymerization of hexachlorocyclophosphazene and 4, 4'-sulfonyldiphenol with co-assembly of colloidal SiO2 NPs, followed by a pyrolysis and etching process. The NPS-HPCs with high surface area (960 m2/g) and pore volume (1.86 cm3/g) showed that the palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) loaded NPS-HPCs using methanol as a reductant exhibit high activity, excellent stability and recyclability for hydrogenation of nitroarenes [112]. The Pd NPs immobilized on m-aminophenol/formaldehyde resin (APF)-derived porous carbon spheres (Pd@PCS) was used as heterogeneous catalysts for organic dye reduction reactions. The Pd NPs with an average particle size of ca. 12 ± 0.8 nm were highly dispersed on the surface of PCSs possessed surface area and pore volume as high as 896.3 m2/g and 0.934 cm3/g, respectively. The prepared catalysts exhibited the high catalytic activity towards crystal violet (CV), eosin yellow (SY) and sunset yellow (SY) with reusability [113]. A nitrogen-doped hollow carbon spheres (NHCS) was synthesized by nanocasting using nonporous core/mesoporous shell silica spheres as exotemplate followed by carbonization of PAN at 850 ℃ consist of hollow spheres with a diameter of about 200 nm and a shell thickness of about 30 nm with 1761 m2/g surface area and 1.3 cm3/g total pore volume. This material was studied as a support for platinum-based electrocatalysts. The electrochemical activity in the ORR and stability was studied for two Pt@NHCS materials, one Pt@NHCS with a Pt particle (<2 nm) and other after thermal treatment at 850 ℃ (Pt@NHCSΔT) with a Pt particle size (2–3 nm). The results showed that nitrogen doping of the carbon supports can offer benefits for achieving high initial mass activities due to improved high platinum dispersion [114].
Catalysts consisting of microporous titanium silicalite-1 (TS-1) as reactive and polymer-based spherical activated carbon (PBSAC: Surface area, 1748 m2/g; total pore volume, 2.0 cm3/g and diameter of particle, 0.45–0.50 mm, Blucher, Germany) as sorptive component were used for epoxidation of commercially available biodiesel with aqueous H2O2 as an oxidant. In this catalyst, the active titanium sites were utilized four times more efficiently than in the commercial TS-1 [115]. Synthesis of spherical activated carbon with mesoporous structure using a soluble low molecular weight phenolic resol precursor through an ammonium alginate assisted sol-gel method was carried out. Introducing CaCO3 during the preparation process promoted the formation of a mesoporous structure of carbon spheres and evidently increased the surface area and oxygen content. The conversion of isobutane reached up to 28% for this spherical activated carbon, and the selectivity of isobutene reached up to 96% [116].
ACS also has potential for use in biomedical applications [117]. Paramagnetic mesoporous carbon spheres (surface area, 586 m2/g and total pore volume, 0.53 cm3/g) were successfully used for vitamib B12 adsorption and showed highest vitamin B12 adsorption capacity of 103 mg/g [29]. Sucrose derived ACS prepared using physical and chemical activation was used for removal of pharamaceutical compounds, paracetamol and iopamidol. The maximum adsorption capacity was 472 and 151 mg/g with K2CO3 activated carbon for paracetamol and iopamidol respectively [47].
ACS with mesopores (3 and 5 nm) prepared from phenolic resin using steam activation at 800 ℃ have good properties for adsorption of creatinine. Moreover, ACS (surface area, 1663 m2/g) with mesopores and macropores with 3–5 to 10–90 nm resulted in adsorption properties of VB12, that is larger molecule than creatinine [52].
The antibacterial activity of ZnO containing ACS was studied and reported that the antibacterial activity for Staphylococcus aureus was greater than that for Escherichia coli. This activity was due to the result of H2O2 formation from ZnO dispersed in ACS [118]. AST-120 (Kremezin; Kureha Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) is an oral ACS adsorbent used to remove indole and avoids indoxyl sulfate production in intestines. The treatment effect of AST-120 in chronic kidney disease (CKD) still remains a controversy, and physicians are required to carry out an individualized treatment plan for each CKD patient, in order to provide an optimal treatment to retard the progression of CKD and uremia-related complications, including cardiovascular disease [119]. The adsorptive removal of 5-Hydroxymethyfurfural (HMF) and fructose from aqueous solutions using PBSAC (surface area, 1770–1920 m2/g: Blucher, Germany) as adsorbents was studied and showed a high capacity (450–603 mg/g at 20 ℃) and selectivity for the adsorption of HMF from aqueous solutions. The adsorption capacity for fructose was 280 mg/g. This study on biogenic platform chemicals with polarity differences utilizing commercial ACS may give basis for process development in future [120].
Polyethyleneimine-grafted oxidized mesoporous carbon nanospheres (OP) were also developed for combined photothermal combined gene therapy in vitro and in vivo. This work also revealed that it cannot only deliver the therapeutic gene (pING4) to tumors for gene therapy, but also can eliminate the tumors by photothermal ablation that suggested the OP's potential for cancer therapy [121]. Uniform mesoporous carbon spheres (UMCS) were also used as a carrier to improve the bioavailability of the model drug, celecoxib (CEL) and further investigated the mechanism responsible for the improved bioavailability of CEL. UMCS (surface area, 1069 m2/g and total pore volume, 1.49 cm3/g) significantly reduced the rate of drug efflux and improve CEL permeability [122].
Chemical threat is a major challenge in present day war scenario. In order to protect personnel against chemical threat, personnel protection suit/clothing is most important. Some manufactures around the world have developed chemical protective clothing using ACS. These clothing/ensembles include NBC suit and socks. ACS based chemical protective clothings provide good comfort due to less weight, better air permeability and less water vapor resistance alongwith protection capability against chemical warfare agents. For fabrication of ACS based chemical protective clothing, ACS is coated/adhered on a fabric (knitted or woven base fabric of cotton or aramid) with the help of a polyurethane based adhesive to get strength along with good air permeability and low water vapour resistance. Further, non-woven fabric is laminated over ACS coated fabric either using same adhesive or by hot melt techniques. Finally, fabrication of complete suit or clothing is carried out in combination with this fabric and outer layer fabric [4,13]. Saratoga™ is composite filter fabric containing ACS adhered onto textile carrier fabrics. The ACS density varied from 180 to 220 g/m2 that give 24 h protection against chemical warfare agent and at least 45 days of wear under battlefield conditions alongwith multiple field washings. ACS outer surface of more than 85% is available to toxic gases that resulted in fast adsorption [123]. ACS based filter fabric covered with a polyamide fabric was used to protect against acetic acid, acetone, ethanol, ethylenediamine (1, 2-diaminoethane), and toluene (methylbenzene), n-hexane, methanol, and styrene (phenylethene) and cyclohexylamine (cyclohexanamine) [124].
The usage of PBSAC-based agglomerates in AX canisters resulted in low pressure drops compared to the standard reference. The activation with steam can be terminated during PBSAC production at any time to define the micropore volume. The CO2 activation generates susbstantial amount of meso- and macropore volume. PBSAC was used in air purification for adsorption of organic gases (cyclohexale, isobutene and di-methyl ether) with respiratory canister. Furthermore, PBSAC are also suitable for the removal of trace amounts of pharmaceuticals (diatrizoic acid, carbamazepine, bisoprolol and diclofenac) with fast adsorption kinetics and more capacity from waste water [39]. PBSAC with copper oxides (Cu2O and CuO) was produced on a 1 kg scale using cross-linked polystyrene of 0.3–0.7 mm size and utilized for decomposition of 2-chloroethylethylsulfide. A batch process using a rotary kiln reactor using steam and CO2 activation (two steps) was utilized. This copper modified PBSAC can be a potential hybrid material for self-detoxification used for individual protection from chemical warfare agents. In future, this self-decontamination potential needs validation with real CW agents [125].
ACS derived from polymeric precursor was studied for adsorption of steroid micropollutants and resulted in better performance as compared to conventional GAC, and comparable to PAC at realistic concentrations (10 ng/L to 1 mg/L). This performace of ACS may be attributed to its enhanced hydrophobic characteristics alongwith 2125 m2/g of surface area formed by 98% of small mesopores (<5 nm, average 1–2 nm) [126].
The use of activated carbon is increasing due to the various types of novel applications. Preparation of the better quality of ACS with low-cost, high specific surface area, defined pore size distribution and compressive strength are the important parameters for this increased use. Proper choice of precursors, carbonization conditions, activation types (physical, chemical or combination of both), activation temperature and time, and the burn off percentage are the the most important parameters to achieve high adsorption capacity. The precursors used for ACS preparation include pitch, phenolic and polystyrene resins, lignin, carbohydrates and some other materials. ACS are used for adsorptive removal of toxicants from gases and liquid, separation of gases from mixture, energy storage, chemical catalysis, purifying water and many other applications. Chemical protective clothing has also been developed for personnel protection against chemical warfare agents using ACS. Significant efforts have been made to optimize the carbonization and activation conditions to achieve desired surface area and compressive strength of ACS used in chemical protective clothing. In chemical protective clothing, compressive strength is very important characteristics. It is essential to fully characterize both precursor and ACS to know all the features. For use as an adsorbent material (adsorption of heavy metals, volatile organic contents, dyes, catalysis, gas storage and energy storage), the suface chemistry plays an important role. Process optimization could lead to get excellent characteristics of ACS for many novel applications. Still, it is needed to use alternative precursors or develop a novel approach or methodology to make low cost ACS with greater strength, well pores size distribution, good surface properties and high specific BET surface area.
The author thanks Director, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior for his keen interest, encouragement and guidance for this work.
The author declares that there has no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Manocha SM (2003) Porous carbons. Sadhana 28: 335–348. doi: 10.1007/BF02717142
![]() |
[2] |
Singh A, Lal D (2010) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon spheres from polystyrene sulphonate beads by steam and carbon dioxide activation. J Appl Polym Sci 115: 2409–2415. doi: 10.1002/app.31340
![]() |
[3] | Cukierman AL (2013) Development and environmental applications of activated carbon cloths. ISRN Chem Eng 2013: 1–31. |
[4] | Tripathi NK, Singh VV, Sathe M, et al. (2018) Activated carbon fabric: An adsorbent material for chemical protective clothing. Defence Sci J 68: 83–90. |
[5] |
Khan MK, Maclachlan MJ (2015) Polymer and carbon spheres with an embedded shell of plasmonic gold nanoparticles. ACS Macro Lett 4: 1351–1355. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00742
![]() |
[6] |
Baghel A, Singh B, Prasad GK, et al. (2011) Preparation and characterization of active carbon spheres prepared by chemical activation. Carbon 49: 4739–4744. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.080
![]() |
[7] |
Romero-Anaya AJ, Ouzzine M, Lillo-Ródenas MA, et al. (2014) Spherical carbons: Synthesis, characterization and activation processes. Carbon 68: 296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.006
![]() |
[8] | Tripathi NK, Sathe M (2017) Pilot scale production of activated carbon spheres using fluidized bed reactor and its evaluation for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. J Inst Eng India Ser E 98: 141–147. |
[9] |
Amorós-Pérez A, Cano-Casanova L, Ouzzine M, et al. (2018) Spherical activated carbons with high mechanical strength directly prepared from selected spherical seeds. Materials 11: 770. doi: 10.3390/ma11050770
![]() |
[10] |
Singh A, Lal D (2008) Microporous activated carbon spheres prepared from resole-type crosslinked phenolic beads by physical activation. J Appl Polym Sci 110: 3283–3291. doi: 10.1002/app.28846
![]() |
[11] |
Wickramaratne NP, Jaroniec M (2013) Activated carbon spheres for CO2 adsorption. ACS Appl Mater Inter 5: 1849–1855. doi: 10.1021/am400112m
![]() |
[12] |
Klefer H, Munoz M, Modrow A, et al. (2016) Polymer-based spherical activated carbon as easy-to-handle catalyst support for hydrogenation reactions. Chem Eng Technol 39: 276–284. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201500445
![]() |
[13] |
Boopathi M, Singh B, Vijayaraghavan R (2008) A review on NBC body protective clothing. Open Text J 1: 1–8. doi: 10.2174/1876520300801010001
![]() |
[14] |
Yenisoy-Karakaş S, Aygün A, Güneş M, et al. (2004) Physical and chemical characteristics of polymer-based spherical activated carbon and its ability to adsorb organics. Carbon 42: 477–484. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.11.019
![]() |
[15] | Lee T, Ooi CH, Othman R, et al. (2014) Activated carbon fiber-the hybrid of carbon fiber and activated carbon. Rev Adv Mater Sci 36: 118–136. |
[16] |
Liu Z, Ling L, Qiao W, et al. (1999) Preparation of pitch-based spherical activated carbon with developed mesopore by the aid of ferrocene. Carbon 37: 663–667. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00242-5
![]() |
[17] |
Mao H, Chen X, Huang R, et al. (2018) Fast preparation of carbon spheres from enzymatic hydrolysis lignin: Effects of hydrothermal carbonization conditions. Sci Rep 8: 9501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27777-4
![]() |
[18] |
Nakagawa K, Mukai SR, Tamura K, et al. (2007) Mesoporous activated carbons from phenolic resins. Chem Eng Res Des 85: 1331–1337. doi: 10.1205/cherd06119
![]() |
[19] |
Singh A, Lal D (2006) Effect of reaction parameters on the particle sizes of crosslinked spherical phenolic beads by suspension polymerization of phenol and formaldehyde. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2323–2330. doi: 10.1002/app.22995
![]() |
[20] |
Singh A, Yadav RK, Srivastava A (2009) Synthesis of resole-type phenolic beads from phenol and formaldehyde by suspension polymerization technique. J Appl Polym Sci 112: 1005–1011. doi: 10.1002/app.29480
![]() |
[21] |
Li R, Wang L, Shahbazi A (2015) A review of hydrothermal carbonization of carbohydrates for carbon spheres preparation. Trends Renew Energ 1: 43–56. doi: 10.17737/tre.2015.1.1.009
![]() |
[22] |
Liu J, Wickramaratne NP, Qiao SZ, et al. (2015) Molecular-based design and emerging applications of nanoporous carbon spheres. Nat Mater 14: 763–774. doi: 10.1038/nmat4317
![]() |
[23] |
Li S, Pasc A, Fierro V, et al. (2016) Hollow carbon spheres, synthesis and applications-a review. J Mater Chem A 4: 12686–12713. doi: 10.1039/C6TA03802F
![]() |
[24] |
Roberts AD, Li X, Zhang H (2014) Porous carbon spheres and monoliths: Morphology control, pore size tuning and their applications as Li-ion battery anode materials. Chem Soc Rev 43: 4341–4356. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00071D
![]() |
[25] |
Zhang P, Qiao ZA, Dai S (2015) Recent advances in carbon nanospheres: Synthetic routes and applications. Chem Commun 51: 9246–9256. doi: 10.1039/C5CC01759A
![]() |
[26] |
González-García P (2018) Activated carbon from lignocellulosics precursors: A review of the synthesis methods, characterization techniques and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82: 1393–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.117
![]() |
[27] |
Moreno-Castilla C (2016) Colloidal and micro-carbon spheres derived from low-temperature polymerization reactions. Adv Colloid Interfac 236: 113–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2016.08.003
![]() |
[28] |
Hong M, Chen J, Zhang M, et al. (2016) High-frequency fabrication of discrete and dispersible hollow carbon spheres with hierarchical porous shells by using secondary-crosslinking pyrolysis. RSC Adv 6: 16141–16149. doi: 10.1039/C5RA25932K
![]() |
[29] |
Wu Q, Li W, Tan J, et al. (2015) Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic mesoporous carbon microspheres from carboxymethylcellulose and nickel acetate. Appl Surf Sci 332: 354–361. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.195
![]() |
[30] |
Ma X, Gan L, Liu M, et al. (2014) Mesoporous size controllable carbon microspheres and their electrochemical performances for supercapacitor electrodes. J Mater Chem A 2: 8407–8415. doi: 10.1039/C4TA00333K
![]() |
[31] |
Ge H, Xu H, Lu T, et al. (2016) Microfluidic production of porous carbon spheres with tunable size and pores. J Colloid Interf Sci 461: 168–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.018
![]() |
[32] |
Huang X, Zhou LJ, Voiry D, et al. (2016) Monodisperse mesoporous carbon nanoparticles from polymer/silica self-aggregates and their electrocatalytic activities. ACS Appl Mater Inter 8: 18891–18903. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b05739
![]() |
[33] |
Mhamane D, Kim MS, Park BH, et al. (2018) Orderly meso-perforated spherical and apple-shaped 3D carbon microstructures for high-energy supercapacitors and high-capacity Li-ion battery anodes. J Mater Chem A 6: 6422–6434. doi: 10.1039/C7TA11360A
![]() |
[34] |
Pol VG, Shrestha LK, Ariga K (2014) Tunable, functional carbon spheres derived from rapid synthesis of resorcinol-formaldehyde resins. ACS Appl Mater Inter 6: 10649–10655. doi: 10.1021/am502324m
![]() |
[35] |
Zhu D, Wang Y, Gan L, et al. (2015) Nitrogen-containing carbon microspheres for supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochim Acta 158: 166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.155
![]() |
[36] |
Lu W, Liu M, Miao L, et al. (2016) Nitrogen-containing ultramicroporous carbon nanospheres for high performance supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochim Acta 205: 132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.114
![]() |
[37] |
Anceschi A, Magnacca G, Trotta F, et al. (2017) Preparation and characterization of microporous carbon spheres from high amylose pea maltodextrin. RSC Adv 7: 36117–36123. doi: 10.1039/C7RA05343F
![]() |
[38] |
Tian H, Liu J, O'Donnell K, et al. (2016) Revisiting the Stӧber method: Design of nitrogen-doped porous carbon spheres from molecular precursors of different chemical structures. J Colloid Interf Sci 476: 55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.008
![]() |
[39] |
Böhringer B, Guerra Gonzalez O, Eckle I, et al. (2011) Polymer-based spherical activated carbons-From adsorptive properties to filter performance. Chem Ing Tech 83: 53–60. doi: 10.1002/cite.201000166
![]() |
[40] |
Sun N, Sun C, Liu H, et al. (2013) Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of activated spherical carbon materials for CO2 capture. Fuel 113: 854–862. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.03.047
![]() |
[41] |
Zhang C, Hatzell KB, Boota M, et al. (2014) Highly porous carbon spheres for electrochemical capacitors and capacitive flowable suspension electrodes. Carbon 77: 155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.017
![]() |
[42] |
Yu Q, Guan D, Zhuang Z, et al. (2017) Mass production of monodisperse carbon microspheres with size-dependent supercapacitor performance via aqueous self-catalyzed polymerization. ChemPlusChem 82: 872–878. doi: 10.1002/cplu.201700182
![]() |
[43] |
Huang YP, Hsi HC, Liu SC (2013) Preparation of spherical activated phenol-formaldehyde beads from bamboo tar for adsorption of toluene. J Air Waste Manage 63: 977–983. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.804011
![]() |
[44] |
Zhang C, Song W, Sun G, et al. (2014) Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of activated carbon spheres for removal of dibenzothiophene from model diesel fuel. Ind Eng Chem Res 53: 4271–4276. doi: 10.1021/ie403773f
![]() |
[45] |
Zhang C, Song W, Zhang X, et al. (2018) Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of resin-based carbon spheres modified by oxygen functional groups for gaseous elemental mercury capture. J Mater Sci 53: 9429–9448. doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2231-6
![]() |
[46] | Zhang C, Song W, Zhang X, et al. (2018) Synthesis and evaluation of activated carbon spheres with copper modification for gaseous elemental mercury removal. J Porous Mat 2018: 1–11. |
[47] |
Mestre AS, Tyszko E, Andrade MA, et al. (2015) Sustainable activated carbons prepared from a sucrose-derived hydrochar: Remarkable adsorbents for pharmaceutical compounds. RSC Adv 5: 19696–19707. doi: 10.1039/C4RA14495C
![]() |
[48] |
Romero-Anaya AJ, Lillo-Ródenas MA, Linares-Solano A (2014) Activation of a spherical carbon for toluene adsorption at low concentration. Carbon 77: 616–626. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.066
![]() |
[49] |
Liu J, Sun N, Sun C, et al. (2015) Spherical potassium intercalated activated carbon beads for pulverised fuel CO2 post-combustion capture. Carbon 94: 243–255. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.036
![]() |
[50] |
Wang Q, Liang X, Qiao W, et al. (2009) Preparation of polystyrene-based activated carbon spheres with high surface area and their adsorption to dibenzothiophene. Fuel Process Technol 90: 381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.10.008
![]() |
[51] |
Wang Q, Liang X, Zhang R, et al. (2009) Preparation of polystyrene-based activated carbon spheres and their adsorption of dibenzothiophene. New Carbon Mater 24: 55–60. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5805(08)60036-0
![]() |
[52] |
Yang JB, Ling LC, Liu L, et al. (2002) Preparation and properties of phenolic resin-based activated carbon spheres with controlled pore size distribution. Carbon 40: 911–916. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00222-6
![]() |
[53] |
Menya E, Olupot PW, Storz H, et al. (2018) Production and performance of activated carbon from rice husks for removal of natural organic matter from water: A review. Chem Eng Res Des 129: 271–296. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.008
![]() |
[54] |
Shi Y, Zhang X, Liu G (2015) Activated carbons derived from hydrothermally carbonized sucrose: Remarkable adsorbents for adsorptive desulfurization. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3: 2237–2246. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00670
![]() |
[55] |
Zhang C, Lin S, Peng J, et al. (2017) Preparation of highly porous carbon through activation of NH4Cl induced hydrothermal microsphere derivation of glucose. RSC Adv 7: 6486–6491. doi: 10.1039/C6RA26141H
![]() |
[56] |
Fan Y, Liu PF, Yang ZJ, et al. (2015) Bi-functional porous carbon spheres derived from pectin as electrode material for supercapacitors and support material for Pt nanowires towards electrocatalytic methanol and ethanol oxidation. Electrochim Acta 163: 140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.157
![]() |
[57] |
Chowdhury ZZ, Hamid SBA, Rahman MM, et al. (2016) Catalytic activation and application of micro-spherical carbon derived from hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass: Statistical analysis using Box-Behnken design. RSC Adv 6: 102680–102694. doi: 10.1039/C5RA26189A
![]() |
[58] |
Yang W, Feng Y, Xiao D, et al. (2015) Fabrication of microporous and mesoporous carbon spheres for high-performance supercapacitor electrode materials. Int J Energ Res 39: 805–811. doi: 10.1002/er.3301
![]() |
[59] | Wang L, Li Y, Yang K, et al. (2017) Hierarchical porous carbon microspheres derived from biomass-corncob as ultra-high performance supercapacitor electrode. Int J Electrochem Sc 12: 5604–5617 |
[60] |
Yang X, Xia H, Liang Z, et al. (2017) Monodisperse carbon nanospheres with hierarchical porous structure as electrode material for supercapacitor. Nanoscale Res Lett 12: 550. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2318-z
![]() |
[61] |
Liu M, Gan L, Xiong W, et al. (2013) Nickel-doped activated mesoporous carbon microspheres with partially graphitic structure for supercapacitors. Energ Fuel 27: 1168–1173. doi: 10.1021/ef302028j
![]() |
[62] |
Lin F, Wang Y, Lin Z (2016) One-pot synthesis of nitrogen-enriched carbon spheres for hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution. RSC Adv 6: 33055–33062. doi: 10.1039/C5RA27738H
![]() |
[63] |
Ng SWL, Yilmaz G, Ong WL, et al. (2018) One-step activation towards spontaneous etching of hollow and hierarchical porous carbon nanospheres for enhanced pollutant adsorption and energy storage. Appl Catal B-Environ 220: 533–541. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.069
![]() |
[64] |
Hao ZQ, Cao JP, Zhao XY, et al. (2018) Preparation of porous carbon spheres from 2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor by oxidation and activation for electric double-layer capacitor application. J Colloid Interf Sci 513: 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.006
![]() |
[65] | Ma M, Zhang C, Huang G, et al. (2015) Synthesis and electrochemical performance of polyacrylonitrile carbon nanostructure microspheres for supercapacitor application. J Nanomater 2015: 1–10. |
[66] |
Chang B, Guan D, Tian Y, et al. (2013) Convenient synthesis of porous carbon nanospheres with tunable pore structure and excellent adsorption capacity. J Hazard Mater 262: 256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.054
![]() |
[67] |
Wang Y, Chang B, Guan D, et al. (2015) Mesoporous activated carbon spheres derived from resorcinol-formaldehyde resin with high performance for supercapacitors. J Solid State Electr 19: 1783–1791. doi: 10.1007/s10008-015-2789-8
![]() |
[68] |
Kim C, Kim K, Moon JH (2017) Highly N-doped microporous carbon nanospheres with high energy storage and conversion efficiency. Sci Rep 7: 14400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14686-1
![]() |
[69] |
Sun Y, Zhao J, Wang J, et al. (2017) Sulfur-doped millimeter-sized microporous activated carbon spheres derived from sulfonated poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) for CO2 capture. J Phys Chem C 121: 10000–10009. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02195
![]() |
[70] |
Sun Y, Li K, Zhao J, et al. (2018) Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped microporous activated carbon macro-spheres for CO2 capture. J Colloid Interf Sci 526: 174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.101
![]() |
[71] | Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, et al. (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87: 1051–1069. |
[72] |
Oh WC, Kim JG, Kim H, et al. (2009) Preparation of spherical activated carbon and their physicochemical properties. J Korean Ceram Soc 46: 568–573. doi: 10.4191/KCERS.2009.46.6.568
![]() |
[73] | Dixit S, Shrivastava R, Goswami CS, et al. (2013) Effect of activation parameters on the surface and mechanical properties of activated carbon spheres. Int J Met Mat Sc Eng 3: 75–84. |
[74] |
Wu Q, Li W, Liu S (2014) Carboxyl-rich carbon microspheres prepared from pentosan with high adsorption capacity for heavy metal ions. Mater Res Bull 60: 516–523. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.09.015
![]() |
[75] |
Zhou J, Wang Y, Wang J, et al. (2016) Effective removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by adsorption on mesoporous carbon microspheres. J Colloid Interf Sci 462: 200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.10.001
![]() |
[76] |
Liu MX, Deng XX, Zhu DZ, et al. (2016) Magnetically separated and N,S co-doped mesoporous carbon microspheres for the removal of mercury ions. Chinese Chem Lett 27: 795–800. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.01.038
![]() |
[77] |
Song X, Gunawan P, Jiang R, et al. (2011) Surface activated carbon nanospheres for fast adsorption of silver ions from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 194: 162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.076
![]() |
[78] |
Pan ZZ, Dong L, Lv W, et al. (2017) A hollow spherical carbon derived from the spray drying of corncob lignin for high-rate-performance supercapacitors. Chem-Asian J 12: 503–506. doi: 10.1002/asia.201601724
![]() |
[79] |
Tang J, Wang J, Shrestha LK, et al. (2017) Activated porous carbon spheres with customized mesopores through assembly of diblock copolymers for electrochemical capacitor. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9: 18986–18993. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b04967
![]() |
[80] |
Ho HC, Goswami M, Chen J, et al. (2018) Amending the structure of renewable carbon from biorefinery waste-streams for energy storage applications. Sci Rep 8: 8355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25880-0
![]() |
[81] |
Zhou L, Xie G, Chen X (2018) Carbonization-dependent nitrogen-doped hollow porous carbon nanospheres synthesis and electrochemical study for supercapacitors. J Solid State Chem 261: 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2018.02.001
![]() |
[82] |
Ruan CQ, Wang Z, Lindh J, et al. (2018) Carbonized cellulose beads for efficient capacitive energy storage. Cellulose 25: 3545–3556. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-1811-6
![]() |
[83] |
Chen Z, Ye S, Evans SD, et al. (2018) Confined assembly of hollow carbon spheres in carbonaceous nanotube: A spheres-in-tube carbon nanostructure with hierarchical porosity for high-performance supercapacitor. Small 14: 1704015. doi: 10.1002/smll.201704015
![]() |
[84] |
Sun Z, Shen S, Ma L, et al. (2016) Controlled synthesis of N-doped carbon spheres with different morphologies for supercapacitors. RSC Adv 6: 104642–104647. doi: 10.1039/C6RA22424E
![]() |
[85] |
Liu M, Wang X, Zhu D, et al. (2017) Encapsulation of NiO nanoparticles in mesoporous carbon nanospheres for advanced energy storage. Chem Eng J 308: 240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.061
![]() |
[86] |
Chen A, Xia K, Zhang L, et al. (2016) Fabrication of nitrogen-doped hollow mesoporous spherical carbon capsules for supercapacitors. Langmuir 32: 8934–8941. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02250
![]() |
[87] |
Hong YJ, Kang YC (2015) General formation of Tin nanoparticles encapsulated in hollow carbon spheres for enhanced lithium storage capability. Small 11: 2157–2163. doi: 10.1002/smll.201402994
![]() |
[88] |
Mutuma BK, Matsoso B, Ranganathan K, et al. (2016) Generation of open-ended, worm-like and graphene-like structures from layered spherical carbon materials. RSC Adv 6: 20399–20408. doi: 10.1039/C5RA25880D
![]() |
[89] |
Pappas GS, Ferrari S, Huang X, et al. (2016) Heteroatom doped-carbon nanospheres as anodes in lithium ion batteries. Materials 9: 35. doi: 10.3390/ma9010035
![]() |
[90] |
Kim MH, Kim KB, Park SM, et al. (2016) Hierarchically structured activated carbon for ultracapacitors. Sci Rep 6: 21182. doi: 10.1038/srep21182
![]() |
[91] |
Chen XY, Chen C, Zhang ZJ, et al. (2013) Nitrogen-doped porous carbon spheres derived from polyacrylamide. Ind Eng Chem Res 52: 12025–12031. doi: 10.1021/ie4017013
![]() |
[92] |
Chang B, Yang B, Guo Y, et al. (2015) Preparation and enhanced supercapacitance performance of porous carbon spheres with a high degree of graphitization. RSC Adv 5: 2088–2095. doi: 10.1039/C4RA09204J
![]() |
[93] |
Ren W, Zhang Z, Wang Y, et al. (2015) Preparation of porous silicon/carbon microspheres as high performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3: 5859–5865. doi: 10.1039/C4TA07093C
![]() |
[94] |
Wang M, Zhang H, Wang Q, et al. (2015) Steam-etched spherical carbon/sulfur composite with high sulfur capacity and long cycle life for Li/S battery application. ACS Appl Mater Inter 7: 3590–3599. doi: 10.1021/am5075562
![]() |
[95] |
Jia Z, Li Z, Li S, et al. (2016) Adsorption performance and mechanism of methylene blue on chemically activated carbon spheres derived from hydrothermally-prepared poly(vinyl alcohol) microspheres. J Mol Liq 220: 56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.063
![]() |
[96] |
Fu J, Chen Z, Wang M, et al. (2015) Adsorption of methylene blue by a high-efficiency adsorbent (polydopamine microspheres): Kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamics and mechanism analysis. Chem Eng J 259: 53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.101
![]() |
[97] |
Wei D, Zhang Y, Fu J (2017) Fabrication of carbon nanospheres by the pyrolysis of polyacrylonitrile-poly(methyl methacrylate) core–shell composite nanoparticles. Beilstein J Nanotech 8: 1897–1908. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.8.190
![]() |
[98] |
Zhang W, Zhou Z (2017) Citrus pectin-derived carbon microspheres with superior adsorption ability for methylene blue. Nanomaterials 7: 161. doi: 10.3390/nano7070161
![]() |
[99] |
Bedin KC, Martins AC, Cazetta AL, et al. (2016) KOH-activated carbon prepared from sucrose spherical carbon: Adsorption equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for methylene blue removal. Chem Eng J 286: 476–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.099
![]() |
[100] |
Shao X, Wang W, Xue R, et al. (2004) Adsorption of methane and hydrogen on mesocarbon microbeads by experiment and molecular simulation. J Phys Chem B 108: 2970–2978. doi: 10.1021/jp035715d
![]() |
[101] |
Choma J, Osuchowski Ł, Dziura A, et al. (2015) Benzene and methane adsorption on ultrahigh surface area carbons prepared from sulphonated styrene divinylbenzene resin by KOH Activation. Adsorpt Sci Technol 33: 587–594. doi: 10.1260/0263-6174.33.6-8.587
![]() |
[102] |
Choma J, Osuchowski Ł, Marszewski M, et al. (2014) Highly microporous polymer-based carbons for CO2 and H2 adsorption. RSC Adv 4: 14795. doi: 10.1039/c3ra47278g
![]() |
[103] |
Wang ZQ, Sun LX, Xu F, et al. (2016) The synthesis of nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon spheres for hydrogen storage. Mater Sci Forum 852: 864–869. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.852.864
![]() |
[104] |
Sun N, Sun C, Liu J, et al. (2015) Surface-modified spherical activated carbon materials for pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture. RSC Adv 5: 33681–33690. doi: 10.1039/C5RA02665B
![]() |
[105] |
Jahandar LM, Atkinson JD, Hashisho Z, et al. (2016) The role of beaded activated carbon's surface oxygen groups on irreversible adsorption of organic vapors. J Hazard Mater 317: 284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.087
![]() |
[106] |
Romero-Anaya AJ, Lillo-Ródenas MA, Linares-Solano A (2015) Factors governing the adsorption of ethanol on spherical activated carbons. Carbon 83: 240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.092
![]() |
[107] |
Jahandar LM, Atkinson JD, Hashisho Z, et al. (2016) The role of beaded activated carbon's pore size distribution on heel formation during cyclic adsorption/desorption of organic vapors. J Hazard Mater 315: 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.071
![]() |
[108] |
Qi J, Li J, Li Y, et al. (2017) Synthesis of porous carbon beads with controllable pore structure for volatile organic compounds removal. Chem Eng J 307: 989–998. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.022
![]() |
[109] |
Zhang P, Zhu H, Dai S (2015) Porous carbon supports: Recent advances with various morphologies and compositions. ChemCatChem 7: 2788–2805. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201500368
![]() |
[110] |
Munoz M, Kolb V, Lamolda A, et al. (2017) Polymer-based spherical activated carbon as catalytic support for hydrodechlorination reactions. Appl Catal B-Environ 218: 498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.001
![]() |
[111] |
Hadidi L, Mahmoud AYF, Purkait TK, et al. (2017) Cellulose nanocrystal-derived hollow mesoporous carbon spheres and their application as a metal-free catalyst. Nanotechnology 28: 505606. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa95a2
![]() |
[112] |
Yang S, Zhu Y, Cao C, et al. (2018) Controllable synthesis of multiheteroatoms co-doped hierarchical porous carbon spheres as an ideal catalysis platform. ACS Appl Mater Inter 10: 19664–19672. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b03283
![]() |
[113] |
Veerakumar P, Muthuselvam P, Pounraj T, et al. (2018) Low-cost palladium decorated on m-aminophenol-formaldehyde-derived porous carbon spheres for the enhanced catalytic reduction of organic dyes. Inorg Chem Front 5: 354–363. doi: 10.1039/C7QI00553A
![]() |
[114] |
Galeano C, Meier JC, Soorholtz M, et al. (2014) Nitrogen-doped hollow carbon spheres as a support for platinum-based electrocatalysts. ACS Catal 4: 3856–3868. doi: 10.1021/cs5003492
![]() |
[115] |
With PC, Wilde N, Modrow A, et al. (2015) Polymer-based spherical activated carbons in combination with TS-1 as efficient epoxidation catalysts. Chem Eng Technol 38: 1671–1676. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201500366
![]() |
[116] |
Wang X, Xin C, Shi C, et al. (2018) Simple preparation of spherical activated carbon with mesoporous structure from phenolic resol and associated catalytic performance in isobutane dehydrogenation. Trans Tianjin Univ 24: 351–360. doi: 10.1007/s12209-018-0144-8
![]() |
[117] |
Zhao Q, Lin Y, Han N, et al. (2017) Mesoporous carbon nanomaterials in drug delivery and biomedical application. Drug Deliv 24: 94–107. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1399300
![]() |
[118] |
Yamamoto O, Sawai J, Sasamoto T (2002) Activated carbon sphere with antibacterial characteristics. Mater Trans 43: 1069–1063. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.43.1069
![]() |
[119] |
Yamaguchi J, Tanaka T, Inagi R (2017) Effect of AST-120 in chronic kidney disease treatment: Still a controversy? Nephron 135: 201–206. doi: 10.1159/000453673
![]() |
[120] |
Schute K, Louven Y, Detoni C, et al. (2016) Selective liquid phase adsorption of biogenic HMF on hydrophobic spherical activated carbons. Chem Ing Tech 88: 355–362. doi: 10.1002/cite.201500133
![]() |
[121] |
Meng Y, Wang S, Li C, et al. (2016) Photothermal combined gene therapy achieved by polyethyleneimine-grafted oxidized mesoporous carbon nanospheres. Biomaterials 100: 134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.033
![]() |
[122] |
Wang T, Zhao P, Zhao Q, et al. (2016) The mechanism for increasing the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs using uniform mesoporous carbon spheres as a carrier. Drug Deliv 23: 420–428. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2014.916767
![]() |
[123] | Karkalić R, Maslak V, Nikolić A, et al. (2015) Application of permeable materials for CBRN protective equipment. Zast Mater 56: 239–242. |
[124] |
Fernández JF, Nierobisch P, Niemeyer B (2014) Performance evaluation of protective clothing against toxic industrial chemicals. Chem Ing Tech 86: 35–40. doi: 10.1002/cite.201300055
![]() |
[125] |
Fichtner S, Hofmann J, Möller A, et al. (2013) Decomposition of 2-chloroethylethylsulfide on copper oxides to detoxify polymer-based spherical activated carbons from chemical warfare agents. J Hazard Mater 262: 789–795. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.052
![]() |
[126] |
Tagliavini M, Engel F, Weidler PG, et al. (2017) Adsorption of steroid micropollutants on polymer-based spherical activated carbon (PBSAC). J Hazard Mater 337: 126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.036
![]() |
1. | Liudmyla M. Grishchenko, Galyna G. Tsapyuk, Natalia S. Novichenko, Oleksandr V. Mischanchuk, Andrii V. Yatsymyrskiy, Olga Yu. Boldyrieva, Vitaliy E. Diyuk, Amination of brominated nanoporous activated carbon beads for the preparation of CO2 adsorbents, 2020, 699, 1542-1406, 20, 10.1080/15421406.2020.1732535 | |
2. | P. Staciwa, D. Sibera, I. Pełech, U. Narkiewicz, W. Łojkowski, S. Dąbrowska, R. Cormia, Effect of microwave assisted solvothermal process parameters on carbon dioxide adsorption properties of microporous carbon materials, 2021, 314, 13871811, 110829, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110829 | |
3. | Iwona Pełech, Daniel Sibera, Piotr Staciwa, Urszula Narkiewicz, Robert Cormia, Pressureless and Low-Pressure Synthesis of Microporous Carbon Spheres Applied to CO2 Adsorption, 2020, 25, 1420-3049, 5328, 10.3390/molecules25225328 | |
4. | Yufu Yi, Peng Wang, Guorong Fan, Zongde Wang, Shangxing Chen, Ting Xue, Yangping Wen, Hierarchically Porous Carbon Microsphere Doped with Phosphorus as a High Conductive Electrocatalyst for Oxidase-like Sensors and Supercapacitors, 2020, 8, 2168-0485, 9937, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03978 | |
5. | Abdelmoneim Mars, Alma Mejri, Hamza Elfil, 2023, Chapter 31, 978-981-19-7187-7, 885, 10.1007/978-981-19-7188-4_31 | |
6. | Xinting Chen, Yue Wu, Weihua Gu, Ming Zhou, Shaolong Tang, Jieming Cao, Zhongqiu Zou, Guangbin Ji, Research progress on nanostructure design and composition regulation of carbon spheres for the microwave absorption, 2022, 189, 00086223, 617, 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.100 | |
7. | Jie Li, Zhenheng Xu, Liang Yu, Lixiong Zhang, Preparation of hundred-micron carbon spheres using solvent extraction in a simple microchannel device, 2022, 343, 13871811, 112186, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112186 | |
8. | Foster Amoateng Appiah, Dzifa Nugloze, Lois Sandra Sai-Obodai, Paweesuda Natewong, Raphael O. Idem, Activated Carbon Produced from the Hydrothermal Treatment of Glucose with KOH Activation for Catalytic Absorption of CO2 in a BEA-AMP Bi-Solvent Blend, 2023, 2470-1343, 10.1021/acsomega.2c07758 | |
9. | Iris Denmark, Amna Khan, Taylor Scifres, Tito Viswanathan, Fumiya Watanabe, Noureen Siraj, Synthesis and Characterization of Supercapacitor Materials from Soy, 2021, 2, 2673-3293, 534, 10.3390/electrochem2040034 | |
10. | Kyung-Jin Lee, Eun-Jeong Yi, Yanggu Kang, Haejin Hwang, A novel method of silicon carbide coating to protect porous carbon against oxidation, 2021, 99, 02634368, 105596, 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2021.105596 | |
11. | Senay Balbay, Caglayan Acıkgoz, New Method for Producing Carbon Sphere from Waste Tyre (NEWCSWT), 2022, 13, 1877-2641, 4951, 10.1007/s12649-022-01765-2 | |
12. | Souad Hammadou née Mesdour, Djamila Boufades, Hassina Bousak, Anissa Moussiden, Hafsa Benmabrouka, Soraya Demim, Boudjema Hamada, Claire Hérold, Omar Kaddour, Potential application of carbon nanospheres as adsorbent for the simultaneous desulfurization and demetallization of transportations fuels, 2022, 30, 1536-383X, 419, 10.1080/1536383X.2021.1947809 | |
13. | Jingming Lan, Baoying Wang, Chunmiao Bo, Bolin Gong, Junjie Ou, Progress on fabrication and application of activated carbon sphere in recent decade, 2023, 120, 1226086X, 47, 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.12.045 | |
14. | Iwona Pełech, Piotr Staciwa, Daniel Sibera, Robert Pełech, Konrad S. Sobczuk, Gulsen Yagmur Kayalar, Urszula Narkiewicz, Robert Cormia, CO2 Adsorption Study of Potassium-Based Activation of Carbon Spheres, 2022, 27, 1420-3049, 5379, 10.3390/molecules27175379 | |
15. | Michal Marciniak, Joanna Goscianska, Małgorzata Norman, Teofil Jesionowski, Aleksandra Bazan-Wozniak, Robert Pietrzak, Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies on Adsorption of Rhodamine B from Aqueous Solutions Using Oxidized Mesoporous Carbons, 2022, 15, 1996-1944, 5573, 10.3390/ma15165573 | |
16. | Konrad S. Sobczuk, Iwona Pełech, Urszula Narkiewicz, Piotr Staciwa, Daniel Sibera, Dariusz Moszyński, The influence of the synthesis pH on the morphology and adsorption properties of carbon spheres, 2023, 608, 01694332, 155196, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155196 | |
17. | Kalpana Talari, Sai Krishna Ganji, Raja Rajeswari Tiruveedula, Gas chromatography–mass spectrometric determination of bisphenol residues by dispersive solid phase extraction followed by activated carbon spheres cleanup from fish feed samples, 2023, 1469-0667, 146906672311744, 10.1177/14690667231174446 | |
18. | Dariusz Sternik, Małgorzata Wasilewska, Anna Derylo‐Marczewska, Adam W. Marczewski, Volodymyr M. Gun'ko, Studies on the process of basic dyes adsorption on uniform spherical carbons, 2024, 1439-4235, 10.1002/cphc.202300825 | |
19. | Sarah L. Boyall, Phoebe Berman, Anthony Griffiths, Alexander Massey, Thomas Dixon, Thomas Shaw, Joanna Miller, Jonathan P. White, Robert Menzel, Kevin Leslie, Graeme Clemens, Frans L. Muller, Richard A. Bourne, Thomas W. Chamberlain, Palladium nanoparticle deposition on spherical carbon supports for heterogeneous catalysis in continuous flow, 2024, 2044-4753, 10.1039/D3CY01718D | |
20. | Bishwas Pokharel, Deep Shankar Pandey, Anjuli Sapkota, Bhimraj Yadav, Vasanta Gurung, Mandira Pradhananga Adhikari, Lok Nath Regmi, Nanda Bikram Adhikari, A Comparative Study of State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Models for Semantic Segmentation of Pores in Scanning Electron Microscope Images of Activated Carbon, 2024, 12, 2169-3536, 50217, 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3381523 | |
21. | Pramod Kumar, Biplab Maji, Formation to Transportation: En‐Route Fission‐Facilitated Formation of Spheres in a Phosphorus‐Based Porous Organic Polymer for Transportation of Iodine, 2024, 0947-6539, 10.1002/chem.202402559 | |
22. | Selma Ekinci, Erhan Onat, Serdal Atiç, Optimized Synthesis and Characterization of Activated Carbon from Corn Silk and Corn Silk Hydrochar, 2025, 10, 2365-6549, 10.1002/slct.202405854 | |
23. | Bo Liu, Zhilu Wang, Lei Zhou, Tianhao Wang, Lina Zhang, Wenxin Ma, Qiang Fu, Xia Chen, Pyridinic and pyrrolic nitrogen-doped porous carbon improves control of N2 and H2 adsorption thermodynamic for N2/H2 separation, 2025, 122, 03603199, 107, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.328 | |
24. | Huan Xiangli, Baishan Liu, Yanli Wang, Liang Cheng, Liang Zhan, Yongzheng Zhang, Pore structure design of activated carbon microspheres by molten salt-assisted strategy for high energy density supercapacitors, 2025, 320, 09215107, 118412, 10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118412 |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | CO2 | 1266 | 1.13 | [2] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 949 | 0.98 | [2] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1009 | 0.89 | [8] |
CI seed | CO2 | 1616 | 0.64* | [9] |
RA seed | CO2 | 889 | 0.40* | [9] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 3101 | 2.08 | [10] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 2284 | 0.89 | [11] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1160 | 0.478* | [14] |
Pitch | Steam | - | 0.65 | [16] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1280 | 0.91/0.43 | [40] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | CO2 | 2905 | 1.6 | [41] |
Phenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 840 | 0.40* | [42] |
Phenol-formaldehyde beads from bamboo tar | CO2 | 189 | 0.10 | [43] |
3-methylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1501 | 0.72 | [44] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1585.13 | 0.69/0.45 | [45] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1066 | 0.52/0.47 | [46] |
Sucrose | Steam | 824 | 0.37/0.36 | [47] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 1065 | 0.53* | [48] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1128 | 0.45/0.43 | [49] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1555 | 1.29/0.56 | [50] |
Pitch | Steam | 1573 | 0.68/0.50 | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 979 | 0.84/0.31 | [51] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1663 | 20.77 | [52] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | H2SO4 | 976 | 0.68/0.47 | [6] |
Saccharose | H3PO4 | 2120 | 1.0* | [7] |
Glucose | KOH | 3152 | 1.18* | [7] |
Enzymatic hydrolysis lignin | KOH | 1240 | 0.62 | [17] |
Sucrose | K2CO3 | 1375 | 0.63/0.62 | [47] |
Phenolic beads (PR4_800 ACS) | KOH | 1171 | 0.50/0.47 | [49] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1566 | 1.05/0.62 | [50] |
Sucrose | KOH | 2217 | 1.006/0.776 | [54] |
Glucose | KOH | 3003 | - | [55] |
Pectin | KOH | 2440 | 1.28/0.65 | [56] |
Jute | KOH and CO2 | 856.89 | 0.889/0.689 | [57] |
Corncob | KOH | 1652 | 0.948/0.416 | [59] |
F108/resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 703 | 0.645/0.317 | [60] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1096 | 0.97/0.14 | [61] |
m-phenylenediamine and hexamethylenetetramine | ZnCl2 | 1237 | 0.58/0.35 | [62] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1227 | 0.90/0.81 | [63] |
2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor | KOH | 2478 | 1.24/0.99 | [64] |
PAN | KOH | 2134 | 1.41/0.82 | [65] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | [66] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | ZnCl2 | 2437 | 1.37 | [67] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 844.9 | 0.48/0.33 | [68] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1526 | 0.72/0.61 | [69] |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-4-700) | KOH | 1757 | 0.81/0.73 | [70] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | pH/ Temperature | Order of the kinetic model | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity/ Recovery with heavy metal | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | H2SO4 | 976 | 0.68/0.47 | - | - | - | Pb(Ⅱ)-96.4%; Hg(Ⅱ)-96%; Cu(Ⅱ)-93% | [6] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1009 | 0.89 | 2 | - | - | Cr(Ⅵ)-99.1% | [8] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1329.11 | 0.62/0.41 | 25 ℃ | - | - | Elemental Hg-71% | [45] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 954 | 0.49/0.42 | 150 ℃ | - | - | Elemental Hg | [46] |
Jute | KOH and CO2 | 856.89 | 0.889/0.689 | 30 ℃ | Pseudo-second order | Langmuir | 31.44 mg/g for Cu(Ⅱ) | [57] |
m-phenylenediamine and hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) | ZnCl2 | 1237 | 0.58/0.35 | 1.5 | Pseudo-second order | Freundlich | 279 mg/g for Cr(Ⅵ) | [62] |
Pentosan | Hydrothermal | 13.7 | 0.026* | 30 ℃ | - | Freundlich and Langmuir | 380.1 mg/g for Pb(Ⅱ) and 100.8 mg/g for Cd(Ⅱ) | [74] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde/SiO2 | - | 1221 | 2.7/0.253 | 3 | Pseudo-second order | Freundlich and Langmuir | 165.3 mg/g for Cr(Ⅵ) | [75] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 542 | - | - | Pseudo-second order | - | 74.5 mg/g for Hg2+ | [76] |
Glucose | NaOH | 12.7 | 0.02 | RT | Pseudo-second order | Langmuir | 144.9 mg/g for Ag(Ⅰ) | [77] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Capacitance (F/g) | Refs. |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 1439 | 2.12/0.52 | 268 | [30] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 687 | 0.59 | 269 | [36] |
Phenolic resin | - | 482 | - | 127 | [38] |
Phenolic-formaldehyde | Steam | 840 | 0.40* | 282 | [42] |
Glucose | KOH | 3003 | - | 349 | [55] |
Pectin | KOH | 2440 | 1.28/0.65 | 231 | [56] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 735.4 | 0.622/0.306 | 182 | [58] |
F108/resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 703 | 0.645/0.317 | 224 | [60] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1096 | 0.97/0.14 | 361 | [61] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1227 | 0.90/0.81 | 353 | [63] |
2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor | KOH | 2478 | 1.24/0.99 | 303.7 | [64] |
PAN | KOH | 2134 | 1.41/0.82 | 311 | [62] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | ZnCl2 | 2437 | 1.37 | 240 | [67] |
Polystyrene beads (N-porous CS) | KOH | 844.9 | 0.48/0.33 | 373 | [68] |
Polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) | KOH | 2320 | 1.24/0.64 | 111 | [79] |
Sugar | KOH | 872 | 0.511 | 109 | [80] |
Polylactide-b-polystyrene (PLA-b-PS) copolymers and aniline | - | 945 | - | 250 | [81] |
PAN | - | 718 | 0.87 | 206 | [86] |
Pitch | KOH | 1957 | 3.0 | 157 | [90] |
Polyacrylamide | - | 648 | 0.59/0.11 | 194.7 | [91] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 1103.4 | 0.71/0.36 | 127.4 | [92] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | Dye | pH/ Temperature | Order of the kinetic model | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity/ Efficiency | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads ACS (M/s Kureha, Japan) | Steam | 1160 | 0.478* | Methylene blue | 3.8–4.4 | Langmuir isotherm | 32 mg/g | [14] | |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Methylene blue | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 3152 mg/g | [66] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Malachite green | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 1455 mg/g | [66] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Rhodamine B | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 1409 mg/g | [66] |
Polyvinyl alcohol | H2SO4 | - | - | Methylene blue | 6.5 | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 602.4 mg/g | [95] |
Polydopamine | - | 13.77 | - | Methylene blue | 25 ℃ | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 90.7 mg/g | [96] |
Citrus-pectin | - | 5.22 | - | Methylene blue | 12 | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 979.3 mg/g | [98] |
Sucrose | KOH | 1534 | 0.765 | Methylene blue | 25 ℃ | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 704.2 mg/g | [99] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Gas | Storage capacity/ uptake | Refs. |
Phenolic beads (CS-6-CD-4) | CO2 | 2284 | 0.89 | CO2 | 4.55 mmol/g | [11] |
Phenolic resin spheres | - | 482 | - | CO2 | 89 cm3/g | [38] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1280 | 0.91/0.43 | CO2 | 9.31% | [40] |
Phenolic beads | Steam and NH3 | 978 | 0.41/0.37 | CO2 | 10.33% | [40] |
Phenolic beads (ACS) | Steam | 1128 | 0.45/0.43 | CO2 | 0.79 mmol/g | [49] |
Phenolic beads (PR4_8000 ACS) | KOH | 1171 | 0.50/0.47 | CO2 | 1.25 mmol/g | [49] |
Polystyrene beads (SCS-700) | KOH | 1526 | 0.72/0.61 | CO2 | 4.21 mmol/g | [69] |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-4-700) | KOH | 1757 | 0.81/0.73 | CO2 | [70] | |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-1-700) | KOH | 1269 | 0.58/0.53 | CO2 | 1.11 mmol/g | [70] |
Pitch | KOH | 3180 | 1.9 | CH4 | 14.73% | [100] |
Pitch | KOH | 3180 | 1.9 | H2 | 7.8% | [100] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07/1.59 | CH4 | 1.68 mmol/g | [101] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07 | CO2 | 356 mg/g | [102] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07 | H2 | 39 mg/g | [102] |
Phenol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1200 | 1.51 | H2 | 185 cm3/g | [103] |
Phenolic resin (novolac) | - | 1106 | 0.49/0.41 | CO2 | 4.9 mmol/g | [104] |
Precursor/Product | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | Volatile | Temperature | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | Refs. |
Phenol-formaldehyde beads from bamboo tar | CO2 | 189 | 0.10 | Toluene | 50 ℃ | Langmuir | 29 mg/g | [43] |
3-methylphenol and formaldehyde | Steam | 1501 | 0.72/0.25 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Langmuir-Freundlich | 21.83 mg/g | [44] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1566 | 1.05/0.62 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 153 mg/g | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1555 | 1.29/0.56 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 102 mg/g | [50] |
Pitch | Steam | 1573 | 0.68/0.50 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 93 mg/g | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 979 | 0.84/0.31 | Dibenzothiophene | - | Freundlich | 109.36 mg/g | [51] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 1065 | 0.53* | Toluene | 25 ℃ | - | 236 mg/L | [48] |
BAC from pitch (M/s Kureha, Japan) | - | 1291 | 0.55* | Ethanol | 25 ℃ | - | 0.51 cm3/g | [106] |
BAC4 oxidized with HNO3 | - | 1212 | 0.53* | Ethanol | 25 ℃ | - | 0.49 cm3/g | [106] |
BAC-O from Pitch (M/s Kureha, Japan) | - | 1189 ± 11 | 0.50 ± 0.01/ 0.43 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-O-400 | - | 1360 ± 5 | 0.56 ± 0.01/ 0.50 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-H-400 | - | 1335 ± 24 | 0.56 ± 0.01/ 0.49 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-400 | - | 1315 ± 15 | 0.55 ± 0.01/ 0.49 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Carbon (C) % | Nitrogen (N) % | Hydrogen (H) % | Oxygen (O) % | Sulfur (S) % | Refs. |
Sulphonated polystyrene resins | 40.6 | 1.5 | 6.1 | 39.6 | 12.2 | [8] |
Phenolic resins | 68.9 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 23.3 | - | [10] |
Enzymatic hydrolysis lignin | 77.5 | 0.25 | 1.6 | 20.6 | - | [17] |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | CO2 | 1266 | 1.13 | [2] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 949 | 0.98 | [2] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1009 | 0.89 | [8] |
CI seed | CO2 | 1616 | 0.64* | [9] |
RA seed | CO2 | 889 | 0.40* | [9] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 3101 | 2.08 | [10] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 2284 | 0.89 | [11] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1160 | 0.478* | [14] |
Pitch | Steam | - | 0.65 | [16] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1280 | 0.91/0.43 | [40] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | CO2 | 2905 | 1.6 | [41] |
Phenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 840 | 0.40* | [42] |
Phenol-formaldehyde beads from bamboo tar | CO2 | 189 | 0.10 | [43] |
3-methylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1501 | 0.72 | [44] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1585.13 | 0.69/0.45 | [45] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1066 | 0.52/0.47 | [46] |
Sucrose | Steam | 824 | 0.37/0.36 | [47] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 1065 | 0.53* | [48] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1128 | 0.45/0.43 | [49] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1555 | 1.29/0.56 | [50] |
Pitch | Steam | 1573 | 0.68/0.50 | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 979 | 0.84/0.31 | [51] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1663 | 20.77 | [52] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | H2SO4 | 976 | 0.68/0.47 | [6] |
Saccharose | H3PO4 | 2120 | 1.0* | [7] |
Glucose | KOH | 3152 | 1.18* | [7] |
Enzymatic hydrolysis lignin | KOH | 1240 | 0.62 | [17] |
Sucrose | K2CO3 | 1375 | 0.63/0.62 | [47] |
Phenolic beads (PR4_800 ACS) | KOH | 1171 | 0.50/0.47 | [49] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1566 | 1.05/0.62 | [50] |
Sucrose | KOH | 2217 | 1.006/0.776 | [54] |
Glucose | KOH | 3003 | - | [55] |
Pectin | KOH | 2440 | 1.28/0.65 | [56] |
Jute | KOH and CO2 | 856.89 | 0.889/0.689 | [57] |
Corncob | KOH | 1652 | 0.948/0.416 | [59] |
F108/resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 703 | 0.645/0.317 | [60] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1096 | 0.97/0.14 | [61] |
m-phenylenediamine and hexamethylenetetramine | ZnCl2 | 1237 | 0.58/0.35 | [62] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1227 | 0.90/0.81 | [63] |
2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor | KOH | 2478 | 1.24/0.99 | [64] |
PAN | KOH | 2134 | 1.41/0.82 | [65] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | [66] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | ZnCl2 | 2437 | 1.37 | [67] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 844.9 | 0.48/0.33 | [68] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1526 | 0.72/0.61 | [69] |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-4-700) | KOH | 1757 | 0.81/0.73 | [70] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | pH/ Temperature | Order of the kinetic model | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity/ Recovery with heavy metal | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads | H2SO4 | 976 | 0.68/0.47 | - | - | - | Pb(Ⅱ)-96.4%; Hg(Ⅱ)-96%; Cu(Ⅱ)-93% | [6] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1009 | 0.89 | 2 | - | - | Cr(Ⅵ)-99.1% | [8] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 1329.11 | 0.62/0.41 | 25 ℃ | - | - | Elemental Hg-71% | [45] |
Alkylphenol-formaldehyde | Steam | 954 | 0.49/0.42 | 150 ℃ | - | - | Elemental Hg | [46] |
Jute | KOH and CO2 | 856.89 | 0.889/0.689 | 30 ℃ | Pseudo-second order | Langmuir | 31.44 mg/g for Cu(Ⅱ) | [57] |
m-phenylenediamine and hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) | ZnCl2 | 1237 | 0.58/0.35 | 1.5 | Pseudo-second order | Freundlich | 279 mg/g for Cr(Ⅵ) | [62] |
Pentosan | Hydrothermal | 13.7 | 0.026* | 30 ℃ | - | Freundlich and Langmuir | 380.1 mg/g for Pb(Ⅱ) and 100.8 mg/g for Cd(Ⅱ) | [74] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde/SiO2 | - | 1221 | 2.7/0.253 | 3 | Pseudo-second order | Freundlich and Langmuir | 165.3 mg/g for Cr(Ⅵ) | [75] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 542 | - | - | Pseudo-second order | - | 74.5 mg/g for Hg2+ | [76] |
Glucose | NaOH | 12.7 | 0.02 | RT | Pseudo-second order | Langmuir | 144.9 mg/g for Ag(Ⅰ) | [77] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Capacitance (F/g) | Refs. |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 1439 | 2.12/0.52 | 268 | [30] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 687 | 0.59 | 269 | [36] |
Phenolic resin | - | 482 | - | 127 | [38] |
Phenolic-formaldehyde | Steam | 840 | 0.40* | 282 | [42] |
Glucose | KOH | 3003 | - | 349 | [55] |
Pectin | KOH | 2440 | 1.28/0.65 | 231 | [56] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 735.4 | 0.622/0.306 | 182 | [58] |
F108/resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 703 | 0.645/0.317 | 224 | [60] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1096 | 0.97/0.14 | 361 | [61] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1227 | 0.90/0.81 | 353 | [63] |
2-keto-l-gulonic acid mother liquor | KOH | 2478 | 1.24/0.99 | 303.7 | [64] |
PAN | KOH | 2134 | 1.41/0.82 | 311 | [62] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | ZnCl2 | 2437 | 1.37 | 240 | [67] |
Polystyrene beads (N-porous CS) | KOH | 844.9 | 0.48/0.33 | 373 | [68] |
Polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) | KOH | 2320 | 1.24/0.64 | 111 | [79] |
Sugar | KOH | 872 | 0.511 | 109 | [80] |
Polylactide-b-polystyrene (PLA-b-PS) copolymers and aniline | - | 945 | - | 250 | [81] |
PAN | - | 718 | 0.87 | 206 | [86] |
Pitch | KOH | 1957 | 3.0 | 157 | [90] |
Polyacrylamide | - | 648 | 0.59/0.11 | 194.7 | [91] |
Resorcinol-formaldehyde | - | 1103.4 | 0.71/0.36 | 127.4 | [92] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | Dye | pH/ Temperature | Order of the kinetic model | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity/ Efficiency | Refs. |
Polystyrene beads ACS (M/s Kureha, Japan) | Steam | 1160 | 0.478* | Methylene blue | 3.8–4.4 | Langmuir isotherm | 32 mg/g | [14] | |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Methylene blue | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 3152 mg/g | [66] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Malachite green | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 1455 mg/g | [66] |
Glucose | ZnCl2 | 2902.5 | 1.49/0.34 | Rhodamine B | - | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 1409 mg/g | [66] |
Polyvinyl alcohol | H2SO4 | - | - | Methylene blue | 6.5 | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 602.4 mg/g | [95] |
Polydopamine | - | 13.77 | - | Methylene blue | 25 ℃ | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 90.7 mg/g | [96] |
Citrus-pectin | - | 5.22 | - | Methylene blue | 12 | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 979.3 mg/g | [98] |
Sucrose | KOH | 1534 | 0.765 | Methylene blue | 25 ℃ | Pseudo-second-order | Langmuir isotherm | 704.2 mg/g | [99] |
* Micropore volume. |
Precursor | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/micropore volume (cm3/g) | Gas | Storage capacity/ uptake | Refs. |
Phenolic beads (CS-6-CD-4) | CO2 | 2284 | 0.89 | CO2 | 4.55 mmol/g | [11] |
Phenolic resin spheres | - | 482 | - | CO2 | 89 cm3/g | [38] |
Phenolic beads | Steam | 1280 | 0.91/0.43 | CO2 | 9.31% | [40] |
Phenolic beads | Steam and NH3 | 978 | 0.41/0.37 | CO2 | 10.33% | [40] |
Phenolic beads (ACS) | Steam | 1128 | 0.45/0.43 | CO2 | 0.79 mmol/g | [49] |
Phenolic beads (PR4_8000 ACS) | KOH | 1171 | 0.50/0.47 | CO2 | 1.25 mmol/g | [49] |
Polystyrene beads (SCS-700) | KOH | 1526 | 0.72/0.61 | CO2 | 4.21 mmol/g | [69] |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-4-700) | KOH | 1757 | 0.81/0.73 | CO2 | [70] | |
Polystyrene beads (NSCS-1-700) | KOH | 1269 | 0.58/0.53 | CO2 | 1.11 mmol/g | [70] |
Pitch | KOH | 3180 | 1.9 | CH4 | 14.73% | [100] |
Pitch | KOH | 3180 | 1.9 | H2 | 7.8% | [100] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07/1.59 | CH4 | 1.68 mmol/g | [101] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07 | CO2 | 356 mg/g | [102] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 3870 | 2.07 | H2 | 39 mg/g | [102] |
Phenol-formaldehyde | KOH | 1200 | 1.51 | H2 | 185 cm3/g | [103] |
Phenolic resin (novolac) | - | 1106 | 0.49/0.41 | CO2 | 4.9 mmol/g | [104] |
Precursor/Product | Activation agent | BET surface area (m2/g) | Total pore/ micropore volume (cm3/g) | Volatile | Temperature | Adsorption model | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | Refs. |
Phenol-formaldehyde beads from bamboo tar | CO2 | 189 | 0.10 | Toluene | 50 ℃ | Langmuir | 29 mg/g | [43] |
3-methylphenol and formaldehyde | Steam | 1501 | 0.72/0.25 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Langmuir-Freundlich | 21.83 mg/g | [44] |
Polystyrene beads | KOH | 1566 | 1.05/0.62 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 153 mg/g | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 1555 | 1.29/0.56 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 102 mg/g | [50] |
Pitch | Steam | 1573 | 0.68/0.50 | Dibenzothiophene | 25 ℃ | Freundlich | 93 mg/g | [50] |
Polystyrene beads | Steam | 979 | 0.84/0.31 | Dibenzothiophene | - | Freundlich | 109.36 mg/g | [51] |
Phenolic beads | CO2 | 1065 | 0.53* | Toluene | 25 ℃ | - | 236 mg/L | [48] |
BAC from pitch (M/s Kureha, Japan) | - | 1291 | 0.55* | Ethanol | 25 ℃ | - | 0.51 cm3/g | [106] |
BAC4 oxidized with HNO3 | - | 1212 | 0.53* | Ethanol | 25 ℃ | - | 0.49 cm3/g | [106] |
BAC-O from Pitch (M/s Kureha, Japan) | - | 1189 ± 11 | 0.50 ± 0.01/ 0.43 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-O-400 | - | 1360 ± 5 | 0.56 ± 0.01/ 0.50 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-H-400 | - | 1335 ± 24 | 0.56 ± 0.01/ 0.49 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
BAC-400 | - | 1315 ± 15 | 0.55 ± 0.01/ 0.49 ± 0.01 | Organic vapours | 25 ℃ | - | - | [105] |
* Micropore volume. |