Research article Special Issues

Dynamic stress intensity factor analysis of the interaction between multiple impact-loaded cracks in infinite domains

  • Received: 23 August 2016 Accepted: 15 November 2016 Published: 29 November 2016
  • In this work, the dynamic interaction between multiple cracks whose surfaces are symmetrically impact-loaded in infinite domains is investigated. Toward this end, the symmetric-Galerkin boundary element method (SGBEM) for 2-D elastodynamics in the Laplace-space frequency (LaplaceSGBEM) was employed to compute the dynamic stress intensity factors (DSIFs) for the cracks during their interaction under dynamic loading conditions. Three examples of multi-crack dynamic interaction were considered. The Laplace-SGBEM results show that the DSIFs will reach their maximum value after the cracks are loaded. It is followed by a damped-like oscillation of the DSIFs about their corresponding static value. In addition, as the cracks approach each other, the dynamic stress field in the vicinity of their crack tips interacts which results in an increase or decrease of the maximum DSIFs.

    Citation: A.-V. Phan. Dynamic stress intensity factor analysis of the interaction between multiple impact-loaded cracks in infinite domains[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(4): 1683-1695. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.4.1683

    Related Papers:

  • In this work, the dynamic interaction between multiple cracks whose surfaces are symmetrically impact-loaded in infinite domains is investigated. Toward this end, the symmetric-Galerkin boundary element method (SGBEM) for 2-D elastodynamics in the Laplace-space frequency (LaplaceSGBEM) was employed to compute the dynamic stress intensity factors (DSIFs) for the cracks during their interaction under dynamic loading conditions. Three examples of multi-crack dynamic interaction were considered. The Laplace-SGBEM results show that the DSIFs will reach their maximum value after the cracks are loaded. It is followed by a damped-like oscillation of the DSIFs about their corresponding static value. In addition, as the cracks approach each other, the dynamic stress field in the vicinity of their crack tips interacts which results in an increase or decrease of the maximum DSIFs.
    加载中
    [1] Trinh QT, Mouhoubi S, Chazallon C, et al. (2015) Solving multizone and multicrack elastostatic problems: A fast multipole symmetric Galerkin boundary element method approach. Eng Anal Bound Elem 50: 486–495.
    [2] Guo Z, Liu Y, Mac H, et al. (2014) A fast multipole boundary element method for modeling 2-D multiple crack problems with constant elements. Eng Anal Bound Elem 47: 1–9.
    [3] Grytsenko T, Galybin AN (2010) Numerical analysis of multi-crack large-scale plane problems with adaptive cross approximation and hierarchical matrices. Eng Anal Bound Elem 34: 501–510.
    [4] Wang XM, Gao S, Shen YP (1996) Interaction between an interface and cracks. Eng Fract Mech 53: 107–117.
    [5] Jiang ZD, Zeghloul A, Bezine G, et al. (1990) Stress intensity factors of parallel cracks in finite width sheet. Eng Fract Mech 35: 1073–1079.
    [6] Wu KC, Hou YL, Huang SM (2015) Transient analysis of multiple parallel cracks under anti-plane dynamic loading. Mech Mater 81: 56–61.
    [7] Monfared MM, Ayatollahi M (2013) Dynamic stress intensity factors of multiple cracks in an orthotropic strip with FGM coating. Eng Fract Mech 109: 45–57.
    [8] Ang WT, Athanasius L (2011) Dynamic interaction of multiple arbitrarily oriented planar cracks in a piezoelectric space: A semi-analytic solution. Eur J Mech A-Solids 30: 608–618.
    [9] Wu KC, Chen JC (2011) Transient analysis of collinear cracks under anti-plane dynamic loading. Procedia Eng 10: 924–929.
    [10] Itou S (2016) Transient dynamic stress intensity factors around three stacked parallel cracks in an infinite medium during passage of an impact normal stress. Int J Solids Struct 78–79: 199–204.
    [11] Itou S (2016) Dynamic stress intensity factors for three parallel cracks in an infinite plate subject to harmonic stress waves. Engineering 2: 485–495.
    [12] Dong L, Atluri SN (2013) Fracture & Fatigue Analyses: SGBEM-FEM or XFEM? Part 1: 2D Structures. Comp Model Eng Sci 90: 91–146.
    [13] Dong L, Atluri SN (2013) Fracture & Fatigue Analyses: SGBEM-FEM or XFEM? Part 2: 3D Solids. Comp Model Eng Sci 90: 379–413.
    [14] Sutradhar A, Paulino GH, Gray LJ (2008) Symmetric Galerkin Boundary Element Method, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    [15] Chirino F, Dominguez J (1989) Dynamic analysis of cracks using boundary element method. Eng Fract Mech 34: 1051–1061.
    [16] Gray LJ (1991) Evaluation of hypersingular integrals in the boundary element method. Math Comp Model 15: 165–174.
    [17] Gray LJ, Phan AV, Paulino GH, et al. (2003) Improved quarter-point crack tip element. Eng Fract Mech 70: 269–283.
    [18] Fedeli´nski P, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1995) A single-region time domain BEM for dynamic crack problems. Int J Solids Struct 32: 3555–3571.
    [19] Ebrahimi S, Phan AV (2013) Dynamic analysis of cracks using the SGBEM for elastodynamics in the Laplace-space frequency domain. Eng Anal Bound Elem 37: 1378–1391.
    [20] Phan AV, Gray LJ, Salvadori A (2010) Transient analysis of the dynamic stress intensity factors using SGBEM for frequency-domain elastodynamics. Comp Method Appl M 199: 3039–3050.
    [21] Aliabadi MH (2002) The Boundary Element Method – Volume 2: Applications in Solids and Structures, England: John Wiley & Sons.
    [22] Phan AV, Napier JAL, Gray LJ, et al. (2003) Symmetric-Galerkin BEM simulation of fracture with frictional contact. Int J Numer Meth Eng 57: 835–851.
    [23] Henshell RD, Shaw KG (1975) Crack tip finite elements are unnecessary. Int J Numer Meth Eng 9: 495–507.
    [24] Barsoum RS (1976) On the use of isoparametric finite elements in linear fracture mechanics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 10: 25–37.
    [25] Blandford GE, Ingraffea AR, Liggett JA (1981) Two-dimensional stress intensity factor compu­tations using the boundary element method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 17: 387–404.
    [26] Banks-Sills L (1991) Application of the finite element method to linear elastic fracture mechanics. Appl Mech Rev 44: 447–461.
    [27] Gray LJ, Paulino GH (1998) Crack tip interpolation, revisited. SIAM J Appl Math 58: 428–455.
    [28] Costabel M, Dauge M, Duduchava R (2003) Asymptotics Without Logarithmic Terms for Crack Problems. Commun Part Diff Eq 28: 869–926.
    [29] Phan AV, Gray LJ, Kaplan T (2007) On some benchmarch results for the interaction of a crack with a circular inclusion. ASME J Appl Mech 74: 1282–1284.
    [30] Durbin F (1974) Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms: an efficient improvement to Dubner and Abate’s method. Comp J 17: 371–376.

    © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
  • Reader Comments
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1851) PDF downloads(953) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(12)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog