
Citation: Gustavo E. Ratto, Fabián Videla, Jorge Reyna Almandos, Ricardo Maronna. Air quality at La Plata Conglomerate, Argentina: Review and prospective study to improve the present situation[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2018, 4(1): 88-125. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2018.1.88
[1] | Melike E. Bildirici, Mesut M. Badur . Correction: The effects of oil prices on confidence and stock return in China, India and Russia. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2019, 3(1): 46-52. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.1.46 |
[2] | Emmanuel Assifuah-Nunoo, Peterson Owusu Junior, Anokye Mohammed Adam, Ahmed Bossman . Assessing the safe haven properties of oil in African stock markets amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a quantile regression analysis. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2022, 6(2): 244-269. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2022011 |
[3] | Xiaohang Ren, Weixi Xu, Kun Duan . Fourier transform based LSTM stock prediction model under oil shocks. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2022, 6(2): 342-358. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2022015 |
[4] | Raéf Bahrini, Assaf Filfilan . Impact of the novel coronavirus on stock market returns: evidence from GCC countries. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2020, 4(4): 640-652. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2020029 |
[5] | Md Akther Uddin, Mohammad Enamul Hoque, Md Hakim Ali . International economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns of Bangladesh: evidence from linear and nonlinear model. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2020, 4(2): 236-251. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2020011 |
[6] | Chiao Yi Chang, Fu Shuen Shie, Shu Ling Yang . The relationship between herding behavior and firm size before and after the elimination of short-sale price restrictions. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2019, 3(3): 526-549. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.3.526 |
[7] | Albert A. Agyemang-Badu, Fernando Gallardo Olmedo, José María Mella Márquez . Conditional macroeconomic and stock market volatility under regime switching: Empirical evidence from Africa. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2024, 8(2): 255-285. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2024010 |
[8] | Fangzhou Huang, Jiao Song, Nick J. Taylor . The impact of business conditions and commodity market on US stock returns: An asset pricing modelling experiment. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2022, 6(3): 433-458. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2022019 |
[9] | Andrey Kudryavtsev . Absolute Stock Returns and Trading Volumes: Psychological Insights. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2017, 1(2): 186-204. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2017.2.186 |
[10] | Rubaiyat Ahsan Bhuiyan, Tanusree Chakravarty Mukherjee, Kazi Md Tarique, Changyong Zhang . Hedge asset for stock markets: Cryptocurrency, Cryptocurrency Volatility Index (CVI) or Commodity. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2025, 9(1): 131-166. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2025005 |
The need for energy security, as well as, environmental concerns, are the main drivers behind the growth of bioenergy and consequently biofuels, in recent years. In 2009 the EU issued a mandatory environmental directive, Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC, regarding renewable energy, to address environmental problems that have arisen from the use of fossil fuels in energy generation. This directive specified that 20% of all energy in the EU-27 should be from renewable sources, with 10% of road transport energy coming from biofuels, by the end of 2020. Moreover, in 2012, an amendment of the directive required that first generation derived biofuels should be limited to 5%, reinforcing the need for further development of second-generation advanced biofuels. A report from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) projects a scenario with 22% of transportation fuels coming from liquid biofuels and biogas by 2050 (Figure 1) [1].
In addition to changes in legislation, the use of fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases (GHG) into the atmosphere and contributes to the atmospheric CO2 concentration, which is directly related with climate change. Subsequently, there is renewed interest in the production of liquid biofuels from biomass since their use has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions [2]. "First generation" biofuels can contribute to CO2 emissions reduction, but they compete with land used for arable and pastoral farming; therefore, first generation biofuels are not included in this review. "Second generation" liquid biofuels are produced from non-food biomass, including agricultural and forest biomass residues, dedicated energy crops, lignocellulosic fraction of municipal and industrial solid waste [3]. Furthermore, waste vegetable oils and waste animal fats can be used for the generation of liquid biofuels. The same type of biomass can generate different sustainable liquid fuels depending on the applied technology. Figure 2 illustrates the fuels discussed in this paper. Challenges associated with the production of such fuels include cost effectiveness and technical issues.
Advanced liquid biofuels that are studied in this review include bioethanol, biodiesel, bio-methanol, dimethyl-ether, bio-oil, biobutanol, and biojet. Such biofuels (i.e. biodiesel and bioethanol) are characterized either by their ability to blend with existing petroleum fuels, or by their ability to be used in existing internal combustion engines. To preserve the integrity of engine manufacturer warrantees and ensure the same engine combustion, emissions, and performance output, second generation liquid biofuels are required to have similar properties to existing petroleum fuels. These properties among others include heating value, octane number, viscosity, water content, and flash point. Figure 3 shows how fossil fuels can be replaced by sustainable biofuels and their application.
In order to produce biofuels, researchers are developing and improving different pathways that can be divided into two main conversion routes, thermochemical or biochemical. The most studied biochemical routes are fermentation and transesterification processes, the most studied thermochemical routes are pyrolysis, gasification, and Fischer Tropsch processes. The sustainability of the pathways for the production of liquid biofuels significantly depends on the type of feedstock used and the end product specifications. Therefore, there is no best pathway or solution to produce renewable liquid fuels. This paper aims to provide an up to date review on the most promising second generation liquid biofuels and the sustainable pathways for their production. Challenges concerning the commercialisation of these biofuels are also discussed.
Bioethanol is commonly produced from the fermentation of sugars and can be used as a petrol substitute to fuel spark ignition engines. Another pathway is through fermentation of syngas. Petrol is a liquid consisting of C4–C12 hydrocarbons and is produced by cracking crude oil. Ethanol can be used in its pure form (E-100) or blended with petrol. It should be noted that the use of pure ethanol (E-100) requires engine modifications to overcome issues associated with fuel compression, timing of injection, and engine corrosion. Bioethanol can be blended up to 10% and 15 % with petrol according to the requirements in the EN 15376 and ASTM D4806 specifications, respectively. The important properties of pure ethanol (E100) and its 10% blend with petrol (E10) can be seen in Table 1 and are compared with pure petrol.
Properties | Petrol | E-100 | E-10 |
Viscosity mm2/s | 0.48–0.84 | 1.57 (20 ℃) | 0.53 (30 ℃) |
Flash Point ℃ | −65 | 13 | −40 |
RON ℃ | 86.4–100 | 108.6–114 | 87.4–94 |
MON ℃ | 80–98.8 | 89.7–112 | 86–99.9 |
Octane number | 86–94 | 98–100 | - |
Cloud point ℃ | −22 | - | 8 |
Pour point ℃ | (−17)–(−19) | - | 0 |
MJ/Kg | 41.9–44.4 | 26–30 | 33.19–44.22 |
It can be observed that pure ethanol has a higher octane number than petrol suggesting that it has higher anti knocking properties. The flashpoint of ethanol and the blend is also higher than petrol making the fuel safer to handle during transport. Moreover, ethanol has a lower heating value.
There are two processing routes for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into bioethanol: Fermentation of carbohydrates resulting from the hydrolysis of biomass into bioethanol and the fermentation of syngas. The alcohol produced from the fermentation of carbohydrates or syngas can be subjected further to ethanol dehydration, oligomerization, distillation, and hydrogenation to produce liquid biofuels, such as biojet fuel and green diesel.
Bioethanol is currently produced from starch/sugar based biomass such as wheat and corn, but issues arise concerning the sustainability of such feedstocks since they compete with human food [6]. Alternative, lignocellulosic biomass can be used for the production of ethanol, but additional technological steps are required, making the process more complicated and costly. Another shortcoming of bioethanol production from sugars is that the process of fermentation is lengthy, usually taking hours or days to complete.
Either acid or enzymatic hydrolysis (also known as saccharification) is required to convert the hemicellulose and cellulose constituents of lignocellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars. The lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose structure, form a chemical and physical barrier preventing the access of enzymes and the hydrolysis of biomass to produce fermentable sugars. This requires the separation of lignin from the biomass structure, reduction in the crystallinity of cellulose, and alterations in the surface area and porosity of the biomass [7]. Hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose results in the generation of mainly hexoses (glucose) and pentoses, respectively, although some hexoses can also be obtained from hemicellulose.
The main steps for the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass are pretreatment and/or detoxification, hydrolysis, fermentation, and product recovery [8]. Crushing the feedstock and mixing it with water is required prior to pretreatment to generate slurry. Zhu et al. concluded that the selection of the appropriate pretreatment technology significantly depends on feedstock type [9]. Biochemical fermentation of carbohydrates resulting from the hydrolysis of biomass takes place under the presence of specific microorganisms (yeast or bacteria) at temperatures of up to approximately 38 ℃ with either a batch, fed-batch, or continuous mode bioreactor. The selection of appropriate microorganisms depends on pretreatment conditions, fermentation conditions, and reactor configuration. Furthermore, the hydrolysate of lignocellulosic biomass can contain mixtures of sugars, such as pentoses and hexoses, and the desirable microorganisms should be able to convert both type of sugars. Zabed et al. presented a comprehensive overview on the technological approaches and microbial contribution to the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol [8]. Following pretreatment and hydrolysis the sugars released are then fermented by the relevant microorganisms and converted into ethanol. The microorganisms can be acquired from yeast, bacteria, and filamentous funghi and are chosen based on the ethanol yields that they can achieve in addition to the inhibitor tolerance.
Ethanol yields depend on the biomass structure, pretreatment method, type of sugars (five or six carbon sugars), concentration of sugars in the hydrolysates, type of microorganisms, and the fermentation process conditions. The integration of hydrolysis and fermentation is also an important step to achieve process sustainability and high ethanol yields. De Silva et al. investigated the use of carnauba straw residue to produce ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process [10]. The SSF approach involves both cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation of hexose sugars in a single reactor. The pretreatment methods applied on the sample included hydrothermal (HT), alkaline (AL), and acid-alkaline (AA) treatment. It was shown that the AL pretreatment resulted in the most efficient removal of lignin and hemicellulose. Moreover, enzymatic hydrolysis of the AL treated sample converted 64.43% to sugars. The maximum ethanol concentration was achieved by using Kluyveromyces marxianus ATCC-36907 cultivated at 45 ℃ and generated 7.53 g/L of ethanol. Further work by Nguyen et al. studied the effectiveness of popping pretreatment in the saccharification process and its consequent effect on bioethanol yields, using coffee beans, cassava starch, and coconut [11]. Results revealed that saccharification efficiencies, after enzymatic hydrolysis, were increased significantly in all the popping-pretreated samples compared to the non-pretreated samples. The total fermentable sugars after pretreatment reached values up to 22.6 g/L, in comparison with the samples without pretreatment, which only achieved maximum values of 7.8 g/L.
Nguyen et al. also investigated the effect of separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and SSF processing on bioethanol production and foundthe SSF process more promising than the SHF process [11]. In their study ethanol conversion yields from the popping-pretreated sample (mixture of coffee beans, cassava starch, and coconut) using the SSF approach reached 88.1%, which is significantly greater than the yields of 76.8% (9.5 g/L) achieved by the SHF process. The SSF configuration was previously shown to be more effective in terms of ethanol concentration and conversion yields, in the conversion of corn stover and loblolly pine, when compared with SHF [12]. Ethanol yields of 84% (17.3 g/L) and 77% (15.4 g/L) were achieved from the SSF processing of corn stover and loblolly pine, respectively, while the yields were lower (76% for corn stover and 67% for loblolly pine), for the SHF processing. Dahnum et al. also study the influence of SHF and SSF on ethanol yields using empty fruit bunch [13]. Similar to the previous studies the SSF approach produced the highest concentration of ethanol.
Cotana et al. investigated the potential of the SHF and semi-simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSSF) configurations for ethanol production using cardoon [14]. Steam explosion was the pretreatment method selected for the study. Similar to the previous studies the SSSF process displayed better results in terms of ethanol yields and length of the process. Another study used delignified coconut waste and cactus to compare the SSF and SSSF approach [15]. Similar, to Cotana et al., the SSSF configuration resulted in higher ethanol yields (up to 89.15%) when compared to SSF.
Ishola et al. examined the potential of the simultaneous saccharification, filtration, and fermentation (SSFF) process of spruce chips on ethanol yields [16]. This process configuration involves the combination of SHF and SSF, with fermentation broth circulated between the hydrolysis and fermentation vessels. The samples were chemically pretreated with SO2 impregnation and exposed to a pressure of 22 bars, and a temperature of 215 ℃ for 5 minutes. Approximately, 31.1 g/L of ethanol was produced in the hydrolysis reactor after 96 hours of processing, which corresponds to 85.0% of the theoretical yield.
Another configuration for ethanol production is simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) which involves both cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars in a single reactor. Liu et al. used a dry biorefining approach including dry acid pretreatment, disk milling, and biodetoxification of corn stover, wheat straw, rice straw, sugarcane bagasse, and poplar sawdust to maximise the potential of SSCF [17]. The most promising feedstock was wheat straw, which produced 101.4 g/L of ethanol.
Consolidated bioprocess (CBP) is another process configuration, where hydrolysis and fermentation take place in the same vessel simultaneously, as well as, producing the required hydrolytic enzymes within the process [18]. Horisawa et al. investigated the potential of direct ethanol production from wood chips in a single reactor under anaerobic conditions using the white rot fungus Schizophyllum commune NBRC 4928 [19]. This fungus was selected due its ability to produces enzymes that degrade all biomass constitutes including lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose. Initial tests were performed with polysacchatides and monosaccharides to determine the fungus's ability to produce ethanol from various types of sugar. Results show that the rate of saccharification was slower for polysacchatides fermentation. Concerning the fermentation of wood chips, successful delignification and ethanol production were achieved by also adding the lignin-degrading fungus T. cucumeris IWA5b to the culture. The study demonstrated that the combined use of lignin and polysaccharide degrading fungi was successful and that direct ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass, without pretreatment, could be feasible. Huang et al. also demonstrated the feasibility of producing ethanol directly from sugarcane bagasse (without pretreatment) using the Recombinant Trichoderma reesei Strain HJ48 [20]. The maximum ethanol concentration produced was 3.1 g/L after 120 hours of cultivation. Recent work by Loaces et al. showed that Arundo donax biomass can be converted into ethanol by a genetically modified E. coli under a SSF process configuration. It should be noted that the biomass was pretreated with 2% sulfuric acid in mild conditions [21].
Another pathway for production of ethanol is through fermentation of syngas. Lignocellulosic waste materials can be converted initially through gasification into a gas mixture (syngas) consisting of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrogen (H2), methane (CH4), water vapour, and short chain hydrocarbon gases [22]. During gasification, all biomass components are utilised, including lignin, which is the main advantage of the process when compared with saccharification fermentation where only hemicellulose and cellulose are consumed.
The fermentation of syngas involves mixing together carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide, which are converted into acetate, followed by ethanol. Typical reactions are the following:
4CO+2H2O→CH3COOH+2CO2 | (1) |
6CO+3H2O→C2H5OH+4CO2 | (2) |
6H2+2CO2→C2H5OH+3H2O | (3) |
Syngas produced from gasification contains impurities, such as nitrous oxide, alkali compounds, and tars. Impurities can affect microbial activities and the pH of the fermenting broth, which could lead to cell toxicity, thus gas cleaning is required prior to fermentation. The optimum temperature range for the mesophilic bacteria is 37–40 ℃, whereas for the thermophilic bacteria the range is 55–80 ℃. The process takes place under strict anaerobic conditions. The most promising microorganisms are acetogens, such as C. carboxidivorans and A. bacchi, which can metabolize CO, CO2, and H2 to alcohols and organic acids [23,24]. These microorganisms use two metabolic steps, an acidogenic, and a solventogenic. The acidogenic step involves the main bacterial growth where acids are produced with little or no production of alcohols. The generation of ethanol occurs in the solventogenic step in which alcohol is produced from the formed acids or to a lesser extent, directly from syngas consumption.
Syngas fermentation was performed using a two-stage continuous system with two stirred tank reactors connected in series by Abubackar et al. [25]. The effectiveness of the microorganism clostridium carboxidivorans on the production of acids and alcohols was investigated in continues mode. Syngas (CO:CO2:H2:N2; 30:10:20:40; vol%) was supplied at a constant flow rate while a nutrient medium was provided at different flow rates (8.1–30 ml/h). The bioreactors were maintained at different pH levels to enhance acidogenesis (pH 6) and stimulate solventogenesis (pH 5). The highest ethanol concentration was 1.51 g/L and it was achieved for medium flow rates of 22 ml/h. Previous work by Fernández-Naveira et al. used the same medium as mentioned previously to investigate the conversion of syngas by Clostridium carboxidivorans into hexanol, butanol, and ethanol (H-B-E fermentation) [26]. Syngas with composition of CO:CO2:H2:N2 (20:20:10:50) was provided continuously at 10 mL/min using a two-stage continuous system with two stirred tank reactors connected in series. The maximum concentrations of ethanol, butanol, and hexanol, were achieved at a pH of 5.75 and were 2.7 g/L, 1.9 g/L, and 0.85 g/L, respectively.
Devarapalli et al. investigated the use of Clostridium ragsdalei, which is another acetogen microorganism, for the conversion of syngas into ethanol [27]. A trickle bed reactor was utilised as the fermentation bioreactor while a syngas mixture of CO:CO2:H2:N2 (38:28.5:28.5:5), as well as, the medium, were fed continuously. The highest ethanol concentration (5.7 g/L) was accomplished at 200 ml/min of liquid flow rate and 4.6 sccm syngas flow rate. An interesting approach to enhance ethanol production during syngas fermentation was to use biochar as a medium to serve as nutrients to the Clostridium ragsdalei since it contains mineral and metals [28]. The study compared four fermentation media containing biochar from switchgrass, forage sorghum, red cedar, and poultry litter, with a standard yeast extract medium. Syngas fermentations were conducted in 250 mL bottle reactors at 150 rpm and 37 ℃ with syngas containing CO:H2:CO2 (40:30:30) by volume. The poultry litter derived biochar medium showed the highest ethanol improvement (58.9%) in comparison to the yeast medium. It is believed that this is due the high release of Na, K, Ca, Mg, S and P from the biochar derived medium.
The use of a mixed culture in a corn steep liquor containing A. bacchi strain CP15 and C. propionicum was also researched [29]. Syngas fermentation with cell recycle was performed in a 7 L continuous stirred tank reactor with a syngas composition of CO:CO2:H2:N2 (20:15:5:60) by volume. The mixed culture medium was able to produce 8 g/L, 6 g/L and 1 g/L of ethanol, n-propanol and n-butanol, respectively.
Biobutanol (C4H9OH) can be used as a petrol substitute since its properties are comparable to petroleum derived petrol. It can be produced from lignocellulosic biomass via the process of fermentation. Similar to the fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol (mentioned in Section 2.1.1) pretreatment steps are also required. The important properties of pure biobutanol can be seen in Table 2 and are compared with pure petrol.
Properties | Biobutanol | Petrol |
Boiling point (℃) | 118 | 200 |
Freezing point (℃) | −89 | −40 |
Density (kg/m3) | 810 | 760 |
Heat of vaporization (MJ/kg) | 0.43 | 0.36 |
Energy density (MJ/L) | 30 | 32 |
Cetane no | ~25 | 5–20 |
Flash point (℃) | 35 | −42 |
Auto-ignition temperature (℃) | 397 | 257 |
Biobutanol can be produced by the same pathways as bioethanol; Figure 4 illustrates the production routes of bioethanol and biobutanol. As mentioned previously, butanol is produced simultaneously with ethanol from the fermentation of sugars or syngas [26,28]. Biobutanol production from fermentation of syngas including recent technological advances was discussed in the bioethanol section. With regards to fermentation of sugars, the conventional pathway for biobutanol production is the acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation route using the microorganism Clostridium acetobutylicum. The main challenge is the recovery of butanol from the fermentation broth, since it is difficult to exceed 2% (v/v), while ethanol can reach yields of up to 15% (v/v).
Xue et al. investigated the potential of Jerusalem artichoke stalk (JAS) as a feedstock for microbial butanol production and the vapour stripping-vapor permeation (VSVP) process for butanol recovery [32]. JAS was subjected initially to alkaline pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis to achieve delignification and fermentable sugar release. It was found that 11.8 g/L of butanol was produced under the optimum conditions using a Clostridium microorganism. Moreover, the VSVP process proved to be more productive for butanol recovery from the fermentation broth, than conventional pervaporation process. Further work by Xue et al. [33] reviewed the problems and advances in butanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum to achieve process feasibility. It was concluded that in-situ product recovery techniques can lead to a reduction in the production cost of biobutanol, since the continuous removal and purification of inhibitory products during fermentation, results in the generation of ABE in a concentrated solution. Furthermore, genome editing of Clostridium acetobutylicum could lead to a significant improvement in biobutanol yields.
Biodiesel can be defined as fatty acid methyl/ethyl ester (FAME and FAEE) derived from transesterification and esterification of vegetable oils or animal fats and alcohol (methanol or ethanol), usually in the presence of a basic, acid, or enzyme catalyst [34]. Currently, first generation biodiesel is produced on a large scale and is blended with fossil derived diesel. It is regulated by the standards ASTM D6751 and EN 14214. Table 3 shows the key properties and differences between regulated biodiesels and fossil diesel.
Properties | Biodiesel (ASTM D6751) | Biodiesel (EN 14214) | Fossil diesel |
Density 15 ℃ (kg/m3) | 880 | 860–900 | 820–850 |
Viscosity @ 40 ℃ (cSt) | 1.9–6.0 | 3.5–5.0 | 2.04–3.23 |
Calorific value (MJ/kg) | - | 35 | 42–48 |
Acidity total (mgKOH/g) | Max. 0.50 | Max. 0.5 | 0.02 |
Cetane number (min) | Min. 47 | Min. 51 | Min. 40 |
Iodine number (max) | - | 120 | - |
Flash point (℃) | Min. 93 | Min. 120 | Min. 52 |
Pour point (℃) | −15 to 10 | - | −35 to −15 |
Cloud point (℃) | −3 to 12 | - | −15 to 5 |
Cold filter plugging point (℃) | 19 | Max. 5 | 5 |
Copper strip corrosion (3 h–50 ℃) | Max. 3 | Min. 1 | Max. 3 |
Sulphur % (ppm) | Max. 15 | Max. 10 | Max. 15 |
Sulphated ash % (m/m) | Max. 0.02 | Max. 0.02 | Max. 0.01 |
Oxidation stability (min, 110 ℃) | 3 | 6 | - |
Compared to fossil diesel, biodiesel has low sulphur and aromatics content, high biodegradability, low stability (which can be increased with the addition of antioxidants) [35] and high NOx emissions when burned [36].
Biodiesel is produced through the transesterification/esterification reaction. The oil (triglycerides and free fat acids (FFA)) reacts with an alcohol (usually methanol) in the presence of a catalyst (mainly alkaline) to form alkyl esters (fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) when reacted with methanol) and glycerol or water. The exemplified reactions are below:
Triglycerides+3alcohol→3ethylesters+glycerol | (4) |
Fattyacid+alcohol→ethylester+water | (5) |
Many studies have been performed to identify the best catalyst for biodiesel production. The most commonly used catalysts are the alkaline ones (NaOH and KOH), however they require less water and FFA in the oil, so this route is limited by the feedstock properties. Waste cooking oil, for example, has a large amount of FFA and is not suitable for this route. Therefore, more catalytic routes have been developed including heterogeneous catalysts, acid catalysts, and enzymes [37]. The latest studies focus on the use of heterogeneous catalysts from biological waste because of their high activity, tolerance to water, non-toxicity, and enviromental benefits [38].
Other studies have focussed on eliminating catalysts all together by using supercritical fluids including, subcritical hydrolysis for lipid extraction integrated into supercritical esterification and, direct supercritical transesterification. The advantage of these approaches is their high tolerance to water and FFA, therefore they are more suitable for cooking oil and wet biomass (algae). However, their efficiency and economic feasibility need to be improved in order to make these technologies viable for larger scale applications [39].
Another biofuel that can be blended or replace fossil diesel is green or renewable diesel [40]. Green diesel is derived from the diesel fraction of upgraded bio-oil or Fischer–Tropsch (FT) wax. In this case, green diesel, has not been derived from the transesterification process and can be obtained by hydroprocessing (HDO), followed by cracking or isomerisation, of bio-oil or FT wax. This technology will be explained further in Section 2.6.2 and Section 2.8.1.2. However, it is not commonly used yet, as its production costs are higher when compared to biodiesel, and operating conditions are more complex (higher temperatures and pressures). Green diesel has a higher cetane number (around 70–90) when compared to biodiesel (50–65) and diesel (40) and a higher range of cloud point (from −20 to 20 ℃) due to isomerisation after the HDO step [41]. Thus, it is more stable. Moreover, green diesel has a higher calorific value, lower oxygen content, lubricity, density, and viscosity when compared with biodiesel [42].
Biomethanol is an alcohol (CH3OH) that can be produced by catalytic (usually copper, zinc or chromium oxides) hydrogenation of syngas (carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide) or biogas (methane) [43,44]. Its production can be divided into 3 reactions:
CO+2H2→←\vboxto.5ex\vssCH3OH(twostages:CO+H2→←\vboxto.5ex\vssCH2OfollowedbyCH2O+H2→←\vboxto.5ex\vssCH3OH) | (6) |
CO2+3H2→←\vboxto.5ex\vssCH3OH+H2O | (7) |
CH4+H2O→←\vboxto.5ex\vssCH2OH+H2O | (8) |
The reactions occur at 200–300 ℃ and 50–100 bar and the use of catalysts are required in order to force thermodynamic equilibrium for methanol production. The recycling of the unreacted gas and the required cooling systems (due to the exothermic nature of the reaction) are responsible for the main costs of the synthesis process [45].
For methanol synthesis, the syngas ratio (H2/CO2) is required to be higher than 2. Thus, cleaning of syngas is carried out before methanol generation in order to optimize its composition. Furthermore, syngas contains impurities, such as sulphur and chlorides that can be harmful to the environment and/or deactivate the catalyst [46]. Another way of optimising the process is the conversion of CO to CO2 using a water gas shift catalyst or a catalytic membrane reactor immediately after the gasification process [47]. CO2 is then converted to methanol by catalytic hydrogenation. The produced biomethanol also requires a purification step in order to meet specifications. This process can be realised at a competitive price when biomethanol is used as a biofuel blend and methanol can be directed to the production of other fuels such as biodiesel, DME, and OME [47]. Biomethanol production can be simplified with the approach presented in Figure 5 below:
It has been shown that biomethanol has a competitive cost production and GHG emissions reduction when compared to methanol production from fossil fuels [48]. Biomethanol can be used as direct blending with petrol and maritime fuel, for transesterification, and as feedstock for DME/OME synthesis [49].
Poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers (OME) and dimethyl ether (DME) are diesel substitutes and can be used in compression ignition engines without major modifications. Biomethanol can be used as feedstock for the generation of OME/DME. The DME structure is CH3OCH3, while OME is H3CO(CH2O)nCH3, with n from 2 to 8, preferably 3 to 5 for diesel replacement [48]. The properties of these fuels in comparison with diesel are presented in Table 4 [49,50].
Properties | DME | OME | Fossil diesel |
Molecular weight | 46.07 | 76–196.2 | 96 |
Density 20 ℃ (kg/m3) | 660 | 960–1105 | 800–840 |
Viscosity @ 40 ℃ (cSt) | 0.12–0.15 | 0.64–1.75 | 2–4 |
Calorific value (MJ/kg) | 28.5 | 18.5–23.3 | 42.5 |
Cetane number (min) | 55–60 | 60–90 | Min. 40 |
DME has a high oxygen content, low viscosity, low lubrication, and LHV when compared to fossil diesel fuel [51]. DME has already been tested in diesel engines; information regarding emissions and performance are established. When compared to diesel combustion, DME emits lower levels of particulate matter, HC, and nitrous oxides (NOx) [51], but also has inferior performance (due to the lower LHV) [52]. OME does not contain impurities and has a cetane number higher than conventional diesel, but it has a lower HHV. Costs analysis confirms that OME production could be even cheaper than diesel production [50].
The main pathway for DME production is methanol dehydration in a catalytic gas-phase reactor followed by purification and distillation [53]. Common catalysts used are solid-acid catalysts, such as alumina, zeolites, AlPO4, and CuO/ZrO2. DME synthesis usually occurs in slurry or fixed bed reactors, but the process can also take place in fluidized-bed reactors, coupled and dual type, as well as, membrane reactors [54]. The reaction of the commercialised process is presented below:
2CH3OH→CH3OCH3+H2O | (9) |
A promising route that is currently being studied is DME production in a one stage reactor. DME can be produced directly from syngas, at 250–400 ℃ and pressures higher than 10 bar, in an exothermic reaction using a bi-functional catalyst that is able to synthesise methanol followed by DME. The process is strongly influenced by the presence of water, H2/CO ratio, CO2 content, and reaction temperature [56].
For OME production, the methanol is utilised by a metal oxide catalytic process (or with silver catalyst) to produce formaldehyde as shown in the reactions below:
CH3O+1/2O2→CH2O+H2O | (10) |
CH3O→CH2O+H2 | (11) |
From the formaldehyde, trioxane is produced with the use of sulphuric acid (3CH2O → (CH2O)3) and methylal is produced by a reaction-distillation process with an acidic heterogeneous catalyst (2CH3OH + CH2O ⇄ CH3O-CH2O-CH3 + H2O) [50]. The most used catalysts are liquid catalysts (mineral acid (H2SO4) or ionic liquids) and heterogeneous catalysts (ion exchange resin, carbon marerial, solid superacid, zeolite and others) [55].
The catalytic steps involved in OME synthesis is the main drawback of the process. Therefore, further research has been undertaken aiming to simplify the process with more efficient and feasible catalysts [57].
Further optimisations regarding the feasibility of the DME/OME routes has been investigated in regards to the optimization of the gasification and methanol process. Parvez (2018) showed that CO2-enhanced gasification resulted in better energy efficiency and less environmental impact when producing DME compared to conventional gasification [56].
Bio-oil is the primary product from the process of pyrolysis, which can be obtained from the thermal decomposition of lignocellulose biomass with rapid heating in the absence of oxygen followed by rapid quenching of the vapour products. It is a multicomponent mixture consisting of hundreds of different sized molecules obtained from the depolymerisation and fragmentation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [57]. A typical compound distribution in bio-oil includes acids, esters, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, sugars, furans, hydrocarbons (such as alkene, aromatics), phenols (such as phenols, anisoles, catechols, guaiacols, syringols), water, and fragments of cellulose and lignin [58,59]. The composition and yields of bio-oil are significantly dependent on the process operating parameters, reactor configuration, and feedstock type.
Bio-oil can be used as a substitute for fuel oil or diesel in many industrial boilers, furnaces, and static engines for heat and power generation. The USA has developed the ASTM D7544, which covers the specification of pyrolysis liquid produced from biomass for use in various types of fuel-burning equipment.
Significant upgrading of bio-oil is required to meet engine specifications, since its physiochemical properties vary significant from those of conventional fossil fuels (Table 5). The main reason for the differences between bio-oil and transportation fuels is the high content of oxygen in bio-oil, which tends to resemble its original biomass [60]. Furthermore, it is immiscible with fossil fuels, because of its high polarity and hydrophilic nature. The indigenous undesired properties of bio-oil that makes it unsuitable as a transportation fuel are given below:
Analysis | Typical wood derived bio-oil | Fossil diesel | LFO Motor/heating EN590 |
Water, wt.% | 20–30 | ∼0 | ∼0 |
Stability | Unstable* | ||
Viscosity (40 ℃), cSt | 15–35 | 2.04–3.23 | 2.0–4.5 |
Density (15 ℃), kg/dm3 | 1.10–1.30c | 0.820–0.850 | Max. 0.845 |
Flash point, ℃ | 40–110d | Min. 52 | Min.60 |
Pour point, ℃ | −9–36 | −35−15 | −5 min |
LHV, MJ/kg | 13–18c | 42–48 | 42.6 |
Distillability | Non-distillable | Distillable | Distillable |
*Polymerisation occurs during heating for prolonged periods. |
● Low heating value,
● Immiscible with fossil transportation fuels,
● Acidity,
● High oxygen content,
● High viscosity,
● High water content,
● High solid content.
Bio-oil can be used in other applications, such as a food flavouring and chemical production, however our focus is on its potential as a biofuel for transportation.
Pyrolysis is defined as the thermal decomposition of organic matter in the complete absence of oxygen (usually nitrogen). Pyrolysis takes place in the temperature range 280–850 ℃ depending on the nature of the feedstock, the desired products, and the particular pyrolysis process employed. Depending on the heating rate and vapour phase residence time, pyrolysis can be classified into several categories. Slow pyrolysis is a batch process characterised by long vapour residence time (5–30 min), slow heat transfer rates up to 2 ℃/s, and low reactor temperatures ranging from 300–500 ℃. Intermediate pyrolysis is carried out in the temperature range 300–500 ℃ with heat transfer rates up to 1000 ℃/s. Fast pyrolysis is a continuous process and requires high heat transfer rates (>1000 ℃/s), short vapour residence time (1 s), and a relatively high temperature (450–600 ℃). Moreover, feedstock drying is necessary in fast pyrolysis, while slow and intermediate pyrolysis process feedstocks with higher moisture levels. Even though fast pyrolysis produces the highest bio-oil yields (up to 75 wt.% expressed on biomass basis), it has been shown that intermediate pyrolysis can produce better quality of bio-oil (low tar yield and viscosity) [62]. The processes described above occur under atmospheric pressure.
In addition to the previous categorisation, hydrogen can be used instead of an inert nitrogen environment. Hydropyrolysis takes place under a pressurised hydrogen atmosphere, which results in the reduction of unsaturated hydrocarbons and formation of fewer compounds in the bio-oil with higher selectivity [63]. It seems that the presence of hydrogen avoids the random thermal cracking that takes place under a nitrogen environment and promotes the systematic bond cleavage in the structure of biomass, thus increasing the quality of the produced bio-oil. Pressurised water can also be used to achieve the thermochemical conversion of biomass into bio-oil in a process termed hydrothermal liquefaction [64]. Typical operating temperatures are 250–374 ℃ and operating pressures from 4–22 MPa. Another promising pyrolysis mode is microwave pyrolysis [65]. The fundamental difference here is that microwave waves heat the biomass particles from within and not by external heat transfer from a high temperature heat source.
● Catalytic hydrotreatment
The process takes place at high pressure (up to 200 bar) and moderate temperature (up to 400 ℃) in the presence of a heterogeneous catalyst. A hydrogen source is necessary to achieve the removal of the oxygenated compounds in bio-oil, such as ketones and carboxylic acids, and to produce an oil suitable to be used as a feedstock in a biorefinery or blend with diesel. Hydrotreatment rejects oxygen as water by catalytic reaction with hydrogen [66].
(CH2O)+H2→Catalyst→(CH2)+H2O | (12) |
Gollacota et al. summarised the following different type of reactions that occur during the process: Hydrodeoxygenation, hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, hydrocracking, dehydration, and decarboxylation [67]. Hydrotreating (HT) gives a naphtha-like product that requires further refining to produce transport fuels, such as aviation fuel and green diesel [68].
Commonly applied catalysts for the hytrotreating of bio-oil or bio-oil model compounds are alumina or aluminosilicate supported sulfided CoMo and NiMo catalysts. This review focuses on the upgrading of actual bio-oil, thus work regarding bio-oil model compounds is not discussed further. The main work involving the testing of sulphided CoMo or NiMo catalysts on wood derived bio-oil was conducted in the 1980s and 1990s [69,70]. Their results showed that even though the catalysts were effective in the enhancement of bio-oil, several issues, such as low upgraded bio-oil yields and catalyst deactivation caused by carbon/coke deposition, required further research. The disadvantage of alumina as a support material for the HT catalysts was its instability at high temperatures in the high water environment of the bio-oil. Thus, carbon-supported sulphided CoMo and NiMo catalysts were also tested as HT catalysts by Elliot et al. [71].
Alternatively, noble metals have been tested, dispersed on active charcoal supports or metal oxides, for the HT of bio-oil [72,73,74]. Wildschut et al. used Ru, Rh, Pd and Pt over different supports to assess their effect on the deoxygenation of bio-oil in comparison with conventional HT catalysts. It was found that the Ru/C catalyst was greater than the HT catalysts with reference to bio-oil yields (up to 60 wt.%) and deoxygenation level (up to 90 wt.%). The type of catalyst precursor on catalyst performance was also found to play a role on the HT of bio-oil [76]. However, the high cost of noble metals significantly affects the industrialisation of the process.
Inexpensive non-sulphided transition metal catalysts over various support materials, such as aluminosilicate and zeolite, have been studied for their HDO activity for bio-oil upgrading. Ni-based catalysts with three different support materials (active carbon, SBA-15 and Al-SBA-15) and their catalytic effects were tested with poplar derived bio-oil by Oh et al. [75]. The Ni/SBA-15 catalyst was found to show the highest degree of deoxygenation and upgraded bio-oil yields by 47.7 wt.%.
Xu et al. investigated the effect of a non-sulphided bimetallic catalyst, MoNi/γ-Al2O3, for upgrading of pine sawdust derived bio-oil [76]. The catalyst seemed to improved pH and water content, but the oxygen content was not reduced significantly. The influence of the non-sulphided bimetallic FeCo/SiO2 catalyst, as well as, the monometallic Co/SiO2 and Fe/SiO2 catalysts, on deoxygenation of pine sawdust derived bio-oil was also tested [77]. The bimetallic Fe-Co/SiO2 catalysts decreased the upgraded bio-oil yields (23.85–26.94 wt.%) and increased the gas yields (10.35–22.90 wt.%). The bimetallic catalysts showed an improvement on HDO performance over the monometallic catalysts, but they produced lower upgraded bio-oil yields (23.85–26.94 wt.% in comparison of 31.23–33.91 wt.%).
Furthermore, activated carbon supported Ni, Co and Mo phosphide catalysts have been shown to be promising for HT [78]. Guo et al. investigated the effect of phosphorus content on the deoxygenation of bio-oil by varying the metal/P ratio [79]. It was found that the addition of phosphorous to a certain level resulted in the improvement of H2 consumption, upgraded oil yields, and increased the degree of deoxygenation. The Ni-based catalysts seemed more promising than Co-based catalysts with regards to hydrogenation and HDO activities.
● Zeolite cracking
Zeolite catalysts can be used to improve the quality of bio-oil in two configurations. One mode is in-situ upgrading which involves the integration of catalysts into the pyrolysis system. The other configuration involves catalytic upgrading as a downstream (decoupled) process. The process takes place under atmospheric pressure and does not require the presence of hydrogen. The reactions described for the HT process also take place in zeolite cracking, but the cracking reactions are the primary ones. Zeolite cracking rejects oxygen as CO2 and H2O, generating liquid hydrocarbon products through the remaining hydrocarbon fraction [80].
C1H1.33O0.43+0.26O2→0.65CH1.2+0.34CO2+0.27H2O | (13) |
ZSM-5 has been used extensively as a catalyst by a number of researchers to improve the quality of bio-oil. Comprehensive work was performed by Williams and Horne to study the effect of ZSM-5 on pyrolysis product yields and chemical distribution using a fluidised bed reactor [81]. The catalyst was placed at the reactor freeboard as a fixed bed (in-situ configuration). Results showed that the oil yields were reduced from 40.4 to 5.5 wt.% of biomass, while a reduction was also observed in the molecular weight (from 30–1300 u to 50–600 u) of the bio-oil. The chemical distribution of the bio-oil was also affected, particularly the formation of monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).
Furthermore, the influence of ZSM-5 temperature has been investigated. Catalytic experiments were performed over a range of temperatures from 400–600 ℃ [82]. It was found that the total liquid yields, molecular weight and oxygenated compounds (such as phenols and benzenediol) in bio-oil were reduced. On the contrary, the concentration of aromatic hydrocarbons and PAH were increased. Li et al. also investigated the effect of catalytic reaction temperature (390,410,450,470,500, or 550 ℃) and WHSV (1 to 5 h−1) on bio-oil using ZSM-5 [83]. The reactor configuration involved a fluidized bed reactor for pyrolysis coupled with a secondary fixed bed reactor for upgrading. It was observed that acid and ketones were reduced, whereas hydroxybenzene and monocyclic or dicyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were increased. Both researchers found that as catalytic temperature increased the upgraded bio-oil yields decreased while the opposite trend was observed for the gas yields. This is due the decomposition of bio-oil to light gases and carbon at higher temperatures. It should be noted that it is necessary to establish the optimum degree of cracking, where a sufficient amount of oxygen is removed but the yields of upgraded bio-oil are not too low. Catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) bio-oils with different organic oxygen contents (4–18 wt.%) were prepared in a bench-scale dual fluidized bed reactor system by ex-situ CFP of southern pine over HZSM-5, and the oils were subsequently hydrotreated over a sulphided CoMo catalyst at 170 bar [84].
The main properties for the catalytic activity of zeolite catalysts are their shape selectivity and acidity. The limitations of the pore size (5A) of H-ZSM-5 in the case of large molecules justified further research using zeolite materials with larger pore size, such as MCM-41 and zeolite Y.
Williams and Horne [85] studied the effect of different zeolite structures and activated alumina on bio-oil. Regarding the product yields, stainless steel balls, Na-ZSM-5, H-ZSM-5, Y and activated alumina showed a reduction in organic liquid yields (blank run—40.41%) of 11.80, 6.01, 5.47, 1.13 and 3.12 respectively, expressed on wt.% of biomass feed. The overall conclusions were that all the zeolites produced hydrocarbons (aromatic and PAHs); Y-zeolite formed higher PAHs levels compared to the other catalysts; ZSM-5 was the most effective catalyst; hydrocarbon yields were low, when expressed on wt.% of biomass feed.
Extensive work related to the acidity and metal incorporation of catalysts was conducted by Antonakou et al. [86]. Pyrolysis experiments using Al-MCM-41 catalysts with various acidities (Si:Al ratios of 20, 40, 60) and metal containing Al-MCM-41catalysts (Cu, Fe and Zn) were conducted using a bench scale fixed bed reactor. An increase was observed in the amount of phenols and hydrocarbons in bio-oil, while the opposite effect occurred for the oxygenated compounds. It should be highlighted that a reduction in acids, carbonyls, and heavy compounds was also observed. The organic yields, though, decreased by about 9 wt.% (on biomass basis) when catalysts were applied.
Metal oxide catalysts have also been tested for their catalytic effect on pyrolysis oils [87,88]. The effect of ZnO on bio-oil was studied by Nokkosmäki et al. in a fluidised bed reactor with capacity of 1 kg/h−1, with the catalytic fixed bed reactor connected into the side stream of the reactor system [89]. The pyrolysis reaction temperature was 525 ℃, while the catalytic reaction temperature was 400 ℃. Results revealed that the ZnO derived bio-oil had lower viscosity thus indicating an improvement in stability. Putun et al investigated the effect of MgO on pyrolysis product yields [90]. A fixed bed reactor was used with the catalyst placed as a bed material inside the reactor. Oxygen content of the treated bio-oil was reduced from 9.56% to 4.90% when different amounts of catalysts were applied.
● Filtration
Bio-oil contains impurities, such as alkali metals and particulates, which cause problems in certain applications. Hot-vapour filtration can be used to reduce the solid content of the oil to less than 0.01% and the alkali content to less than 10 ppm [82,89]. However, bio-oil requires further upgrading since the primary reason for its immiscibility with fossil fuels is its oxygen content.
● Supercritical fluids (SCFs)
A fluid is defined as supercritical when its pressure and temperature go beyond its critical point and it has the ability to dissolve materials that are not normally soluble in either the liquid or gaseous phase of the SCFs. In the case of bio-oil production, the use of SCF organic solvents, results in an oil with higher caloric values, lower viscosity, and higher yields [90]. Typical SCFs organic solvents have been identified by Baloch et al. and include ethanol, butanol, acetones, methanol, n-hexanol, 2-propanol, and 1, 4-di-oxane [91].
● Solvent addition/esterification
Esterification can reduce the acidity of bio-oil by removing the carboxylic acids. The reaction takes place in the presence of a catalyst and a solvent to generate esters. Catalysts used for esterification are solid acid, solid alkali, and ionic liquid ion exchange resins [92,93,94].
● Emulsification (emulsions)
Emulsification is a physical method for upgrading bio-oil. Homogenous emulsion of bio-oil with diesel can be achieved by agitation with an emulsifier [95].
Biojet fuel or renewable aviation fuel is a biomass derived fuel and contains hydrocarbons with a boiling range similar to fossil jet fuel (170–300 ℃). Fossil jet fuel is composed of approximately 20% paraffin, 40% isoparaffin, 20% naphthenes and 20% aromatics. Depending on the pathway, biojet fuel does not always contain aromatic compounds. Mixtures of up to 50% biojet fuel with aviation fossil fuels have been established as a standard to overcome this issue. Biojet fuel is only certified if it has similar properties with fossil jet fuel, such as energy content and density. Some characteristics of biojet fuel (according to ASTMD 7566) that are similar to fossil jet fuel are presented in Table 6 [96].
Properties | Biojet fuel |
Acidity, total (mgKOH/g) | 0.1 max |
Flash point (℃) | 38 min |
Density @15 ℃ (kg/m3) | 775–840 |
Freezing point (℃), max | −40 JetA; −47 JetA1 |
Viscosity @ −20 ℃ (cSt) | 8, max |
Net heat of comb (MJ/kg) | 42.8, min |
Certified biojet fuel can be blended up to 50% with conventional aviation fossil fuel according to the requirements in the ASTM D7566 specification. The following processes have been certified by the standard for production of renewable aviation fuel.
HRJ also known as hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) are paraffinic liquids with the chemical formula CnH2n+2. HRJs are produced by the hydrodeoxygenation of triglyceride-based feedstocks, followed by isomerisation and cracking, forming fuels equivalent to conventional aviation fossil fuel. The use of bio-oil as a triglyceride-based feedstock is not yet certified.
The triglyceride-based feedstock is firstly converted to lineal long chain hydrocarbons, under high pressure and temperature in the presence of hydrogen and a solid catalyst (hydrodeoxygenation, see Section 2.6.2); by-products formed are water, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. Isomerisation and cracking convert the lineal long chain hydrocarbons into the hydrocarbon chains that are in the range C8 to C16 (biojet fuel). Light gases, naphtha, and green diesel are produced in addition to biojet fuel. In comparison to fossil fuels, HRJ fuels possess a higher cetane number, lower aromatic content, lower sulphur content, and potentially lower GHG emissions.
The hydrotreating process has been demonstrated at pilot plant level by UOP Honeywell for the production of renewable jet fuel using second-generation oils as feedstock [97]. It should be noted that information concerning the type of catalyst involved in the UOP Honeywell process is not publicly available. There are few studies in literature focussing on hydrotreating of sustainable feedstocks for biojet fuel production. Promising work has been performed by Robota et al. regarding the conversion of algal triglycerides to biodiesel and HEFA jet fuel fractions [98]. The proposed process involves deoxygenation, hydrogenation, and hydro isomerisation using a 3% Pd/carbon, a 0.5% Pt/alumina, and a 0.5% Pt/US-Y zeolite catalyst, respectively. Choi et al. studied the use of a Pt/TiO2 catalyst with a W addition for the deoxygenation of Jatropha fatty acid derived from Jatropha oil by hydrolysis [99]. The deoxygenation reaction was carried out in a fixed-bed reactor without the presence of hydrogen producing saturated hydrocarbons (C17 and C15) with a degree of deoxygenation of 86%.
Zhao et al. investigated the upgrading of non-edible sunflower oils over a ZSM-5 catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor, at three different reaction temperatures (450 ℃, 500 ℃ and 550 ℃), followed by distillation [100]. The maximum conversion efficiency of sunflower oils to hydrocarbon fuels was 30.1% and was realised at 550 ℃. Even though the properties of the hydrocarbon fraction were improved after upgrading and distillation, further refining is required to remove the remaining oxygen atoms. Liu et al. used Ni supported on moderate acidic zeolites to produce biojet fuel from castor oil by hydroprocessing in a continuous-flow fixed-bed microreactor followed by isomerization and hydrocracking [101]. The main observation of this work was that the acid strength of zeolite had an important role in the conversion of castor oil into biojet range alkanes. It should be mentioned that the oils produced meet all of the basic jet-fuel mixing requirements according to ASTM D7566. The conversion of waste cooking oil to jet biofuel has also been researched with nickel-based mesoporous zeolite Y catalyst [102]. Moreover, NiMo, CoMo, and NiW sulfide catalysts were also applied during hydrodeoxygenation of waste cooking oil [103]. During both studies the deoxygenation of cooking oil was achieved and converted into jet range alkanes, but further investigation is required to achieve higher fuel yields.
FT fuels are biomass derived hydrocarbon fuels, which are produced from the catalytic conversion of syngas. The integration of gasification with Fisher Tropsch synthesis shows great potential as a sustainable route for production of biodiesel and biojet fuel from biomass [104,105,106,107]. Process temperature varies from 700–1000 ℃ and requires a gasifying agent, such as steam or air. The process is carried out under atmospheric pressure typically with a fixed bed gasifier which is categorised as either updraft, downdraft, or crossdraft [108].
Fischer Tropsch technology involves conversion of syngas into long chain hydrocarbon products, either straight or branched. FT synthesis occurs in two temperature ranges, a low temperature FT (LTFT) and a high temperature FT (HTFT), which range between 200–240 ℃ and 300–350 ℃, respectively [109]. The low temperature process uses either iron or cobalt catalysts, while the high temperature process uses iron-based catalysts [110,111]. Pressures range from 10–60 bar. Typical reactor types are circulated fluidised bed and fluidised bed for HTFT and tubular fixed bed and slurry phase for LTFT [109].
FT synthesis converts the gasification gas mixture into a mixture of light (C1–C4), naphtha (C5–C11), diesel (C12–C20) and heavier hydrocarbons/wax (>C20) [112,113]. The latter requires further catalytic hydrocracking to produce biojet fuel and green diesel. Liquid product yields from FT synthesis can be up to 95%. This crude FT product requires further processing for the synthesis of the FT fuel. The composition of the crude FT product strongly depends on the H2/CO ratio, the catalyst, pressure, and temperature process conditions. Furthermore, cracking and isomerization of the crude FT product generates FT fuel with hydrocarbon chains that are in the range C8–C16, corresponding to biojet fuel.
Recent work by Hillestad et al. demonstrated the feasibility of a power and biomass plant for the production of Fischer-Tropsch biojet fuel compared to a conventional Biomass-to-Liquid (BtL) process [114]. It was shown that the carbon efficiency of a conventional BtL process can be increased from 38% to more than 90%. This was achieved by adding hydrogen from high temperature steam electrolysis in a solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC), with high temperature steam generated from the hot syngas. Moreover, SOEC produces oxygen, which is supplied as oxidant in the gasifier, thereby eliminating the need for a cryogenic air separation unit. Previously, Viguié et al. presented the BioTfueL project, which produces biojet fuel and green diesel from second generation feedstocks [115]. This project focuses on the original concept of co-processing (biomass and fossil feedstock). The selection of the appropriate catalyst for hydrocracking of crude FT is also an important parameter to achieve process feasibility. Hanaoka et al. produced biojet fuel by hydrocracking an FT product derived from woody biomass via gasification [116]. The maximum jet fuel yield was 29.1 C-mol% with a Pt-loaded zeolite catalyst with particle size of 7.6 nm.
SIP fuels, were formerly known as direct-sugar-to-hydrocarbon (DSHC) fuels. The process involves the biochemical fermentation of carbohydrate sugars to hydrocarbon fuels through purification and hydroprocesing, without producing ethanol first. The sugars can be derived from the hydrolysis of biomass or from direct sugar sources such as sugar cane residues. Blends of 10% volume of SIPs with aviation fossil fuels are permitted by ASTM D7566.
ATJ fuels are produced by thermal and biochemical fermentation of carbohydrates obtained from the hydrolysis of biomass. The sugars extracted by hydrolysis are fermented, followed by distillation to get bio alcohol. Direct use of alcohol as jet fuel requires engine modification, thus further processing needs to occur to produce a suitable jet fuel. The next steps are alcohol dehydration, oligomerisation, hydrogenation followed by distillation to produce a biojet fuel similar to fossil aviation fuel. Additionally, the process produces naphtha and diesel. Lanzatech is the world's first large scale ATJ facility producing commercial quantities of fuel in the UK [117]. The commercial facility will convert ethanol produced from waste to biojet.
Other promising pathways for biojet fuel production that are not yet certified by the standard are:
● Catalytic hydro-thermolysis (CH) fuels, also termed hydrothermal liquefaction. The same process is followed as described for the SIPs, but it involves catalytic conversion of sugars instead of biochemical fermentation.
● Hydro-treated depolymerized cellulosic jet (HDCJ), also known as fast pyrolysis with upgrading to jet fuel.
● Gas fermentation process. Instead of catalytically upgrading FT syngas to biojet fuel, it is also possible to ferment syngas to liquid biofuels. The cooled syngas can be fermented to ethanol or butanol by acetogenic bacteria followed by oligomerisation and hydrogenation to produce biojet fuel.
Various pathways have been developed for the production of second generation liquid biofuels. This review considers only sustainable feedstocks that do not compete with food production including sugar and starch crop residues, lignocellulosic biomass and waste, and non edible oils (or fats). Figure 6 illustrates the fuels and their production routes.
Sugar and starch type agricultural residues are converted through biochemical fermentation to bioethanol or biobuthanol. Further processing through hydroprocessing and cracking/isomerization produces biojet fuel and green diesel. Another approach for the latter fuels using sugar and starch feedstocks is through catalytic conversion followed by hydroprocessing and cracking/isomerization. Lignocellulosic feedstocks can be converted to sugars by hydrolysis, syngas by gasification or bio-oil by pyrolysis. The produced syngas can be directed to biochemical fermentation, Fisher-Tropsch and biometanol synthesis. Biomethanol (generated from the methanol synthesis) can be used directly as biofuel or to generate DME and OME. Pyrolysis derived bio-oil can be subjected to further processing through zeolite cracking or hydro-deoxygenation to produce a de-oxygenated bio-oil which after cracking/isomerization produces biojet fuel, petrol, and green diesel. Oils and fats can be directed either to zeolite cracking and hydro-deoxygenation or to transesterification and esterification, to generate green diesel and biodiesel, respectively. A comparison of the main advantages and disadvantages of the technological pathways for second generation liquid biofuels are summarised in Table 7.
Product | Pathway | Advantages | Challenges |
Ethanol | Biochemical fermentation from sugars | Well-developed route Acid/enzymatic step allows for feedstock diversification | Development of microorganisms to be able to convert both type of sugars Research on process integration is required to achieve process feasibility |
Fermentation of syngas | All biomass components are utilised, including lignin | Syngas conditioning is required | |
Butanol | Biochemical fermentation from sugars | Simultaneous process with ethanol production | Product recovery process |
Fermentation of syngas | |||
Biodiesel | Catalytic Transesterification | Well-developed route Market ready for the product | Catalyst developed for first generation oils |
Supercritical Transesterification | High feedstock tolerance | Expensive process when compared to the catalytic route Extreme conditions and high energy demand (more development needed) | |
Green diesel | Bio-oil upgrading (HDO and HC) | Less feedstock limitation Similarity with fossil diesel | Bio-oil production technology challenges Catalyst |
Biomethanol | Gasification + MeOH Synthesis | Cost competitive with methanol from fossil fuels Developed market for the product | Gasification process challenges Syngas conditioning |
DME/OME | DME/OME Synthesis | Used as diesel replacement Not expensive | Inferior performance compared to the fossil fuel Challenges from the methanol production |
Petrol | Hydroprocessing followed by cracking/isomerisation | Several production routes | Further development on processing of bio-oil Low yields, is produced as a by-product |
Biojet fuel | Hydroprocessing of triglycerides | Cost competitive than the other biojet routes | Cost of catalysts and hydrogen Limited feedstock tolerance Product refining |
Biochemical fermentation of sugars to hydrocarbons | Fewer technological steps than ATJ fuels | Product refining | |
Biochemical fermentation of sugars to ethanol followed by hydrogenation | Less feedstock limitation | Product refining | |
FT synthesis | All biomass components are utilised, including lignin | Cost of FT synthesis |
The technoeconomic feasibility of a production pathway chosen for fuel production is dependant on a number of different factors, such as market demand, feedstock availability, and market readiness in each location. Location on its own is also an important factor, influencing both the feedstock supply chain and plant construction and commissioning costs. In Brazil the abundance of arable land, as well as, the availability of sugar cane and bagasse, has lead to the dominance of bioethanol in the Brazilian market. In addition to geographical, political influence has also been an important driver of the bioethanol market in Brazil today, where public policy has helped to create the largest flexible-fuel fleet in the world [118].
Feedstock availability is another important parameter affecting process feasibility. Thus pathways that allow for feedstock diversification present an important advantage when compared with technologies that can only process limited feedstocks. One of the most significant advantages of thermochemical technologies (see Table 7), such as gasification and pyrolysis, is the high diversity of feedstock, from waste (household, food, municipal, sewage sludge) to animal manure, including forest and agricultural biomass residues. Hamelinck and Faaij estimated the feedstock costs as 45–58% of the total fuel production costs, highlighting the importance of feedstock flexibility [119]. Biofuels production costs are highly dependent on feedstock price [120], which can vary considerable with the type, season, and country. Consequently, technologies that use a variety of feedstocks are attractive, allowing the most economical feedstock to be used at any given time.
Additional technological steps required to address end user product specifications, will further increase the overall costs and need to be taken into consideration. For example, the addition of the hydrolysis (acid/enzymatic) step to the biochemical route to process lignocellulosic biomass results in higher costs and technological complexity but it allows for feedstock flexibility. The effect of economies of scales is also a significant factor in biofuel production costs, thus a comprehensive technoeconomic study is required to assess the feasibility of each route to produce a specific biofuel [121].
Further factors that require consideration are market readiness and technological maturity. Many of the presented technologies are commercially mature because they have been successfully applied for many years to first generation biofuels. Technologies such as gasification which only requires small modifications in order to produce second generation biofuels. Gasifiers are already commercially spread around the world; there are more than 270 operational plants, mostly in Asia and Australia, and over 100 more currently under construction [122]. On the other hand, some technologies, such as biochemical fermentation, require further modifications to produce second generation biofuels. These additional technological steps make the process costlier and more complicated, and are therefore hindering its commercial adoption.
Taking into consideration factors such as technological maturity, the market, feedstock availability and location, each technology presents its own advantages and disadvantages. As a result a detailed process design and technoeconomic analysis is required to assess the feasibility of any route to produce a specific biofuel.
The transition from fossils fuels to advanced liquid biofuels will have an enormous impact on global climate change due to the resulting reduction in GHG emissions. The production of advanced liquid biofuels cannot rely solely on a specific process since each technology strongly depends on biomass feedstock composition. To add to this complexity, the final product obtained from each technology and feedstock varies in quality and type. The integration of technologies and variety into the biomass supply chain can overcome some/all of the issues associated with cost and product quality.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | Kelly F, Fuller G, Walton H, et al. (2012) Monitoring air pollution: Use of early warning systems for public health. Respirology 17: 7–19.1. NU (2009) HOME (Cine documental dirigido por Yann Arthus-Bertrand y producido por Luc Besson y la participación de Naciones Unidas, Nueva York). |
[2] | Boubel R, Fox D, Turner D, et al. (1994) The Fundamentals of Air Pollution, Third Edition. San Diego, Academic Press, 1–574. |
[3] | Mage D, Ozolins G, Peterson P, et al. (1996) Urban air pollution in megacities of the world. Atmos Environ 30: 681–686. |
[4] | Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Allen Burton Jr, G et al. (2002) Introduction, In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Allen Burton Jr, G, Cairus Jr, J, Eds., Handbook of Ecotoxicology, Second Edition, Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 1–15. |
[5] | Fenger J (2009) Air pollution in the last 50 years-from local to global. Atmos Environ 43:13–22. |
[6] | Hughes D (2009) An Environmental History of the World-Humankind's changing role in the community of life, Second Edition. Routledge 1–306. |
[7] | Moldoveanu AM (2011) Advanced Topics in Environmental Health and Air Pollution Case Studies. Croatia InTech 1–470. |
[8] | Rückerl R, Schneidr A, Breitner S, et al. (2011) Health effects of particulate air pollution: A review of epidemiological evidence. Inhalation Toxicol 23: 555–592. |
[9] | WMO (2012) Impacts of Megacities on air pollution and climate. Global Atmosphere Watch, Technical Report No. 205, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. |
[10] | Mainka A, Kozielska B (2016) Assessment of the BTEX concentrations and health risk in urban nursery schools in Gliwice, Poland. AIMS Environ Sci 3: 199–219. |
[11] | Lebel J (2005) Salud. Un enfoque ecosistémico, Centro Internacional de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo. Ottawa, Eds., Alfaomega, 1–49. |
[12] | Andrade MI, Scarpati OE (2007) Recent changes in flood risk in the Gran La Plata, Buenos Aires province, Argentina: Causes and management strategy. Geojournal 70: 245–250. |
[13] | Soria J, Fernández M, Más allá del cambio climático: Las dimensiones psicosociales del cambio ambiental global, 2006. Primera edición. Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE-Semarnat), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Facultad de Psicología. Available from: http//:www.ine.gob.mx. |
[14] | Cafaro P (2001) Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson: Toward an environmental virtue ethics. Environ Ethics 23: 3–17. |
[15] | PNUMA (2001) Justicia Ambiental: Construcción y defensa de los nuevos derechos ambientales culturales y colectivos en América Latina. Coord. E. Leff, Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA) y Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades, México D.F., 1–275. |
[16] | Minteer BA (2009) Nature in Common? Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1–301. |
[17] | Gardiner S (2011) A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Univ Oxford 1–408. |
[18] | Prieto Méndez JM (2013) Derechos de la Naturaleza, Fundamento, contenido y exigibilidad jurisdiccional. Centro de Estudios y Difusión del Derecho Constitucional-Corte Constitucional del Ecuador, Quito. |
[19] | Tosun J (2013) Environmental Policy Change in Emerging Market Democracies, Central and Eastern Europe and Latin America Compared. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1–253. |
[20] | Muller C, Chapman L, Grimmond C, et al. (2013) Sensors and the city: A review of urban meteorological networks. Int J Climatol 33: 1585–1600. |
[21] | Ramsey NR, Klein PM, Iii BM (2014) The impact of meteorological parameters on urban air quality. Atmos Environ 86: 58–67. |
[22] | Cochrane A, (2008) Cities: Urban Worlds, In: Daniels P., Bradshaw M., Shaw D., Sidaway J., Eds., An Introduction To Human Geography-Issues For The 21st Century, Third Edition, London: Pearson Education Limited, Prentice-Hall, 205–217. |
[23] | Koonings K, Kruijt D, (2009) The rise of megacities and the urbanization of informality, exclusion and violence, In: Koonings, Kruijt, Eds., Megacities: The politics of urban exclusion and violence in the global South, London: Zed Books, 8–16. |
[24] | Fernández MA (1996) Ciudades en riesgo, degradaciòn ambiental, riesgos urbanos y desastres. Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina, Ed. La Red, 1–30. Available from: http://www.desenredando.org. |
[25] | PNUMA. Proyecto Geo Ciudades, PNUMA, 2012. Available from: http://www.pnuma.org. |
[26] | BID-AIDIS-OPS (2010) Informe de la evaluación regional del manejo de residuos sólidos urbanos en Amperica Latina y el Caribe 2010. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Asociación Interamericana de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ambiental, Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Available from: https://publications.iadb.org. |
[27] | UNEPWHO (1992) Urban Air Pollution in Megacities of the World. United Nations Environmental Programme-World Health Organization, Blackwell, Oxford. |
[28] | Smook RAF, (1998) Chapter 62 European sustainable cities: The chanllenge of citylife: Being exposed to an air polluted urban environment, In: Schneider T, Ed., Air Pollution in the 21st Century: Priority Issues and Policy, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1043–1056. |
[29] | Bicknell J, Dodman D, Satterthwaite D (2009) Adapting cities to climate change-understanding and Addressing the Development challenges. London, Ed. Earthscan, 1–397. |
[30] | Romero-Lankao P, Qin H, Borbor-Cordova M (2013) Exploration of health risks related to air pollution and temperature in three Latin American cities. Soc Sci Med 83: 110–118. |
[31] | Jabareen J (2015) The risk city: Cities countering climate change: Emerging planning theories and practices around the world. Springer Neth 1–204. |
[32] | Fenger J (1999) Urban air quality. Atmos Environ 33: 4877–4900. |
[33] | OECD (2010) Cities and Climate Change. OECD Publishing, Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091375-en. |
[34] | WB, (2011) Introduction: Cities and the Urgent Challenges of Climate Change, In: Hoornweg D., Freire M., Lee M., Bhada-Tata P., Yuen B., Eds., Cities and climate change-Responding to an urgent agenda, Washington: The World Bank, 1–14. |
[35] | UNEP (2014) La Asamblea histórica de la ONU para el Medio Ambiente reclama una acción más fuerte para mejorar la calidad del aire, responsable de 7 millones de muertes al año, junto a otras 16 resoluciones, Nairobi, June 2014. Available from: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.Print.asp? DocumentID =2791&ArticleID=10931&l=es. |
[36] | Riojas Rodríguez H, Soares da Silva A, Texcalac-Sangrador JL, et al. (2016) Air pollution management and control in Latin America and the Caribbean: Implications for climate change. Pan Am J Public Health 40: 150–159. |
[37] | Erikson LE, Jennings M (2017) Energy, Transportation, Air Quality, Climate Change, Health Nexus: Sustainable Energy is Good for Our Health. AIMS Public Health 4: 47–61. |
[38] | Khare A, Beckman T (2013) Mitigating Climate Change-the Emerging Face of Modern Cities, Heidelberg, Springer, 1–281. |
[39] | Thornbush MJ (2015) Vehicular Air Pollution and Urban Sustainability An Assessment from Central Oxford, UK. Heidelberg, Springer Cham, 1–71. |
[40] | De Flander K, (2013) Resource-Centered Cities and the Opportunity of Shrinkage, In: Khare A., Beckman T., Eds., Mitigating Climate Change-the Emerging Face of Modern Cities, Heidelberg, Springer, 45–58. |
[41] | Wais de Badgen IR (1998) Ecología de la Contaminación Ambiental, 1ra Edición, Buenos Aires, Ediciones Universo, 1–208. |
[42] | Korc ME, Sáenz R (1999) Monitoreo de la calidad del aire en América Latina. Korc Marcelo E 1–22. |
[43] | Petcheneshsky T, Gravarotto MC, Benitez R, et al. (2002) La Evaluación de la Calidad del Aire en la República Argentina. Departamento de Salud Ambiental del Ministerio de Salud y Acción Social de La Nación, Buenos Aires, AIDIS, 1–13. |
[44] | PNUMA (2004) Geo Argentina. Perspectivas del Medio Ambiente de la Argentina. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA) y Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la República Argentina (SAyDS), 1–303. |
[45] | Mazzeo NA, Venegas LE, Choren H (2005) Analysis of NO, NO2, O3 and NOx concentrations measured at a green area of Buenos Aires City during wintertime. Atmos Environ 39: 3055–3068. |
[46] | Arkouli M, Ulke AG, Endlicher W, et al. (2010) Distribution and temporal behavior of particulate matter over the urban area of Buenos Aires. Atmos Pollut Res 1: 1–8. |
[47] | Fujiwara FG, Gomez D, Faggi A (2013) Perfiles químicos y patrones espaciales del polvo de la calle colectado en la megaciudad de Buenos Aires. Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 385–392. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias/pp(Memorias). |
[48] | Olcese LE, Toselli BM (2002) Some aspects of air pollution in Córdoba, Argentina. Atmos Environ 36: 299–306. |
[49] | Diez S, Fonseca JM, Piccioni M, et al. (2013) Dispersión de PM10 generado por el tráfico vehicular en la ciudad universitaria, Córdoba capital. Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 469–482. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias /pp(Memorias). |
[50] | Achad M (2015) Aerosoles: Efectos sobre la Radiación UV-B y sobre la Calidad de Aire en la Región Central de Argentina. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina. |
[51] | Puliafito E, Guevar M, Puliafito C (2003) Characterization of urban air quality using GIS as a management system. Environ Pollut 122: 105–117. |
[52] | Allende D, Romero G, Cremades P, et al. (2013) Caracterización horaria y diaria de la concentración del número total de partículas en ambientes urbanos y suburbanos en Mendoza, Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 393–409. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias /pp(Memorias). |
[53] | Allende D, Flores P, Ruggeri R, et al. (2015) Medición y caracterización de las fuentes de PM10, PM2.5 y PM1 en las áreas urbanas y suburbanas del Gran Mendoza y Gran San Juan, Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 157–172. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias /pp(Memorias). |
[54] | Caminos JA, Enrique C, Ghirardi R, et al. (2011) Calidad de Aire en la Ciudad de Santa Fe. Facultad Regional Santa Fe, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Editorial UTN, 1–42. |
[55] | PNUMA (2007) Perspectivas del Medio Ambiente Urbano: Geo San Miguel de Tucumán, Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA), Facultad de arquitectura y urbanismo de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Municipalidad de San Miguel de Tucumán, 1–249. Available from: http://www.pnuma.org/. |
[56] | Puliafito E, Rey Saravia F, Pereyra M, et al. (2007) Calidad del aire en el polo petroquímico de Bahía Blanca, Libro de Actas PROIMCA (publicado en 2009), Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 113–121. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias /pp(Memorias). |
[57] | Arranz G, Pereyra M, Cifuentes O (2015) Herramienta de gestión: Monitoreo perimetral en tiempo real de emisiones industriales de VCM (Caso Polo Petroquímico de Bahía Blanca), Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 173–188. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias/pp(Memorias). |
[58] | Puliafito E (2009) Gestión de la calidad del aire en la Argentina, Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 67–82. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias/pp(Memorias). |
[59] | Bell M, Davis DL, Gouveia N, et al. (2006) The avoidable health effects of air pollution in three Latin American cities: Santiago, São Paulo, and Mexico City. Environ Res 100: 431–440. |
[60] | Garcia-Huidobro T, Marshall FM, Bell JNB (2001) A risk assessment of potential agricultural losses due to ambient SO2 in the central regions of Chile, Atmos Environ 35: 4903–4915. |
[61] | Mölders N (2012) Land Use and Land Cover Changes-Impact on Climate and Air Quality. New York Springer, 1–189. |
[62] | Miranda JJ (2006) Impacto Económico en la Salud por Contaminación del Aire en Lima Metropolitana, Programa de Investigaciones ACDI, IDRC (International Development Research Centre), Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social (CIES), Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, 1–38. Available from: http://redpeia.minam.gob.pe. |
[63] | Sánchez Triana E, Kulsum A, Yewande A (2007) Prioridades ambientales para la reducción de la pobreza en Colombia. Un análisis ambiental del país para Colombia. Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento/Banco Mundial, Washington. Bogotá, Banco Mundial y Mayol Ediciones S.A., 1–501. |
[64] | OECD (2014) The Cost of Air Pollution: Health Impacts of Road Transport. OECD Publishing, 1–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264210448-en. |
[65] | Lovett GM, Burns DA, Driscoll CT, et al. (2007) Who needs environmental monitoring? Front Ecol Environ 5: 253–260. |
[66] | GPBA-UNLP (1982) La Plata, una obra de arte 1882–1982, GPBA (Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires)-UNLP (Universidad Nacional de La Plata), 1–437. Disponible en: Biblioteca Pública-Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Plaza Rocha 137. Available from: http://biblio.unlp.edu.ar. |
[67] | Cowen MP (2010) Viejos problemas en ciudades nuevas: La Plata: Agua potable y problemas sanitarios en la época fundacional. Res Gesta 2010: 69–96. |
[68] | Ravella O, Giacobbe N (2003) Sustentabilidad, movilidad y transporte: El caso del Gran La Plata. Av Energías Renov y Medio Ambiente 7: 19–24. |
[69] | LINTA-IIT (2016) Patrimonio cultural y turismo en La Plata, Berisso y Ensenada. Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ed. LINTA (Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Territorio y el Ambiente) y IIT (Instituto de Investigaciones en Turismo), 1–110. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/55598. |
[70] | Lerange C, Pardo D, Diyelsi M, et al. (1982) La Plata ciudad milagro. Buenos Aires, Ed. Corregidor, 1–683. |
[71] | Romero LA (2012) Breve historia contemporánea de la Argentina, 3ra Ed., Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1–431. |
[72] | Lopez I, Etulain J (1992) Emergentes de los planes urbanos y nuevas estrategias. Estudio del casco del partido de La Plata. En: La Plata, de la ciudad antigua a la ciudad nueva. Sueños y Realidades. LINTA (Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Territorio y el Ambiente)-UNLP (Universidad Nacional de La Plata), La Plata, 67–72. Disponible en Biblioteca Pública-Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Plaza Rocha 137. Available from: http://biblio.unlp.edu.ar. |
[73] | Katz RS (2007) Ciudad de La Plata y su historia. Buenos Aires, Edición de Autor, 1–524. Disponible en: Biblioteca Pública- Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Plaza Rocha 137. Available from: http://biblio.unlp.edu.ar. |
[74] | Oszlak O (1991) Mereced la ciudad. Los pobres y el derecho al espacio urbano. Buenos Aires, Ed. CEDES- Hvumanitas, 1–315. |
[75] | Frediani J (2010) Lógicas y tendencias de la expansión residencial en áreas periurbanas-El partido de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, entre 1990 y 2010, Tesis de Doctorado, Argentina, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación-Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 1–458. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/. |
[76] | VA (2017) Mapas de Villas de la Argentina. Obtenido en Febrero de 2017 de. Available from: http://relevamiento.techo.org.ar. |
[77] | Hurtado M, Cabral M, Gimenez J, et al. (1992) Cavas, Degradación ambiental producto de la actividad extractiva, In: La Plata, de la ciudad antigua a la ciudad nueva. Sueños y Realidades, LINTA (Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Territorio y el Ambiente)-UNLP (Universidad Nacional de La Plata), La Plata, 94–97. Disponible en: Biblioteca Pública- Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Plaza Rocha 137. Available from: http://biblio.unlp.edu.ar. |
[78] | MLP-UNLP (2001) Observatorio de Calidad de Vida La Plata. Diagnóstico de Calidad de Vida en el Partido de La Plata, Municipalidad de La Plata (MLP) y Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), La Plata, 1–316. Disponible en: Biblioteca Pública-Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Plaza Rocha, 137, Available from: http://biblio.unlp.edu.ar. |
[79] | Rozadilla G, Solimano F, Correa L, et al. (2015) Análisis de potabilidad de aguas subterráneas en La Plata y alrededores, Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, 519–530. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias /pp(Memorias). |
[80] | FCLP (2011) El futuro de la ciudad, Fundación Ciudad de La Plata, Centro Cultural Dardo Rocha, La Plata. Available from: http://www.fundciudaddelaplata.org.ar. |
[81] | La Nación (2011) Advierten que La Plata pierde su esencia, National Dairy Newspaper "La Nación", Noviembre 21. Available from: http://www.lanacion.com.ar. |
[82] | Lauría D, Brugallera R, Couselo R, et al. (2010) Caracterización productiva regional, La Plata-Berisso-Ensenada, Fac. de Ciencias Económicas-Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, 1–52. Available from: http://www.mba.econo.unlp.edu.ara. |
[83] | Frediani JC, López MJ (2014) Diseño de una matriz de medidas tendientes a la integración ciudad-movilidad a partir de las componentes ambiental, energética y social. Rev Transp y Territorio 6: 33–52. |
[84] | Blanco EE, Porta AA (2013) La contaminación atmosférica y la salud de la población en la micro región La Plata, Berisso y Ensenada. Definición de variables e indicadores de gestión en el marco de políticas públicas. Reporte de la Editorial Universitaria de la Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (UTN-Argentina), 1–11. Available from: http://www.edutecne.utn.edu.ar/coini_2013/trabajos/COA20_TC.pdf. |
[85] | CIPPEC (2016) Gobernanza metropolitana en América Latina y el Caribe, Documento de Trabajo Nro. 51. Programa de Ciudades-Area de Instituciones y Gestión Pública, Centro de Implementación de Políticas Públicas para la Equidad y el Crecimiento (CIPPEC) y Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID), Buenos Aires, 1–222. Available from: http://www.cippec.org. |
[86] | Barros V, Menéndez A, Nagy G (2005) El Cambio Climático en el Río de La Plata, CIMA Textos del reporte técnico de los proyectos: Impactos del Cambio Global en las áreas costeras del Río de la Plata y Variabilidad hidroclimática del estuario del Río de la Plata: Influencia humana, ENSO y estado trófico. Proyecto "Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change (AIACC)", START-TWAS-UNEP, 1–204. |
[87] | Scarpati O, Benitez M (2005) Las inundaciones en la ciudad de La Plata. Su análisis en relación con las precipitaciones durante las últimas décadas del siglo XX, Geograficando, 1: 1–11. Available from: http://geogra_cando.fahce.unlp.edu.ar. |
[88] | Dutton K (2013) La Vulnerabilidad de la Tercera edad en Desastres Naturales: Un Estudio de la Inundación en La Plata, Argentina el 2 de abril de 2013, Paper 1583. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 1–57. Available from: http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1583. |
[89] | Guerrero E, Agnolin F (2016) Recent changes in plant and animal distribution in the southern extreme of the Paranaense biogeographical province (northeastern Buenos Aires province, Argentina): Ecological responses to climate change? Rev Mus Argent Cienc Nat 18: 9–30. |
[90] | CAI (2012) La Calidad del Aire en América Latina: Una Visión Panorámica. Clean Air Institute, EUA, Washington DC, 1–36. Available from: http://www.cleanairinstitute.org/calidad delaireamericalatina/TransporteyAireLimpio-cai-april2013.pdf. |
[91] | WHO (2006) Planning to protect children against hazards, Europe, World Health Organization, 1–25. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/eehc. |
[92] | WHO (2006) Principles for evaluating health risks in children associated with exposure to chemicals. Environmental Health Criteria 237, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1–351. |
[93] | Sánchez-González D, Rodríguez-Rodríguez V (2016) Environmental Gerontology in Europe and Latin America, Policies and Perspectives on Environment and Aging. Heidelberg, Springer International Publishing, 1–306. |
[94] | INDEC (2017) Informes Técnicos Vol. 1 Nro. 53, Condiciones de Vida Vol.1 Nro. 4, Incidencia de la pobreza y la indigencia en 31 aglomerados urbanos. Segundo Semestre 2016. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos, ISSN 2545-6636, Ministerio de Hacienda, Argentina. Available from: http://indec.gob.ar. |
[95] | El Día (2017) La Plata es la ciudad bonaerense con más asentamientos y villas: Tiene 129, Local Daily Newspaper "El Día", January 15, La Plata. Available from: http://www.eldia.com. |
[96] | UN-HABITAT (2012) State of the World's Cities. Prosperity of Cites. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 1–149. |
[97] | Lipfert FW (2004) Air pollution and poverty: Does the sword cut both ways? J Epidemiol Community Health 58: 2–3. |
[98] | Petcheneshsky T, Gravarotto MC, Benitez R, et al. (1998) Gestión de la Calidad de Aire Urbano-Industrial. Situación del Monitoreo de la Calidad del Aire (GEMS-AIRE) en la República Argentina. Departamento de Salud Ambiental del Ministerio de Salud y Acción Social de La Nación, Buenos Aires, AIDIS, 1–12. |
[99] | AAPLP (2006) Análisis Ambiental del Partido de La Plata. Aportes al Ordenamiento Territorial, Instituto de Geomorfología y Suelos-UNLP y Centro de Investigaciones de Suelos y Aguas de Uso Agropecuario (CISAUA), Provincia de Buenos Aires, Consejo Federal de Inversiones, Municipalidad de La Plata, 1–124. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/27046. |
[100] | Gassmann MI, Mazzeo NA (2000) Air pollution Potential: Regional Study in Argentina. Environ Manage 25: 375–382. |
[101] | WHO (1998) La Salud en las Américas, Vol. 1 & 2, Washington. Publicación Científica Nº 569, World Health Organization, 1–972. |
[102] | SPA (2007) Exp.2145-7007/06 Secretaría de Política Ambiental de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, La Plata, Argentina (Ref.: Solicitud de información ambiental de La Plata y alrededores según los beneficios de la Ley 25.831/04―Régimen de libre acceso a la información pública ambiental). |
[103] | Ratto G (2016) Estudio de parámetros ambientales utilizando técnicas espectroscópicas, datos meteorológicos y métodos estadísticos, Tesis de Doctorado, Centro de Investigaciones Opticas y Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/. |
[104] | Cabrera Christiansen F, Sosa E, Dobal M, et al. (2015) Polos: Injusticias ambientales e industrialización petrolera en Argentina. Ediciones del Jinete Insomne 1–136. |
[105] | McGregor GR, (1999) Basic Meteorology (Chapter 3), In: Holgate ST, Samet JM, Koren HS, Maynard RL, Eds., Air Pollution and Health, San Diego, Academic Press, 21–49. |
[106] | Wieringa J (1996) Does representative wind information exist? J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 65: 1–12. |
[107] | Wieringa J (1980) Representativeness of Wind Observations at Airports, Bull Am Meteorol Soc 61: 962–971. |
[108] | Holzworth GC (1967) Mixing depths, wind speeds and air pollution potential for selected locations in the United States. J Appl Meteorol 6: 1039–1044. |
[109] | Mazzeo NA, Nicolini M, Müler C, et al. (1974) Algunos aspectos climatológicos de la contaminación atmosférica en el área de La Plata (Prov. de Buenos Aires). Meteorológica 3: 99–134. |
[110] | Nieto AE, Macchi C, Digiani AR, (1971) Air pollution levels in the city of La Plata, In: Englund HM, W.T. Beery, Eds., Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress, Washington: Academic Press Inc, 1–2. |
[111] | Mazzeo NA, Nicolini M, Moledo L, et al. (1972) Condiciones de Estabilidad Atmosférica y Capacidad de Dilución Vertical de Contaminantes en la Ciudad de La Plata. Congreso Interamericano de Ingeniería Sanitaria, Paraguay: Agosto, 1972: 101–114. |
[112] | Mazzeo NA, Nicolini M (1974) Eficiencia de las dispersión atmosférica en la zona de La Plata (Provincia de Buenos Aires). Meteorológica 5: 33–43. Available from: http://www.cenamet.org.ar. |
[113] | Cattogio J, Succar SD, Roca AF (1989) Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon content of particulate matter suspended in the atmosphere of La Plata, Argentina. Sci Total Environ 79: 43–58. |
[114] | Herbarth O, Rehwagen M, Ronco A (1997) The influence of localized emittants on the concentration of volatile organic compounds in the ambient air measured close to ground level. Environ Toxicol 12: 31–37. |
[115] | Colombo JC, Landoni P, Bilos C (1999) Sources, distribution and variability of airborne particles and hydrocarbons in La Plata area, Argentina. Environ Pollut 104: 305–314. |
[116] | Bilos C, Colombo JC, Skorupka CN, et al. (2001) Sources, distribution and variability of airborne trace metals in La Plata City area, Argentina. Environ Pollut 111: 149–158. |
[117] | Díscoli CA, Barbero DA (2001) Insustentabilidad urbano-energética-ambiental. Determinación y cuantificación de contaminantes aéreos y sumideros. Avances en Energías Renovables y Medio Ambiente Vol. 5 (Reunión Nacional de ASADES-Asociación Argentina de Energías Renovables y Ambiente). Available from: http://www.cricyt.edu.ar/asades/. |
[118] | San Juan G, Díscoli C, Martini I, et al. (2006) Estructura de un atlas urbano-ambiental para la región del Gran La Plata. Sistematización de las variables intervinientes, Avances en Energías Renovables y Medio Ambiente, Vol.10. (Reunión Nacional de ASADES-Asociación Argentina de Energías Renovables y Ambiente). Available from: http://www.cricyt.edu.ar/asades/. |
[119] | Díscoli CA (2009) Metodología para el diagnóstico urbano-energético-ambiental en aglomeraciones intermedias-El caso del Gran La Plata, Tesis de Doctorado, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas-Universidad Nacional de Salta. Publicada por Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/. |
[120] | Dicroce L, Esparza J, Díscoli C, et al. (2010) Evaluación de contrastes urbanos a partir del grado de percepción en patologías urbano-ambientales presentes en el área del gran la plata, Avances en Energías Renovables y Medio Ambiente, Vol. 14 (Reunión Nacional de ASADES-Asociación Argentina de Energías Renovables y Ambiente). Available from: http://www.cricyt.edu.ar/asades/. |
[121] | Massolo L, Müller A, Tueros M, et al. (2002) Assessment of Mutagenicity and Toxicity of Different-Size Fractions of Air articulates from La Plata, Argentina, and Leipzig, Germany. Environ Toxicol 17: 219–231. |
[122] | Marañon Di Leo J, Del Nero S, Ragaini JC, et al. (2004) Air Concentrations of SO2 and Wind Turbulence near La Plata Petrochemical Pole (Argentina). Lat Am Appl Res 34: 55–58. |
[123] | Rehwagen M, Müller A, Massolo L, et al. (2005) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with particles in ambient air from urban and industrial areas. Sci Total Environ 348: 199–210. |
[124] | Nitiu DS (2003) Annual, daily and intradiurnal variation of Celtis pollen in the city of La Plata, Argentina. Aerobiologia 19: 71–78. |
[125] | Nitiu DS (2006) Aeropalynologic analysis of La Plata City (Argentina) during 3-year period. Aerobiologia 22: 79–87. |
[126] | Negrin M, Del Panno T, Ronco A (2007) Study of bioaerosols and site influence in the La Plata area (Argentina) using conventional and DNA (fingerprint) based methods. Aerobiologia 23: 249–258. |
[127] | Rosato ME, Reyna Almandos J, Ratto G, et al. (2001) Mesure de SO2 à La Plata, Argentine. Pollut Atmosphérique 169: 85–98. |
[128] | Ratto G, Videla F, Almandos JR, et al. (2006) Study of meteorological aspects and urban concentration of SO2 in atmospheric environment of La Plata, Argentina. Environ Monit Assess 121: 327–342. |
[129] | Ratto G, Videla F, Maronna R (2009) Analyzing SO2 concentrations and wind directions during a short monitoring campaign at a site far from the industrial pole of La Plata, Argentina. Environ Monit Assess 149: 229–240. |
[130] | Wichmann FA, Müller A, Busi LE, et al. (2009) Increased asthma and respiratory symptoms in children exposed to petrochemical pollution. J Allergy Clin Immun 123: 632–638. |
[131] | Massolo L, Rehwagen M, Porta A, et al. (2010) Indoor-outdoor distribution and risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of industrial and urban areas. Environ Toxicol 25: 339–349. |
[132] | Orte MA (2011) Estudio y análisis de la contaminación atmosférica mediante técnicas físicas y químicas en los alrededores del Polo Petroquímico de La Plata, Tesina de Grado, Licenciatura en Tecnología Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Tandil. |
[133] | Ratto G, Videla F, Maronna R, et al. (2012) Calm analysis using a robust method. Argentina y Ambiente 2012, Primer Congreso Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Ambiental. Mar del Plata, 28 Mayo-1 Junio de 2012, Argentina. |
[134] | Ratto G, Nico A (2012) Preliminary wind analysis regarding different speed ranges in the city of La Plata, Argentina. Rev Bras Meteorol 27: 281–290. |
[135] | Colman Lerner JE, Kohajda T, Aguilar ME, et al. (2014) Improvement of health risk factors after reduction of VOC concentrations in industrial and urban areas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21: 9676–9688. |
[136] | Gutiérrez M de los A (2015) Alteraciones oculares relacionadas con la contaminación del aire. Estudio comparativo en poblaciones de La Plata y Ensenada, Tesis de Doctorado, Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente y Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/. |
[137] | Orte MA, Coman Lerner J, Gutiérrez M, et al. (2015) Estudio de hidrocarburos aromáticos policíclicos asociados al material particulado y en fase gaseosa en la ciudad de La Plata y alrededores, Libro de Actas de PROIMCA, Proyecto Integrador para la Mitigación de la Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Available from: http://www.utn.edu.ar/secretarias/pp(Memorias). |
[138] | Cavallotto JL (1995) Evolución geomorfológica de la llanura costera ubicada en la margen sur del Río de la Plata, Tesis de Doctorado, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo-Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. |
[139] | Michellod OE (2000) La identidad del paisaje urbano a través de la memoria: Berisso, Argentina. Tesis de Magister, (Magíster en Paisaje, Medio Ambiente y Ciudad), Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago. |
[140] | Berri GJ, Sraibman L, Tanco R. et al. (2010) Low-level wind field climatology over the La Plata River region obtained with a mesoscale atmospheric boundary layer model forced with local weather observations. J Clim Appl Meteorol 49: 1293–1305. |
[141] | Ratto G, Maronna R, Repossi P, et al. (2012) Analysis of winds affecting air pollutant transport at La Plata, Argentina. Atmos Clim Sci 2: 60–75. |
[142] | Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 1: 55–94. |
[143] | Arhens CD (2009) Meteorology Today. Brooks/cole Pub 1–621. |
[144] | Gianibelli JC, Köln J, Kruse EE (2001) The precipitation series in La Plata, Argentina and its possible relationship with geomagnetic activity. Geofís Int 40: 309–314. |
[145] | Ratto G, Maronna R, Berri G (2010) Analysis of wind roses using hierarchical cluster and multidimensional scaling analysis at La Plata, Argentina. Boundary Layer Meteorol 137: 477–492. |
[146] | WMO (2008) Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation. WMO-Nº 8, World Meteorological Organization, Switzerland. |
[147] | EPA (2008) Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems-Volume IV: Meteorological Measurements Version 2.0, EPA-454/B-08-002, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. |
[148] | Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1–329. |
[149] | EPA (2009) Scout 2008 Version 1.0 User Guide, Second Edition, EPA/600/R-08/038, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. |
[150] | Fauconnier C, Haesbroeck G (2009) Outliers Detection with the Minimum Covariance Determinant Estimator in Practice. Stat Methodol 6: 363–379. |
[151] | Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN, (2006) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, In: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edition, Hoboken, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1–1225. |
[152] | Brunekreef B, Holgate S (2002) Air Pollution and Health. Lancet 360: 1233–1242. |
[153] | OMS (2006) Guías de calidad del aire de la OMS relativas al material particulado, el ozono, el dióxido de nitrógeno y el dióxido de azufre, Actualización mundial 2005. WHO/SDE/PHE/OEH/06.02, Ginebra. |
[154] | US ATSDR (1998) Toxicological Profile for Sulphur Dioxide, Chapter 5. Georgia, Agency for Toxics Substances and Disease Registry-Public Health Service: Science International Inc. Editors, 111–130. |
[155] | Cuciureanu R, Dimitriu G (2006) Photochemical reactions in the atmosphere-a source of secondary pollutants. Проблеми програмування (Спеціальний випуск) 2: 682–687. |
[156] | Cheng S, Lamb K (1998) An analysis of winds affecting air pollution concentrations in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 32: 2559–2567. |
[157] | Goyal P (2002) Effect of winds on SO2 and SPM concentrations in Delhi. Atmos Environ 36: 2925–2930. |
[158] | Ratto G, Videla F, Maronna R, et al. (2010) Air pollutant transport analysis based on hourly winds in the city of La Plata and surroundings, Argentina. Water Air Soil Pollut 208: 243–257. |
[159] | SMN (2011) Estadísticas Climatológicas, Servicio Meteorológico Nacional 2001–2010, SMN, Buenos Aires. |
[160] | McCormik RA, (1968) Air Pollution Climatology, In: Air Pollution (Stern, A.) Vol. 1, Chapter 9 Second Edition, New York: Academic Press, 275–320. |
[161] | Moore DJ (1969) The distributions of surface concentrations of sulphur dioxide emitted from tall chimneys. Trans R Soc Can 265. |
[162] | Deardorff JW, (1984) Upstream diffusion in the convective boundary layer with weak or zero mean wind, In: Fourth joint conference on application of air pollution meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, Massachusetts. |
[163] | EPA (2007) Ambient air monitoring network assessment guidance-Analytical techniques for technical assessments of ambient air monitoring networks, EPA-454/D-07-001, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. |
[164] | Trujillo-Ventura A, Ellis J (1991) Multiobjective air pollution monitoring network design, Atmos Environ 25: 469–479. |
[165] | EPA (2013) Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program, EPA-454/B-13-003, Washington. |
[166] | Joly M, Peuch VH (2012) Objective classification of air quality monitoring sites over Europe. Atmos Environ 47: 111–123. |
[167] | Pickett EE, Whiting RG (1981) The design of cost-effective air quality monitoring networks. Environ Monit Assess 1: 59–74. |
[168] | Pérez-Abreu V, Rodríguez JE (1996) Index of effectiveness of a multivariate environmental monitoring network. Environmentrics 7: 489–501. |
[169] | Silva C, Quiroz A (2003) Optimization of the atmospheric pollution monitoring network at Santiago de Chile. Atmos Environ 37: 2337–2345 |
[170] | Pires JCM, Pereira MC, Alvim-Ferraz MCM, et al. (2009) Identification of redundant air quality measurements through the use of principal component analysis. Atmos Environ 43: 3837–3842. |
[171] | Borge R, De la Paz D, Lumbreras J, et al. (2014) Analysis of Contributions to NO2 Ambient Air Quality Levels in Madrid City (Spain) through Modeling. Implications for the Development of Policies and Air Quality Monitoring. J Geosci Environ Prot 2: 6–11. |
[172] | Henriquez A, Gallardo L, Diaz Resquin M (2015) Analysis and optimal design of air quality monitoring networks using a variational approach. Tellus B 67: 25385: 1–13. |
[173] | Colombo JC, Pelletier E, Brochu C, et al. (1989) Determination of hydrocarbon sources using n-alkane and polyaromatic hydrocarbon distribution indexes. Case study: Rio de La Plata Estuary, Argentina. Environ Sci Technol 23: 888–894. |
[174] | Colombo J, Bilos C, Remes Lenicov R, et al. (2000) Detritivorous fish contamination in the Río de la Plata estuary: A critical accumulation pathway in the cycle of anthropogenic compounds. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57: 1139–1150. |
[175] | Bower J (1997) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring-A review paper for the Royal Society of Chemistry, AEA Technology-National Environmental Technology Centre, Oxfordshire (England). |
[176] | Martinez AP, Romieu I (1997) Introducción al Monitoreo Atmosférico, Departamento del Distrito Federal de México, Ciudad de México, OPS/OMS, ECO-GTZ, 1–362. |
[177] | Jedrychowski W, Flak E, Mróz E (1999) The Adverse Effect of Low Levels of Ambient Air Pollutants on Lung Function Growth in Preadolescent Children. Environ Health Persp 107: 669–674. |
[178] | IACA (2014) Informe de Calidad de Aire-Informe Anual, Montevideo. Servicio Evaluación de la Calidad y Control Ambiental, Departamento de Desarrollo Ambiental, Intendencia de Montevideo, Uruguay. |
[179] | PAR (2012) Plan Ambiental de Rosario. Calidad de Aire y Ruido, Municipalidad de Rosario, Santa Fe. Available from: http://www.rosario.gov.ar/sitio/. |
[180] | Gorchakov G, Semoutnikova E, Karpov A, et al. (2011) Air Pollution in Moscow Megacity, In: Anca Maria Moldoveanu, Ed., Advanced Topics in Environmental Health and Air Pollution Case Studies, Croatia, INTECH, 211–236. |
[181] | WHO-WMO (1977) Air monitoring programme desing for urban and industrial areas. Offset publication No. 33, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1–46. |
[182] | WHO (1980) Analysing and Interpreting Air Monitoring Data. Offset publication No. 51, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1–59. |
[183] | EA (2006) Review of background air-quality data and methods to combine these with process contributions, Science report: SC030174/1 SR1, Bristol, Environmental Agency, 1–58. Available from: www.environment-agency.gov.uk. |
[184] | UNEP (2014b) Plan de Acción Regional de Cooperación Intergubernamental en materia de Contaminación Atmosférica para América Latina y el Caribe, Anexo de la XIX Reunión del Foro de Ministros de Medio Ambiente de América Latina y el Caribe, Los Cabos, 11–14 de Marzo de 2014, UNEP/LAC-IGWG.XIX/7 Final, Los Cabos, México. |
[185] | DEFRA (2016) Air Pollution in the UK 2015, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Ed. OGL Crown, UK. Available from: https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/library/annualreport/index. |
[186] | Keith L (2014) The Source of U.S. EPA's Sixteen PAH Priority Pollutants. Polycyclic Aromat Compd 35: 147–160. |
[187] | Andersson JT, Achten C (2015) Time to Say Goodbye to the 16 EPA PAHs? Toward an Up-to-Date Use of PACs for Environmental Purposes. Polycyclic Aromat Compd 35: 330–354. |
[188] | WMO (2006) Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites-Instruments and observing methods, Report No. 81, WMO/TD-No. 1250, Switzerland, World Meteorological Organization, 1–47. |
[189] | EPA (2000) Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications, EPA-454/R-99-005, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. |
[190] | Marc M, Tobiszewski M, Zabiegała B, et al. (2015) Current air quality analytics and monitoring: A review. Anal Chim Act 853: 116–126. |
[191] | Manes G, Collodi G, Fusco R, et al. (2011) Real-Time Monitoring of Volatile Organic Compounds in Hazardous Sites (Chapter 14), In: Ekundayo E., Ed., Environmental Monitoring, InTech-Open Access Publisher, 219–244. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/. |
[192] | Mukerjee S, Smith LA, Norris GA, et al. (2004) Field Method Comparison between Passive Air Samplers and Continuous Monitors for VOCs and NO2 in El Paso, Texas. J Air Waste Manage 54: 307–319. |
[193] | Sigrist M (1994) Air Monitoring by Spectroscopic Techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1–560. |
[194] | Platt U, Stutz J (2008) Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications. Heidelberg Springer, 1–597. |
[195] | EPA (2011) Optical Remote Sensing for Measurement and Monitoring of Emissions Flux, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina. |
[196] | Plane JMC, Saiz-Lopez A, (2006) UV-Visible Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy, (DOAS) (Chapter 3), In: Heard DE, Ed., Analytical Techniques for Atmospheric Measurement, New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 148–188. |
[197] | Edner H, Ragnarson P, Spännare S, et al. (1993) Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) system for urban atmospheric pollution monitoring. Appl Optics 32: 327–332. |
[198] | Kourtidis K, Ziomas I, Zerefos C, et al. (2000) Benzene and toluene levels measured with a commercial DOAS system in Thessaloniki, Greece. Atmos Environ 34: 1471–1480. |
[199] | Chiu KH, Sree U, Tseng SH, et al. (2005) Differential optical absorption spectrometer measurement of NO2, SO2, O3, HCHO and aromatic volatile organics in ambient air of Kaohsiung Petroleum Refinery in Taiwan. Atmos Environ 39: 941–955. |
[200] | Lee C, Choi IJ, Jung JS, et al. (2005) Measurement of atmospheric monoaromatic hydrocarbons using differential optical absorption spectroscopy: Comparison with on-line gas chromatography measurements in urban air. Atmos Environ 39: 2225–2234. |
[201] | Avino P, Manigrasso M (2008) Ten-year measurements of gaseous pollutants in urban air by an open-path analyzer. Atmos Environ 42: 4138–4148. |
[202] | Johanson M, Galle B, Yu T, et al. (2008) Quantification of total emission of air pollutants from Beijing using mobile mini-DOAS. Atmos Environ 42: 6926–6933. |
[203] | Baidar S, Oetjen H, Coburn S, et al. (2013) The CU Airborne MAX-DOAS instrument: Vertical profiling of aerosol extinction and trace gases. Atmos Meas Tech 6: 719–739. |
[204] | Frins E, Bobrowski N, Osorio M, et al. (2014) Scanning and mobile multi-axis DOAS measurements of SO2 and NO2 emissions from an electric power plant in Montevideo, Uruguay. Atmos Environ 98: 347–356. |
[205] | CFR (2011) Ambient Air Quality Surveillance, 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 58, 7-1-11 Edition, US EPA, Washington. |
[206] | Seibert P, Beyrich F, Gryning SE, et al. (2000) Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height. Atmos Environ 34: 1001–1027. |
[207] | Sicard M, Perez C, Rocadenbosch F, et al. (2006) Mixed-layer depth determination in the Barcelona coastal area from regular LIDAR measurements: Methods, results and limitations. Boundary Layer Meteorol 119: 135–157. |
[208] | Emeis S, Schäfer K, Münkel C (2008) Surface-based remote sensing of the mixing-layer height-a review. Meteorologische Z 17: 621–630. |
[209] | Pérez IA, García M de los A, Sanchez ML, et al. (2006) Fit of wind speed and temperature profiles in the low atmosphere from rass sodar data, J Atmos Sol-Terr Phy 68: 1125–1135 |
[210] | Chan PW (2008) Measurement of turbulence intensity profile by a mini-sodar. Meteorol Appl 15: 249–258. |
[211] | EPA (2006) Guidance for Data Quality Assessment. Practical-Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G9, US EPA-EPA/240/B-06/003, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. |
[212] | Lacey M, West J (2006) The Air Spora. A manual for catching and identifying airborne biological particles. Springer, Dordrecht. |
[213] | Laner D, Crest M, Scharff H, et al. (2012) A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills. Waste Manag 32: 498–512. |
[214] | Sarkar U, Hobbs S, Longhurst P (2003) Dispersion of odour: A case study with a municipal solid waste landfill site in North London, United Kingdom. J Environ Manage 68: 153–160. |
[215] | Ancona C, Badaloni C, Mataloni F, et al. (2015) Mortality and morbidity in a population exposed to multiple sources of air pollution: A retrospective cohort study using air dispersion models. Environ Res 137: 467–474. |
[216] | Bolze U, De Freitas M (1997) Monitoring gas emissions from landfill sites. Waste Manage Res 15: 463–476. |
[217] | Palmiotto M, Fattore E, Paiano V, et al. (2014) Influence of a municipal solid waste landfill in the surrounding environment: Toxicological risk and odor nuisance effects. Environ Int 68: 16–24. |
[218] | Liu Y, Lu W, Guo H, et al. (2016) Aromatic compound emissions from municipal solid waste landfill: Emission factors and their impact on air pollution. Atmos Environ 139: 205–213. |
[219] | El Día (2013a) Reclamo por malos olores. Local Daily Newspaper "El Día", January 9, La Plata. Available from: http://www.eldia.com. |
[220] | El Día (2013b) Reclamo por malos olores. Local Daily Newspaper "El Día", July 5, La Plata. Available from: http://www.eldia.com. |
[221] | El Día (2016)Aire irrespirable en Villa del Plata por el olor a basura de la Ceamse. Local Daily Newspaper "El Día", January 27, La Plata. Available from: http://www.eldia.com. |
[222] | Hoy (2013) YPF y una contaminación que ya da asco en Ensenada. Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", September 23, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[223] | Hoy (2014) UNLP confirma contaminación letal de YPF, August 3, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[224] | Hoy (2015a) Otra vez la Refinería puso en vilo a los vecinos de la región. Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", August 26, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[225] | Hoy (2015b) YPF puso otra vez en vilo a la región, November 3, Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", August 26, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[226] | Hoy (2016a) Denuncian un fuerte olor en la periferia del CEAMSE. Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", March 7, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[227] | Hoy (2016b) Vecinos denuncian fuertes olores nauseabundos emanados desde la refinería YPF. Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", October 5, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[228] | Hoy (2016c) Nuevas emanaciones de YPF llegaron hasta City Bell. Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", October 6, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[229] | SEPA (2010) Odour Guidance, Scottish Environment Protection Agency. Available from: www.sepa.org.uk/media/154129/odour_guidance.pdf. |
[230] | Vallero D (2008) Fundamentals of Air Pollution, 4th edition, California, Academic Press, 1–942. |
[231] | Majra JP, (2011) Air quality in rural areas (Chapter 23), In: Mazzeo N, Ed., Chemistry, Emission Control, Radioactive Pollution and Indoor Air Quality, Rijeka, InTech press, 619–638. |
[232] | Gupta A, Kumar R, Kumari K, et al. (2003) Measurement of NO2, HNO3, NH3 and SO2 and related particulate matter at a rural site in Rampur, India. Atmos Environ 37: 4837–4846 |
[233] | Hunova I, Santroch J, Ostatnick J (2004) Ambient air quality and deposition trends at rural stations in the Czech Republic during 1993–2001. Atmos Environ 38: 887–898. |
[234] | Oke TR (1987) Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd Edition, London, Routledge, 1–435. |
[235] | Jacobson MZ (2005) Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling, Second Edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1–813. |
[236] | Emeis S (2012) Wind Energy Meteorology. Atmospheric Physics for Wind Power Generation, Heidelberg, Springer, 1–196. |
[237] | Simpson JE (1994) Sea breeze and local wind, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1–234. |
[238] | Ríos L (2007) Degradación de los espacios públicos del borde costero de Ensenada: Criterios para el diseño de políticas, Informe de Beca, Unidad de Investigación Nº 5, Instituto de Estudios del Hábitat-Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Available from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/27071. |
[239] | Oke TR (1982) The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J of the Roy Meteor Soc 108: 1–24. |
[240] | Gartland L (2008) Heat islands understanding and mitigating heat in urban areas. Earthscan Publisher, London. |
[241] | Dousset B, Gourmelon F, Laaidi K, et al. (2010) Satellite monitoring of summer heat waves in the Paris metropolitan area. Int J Climatol 31: 313–323. |
[242] | Sarrat C, Lemonsu A, Masson V, et al. (2006) Impact of urban heat island on regional atmospheric pollution. Atmos Environ 40: 1743–1758. |
[243] | Bassett R, Cai X, Chapman L, et al. (2016) Observations of urban heat island advection from a high-density monitoring network. Q J R Meteorol Soc 142: 2434–2441. |
[244] | Chapman L, Azevedo JA, Prieto-Lopez T (2013) Urban heat & critical infrastructure networks: A viewpoint. Urban Climate 3: 7–12. |
[245] | Muller C, Chapman L, Grimmond C, et al. (2013b) Toward a Standardized Metadata Protocol for Urban Meteorological Networks. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94: 1161–1185. |
[246] | Chapman L, Muller C, Young D, et al. (2014) The Birmingham Urban Climate Laboratory: An open meteorological testbed and challenges of the smart city. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96: 1545–1560. |
[247] | Chen D, Wang X, Khoo Y, et al. (2013) Assessment of urban heat island and mitigation by urban green coverage, In: Khare A, Beckman T, Eds., Mitigating Climate Change-The Emerging Face of Modern Cities, Heidelberg, Springer, 247–258. |
[248] | Sawyer RF (2010) Vehicle emissions: Progress and Challenges. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol 20: 487–488. |
[249] | Gallardo L, Escribano J, Dawidowski L, et al. (2012) Evaluation of vehicle emission inventories for carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides for Bogotá, Buenos Aires, Santiago, and São Paulo. Atmos Environ 47: 12–19. |
[250] | ARPEL (2001) Enfoque sistémico para el control de las emisiones vehiculares en América Latina y el Caribe, Asociación regional de empresas de petróleo y gas natural en Latinoamérica y el Caribe (ARPEL), Montevideo. Available from: http://www.arpel.org. |
[251] | Baldauf R, Watkins N, Heist D, et al. (2009) Near-road air quality monitoring: Factors affecting network design and interpretation of data. Air Qual Atmos Health 2:1–9. |
[252] | HEI (2010) Traffic-related air pollution: A critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. Environment 131: 1–384. |
[253] | Guderian R (1985) Air pollution by photochemical oxidants, Formation, transport, control, and effects on plants. Heidelberg, Springer-Ver1ag, 1–346. |
[254] | Kado NY, Okamoto R, Kuzmicky P, et al. (2005) Emissions of Toxic Pollutants from Compressed Natural Gas and Low Sulfur Diesel-Fueled Heavy-Duty Transit Buses Tested over Multiple Driving Cycles. Environ Sci Technol 39: 7638–7649. |
[255] | Cooper CD, Alley FC (2010) Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach. Illinois, Waveland Press, 1–839. |
[256] | IARC (2013) Air Pollution and Cancer, Publication N°161, Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1–169. |
[257] | NIOSH (2005) NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Publication N°2005-149: 1–424. |
[258] | Joeng L, Bakand S, Hayes A (2015) Diesel exhaust pollution: Chemical monitoring and cytotoxicity assessment. AIMS Environ Sci 2: 718–736. |
[259] | Soares da Silva A, Cardoso MR, Meliefte K, et al. (2006) Use of passive diffusion sampling method for defining NO2 concentrations gradient in São Paulo, Brazil. Environ Health 5: 19. |
[260] | Greenwood R, Mills G, Vrana B (2007) Passive sampling techniques in environmental monitoring. Compr Anal Chem 48: 1–453. |
[261] | AEA (2008) Diffusion Tubes for Ambient NO2 Monitoring: Practical Guidance for Laboratories and Users. 1: 1–47. |
[262] | Masey N, Gillespie J, Heal MR, et al. (2017) Influence of wind-speed on short-duration NO2 measurements using Palmes and Ogawa passive diffusion samplers. Atmos Environ 160: 70–76. |
[263] | El Día (2014) Se multiplican las quejas de vecinos por ruidos en la refinería de YPF, July 7, La Plata. Available from: http://www.eldia.com. |
[264] | El Día (2015) Vecinos en alerta por fuertes ruidos en la Destilería de YPF0. Local Daily Newspaper "El Día", February 26, La Plata. Available from: http://www.eldia.com. |
[265] | Hoy (2015c) Nueva alerta por contaminación sonora en YPF0. Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", November 28, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[266] | Hoy (2016d) Los ruidos y las llamas de la refinería seguirán toda la semana. Local Daily Newspaper "Hoy", July 12, La Plata. Available from: http://diariohoy.net. |
[267] | Rosenfeld E, Discoli C, Ferreyro C, et al. (2005) Desarrollo de una metodología y aplicación para la elaboración de un atlas energético-ambiental para la región del Gran La Plata. Avances en Energías Renovables y Medio Ambiente, Vol. 9 (Reunión Nacional de ASADES-Asociación Argentina de Energías Renovables y Ambiente). Available from: http://www.cricyt.edu.ar/asades/. |
[268] | Torras OS, Friedrich R (2013) A modelling approach for estimating background pollutant concentrations in urban areas. Atmos Pollut Res 4: 147–156. |
[269] | WHO (2013) Health risks of air pollution in Europe-HRAPIE project new emerging risks to health from air pollution-results from the survey of experts. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest. |
[270] | Lalas DP, Veirs VR, Karras G, et al. (1982) An analysis of the SO2 concentration levels in Athens, Greece. Atmos Environ 16: 531–544. |
[271] | Perevochtchikova M (2009) La situación actual del sistema de monitoreo ambiental en la Zona Metropolitana de la Ciudad de México. Estud Demográficos Y Urbanos 24: 513–547. |
[272] | USAC-MAG (2012) Monitoreo del aire en la ciudad de Guatemala. Informe anual 2011. Universidad de San Carlos-Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Guatemala. |
[273] | CR (2012) Estado de la Calidad del Aire del Área Metropolitana de Costa Rica. Informe Técnico Quinto, Ministerio de Salud de Costa Rica, Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía, Ministerio de Salud, Universidad de Costa Rica y Municipalidad de San José, San José. Available from: http://www.bvs.sa.cr/AMBIENTE/textos/quinto.pdf. |
[274] | LAQN (2015) London Air Quality Network. Summary Report 2013, Environmental Research Group, Kings College of London, London. Available from: http://www.londonair.org.uk. |
[275] | UNEP (2010) Geo Cities Manual-Guidelines for Integrated Environmental Assessment of Urban Areas. EECCA Region, United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP-DEWA/GRID-Europe. |
[276] | Kelly F, Fuller G, Walton H, et al. (2012) Monitoring air pollution: Use of early warning systems for public health. Respirology 17: 7–19.1. NU (2009) HOME (Cine documental dirigido por Yann Arthus-Bertrand y producido por Luc Besson y la participación de Naciones Unidas, Nueva York). |
[277] | 186. Keith L (2014) The Source of U.S. EPA's Sixteen PAH Priority Pollutants. Polycyclic Aromat Compd 35: 147–160. |
[278] | Kelly F, Fuller G, Walton H, et al. (2012) Monitoring air pollution: Use of early warning systems for public health. Respirology 17: 7–19. |
[279] | 1. NU (2009) HOME (Cine documental dirigido por Yann Arthus-Bertrand y producido por Luc Besson y la participación de Naciones Unidas, Nueva York). |
[280] | 186. Keith L (2014) The Source of U.S. EPA's Sixteen PAH Priority Pollutants. Polycyclic Aromat Compd 35: 147–160. |
[281] | 186. Keith L (2014) The Source of U.S. EPA's Sixteen PAH Priority Pollutants. Polycyclic Aromat Compd 35: 147–160. |
1. | Sa Xu, Ziqing Du, Hai Zhang, Can Crude Oil Serve as a Hedging Asset for Underlying Securities?—Research on the Heterogenous Correlation between Crude Oil and Stock Index, 2020, 13, 1996-1073, 3139, 10.3390/en13123139 | |
2. | Melike E. Bildirici, Mesut M. Badur, Correction: The effects of oil prices on confidence and stock return in China, India and Russia, 2019, 3, 2573-0134, 46, 10.3934/QFE.2019.1.46 | |
3. | Siming Liu, Honglei Gao, Peng Hou, Yong Tan, Risk spillover effects of international crude oil market on China’s major markets, 2019, 7, 2333-8334, 819, 10.3934/energy.2019.6.819 | |
4. | Renren Liu, Jianzhong Chen, Fenghua Wen, The nonlinear effect of oil price shocks on financial stress: Evidence from China, 2021, 55, 10629408, 101317, 10.1016/j.najef.2020.101317 | |
5. | Liuguo Shao, Hua Zhang, Jinyu Chen, Xuehong Zhu, Effect of oil price uncertainty on clean energy metal stocks in China: Evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach, 2021, 73, 10590560, 407, 10.1016/j.iref.2021.01.009 | |
6. | Mengna Zhou, Jizheng Yi, Jieqiong Yang, Yi Sima, Characteristic Representation of Stock Time Series Based on Trend Feature Points, 2020, 8, 2169-3536, 97016, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995958 | |
7. | Yue Liu, Yuhang Zheng, Benjamin M Drakeford, Reconstruction and dynamic dependence analysis of global economic policy uncertainty, 2019, 3, 2573-0134, 550, 10.3934/QFE.2019.3.550 | |
8. | Yue Liu, Pierre Failler, Jiaying Peng, Yuhang Zheng, Time-Varying Relationship between Crude Oil Price and Exchange Rate in the Context of Structural Breaks, 2020, 13, 1996-1073, 2395, 10.3390/en13092395 | |
9. | Yanhong Feng, Dilong Xu, Pierre Failler, Tinghui Li, Research on the Time-Varying Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Crude Oil Price Fluctuation, 2020, 12, 2071-1050, 6523, 10.3390/su12166523 | |
10. | Jiaying Peng, Zhenghui Li, Benjamin M. Drakeford, Dynamic Characteristics of Crude Oil Price Fluctuation—From the Perspective of Crude Oil Price Influence Mechanism, 2020, 13, 1996-1073, 4465, 10.3390/en13174465 | |
11. | Ke Liu, Changqing Luo, Zhao Li, Investigating the risk spillover from crude oil market to BRICS stock markets based on Copula-POT-CoVaR models, 2019, 3, 2573-0134, 754, 10.3934/QFE.2019.4.754 | |
12. | Fen Li, Zhehao Huang, Junhao Zhong, Khaldoon Albitar, Do Tense Geopolitical Factors Drive Crude Oil Prices?, 2020, 13, 1996-1073, 4277, 10.3390/en13164277 | |
13. | Yue Liu, Hao Dong, Pierre Failler, The Oil Market Reactions to OPEC’s Announcements, 2019, 12, 1996-1073, 3238, 10.3390/en12173238 | |
14. | Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, Elie Bouri, Mobeen Ur Rehman, Muhammad Abubakr Naeem, Tareq Saeed, Oil price risk exposure of BRIC stock markets and hedging effectiveness, 2021, 0254-5330, 10.1007/s10479-021-04078-0 | |
15. | Ping Wei, Yiying Li, Xiaohang Ren, Kun Duan, Crude oil price uncertainty and corporate carbon emissions, 2022, 29, 0944-1344, 2385, 10.1007/s11356-021-15837-8 | |
16. | Feipeng Zhang, Zhao Zhang, Forecasting exchange rate markets' volatility of G7 countries: will stock market volatility help?, 2023, 30, 1350-4851, 991, 10.1080/13504851.2022.2031856 | |
17. | Jiaying Peng, Yuhang Zheng, Does Environmental Policy Promote Energy Efficiency? Evidence From China in the Context of Developing Green Finance, 2021, 9, 2296-665X, 10.3389/fenvs.2021.733349 | |
18. | Melike E. Bildirici, Memet Salman, Özgür Ömer Ersin, Nonlinear Contagion and Causality Nexus between Oil, Gold, VIX Investor Sentiment, Exchange Rate and Stock Market Returns: The MS-GARCH Copula Causality Method, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 4035, 10.3390/math10214035 |
Properties | Petrol | E-100 | E-10 |
Viscosity mm2/s | 0.48–0.84 | 1.57 (20 ℃) | 0.53 (30 ℃) |
Flash Point ℃ | −65 | 13 | −40 |
RON ℃ | 86.4–100 | 108.6–114 | 87.4–94 |
MON ℃ | 80–98.8 | 89.7–112 | 86–99.9 |
Octane number | 86–94 | 98–100 | - |
Cloud point ℃ | −22 | - | 8 |
Pour point ℃ | (−17)–(−19) | - | 0 |
MJ/Kg | 41.9–44.4 | 26–30 | 33.19–44.22 |
Properties | Biobutanol | Petrol |
Boiling point (℃) | 118 | 200 |
Freezing point (℃) | −89 | −40 |
Density (kg/m3) | 810 | 760 |
Heat of vaporization (MJ/kg) | 0.43 | 0.36 |
Energy density (MJ/L) | 30 | 32 |
Cetane no | ~25 | 5–20 |
Flash point (℃) | 35 | −42 |
Auto-ignition temperature (℃) | 397 | 257 |
Properties | Biodiesel (ASTM D6751) | Biodiesel (EN 14214) | Fossil diesel |
Density 15 ℃ (kg/m3) | 880 | 860–900 | 820–850 |
Viscosity @ 40 ℃ (cSt) | 1.9–6.0 | 3.5–5.0 | 2.04–3.23 |
Calorific value (MJ/kg) | - | 35 | 42–48 |
Acidity total (mgKOH/g) | Max. 0.50 | Max. 0.5 | 0.02 |
Cetane number (min) | Min. 47 | Min. 51 | Min. 40 |
Iodine number (max) | - | 120 | - |
Flash point (℃) | Min. 93 | Min. 120 | Min. 52 |
Pour point (℃) | −15 to 10 | - | −35 to −15 |
Cloud point (℃) | −3 to 12 | - | −15 to 5 |
Cold filter plugging point (℃) | 19 | Max. 5 | 5 |
Copper strip corrosion (3 h–50 ℃) | Max. 3 | Min. 1 | Max. 3 |
Sulphur % (ppm) | Max. 15 | Max. 10 | Max. 15 |
Sulphated ash % (m/m) | Max. 0.02 | Max. 0.02 | Max. 0.01 |
Oxidation stability (min, 110 ℃) | 3 | 6 | - |
Properties | DME | OME | Fossil diesel |
Molecular weight | 46.07 | 76–196.2 | 96 |
Density 20 ℃ (kg/m3) | 660 | 960–1105 | 800–840 |
Viscosity @ 40 ℃ (cSt) | 0.12–0.15 | 0.64–1.75 | 2–4 |
Calorific value (MJ/kg) | 28.5 | 18.5–23.3 | 42.5 |
Cetane number (min) | 55–60 | 60–90 | Min. 40 |
Analysis | Typical wood derived bio-oil | Fossil diesel | LFO Motor/heating EN590 |
Water, wt.% | 20–30 | ∼0 | ∼0 |
Stability | Unstable* | ||
Viscosity (40 ℃), cSt | 15–35 | 2.04–3.23 | 2.0–4.5 |
Density (15 ℃), kg/dm3 | 1.10–1.30c | 0.820–0.850 | Max. 0.845 |
Flash point, ℃ | 40–110d | Min. 52 | Min.60 |
Pour point, ℃ | −9–36 | −35−15 | −5 min |
LHV, MJ/kg | 13–18c | 42–48 | 42.6 |
Distillability | Non-distillable | Distillable | Distillable |
*Polymerisation occurs during heating for prolonged periods. |
Properties | Biojet fuel |
Acidity, total (mgKOH/g) | 0.1 max |
Flash point (℃) | 38 min |
Density @15 ℃ (kg/m3) | 775–840 |
Freezing point (℃), max | −40 JetA; −47 JetA1 |
Viscosity @ −20 ℃ (cSt) | 8, max |
Net heat of comb (MJ/kg) | 42.8, min |
Product | Pathway | Advantages | Challenges |
Ethanol | Biochemical fermentation from sugars | Well-developed route Acid/enzymatic step allows for feedstock diversification | Development of microorganisms to be able to convert both type of sugars Research on process integration is required to achieve process feasibility |
Fermentation of syngas | All biomass components are utilised, including lignin | Syngas conditioning is required | |
Butanol | Biochemical fermentation from sugars | Simultaneous process with ethanol production | Product recovery process |
Fermentation of syngas | |||
Biodiesel | Catalytic Transesterification | Well-developed route Market ready for the product | Catalyst developed for first generation oils |
Supercritical Transesterification | High feedstock tolerance | Expensive process when compared to the catalytic route Extreme conditions and high energy demand (more development needed) | |
Green diesel | Bio-oil upgrading (HDO and HC) | Less feedstock limitation Similarity with fossil diesel | Bio-oil production technology challenges Catalyst |
Biomethanol | Gasification + MeOH Synthesis | Cost competitive with methanol from fossil fuels Developed market for the product | Gasification process challenges Syngas conditioning |
DME/OME | DME/OME Synthesis | Used as diesel replacement Not expensive | Inferior performance compared to the fossil fuel Challenges from the methanol production |
Petrol | Hydroprocessing followed by cracking/isomerisation | Several production routes | Further development on processing of bio-oil Low yields, is produced as a by-product |
Biojet fuel | Hydroprocessing of triglycerides | Cost competitive than the other biojet routes | Cost of catalysts and hydrogen Limited feedstock tolerance Product refining |
Biochemical fermentation of sugars to hydrocarbons | Fewer technological steps than ATJ fuels | Product refining | |
Biochemical fermentation of sugars to ethanol followed by hydrogenation | Less feedstock limitation | Product refining | |
FT synthesis | All biomass components are utilised, including lignin | Cost of FT synthesis |
Properties | Petrol | E-100 | E-10 |
Viscosity mm2/s | 0.48–0.84 | 1.57 (20 ℃) | 0.53 (30 ℃) |
Flash Point ℃ | −65 | 13 | −40 |
RON ℃ | 86.4–100 | 108.6–114 | 87.4–94 |
MON ℃ | 80–98.8 | 89.7–112 | 86–99.9 |
Octane number | 86–94 | 98–100 | - |
Cloud point ℃ | −22 | - | 8 |
Pour point ℃ | (−17)–(−19) | - | 0 |
MJ/Kg | 41.9–44.4 | 26–30 | 33.19–44.22 |
Properties | Biobutanol | Petrol |
Boiling point (℃) | 118 | 200 |
Freezing point (℃) | −89 | −40 |
Density (kg/m3) | 810 | 760 |
Heat of vaporization (MJ/kg) | 0.43 | 0.36 |
Energy density (MJ/L) | 30 | 32 |
Cetane no | ~25 | 5–20 |
Flash point (℃) | 35 | −42 |
Auto-ignition temperature (℃) | 397 | 257 |
Properties | Biodiesel (ASTM D6751) | Biodiesel (EN 14214) | Fossil diesel |
Density 15 ℃ (kg/m3) | 880 | 860–900 | 820–850 |
Viscosity @ 40 ℃ (cSt) | 1.9–6.0 | 3.5–5.0 | 2.04–3.23 |
Calorific value (MJ/kg) | - | 35 | 42–48 |
Acidity total (mgKOH/g) | Max. 0.50 | Max. 0.5 | 0.02 |
Cetane number (min) | Min. 47 | Min. 51 | Min. 40 |
Iodine number (max) | - | 120 | - |
Flash point (℃) | Min. 93 | Min. 120 | Min. 52 |
Pour point (℃) | −15 to 10 | - | −35 to −15 |
Cloud point (℃) | −3 to 12 | - | −15 to 5 |
Cold filter plugging point (℃) | 19 | Max. 5 | 5 |
Copper strip corrosion (3 h–50 ℃) | Max. 3 | Min. 1 | Max. 3 |
Sulphur % (ppm) | Max. 15 | Max. 10 | Max. 15 |
Sulphated ash % (m/m) | Max. 0.02 | Max. 0.02 | Max. 0.01 |
Oxidation stability (min, 110 ℃) | 3 | 6 | - |
Properties | DME | OME | Fossil diesel |
Molecular weight | 46.07 | 76–196.2 | 96 |
Density 20 ℃ (kg/m3) | 660 | 960–1105 | 800–840 |
Viscosity @ 40 ℃ (cSt) | 0.12–0.15 | 0.64–1.75 | 2–4 |
Calorific value (MJ/kg) | 28.5 | 18.5–23.3 | 42.5 |
Cetane number (min) | 55–60 | 60–90 | Min. 40 |
Analysis | Typical wood derived bio-oil | Fossil diesel | LFO Motor/heating EN590 |
Water, wt.% | 20–30 | ∼0 | ∼0 |
Stability | Unstable* | ||
Viscosity (40 ℃), cSt | 15–35 | 2.04–3.23 | 2.0–4.5 |
Density (15 ℃), kg/dm3 | 1.10–1.30c | 0.820–0.850 | Max. 0.845 |
Flash point, ℃ | 40–110d | Min. 52 | Min.60 |
Pour point, ℃ | −9–36 | −35−15 | −5 min |
LHV, MJ/kg | 13–18c | 42–48 | 42.6 |
Distillability | Non-distillable | Distillable | Distillable |
*Polymerisation occurs during heating for prolonged periods. |
Properties | Biojet fuel |
Acidity, total (mgKOH/g) | 0.1 max |
Flash point (℃) | 38 min |
Density @15 ℃ (kg/m3) | 775–840 |
Freezing point (℃), max | −40 JetA; −47 JetA1 |
Viscosity @ −20 ℃ (cSt) | 8, max |
Net heat of comb (MJ/kg) | 42.8, min |
Product | Pathway | Advantages | Challenges |
Ethanol | Biochemical fermentation from sugars | Well-developed route Acid/enzymatic step allows for feedstock diversification | Development of microorganisms to be able to convert both type of sugars Research on process integration is required to achieve process feasibility |
Fermentation of syngas | All biomass components are utilised, including lignin | Syngas conditioning is required | |
Butanol | Biochemical fermentation from sugars | Simultaneous process with ethanol production | Product recovery process |
Fermentation of syngas | |||
Biodiesel | Catalytic Transesterification | Well-developed route Market ready for the product | Catalyst developed for first generation oils |
Supercritical Transesterification | High feedstock tolerance | Expensive process when compared to the catalytic route Extreme conditions and high energy demand (more development needed) | |
Green diesel | Bio-oil upgrading (HDO and HC) | Less feedstock limitation Similarity with fossil diesel | Bio-oil production technology challenges Catalyst |
Biomethanol | Gasification + MeOH Synthesis | Cost competitive with methanol from fossil fuels Developed market for the product | Gasification process challenges Syngas conditioning |
DME/OME | DME/OME Synthesis | Used as diesel replacement Not expensive | Inferior performance compared to the fossil fuel Challenges from the methanol production |
Petrol | Hydroprocessing followed by cracking/isomerisation | Several production routes | Further development on processing of bio-oil Low yields, is produced as a by-product |
Biojet fuel | Hydroprocessing of triglycerides | Cost competitive than the other biojet routes | Cost of catalysts and hydrogen Limited feedstock tolerance Product refining |
Biochemical fermentation of sugars to hydrocarbons | Fewer technological steps than ATJ fuels | Product refining | |
Biochemical fermentation of sugars to ethanol followed by hydrogenation | Less feedstock limitation | Product refining | |
FT synthesis | All biomass components are utilised, including lignin | Cost of FT synthesis |