Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article

In-silico based identification and functional analyses of miRNAs and their targets in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)

  • Received: 20 April 2017 Accepted: 15 June 2017 Published: 29 June 2017
  • Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) is an important leguminous plant and a good diet due to presence of carbohydrate and high protein contents. Currently, only few cowpea microRNAs (miRNAs) are reported. This study is intended to identify and functionally analyze new miRNAs and their targets in cowpea. An in-silico based homology search approach was applied and a total of 46 new miRNAs belonging to 45 families were identified and functionally annotated from the cowpea expressed sequence tags (ESTs). All these potential miRNAs are reported here for the first time in cowpea. The 46 new miRNAs were also observed with stable hairpin structures with minimum free energy, ranging from −10 to −132 kcal mol−1 with an average of −40 kcal mol−1. The length of new cowpea miRNAs are ranged from 18 to 26 nt with an average of 21 nt. The cowpea miRNA-vun-mir4414, is found as pre-miRNA cluster for the first time in cowpea. Furthermore, a set of 138 protein targets were also identified for these newly identified 46 cowpea miRNAs. These targets have significant role in various biological processes, like metabolism, transcription regulation as transcription factor, cell transport, signal transduction, growth & development and structural proteins. These findings are the significant basis to utilize and manage this important leguminous plant-cowpea for better nutritional properties and tolerance for biotic and abiotic stresses.

    Citation: Zareen Gul, Muhammad Younas Khan Barozai, Muhammad Din. In-silico based identification and functional analyses of miRNAs and their targets in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)[J]. AIMS Genetics, 2017, 4(2): 138-165. doi: 10.3934/genet.2017.2.138

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mounir OUABA, Mohamed Elmehdi SAIDI . Contribution of morphological study to the understanding of watersheds in arid environment: A case study (Morocco). AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(1): 16-32. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023002
    [2] Zhong-Min Wang . Sulfur dioxide removal by sol-gel sorbent derived CuO/Alumina sorbents in fixed bed adsorber. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(1): 134-144. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.1.134
    [3] Hesam Zamankhan Malayeri, Mike Twardowski, James Sullivan, Timothy Moore, Hyeok Choi . Correlation of cyanobacterial harmful bloom monitoring parameters: A case study on western Lake Erie. AIMS Environmental Science, 2018, 5(1): 24-34. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2018.1.24
    [4] Abubakar Aji, Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn, Hisham Ben Mahmud . The role of polymer nanocomposites in sustainable wax deposition control in crude oil systems - systematic review. AIMS Environmental Science, 2025, 12(1): 16-52. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2025002
    [5] P. U. Singare, J.P. Shirodkar . Persistent and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the north-western coastal marine environment of India. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(2): 169-189. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021012
    [6] Djordje Vilimanovic, Gangadhar Andaluri, Robert Hannah, Rominder Suri, A. Ronald MacGillivray . Occurrence and aquatic toxicity of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in tributaries of an urbanized section of the Delaware River Watershed. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(4): 302-319. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020019
    [7] Sugili Putra, Fifi Nurfiana, Junita Sari, Waringin M. Yusmaman . Conversion of chromium from simulated batik waste through the utilization of gamma irradiation technique to produce potassium dichromate. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(3): 457-470. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024023
    [8] Adam O'Keeffe, Erin Brooks, Chad Dunkel, Dev S. Shrestha . Soil moisture routing modeling of targeted biochar amendment in undulating topographies: an analysis of biochar's effects on streamflow. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(4): 529-546. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023030
    [9] Alif Alfarisyi Syah, Anugrah Ricky Wijaya, Irma Kartika Kusumaningrum . Preparation and development of amidoxime-modified Fe3O4/SiO2 core-shell magnetic microspheres for enhancing U(VI) adsorption efficiency from seawater. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(1): 21-37. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024002
    [10] Clare Maristela V. Galon, James G. Esguerra . Impact of COVID-19 on the environment sector: a case study of Central Visayas, Philippines. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(2): 106-121. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022008
  • Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) is an important leguminous plant and a good diet due to presence of carbohydrate and high protein contents. Currently, only few cowpea microRNAs (miRNAs) are reported. This study is intended to identify and functionally analyze new miRNAs and their targets in cowpea. An in-silico based homology search approach was applied and a total of 46 new miRNAs belonging to 45 families were identified and functionally annotated from the cowpea expressed sequence tags (ESTs). All these potential miRNAs are reported here for the first time in cowpea. The 46 new miRNAs were also observed with stable hairpin structures with minimum free energy, ranging from −10 to −132 kcal mol−1 with an average of −40 kcal mol−1. The length of new cowpea miRNAs are ranged from 18 to 26 nt with an average of 21 nt. The cowpea miRNA-vun-mir4414, is found as pre-miRNA cluster for the first time in cowpea. Furthermore, a set of 138 protein targets were also identified for these newly identified 46 cowpea miRNAs. These targets have significant role in various biological processes, like metabolism, transcription regulation as transcription factor, cell transport, signal transduction, growth & development and structural proteins. These findings are the significant basis to utilize and manage this important leguminous plant-cowpea for better nutritional properties and tolerance for biotic and abiotic stresses.


    Estuaries are coastal wetlands that serve a variety of roles from being nurseries for marine species to chemical sink. As a nursery, estuaries house larval fish and crustaceans, some of which are of economic importance and a primary sources of protein for many populations. Game fish such as red drum, seatrout, and snapper are fished recreationally and also commercially harvested along with white shrimp, blue crabs, oysters, and many more [1]. Seafood, being a critical food resource is needed to be monitored in estuaries for potential pollutants as they may accumulate in marine organisms and passed on to humans [2,3]. Trace elements (TE) like arsenic (As), selenium (Se), boron (B), and heavy metals like lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) are pollutants that have a wide range of toxicity to many organisms. Some are essential to our growth and development at low concentrations but harmful at higher doses, while others are highly toxic even at smaller doses. Tabelin et al. reviewed the sources, modes of enrichment, mechanisms of release, and mitigation strategies for these hazardous and toxic inorganic elements in naturally contaminated rocks [4]. Whalley et al. reported substantial amounts of arsenic (5 to 1740  µg/kg) in the sediments around estuaries and sequestration from seawater can be considered as one of the main mechanism by which arsenic, boron, and selenium are enriched on the sedimentary rocks [5,6]. Wetlands, such as estuaries, can act as a geochemical trap that bond pollutants to the sediments [7] thereby reducing their bioavailability. According to Peterson et al. a basic understanding of a wetland's specific hydrology, precipitation, surface runoff, and flooding is the most essential understanding to the management of specific sites [8,9]. More recently it has been observed that the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River system acts as a sink for many TEs. This stacking of TEs from agriculture, industry, urban runoff, or river discharge will also affect the Northern Gulf of Mexico area [10].

    Much work has been done on the kinetics of specific TEs especially the pollution with chemical contaminants found in estuaries and sediments [11] and their effects of salinity under oxidized or reduced conditions [12,13]. Other studies focused on the bioavailability of TEs in relation to sediment types or particulate variations through typical laboratory tests [14,15]. The bioavailability of trace elements in the estuaries is a complex phenomenon and is affected by many factors, such as chemical and mineralogy composition of soils and sediments including their solid phase partitioning along with the effect of salinity, pH, organic matter, and redox conditions [16,17]. Interaction of rainwater with pollutants in storm water [18], acid-drainage [19], and microbial activity [20] were typically studied on kinetics at the molecular level. There is little information available on the direct effects of meteorological conditions on TEs bioavailability at the ecosystem level particularly in Mississippi (MS) estuaries. This approach of direct measurements allow us to have a clear understanding of environmental conditions using empirical data [21]. The current research seeks to determine the overall effect of rainfall, drought intensities, and storm data on TEs binding to soil-sediments and its significance at the ecosystem level. It is hypothesized that the weather conditions such as the presence of rain, rainfall variations, drought intensity and storms affects the concentrations of soil-bound As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn either by chemical redox conditions caused by inundated sediments or by precipitation reactions that compete for sorption sites in the soil due to changes in salinity.

    Data on the trace elements was acquired from NOAA's Data Integration Visualization Exploration and Reporting (DIVER) system, which collects chemical contaminant data for the Gulf of Mexico and other geographic regions. Analysis on DIVER system's environmental data adds uniqueness by evaluating various hazardous and toxic inorganic elements that could pose very serious problems in Mississippi gulf coast marsh habitats and estuaries. Related meteorological information and weather data were collected from NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). Drought information was collected from the U.S. Drought Monitor database, which stores weekly drought data. The study samples for 2010 and 2011 were selected based on the location and collection matrix. All samples were documented to be surface-soil sediments from marsh habitats along Mississippi's coastline and were collected by a core sampler from depths 1–10 cm (Figure 1). A total of 49 samples each for As, Cd, Cr and 181 samples each for Pb, and Zn were collected and distributed to various private and public laboratories to determine contamination chemistry and composition. Analyses were conducted by inductively coupled plasma- atomic emission spectrometry, mass spectrometry, and atomic absorption spectrometry following EPA protocols, SW6010B, SW6020, HY017, and 200.7. Detection limits varied based on lab, analyte, and instrument ranging from 0.012–2.5 mg/kg, 0.004–1 mg/kg, 0.01–1 mg/kg, and nearly zero to 0.35 and 0.78 mg/kg for As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn respectively. Data on precipitation were collected from several weather stations along the Mississippi Gulf Coast: Biloxi (Station USC00220792), Gulfport Naval Center (Station USC00223671), Saucier Experimental Forest (Station USC00227840), Ocean Springs (Station USC00226484 & US1MSJC0015), Gulfport-Biloxi Airport (Station USW00093874), Pascagoula International Airport (USW00053858), and Sandhill Crane (USR0000MSAN).

    Figure 1.  Mississippi gulf coast marsh habitats where soil samples were collected (Barrier Islands where data was unavailable were not used). Image obtained from National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration's DIVER.

    Data were analyzed using SAS v. 9.4 and graphs were created using Microsoft Excel for consistency. The mean precipitation was calculated for multiple rainfall events occurring the same day at different stations. The mean values for daily precipitation rain intensity errors were masked for over or underestimations [22]. Due to non-Gaussian nature of precipitation, data were transformed to log (x + 1) for positive skewness and to remove the heterogeneity [23,24] thus making the data to be normally distributed. Soil samples were collected by several cruises between May and October of 2011. The mean TE concentrations were calculated for multiple samples across the Mississippi coast for the same day. For each TE concentration, data were organized into groups (rainfall and no rainfall) in order to determine the effect of rain [25]. Data on drought (obtained from the National Drought Mitigation Center's (NDMC)) were categorized on a scale of 1–6 as non-drought and abnormally dry to exceptional drought conditions. This study also included normal weather, thunderstorm winds, coastal flood, marine thunderstorm, and marine winds information data.

    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to examine the variations of log transformed daily rainfall, the occurrence of precipitation, drought intensity, rainfall or no rainfall, TE soil concentrations and other miscellaneous storms against time data. Correlations (r) and regression analysis were performed for rainfall and drought intensity for each TE concentrations.

    A total of 166 weather observations were collected from NCEI and were analyzed. Sample collection were done from May to October for the years 2010 and 2011, with exception of Arsenic and Zinc, where sampling and chemical analysis was only conducted for one year. Arsenic soil sediment concentrations were collected in 2010 and for Zinc in 2011. The log transformed daily rainfall means were found to be 0.39 and 0.29, respectively for 2010 and 2011 (Figure 2). The yearly rainfall data were not significantly different (p > 0.05) and this may be due to precipitation amounts averaging similar volumes of rainfall between the months of May and October in Mississippi's coast. The monthly analysis of log transformed rainfall showed a significant variation (p < 0.05) with the lowest recorded in October (0.11) and highest in August (0.60). The monthly distributions for the amounts of daily precipitation reached its peak during August and declined gradually till it reached the lowest for the month of October (Figure 3).

    Figure 2.  Distribution of log transformed, log (x + 1), daily rainfall (LOGVOL) over the total collection period between May and October of 2010 and 2011. Mean for each year was 0.39 and 0.29, respectively. No significant difference in daily rainfall was observed between 2010 and 2011 sampling periods.
    Figure 3.  Distribution of log transformed daily rainfall (LOGVOL) between May and October for 2010 and 2011. Each "x" represents monthly means. Significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between September with May, July, and August.

    Zinc was the only TE that displayed a strong positive correlation, r = 0.80, with daily rainfall. This strong positive correlations are due to high concentrations of Zn that were retained in the soil with increased amount of rainfall and this may be due to adsorption of Zn to soil-sediments (Figure 4). After initial rainfall, the amount of Zn-bound sediment to other soil components, such as oxidized metals or reduced sulfur has considerably increased. Decomposing organic matter or reduced metal-oxides releasing soluble Zn can be explained by oxidized metal-oxide or reduced sulfur found in other layers [26,27].

    Figure 4.  Zinc (Zn) concentration (µg/kg) found in Mississippi Coastal soils showed a strong correlation (r = 0.80) with log transformed rainfall (LOGVOL).

    There was no difference in the amount of daily rainfall data between 2010 and 2011. This resulted in non-significant difference in the yearly comparisons for As and Zn. Statistical analysis showed no significant variation between TE soil concentrations and occurrences of rainfall.

    Drought data over the two sampling years exhibited a significant difference across every month (Figure 5). Drought categories included: No Drought (1), Abnormally Dry (2), Moderate Drought (3), Severe Drought (4), Extreme Drought (5), and Exceptional Drought (6). Droughts were more frequent and more intense on the Mississippi Coast in 2011 during the summer months ending in September. In 2010 the only month of the sampling period burdened by drought was October. Arsenic and Zinc were not observed to be affected with dry conditions. This could be due to less drought intensity prevailing during the sampling period in 2010. Significant variations for Cd, Cr, and Pb were observed among each drought intensity sampling periods. Both Cd and Cr concentrations in the soil exhibit a negative correlation with a mean of 28.6 and 29.3 µg/kg, during Non-drought conditions and with a mean of 8.7 µg/kg during Extreme drought conditions (Figure 6). Lead (Pb) exhibited a positive correlation for drought intensities with a mean of 12.7 µg/kg during Non-drought and 45.8 µg/kg in Extreme drought conditions. Cd and Cr concentrations in the soil showed significant variations during drier weather conditions. Pb concentrations appears to be minimal during normal conditions but showed an increase in values as the drought conditions increased. This was further observed by Pearson coefficients of −0.63 for Cd, −0.27 for Cr, and 0.63 for Pb, and were all found to be significant at p < 0.05. Analysis on drought conditions included (1) No Drought, (2) Abnormally dry, & (5) Extreme Drought conditions as the other drought intensities were not observed during that specific sampling time.

    Figure 5.  Distribution of weekly drought data plotted over the both sampling periods: May to October for 2010 and 2011.
    Figure 6.  Distribution of cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), and lead (Pb) soil concentrations (µg/kg) at various drought conditions: No drought (1), Abnormally dry (2), Extreme Drought (5).

    The increase of Cd and Cr during Non-drought conditions could have been due to rain events that cleansed the accumulated contaminants and other pollutants [28,29]. There was a significant temporal difference for Cd between the two sampling years and this could have been due to a more intense droughts in 2011. Dissolved organic matter as well as reduced compounds may leach through the sediment during dry conditions there by releasing sequestered Cd, which in turn percolates further into the soil with the changing ground water level [6,30,31,32]. Highest concentration was observed for Pb during dry seasons rather than wet conditions whereas Cr illustrated a reverse phenomenon [8,33]. However, if sediment was submerged during the dry periods increase salinity may enhance the mobility of Cd forming stable chloride complexes [34].

    Miscellaneous storm data that represented extreme storm events of high magnitude collected during the sampling periods of 2010 and 2011 were analyzed. Cadmium, Pb, and Zn demonstrated significant variability between normal conditions, thunderstorms with high winds, marine storms, high marine winds, and coastal flooding. Storm data variations represent a typical normal weather to rain events where thunderstorm winds can cause either extreme high tides or low tides. Coastal floods would had heavy wave actions and seawater intrusion due to Marine thunderstorms and Marine winds [33,35]. For Cd, there was a significant difference between Normal conditions, Thunderstorm winds, and Marine winds averaging 27.1, 22.8, 30.0 µg/kg, respectively (Figure 7). The results showed lowest mean values for thunderstorm winds, which was contrary to other studies, and under saturated water conditions Cd precipitates with other soil components such as sulfides [36,37,38,39].

    Figure 7.  Concentrations (µg/kg) of cadmium found in soil during miscellaneous weather events. Normal conditions, Thunderstorm winds, Coastal floods, Marines storms, & Marine winds.

    Chromium showed an opposite effect when compared to Cd (Figure 8). Lead had the mean of 24.0 µg/kg during thunderstorm conditions indicating that the soil was affected by rainwater. Marine storms, winds, & coastal floods brings in seawater, which increase the mobility of many TEs [32,38]. The amount of seawater exposure from these Coastal floods, Marine storms, and Marine winds were shown to effect Pb concentrations in sediments, with the mean values of 11.4, 10.0, 11.0 µg/kg respectively (Figure 9) [27].

    Figure 8.  Concentrations (µg/kg) of chromium (Cr) found in soil during miscellaneous weather events. Normal conditions, Thunderstorm winds, Coastal floods, Marines storms, & Marine winds.
    Figure 9.  Concentrations (µg/kg) of lead (Pb) found in soil during miscellaneous weather events. Normal conditions, Thunderstorm winds, Coastal floods, Marines storms, & Marine winds.

    Increased levels in salinity typically promoted desorption from sediment. Sediment bound Pb had been observed to have a less linear relationship with seawater and demonstrates different behaviors at different salinities by forming complexes with chlorides from salt water [4,40]. As for Zn, a mean of 556.7 µg/kg was observed during Thunderstorms with high winds and 121.0 µg/kg during normal conditions (Figure 10).

    Figure 10.  Concentrations (µg/kg) of zinc (Zn) found in soil during Normal conditions, and Thunderstorms winds.

    There was a significant variation between the months for the concentrations of Cd, Cr, and Pb, over the sampling periods in 2010 and 2011 (Figure 11). Arsenic remained relatively stable in the sediment averaging 21.09 µg/kg. Coastal soils were higher in Cd and Cr concentrations in 2010 (28.89 µg/kg for Cd and 28.91 µg/kg for Cr) compared to 2011 (both 9.16 µg/kg). Precipitation was similar as the drought intensities demonstrated strong relationships between the two sampling years. Lower levels of Cd was observed during May (24.38 µg/kg) and October (8.89 µg/kg) compared to the other months that had the mean range from 30.03 to 31.11 µg/kg. Chromium (Cr) exhibited its highest soil concentration in June with 38.29 µg/kg and lowest in October with 15.56 µg/kg. This was likely due to intense drought conditions, with exception of July and August, which showed no significant difference for 2010 sampling period. The highest Pb concentration was observed in October (33.33 µg/kg) and the lowest during June to September (10.56–12.05 µg/kg) with r = 0.63. Zinc had the highest mean in May (199.60 µg/kg) during Thunderstorms with high winds, and the lowest in October (66.96 µg/kg). This increase in sediment-bound Zn suggests an enrichment from anthropogenic input from either point or nonpoint sources.

    Figure 11.  Distribution of Trace Elements concentrations in µg/kg [arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb)] over entire sampling period for 2010 and 2011.

    This study was aimed at determining the effects of meteorological conditions, such as rainfall, droughts, and storms, on TEs at the ecosystem level. The results reported in this study were derived from the data collected only during the sampling periods in 2010 and 2011. We concluded that Arsenic was not affected by any of the studied weather conditions. Zinc was the only TE that was affected by the amount of rainfall demonstrating a strong positive correlation (0.80) that may be due to adsorption to other components found in the soil. During Thunderstorms, both Pb and Zn concentrations increased in the soil. This may have been due to storm runoff from roads or other human impacted areas to the soils that act as a chemical sink by redox processes. TEs were also greatly affected by drought intensities, either in a positive correlation (Pb, 0.63) or negative correlation (Cd, −0.63; Cr, −0.27). It was observed that concentrations of Cd and Cr were decreased while the concentrations of Pb increased in soils during our sampling periods in 2010 and 2011. Arsenic and Zinc were collected only for one of the sampling years and monthly observations exhibited stable concentration of Arsenic while concentrations of Zinc were decreased from May to October.

    This study observed coastal soils entrapping of TEs (Pb and Zn) while releasing other TEs (Cd and Cr) under various weather conditions. This release of TEs become bioavailable to the local aquatic organisms such as bivalves, crustaceans, and larval fish. Such accumulation raises concern, since chronic exposure had been shown to affect human health. Overall, this empirical study may offer a better insight of TEs dynamics and their effects on the environment and ecosystem.

    This work was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number G12MD007581. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    The study focused only on Gulf Coast of Mississippi, USA and therefore, care must be taken when extrapolating this data to other coastal regions.

    The transport and distribution of TEs along the Gulf Coast needs further monitoring. Analyzing TEs in aquatic organisms of human interest will assist in determining potential risk to the environment and public health.

    [1] Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281-297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
    [2] Kim YJ, Zheng B, Yu Y, et al. (2011) The role of mediator in small and long noncoding RNA production in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J 30: 814-822. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.3
    [3] Zhang BH, Pan XP, Wang QL, et al. (2005) Identification and characterization of new plant microRNAs using EST analysis. Cell Res 15: 336-360. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290302
    [4] Hammond SC, Bernstein E, Beach D, et al. (2000) An RNA-directed nuclease mediates posttranscriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature 404: 293-296. doi: 10.1038/35005107
    [5] Kidner CA, Martienssen RA (2005) The developmental role of microRNA in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.11.008
    [6] Baloch IA, Barozai MYK, Din M (2013) MicroRNAs: the mega regulators in eukaryotic genomes. Pure Appl Biol 2: 83-88. doi: 10.19045/bspab.2013.23002
    [7] Bai M, Yang GS, Chen WT, et al. (2012) Genome-wide identification of Dicer-like, Argonaute and RNA dependent RNA polymerase gene families and their expression analyses in response to viral infection and abiotic stresses in Solanum lycopersicum. Gene 501: 52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.02.009
    [8] Barozai MYK (2012) Insilico identification of microRNAs and their targets in fiber and oil producing plant Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Pak J Bot 44: 1357-1362.
    [9] Gao P, Bai X, Yang L, et al. (2011) Osa-MIR393: a salinity- and alkaline stress-related microRNA gene. Mol Biol Rep 38: 237-242. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0100-8
    [10] Shui XR, Chen ZW, Li JX (2013) MicroRNA prediction and its function in regulating drought-related genes in cowpea. Plant Sci 210: 25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.05.002
    [11] Xie FL, Huang SQ, Guo K, et al. (2007) Computational identification of novel microRNAs and targets in Brassica napus. FEBS Lett 581: 1464-1474. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.02.074
    [12] Zhang BH, Pan XP, Stellwag EJ (2008) Identification of soybean microRNAs and their targets. Planta 229: 161-182. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0818-x
    [13] Barozai MYK, Irfan M, Yousaf R, et al. (2008) Identification of micro-RNAs in cotton. Plant Physiol Biochem 46: 739-751. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.05.009
    [14] Zhang BH, Wang QL, Wang KB, et al. (2007) Identification of cotton microRNAs and their targets. Gene 397: 26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.03.020
    [15] Zhang B, Pan X, Cannon CH, et al. (2006) Conservation and divergence of plant microRNA genes. Plant J 46: 243-259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02697.x
    [16] Frazier TP, Xie F, Freistaedter A, et al. (2010) Identification and characterization of microRNAs and their target genes in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Planta 232: 1289-1308. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1255-1
    [17] Xie F, Frazier T, Zhang B (2010) Identification and characterization of microRNAs and their targets in the bioenergy plant switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). Planta 232: 417-434. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1182-1
    [18] Barozai, MYK, Din M, Baloch IA (2013) Structural and functional based identification of the bean (Phaseolus) microRNAs and their targets from Expressed Sequence Tags. J Struct Funct Genomics 14: 11-18. doi: 10.1007/s10969-013-9152-z
    [19] Din M, Barozai MYK (2014) Profiling microRNAs and their targets in an important fleshy fruit: Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Gene 535: 198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.11.034
    [20] Din M, Barozai MYK (2014) Profiling and characterization of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) microRNAs and their targets. Mol Biol Rep 41: 889-894.
    [21] Din M, Barozai MYK, Baloch IA (2016) Profiling and annotation of microRNAs and their putative target genes in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) using ESTs. Gene Rep 5: 62-69.
    [22] Muchero W, Diop NN, Bhatetal PR (2009) A consensus genetic map of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) and synteny based on EST-derived SNPs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 106:18159-18164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905886106
    [23] Pule-Meulenberg F, Belane AK, Krasova-Wade T, et al. (2010) Symbiotic functioning and bradyrhizobial biodiversity of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) in Africa. BMC Microbiol 10: 89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-89
    [24] Griffiths-Jones S (2004) The microRNA registry. Nucleic Acids Res 32D: 109-111.
    [25] Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
    [26] Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
    [27] Zuker M (2003) Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3406-3415. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595
    [28] Barozai MYK (2012) Identification and characterization of the microRNAs and their targets in Salmo salar. Gene 499: 163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.03.006
    [29] Ambros V, Bartel B, Bartel DP, et al. (2003) A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA 9: 277-279.
    [30] Dai X, Zhao PX (2011) psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 155-159. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq766
    [31] Barozai MYK (2012) The microRNAs and their targets in the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Mol Biol Rep 39: 8867-8872. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1753-2
    [32] Kruger J, Rehmsmeier M (2006) RNAhybrid: microRNA target prediction easy, fast and flexible. Nucl Acids Res 34: 451-454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj455
    [33] Barozai MYK, Husnain T (2011) Identification of biotic and abiotic stress up-regulated ESTs in Gossypium arboreum. Mol Biol Rep 39: 1011-1018.
    [34] Barozai MYK, Wahid AH (2012) In silico identification and characterization of cumulative abiotic stress responding genes in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Pak J Bot 44: 57-69.
    [35] Barozai MYK, Kakar AG, Din M (2012) The relationship between codon usage bias and salt resistant genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. Pure Appl Biol 1: 48-51. doi: 10.19045/bspab.2012.12005
    [36] Barozai MYK, Kakar S, Sarangzai AM (2013) Profiling the carrot (Daucus carota L.) microRNAs and their targets. Pak J Bot 45: 353-358.
    [37] Wang J, Yang X, Xu H, et al. (2012) Identification and characterization of microRNAs and their target genes in Brassica oleracea. Gene 505: 300-308. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.06.002
    [38] Barozai MYK (2013) Identification of microRNAs and their targets in Artemisia annua L. Pak J Bot 45: 461-465.
    [39] Ghani A, Din M, Baloch IA, et al. (2013) Identification of MicroRNA in 12 plant species of fabaceae. Pure Appl Bio 2: 104-115. doi: 10.19045/bspab.2013.23005
    [40] Orlov YL, Dobrovolskaya O, Yuan CH, et al. (2012). Integrative computer analysis of antisense transcripts and miRNA targets in plant genomes. J Stress Physiol Biochem 8: S7.
    [41] Barozai MYK (2012) The novel 172 sheep (Ovis aries) microRNAs and their targets. Mol Biol Rep 39: 6259-6266. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1446-x
    [42] Chen L, Ren YY, Zhang YY, et al. (2012) Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of heat-responsive and novel microRNAs in Populus tomentosa. Gene 504: 160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.05.034
    [43] Ji Z, Wang G, Xie Z, et al. (2012) Identification and characterization of microRNA in the dairy goat (Capra hircus) mammary gland by Solexa deep sequencing technology. Mol Biol Rep 39: 9361-9371. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1779-5
    [44] Barozai MYK (2012) The microRNAs and their targets in the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Mol Biol Rep 39: 8867-8872. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1753-2
    [45] Yu J, Wang F, Yang GH, et al. (2006). Human microRNA clusters: genomic organization and expression profile in leukemia cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 349: 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.207
    [46] Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP (2004) Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress induced miRNA. Mol Cell 14: 787-799. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.027
    [47] Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, et al. (2004) Web-Logo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14:1188-1190. doi: 10.1101/gr.849004
    [48] Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, et al. (2007) ClustalW and ClustalX version 2. Bioinform 23: 2947-2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
    [49] Zeng CY, Wang WQ, Zheng Y, et al.(2009) Conservation and divergence of microRNAs and their functions in Euphorbiaceous plants. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 981-995.
    [50] Bartel DP (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136: 215-233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002
    [51] Kohli P, Kalia M, Gupta R (2015) Pectin Methylesterases: A Review. J Bioprocess Biotech 5: 228.
    [52] Whitney SM, Andrews TJ (2001) The gene for the ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) small subunit relocated to the plastid genome of tobacco directs the synthesis of small subunits that assemble into Rubisco. Plant Cell 13: 193-205. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.1.193
    [53] Ballester AR, Molthoff J, de Vos R, et al. (2010) Biochemical and molecular analysis of pink tomatoes: deregulated expression of the gene encoding transcription factor SlMYB12 leads to pink tomato fruit color. Plant Physiol 152: 71-84. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.147322
    [54] Kodaira KS, Qin F, Tran LS, et al. (2011) Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc-finger proteins AZF1 and AZF2 negatively regulate abscisic acid-repressive and auxin-inducible genes under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Physiol 157: 742-756. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.182683
    [55] Soria-Guerra RE, Rosales-Mendoza S, Gasic K, et al. (2011) Gene expression is highly regulated in early developing fruit of apple. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29: 885-897. doi: 10.1007/s11105-011-0300-y
    [56] Yadav SK (2010) Cold stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30: 515-527. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009050
    [57] Prasad PVV, Staggenborg SA, (2008) Impacts of drought and/or heat stress on physiological, developmental, growth, and yield processes of crop plants, In Ristic, Z. Author, Response of Crops to Limited Water. Madison, WI, USA, 301-355.
    [58] Qados AMSA (2011) Effect of salt stress on plant growth and metabolism of bean plant Viciafaba (L.). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 10: 7-15.
    [59] Rejeb IB, Pastor V, Mauch-Mani B (2014) Plant Responses to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stress: Molecular Mechanisms. Plants 3:458-475. doi: 10.3390/plants3040458
    [60] Sheshadri SA, Nishanth MJ, Simon B (2016) Stress-mediated cis-element transcription factor interactions interconnecting primary and specialized metabolism in planta. Front Plant Sci 7: 1725.
    [61] Fluhr R (2001) Sentinels of disease. Plant resistance genes. Plant Physiol 127: 1367-1374.
    [62] Umezawa T, Yoshida R, Maruyama K, et al. (2004) SRK2C, a SNF1-related protein kinase 2, improves drought tolerance by controlling stress-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 101: 17306-17311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407758101
    [63] Narayan A, Sachdeva P, Sharma K, et al. (2007) Serine threonine protein kinases of mycobacterial genus: phylogeny to function. Physiol genomics 29: 66-75. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00221.2006
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Erika Berenice Martínez-Ruiz, Myriel Cooper, Munir A. Al-Zeer, Jens Kurreck, Lorenz Adrian, Ulrich Szewzyk, Manganese-oxidizing bacteria form multiple cylindrospermopsin transformation products with reduced human liver cell toxicity, 2020, 729, 00489697, 138924, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138924
    2. Carlos González-Blanco, Felipe Augusto Dörr, Renata Albuquerque, Janice Onuki, Ernani Pinto, Alternative Isolation Protocol for Desulfo and Zwitterionic Cylindrospermopsin Alkaloids and Comparison of Their Toxicity in HepG2 Cells, 2020, 25, 1420-3049, 3027, 10.3390/molecules25133027
    3. Theo W. Dreher, Amanda J. Foss, Edward W. Davis, Ryan S. Mueller, 7-epi-cylindrospermopsin and microcystin producers among diverse Anabaena/Dolichospermum/Aphanizomenon CyanoHABs in Oregon, USA, 2022, 116, 15689883, 102241, 10.1016/j.hal.2022.102241
    4. Lucie Blahova, Ludek Sehnal, Olga Lepsova-Skacelova, Vendula Szmucova, Pavel Babica, Klara Hilscherova, Jonna Teikari, Kaarina Sivonen, Ludek Blaha, Occurrence of cylindrospermopsin, anatoxin-a and their homologs in the southern Czech Republic – Taxonomical, analytical, and molecular approaches, 2021, 108, 15689883, 102101, 10.1016/j.hal.2021.102101
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6245) PDF downloads(1309) Cited by(12)

Figures and Tables

Figures(11)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog