
Citation: D.M. Reddy Prasad, R. Senthilkumar, Govindarajan Lakshmanarao, Saravanakumar Krishnan, B.S. Naveen Prasad. A critical review on thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar applications[J]. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(4): 507-526. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.4.507
[1] | Muhammad Rashed Al Mamun, Shuichi Torii . Comparative Studies on Methane Upgradation of Biogas by Removing of Contaminant Gases Using Combined Chemical Methods. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(3): 255-266. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.3.255 |
[2] | Wasinton Simanjuntak, Kamisah Delilawati Pandiangan, Tika Dwi Febriyanti, Aryani Putri Islami, Sutopo Hadi, Ilim Ilim . Catalytic upgrading of palm oil derived bio-crude oil for bio-hydrocarbon enrichment using protonated zeolite-Y as catalyst. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(3): 600-616. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024028 |
[3] | Kharisma Bani Adam, Jangkung Raharjo, Desri Kristina Silalahi, Bandiyah Sri Aprilia, IGPO Indra Wijaya . Integrative analysis of diverse hybrid power systems for sustainable energy in underdeveloped regions: A case study in Indonesia. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(1): 304-320. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024015 |
[4] | Sokna San, Seyla Heng, Vanna Torn, Chivon Choeung, Horchhong Cheng, Seiha Hun, Chanmoly Or . Production of biogas from co-substrates using cow dung, pig dung, and vegetable waste: A case study in Cambodia. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(5): 1010-1024. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024047 |
[5] | Muhammad Rashed Al Mamun, Anika Tasnim, Shahidul Bashar, Md. Jasim Uddin . Potentiality of biomethane production from slaughtered rumen digesta for reduction of environmental pollution. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 658-672. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.658 |
[6] | Yingjie Wang, Shijie Li, Yi Zhao, Shuailei Kang, Guanghui Chu . Research on the modeling and simulation of the rural Photovoltaic-Biogas-Storage Direct-Current and Flexible Architecture System. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(4): 879-900. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025032 |
[7] | Sebastian Auburger, Richard Wüstholz, Eckart Petig, Enno Bahrs . Biogas digestate and its economic impact on farms and biogas plants according to the upper limit for nitrogen spreading—the case of nutrient-burdened areas in north-west Germany. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 740-759. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.740 |
[8] | Lihao Chen, Kunio Yoshikawa . Bio-oil upgrading by cracking in two-stage heated reactors. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(1): 203-215. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.1.203 |
[9] | Mikael Lantz, Emma Kreuger, Lovisa Björnsson . An economic comparison of dedicated crops vs agricultural residues as feedstock for biogas of vehicle fuel quality. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(5): 838-863. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.5.838 |
[10] | Robinson J. Tanyi, Muyiwa S Adaramola . Bioenergy potential of agricultural crop residues and municipal solid waste in Cameroon. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(1): 31-46. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023002 |
Due to industrialization, increasing number of populations and modern agricultural machineries and way of life, the demand of energy is increasing at an alarming rate. To satisfy the energy need, large amount of fossil fuels are used with adverse impact on the environmental impact [1]. To decrease the reliance on fossil fuels, renewable energy is being used.
Considering, Ethiopia where more than 60% of the municipal solid waste is organic, advanced Biogas systems can be adopted for generation of electricity, cooking and transportation purpose. One of the most important components of municipal solid waste is food waste such as household food waste, food-processing waste, and cafeteria and restaurant waste. Besides, more than 82% of the Ethiopian population is living in rural area and most of them are farmers. Thus, by combining food waste, animal waste and agricultural waste, it is possible to generate energy for the rural communities. Thus, Biogas is a recommended technology to convert organic waste into energy.
Biogas is produced when organic material is decomposed under anaerobic condition in a digester. Biogas is a mixture of mainly methane and carbon dioxide produced by bacterial decomposition of sewage, manure, garbage, or plant crop [1]. Raw biogas consists mainly of methane (CH4, 50–75%) and Carbon dioxide (CO2, 25–40%) and other elements like, water (H2O, 5–10%), Hydrogen sulfide (H2S, 0.005–2%), ammonia (NH3, < 1%), oxygen (O2, 0–1%), carbon monoxide (CO, < 0.6%) and nitrogen (N2, 0–2%) can be present. The average lower heating value of a biogas varies between 30 and 35 MJ/kg [2]. Whereas, the calorific value of pure methane is approximately 55 MJ/kg. The difference in calorific value is due to CO2, which is the incombustible part of Biogas. Besides reducing the calorific value, the existence of CO2 in the Biogas also increases compression and transportation costs [3]. Thus, purified methane can be used for various applications: compressed gas, electricity generation, internal combustion engines, etc.
Even though Biogas is used without removing unwanted gases, it is very useful to upgrade the biogas and so that it can be used as a natural gas and for various applications with high efficiency. Biogas upgrading and compressing is the most promising technology to convert raw biogas to Bio methane [2]. Biogas production shows an increased trend in recent years. So, biogas purification and upgrading had been researched extensively in recent years.
Awe OW et al. [4] reviewed biogas purification with the focus on the removal of contaminants, such as H2S, NH3, and siloxanes, but the removal of CO2 was only briefly mentioned.Weiland [5] presented an overview of the complete biogas production and consumption chain but did not focus on currently available upgrading technologies. Bekkering et al. [6] studied the current status and future options of biogas upgrading technologies but did not present the technical performance and economic report on various upgrading technologies. Beil et al. [7] reviewed different biogas upgrading technologies with the focus on their operating conditions, drawbacks and efficiency. Pertl et al. [8] and Starr et al. [9] applied life cycle assessment (LCA) to biogas upgrading Masebinu et al. [10] found that the market shares for biogas upgrading technologies have been changed rapidly in recent years, amine scrubbing is continuously achieving significant market shares. Kárászová et al. [11] reviewed membrane separation processes for biogas and found that membrane gas permeation is able to compete with classical biogas upgrading technologies.Sun et al. [12] encouraged more researches on membrane separation process for economical biogas upgrading and its utilization as a vehicle fuel. Chen et al. [13] revealed that hybrid processes for biogas upgrading are more efficient, where membrane separation is combined with absorption, adsorption, and cryogenic technique. This combined separation processes can improve the performance and reduce the operational cost of the process.
Removal of contaminants from biogas can be generally conducted as follows: H2S can be removed using activated carbon, Iron Sponge, biological oxidation, etc., CO2 can be removed using NaOH/KOH, amine solution etc., H2O can be removed using Silicagel [14,15,16]. CO2 can be removed by biological purification processes using algae cultures [17].
Even though several literatures can be found for biogas upgrading, it is still needs special attention in reducing the operational cost of the upgrading system and disseminate the technologies for a wider use. Especially in Ethiopia, more than 82 % of the population is living in the rural areas and most of them are farmers. At the same time the rural electrification rate in Ethiopia is less than 10% [18]. Thus, if we use the waste from cattle to produced biogas and upgrade it, it can be used for various applications: compressed gas, electricity generation, transportation etc. Thus, in this paper, a chemical absorption method is used to upgrade the biogas (Activated carbon to remove H2S, Potassium hydroxide and Sodium hydroxide to remove CO2 and Silica gel to remove H2O). Detailed analysis of the food waste, raw Biogas and upgraded biogas were performed.
An experimental analysis together with extensive survey of different literature on upgrading technologies was carried out. Thus, a chemical adoption method has been adopted for gas cleaning due to the availability of the chemicals in the Ethiopian local market and their economical benefits. The chemical absorption method uses aqueous chemical solution (NaOH solution, KOH solution), activated carbon and silica gel. The schematic diagram of the procedure is depicted as shown in Figure 1. First, activated carbon has been used to remove H2S. Then two different chemical solutions, i.e. NaOH and KOH have been used to remove CO2. After that, silica gel has been used to remove H2O. Finally, the treated gas has been compressed and stored in a gas cylinder.
Organic wastes (leftover food from student's cafeteria) were collected from Addis Ababa University (Sidist Kilo Campus) and the cattle manure was collected from a nearby area. The substrates which are collected were crushed into small pieces of 2 mm sizes with a mechanical crusher and blended together. The blended sample was mixed and diluted with water in a ratio to get a 10% total solid content inside the digester. The prepared stock was fed to a volume of 10 m3 Biogas digester. Inoculum was prepared from fresh cow dung with a total solid matter of less than with < 15 % of dry matter. Note: Inoculum is microbial biomass which is added at the beginning of fermentation or during the course of fermentation in order to accelerate it [19]. The temperature of the digester is kept at 30 ℃ using heating system. The retention time was around 30 days.
Ultimate analysis: The ultimate analyses of the food waste were estimated experimentally using EA 1112 Flash CHNS/O ultimate analyzer. The results of ultimate analysis by using ultimate analyzer are 45.405%, 7.655%, 42.915%, 3.945%, and 0.4% for contents of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and Sulfur, respectively. The following are the measurement conditions of the analyzer: Carrier gas flow rate of 120 ml/min, reference flow rate 100 ml/min, oxygen flow rate 250 ml/min; furnace temperature of 900 ℃ and oven temperature of 75 ℃, 4 calibration points for every component were taken. Samples were run in duplicate and the average values were taken. Based on the ultimate analysis result, the chemical formula of the sample is calculated: C3.78H7.66O3.78N0.28S3.70.018. Equation for the theoretical biogas composition, including sulphur and nitrogen is expressed according to Boyle[20]:
caHbocNdSe+(a−b4−c2+3d4+e2)H2O→(a2+b8−c4−3d8−e4)cH4+(a2−b8+c4+3d8+e4)co2+dNH3+eH2s |
It worth mentioning that, the produced ammonia can be recovered and used as a fertilizer. This can increase the economic sustainability of biogas cleaning.
A simple system consists of a stirred reactor with a single input and output stream, and constant feedstock volume. This bioreactor is fed by reactants A and B which are converted through a series of biological steps into products C and D as shown in Figure 2. The rate of accumulation of each component in the reaction can be described by a mathematical differential equation. For instance, the rate of change of concentration of 'A' in the tank is equal to the rate of change of concentration due to new feedstock being added plus the rate of change of concentration due to material going to outlet plus the rate of change of concentration due to the biochemical reaction.
A mathematical differential equation is used to describe the rate of accumulation of each component in the reaction. The rate of change of concentration of A in the tank is equal to the rate of change of concentration due to new feedstock being added plus the rate of change of concentration due to material going to outlet plus the rate of change of concentration due to the biochemical reaction [21]. The set of differential equations that follows from the simple equation is given below:
d[A]dt=d[A]dtin−dAdtout−K[A][B]c1 | (1) |
dBdt=d[B]dtin−d[B]dtout−C1K[A][B]C1 | (2) |
dCdt=d[C]dtin−d[C]dtout+C2K[A][B]C1 | (3) |
dDdt=d[D]dtin−d[D]dtout+C3K[A][B]C1 | (4) |
The reaction rate constant k can be either determined experimentally. Theoretically, k can be determined from the Arrhenius equation and where C1, C2 and C3 are constants of chemical reaction.
K=Ce−EA/RT | (5) |
For an initial approximation, Wu et al. [22] gave an estimation of the value of k:
K=6.21×10−8(moll×t)−1 | (6) |
The value of k used in this model is determined by matching the model to the experiment initially and more accurately by running a number of simulations.
In order to remove CO2, H2S and H2O, a purification system has been used. NaOH/KOH, activated carbon and silica gel were added to purification system to remove CO2, H2S and H2O from the raw biogas respectively. The purification system is arranged as shown in Figure 3.
Removal of H2S: Since activated carbon has high surface area, porosity, and surface chemistry, it is suitable to adsorb H2S from biogas [23]. During removal process the impregnated activated carbon was 10 g per liter of water and NaOH. This reaction is an adsorption process. Hydrogen sulfide is adsorbed on the carbon surface and dissolution of H2S into the water film is resulted.
Removable of CO2: The upgrading section consists of solutions of NaOH/KOH which was varied from 1–10 kg per litter for all the experimental runs. Biogas was passed through the upgrading first flask where it reacts with NaOH of 0.1 moles with a Biogas flow rate of 15 L/min and solution flow rate of 10–20 L/min. The chemical reaction during the process is depicted here below:
2NaOH(aqu)+CO2(g)→Na2CO3(aqu)+H2O(l) | (7) |
The Carbon dioxide removal efficiency was calculated using:
ηco2=(1−co2pureco2raw)×100% | (8) |
2KOHacq+CO2↔K2CO3,acq+H2O(l) | (9) |
The chemical absorption process of CO2 using KOH is no different from the process applied using NaOH. However, KOH is more expensive than NaOH [4]. Yan et al. [24] discussed in detail that instead of using expensive chemicals, biomass ash could be used in substitution of NaOH/KOH, in order to reduce operational expense. The formation of K2CO3,acq in equation 10, can improve biogas upgrading through the subsequent reaction of K2CO3 + CO2 + H2O = 2KHCO3 and this reaction further increases the CO2 [25].
Removal of H2O: Silica gel as it has very good moisture absorbing capacity. The biogas enters the moisture eliminating column after passing the H2S and CO2 removal unit. H2O is mostly adsorbed on silica without chemical reactions.
The raw biogas was passed through the upgrading system where it reacted with NaOH and KOH solution. In this case, aqueous solutions of NaOH and KOH were used as chemical solvents to demonstrate and compare which chemical solvent is best to absorb CO2. The reactor flask was observed to remove a high portion of CO2 gradually (approximately 80–85% removal efficiency) resulting in CH4 enriched biogas. This alkali solution NaOH fully controls CO2 reaction in the biogas intensively through an acid-base neutralization reaction absorbing and reducing the desired gas. The average CO2 concentration in the raw biogas was about 35.4%, whereas, the CO2 concentration in upgrading gas decreased steadily with increasing of NaOH and KOH concentration.
Water vapor is the leading corrosion risk factor when reacting with H2S since it produces H2SO4 acid. The color of the silica gel was changed from blue to pink after absorbing the water vapor from the raw biogas. A decrease in moisture content was noticed when the quantity of Silica gel increases. Based on the result, silica gel is extremely porous and can absorb a large amount of water due to its large internal surface area.
The removal efficiency is increasing almost linearly with increasing the mass of chemical agents. The removal efficiency was the highest using those chemicals, with efficiency results such as 91.5%, 87.96%, 89.90%, for CO2, H2S, and H2O, respectively during the experiments as shown in Figure 7. The corresponding methane content is 88%. Based on the experimental result, it can be concluded that chemical purification process would be considered as the best way to upgrade biogas by enhancing the CH4 concentration. Based on the experiment result using Method 1, which is using NaOH, activated carbon, and silcagel is good enough when we compare to Method 2 of using KOH, Wood charcoal and Silcagel.
In this study a detailed experimental analysis to upgrade raw biogas has been performed in order to increase the calorific value and remove unwanted components from the raw biogas. The experimental result shows that these innovative technologies reduces the acidic content (H2S) by 99% and removes the CO2 content by 82%. As a result, the methane content increased from 56.7% to 85%. The CO2 content decreased from 36% to 7%. Based on the experimental result, it can be concluded that chemical purification process would be considered as the best way to upgrade biogas by enhancing the CH4 concentration. Based on the experiment result using method 1, which is using NaOH, activated carbon and silcagel is good enough when compared to method 2 of using KOH, wood charcoal and silcagel. It is highly recommended to do economic analysis to prove that the additional cost to upgrade biogas can be returned back by selling the upgrade biogas. Future works can be performed by using different biogas upgrading technologies to better select the right technologies that are efficient, economical and environmental friendly.
Authors acknowledge the financial support of the Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer Office of Addis Ababa University.
All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Ahmed SF, Khalid M, Rashmi W, et al. (2017) Recent progress in solar thermal energy storage using nanomaterials. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 67: 450–460. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.034
![]() |
[2] |
Kalogirou SA (2004) Solar thermal collectors and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30: 231–295. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2004.02.001
![]() |
[3] |
Burke MJ, Stephens JC (2018) Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Res Soc Sci 35: 78–93. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
![]() |
[4] | Smil V (1991) General Energetics: Energy in the Biosphere and Civilization. 1st Eds., New York: Wiley. |
[5] |
Tian Y, Zhao CY (2013) A review of solar collectors and thermal energy storage in solar thermal applications. Appl Energy 104: 538–553. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.051
![]() |
[6] |
Sarbu I, Dorca A (2019) Review on heat transfer analysis in thermal energy storage using latent heat storage systems and phase change materials. Int J Energy Res 43: 29–64. doi: 10.1002/er.4196
![]() |
[7] | DeWinter F (1990) Solar Collectors, Energy Storage, and Materials. Massachusetts: The MIT press. |
[8] |
Bai Z, Liu Q, Gong L, et al. (2019) Application of a mid-/low-temperature solar thermochemical technology in the distributed energy system with cooling, heating and power production. Appl Energy 253: 113491. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113491
![]() |
[9] |
Zalba B, Marín JM, Cabeza LF, et al. (2003) Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl Therm Eng 23: 251–283. doi: 10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00192-8
![]() |
[10] |
Sarbu I, Sebarchievici C (2018) A comprehensive review of thermal energy storage. Sustainability 10: 191. doi: 10.3390/su10010191
![]() |
[11] | Khartchenko NV, Kharchenko VM (2013) Advanced Energy Systems. 2 Eds., Florida: CRC Press. |
[12] |
Phelan P, Otanicar T, Taylor R, et al. (2013) Trends and opportunities in direct-absorption solar thermal collectors. J Therm Sci Eng Appl 5: 021003. doi: 10.1115/1.4023930
![]() |
[13] |
Martinopoulos G (2018) Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy conversion systems in energetic retrofitted buildings. J Building Eng 20: 256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.027
![]() |
[14] |
Martinopoulos G, Tsalikis G (2018) Diffusion and adoption of solar energy conversion systems-the case of Greece. Energy 144: 800–807. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.093
![]() |
[15] |
Hou Y, Vidu R, Stroeve P, et al. (2011) Solar energy storage methods. Ind Eng Chem Res 50: 8954–8964. doi: 10.1021/ie2003413
![]() |
[16] |
Pelaya U, Luoa L, Fana Y, et al. (2017) Thermal energy storage systems for concentrated solar power plants. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 79: 82–100. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.139
![]() |
[17] |
Chen H, Cong TN, Yang W, et al. (2009). Progress in electrical energy storage system: a critical review. Prog Nat Sci 19: 291–312. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.014
![]() |
[18] |
Zhao CY, Wu ZG (2011) Thermal property characterization of a low melting temperature ternary nitrate salt mixture for thermal energy storage systems. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 95: 3341–3346. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.029
![]() |
[19] |
Nazir H, Batool M, Osorio FJB, et al. (2019) Recent developments in phase change materials for energy storage applications: A review. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 129: 491–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.09.126
![]() |
[20] |
Abedin AH, Rosen MA (2011) A critical review of thermochemical energy storage systems. Open Renewable Energy J 4: 42–46. doi: 10.2174/1876387101004010042
![]() |
[21] |
Farid MM, Khudhair AM, Razack SAK, et al. (2004) A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications. Energy Convers Manage 45: 1597–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.015
![]() |
[22] | Cabeza LF (2014) Advances in Thermal Energy Storage Systems: Methods and Applications, Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy. |
[23] | Gil A, Medrano M, Martorell I, et al. (2010) State of the art on high temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. part 1-concepts, materials and modellization. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14: 31–55. |
[24] |
Wang Z, Yang W, Qiu F, et al. (2015) Solar water heating: From theory, application, marketing and research. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 41: 68–84. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.026
![]() |
[25] |
Antoniadis CN, Martinopoulos G (2019) Optimization of a building integrated solar thermal system with seasonal storage using TRNSYS. Renewable Energy 137: 56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.074
![]() |
[26] |
Fisch MN, Guigas M, Dalenbäck JO (1998) A review of large-scale solar heating systems in Europe. Sol Energy 63: 355–366. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(98)00103-0
![]() |
[27] |
Kousksou T, Bruel P, Jamil A, et al. (2014) Energy storage: applications and challenges. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 120: 59–80. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.08.015
![]() |
[28] |
Vijayaraghavan K, Raja FD (2014) Design and development of green roof substrate to improve runoff water quality: plant growth experiments and adsorption. Water Res 63: 94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.06.012
![]() |
[29] |
Badran AA, Jubran BA (2001) Fuel oil heating by a trickle solar collector. Energy Convers Manage 42: 1637–1645. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00163-1
![]() |
[30] |
Marchã J, Osório T, Pereira MC, et al. (2014) Development and test results of a calorimetric technique for solar thermal testing loops, enabling mass flow and cp measurements independent from fluid properties of the htf used. Energy Procedia 49: 2125–2134. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.225
![]() |
[31] |
Vijayaraghavan K, Yun YS (2008) Competition of Reactive red 4, Reactive orange 16 and Basic blue 3 during biosorption of Reactive blue 4 by polysulfone-immobilized Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Hazard Mater 153: 478–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.079
![]() |
[32] |
Liu M, Saman W, Bruno F, et al. (2012) Review on storage materials and thermal performance enhancement techniques for high temperature phase change thermal storage systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 16: 2118–2132. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.020
![]() |
[33] |
Wang T, Mantha D, Reddy RG (2013) Novel low melting point quaternary eutectic system for solar thermal energy storage. Appl Energy 102: 1422–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.001
![]() |
[34] |
Cingarapu S, Singh D, Timofeeva EV, et al. (2015) Use of encapsulated zinc particles in a eutectic chloride salt to enhance thermal energy storage capacity for concentrated solar power. Renewable Energy 80: 508–516. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.026
![]() |
[35] |
Umair MM, Zhang Y, Iqbal K, et al. (2019) Novel strategies and supporting materials applied to shape-stabilize organic phase change materials for thermal energy storage–A review. Appl Energy 235:846–873. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.017
![]() |
[36] |
Andreu-Cabedo P, Mondragon R, Hernandez L, et al. (2014) Increment of specific heat capacity of solar salt with SiO2 nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 9: 582. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-582
![]() |
[37] |
Seo J, Shin D (2014) Enhancement of specific heat of ternary nitrate (LiNO3-NaNO3-KNO3) salt by doping with SiO2 nanoparticles for solar thermal energy storage. Micro Nano Lett 9: 817–820. doi: 10.1049/mnl.2014.0407
![]() |
[38] |
Zhang G, Li J, Chen Y, et al. (2014) Encapsulation of copper-based phase change materials for high temperature thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 128: 131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.012
![]() |
[39] | Hasnain SM (1998) Review on sustainable thermal energy storage technologies, part1: heat storage materials and techniques. Energy Convers Manage 39: 1127–1138. |
[40] |
Hänchen M, Brückner S, Steinfeld A, et al. (2011) High-temperature thermal storage using a packed bed of rocks–heat transfer analysis and experimental validation. Appl Therm Eng 31: 1798–1806. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.10.034
![]() |
[41] | King R, Burns AP (1981) Sensible Heat storage in Packed Beds. In: Proc. Intl. Conf. on Energy Storage, Brighton, UK, 231–245. |
[42] |
Martins M, Villalobos U, Delclos T, et al. (2015) New concentrating solar power facility for testing high temperature concrete thermal energy storage. Energy Procedia 75: 2144–2149. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.350
![]() |
[43] |
Schlipf D, Schicktanz P, Maier H, et al. (2015) Using sand and other small grained materials as heat storage medium in a packed bed HTTESS. Energy Procedia 69: 1029–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.202
![]() |
[44] |
Chen X, Zhang Z, Qi C, et al. (2018) State of the art on the high-temperature thermochemical energy storage systems. Energy Convers Manage 177: 792–815. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.011
![]() |
[45] |
Wentworth WE, Chen E (1976) Simple thermal decomposition reactions for storage of solar thermal energy. Sol Energy 18: 205–214. doi: 10.1016/0038-092X(76)90019-0
![]() |
[46] |
Silakhori M, Jafarian M, Arjomandi M et al. (2019) Thermogravimetric analysis of Cu, Mn, Co, and Pb oxides for thermochemical energy storage. J Energy Storage 23: 138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2019.03.008
![]() |
[47] |
Silakhori M, Jafarian M, Arjomandi M et al. (2017) Comparing the thermodynamic potential of alternative liquid metal oxides for the storage of solar thermal energy. Sol Energy 157: 251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.039
![]() |
[48] |
Tescari S, Agrafiotis C, Breuer S, et al. (2014) Thermochemical solar energy storage via redox oxides: materials and reactor/heat exchanger concepts. Energy Procedia 49: 1034 –1043. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.111
![]() |
[49] |
Xiao L, Wu S-Y, Li Y-R (2012) Advances in solar hydrogen production via two-step water-splitting thermochemical cycles based on metal redox reactions. Renewable Energy 41: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.023
![]() |
[50] |
Arunachalam S (2019) Latent heat storage: container geometry, enhancement techniques, and applications-a review. J Sol Energy Eng 141: 050801. doi: 10.1115/1.4043126
![]() |
[51] |
Padmaraju SAV, Viginesh M, Nallusamy N, et al. (2008) Comparitive study of sensible and latent heat storage systems integrated with solar water heating unit. Renewable Energies Power Qual J 1: 55–60. doi: 10.24084/repqj06.218
![]() |
[52] |
Martinopoulos G, Ikonomopoulos A, Tsilingiridis G (2016) Initial evaluation of a phase change solar collector for desalination applications. Desalination 399: 165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.09.009
![]() |
[53] |
Cárdenas B, León N (2013) High temperature latent heat thermal energy storage: phase change materials, design considerations and performance enhancement techniques. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 27: 724–737. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.028
![]() |
[54] |
Zeinelabdein R, Omer S, Gan G (2018) Critical review of latent heat storage systems for free cooling in buildings. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 82: 2843–2868. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.046
![]() |
[55] |
Singh H, Saini RP, Saini JS, et al. (2010) A review on packed bed solar energy storage systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14: 1059–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.022
![]() |
[56] |
Su WG, Darkwa J, Kokogiannakis G, et al. (2015) Review of solid–liquid phase change materials and their encapsulation technologies. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 48: 373–391. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.044
![]() |
[57] |
Mohamed SA, Al-Sulaimana FA, Ibrahim NI, et al. (2017) A review on current status and challenges of inorganic phase change materials for thermal energy storage systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 70: 1072–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.012
![]() |
[58] |
Xu B, Li PW, Chan C (2015) Application of phase change materials for thermal energy storage in concentrated solar thermal power plants: a review to recent developments. Appl Energy 160: 286–307. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.016
![]() |
[59] |
Sharma RK, Ganesan P, Tyagi VV, et al. (2015) Developments in organic solid–liquid phase change materials and their applications in thermal energy storage. Energy Convers Manage 95: 193–228. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.084
![]() |
[60] |
Pielichowska K, Pielichowski K (2014) Phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Prog Mater Sci 65: 67–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.03.005
![]() |
[61] |
Al-Hinti I, Al-Ghandoor A, Maaly A, et al. (2010) Experimental investigation on the use of water-phase change material storage in conventional solar water heating systems. Energy Convers Manage 51: 1735–1740. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.08.038
![]() |
[62] |
Li B, Liu T, Hu L, et al. (2013) Fabrication and properties of microencapsulated paraffin@SiO2 phase change composite for thermal energy storage. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 1: 374–380. doi: 10.1021/sc300082m
![]() |
[63] | Chai LX, Wang XD, Wu DZ (2015) Development of bifunctional microencapsulated phase change materials with crystalline titanium dioxide shell for latent-heat storage and photocatalytic effectiveness. Appl Energy 138: 661−674. |
[64] |
Sathishkumar M, Mahadevan A, Vijayaraghavan K, et al. (2010) Green recovery of gold through biosorption, biocrystallization, and pyro-crystallization. Ind Eng Chem Res 49: 7129–7135. doi: 10.1021/ie100104j
![]() |
[65] |
Elias CN, Stathopoulos VN (2019) A comprehensive review of recent advances in materials aspects of phase change materials in thermal energy storage. Energy Procedia 161: 385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.101
![]() |
[66] |
Paksoy H, Sahana N (2012) Thermally enhanced paraffin for solar applications. Energy Procedia 30: 350–352. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.11.041
![]() |
[67] |
Sari A, Karaipekli A (2007) Thermal conductivity and latent heat thermal energy storage characteristics of paraffin/expanded graphite composite as phase change material. Appl Therm Eng 27: 1271–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.11.004
![]() |
[68] | Liu H, Wang X, Wu D, et al. (2017) Fabrication of graphene/TiO2/paraffin composite phase change materials for enhancement of solar energy efficiency in photocatalysis and latent heat storage. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 5: 4906−4915. |
[69] |
Alva G, Liu L, Huang X, et al. (2017) Thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar energy applications. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 68: 693–706. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.021
![]() |
[70] |
Sarier N, Onderb E (2012) Organic phase change materials and their textile applications: an overview. Thermochim Acta 540: 7–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.04.013
![]() |
[71] |
Ong HR, Khan MR, Yousuf A, et al. (2015) Effect of waste rubber powder as filler for plywood application. Polish J Chem Technol 17: 41–47. doi: 10.1515/pjct-2015-0007
![]() |
[72] |
Chen C, Wang L, Huang Y (2008) Morphology and thermal properties of electrospun fatty acids/polyethylene terephthalate composite fibers as novel form-stable phase change materials. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92: 1382–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.05.013
![]() |
[73] |
Liu H, Awbi HB (2009) Performance of phase change material boards under natural convection. Build Environ 44:1788–1793. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.12.002
![]() |
[74] | Bruno F, Belusko M, Liu M, et al. (2015) Using solid-liquid phase change materials (PCMs) in thermal energy storage systems, In: Cabeza L.F. editor, Advances in Thermal Energy Storage Systems, Woodhead Publishing, 201–246. |
[75] |
Zhao T, Zheng M, Munis A, et al. (2019) Corrosion behaviours of typical metals in molten hydrate salt of Na2HPO4•12H2O–Na2SO4•10H2O for thermal energy storage. Corros Eng Sci Technol 54: 379–388. doi: 10.1080/1478422X.2019.1595296
![]() |
[76] |
Kong Q, Ma J, Che C, et al. (2009) Theoretical and experimental study of volumetric change rate during phase change process. Int J Energy Res 33: 513–525. doi: 10.1002/er.1498
![]() |
[77] |
Kenisarin MM (2010) High-temperature phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14: 955–970. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.011
![]() |
[78] |
Kazemi Z, Mortazavi SM (2014) A new method of application of hydrated salts on textiles to achieve thermoregulating properties. Thermochim Acta 589: 56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2014.05.015
![]() |
[79] |
Ramirez BG, Glorieux C, Martinez ES, et al. (2014) Tuning of thermal properties of sodium acetate trihydrate by blending with polymer and silver nanoparticles. Appl Therm Eng 62: 838–844. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.09.049
![]() |
[80] |
Hu P, Lu DJ, Fan XY, et al. (2011) Phase change performance of sodium acetate trihydrate with AlN nanoparticles and CMC. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 95: 2645–2649. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.05.025
![]() |
[81] | Lu DJ, Hu P, Zhao BB, et al. (2012) Study on the performance of nanoparticles as nucleating agents for sodium acetate trihydrate. J Eng Thermophys 33: 1279–1282. |
[82] | Lane GA, (1983) Solar heat storage: latent heat materials, Vol. I: Background and scientific principles. |
[83] |
Vijayaraghavan K, Sathishkumar M, Balasubramanian R (2011) Interaction of rare earth elements with a brown marine alga in multi-component solutions. Desalination 265: 54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.030
![]() |
[84] |
Senthilkumar R, Prasad DMR, Govindarajan L, et al. (2019) Green alga-mediated treatment process for removal of zinc from synthetic solution and industrial effluent. Environ Technol 40: 1262–1270. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1420696
![]() |
[85] |
Park JJ, Butt DP, Beard CA, et al. (2000) Review of liquid metal corrosion issues for potential containment materials for liquid lead and lead–bismuth eutectic spallation targets as a neutron source. Nucl Eng Des 196: 315–325. doi: 10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00303-9
![]() |
[86] |
Regin AF, Solanki SC, Saini JS, et al. (2008) Heat transfer characteristics of thermal energy storage system using PCM capsules: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 12: 2438–2458. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.009
![]() |
[87] |
Sugo H, Kisi E, Cuskelly D, et al. (2013) Miscibility gap alloys with inverse microstructures and high thermal conductivity for high energy density thermal storage applications. Appl Therm Eng 51: 1345–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.029
![]() |
[88] |
Ma B, Li J, Xu Z, et al. (2014) Fe-shell/Cu-core encapsulated metallic phase change materials prepared by aerodynamic levitation method. Appl Energy 132: 568–574. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.054
![]() |
[89] | Murray JP (1999) Solar production of aluminium ore by direct reduction of ore to Al-Si alloy. Proceedings of ISES'99 Solar world congress, Jerusalem, Israel. |
[90] | Kubota M, Yokoyama K, Watanabe F, et al. (2000) Heat releasing characteristics of CaO/CaCO3 reaction in a packed bed for high temperature heat storage and temperature up-grading. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on thermal energy storage (Terrastock 2000), Stuttgart, Germany. |
[91] | Hahne E (1986) Thermal energy storage some view on some problems. Proceedings of the 8th international heat transfer conference, San Francisco, USA. |
[92] | Shiizaki S, Nagashimga I, Iwata K, et al. (2000) Development of plate fin reactor for heat recovery system using methanol decomposition. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on thermal energy storage (Terrastock 2000), Stuttgart, Germany. |
[93] |
Steinfeld A, Sanders S, Palumbo R, et al. (1999) Design aspects of solar thermochemical engineering – a case study: two-step water splitting cycle using Fe3O4/FeO redox system. Sol Energy 65: 43–53. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(98)00092-9
![]() |
1. | Ahmad Rafiee, Kaveh R. Khalilpour, James Prest, Igor Skryabin, Biogas as an energy vector, 2021, 144, 09619534, 105935, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105935 | |
2. | Register Mrosso, Revocatus Machunda, Tatiana Pogrebnaya, Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Biogas Using a Red Rock, 2020, 2020, 2356-735X, 1, 10.1155/2020/2309378 | |
3. | Maria Andronikou, Vasiliki Adamou, Loukas Koutsokeras, Georgios Constantinides, Ioannis Vyrides, Magnesium ribbon and anaerobic granular sludge for conversion of CO2 to CH4 or biogas upgrading, 2022, 435, 13858947, 134888, 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134888 | |
4. | Wondwossen Bogale, Maya F. Misikir, Bruck Sewnet, Ann-Kathrin van Laere, Saut Sagala, Chuan Ma, Jorge Antonio Hilbert, Mutala Mohammed, Yaseen Salie, Strengthening the biogas sector of Ethiopia through international collaboration: the case of the Digital Global Biogas Cooperation (DiBiCoo), 2022, 1094, 1755-1307, 012009, 10.1088/1755-1315/1094/1/012009 | |
5. | Denny K.S. Ng, Sarah L.X. Wong, Viknesh Andiappan, Lik Yin Ng, Mathematical optimisation for sustainable bio-methane (Bio-CH4) production from palm oil mill effluent (POME), 2023, 265, 03605442, 126211, 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126211 | |
6. | Mayerlin Edith Acuña Montaño, Richard de Albuquerque Felizola Romeral, Maria de Almeida Silva, Kevin Nabor Paredes Canencio, Murilo Duma, Gustavo Rafael Collere Possetti, Renata Mello Giona, Alesandro Bail, Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge and Waste Pickling Acid to Produce a Novel Adsorbent for Hydrogen Sulfide Removal From Biogas, 2024, 2193-567X, 10.1007/s13369-024-09129-9 | |
7. | Gebrehiwot Kunom Hagos, Wondalem Misganaw Golie, Fentahun Abebaw Belete, Yared Hagos Gidey, Biogas upgrading produced through anaerobic co-digestion of organic biowastes: a comparative study, 2025, 2190-6815, 10.1007/s13399-025-06757-5 | |
8. | W. H. Debele, D. D. Keche, A. C. Wachemo, T. D. Wanore, H. A. Legesse, Optimization of biomethane production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and banana stems: a characterization-based approach, 2025, 2538-3604, 10.1007/s42108-025-00373-9 |