
Citation: Akram Jahanshahi, Dina Jahanianfard, Amid Mostafaie, Mohammadreza Kamali. An Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Model for prediction of energy consumption by household sector in Euro area[J]. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(2): 151-164. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.151
[1] | Lamya Lairgi, Rachid Lagtayi, Yassir Lairgi, Abdelmajid Daya, Rabie Elotmani, Ahmed Khouya, Mohammed Touzani . Optimization of tertiary building passive parameters by forecasting energy consumption based on artificial intelligence models and using ANOVA variance analysis method. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(5): 795-809. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023039 |
[2] | Hassan Shirzeh, Fazel Naghdy, Philip Ciufo, Montserrat Ros . Stochastic energy balancing in substation energy management. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 810-837. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.810 |
[3] | Lilias Makashini, Austine Ng'ombe, Henry Abanda, Albert Malama, Priscilla Mudenda . Household lifestyle, energy related practices and perceptions of energy efficiency: Evidence from Kitwe, Zambia. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(3): 276-294. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.3.276 |
[4] | Mette Wik, Taoyuan Wei, Kristine Korneliussen, Rui Zhang, Solveig Glomsrød, Qinghua Shi . Drivers behind energy consumption by rural households in Shanxi. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 576-591. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.576 |
[5] | Hamza El Hafdaoui, Ahmed Khallaayoun, Kamar Ouazzani . Activity and efficiency of the building sector in Morocco: A review of status and measures in Ifrane. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(3): 454-485. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023024 |
[6] | Bilal Akbar, Khuram Pervez Amber, Anila Kousar, Muhammad Waqar Aslam, Muhammad Anser Bashir, Muhammad Sajid Khan . Data-driven predictive models for daily electricity consumption of academic buildings. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(5): 783-801. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.5.783 |
[7] | Gunnar Lima, Andreas Nascimento, Marcelo P. Oliveira, Fagner L. G. Dias . Energy efficiency analysis: A household digital transformation. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(4): 774-808. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024037 |
[8] | Zhongjiao Ma, Zichun Yan, Mingfei He, Haikuan Zhao, Jialin Song . A review of the influencing factors of building energy consumption and the prediction and optimization of energy consumption. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(1): 35-85. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025003 |
[9] | Rashmi Murali, Sangeeta Malhotra, Debajit Palit, Krishnapada Sasmal . Socio-technical assessment of solar photovoltaic systems implemented for rural electrification in selected villages of Sundarbans region of India. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 612-634. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.612 |
[10] | Rahaman Abu, John Amakor, Rasaq Kazeem, Temilola Olugasa, Olusegun Ajide, Nosa Idusuyi, Tien-Chien Jen, Esther Akinlabi . Modeling influence of weather variables on energy consumption in an agricultural research institute in Ibadan, Nigeria. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(1): 256-270. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024012 |
Lime-induced iron (Fe) chlorosis is a frequent issue of several fruit plant species; in Italy, many orchards are located on calcareous or alkaline soils, where the reduced Fe availability impairs fruit yield and quality [1]. The high pH of these soils causes Fe precipitation as hydroxides (i.e. Fe(OH)2 and Fe(OH)3 [2]) and the reduction of the activity of Fe-chelate-reductase at the cell membranes of the root cortical zone. This enzyme is responsible for the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+; the latter is the form that roots of plants characterized by "strategy I" can uptake [3]. These plants respond to Fe deficiency with protons (H+) excretion in order to reduce soil pH to around 6.5 and activate the enzyme [4]. However, this strategy is not sufficient to counteract the effect of calcareous or alkaline soils. To prevent the occurrence of Fe deficiency, growers often apply synthetic Fe-chelates to soil that, however, are expensive and can cause pollution of ground water due to their high water solubility [1,5]. Therefore, alternative means for controlling the Fe chlorosis should be developed to reduce cost and improve environmental sustainability.
Recent research in medicine [6,7] developed drug carriers able to release specific molecules into the systemic circulation of the body. Analogous systems for programmed release of nutrients in soils could be of relevant interest in agriculture [8] and contribute to reduce the impact of fertilization on the environment. Fertilizers carriers have the ability of slowly releasing a specific molecule upon a stimulus (pH, temperature, light).
Plant tissue culture techniques allow a rigorous monitoring and precise manipulation of plant growth and development. In vitro experiments proved to be a useful mean for rapid evaluation of plant responses to different substances [9] and to biotic and abiotic stresses [10,11]. Previous experiments [12,13] demonstrated that plants grown in vitro and in vivo had similar behaviors. In particular, some quince BA 29 [14] and quince A [15] somaclones, that were tolerant to in-vitro Fe deficiency conditions, also showed good tolerance to Fe chlorosis in hydroponic culture and in the greenhouse, respectively. Moreover, some leaf-derived kiwifruit somaclones in vitro selected for their better growth at high pH, were also moderately tolerant to lime when cultured in pots and/or in the field [16].
Kiwifruit shoot cultures were used as model plant, since this species is sensitive to lime-induced Fe-chlorosis both in fields [5] and in vitro at high medium pH [17].
In our preliminary experiment [18] the effect of ethylenediamine-N, N'-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid) ferric-sodium complex (Fe-EDDHSA) combined with calcite (CaCO3) was tested on kiwifruit proliferating shoots (without roots) grown on modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) media [19] with pH adjusted to 8. This high pH avoided calcite dissolution. The release of H+ ions by the cultures caused the decrease of the external pH; consequently, calcite crystals were dissolved and Fe became available for plant uptake. The red colour of phenanthroline added to the medium evidenced Fe2+ release. Moreover, comparative SEM images of Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 crystals before inclusion in the culture medium and near the shoot bases proved crystals dissolution during culture. Therefore, the increased Fe availability improved shoot growth compared to a culture medium lacking Fe.
To evaluate the effect of roots on calcite crystals, the present experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that, when roots get in contact with Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3, the extrusion of H+ decreases the pH and dissolves calcite with release of Fe, which becomes available for plant uptake.
If the results of the previous experiment on proliferating shoots [18] are here confirmed, this will reinforce the hypothesis that synthetic calcite could act, in sub-alkaline soils, as a carrier and stable source of Fe until it is absorbed by plants.
As previously reported [18], donor in-vitro shoot cultures of kiwifruit [Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.) A.Chev.] cv. Hayward, were maintained through repeated 5 week subcultures on a modified MS [19] shoot multiplication medium. Four shoots were grown in 500 mL glass jars, each containing 40 mL of medium; jars were closed with twist-off screw metal caps and wrapped with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) transparent film (allowing gas exchange). Standard growth conditions were: 22 ± 2 ℃, 16-h-photoperiod at 30 µmol m−2 s−1 photosynthetic active radiation (supplied by Philips TLD 36 W/33 lamps).
A two-step rooting procedure was used providing a root-induction and a root-elongation phase. At the end of the maintenance subculture about 20 mm well developed shoots were dissected and transplanted on a root induction medium (in 250 mL jars, with 30 mL medium and two shoots each) and placed five days in complete darkness, at 22 ± 2 ℃. The root induction medium had the same composition of the multiplication medium but the addition of 2.5 μM indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) as the only plant growth regulator. Afterward, two shoots were transplanted in each jar on root-elongation media with the same basal composition as the induction medium but lacking IBA and added with different Fe source as reported below. Plantlets were grown for additional 50 days under standard growth conditions. The jars were closed as reported above in both rooting phases.
Calcite crystals entrapping Fe-EDDHSA were obtained from a controlled precipitation process of solutions of CaCl2 and Fe-EDDHSA mixed with sodium carbonate [18,20]. The obtained Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 hybrid crystals are stable at sub-alkaline pH values, while at sub-acid pH they dissolve releasing the Fe-EDDHSA complex. The maximum concentration of Fe entrapped within the calcite lattice was 0.616 wt% when the precipitation occurred in the presence of 1.0 × 10−3 M of Fe-EDDHSA [18].
The IBA-induced shoots were randomly transferred to three root-elongation media with pH adjusted to 8.0 and the same basal composition except for Fe, differing as follows: 1) control medium containing complete MS [19] salt mixture; 2) calcite medium enriched with Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 as the only Fe source, at the concentration of 1861 mg l−1 in order to match Fe content of control medium; 3) −Fe medium without any Fe supply. In detail, control and calcite medium both contained Fe but while control was added with FeSO4 chelated with Na2EDTA, calcite medium was enriched with Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 hybrid crystals providing a slow release source of Fe. Five jars (replicates), each containing two shoots, were used for each treatment.
At the end of the rooting phase (55 days), mean fresh (fw) and dry weight (dw) of shoot and roots + callus, the final medium pH and the mineral composition of plants were determined on five jars (replicates) per treatment. Rooting occurred on shoots through the formation of a basal callus before root emergence. Since it was impossible to separate callus from roots, they were weighed together. The culture media were heated to about 50 ℃ in order to obtain agar liquefaction for a better accuracy in pH determination.
Phosphorous (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sulphur (S), copper (Cu), Fe, manganese (Mn) and zinc (Zn) concentrations were determined by plasma spectrometer (ICP-OES Ametek Spectro, Arcos, Kleve, Germany) on a 0.2 g dry sample previously mineralized (US EPA Methods 3052) [21] in an Etos TC microwave lab station (Milestone, Bergamo, Italy). Element concentration of different plant portions was referred to dw. Organ macro and micronutrients content was calculated by multiplying nutrient concentration by dw; shoot and root-callus nutrient content was summed to calculate total uptake.
All data were subjected to the analysis of variance as in a complete randomized experimental design considering each jar as a replicate; when analysis of variance showed a statistical effect of treatments (p ≤ 0.05), means were separated by Student Newman Keuls (SNK) test.
The discriminant canonical analysis performed on plant fresh weight (Figure 1) separated the three different media, indicating that control had the highest total plant and roots + callus growth, followed by calcite medium and −Fe (Figure 1). Shoot fresh weight was higher in control plants than in those grown on calcite medium; −Fe showed intermediate values (Figure 1).
Medium pH was significantly (p ≤ 0.001) decreased by plants in control and −Fe (4.72 and 4.40, respectively), while remained near 7 (7.22) in calcite.
The addition of doped calcite increased Ca concentration (Table 1). Phosphorous, K, Mg, S, Cu and Zn concentration was not statistically influenced by different media (Table 1). Iron concentration was highest in control; calcite medium showed intermediate values, lower than control but higher than −Fe (Table 1). Manganese concentration was higher in control than −Fe, calcite induced intermediate values not different from the other media (Table 1).
Treatment | P (% dw) | K (% dw) | Ca (% dw) | Mg (% dw) | S (% dw) | Cu (mg kg−1 dw) | Fe (mg kg−1 dw) | Mn (mg kg−1 dw) | Zn (mg kg−1 dw) |
Control | 0.122 | 1.18 | 0.236 b | 0.076 | 0.155 | 1.27 | 82.3 a | 111 a | 50.6 |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.080 | 1.26 | 0.463 a | 0.072 | 0.132 | 0.446 | 19.6 b | 74.4 ab | 29.6 |
−Fe | 0.060 | 0.618 | 0.077 b | 0.032 | 0.058 | 0.285 | 5.45 c | 25.8 b | 20.1 |
Significance | n.s. | n.s. | * | n.s. | n.s. | n.s | * | * | n.s. |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). n.s., *: Effect not significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. dw = dry weight. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
Potassium concentration was enhanced by Fe, no matter the source (Table 2). Magnesium concentration was higher on calcite medium if compared to −Fe; control showed intermediate values not different from calcite medium and −Fe (Table 2). Iron concentration was higher in control than other media (Table 2). Phosphorous, S, Cu, Mn and Zn concentrations were higher in -Fe than calcite medium and control (Table 2).
Treatment | P (% dw) | K (% dw) | Ca (% dw) | Mg (% dw) | S (% dw) | Cu (mg kg−1 dw) | Fe (mg kg−1 dw) | Mn (mg kg−1 dw) | Zn (mg kg−1 dw) |
Control | 0.168 b | 3.04 a | 0.310 b | 0.193 ab | 0.218 b | 1.70 b | 262 a | 188 b | 182 b |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.152 b | 3.59 a | 0.754 a | 0.245 a | 0.226 b | 1.71 b | 35.0 b | 107 b | 157 b |
−Fe | 0.498 a | 2.24 b | 0.220 b | 0.124 b | 0.271 a | 2.62 a | 25.0 b | 387 a | 514 a |
Significance | * | ** | *** | * | ** | * | *** | ** | ** |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). *, **, ***: Effect significant at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. dw = dry weight. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
The total content of K, Mg, S, Cu, Fe and Mn was higher in control plants than in other media that showed comparable values (Table 3). Calcium total uptake was similar for control and calcite medium and higher than −Fe; no significant differences were observed for P and Zn total plant content (Table 3).
Treatment | P (mg) | K (mg) | Ca (mg) | Mg (mg) | S (mg) | Cu (µg) | Fe (µg) | Mn (µg) | Zn (µg) |
Control | 0.701 | 10.6 a | 1.33 a | 1660 a | 0.913 a | 0.722 a | 87.0 a | 73.7 a | 58.6 |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.257 | 5.65 b | 1.38 a | 617 b | 0.405 b | 0.258 b | 6.16 b | 42.1 b | 21.6 |
−Fe | 0.627 | 2.85 b | 0.298 b | 366 b | 0.338 b | 0.311 b | 3.15 b | 18.4 b | 58.6 |
Significance | n.s. | * | ** | *** | * | * | ** | * | n.s. |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). n.s., *, **, ***: Effect not significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
Auxins in the medium induce the release of H+ ions from cells and K+ influx; therefore, the medium pH will decrease while that of the cell sap will rise. Callus growth and root formation are affected by medium pH [22]. The two-step rooting procedure used in the present experiment should prevent the interference of IBA protonic pumps activation of the cell membranes on the potential ability of the shoots to acidify the culture medium. In the present experiment, callus formation at the base of most shoots should be the consequence of a combined effect of residual IBA from root-induction and the initial high pH of root-elongation media, both of them enhancing H+ secretion, with consequent cell expansion.
As expected, the highest shoot growth was found with the complete MS salt mixture (control); roots + callus growth on calcite medium was higher than −Fe. Plants grown on control also had the highest Fe concentration in shoots, roots and callus. Changes in mineral uptake can strongly affect in vitro morphogenesis; in particular, optimal Fe availability was found to improve growth of all types of plant cultures [22]. Iron deficiency during bud formation in strawberry nodal cultures resulted in significant reduction of explant growth [23], as also observed in our experiment, in particular for roots and callus.
On the other hand, the higher shoot Fe concentration on calcite medium than −Fe indicates that plants were able to partially dissolve the CaCO3 hybrid crystals. Since in control and −Fe media pH decreased, a release of H+ by roots can be supposed. The lower pH reduction of calcite medium (from initial pH 8.0 to 7.22 at the end of the experiment) also suggests a release of H+, although CaCO3 coming from Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 masked plant cell activity toward a decrease of the external pH.
In addition, the dissolution of Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 brought about an increase of Ca concentration in the whole plant on calcite medium with respect to the other two media. The higher K concentration in roots + callus of plants grown on control and calcite with respect to −Fe should be the final consequence of the extrusion of H+ ions and the contemporary penetration of K+ into the cells characterized by a better growth in the presence of Fe, as a part of cell pH and osmotic balance regulation process [22].
Surprisingly, in roots + callus, P, S, Cu, Mn and Zn concentrations were higher in −Fe than calcite and control. Probably, this was due to the reduced growth in −Fe with consequent lower nutrient dilution.
Control plants showed a higher total K, Mg, S, Cu, Fe and Mn content mainly due to their higher weight. However, the same nutrients except for Cu were higher on calcite medium than in −Fe, although not significant.
High agar concentrations lead to medium hardening that reduce water and nutrients uptake by the cultures and inhibit their growth [22]. Thus, the lower plant growth and nutrient uptake on calcite medium with respect to control could be due to the hardening of the culture medium observed after CaCO3 hybrid crystals addition. Moreover, considering that only the basal part of the explant was in contact with the medium, gradients of nutrients might be formed between the medium and plants tissues. In addition, since a basal callus is produced by shoots before roots development, vascular connections between roots and shoot might be incomplete [22]. Therefore, the presence of callus at the shoot base might be in part responsible of some unclear results on nutrient uptake.
In conclusion, the present research, on in-vitro grown entire plants with roots showed that doped calcite, although not being a Fe source as effective as FeSO4 chelated with Na2EDTA, was able to release Fe for plant uptake. Therefore, the results of this and the previous experiment [18] support the hypothesis that synthetic calcite hybrid crystals could act in sub-alkaline substrates as a carrier and stable source of Fe until it is absorbed by plants, being an environmental friendly alternative to chelates. In contrast, iron chelates, traditionally used in agriculture, are not slow release fertilizers and since they are water soluble they could be leached and pollute ground water with unpredictable effects on the food chain. However, future research should focus on the use of Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 crystals under in-vivo conditions (potted or field grown plants).
All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Jahanshahi A, Kamali M, Khalaj M, et al. (2019) Delphi-based prioritization of economic criteria for development of wave and tidal energy technologies. Energy 167: 819–827. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.040
![]() |
[2] |
Khalaj M, Kamali M, Khodaparast Z, et al. (2018) Copper-based nanomaterials for environmental decontamination-An overview on technical and toxicological aspects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 148: 813–824. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.060
![]() |
[3] |
Kamali M, Kamali AR (2018) Preparation of borax pentahydrate from effluents of iron nanoparticles synthesis process. AIMS Energy 6: 1067–1073. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.6.1067
![]() |
[4] |
Holmberg K, Kivikytö-Reponen P, Härkisaari P, et al. (2017) Global energy consumption due to friction and wear in the mining industry. Tribol Int 115: 116–139. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.05.010
![]() |
[5] | Li S, Li R (2017) Comparison of forecasting energy consumption in Shandong, China using the ARIMA model, GM model, and ARIMA-GM model. Sustainability 9: 1–19. |
[6] |
Santiago I, López-Rodríguez MA, Gil-de-Castro A, et al. (2013) Energy consumption of audiovisual devices in the residential sector: Economic impact of harmonic losses. Energy 60: 292–301. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.018
![]() |
[7] |
Ediger VŞ, Akar S (2007) ARIMA forecasting of primary energy demand by fuel in Turkey. Energy Policy 35: 1701–1708. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.05.009
![]() |
[8] |
Yuan C, Liu S, Fang Z (2016) Comparison of China's primary energy consumption forecasting by using ARIMA (the autoregressive integrated moving average) model and GM (1,1) model. Energy 100: 384–390. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.001
![]() |
[9] |
Zhang PG (2003) Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing 50: 159–175. doi: 10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00702-0
![]() |
[10] | Rahman A, Ahmar AS (2017) Forecasting of primary energy consumption data in the United States: A comparison between ARIMA and Holter-Winters models. AIP Conf Proc 1885. |
[11] |
Barak S, Sadegh SS (2016) Forecasting energy consumption using ensemble ARIMA-ANFIS hybrid algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 82: 92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.012
![]() |
[12] |
12 de Oliveira EM, Cyrino Oliveira FL (2018) Forecasting mid-long term electric energy consumption through bagging ARIMA and exponential smoothing methods. Energy 144: 776–788. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.049
![]() |
[13] | Nichiforov C, Stamatescu I, Fagarasan I, et al. (2017) Energy consumption forecasting using ARIMA and neural network models. Proc. - 2017 5th Int Symp Electr Electron Eng ISEEE: 1–4. |
[14] |
Sen P, Roy M, Pal P (2016) Application of ARIMA for forecasting energy consumption and GHG emission: A case study of an Indian pig iron manufacturing organization. Energy 116: 1031–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.068
![]() |
[15] |
Kaivo-Oja J, Vehmas J, Luukkanen J (2016) Trend analysis of energy and climate policy environment: Comparative electricity production and consumption benchmark analyses of China, Euro area, European Union, and United States. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60: 464–474. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.086
![]() |
[16] | PORDATA - Statistics, charts and indicators on Municipalities, Portugal and Europe. Available from: https://www.pordata.pt/en/Home. |
[17] | Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2017) Time Series Analysis and Its Applications with examples. 4 Eds., Springer, 417–437. |
[18] | Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (2016) Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting. Springer. |
[19] | Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC, et al. (2015) Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. 5 Eds., San Francisco: Holden-Day. |
[20] |
Haiges R, Wang YD, Ghoshray A, et al. (2017) Forecasting electricity generation capacity in Malaysia: An Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average Approach. Energy Procedia 105: 3471–3478. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.795
![]() |
[21] |
Burroughs S (2018) Improving office building energy-efficiency ratings using a smart-engineering–computer-simulation approach: an Australian case study. Adv Build Energy Res 12: 217–234. doi: 10.1080/17512549.2017.1287127
![]() |
[22] |
Delgado Marín JP, Vera García F, García Cascales JR (2019) Use of a predictive control to improve the energy efficiency in indoor swimming pools using solar thermal energy. Sol Energy 179: 380–390. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.004
![]() |
[23] |
Hossieny N, Shrestha SS, Owusu OA, et al. (2019) Improving the energy efficiency of a refrigerator-freezer through the use of a novel cabinet/door liner based on polylactide biopolymer. Appl Energy 235: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.093
![]() |
[24] |
Fornara F, Pattitoni P, Mura M, et al. (2016) Predicting intention to improve household energy efficiency: The role of value-belief-norm theory, normative and informational influence, and specific attitude. J Environ Psychol 45: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.001
![]() |
[25] |
Li Q, Jiang J, Qi J, et al. (2016) Improving the energy efficiency of stoves to reduce pollutant emissions from household solid fuel combustion in China. Environ Sci Technol Lett 3: 369–374. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00324
![]() |
[26] | European Environment Agency, 'Household energy consumption', 2018. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/airs/2018/resource-efficiency-and-low-carbon-economy/household-energy-consumption. |
[27] | IPCC, 2011, IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. |
[28] |
Odenberger M, Kjärstad J, Johnsson F (2013) Prospects for CCS in the EU energy roadmap to 2050. Energy Procedia 37: 7573–7581. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.701
![]() |
[29] | European Comission, Clean energy for all Europeans, Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-strategy-and-energy-union/clean-energy-all europeans. |
[30] | Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. |
[31] | Jorant C (2011), The implications of Fukushima the European perspective. Bull At Sci 67: 14–17. |
[32] | Kádár P (2014) Pros and cons of the renewable energy application. Acta Polytech Hungarica 11: 211–224. |
[33] | European Comission (2011) 'Energy roadmap 2050', Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2012_energy_roadmap_2050_en_0.pdf. |
1. | Ewa Chodakowska, Joanicjusz Nazarko, Łukasz Nazarko, ARIMA Models in Electrical Load Forecasting and Their Robustness to Noise, 2021, 14, 1996-1073, 7952, 10.3390/en14237952 | |
2. | Grzegorz Ślusarz, Dariusz Twaróg, Barbara Gołębiewska, Marek Cierpiał-Wolan, Jarosław Gołębiewski, Philipp Plutecki, The Role of Biogas Potential in Building the Energy Independence of the Three Seas Initiative Countries, 2023, 16, 1996-1073, 1366, 10.3390/en16031366 | |
3. | Özlem KARADAĞ ALBAYRAK, Forecasting of Renewable Energy Generation for Turkey by Artificial Neural Networks and ARIMA Model: 2023 Generation Targets by Renewable Energy Resources, 2022, 1013-1388, 10.51551/verimlilik.1031367 | |
4. | Ruixia Suo, Qi Wang, Yuanyuan Tan, Qiutong Han, An innovative MGM–BPNN–ARIMA model for China’s energy consumption structure forecasting from the perspective of compositional data, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-58966-z | |
5. | Junfeng Zhang, Feng Dai, Junyang Jin, Shuai Zhang, Xiaoxiong Zhang, Yong Zhang, 2023, Short-Term Energy Consumption Prediction of High-Speed Train Production Based on Small Sample Data Repair and Augmentation, 979-8-3503-0375-9, 3456, 10.1109/CAC59555.2023.10452097 | |
6. | Shengcai Zhang, Changsheng Zhu, Xiuting Guo, Wind Speed Multi-Step Forecasting Using High- Resolution and Multi-Objective Ensemble Model With Error Correction, 2024, 12, 2169-3536, 73141, 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3404268 | |
7. | Winita Sulandari, Yudho Yudhanto, Etik Zukhronah, Isnandar Slamet, Hilman Ferdinandus Pardede, Paulo Canas Rodrigues, Muhammad Hisyam Lee, Hybrid Prophet-NAR Model for Short-Term Electricity Load Forecasting, 2025, 13, 2169-3536, 7637, 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3526735 | |
8. | Zhongjiao Ma, Zichun Yan, Mingfei He, Haikuan Zhao, Jialin Song, A review of the influencing factors of building energy consumption and the prediction and optimization of energy consumption, 2025, 13, 2333-8334, 35, 10.3934/energy.2025003 | |
9. | Nguyen Hung Cuong, Tran Quoc Tuan, Yvon Besanger, 2024, Stability Analysis of Grid with High Renewable Energy Sources Under Uncertainty Conditions, 979-8-3503-9042-1, 1, 10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863750 | |
10. | Snezhinka Zaharieva, Ivan Georgiev, Slavi Georgiev, Adriana Borodzhieva, Venelin Todorov, A Method for Forecasting Indoor Relative Humidity for Improving Comfort Conditions and Quality of Life, 2025, 16, 2073-4433, 315, 10.3390/atmos16030315 |
Treatment | P (% dw) | K (% dw) | Ca (% dw) | Mg (% dw) | S (% dw) | Cu (mg kg−1 dw) | Fe (mg kg−1 dw) | Mn (mg kg−1 dw) | Zn (mg kg−1 dw) |
Control | 0.122 | 1.18 | 0.236 b | 0.076 | 0.155 | 1.27 | 82.3 a | 111 a | 50.6 |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.080 | 1.26 | 0.463 a | 0.072 | 0.132 | 0.446 | 19.6 b | 74.4 ab | 29.6 |
−Fe | 0.060 | 0.618 | 0.077 b | 0.032 | 0.058 | 0.285 | 5.45 c | 25.8 b | 20.1 |
Significance | n.s. | n.s. | * | n.s. | n.s. | n.s | * | * | n.s. |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). n.s., *: Effect not significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. dw = dry weight. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
Treatment | P (% dw) | K (% dw) | Ca (% dw) | Mg (% dw) | S (% dw) | Cu (mg kg−1 dw) | Fe (mg kg−1 dw) | Mn (mg kg−1 dw) | Zn (mg kg−1 dw) |
Control | 0.168 b | 3.04 a | 0.310 b | 0.193 ab | 0.218 b | 1.70 b | 262 a | 188 b | 182 b |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.152 b | 3.59 a | 0.754 a | 0.245 a | 0.226 b | 1.71 b | 35.0 b | 107 b | 157 b |
−Fe | 0.498 a | 2.24 b | 0.220 b | 0.124 b | 0.271 a | 2.62 a | 25.0 b | 387 a | 514 a |
Significance | * | ** | *** | * | ** | * | *** | ** | ** |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). *, **, ***: Effect significant at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. dw = dry weight. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
Treatment | P (mg) | K (mg) | Ca (mg) | Mg (mg) | S (mg) | Cu (µg) | Fe (µg) | Mn (µg) | Zn (µg) |
Control | 0.701 | 10.6 a | 1.33 a | 1660 a | 0.913 a | 0.722 a | 87.0 a | 73.7 a | 58.6 |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.257 | 5.65 b | 1.38 a | 617 b | 0.405 b | 0.258 b | 6.16 b | 42.1 b | 21.6 |
−Fe | 0.627 | 2.85 b | 0.298 b | 366 b | 0.338 b | 0.311 b | 3.15 b | 18.4 b | 58.6 |
Significance | n.s. | * | ** | *** | * | * | ** | * | n.s. |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). n.s., *, **, ***: Effect not significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
Treatment | P (% dw) | K (% dw) | Ca (% dw) | Mg (% dw) | S (% dw) | Cu (mg kg−1 dw) | Fe (mg kg−1 dw) | Mn (mg kg−1 dw) | Zn (mg kg−1 dw) |
Control | 0.122 | 1.18 | 0.236 b | 0.076 | 0.155 | 1.27 | 82.3 a | 111 a | 50.6 |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.080 | 1.26 | 0.463 a | 0.072 | 0.132 | 0.446 | 19.6 b | 74.4 ab | 29.6 |
−Fe | 0.060 | 0.618 | 0.077 b | 0.032 | 0.058 | 0.285 | 5.45 c | 25.8 b | 20.1 |
Significance | n.s. | n.s. | * | n.s. | n.s. | n.s | * | * | n.s. |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). n.s., *: Effect not significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. dw = dry weight. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
Treatment | P (% dw) | K (% dw) | Ca (% dw) | Mg (% dw) | S (% dw) | Cu (mg kg−1 dw) | Fe (mg kg−1 dw) | Mn (mg kg−1 dw) | Zn (mg kg−1 dw) |
Control | 0.168 b | 3.04 a | 0.310 b | 0.193 ab | 0.218 b | 1.70 b | 262 a | 188 b | 182 b |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.152 b | 3.59 a | 0.754 a | 0.245 a | 0.226 b | 1.71 b | 35.0 b | 107 b | 157 b |
−Fe | 0.498 a | 2.24 b | 0.220 b | 0.124 b | 0.271 a | 2.62 a | 25.0 b | 387 a | 514 a |
Significance | * | ** | *** | * | ** | * | *** | ** | ** |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). *, **, ***: Effect significant at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. dw = dry weight. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |
Treatment | P (mg) | K (mg) | Ca (mg) | Mg (mg) | S (mg) | Cu (µg) | Fe (µg) | Mn (µg) | Zn (µg) |
Control | 0.701 | 10.6 a | 1.33 a | 1660 a | 0.913 a | 0.722 a | 87.0 a | 73.7 a | 58.6 |
Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 | 0.257 | 5.65 b | 1.38 a | 617 b | 0.405 b | 0.258 b | 6.16 b | 42.1 b | 21.6 |
−Fe | 0.627 | 2.85 b | 0.298 b | 366 b | 0.338 b | 0.311 b | 3.15 b | 18.4 b | 58.6 |
Significance | n.s. | * | ** | *** | * | * | ** | * | n.s. |
Within the same column, values followed by the same letter are not statistically different according to Student Newman Keul test (p ≤ 0.05). n.s., *, **, ***: Effect not significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. Control = medium containing complete MS salt mixture; Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3 = calcite medium enriched with 1861 mg l−1 Fe-EDDHSA/CaCO3; −Fe = medium without Fe. Data are average of five jars (replicates) with two shoots each. |