Citation: Zainab AL-Kaabi, Ranjan Pradhan, Naresh Thevathasan, Precious Arku, Andrew Gordon, Animesh Dutta. Beneficiation of renewable industrial wastes from paper and pulp processing[J]. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 880-907. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.880
[1] | Jin H. Jo, Zachary Rose, Jamie Cross, Evan Daebel, Andrew Verderber, John C. Kostelnick . Application of Airborne LiDAR Data and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Develop a Distributed Generation System for the Town of Normal, IL. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(2): 173-183. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.2.173 |
[2] | Chris Thankan, August Winters, Jin Ho Jo, Matt Aldeman . Feasibility of applying Illinois Solar for All (ILSFA) to the Bloomington Normal Water Reclamation District. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(1): 117-137. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021007 |
[3] | Jin H. Jo, Kadi Ilves, Tyler Barth, Ellen Leszczynski . Implementation of a large-scale solar photovoltaic system at a higher education institution in Illinois, USA. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(1): 54-62. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.1.54 |
[4] | Peter Majewski, Rong Deng, Pablo R Dias, Megan Jones . Product stewardship considerations for solar photovoltaic panels. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(1): 140-155. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023008 |
[5] | Rashmi Murali, Sangeeta Malhotra, Debajit Palit, Krishnapada Sasmal . Socio-technical assessment of solar photovoltaic systems implemented for rural electrification in selected villages of Sundarbans region of India. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 612-634. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.612 |
[6] | Jin H. Jo, Kadi Ilves, Tyler Barth, Ellen Leszczynski . Correction: Implementation of a large-scale solar photovoltaic system at a higher education institution in Illinois, USA. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(2): 313-315. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.2.313 |
[7] | Mohammed A. Alanazi, Zakariya Kaneesamkandi . Performance studies on PVT assisted solar drying of municipal solid waste for enhancement of heat generation during combustion. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(4): 922-937. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025034 |
[8] | Arben Gjukaj, Rexhep Shaqiri, Qamil Kabashi, Vezir Rexhepi . Renewable energy integration and distributed generation in Kosovo: Challenges and solutions for enhanced energy quality. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(3): 686-705. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024032 |
[9] | Virendra Sharma, Lata Gidwani . Recognition of disturbances in hybrid power system interfaced with battery energy storage system using combined features of Stockwell transform and Hilbert transform. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(5): 671-687. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.5.671 |
[10] | Abdulrahman Th. Mohammad, Amer Ibrahim Ismael . An equivalent photovoltaic solar system to solve the problems of electricity in Iraqi houses. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(5): 660-670. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.5.660 |
The Ligand Epitope Antigen Presentation System (LEAPS) is unique as a platform for developing T cell vaccines that convert a peptide containing single and multiple T cell epitopes into an immunogen and simultaneously directs the nature of the subsequent immune response [1,2] to either a Th1 or Th2/Treg directed response. LEAPS vaccines act as both antigen and adjuvant. We reviewed [3,4,5,6] and compared the LEAPS approach to other vaccine technologies and conjugates (including Ii-Key, PaDRe, SLP, TRL, as well as DNA vaccines) that promote T cell activation but LEAPS is unique in its ability to define the nature of the subsequent response without concurrent administration of a cytokine, its gene, or other response determining adjuvant. This review will focus on J-LEAPS vaccines because these vaccines elicit their response by promoting the maturation of precursors into dendritic cells that produce Interleukin (IL) IL12p70 and promote Th1 responses (DC1 cells) (see later). This review of J-LEAPS vaccines describes newer applications of the technology.
LEAPS vaccines have been developed and tested in animal models and elicit protection against lethal challenge with herpes simplex type 1 (HSV-1) [7,8] and influenza A [9] viruses, elicit relevant immune responses to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [10,11] and tuberculosis [1,2] prevent the establishment of tumors and the spread of HER-2/neu tumor cells [12] and stop the progression of autoimmune diseases such as experimental autoimmune myocarditis [13] and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [14,15,16]. Several of these vaccines are awaiting the opportunity to be tested in humans.
The antigenic peptides incorporated into LEAPS vaccines can be as small as 8 amino acids or as large as 32 amino acids but must contain at least one T cell epitope [9]. Peptides as small as 8 amino acids are usually poor or not immunogens but are effective in LEAPS vaccines. The peptides to be incorporated into a LEAPS vaccine are identified in the literature or through in silico predictions to contain T cell epitopes important for eliciting T cell associated protective or therapeutic responses and have chemical properties conducive to synthesis, stability and delivery. Attachment to either of two immune cell binding ligands (ICBL) (approximately 13 amino acids) through a triglycine linker [1,2,12] (Figure 1 and Table 1) creates the LEAPS vaccine and covalent attachment is required for activity. The J-ICBL is a peptide from the beta-2 microglobulin component of the MHC Ⅰ molecule (DLLKNGERIEKVE, aa 38–50) [17] and the G-ICBL is a peptide from the beta chain of the MHC Ⅱ molecule (NGQEEKAGVVSTGLI, aa 135–149) [18,19,20]. The DerG (DGQEEKAGVVSTGLI) ICBL is functional and preferred to the G-ICBL because it is more stable. These ICBLs were chosen because they interact with receptors on leukocytes and mutations within these peptide sequences or antibodies that bind to these sequences prevent the onset of immune responses. The ICBL itself is a poor immunogen and does not elicit an antibody response without conjugation to a large carrier such as keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The LEAPS vaccines are administered in an oil-in-water adjuvant emulsion for depot release. Most LEAPS vaccines have been tested with the Montanide ISA 51 adjuvant [7,14,21,22] but they have also been tested with MPL (Lipid A) and Novasomes [3]. Alum and similar adjuvants are not effective [10].
Peptide | Source | Sequence |
INFECTIOUS DISEASE VACCINES | ||
Herpes simplex virus type 1 | ||
H1 | ICP27 322–332 | LYRTFAGNPRA |
gB | Glycoprotein B 498–505 | SSIEFARL |
gD | Glycoprotein D 8–23 | SLKMADPNRFRGKDLP |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | ||
M | 38 kDa protein 350–369 | DQVHFQPLPPAVVKLSDAL |
HIV-1 | ||
H | HGP-30 p17 protein 85–115 | YSVHQRIDVKDTKEALEKIEEEQNKSKKKA |
mHGP30 | HGP-30 p17 protein 82–112 | ATLYSVHQRIDVKDTKEALEKIEEEQN |
Influenza | ||
M2e | M2 envelope protein 2–24 | SLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSD |
NP | Nucleoprotein 144–158 | NDATYQRTRALVRTG |
HA1 | Hemagglutinin 38–53 | LKSTQNAIDEITNKVN |
HA2 | Hemagglutinin 1–13 | GLFGAIAGFIEGG |
THERAPIES | ||
Breast Cancer | ||
HER | Rat HER-2/neu 66–74 | TYVPANASL |
Rheumatoid Arthritis | ||
CEL-2000 | Human Collagen type 2 254–273 | TGGKPGIAGFKGEQGPKGEP |
Myocarditis | ||
My-1 | Murine Cardiac Myosin 334–352 | DSAFDVLSFTAEEKAGVYK |
The G-and DerG-ICBLs are not the topic of this review and will be mentioned only briefly. The G and DerG-ICBL are structurally related peptides that interact with the CD4 molecule present on a major subclass of T cells but also on other cells, e.g. certain classes of monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and mast cells. The G-and DerG-ICBLs promote immunomodulatory regulatory CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ T cell (Treg) and Th2 type responses via CD4+ T cells and not DCs [14,15]. Konig and colleagues demonstrated that the G-peptide binds to CD4 and at high concentrations it inhibits T cell responses while at more physiological concentrations, the peptide enhances T cell responses through promoting changes in calcium flux and cyclic AMP levels [20]. Antibody production by G (or DerG)-LEAPS vaccines requires an antigenic boost with protein antigen and in the mouse this results in a secondary Th2 antibody response indicated by the presence of IgG1 and IgG3 but lack of IgM [1,2]. A DerG-LEAPS vaccine is therapeutic in a proteoglycan-induced mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [14,15].
The initial J-LEAPS vaccines incorporated a peptide from the 38 kDa protein of M. tuberculosis (peptide 350–369) [1,2]; a peptide from the p17 HGP-30 protein of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) [10,11] (peptide 85–115) or a region of the p41 envelope portion (peptide 603–620) of HIV [1]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that successful J-LEAPS vaccines contain a CD8 T cell epitope [9]. Providing a protein boost to mice following immunization with either of these vaccines produced a secondary immune response dominated by the IgG2a subtype. This indicated that the J-LEAPS vaccines elicit a primary Th1 focused response. Th1 responses are usually pro-inflammatory and activate macrophages for more effective antimicrobial activity towards intracellular microbes, activate T cells to produce more interferon gamma (IFNγ) to reinforce the response, and activate cytolytic CD8 T cells. In contrast, attachment of the same antigenic peptides to the G-ICBL or DerG-ICBL instead of the J-ICBL induced Th2 related antibody responses upon protein boost and Treg responses [1,2,14]. Hints towards the mechanism of action of the J-ICBL were obtained in studies performed with the JgD anti-HSV vaccine which incorporates peptide 8–23 from the herpes simplex virus Type 1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein D (gD) [4] and with the JH vaccine that incorporates peptide 85–115 from the HIV p17 protein [10,11]. Temporal antibody ablation studies showed that CD8 bearing cells are important to initiate the response to JgD and CD4-bearing cells, CD8 bearing cells and IFNγ were important for delivering protection from lethal challenge with HSV-1 [8]. In mice, CD8 is expressed on T cells but also on a dendritic cell type 1 (DC1) subset [22] which is especially adept at cross presentation of antigen and important for activating CD8 T cells. Treatment of immune-naive uninfected mice with JgD or JH caused the production and presence in serum of IL12p70 by the 4th day post immunization [22]. IL17 and IL12p70 were detectable in serum on the 10th day, followed by waning of IL17 and an increase in IFNγ on the 20th day after immunization. Interestingly, serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) did not increase in response to JgD treatment. IL12p70 is produced by DC1 cells, a subset of DCs that promote Th1 responses [23]. As described below, treatment of precursor cells from mouse bone marrow or human monocytes with JgD or JH promoted their maturation to become DC1s.
The proof of concept for J-LEAPS vaccines was obtained by demonstration of protection from lethal challenge with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) after immunization with antigen specific J-LEAPS vaccines. G-LEAPS vaccines either had no effect or exacerbated the infection as would be predicted following induction of a Th2 type of response. The initial study utilized a vaccine that incorporated an 11 amino acid CD8 T cell epitope from the intracellular viral protein ICP27 (JH1) [7]. Antibody production to this epitope or protein would not be protective. Vaccination of Balb/C mice elicited protection from lethal challenge with minimal morbidity and mortality and generated delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to the viral antigens but did not generate an antibody response either upon immunization or challenge by infectious virus. These studies indicated success of the JH1 vaccine and that a T cell response was elicited which was sufficient for protection. Similar protections were elicited towards the 8 amino acid major CD8 T cell epitope (SSIEFARL) from glycoprotein B (gB) of HSV-1 recognized by C57/BL6 mice [4]. Again, no antibody was produced prior to challenge by infectious virus. Heteroconjugates of the H1 or gB or gD peptides with the G-ICBL did not confer protective immunity [4,8].
The most in depth vaccine studies were performed with JgD [4,8,22]. As with the other anti-HSV vaccines, this vaccine elicited protection against morbidity and mortality. Antibody was only detected when there was minor breakthrough disease signs indicative of virus production which provided the requisite protein boost. Elicitation of protection was observed in multiple strains of mice including four different inbred and three different outbred strains [8].
The J-ICBL promotes interactions between the LEAPS vaccine and dendritic cell precursors and promotes their maturation into DC1s [22,24]. Treatment of mouse bone marrow cells with JgD or JH generated cells with the mature DC1 phenotype within 48 hours [22]. The conversion occurred whether the bone marrow cells were not pretreated or pretreated with GM-CSF alone or GM-CSF and IL4 according to standard protocols for generating DCs. Similarly, treatment of purified human monocytes obtained from peripheral blood with JgD or JH after pretreatment with GM-CSF plus IL4 or not, also generated DC1s with a similar phenotype to the mouse DC1s [24]. These cells are referred to as JgD-muDCs and JH-muDCs from the mouse and JgD-huDC and JH-huDC from humans. JH-DCs and JgD-DCs from human and mouse produced IL12p70 and DC1 related chemokines but unlike DC1s produced by other means, did not produce TNFα. The JgD-muDCs and JH-muDCs were able to induce the Th1 cytokines, IL2 and IFNγ, from na ve mouse spleen cells [22] and the JgD-huDCs and JH-huDCs were able to elicit these cytokines from human peripheral blood T cells [6,24]. In the converse of this experiment, a cytokine response (IL2 or IFNγ) was not elicited by T cells treated with JgD or JH for 48 hours followed by washing away free peptide prior to mixing with monocytes. Demonstration that JgD and JH elicit similar reactions in human and mouse dendritic cell precursors provides basis for developing J-LEAPS vaccines for humans.
The strongest proof that the JgD peptide promotes maturation of precursors to DC1s was obtained by the antigen specific protection from lethal HSV-1 challenge elicited after adoptive transfer of carefully washed, ex vivo generated JgD-muDCs into otherwise immuno-naive mice [22]. Mice receiving JgD-muDCs were protected whereas mice receiving JH-muDCs were not. Bone marrow cells treated with the J-LEAPS peptide for 48h were administered on two occasions 14 days apart and then one week later the mice received a lethal challenge with HSV-1. All the mice receiving JgD-muDCs survived with only very minor disease signs observed in 2 out of 7 mice. The antigen specificity of the response was demonstrated by the deaths of all mice receiving JH-muDCs, cells generated with the HIV vaccine.
In similar studies by Boonnak et al. [9], J-LEAPS muDCs, matured by J-LEAPS vaccines containing appropriate CTL protective influenza A epitopes, prevented morbidity and mortality when administered as a treatment after lethal challenge with influenza A. Bone marrow cells pre-incubated in GM-CSF were treated with J-LEAPS peptides that incorporated 15 to 30 amino acid—long peptides derived from influenza virus NP, M2e, or HA proteins. The treatment caused maturation of the cells to become DC1s. The NP and M2e peptides contained CD8 T cell epitopes while the HA peptide contained CD4 T and B cell epitopes. The mice that were treated with J-NP-muDCs, or J-M2e-muDCs or a mixture of DCs matured with all four of the influenza peptides (J-NP, J-M2e, J-HA1, J-HA2) as late as 48 h after lethal viral challenge maintained normal weight and viability whereas those receiving LEAPS-muDCs prepared with only the J-HA1, J-HA2 or the unrelated JH vaccine (vaccine for HIV) died within 9 days. Influenza virus replication and TNFα, IL6 and IL1α inflammatory cytokine levels in the lungs were reduced while IL12p70 and IFNγ levels were increased by the successful treatments indicating rapid modulation of the T cell cytokine response to infection. These studies confirmed the ability of J-LEAPS vaccines to promote the maturation of DC1s. Adoptive transfer of the J-LEAPS-DCs after virus challenge provided therapy for the on-going disease, limiting production and spread of the virus and providing antigen specific immunomodulation of the cytokine storm that exacerbates the disease. Unlike conventional immunization, as with the J-LEAPS peptides, the preformed and antigen presenting J-LEAPS-DCs were able to elicit the therapeutic response very quickly and rapidly enough to induce protections after influenza challenge to protect the animals from disease.
Therapeutic immune responses to tumors depend upon a strong CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response as part of a Th1 and Tc1 response [25] similar to those elicited by J-LEAPS vaccines. The CTLs driven by IL12 and Th1 and Tc1 responses are more sensitive to antigen than T cells induced by other responses [26,27,28,29] and IL12 promotes other responses that support anti-tumor activities [28,29]. As for the antiviral vaccines, anti-tumor vaccines can be designed by attaching a CTL epitope from a tumor antigen to the J-ICBL. Appropriate tumor antigens and epitopes from these antigens for inclusion in J-LEAPS vaccines can be obtained from studies described in the literature or from in silico analysis of tumor proteins.
As a proof of concept oncology study, a J-LEAPS vaccine for HER-2/neu breast cancer (J-HER) was designed and tested in a mouse model [12]. The HER-2/neu cell surface receptor is overexpressed in many breast cancer tumors and the tumor cells require the function of the protein [30,31]. CTL epitopes have been identified within HER-2/neu for mouse and human immune systems [32,33]. J-HER incorporates a prominent CTL eliciting minimal epitope (aa 66–74: TYVPANASL) for BALB/c mice [32,33]. The vaccine was administered as an emulsion with Montanide ISA-51 in an oil in water emulsion. The vaccine was tested in mice challenged with TUBO cells, a tumor cell line [34] originally obtained from a spontaneous mammary gland tumor that arose in genetically altered BALB/c mice that overexpress HER-2/neu.
When administered as a prophylactic vaccination before tumor challenge, J-HER protected against tumor development for at least 48 days. When administered after the tumor challenge, vaccination with J-HER made a large difference in the health and survival of the tumor bearing mice by controlling tumor spread even though the primary tumors continued to grow. The ability of the vaccine to elicit this type of therapeutic response suggests that a J-HER vaccine would be useful as a neoadjuvant therapy administered prior to surgery to initiate responses against tumor recurrence or metastasis. A HER-2/neu protein based dendritic cell vaccine has shown efficacy in this capacity [29,35].
The success of the J-HER pilot study indicates the potential of J-LEAPS tumor vaccines. J-LEAPS tumor vaccines can be prepared as minimal epitope peptides, tandem epitope peptides or mixtures of peptides. These vaccines can be readily synthesized to include different CD8 T cell tumor antigen epitopes. The J-LEAPS vaccines can be customized to contain several tumor antigen peptides to optimize tumor therapy or to personalize treatment for individuals with different HLA types. The J-LEAPS vaccines can be administered as peptides or as J-LEAPS DCs.
As stated by Palucka and Banchareau [26], the goal of cancer immunotherapy is to elicit tumor-specific CD8+ T cell mediated immune responses that will be sufficiently robust and long-lasting to generate durable tumor regression and/or eradication. They and others [36] utilize ex-vivo generated and antigen primed DCs for tumor therapy. Key to the success of these therapies is the proper maturation of precursors to become DC1s capable of activating the appropriate anti-tumor response and the choice of the optimal tumor antigen to be presented to the CD8 T cells [36]. Dendreon developed the first FDA approved anti-tumor Antigen Presenting Cell (APC) vaccine (sipuleucel-T) for prostate cancer [37]. Autologous peripheral-blood mononuclear cells from patients were treated with a conjugate of prostatic acid phosphatase and GM-CSF to promote maturation of cells and presentation of the tumor antigen upon re-infusion into the patient. The cells were then reinfused into the patient on three occasions. The sipuleucel-T generated APC cell population contained a mixture of cells including DCs but was not optimized for DC1s. Czerniecki et al. [29,35] and others [36] have focused their efforts on the use of antigen loaded DC1s as immunotherapy. This ensures treatment with the optimal antigen presenting cell expressing appropriate tumor antigens to elicit CD8 T cell responses.
DC1 cells capable of presenting relevant tumor antigenic epitopes can be designed using J-LEAPS peptides for use as autologous cell vaccines. Using the JgD-muLEAPS-DC and influenza-mu-LEAPS-DC as models, the tumor-peptide-LEAPS-DCs can be prepared within 48 hours of leukopheresis of the patient's monocytes (and probably less than 24 hours) and be ready to be infused as adoptive transfer therapy. Procedures could be developed for on-site maturation of the J-LEAPS-DCs allowing rapid generation of a customized autologous DC vaccine that delivers the appropriate antigen specific response.
Both J-LEAPS peptide and J-LEAPS-DC anti-tumor vaccines can readily be developed to customize the treatment of the cancer patient. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. Studies with the anti-viral J-LEAPS peptide vaccines indicate that DC1s are elicited in the body after immunization to mediate therapy but elicitation of a sufficient T cell response for therapy takes time. The J-LEAPS-DCs act quickly and can be injected into the draining lymph node of the tumor to focus the response but require extensive and expensive cell fractionation and tissue culture procedures prior to its use in treating the patient with concerns for the viability, sterility, means of delivery and function of the cells. Both approaches await further trials.
Th17 responses are a major driving force for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis as evidenced by the efficacy of therapeutic ablation of Th17 responses with antibodies to TNFα, IL17 or IL23 [38]. Unfortunately, these potent therapies compromise host protections provided by the Th17 response for tuberculosis and other infections. J-LEAPS vaccines offer a therapeutic option. The ability of LEAPS vaccines to promote the maturation of precursors into DC1s which promote a Th1 response defined by production of IFNγ but not TNFα and the ability of J-influenza-DCs to modulate the pathogenic inflammatory responses induced by influenza infection, suggest their use for immunomodulation of autoimmune diseases driven by Th17 proinflammatory responses. IFNγ inhibits Th17 responses [39]. Unlike the antibody ablation therapies, the LEAPS vaccine therapy would be focused on the antigen specific T cells that are promoting the disease rather than the entire cytokine driven immune response.
In a mouse model for experimental autoimmune myocarditis, treatment with a J-LEAPS vaccine incorporating an epitope from murine cardiac myosin (J-My1) prevented the development of the disease [13]. Similarly, the LEAPS vaccine, CEL-2000 (a conjugate composed of the J-ICBL and an immunodominant type Ⅱ collagen (CII) epitope) was therapeutic when administered after the onset of disease symptoms in the collagen induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis, a Th17 driven disease [16]. Treatment with CEL-2000 caused a reduction in serum levels of pro-inflammatory IL17, IL6 and TNFα while increasing IL12, IFNγ and IL10 levels. IL10 is a regulatory cytokine produced by regulatory T cells, B cells and even some Th1 cells [40].
Although useful for Th17 driven autoimmune responses, a J-LEAPS vaccine was not effective in a mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis driven by Th1 proinflammatory responses to proteoglycan [14]. Therapy was provided by a derG-LEAPS vaccine incorporating an epitope from proteoglycan. LEAPS vaccines provide a choice of appropriate immunomodulatory therapy once the cytokine nature of the inflammatory response driving autoimmune disease is known. A J-LEAPS vaccine is appropriate for Th17 proinflammatory autoimmune diseases whereas a derG-LEAPS vaccine would be appropriate for Th1 proinflammatory autoimmune diseases.
J-LEAPS vaccines and J-LEAPS-DCs provide the opportunity to custom design vaccines that elicit appropriate protective and therapeutic responses to disease related peptides. As demonstrated for influenza, J-LEAPS-DCs provide the additional advantage of initiating rapid, effective, protective therapeutic responses. All challenge studies with J-LEAPS vaccines to date have been limited to mice. However, both JgD and JH demonstrated their ability to induce responses in human cells that parallel those in mice by converting human monocytes into functional dendritic cells capable of inducing allotypic responses [25]. These studies showed the potential for application of J-LEAPS technology to human diseases.
A human J-LEAPS vaccine could consist of a single heteroconjugate peptide containing one or more epitopes or a mixture of J-LEAPS vaccine peptides. Customized or mixtures of vaccines can be developed to accommodate the heterogeneity in human histocompatibility molecules and disease related antigens. Many of the protective antigenic peptide sequences for intracellular microbial and viral infections and tumors are already known and J-LEAPS peptides can be readily synthesized under GMP conditions to produce vaccines for these diseases. For autoimmune diseases, J-LEAPS therapeutic vaccines can be utilized after the patient's disease is demonstrated to be driven by Th17 responses. In vitro assays to test these elements were developed for mouse spleen cells [14] but can be readily adapted to use for a human patient's peripheral blood cells to provide the potential for personalized medicine.
Despite great potential, funding limitations have precluded the jump to clinical trials for J-LEAPS vaccines. Studies are about to be initiated on a DerG-LEAPS vaccine for RA (CEL-4000) [14] to prepare this vaccine for first in man testing.
The J-LEAPS vaccine platform provides the means to custom design peptide vaccines that promote the maturation of dendritic cells to deliver interferon gamma driven CD8 T cell responses. The resultant immune responses are sufficient to elicit protections against lethal herpes simplex virus and likely other viral and intracellular infections, cytolytic therapy for cancer and immunomodulatory therapy for Th17 driven autoimmune diseases. Ex-vivo derived DC1s can be prepared with the J-LEAPS vaccine peptides to provide a more rapid acting and focused response. In addition to prophylaxis, the J-LEAPS peptide and J-LEAPS-DC vaccines provide therapy by promoting appropriate anti-tumor responses and immunomodulation of pathogenic inflammatory responses. The J-LEAPS vaccines interact with human dendritic cell precursors and promote similar responses with human cells as with mouse cells suggesting the efficacy of J-LEAPS vaccines in humans. The J-LEAPS vaccines can be customized to include appropriate epitopes, exclude inhibitory or regulatory epitopes, and to accommodate different MHC backgrounds. In addition, mixtures of peptides can be used to prepare J-LEAPS vaccines which can be used to optimize or expand their spectrum and efficacy.
All the studies presented in this review have been published and funding sources acknowledged in those publications. We would like to thank our collaborators for their contributions to the development of the J-LEAPS technology.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] | Thuijl E, Van Roos C, Beurskens L (2003) An overview of biofuel technologiesmarkets and policies in Europe,1–64. |
[2] | ExxonMobil (2016) The Outlook for energy: a view to 2040, 1–16. |
[3] |
Naqvi M, Yan J, Dahlquist E (2010) Black liquor gasification integrated in pulp and paper mills: A critical review. Bioresource Technol 101: 8001–8015. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.013
![]() |
[4] | Field CB, Campbell JE, Lobell DB (2008) Biomass energy: The scale of the potential resource. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 761–767. |
[5] |
Demirbaş A (2005) Estimating of structural composition of wood and non-wood biomass samples. Energ Source 27: 761–767. doi: 10.1080/00908310490450971
![]() |
[6] | Kappejan J, Loo S, (2008) Biomass fuel properties and basic principles of biomass combustion, In: The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-Firing, 2nd ed., Earthscan: London, UK, 1: 7–34. |
[7] |
Kang S, Li X, Fan J, et al. (2012) Solid fuel production by hydrothermal carbonization of black liquor. Bioresource Technol 110: 715–718. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.093
![]() |
[8] |
9. Joelsson JM, Gustavsson L (200 CO2 emission and oil use reduction through black liquor gasification and energy efficiency in pulp and paper industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 52: 747–763. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.11.002
![]() |
[9] |
10. Marklund M, Tegman R, Gebart R (2007) CFD modelling of black liquor gasification: Identification of important model parameters. Fuel 86: 18–1926. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.015
![]() |
[10] | 11. Ramesh S, Chaurasia S, Mahalingam H, et al. (2013) Kinetics of Devolatilization of Black Liquor Droplets in Chemical Recovery Boilers-Pyrolysis of Dry Black Liquor Solids. Int J Chem Eng Appl 4: 1–5. |
[11] |
12. Ksibi M (2003) Photodegradation of lignin from black liquor using a UV/TiO2 system. J Photochem Photobiol A 154: 2218. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00316-7
![]() |
[12] |
13. Huet M, Roubaud A, Chirat C, et al. (2016) Hydrothermal treatment of black liquor for energy and phenolic platform molecules recovery in a pulp mill. Biomass Bioenerg 89: 105–1 doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.023
![]() |
[13] | 14. Adams TN, Frederick WJ, Grace TM, et al. (1997) Kraft Recovery Boilers. Tappi Press, Atlanta. |
[14] | 15. Area MC, Fernando FE, Venica A, et al. (1998) NSSC Process Optimization: I. Pulps Quality. Pulping Conference, Proceedings of the Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry, 2: 671–81. |
[15] | 16. Andelin J, Robert W, Niblock JWC (1989) The Pulp and Paper Making Process. Technologies for Reducing Dioxin in the Manufacture of Bleached Wood Pulp. |
[16] | 17. Bajpai P (2014) Emissions from pulping, In: Biological Odour Treatment, Springer Briefs in Environmental Science, 9–17. |
[17] |
18. Gierer J (1980) Chemical Aspects of Kraft Pulping. Wood Sci Technol 14: 241–266. doi: 10.1007/BF00383453
![]() |
[18] | 19. Patt R, Kordsachia O, Süttinger R, et al. (2005) Paper and Pulp. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a545. |
[19] | 20. Andelin J, Niblock R, Curlin J (9) The pulp and paper making process, In: Technologies for Reducing Dioxin in the Manufacture of Bleached Wood Pulp. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC, USA, 17–25. |
[20] | 21. Christopher B (1996) Handbook of Pulping and Papermaking. Second. California, United states of America: Academic Press, An imprint of Elsevier. |
[21] | 22. Lora J (2008) Monomers, Polymers and Composites from Renewable Resources: Industrial Commercial Lignins: Sources, Properties and Application, 225. |
[22] | 23. Patt R, Kordsachia O, Suttinger R (2011) Pulp, In: Ullmann's Encyclopedia of In-dustrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2011, 487–491. |
[23] | 24. Klett AS (2017) Purification, Fractionation, and Characterization of Lignin from Kraft Black Liquor for Use as a Renewable Biomaterial. Clemson University. |
[24] |
25. Ninawe S, Kuhad RC (2006) Bleaching of wheat straw-rich soda pulp with xylanase from a thermoalkalophilic Streptomyces cyaneus SN32. Bioresource Technol 97: 2291–2295. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.035
![]() |
[25] |
26. González-García S, Moreira MT, Artal G, et al. (2010) Environmental impact assessment of non-wood-based pulp production by soda-anthraquinone pulping process. J Cleaner Prod 18: 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.008
![]() |
[26] |
27. Gratzl JS, Chen CL (1999) Chemistry of Pulping: Lignin Reactions. ACS Symp 742: 392–421. doi: 10.1021/bk-2000-0742.ch020
![]() |
[27] | 28. Von Koeppen A (1986) Chemimechanical Pulps from Hardwood Using the NSSC [Neutral Sulfite Semichemical] Process. Paper Trade J 170: 49–51. |
[28] | 29. Farrington A, Hickey BL (1989) Wood sources for the Port Huon Mill: NSSC pulping of some young eucalypt species. Appita J 42: 419–423. |
[29] | 30. Phillips FH, Logan AF, Balodis V, et al. (1991) Studies on pulpwood resources in southern tasmania. 2. Kraft-AQ, soda-AQ, and NSSC pulps. Appita J 44: 173–178. |
[30] |
31. Cardoso M, de Oliveira ÉD, Passos ML (2009) Chemical composition and physical properties of black liquors and their effects on liquor recovery operation in Brazilian pulp mills. Fuel 88: 756–763. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.10.016
![]() |
[31] |
32. Demirbas A (2002) Pyrolysis and steam gasification processes of black liquor. Energ Convers Manage 43: 877–884. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00087-5
![]() |
[32] |
33. Al-Kaabi Z, Pradhan RR, Thevathasan N, et al. (2017) Potential Value Added Applications of Black Liquor Generated at Paper Manufacturing Industry Using Recycled Fibers. J Cleaner Prod 149: 156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.074
![]() |
[33] | 34. Dickinson JA, Verrill CL, Kitto JB (1998) Development and Evaluation of a Low Temperature Gasification Process for Chemical Recovery from Kraft Black Liquor, In: International Chemical Recovery Conference, 1–17. |
[34] |
35. Gea G, Murillo MB, Arauzo J (2002) Thermal degradation of alkaline black liquor from straw. Thermogravimetric Study. Ind Eng Chem Res 41: 4714–4721. doi: 10.1021/ie020283z
![]() |
[35] | 36. Song X, Bie R, Ji X, et al. (2015) Kinetics of reed black liquor (RBL) pyrolysis from thermogravimetric data. Bio-Resources 10: 137–144. |
[36] |
37. Li J, Heiningen ARPV (1990) Kinetics of carbon dioxide gasification of fast pyrolysis black liquor char. Ind Eng Chem Res 29: 1776–1785. doi: 10.1021/ie00105a007
![]() |
[37] |
38. Bhattacharya PK, Parthiban V, Kunzru D (1986) Pyrolysis of Black Liquor Solids. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 25: 420–426. doi: 10.1021/i200033a012
![]() |
[38] |
39. Cao C, Guo L, Chen Y, et al. (2011) Hydrogen production by supercritical water gasification of alkaline wheat straw pulping black liquor in continuous flow system. Int J Hydrogen Energ 36: 13528–13535. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.101
![]() |
[39] |
40. Peng C, Zhang G, Yue J, et al. (2014) Pyrolysis of black liquor for phenols and impact of its inherent alkali. Fuel Process Technol 127: 149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.06.020
![]() |
[40] | 41. Lu N, Yang G, Chen J, et al. (2017) Producing Hydrochar from Cotton Linter Black Liquor. Bio-Resources 12: 3666–3676. |
[41] | 42. Sánchez JL, Gonzalo A, Gea G, et al. (2005) Straw black liquor steam reforming in a fluidized bed reactor. Effect of temperature and bed substitution at pilot scale. Energ Fuel 19: 2140–2147. |
[42] |
43. Zhao Y, Bie R, Lu J, et al. (2010) Kinetic study of NSSC black liquor combustion using different kinetic models. Energ Source 32: 962–969. doi: 10.1080/15567030802578815
![]() |
[43] |
44. Sricharoenchaikul V (2009) Assessment of black liquor gasification in supercritical water. Bioresource Technol 100: 638–6 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.011
![]() |
[44] |
45. Arkell A, Olsson J, Wallberg O (2014) Process performance in lignin separation from softwood black liquor by membrane filtration. Chem Eng Res Des 92: 1792–1800. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.12.018
![]() |
[45] |
46. Haddad M, Bazinet L, Savadogo O, et al. (2017) A feasibility study of a novel electro-membrane-based process to acidify Kraft black liquor and extract lignin. Process Saf Environ 106: 68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.10.003
![]() |
[46] |
47. Zhao XY, Cao JP, Sato K, et al. (2010) High Surface Area Activated Carbon Prepared from Black Liquor in the Presence of High Alkali Metal Content. J Chem Eng Jap 43: 1029–1034. doi: 10.1252/jcej.10we170
![]() |
[47] |
48. Cao C, Guo L, Jin H, et al. (2017) System analysis of pulping process coupled with supercritical water gasification of black liquor for combined hydrogen, heat and power production. Energy 132: 238–2 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.104
![]() |
[48] | 49. Rasanen O, Alajarvi T (1990) Evaporation to ultra- high solids: Benefits and possibilities :1990 Kraft Recovery Operations Short Course Notes. TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 95–104. |
[49] | 50. Reza Fakhrai (2002) Black Liquor Combustion in Kraft Recovery Boilers-Numerical Modelling. Royal Institute of Technology. |
[50] | 51. Hupa M, Solin P, Hyoty P (1987) Combustion Behaviour of Black Liquor Droplets. J Pulp Pap Sci 13: 67–72. |
[51] |
52. Gellerstedt G (2015) Softwood kraft lignin: Raw material for the future. Ind Crop Prod 77: 845–854. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.040
![]() |
[52] | 53. Tran H, Vakkilainnen EK (2012) The Kraft Chemical Recovery Process. TAPPI Kraft Recovery Course. TAPPI Press, 1–8. |
[53] |
54. Gosselink RJ, Abächerli A, Semke H, et al. (2004) Analytical protocols for characterisation of sulphur-free lignin. Ind Crop Prod 19: 271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.008
![]() |
[54] |
55. Santos PSBD, Erdocia X, Gatto DA, et al. (2014) Characterisation of Kraft lignin separated by gradient acid precipitation. Ind Crop Prod 55: 149–1 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.01.023
![]() |
[55] | 56. Wessel R, Baxter L (2003) Comprehensive model of alkali-salt deposition in recovery boilers. Tappi J 2: 19–24. |
[56] | 57. Larson ED, Consonni S, Katofsky RE, et al. (2006) A Cost-Benefit Assessment of Gasification-Based Biorefining in the Kraft Pulp and Paper Industry. Oper Res Decisions 1: 17–28. |
[57] | 58. Nie ANS (2008) Characterization of Recovered Black Liquor and Isolated Lignin from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Soda Pulping. M.S. Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia. |
[58] |
59. Yaman S (2004) Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energ Convers Manage 45: 651–671. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00177-8
![]() |
[59] |
60. Fletcher TH, Pond HR, Webster J, et al. (2012) Prediction of tar and light gas during pyrolysis of black liquor and biomass. Energ Fuel 26: 3381–3387. doi: 10.1021/ef300574n
![]() |
[60] | 61. Rojith G, Singh B (2012) Lignin recovery, biochar production and decolourisation of coir pith black liquor. Res J Recent Sci 1: 270–274. |
[61] |
62. Demirbaş A (2002) Utilization of urban and pulping wastes to produce synthetic fuel via pyrolysis. Energ Source 24: 205–213. doi: 10.1080/009083102317243593
![]() |
[62] |
63. Song XF, Ji XY, Bie HP, et al. (2015) Characteristics of gas and char generation study from reed black liquor particles (RBLP) pyrolysis in fluidized bed. Fuel 159: 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.061
![]() |
[63] |
64. Kruse A, Funke A, Titirici MM (2013) Hydrothermal conversion of biomass to fuels and energetic materials. Curr Opin Chem Biol 17: 515–521. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.05.004
![]() |
[64] |
65. Falco C, Baccile N, Titirici MM (2011) Morphological and structural differences between glucose, cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass derived hydrothermal carbons. Green Chem 13: 3273–3281. doi: 10.1039/c1gc15742f
![]() |
[65] |
66. Kruse A, Badoux F, Grandl R, et al. (2012) Hydrothermale Karbonisierung: 2. Kinetik der Biertreber-Umwandlung. Chem-Ing-Tech 84: 509–512. doi: 10.1002/cite.201100168
![]() |
[66] |
67. Möller M, Nilges P, Harnisch F, et al. (2011) Subcritical water as reaction environment: Fundamentals of hydrothermal biomass transformation. Chemsuschem 4: 5579. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201000341
![]() |
[67] |
68. Berge ND, Ro KS, Mao J, et al. (2011) Hydrothermal Carbonization of Municipal Waste Streams. Environ Sci Technol 45: 5696–5703. doi: 10.1021/es2004528
![]() |
[68] | 69. Dinjus E, Kruse A, Tröger N (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization-1. Influence of lignin in lignocelluloses. Chem Eng Technol 34: 2037–2043. |
[69] |
70. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) Comparative evaluation of torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of solid biofuel. Energ Convers Manage 105: 746–755. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.031
![]() |
[70] |
71. Yang G (2015) A Fast Approach for Preparation of Adsorbent from Reed Black Liquor and Its Performance in Equilibrium and Kinetic Gas Separation. Chem Biochem Eng Q 29: 375–383. doi: 10.15255/CABEQ.2013.1856
![]() |
[71] |
72. Gamgoum R, Dutta A, Santos R, et al. (2016) Hydrothermal Conversion of Neutral Sulfite Semi-Chemical Red Liquor into Hydrochar. Energies 9: 435. doi: 10.3390/en9060435
![]() |
[72] |
73. Naqvi M, Yan J, Dahlquist E (2012) Bio-refinery system in a pulp mill for methanol production with comparison of pressurized black liquor gasification and dry gasification using direct causticization. Appl Energ 90: 24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.074
![]() |
[73] |
74. Salmenoja K (1993) Black-Liquor Gasification: Theoretical and Experimental Studie. Bioresource Technol 46: 167–171. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(93)90069-N
![]() |
[74] |
75. Whitty K, Backman R, Hupa M (2008) Influence of pressure on pyrolysis of black liquor: 1. Swelling. Bioresource Technol 99: 663–670. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.065
![]() |
[75] | 76. Whitty K, Kullberg M, Sorvari V, et al. (2008) Influence of pressure on pyrolysis of black liquor: 2. Char yields and component release. Bioresource Technol 99: 671–679. |
[76] |
77. Rönnlund I, Myréen L, Lundqvist K, et al. (2011) Waste to energy by industrially integrated supercritical water gasification-effects of alkali salts in residual by-products from the pulp and paper industry. Energy 36: 2151–2163. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.027
![]() |
[77] | 78. Boucard H (2014) Contributions to the understanding of hydrothermal processes: Application to black liquor. Tohoku University. |
[78] | 79. Nong G, Wang S, Mu J, et al. (2012) Kinetics of Reaction between Dimethyl Sulfide and Hydrogen in Black Liquor Gasification Gas with ZnO Catalyst. Asian J Chem 24: 3118–3122. |
[79] |
80. Naqvi M, Yan J, Dahlquist E (2013) System analysis of dry black liquor gasification based synthetic gas production comparing oxygen and air blown gasification systems. Appl Energ 112: 1275–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.065
![]() |
[80] |
81. Häggström C, Öhrman O, Rownaghi AA, et al (2012) Catalytic methanol synthesis via black liquor gasification. Fuel Process Technol 94: 10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.09.019
![]() |
[81] | 82. Wiinikka H, Carlsson P, Marklund M, et al. (2012) Experimental investigation of an industrial scale black liquor gasifier. Part 2: Influence of quench operation on product gas composition. Fuel 93: 117–129. |
[82] |
83. Silva EAB, da Zabkova M, Araújo JD, et al. (2009) An integrated process to produce vanillin and lignin-based polyurethanes from Kraft lignin. Chem Eng Res Des 87: 1276–1292. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2009.05.008
![]() |
[83] | 84. Bajpai P (2013) Biorefinery in the Pulp and Paper Industry. 1st Editio. ed. Academic Press, London, UK. |
[84] | 85. Fatehi P, Chen J (2016) Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges and Opportunities, In: Production of Biofuels and Chemicals from Lignin, 35–54. |
[85] | 86. Lake MA, Blackburn JC (2014) SlrpTM an Innovative Lignin-Recovery Technology. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology. Cellulose Chem Technol 48: 799–804. |
[86] |
87. Mussatto SI, Fernandes M, Roberto IC (2007) Lignin recovery from brewer's spent grain black liquor. Carbohyd Polym 70: 218–223. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.03.021
![]() |
[87] | 88. Kouisni L, Holt-Hindle P, Maki K (2012) The LignoForce System: A new process for the production of high-quality lignin from black liquor. J Sci Technol Forest Prod Processes 2: 6–10. |
[88] | 89. Tomani P (2010) The lignoboost process. Cellul Chem Technol 44: 53–58. |
[89] |
90. Lourençon TV, Hansel FA, Silva TAD, et al. (2015) Hardwood and softwood kraft lignins fractionation by simple sequential acid precipitation. Sep Purif Technol 154: 82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.015
![]() |
[90] | 91. Durruty J (2017) On the Local Filtration Properties of LignoBoost Lignin, Studies of the influence of xylan and ionic strength. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. |
[91] |
92. Kong F, Wang S, Fatehi, P, et al. (2015) Water soluble kraft lignin-acrylic acid copolymer: Synthesis and characterization. Green Chem 17: 4355–4366. doi: 10.1039/C5GC00228A
![]() |
[92] | 93. Lake MA, Blackburn JC (2016) Process for recovering lignin. U.S. Patent, 0464. |
[93] | 94. Velez J, Thies MC (2013) Solvated liquid-lignin fractions from a Kraft black liquor. Bioresource Technol 20: 586. |
[94] | 95. Smook GA (2002) Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologies, 3rd ed. Angus Wilde Publications, Inc., Vancover, BC. |
[95] |
96. Koljonen K, Österberg M, Kleen M, et al. (2004) Precipitation of lignin and extractives on kraft pulp: Effect on surface chemistry, surface morphology and paper strength. Cellulose 11: 209–224. doi: 10.1023/B:CELL.0000025424.90845.c3
![]() |
[96] |
97. Doherty WOS, Mousavioun P, Fellows CM (2011) Value-adding to cellulosic ethanol: Lignin polymers. Ind Crop Prod 33: 259–276. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.022
![]() |
[97] |
98. Schorr D, Diouf PN, Stevanovic T (2014) Evaluation of industrial lignins for biocomposites production. Ind Crop Prod 52: 65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.10.014
![]() |
[98] |
99. EI Mansouri NE, Salvadó J (2006) Structural characterization of technical lignins for the production of adhesives: Application to lignosulfonate, kraft, soda-anthraquinone, organosolv and ethanol process lignins. Ind Crop Prod 24: 8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2005.10.002
![]() |
[99] |
100. Lange H, Decina S, Crestini C (2013) Oxidative upgrade of lignin-recent routes reviewed. Eur Polym J 49: 1151–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.03.002
![]() |
[100] | 101. Kambo H (2014) Energy Densification of Lignocellulosic Biomass via Hydrothermal Carbonization and Torrefaction. University of Guelph. |
[101] |
102. Adachi S, Tanimoto M, Tanaka M, et al. (1992) Kinetics of the alkaline nitrobenzene oxidation of lignin in rice straw. Chem Eng J 49: B17–B21. doi: 10.1016/0300-9467(92)80047-E
![]() |
[102] | 103. Higuchi T, Kirk K, Higuchi T, et al. (1980) Lignin structure and morphological distribution in plant cell wall, In: Lignin Biodegradation: Microbiology, Chemistry, and Potential Applications, (eds) CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1–20. |
[103] |
104. Cordero T, Rodriguez J (1993) Activated Carbons from CO2 Partial Gasification of Eucalyptus Kraft Lignin. Energ Fuel 7: 133–138. doi: 10.1021/ef00037a021
![]() |
[104] |
105. Fierro V, Torné-Fernández V, Celzard A (2006) Kraft lignin as a precursor for microporous activated carbons prepared by impregnation with ortho-phosphoric acid: Synthesis and textural characterisation. Micropor Mesopor Mat 92: 243–250. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.01.013
![]() |
[105] |
106. Rodriguez-Mirasol J, Cordero T, Rodriguez J (1993) Preparation and Characterisation of Activated Carbons from Eucalyptus Kraft Lignin. Carbon 31: 87–95. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(93)90160-C
![]() |
[106] | 107. Dieste A, Clavijo L, Torres AI, et al. (2016) Lignin from Eucalyptus spp. kraft black liquor as biofuel. Energ Fuel 30: 10494–10498. |
[107] |
108. Gustafsson Å, Hale S, Cornelissen G, et al. (2017) Activated carbon from kraft lignin: A sorbent for in situ remediation of contaminated sediments. Environ Technol Innovat 7: 160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2016.11.001
![]() |
[108] |
109. Jääskeläinen S, Liitiä T, Mikkelson A, et al. (2017) Aqueous organic solvent fractionation as means to improve lignin homogeneity and purity. Ind Crop Prod 103: 51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.039
![]() |
[109] |
110. Laurichesse L, Averous S (2014) Chemical modification of lignins: Towards biobased polymers. Prog Polym Sci 39: 1266–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.11.004
![]() |
[110] | 111. Hodásová L, Jablonsky M, Skulcova A (2015) Lignin, potential products and their market value. Wood Res 60: 973–986. |
[111] | 112. Li T, Takkellapati S (2018) The current and emerging sources of technical lignins and their applications. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin, 1–32. |
[112] |
113. Chen Z, Wan C (2017) Biological valorization strategies for converting lignin into fuels and chemicals. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73: 610–621. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.166
![]() |
[113] | 114. Jablonsky M, Kočiš J, Haz A, et al. (2014) The approach the isolation of lignins and its characterization. Power Engineering 2014. Renewable Energy Sources 2014, In: Proceedings of 5th International scientific conference OZE 2014, Bratislava, 27–32. |
[114] |
115. Thielemans W, Wool P (2005) Lignin esters for use in unsaturated thermosets: Lignin modification and solubility modelling. Biomacromolecules 6: 1895–1905. doi: 10.1021/bm0500345
![]() |
[115] |
116. Ahvazi B, Wojciechowicz O, Ton-That M, et al. (2011) Preparation of lignopolyols from wheat straw soda lignin. J Agric Food Chem 59: 10505–10516. doi: 10.1021/jf202452m
![]() |
[116] |
117. Bouajila J, Dole P, Joly C, et al. (2006) Some laws of a lignin plasticization. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 1445–1451. doi: 10.1002/app.24299
![]() |
[117] |
118. Alekhina M, Ershova O, Ebert A, et al. (2015) Softwood kraft lignin for value-added applications: Fractionation and structural characterization. Ind Crop Prod 66: 220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.021
![]() |
[118] |
119. Xu C, Arancon D, Labidi J, et al. (2014) Lignin depolymerisation strategies: Towards valuable chemicals and fuels. Chem Soc Rev 43: 7485–7500. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00235K
![]() |
[119] | 120. Heiningen AV (2006) Converting a kraft pulp mill into an integrated forest biorefinery. Pulp Pap Can 107: 38–43. |
[120] |
121. Fitzpatrick M, Champagne P, Cunningham M, et al. (2010) A biorefinery processing perspective: Treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products. Bioresource Technol 101: 8915–8922. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.125
![]() |
[121] |
122. Wahyudiono, Sasaki M, Goto M (2011) Thermal decomposition of guaiacol in sub- and supercritical water and its kinetic analysis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 13: 68–79. doi: 10.1007/s10163-010-0309-6
![]() |
[122] | 123 Ragauskas A, Beckham G, Biddy M, et al. (2014) Lignin valorization: Improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 344: 1246843. |
[123] |
124. Montané D, Torné-Fernández V, Fierro V (2005) Activated carbons from lignin: Kinetic modeling of the pyrolysis of Kraft lignin activated with phosphoric acid. Chem Eng J 106: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2004.11.001
![]() |
[124] |
125. Duval A, Lawoko M (2014) A review on lignin-based polymeric, micro- and nano-structured materials. React Funct Polym 85: 78–96. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.017
![]() |
[125] |
126. Azadi P, Inderwildi R, Farnood R, et al. (2013) Liquid fuels, hydrogen and chemicals from lignin: A critical review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21: 506–523. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.022
![]() |
[126] |
127. Kleinert M, Barth T (2008) Towards a lignincellulosic biorefinery: Direct one-step conversion of lignin to hydrogen-enriched biofuel. Energ Fuel 22: 1371–1379. doi: 10.1021/ef700631w
![]() |
[127] |
128. Kim D, Lee K, Park Y (2016) Upgrading the characteristics of biochar from cellulose, lignin, and xylan for solid biofuel production from biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. J Ind Eng Chem 42: 95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.037
![]() |
[128] |
129. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, et al. (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86: 1781–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013
![]() |
[129] |
130. Franco MAED, Carvalho CBD, Bonetto MM, et al. (2018) Diclofenac removal from water by adsorption using activated carbon in batch mode and fixed-bed column: Isotherms, thermodynamic study and breakthrough curves modeling. J Cleaner Prod 181: 145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.138
![]() |
[130] |
131. De Franco E, de Carvalho B, Bonetto M, et al. (2017) Removal of amoxicillin from water by adsorption onto activated carbon in batch process and fixed bed column: Kinetics, isotherms, experimental design and breakthrough curves modelling. J Cleaner Prod 161: 947–956. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.197
![]() |
[131] |
132. Pollard T, Fowler D, Sollars J, et al. (1992) Low-cost adsorbents for waste and wastewater treatment: A review. Sci Total Environ 116: 31–52. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(92)90363-W
![]() |
[132] |
133. Fu K, Yue Q, Gao B, et al. (2013) Preparation, Characterization and Application of lignin-based activated carbon from black liquor lignin by steam activation. Chem Eng J 228: 1074–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.028
![]() |
[133] | 134. Ntuli V, Hapazari I (2013) Sustainable waste management by production of activated carbon from agroforestry residues. S Afr J Sci 109: 1–6. |
[134] |
135. Ahmedna M, Marshall W, Rao R (2000) Production of granular activated carbons from select agricultural by-products and evaluation of their physical, chemical and adsorption properties1Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station manuscript 99-21-0066.1. Bioresource Technol 71: 113–123. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00070-X
![]() |
[135] |
136. Cotoruelo M, Marqués D, Díaz J, et al. (2012) Adsorbent ability of lignin-based activated carbons for the removal of p-nitrophenol from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 184: 176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.026
![]() |
[136] |
137. Gonzalez-Serrano E, Cordero T, Rodriguez-Mirasol J, et al. (1997) Development of porosity upon chemical activation of kraft lignin with ZnCl2. Ind Eng Chem Res 36: 4832–4838. doi: 10.1021/ie970261q
![]() |
[137] |
138. Gonzalez-Serrano E, Cordero T, Rodriguez-Mirasol J, et al. (2004) Removal of water pollutants with activated carbons prepared from H 3PO4 activation of lignin from kraft black liquors. Water Res 38: 3043–3050. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.048
![]() |
[138] | 139. Fierro V, Torne V, Montane´ D, et al. (2003) Activated carbons prepared from kraft lignin by phosphoric acid impregnation. In: Proc. Carbon 2003, Oviedo, Spain. |
[139] |
140. Rodrı´guez-Miraso J, Cordero T, Rodrı´guez J (1993) Activated carbons from CO2 partial gasification of eucalyptus kraft lignin. Energ Fuel 7: 133–138. doi: 10.1021/ef00037a021
![]() |
[140] |
141. Gao Y, Yue Q, Gao B, et al. (2013) Preparation of high surface area-activated carbon from lignin of papermaking black liquor by KOH activation for Ni(II) adsorption. Chem Eng J 217: 345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.038
![]() |
[141] | 142. Smolarski N (2012) High-value opportunities for lignin: Unlocking its potential. Frost and Sullivan, Paris, 1–15. |
[142] |
143. Niemi H, Lahti J, Hatakka H, et al. (2011) Fractionation of organic and inorganic compounds from black liquor by combining membrane separation and crystallization. Chem Eng Technol 34: 593–598. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201000520
![]() |
[143] |
144. Gosselink A, Snijder B, Kranenbarg A, et al. (2004) Characterisation and application of NovaFiber lignin. Ind Crop Prod 20: 191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.021
![]() |
[144] |
145. Zhu Z, Sun M, Su C, et al. (2013) One-pot quantitative hydrolysis of lignocelluloses mediated by black liquor. Bioresource Technol 128: 229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.072
![]() |
[145] | 146. Gosselink RJA, Dam JGEV, Jong ED, et al. (2010) Fractionation, analysis, and PCA modeling of properties of four technical lignins for prediction of their application potential in binders. Holzforschung 64: 193–200. |
[146] |
147. Nadji H, Diouf N, Benaboura A, et al. (2009) Comparative study of lignins isolated from Alfa grass (Stipa tenacissima L.). Bioresource Technol 100: 3585–3592. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.074
![]() |
[147] |
148. Tejado A, Peña C, Labidi J (2007) Physico-chemical characterization of lignins from different sources for use in phenol-formaldehyde resin synthesis. Bioresource Technol 98: 1655–1663. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.042
![]() |
[148] |
149. Hellstén S, Lahti J, Heinonen J, et al. (2013) Purification process for recovering hydroxy acids from soda black liquor. Chem Eng Res Des 91: 2765–2774. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.06.001
![]() |
[149] |
150. Faustino H, Gil N, Baptista C, et al. (2010) Antioxidant activity of lignin phenolic compounds extracted from kraft and sulphite black liquors. Molecules 15: 9308–9322. doi: 10.3390/molecules15129308
![]() |
[150] |
151. Mänttäri M, Lahti J, Hatakka H, et al. (2015) Separation phenomena in UF and NF in the recovery of organic acids from kraft black liquor. J Membrane Sci 490: 84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.048
![]() |
[151] |
152. Kumar H, Alén R (2015) Recovery of aliphatic low-molecular-mass carboxylic acids from hardwood kraft black liquor. Sep Purif Technol 142: 293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.038
![]() |
[152] | 153. Ponomarenko J, Dizhbite T, Lauberts M, et al. (2014) Characterization of Softwood and Hardwood Lignoboost Kraft Lignins with Emphasis on their Antioxidant Activity. Bio-Resources 9: 2051–2068. |
Peptide | Source | Sequence |
INFECTIOUS DISEASE VACCINES | ||
Herpes simplex virus type 1 | ||
H1 | ICP27 322–332 | LYRTFAGNPRA |
gB | Glycoprotein B 498–505 | SSIEFARL |
gD | Glycoprotein D 8–23 | SLKMADPNRFRGKDLP |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | ||
M | 38 kDa protein 350–369 | DQVHFQPLPPAVVKLSDAL |
HIV-1 | ||
H | HGP-30 p17 protein 85–115 | YSVHQRIDVKDTKEALEKIEEEQNKSKKKA |
mHGP30 | HGP-30 p17 protein 82–112 | ATLYSVHQRIDVKDTKEALEKIEEEQN |
Influenza | ||
M2e | M2 envelope protein 2–24 | SLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSD |
NP | Nucleoprotein 144–158 | NDATYQRTRALVRTG |
HA1 | Hemagglutinin 38–53 | LKSTQNAIDEITNKVN |
HA2 | Hemagglutinin 1–13 | GLFGAIAGFIEGG |
THERAPIES | ||
Breast Cancer | ||
HER | Rat HER-2/neu 66–74 | TYVPANASL |
Rheumatoid Arthritis | ||
CEL-2000 | Human Collagen type 2 254–273 | TGGKPGIAGFKGEQGPKGEP |
Myocarditis | ||
My-1 | Murine Cardiac Myosin 334–352 | DSAFDVLSFTAEEKAGVYK |
Peptide | Source | Sequence |
INFECTIOUS DISEASE VACCINES | ||
Herpes simplex virus type 1 | ||
H1 | ICP27 322–332 | LYRTFAGNPRA |
gB | Glycoprotein B 498–505 | SSIEFARL |
gD | Glycoprotein D 8–23 | SLKMADPNRFRGKDLP |
Mycobacterium tuberculosis | ||
M | 38 kDa protein 350–369 | DQVHFQPLPPAVVKLSDAL |
HIV-1 | ||
H | HGP-30 p17 protein 85–115 | YSVHQRIDVKDTKEALEKIEEEQNKSKKKA |
mHGP30 | HGP-30 p17 protein 82–112 | ATLYSVHQRIDVKDTKEALEKIEEEQN |
Influenza | ||
M2e | M2 envelope protein 2–24 | SLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSD |
NP | Nucleoprotein 144–158 | NDATYQRTRALVRTG |
HA1 | Hemagglutinin 38–53 | LKSTQNAIDEITNKVN |
HA2 | Hemagglutinin 1–13 | GLFGAIAGFIEGG |
THERAPIES | ||
Breast Cancer | ||
HER | Rat HER-2/neu 66–74 | TYVPANASL |
Rheumatoid Arthritis | ||
CEL-2000 | Human Collagen type 2 254–273 | TGGKPGIAGFKGEQGPKGEP |
Myocarditis | ||
My-1 | Murine Cardiac Myosin 334–352 | DSAFDVLSFTAEEKAGVYK |