Design, construction and performance evaluation of aBox type solar cooker with a glazing wiper mechanism

Zeleke Ademe ^,,
Sameer Hameer

Bahir Dar Energy Research Center, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

Received: 03 November 2017 Accepted: 19 January 2018 Published: 25 January 2018

Abstract
Full Text(HTML)

This research work describes the performance evaluation of a double-glazed box-type solar oven with three reflectors and with a vapor wiper mechanism fabricated using locally available materials. The box cooker has external box dimensions of 600 mm × 600 mm × 250 mm and pyramidal internal box dimensions of 460 mm × 460 mm top face and 300 mm × 300 mm bottom face with depth of 150 mm. The thermal performance was tested as per the ASAE International Test procedure and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) for testing the thermal performance of a box-type solar cooker. The obtained test results after employing required calculations were figures of merit F₁ = 0.123 Km²/W, F₂ = 0.540, the standard cooking power P₅₀ = 36 W and the cumulative efficiency to be 22%, whereas with the application of the wiper mechanism, it was found that F₁ = 0.123, F₂= 0.827, the standard cooking power (P₅₀) = 51 W, and the cumulative efficiency to be 31.4%. The standard boiling time of 1.43 kg of water was calculated to be 53.54 and 88.84 minutes for the cooker with and without the application of wiper mechanism respectively. The thermal distribution of the cooker was modeled using interior box geometry as a boundary condition with ANSYS 15.0. The temperature distribution inside the box was simulated and the maximum wall temperature was found to be 139 ℃. This was lower than the experimental results by 22 ℃. The method of modeling and simulation of the cooker with and without a wiper mechanism is similar except for the variation of the transmittance of the glass due to shading of vapor which can be deducted from the cumulative efficiency for the latter case. The results show that using the vapor wiper mechanism increases the cumulative efficiency by 9.4% and reduces the boiling time by 35.3 minutes. Finally, the techno-economic analysis shows that the cooker with a vapor wiper mechanism has a good reliability for outdoor cooking of food and is economically feasible.
- solar energy,
- solar cookers,
- thermal performance,
- box type solar cooker,
- wiper mechanism,
- modeling,
- ANSYS
Citation: Zeleke Ademe, Sameer Hameer. Design, construction and performance evaluation of aBox type solar cooker with a glazing wiper mechanism[J]. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(1): 146-169. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.1.146

Related Papers:

Abstract

This research work describes the performance evaluation of a double-glazed box-type solar oven with three reflectors and with a vapor wiper mechanism fabricated using locally available materials. The box cooker has external box dimensions of 600 mm × 600 mm × 250 mm and pyramidal internal box dimensions of 460 mm × 460 mm top face and 300 mm × 300 mm bottom face with depth of 150 mm. The thermal performance was tested as per the ASAE International Test procedure and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) for testing the thermal performance of a box-type solar cooker. The obtained test results after employing required calculations were figures of merit F₁ = 0.123 Km²/W, F₂ = 0.540, the standard cooking power P₅₀ = 36 W and the cumulative efficiency to be 22%, whereas with the application of the wiper mechanism, it was found that F₁ = 0.123, F₂= 0.827, the standard cooking power (P₅₀) = 51 W, and the cumulative efficiency to be 31.4%. The standard boiling time of 1.43 kg of water was calculated to be 53.54 and 88.84 minutes for the cooker with and without the application of wiper mechanism respectively. The thermal distribution of the cooker was modeled using interior box geometry as a boundary condition with ANSYS 15.0. The temperature distribution inside the box was simulated and the maximum wall temperature was found to be 139 ℃. This was lower than the experimental results by 22 ℃. The method of modeling and simulation of the cooker with and without a wiper mechanism is similar except for the variation of the transmittance of the glass due to shading of vapor which can be deducted from the cumulative efficiency for the latter case. The results show that using the vapor wiper mechanism increases the cumulative efficiency by 9.4% and reduces the boiling time by 35.3 minutes. Finally, the techno-economic analysis shows that the cooker with a vapor wiper mechanism has a good reliability for outdoor cooking of food and is economically feasible.

References

[1]	Concentrating Solar Power, Global Outlook 09, Greenpeace USA. Solar PACES and ESTELA, 2009. Available from: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/.../2009/.
[2]	World Outlook Energy 2015, Executive Summary, International Energy Agency. Available from: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2015.pdf.
[3]	Solar Cookers: Technology and Development. Available from: http://www.appropedia.org/Solar_Cooking_and_the_Box_Cooker:_T.
[4]	Sedighi M, Zakariapour M (2014) A review of direct and indirect solar cookers. Sustain Energ 2: 44–51.
[5]	Brinkmann K (2012) Analysis of landscape transformation processes in and around four west African cities over the last 50 years. Landscape Urban Plan 105 (1–2): 94–105.
[6]	Food and Agriculture Organization. Global forest resources assessment database, 2015. Available from: http://countrystat.org/home.aspx?c=FOR.
[7]	Food and Agriculture Organization. Global forest resources assessment 2010: main report. Rome, 2010. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf.
[8]	Hambidge M, Miller L, Krebs NF, et al. (2012) An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ Res Lett 7: 189–190.
[9]	International Journal of Energy Engineering 2015, DOI: 10.5923/j.ijee.20150505.02-ResearcgGate, Available from: http://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=26677&tip=sid.
[10]	Mandelli S, Barbieri J, Mattarolo L, et al. (2014) Sustainable energy in Africa: a comprehensive data and policies review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 37: 656–686. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.069
[11]	Research Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management. 4: 216–224, 2015. ISSN 2315-8719© 2015. Available from: http://www. apexjournal.org/rjaem/index.htm.
[12]	Institute for Population Research-National Research Council (Irp-Cnr) Roma, Italy.
[13]	SOLANKI, Singh C (2009) Renewable energy technologies: A practical guide to beginners. Available from: https://www.kopykitab.com/ebooks/2016/06/7379/sample/sample_7379.pdf.
[14]	Solar Thermal Process, Duffie AJ, Beckmann NJ (1991) 3rdedition, New York, John Wiley. Available from: http://www.studyres.com/doc/.../energy-engineering---kalasalingam-univers.
[15]	Ercan-Ataer Ö, Energy Storage systems-Vol I, Gazi University, Mechanical Engineering Department, Malteps, 06570, Ankara Turkey.
[16]	Sahin AD, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2007) Thermodynamic analysis of solar photovoltaic cell systems. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 91: 153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.07.015
[17]	Cuce E, Cuce PM (2013) A comprehensive review on solar cookers. Appl Energ 102: 1399–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.002
[18]	Colombo E, Masera D, Bologna S (1997) Renewable energies to promote local development. In: Colombo E, Bologna S, Masera D, Eds. Renewable Energy for Unleashing Sustainable Development. Springer International Publishing: Switzerland, 3–25.
[19]	Legros G, Havet I, Bruce N, et al. (2009) The Energy Access Situation in Developing Countries: A Review focusing on the Least Developed Countries and Sub-Saharan Africa. New York. Available from: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Environment and Energy/Sustainable Energy/energy- access-situation-in-developing-countries.pdf.
[20]	Oduori SM, Rembold F, Abdulle OH, et al. (2011) Assessment of charcoal driven deforestation rates in a fragile rangeland environment in north eastern Somalia using very high resolution imagery. J Arid Environ 75: 1173–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.05.003
[21]	Panwar NL, Kaushik SC, Kothari S (2011) Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 1513–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037
[22]	Saxena A, Varun, Pandey SP, et al. (2011) A thermodynamic review on solar box type cookers. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 3301–3318. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.017
[23]	Funk PA, Larson DL (1998) Parametric model of solar cooker performance. Sol Energy 62: 63–68. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(97)00074-1
[24]	Hren S, Hren R (2010) The Carbon-Free Home: 36 Remodeling Projects to Help Kick the Fossil-Fuel Habit. Chelsea Green Publishing: Chelsea, Vermont.
[25]	Nahar NM (1998) Design, development and testing of a novel non-tracking solar cooker. Int J Energ Res 22:1191–1198. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(19981025)22:13<1191::AID-ER445>3.0.CO;2-V
[26]	Pande PC, Thanvi KP (2010) Design and development of a solar cooker cum drier. Int J Energ Res 12: 539–545.
[27]	Sedighi M, Zakariapour M (2014) A review of direct and indirect solar cookers. Sustain Energ 2: 44–51.
[28]	Nahar NM (2009) Design development of a large size non- tracking solar cooker. J Eng Sci Technol 4: 264–271.
[29]	Bowman TE, Blatt JH (1978) Solar cookers, history design fabrication test and evaluation. First International Symposium of Engineering, Florida.
[30]	Thermodynamic Review of Solar Box Cookers (Excerpted from the thesis of Petri Konttinen for the Helsinki University of Technology. Submitted September 25th, 1995). Available from: http://www. solarcooking.org/research/fi/petrithe.htm.
[31]	Kundapur A (1998) Review of solar cooker designs.TIDE8-1: 1–37.
[32]	Boyle G (2004) Renewable energy, Oxford University Press Ink (New York). Available from: http://oro.open.ac.uk/3044/.
[33]	Wikipedia (2011) Glazing-Solar/Cooking. Available from: http//solarcooking.wikia.com/wiki/Glazing.
[34]	Norton B (2006) Anatomy of a solar collector. Refocus 7: 32–35.
[35]	International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET). Article ID: IJARET_06_07_001. 2015, 6: 01–06. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/iaeme/ijaret-06-07001.
[36]	ASAE S580 JAN03 Testing and Reporting Solar Cooker Performance, 2003. Available from: http//www.solarcooking.org/asae_test_std.pdf.
[37]	Bhagavan MR, Karekezi S (1992) Energy management in Africa. African Energy Policy Research Network (AFREPREN) Zed Books Ltd.
[38]	Mirdha US, Dhariwal SR (2008) Design optimization of solar cooker. Renew Energ 33: 530–544. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.04.009
[39]	Design, Construction and Performance Evaluation of a box type solar cooker, Anonymous., Indian standard for box type solar cooker specification. IS 13429 (Part 3), Bureau of Indian Standard 2000, 2006. Available from: https://issuu.com/zeleke1/docs/design.docx.
[40]	Duffie JA, Beckman WA, Mcgowan J (1994) Solar engineering of thermal processes. J Sol Energ Eng 116: 549.
[41]	Hasan MA, Sumathy K (2010) Photovoltaic thermal module concepts and their performance analysis: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 1845–1859. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.011
[42]	Aremu AK, Akinoso R (2013) Potential use of box type solar cooker in developing countries. J Assoc Prof Eng Trinidad Tobago 41: 11–17.
[43]	Kuhnke K, Renbar M (1997) Solar cookers in the third world. Available from: http://www.detlef-schwefel.de/119-Schwefel-Kuhnke-solar-cookers.pdf.
[44]	Fundamentals of the Finite ElementMethod for Heat and Fluid Flow. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004.
[45]	International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environmental Engineering ISSN 2348-0157, 2015, 3: 105–110. Available from: http//www basharesearch.com/IJREEE.html.
[46]	El-Sebaii AA, Domański R, Jaworski M (2014) Experimental and theoretical investigation of a box-type solarcooker with multi-step inner reflectors. Energy 19: 1011–1021.
[47]	Szulczewski M (2016) Lasting impacts of a solar cooker project. Available from: http://static2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111229184529/solarcooking/images/e/ec/Lasting_Impacts_of_Solar_Cooker_Projects.pdf.
[48]	Mullick SC, Kandpal TC, Saxena AK (1987) Thermal test procedure for box type solar cooker. Sol Energy 39: 353–360. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(87)80021-X
[49]	Sharma SD, Iwata T, Sagara K (2004) Thermal performance of box type solar cooker: a study in Japan climate. J Japan Sol Energ Soc 30: 49–54.
[50]	Folaranmi J (2013) Performance evaluation of a double-glazed box-type solar oven with reflector. J Renew Energ 2013.
[51]	Nahar NM (2001) Design, development and testing of a double reflector hot box solar cooker with a transparent insulation material. Renew Energ 23: 167–179. doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00178-6
[52]	Ammer EH (2003) Theoretical and experimental assessment of double exposure solar cooker. Energ Consers Manage 44: 2651–2663. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00022-0
[53]	Ikiara M, Mwakubo S, Mutua J, et al. (2006) Integrated assessment of energy policy with focus on the transport and household energy sector. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275208387_Kenya_Integrated_assessment_of_the_Energy_Policy_With_focus_on_the_transport_and_household_energy_sectors.
[54]	UNISUN TECHNOLOGIES (P) LTD.No 7, Ist Floor, Kodava Samaja, Vasanthnagar, Bangalore-560052, INDIA. Web: ISSN: 2455-5304. Available from:https://books.google.it/books?isbn=8188234265.
[55]	Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis of A Passive Solar Cooker for Application in Nigeria, The International Journal of Engineering And Science (IJES), December–2014, ISSN (e): 2319–1813 ISSN (p): 2319–1805, Available from: https://heijes.com/papers/v3-i12/Version-3/B03120306011.pdf.

Reader Comments

your name:*

Email:*
© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)