Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Range-extending Zinc-air battery for electric vehicle

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

Topical Section: Electric and Hybrid Vehicles

A vehicle model is used to evaluate a novel powertrain that is comprised of a dual energy storage system (Dual ESS). The system includes two battery packs with different chemistries and the necessary electronic controls to facilitate their coordination and optimization. Here, a lithium-ion battery pack is used as the primary pack and a Zinc-air battery as the secondary or range-extending pack. Zinc-air batteries are usually considered unsuitable for use in vehicles due to their poor cycle life, but the model demonstrates the feasibility of this technology with an appropriate control strategy, with limited cycling of the range extender pack. The battery pack sizes and the battery control strategy are configured to optimize range, cost and longevity. In simulation the vehicle performance compares favourably to a similar vehicle with a single energy storage system (Single ESS) powertrain, travelling up to 75 km further under test conditions. The simulation demonstrates that the Zinc-air battery pack need only cycle 100 times to enjoy a ten-year lifespan. The Zinc-air battery model is based on leading Zinc-air battery research from literature, with some assumptions regarding achievable improvements. Having such a model clarifies the performance requirements of Zinc-air cells and improves the research community's ability to set performance targets for Zinc-air cells.
  Article Metrics

Keywords range extender; Zinc-air battery; dual energy storage system; vehicle model; metal-air battery; single energy storage system; driving profile; vehicle use pattern

Citation: Steven B. Sherman, Zachary P. Cano, Michael Fowler, Zhongwei Chen. Range-extending Zinc-air battery for electric vehicle. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(1): 121-145. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.1.121


  • 1. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, et al. (2014) IPCC, 2014: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_summary-forpolicymakers.pdf.
  • 2 United States Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2014. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-04/documents/us-ghg-inventory-2016-main-text.pdf.
  • 3. Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016) Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators: Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available from: https://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/F60DB708-6243-4A71-896B-6C7FB5CC7D01/GHGEmissions_EN.pdf.
  • 4. International Energy Agency (2017) Global EV Outlook 2017: Two million and counting.
  • 5. Li W, Long R, Chen H, et al. (2017) A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78: 318–328.    
  • 6. Goldstein J, Brown I, Koretz B (1999) New developments in the electric fuel Ltd. zinc/air system. J Power Sources 80: 171–179.    
  • 7. Toussaint G, Stevens P, Rouget R, et al. (2012) A high energy density rechargeable Zinc-air battery for automotive application. Meet. Abstr. MA2012-02, 1172–1172. Available from: http://ma.ecsdl.org/content/MA2012-02/11/1172.full.pdf.
  • 8. Buisness Wire (2017) Eos Energy Storage Now Taking Orders at $95/kWh for the Eos Aurora® DC Battery System. Available from: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/ 20170418005284/en/Eos-Energy-Storage-Orders-95kWh-Eos-Aurora%C2%AE.
  • 9. Li Y, Dai H (2014) Recent advances in Zinc-air batteries. Chem Soc Rev 43: 5257.    
  • 10. Bockstette J, Habermann K, Ogrzewalla J, et al. (2013) Performance plus range: Combined battery concept for plug‑in hybrid vehicles. Sae Int J Altern Powertrains 2: 156–171.    
  • 11. Stewart SG, Kohn SI, Kelty KR, et al. (2014) Electric vehicle extended range hybrid battery pack system: US, US 8803470 B2.
  • 12. Catton J, Wang C, Sherman S, et al. (2017) Extended range electric vehicle powertrain simulation and comparison with consideration of fuel cell and metal-air battery. WCX™ 17: SAE World Congress Experience.
  • 13. Rahman MA, Wang X, Wen C (2013) High energy density metal-air batteries: A review. J Electrochem Soc 160: A1759–A1771.    
  • 14. Fu J, Cano ZP, Park MG, et al. (2016) Electrically rechargeable Zinc-air batteries: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. Adv Mater 29: 1604685.
  • 15. CBC News (2014) Electric car with massive range in demo by Phinergy, Alcoa. Available from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/electric-car-with-massive-range-in-demo-by-phinergy-alcoa-1.2664653.
  • 16. Nixon DB (1994) Electric vehicle having multiple replacement batteries: US, US 5542488 A.
  • 17. Passaniti J, Carpenter D, McKenzie R (2011) Button cell batteries: Silver oxide-Zinc and Zinc-air systems. In: Reddy TB (Ed.), Linden's Handbook of Batteries (13). Available from: http://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/lindens-handbook-of-batteries-fourth-edition.
  • 18. Vatsalarani J, Trivedi DC, Ragavendran K, et al. (2005) Effect of polyaniline coating on "Shape Change" phenomenon of porous Zinc electrode. J Electrochem Soc 152: A1974–A1978.    
  • 19. Chang WL, Sathiyanarayanan K, Eom SW, et al. (2006) Novel alloys to improve the electrochemical behavior of Zinc anodes for Zinc/air battery. J Power Sources 160: 1436–1441.    
  • 20. Parker JF, Chervin CN, Nelson ES, et al. (2014) Wiring zinc in three dimensions re-writes battery performance-dendrite-free cycling. Energ Environ Sci 7: 1117–1124.    
  • 21. Jung KN, Jung JH, Im WB, et al. (2013) Doped lanthanum nickelates with a layered perovskite structure as bifunctional cathode catalysts for rechargeable metal-air batteries. ACS Appl Matter Inter 5: 9902–9907.    
  • 22. Lee DU, Choi J, Feng K, et al. (2013) Advanced extremely durable 3D bifunctional air electrodes for rechargeable Zinc-air batteries. Adv Energy Mater 4: 1301389.
  • 23. Clark S, Latz A, Horstmann B (2017) Rational development of neutral aqueous electrolytes for Zin-Air batteries. Chemsuschem 2017: 4735.
  • 24. Goh FWT, Liu Z, Hor TSA, et al. (2014) A near-neutral chloride electrolyte for electrically rechargeable Zinc-air batteries. J Electrochem Soc 161: A2080–A2086.    
  • 25. Eos Energy Storage, Llc. Electrochemical cell with divalent cation electrolyte and at least one intercalation electrode. US 20150244031 A1.
  • 26. Eos Storage. Products and Technology. Available from: https://eosenergystorage.com/products-technology/.
  • 27. Mohamad AA (2006) Zn/gelled 6M KOH/O2 Zinc-air battery. J Power Sources 159: 752–757.    
  • 28. Dahn J, Ehrlich GM (2011) Lithium-Ion Batteries. In: Reddy TB (Ed.), Linden's Handbook of Batteries (26). Available from: http://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/lindens-handbook-of-batteries-fourth-edition.
  • 29. Argonne National Labs (2017) Available from: http://www.autonomie.net/expertise/Autonomie.html.
  • 30. Argonne National Laboratory (2016) EcoCar3 Advanced Vehicle Technology Competition. Available from: http://ecocar3.org/.
  • 31. A123 Systems, Inc. Nanophosphate Basics: An Overview of the Structure, Properties and Benefits of A123 System' Proprietary Lithium Ion Battery Technology. Available from: https://www.neces.com/assets/A123-Systems_Nanophosphate-overview-whitepaper_FINAL1.pdf.
  • 32. A123 Systems, Inc. 20Ah Prismatic Pouch Cell. Available from: http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/lindens-handbook-of-batteries-fourth-edition/p2001c2f299713_1001#p2001c2f299713_16002.
  • 33. Nejad S, Gladwin DT, Stone DA (2016) A systematic review of lumped-paramter equivalent circuit models for real-time estimation of lithium-ion battery states. J Power Sources 316: 183–196.    
  • 34. A123 Systems, Inc. Battery Pack Design, Validation and Assembly Guide using A123 Systems AMP20mlHD-A Nanophosphate Cells. Available from: http://www.formula-hybrid.org/wp-content/uploads/A123_AMP20_battery_Design_guide.pdf.
  • 35 Nykvist B, Nilsson M (2015) Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nat Clim Change 5: 329–332.    
  • 36. Eckl R, Ehrl B, Lienkamp M (2013) Range extender for seldom use in the electric car mute-Zinc Air battery. Conference on Future Automotive Technology: Focus Electromobility, Munich.
  • 37. Adler TC, McLarnon FR, Cairns EJ (1993) Low-Zinc-solubility electrolytes for use in Zinc/Nickel oxide cell. J Electrochem Soc 140: 289–294.    
  • 38. Narayanan SR, Prakash GKS, Manohar A, et al. (2011) Materials challenges and technical approaches for realizing inexpensive and robust iron-air batteries for large-scale energy storage. Solid State Ionics 216: 105–109.
  • 39. U.S. Department of Energy (2017) Available from: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml.
  • 40. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Available from: http://nhts.ornl.gov.
  • 41. Drillet JF, Holzer F, Kallis T, et al. (2001) Influence of CO2 on the stability of bifunctional oxygen electrodes for rechargeable zinc/air batteries and study of different CO2 filter materials. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3: 368–371.    
  • 42. Dharmakeerthi CH, Mithulananthan N, Saha TK (2014) Impact of electric vehicle fast charging on power system voltage stability. Int J Electr Power 57: 241–249.    
  • 43. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2017) Model Year 2016 Fuel Economy Guide. Available from: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2016.pdf.
  • 44. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2016) Model Year 2014 Fuel Economy Guide. Available from: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2014.pdf.
  • 45. Vijayenthiran V (2015) 2016 Chevrolet Camaro Full Pricing Released. MotorAuthority. Available from: http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1099687_2016-chevrolet-camaro-full-pricing-released.
  • 46. Kochhan R, Fuchs S, Reuter B, et al. (2014) An overview of costs for vehicle components, fuels and greenhouse gas emissions.
  • 47. Propfe B, Redelbach M, Santini DJ, et al. (2012) Cost analysis of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles including Maintenance & Repair Costs and Resale Values, EVS26 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Los Angeles, California.
  • 48. Schlömer S, Bruckner T, Fulton L, et al. (2014) Annex III Technology-specific cost and performance parameters. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-iii.pdf.
  • 49. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2016, April). Frequently Asked Questions: What is U.S. electricity generation by energy source? Available from: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3.
  • 50. Canadian Electricity Association (2014) Key Canadian Electricity Statistics. Available from: http://www.electricity.ca/media/Electricity101/KeyCanadianElectricityStatistics10June2014.pdf.
  • 51. U.S. Department of Energy (2017) Available from: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=38187.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Keliang Wang, Pucheng Pei, Yichun Wang, Cheng Liao, Wei Wang, Shangwei Huang, Advanced rechargeable zinc-air battery with parameter optimization, Applied Energy, 2018, 225, 848, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.071
  • 2. Brandon J. Hopkins, Yang Shao-Horn, Douglas P. Hart, Suppressing corrosion in primary aluminum–air batteries via oil displacement, Science, 2018, 362, 6415, 658, 10.1126/science.aat9149
  • 3. Hao Wang, Feng‐Xiang Yin, Ning Liu, Rong‐Hui Kou, Xiao‐Bo He, Cheng‐Jun Sun, Biao‐Hua Chen, Di‐Jia Liu, Hua‐Qiang Yin,  Engineering Fe–Fe 3 C@Fe–N–C Active Sites and Hybrid Structures from Dual Metal–Organic Frameworks for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in H 2 –O 2 Fuel Cell and Li–O 2 Battery , Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 1901531, 10.1002/adfm.201901531
  • 4. Sheying Li, Yang-Hui Cai, Andrea I. Schäfer, Bryce S. Richards, Renewable energy powered membrane technology: A review of the reliability of photovoltaic-powered membrane system components for brackish water desalination, Applied Energy, 2019, 253, 113524, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113524
  • 5. Thuy Nguyen Thanh Tran, Michael P. Clark, Hyun‐Joong Chung, Douglas G. Ivey, Effects of Crosslinker Concentration in Poly(Acrylic Acid)‐KOH Gel Electrolyte on Performance of Zinc‐Air Batteries, Batteries & Supercaps, 2020, 10.1002/batt.201900199
  • 6. Thuy Nguyen Thanh Tran, Drew Aasen, Dinara Zhalmuratova, Matthew Labbe, Hyun‐Joong Chung, Douglas G. Ivey, Compositional Effects of Gel Polymer Electrolyte and Battery Design for Zinc‐Air Batteries, Batteries & Supercaps, 2020, 10.1002/batt.202000054

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved