Energy efficient measure to upgrade a multistory residential in a nZEB

Antonio Gagliano; Salvatore Giuffrida; Francesco Nocera; Maurizio Detommaso

doi:10.3934/energy.2017.4.601

AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(4): 601-624. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.4.601. Research article Topical Section

Export file:

Format

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
BibTex
Text

Content

Citation Only
Citation and Abstract

Energy efficient measure to upgrade a multistory residential in a nZEB

Antonio Gagliano, Salvatore Giuffrida, Francesco Nocera, Maurizio Detommaso

1 Department of Engineering Electrical, Electronics and information, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy
2 Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy

Received: , Accepted: , Published:

Topical Section: Energy Technology for Building

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure/Table Related pages

Developing nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEB) represents a path toward sustainable communities as required by the Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD). As consequence, nZEB target for new or existing buildings has become a mandatory priority for the multidisciplinary researchers involved in architectural engineering and building physics. Therefore, it is grown the interest in design energy efficient measures for reaching the nZEB status of both new and existing buildings. In this paper, the energy efficient measures adopted for reaching the nearly Zero Energy Building standards, for a multi-floor residential building located in the Mediterranean area, are presented. The extra cost necessary to reach the nZEB target have been calculated in the case of the energy retrofit of an existing building (scenario 1) and in the case to directly realize a building with achieve the nZEB status (scenario 2). Further, the two scenarios have been compared under financial point of view. The results of this paper provide to builders and stakeholder useful information for quantify the convenience to build a nZEB building in advance in order to prevent the additional expenses necessary by future energy retrofit programs.

Figure/Table

Supplementary

Article Metrics

Keywords: NZEB; efficient building envelope; solar thermal; photovoltaic; economic analysis

Citation: Antonio Gagliano, Salvatore Giuffrida, Francesco Nocera, Maurizio Detommaso. Energy efficient measure to upgrade a multistory residential in a nZEB. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(4): 601-624. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.4.601

References:

1. European Commission, Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings (recast), 2010. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy.../buildings.
2. Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla KK (2010) Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energ Buildings 42: 1592–1600.
3. Hamdy M, Hasan A, Siren H (2013) A multi-stage optimization method for cost-optimal and nearly-zero-energy building solutions in line with the EPBD-recast 2010. Energ Buildings 56: 189–203.
4. Georges L, Massart C, Moeseke G, et al. (2012) Environmental and economic performance of heating systems for energy-efficient dwellings: case of passive and low-energy single-family houses. Energ Policy 40: 452–464.
5. Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P (2011) Life cycle cost analysis of a multi-storey residential net zero energy building in Denmark. Energy 41: 5600–5609.
6. Wang L, Gwilliam J, Jones P (2009) Case study of zero energy house design in UK. Energ Buildings 41: 1215–1222.
7. Gagliano A, Patania F, Capizzi A et al. (2012) A proposed methodology for estimating the performance of small wind turbines in urban area. Sustain Energ Buildings 12: 539–548.
8. Gagliano A, Patania F, Nocera F, et al. (2013) GIS-based decision support for solar photovoltaic planning in urban environment. Sustain Energ Buildings 22: 865–874.
9. Net Zeb evaluation tool, User guide, 2012. Available from: http://task40.iea-shc.org/Data/Sites/11/documents/net-zeb/Net-ZEB-Evaluation-Tool-User-Guide.pdf.
10. Salom J, Widén J, Candanedo J, et al. (2011) Understanding net zero energy buildings: evaluation of load matching and grid interaction indicators. In: Proceedings of Building Simulations, Sidney.
11. Satori I, Napolitano A, Marszal A, et al. (2012) Criteria for definition of net zero energy buildings. Available from: http://www.iea-shc.org/publications/task.aspx?Task¼40.
12. Goggins J, Moran P, Armstrong A, et al. (2016) Lifecycle environmental and economic performance of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) in Ireland. Energ Buildings 116: 622–637.
13. Krati M, Ihm P (2016) Evaluation of net-zero energy residential buildings in the MENA region. Sustain Cities Soc 22: 116–125.
14. Brinks P, Kornadt O, Oly R (2016) Development of concepts for cost-optimal nearly zero-energy buildings for the industrial steel building sector. Appl Energ 173: 343–354.
15. Kristjansdottir TF, Good CS, Inman MR, et al. (2016) Embodied greenhouse gas emissions from PV systems in Norwegian residential zero emission pilot buildings. Sol Energy 133: 155–171.
16. Chastas P, Theodosiou T, Bikas T (2016) Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: a literature review. Build Environ 105: 267–282.
17. Kolokotsa D, Rovas D, Kosmatopoulos E, et al. (2011) A roadmap towards intelligent net zero- and positive-energy buildings. Sol Energy 85: 3067–3084.
18. Cho S, Lee JS, Jang JY (2008) Development of integrated operation, low-end energy building engineering technology in Korea. In: EKC2008 Proceedings of the EU-KOREA Conference on Science and Technology, Springer Proceedings in Physics, 123–133.
19. Barthelmes VM, Becchio C, Corgnati SP, et al. (2015) Replicability of nZEBs on real estate market in mediterranean countries. Energ Procedia 82: 452–457.
20. Giuffrida S, Ferluga G, Valenti A (2015) Capitalization rates and 'real estate semantic chains': an application of clustering analysis. Int J Business Intelligence Data Mining 10(2). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM. 2015.069271.
21. Napoli G (2015) Financial sustainability and morphogenesis of urban transformation projects. In: Gervasi O et al., ICCSA 2015, Part III LNCS, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 178–193. Available from: doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2.
22. MasterClima Aermec. Available from: http://www.masterclima.info/.
23. Design Builder-energy simulation software, version 3. Available from: http://designbuilder.co.uk.
24. Bottarelli M, Gabrielli L (2011) Payback period for a ground source heat pump system. Int J Heat Tech 29: 145–150.
25. Sullivan WG, Wicks EM, Luxhoj JT (2006) Engineering Economy, In: 13 th Eds., New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 212–213.
26. Mancarella P, Canova A, Chicco G, et al. (2009) Cogenerazione distribuita a gas naturale. Modelli e tecniche per valutazioni energetiche ambientali ed economiche, Milano: Franco Angeli.
27. Simonotti M (1997) La stima immobiliare con principi di economia e applicazioni estimative, Milano: UTET Libreria.
28. UNI EN ISO 10077-1 (2006) Thermal performance of windows, doors and shutters-Calculation of thermal transmittance-Numerical method for frame.
29. UNI EN 673-2005, Glass in building-Determination of Thermal transmittance-Calculation method.
30. UNI EN ISO 6946 Elements and components in buildings-Thermal resistance and transmittance -Calculation method.
31. UNI EN ISO 13786:2008 Thermal Performance of Building Components-Dynamic Thermal Characteristics-Calculation Methods.
32. European Commission, Commission Delegated Regulation (Eu) No 244/2012, Available from: www.buildup.eu › Practices › Publications.
33. Enea, Solterm, Solar Calculator. Available from: http://www.solaritaly.enea.it/CalcRggmmNorm/Calcola1.php.
34. Duffie JA, Beckman WA (1991) Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. John Wiley & Sons.
35. TERNA, Dati statistici sugli impianti e la produzione di energia elettrica in Italia, 2007. Available from: www.terna.it.
36. Joint Research Centre, Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS), Available from: http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/apps4/pvest.php.
37. Tina G, Cosentino F, Notton G (2012) Effect of thermal gradient on electrical efficiency of hybrid PV/T. In: 25^th European photovoltaic solar energy conference and exhibition, Valencia, Spain.
38. Susca T, Gaffin SR, Dell'Osso GR (2011) Positive effects of vegetation: Urban heat island and green roofs. Environ Pollut 159: 2119–2126.
39. Gagliano A, Detommaso M, Nocera F, et al. (2014) The retrofit of existing buildings through the exploitation of the green roofs-a simulation study. Energy Procedia 62: 52–61.

show all references

This article has been cited by:

1. Francesco Nocera, Salvatore Giuffrida, Maria Rosa Trovato, Antonio Gagliano, Energy and New Economic Approach for Nearly Zero Energy Hotels, Entropy, 2019, 21, 7, 639, 10.3390/e21070639
2. Salvatore Giuffrida, Vittoria Ventura, Francesco Nocera, Maria Rosa Trovato, Filippo Gagliano, , Values and Functions for Future Cities, 2020, Chapter 24, 425, 10.1007/978-3-030-23786-8_24
3. Grazia Napoli, Antonella Mamì, Simona Barbaro, Serena Lupo, , Values and Functions for Future Cities, 2020, Chapter 6, 89, 10.1007/978-3-030-23786-8_6

Reader Comments

your name: * your email: *

Copyright Info: 2017, Francesco Nocera, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Associated material

Metrics