Review Special Issues

A comparison of the technological, economic, public policy, and environmental factors of HVDC and HVAC interregional transmission

  • Received: 30 September 2014 Accepted: 03 February 2015 Published: 28 February 2015
  • The design of an interregional high-voltage transmission system in the US is a revolutionary technological concept that will likely play a significant role in the planning and operation of future electric power systems. Historically, the primary justification for building interregional high-voltage transmission lines in the US and around the world has been based on economic and reliability criteria. Today, the implementation renewable portfolio standards, carbon emission regulations, the improvements in the performance of power electronic systems, and unused benefits associated with capacity exchange during times of non-coincident peak demand, are driving the idea of designing an interregional high-voltage transmission system in the US. However, there exist challenges related to technical, economic, public policy, and environmental factors that hinder the implementation of such a complex infrastructure. The natural skepticism from many sectors of the society, in regards to how will the system be operated, how much will it cost, and the environmental impact that it could potentially create are among the most significant challenges to its rapid implementation. This publication aims at illustrating the technological, environmental, economic, and policy challenges that interregional HV transmission systems face today in the US, looking specifically at the Clean Line Rock Island project in Iowa.

    Citation: Armando L. Figueroa-Acevedo, Michael S. Czahor, David E. Jahn. A comparison of the technological, economic, public policy, and environmental factors of HVDC and HVAC interregional transmission[J]. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(1): 144-161. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.1.144

    Related Papers:

    [1] Longxing Qi, Shoujing Tian, Jing-an Cui, Tianping Wang . Multiple infection leads to backward bifurcation for a schistosomiasis model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(2): 701-712. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019033
    [2] Yingke Li, Zhidong Teng, Shigui Ruan, Mingtao Li, Xiaomei Feng . A mathematical model for the seasonal transmission of schistosomiasis in the lake and marshland regions of China. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1279-1299. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017066
    [3] Chunhua Shan, Hongjun Gao, Huaiping Zhu . Dynamics of a delay Schistosomiasis model in snail infections. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(4): 1099-1115. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.1099
    [4] Conrad Ratchford, Jin Wang . Multi-scale modeling of cholera dynamics in a spatially heterogeneous environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 948-974. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020051
    [5] Kazeem Oare Okosun, Robert Smith? . Optimal control analysis of malaria-schistosomiasis co-infection dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(2): 377-405. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017024
    [6] Wahyudin Nur, Trisilowati, Agus Suryanto, Wuryansari Muharini Kusumawinahyu . Schistosomiasis model with treatment, habitat modification and biological control. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 13799-13828. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022643
    [7] Maghnia Hamou Maamar, Matthias Ehrhardt, Louiza Tabharit . A nonstandard finite difference scheme for a time-fractional model of Zika virus transmission. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 924-962. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024039
    [8] Long-xing Qi, Yanwu Tang, Shou-jing Tian . Parameter estimation of modeling schistosomiasis transmission for four provinces in China. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(2): 1005-1020. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019047
    [9] Yuyi Xue, Yanni Xiao . Analysis of a multiscale HIV-1 model coupling within-host viral dynamics and between-host transmission dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 6720-6736. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020350
    [10] Xinli Hu, Wenjie Qin, Marco Tosato . Complexity dynamics and simulations in a discrete switching ecosystem induced by an intermittent threshold control strategy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2164-2178. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020115
  • The design of an interregional high-voltage transmission system in the US is a revolutionary technological concept that will likely play a significant role in the planning and operation of future electric power systems. Historically, the primary justification for building interregional high-voltage transmission lines in the US and around the world has been based on economic and reliability criteria. Today, the implementation renewable portfolio standards, carbon emission regulations, the improvements in the performance of power electronic systems, and unused benefits associated with capacity exchange during times of non-coincident peak demand, are driving the idea of designing an interregional high-voltage transmission system in the US. However, there exist challenges related to technical, economic, public policy, and environmental factors that hinder the implementation of such a complex infrastructure. The natural skepticism from many sectors of the society, in regards to how will the system be operated, how much will it cost, and the environmental impact that it could potentially create are among the most significant challenges to its rapid implementation. This publication aims at illustrating the technological, environmental, economic, and policy challenges that interregional HV transmission systems face today in the US, looking specifically at the Clean Line Rock Island project in Iowa.


    [1] American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) (2013) State Wind Energy Statistics: Iowa. Available from: http://www.awea.org/Resources/state.aspx?ItemNumber=5224.
    [2] Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) (2014) Wind Integration: Dispatchable Intermittent Resources (DIRs). Available from: https://www.misoenergy.org/WhatWeDo/StrategicInitiatives/Pages/WindIntegration.aspx.
    [3] Navid N, Rosenwald G (2013) Ramp Capability Product Design for MISO Market. Midcontinent Independent System Operator. Available from: https://www.misoenergy.org/Library/Repository/Communication%20Material/Key%20Presentations%20and%20Whitepapers/Ramp%20Product%20Conceptual%20Design%20Whitepaper.pdf.
    [4] Bird L, Cochran J, Wang X (2014) Wind and Solar Curtailment: Experience and Practice in the United States. Technical Report, NREL/TP-6A20-60983.
    [5] Iowa Wind Energy Association (2010) Wind Power Facts. Available from: http://www.iowawindenergy.org/whywind.php.
    [6] DOE (2008) 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Available from: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/12/f5/41869.pdf.
    [7] Parfomak PW (2011) Carbon Control in the US Electricity Sector: Key Implementation Uncertainties. Available from: http://heartland.org/sites/all/modules/custom/heartland_migration/files/pdfs/24486.pdf.
    [8] Li Y, McCalley JD (2014) Design of A High Capacity Inter-Regional Transmission Overlay for the US. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 30: 513-521.
    [9] EnerNex Corporation (2011) Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study. NREL. Available from: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/47078.pdf.
    [10] MacDonald AS, Clack CC (2014) Low Cost and Low Carbon Emission Wind and Solar Energy Systems are Feasible for Large Geographical Domains. Sustainable Energy and Atmospheric Science Seminar, NOAA.
    [11] Osborn D (2014) HVDC for System Expansion-East and West. Presentation, IEEE PES General Meeting, Washington, DC.
    [12] Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative (EIPC) (2011) Phase 1 Report: Formation of Stakeholder Process, Regional Plan Integration and Macroeconomic Analysis. DOE Award Project DE-OE0000343.
    [13] Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (1996) Power Generation Operation and Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [14] Murray B (2009) Power Markets and Economics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    [15] Chaudhuri NR, Chaudhuri RM, Yazdani A (2014) Multi-terminal Direct-Current Grids: Modeling, Analysis, and Control. Wiley, IEEE Press.
    [16] Padiyar KR (2011) HVDC Power Transmission Systems, New Academic Science.
    [17] Lotfjou A, Shahidehpour M, Fu Y, et al. (2010) Hourly Scheduling of DC Transmission Lines in SCUC with Voltage Source Converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 26: 650-660.
    [18] Urquidez OA, Xie L (2015) Smart Targeted Planning of VSC-Based Embedded HVDC via Line Shadow Price Weighting. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 6: 431-440. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2354296
    [19] Shahidehopour M, Yong Fu (2005) Benders decomposition: applying Benders decomposition to power systems. Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE 3: 20-21.
    [20] de Toledo PF, Jiuping Pan, Srivastava K, et al. (2008) Case Study of a Multi-Infeed HVDC System. Power System Technology and IEEE Power India Conference, 2008. POWERCON 2008. Joint International Conference 1,7, 12-15.
    [21] McNamara P, Negenborn RR, De Schutter B, et al. (2013) Optimal Coordination of a Multiple HVDC Link System Using Centralized and Distributed Control. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions 21: 302-314. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2011.2180906
    [22] Magnus Callavik, Anders Blomberg, Jürgen Häfner, et al. (2012) The Hybrid HVDC Breaker. ABB Grid Systems, Technical Paper.
    [23] Zhang L, Harnefors L, Nee HP (2011) Interconnection of Two Very Weak AC Systems by VSC-HVDC Links Using Power-Synchronization Control. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions 26: 344-355.
    [24] Reitenback G (2012) ABB Announces World's First Circuit Breaker for HVDC. Power: Official Publication of Electric Power.
    [25] The Grid West Project. Tech. Stage 1 ed. Vol. 3. Dublin: Tobin Consulting Engineers, 2013. Print. Appendix 3.2.
    [26] Rudervall Roberto, Charpentier JP, Sharma R (2000) High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) Transmission Systems Technology Review Paper. Proc. of Energy Week 2000, Washington D.C. N.p.: 1-17.
    [27] Alberta Energy ( 2009) Assessment of Electric Transmission Technologies. Rep. N.p.: Stantec.
    [28] High Voltage Direct Current Transmission-Proven Technology for Power Exchange. Available from: http://www.siemens.com/about/sustainability/pool/en/environmental-portfolio/products-
    solutions/power-transmission-distribution/hvdc_proven_technology.pdf.
    [29] Oudalov A, Lave L, Reza M, et al. (2009) A method for a comparison of bulk energy transport systems. Environ Sci Tech 43: 7619-7625. doi: 10.1021/es900687e
    [30] Arc Math, High Voltage Direct Current. Available from: http://envirostudies.net/devlopment/hvdc/.
    [31] Humpert C (2012) Long Distance Transmission Systems for the Future Electricity Supply - Analysis of Possibilities and Restrictions. Energy 48: 278-283. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.018
    [32] Siting Wind Farms Requires Choosing a Proper Location. American Wind Energy Association. AWEA, n.d. Web. 26 Aug. 2014.
    [33] United States. Government Accountability Office. Issues Associated with High-Voltage Direct-Current Transmission Lines along Transportation Rights of Way. By David J. Wise. N.p., 1 Feb. 2008. Web.
    [34] van Rongen E (2010) Health issues relating to HVDC cable technology. Energy & Nat. Resources of Republic of Ireland. Available from: http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/NR/rdonlyres/C28F441C-D8BD-43D6-A15B-2744AC5F8F01/0/HVDCExpertOpinionreport.pdf.
    [35] ICNIRP—International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (1994) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 66: 100-106.
    [36] ICNIRP—International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (2009) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 96(4): 504-514.
    [37] Brailey WH, Weil DE, Stewart JR (1997) HVDC Power Transmission Environmental Issues Review. Available from: http://www.cleanlineenergy.com/sites/cleanline/media/resources/HVDC
    -Power-Transmission-Environmental-Issues-Review.pdf.
    [38] Koshcheev LA (2003) Environmental characteristics of HVDC overhead transmission lines. Third workshop on Power Grid Interconnection in Northeast Asia. Vladivostok, Russia.
    [39] Crane PC (2010) Radio interference (RFI) from extra-high voltage (EHV) transmission lines. Memo, Univ. Vermont. Available from: http://www.ece.vt.edu/swe/lwa/memo/lwa0168.pdf.
    [40] Rock Island Clean Line (2015) HVDC Project in Illinois. Available from: http://www.rockislandcleanline.com/site/home.
    [41] Moland G, Cleveland R (2012) Rock Island Project: Benefits Study. Available from: http://www.rockislandcleanline.com/sites/rock_island/media/docs/Clean_Line_Rock_Island_Benefits_Study.pdf
    [42] Carlson JL, Loomis DG, Solow JL (2011) Economic Impact Study of the Proposed Rock Island Clean Line. Loomis Consulting. Available from: http://www.rockislandcleanline.com/sites/rock_island/media/docs/RICL%20Economic%20Impact%20Study.pdf.
    [43] Flaugh LG (2014) Rock Island HVDC Project opposition remains befuddled. Chronicle Times.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Chunxiao Ding, Yun Sun, Yuanguo Zhu, A schistosomiasis compartment model with incubation and its optimal control, 2017, 40, 01704214, 5079, 10.1002/mma.4372
    2. Chunxiao Ding, Nana Tao, Yun Sun, Yuanguo Zhu, The effect of time delays on transmission dynamics of schistosomiasis, 2016, 91, 09600779, 360, 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.06.017
    3. Chunxiao Ding, Wenjian Liu, Yun Sun, Yuanguo Zhu, A delayed Schistosomiasis transmission model and its dynamics, 2019, 118, 09600779, 18, 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.11.005
    4. Tailei Zhang, Xiao-Qiang Zhao, Mathematical Modeling for Schistosomiasis with Seasonal Influence: A Case Study in Hubei, China, 2020, 19, 1536-0040, 1438, 10.1137/19M1280259
    5. M. A. Aziz-Alaoui, Jean M.-S. Lubuma, Berge Tsanou, Prevalence-based modeling approach of schistosomiasis: global stability analysis and integrated control assessment, 2021, 40, 2238-3603, 10.1007/s40314-021-01414-9
    6. François M. Castonguay, Susanne H. Sokolow, Giulio A. De Leo, James N. Sanchirico, Cost-effectiveness of combining drug and environmental treatments for environmentally transmitted diseases, 2020, 287, 0962-8452, 20200966, 10.1098/rspb.2020.0966
    7. Chunxiao Ding, Yun Sun, Yuanguo Zhu, A NN-Based Hybrid Intelligent Algorithm for a Discrete Nonlinear Uncertain Optimal Control Problem, 2017, 45, 1370-4621, 457, 10.1007/s11063-016-9536-8
    8. Xi-Chao Duan, I Hyo Jung, Xue-Zhi Li, Maia Martcheva, Dynamics and optimal control of an age-structured SIRVS epidemic model, 2020, 43, 01704214, 4239, 10.1002/mma.6190
    9. Zhipeng Qiu, Xuerui Wei, Chunhua Shan, Huaiping Zhu, Monotone dynamics and global behaviors of a West Nile virus model with mosquito demographics, 2020, 80, 0303-6812, 809, 10.1007/s00285-019-01442-4
    10. Tao Feng, Zhipeng Qiu, Yi Song, Global analysis of a vector-host epidemic model in stochastic environments, 2019, 356, 00160032, 2885, 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.01.033
    11. Yujiang Liu, Shujing Gao, Zhenzhen Liao, Di Chen, Dynamical behavior of a stage-structured Huanglongbing model with time delays and optimal control, 2022, 156, 09600779, 111830, 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111830
    12. S. KADALEKA, S. ABELMAN, P. M. MWAMTOBE, J. M. TCHUENCHE, OPTIMAL CONTROL ANALYSIS OF A HUMAN–BOVINE SCHISTOSOMIASIS MODEL, 2021, 29, 0218-3390, 1, 10.1142/S0218339021500017
    13. Linghui Yu, Zhipeng Qiu, Ting Guo, Modeling the effect of activation of CD4$^+$ T cells on HIV dynamics, 2022, 27, 1531-3492, 4491, 10.3934/dcdsb.2021238
    14. Chinwendu E. Madubueze, Z. Chazuka, I. O. Onwubuya, F. Fatmawati, C. W. Chukwu, On the mathematical modeling of schistosomiasis transmission dynamics with heterogeneous intermediate host, 2022, 8, 2297-4687, 10.3389/fams.2022.1020161
    15. Lei Shi, Longxing Qi, Dynamic analysis and optimal control of a class of SISP respiratory diseases, 2022, 16, 1751-3758, 64, 10.1080/17513758.2022.2027529
    16. Wei Wang, Robert Bergquist, Charles H. King, Kun Yang, Joanne P. Webster, Elimination of schistosomiasis in China: Current status and future prospects, 2021, 15, 1935-2735, e0009578, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009578
    17. Liming Cai, Peixia Yue, Mini Ghosh, Xuezhi Li, Assessing the impact of agrochemicals on schistosomiasis transmission: A mathematical study, 2021, 14, 1793-5245, 10.1142/S1793524521500492
    18. Solomon Kadaleka, Shirley Abelman, Jean M. Tchuenche, A Human-Bovine Schistosomiasis Mathematical Model with Treatment and Mollusciciding, 2021, 69, 0001-5342, 511, 10.1007/s10441-021-09416-0
    19. Tailei Zhang, Xiao-Qiang Zhao, A multi-host schistosomiasis model with seasonality and time-dependent delays, 2023, 28, 1531-3492, 2927, 10.3934/dcdsb.2022198
    20. Xinjie Hao, Lin Hu, Linfei Nie, Stability and Global Hopf Bifurcation Analysis of a Schistosomiasis Transmission Model with Multi-Delays, 2025, 35, 0218-1274, 10.1142/S0218127425500397
    21. Lele Fan, Zhipeng Qiu, Qi Deng, Ting Guo, Libin Rong, Modeling SARS-CoV-2 Infection Dynamics: Insights into Viral Clearance and Immune Synergy, 2025, 87, 0092-8240, 10.1007/s11538-025-01442-0
    22. Yan Zhao, Qi Deng, Zhipeng Qiu, Ting Guo, Shigui Ruan, Modeling the Interaction of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes and Oncolytic Viruses in a Tumor Microenvironment, 2025, 85, 0036-1399, 983, 10.1137/23M1613608
    23. Chang-Yuan Cheng, Feng-Bin Wang, A nonlocal reaction-diffusion system modeling the Schistosomiasis transmission with multiple hosts and periodic delays, 2025, 91, 0303-6812, 10.1007/s00285-025-02238-5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(9253) PDF downloads(1475) Cited by(17)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(12)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog