Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2020, 4(2): 274-293. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2020013.

Research article Special Issues

Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Economic crisis as a consequence COVID-19 virus attack: risk and damage assessment

Oleg S. Sukharev

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 32, Nakhimovsky prospekt, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation

Received: , Accepted: , Published:

Special Issues: Special Issue on the Economic and Financial Impact of “COVID-19”

Abstract    Full Text(HTML)    Figure/Table    Related pages

The purpose of the research is to reveal the mechanism of influence of coronavirus on the economic crisis and to develop a method for assessing threats and risks. Understanding the mechanism of generating an economic crisis allows to develop methods of anti-crisis government policy. The research methodology is based on structural analysis and taxonomic approach. Their application makes it possible to distinguish activities with decreasing demand relative to initial supply, and with increasing demand, which generates deficits of goods. The results of the research at the theoretical level of analysis is the proposed method of assessing threats and risks from the spread of coronavirus, which allows the benefits of certain types of activities (pharmaceuticals and medicine), and consider the damage on other activities (tourism, transportation, education). The diagram of the ratio of benefits and losses from the spread of the virus attack allows to position different economies in different zones of the diagram, according to the reaction of a particular economy to the epidemic, with a different scale of influence. Using such a chart, estimating the expected damage and expected benefits, the impact of COVID-19 on the economy is assessed based on changes in the dynamics of investments in financial and non-financial assets. Analysis of financial and non-financial investments in some countries has led to the conclusion that the financial system that is less biased in terms of financial investment relative to the functioning of non-financial sectors is the least vulnerable in a crisis. The multiple excess of financial investments over non-financial ones for Russia creates the foundation of financial instability and recession. This is confirmed using econometric analysis and forecast. Therefore, overcoming the economic crisis caused by COVID-19 in addition to the current measures will require correcting, in particular, the structure of “financial-non-financial” investments.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords:  economic crisis; virus attack on the economy; damage assessment method; risk; supply and demand dynamics; government anti-crisis policy; financial stability; institutional rigidity of the “financial-non-financial” investment structure

Citation: Oleg S. Sukharev. Economic crisis as a consequence COVID-19 virus attack: risk and damage assessment. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2020, 4(2): 274-293. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2020013

References: 

  • 1. Alonso-Carrera J, Raurich X (2018) Labor mobility, structural change and economic growth. J Macroecon 56: 292-310.    
  • 2. Beutels P, Jia N, Zhou QY, et al. (2009) The economic impact of SARS in Beijing, China. Trop Med Int Health 14: 85-91.    
  • 3. Brancaccio E, Garbellini N, Giammetti R (2018) Structural labour market reforms, GDP growth and the functional distribution of income. Struct Change Econ Dyn 44: 34-45.    
  • 4. Chambers J, Barker K, Rouse A (2012) Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response. Health Place 18: 737-745.    
  • 5. Cutrini E (2019) Economic integration, structural change, and uneven development in the European Union. Struct Change Econ Dyn 50: 102-113.    
  • 6. Freire C (2019) Economic diversification: A model of structural economic dynamics and endogenous technological change. Struct Change Econ Dyn 49: 13-28.    
  • 7. Guerard JB, Markowitz H, Xu G (2015) Earnings forecasting in a global stock selection model and efficient portfolio construction and management. Int J Forecasting 31: 550-560.    
  • 8. Gates B (2020) Responding to COVID-19-a once in-a-century pandemic? New Engl J Med.
  • 9. Iamsiraroj S (2016) The foreign direct investment-economic growth nexus. Int Rev Econ Financ 42: 116-133.    
  • 10. Landesmann MA, Stöllinge R (2019) Structural change, trade and global production networks: An 'appropriate industrial policy' for peripheral and catching-up economies. Struct Change Econ Dyn 48: 7-23.    
  • 11. Nicoll A, Ammon A, Amato A, et al. (2010) Experience and lessons from surveillance and studies of the 2009 pandemic in Europe. Public Health 124: 14-23.    
  • 12. Nkeki CI (2018) Optimal investment risks and debt management with backup security in a financial crisis. J Comput Appl Math 338: 129-152.    
  • 13. Pasquini-Descomps H, Brender N, Maradan D (2017) Value for money in H1N1 influenza: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of pandemic interventions. Value Health 20: 819-827.    
  • 14. Samaniego RM, Sun JY (2016) Productivity growth and structural transformation. Rev Econ Dyn 21: 266-285.    
  • 15. Singhal T (2020) A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J Pediatrics, 281-286.
  • 16. Sukharev OS (2020) Structural analysis of income and risk dynamics in models of economic growth. Quant Financ Econ 4: 1-18    
  • 17. Sukharev OS (2019) The restructuring of the investment portfolio: the risk and effect of the emergence of new combinations. Quant Financ Econ 3: 390-411.    
  • 18. Zhao S, Chen H (2020) Modeling the epidemic dynamics and control of COVID-19 outbreak in China. Quant Biology.
  • 19. Vu KM (2017) Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Struct Change Econ Dyn 41: 64-77.    
  • 20. Xie B, He D, Mercer T, et al. (2020) Global health crises are also information crises: A call to action. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol.
  • 21. Yu KDS, Aviso KB (2020) Modelling the Economic Impact and Ripple Effects of Disease Outbreaks. Process Integration Optim Sustainability.

 

This article has been cited by: 

  • 1. O. S. Sukharev, Investments in the Transaction Sector and Financial Assets: Impact on Economic Growth, Finance: Theory and Practice, 2020, 24, 3, 60, 10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-3-60-80
  • 2. Olha Kravchenko, Nadiia Bohomolova, Oksana Karpenko, Maryna Savchenko, Nataliia Bondar, Scenario-based financial planning: the case of Ukrainian railways, National Accounting Review, 2020, 2, 3, 217, 10.3934/NAR.2020013
  • 3. Jawad Saleemi, In COVID-19 outbreak, correlating the cost-based market liquidity risk to microblogging sentiment indicators, National Accounting Review, 2020, 2, 3, 249, 10.3934/NAR.2020014

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Export Citation

Associated material

PubMed record

 

Metrics

PDF downloads(431)

HTML views(336)

Cited by(3)

 

Other articles by authors

[+] on Google Scholar

[+] on PubMed

[+] on ORCID

 

Related pages

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

 

Tools

Download XML

Email to a friend

Order reprints

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved