Mini review Topical Sections

Energy aspects of microalgal biodiesel production

  • Algal biodiesel production will play a significant role in sustaining future transportation fuel supplies. A large number of researchers around the world are investigating into making this process sustainable by increasing the energy gains and by optimizing resource-utilization efficiencies. Although, research is being pursued aggressively in all aspects of algal biodiesel production from microalgal cell cultivation, cell harvesting, and extraction and transesterification steps to the final product separation and purification, there is a large disparity in the data presented in recent reports making it difficult to assess the real potential of microalgae as a future energy source. This article discusses some of the key issues in energy consumption in the process of algal biodiesel production and identifies the areas for improvement to make this process energy-positive and sustainable.

    Citation: Edith Martinez-Guerra, Veera Gnaneswar Gude. Energy aspects of microalgal biodiesel production[J]. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(2): 347-362. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.2.347

    Related Papers:

    [1] Imran Siddique, Yasir Khan, Muhammad Nadeem, Jan Awrejcewicz, Muhammad Bilal . Significance of heat transfer for second-grade fuzzy hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching/shrinking Riga wedge. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 295-316. doi: 10.3934/math.2023014
    [2] Mushtaq Ahmad, Muhammad Imran Asjad, Ali Akgül, Dumitru Baleanu . Analytical solutions for free convection flow of Casson nanofluid over an infinite vertical plate. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2344-2358. doi: 10.3934/math.2021142
    [3] Taqi A. M. Shatnawi, Nadeem Abbas, Wasfi Shatanawi . Comparative study of Casson hybrid nanofluid models with induced magnetic radiative flow over a vertical permeable exponentially stretching sheet. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20545-20564. doi: 10.3934/math.20221126
    [4] J. Kayalvizhi, A. G. Vijaya Kumar, Ndolane Sene, Ali Akgül, Mustafa Inc, Hanaa Abu-Zinadah, S. Abdel-Khalek . An exact solution of heat and mass transfer analysis on hydrodynamic magneto nanofluid over an infinite inclined plate using Caputo fractional derivative model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3542-3560. doi: 10.3934/math.2023180
    [5] Yousef Jawarneh, Samia Noor, Ajed Akbar, Rafaqat Ali Khan, Ahmad Shafee . Intelligent neural networks approach for analysis of the MHD viscous nanofluid flow due to rotating disk with slip effect. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 10387-10412. doi: 10.3934/math.2025473
    [6] Sami Ul Haq, Saeed Ullah Jan, Syed Inayat Ali Shah, Ilyas Khan, Jagdev Singh . Heat and mass transfer of fractional second grade fluid with slippage and ramped wall temperature using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3056-3088. doi: 10.3934/math.2020198
    [7] Abdelraheem M. Aly, Abd-Allah Hyder . Fractional-time derivative in ISPH method to simulate bioconvection flow of a rotated star in a hexagonal porous cavity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 31050-31069. doi: 10.3934/math.20231589
    [8] Subhan Ullah, Hassan Ali Ghazwani, Dolat Khan, Zareen A. Khan . Heat transfer augmentation of Jeffery–Hamel hybrid nanofluid in a stretching convergent/divergent channel through porous medium. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 388-402. doi: 10.3934/math.2025018
    [9] Xiping Liu, Mei Jia, Zhanbing Bai . Nonlocal problems of fractional systems involving left and right fractional derivatives at resonance. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3331-3345. doi: 10.3934/math.2020214
    [10] Humaira Yasmin, Rawan Bossly, Fuad S. Alduais, Afrah Al-Bossly, Anwar Saeed . Analysis of the radiated ternary hybrid nanofluid flow containing TiO2, CoFe2O4 and MgO nanoparticles past a bi-directional extending sheet using thermal convective and velocity slip conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9563-9594. doi: 10.3934/math.2025441
  • Algal biodiesel production will play a significant role in sustaining future transportation fuel supplies. A large number of researchers around the world are investigating into making this process sustainable by increasing the energy gains and by optimizing resource-utilization efficiencies. Although, research is being pursued aggressively in all aspects of algal biodiesel production from microalgal cell cultivation, cell harvesting, and extraction and transesterification steps to the final product separation and purification, there is a large disparity in the data presented in recent reports making it difficult to assess the real potential of microalgae as a future energy source. This article discusses some of the key issues in energy consumption in the process of algal biodiesel production and identifies the areas for improvement to make this process energy-positive and sustainable.


    It is very tough to visualize humans living in a recent time without heat transference. Maximum heat transmission processes in heat systems are achieved by employing the thermal transmission of fluids. The utilization of conventional thermal transfer fluids like ethylene glycol, water, engine oil and methanol is finite because of their short heat conductions [1]. For the advancement of the energy effectiveness of systems in different fields of science and engineering, the conventional thermal transference of fluids was substituted by nanofluids (NFs) [2]. NFs are an emulsion of little complex non-metallic or metallic elements, named nanoparticles in the base as mentioned for earlier liquids [3]. Through the more significant heat conduction of nanoparticles, the use of NFs boosts the thermal transmission. The NFs, in terms of their thermal performance, construction, solidity, and properties, were studied by Aydin and Guru [4]. Although NFs are formed through scattering one kind of nanoparticles in the base liquid, the thermal characteristics of NFs might be enhanced by using hybrid nanofluids (HNFs). HNFs combine two or more two different nanoparticles in the base liquid. Suitable nanoparticle kinds with precise weight percent are utilized to attain the required thermal exchange percentage. The HNFs institute enormous utilization in various features of the human life cycle, for instance, in defense, microfluidics and transportation [5,6], in this mode, the idea of HNFs has been the topic of several numerical and experimental investigations. An excellent analysis of HNFs, their techniques of preparation and the features affecting their performance and areas of employment were examined in [7]. The water-based HNF of silicon dioxide and graphite was groomed by Dalkılıç et al. [8], and its thickness in dissimilar NP volume fractions and temperatures was calculated. The thickness increases by the volume fraction rise and temperature decline were established; the maximum thickness increase was also attained. Numerous researches work on the movement of HNFs have been investigated in the relevant literature; see [9,10]. A Casson fluid is an essential form of non-Newtonian fluid that acts identical to a flexible solid in which no movement happens with minor yield stress [11]. It is appropriate for cooling and heating operations because of its powerful influence on the energy communication rate, which qualifies it for application in numerous fields like diet processing, drilling, metallurgy, and biotechnology developments. A Casson fluid is helpful during the construction of printing ink [12]. Casson fluid is also proficiently efficient at describing many polymers' movement features extensively [13].

    Moreover, experiments based on blood have established that blood can perform as a Casson fluid [14,15]. Human blood, tomato sauce, custard, toothpaste, foams, starch suspensions, yogurt, nail polish and molten cosmetics are well-known examples of this fluid. Recently, Mustafa et al. [16] testified, when the speed is reducing and temperature is growing, raising the Casson parameter increases shear stress as well as thermal transfer. Mukhopadhyay et al. [17] exploited the shooting technique to study the flow of a Casson liquid as well as energy communication. Khalid et al. [18] studied the magneto-natural convection flow of a Casson fluid on a plate in a porous medium. Animasaun et al. [19] verified that the development in the Casson constraint source estimations enhances curve growth and reduces temperature curves. The influence of chemical reactions with a Casson liquid and a sphere was reviewed in [20]. Makinde et al. [21] discussed a meaningful connection between the influence of the Lorentz force and the movement of Casson fluid. The influence and skill of HNFs as the heat transfer fluid with a moving surface were numerically examined in [22]. A numerical investigation was done to study the HNFs boundary layer flow by Khashi'ie et al. [23]. They proved that the surface of a flat plate reduces the difference of the boundary layer and improves the heat transmission phenomena. The numerical solution and stability investigation for HNFs flow on a porous stretching/shrinking cylinder was discussed in [24] by utilizing the bvp4c problem solver in the Matlab package. They proved that a rise in the melting factor decreases the quantity of heat transmission and boosts the difference in the boundary layer. Ahmad et al. [25] investigated the analytical solution of a Casson NF flowing on an infinite vertical plate by utilizing the Caputo fractional derivatives definition.

    The construction of different physical phenomena consequences complicated partial differential equations. The solution to such problems is relatively substantial in evaluating diverse types of physical phenomena. Fractional calculus excellently defines different approaches for investigating this type of problem. The terms, with the local and non-local kernels, are proficiently conserved by fractional technique. In the branch of fractional calculus, Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) and Atangana-Baleanu (AB) approaches are well-known techniques which have been extensively applied by investigators for several years in the past [26,27]. A well-known Indian mathematician, Tialk Raj Prabhakar, anticipated an innovative fractional operator along with three parameters. The Prabhakar fractional operator is a Mittag-Leffer function with three dissimilar fractional derivative operators. This operator has Mittag-Leffer tails using classical kernels positively [28]. Ali et al. [29] applied a Laplace transform and fractional approach to discuss a viscous fractional fluid model. Raza et al. [30,31] applied Prabhakar and Caputo fractional approach and a Laplace transform to study different fluid models and tools to improve the thermal transfer methods. Samia et al. [32] discussed a rate-type fractional model with a semi-analytical approach. Different numerical familiar techniques were applied for a fractional Oldroyd-B fluid mathematical model in [33]. Wang et al. [34] applied a Prabhakar approach to examine the blood-based HNF models with diverse nanoparticles by considering the Newtonian heating effect. Jie et al. [35] discussed the Brinkman NF fractional model and sinusoidal oscillations and submitted significant results. Suganya et al. [36] discussed an innovative numerical technique for 2-D stimulation energy along with an unsteady and revolving HNF flow for stretching and moving surfaces by exploiting the explicit finite-difference method. Their results revealed that the stimulation energy controls the thermal transmission amount. Abu Bakar et al. [37]studied the flow of HNFs over a porous medium along with the slip and radiation effects on a shrinking sheet by employing the shooting method. They perceived the rise of thermal transfer in the HNF relative to the usual NF. Shoeibi et al. [38] studied the glass chilling of a double-slope lunar still by utilizing an HNF (TiO2-Al2O3) at a 0.4% concentration numerically. Kanti et al. [39] applied the two-step technique to formulate the nanofluids. Their results exposed that the thermal conductivity of the NFs increased with increasing concentration and temperature. Nadeem et al. [40] discussed the heat transmission and MHD (magnetohydrodynamics) second-grade stagnation point flow of HNF with a convectively heated porous sheet to enhance the quantity of heat transfer by exploiting the numerical bvp4c method.

    After reviewing the above literature, we have examined the Casson NF with sinusoidal heat transference and slip boundaries in this article. Different nanoparticles, i.e., copper $ \left(Cu\right) $, titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $ and aluminum oxide $ \left(A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}\right) $ have been utilized for the suspension of NFs with water as the base fluid. The comparative analysis of the attained results of governed equations with innovative fractional derivatives, i.e., AB and CF-time fractional derivatives are examined. The semi-analytical solution of thermal and momentum fields is attained with the assistance of the Laplace transform and some numerical methods. To analyze the effects of different parameters on the governing equations, graphical and numerical comparisons are discussed with different values of parameters. Furthermore, the numerical comparison of the Nusselt number and skin friction is inspected at different times and numerical schemes.

    In this manuscript, we have supposed a free mixed-convection viscous Casson NF flowing on an oscillating poured inclined plate due to the influence of applied inclined magnetic field with a strength of $ {B}_{o} $. The flowing Casson fluid is mixed with different $ (A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}, Cu, Ti{O}_{2}) $ nanoparticles. Thermophysical properties and their values of base fluid and nanoparticles are described in Tables 1 and 2. Primarily at $ t = 0 $, the temperature and inclined poured plate are both in a stable position. With the time at $ t > {0}^{+} $, the inclined plate begins to vibrate with a velocity $ {U}_{o}Cos\left(\omega t\right) $, where $ \omega $ shows the frequency of oscillations of the inclined plate. Due to the plate oscillations and rise in the thermal profile, the fluid also begins to flow on the oscillating plate with the same velocity as the plate oscillations, as displayed in Figure 1.

    Table 1.  Model for thermophysical properties of NF quantities.
    Thermal features Regular NF
    Density $ {\rho }_{f}=\frac{{\rho }_{nf}}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\rho }_{s}}{{\rho }_{s}}} $
    Dynamic Viscosity $ {\mu }_{f}={\mu }_{nf}{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5} $
    Electrical conductivity $ {\sigma }_{f}=\frac{{\sigma }_{nf}}{\left(1+\frac{3\left(\frac{{\sigma }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{f}}-1\right)\varphi }{\left(\frac{{\sigma }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{f}}+2\right)-\left(\frac{{\sigma }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{f}}-1\right)\varphi }\;\;\;\;\right)} $
    Thermal conductivity $ {k}_{f}=\frac{{k}_{nf}}{\left(\frac{{k}_{s}+\left(n-1\right){k}_{f}-\left(n-1\right)\left({k}_{f}-{k}_{s}\right)\varphi }{{k}_{s}+\left(n-1\right){k}_{f}+\left({k}_{f}-{k}_{s}\right)\varphi }\;\;\;\;\;\;\right)} $
    Heat capacitance $ {\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{f}=\frac{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{nf}}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)\;}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)\;}_{f}}} $
    Thermal Expansion Coefficient $ {\left(\rho \beta \right)}_{f}=\frac{{\left(\rho \beta \right)}_{nf}}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho \beta \right)\;\;}_{s}}{{\left(\rho \beta \right)\;\;}_{f}}} $

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  Thermal characteristics of base fluids and nanoparticles [45].
    Material Water Al2O3 Cu TiO2
    $ \rho \left(kg/{m}^{3}\right) $ 997.1 3970 8933 4250
    $ {C}_{p}\left(J/kgK\right) $ 4179 765 385 686.2
    $ k\left(W/mK\right) $ 0.613 40 401 8.9528
    $ {\beta }_{T}\times {10}^{5}\left({K}^{-1}\right) $ 21 0.85 1.67 0.90

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  Geometry of the flow.

    By neglecting the pressure gradient and utilizing the Boussinesq's [41,42] and Rosseland estimations, the governed equations for this fractional model can be originated as follows [43,44]:

    $ {\rho }_{nf}\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial t} = {\mu }_{nf}\left(1+\frac{1}{{\lambda }_{1}^{*}}\right)\frac{{\partial }^{2}w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\sigma }_{nf}{B}_{o}^{2}Sin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mu }_{nf}\varphi }{K}\right)w\left(\xi , t\right)+g{\left(\rho \beta \right)}_{nf}\left[T\left(\xi , t\right)-\\ \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad {T}_{\infty }\right]Cos\left({\theta }_{2}\right) , $ (1)
    $ {\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{nf}\frac{\partial T(\xi , t)}{\partial t} = {k}_{nf}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (2)

    with suitable conditions, as follows

    $ w\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0, T\left(\xi , 0\right) = {T}_{\infty };\xi > 0 , $ (3)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = {U}_{o}Cos\left(\omega t\right), T\left(0, t\right) = \left\{T+(TwT)tto,0<tto,Tw,t>to,
    \right. $
    (4)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0, T\left(\xi , t\right)\to {T}_{\infty };\xi \to \infty , t > 0 . $ (5)

    Now, we introduce the appropriate non-dimensional parameters to non-dimensionalize the leading perspective conditions, Eqs (1) and (2):

    $ {w}^{*} = \frac{w}{{w}_{o}}, {\xi }^{*} = \frac{\xi {U}_{o}}{{\upsilon }_{f}}, {h}^{*} = \frac{h{U}_{o}^{2}}{\upsilon }{t}^{*} = \frac{t}{{t}_{o}}, {t}_{o} = \frac{{\upsilon }_{f}}{{U}_{o}^{2}}, {T}^{*} = \frac{T-{T}_{\infty }}{{T}_{w}-{T}_{\infty }} . $

    By neglecting the star notation, the governing Eqs (1) and (2) and corresponding conditions in the non-dimensional form will become as

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}\frac{\partial w(\xi , t)}{\partial t} = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}w(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)w(\xi , t)+{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)T\left(\xi , t\right) , $ (6)
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr\frac{\partial T(\xi , t)}{\partial t} = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (7)

    with the non-dimensional conditions:

    $ w\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0, T\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0;\xi > 0 , $ (8)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = Cos\left(\omega t\right), T\left(0, t\right) = \left\{t,0<t1,1,t>1,
    \right. $
    (9)
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0, T\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0;\xi \to \infty , t > 0 . $ (10)

    In Eq (8) the initial conditions of the flowing mathematical model are described with the zero velocity and temperature at time $ t = 0 $. And in Eq (9) the boundary conditions at $ \xi = 0 $ are described with slipping boundary effect and sinusoidal thermal conditions, where

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1} = \left(1-\varphi \right){\rho }_{f}+\varphi \frac{{\rho }_{s}}{{\rho }_{f}}, {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2} = \frac{1}{{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5}}, {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3} = \frac{{\sigma }_{hnf}}{{\sigma }_{f}} , $
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4} = \left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {\beta }_{T}\right)}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {\beta }_{T}\right)}_{f}}, {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5} = \left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {C}_{p}\right)}_{f}} , $
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6} = \frac{\left(1-\varphi \right)+2\varphi \frac{{k}_{s}}{{k}_{s}{-k}_{f}}ln\left(\frac{{k}_{s}{-k}_{f}}{2{k}_{f}}\right)}{\left(1-\varphi \right)+2\varphi \frac{{k}_{s}}{{k}_{s}{-k}_{f}}ln\left(\frac{{k}_{s}{+k}_{f}}{2{k}_{f}}\right)}, {\lambda }_{1} = 1+\frac{1}{{\lambda }_{1}^{*}}, Gr = \frac{{g\beta }_{f}\left({T}_{w}-{T}_{\infty }\right)}{{U}_{o}^{3}} , $
    $ Pr = \frac{{\mu }_{f}{\left({C}_{p}\right)}_{f}}{{k}_{f}}, M = \frac{{\upsilon }_{f}{\sigma }_{f}{B}_{o}^{2}}{{\rho }_{f}{U}_{o}^{2}}, K = \frac{k{U}_{o}^{2}}{{\upsilon }_{f}\varphi } . $

    Definition 1. The mathematical form of the AB-fractional derivative for the function $ u\left(y, t\right) $ is

    $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }u\left(y, t\right) = \frac{1}{1-\beta }{\int }_{0}^{t}{E}_{\beta }\left[\frac{\beta {\left(t-z\right)}^{\beta }}{1-\beta }\right]{{u}^{\mathrm{\text{'}}}}_{\left(y, t\right)}dt; 0 < \beta < 1 , $ (11)

    where $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta } $ is the AB-fractional operator with fractional order parameter$ \beta $ [46] and $ {E}_{\beta }\left(z\right) $ is a Mittag-Leffer function with the mathematical form of

    $ {E}_{\beta }\left(z\right) = \sum _{r = 0}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{{z}^{\beta }}{\mathrm{\Gamma }\left(r\beta +1\right)};z\in \mathbb{C} . $

    The Laplace transform of the AB-fractional derivative (Eq(5)) can be well-defined as [47]

    $ \mathcal{L}\left\{{}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }w\left(\xi , t\right)\right\} = \frac{{q}^{\beta }\mathcal{L}\left[w\left(\xi , t\right)\right]-{q}^{\beta -1}w\left(\xi , 0\right)}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta } , $ (12)

    where $ q $ is the transformed constraint via the Laplace scheme.

    Definition 2. The CF-time-fractional derivative for the function $ u\left(y, t\right) $ can be notarized as

    $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }u\left(y, t\right) = \frac{1}{1-\alpha }{\int }_{0}^{t}exp\left(\frac{\alpha \left(1-\tau \right)}{1-\alpha }\right){u}^{\text{'}}\left(y, t\right)d\tau ; 0 < \alpha < 1 , $ (13)

    where $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha } $ is the CF-fractional operator with non-integer order $ \alpha $, and its Laplace transformation is [48,49]

    $ \mathcal{L}\left\{{}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }w\left(\xi , t\right)\right\} = \frac{s\mathcal{L}\left[w\left(\xi , t\right)\right]-w\left(\xi , 0\right)}{\left(1-\alpha \right)s+\alpha } . $ (14)

    The dimensionless version of the AB-fractional model may be attained by substituting the partial derivative with the AB-time fractional operator $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta } $ of Eqs (6) and (7).

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}{}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }w(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}w(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)w(\xi , t)+{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)T\left(\xi , t\right) , $ (15)
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr{}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta }T(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (16)

    where $ {}^{AB}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\beta } $ signifies the AB-fractional operator.

    Using the Laplace transform to solve the energy equation (Eq (16)), we have

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr\left(\frac{{q}^{\beta }\mathcal{L}\left[T(\xi , t)\right]-{q}^{\beta -1}\bar{T}(\xi , 0)}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{T}(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} $ (17)

    with the following transformed conditions:

    $ \bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}, \;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\;\bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty . $

    Exploiting the above transformed conditions, the simulation of the energy profile is summarized as

    $ \bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}} . $ (18)

    In Tables 35, we show the inverse results for Eq (18) that were obtained numerically by using inverse procedures such as the Stehfest and Tzou's approaches.

    Table 3.  Numerical analysis results for the Nusselt number $ Nu $ for the AB- and CF-fractional models.
    $ \boldsymbol{\alpha }, \boldsymbol{\beta } $ $ \boldsymbol{\varphi } $ $ \boldsymbol{t} $ $ \boldsymbol{N}\boldsymbol{u}\left(\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{B}\right) $ $ \boldsymbol{N}\boldsymbol{u}\left(\boldsymbol{C}\boldsymbol{F}\right) $
    0.1 0.00 0.1 0.6300 0.6410
    0.4 0.01 0.1 0.7200 0.7589
    0.7 0.02 0.1 0.9153 0.9761
    0.9 0.03 0.1 1.2046 1.2565
    0.1 0.00 0.3 0.6202 0.6310
    0.4 0.01 0.3 0.7088 0.7471
    0.7 0.02 0.3 0.9011 0.9609
    0.9 0.03 0.3 1.1859 1.2369
    0.1 0.00 0.5 0.5955 0.6059
    0.4 0.01 0.5 0.6806 0.7174
    0.7 0.02 0.5 0.8653 0.9227
    0.9 0.03 0.5 1.1387 1.1877
    0.1 0.00 0.8 0.6106 0.6213
    0.4 0.01 0.8 0.6978 0.7356
    0.7 0.02 0.8 0.8872 0.9461
    0.9 0.03 0.8 1.1676 1.2178

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Numerical analysis results for the skin friction $ {C}_{f} $ at different time.
    $ \boldsymbol{\beta } $ $ \boldsymbol{t}={\bf{1.0}} $ $ \boldsymbol{t}={\bf{1.5}} $
    $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{B}\right) $ $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{C}\boldsymbol{F}\right) $ $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{A}\boldsymbol{B}\right) $ $ {\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{f}}\left(\boldsymbol{C}\boldsymbol{F}\right) $
    0.1 0.1201 0.1546 0.7407 0.7590
    0.2 0.1384 0.1993 0.7541 0.7851
    0.3 0.1679 0.2484 0.7750 0.8150
    0.4 0.2083 0.3025 0.8034 0.8496
    0.5 0.2601 0.3624 0.8401 0.8903
    0.6 0.3243 0.4286 0.8869 0.9391
    0.7 0.4027 0.5014 0.9471 0.9990
    0.8 0.4967 0.5793 1.0264 1.0747
    0.9 0.6050 0.6550 1.1349 1.1720

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Numerical analysis results for the velocity and temperature profile.
    $ \boldsymbol{\xi } $ Velocity (Stehfest) Velocity (Tzou's) Temperature (Stehfest) Temperature (Tzou)
    AB CF AB CF AB CF AB CF
    0.1 1.8385 1.8236 1.8203 1.8179 0.7294 0.7258 0.7389 0.7352
    0.3 1.9869 2.0373 1.9890 2.0235 0.6074 0.5984 0.6154 0.6064
    0.5 1.9289 2.0150 1.9456 1.9963 0.5059 0.4934 0.5126 0.5000
    0.7 1.7664 1.8673 1.7927 1.8461 0.4212 0.4067 0.4269 0.4123
    0.9 1.5601 1.6622 1.5917 1.6404 0.3507 0.3353 0.3555 0.3399
    1.1 1.3447 1.4401 1.3787 1.4189 0.2920 0.2763 0.2960 0.2802
    1.3 1.1394 1.2239 1.1735 1.2041 0.2431 0.2277 0.2464 0.2310
    1.5 1.9533 1.0254 0.9862 1.0073 0.2024 0.1876 0.2052 0.1904
    1.7 0.7902 0.8498 0.8208 0.8337 0.1684 0.1546 0.1708 0.1569
    1.9 0.6502 0.6983 0.6781 0.6842 0.1402 0.1274 0.1422 0.1293

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Applying the Laplace transform to Eq (15) and its accompanying conditions, we acquire the velocity solution as

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}\left(\frac{{q}^{\beta }\mathcal{L}\left[w\left(\xi , t\right)\right]-{q}^{\beta -1}w\left(\xi , 0\right)}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)\bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right) $
    $ +{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)\bar{T}\left(\xi , q\right) $ (19)

    with the transformed conditions:

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = \frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{q}^{2}} \;\text{and }\; \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty . $ (20)

    Utilizing conditions of Eq (20), the solution of Eq (19) will become

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , q\right) = \frac{1}{1+h\sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}}\times $
    $ \left(\frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{1+h\sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}+\frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{q}^{2}}\right)\times $
    $ {e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)}}- $
    $ \frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }}}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{q}^{\beta }}{\left(1-\beta \right){q}^{\beta }+\beta }\right)} . $ (21)

    By substituting the partial derivative with respect to time with the CF-fractional operator $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha } $, the model equations for the CF-fractional derivative will be obtained as

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}{}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }w(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}\frac{{\partial }^{2}w(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}\right)w(\xi , t)+{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)T\left(\xi , t\right) , $ (22)
    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr{}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha }T(\xi , t) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}T(\xi , t)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (23)

    where $ {}^{CF}{\mathfrak{D}}_{t}^{\alpha } $ signifies the CF-fractional operator. With the following transformed conditions:

    $ w\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0, T\left(\xi , 0\right) = 0;\xi > 0 , $
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial w\left(\xi , t\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = Cos\left(\omega t\right), T\left(0, t\right) = \left\{t,0<t1,1,t>1,
    \right. $
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0, T\left(\xi , t\right)\to 0;\xi \to \infty , t > 0 . $

    Because the thermal profile in Eq (23) is agnostic of the momentum profile, applying the Laplace transform to the heat equation (Eq (23)) yields

    $ {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr\left(\frac{s\mathcal{L}\left[T(\xi , t)\right]-T(\xi , 0)}{\left(1-\alpha \right)s+\alpha }\right) = {\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}\frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{T}(\xi , s)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}} , $ (24)

    with the following conditions:

    $ \bar{T}\left(\xi , s\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-s}}{{s}^{2}}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\;\bar{T}\left(\xi , s\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty . $

    Employing the above conditions, the thermal profile will be

    $ \bar{\vartheta }\left(y, s\right) = \frac{1-{e}^{-s}}{{s}^{2}}{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{5}Pr}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{6}}\frac{{\mathrm{a}}_{1}\mathrm{s}}{\mathrm{s}+{\mathrm{a}}_{2}}\right)}} . $ (25)

    Again the Laplace inverse of the above equation can be observed numerically in Table 4.

    Now, for the velocity solution, apply the Laplace transform to the CF-fractional version given by Eq (22), as well as the temperature solution found in Eq (25)

    $ \frac{{\partial }^{2}\bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)}{\partial {\xi }^{2}}-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{1}{\mathrm{a}}_{1}\mathrm{s}}{\mathrm{s}+{\mathrm{a}}_{2}}\right)\bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right) = -\frac{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\bar{T}\left(\xi , s\right) , $ (26)

    with the following conditions:

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)-h{\left.\frac{\partial \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)}{\partial \xi }\right|}_{\xi = 0} = \frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{s}^{2}} $ and $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right)\to 0\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{s}\;\xi \to \infty. $ (27)

    Using the condition mentioned earlier, the follow-up studies of Eq (26) may be obtained.

    $ \bar{w}\left(\xi , s\right) = \frac{1}{1+h\sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)}}\times $
    $ \left(\frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{1+h\sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)}+\frac{\omega }{{\omega }^{2}+{q}^{2}}\right)\times $
    $ {e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)}}-\frac{{\varPi }_{4}GrCos\left({\theta }_{2}\right)}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\frac{1-{e}^{-q}}{{q}^{2}}\frac{{e}^{-\xi \sqrt{\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}}}}{\left(\frac{{\varPi }_{5}Pr}{{\varPi }_{6}}\frac{{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)-\frac{1}{{\varPi }_{2}{\lambda }_{1}}\left({\varPi }_{3}MSin\left({\theta }_{1}\right)+\frac{{\varPi }_{2}}{K}+\frac{{\varPi }_{1}{a}_{1}s}{s+{a}_{2}}\right)} . $ (28)

    We will utilize Stehfest and Tzou's numerical methods to compute the inverse Laplace transform of the temperature and velocity profiles using the AB and CF-fractional derivatives of Eqs (18), (21), (25) and (28), correspondingly [50,51,52]:

    $ w\left(\xi , t\right) = \frac{ln\left(2\right)}{t}\sum _{n = 1}^{M}{v}_{n}\overline{u}\left(\xi , n\frac{ln\left(2\right)}{t}\right) , $
    $ {v}_{n} = {\left(-1\right)}^{n+\frac{M}{2}}\sum _{p = \frac{q+1}{2}}^{min\left(q, \frac{M}{2}\right)}\frac{{p}^{\frac{M}{2}}\left(2p\right)!}{\left(\frac{M}{2}-p\right)!p!\left(p-1\right)!\left(q-p\right)!\left(2p-q\right)!} , $
    $ w\left(\xi , t\right) = \frac{{e}^{4.7}}{t}\left[\frac{1}{2}\bar{w}\left(r, \frac{4.7}{t}\right)+Re\left\{\sum _{j = 1}^{N}{\left(-1\right)}^{k}\overline{w}\left(r, \frac{4.7+k\pi i}{t}\right)\right\}\right] . $

    The fundamental goal of this investigation was to demonstrate the importance of fractional derivatives for the Casson-type NF by means of AB and CF derivatives. For the energy and momentum equations, an NF mixed with various nanoparticles, such as $ A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}, Cu, Ti{O}_{2} $ was assumed and water was applied as the base fluid. The solution of the non-dimensional governing equations, i.e., the energy and momentum fields were found by applying the Laplace approach to the AB and CF-fractional models. The impacts of various constraints on non-dimensional governing equations are visually shown in Figures 213. The results of the numerical analysis of the Nusselt number and the skin friction are shown in Tables 35.

    Figure 2.  Temperature profile against $ \xi $ due to $ \alpha, \beta $ when $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ \varphi = 0.02 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 3.  Temperature profile against $\xi$ due to $\varphi$ when $\alpha, \beta = 0.5, P r = 6.2$, and $t = 1.0$.
    Figure 4.  Temperature profile against $ \xi $ due to $ Pr $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ \varphi = 0.0 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 5.  Velocity profile against $\xi$ due to $\alpha, \beta$ when $P r = 6.2, G r = 2.6, M = 0.85, \theta_1 = \theta_2 = \frac{\pi}{4}, K = 2.5, h = 0.5$, and $t = 1.0$.
    Figure 6.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ Pr $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, $ h = 0.5 $, $ \varphi = 0.0 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 7.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ \varphi $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, $ h = 0.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 8.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ h $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 9.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ K $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ M = 0.85 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ h = 0.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 10.  Velocity profile against $ \xi $ due to $ M $ when $ \alpha, \beta = 0.5 $, $ Pr = 6.2 $, $ Gr = 2.6 $, $ {\theta }_{1} = {\theta }_{2} = \frac{\pi }{4} $, $ K = 2.5 $, $ h = 0.5 $, and $ t = 1.0 $.
    Figure 11.  Comparison of fractional and ordinary derivative momentum and thermal fields.
    Figure 12.  Comparison of numerical schemes for momentum and thermal fields.
    Figure 13.  Comparison of thermal and momentum profiles with the results of Ahmad et al. [25].

    The effects of the fractional parameters $ \left(\alpha, \beta \right) $ on temperature are shown in Figure 2(a) and 2(b). It is perceived that the temperature behavior decreases with growing estimations of fractional parameters for both fractional approaches. The AB-fractional operators have a more substantial impact than the CF-fractional operators on the energy profile. Such an impact happens because of the kernel of both diverse fractional operators. Figure 2(b) also shows the comparison of two different nanoparticles indicating that titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $-based NFs have a relatively more progressive value than copper $ \left(Cu\right) $-based NFs, due to the physical characteristics of the considered nanoparticles. Figure 3(a) and 3(b) were made to intercept the response of the temperature profile when the volume fraction of the $ Ti{O}_{2} $ and $ Cu $ nanoparticles are equally varied. The response of the temperature field declined for improvement of the volume fraction ($ \varphi $) for both fractional models. Figure 3(b) shows that the profile of the temperature of the $ Ti{O}_{2} $-based NF was better than that of the $ Cu $-based NF. These suspension consequences are due to a growth in the thickness of the subsequent impact of the nanoparticles. Further, this effect is primarily attributed to the thermal features of the included nanoparticles, which refine the thermal presentation of the host fluid. Figure 4(a) and 4(b) were designed for the temperature profile to display the impacts of the $ Pr $; the thermal boundary layer is shown as the same for both cases of fractional techniques. The temperature profile can be perceived as reciprocal performance for heat transmission over the whole domain. Figure 4(b) shows that the temperature for the normal working-based fluid. Here, the rising impacts of $ Pr $ decelerates the temperature profile.

    The effects of the fractional parameters $ \left(\alpha, \beta \right) $ on velocity are exposed in Figure 5(a) and 5(b). It is noted that the velocity behavior also lessened with growing estimations of the fractional parameters for both cases of fractional approaches. The AB-fractional operators had a more significant impact than CF fractional operators owing to the different kernels of the diverse fractional derivatives on the velocity profile. Figure 5(b) also illustrates the comparison of two different nanoparticles, and we concluded that titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $-based NFs has a relatively progressive value than copper $ \left(Cu\right) $-based nanofluid, due to the physical characteristics of the considered nanoparticles, like the thermal profile.

    Figure 6(a) and 6(b) were sketched for the profile of the velocity to see the impact of $ Pr $ and it is noted that the velocity profile also had reciprocal performance for heat transmission over the whole domain due to the fact that $ Pr $ states the ratio of momentum diffusivity to thermal diffusivity. In heat transference models, $ Pr $ controls the relative viscosity of the momentum and thermal boundary layers. Figure 6(b) describes the velocity for the normal working-based fluid. The results reveal that, with the rising value of $ Pr $, the velocity profile declines. The effects of the volume fraction ($ \varphi $) on the velocity are shown in Figure 7(a) and 7(b) for both fractional models. It was detected that the velocity decelerates by increasing the estimations of $ \varphi $ because of the thermal conductivity of NFs for the $ \varphi $ parameters. Moreover, Figure 7(b) depicts that $ Ti{O}_{2} $-based NFs have a superior velocity value compared to $ Cu $-based NFs. Figure 8(a) is portrayed to examine the behavior of $ \beta $ on a velocity, along with the slip and no-slip conditions. It is observed that the velocity declines due to more significant estimations of $ \beta $. Moreover, it is distinguished that the velocity graph with slip conditions was higher than the graph without slip conditions near the oscillating plate. The effect of the Casson parameter $ {\lambda }_{1} $ on the velocity is shown in Figure 8(b). It can be seen that the velocity behavior represents the dual behavior for the Casson parameter $ {\lambda }_{1} $for both cases of fractional approaches. Initially, the momentum profile decreases due to increase in $ {\lambda }_{1} $, but and then decelerate its impact and the fluid flows more significantly. The AB-fractional operators have a more significant impact than the CF-fractional operators owing to the different kernels of the diverse fractional derivatives on the velocity.

    Figure 9(a) and 9(b) represent the velocity diagrams that can be used to understand the influence of $ Gr $ and $ K $, respectively. A rise in the velocity appeared because an enhancement in the estimations of $ Gr $ and the decreasing behavior can be seen for the porosity constraint $ K $. Physically, the upsurge in the $ Gr $ results from significant induced fluid flows because of an increase in buoyancy influences. Consequently, these forces may influence an increase in the velocity. Moreover, for the porosity constraint, physically, when in the porous medium, the holes are significantly sufficient, so the resistance of the permeability medium can be ignored. Therefore, the velocity rises as the existence of the porous surface increases the resistance to the fluid.

    Figure 10(a) illustrates the impact of the magnetic field $ M $ on the velocity. It is defined that magnetic field existence creates a Lorentz force in an electrically conducting fluid, which acts inversely to the fluid movement path if the value of $ M $ is imposed in the perpendicular direction, decelerating the velocity of the fluid. Furthermore, Figure 10(b) shows a comparison of different nanoparticles, and it is concluded that titanium dioxide $ \left(Ti{O}_{2}\right) $-based NFs have a more significant impact on the momentum field as compared to the copper $ \left(Cu\right) $ and aluminum oxide $ \left(A{l}_{2}{O}_{3}\right) $ nanoparticles. Figure 11(a) and 11(b) signify the effects of ordinary and fractional derivatives on velocity and temperature. It is perceived that the velocity and temperature for the ordinary model were more extensive than those for the AB- and CF-fractional models. Figure 12(a) and 12(b) were drawn to compare two different numerical methods, i.e., the Stehfest and Tzou methods, for thermal and momentum profiles. The outcomes from both curves show a slight overlap, which signifies this work's validity. Figure 13(a) and 13(b) were plotted to check the validity of our attained results in comparison with the results of Ahmad et al. [25] for velocity and temperature fields, respectively. It can be realized from these figures that our obtained results match those acquired by Ahmad et al. [25] by the overlapping of both curves.

    Table 3 shows the numerical analysis of the Nusselt number $ Nu $ with the impact of diverse parameters for the AB and CF models. It is perceived that the value of $ Nu $ for the CF model is larger than that for the AB model. Physically, it is due to the kernels of different fractional operators. Table 4 signifies the results of the numerical investigation of the skin friction $ {C}_{f} $ with the disparity in the fractional parameters at various times for the AB- and CF-fractional derivatives; it was concluded that the value of $ {C}_{f} $ for the CF model was larger than that for the AB model. Table 5 represents the results of the numerical study of velocity and temperature via diverse numerical inverse systems for the validation and accuracy of our obtained results as well as applied techniques. Furthermore, the results of the numerical comparison of our attained temperature and velocity profiles are examined in Table 6.

    Table 6.  Numerical comparison results for the temperature and velocity with Ahmad et al. [25].
    $ \boldsymbol{\xi } $ Temperature by this study Temperature by Ahmad et al. [25] Velocity by this study Velocity by Ahmad et al. [25]
    0.1 0.9311 0.9376 0.9407 0.9363
    0.3 0.7991 0.8198 0.8710 0.8599
    0.5 0.6854 0.7151 0.7658 0.7448
    0.7 0.5877 0.6226 0.6516 0.6223
    0.9 0.5037 0.5412 0.5424 0.5076
    1.1 0.4311 0.4696 0.4446 0.4071
    1.3 0.3696 0.4068 0.3602 0.3226
    1.5 0.3164 0.3520 0.2894 0.2533
    1.7 0.2708 0.3041 0.2310 0.1976
    1.9 0.2317 0.2624 0.1835 0.1533

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The Casson nanoparticles flow via AB and CF time-fractional derivatives has been studied. An NF mixed with various nanoparticles was assumed with water as the base fluid for the energy and momentum equations. The inversion algorithms as well as the Laplace transform were employed to obtain the solutions of velocity and temperature. A comparison was carried out for the ordinary, AB- and CF models. Some consequences from the literature can also be recovered from our obtained outcomes. Some concluding remarks are as follows:

    ● Temperature and momentum fields illustrate decaying behavior for fractional parameters in the case of the AB and CF models.

    ● The response of temperature and velocity fields declined to improve the volume fraction ($ \varphi $) for both fractional models.

    ● The computations show that temperature, as well as the velocity field rate declined by growing $ Pr $ for both fractional techniques.

    ● The velocity behavior also lessened with $ {\lambda }_{1} $ for both cases of fractional approaches.

    ● An increasing behavior for the velocity appeared due to an enhancement in the estimations of $ Gr $ and decreasing behavior was seen for $ K $.

    ● The behavior of velocity declined with the growing estimations of $ M. $

    ● The velocity and temperature for the ordinary model were more extensive than those for the AB- and CF- fractional models.

    ● The comparison of the two different numerical methods, i.e., the Stehfest and Tzou methods for thermal and momentum profiles, showed that the outcomes from both curves have a slight overlap.

    ● Our obtained temperature and velocity profile results match those acquired by Ahmad et al. [25].

    ● Velocity field increases are more significant than increase in the values of $ Gr $.

    ● The solution attained via the CF approach showed more decaying behavior then the AB model.

    This research received funding support from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (grant number B05F640092).

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25: 294-306. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001
    [2] Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 217-232.
    [3] Moody JW, McGinty CM, Quinn JC (2014) Global evaluation of biofuel potential from microalgae. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111: 8691-8696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321652111
    [4] Lardon L, Helias A, Sialve B, et al. (2009) Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 43: 6475-6481. doi: 10.1021/es900705j
    [5] Uduman N, Qi Y, Danquah MK, et al. (2010) Dewatering of microalgal cultures: a major bottleneck to algae-based fuels. J Renew Sustain Energy 20: 12701-12715.
    [6] Batan L, Quinn J, Willson B, et al. (2010) Net Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Evaluation of Biodiesel Derived from Microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 44: 7975-7980. doi: 10.1021/es102052y
    [7] Stephenson AL, Kazamia E, Dennis JS, et al. (2010) Life-Cycle Assessment of Potential Algal Biodiesel Production in the United Kingdom: A Comparison of Raceways and Air-Lift Tubular Bioreactors. Energ Fuel 24: 4062-4077. doi: 10.1021/ef1003123
    [8] Sturm BSM, Lamer SL (2011) An energy evaluation of coupling nutrient removal from wastewater with algal biomass production. Appl Energ 88: 3499-3506.
    [9] Liu X, Saydah B, Eranki P, et al. (2013) Pilot-scale data provided enhanced estimates of the life cycle energy and emissions profile of algae biofuels produced via hydrothermal liquefaction. Bioresource Technol 148: 163-171.
    [10] Ozkan A, Kinney K, Katz L, et al. (2012) Reduction of water and energy requirement of algae cultivation using an algae biofilm photobioreactor. Bioresource Technol 114: 542-548.
    [11] Molina Grima E, Belarbi EH, AciénFernández FG, et al. (2003) Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. Biotechnol Adv 20: 491-515.
    [12] Jorquera O, Kiperstok A, Sales EA, et al. (2010) Comparative energy life-cycle analyses of microalgal biomass production in open ponds and photobioreactors. Bioresour Technol 101: 1406-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.038
    [13] Slade R, Bauen A (2013) Microalgae cultivation for biofuels: cost, energy balance, environmental impacts and future prospects. Biomass bioenerg 53: 29-38.
    [14] Singh M, Shukla R, Das K (2013) Harvesting of microalgal biomass in Biotechnological applications of microalgae. CRC Press: 77-88.
    [15] Vandamme D, 2013. Flocculation based harvesting processes for microalgae biomass production (Doctoral dissertation, UGent).
    [16] Sanghi R, Singh V, Green Chemistry for Environmental Remediation. John Wiley & Sons; 2012. Chapter 8.4.
    [17] Reddy HK, Muppaneni T, Patil PD, et al. (2014) Direct conversion of wet algae to crude biodiesel under supercritical ethanol conditions. Fuel 115: 720-726. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.090
    [18] Ali M, Watson IA (2015) Microwave treatment of wet algal paste for enhanced solvent extraction of lipids for biodiesel production. Renew Energy 76: 470-477.
    [19] Martinez-Guerra E, Gude VG, Mondala A, et al. (2014) Extractive-transesterification of algal lipids under microwave irradiation with hexane as solvent. Bioresource Technol 156: 240-247.
    [20] Martinez-Guerra E, Gude VG, Mondala A, et al. (2014b) Microwave and ultrasound enhanced extractive-transesterification of algal lipids. Appl Energ 129: 354-363.
    [21] Patil PD, Gude VG, Mannarswamy A, et al. (2012) Comparison of direct transesterification of algal biomass under supercritical methanol and microwave irradiation conditions. Fuel 97: 822-831.
    [22] Chen CL, Huang CC, Ho KC, et al. (2015) Biodiesel production from wet microalgae feedstock using sequential wet extraction/transesterification and direct transesterification processes. Bioresource Technol 194: 179-186.
    [23] Cheng J, Yu T, Li T, et al. (2013) Using wet microalgae for direct biodiesel production via microwave irradiation. Bioresource Technol 131: 531-535.
    [24] Koberg M, Cohen M, Ben-Amotz A, et al. (2011) Bio-diesel production directly from the microalgae biomass of nannochloropsis by microwave and ultrasound radiation. Bioresource Technol 102: 4265-4269.
    [25] Araujo GS, Matos LJBL, Fernandes JO, et al. (2013) Extraction of lipids from microalgae by ultrasound application: prospection of the optimal extraction method. Ultrason Sonochem 20: 95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.07.027
    [26] Wiyarno B, Yunus RM, Mel M (2010) Ultrasound Extraction Assisted (UEA) of oil from microalgae (nannochloropsis sp.). Int J Sci Eng Technol 3: 65-71.
    [27] Ranjan A, Patil C, Moholkar VS (2010) Mechanistic assessment of microalgal lipid extraction. Ind Eng Chem Res 49: 2979-2985.
    [28] Adam F, Abert-Vian M, Peltier G, et al. (2012) Solvent-free ultrasound-assisted extraction of lipids from fresh microalgae cells: A green, clean and scalable process. Bioresource Technol 114: 457-465.
    [29] Lee JY, Yoo C, Ju SY, et al. (2010) Comparison of several methods for effective lipid extraction from microalgaemicroalgae. Bioresource Technol 101: S75-S77.
    [30] Balasundaram B, Skills SC, Llewellyn CA (2012) A low energy process for the recovery of bioproducts from cyanobacteria using a ball mill. Biochem Eng J 69: 48-56.
    [31] McGarry MG (1970) Alga flocculation with aluminium sulfate and polyelectrolytes. J Water Pollut Control Fed 42: R191-201.
    [32] Benemann JR, Kopman BL, Weissman DE, et al. Development of microalgae harvesting and high rate pond technologies in California. In: Shelef G, Soeder CJ, editors. Algal biomass. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1980, 457.
    [33] Moraine R, Shelef G, Sandbank F, Bar-Moshe Z, Shvartzbard I. Recovery of sewage borne algae: flocculation and centrifugation technique. In: Shelef G, Soeder CJ, editors. Algae biomass. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1980, 531-546.
    [34] Koopman B, Lincoln EP (1983) Autoflotation harvesting of algae from high rate pond effluents. Agric Wastes 5: 231-246. doi: 10.1016/0141-4607(83)90038-0
    [35] Lincoln EP (1985) Resource recovery with microalgae. Arch Hydrobiol 20: 25-34.
    [36] Buelna G, Bhattarai KK, de la Nuoe J, et al. (1990) Evaluation of various flocculants for the recovery of algal biomass grown on pig-Waste. Biol Waste 31: 211-222. doi: 10.1016/0269-7483(90)90160-T
    [37] Harith ZT, Yusoff FM, Mohamed MS, et al. (2009) Effect of different flocculants on the flocculation performance of microalgae, Chaetoceroscalcitrans, cells. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 5971-5978.
    [38] Bosma R, van Spronsen WA, Tramper J, et al. (2003) Ultrasound, a new separation technique to harvest microalgae. J Appl Phycol 15: 143-153.
    [39] Zhang X, Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, et al. (2010) Harvesting algal biomass for biofuelsusing ultrafiltration membranes. Bioresour Technol 101: 5297-5304. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.007
    [40] Zou S, Gu Y, Xiao D, et al. (2011) The role of physical and chemical parameters on forwardosmosis membrane fouling during algae separation. J Membr Sci 366: 356-362. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.030
    [41] Mohn F (1980) Experiences and strategies in the recovery of biomass from mass cultures of microalgae. Algae Biomass: 547-571.
    [42] Bilad MR, Vandamme D, Foubert I, et al. (2012) Harvesting microalgal biomass using submerged microfiltration membranes. Bioresource Technol 111: 343-352.
    [43] Milledge JJ, Heaven S (2013) A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production. Rev Environ Sci Bio 12: 165-178.
    [44] Supple D. MIT Energy Club (https://mitei.mit.edu/research). Accessed February 5, 2016.
    [45] University of Washington (http://www.ocean.washington.edu). Accessed February 5, 2016.
    [46] Singh J, Gu S (2010) Commercialization potential of microalgae for biofuels production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 2596-2610.
    [47] Gude VG, Patil PD, Deng S, et al. (2011) Microwave enhanced methods for biodiesel production and other environmental applications. Green chemistry for environmental remediation. New York: Wiley Interscience, 209-249.
    [48] Gude VG, Patil P, Martinez-Guerra E, et al. (2013). Microwave energy potential for biodiesel production. Sustainable Chemical Processes 1: 1-31. doi: 10.1186/2043-7129-1-1
    [49] Ma G, Hu W, Pei H, et al. (2016) In situ heterogeneous transesterification of microalgae using combined ultrasound and microwave irradiation. Energ Convers Manage 90: 41-46.
    [50] Kanitkar AV, Master’s Thesis. Lousiana State University, Baton Rougue, LA.2010
    [51] Kanitkar A, Balasubramanian S, Lima M, et al. (2011) A critical comparison of methyl and ethyl esters production from soybean and rice bran oil in the presence of microwaves. Bioresource Technol 102: 7896-7902.
    [52] Balasubramanian S, Allen JD, Kanitkar A, et al. (2011) Oil extraction from Scenedesmusobliquus using a continuous microwave system--design, optimization, and quality characterization. Bioresource Technol 102: 3396-3403.
    [53] Stavarache C, Vinatoru M, Maeda Y, et al. (2007) Ultrasonically driven continuous process for vegetable oil transesterification. Ultrason Sonochem 14: 413-417.
    [54] Santos FFP, Rodrigues S, Fernandes FAN (2009) Optimization of the production of biodiesel from soybean oil by ultrasound assisted methanolysis. Fuel Process Technol 90: 312-316. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.09.010
    [55] Cintas P, Mantegna S, Gaudino EC, et al. (2010) A new pilot flow reactor for high intensity ultrasound irradiation. Application to the synthesis of biodiesel. Ultrason Sonochem 17: 985-989. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.12.003
    [56] Chisti Y (2013) Constraints to commercialization of algal fuels. J biotechnol 167: 201-214.
    [57] Brentner LB, Eckelman MJ, Zimmerman JB (2011) Combinatorial Life Cycle Assessment to Inform Process Design of Industrial Production of Algal Biodiesel. Environ Sci Technol 45: 7060-7067. doi: 10.1021/es2006995
    [58] Campbell PK, Beer T, Batten D (2011) Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae in ponds. Bioresour Technol 102: 50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.048
    [59] Chowdhury R, Viamajala S, Gerlach R (2012) Reduction of environmental and energy footprint of microalgal biodiesel production through material and energy integration. Bioresour Technol 108: 102-111.
    [60] Clarens AF, Nassau H, Resurreccion EP, et al. (2011) Environmental Impacts of Algae-Derived Biodiesel and Bioelectricity for Transportation. Environ Sci Technol 45: 7554-7560. doi: 10.1021/es200760n
    [61] Frank ED, Palou-Rivera I, Elgowainy A, et al. (2011) Life- Cycle Analysis of Algal Lipid Fuels with the GREET Model; Argonne National Laboratory: Argonne, IL, 2011.
    [62] Khoo HH, Sharratt PN, Das P, et al. (2011) Life cycle energy and CO2 analysis of microalgae-to-biodiesel: Preliminary results and comparisons. Bioresour Technol 102: 5800-5807.
    [63] Razon LF, Tan RR (2011) Net energy analysis of the production of biodiesel and biogas from the microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis and Nannochloropsis. Appl Energy 88: 3507-3514. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.052
    [64] Sander K, Murthy G (2010) Life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15: 704-714.
    [65] Sawayama S, Minowa T, Yokoyama SY (1999) Possibility of renewable energy production and CO2 mitigation by thermochemical liquefaction of microalgae. Biomass Bioenergy 17: 33-39. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00019-7
    [66] Shirvani T, Yan X, Inderwildi OR, et al. (2011) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis for algae-derived biodiesel. Energy Environ Sci 4: 3773-3778. doi: 10.1039/c1ee01791h
    [67] Vasudevan V, Stratton RW, Pearlson MN, et al. (2012) Environmental Performance of Algal Biofuel Technology Options. Environ Sci Technol 46: 2451-2459. doi: 10.1021/es2026399
    [68] Chisti Y (2008) Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends in Biotechnology 26: 126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.12.002
    [69] Fast SA, Kokabian B, Gude VG (2014) Chitosan enhanced coagulation of algal turbid waters–Comparison between rapid mix and ultrasound coagulation methods. Chem Eng J 244: 403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.081
    [70] Fast SA, Gude VG (2015) Ultrasound-chitosan enhanced flocculation of low algal turbid waters. J Ind Eng Chem 24: 153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.023
    [71] Patil PD, Gude VG, Mannarswamy A, et al. (2011) Optimization of direct conversion of wet algae to biodiesel under supercritical methanol conditions. Bioresource Technol 102: 118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.031
    [72] Patil PD, Gude VG, Mannarswamy A, et al. (2011) Optimization of microwave-assisted transesterification of dry algal biomass using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technol 102: 1399-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.046
    [73] Martinez-Guerra E, Gude VG (2016) Energy analysis of extractive transesterification of algal lipids for biocrude production. Biofuels, in press.
    [74] Yang J, Xu M, Zhang X, et al. (2011) Life-cycle analysis on biodiesel production from microalgae: water footprint and nutrients balance. Bioresource Technol 102: 159-165.
    [75] Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Biochem Cell Bio 37: 911-917
    [76] Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226: 497-509.
    [77] Gude VG (2015) Synergism of microwaves and ultrasound for advanced biorefineries. Resource-Efficient Technologies 1: 116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.reffit.2015.10.001
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ali Raza, Musawa Y. Almusawa, Qasim Ali, Absar Ul Haq, Kamel Al-Khaled, Ioannis E. Sarris, Solution of Water and Sodium Alginate-Based Casson Type Hybrid Nanofluid with Slip and Sinusoidal Heat Conditions: A Prabhakar Fractional Derivative Approach, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2658, 10.3390/sym14122658
    2. Rusya Iryanti Yahaya, Mohd Shafie Mustafa, Norihan Md Arifin, Ioan Pop, Fadzilah Md Ali, Siti Suzilliana Putri Mohamed Isa, Hybrid nanofluid flow past a biaxial stretching/shrinking permeable surface with radiation effect: Stability analysis and heat transfer optimization, 2023, 85, 05779073, 402, 10.1016/j.cjph.2023.06.003
    3. Samaira Aziz, Iftikhar Ahmad, Sami Ullah Khan, Nasir Ali, Bioconvective nonlinear radiative flow of cross nanofluid due to porous oscillating surface with variable thermal conductivity and Cattaneo–Christov model, 2023, 1745-5030, 1, 10.1080/17455030.2023.2226770
    4. Ali Raza, Rifaqat Ali, Ali Hasan Ali, Suleman H. Alfalqi, Kalsoom Chishti, Prabhakar fractional simulations for natural convective hybrid nanofluid mixed with Cu and AlO nanoparticles flowing through a channel, 2024, 12, 23071877, 25, 10.1016/j.jer.2023.08.027
    5. Areej Fatima, Muhammad Sagheer, Shafqat Hussain, A study of inclined magnetically driven Casson nanofluid using the Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model with multiple slips towards a chemically reacting radially stretching sheet, 2023, 30, 2095-2899, 3721, 10.1007/s11771-023-5485-3
    6. Wan Faezah Wan Azmi, Ahmad Qushairi Mohamad, Lim Yeou Jiann, Sharidan Shafie, Mathematical Modelling on Pulsative MHD Blood Casson Nanofluid in Slip and Porous Capillaries for Nano-cryosurgery with Caputo-Fabrizio Approach, 2025, 55, 0103-9733, 10.1007/s13538-025-01701-4
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(9026) PDF downloads(1592) Cited by(17)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog