
In the era of climate change-induced extreme rainfall events, the world faces unprecedented natural hazards, notably flooding. These events pose multifaceted risks to life, agriculture, infrastructure, and the well-being of society. Understanding and predicting extreme rainfall events are critical for achieving sustainable development and building resilient communities. This study employed advanced statistical techniques, specifically the generalized extreme value distribution (GEVD) and generalized Pareto distribution (GPD), using a Bayesian approach, to model and forecast annual maximum monthly rainfall in Somalia. Utilizing data spanning from 1901 to 2022, the rainfall extremes were fitted to both GEVD and GPD models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. Due to the lack of specific prior information, non-informative and independent priors were used to estimate posterior densities, ensuring objectivity and data-driven results, and minimizing subjective bias. Model comparisons were conducted using the deviance information criterion (DIC), prediction errors, and k-fold cross-validation. Findings reveal the robustness of the GEVD model in forecasting and predicting rainfall extremes in Somalia. Diagnostic plots confirmed the goodness of fit of the chosen model. Remarkably, the Bayesian GEVD return level estimation suggested that extreme rainfall could exceed 106 mm, 163 mm, and 195 mm for return periods of 10, 50, and 100 years, respectively. These precise return level estimates may benefit urban planners, civil engineers, and policymakers. Armed with this knowledge, they can design resilient infrastructure and buildings capable of withstanding the most extreme climatic conditions. Therefore, this study provides critical information for fostering sustainable development and resilience against climate-induced challenges in Somalia and beyond. Accurate estimation of extreme rainfall return levels enables effective mitigation of flooding risks and supports climate-resilient urban planning, civil engineering, and policymaking. These findings also inform strategies to optimize drainage systems, fortify infrastructure, and develop adaptive policies, thereby safeguarding lives, livelihoods, and infrastructure amidst escalating climate uncertainties.
Citation: Jama Mohamed, Dahir Abdi Ali, Abdimalik Ali Warsame, Mukhtar Jibril Abdi, Eid Ibrahim Daud, Mohamed Mohamoud Abdilleh. Bayesian extreme value modelling of annual maximum monthly rainfall in Somalia from 1901 to 2022[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2024, 10(3): 598-622. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2024031
[1] | Sanling Yuan, Xuehui Ji, Huaiping Zhu . Asymptotic behavior of a delayed stochastic logistic model with impulsive perturbations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1477-1498. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017077 |
[2] | Zeyan Yue, Sheng Wang . Dynamics of a stochastic hybrid delay food chain model with jumps in an impulsive polluted environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 186-213. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024009 |
[3] | Zixiao Xiong, Xining Li, Ming Ye, Qimin Zhang . Finite-time stability and optimal control of an impulsive stochastic reaction-diffusion vegetation-water system driven by Lˊevy process with time-varying delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 8462-8498. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021419 |
[4] | Linni Li, Jin-E Zhang . Input-to-state stability of stochastic nonlinear system with delayed impulses. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 2233-2253. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024098 |
[5] | Biwen Li, Qiaoping Huang . Synchronization of time-delay systems with impulsive delay via an average impulsive estimation approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(3): 4501-4520. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024199 |
[6] | Yan Zhang, Shujing Gao, Shihua Chen . Modelling and analysis of a stochastic nonautonomous predator-prey model with impulsive effects and nonlinear functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1485-1512. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021077 |
[7] | Xueyan Yang, Xiaodi Li, Qiang Xi, Peiyong Duan . Review of stability and stabilization for impulsive delayed systems. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(6): 1495-1515. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018069 |
[8] | Luyao Li, Licheng Fang, Huan Liang, Tengda Wei . Observer-based event-triggered impulsive control of delayed reaction-diffusion neural networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(7): 1634-1652. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025060 |
[9] | Yu Zhu, Liang Wang, Zhipeng Qiu . Threshold behaviour of a stochastic SIRS Lˊevy jump model with saturated incidence and vaccination. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 1402-1419. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023063 |
[10] | Long Lv, Xiao-Juan Yao . Qualitative analysis of a nonautonomous stochastic SIS epidemic model with Lˊevy jumps. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1352-1369. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021071 |
In the era of climate change-induced extreme rainfall events, the world faces unprecedented natural hazards, notably flooding. These events pose multifaceted risks to life, agriculture, infrastructure, and the well-being of society. Understanding and predicting extreme rainfall events are critical for achieving sustainable development and building resilient communities. This study employed advanced statistical techniques, specifically the generalized extreme value distribution (GEVD) and generalized Pareto distribution (GPD), using a Bayesian approach, to model and forecast annual maximum monthly rainfall in Somalia. Utilizing data spanning from 1901 to 2022, the rainfall extremes were fitted to both GEVD and GPD models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. Due to the lack of specific prior information, non-informative and independent priors were used to estimate posterior densities, ensuring objectivity and data-driven results, and minimizing subjective bias. Model comparisons were conducted using the deviance information criterion (DIC), prediction errors, and k-fold cross-validation. Findings reveal the robustness of the GEVD model in forecasting and predicting rainfall extremes in Somalia. Diagnostic plots confirmed the goodness of fit of the chosen model. Remarkably, the Bayesian GEVD return level estimation suggested that extreme rainfall could exceed 106 mm, 163 mm, and 195 mm for return periods of 10, 50, and 100 years, respectively. These precise return level estimates may benefit urban planners, civil engineers, and policymakers. Armed with this knowledge, they can design resilient infrastructure and buildings capable of withstanding the most extreme climatic conditions. Therefore, this study provides critical information for fostering sustainable development and resilience against climate-induced challenges in Somalia and beyond. Accurate estimation of extreme rainfall return levels enables effective mitigation of flooding risks and supports climate-resilient urban planning, civil engineering, and policymaking. These findings also inform strategies to optimize drainage systems, fortify infrastructure, and develop adaptive policies, thereby safeguarding lives, livelihoods, and infrastructure amidst escalating climate uncertainties.
The chemotaxis refers to the collective motion of bacteria, cells or an organisms in response to an attractant gradient. There are numerous examples of chemotaxis in animal and insect ecology, biological and biomedical sciences [9]. Deep understanding of the behavior of chemotaxis phenomenon is of great significance to the biological and medical applications.
Various kinds of mathematical models have been developed by both experimentalists and theoreticians to describe the chemotactic phenomenon. In addition, to further describe and interpret the bioconvection phenomenon [14], a variety of coupled chemotaxis-fluid models have been proposed and studied in [5,8,24]. The coupled model is expressed as follows:
∂n∂t+∇⋅(un)=Dn∇2n−χ∇⋅[r(c)n∇c], | (1) |
∂c∂t+∇⋅(uc)=Dc∇2c−nκr(c), | (2) |
ρ(∂u∂t+u⋅∇u)=−∇p+η∇2u+nVb(ρb−ρ)g, | (3) |
∇⋅u=0. | (4) |
Here,
It can be seen from the above system that the chemotaxis-fluid model involves highly nonlinearity coupled with chemotaxis, diffusion and convection, which brings great difficulties to get the analytical solution. Recently, several numerical methods have been developed to study the chemotaxis phenomenon, such as finite element, finite volume schemes [13,21], upwind-difference potentials method [10], fractional step algorithms [20,25], interior penalty/discontinuous Galerkin methods [11,12], and cell-overcrowding prevention models [1,7], etc. In the work by Chertock et al. [5], a coupled chemotaxis-fluid system has been numerically studied by a high-resolution vorticity-based hybrid finite-volume finite-difference scheme. In [22], the chemotaxis phenomenon in incompressible viscous fluid has been numerically studied by a compact finite difference scheme. The plume patterns were studied by solving a chemotaxis-diffusion-convection coupling system in [6], where the comparison of different systems of chemotaxis-diffusion-convection, Rayleigh-B
In this work, we will develop an efficient LBM to solve the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model. LBM originates from kinetic Boltzmann equation, which has been successfully applied in modeling complex fluid flows [18,4,2]. In addition, LBM also shows its excellent capability in solving the nonlinear systems [23,3,28,26]. For the chemotaxis problem, a simplified LBM was developed for a bacterial chemotaxis model by Hilpert [16]. While, Yan et al. [27] developed a MRT-LBM to investigate the traveling bacterial bands of chemotactic bacteria. However, due to the highly nonlinearity of the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model, we need to develop more accurate and stable LBM to solve this complex problem. In [19], a novel MRT-LBM was proposed to simulate multi-phase fluids with Peng-Robinson (P-R) equation of state. To enhance the stability of the MRT-LBM, B-W scheme is introduced in the discretization of the evolution equation. Numerical results showed that the P-R free energy model was solved precisely and spurious currents were eliminated effectively. Inspired by this, we will apply the MRT-LBM with B-W scheme to solve the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model.
The rest of this article is organized as follows. In Section Ⅱ, the MRT-LBM with B-W scheme for the chemotaxis-fluid model is proposed. In Section Ⅲ, several numerical experiments are carried out on different chemotaxis problems, including the classical K-S model, the coupled Navier-Stokes-Keller-Segel (NS-KS) model, and the bacterial biocovection problem. The paper ends with some conclusions in Section Ⅳ.
In this section, we will introduce the MRT-LBM with B-W scheme for the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model (1)-(4). To better investigate the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model, the following dimensionless form is taken:
x′=xL,t′=DnL2t,c′=ccair,n′=nnr,u′=LDnu,p′=L2ηDnp,g′=gg, |
where
∂n∂t+∇⋅(un)=∇2n−α∇⋅[r(c)n∇c], | (5) |
∂c∂t+∇⋅(uc)=δ∇2c−βr(c)n, | (6) |
∂u∂t+u⋅∇u=−∇p+Sc∇2u+γScnz. | (7) |
∇⋅u=0, | (8) |
where
r(c)=12(1+c−c∗√(c−c∗)2+ϵ2), |
where
The dimensionless parameters
α=χcairDn,β=κnrL2cairDn,γ=Vbnrg(ρb−ρ)L3ηDn,δ=DcDn,Sc=ηDnρ. |
In this section, LBM with MRT collision operator is applied to solve the incompressible N-S equations (7)-(8). To capture the chemotaxis phenomenon more accurately, B-W scheme is introduced in the discretization of the evolution equation of MRT-LBM.
The discrete velocity Boltzmann equation with MRT collision operator is expressed as
∂hi∂t+ˆcei⋅∇hi=−Λij[hj−heqj]+Hi, | (9) |
where,
The discrete velocity Boltzmann equation (9) is solved by a time-splitting scheme, which is decomposed into two sub-processes, i.e., the collision process,
∂hi∂t=−Λij[hj−heqj]+Hi, | (10) |
and the streaming process,
∂hi∂t+ˆcei⋅∇hi=0. | (11) |
In the MRT model, the collision subprocess is carried out in the moment space. We take the generally used D2Q9 (two-dimensional space with nine discrete velocities) model as an example. The distribution functions
m=M⋅h=(ρ,e,ε,jx,qx,jy,qy,pxx,pxy)T, |
where
M=(111111111−4−1−1−1−122224−2−2−2−21111010−101−1−110−20201−1−110010−111−1−100−20211−1−101−11−10000000001−11−1). |
Through multiplying the transformation matrix
∂m∂t=−˜S(m−meq)+ˆH, | (12) |
where
˜S=diag{˜s0,˜s1,˜s2,˜s3,˜s4,˜s5,˜s6,˜s7,˜s8}. |
The equilibrium moment
meq=M⋅heq=ρ[1−2+3u21−3u2u−uv−vu2−v2uv]. | (13) |
ˆH0=0,ˆH1=6(1−s12)u⋅Ft,ˆH2=−6(1−s22)u⋅Ft,ˆH3=Ftx,ˆH4=−(1−s42)Ftx,ˆH5=Fty,ˆH6=−(1−s62)Fty,ˆH7=2(1−s72)(uFtx−vFty),ˆH8=(1−s82)(uFty+vFtx), | (14) |
where
Ft=(Ftx,Fty). |
In this simulation,
Ft=γScnz. | (15) |
The first order explicit Euler scheme is used to discrete (12) as
m+=m−S(m−meq)+δtˆH, | (16) |
where
S=diag{s0,s1,s2,s3,s4,s5,s6,s7,s8}. |
In simulations,
Next, through using the second-order B-W scheme, Eq. (11) can be solved on a regular lattice with spacing
hi(x,t+δt)=h+i(x,t)−A2(3h+i(x,t)−4h+i(x−eiδx,t)+h+i(x−2eiδx,t))+A22(h+i(x,t)−2h+i(x−eiδx,t)+h+i(x−2eiδx,t)), | (17) |
where the time step
The macroscopic quantities,
ρ=∑ihi,ρu=∑icihi+δt2Ft. | (18) |
The evolution equations of the LBM for (5) and (6) are given by
∂fi∂t+ˆci⋅∇fi=−1τn(fi−feqi)+Si, | (19) |
∂gi∂t+ˆci⋅∇gi=−1τc(gi−geqi)+ˆSi+δt2∂tˆSi, | (20) |
where
Si=ωiˆci⋅Br(c)n∇c,ˆSi=ωi(−βr(c)n). |
Here,
feqi(x,t)=ωin(1+ˆci⋅uc2s),geqi(x,t)=ωic(1+ˆci⋅uc2s). |
(19) and (20) are decomposed into two sub-processes: the collision process
∂fi∂t=−1τn(fi−feqi)+Si, | (21) |
∂gi∂t=−1τc(gi−geqi)+ˆSi+δt2∂tˆSi, | (22) |
and the streaming process,
∂fi∂t+ˆci⋅∇fi=0, | (23) |
∂gi∂t+ˆci⋅∇gi=0. | (24) |
The first order explicit Euler scheme is used to solve the collision process (21)-(22), which leads to
f+i=fi−δtτn(fi−feqi)+δtSi,g+i=gi−δtτc(gi−geqi)+δtˆSi+δt22∂tˆSi. |
B-W scheme is used to solve (23) and (24),
fi(x,t+δt)=f+i(x,t)−A2(3f+i(x,t)−4f+i(x−eiδx,t)+f+i(x−2eiδx,t))+A22(f+i(x,t)−2f+i(x−eiδx,t)+f+i(x−2eiδx,t)), | (25) |
gi(x,t+δt)=g+i(x,t)−A2(3g+i(x,t)−4g+i(x−eiδx,t)+g+i(x−2eiδx,t))+A22(g+i(x,t)−2g+i(x−eiδx,t)+g+i(x−2eiδx,t)). | (26) |
The concentrations of the bacteria
n(x,t)=∑ifi(x,t),c(x,t)=∑igi(x,t). |
To validate that the stability is improved by the present LBM with B-W scheme, and also to verify the capability of the proposed method, a series of chemotaxis problems are numerically investigated. In the following numerical experiments, the general bounce-back scheme in reference [29] is used to treat the macroscopic boundary conditions in the LBM with B-W scheme.
In this section, the following classical K-S chemotaxis problem is considered.
∂n∂t=μ∇⋅n−χ∇⋅(n∇c), | (27) |
∂c∂t=∇2c+n−c. | (28) |
(27)-(28) can be regarded as a special case of the generalized K-S model.
n(x,y,0)=1000e−100(x2+y2),c(x,y,0)=500e−50(x2+y2). |
The boundary conditions are
∂n∂v=∂c∂v=0,(x,y)∈∂Ω, |
where
Under above initial and boundary conditions, the solution of (27)-(28) will blow up at the origin in finite time, which brings a great challenge in the numerical simulation. To illustrate that the stability is improved by B-W scheme, the comparison between standard LBM and the present LBM with B-W scheme is carried out. In the numerical experiment, the D2Q9 lattice model is used with a
In this section, the incompressible N-S equations coupled with K-S equation is solved for the convergence test of the proposed LBM with B-W scheme. The mathematical model has the following form,
∂n∂t+∇⋅(un)=∇2n−∇⋅[χn∇c],∂c∂t+∇⋅(uc)=∇2c+nf(c)−cκ, |
∂u∂t+u⋅∇u=−∇p+μ∇2u, | (29) |
∇⋅u=0. | (30) |
In the numerical simulation,
∂n∂v=∂c∂v=∂p∂v=0,u=uexact,(x,y)∈∂Ω. |
The computational domain is
uexact=−cos(πx)sin(πy)e−2π2t,vexact=−sin(πx)cos(πy)e−2π2t,p=c1−0.25(cos(2πx)+cos(2πy))e−4π2t,nexact=cos(πx)cos(πy)e−π2t,cexact=cos(πx)cos(πy)e−2π2t. |
To measure the accuracy, the following relative error is applied:
E=Σ|ϕ(x,t)−ϕ∗(x,t)|Σ|ϕ∗(x,t)|, |
where
It can be seen from Table 1 that numerical solutions of
order | order | order | ||||
– | – | – | ||||
1.9172 | 1.9130 | 1.9139 | ||||
1.9580 | 1.9560 | 1.9560 | ||||
1.9788 | 1.9772 | 1.9779 |
The chemotaxis response of bacterial suspensions can be described by the chemotaxis-fluid model (5)-(8). The balance between chemotaxis, diffusion, and convection of bacteria leads to the formation and stability of plumes. There still needs to a deep understanding of the particular impact of each mechanism.
In the simulations, the parameters of (5)-(8) are set as
n0(x,y)={1,ify>0.501−0.01(sin(x−0.5)π)),0.5,otherwise,c0(x,y)=1,u0(x,y)=0, |
At the top boundary
χnr(c)cy−Dnny=0,c=1.0,v=0,uy=0,∀(x,y)∈∂Ωtop, | (31) |
where
ny=cy=0,u=v=0,∀(x,y)∈∂Ωbot. | (32) |
The mixed boundary condition in Eq. (31) can be regrouped as
First of all, as the numerical experiments in [17], the case of
In this subsection, the system (5)-(8) on the rectangular domain is numerically studied. In the following numerical simulations, the coefficients are set as
As in [17], the following initial data is considered:
n0(x,y)=0.8+0.2rand(),c0(x,y)=1,u0(x,y)=0, |
where rand() is a random number uniformly distributed in the interval [0, 1].
The evolution of the cell density
In this subsection, the effect of the parameter
n0(x,y)={1,ify>0.499−0.05(sin(x−0.5)π))0.5,otherwise,c0(x,y)=1,u0(x,y)=0. |
The computational domain is
Numerical results of
An accurate and stable MRT-LBM with B-W scheme for a chemotaxis-fluid model is developed. Through introducing B-W scheme in the evolution process of the LBM, the numerical stability is improved. The numerical study of the classical K-S model shows that the proposed LBM with B-W scheme could preserve the positivity of bacteria concentrations. Then, the second order accuracy is tested by simulating the coupled NS-KS model. The nonlinear dynamics of the chemotaxis-fluid model was investigated numerically by the proposed MRT-LBM with B-W scheme. Our numerical results agree well with those in the literature under different settings. In the numerical simulation of bioconvection phenomenon, the evolution of the instability of falling plumes and the convergence towards numerically stable stationary plumes are observed.
Rewritten the evolution equation (17) up to
hi(x,t+δt)=h+i(x,t)−δtcei⋅∇h+i(x,t)+12δt2(cei⋅∇)2h+i(x,t)+O(δx3). | (33) |
Multiplying Eq. (16) by inverse of the transformation matrix
∂thi+cei⋅∇hi=Ωi−δt2[∂2thi−(cei⋅∇)2hi+2cei⋅∇Ωi]+O(δx2+δt2), | (34) |
where
∂2thi=(cei⋅∇)2hi+∂tΩi−cei⋅∇Ωi+O(δt). | (35) |
Thus, Eq. (34) can be rewritten as
Dihi=(1−δt2Di)Ωi+O(δx2+δt2), | (36) |
where
In addition, from Eq. (34), we can see that
Dihi+δt2D2ihi=−Λij[hj−heqj]+Hi+O(δx2+δt2). | (37) |
Then we introduce the following expansions:
hi=h(0)i+εh(1)i+ε2h(2)i+⋯,∂∂t=ε∂∂t1+ε2∂∂t2,∇=ε∇1,Hi=εH(1)i, | (38) |
where
O(ε0):h(0)i=h(eq)i, | (39a) |
O(ε1):D1ih(eq)i=−Λijh(1)j+H(1)i, | (39b) |
O(ε1):∂t2h(0)i+D1i[(Iij−Λij2)h(1)j]=−Λijh(2)j−δt2D1iH(1)i, | (39c) |
where
Multiplying the transformation Matrix
O(ε0):m(0)=m(eq), | (40a) |
O(ε1):D1m(0)=−˜Sm(1)+ˆH(1), | (40b) |
O(ε2):∂t2m(0)+D1(I−S2)m(1)+δt2D1ˆH(1)=−˜Sm(2), | (40c) |
where
In addition, from Eqs. (18) and (40a), we derive
ρ(1)=0,j(1)x=−δt2F(1)tx,j(1)y=−δt2F(1)ty,ρ(k)=j(k)x=j(k)y=0,k>1. | (41) |
On the
∂t1[ρρ(−2+3u2)ρ(1−3u2)ρu−ρuρv−ρvρ(u2−v2)ρuv]+∂1x[ρu0−ρuc2sρ+ρu2ρBx/3ρuvρuv2ρu/3ρv/3]+∂1y[ρv0−ρvρuvρuvc2sρ+ρv2ρBy/3−2ρv/3ρu/3]=[0−˜s1e(1)−˜s2ε(1)0−˜s4q(1)x0−˜s6q(1)y−˜s7p(1)xx−˜s8p(1)xy]+[06(1−s1/2)u⋅F(1)t−6(1−s2/2)u⋅F(1)tF(1)tx−(1−s4/2)F(1)txF(1)ty−(1−s6/2)F(1)ty2(1−s7/2)(uF(1)tx−vF(1)ty)(1−s8/2)(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)] | (42) |
where
Similarly, From Eq. (40b), the scale equations of conserved quantities
∂t2ρ=0. | (43) |
∂t2(ρu)+16(1−s12)∂1xe(1)+(1−s72)(12∂1xp(1)xx+∂1yp(1)xy)+δt2(1−s12)∂1x(u⋅F(1)t)+δt2(1−s72)∂1x(uF(1)tx−vF(1)ty)+δt2(1−s82)∂1y(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)=0, | (44) |
∂t2(ρv)+16(1−s12)∂1ye(1)+(1−s72)(∂1xp(1)xy−12∂1yp(1)xx)+δt2(1−s72)∂1x(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)+δt2(1−s12)∂1y(u⋅F(1)t)−δt2(1−s72)∂1y(uF(1)tx−vF(1)ty)=0. | (45) |
To close the hydrodynamic equations at the second order of
e(1)=−1˜s1[2ρ(∂1xu+∂1yv)+3s1u⋅F(1)t]+O(Ma3), | (46) |
p(1)xx=−1˜s7[23ρ(∂1xu−∂1yv)+s7(uF(1)tx−vF(1)ty)]+O(Ma3), | (47) |
p(1)xy=−1˜s8[13ρ(∂1xv+∂1yu)+s82(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)]+O(Ma3). | (48) |
With Eqs. (46), (47) and (48), we can obtain the hydrodynamic equations at
Continuity equations
∂t1ρ+∂1x(ρu)+∂1y(ρv)=0, | (49) |
∂t2ρ=0. | (50) |
Momentum equations
∂t1ρu+∂1x(c2sρ+ρu2)+∂1y(ρuv)=F(1)tx, | (51) |
∂t1ρv+∂1x(ρuv)+∂1y(c2sρ+ρv2)=F(1)ty, | (52) |
∂t2(ρu)=∂1x(ρν(∂1xu−∂1yv)+ρζ(∂1xu+∂1yv))+∂1y(ρν(∂1xv+∂1yu)), | (53) |
∂t2(ρv)=∂1x(ρν(∂1xv+∂1yu))+∂1y(ρν(∂1yv−∂1xu)+ρζ(∂1xu+∂1yv)), | (54) |
where
Combining the above equations on
∂tρ+∇⋅(ρu)=0, | (55) |
∂ρu∂t+∇⋅(ρu⊗u)=−∇c2sρ+∇⋅[ρν(∇u+∇uT)+ρ(ζ−ν)(∇⋅u)I]+Ft. | (56) |
[1] | Paola F De, Giugni M, Garcia-Aristizabal A, et al. (2013) Stationary vs. Non-Stationary of Extreme Rainfall in Dar Es Salaam (Tanzania), Beijing, IAHR Congress Tsinghua University Press. |
[2] | IPCC, Climate Change 2023. 2023. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_FullVolume.pdf. |
[3] | UNHCR, Floods drive over 650,000 Somalis from their homes in 2020, 2020. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/news/briefing/2020/8/5f2cf86c4/floods-drive-650000-somalis-homes2020.html#: ~: text = Floods drive over 650%2C000 Somalis from their homes in 2020, This is a & text = More than 150%2C000 Somalis have, the Southern regions of Somalia. |
[4] | FAO, Somalia floods update Series. 2018. Available from: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/emergencies/docs/FAOSomaliaFloodsUpdate050718.pdf. |
[5] | Gure A (2021) The Role of Climate information and Early Warning Systems in Supporting Disaster Risk Reduction in Somalia. 1–50. |
[6] |
Wang N, Sun F, Koutsoyiannis D, et al. (2023) How can Changes in the Human‐Flood Distance Mitigate Flood Fatalities and Displacements? Geophys Res Lett 50. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105064 doi: 10.1029/2023GL105064
![]() |
[7] |
Shabri AB, Daud ZM, Ariff NM (2011) Regional analysis of annual maximum rainfall using TL-moments method. Theor Appl Climatol 104: 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0437-5 doi: 10.1007/s00704-011-0437-5
![]() |
[8] | Zawiah WZW, Jemain AA, Ibrahim K (2009) A Comparative Study of Extreme Rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia: with Reference to Partial Duration and Annual Extreme Series. Sains Malays 38: 751–760. |
[9] |
Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D, Tzouka K (2016) Predictability in dice motion: how does it differ from hydro-meteorological processes? Hydrol Sci J 61: 1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1034128 doi: 10.1080/02626667.2015.1034128
![]() |
[10] |
Iliopoulou T, Koutsoyiannis D (2019) Revealing hidden persistence in maximum rainfall records. Hydrol Sci J 64: 1673–1689. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1657578 doi: 10.1080/02626667.2019.1657578
![]() |
[11] |
Gneiting T, Schlather M (2004) Stochastic Models That Separate Fractal Dimension and the Hurst Effect. SIAM Rev 46: 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144501394387 doi: 10.1137/S0036144501394387
![]() |
[12] |
Hurst HE (1951) Long-Term Storage Capacity of Reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 116: 770–799. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0006518 doi: 10.1061/TACEAT.0006518
![]() |
[13] |
Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D, Iliopoulou T, et al. (2021) A Global-Scale Investigation of Stochastic Similarities in Marginal Distribution and Dependence Structure of Key Hydrological-Cycle Processes. Hydrology 8: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020059 doi: 10.3390/hydrology8020059
![]() |
[14] |
Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D (2018) Stochastic synthesis approximating any process dependence and distribution. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32: 1493–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1540-2 doi: 10.1007/s00477-018-1540-2
![]() |
[15] |
Van de Vyver H (2012) Evolution of extreme temperatures in Belgium since the 1950s. Theor Appl Climatol 107: 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0456-2 doi: 10.1007/s00704-011-0456-2
![]() |
[16] | Blain GC (2011) Modeling extreme minimum air temperature series under climate change conditions. Ciência Rural 41: 1877–1883. |
[17] |
Siliverstovs B, Oetsch R, Kemfert C, et al. (2010) Climate Change and Modelling of Extreme Temperatures in Switzerland. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24: 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-009-0321-3 doi: 10.1007/s00477-009-0321-3
![]() |
[18] | Gilleland E, Katz RW (2006) Analyzing seasonal to interannual extreme weather and climate variability with the extremes toolkit. 18th Conference on Climate Variability and Change, 86th American Meteorological Society (AMS) Annual Meeting. |
[19] |
Hurairah A, Akma Ibrahim N, Bin Daud I, et al. (2005) An application of a new extreme value distribution to air pollution data. Manage Environ Qual 16: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830510574317 doi: 10.1108/14777830510574317
![]() |
[20] |
Katz RW, Brush GS, Parlange MB (2005) STATISTICS OF EXTREMES: MODELING ECOLOGICAL DISTURBANCES. Ecology 86: 1124–1134. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0606 doi: 10.1890/04-0606
![]() |
[21] |
Koutsoyiannis D, Baloutsos G (2000) Analysis of a Long Record of Annual Maximum Rainfall in Athens, Greece, and Design Rainfall Inferences. Nat Hazards 22: 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008001312219 doi: 10.1023/A:1008001312219
![]() |
[22] |
Flocas AA, Angouridakis VE (1979) Extreme values analysis of air temperature over Greece. Arch für Meteorol Geophys und Bioklimatologie Wien 27: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245909 doi: 10.1007/BF02245909
![]() |
[23] | Chavez-Demoulin V, Davison AC (2012) Modelling time series extremes. REVSTAT-Stat J 10: 109–133. |
[24] | Coles S (2001) An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, London, Springer. |
[25] |
Coles SG, Tawn JA (1996) A Bayesian Analysis of Extreme Rainfall Data. Appl Stat 45: 463. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986068 doi: 10.2307/2986068
![]() |
[26] |
Coles S, Pericchi LR, Sisson S (2003) A fully probabilistic approach to extreme rainfall modeling. J Hydrol 273: 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00353-0 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00353-0
![]() |
[27] | Smith E (2005) Bayesian modelling of extreme rainfall data. University of Newcastle upon Tyne. |
[28] | Fawcett L, Walshaw D (2008) Modelling Environmental Extremes, Kelowna, Short Course for the 19th Annual Conference of the International Environmetrics Society. Available from: http://www.mas.ncl.ac.uk/~ndw/kelownabetter.pdf. |
[29] |
Mohamed J, Adam MB (2022) Modeling of magnitude and frequency of extreme rainfall in Somalia. Model Earth Syst Environ 8: 4277–4294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01363-0 doi: 10.1007/s40808-022-01363-0
![]() |
[30] |
Mohamed J, Ali DA, Warsame AA, et al. (2022) Two phases of long-term shift in extreme precipitation in Somalia. Meteorol Atmos Phys 134: 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-022-00896-4 doi: 10.1007/s00703-022-00896-4
![]() |
[31] | UNDP (2013) Somalia National Adaptation Programme of Action on Climate Change (NAPA). Available from: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/napa/som01.pdf. |
[32] |
Harris I, Osborn TJ, Jones P, et al. (2020) Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci Data 7: 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3 doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3
![]() |
[33] |
Koutsoyiannis D (2004) Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: Ⅱ. Empirical investigation of long rainfall records/Statistiques de valeurs extrêmes et estimation de précipitations extrêmes: Ⅱ. Recherche empirique sur de longues séries de précipitations. Hydrol Sci J 49: 610. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.591.54424 doi: 10.1623/hysj.49.4.591.54424
![]() |
[34] | Eli A, Wan MS, Zin ZW (2012) Preliminary Study on Bayesian Extreme Rainfall Analysis: A Case Study of Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia. Sains Malays 41: 1403–1410. |
[35] |
Lazoglou G, Anagnostopoulou C (2017) An Overview of Statistical Methods for Studying the Extreme Rainfalls in Mediterranean. Proceedings 2017: 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2017-04132 doi: 10.3390/ecas2017-04132
![]() |
[36] |
Ahmad I, Ahmad T, Almanjahie I (2019) Modelling of extreme rainfall in Punjab: Pakistan using bayesian and frequentist approach. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17. https://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1706_1372913748 doi: 10.15666/aeer/1706_1372913748
![]() |
[37] |
Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images. IEEE T Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 721–741. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
![]() |
[38] |
Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213
![]() |
[39] |
Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, et al. (1953) Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J Chem Phys 21: 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114 doi: 10.1063/1.1699114
![]() |
[40] | Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57: 97–109. |
[41] |
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, et al. (2002) Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 64: 583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353 doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
![]() |
[42] |
Gilleland E, Katz RW (2016) extRemes 2.0: An Extreme Value Analysis Package in R. J Stat Softw 72: 1–39. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v072.i08 doi: 10.18637/jss.v072.i08
![]() |
[43] | Gamerman D (1997) Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference, London, Chapman Hall. |
[44] |
Coles S, Tawn J (2005) Bayesian modelling of extreme surges on the UK east coast. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 363: 1387–1406. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1574 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2005.1574
![]() |
[45] |
Diriba TA, Debusho LK, Botai J, et al. (2017) Bayesian modelling of extreme wind speed at Cape Town, South Africa. Environ Ecol Stat 24: 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-017-0369-z doi: 10.1007/s10651-017-0369-z
![]() |
[46] | Koutsoyiannis D (2023) Stochastics of Hydroclimatic Extremes—A Cool Look at Risk. Kallipos Open Academic Editions. https://doi.org/10.57713/kallipos-1 |
1. | Lei Xu, Zhengzheng Yan, Rongliang Chen, A discrete unified gas kinetic scheme on unstructured grids for viscid compressible flows and its parallel algorithm, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 8829, 10.3934/math.2023443 | |
2. | Chengjie Zhan, Zhenhua Chai, Baochang Shi, A lattice Boltzmann model for the coupled cross-diffusion-fluid system, 2021, 400, 00963003, 126105, 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126105 | |
3. | Ben Gao, Qinglian Yin, Construction of invariant solutions and conservation laws to the (2+1)-dimensional integrable coupling of the KdV equation, 2020, 2020, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-020-01466-6 |
order | order | order | ||||
– | – | – | ||||
1.9172 | 1.9130 | 1.9139 | ||||
1.9580 | 1.9560 | 1.9560 | ||||
1.9788 | 1.9772 | 1.9779 |