Research article Special Issues

Bayesian extreme value modelling of annual maximum monthly rainfall in Somalia from 1901 to 2022

  • In the era of climate change-induced extreme rainfall events, the world faces unprecedented natural hazards, notably flooding. These events pose multifaceted risks to life, agriculture, infrastructure, and the well-being of society. Understanding and predicting extreme rainfall events are critical for achieving sustainable development and building resilient communities. This study employed advanced statistical techniques, specifically the generalized extreme value distribution (GEVD) and generalized Pareto distribution (GPD), using a Bayesian approach, to model and forecast annual maximum monthly rainfall in Somalia. Utilizing data spanning from 1901 to 2022, the rainfall extremes were fitted to both GEVD and GPD models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. Due to the lack of specific prior information, non-informative and independent priors were used to estimate posterior densities, ensuring objectivity and data-driven results, and minimizing subjective bias. Model comparisons were conducted using the deviance information criterion (DIC), prediction errors, and k-fold cross-validation. Findings reveal the robustness of the GEVD model in forecasting and predicting rainfall extremes in Somalia. Diagnostic plots confirmed the goodness of fit of the chosen model. Remarkably, the Bayesian GEVD return level estimation suggested that extreme rainfall could exceed 106 mm, 163 mm, and 195 mm for return periods of 10, 50, and 100 years, respectively. These precise return level estimates may benefit urban planners, civil engineers, and policymakers. Armed with this knowledge, they can design resilient infrastructure and buildings capable of withstanding the most extreme climatic conditions. Therefore, this study provides critical information for fostering sustainable development and resilience against climate-induced challenges in Somalia and beyond. Accurate estimation of extreme rainfall return levels enables effective mitigation of flooding risks and supports climate-resilient urban planning, civil engineering, and policymaking. These findings also inform strategies to optimize drainage systems, fortify infrastructure, and develop adaptive policies, thereby safeguarding lives, livelihoods, and infrastructure amidst escalating climate uncertainties.

    Citation: Jama Mohamed, Dahir Abdi Ali, Abdimalik Ali Warsame, Mukhtar Jibril Abdi, Eid Ibrahim Daud, Mohamed Mohamoud Abdilleh. Bayesian extreme value modelling of annual maximum monthly rainfall in Somalia from 1901 to 2022[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2024, 10(3): 598-622. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2024031

    Related Papers:

    [1] Sanling Yuan, Xuehui Ji, Huaiping Zhu . Asymptotic behavior of a delayed stochastic logistic model with impulsive perturbations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1477-1498. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017077
    [2] Zeyan Yue, Sheng Wang . Dynamics of a stochastic hybrid delay food chain model with jumps in an impulsive polluted environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 186-213. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024009
    [3] Zixiao Xiong, Xining Li, Ming Ye, Qimin Zhang . Finite-time stability and optimal control of an impulsive stochastic reaction-diffusion vegetation-water system driven by Lˊevy process with time-varying delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 8462-8498. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021419
    [4] Linni Li, Jin-E Zhang . Input-to-state stability of stochastic nonlinear system with delayed impulses. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 2233-2253. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024098
    [5] Biwen Li, Qiaoping Huang . Synchronization of time-delay systems with impulsive delay via an average impulsive estimation approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(3): 4501-4520. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024199
    [6] Yan Zhang, Shujing Gao, Shihua Chen . Modelling and analysis of a stochastic nonautonomous predator-prey model with impulsive effects and nonlinear functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1485-1512. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021077
    [7] Xueyan Yang, Xiaodi Li, Qiang Xi, Peiyong Duan . Review of stability and stabilization for impulsive delayed systems. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(6): 1495-1515. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018069
    [8] Luyao Li, Licheng Fang, Huan Liang, Tengda Wei . Observer-based event-triggered impulsive control of delayed reaction-diffusion neural networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(7): 1634-1652. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025060
    [9] Yu Zhu, Liang Wang, Zhipeng Qiu . Threshold behaviour of a stochastic SIRS Lˊevy jump model with saturated incidence and vaccination. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 1402-1419. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023063
    [10] Long Lv, Xiao-Juan Yao . Qualitative analysis of a nonautonomous stochastic SIS epidemic model with Lˊevy jumps. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1352-1369. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021071
  • In the era of climate change-induced extreme rainfall events, the world faces unprecedented natural hazards, notably flooding. These events pose multifaceted risks to life, agriculture, infrastructure, and the well-being of society. Understanding and predicting extreme rainfall events are critical for achieving sustainable development and building resilient communities. This study employed advanced statistical techniques, specifically the generalized extreme value distribution (GEVD) and generalized Pareto distribution (GPD), using a Bayesian approach, to model and forecast annual maximum monthly rainfall in Somalia. Utilizing data spanning from 1901 to 2022, the rainfall extremes were fitted to both GEVD and GPD models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations. Due to the lack of specific prior information, non-informative and independent priors were used to estimate posterior densities, ensuring objectivity and data-driven results, and minimizing subjective bias. Model comparisons were conducted using the deviance information criterion (DIC), prediction errors, and k-fold cross-validation. Findings reveal the robustness of the GEVD model in forecasting and predicting rainfall extremes in Somalia. Diagnostic plots confirmed the goodness of fit of the chosen model. Remarkably, the Bayesian GEVD return level estimation suggested that extreme rainfall could exceed 106 mm, 163 mm, and 195 mm for return periods of 10, 50, and 100 years, respectively. These precise return level estimates may benefit urban planners, civil engineers, and policymakers. Armed with this knowledge, they can design resilient infrastructure and buildings capable of withstanding the most extreme climatic conditions. Therefore, this study provides critical information for fostering sustainable development and resilience against climate-induced challenges in Somalia and beyond. Accurate estimation of extreme rainfall return levels enables effective mitigation of flooding risks and supports climate-resilient urban planning, civil engineering, and policymaking. These findings also inform strategies to optimize drainage systems, fortify infrastructure, and develop adaptive policies, thereby safeguarding lives, livelihoods, and infrastructure amidst escalating climate uncertainties.



    The chemotaxis refers to the collective motion of bacteria, cells or an organisms in response to an attractant gradient. There are numerous examples of chemotaxis in animal and insect ecology, biological and biomedical sciences [9]. Deep understanding of the behavior of chemotaxis phenomenon is of great significance to the biological and medical applications.

    Various kinds of mathematical models have been developed by both experimentalists and theoreticians to describe the chemotactic phenomenon. In addition, to further describe and interpret the bioconvection phenomenon [14], a variety of coupled chemotaxis-fluid models have been proposed and studied in [5,8,24]. The coupled model is expressed as follows:

    nt+(un)=Dn2nχ[r(c)nc], (1)
    ct+(uc)=Dc2cnκr(c), (2)
    ρ(ut+uu)=p+η2u+nVb(ρbρ)g, (3)
    u=0. (4)

    Here, u is velocity, ρ is the fluid density, p is the hydrodynamic pressure, η is the coefficient of dynamic viscosity, g is the gravity, n and c represent the concentrations of bacteria and oxygen, respectively. κ is the oxygen consumption rate, χ is the chemotactic sensitivity, Dn and Dc are diffusion coefficients for bacteria and oxygen, respectively. Vb and ρb are the bacterial volume and density, respectively. r(c) is the dimensionless cut-off function.

    It can be seen from the above system that the chemotaxis-fluid model involves highly nonlinearity coupled with chemotaxis, diffusion and convection, which brings great difficulties to get the analytical solution. Recently, several numerical methods have been developed to study the chemotaxis phenomenon, such as finite element, finite volume schemes [13,21], upwind-difference potentials method [10], fractional step algorithms [20,25], interior penalty/discontinuous Galerkin methods [11,12], and cell-overcrowding prevention models [1,7], etc. In the work by Chertock et al. [5], a coupled chemotaxis-fluid system has been numerically studied by a high-resolution vorticity-based hybrid finite-volume finite-difference scheme. In [22], the chemotaxis phenomenon in incompressible viscous fluid has been numerically studied by a compact finite difference scheme. The plume patterns were studied by solving a chemotaxis-diffusion-convection coupling system in [6], where the comparison of different systems of chemotaxis-diffusion-convection, Rayleigh-Bˊenard convection and the double diffusive convection were investigated. And it was indicated that although physical mechanisms are different, the convection patterns and the dimensionless differential systems are similar. In addition, a three-dimensional chemotaxis-fluid model was numerically investigated in [17]. The formation of falling bacterial plumes and its convergence to a steady state have been observed.

    In this work, we will develop an efficient LBM to solve the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model. LBM originates from kinetic Boltzmann equation, which has been successfully applied in modeling complex fluid flows [18,4,2]. In addition, LBM also shows its excellent capability in solving the nonlinear systems [23,3,28,26]. For the chemotaxis problem, a simplified LBM was developed for a bacterial chemotaxis model by Hilpert [16]. While, Yan et al. [27] developed a MRT-LBM to investigate the traveling bacterial bands of chemotactic bacteria. However, due to the highly nonlinearity of the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model, we need to develop more accurate and stable LBM to solve this complex problem. In [19], a novel MRT-LBM was proposed to simulate multi-phase fluids with Peng-Robinson (P-R) equation of state. To enhance the stability of the MRT-LBM, B-W scheme is introduced in the discretization of the evolution equation. Numerical results showed that the P-R free energy model was solved precisely and spurious currents were eliminated effectively. Inspired by this, we will apply the MRT-LBM with B-W scheme to solve the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model.

    The rest of this article is organized as follows. In Section Ⅱ, the MRT-LBM with B-W scheme for the chemotaxis-fluid model is proposed. In Section Ⅲ, several numerical experiments are carried out on different chemotaxis problems, including the classical K-S model, the coupled Navier-Stokes-Keller-Segel (NS-KS) model, and the bacterial biocovection problem. The paper ends with some conclusions in Section Ⅳ.

    In this section, we will introduce the MRT-LBM with B-W scheme for the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model (1)-(4). To better investigate the coupled chemotaxis-fluid model, the following dimensionless form is taken:

    x=xL,t=DnL2t,c=ccair,n=nnr,u=LDnu,p=L2ηDnp,g=gg,

    where nr is the characteristic cell density, cair is the oxygen concentration in the air, and L is a characteristic length. Through introducing the above scaled variables and dropping the prime notation, the following system can be obtained.

    nt+(un)=2nα[r(c)nc], (5)
    ct+(uc)=δ2cβr(c)n, (6)
    ut+uu=p+Sc2u+γScnz. (7)
    u=0, (8)

    where z is the unit vector in the vertical direction. r(c) is regularized by

    r(c)=12(1+cc(cc)2+ϵ2),

    where c is a cut-off constant and ϵ>0 is a constant close to zero.

    The dimensionless parameters α, β, γ, δ, and the Schmidt number Sc are given below

    α=χcairDn,β=κnrL2cairDn,γ=Vbnrg(ρbρ)L3ηDn,δ=DcDn,Sc=ηDnρ.

    In this section, LBM with MRT collision operator is applied to solve the incompressible N-S equations (7)-(8). To capture the chemotaxis phenomenon more accurately, B-W scheme is introduced in the discretization of the evolution equation of MRT-LBM.

    The discrete velocity Boltzmann equation with MRT collision operator is expressed as

    hit+ˆceihi=Λij[hjheqj]+Hi, (9)

    where, hi(x,t) is the discrete distribution function of particle at site x and time t moving with speed ˆc along the direction ei. {ei,i=0,1,,k1} is the set of discrete velocity directions, ˆc is the sound speed, Λij is the collision matrix, heqi(x,t) is the equilibrium distribution function (EDF), and Hi is the force distribution function.

    The discrete velocity Boltzmann equation (9) is solved by a time-splitting scheme, which is decomposed into two sub-processes, i.e., the collision process,

    hit=Λij[hjheqj]+Hi, (10)

    and the streaming process,

    hit+ˆceihi=0. (11)

    In the MRT model, the collision subprocess is carried out in the moment space. We take the generally used D2Q9 (two-dimensional space with nine discrete velocities) model as an example. The distribution functions hi in the moment space are defined as

    m=Mh=(ρ,e,ε,jx,qx,jy,qy,pxx,pxy)T,

    where e and ε are related to total energy and the function of energy square; jx and jy are relevant to the momentum; qx and qy are related to the x and y components of the energy; pxx and pxy are the corresponding diagonal and off-diagonal components of the stress tensor, respectively. M is the transformation matrix. h={hi,i=0,1,k1}. For the D2Q9 model, M is defined as

    M=(111111111411112222422221111010101111020201111001011111002021111011110000000001111).

    Through multiplying the transformation matrix M, the collision process can be rewritten onto the moment space as

    mt=˜S(mmeq)+ˆH, (12)

    where ˜S=MΛM1 is a diagonal relaxation matrix, given by

    ˜S=diag{˜s0,˜s1,˜s2,˜s3,˜s4,˜s5,˜s6,˜s7,˜s8}.

    The equilibrium moment meq is defined as

    meq=Mheq=ρ[12+3u213u2uuvvu2v2uv]. (13)

    ˆH=MH is the corresponding force moment, which is expressed as

    ˆH0=0,ˆH1=6(1s12)uFt,ˆH2=6(1s22)uFt,ˆH3=Ftx,ˆH4=(1s42)Ftx,ˆH5=Fty,ˆH6=(1s62)Fty,ˆH7=2(1s72)(uFtxvFty),ˆH8=(1s82)(uFty+vFtx), (14)

    where H=(H0,...,H8)T. Ft is the external force, which has the following form

    Ft=(Ftx,Fty).

    In this simulation, Ft should be expressed as

    Ft=γScnz. (15)

    The first order explicit Euler scheme is used to discrete (12) as

    m+=mS(mmeq)+δtˆH, (16)

    where m+=Mh+ is the post-collision moments, and h+=(h+0,...,h+8)T is the post-collision distribution function. The non-dimensional relaxation matrix is defined as S=δt˜S, which is given by

    S=diag{s0,s1,s2,s3,s4,s5,s6,s7,s8}.

    In simulations, s0=s3=s5, s4=s6 and s7=s8.

    Next, through using the second-order B-W scheme, Eq. (11) can be solved on a regular lattice with spacing δx,

    hi(x,t+δt)=h+i(x,t)A2(3h+i(x,t)4h+i(xeiδx,t)+h+i(x2eiδx,t))+A22(h+i(x,t)2h+i(xeiδx,t)+h+i(x2eiδx,t)), (17)

    where the time step δt is related to the CFL number A as δt=Aδx/c.

    The macroscopic quantities, ρ and u are calculated as

    ρ=ihi,ρu=icihi+δt2Ft. (18)

    The evolution equations of the LBM for (5) and (6) are given by

    fit+ˆcifi=1τn(fifeqi)+Si, (19)
    git+ˆcigi=1τc(gigeqi)+ˆSi+δt2tˆSi, (20)

    where τn and τc are the dimensionless relaxation factors, ˆci=ˆcei, fi(x,t) and gi(x,t) are the distribution functions of particle moving with velocity ˆci at position x and time t. Si(x,t) and ˆSi(x,t) are source distribution functions, which are defined as

    Si=ωiˆciBr(c)nc,ˆSi=ωi(βr(c)n).

    Here, B is a parameter, which satisfies α=Bc2sτnδt. feqi(x,t) and geqi(x,t) are local equilibrium distribution functions, and read as

    feqi(x,t)=ωin(1+ˆciuc2s),geqi(x,t)=ωic(1+ˆciuc2s).

    (19) and (20) are decomposed into two sub-processes: the collision process

    fit=1τn(fifeqi)+Si, (21)
    git=1τc(gigeqi)+ˆSi+δt2tˆSi, (22)

    and the streaming process,

    fit+ˆcifi=0, (23)
    git+ˆcigi=0. (24)

    The first order explicit Euler scheme is used to solve the collision process (21)-(22), which leads to

    f+i=fiδtτn(fifeqi)+δtSi,g+i=giδtτc(gigeqi)+δtˆSi+δt22tˆSi.

    B-W scheme is used to solve (23) and (24),

    fi(x,t+δt)=f+i(x,t)A2(3f+i(x,t)4f+i(xeiδx,t)+f+i(x2eiδx,t))+A22(f+i(x,t)2f+i(xeiδx,t)+f+i(x2eiδx,t)), (25)
    gi(x,t+δt)=g+i(x,t)A2(3g+i(x,t)4g+i(xeiδx,t)+g+i(x2eiδx,t))+A22(g+i(x,t)2g+i(xeiδx,t)+g+i(x2eiδx,t)). (26)

    The concentrations of the bacteria n(x,t) and oxygen c(x,t) are computed by

    n(x,t)=ifi(x,t),c(x,t)=igi(x,t).

    To validate that the stability is improved by the present LBM with B-W scheme, and also to verify the capability of the proposed method, a series of chemotaxis problems are numerically investigated. In the following numerical experiments, the general bounce-back scheme in reference [29] is used to treat the macroscopic boundary conditions in the LBM with B-W scheme.

    In this section, the following classical K-S chemotaxis problem is considered.

    nt=μnχ(nc), (27)
    ct=2c+nc. (28)

    (27)-(28) can be regarded as a special case of the generalized K-S model. μ and χ represent the diffusion constants. Without loss of generality, the values of these parameters are set as μ=χ=1. The computational domain is Ω=[0.5,0.5]×[0.5,0.5] and the initial conditions are

    n(x,y,0)=1000e100(x2+y2),c(x,y,0)=500e50(x2+y2).

    The boundary conditions are

    nv=cv=0,(x,y)Ω,

    where v is unit normal vector and Ω represents the domain boundary.

    Under above initial and boundary conditions, the solution of (27)-(28) will blow up at the origin in finite time, which brings a great challenge in the numerical simulation. To illustrate that the stability is improved by B-W scheme, the comparison between standard LBM and the present LBM with B-W scheme is carried out. In the numerical experiment, the D2Q9 lattice model is used with a 256×256 uniform grid in space and time step δt=5.0×107. Fig. 1 shows numerical solutions of bacteria concentrations n(x,t) at different time points by the standard LBM, i.e., A=0. It can be observed that numerical solutions appear negative values as time evolves. Then, the LBM with B-W scheme is applied to solve the above initial-value problem. In the simulation, the same grid is used with the CFL number A=0.5, which gives δt=2.5×107. Numerical solutions can be found in Fig. 2, which show that the positivity of bacteria concentrations n(x,t) is well preserved. In addition, one-dimensional profiles of n(x,t) along y=0 at t=1.15×104 are depicted in Fig. 3. Negative values can be observed clearly near the origin in Fig. 3(a), while not in Fig. 3(b), which verifies that the numerical stability is improved by the proposed LBM with B-W scheme.

    Figure 1.  Numerical solutions of bacteria concentrations n(x,t) of (27)-(28) by the standard LBM (A = 0): (a) t=5.0×106, (b) t=1.0×105, (c) t=4.5×105, (d) t=1.15×104.
    Figure 2.  Numerical solutions of bacteria concentrations n(x,t) of (27)-(28) by the present LBM with B-W scheme (A = 0.5), (a) t=5.0×106, (b) t=1.0×105, (c) t=4.5×105, (d) t=1.15×104.
    Figure 3.  1D profiles of n(x,t) along y = 0 at t=1.15×104: (a) by the standard LBM (A = 0); (b) by the present LBM with B-W scheme (A = 0.5).

    In this section, the incompressible N-S equations coupled with K-S equation is solved for the convergence test of the proposed LBM with B-W scheme. The mathematical model has the following form,

    nt+(un)=2n[χnc],ct+(uc)=2c+nf(c)cκ,
    ut+uu=p+μ2u, (29)
    u=0. (30)

    In the numerical simulation, f=κ=1. The boundary conditions are

    nv=cv=pv=0,u=uexact,(x,y)Ω.

    The computational domain is Ω=[0,1]×[0,1]. The above problem has the following exact solutions [22],

    uexact=cos(πx)sin(πy)e2π2t,vexact=sin(πx)cos(πy)e2π2t,p=c10.25(cos(2πx)+cos(2πy))e4π2t,nexact=cos(πx)cos(πy)eπ2t,cexact=cos(πx)cos(πy)e2π2t.

    To measure the accuracy, the following relative error is applied:

    E=Σ|ϕ(x,t)ϕ(x,t)|Σ|ϕ(x,t)|,

    where ϕ and ϕ represent the analytical and numerical solutions, respectively, and the summation is taken over all grid points.

    It can be seen from Table 1 that numerical solutions of n,c,u by the proposed LBM with B-W scheme has second order convergence.

    Table 1.  Convergence test with different lattice spacings, δt=1.0×105.
    Meshes En order Ec order Eu order
    64×64 1.3934×104 1.6327×104 2.0029×104
    128×128 3.6892×105 1.9172 4.3355×105 1.9130 5.3150×105 1.9139
    256×256 9.4955×106 1.9580 1.1174×105 1.9560 1.3699×105 1.9560
    512×512 2.4090×106 1.9788 2.8380×106 1.9772 3.4775×106 1.9779

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The chemotaxis response of bacterial suspensions can be described by the chemotaxis-fluid model (5)-(8). The balance between chemotaxis, diffusion, and convection of bacteria leads to the formation and stability of plumes. There still needs to a deep understanding of the particular impact of each mechanism.

    In the simulations, the parameters of (5)-(8) are set as γ=418, Sc=7700, c=0.3, the grid spacing and time step are h=1/128 and δt=2×105, respectively, and ϵ=h. The initial conditions are defined as:

    n0(x,y)={1,ify>0.5010.01(sin(x0.5)π)),0.5,otherwise,c0(x,y)=1,u0(x,y)=0,

    At the top boundary Ωtop, the boundary conditions are given as

    χnr(c)cyDnny=0,c=1.0,v=0,uy=0,(x,y)Ωtop, (31)

    where u=(u,v). At the bottom of the domain Ωbot, the boundary conditions are:

    ny=cy=0,u=v=0,(x,y)Ωbot. (32)

    The mixed boundary condition in Eq. (31) can be regrouped as αcy=(lnn)y, where α=χr(c)/Dn. By integrating αcy=(lnn)y with respect to y, the mixed boundary condition is transformed into Dirichlet boundary condition, then the general bounce-back scheme in reference [29] is used.

    First of all, as the numerical experiments in [17], the case of α=5, β=5 and δ=0.25 is considered. Numerical results of the vertical profiles of c and cell densities n at t = 0.22 are shown in Fig. 4(a), which agree well with the available data in [17]. As a result of the cut-off of the chemotactic convection for oxygen levels below cc, an increase of cells towards the bottom can be found from the vertical profile of the cell density. The streamlines in Fig. 4(b) shows that the bioconvection phenomenon is well captured. Next, the effect of β is investigated for α=5 and δ=1. Numerical results for β=7.23, 10, 20, 40 are shown in Fig. 5. When the value of β increases, the oxygen consumption increases relative to the oxygen diffusion. It can be seen from Fig. 5(a) that the oxygen density decreases with the increases of the value of β, while the cell up-swimming increases (see Fig. 5(b)). The effect of α is also investigated for the fixed value of β=10 and δ=1. The cases of α=1, 2, 4, 5.952 are considered. Numerical results are shown in Fig. 6, which indicate that the cell density near the surface increases when the value of α increases (see Fig. 6(b)), and less overall oxygen consumption occurs in these regions (see Fig. 6(a)). Similar results as in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 can be found in [17].

    Figure 4.  (a) Vertical profiles of the oxygen c and cell densities n and (b) streamlines at t = 0.22.
    Figure 5.  Vertical profiles of (a) oxygen c and (b) cell densities n at t = 0.22 with α=5, δ=1 and different β.
    Figure 6.  Vertical profiles of (a) oxygen c and (b) cell densities n at t = 0.22 with β=10, δ=1 and different α.

    In this subsection, the system (5)-(8) on the rectangular domain is numerically studied. In the following numerical simulations, the coefficients are set as α=10, β=10, γ=1000, δ=5, Sc=500, and the cut-off c=0.3. The computational domain is Ω=[0,6]×[0,1]. The mesh grid and time step are h=1/256 and δt=105, respectively, and we use ϵ=h. The boundary conditions (31) and (32) are applied.

    As in [17], the following initial data is considered:

    n0(x,y)=0.8+0.2rand(),c0(x,y)=1,u0(x,y)=0,

    where rand() is a random number uniformly distributed in the interval [0, 1].

    The evolution of the cell density n at different time is depicted in Fig. 7. It can be observed that the cell concentration increases with time as a result of the cells accumulating at the top of the chamber, while the distinct phenomenon of the cell concentration can be found at the bottom of the chamber. As a consequence, several instabilities at a high-concentration layer is triggered below the fluid-air surface at t=0.32. At t=0.37, two falling plumes is formulated due to the instabilities and all plumes hit the bottom of the chamber at t=0.42. At the bottom of the plumes, the cells move onto the edge of the plumes, and are advected by the flow field near the fluid-air surface. Thus the smaller plumes and thicker cell-rich layer at t=0.47 than those at t=0.42 can be observed. The velocity components u(x,y,t) and v(x,y,t) are depicted as arrows in Fig. 7. It can be seen that the fluid velocity is downward in regions of large concentrations. The above phenomenon was also observed in [5,17,6].

    Figure 7.  Bioconvection patterns of the cell density n(x,y) at (a) t=0.32, (b) t=0.37, (c) t=0.42, and (d) t=0.47.

    In this subsection, the effect of the parameter δ on evolution of the cell density is investigated. In numerical simulations, the following initial data is used.

    n0(x,y)={1,ify>0.4990.05(sin(x0.5)π))0.5,otherwise,c0(x,y)=1,u0(x,y)=0.

    The computational domain is Ω=[0,4]×[0,1] and the values of δ are set as: δ=5, 25, 50, while the value of Dn is fixed. The other parameters are α=10, β=10, γ=1000, and Sc=500.

    Numerical results of δ=5, 25, and 50 are shown in Figs. 8-10, which are consistent with the results in [17,15]. For δ=5 (see Fig. 8), profiles of plumes are similar to those in Fig. 7. However, for δ=25 and 50 (see Figs. 9 and 10, respectively), profiles of plumes are significantly different, where we could observe that the two instabilities are approaching each other and merge into one instability.

    Figure 8.  For δ=5, cell concentration n(x,y) at (a) t=0.27, (b) t=0.34, and (c) t=0.39.
    Figure 9.  For δ=25, cell concentration n(x,y) at (a) t=2.9, (b) t=3.4, and (c) t=3.9.
    Figure 10.  For δ=50, cell concentration n(x,y) at (a) t=1.9, (b) t=2.4, and (c) t=2.9.

    An accurate and stable MRT-LBM with B-W scheme for a chemotaxis-fluid model is developed. Through introducing B-W scheme in the evolution process of the LBM, the numerical stability is improved. The numerical study of the classical K-S model shows that the proposed LBM with B-W scheme could preserve the positivity of bacteria concentrations. Then, the second order accuracy is tested by simulating the coupled NS-KS model. The nonlinear dynamics of the chemotaxis-fluid model was investigated numerically by the proposed MRT-LBM with B-W scheme. Our numerical results agree well with those in the literature under different settings. In the numerical simulation of bioconvection phenomenon, the evolution of the instability of falling plumes and the convergence towards numerically stable stationary plumes are observed.

    Rewritten the evolution equation (17) up to O(δx3), one can obtain the following equation

    hi(x,t+δt)=h+i(x,t)δtceih+i(x,t)+12δt2(cei)2h+i(x,t)+O(δx3). (33)

    Multiplying Eq. (16) by inverse of the transformation matrix M, and substituting it into the above equation and expanding the variables around (x,t) up to O(δx2) and O(δt2), we obtain

    thi+ceihi=Ωiδt2[2thi(cei)2hi+2ceiΩi]+O(δx2+δt2), (34)

    where Ωi=Λij(hjheqj)+Hi.

    2thi can be expressed as

    2thi=(cei)2hi+tΩiceiΩi+O(δt). (35)

    Thus, Eq. (34) can be rewritten as

    Dihi=(1δt2Di)Ωi+O(δx2+δt2), (36)

    where Di=t+cei.

    In addition, from Eq. (34), we can see that Ωi=Dihi+O(δt). Thus, Eq. (36) is also equivalent to

    Dihi+δt2D2ihi=Λij[hjheqj]+Hi+O(δx2+δt2). (37)

    Then we introduce the following expansions:

    hi=h(0)i+εh(1)i+ε2h(2)i+,t=εt1+ε2t2,=ε1,Hi=εH(1)i, (38)

    where ε is a small parameter. With the expansions, Eq. (37) can be rewritten in consecutive orders of ε as

    O(ε0):h(0)i=h(eq)i, (39a)
    O(ε1):D1ih(eq)i=Λijh(1)j+H(1)i, (39b)
    O(ε1):t2h(0)i+D1i[(IijΛij2)h(1)j]=Λijh(2)jδt2D1iH(1)i, (39c)

    where D1i=t1+ci1.

    Multiplying the transformation Matrix M on both side of Eq. (39), we can obtain the following moment equations:

    O(ε0):m(0)=m(eq), (40a)
    O(ε1):D1m(0)=˜Sm(1)+ˆH(1), (40b)
    O(ε2):t2m(0)+D1(IS2)m(1)+δt2D1ˆH(1)=˜Sm(2), (40c)

    where D1=t1I+Cα1α, Cα is the discrete velocity matrix.

    In addition, from Eqs. (18) and (40a), we derive

    ρ(1)=0,j(1)x=δt2F(1)tx,j(1)y=δt2F(1)ty,ρ(k)=j(k)x=j(k)y=0,k>1. (41)

    On the t1 time scale, Eq. (40b) can be rewritten as follows:

    t1[ρρ(2+3u2)ρ(13u2)ρuρuρvρvρ(u2v2)ρuv]+1x[ρu0ρuc2sρ+ρu2ρBx/3ρuvρuv2ρu/3ρv/3]+1y[ρv0ρvρuvρuvc2sρ+ρv2ρBy/32ρv/3ρu/3]=[0˜s1e(1)˜s2ε(1)0˜s4q(1)x0˜s6q(1)y˜s7p(1)xx˜s8p(1)xy]+[06(1s1/2)uF(1)t6(1s2/2)uF(1)tF(1)tx(1s4/2)F(1)txF(1)ty(1s6/2)F(1)ty2(1s7/2)(uF(1)txvF(1)ty)(1s8/2)(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)] (42)

    where Bx=1+6v2+3u2, By=1+6u2+3u2.

    Similarly, From Eq. (40b), the scale equations of conserved quantities ρ, jx and jy on the t2 time scale can be rewritten as

    t2ρ=0. (43)
    t2(ρu)+16(1s12)1xe(1)+(1s72)(121xp(1)xx+1yp(1)xy)+δt2(1s12)1x(uF(1)t)+δt2(1s72)1x(uF(1)txvF(1)ty)+δt2(1s82)1y(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)=0, (44)
    t2(ρv)+16(1s12)1ye(1)+(1s72)(1xp(1)xy121yp(1)xx)+δt2(1s72)1x(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)+δt2(1s12)1y(uF(1)t)δt2(1s72)1y(uF(1)txvF(1)ty)=0. (45)

    To close the hydrodynamic equations at the second order of ε, the terms of e(1), p(1)xx and p(1)xy in Eqs. (44) and (45) should be estimated. Under the low Mach number assumption, these terms can be evaluated as

    e(1)=1˜s1[2ρ(1xu+1yv)+3s1uF(1)t]+O(Ma3), (46)
    p(1)xx=1˜s7[23ρ(1xu1yv)+s7(uF(1)txvF(1)ty)]+O(Ma3), (47)
    p(1)xy=1˜s8[13ρ(1xv+1yu)+s82(uF(1)ty+vF(1)tx)]+O(Ma3). (48)

    With Eqs. (46), (47) and (48), we can obtain the hydrodynamic equations at t1 and t2 scales,

    Continuity equations

    t1ρ+1x(ρu)+1y(ρv)=0, (49)
    t2ρ=0. (50)

    Momentum equations

    t1ρu+1x(c2sρ+ρu2)+1y(ρuv)=F(1)tx, (51)
    t1ρv+1x(ρuv)+1y(c2sρ+ρv2)=F(1)ty, (52)
    t2(ρu)=1x(ρν(1xu1yv)+ρζ(1xu+1yv))+1y(ρν(1xv+1yu)), (53)
    t2(ρv)=1x(ρν(1xv+1yu))+1y(ρν(1yv1xu)+ρζ(1xu+1yv)), (54)

    where ν=ρη and ζ=ρξ are the kinematic and bulk viscosities, respectively. In the present MRT-LB model, we enforce ν=13(1s712)δt and ζ=13(1s112)δt.

    Combining the above equations on t0 and t1 scale, the following hydrodynamic equations can be obtained.

    tρ+(ρu)=0, (55)
    ρut+(ρuu)=c2sρ+[ρν(u+uT)+ρ(ζν)(u)I]+Ft. (56)


    [1] Paola F De, Giugni M, Garcia-Aristizabal A, et al. (2013) Stationary vs. Non-Stationary of Extreme Rainfall in Dar Es Salaam (Tanzania), Beijing, IAHR Congress Tsinghua University Press.
    [2] IPCC, Climate Change 2023. 2023. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_FullVolume.pdf.
    [3] UNHCR, Floods drive over 650,000 Somalis from their homes in 2020, 2020. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/news/briefing/2020/8/5f2cf86c4/floods-drive-650000-somalis-homes2020.html#: ~: text = Floods drive over 650%2C000 Somalis from their homes in 2020, This is a & text = More than 150%2C000 Somalis have, the Southern regions of Somalia.
    [4] FAO, Somalia floods update Series. 2018. Available from: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/emergencies/docs/FAOSomaliaFloodsUpdate050718.pdf.
    [5] Gure A (2021) The Role of Climate information and Early Warning Systems in Supporting Disaster Risk Reduction in Somalia. 1–50.
    [6] Wang N, Sun F, Koutsoyiannis D, et al. (2023) How can Changes in the Human‐Flood Distance Mitigate Flood Fatalities and Displacements? Geophys Res Lett 50. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105064 doi: 10.1029/2023GL105064
    [7] Shabri AB, Daud ZM, Ariff NM (2011) Regional analysis of annual maximum rainfall using TL-moments method. Theor Appl Climatol 104: 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0437-5 doi: 10.1007/s00704-011-0437-5
    [8] Zawiah WZW, Jemain AA, Ibrahim K (2009) A Comparative Study of Extreme Rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia: with Reference to Partial Duration and Annual Extreme Series. Sains Malays 38: 751–760.
    [9] Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D, Tzouka K (2016) Predictability in dice motion: how does it differ from hydro-meteorological processes? Hydrol Sci J 61: 1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1034128 doi: 10.1080/02626667.2015.1034128
    [10] Iliopoulou T, Koutsoyiannis D (2019) Revealing hidden persistence in maximum rainfall records. Hydrol Sci J 64: 1673–1689. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1657578 doi: 10.1080/02626667.2019.1657578
    [11] Gneiting T, Schlather M (2004) Stochastic Models That Separate Fractal Dimension and the Hurst Effect. SIAM Rev 46: 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144501394387 doi: 10.1137/S0036144501394387
    [12] Hurst HE (1951) Long-Term Storage Capacity of Reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 116: 770–799. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0006518 doi: 10.1061/TACEAT.0006518
    [13] Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D, Iliopoulou T, et al. (2021) A Global-Scale Investigation of Stochastic Similarities in Marginal Distribution and Dependence Structure of Key Hydrological-Cycle Processes. Hydrology 8: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020059 doi: 10.3390/hydrology8020059
    [14] Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D (2018) Stochastic synthesis approximating any process dependence and distribution. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32: 1493–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1540-2 doi: 10.1007/s00477-018-1540-2
    [15] Van de Vyver H (2012) Evolution of extreme temperatures in Belgium since the 1950s. Theor Appl Climatol 107: 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0456-2 doi: 10.1007/s00704-011-0456-2
    [16] Blain GC (2011) Modeling extreme minimum air temperature series under climate change conditions. Ciência Rural 41: 1877–1883.
    [17] Siliverstovs B, Oetsch R, Kemfert C, et al. (2010) Climate Change and Modelling of Extreme Temperatures in Switzerland. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24: 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-009-0321-3 doi: 10.1007/s00477-009-0321-3
    [18] Gilleland E, Katz RW (2006) Analyzing seasonal to interannual extreme weather and climate variability with the extremes toolkit. 18th Conference on Climate Variability and Change, 86th American Meteorological Society (AMS) Annual Meeting.
    [19] Hurairah A, Akma Ibrahim N, Bin Daud I, et al. (2005) An application of a new extreme value distribution to air pollution data. Manage Environ Qual 16: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830510574317 doi: 10.1108/14777830510574317
    [20] Katz RW, Brush GS, Parlange MB (2005) STATISTICS OF EXTREMES: MODELING ECOLOGICAL DISTURBANCES. Ecology 86: 1124–1134. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0606 doi: 10.1890/04-0606
    [21] Koutsoyiannis D, Baloutsos G (2000) Analysis of a Long Record of Annual Maximum Rainfall in Athens, Greece, and Design Rainfall Inferences. Nat Hazards 22: 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008001312219 doi: 10.1023/A:1008001312219
    [22] Flocas AA, Angouridakis VE (1979) Extreme values analysis of air temperature over Greece. Arch für Meteorol Geophys und Bioklimatologie Wien 27: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245909 doi: 10.1007/BF02245909
    [23] Chavez-Demoulin V, Davison AC (2012) Modelling time series extremes. REVSTAT-Stat J 10: 109–133.
    [24] Coles S (2001) An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, London, Springer.
    [25] Coles SG, Tawn JA (1996) A Bayesian Analysis of Extreme Rainfall Data. Appl Stat 45: 463. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986068 doi: 10.2307/2986068
    [26] Coles S, Pericchi LR, Sisson S (2003) A fully probabilistic approach to extreme rainfall modeling. J Hydrol 273: 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00353-0 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00353-0
    [27] Smith E (2005) Bayesian modelling of extreme rainfall data. University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
    [28] Fawcett L, Walshaw D (2008) Modelling Environmental Extremes, Kelowna, Short Course for the 19th Annual Conference of the International Environmetrics Society. Available from: http://www.mas.ncl.ac.uk/~ndw/kelownabetter.pdf.
    [29] Mohamed J, Adam MB (2022) Modeling of magnitude and frequency of extreme rainfall in Somalia. Model Earth Syst Environ 8: 4277–4294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01363-0 doi: 10.1007/s40808-022-01363-0
    [30] Mohamed J, Ali DA, Warsame AA, et al. (2022) Two phases of long-term shift in extreme precipitation in Somalia. Meteorol Atmos Phys 134: 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-022-00896-4 doi: 10.1007/s00703-022-00896-4
    [31] UNDP (2013) Somalia National Adaptation Programme of Action on Climate Change (NAPA). Available from: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/napa/som01.pdf.
    [32] Harris I, Osborn TJ, Jones P, et al. (2020) Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci Data 7: 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3 doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3
    [33] Koutsoyiannis D (2004) Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: Ⅱ. Empirical investigation of long rainfall records/Statistiques de valeurs extrêmes et estimation de précipitations extrêmes: Ⅱ. Recherche empirique sur de longues séries de précipitations. Hydrol Sci J 49: 610. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.591.54424 doi: 10.1623/hysj.49.4.591.54424
    [34] Eli A, Wan MS, Zin ZW (2012) Preliminary Study on Bayesian Extreme Rainfall Analysis: A Case Study of Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia. Sains Malays 41: 1403–1410.
    [35] Lazoglou G, Anagnostopoulou C (2017) An Overview of Statistical Methods for Studying the Extreme Rainfalls in Mediterranean. Proceedings 2017: 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2017-04132 doi: 10.3390/ecas2017-04132
    [36] Ahmad I, Ahmad T, Almanjahie I (2019) Modelling of extreme rainfall in Punjab: Pakistan using bayesian and frequentist approach. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17. https://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1706_1372913748 doi: 10.15666/aeer/1706_1372913748
    [37] Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images. IEEE T Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 721–741. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
    [38] Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213
    [39] Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, et al. (1953) Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J Chem Phys 21: 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114 doi: 10.1063/1.1699114
    [40] Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57: 97–109.
    [41] Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, et al. (2002) Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 64: 583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353 doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
    [42] Gilleland E, Katz RW (2016) extRemes 2.0: An Extreme Value Analysis Package in R. J Stat Softw 72: 1–39. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v072.i08 doi: 10.18637/jss.v072.i08
    [43] Gamerman D (1997) Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference, London, Chapman Hall.
    [44] Coles S, Tawn J (2005) Bayesian modelling of extreme surges on the UK east coast. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 363: 1387–1406. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1574 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2005.1574
    [45] Diriba TA, Debusho LK, Botai J, et al. (2017) Bayesian modelling of extreme wind speed at Cape Town, South Africa. Environ Ecol Stat 24: 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-017-0369-z doi: 10.1007/s10651-017-0369-z
    [46] Koutsoyiannis D (2023) Stochastics of Hydroclimatic Extremes—A Cool Look at Risk. Kallipos Open Academic Editions. https://doi.org/10.57713/kallipos-1
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Lei Xu, Zhengzheng Yan, Rongliang Chen, A discrete unified gas kinetic scheme on unstructured grids for viscid compressible flows and its parallel algorithm, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 8829, 10.3934/math.2023443
    2. Chengjie Zhan, Zhenhua Chai, Baochang Shi, A lattice Boltzmann model for the coupled cross-diffusion-fluid system, 2021, 400, 00963003, 126105, 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126105
    3. Ben Gao, Qinglian Yin, Construction of invariant solutions and conservation laws to the (2+1)-dimensional integrable coupling of the KdV equation, 2020, 2020, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-020-01466-6
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1560) PDF downloads(61) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(10)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog