The time delay may induce oscillatory behaviour in multi-agent systems, which may destroy the consensus of the system. Therefore, the critical delay that is the maximum value of the delay to guarantee the consensus of the system, is an important performance index of multi-agent systems. This paper studies the influence of the processing delay on the consensus for a class of multi-agent system involving task strategies. The first-order system with a single delay and the second-order system with two different delays are investigated respectively. A critical delay independent of strategies and a critical region of the 2-D plane that depends on strategies is obtained for the first-order and the second-order system respectively. Specifically, a geometric method was used for the case of two different delays. Several numerical simulations are presented to explain the results.
Citation: Yipeng Chen, Yicheng Liu, Xiao Wang. The critical delay of the consensus for a class of multi-agent system involving task strategies[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(2): 513-531. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023021
[1] | Hye Kyung Kim, Dmitry V. Dolgy . Degenerate Catalan-Daehee numbers and polynomials of order $ r $ arising from degenerate umbral calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3845-3865. doi: 10.3934/math.2022213 |
[2] | Takao Komatsu, Ram Krishna Pandey . On hypergeometric Cauchy numbers of higher grade. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6630-6646. doi: 10.3934/math.2021390 |
[3] | Nadia N. Li, Wenchang Chu . Explicit formulae for Bernoulli numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28170-28194. doi: 10.3934/math.20241366 |
[4] | Feng Qi, Bai-Ni Guo . Several explicit and recursive formulas for generalized Motzkin numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1333-1345. doi: 10.3934/math.2020091 |
[5] | Faik Babadağ . A new approach to Jacobsthal, Jacobsthal-Lucas numbers and dual vectors. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18596-18606. doi: 10.3934/math.2023946 |
[6] | Junyong Zhao . On the number of unit solutions of cubic congruence modulo $ n $. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13515-13524. doi: 10.3934/math.2021784 |
[7] | Sufyan Asif, Muhammad Khalid Mahmood, Amal S. Alali, Abdullah A. Zaagan . Structures and applications of graphs arising from congruences over moduli. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21786-21798. doi: 10.3934/math.20241059 |
[8] | Aimin Xu . Some identities connecting Stirling numbers, central factorial numbers and higher-order Bernoulli polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3197-3206. doi: 10.3934/math.2025148 |
[9] | Kai An Sim, Kok Bin Wong . On the cooling number of the generalized Petersen graphs. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36351-36370. doi: 10.3934/math.20241724 |
[10] | Takao Komatsu, Wenpeng Zhang . Several expressions of truncated Bernoulli-Carlitz and truncated Cauchy-Carlitz numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5939-5954. doi: 10.3934/math.2020380 |
The time delay may induce oscillatory behaviour in multi-agent systems, which may destroy the consensus of the system. Therefore, the critical delay that is the maximum value of the delay to guarantee the consensus of the system, is an important performance index of multi-agent systems. This paper studies the influence of the processing delay on the consensus for a class of multi-agent system involving task strategies. The first-order system with a single delay and the second-order system with two different delays are investigated respectively. A critical delay independent of strategies and a critical region of the 2-D plane that depends on strategies is obtained for the first-order and the second-order system respectively. Specifically, a geometric method was used for the case of two different delays. Several numerical simulations are presented to explain the results.
In mathematical analysis Hardy operator is considered an important averaging operator as it plays a vital role in many branches of mathematics, such as complex analysis, partial differential equations and harmonic analysis (for example, see [2,7,8,10,29]). In [6], Hardy introduced the one-dimensional Hardy operator
Hf(x)=1x∫x0f(t)dt,x>0, | (1.1) |
for a measurable function f:R+→R+. The operator in (1.1) satisfies the below inequality
‖Hf‖Lq(R+)≤qq−1‖f‖Lq(R+),1<q<∞, | (1.2) |
where the constant q/(q−1) is sharp. An extension of the operator H on higher dimensional space Rn was defined in [3] by Faris as
Hf(x)=1|x|n∫|t|≤|x|f(t)dt, | (1.3) |
where |x|=(∑ni=1x2i)1/2 for x=(x1,…,xn). Furthermore, Christ and Grafakos [1] acquired the exact value of the norm of operator H defined by (1.3). Recently, Hardy operator has gained a tremendous amount of consideration, see for example [16,20,24,30,33,34] and the references therein.
In the past few decades there has been a relentless attention in p-adic models appearing in various branches of science. The applications of p-adic analysis are found mainly in the field of mathematical physics (see, for example, [15,26,27]). Importantly, many current researchers are paying a valiant effort to harmonic analysis on p-adic field [9,10,11,13,17,21,22,25].
Let Q be a field of rational numbers and p a prime number. We introduce a so called p-adic norm |x|p on Q by a rule |x|p={0}∪{p−γ:γ∈Z}, where γ=γ(x) is defined from the following representation
x=pγs/t, |
integers s and t are coprime to p. |⋅|p fulfills all the axioms of a real norm along with the following non-Archimedean property:
|x+y|p≤max{|x|p,|y|p}. | (1.4) |
The field of p-adic numbers Qp is the completion of Q with respect to |⋅|p. Any nonzero p-adic number can be written in canonical form (see [28]) as:
x=pγ∞∑j=0αjpj, | (1.5) |
where αj,γ∈Z,αj∈ZpZp,α0≠0. Interestingly, the series in (1.5) is convergent with respect to |⋅|p because |pγαkpj|p=p−γ−j.
The higher dimensional p-adic vector space Qnp consists of points x=(x1,x2,...,xn), where xi∈Qp,i=1,2,...,n, with the following norm
|x|p=max1≤i≤n|xi|p. | (1.6) |
Let
Bγ(a)={x∈Qnp:|x−a|p≤pγ}, Sγ(a)={x∈Qnp:|x−a|p=pγ} |
be the ball and sphere respectively with center at a∈Qnp and radius pγ. If a=0, we may write Bγ(0)=Bγ, Sγ(0)=Sγ.
It is well known that the space Qnp is locally compact commutative group under addition, then there exists a translation invariant Haar measure dx which is normalized such that
∫B0dx=|B0|H=1, |
where |A|H represents the Haar measure of a measurable subset A of Qnp. Moreover, one can easily show that |Bγ(a)|H=pnγ and |Sγ(a)|H=pnγ(1−p−n), for any a∈Qnp.
In what follows the p-adic Hardy operator
Hpf(x)=1|x|np∫|t|p≤|x|pf(t)dt |
and its commutator
Hpbf(x)=bHp(f)−Hp(bf) |
were defined and studied for f,b∈Lloc1(Qnp) in [4]. In the same paper, Fu et al. acquired the boundedness of p-adic Hardy operator and its commutator on Lebesgue spaces and Herz spaces. On the Morrey-Herz spaces, the p-adic Hardy type operators and their commutators are reported in [5]. For complete comprehension of p-Hardy operator and its commutator, we refer the publications [12,18,31,32].
The purpose of the current article is to discuss the weighted central bounded mean oscillations and weighted p-adic Lipschitz estimates of Hpb on two weighted p-adic Herz spaces and p-adic Morrey-Herz spaces. Throughout this article a letter C denotes a constant whose value may change at its different places. It is mandatory to recall the definitions of relevant p-adic function spaces before moving to our results.
Suppose w(x) is a nonnegative function on Qnp. The weighted measure of A is denoted and defined as w(A)=∫Aw(x)dx. The weighted p-adic Lebesgue space Lq(w,Qnp),(0<q<∞) is defined to be the space of all measurable functions f on Qnp such that:
‖f‖Lq(w,Qnp)=(∫Qnp|f(x)|qw(x)dx)1q<∞. |
The theory of Aq weights on Rn was introduced by Benjamin Muckenhoupt in [19]. Let us recall the definition of Aq weights in p-adic setting.
Definition 1.1. [23] A weight function w∈Aq(1≤q<∞) if there exists a constant C free from choice of B⊂Qnp such that
(1|B|∫Bw(x)dx)(1|B|∫Bw(x)−1q−1dx)1/q≤C. |
For the case q=1,w∈A1, we have
1|B|∫Bw(x)dx≤Cessinfx∈Bw(x), |
for every B⊂Qnp.
Remark 1.2. A weight function w∈A∞ if it undergoes the stipulation of Aq(1≤q<∞) weights.
Definition 1.3. Suppose w is a weight function and 1≤q<∞. The p-adic space CMOq(w,Qnp) is defined by
‖f‖CMOq(w,Qnp)=supγ∈Z(1w(Bγ)∫Bγ|f(x)−fBγ|qw(x)1−qdx)1/q, |
where
fBγ=1|Bγ|∫Bγf(x)dx. | (1.7) |
Definition 1.4. [22] Suppose w1 and w2 are weight functions, 0<r,q<∞ and α∈R. Then the two weighted p-adic Herz space Kα,rq(w1,w2) is defined as
Kα,rq(w1,w2)={f∈Lqloc(w2,Qnp∖{0}):‖f‖Kα,rq(w1,w2)<∞}, |
where
‖f‖Kα,rq(w1,w2)=(∞∑k=−∞w1(Bk)αr/n‖fχk‖rLq(w2,Qnp))1/r | (1.8) |
and χk is the characteristic function of the sphere Sk=Bk∖Bk−1.
Remark 1.5. Obviously K0,qq(w1,w2)=Lq(w2,Qnp).
Definition 1.6. [22] Suppose w1 and w2 are weight functions, 0<r,q<∞, α∈R and λ≥0. Then the two weighted p-adic Morrey-Herz space MKα,λr,q(w1,w2) is defined as follows
MKα,λr,q(w1,w2)={f∈Lqloc(w2,Qnp∖{0}):‖f‖MKα,λr,q(w1,w2)<∞}, |
where
‖f‖MKα,λr,q(w1,w2)=supk0∈Zw1(Bk0)−λ/n(k0∑k=−∞w1(Bk)αr/n‖fχk‖rLq(w2,Qnp))1/r. | (1.9) |
Remark 1.7. It is evident that MKα,0r,q(w1,w2)=Kα,rq(w1,w2).
Definition 1.8. [23] Suppose 1≤q<∞, 0<β<1 and w is a weight function. The p-adic space Lipβ(w,Qnp) is defined as
‖f‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)=supB⊂Qnp1w(B)β/n(1w(B)∫B|f(x)−fB|qw(x)1−qdx)1/q, |
where
fB=1|B|∫Bf(x)dx. | (1.10) |
The following section discusses the weighted CMO estimates of Hpb on two weighted p-adic Herz-type spaces. We open up the section with few lemmas which are useful in proving key results.
Lemma 2.1. [14] Suppose w∈A1, then there exist constants C1,C2 and 0<μ<1 such that
C1|A||B|≤w(A)w(B)≤C2(|A||B|)μ, |
for any measurable subset A of a ball B.
Remark 2.2. If w∈A1, then it follows from lemma (2.1) that there exist constants C and μ(0<μ<1) such that w(Bk)w(Bi)≤Cp(k−i)n as i<k and w(Bk)w(Bi)≤Cp(k−i)nμ as i≥k.
Lemma 2.3. [23] Suppose w∈A1 and b∈CMOq(w,Qnp), then there is a constant C such that for i, k∈Z,
|bBi−bBk|≤C(i−k)‖b‖CMOq(w,Qnp)w(Bk)|Bk|. |
Lemma 2.4. [23] Suppose w∈A1, then for 1<q<∞,
∫Bw(x)1−q′dx≤C|B|q′w(B)1−q′, |
where 1/q+1/q′=1.
Now we state the result about the boundedness of Hpb on two weighted p-adic Herz-type spaces.
Theorem 2.5. Let 0<r1≤r2<∞, 1≤r,q<∞ and let w∈A1. If α<nμq′, then the inequality
‖Hpbf‖˙Kα,r2q(w,w1−q)≤C‖b‖CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)‖f‖˙Kα,r1q(w,w) |
holds for all b∈CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp) and f∈Lloc(Qnp).
If α=0,r1=r2=q, then we have the following result.
Corollary 2.6. Let 1≤r,q<∞ and w∈A1, then
‖Hpbf‖Lq(w1−q,Qnp)≤C‖b‖CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)‖f‖Lq(w,Qnp) |
holds for all b∈CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp) and f∈Lloc(Qnp).
Theorem 2.7. Let 0<r1≤r2<∞,1≤r,q<∞ and let also w∈A1 and λ>0. If α<nμq′+λ, then
‖Hpbf‖M˙Kα,λr2,q(w,w1−q)≤C‖b‖CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q(w,w) |
holds for all b∈CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp) and f∈Lloc(Qnp).
Proof of Theorem 2.5: First, by the definition we have
‖(Hpbf)χk‖qLq(w1−q,Qnp)=∫Sk|x|−qnp|∫|t|p≤|x|pf(t)(b(x)−b(t))dt|qw(x)1−qdx≤Cp−kqn∫Sk(∫|t|p≤pk|f(t)(b(x)−b(t))|dt)qw(x)1−qdx=Cp−kqn∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(b(x)−b(t))|dt)qw(x)1−qdx≤Cp−kqn∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(b(x)−bBk)|dt)qw(x)1−qdx+Cp−kqn∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(b(t)−bBk)|dt)qw(x)1−qdx=I+II. | (2.1) |
Since w∈A1⊂Aq, making use of Hölder's inequality along with lemma 2.4, we have
∫Sif(t)dt≤(∫Si|f(t)|qw(t)dt)1/q(∫Siw(t)−q′/qdt)1/q′≤C‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp)|Bi|w(Bi)−1/q. | (2.2) |
To estimate I, by the application of Hölder's inequality, Remark 2.2 along with inequality (2.2), we are down to
I≤Cp−kqn‖b‖qCMOq(w,Qnp)w(Bk)(k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp)|Bi|w(Bi)−1/q)q≤Cp−knq‖b‖qCMOq(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp)|Bi|(w(Bk)w(Bi))1/q)q≤C‖b‖qCMOq(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞p(i−k)n/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))q. | (2.3) |
Now, we estimate II as follows
II≤Cp−kqn∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(b(t)−bBi)|dt)qw(x)1−qdx+Cp−kqn∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(bBk−bBi)|dt)qw(x)1−qdx=II1+II2. | (2.4) |
Next, applying Hölder's inequality to deduce
∫Si|f(t)(b(t)−bBi)|dt≤(∫Si|f(t)|qw(t)dt)1/q(∫Si|b(t)−bBi|q′w(t)−q′/qdt)1/q′≤w(Bi)−1/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp)‖b‖CMOq′(w,Qnp). | (2.5) |
By the application of Hölder's inequality, inequality (2.5), lemma 2.4 and Remark 2.2, we are in a position to estimate II1.
II1≤Cp−kqn∫Skw(x)1−qdx(k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp)w(Bi)1/q′)q≤Cp−kqn|Bk|qw(Bk)1−q‖b‖qCMOq′(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp)w(Bi)1/q′)q≤C‖b‖qCMOq′(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞(w(Bi)w(Bk))1−1/q‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))q≤C‖b‖qCMOq′(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞p(i−k)nμ/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))q. | (2.6) |
Next task is to estimate II2. For this, we use Hölder's inequality, lemmas 2.3 and 2.4, Remark 2.2 and inequality (2.2)
II2≤Cp−kqn×∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(y)(i−k)‖b‖CMOr(w,Qnp)w(Bi)|Bi||dy)qw(x)1−qdx≤Cp−kqn‖b‖qCMOr(w,Qnp)|Bk|qw(Bk)1−q×(k∑i=−∞(k−i)w(Bi)1−1/q|Bi||Bi|‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))q≤C‖b‖qCMOr(w,Qnp)×(k∑i=−∞(k−i)(w(Bi)w(Bk))1−1/q‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))q≤C‖b‖qCMOr(w,Qnp)×(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)nμ/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))q. | (2.7) |
From (2.3), (2.6) and (2.7) together with Jensen's Inequality, we have
‖Hpbf‖˙Kα,r2q(w,w1−q)=(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr2/n‖(Hpbf)χk‖r2Lq(w1−q,Qnp))1/r2≤(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr1/n‖(Hpbf)χk‖r1Lq(w1−q,Qnp))1/r1≤C‖b‖CMOq(w,Qnp)(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr1/n(k∑i=−∞p(i−k)n/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))r1)1/r1+C‖b‖CMOq′(w,Qnp)(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr1/n(k∑i=−∞p(i−k)nμ/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))r1)1/r1+C‖b‖CMOr(w,Qnp)(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr1/n(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)nμ/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))r1)1/r1=J. |
Therefore,
Jr1≤C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)×∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr1/n(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)nμ/q′‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))r1≤C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)×∞∑k=−∞(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)nμ/q′−α‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp))r1. |
In what follows we consider two cases, 0<r1≤1 and r1>1.
Case 1: When 0<r1≤1 and α<nμ/q′, we have
Jr1≤C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)×∞∑k=−∞k∑i=−∞(k−i)r1w(Bi)αr1/np(i−k)(nμ/q′−α)r1‖fχi‖r1Lq(w,Qnp)=C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)×∞∑k=−∞w(Bi)αr1/n‖fχi‖r1Lq(w,Qnp)∞∑k=i(k−i)r1p(i−k)(nμ/q′−α)r1=C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)‖f‖r1˙Kα,r1q(w,w). |
Case 2: Whenever r1>1, an application of Hölder's inequality with α<nμ/q′, we get
Jr1≤C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)∞∑k=−∞k∑i=−∞w(Bi)αr1/n‖fχi‖r1Lq(w,Qnp)p(i−k)(nμ/q′−α)r1/2×(k∑i=−∞(k−i)r′1p(i−k)(nμ/q′−α)r′1/2)r1/r′1=C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)∞∑k=−∞w(Bi)αr1/n‖fχi‖r1Lq(w,Qnp)∞∑k=ip(i−k)(nμ/q′−α)r1/2=C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)‖f‖r1˙Kα,r1q1(w,w). |
Hence, the proof of theorem is completed.
Proof of Theorem 2.7: From theorem 2.5, we have
‖(Hpb)fχk‖Lq(w1−q,Qnp)≤C‖b‖r1CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)(nμ/q′)‖fχi‖Lq(w,Qnp). |
By definition of weighted p-adic Morrey-Herz spaces and Jensen's Inequality along with α<nμ/q′+λ, λ>0 and 1<r1<∞, we reach at
‖Hpbf‖M˙Kα,λr2,q(w,w1−q)=supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n(k0∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr2/n‖(Hpbf)χk‖r2Lq(w1−q,Qnp))1/r2≤supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n(k0∑k=−∞w(Bk)αr1/n‖(Hpbf)χk‖r1Lq(w1−q,Qnp))1/r1≤C‖b‖CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n×(k0∑k=−∞w(Bk)λr1/n(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)nμ/q′(w(Bk)w(Bi))λr1/n×w(Bi)−λ/n(i∑l=−∞w(Bl)αr1/n‖fχi‖r1Lq(w,Qnp))1/r1)r1)1/r1≤C‖b‖CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n×(k0∑k=−∞w(Bk)λr1/n(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)(nμ/q′−α+λ)‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q(w,w))r1)1/r1≤C‖b‖CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n×(k0∑k=−∞w(Bk)λr1/n)1/r1‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q(w,w)≤C‖b‖CMOrmax{q,q′}(w,Qnp)‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q(w,w). |
The current section deals the weighted p-adic Lipschitz estimates of Hpb on two weighted p-adic Herz-type spaces. The outset of a section is with a lemma which is helpful in proving main results.
Lemma 3.1. [23] Suppose w∈A1 and b∈Lipβ(w,Qnp), then there is a constant C such that for i, k∈Z,
|bBi−bBk|≤C(i−k)‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)w(Bi)β/nw(Bk)|Bk|. |
Now, we state the result about the boundedness of commutator of p-adic Hardy operator on two weighted p-adic Herz-type spaces.
Theorem 3.2. Let 0<r1≤r2<∞, 1≤q1,q2<∞,1/q1−1/q2=β/n and let w∈A1. If α<nμq′1, then the inequality
‖Hpbf‖˙Kα,r2q2(w,w1−q2)≤C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)‖f‖˙Kα,r1q1(w,w) |
holds for all b∈Lipβ(w,Qnp) and f∈Lloc(Qnp).
If α=0,r1=q1=p and r2=q2=q, then we have the following corollary.
Corollary 3.3. Let 1≤q<∞, 1/q1−1/q2=β/n and w∈A1, then
‖Hpbf‖Lq(w1−q,Qnp)≤C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)‖f‖Lq(w,Qnp) |
holds for all b∈Lipβ(w,Qnp) and f∈Lloc(Qnp).
Theorem 3.4. Let 0<r1≤r2<∞, 1≤q1,q2<∞,1/q1−1/q2=β/n and let w∈A1. If α<nμq′1+λ, then
‖Hpbf‖M˙Kα,λr2,q2(w,w1−q2)≤C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q1(w,w) |
holds for all b∈Lipβ(w,Qnp) and f∈Lloc(Qnp).
Proof of Theorem 3.2: In a similar fashion as that of theorem 2.5, we get
‖(Hpbf)χk‖q2Lq2(w1−q2,Qnp)≤Cp−kq2n∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(b(x)−bBk)|dt)q2w(x)1−q2dx+Cp−kq2n∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(b(t)−bBk)|dt)q2w(x)1−q2dx=L+LL. | (3.1) |
For the evaluation of L, we apply Hölder's inequality, Remark 2.2, β/n=1/q1−1/q2,w∈A1⊂Aq1, and inequality (2.2) to get
L≤Cp−kq2n‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)w(Bk)1+βq2/n{k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp)|Bi|w(Bi)−1/q1}q2≤Cp−knq2‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp){k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp)|Bi|(w(Bk)w(Bi))1/q1}q2≤C‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)(p(k−i)n/q′1‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))q2. | (3.2) |
In order to evaluate LL, we proceed as follows
LL≤Cp−kq2n∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(b(t)−bBi)|dt)q2w(x)1−q2dx+Cp−kq2n∫Sk(k∑i=−∞∫Si|f(t)(bBk−bBi)|dt)q2w(x)1−q2dx=LL1+LL2. | (3.3) |
The following preparation will do world of good to estimate LL1. Using Hölder's inequality, we have
∫Si|f(t)(b(t)−bBi)|dt≤(∫Si|f(t)|q1w(t)dt)1/q1(∫Si|b(t)−bBi|q′1w(t)−q′1/q1dt)1/q′1≤w(Bi)−1/q′1+β/n‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp)‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp). | (3.4) |
To evaluate LL1, we apply Hölder's inequality, inequality (3.4), lemma 2.4 and Remark 2.2.
LL1≤Cp−kq2n∫Skw(x)1−q2dx(k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp)w(Bi)1/q′1+β/n‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp))q2≤Cp−kq2n|Bk|q2w(Bk)1−q2‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp)w(Bi)1/q′1+β/n)q2≤C‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞(w(Bi)w(Bk))1−1/q2‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))q2≤C‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)(k∑i=−∞p(i−k)nμ/q′2‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))q2. | (3.5) |
Next step is to evaluate LL2. For this we use Hölder's inequality, lemmas 3.1 and 2.4, inequality (2.2), and Remark 2.2 to get
LL2≤Cp−kq2n‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)|Bk|q2w(Bk)1−q2×(k∑i=−∞(k−i)w(Bk)β/nw(Bi)|Bi||Bi|w(Bi)−1/q1‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))q2=C‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)×(k∑i=−∞(k−i)(w(Bi)w(Bk))1−1/q1‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))q2≤C‖b‖q2Lipβ(w,Qnp)×(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)nμ/q′1‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))q2. | (3.6) |
Remaining proof is more or less same to the proof of theorem 2.5. Thus, we conclude the theorem.
Proof of Theorem 3.4: Let α<nμ/q′1+λ. By the definition of weighted p-adic Morrey-Herz spaces together with inequalities (3.2), (3.5), and (3.6), we have
‖Hpbf‖M˙Kα,λr2,q2(w,w1−q2)≤C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)βr2/n(k∑i=−∞p(i−k)n/q′1‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))r2)1/r2+C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)βr2/n(k∑i=−∞p(i−k)nμ/q′2‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))r2)1/r2+C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)supk0∈Zw(Bk0)−λ/n(∞∑k=−∞w(Bk)βr2/n(k∑i=−∞(k−i)p(i−k)nμ/q′1‖fχi‖Lq1(w,Qnp))r2)1/r2=S1+S2+S3. |
Next by applying the similar arguments as in theorem 2.7, we get
S1≤C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q(w,w),α<n/q′1+λ, |
S2≤C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q(w,w),α<nμ/q′2+λ, |
S3≤C‖b‖Lipβ(w,Qnp)‖f‖M˙Kα,λr1,q(w,w),α<nμ/q′1+λ. |
So, the proof of the theorem is finished.
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudia Arabia for funding this work through research groups program under grant number R.G. P-2/29/42.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] |
R. Olfati-Saber, J. A. Fax, R. M. Murray, Consensus and cooperation in cetworked multi-Agent systems, Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng, 93 (2007), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2006.03.065 doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.03.065
![]() |
[2] |
F. Cucker, S. Smale, Emergent behavior in flocks, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 52 (2007), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2007.895842 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2007.895842
![]() |
[3] |
M. Brambilla, E. Ferrante, M. Birattari, M. Dorigo, Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective, Swarm Intell., 7 (2013), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2 doi: 10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2
![]() |
[4] |
J. A. Carrillo, Y. P. Choi, P. B. Mucha, J. Peszek, Sharp condition to avoid collisions in singular Cucker-Smale interactions, Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl, 37 (2017), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.02.017 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.02.017
![]() |
[5] |
J. Hu, H. Zhang, L. Liu, X. Zhu, C. Zhao, Q. Pan, Convergent multiagent formation control with collision avoidance, IEEE Trans. Robot., 36 (2020), 1805–1818. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2020.2998766 doi: 10.1109/TRO.2020.2998766
![]() |
[6] | K. K. Oh, M. C. Park, H. S. Ahn, A survey of multi-agent formation control, Automatica, 53 (2015), 424–440. |
[7] |
Y. P. Choi, D. Kalise, J. Peszek, A. P. Andres, A Collisionless Singular Cucker-Smale model with decentralized formation control, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 18 (2019), 1954–1981. https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1241799 doi: 10.1137/19M1241799
![]() |
[8] |
D. V. Dimarogonas, E. Frazzoli, K. H. Johansson, Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 57 (2012), 1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2011.2174666 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2011.2174666
![]() |
[9] |
X. Chen, H. Yu, F. Hao, Prescribed-time event-triggered bipartite consensus of multiagent systems, IEEE Trans Cybern, 52 (2022), 2589–2598. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3004572 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3004572
![]() |
[10] |
Z. Li, G. Wen, Z. Duan, W. Ren, Designing fully distributed consensus protocols for linear multi-agent systems with directed graphs, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 60 (2015), 1152–1157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2014.2350391 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2350391
![]() |
[11] |
X. Jin, S. Lü, C. Deng, M. Chadli, Distributed adaptive security consensus control for a class of multi-agent systems under network decay and intermittent attacks, Inf. Sci., 547 (2021), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.013 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.013
![]() |
[12] |
S. Yu, X. Long, Finite-time consensus for second-order multi-agent systems with disturbances by integral sliding mode, Automatica, 54 (2015), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.02.001
![]() |
[13] |
H. Du, G. Wen, D. Wu, Y. Cheng, J. Lü, Distributed fixed-time consensus for nonlinear heterogeneous multi-agent systems, Automatica, 113 (2020), 108797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108797 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108797
![]() |
[14] |
J. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Yu, C. Sun, Fixed-time leader–follower consensus of networked nonlinear systems via event/self-triggered control, IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 31 (2020), 5029–5037. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2957069 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2957069
![]() |
[15] |
Y. Hong, G. Chen, L. Bushnell, Distributed observers design for leader-following control of multi-agent networks, Automatica, 44 (2008), 846–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2007.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.07.004
![]() |
[16] |
J. Shen, Cucker-Smale flocking under hierarchical leadership, SIAM J Appl Math, 68 (2008), 694–719. https://doi.org/10.1137/060673254 doi: 10.1137/060673254
![]() |
[17] |
J. Ni, P. Shi, Adaptive neural network fixed-time leader–follower consensus for multiagent systems with constraints and disturbances, IEEE Trans Cybern, 51 (2021), 1835–1848. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.2967995 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2967995
![]() |
[18] |
B. Piccoli, N. P. Duteil, B. Scharf, Optimal control of a collective migration model, Math Models Methods Appl Sci, 26 (2016), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202516400066 doi: 10.1142/S0218202516400066
![]() |
[19] |
Y. Chen, Y. Liu, Flocking dynamics for a multiagent system involving task strategy, Math Models Methods Appl Sci, 46 (2023), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8532 doi: 10.1002/mma.8532
![]() |
[20] | Y. Liu, J. Wu, Flocking and asymptotic velocity of the Cucker-Smale model with processing delay, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 415 (2014), 53-61. |
[21] | Y. Liu, J. Wu, Opinion consensus with delay when the zero eigenvalue of the connection matrix is semi-simple, J Dyn Differ Equ, 29 (2016), 1–13. |
[22] |
M. R. Cartabia, Cucker-Smale model with time delay, Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser A, 42 (2022), 2409–2432. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2021195 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021195
![]() |
[23] | X. Wang, L. Wang, J. Wu, Impacts of time delay on flocking dynamics of a two-agent flock model, Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 70 (2019), 80–88. |
[24] |
J. Haskovec, I. Markou, Asymptotic flocking in the Cucker-Smale model with reaction-type delays in the non-oscillatory regime, Kinet. Relat. Models, 13 (2020), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.3934/krm.2020027 doi: 10.3934/krm.2020027
![]() |
[25] |
Y. Liu, J. Wu, X. Wang, Collective periodic motions in a multiparticle model involving processing delay, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 3280–3302. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6939 doi: 10.1002/mma.6939
![]() |
[26] |
R. Olfsti-Saber, R. M. Murray, Consensus problem in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 49 (2004), 1520–1533. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2004.834113 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2004.834113
![]() |
[27] |
W. Yu, G. Chen, M. Cao, Some necessary and sufficient conditions for second-order consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems, Automatica, 46 (2010), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2010.03.006
![]() |
[28] |
D. Ma, R. Tian, A. Zulfiqar, J. Chen, T. Chai, Bounds on delay consensus margin of second-order multiagent systems with robust position and velocity feedback protocol, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 64 (2019), 3780–3787. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2018.2884154 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2884154
![]() |
[29] | D. Ma, J. Chen, R. Lu, J. Chen, T. Chai, Delay effect on First-Order consensus over directed graphs: optimizing PID protocols for maximal robustness, SIAM J Control Optim, 60 (2022), 233–258. |
[30] |
W. Yu, G. Chen, M. Cao, W. Ren, Delay-induced consensus and quasi-consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems, IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap, 60 (2013), 2679–2687. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2013.2244357 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2013.2244357
![]() |
[31] |
W. Hou, M. Fu, H. Zhang, Z. Wu, Consensus conditions for general second-order multi-agent systems with communication delay, Automatica, 75 (2017), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.09.042 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.09.042
![]() |
[32] |
Q. Ma, S. Xu, Consensus switching of second-order multiagent systems with time delay, IEEE Trans Cybern, 52 (2022), 3349–3353. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3011448 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3011448
![]() |
[33] | J. K. Hale, S. M. V. Lunel, Introduction to Functional Differential Equations, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993. |
[34] |
E. Beretta, Y. Kuang, Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems with delay dependent parameters, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 33 (2002), 1144–1165. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141000376086 doi: 10.1137/S0036141000376086
![]() |
[35] | K. Gu, S. I. Niculescu, J. Chen, On stability crossing curves for general systems with two delays, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 331 (2005), 231–253. |
[36] |
Q. Ma, S. Xu, Exact delay bounds of second-order multi-agent systems with input and communication delays, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs, 69 (2022), 1119-1123. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2021.3094185 doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2021.3094185
![]() |
[37] |
L. hang, X. Li, Z. Mao, J. Chen, G. Fan, Some new algebraic and geometric analysis for local stability crossing curves, Automatica, 123 (2021), 109312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109312 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109312
![]() |
1. | Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam, Mir Zaman, Fahd Jarad, Estimates for p-adic fractional integral operator and its commutators on p-adic Morrey–Herz spaces, 2022, 2022, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-022-02829-6 | |
2. | Amjad HUSSAİN, Naqash SARFRAZ, Ferit GÜRBÜZ, Sharp weak bounds for p-adic Hardy operators on p-adic linear spaces, 2022, 71, 1303-5991, 919, 10.31801/cfsuasmas.1076462 | |
3. | Naqash Sarfraz, Muhammad Aslam, Fahd Jarad, Sarfraz Nawaz Malik, Boundedness for Commutators of Rough p -Adic Hardy Operator on p -Adic Central Morrey Spaces, 2021, 2021, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2021/4886197 | |
4. | Naqash Sarfraz, Fahd Jarad, Estimates for a Rough Fractional Integral Operator and Its Commutators on p-Adic Central Morrey Spaces, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 117, 10.3390/fractalfract6020117 | |
5. | Yunpeng Chang, Jianglong Wu, Boundedness for the Commutator of Fractional Integral Operator on Grand $$p$$-Adic Herz-Morrey Spaces, 2025, 17, 2070-0466, 115, 10.1134/S2070046625020013 |