Target gene | Forward | Reverse |
GRIN2A | TCCGCCTTTCCGATTTGGG | GCGTCCAACTTCCCAGTTTTC |
GRIN2B | CTGAGACTGAAGAACAGGAAGATGACCATC | CGGGACTGTATTCCGCATGCAGG |
Our understanding of the cerebellum’s role in health and disease has evolved considerably in the past few decades; largely due to the availability of newer and better modalities for studying the relationships between the cerebellum and other segments of the brain, and how these impact behavioural responses like motor function, emotionality, memory and more recently, cognition. In this review, we discuss the evolution of our understanding of the structure and function of the cerebellum; where we were, and how we got here. We also examine the important roles of the cerebellum in neuro-cognitive processing, cognition and cognitive disorders; and ponder on how targeting cerebellar cognition may open a new chapter in the quest for the development and identification of newer cognition-modulating agents.
Citation: O. J. Onaolapo, A. Y. Onaolapo. The 21st Century Cerebellum: An Evolution of Cognitive Functions, Connections, Disorders, and Pharmacotherapeutic Modulation[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2017, 4(4): 189-222. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2017.4.189
[1] | Ziphozethu Ndlazi, Oualid Abboussi, Musa Mabandla, Willie Daniels . Memantine increases NMDA receptor level in the prefrontal cortex but fails to reverse apomorphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats. AIMS Neuroscience, 2018, 5(4): 211-220. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2018.4.211 |
[2] | Gigi Tevzadze, Tamar Barbakadze, Elisabed Kvergelidze, Elene Zhuravliova, Lali Shanshiashvili, David Mikeladze . Gut neurotoxin p-cresol induces brain-derived neurotrophic factor secretion and increases the expression of neurofilament subunits in PC-12 cells. AIMS Neuroscience, 2022, 9(1): 12-23. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022002 |
[3] | Mazyar Zahir, Amir Rashidian, Mohsen Hoseini, Reyhaneh Akbarian, Mohsen Chamanara . Pharmacological evidence for the possible involvement of the NMDA receptor pathway in the anticonvulsant effect of tramadol in mice. AIMS Neuroscience, 2022, 9(4): 444-453. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022024 |
[4] | Chris Cadonic, Benedict C. Albensi . Oscillations and NMDA Receptors: Their Interplay Create Memories. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(1): 52-64. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.52 |
[5] | Dai Mitsushima . Contextual Learning Requires Functional Diversity at Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses onto CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. AIMS Neuroscience, 2015, 2(1): 7-17. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.1.7 |
[6] | Robert A. Moss, Jarrod Moss . The Role of Dynamic Columns in Explaining Gamma-band Synchronization and NMDA Receptors in Cognitive Functions. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(1): 65-88. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.65 |
[7] | Mani Pavuluri, Kelley Volpe, Alexander Yuen . Nucleus Accumbens and Its Role in Reward and Emotional Circuitry: A Potential Hot Mess in Substance Use and Emotional Disorders. AIMS Neuroscience, 2017, 4(1): 52-70. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2017.1.52 |
[8] | Nicholas J. D. Wright . A review of the direct targets of the cannabinoids cannabidiol, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, N-arachidonoylethanolamine and 2-arachidonoylglycerol. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(2): 144-165. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024009 |
[9] | Nao Fukuwada, Miki Kanno, Satomi Yoshida, Kenjiro Seki . Gαq protein signaling in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis regulate the lipopolysaccharide-induced despair-like behavior in mice. AIMS Neuroscience, 2020, 7(4): 438-458. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2020027 |
[10] | Ruben Carvalho, Alisa N. Lukoyanova, João Casalta-Lopes, Nikolay V. Lukoyanov, Joana Isabel Soares . Plastic rearrangement of basal forebrain parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in the kainite model of epilepsy. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(4): 300-314. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023023 |
Our understanding of the cerebellum’s role in health and disease has evolved considerably in the past few decades; largely due to the availability of newer and better modalities for studying the relationships between the cerebellum and other segments of the brain, and how these impact behavioural responses like motor function, emotionality, memory and more recently, cognition. In this review, we discuss the evolution of our understanding of the structure and function of the cerebellum; where we were, and how we got here. We also examine the important roles of the cerebellum in neuro-cognitive processing, cognition and cognitive disorders; and ponder on how targeting cerebellar cognition may open a new chapter in the quest for the development and identification of newer cognition-modulating agents.
N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors (NMDARs) play a central role in learning, memory, and synaptic development, and are implicated in various neurological and psychiatric disorders [1],[2]. The function and biophysical features of NMDARs are mainly dictated by their subunit composition. The major variants of the GLUN2 subunit—GLUN2A and GLUN2B—are expressed in a spatio-temporal manner. NMDAR subunit expression and composition are controlled by various mechanisms, such as transcriptional regulation, differential trafficking of receptors, post-transcriptional modifications (e.g. phosphorylation), and protein-protein interactions in membrane macromolecular complexes [3]–[5]. Subcellular localization might be an additional regulator of their physiological and pathological functions, as some NMDA receptors are targeted to synaptic sites while others are inserted extrasynaptically. It is supposed that synaptic localization is more characterized for GLUN2A-containing NMDARs, whereas GLUN2B-enriched NMDARs are found in extrasynaptic membranes of the adult central nervous system (CNS). Different localization and composition is possibly associated with opposite effect on neural cell survival: downstream intracellular cascades of synaptic NMDARs promote cell survival, whereas excessive calcium influx by extrasynaptic NMDARs induces mitochondrial dysfunction and, consequently, cell death [6]. Among specific downstream effectors of synaptic NMDARs, cyclic-AMP response element binding protein (CREB) draws special attention because of its established role in neuronal survival [7],[8]. The inhibitory effect of extrasynaptic NMDAR activation on neuronal viability is mediated by a variety of signaling pathways, including inactivation of CREB and ERK1/2, and expression of pro-apoptotic genes. High surface mobility of GLUN2B-enriched NMDARs (250-fold higher than that of GLUN2A-enriched NMDARs) facilitates their regulated lateral diffusion, endocytosis, and recycling. This mobility process is controlled by several post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, nitrosylation, and palmitoylation [9]. Mislocalization and abnormal expression and targeting of NMDAR subunits are implicated in several brain disorders and pathological conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, schizophrenia, and stroke (reviewed in [3]).
Membrane delivery and stability of NMDARs depend on the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton [10]. The Rho family of guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) proteins regulate neuronal structure and function, including neuronal actin dynamics. For example, Rac1, a member of the Rho GTPases, stimulates spine formation, dendrite arborization, elongation, and branching complexity [11]. The expression of Rac1 is significantly increased in the temporal lobe of patients with epilepsy and epilepsy model animals, suggesting that elevated Rac1 expression contributes to the pathophysiology of the disease [12]. In contrast, inhibition of Rac1 activity impairs NMDAR function and induces autism spectrum disorders (ASD)-like social deficits in animals. GLUN2B-containing NMDARs and signals predominantly through Rac promote LTD in hippocampal slices [13]. Activation of GLUN2B-containing NMDARs predominantly activates the downstream Rac/p38 pathway [14],[15].
Gut microbiota modulate host brain function and cognitive behavior, and contribute to the development of neurological disorders [16],[17]. Several species of gut Clostridium have been shown to produce a wide range of neurotoxins, including p-cresol—the end product of microbial degradation of tyrosine [18],[19]. P-cresol interferes with the conversion of dopamine to norepinephrine via covalent inactivation of dopamine beta-hydroxylase [20],[21]. Elevated dopamine and reduced norepinephrine levels are consistent with monoamine models of psychopathology, and accumulating evidence supports the role of dopaminergic dysfunction in certain neurological disorders [22].
Nevertheless, the functional link between p-cresol and NMDAR-dependent neurological disorders remains unexplored. Recently, we have shown that intraperitoneal injection of p-cresol induced autism-like behavior in healthy rats and accelerated seizure reactions in epilepsy-prone rats [23],[24]. These alterations were accompanied by the increased expression of GLUN2B in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) [25]. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that p-cresol could promote abnormal subcellular localization of NMDAR subunits and, consequently, alter the composition of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDARs. In this study, we determined the amount of GLUN2B and GLUN2A, and assessed the activitity of CREB and Rac1 (downstream effectors of NMDARs) in healthy and epilepsy-prone rats following p-cresol treatment. We found that subchronic intraperitoneal injection of p-cresol induced differential expression of the two subunits between the hippocampi and NAc of healthy and epilepsy-prone rats, and altered their GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio. Furthermore, p-cresol decreased the levels of phosphorylated CREB in both brain structures and stimulated Rac activity in the hippocampus. These data suggest that p-cresol specifically impairs NMDAR-dependent activity in the NAc and hippocampi of healthy and epilepsy-prone rats, and that this effect is mediated via mislocalization of NMDAR subunits.
Healthy Wistar rats and audiogenic seizure-prone Krushinski–Molodkina (KM) rats [26] (160–180 g) were randomly allocated into experimental and control groups, with 5 rats in each group. During the experiments, the rats were allowed water and standard laboratory chow ad libitum, and were maintained under controlled temperature (21–22 °C) and humidity (47 ± 2%), with 12-h light/dark cycle. The rats were housed in cages (transparent polycarbonate, 595 × 380 × 200 mm3), with 5 animals per cage. The experimental procedures and animal care and handling were performed in conformity with the European Communities Council Directive EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Research Projects' Ethics Commission of Ilia State University.
Rats in the experimental and control groups received daily intraperitoneal injections of p-cresol (30 mg/kg per injection; Sigma-Aldrich) or isotonic saline, respectively, for 21 days. Three days after termination of injections, the animals were sacrificed and decapitated. Immediately after decapitation, their hippocampi and NAc were extracted, rapidly homogenized in an ice-cold buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.32 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid), 0.5 mM EGTA (ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid)) and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich), and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min. The pellet (nuclear fraction) was collected and the supernatant centrifuged at 12 000 ×g for 15 min. The resulting supernatant (“cytosol fraction”) was collected and stored at −80 °C until further use, while the pellet (membrane fraction) was washed once and centrifuged as before. A concentrated solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was added to the membrane fraction to give a final concentration of 5%, and the sample was incubated at 4 °C for ≥1 h. Protein content of the membrane fraction was determined in quadruplicate using the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (cat. no. 23235, Pierce), according the manufacturer's protocol. All samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis.
Aliquots of the solubilized membrane fraction containing 30 µg of total protein in equal volume were applied to SDS gels (4–12%) and electrophoresed. The separated proteins were electroblotted onto 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membranes before the membranes were stained with Ponceau S solution to confirm uniform sample loading and efficient protein transfer. Subsequently, the membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST), and incubated for 1h with antibodies against GLUN2B and GLUN2A (sc-390094 and sc-3655R97, 1:1000; Santa Cruz, USA). Following incubation, the membranes were washed in TBST and probed with species-appropriate peroxidase-conjugated affinity-purified secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. After further washing in TBST, standard immunochemical procedures were carried out using chemiluminescent substrate (Santa Cruz, USA). The blots were exposed to X-ray films (Amersham) with intensifying screens to ensure linearity of response. The chemiluminescent bands were acquired and their intensities quantified using Image Lite Studio software.
Analysis of copy number variation (CNV) was based on qPCR [27]. DNA was extracted from the nuclear fraction using the Tissue DNA Extraction Kit (GeneON), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA content of the preparations was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher, USA) before the samples were diluted to ensure equal DNA concentration in each preparation. GRIN2A and GRIN2B genes (encoding GLUN2A and GLUN2B, respectively) were amplified by qPCR, using primers whose sequences are listed in Table 1.
Target gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene beta-actin. All primers used were purchased from Eurofins. Reverse transcription was performed using the Real-time-PCR Master Mix E3 (GeneON) containing EvaGreen, dUTP, and ROX. qPCR was carried out on QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher, USA) using the following thermocycler conditions: 2 min at 95 °C; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 59 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 33 s. The data were analyzed by comparing cycle threshold (Ct) values.
Target gene | Forward | Reverse |
GRIN2A | TCCGCCTTTCCGATTTGGG | GCGTCCAACTTCCCAGTTTTC |
GRIN2B | CTGAGACTGAAGAACAGGAAGATGACCATC | CGGGACTGTATTCCGCATGCAGG |
Rac activation assay was performed on the “cytosol fraction” containing equal total protein amount, using the Rac1,2,3 G-LISA Activation Assay Kit (Cytoskeleton, cat. no. BK125), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The results were expressed as optical density (OD) per mg of total protein.
The levels of Ser133-phosphorylated CREB were assessed in the nuclear fraction using the Human/Mouse/Rat Phospho-CREB (S133) DuoSet IC ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, cat. no. DYC2510-2), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The concentration of pCREB in each sample was calculated from the standard curve run with each assay, and expressed as ng of pCREB per mg of total protein.
OD values for GLUN2B and GLUN2A were analyzed with one-way ANOVA. Planned comparisons using two-tailed T-tests were performed to compare the groups. Statistix 9 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
Brain regions (the hippocampus and NAc) extracted from control and p-cresol-treated rats were used for the following analyses. Abnormal expression of GLUN2B and GLUN2A is implicated in both epilepsy and autism spectrum disorder [28]. Hence, primarily we determined the expression of those two proteins in rat brain tissue after treatment with p-cresol and GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio were estimated. The results showed that the two subunits were differentially expressed in plasma membranes between the hippocampus and NAc in both healthy and KM rats (Figure 1).
Consequently, the GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio was altered in both brain structures. In healthy, p-cresol-treated rats, the ratio was decreased in the hippocampus and increased in the NAc (Figure 2A) while the opposite effect was observed in p-cresol-treated KM rats (Figure 2B).
Several genetic studies have been conducted to elucidate the role of GRIN2A/GRIN2B genes in the molecular mechanism of the neurological pathologies [29]–[31]. Different copy number variants (CNVs are associated with disorders such as intellectual disability, autism, epilepsy, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder [32]–[34]. Based on these observations, we performed qPCR to detect CNV gains and losses (deletion/duplication) in GRIN2A and GRIN2B. No significant differences in Ct (cycle threshold) values between the hippocampus and NAc and between untreated and p-cresol-treated rats were found (data not shown). These results indicate that the number of copies of GRIN2B and GRIN2A genes is the same in the NAc and hippocampi of healthy and KM rats, and that it is not affected by p-cresol. Thus, it could be suggested that epigenetic regulation of the expression of GRIN2A/GRIN2B genes, or post-transcriptional processes, may contribute to the differential spatio-temporal distribution of GLUN2B and GLUN2A NMDAR subunits [29].
The high lateral mobility of GLUN2B-containing receptors allows them to translocate between synaptic and extrasynaptic sites, and the GLUN2A/GLUN2B ratios may differ considerably between inputs [6]. Extrasynaptic GLUN1/GLUN2B receptors trigger major cell death pathways, leading to neuronal death [35], while activation of synaptic GLUN2A/GLUN2B-containing receptors may convey pro-survival cues [36] through CREB signaling [6]. Therefore, alterations in the GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio may be caused by the increased expression of extrasynaptic GLUN2B. In the next experiment, we assessed the activity of CREB. We found that subchronic exposure to p-cresol decreased pCREB levels in the NAc of healthy rats and hippocampi of KM rats, without affecting its levels in the hippocampi of healthy rats and NAc of KM rats (Figure 3). CREB activity was negatively correlated with the amount of GLUN2B protein, suggesting that the observed changes in the GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio are caused by an increase in extrasynaptic GLUN2B.
The Rho GTPases regulate the actin cytoskeleton and play an important role in the maintenance and reorganization of dendritic spines [37]. Therefore, we next sought to assess the activity of Rac1 in the NAc and hippocampi of healthy and KM rats. The results revealed that, following p-cresol treatment, the levels of active Rac1 were diminished in the NAc and elevated in the hippocampi of rats in both groups (Figure 4).
The hippocampus—the largest structure of the mesial temporal lobe, is usually the primary region of lesions and is responsible for majority of symptoms characterizing temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Experimental and clinical data also suggest involvement of the nucleus accumbens (NAс) in propagation of frontal and temporal lobe seizures as well as in behavioral modification [38]. Preclinical studies demonstrated that NAc had been involved in the progress of epilepsy and recurrent epilepsy caused neuronal degeneration via this region-related pathways [39]. It was shown that stimulation of the ventral tegmental area can either inhibit or facilitate the activity of NAc neurons driven by hippocampal input [40]–[42]. Hippocampal glutamatergic pathway in NAc neurons could modify the activity of this region through changes in postsynaptic density, presumably by increasing the number of GLUN2B-containing extrasynaptic NMDARs [43]. Conversely, NMDAR-dependent plasticity in the NAc is required for early stages of learning [44].
We have found that treatment of rats with p-cresol modified the expression of GLUN2B and GLUN2A subunits of NMDAR in the plasma membranes of NAc and hippocampal neurons, significantly changing their GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio. Importantly, the ratio was altered in opposite directions in the two brain regions: it was increased in the NAc and decreased in the hippocampi of healthy rats, whereas in KM rats, the opposite result was observed. Considering that these changes might have been the result of distinct genomic programmes of synthesis and expression of GLUN2A and GLUN2B subunits in different brain structures, we analysed the copy numbers of GRIN2A and GRIN2B. No significant differences in the CNV of either gene were found between the NAc and hippocampus, and between untreated and p-cresol-treated rats. Thus, we propose that epigenetic regulation of GRIN2A/GRIN2B expression, or post-transcriptional processes, contribute to the differential spatio-temporal distribution of these NMDAR subunits.
To assess the physiological significance of changes in NMDAR subunit composition, we evaluated the activity of CREB—one of the most important signaling-dependent transcription factors whose role in neuronal survival, as well as in synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, learning, and memory is well-documented [45],[46]. It is thought that GLUN2B localized in the extrasynaptic sites promotes CREB dephosphorylation. In contrast, synaptic NMDARs stimulate CREB phosphorylation [6], which, in turn, initiates synaptogenesis in the hippocampus and NAc [47],[48]. To determine the effect of changed ratio of subunits on the activity of one the key transcription factors–CREB, we have analyzed the phosphorylated form of this protein. We have found that administration of p-cresol impaired CREB phosphorylation in the NAc of healthy rats and hippocampi of KM rats while the level of phosphorylated CREB did not change in the hippocampi of saline-treated rats. An inverse correlation between the activity of CREB and the amount of GLUN2B protein was found, suggesting that elevated GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio in the NAc of healthy rats and hippocampi of KM rats is due to an increase in extrasynaptic GLUN2B. These data suggest that p-cresol modulates the composition of NMDARs, leading to a reduction in synaptic plasticity in the NAc of normal rats and hippocampi of KM rats.
CREB-responsive genes promote dendritic arborization through stimulation of the Rac pathway [49]; thus, Rac activity should be positively correlated with CREB phosphorylation. However, our results have shown that the two were only correlated in the NAc, and that p-cresol inhibited both Rac activity and CREB phosphorylation. Conversely, in the hippocampus, Rac activity was stimulated by p-cresol, indicating that p-cresol exerts opposing effects on NAc and hippocampal cells.
The effects of p-cresol on the hippocampi and NAc of healthy and epilepsy-prone rats might be caused by the different anatomical and biochemical features of these structures. Considering that p-cresol alters dopamine metabolism, we propose that the variable effects of this toxin on the hippocampus and NAc are mediated by differences in the density and activity of dopaminergic pathways in the two brain regions. Both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors physically interact with NMDAR subunits, and dopaminergic ligands dynamically regulate this complex. Surface expression of NR1 and GLUN2B proteins was reported to increase in cultured prefrontal cortex neurons following exposure to a D1DR (D1 dopamine receptors) agonist [50],[51]. Additionally, D1 receptors mediate CREB phosphorylation via phosphorylation of NMDARs [52]. In a membrane fractionation study involving striatal tissue homogenates, activation of the D1 receptor triggered redistribution of NR1, GLUN2A, and GLUN2B to synaptosomal compartments [53]. Thus, we suppose that surface expression, and possibly redistribution, of NMDAR subunits in p-cresol-exposed brain depends on its dopamine concentration and on the docking of NMDAR subunits by dopamine receptor subtypes.
The changes to glutamate receptor composition in the hippocampi of epilepsy-prone, audio-sensitive rats appear to be the result of genetically determined variations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems in the brain. The striatal dopamine system of KM rats is different to that of healthy rats. Basal dopamine levels are 25% higher in brain dialysates of KM rats than in those of control rats, while D2 and NMDAR densities are compensatorily lowered [26]. Thus, the higher dopamine concentration in KM rats could contribute to the different effect of p-cresol on KM and healthy rats.
Chernigovskaya and colleagues [54] revealed that expression of VGLUT2 (glutamate transporter) and GLUN2B in KM rats increased until day 14 after birth, before dramatically decreasing in later stages of life. The genetically determined increase inERK1/2 signaling was also observed during postnatal ontogenesis of KM rats. The latter effect could be related to disturbances in the synthesis and activity of proteins regulating hippocampal glutamatergic transmission during the development of seizure susceptibility.
Collectively, our data suggest that interactions between the glutamatergic and dopaminergic systems play a central role in synaptic plasticity in the NAc and hippocampus exposed to the gut neurotoxin p-cresol. Elevation of dopamine levels in response to inhibition of dopamine beta-hydroxylase can alter the surface expression and subcellular localization of the DR-NMDA heteroreceptor in these brain regions, leading to changes in downstream effector activity and abnormal extrapyramidal motor and cognitive behaviors.
Subchronic intraperitoneal injection of p-cresol caused differential expression of GLUN2B and GLUN2A between murine hippocampi and NAc, and altered the GLUN2B/GLUN2A ratio differently in healthy and KM rats. These changes were accompanied by decreased CREB phosphorylation in both brain structures, and increased Rac activitiy in the hippocampus. These data suggest that p-cresol has distinct effects on NMDAR-dependent activity in the NAc and hippocampus in healthy and epilepsy-prone rats.
[1] | Buckner RL (2013) The Cerebellum and Cognitive Function: 25 Years of Insight from Anatomy and Neuroimaging. Neuron 80: 807-815. |
[2] | Strick PL, Dum RP, Fiez JA (2009) Cerebellum and nonmotor function. Annu Rev Neurosci 32: 413-434. |
[3] | Leiner HC (2010) Solving the mystery of the human cerebellum. Neuropsychol Rev 20: 229-235. |
[4] |
Schmahmann JD (2010) The role of the cerebellum in cognition and emotion: personal reflections since 1982 on the dysmetria of thought hypothesis, and its historical evolution from theory to therapy. Neuropsychol Rev 20: 236-260. doi: 10.1007/s11065-010-9142-x
![]() |
[5] |
Manto M, Haines D (2012) Cerebellar research: two centuries of discoveries. Cerebellum 11: 446-448. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0336-4
![]() |
[6] |
Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Castellanos A, et al. (2011) The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 106: 2322-2345. doi: 10.1152/jn.00339.2011
![]() |
[7] | Sokolov AA, Erb M, Grodd W, et al. (2014) Structural loop between the cerebellum and the superior temporal sulcus: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Cereb Cortex 24, :626-32. |
[8] | Leiner HC, Leiner AL (1997) How fibers subserve computing capabilities: similarities between brains and machines. Int Rev Neurobiol 41: 535-553. |
[9] | Finger S (1994) Origins of neuroscience: A history of explorations into brain function. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press: 1-480. |
[10] | Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
[11] | Larsell O (1970) The comparative anatomy and histology of the cerebellum from monotremes through apes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. |
[12] | Larsell O, Jansen (1972) The comparative anatomy and histology of the cerebellum, Vol. 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press |
[13] | White DD (2005) Size and shape of the cerebellum in catarrhine primates and plio-pleistocene fossil hominins: A paleoneurological analysis of endocranial casts. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Anthropology, College of Arts and Science, University at Albany, State University of New York. |
[14] | Clarke E, O'Malley E (1968) The human brain and spinal cord. University of California Press. |
[15] | Glickstein M, Yeo C (1990) The cerebellum and Motor learning. J Cognitive Neurosci 2: 206-210. |
[16] |
Holmes G (1917) The symptoms of acute cerebellar injuries due to gunshot injuries. Brain 40: 461-535. doi: 10.1093/brain/40.4.461
![]() |
[17] |
Glickstein M, Voogd J (1995) Lodewijk Bolk and the comparative anatomy of the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 18: 206-210. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93903-B
![]() |
[18] | Strata P, Scelfo B, Sacchetti B (2011) Involvement of cerebellum in emotional behaviour. Physiol Res 60: S39-S48. |
[19] | Ohki M, Kitazawa H, Hiramatsu T, et al. (2009) Role of primate cerebellar hemisphere in voluntary eye movement control revealed by lesion effects. J Neurophysiol 101: 934-947. |
[20] | Hiramatsu T, Ohki M, Kitazawa H, et al. (2008) Role of primate cerebellar lobulus petrosus of paraflocculus in smooth pursuit eye movement control revealed by chemical lesion. Neurosci Res 60: 250-258. |
[21] | Marr D (1969) A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 202: 437-470. |
[22] |
Albus JS (1971) A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosc 10: 25-61. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4
![]() |
[23] | Habas C, Kamdar N, Nguyen D (2009) Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks. J Neurosci 29: 8586-8594. |
[24] |
Krienen FM, Buckner RL (2009) Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex 19: 2485-2497. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp135
![]() |
[25] |
O'Reilly JX, Beckmann CF, Tomassini V, (2010) Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex 20: 953-965. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp157
![]() |
[26] | Leiner HC, Leiner AL, Dow RS (1986) Does the cerebellum contribute to mental skills? Behav Neurosci 100: 443-454. |
[27] | Schmahmann JD (2004) Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 16: 367-378. |
[28] |
Ito M (2006) Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Prog Neurobiol 78: 272-303. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.02.006
![]() |
[29] |
Schmahmann JD, Caplan D (2006) Cognition, emotion and the cerebellum. Brain 129: 290-292. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh729
![]() |
[30] |
Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD (2009) Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 44: 489-501. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039
![]() |
[31] | Holloway RL (1996). Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution. Lock A, Peters CR eds. Oxford: Clarendon: 74-108. |
[32] |
Weaver AH (2005) Reciprocal evolution of the cerebellum and neocortex in fossil humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 3576-3580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500692102
![]() |
[33] |
Ramnani N (2006) The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 511-522. doi: 10.1038/nrn1953
![]() |
[34] | Petersen SE, Fox PT, Posner MI, et al. (1989) Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of singe words. J Cogn Neurosci 1: 153-170. |
[35] |
Kim SG, Uğurbil K, Strick PL (1994) Activation of a cerebellar output nucleus during cognitive processing. Science 265: 949-951. doi: 10.1126/science.8052851
![]() |
[36] |
Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN (1997) The cerebrocerebellar system. Int Rev Neurobiol 41: 31-60. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60346-3
![]() |
[37] | Middleton FA, Strick PL (2001) Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate. J Neurosci 21: 700-712. |
[38] | Kelly RM, Strick PL (2003) Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci 23: 8432-8444. |
[39] | Fiez JA, Petersen SE, Cheney MK, et al. (1992) Impaired non-motor learning and error detection associated with cerebellar damage. A single case study. Brain 115: 155-178. |
[40] | Moulton EA, Elman I, Becerra LR, et al. (2014) The cerebellum and addiction: insights gained from neuroimaging research. Addict Biol 19: 317-331. |
[41] | Miquel M, Vazquez-Sanroman D, Carbo-Gas M, et al. (2016) Have we been ignoring the elephant in the room? Seven arguments for considering the cerebellum as part of addiction circuitry. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 60: 1-11. |
[42] | Arriada-Mendicoa N, Otero-Silceo E, Corona-Vazquez T (1999) Current concepts regarding the cerebellum and cognition. Rev Neurol 29: 1075-1082. |
[43] |
Ito M (1993) Movement and thought: identical control mechanisms by the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 16: 448-454. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90073-U
![]() |
[44] | Lent R, Azevedo FA, Andrade-Moraes CH, et al. (2012) How many neurons do you have? Some dogmas of quantitative neuroscience under revision. Eur J Neurosci 35: 1-9. |
[45] | Donkelaar HJT, Lammens M, Wesseling P, et al. (2003) Development and developmental disorders of the human cerebellum. J Neurol 250: 1025-1036. |
[46] |
Carletti B, Rossi F (2008) Neurogenesis in the cerebellum. Neuroscientist 14: 91-100. doi: 10.1177/1073858407304629
![]() |
[47] |
Volpe JJ (2009) Cerebellum of the Premature Infant: Rapidly Developing, Vulnerable, Clinically Important. J Child Neurol 24: 1085-1104. doi: 10.1177/0883073809338067
![]() |
[48] | Singh I (1997) Gross Anatomy of the Cerebellum, Chapter 7 in Textbook of Human Neuroanatomy, Fifth Edition ed. Singh I, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd New Delhi: 60-65. |
[49] | Andersen BB, Korbo L, Pakkenberg B (1992) A quantitative study of the human cerebellum with unbiased stereological techniques. J Comp Neurol 326: 549-560. |
[50] | Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, et al., editors. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2001. |
[51] | Patestas MA, Gartner LP, (2016) Chapter 6 Gross anatomy of the brain: A Textbook of Neuroanatomy; Wiley-Blackwell. |
[52] | Simat M, Parpan P, Fritschy JM (2006) Heterogeneity of glycinergic and gabaergic interneurons in the granule cell layer of mouse cerebellum. J Comp Neurol 500: 71-83. |
[53] |
Larsell O (1947) The development of the cerebellum in man in relation to its comparative anatomy. J Comp Neurol 87: 85-129. doi: 10.1002/cne.900870203
![]() |
[54] | Larsell O (1958) Lobules of the mammalian and human cerebellum. Anat Rec 130: 329-330. |
[55] | Grimaldi G, Manto M (2012) Topography of cerebellar deficits in humans. Cerebellum 11: 336-351. |
[56] |
Manto M, Mariën P (2015) Schmahmann's syndrome - identification of the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology. Cerebellum Ataxias 2: 2. doi: 10.1186/s40673-015-0023-1
![]() |
[57] | Cerminara NL, Apps R (2011) Behavioural Significance of Cerebellar Modules. Cerebellum 10: 484-494. |
[58] |
White JJ, Arancillo M, Stay TR, et al. (2014) Cerebellar Zonal Patterning Relies on Purkinje Cell Neurotransmission. J Neurosci 34: 8231-8245. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0122-14.2014
![]() |
[59] | Snider RS, Stowell A (1944) Receiving areas of the tactile, auditory and visual systems in the cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 7: 331-357. |
[60] | Grodd W, Hülsmann E, Lotze M, et al. (2001) Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization. Hum Brain Mapp 13: 55-73. |
[61] | Wiestler T, McGonigle DJ, Diedrichsen J (2011) Integration of sensory and motor representations of single fingers in the human cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 105: 3042-3053. |
[62] |
Schlerf JE, Verstynen TD, Ivry RB, et al. (2010) Evidence of a novel somatopic map in the human neocerebellum during complex actions. J Neurophysiol 103: 3330-3336. doi: 10.1152/jn.01117.2009
![]() |
[63] | Ivry R (1997) Cerebellar timing systems. Int Rev Neurobiol 41: 555-573. |
[64] | Apps R, Hawkes R (2009) Cerebellar cortical organization: a one-map hypothesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 670-681. |
[65] |
Horn KM, Pong M, Gibson AR (2010) Functional relations of cerebellar modules of the cat. J Neurosci 30: 9411-9423. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0440-10.2010
![]() |
[66] | White JJ, Sillitoe RV (2013) Postnatal development of cerebellar zones revealed by neurofilament heavy chain protein expression. Front Neuroanat 7: 9. |
[67] | Uusisaari M, De Schutter E (2001) The mysterious microcircuitry of the cerebellar nuclei. J Physiol 589, 3441-3457. |
[68] | Voogd J, Bigare F (1980) Topographical distribution of olivary and corticonuclear fibers in the cerebellum. In: The inferior olivary nucleus. (eds) Courville J, DeMontigny C, Lamarre Y, New York: Raven: 207-234. |
[69] |
Voogd J, Glickstein M (1998) The anatomy of the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 21: 370-375. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01318-6
![]() |
[70] | Glickstein M, Sultan F, Voogd J (2011) Functional localization in the cerebellum. Cortex 47: 59-80. |
[71] |
Chaumont J, Guyon N, Valera AM, et al. (2013) Clusters of cerebellar Purkinje cells control their afferent climbing fiber discharge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 16223-16228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302310110
![]() |
[72] |
Apps R, Garwicz M (2005) Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebellar information processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 297-311. doi: 10.1038/nrn1646
![]() |
[73] |
Ebner TJ, Wang X, Gao W, et al. (2012) Parasagittal zones in the cerebellar cortex differ in excitability, information processing, and synaptic plasticity. Cerebellum 11: 418-419. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0347-1
![]() |
[74] | Azevedo FA, Carvalho LR, Grinberg LT, et al. (2009) Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. J Comp Neurol 513: 532-541. |
[75] | Hoxha E, Tempia F, Lippiello P, et al. (2016) Modulation, Plasticity and Pathophysiology of the Parallel Fiber-Purkinje Cell Synapse. Front Synaptic Neurosci 8: 35. |
[76] | Miyakawa H, Lev-Ram V, Lasser-Ross N et al. (1992) Calcium transients evoked by climbing fiber and parallel fiber synaptic inputs in guinea pig cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J Neurophysiol 68: 1178-1189. |
[77] | Person AL, Raman IM (2012) Purkinje neuron synchrony elicits time-locked spiking in the cerebellar nuclei. Nature 481: 502-505. |
[78] | Pedroarena CM, Schwarz C (2003) Efficacy and short-term plasticity at GABAergic synapses between Purkinje and cerebellar nuclei neurons. J Neurophysiol 89: 704-715. |
[79] |
Pugh JR, Raman IM (2005) GABAA receptor kinetics in the cerebellar nuclei: evidence for detection of transmitter from distant release sites. Biophys J 88: 1740-1754. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.055814
![]() |
[80] |
Sugihara I, Fujita H, Na J, et al. (2009) Projection of reconstructed single Purkinje cell axons in relation to the cortical and nuclear aldolase C compartments of the rat cerebellum. J Comp Neurol 512: 282-304. doi: 10.1002/cne.21889
![]() |
[81] | Sugihara I (2011) Compartmentalization of the deep cerebellar nuclei based on afferent projections and aldolase C expression. Cerebellum 10: 449-463. |
[82] |
Bengtsson F, Svensson P, Hesslow G (2004) Feedback control of Purkinje cell activity by the cerebello-olivary pathway. Eur J Neurosci 20: 2999-3005. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03789.x
![]() |
[83] | Witter L, Canto CB, Hoogland TM, et al. (2013) Strength and timing of motor responses mediated by rebound firing in the cerebellar nuclei after Purkinje cell activation. Front Neural Circuits 7: 133. |
[84] |
Orduz D, Llano I (2007) Recurrent axon collaterals underlie facilitating synapses between cerebellar Purkinje cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 17831-17836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707489104
![]() |
[85] | Wadiche JI, Jahr CE (2005) Patterned expression of Purkinje cell glutamate transporters controls synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci 8: 1329-1334. |
[86] | Watt AJ, Cuntz H, Mori M, et al. (2009). Travelling waves in developing cerebellar cortex mediated by asymmetrical Purkinje cell connectivity. Nat Neurosci 12: 463-473. |
[87] | Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, Katz LC, et al. (2004) Chapter 18: Modulation of Movement by the Cerebellum, Circuits within the cerebellum, In Neuroscience 3rd Edition, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (MA). |
[88] | Gao W, Chen G, Reinert KC, et al. (2006) Cerebellar cortical molecular layer inhibition is organized in parasagittal zones. J Neurosci 26: 8377-8387. |
[89] | Dizon MJ, Khodakhah K (2011) The role of interneurons in shaping Purkinje cell responses in the cerebellar cortex. J Neurosci 231: 10463-10473. |
[90] |
Booth J, Wood L, Lu D, et al. (2007) The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing. Brain Res 1133: 136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.074
![]() |
[91] | Kellermann T, Regenbogen C, De Vos M, et al. (2012). Effective connectivity of the human cerebellum during visual attention. J Neurosci 32: 11453-11460. |
[92] |
Sokolov AA, Erb M, Gharabaghi A, et al. (2012). Biological motion processing: the left cerebellum communicates with the right superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage 59: 2824-2830. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.039
![]() |
[93] |
Jack A, Pelphrey KA (2015). Neural correlates of animacy attribution include neocerebellum in healthy adults. Cereb Cortex 25: 4240-4247. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu146
![]() |
[94] |
Schweighofer N, Doya K, Kuroda S (2004) Cerebellar aminergic neuromodulation: towards a functional understanding. Brain Res Rev 44: 103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.10.004
![]() |
[95] | Wamsley JK, Palacios JM (1984) Amino acid and benzodiazepine receptors. In Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. In: Bjorklund A, Hiikfelt T, Kuhar MJ eds. Classical Transmitters and Transmitter Receptors in the CNS. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 352-385. |
[96] | Somogyi P, Takagi H, Richards JG (1989) Subcellular localization of benzodiazepine/GABAA receptors in the cerebellum of rat, cat, and monkey using monoclonal antibodies. J Neurosci 9: 2197-2209. |
[97] |
Kuhar MJ, De Souza EB, Unnerstall JR (1986) Neurotransmitter receptor mapping by autoradiography and other methods. Annu Rev Neurosci 9: 27-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.000331
![]() |
[98] | De Blas AL, Vitorica J, Friedrich P (1988) Localization of the GABA-A receptor in the rat brain with a monoclonal antibody to the 57,000 Mr peptide of the GABA-A receptor/benzodiazepine receptor/Cl- channel complex. J Neurosci 8: 602-614. |
[99] |
Kulik A, Nakadate K, Nyiri G, et al. (2002) Distinct localization of GABA(B) receptors relative to synaptic sites in the rat cerebellum and ventrobasal thalamus. Eur J Neurosci 15: 291-307. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01855.x
![]() |
[100] | Llansola M, Sanchez-Perez A, Cauli O, et al. (2005) Modulation of NMDA receptors in the cerebellum. 1. Properties of the NMDA receptor that modulate its function. Cerebellum 4: 154-161. |
[101] | Garyfallou VT, Kohama SG, Urbanski HF (1996) Distribution of NMDA and AMPA receptors in the cerebellar cortex of Rhesus macaques. Brain Res 716: 22-28. |
[102] | Knöpfel T, Grandes P (2002). Metabotropic glutamate receptors in the cerebellum with a focus on their function in Purkinje cells. Cerebellum 1: 19-26. |
[103] |
Crepel F, Hemart H, Jaillard D, et al. (1996) Cellular mechanism of long-term depression in the cerebellum. Behav Brain Sci 19: 347-353. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00081449
![]() |
[104] | Kano M, Kato M (1987) Quisqualate receptors are specifically involved in cerebellar synaptic plasticity. Nature 325: 276-279. |
[105] | Yamazaki M, Araki K, Shibata A, et al. (1992) Molecular cloning of a cDNA encoding a novel member of the mouse glutamate receptor channel family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 183: 886-892. |
[106] | Araki K, Meguro H, Kushiya E, et al. (1993) Selective expression of the glutamate receptor channel delta 2 subunit in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 197: 1267-1276. |
[107] | Landsend AS, Amiry-Moghaddam M, Matsubara A, et al. (1997) Differential localization of delta glutamate receptors in the rat cerebellum: co-expression with AMPA receptors in parallel fiber-spine synapses and absence from climbing fiber-spine synapses. J Neurosci 17: 834-842. |
[108] | Ikai S, Takada Y, Shinonaga M (1992) Dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area of the rat project, respectively, to the cerebellar cortex and deep cerebellar nuclei. Neurosci 51: 719-728. |
[109] |
Barili P, Bronzetti E, Ricci A, et al. (2000) Microanatomical localization of dopamine receptor protein immunoreactivity in the rat cerebellar cortex. Brain Res 854: 130-138. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)02306-9
![]() |
[110] |
Alder R, Barbas H (1995) Complementary distribution of the phosphoproteins DARPP-32 and I-1 in the cerebellar system. Neuroreport 6: 2368-2372. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199511270-00022
![]() |
[111] | Kawaguchi Y, Hirano T (2002) Signalling cascade regulating long-term potentiation of GABA (A) receptor responsiveness in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J Neurosci 22: 3969-3976. |
[112] |
Kerr CW, Bishop GA (1992) The physiological effects of serotonin are mediated by the 5HT1A receptor in the cat's cerebellar cortex. Brain Res 591: 253-260. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91705-J
![]() |
[113] | Geurts FJ, De Schutter E, Timmermans JP (2002) Localization of 5-HT2A, 5-HT3, 5-HT5A and 5-HT7 receptor-like immunoreactivity in the rat cerebellum. J Chem Neuroanat 24: 65-74. |
[114] | Bishop GA, Ho RH (1985) The distribution and origin of serotonin immunoreactivity in the rat cerebellum. Brain Res 331: 195-207. |
[115] |
Kerr CW, Bishop GA (1991) Topographical organization in the origin of serotoninergic projections to different regions of the cat cerebellar cortex. J Comp Neurol 304: 502-515. doi: 10.1002/cne.903040313
![]() |
[116] | Weiss M, Pellet J (1982) Raphe–cerebellum interactions: I. Effects of cerebellar stimulation and harmaline administration on single unit activity of midbrain raphe neurons in the rat. Exp Brain Res 48: 163-170. |
[117] | Weiss M, Pellet J (1982) Raphe-cerebellum interactions: II. Effects of midbrain raphe stimulation and harmaline administration on single unit activity of cerebellar cortical cells in the rat. Exp Brain Res 48: 171-176. |
[118] |
Maura G, Ricchetti A, Raiteri M (1986) Serotonin inhibits the depolarization-evoked release of endogenous glutamate from rat cerebellar nerve endings. Neurosci Lett 67: 218-222. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90401-5
![]() |
[119] | Mitoma H, Konishi S (1999) Monoaminergic long-term facilitation of GABA-mediated inhibitory transmission at cerebellar synapses. Neurosci 88: 871-883. |
[120] |
Lippiello P, Hoxha E, Speranza L, et al. (2016) The 5-HT7 receptor triggers cerebellar long-term synaptic depression via PKC-MAPK. Neuropharmacol 101: 426-438. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.10.019
![]() |
[121] | Kimoto Y, Satoh K, SakumotoT et al. (1978) Afferent fibre connections from the lower brain stem to the rat cerebellum by the horseradish peroxidase method combined with MAO staining, with special reference to noradrenergic neurons. J Hirnforsch 19: 85-100. |
[122] | Mitoma H, Konishi S (1996) Long-lasting facilitation of inhibitory transmission by monoaminergic and cAMP-dependent mechanism in rat cerebellar GABAergic synapses. Neurosci Lett 217: 141-144. |
[123] | Saitow F, Satake S, Yamada J, et al. (2000) Beta-adrenergic receptor mediated presynaptic facilitation of inhibitory GABAergic transmission at cerebellar interneuron-Purkinje cell synapses. J Neurophysiol 84: 2016-2025. |
[124] | Cheun JJ, Yeh HH (1996) Noradrenergic potentiation of cerebellar Purkinje cell responses to GABA: cyclic AMP as intracellular intermediary. Neurosci 74: 835-844. |
[125] | Gould TJ, Adams CE, Bickford PC (1997) Beta-adrenergic modulation of GABAergic inhibition in the deep cerebellar nuclei of F344 rats. Neuropharmacol 36: 75-81. |
[126] |
Watson M, McElligott JG (1984) Cerebellar norepinephrine depletion and impaired acquisition of specific locomotor tasks in rats. Brain Res 296: 129-138. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90518-3
![]() |
[127] | Bickford P (1993) Motor learning deficits in aged rats are correlated with loss of cerebellar noradrenergic function. Brain Res 620: 133-138. |
[128] | Schambra UB, Mackensen GB, Stafford-Smith M, et al. (2005). Neuron specific alpha-adrenergic receptor expression in human cerebellum: implications for emerging cerebellar roles in neurologic disease. Neurosci 135: 507-523. |
[129] |
Papay R, Gaivin R, Jha A, et al. (2006) Localization of the mouse alpha1A-adrenergic receptor (AR) in the brain: alpha1AAR is expressed in neurons, GABAergic interneurons, and NG2 oligodendrocyte progenitors. J Comp Neurol 497: 209-222. doi: 10.1002/cne.20992
![]() |
[130] | Hirono M, Matsunaga W, Chimura T, et al. (2008) Developmental enhancement of alpha2-adrenoceptor-mediated suppression of inhibitory synaptic transmission onto mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neurosci 156: 143-154. |
[131] |
Lippiello P, Hoxha E, Volpicelli F, et al. (2015) Noradrenergic modulation of the parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapse in mouse cerebellum. Neuropharmacol 89: 33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.08.016
![]() |
[132] |
Siggins GR, Hoffer BJ, Oliver AP, et al. (1971) Activation of a central noradrenergic projection to cerebellum. Nature 233: 481-483. doi: 10.1038/233481a0
![]() |
[133] | Hoffer BJ, Siggins GR, Bloom FE (1971) Studies on norepinephrine-containing afferents to Purkinje cells of rat cerebellum. II. Sensitivity of Purkinje cells to norepinephrine and related substances administered by microiontophoresis. Brain Res 25: 523-534. |
[134] | Saitow F, Konishi S (2000) Excitability increase induced by beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of hyperpolarization-activated cation channels in rat cerebellar basket cells. J Neurophysiol 84: 2026-2034. |
[135] |
Carey MR, Regehr WG (2009) Noradrenergic control of associative synaptic plasticity by selective modulation of instructive signals. Neuron 62: 112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.022
![]() |
[136] | Jaarsma D, Ruigrok TJ, Caffe R, et al. (1997) Cholinergic innervation and receptors in the cerebellum. Prog Brain Res 114: 67-96. |
[137] | Turner JR, Kellar KJ (2005) Nicotinic cholinergic receptors in the rat cerebellum: multiple heteromeric subtypes. J Neurosci 25: 9258-9265. |
[138] | Andre P, Pompeiano O, White SR (1993) Activation of muscarinic receptors induces a long-lasting enhancement of Purkinje cell responses to glutamate. Brain Res 617: 28-36. |
[139] | Graham A, Court JA, Martin-Ruiz CM, et al. (2000) Immunohistochemical localisation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits in human cerebellum. Neurosci 113: 493-507. |
[140] |
Glickstein M (2007) What does the cerebellum really do? Curr Biol 17: R824-827. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.009
![]() |
[141] | Baillieux H, Smet HJ, Paquier PF, et al. (2008) Cerebellar neurocognition: Insights into the bottom of the brain. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 11:763-773. |
[142] | Dean P, Porrill J (2008) Oculomotor anatomy and the motor-error problem: the role of the paramedian tract nuclei. Prog Brain Res 171: 177-186. |
[143] | Haith A, Vijayakumar S (2009) Implications of different classes of sensorimotor disturbance for cerebellar based motor learning models. Biol Cybern 100: 81-95. |
[144] | Ohyama T, Medina JF, Nores WL, et al. (2002) Trying to understand the cerebellum well enough to build one. Ann NY Acad Sci 978, 425-438. |
[145] |
Ito M (2008) Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 304-313. doi: 10.1038/nrn2332
![]() |
[146] |
Koziol LF, Budding DE, Chidekel D (2012) From movement to thought: executive function, embodied cognition, and the cerebellum. Cerebellum 11: 505-525. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0321-y
![]() |
[147] | Paulin MG (2005) Evolution of the cerebellum as a neuronal machine for Bayesian state estimation. J Neural Eng 2: S219-234 |
[148] |
Miall RC, Weir DJ, Wolpert DM, et al. (1993) Is the cerebellum a Smith predictor? J Motor Behav 25: 203-216. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1993.9942050
![]() |
[149] | Kurtaj L, Limani I, Shatri V, et al. (2013) The cerebellum: new computational model that reveals its primary function to calculate multibody dynamics conform to Lagrange-Euler formulation. Int J Computer Sci 10: 1-18. |
[150] |
Fujita M (1982) Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum. Biol Cybern 45: 195-206. doi: 10.1007/BF00336192
![]() |
[151] | Dean P, Porrill J, Ekerot CF, et al. (2010) The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 30-43. |
[152] | Rosenblatt F (1962) Principles of neurodynamics. Spartan Books; Washington. |
[153] |
Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8
![]() |
[154] | Barlow JS (2002) The cerebellum and adaptive control. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK. |
[155] | Farber NB, Newcomer JW, Olney JW (2000) Are glycine sites saturated In vivo? Arch Gen Psychiatry 57: 1181-1183. |
[156] | Mariën P, Ackermann H, Adamaszek M, et al. (2014) Consensus Paper: Language and the Cerebellum: an ongoing Enigma. Cerebellum 13: 386-410. |
[157] | Baddeley A (2003) Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 829-839. |
[158] | Ben-Yehudah G, Fiez JA (2008) Impact of cerebellar lesions on reading and phonological processing. Ann NY Acad Sci 1145: 260-274. |
[159] |
Leggio MG, Chiricozzi FR, Clausi S (2011) The neuropsychological profile of cerebellar damage: the sequencing hypothesis. Cortex 47: 137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.011
![]() |
[160] |
Kirschen MP, Davis-Ratner MS, Milner MW, et al. (2008) Verbal memory impairments in children after cerebellar tumor resection. Behav Neurol 20: 39-53. doi: 10.1155/2008/817253
![]() |
[161] |
Law N, Bouffet E, Laughlin S, et al. (2011) Cerebello-thalamo-cerebral connections in pediatric brain tumor patients: impact on working memory. NeuroImage 56: 2238-2248. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.065
![]() |
[162] |
Justus T, Ravizza SM, Fiez JA, et al. (2005) Reduced phonological similarity effects in patients with damage to the cerebellum. Brain Lang 95: 304-318. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.02.001
![]() |
[163] | Cooper FE, Grube M, Von Kriegstein K, et al. (2012) Distinct critical cerebellar subregions for components of verbal working memory. Neuropsychologia 50: 189-197. |
[164] |
Boyden ES, Katoh A, Pyle JL, et al. (2006) Selective engagement of plasticity mechanisms for motor memory storage. Neuron 51: 823-834. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.026
![]() |
[165] |
Medina JF, Nores WL, Ohyama T, et al. (2000) Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10: 717-724. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00154-9
![]() |
[166] | Schonewille M, Gao Z, Boele HJ, et al. (2011) Reevaluating the role of LTD in cerebellar motor learning. Neuron 70: 43-50. |
[167] |
Grasselli G, Hansel C (2014) Cerebellar long-term potentiation: cellular mechanisms and role in learning. Int Rev Neurobiol 117: 39-51. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420247-4.00003-8
![]() |
[168] | Hansel C, Linden DJ (2000) Long-term depression of the cerebellar climbing fiber--Purkinje neuron synapse. Neuron 26: 473-482. |
[169] | Kawaguchi S, Hirano T (2000) Suppression of inhibitory synaptic potentiation by presynaptic activity through postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors in a Purkinje neuron. Neuron 27: 339-347. |
[170] |
Jörntell H, Hansel C (2006) Synaptic memories upside down: bidirectional plasticity at cerebellar parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. Neuron 52: 227-238. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.032
![]() |
[171] | Wang DJ, Su LD, Wang YN, et al. (2014) Long-term potentiation at cerebellar parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses requires presynaptic and postsynaptic signalling cascades. J Neurosci 534: 2355-2364. |
[172] |
Lev-Ram V, Mehta SB, Kleinfeld D, et al. (2003) Reversing cerebellar long-term depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15989-15993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2636935100
![]() |
[173] |
Van Overwalle F, Mariën P (2016) Functional connectivity between the cerebrum and cerebellum in social cognition: A multi-study analysis. NeuroImage 124: 248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.001
![]() |
[174] | Hoche F, Guell X, Sherman JC, et al. (2016) Cerebellar Contribution to Social Cognition. Cerebellum 15: 732-743. |
[175] |
Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, et al. (2014) Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 42: 9-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009
![]() |
[176] |
Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117: 440-463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963
![]() |
[177] |
Van Overwalle F, Baetens K, Mariën P, et al. (2014) Social cognition and the cerebellum: a meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies. NeuroImage 86: 554-572. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.033
![]() |
[178] |
Van Overwalle F, D'aes T, Mariën P (2015) Social Cognition and the Cerebellum: A Meta-analytic Connectivity Analysis. Hum Brain Map 36: 5137-5154. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23002
![]() |
[179] | Van Overwalle F, Baetens K, Mariën P, et al. (2015) Cerebellar areas dedicated to social cognition? A comparison of meta-analytic and connectivity results. Soc Neurosci 10: 337-344. |
[180] | Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC (1998) The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain 121: 561-579. |
[181] | Chheda M, Sherman J, Schmahmann JD (2002) Neurologic, psychiatric and cognitive manifestations in cerebellar agenesis. Neurology 58: 356. |
[182] |
Tavano A, Grasso R, Gagliardi C, et al. (2007) Disorders of cognitive and affective development in cerebellar malformations. Brain 130: 2646-2660. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm201
![]() |
[183] |
Kim YH, Kim KW (2006) Effects of single-dose methylphenidate on cognitive performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: a double-blind placebo controlled study. Clin Rehabil 20: 24-30. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr927oa
![]() |
[184] | Yap JL, Wachtel LE, Ahn ES, et al. (2012) Treatment of cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome with aripiprazole. J Pediatric Rehab Med 5: 233-238. |
[185] |
Chang C, Siao SW (2016) Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome: Attention deficite hyperactivity disorder episode of adolescent with cerebellar atrophy in a psychiatric ward. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32: 52-54. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.10.006
![]() |
[186] |
Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer T, et al. (2005) Atomoxetine and stroop task performance in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 15: 664-670. doi: 10.1089/cap.2005.15.664
![]() |
[187] |
Foster DJ, Good DC, Fowlkes A, et al. (2006) Atomoxetine enhances a short-term model of plasticity in humans. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87: 216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.131
![]() |
[188] |
Borchert RJ, Rittman T, Passamonti L, et al. (2016) Atomoxetine Enhances Connectivity of Prefrontal Networks in Parkinson's Disease. Neuropsychopharmacol 41: 2171-2177. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.18
![]() |
[189] | Doody RS |
1. | Denis Pavăl, Ioana Valentina Micluția, The Dopamine Hypothesis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Revisited: Current Status and Future Prospects, 2021, 43, 0378-5866, 73, 10.1159/000515751 | |
2. | Gigi Tevzadze, Tamar Barbakadze, Elisabed Kvergelidze, Elene Zhuravliova, Lali Shanshiashvili, David Mikeladze, Gut neurotoxin p-cresol induces brain-derived neurotrophic factor secretion and increases the expression of neurofilament subunits in PC-12 cells, 2021, 9, 2373-7972, 12, 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022002 | |
3. | Aidan Pavao, Madeline Graham, Mario L. Arrieta-Ortiz, Selva Rupa Christinal Immanuel, Nitin S. Baliga, Lynn Bry, Reconsidering the in vivo functions of Clostridial Stickland amino acid fermentations, 2022, 76, 10759964, 102600, 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102600 | |
4. | F. Blachier, M. Andriamihaja, Effects of the l-tyrosine-derived bacterial metabolite p-cresol on colonic and peripheral cells, 2022, 54, 0939-4451, 325, 10.1007/s00726-021-03064-x | |
5. | Guoqiang Liu, Quntao Yu, Bo Tan, Xiao Ke, Chen Zhang, Hao Li, Tongmei Zhang, Youming Lu, Gut dysbiosis impairs hippocampal plasticity and behaviors by remodeling serum metabolome, 2022, 14, 1949-0976, 10.1080/19490976.2022.2104089 | |
6. | Marina Nikolaishvili, Zakaria Nanobashvili, Nodar Mitagvaria, Gvantsa Chkadua, Tea Museliani, Gogi Jikia, Irine Bilanishvili, Khatuna Dondoladze, The Level of Individual Biochemical Constants of the Brain of in the Krushinsky-Molodkina Inbred Rat Strain against the Background of Radon Inhalation During Epilepsy, 2022, 10, 1857-9655, 2555, 10.3889/oamjms.2022.10716 | |
7. | Stephen I. Deutsch, Zachary N. M. Luyo, Jessica A. Burket, Targeted NMDA Receptor Interventions for Autism: Developmentally Determined Expression of GluN2B and GluN2A-Containing Receptors and Balanced Allosteric Modulatory Approaches, 2022, 12, 2218-273X, 181, 10.3390/biom12020181 | |
8. | Denis Pavăl, 2023, 173, 9780443137297, 1, 10.1016/bs.irn.2023.08.009 | |
9. | Young Hyun Jung, Chang Woo Chae, Ho Jae Han, The potential role of gut microbiota-derived metabolites as regulators of metabolic syndrome-associated mitochondrial and endolysosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease, 2024, 56, 2092-6413, 1691, 10.1038/s12276-024-01282-3 | |
10. | Tereena Lucas, Brent Brown, Expansion of a versatile pathogen: Clostridioides difficile, 2024, 12, 27730492, 100108, 10.1016/j.heha.2024.100108 | |
11. | François Blachier, 2023, Chapter 5, 978-3-031-26321-7, 189, 10.1007/978-3-031-26322-4_5 | |
12. | Ann B. Roskjær, Henrik M. Roager, Lars O. Dragsted, D-Amino acids from foods and gut microbiota and their effects in health and disease, 2024, 40, 8755-9129, 3196, 10.1080/87559129.2024.2347472 | |
13. | Mahi Basra, Lauren Miceli, Vatsala Mundra, Alison Stern-Harbutte, Hemangi Patel, Jenifer Haynes, Mayur S. Parmar, Exploring the neurotoxic effects of microbial metabolites: A potential link between p-Cresol and autism spectrum disorders?, 2024, 00068993, 149427, 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149427 | |
14. | Laura Bertarini, Federico Imbeni, Antonietta Vilella, Silvia Alboni, Federica Pellati, Targeted Metabolomics for the Analysis of p-Cresol in Mouse Brain: Impact of Biological Sex and Strain, 2025, 1948-7193, 10.1021/acschemneuro.4c00698 | |
15. | Christina K. Flynn, James B. Adams, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown, Alexander Khoruts, Michael J. Sadowsky, Khemlal Nirmalkar, Evelyn Takyi, Paul Whiteley, Review of Elevated Para-Cresol in Autism and Possible Impact on Symptoms, 2025, 26, 1422-0067, 1513, 10.3390/ijms26041513 | |
16. | Zijin Huang, Xueke Du, Fangzhou Li, Zhixuan Lan, Liang Guo, Linghui Pan, Gut microbiota and blood metabolites: unveiling their roles in hippocampal volume changes through Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis, 2025, 40, 1573-7365, 10.1007/s11011-025-01611-z | |
17. | Karol Chojnowski, Mikołaj Opiełka, Krzysztof Urbanowicz, Marta Zawadzka, Karolina Wangin, Ryszard Tomasz Smoleński, Maria Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska, Untargeted metabolomics reveals key metabolic alterations in pediatric epilepsy with insights into Tryptophan metabolism and the gut–brain axis, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-99805-z |
Target gene | Forward | Reverse |
GRIN2A | TCCGCCTTTCCGATTTGGG | GCGTCCAACTTCCCAGTTTTC |
GRIN2B | CTGAGACTGAAGAACAGGAAGATGACCATC | CGGGACTGTATTCCGCATGCAGG |