This research aims to develop a holistic framework for ecovillage development tailored to the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma. Globally, ecovillages are gaining immense popularity as ideal models for sustainable living. Most existing models are shaped by middle- and upper-middle-class white people, thus limiting their relevance for Cherokee contexts, which are grounded in distinct traditions of land, governance, and mutual aid. Hence, this research addresses that gap by developing a holistic approach that represents Cherokee cultural values, governance traditions, and environmental ethics. A mixed-method design is employed, where the first stage of data collection consists of an exploratory factor analysis to determine the key dimensions grounded in Cherokee perspectives. In the second stage, a confirmatory factor analysis is used to validate the internal coherence of these dimensions across a broader sample. The third stage, which is a longitudinal data collection method, spans six months and incorporates diverse community voices, elders, youth, planners, and cultural leaders. The expected outcomes include an empirically grounded ecovillage framework, consisting of core pillars and the practices that constitute the identified pillars. The framework is intended to support policy development, guide sustainable infrastructure planning, and revitalize traditional lifeways. Moreover, the framework provides a broader applicability for indigenous and rural communities that seek culturally anchored approaches to sustainability through the concept of ecovillages.
Citation: Hossein Nezakati, Mai Anh Vu Tran, Alireza Mohammadi, Imran Rautan. A preliminary study on developing a culturally grounded ecovillage framework for sustainable communities in the Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2025, 3(3): 195-204. doi: 10.3934/urs.2025009
This research aims to develop a holistic framework for ecovillage development tailored to the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma. Globally, ecovillages are gaining immense popularity as ideal models for sustainable living. Most existing models are shaped by middle- and upper-middle-class white people, thus limiting their relevance for Cherokee contexts, which are grounded in distinct traditions of land, governance, and mutual aid. Hence, this research addresses that gap by developing a holistic approach that represents Cherokee cultural values, governance traditions, and environmental ethics. A mixed-method design is employed, where the first stage of data collection consists of an exploratory factor analysis to determine the key dimensions grounded in Cherokee perspectives. In the second stage, a confirmatory factor analysis is used to validate the internal coherence of these dimensions across a broader sample. The third stage, which is a longitudinal data collection method, spans six months and incorporates diverse community voices, elders, youth, planners, and cultural leaders. The expected outcomes include an empirically grounded ecovillage framework, consisting of core pillars and the practices that constitute the identified pillars. The framework is intended to support policy development, guide sustainable infrastructure planning, and revitalize traditional lifeways. Moreover, the framework provides a broader applicability for indigenous and rural communities that seek culturally anchored approaches to sustainability through the concept of ecovillages.
| [1] |
Pickerill J, Chitewere T, Cornea N, et al. (2024) Urban ecological futures: Five eco-community strategies for more sustainable and equitable cities. Int J Urban Reg Res 48: 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13209 doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.13209
|
| [2] |
Monteith H, Checholik C, Galloway T, et al. (2024) Infant feeding experiences among Indigenous communities in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa: A scoping review of the qualitative literature. BMC Public Health 24: 1583. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19060-1 doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19060-1
|
| [3] |
Reyes-García V, García-Del-Amo D, Porcuna-Ferrer A, et al. (2024) Local studies provide a global perspective of the impacts of climate change on Indigenous Peoples and local communities. Sustain Earth Rev 7: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-023-00063-6 doi: 10.1186/s42055-023-00063-6
|
| [4] |
Gausset Q, Jensen PD (2024) Living sustainably in a Danish eco-community: How social and physical infrastructures affect carbon footprints. NPJ Clim Action 3: 33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00113-5 doi: 10.1038/s44168-024-00113-5
|
| [5] | United Nations (2024) Ecovillage initiative for achieving the SDGs. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/ecovillage-initiative-achieving-sdgs. |
| [6] |
Tres GS, de Souza WJ, de Moura Ferraz J (2023) Communal labor in ecovillages: Contradictions, impasses, and possibilities within the notion of self-sufficiency. Voluntas 34: 922–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00537-9 doi: 10.1007/s11266-022-00537-9
|
| [7] |
Magnusson D (2018) Going back to the roots: The fourth generation of Swedish eco-villages. Scott Geogr J 134: 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2018.1465199 doi: 10.1080/14702541.2018.1465199
|
| [8] |
Saadi S, Antoni JP, Karimzadeh H, et al. (2022) Determining the proportions of the ecovillage based on the resident's preferences in relation to the geographical location in France. Sustain Cities Soc 87: 104226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104226 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104226
|
| [9] | Stremlau R (2011) Sustaining the Cherokee Family: Kinship and the Allotment of an Indigenous Nation, University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/9780807869109_stremlau |
| [10] |
Farkas J (2017) 'Very little heroes' history and roots of the eco-village movement. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 62: 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1556/022.2017.62.1.4 doi: 10.1556/022.2017.62.1.4
|
| [11] | Gilman R, Gilman D (1991) Ecovillages and Sustainable Communities: A Report for Gaia Trust, Context Institute. |
| [12] | Global Ecovillage Network (2025) Concepts. Available from: https://ecovillage.org/about/about-gen/concepts/. |
| [13] |
Koduvayur Venkitaraman A, Joshi N (2022) A critical examination of a community-led ecovillage initiative: A case of Auroville, India. Clim Action 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00016-3 doi: 10.1007/s44168-022-00016-3
|
| [14] | Global Ecovillage Network (2024) Eco-fest 2025: Cultivating hope, community and resilience in the Sahel. Available from: https://ecovillage.org/. |
| [15] | Rojas-Jimenez HH (2024) Experimental Center EL Remanso ECER in Choachi-Colombia. A laboratory eco-village to learn and co-build a circular learning. Circ Econ Sustain 5: 2593–2608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00454-7 |
| [16] |
Pel B, Wittmayer JM, Avelino F, et al. (2022) Paradoxes of transformative social innovation: From critical awareness towards strategies of inquiry. Novation-Crit Stud Innovation 2022: 35–62. https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91113 doi: 10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91113
|
| [17] | Haxeltine A, Avelino F, Pel B, et al. (2016) A framework for transformative social innovation (TRANSIT working paper). |
| [18] |
Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ (2024) Determining sample size requirements in EFA solutions: A simple empirical proposal. Multivar Behav Res 59: 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2024.2342324 doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2342324
|
| [19] |
Hair Jr JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C (2020) Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res 109: 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
|
| [20] |
Lewis TF (2017) Evidence regarding the internal structure: Confirmatory factor analysis. Meas Eval Couns Dev 50: 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336929 doi: 10.1080/07481756.2017.1336929
|
| [21] |
Wittmayer JM, Backhaus J, Avelino F, et al. (2019) Narratives of change: How social innovation initiatives construct societal transformation. Futures 112: 102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.005
|