Review Special Issues

Use of beneficial bacterial endophytes: A practical strategy to achieve sustainable agriculture

  • Beneficial endophytic bacteria influence their host plant to grow and resist pathogens. Despite the advantages of endophytic bacteria to their host, their application in agriculture has been low. Furthermore, many plant growers improperly use synthetic chemicals due to having no or little knowledge of the role of endophytic bacteria in plant growth, the prevention and control of pathogens and poor access to endobacterial bioproducts. These synthetic chemicals have caused soil infertility, environmental contamination, disruption to ecological cycles and the emergence of resistant pests and pathogens. There is more that needs to be done to explore alternative ways of achieving sustainable plant production while maintaining environmental health. In recent years, the use of beneficial endophytic bacteria has been noted to be a promising tool in promoting plant growth and the biocontrol of pathogens. Therefore, this review discusses the roles of endophytic bacteria in plant growth and the biocontrol of plant pathogens. Several mechanisms that endophytic bacteria use to alleviate plant biotic and abiotic stresses by helping their host plants acquire nutrients, enhance plant growth and development and suppress pathogens are explained. The review also indicates that there is a gap between research and general field applications of endophytic bacteria and suggests a need for collaborative efforts between growers at all levels. Furthermore, the presence of scientific and regulatory frameworks that promote advanced biotechnological tools and bioinoculants represents major opportunities in the applications of endophytic bacteria. The review provides a basis for future research in areas related to understanding the interactions between plants and beneficial endophytic microorganisms, especially bacteria.

    Citation: Rudoviko Galileya Medison, Litao Tan, Milca Banda Medison, Kenani Edward Chiwina. Use of beneficial bacterial endophytes: A practical strategy to achieve sustainable agriculture[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(4): 624-643. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022040

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yulduzkhon Abdullaeva, Gulsanam Mardonova, Farkhod Eshboev, Massimiliano Cardinale, Dilfuza Egamberdieva . Harnessing chickpea bacterial endophytes for improved plant health and fitness. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(3): 489-506. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024024
    [2] Ananya Mukherjee, Puja Bhattacharjee, Rituparna Das, Arundhati Pal, Amal K. Paul . Endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting abilities from Ophioglossum reticulatum L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 596-612. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.596
    [3] Hemant Sharma, Arun Kumar Rai, Divakar Dahiya, Rajen Chettri, Poonam Singh Nigam . Exploring endophytes for in vitro synthesis of bioactive compounds similar to metabolites produced in vivo by host plants. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(2): 175-199. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021012
    [4] Shubhra Singh, Douglas J. H. Shyu . Perspective on utilization of Bacillus species as plant probiotics for different crops in adverse conditions. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 220-238. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024011
    [5] Vyacheslav Shurigin, Burak Alaylar, Kakhramon Davranov, Stephan Wirth, Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath-Kimura, Dilfuza Egamberdieva . Diversity and biological activity of culturable endophytic bacteria associated with marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(3): 336-353. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021021
    [6] Elisa Gamalero, Bernard R. Glick . Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(2): 415-448. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024021
    [7] Esther Menendez, Paula Garcia-Fraile . Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 502-524. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.502
    [8] Monyck Jeane dos Santos Lopes, Aline Figueiredo Cardoso, Moacyr Bernardino Dias-Filho, Ely Simone Cajueiro Gurgel, Gisele Barata da Silva . Brazilian Amazonian microorganisms: A sustainable alternative for plant development. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 150-166. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025008
    [9] Alexandra Díez-Méndez, Raul Rivas . Improvement of saffron production using Curtobacterium herbarum as a bioinoculant under greenhouse conditions. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 354-364. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.354
    [10] Gulsanam Mardonova, Vyacheslav Shurigin, Farkhod Eshboev, Dilfuza Egamberdieva . Potential plant benefits of endophytic microorganisms associated with halophyte Glycyrrhiza glabra L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(4): 859-879. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024037
  • Beneficial endophytic bacteria influence their host plant to grow and resist pathogens. Despite the advantages of endophytic bacteria to their host, their application in agriculture has been low. Furthermore, many plant growers improperly use synthetic chemicals due to having no or little knowledge of the role of endophytic bacteria in plant growth, the prevention and control of pathogens and poor access to endobacterial bioproducts. These synthetic chemicals have caused soil infertility, environmental contamination, disruption to ecological cycles and the emergence of resistant pests and pathogens. There is more that needs to be done to explore alternative ways of achieving sustainable plant production while maintaining environmental health. In recent years, the use of beneficial endophytic bacteria has been noted to be a promising tool in promoting plant growth and the biocontrol of pathogens. Therefore, this review discusses the roles of endophytic bacteria in plant growth and the biocontrol of plant pathogens. Several mechanisms that endophytic bacteria use to alleviate plant biotic and abiotic stresses by helping their host plants acquire nutrients, enhance plant growth and development and suppress pathogens are explained. The review also indicates that there is a gap between research and general field applications of endophytic bacteria and suggests a need for collaborative efforts between growers at all levels. Furthermore, the presence of scientific and regulatory frameworks that promote advanced biotechnological tools and bioinoculants represents major opportunities in the applications of endophytic bacteria. The review provides a basis for future research in areas related to understanding the interactions between plants and beneficial endophytic microorganisms, especially bacteria.



    Recently, there have been studies that focus on the use of microorganisms to enhance nutrition element availability in the soil and control plant disease without the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides or herbicides. One of the typical microorganisms that have the potential to promote plant growth and protection from pathogens is a group of beneficial bacterial communities known as endophytes that are harbored in plant organs such as roots, leaves, stems shoots and flowers [1][3]. Research has shown that some bacterial endophytes also colonize agronomic crops and play a role in providing and enhancing nutrient availability and biological control mechanisms against pathogens and insect pests [4],[5]. Endophytic bacteria are not limited to a single function, but have multiple plant growth-promoting and biocontrol traits that can be released simultaneously [6]. For example, endophytic Paenibacillus polymyxa was able to fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphorous, synthesize phytohormones and display biocontrol properties against pathogenic fungi [7].

    Endophytic bacteria use various physical, molecular and biochemical mechanisms to perform and display various growth and biocontrol traits [8],[9]. The ability to exhibit most of the plant growth-promoting and biological control traits qualifies the specific endophytic bacteria to be a reliable agent in plant growth, reproduction and protection; therefore, such bacteria can be researched further and formulated for commercial purposes [10],[11]. Most of the beneficial endophytic bacteria absorb very important organic acid-metal complexes such as copper, iron, zinc and magnesium. The penetration of endophytic bacteria into the plant roots allows plants to extract these metals from the microbes [12]. On the other hand, inoculating plants with endophytic bacteria could inhibit disease symptoms initiated by disease-causing organisms such as insects, nematodes, fungi bacteria and viruses [13],[14].

    There have been few applications and formulations of endophytic bacteria in agriculture. Furthermore, many growers continue with the heavy use of synthetic chemicals because of a poor understanding of the roles of endophytic bacteria in plant growth promotion and plant health improvement. There is also a perspective that most of the microbes are pathogenic to plants. These challenges show that there is still a gap between the research and the normal use of endophytic bacteria and their products by farmers. Therefore, this paper is aimed to review the progress in the research on the major roles played by endophytic bacteria in alleviating biotic and abiotic plant stresses, increasing plant growth and yield performance and biologically controlling major plant pathogens. The review will provide opportunities, gaps in the bacterial endophytes research and the way forward to fully utilize these untapped microorganisms. Based on our knowledge, this review will provide a basis for future research areas dedicated to understanding the interactions between plants and their endo-microbes.

    Recently, there have been many studies about nitrogen-fixing bacteria focusing on applying the same concept of symbiotic associations that occur in legumes to non-leguminous plants such as maize, sorghum wheat and sugarcane [15]. Moreover, even those plants under various environmental stress can benefit from the biologically fixed nitrogen by endobacteria. The efficiency of nitrogen fixation by other endophytes cannot surpass that fixed by the Rhizobium sp. bacteria in leguminous plants [16]. However, this nitrogen is of paramount importance, especially in host plants that grow in limited nitrogen soils, as has already been proved by many researchers. Recently, nitrogen-fixing diazotroph bacteria (Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus) have been isolated from the tissues of the sugarcane plants. This bacterium was able to grow and fix nitrogen, thus causing postulation that these bacteria can satisfy the nitrogen requirements of its host plant [17],[18].

    Phosphate is the precursor for the synthesis of various enzymes responsible for various plant physiological processes, in addition to aiding plant disease resistance [19]. To be changed into an accessible soluble form, organic and inorganic phosphates need to undergo processes of solubilization and mineralization with the aid of bacterial enzymes known as phosphatases that are controlled by the presence of genes [20]. During phosphate solubilization by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, chelators that are organic acids are produced and help to displace metals [21]. Research has indicated that more than 20 copies of genes responsible for phosphate solubilization were found in the non-phototrophic endobacteria metagenome. Endophytic bacteria that solubilize phosphate into an accessible form help their host organisms to grow and survive even in poor environmental conditions and improve growth and yield performance even when inoculated in crop plants [2],[22]. By contributing the major nutrition elements to plants, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria contribute more to the functions, diversity and ecology of plants in the ecosystems. However, there is a need to explore more of the endophytic phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, from the molecular level to their practical applications, as they are very crucial in sustainable agriculture and environmental protection, and very little research has been done to date.

    Most of the potassium-solubilizing bacteria lives in the soil [23]. However, some endophytic bacteria are reported to have the ability to solubilize the unavailable potassium into accessible forms. As a result, endophytic bacteria have attracted attention in agriculture for soil root inoculation because of their capacity to penetrate and colonize root interiors [24]. Potassium-solubilizing endophytic bacteria work by synthesizing and discharging organic acids such as oxalic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid and gluconic acid. These acids break the insoluble minerals from various minerals mentioned previously to release accessible soluble potassium [25],[26]. Potassium-solubilizing endophytic bacteria have also been reported to alleviate other environmental stresses, such as salt stresses, and improve production in general [27],[28]. Unfortunately, most of the endophytes that have been isolated and evaluated were targeted for the evaluation of other growth promotion traits such as nitrogen and indole-3-acetic acid, leaving out the role that potassium plays in plant growth and protection.

    Under iron-limiting conditions, some bacteria release low molecular weight iron-chelating molecules called siderophores that exist in various varieties [29]. Siderophores are described as useful peptide chains and functional groups that allow iron ions to bind [30]. Siderophores have been demonstrated to be the source of iron for plant nutrition. Siderophore-producing bacteria have mechanisms that facilitate the availability of iron in very iron-limiting environments. These bacteria strains have outer membrane proteins on their cell surface that transport iron complexes, making the iron available for metabolic processes. Siderophores have a high affinity for iron and bind Fe3+, which is later assimilated by root hairs [31]. Many researchers report both the nutrition and biocontrol significance of siderophores; therefore, the provision of this important endophytic bacteria trait in plant growth and protection cannot be undermined. Siderophore produced by Streptomyces spp., an endophyte from the roots of a Thai jasmine rice plant, remarkably promoted plant growth and improved root and shoot length and overall yield [32].

    Zinc is one of the important trace elements needed by plants and other living things. It influences metabolism and enzymatic activities in plants, although it is a trace element. As a result, the absence of zinc elements in plants is easily noticed from the perspective of the field to the products of crops that lacked zinc elements. Some of the bacterial zinc solubilizers include Gluconacetobacter, Bacillus, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas [33]. Zinc-solubilizing bacteria provide a sustainable and healthy alternative for supplying and converting applied inorganic zinc into a form that can be accessed by plant roots [34]. The inoculation of zinc-solubilizing bacteria has been reported to promote plant growth and yield performance, as well as to improve the nutrition value of maize and rice as part of bio-inoculants for biofortification [35],[36]. Zinc-solubilizing endophytic bacteria Pseudomonas sp. MN12 were used in combination with other zinc-supplying materials and proved to improve the grain biofortification of wheat [37]. Endophytic bacteria isolated from soybean and summer mungbean were able to solubilize zinc, and researchers have found that Klebsiella spp. and Pseudomonas spp. produced other plant growth-promoting components such as phosphate and indole-3-acetic acid [38]. With these few given examples, zinc-solubilizing endophytic bacteria require more attention in research and practical applications to improve the plant growth of the most important crops and enhance their nutritive value such that the end will ensure food and nutrition security, as well as environmental protection.

    The use of plant growth regulators from beneficial microorganisms is one promising strategy to enhance plant growth under normal or stressful conditions [39]. The most notable plant growth-promoting hormones that can be synthesized by bacteria include indole-3-acetic acid, zeatin, abscisic acid, cytokinins and gibberellic acids and ethylene [40]. Indole-3-acetic acid is one of the mechanisms which bacteria use to interact with plants, signaling molecules in bacteria and influencing plant growth and development [41]. Indole-3-acetic acid produced by endophytic bacteria has also been reported as a plant defense mechanism against pathogens that would otherwise cause diseases in plants [42]. Gibberellic acid produced by Azospirillum spp., an endophyte, was found to contribute to alleviating drought stress and enhancing plant growth in maize (Zea mays. L) [43]. While gibberellic acids are known to improve plant growth and development, some researchers have reported that the hormone has some root growth-inhibiting influence through the gibberellic DELLA-repressing signaling system [44]. However, sufficient synthesis and production of gibberellic acids in bacteria has major advantages, in terms of plant growth and development, over the growth inhibitory influence that this hormone can display [45].

    Table 1.  Examples of some of the endophytic bacteria that have so far been isolated, identified and evaluated for their plant growth promotion and biocontrol effects.
    Role Bacteria references
    Nitrogen fixation Pseudomonas spp., Herbiconiux solani SS3, Flavobacterium aquidurense SN2r, Rhizobium herbae SR2r., Paenibacillus polymyxa P2b-2R, Pseudomonas protegens CHA0-retS-nif [46][49]
    Phosphorous solubilization Pseudomonas spp. Burkholderia spp, Paraburkhoderia, Novosphingobium, Ochrobactrum, Paenibacillus polymyxa, Bacillus sp., Rahnella Pantoea vagans MZ519966, Pantoea agglomerans MZ519970, Pseudomonas aeruginosa KUPSB12 [50][54]
    Potassium solubilization Paenibacillus polymyxa, Bacillus sp., Burkholderia sp. FDN2-1, Alcaligenes spp., Enterobacter spp. [24],[51],[55]
    Zinc solubilization Bacillus spp., Arthrobacter sp., Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp. [38],[56][58]
    Hormones (indole-3-acetic acid jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, gibberellins, ethylene) Klebsiella sp., Enterobacter sp., Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1; Bacillus sp. PVL1, Bacillus sp. DLMB, Bacillus sp. MBL_B17, Bacillus subtilis MBL_B13, Leifsonia xyli SE134, Bacillus subtilis LK14, [59][66]
    Siderophores and competition for nutrition and space Bradyrhizobium sp.(vigna), Pseudomonas tolaasii ACC23, Mycobacterium ACC14 Pseudomonas fluorescens G10, Mycobacterium sp. G16, Methylobacterium spp., Xanthomonas spp. [16],[67][70]
    Induced Systemic Resistance Parabukholderia sp. Pseudomonas sp, Burkhoderia phytofirman PsJN [71][74]
    Lytic Enzymes {chitinases, proteases, cellulases, hemicellulases, 1, 3-glucanases; pectinases, Serratia proteamaculans 33x, Bacillus pumilis JK-SX001, Paenibacillus polymyxa GS20, Bacillus sp. GS07 [75][77]
    Antibiotics (Bacillomycin 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, fencing, cyclic lipopeptides (surfactin, iturin), and pyocyanin} Bacillus subtilis fmbj, Bacillus subtilis CPA-8, Bacillus subtilis AU195 [73],[78][80]
    Volatile Organic Compounds (2,3-butanediol, acetoin, 2-Hexanone, sulfur-containing compounds, 2-Heptonone, 3-methybutan-1-ol, Dodacanal, 3-methylbutanoic acid, and 2-methylbutanoic acid, 3-Methylbutan-1-ol) Bacillus amylolicefaciens ALB629 and UFLA285, Enterobacter TR1, Bacillus spp. Bacillus Velenzensis 5YN8, Bacillus Velenzensis DSN012 [81][83]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Endophytic bacteria are reported as suitable biocontrol agents owing to their ability to be sustainably transferred to the next generation [13],[84],[85]. The other advantage of endophytic bacteria in biocontrol is that they do not compete with plants for space and nutrition, but contribute to and improve the health of their host plants [86],[87]. Some of the endophytic bacteria with biocontrol properties have well been documented in a previous review [88]. Endophytic bacteria of genera Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Bacillus and Curtobacterium [89],[90] are the best representatives that are used in the biocontrol of plant pathogens and diseases. Usually, after their isolation from the host plant, endophytes are tested by performing dual plate assays and a genetic screening approach [90],[91]. Bacillus spp. have been reported to be good biocontrol agents because of their ability to synthesize a wide range of biologically active molecules that are potent inhibitors of plant pathogens. Some seed associated endophytic bacteria, i.e., Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus velezensis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Lactococcus lactis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, were all used to treat bacterial wilt of tomato, and all isolates were able to exhibit biocontrol properties [92]. Other associated bacterial endophytes have been noted to produce secondary metabolites [93] that might play a role in the biocontrol of plant pathogens. Moreover, Bacillus velezensis 8-4 was found to inhibit potato fungal pathogens such as S. galilaeus, Phoma foveat, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium avenaceum and Colletotrichum coccodes in both in vitro and field experiments [94]. These are just a few examples; however, endophytic bacteria have been used in many applications to control the introduction and growth of notable plant pathogens [95].

    Endophytic bacteria have several mechanisms to inhibit and control the growth of plant pathogens, which some researchers have documented [96],[97]. Most notable is the presence of genes responsible for particular biocontrol traits such as antibacterial and antifungal metabolites that have been identified in the whole genomes of some endophytic bacteria [98][100] Some endophytic bacteria help their host to develop induced systemic resistance (ISR) that comes when plants successfully activate their defense mechanism in response to primary infection by a pathogen [84]. The production of siderophores and antimicrobial compounds as a form of mechanism for biocontrol has so far been well documented in various research manuscripts [101]. Therefore, endophytic bacteria isolates can be commercially formulated into biopesticides to help protect plants while ensuring a healthy environment [102] Some of the mechanisms have briefly been described as researched in the past few years.

    During the primary infection by pathogens, most plants develop and activate various defense mechanisms. Furthermore, plants interact with endophytic bacteria and activate plant resistance against pathogens such as bacteria, fungi and viruses. This type of resistance is known as ISR. The ability of beneficial microbes such as endophytic bacteria to initiate ISR is host-specific and requires full colonization of a type of bacteria to their host plant [103]. The endophytic traits such as the production of volatile compounds, bacterial flagellation and the production of lipopolysaccharides and highly sensitive hormones all determine the development of ISR in plants [104].

    The pathogenesis-related genes and the jasmonic/ethylene-dependent genes induce systemic resistance which is triggered by endophytic and other plant growth-promoting bacteria [73],[105],[106]. Under normal circumstances, the endophytic bacteria in plants trigger a very minimal level of systemic acquired resistance as compared with the moment that a pathogen has been introduced. Once the pathogen has been encountered, plants with endophytes exhibit a high level of systemic acquired resistance and jasmonate and ethylene genes are overexpressed, hence triggering biocontrol mechanisms. Endophytic bacteria have an advantage in that they induce both the systemic acquired resistance and jasmonic/ethylene-dependent ISR that helps plants to simultaneously resist bacterial and fungal pathogens such as Pectobacterium carotovorum and Fusarium oxysporum [107].

    Endophytic bacteria alleviate the adverse and detrimental effects of plant pathogens by actively inducing the resistance mechanisms in plants. It includes the activation of idle and latent defense mechanisms when the pathogenic stimuli are sensed; usually, this process is controlled by the complex networks of signaling pathways [72], [108]. For example, B subtilis GBO3 and B. amyloquefaciens IN937a produced volatile compounds that trigger the ISR against Erwinia carotovora; the research gave proof that the signaling pathway that was activated by the volatile compound from B. subtilis GBO3 is dependent on the ethylene and independent from salicylic and/or jasmonic acid signaling pathways [109], thus giving the difference between systematic acquired resistance and ISR [110]. As part of the mechanism to trigger ISR defense, endophytic bacteria may cause the cell wall of plant cells to strengthen upon the introduction of a pathogen, thus providing a barrier for pathogens. Endophytic bacteria may also modify the physiology and alter metabolic processes in plants that will result in the improved synthesis of plant defense secretions [111][113].

    While siderophores have been characterized to provide iron nutrition to plants, there is enough evidence that siderophores help to control the plant root pathogens by outcompeting them on limited available iron nutrition elements [104]. As described before, bacterial endophytes produce siderophores that have a strong appetite for iron elements in the rhizosphere. Competition for iron ions is one way in which biocontrol endophytic bacteria use against pathogenic fungi [114]. Siderophores bind the Fe+3, rendering it unavailable to the fungal pathogens that produce siderophores with less affinity for iron nutrition [104],[115]. During limited iron nutrition, root endophytic bacteria may produce siderophores that enable plant roots to make full use of the little available iron nutrition element. This makes the harmful microbes such as pathogenic fungi starve and inhibits them from causing harm to plant hosts. In summary, the production of siderophores prevents the introduction of pathogens to plants and limits their growth by outcompeting them for iron and other nutrition elements in a given ecological substrate [116].

    In plants, antibiotics function as antifungal, antiviral, phytotoxic antioxidant, antitoxic and antihelminthic compounds against specific pathogens. Endophytic bacteria are known to be good sources of antibiotics [117]. Usually, there must be at least one antibiotic biosynthesis-related gene that would facilitate the ability of a particular endophytic bacteria to synthesize antibiotics [118],[119]. For example, streptomyces NRR 3052, an endophyte isolated from the medicinal plant Kennedia nigriscans produced high-activity munumbicin antibiotics that act as plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi [120]. The ability to produce very active antibiotics by the endophytic bacteria provides a cheap source of biocontrol agents for sustainable agricultural production and environmental management.

    Volatile organic compounds are signaling substances that intermediate the interaction between a plant and microbes. Volatile organic compounds are very important, as they help in the inhibition of plant-pathogen growth and induce systematic resistance in a host plant [116],[121]. Like other bacteria, endophytic bacteria may produce volatile organic compounds such as 2,3-butanediol, acetoin, 2-hexanone, sulfur-containing compounds, 2-heptonone, 3-methybutan-1-ol and dodacanal. These volatile organic compounds are formed during the metabolism of bacteria, and in the presence of stimuli that influence the internal and external conditions of the bacteria [122]. The availability of specific genes in the genomes, such as the presence of secondary metabolite-encoding genes and other proteins that are involved in the lysis of pathogenic microorganisms, determines the synthesis and secretions of volatile organic compounds [123],[124]. Endophytic bacteria that can produce volatile compounds are vital, as they enhance and improve the immunity of their host plants and would be formulated for the production of biopesticides that are environmentally healthy. For example, the tomato endophytic bacteria B. proteolyticus, E. asburiae, E. cloacea, B. thuringiensis, B. nakamurai and B. pseudomycoides produce bioactive compounds that facilitate the inhibition of Botrytis cinerea, a fungal pathogen for fresh fruits and vegetables [82]. Bacillus amylolicefaciens ALB629 and UFLA285 were found to secrete 3-methylbutanoic acid and 2-methylbutanoic acid, which have been suggested to have inhibited the development of anthracnose disease (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) by inhibiting fungal mycelial growth and spores in Phaseolus vulgaris L. (common bean) [81].

    The most notable enzymes produced by the endophytic bacteria are β-1,3-glucanases, protease, cellulase, extracellular chitinase and laminarinase [125][127]. Production and the whole process of regulating the lytic enzymes involve the GacA/GacS or GrrA/GrrS regulatory systems and colony phase variation [104]. Enzymes lyse fungal hyphal tips and degrade any acids that might be produced by fungal pathogens [128]. Enzymes help bacteria to act as parasites for fungal pathogens and sometimes even break their spores and reduce germination [129],[130]. For example, Bacillus pumilis JK-SX001 is reported to secrete extracellular cellulase and protease enzymes which inhibit pathogenic fungi such as Phomopsis macrospora, Cytospora chrysosperma and Fusicoccum aesculi [76]. In another study, root endophytes Pseudomonas poae JA01, Bacillus sp. GS07 and Paenibacillus polymyxa GS01 were found to exhibit cellulolytic enzyme activity that aids in inhibiting the growth of fungal pathogens such as P. ultimum, F. oxysporum, P. capsica and R. solani, which cause notable diseases [77]. Endophytic bacteria P. aeruginosa and Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes were demonstrated to secrete β-1,3-glucanase and catalase in paddy and assist in the development of preformed defense against pathogenic fungi Pyricularia grisea that cause fungal blast [131]. The presence of endophytic bacteria in a host has also been reported to induce defense genes that encode for catalase, β-1,3-glucanase and other defense proteins in a host plant [132]. Therefore, endophytic bacteria that secrete defensive enzymes contribute to the innate immunity that is based on the preformed and induced defense responses [133].

    Figure 1.  Summary of roles of endophytic bacteria in promoting plant growth and the biological control of plant pathogens.

    Recently, due to rapid population growth, industrialization and intensive agriculture being on the rise, many plant growers have chosen to apply synthetic fertilizers and pesticides excessively to generate high yields and incur more profits at the expense of human, animal and environmental health. Given the foregoing, more interventions that are free from synthetic chemicals are needed. To achieve this, one way is through the use of beneficial microorganisms harbored by plants. To date, many plants that inhabit beneficial bacteria communities are yet to be explored, thus presenting a gap that needs to be closed for the functions and applications of endophytes to be utilized. Therefore, more research efforts are needed to explore and increase the use of endophytic microorganism communities that have the potential to be alternatively used in agriculture and environmental protection.

    Endophytic bacteria are an attractive source of nutrition elements to be used as an alternative to chemical fertilizers. However, several gaps in research and utilization still exist. For example, many research studies have shown that endophytic bacteria fix atmospheric nitrogen gas into a usable form by plants. However, not so many studies have been done on the other two major nutrients, which are phosphorous and potassium. Endophytic bacteria solubilize trace elements such as iron and zinc. However, their ability to solubilize and make other crucial minor elements (e.g., manganese and molybdenum) available for plant utilization has not been made clear or fully utilized. While it is not deniable that much of the research has been concentrated on the ability of endophytes to synthesize and produce indole-3-acetic acid, further research needs to be focused on other hormones, such as zeatin, abscisic acids and gibberellic acids, as very few data are available on the ability of endophytic bacteria to produce these crucial plant growth regulators or their influence on plant growth and development. Therefore, efforts to research individual endophytic bacterial traits will aid in the development of more bioproducts than those presently available for growers. Bioformulations, as has been reported by other researchers, are “easy to deliver, able to enhance plant growth and stress resistance, increase plant biomass and yield and open the way for technological exploitation and marketing” [134].

    Several of the important biocontrol traits that endophytic bacteria have are yet to be thoroughly discovered, explored or documented. In addition, several experiments show that most researchers use the dual culture method to screen the antagonistic ability of biocontrol bacterial agents. However, this method can result in the slow discovery of new biocontrol agents that can inhibit the growth of plant pathogens without showing any inhibitory effect in dual plate culture. Furthermore, the ability of endophytic bacteria to control novel plant pathogens is not known. In addition, the commercialization of biocontrol products has been very slow and limited, and it requires much attention to fully understand both the basic and advanced applications of endophytic biocontrol traits [135]. There has also been a lack of field results to demonstrate the important effectiveness of biocontrol bacteria and, as a result, there has been limited development of bioformulations of these bacteria into biopesticides. For example, the utilization of Streptomyces bacteria for biocontrol has been minimal as compared to the potential and ability to exhibit biocontrol properties that affect various plant pathogens [136]. Based on these challenges, thorough research needs to be conducted on the individual antibiotics, lytic enzymes and volatile compounds in terms of their synthesis and mechanism of action against plant pathogens. In addition, full utilization of the knowledge and the use of omics technological tools and other molecular biology-related studies, such as genomics, epigenetics, metabolomics and proteomics, would help to discover and understand the whole concept of biocontrol agents and their applications in agriculture and plant protection.

    Interactions between plants and microorganisms have major influences on the environment. Of importance is the interaction between plants and their bacterial endophytes. Endophytic bacteria become part of the plant and help their hosts to overcome abiotic stresses by ensuring nutrition uptake, fixing nitrogen and solubilizing phosphates, potassium, zinc and other important trace nutrition elements. In addition, endophytes synthesize and control plant hormones such as indole-3-acetic acids, ethylene, zeatin, abscisic acids and gibberellic acids. Many bacterial endophytes can exhibit biocontrol traits that would become valuable products, including siderophores, antibiotics, volatile organic compounds and lytic enzymes. There are many opportunities to explore both already identified and unidentified endophytic bacteria to maximize their applicability in plant growth and protection. Many of the bacterial endophytes and their secretion could be commercially formulated for use on a wider scale. Finally, the existing gaps identified could be closed by furthering research on endophytes, ensuring efficient collaborations between researchers and growers and making use of our knowledge of omics and other biotechnological tools. In conclusion, endophytic bacteria represent a set of untapped agents that have the potential to replace the overuse of synthetic chemicals and enhance plant health and productivity.



    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

    Authors' contributions



    RGM provided concept and designed the work, RGM, LT, and MBM were involved in literature review and wrote the manuscript. RMG and KEC revised, edit and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Funding options



    The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

    [1] Parniske M (2018) Uptake of bacteria into living plant cells, the unifying and distinct feature of the nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 44: 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.016
    [2] Eid AM, Salim SS, Hassan SED, et al. (2019) Role of endophytes in plant health and abiotic stress management. Microbiome Plant Heal Dis 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8495-0_6
    [3] Lin H, Liu C, Peng Z, et al. (2022) Distribution pattern of endophytic bacteria and fungi in tea plants. Front Microbiol 13: 872034. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.872034
    [4] Rani L, Pandey RK, Kumar V (2018) Isolation and screening of P-Solubilising endophytic diazotropic bacteria from ethno-medicinal indigenous rice of Jharkhand. Int J Biotechnol Res 5: 1-10.
    [5] Tufail MA, Ayyub M, Irfan M, et al. (2022) Endophytic bacteria perform better than endophytic fungi in improving plant growth under drought stress: A meta-comparison spanning 12 years ( 2010 – 2021 ). Physiol Plant 22: e13806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13806
    [6] Wang S, Ji B, Su X, et al. (2020) Isolation of endophytic bacteria from Rehmannia glutinosa libosch and their potential to promote plant growth. J Gen Appl Microbiol 66: 279-288. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2019.12.001
    [7] Khan MS, Gao J, Chen X, et al. (2020) Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa SK1 from Lilium lancifolium. Biomed Res Int 2020: 8650957. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8650957
    [8] Ali S, Isaacson J, Kroner Y, et al. (2018) Corn sap bacterial endophytes and their potential in plant growth-promotion. Environ Sustain 1: 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-00030-4
    [9] Dudeja SS, Suneja-Madan P, Paul M, et al. (2021) Bacterial endophytes: molecular interactions with their hosts. J Basic Microbiol 61: 475-505. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202000657
    [10] Patle P, Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth M, Navnage IN, et al. (2018) Endophytes in plant system: roles in growth promotion, mechanism and their potentiality in achieving agriculture sustainability. Int J Chem Stud 6: 270-274.
    [11] Chen S, Qin R, Yang D, et al. (2022) A comparison of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria in early and late-maturing pumpkin varieties. Microorganisms 10: 1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081667
    [12] White JF, Kingsley KL, Zhang Q, et al. (2019) Review: endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. Pest Manag Sci 75: 2558-2565. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5527
    [13] Hong CE, Park JM (2016) Endophytic bacteria as biocontrol agents against plant pathogens: current state-of-the-art. Plant Biotechnol Rep 10: 353-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-016-0423-6
    [14] Tavarideh F, Pourahmad F, Nemati M (2022) Diversity and antibacterial activity of endophytic bacteria associated with medicinal plant, Scrophularia striata. Vet Res Forum 13: 409-415. https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2021.529714.3174
    [15] de Carvalho EX, Menezes RSC, de Freitas ADS, et al. (2017) The 15N natural abundance technique to assess the potential of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in some important C4 grasses. Aust J Crop Sci 11: 1559-1564. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.17.11.12.pne729
    [16] Afzal I, Shinwari ZK, Sikandar S, et al. (2019) Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants. Microbiol Res 221: 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.02.001
    [17] Baldani JI, Reis VM, Videira SS, et al. (2014) The art of isolating nitrogen-fixing bacteria from non-leguminous plants using N-free semi-solid media: a practical guide for microbiologists. Plant Soil 384: 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2186-6
    [18] Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP (2018) Nitrogen-fixation by endophytic bacteria in agricultural crops: recent advances. Nitrogen in Agriculture - Updates : 73-94.
    [19] Thakur D, Kaushal R, Shyam V (2014) Phosphate solubilising microorganisms: role in phosphorus nutrition of crop plants-a review. Agric Rev 35: 159. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0741.2014.00903.9
    [20] Bashan Y, Kamnev AA, de-Bashan LE (2013) A proposal for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth. Biol Fertil Soils 49: 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0756-4
    [21] Singh YD, Singh MC (2020) Biotechnological aspects of mangrove microorganisms. Biotechnological Utilization of Mangrove Resources 381-398.
    [22] Sigurbjörnsdóttir MA, Andrésson ÓS, Vilhelmsson O (2015) Analysis of the peltigera membranacea metagenome indicates that lichen-associated bacteria are involved in phosphate solubilization. Microbiol (United Kingdom) 161: 989-996. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000069
    [23] Etesami H, Emami S, Alikhani HA (2017) Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects - a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17: 897-911. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017000400005
    [24] Yuan ZS, Liu F, Zhang GF (2015) Characteristics and biodiversity of endophytic phosphorus- and potassiumsolubilizing bacteria in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Acta Biol Hung 66: 449-459. https://doi.org/10.1556/018.66.2015.4.9
    [25] Kour D, Rana KL, Kaur T, et al. (2020) Potassium solubilizing and mobilizing microbes: biodiversity, mechanisms of solubilization, and biotechnological implication for alleviations of abiotic stress. Trends of Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture and Biomedicine Systems: Diversity and Functional Perspectives.Elsevier 177-202.
    [26] Xi J, Qian K, Shan L, et al. (2022) The potential of mineral weathering of halophilic‑endophytic bacteria isolated from Suaeda salsa and Spartina anglica. Arch Microbiol 204: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03129-9
    [27] Feng K, Cai Z, Ding T, et al. (2019) Effects of potassium-solubulizing and photosynthetic bacteria on tolerance to salt stress in maize. J Appl Microbiol 126: 1530-1540. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14220
    [28] Pirhadi M, Enayatizamir N, Motamedi H, et al. (2016) Screening of salt tolerant sugarcane endophytic bacteria with potassium and zinc for their solubilizing and antifungal activity. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun 9: 530-538. https://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/9.3/28
    [29] Velivelli SLS, Sessitsch A, Prestwich BD (2014) The role of microbial inoculants in integrated crop management systems. Potato Res 57: 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-014-9278-9
    [30] Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC (2016) Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Cogent Food Agric 2: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1127500
    [31] Sayyed RZ, Badgujar MD, Sonawane HM, et al. (2005) Production of microbial iron chelators (siderophores) by fluorescent Pseudomonads. Indian J Biotechnol 4: 484-490.
    [32] Rungin S, Indananda C, Suttiviriya P, et al. (2012) Plant growth enhancing effects by a siderophore-producing endophytic streptomycete isolated from a Thai jasmine rice. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 102: 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-012-9778-z
    [33] Saravanan VS, Madhaiyan M, Osborne J, et al. (2008) Ecological occurrence of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and nitrogen-fixing Acetobacteraceae members: their possible role in plant growth promotion. Microb Ecol 55: 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9258-6
    [34] Kamran S, Shahid I, Baig DN, et al. (2017) Contribution of zinc solubilizing bacteria in growth promotion and zinc content of wheat. Front Microbiol 8: 2593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02593
    [35] Mumtaz MZ, Ahmad M, Jamil M, et al. (2017) Zinc solubilizing Bacillus spp. potential candidates for biofortification in maize. Microbiol Res 202: 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.06.001
    [36] Vaid SK, Kumar B, Sharma A, et al. (2014) Effect of zinc solubilizing bacteria on growth promotion and zinc nutrition of rice. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14: 889-910. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-95162014005000071
    [37] Rehman A, Farooq M, Naveed M, et al. (2018) Seed priming of Zn with endophytic bacteria improves the productivity and grain biofortification of bread wheat. Eur J Agron 94: 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.017
    [38] Sharma P, Kumawat KCK, Kaur S, et al. (2011) Assessment of zinc solubilization by endophytic bacteria in legume rhizosphere. Indian J Appl Res 4: 439-441. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/june2014/137
    [39] Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ - Sci 26: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.001
    [40] Role T, Bacteria PP, Stress AS, et al. (2013) The role of phytohormone producing bacteria in alleviating salt stress in crop plants. Biotechnological Techniques of Stress Tolerance in Plants.Stadium Press LLC 21-39.
    [41] Hoffman MT, Gunatilaka MK, Wijeratne K, et al. (2013) Endohyphal bacterium enhances production of indole-3-acetic acid by a foliar fungal endophyte. PLoS One 8: 31-33. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073132
    [42] Zhou H, Ren ZH, Zu X, et al. (2021) Efficacy of plant growth-promoting bacteria Bacillus cereus YN917 for biocontrol of rice blast. Front Microbiol 12: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.684888
    [43] Cohen AC, Travaglia CN, Bottini R, et al. (2009) Participation of abscisic acid and gibberellins produced by endophytic Azospirillum in the alleviation of drought effects in maize. Botany 87: 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1139/B09-023
    [44] Nelson SK, Steber CM (2016) Gibberellin hormone signal perception: down-regulating DELLA repressors of plant growth and development. Annual Plant Reviews.Wiley.
    [45] Martínez C, Espinosa-Ruiz A, Prat S (2016) Gibberellins and plant vegetative growth. Annual Plant Reviews.Wiley 285-322.
    [46] Padda KP, Puri A, Chanway CP (2016) Effect of GFP tagging of Paenibacillus polymyxa P2b-2R on its ability to promote growth of canola and tomato seedlings. Biol Fertil Soils 52: 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1083-3
    [47] Padda KP, Puri A, Chanway C (2019) Endophytic nitrogen fixation - a possible “hidden” source of nitrogen for lodgepole pine trees growing at unreclaimed gravel mining sites. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz172
    [48] Wang M, Bian Z, Shi J, et al. (2020) Effect of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Pseudomonas protegens CHA0-ΔretS-nif on garlic growth under different field conditions. Ind Crops Prod 145: 111982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111982
    [49] Abd-Alla MH, Nafady NA, Bashandy SR, et al. (2019) Mitigation of effect of salt stress on the nodulation, nitrogen fixation and growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by triple microbial inoculation. Rhizosphere 10: 100148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2019.100148
    [50] Chen J, Zhao G, Wei Y, et al. (2021) Isolation and screening of multifunctional phosphate solubilizing bacteria and its growth-promoting effect on Chinese fir seedlings. Sci Rep 11: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88635-4
    [51] Abo-koura HA, Bishara MM, Saad MM (2019) Isolation and identification of N2 - fixing , phosphate and potassium solubilizing rhizobacteria and their effect on root colonization of wheat plant. Int J Microbiol Res 10: 62-76. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijmr.2019.62.76
    [52] Varga T, Hixson KK, Ahkami AH, et al. (2020) Endophyte-promoted phosphorus solubilization in Populus. Front Plant Sci 11: 567918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.567918
    [53] Mei C, Chretien RL, Amaradasa BS, et al. (2021) Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterial endophytes and plant growth promotion in vitro and in greenhouse. Microorganisms 9: 1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091935
    [54] Paul D, Sinha SN (2017) Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa KUPSB12 with antibacterial potential from river Ganga, India. Ann Agrar Sci 15: 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2016.10.001
    [55] Baghel V, Thakur JK, Yadav SS, et al. (2020) Phosphorus and potassium solubilization from rock minerals by endophytic Burkholderia sp. strain fdn2-1 in soil and shift in diversity of bacterial endophytes of corn root tissue with crop growth stage. Geomicrobiol J 37: 550-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2020.1734691
    [56] Kushwaha P, Kashyap PL, Srivastava AK, et al. (2020) Plant growth promoting and antifungal activity in endophytic Bacillus strains from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Brazilian J Microbiol 51: 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00172-5
    [57] Singh D, Geat N, Rajawat MVS, et al. (2018) Deciphering the mechanisms of endophyte-mediated biofortification of Fe and Zn in wheat. J Plant Growth Regul 37: 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-017-9716-4
    [58] Singh D, Rajawat MVS, Kaushik R, et al. (2017) Beneficial role of endophytes in biofortification of Zn in wheat genotypes varying in nutrient use efficiency grown in soils sufficient and deficient in Zn. Plant Soil 416: 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3189-x
    [59] Kang S-M, Waqas M, Hamayun M, et al. (2017) Gibberellins and indole-3-acetic acid producing rhizospheric bacterium Leifsonia xyli SE134 mitigates the adverse effects of copper-mediated stress on tomato. J Plant Interact 12: 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1370142
    [60] Dhungana SA, Itoh K (2019) Effects of co-inoculation of indole-3-acetic acid-producing and-degrading bacterial endophytes on plant growth. Horticulturae 5: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5010017
    [61] Shahzad R, Khan AL, Bilal S, et al. (2017) Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria versus pathogenic infections: An example of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. PeerJ 2017: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3107
    [62] Kang S, Bilal S, Shahzad R, et al. (2020) Effect of ammonia and indole-3-acetic acid producing endophytic Klebsiella pneumoniae YNA12 as a bio-herbicide for weed inhibition: special reference with evening primroses. Plants (Basel) 9: 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060761
    [63] Shah S, Chand K, Rekadwad B, et al. (2021) A prospectus of plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium from orchid (Vanda cristata). BMC Biotechnol 21: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-021-00676-9
    [64] Haidar B, Ferdous M, Fatema B, et al. (2018) Population diversity of bacterial endophytes from jute (Corchorus olitorius) and evaluation of their potential role as bioinoculants. Microbiol Res 208: 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.01.008
    [65] Khan AL, Halo BA, Elyassi A, et al. (2016) Indole acetic acid and ACC deaminase from endophytic bacteria improves the growth of Solanum lycopersicum. Electron J Biotechnol 21: 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.02.001
    [66] Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD (2008) Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol 16: 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008
    [67] Dell'Amico E, Cavalca L, Andreoni V (2008) Improvement of Brassica napus growth under cadmium stress by cadmium-resistant rhizobacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.024
    [68] Sheng XF, Xia JJ, Jiang CY, et al. (2008) Characterization of heavy metal-resistant endophytic bacteria from rape (Brassica napus) roots and their potential in promoting the growth and lead accumulation of rape. Environ Pollut 156: 1164-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.007
    [69] Wani PA, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2007) Effect of metal tolerant plant growth promoting Bradyrhizobium sp. (vigna) on growth, symbiosis, seed yield and metal uptake by greengram plants. Chemosphere 70: 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.028
    [70] Mcdonald IR, Murrell JC (1997) The methanol dehydrogenase structural gene mxaf and its use as a functional gene probe for methanotrophs and methylotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 3218-3224. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.8.3218-3224.1997
    [71] Fragner L, Kerou M, Schloter M, et al. (2020) The potato yam phyllosphere ectosymbiont Paraburkholderia sp. Msb3 is a potent growth promotor in tomato. Front Microbio 11: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00581
    [72] Pieterse CMJ, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, et al. (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52: 347-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340
    [73] Weller DM, Mavrodi DV, Van Pelt JA, et al. (2012) Induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato by 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology 102: 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-08-11-0222
    [74] Ait Barka E, Gognies S, Nowak J, et al. (2002) Inhibitory effect of endophyte bacteria on Botrytis cinerea and its influence to promote the grapevine growth. Biol Control 24: 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00034-8
    [75] Wang M, Xing Y, Wang J, et al. (2014) The role of the chi1 gene from the endophytic bacteria Serratia proteamaculans 336x in the biological control of wheat take-all. Can J Microbiol 60: 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2014-0212
    [76] Ren J, Li H, Wang Y, et al. (2013) Biocontrol potential of an endophytic Bacillus pumilus JK-SX001 against poplar canker. Biol Control 67: 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.09.012
    [77] Cho KM, Hong SY, Lee SM, et al. (2007) Endophytic bacterial communities in ginseng and their antifungal activity against pathogens. Microbial Ecology 54: 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9208-3
    [78] Gong Q, Zhang C, Lu F, et al. (2014) Identification of bacillomycin D from Bacillus subtilis fmbJ and its inhibition effects against Aspergillus flavus. Food Control 36: 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.07.034
    [79] Yánez-Mendizábal V, Usall J, Viñas I, et al. (2011) Potential of a new strain of Bacillus subtilis CPA-8 to control the major postharvest diseases of fruit. Biocontrol Sci Technol 21: 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2010.541554
    [80] Moyne AL, Shelby R, Cleveland TE, et al. (2001) Bacillomycin D: an iturin with antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus. J Appl Microbiol 90: 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01290.x
    [81] Martins SJ, Faria AF, Pedroso MP, et al. (2019) Microbial volatiles organic compounds control anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Biol Control 131: 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.01.003
    [82] Chaouachi M, Marzouk T, Jallouli S, et al. (2021) Activity assessment of tomato endophytic bacteria bioactive compounds for the postharvest biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea. Postharvest Biol Technol 172: 111389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111389
    [83] Jiang CH, Liao MJ, Wang HK, et al. (2018) Bacillus velezensis, a potential and efficient biocontrol agent in control of pepper gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea. Biol Control 126: 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.07.017
    [84] Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, et al. (2008) Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x
    [85] Pathak P, Rai VK, Can H, et al. (2022) Plant-endophyte interaction during biotic stress management. Plants (Basel) 11: 2203. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants1117220
    [86] Ali M, Ahmad Z, Ashraf MF, et al. (2021) Maize endophytic microbial-communities revealed by removing PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing and their synthetic applications to suppress maize banded leaf and sheath blight. Microbiol Res 242: 126639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126639
    [87] Nawangsih Aa, Damayanti Ika, Wiyono S, et al. (2011) Selection and characterization of endophytic bacteria as biocontrol agents of tomato bacterial wilt disease. HAYATI J Biosci 18: 66-70. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.18.2.66
    [88] Eljounaidi K, Lee SK, Bae H (2016) Bacterial endophytes as potential biocontrol agents of vascular wilt diseases–review and future prospects. Biol Control 103: 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.07.013
    [89] Aravind R, Eapen SJ, Kumar A, et al. (2010) Screening of endophytic bacteria and evaluation of selected isolates for suppression of burrowing nematode (Radopholus similis Thorne) using three varieties of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Crop Prot 29: 318-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.12.005
    [90] Aravind R, Kumar A, Eapen SJ, et al. (2009) Endophytic bacterial flora in root and stem tissues of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) genotype: isolation, identification and evaluation against Phytophthora capsici. Lett Appl Microbiol 48: 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02486.x
    [91] Wu Y, Lu C, Qian X, et al. (2009) Diversities within genotypes, bioactivity and biosynthetic genes of endophytic actinomycetes isolated from three pharmaceutical plants. Curr Microbiol 59: 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9463-2
    [92] Dowarah B, Agarwal H, Krishnatreya DB, et al. (2021) Evaluation of seed associated endophytic bacteria from tolerant chilli cv. Firingi Jolokia for their biocontrol potential against bacterial wilt disease. Microbiol Res 248: 126751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126751
    [93] Semenzato G, Faddetta T, Falsini S, et al. (2022) Endophytic bacteria associated with Origanum heracleoticum L. (Lamiaceae) seeds. Microorganisms 10: 2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10102086
    [94] Cui L, Yang C, Wei L, et al. (2020) Isolation and identification of an endophytic bacteria Bacillus velezensis 8-4 exhibiting biocontrol activity against potato scab. Biol Control 141: 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104156
    [95] Djaya L, Hersanti, Istifadah N, et al. (2019) In vitro study of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)and endophytic bacteria antagonistic to Ralstonia solanacearum formulated with graphite and silica nano particles as a biocontrol delivery system (BDS). Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 19: 101153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101153
    [96] Marian M, Ohno T, Suzuki H, et al. (2020) A novel strain of endophytic Streptomyces for the biocontrol of strawberry anthracnose caused by Glomerella cingulata. Microbiol Res 234: 126428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126428
    [97] Zheng T, Liu L, Nie Q, et al. (2021) Isolation, identification and biocontrol mechanisms of endophytic bacterium D61-A from Fraxinus hupehensis against Rhizoctonia solani. Biol Control 158: 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104621
    [98] Chen L, Shi H, Heng J, et al. (2019) Antimicrobial, plant growth-promoting and genomic properties of the peanut endophyte Bacillus velezensis LDO2. Microbiol Res 218: 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.10.002
    [99] Hong CE, Jeong H, Jo SH, et al. (2016) A leaf-inhabiting endophytic bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. KB6, enhances sweet potato resistance to black rot disease caused by Ceratocystis fimbriata. J Microbiol Biotechnol 26: 488-492. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1511.11039
    [100] Deng Y, Zhu Y, Wang P, et al. (2011) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis BSn5, an endophytic bacterium of Amorphophallus konjac with antimicrobial activity for the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. J Bacteriol 193: 2070-2071. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00129-11
    [101] Yu H, Zhang L, Li L, et al. (2010) Recent developments and future prospects of antimicrobial metabolites produced by endophytes. Microbiol Res 165: 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2009.11.009
    [102] Vrublevskaya M, Gharwalova L, Kolouchova I (2019) Biocontrol properties of endophytic bacteria from Vitis vinifera. J Biotechnol 305: S41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.05.148
    [103] Stringlis IA, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, et al. (2019) Type III secretion system of beneficial rhizobacteria pseudomonas simiae WCS417 and pseudomonas defensor WCS374. Front Microbiol 10: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01631
    [104] Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, et al. (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 4951-4959. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
    [105] Lucas JA, García-Cristobal J, Bonilla A, et al. (2014) Beneficial rhizobacteria from rice rhizosphere confers high protection against biotic and abiotic stress inducing systemic resistance in rice seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 82: 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.05.007
    [106] Yi HS, Yang JW, Ryu CM (2013) ISR meets SAR outside: additive action of the endophyte Bacillus pumilus INR7 and the chemical inducer, benzothiadiazole, on induced resistance against bacterial spot in field-grown pepper. Front Plant Sci 4: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00122
    [107] Conn VM, Walker AR, Franco CMM (2008) Endophytic actinobacteria induce defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant-Microbe Interac 21: 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-2-0208
    [108] Pieterse CMJ, Van Der Does D, Zamioudis C, et al. (2012) Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28: 489-521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055
    [109] Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, et al. (2004) Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134: 1017-1026. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.026583
    [110] Ryu CM, Murphy JF, Mysore KS, et al. (2004) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria systemically protect Arabidopsis thaliana against Cucumber mosaic virus by a salicylic acid and NPR1-independent and jasmonic acid-dependent signaling pathway. Plant J 39: 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02142.x
    [111] Compant S, Reiter B, Sessitsch A, et al. (2005) Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 1685-1693. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.4.1685-1693.2005
    [112] Frankowski J, Lorito M, Scala F, et al. (2001) Purification and properties of two chitinolytic enzymes of Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48. Arch Microbiol 176: 421-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002030100347
    [113] Duijff BJ, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Lemanceau P (1997) Involvement of the outer membrane lipopolysaccharides in the endophytic colonization of tomato roots by biocontrol Pseudomonas fluorescens strain WCS417r. New Phytol 135: 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00646.x
    [114] Pliego C, Kamilova F, Lugtenberg B (2011). Bacteria in agrobiology: crop ecosystems, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
    [115] Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res 163: 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001
    [116] Zhao LF, Xu YJ, Lai XH (2018) Antagonistic endophytic bacteria associated with nodules of soybean (Glycine max L.) and plant growth-promoting properties. Brazilian J Microbiol 49: 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.007
    [117] Martinez-Klimova E, Rodríguez-Peña K, Sánchez S (2017) Endophytes as sources of antibiotics. Biochem Pharmacol 134: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2016.10.010
    [118] Xu W, Wang F, Zhang M, et al. (2019) Diversity of cultivable endophytic bacteria in mulberry and their potential for antimicrobial and plant growth-promoting activities. Microbiol Res 229: 126328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.126328
    [119] Gond SK, Bergen MS, Torres MS, et al. (2015) Endophytic Bacillus spp. produce antifungal lipopeptides and induce host defence gene expression in maize. Microbiol Res 172: 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2014.11.004
    [120] Castillo UF, Strobel GA, Ford EJ, et al. (2002) Munumbicins, wide-spectrum antibiotics produced by Streptomyces NRRL 30562, endophytic on Kennedia nigriscans. Microbiology 148: 2675-2685. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-9-2675
    [121] Etminani F, Harighi B, Mozafari AA (2022) Effect of volatile compounds produced by endophytic bacteria on virulence traits of grapevine crown gall pathogen, Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Sci Rep 12: 10510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14864-w
    [122] Korpi A, Järnberg J, Pasanen AL (2009) Microbial volatile organic compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 39: 139-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440802291497
    [123] Cheffi Azabou M, Gharbi Y, Medhioub I, et al. (2020) The endophytic strain Bacillus velezensis OEE1: an efficient biocontrol agent against Verticillium wilt of olive and a potential plant growth promoting bacteria. Biol Control 142: 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104168
    [124] Mohamad OAA, Li L, Ma JB, et al. (2018) Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of endophytic bacterial populations from Chinese traditional medicinal plant licorice and characterization of the bioactive secondary metabolites produced by Bacillus atrophaeus against Verticillium dahliae. Front Microbiol 9: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00924
    [125] Husson E, Hadad C, Huet G, et al. (2017) The effect of room temperature ionic liquids on the selective biocatalytic hydrolysis of chitin: via sequential or simultaneous strategies. Green Chem 19: 4122-4131. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7gc01471f
    [126] Vaddepalli P, Fulton L, Wieland J, et al. (2017) The cell wall-localized atypical β-1,3 glucanase ZERZAUST controls tissue morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 144: 2259-2269. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.152231
    [127] Friedrich N, Hagedorn M, Soldati-Favre D, et al. (2012) Prison break: pathogens' strategies to egress from host cells. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76: 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00024-12
    [128] Mauch F, Mauch-Mani B, Boller T (1988) Antifungal hydrolases in pea tissue. Plant Physiol 88: 936-942. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.3.936
    [129] Chen C, Cao Z, Li J, et al. (2020) A novel endophytic strain of Lactobacillus plantarum CM-3 with antagonistic activity against Botrytis cinerea on strawberry fruit. Biol Control 148: 104306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104306
    [130] El-Tarabily KA (2006) Rhizosphere-competent isolates of streptomycete and non-streptomycete actinomycetes capable of producing cell-wall-degrading enzymes to control Pythium aphanidermatum damping-off disease of cucumber. Can J Bot 84: 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1139/B05-153
    [131] Jha Y (2019) Endophytic bacteria mediated anti‑autophagy and induced catalase , β‑1, 3‑glucanases gene in paddy after infection with pathogen Pyricularia grisea. Indian Phytopathol 72: 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-018-00106-5
    [132] Rojas CM, Senthil-kumar M, Tzin V, et al. (2014) Regulation of primary plant metabolism during plant-pathogen interactions and its contribution to plant defense. Front Plant Sci 5: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00017
    [133] Mysore KS, Ryu C (2004) Nonhost resistance: how much do we know?. Trends Plant Sci 9: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2003.12.005
    [134] Ngalimat MS, Hata EM, Zulperi D, et al. (2021) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as an emerging tool to manage bacterial rice pathogens. Microorganisms 9: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040682
    [135] Tranier MS, Pognant-Gros J, Quiroz R de la C, et al. (2014) Commercial biological control agents targeted against plant-parasitic root-knot nematodes. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol 57: 831-841. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-8913201402540
    [136] Vurukonda SSKP, Giovanardi D, Stefani E (2018) Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of Streptomyces spp. As endophytes. Int J Mol Sci 19: 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19040952
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Shobhit Raj Vimal, Jay Shankar Singh, Ashwani Kumar, Sheo Mohan Prasad, The plant endomicrobiome: Structure and strategies to produce stress resilient future crop, 2024, 6, 26665174, 100236, 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100236
    2. Soheila Aghaei Dargiri, Shahram Naeimi, Mojtaba Khayam Nekouei, 2024, Chapter 6, 978-0-85466-293-7, 10.5772/intechopen.1005390
    3. Z. M. Kuramshina, R. M. Khairullin, I. V. Maksimov, Endophytic Bacteria Bacillus spp. in the Formation of Adaptive Potential of Plants, 2023, 70, 1021-4437, 10.1134/S1021443723602021
    4. Dong-Jiang Lin, Jiang-xiong Zhou, Ahmad Ali, Hua-ying Fu, San-ji Gao, Lin Jin, Yong Fang, Jin-da Wang, Biocontrol efficiency and characterization of insecticidal protein from sugarcane endophytic Serratia marcescens (SM) against oriental armyworm Mythimna separata (Walker), 2024, 262, 01418130, 129978, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129978
    5. Oscar Joubert, Gontran Arnault, Matthieu Barret, Marie Simonin, Sowing success: ecological insights into seedling microbial colonisation for robust plant microbiota engineering, 2024, 13601385, 10.1016/j.tplants.2024.09.004
    6. Xiyin Huang, Qiong Tang, Siqin Liu, Chen Li, Yaoguang Li, Yunjun Sun, Xuezhi Ding, Liqiu Xia, Shengbiao Hu, Discovery of an antitumor compound from xenorhabdus stockiae HN_xs01, 2024, 40, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-024-03915-1
    7. Goshu Misganaw, 2024, Chapter 140-1, 978-3-030-98067-2, 1, 10.1007/978-3-030-98067-2_140-1
    8. Karima G. Helmy, Samah H. Abu-Hussien, Root Rot Management in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Through Integrated Biocontrol Strategies using Metabolites from Trichoderma harzianum, Serratia marcescens, and Vermicompost Tea, 2024, 87, 0095-3628, 10.1007/s00248-024-02400-4
    9. Alice Kira Zelman, Gerald Alan Berkowitz, 2024, Chapter 15, 978-981-97-6373-3, 335, 10.1007/978-981-97-6374-0_15
    10. Jie Cao, Jinyu Bao, Shimin Lan, Xiaoxiao Qin, Shaoying Ma, Sheng Li, Research progress on low-temperature stress response mechanisms and mitigation strategies in plants, 2024, 0167-6903, 10.1007/s10725-024-01248-5
    11. Abhishek Kumar, Pooja Sangwan, Vikash Kumar, Abhay K. Pandey, Ankit Kumar, Prashant Chauhan, Georgios Koubouris, Dimitrios Fanourakis, Kshitij Parmar, Physio-Biochemical Insights of Endophytic Microbial Community for Crop Stress Resilience: An Updated Overview, 2025, 0721-7595, 10.1007/s00344-024-11596-1
    12. MMA Retno Rosariastuti, Irham Luthfi, K. Hiramatsu, N. Uddin, D.P. Ariyanto, The density and diversity of endophytic bacteria and fungi of drought stress-resistant plant: Case study in Karanganyar District, Central Java, Indonesia, 2025, 155, 2117-4458, 01026, 10.1051/bioconf/202515501026
    13. Bianca Rosini, Aline Maria Bulla, Julio Cesar Polonio, Andressa Domingos Polli, Angela Aparecida da Silva, Rodrigo Pawloski Schoffen, Verci Alves de Oliveira-Junior, Shalene da Silva Santos, Halison Correia Golias, João Lúcio Azevedo, João Alencar Pamphile, Isolation, identification, and bioprospection of endophytic bacteria from medicinal plant Mikania glomerata (Spreng.) and the consortium of Pseudomonas as plant growth promoters, 2025, 64, 18788181, 103530, 10.1016/j.bcab.2025.103530
    14. Odyone Nascimento da Silva Bandeira, Renato da Silva Bandeira, Cláudia Regina Batista de Souza, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the potential effects of endophytic bacteria Klebsiella on plant growth promotion and biocontrol of pathogens, 2025, 41, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-025-04300-2
    15. Dipayan Das, Pankaj Losan Sharma, Payel Paul, Nisha Rani Baruah, Jimoni Choudhury, Tina Begum, Rituparna Karmakar, Tasqeen Khan, Jinkee Kalita, Harnessing endophytes: innovative strategies for sustainable agricultural practices, 2025, 2, 3004-9768, 10.1007/s44351-025-00011-z
    16. Jing-Yuan Chen, Lin-Jie Qin, Tiao Long, Rui-Ting Wu, Shi-Hua Niu, Shuo Liu, Wei-Kang Deng, Xin-Di Liao, Si-Cheng Xing, Effortless Rule: Effects of Oversized Microplastic Management on Lettuce Growth and the Dynamics of Antibiotic Resistance Genes From Fertilization to Harvest, 2025, 03043894, 138046, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138046
    17. Ehsan M. Rashad, Mona S. Mahmoud, Dalia M. K. Shaheen, Mohamed I. M. Ahmed, Khalid M. Ghoneem, Abdulaziz A. Al-Askar, Farid Menaa, WesamEldin I. A. Saber, A novel bioformulation derived from seedborne endophytic Serratia proteamaculans enhances performance and disease resistance in peanuts, 2025, 0929-1873, 10.1007/s10658-025-03034-z
    18. Smile Sharma, Mahavir Joshi, Microbial Strategies for Enhancing Wheat and Rice Resilience to Drought, Salinity, and Heat Stress, 2025, 24522198, 101108, 10.1016/j.rhisph.2025.101108
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4014) PDF downloads(297) Cited by(18)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog