Citation: Nikolina-Alexandra Xaxiri, Eleni Nikouli, Panagiotis Berillis, Konstantinos Ar. Kormas. Bacterial biofilm development during experimental degradation of Melicertus kerathurus exoskeleton in seawater[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 397-412. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.397
[1] | Eduardo Mercado III . Relating Cortical Wave Dynamics to Learning and Remembering. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(3): 185-209. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.3.185 |
[2] | Anastasios A. Mirisis, Anamaria Alexandrescu, Thomas J. Carew, Ashley M. Kopec . The Contribution of Spatial and Temporal Molecular Networks in the Induction of Long-term Memory and Its Underlying Synaptic Plasticity. AIMS Neuroscience, 2016, 3(3): 356-384. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2016.3.356 |
[3] | Ritwik Das, Artur Luczak . Epileptic seizures and link to memory processes. AIMS Neuroscience, 2022, 9(1): 114-127. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2022007 |
[4] | Valentina Cesari, Graziella Orrù, Andrea Piarulli, Alessandra Vallefuoco, Franca Melfi, Angelo Gemignani, Danilo Menicucci . The effects of right temporoparietal junction stimulation on embodiment, presence, and performance in teleoperation. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(3): 352-373. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024022 |
[5] | Fatemeh Aghighi, Mahmoud Salami, Sayyed Alireza Talaei . Effect of postnatal environmental enrichment on LTP induction in the CA1 area of hippocampus of prenatally traffic noise-stressed female rats. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(4): 269-281. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023021 |
[6] | Laura Serra, Sara Raimondi, Carlotta di Domenico, Silvia Maffei, Anna Lardone, Marianna Liparoti, Pierpaolo Sorrentino, Carlo Caltagirone, Laura Petrosini, Laura Mandolesi . The beneficial effects of physical exercise on visuospatial working memory in preadolescent children. AIMS Neuroscience, 2021, 8(4): 496-509. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021026 |
[7] | Ubaid Ansari, Jimmy Wen, Burhaan Syed, Dawnica Nadora, Romteen Sedighi, Denise Nadora, Vincent Chen, Forshing Lui . Analyzing the potential of neuronal pentraxin 2 as a biomarker in neurological disorders: A literature review. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(4): 505-519. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024031 |
[8] | Timothy J. Ricker . The Role of Short-term Consolidation in Memory Persistence. AIMS Neuroscience, 2015, 2(4): 259-279. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.4.259 |
[9] | Alexandra P. Key . Human Auditory Processing: Insights from Cortical Event-related Potentials. AIMS Neuroscience, 2016, 3(2): 141-162. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2016.2.141 |
[10] | Oussama Gaied Chortane, Elmoetez Magtouf, Wael Maktouf, Sabri Gaied Chortane . Effects of long-term adapted physical training on functional capacity and quality of life in older adults with Parkinson's disease. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(4): 468-483. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024028 |
Currently, there is an increasing interest [1] in the development of sustainable biotechnological processes which use renewable resources [2,3]. An example is the possibility to produce biofuels (i.e., biogas and biodiesel) from plant biomass [4].Plant biomass is constituted largely by polymers such as cellulose and lignin. Complete degradation of these polymers is generally a limiting step to achieve high efficiency and maximize productivity [4,5].
The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose can be processed by cellulose-degrading microorganisms or the enzymes they produce, e.g, cellulases. Esterases, in combination with cellulases, have been proposed to complement lignin digestion due to ester linkages present within this complex molecule [6]. Increasing temperature has been reported to contribute to lignin and cellulose degradation by thermophilic enzymes [2,7] which suggests that searching for thermophilic enzymes with novel or enhanced functionality can conduce to better overcome some of these limitations [2]. Maximizing the activity of these enzymes is critical to achieve a reduction of costs by decreasing the consumption of enzymes in the process and improving the efficiency of the treatment.
Previous studies, have shown that a scarce presence of trace metals can be limiting the growth of microorganisms during the treatment of plant biomass and waste residues for the production of biogas and other biofuels [8,9]. In this study, we identify and characterize three extracellular enzymes and focus on evaluating the potential of several metal ions to inhibit or increase hydrolytic enzyme activities as a proxy to enhance the efficiency of these enzymes and better understand the role of microorganisms during large scale processes of biofuel production or other biotransformations based on the use of sustainable resources from plant materials.
Soil samples were collected in sterile containers around “La Dulce” freshwater pond (Doñana National Park, Spain; location 36° 58.84’N 6° 29.23’W) [10] in September 2011 and May 2012. The samples were collected from the top 5 cm of soil. They were sandy soils with near neutral pH and an organic content of around 20% by weight. The samples were enriched at 60 °C for 24 h in nutrient broth (Difco, USA) to select the thermophilic bacterial community. Concentration of metal ions in soil samples were determined by an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) at the analytical service of IRNAS-CSIC.
Genomic DNA was extracted using the MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced by shotgun pyrosequencing in a 454 GS FLX+ machine with titanium chemistry (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The obtained reads constituted metagenomes from the selected thermophilic communities at the studied samples. Read assemblage was carried out using the Newbler assembler (Roche). Coding regions (CDS) were detected with the software FragGeneScan [11] and these CDSs were putatively annotated using Blastp and the nr database from GenBank (National Center for Biotechnology Information, NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). We identified and cloned genes encoding enzymes of potential interest for the processing of biomass and plant residues (i.e., cellulase and esterase). Specific primers were designed for cellulase and esterases genes based on the obtained sequences and related sequences from GenBank database around the putative start and stop codons. Alignments between the selected sequences from the metagenomes and related database sequences was carried out using ClustalW [12] under the suite BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor 7.1.9 (www.bioedit.co.uk).
A cellulase gene was amplified using the pair of primers: 5’-ATGGCGAAGTTG GATGCAA-3’ and 5’-ATCCTGCAGGTTAGTCAAATGTAATTTCTTTCACTT-3’. An esterase gene denominated Est1 was amplified using the primers: 5’-ATGAAATTAGTTTCACCAAAACCA-3’ and 5’-ATCCTGCAGGTTACCAATCTAATGATTCTAAAAACTC-3’. A second esterase gene denominated Est2 was amplified with primers: 5’-ATGGTTCCATTATGGGAG TCAC-3’ and 5’-ATCCTGCAGGTTATTTTCTTAACCATGTCTCGC-3’. The restriction site SbfI was incorporated into reverse primer sequences (underlined nucleotides). Start and stop codons are indicated in bold. The PCR amplification was carried out with the Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) for 35 cycles (98 °C for 10 s; 55 °C or 60 °C for 15s for Est2 or cellulase and Est1 sequences, respectively; and 72 °C for 1 min). Amplified PCR fragments were cleaned using ExoSAP-IT PCR Product Cleanup (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), digested with SbfI and ligated into pMAL-p5x vector (New England BioLabs) using T4 DNA Ligase (3 h at 20 °C). Previous to the ligation, the vector was digested with XmnI and SbfI restriction enzymes and purified with JetQuick DNA Purification Kit (Genomed, Löhne, Germany). DNA concentrations were estimated using a NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer. Ligation products were transformed into E.coli ER2523 cells and the transformants were selected on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin. Clones were screened by colony-PCR using the pairs of primers described above and subjected to the following thermal cycles: 1 initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 55 °C or 60 °C and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The last cycle was followed by 2 min extension at 72 °C. The accession number for the DNA sequences of the studied genes are KP823432, KP823433 and KP823434.
Transformants were grown in LB broth containing 2% glucose and 100 µg/mL ampicillin to an optical density of about 0.5 at 600 nm. The expression of the recombinant proteins was induced by adding IPTG to a 1 mM final concentration and cultures were incubated with shaking (150 rpm) at 37 °C for 4 h. The recombinant proteins were purified using affinity chromatography using an amylose resin according to pMAL-p5x usage manual (New England BioLabs).
Cellulase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by mixing 0.5 mL of enzyme solution with 0.5 mL of 0.5% w/v carboxymethyl cellulose in 50 mM phosphate-citrate buffer (pH 5) for 60 min at the temperature to be assayed (in the range 30 °C-80 °C). The reaction was stopped by adding 3 mL 3, 5-dinitro salicylic acid (DNS) reagent. The mixture was heated at 100 °C for 10 min and cooled on ice. Optical density at 540 nm was determined using glucose as a standard. Samples and treatments were carried out in triplicate. Controls lacking enzyme were performed to evaluate potential non-enzymatic hydrolysis of the substrate. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 µmol of reducing sugars per min.
Esterase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the amount of p-nitrophenol released during the esterase-catalyzed hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl butyrate. A stock substrate solution containing 10 mM p-nitrophenyl butyrate was prepared in acetonitrile, ethanol and 50 mM of Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) at a ratio of 1:4:95 (in volume), respectively. The reaction was initiated by the addition of purified enzyme to a diluted substrate solution at a final concentration of 0.5 nM. The mixture was incubated at the temperature to be assayed (in the range 30 °C-80 °C) for 30 min and stopped by cooling on ice for 10 min. The enzyme activity was immediately measured at 405 nm using a NanoDrop 2000c Spectrophotometer. Samples and treatments were carried out in triplicate. Controls lacking enzyme were performed to evaluate potential non-enzymatic hydrolysis of the substrate. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 µmol of p-nitrophenol per min.
The effects of temperature and pH on cellulase and esterase activities were determined using the standard enzyme assays described above. Assays were carried out in triplicate. Assayed temperatures were 30 °C, 40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C and 80 °C. Assayed pHs for cellulase activity were from pH 4 to 8 using 50 mM phosphate-citrate buffer. Assayed pHs for esterase activity were from pH 5 to 11 using the following buffers: 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5), 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7-9) and 50 mM Na2HPO4-NaOH buffer (pH 11). The pH was adjusted for each assay at the corresponding temperature.
The effect of metal ions on cellulase and esterase activities was determined by adding chloride salts of Zn2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+ and Ba2+ metal ions to the substrate solutions at final concentrations of 1 and 10 mM. Enzyme activity in control solutions lacking supplementing metal ions was defined as the 100% level. Enzymatic activity assays were performed under the established conditions described above at the optimum temperature and pH conditions for each enzyme.
Enzymatic activity of the environmental hydrolytic enzymes retrieved from natural thermophilic bacterial communities existing in soils was analyzed in a broad temperature range, 30 °C-80 °C (Figure 1). The optimum Est1 and Est2 activities were observed between 60 °C and 70 °C, and decreased significantly at temperatures below 40 °C and above 80 °C (Figure 1A). Moreover, the analyzed cellulase showed maximal activity in the temperature range of 40-50 °C and decreased sharply above 80 °C (Figure 1B).
These enzymes, esterases and cellulase, were active in a broad pH range (pH 5 to 11 for the esterases and pH 4 to 8 for the cellulase) (Figure 2). Est1 and Est2 exhibited optimum enzymatic activities under alkaline conditions at pH 8-9 (Figure 2A). Esterase activities were drastically reduced below pH 5 and above pH 9. Highest cellulase activity was observed at pH 5 (Figure 2B). These enzymes prove to be valuable for their use in processes at high temperature and different pH values.
Optimum temperature for the studied esterases presented similar optima of temperature and pH than, for instance, a carboxylesterase from Geobacillus sp. ZH1 [13] among other thermophilic esterases [14,15,16]. A cellulase from Trichoderma sp. IS-05 [17] showed optimum temperature slightly higher (60 °C) than the one studied in this study (40 °C-50 °C); the optimum pH for this cellulase was more acidic (pH 3) than the cellulase retrieved from the environment during this work (pH 5). Similar behavior as a function of temperature and pH was observed for a cellulase obtained from Bacillus thuringiensis [18]. The enzymes obtained and analyzed during this study show typical patterns of activity over a broad range of temperature and pH for thermophilic cellulases and esterases [2,13,14,15,16] previously reported. Consequently, they represent potential candidates to be tested for biotechnological applications [3,7], such as during enzymatic treatments of plant materials (i.e., cellulose and lignin), and as possible complement to the activity of previously described enzymes under a range of temperature and pH conditions or the evaluation of their capability to degrade different types of plant materials.
The effects of metal ions on cellulase and esterase activities are shown in Table 1. Interestingly, the addition of Ba2+ to the reactions of hydrolysis catalyzed by these enzymes showed a significant increase of the enzymatic activity at 10 mM Ba2+. At this concentration, the enhancing effect of Barium on Est1 and Est2 activities were 79 and 28 percentage points, respectively, higher than in the unsupplemented control. Cellulase activity in the presence of 10 mM Barium showed an enhancement of 54 porcentual points of the activity observed under unsupplemented conditions. A previous study on bacterial cellobiohydrolases has reported a slight activity enhancement by Ba2+ [24], and a fungal cellulase was shown to be inhibited by Ba2+ and other metal ions [17]. Zhu et al. [13] has shown that Ba2+ could lead to moderate enhancement of the activity of an esterase from a deep-sea Geobacillus species at 10 mM concentration. In spite of these results, in these studies the effect of Barium has been left out and barely discussed. There are multiple studies on the effect of metal ions on proteases because the activity of a large number of proteases has been reported to be metal dependent [19,20]. The effect of Ba2+ has been reported to induce increased activity by several bacterial proteases [21,22]. To our knowledge, no previous reports have highlighted the potential of the enhancing effect of Ba2+ on various extracellular hydrolytic enzymes (other than proteases) from soil microbial bacterial communities.
Metal ions | Concentration (mM) | Relative activity (%) | Environmental concentrations (mM)* | ||
Est1 | Est2 | Cellulase | |||
Control | 100.0 ± 4.1 | 100.0 ± 6.0 | 100.0 ± 5.8 | ||
Zn 2+ | 1 | 69.9 ± 7.4 | 76.1 ± 6.3 | 73.5 ± 7.9 | 0.54/0.11 |
10 | 24.7 ± 8.3 | 50.2 ± 7.1 | 29.0 ± 6.0 | ||
Cu 2+ | 1 | 65.8 ± 6.2 | 59.0 ± 8.1 | 41.6 ± 4.6 | 0.21/0.05 |
10 | 26.0 ± 7.9 | 17.5 ± 6.8 | 6.9 ± 5.6 | ||
Fe 2+ | 1 | 67.8 ± 4.5 | 72.9 ± 6.6 | 70.2 ± 8.2 | 392.18/152.15 |
10 | 40.4 ± 7.6 | 59.0 ± 8.1 | 30.8 ± 5.6 | ||
Co 2+ | 1 | 94.9 ± 8.7 | 91.6 ± 5.2 | 55.3 ± 4.2 | 0.08/0.05 |
10 | 57.5 ± 5.4 | 46.6 ± 15.4 | 40.1 ± 5.8 | ||
Ba 2+ | 1 | 111.3 ± 6.5 | 106.8 ± 5.6 | 96.9 ± 4.4 | 0.58/0.42 |
10 | 179.1 ± 5.7 | 128.3 ± 7.5 | 153.7 ± 2.8 | ||
Ni 2+ | 1 | 80.8 ± 6.4 | 102.0 ± 11.7 | 68.9 ± 5.6 | 0.11/0.06 |
10 | 69.2 ± 8.9 | 59.8 ± 8.0 | 50.4 ± 7.7 | ||
*: Concentration (mM) of ions in the environmental samples where the enzymes were retrieved. Values on the left are for the sample collected on September 2011 and values on the right of the dash was for a sample collected on May 2012. |
In order to compare the activity of these enzymes when supplemented with several metals, other metal ions were tested. Significant inhibition on cellulase and esterase activities at 1 mM and 10 mM concentrations were observed with most metal ions (Table 1). Cu2+ at a concentration of 10 mM was the most inhibitory metal ion in every assay reducing cellulase activity down to 6.9% and the activities of the esterases down to 26% and 17.5%. Previous studies [13,18,23,24] have shown an inhibition of hydrolytic enzyme activities by a number of metals ions including Cu2+ and Zn2+. A highly metal-resistant thermophilic esterase from the Red Sea showed resistance to various metal inhibition by Cu2+, Co2+, Fe2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ at 1 mM and 10 mM concentrations. As a result of soil content of these metals (Table 1), our results suggest that Iron could be inhibiting thermophilic extracellular enzyme activity at the sampled environment due to the high content of this ion at this location [10] although addition of Barium would result in higher extracellular enzyme activities.
The availability of trace metals is a requirement for the growth of microorganisms because some of them are required as cofactors for the activation of a number of intracellular enzymes [19,20] which are central to their metabolism. Around 30% of enzymes might require the tight binding of metal ions [19]. However, in this study, we analyze the effect of trace metals on the first and limiting step in the process of microbial degradation of plant polymers. This step corresponds to the action of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes in charge of decomposing large polymers into smaller molecules and monomers which then can be taken up by the microorganisms and so they can proceed further into microbial metabolism. Most extracellular hydrolytic enzymes (i.e., cellulase and esterases) do not require specific trace metals to show catalytic activity and generally after they have been synthesized they carry out spontaneous folding once outside the cell [19,20].
Although the effect of trace metals on microbial metabolism and enzymatic activity has been frequently reported, to our knowledge, detailed descriptions of the mechanisms of action are very scarce for most metals on extracellular hydrolytic enzymes [25] involved in the decomposition of plant polymers, such as cellulose and lignin. Although metal inhibition might result from partial interference between the active center of these enzymes and their substrates, the action of Barium could be explained by its higher reactivity than other metals [26]. This could contribute to enzyme activation by facilitating ionic interactions between enzyme and polymer substrate, providing stronger stabilization of negative charges than other metals [26], and so enhancing the catalytic activity of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes decomposing plant residues. The potential relevance of Barium on the activity of extracellular enzymes directly involved in plant biomass degradation has been barely considered in previous literature.
The biotechnological industry using microorganisms and enzymes for the processing of plant materials and biomass is currently searching for increasingly efficient enzymes. Advances on strategies to improve activity of novel and previously used enzymes would nicely complement the objective of reaching the highest rates and most complete decompositions of plant materials. Some examples have been presented in this study. Hydrolytic reactions by newly discovered enzymes resulted in increased activities of these extracellular hydrolytic enzymes by up to 80 percentage points of initial activity when supplemented with Barium salts. These data represent a good example showing potential for the optimization of enzymatic and microbial resources aimed to plant biomass degradation.
Improving the efficiency of hydrolytic enzymes is a major step in the development of cost effective and sustainable use of plant biomass as resources in biotechnological transformations. This study used culture-independent methods to retrieve environmental gene sequences from thermophilic bacteria which were cloned and characterized. We highlight the observation that Ba2+ supplementation significantly enhanced the activity of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes (i.e., cellulase and esterase).
The authors acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CONSOLIDER CSD2009-00006, CGL2014-58762-P, CTM2014-55095), the Andalusian Government (BIO288 and RNM2529), both cofinanced by FEDER funds, intramural project OEP2011 (201570I020), the mobility programme 003-ABEL-CM-2013 (NILS Science and Sustainability programme, EEA grants), the mobility and coordination European project ALGAENET (Marie Curie Actions IRSES-295165, FP7-PEOPLE-2011) and COST Action ES1302.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] | Zobell CE, Rittenberg SC (1938) The occurrence and characteristics of chitinoclastic bacteria in the sea. J Bacteriol 35: 275–287. |
[2] |
Gooday GW (1990) The ecology of chitin degradation. Adv Microb Ecol 11: 387–430. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7612-5_10
![]() |
[3] | Alluwihare LI, Meador T (2008) Chemical composition of marine dissolved organic nitrogen, In: Capone DG, Bronk DA, Mulholland MR, Carpenter EJ, Editors, Nitrogen in the marine environment, Academic Press, 95–140. |
[4] |
Souza CP, Almeida BC, Colwell RR, et al. (2011) The importance of chitin in the marine environment. Mar Biotechnol 13: 823. doi: 10.1007/s10126-011-9388-1
![]() |
[5] |
Seki H (1965) Rough estimation on chitin decomposition in the ocean. J Oceanogr Soc Jpn 21: 253–260. doi: 10.5928/kaiyou1942.21.253
![]() |
[6] |
Gooday GW (1990) Physiology of microbial degradation of chitin and chitosan. Biodegradation 1: 177–190. doi: 10.1007/BF00058835
![]() |
[7] |
Teng WL, Khor E, Tan TK, et al. (2001) Concurrent production of chitin from shrimp shells and fungi. Carbohyd Res 332: 305–316. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00084-2
![]() |
[8] | FAO (2017) An overview of recently published global aquaculture statistics. FAO aquaculture newsletter No. 56, 2017. |
[9] |
Zakaria Z, Hall GM, Shama G (1998) Lactic acid fermentation of scampi waste in a rotating horizontal bioreactor for chitin recovery. Process Biochem 33: 1–6. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(97)00069-1
![]() |
[10] |
No HK, Meyers SP (1995) Preparation and characterization of chitin and chitosan-a review. J Aquat Food Prod T 4: 27–52. doi: 10.1300/J030v04n02_03
![]() |
[11] |
Kurita K (2001) Controlled functionalization of the polysaccharide chitin. Prog Polym Sci 26: 1921–1971. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00007-7
![]() |
[12] |
Healy M, Green A, Healy A (2003) Bioprocessing of marine crustacean shell waste. Acta Biotechnol 23: 151–160. doi: 10.1002/abio.200390023
![]() |
[13] |
Islam MS, Khan S, Tanaka M (2004) Waste loading in shrimp and fish processing effluents: Potential source of hazards to the coastal and nearshore environments. Mar Pollut Bull 49: 103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.01.018
![]() |
[14] | Beaney P, Lizardi-Mendoza J, Healy M (2010) Comparison of chitins produced by chemical and bioprocessing methods. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 80: 145–150. |
[15] |
Brzezinska MS, Jankiewicz U, Burkowska A, et al. (2014) Chitinolytic microorganisms and their possible application in environmental protection. Curr Microbiol 68: 71–81. doi: 10.1007/s00284-013-0440-4
![]() |
[16] | Brück WM, Slater JW, Carney BF (2010) Chitin and chitosan from marine organisms, In: Kim SK, Editor, Chitin, chitosan, oligosaccharides and their derivatives, Biological activities and applications, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 11–24. |
[17] | Jo GH, Park RD, Jung WJ (2011) Enzymatic production of chitin from crustacean shell waste, In: Kim SK, Editor, Chitin, chitosan, oligosaccharides and their derivatives, biological activities and applications, Boca Raton, CRC Press, 37–46. |
[18] |
Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, et al. (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored "rare biosphere". P Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 12115–12120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605127103
![]() |
[19] | FAO, 2018. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fishery/species/2587/en. |
[20] |
Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, et al. (2012) Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41: e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1297
![]() |
[21] |
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. (2009) Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microb 75: 7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09
![]() |
[22] |
Quince C, Lanzen A, Curtis TP, et al. (2009) Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nat Methods 6: 639–641. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1361
![]() |
[23] |
Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, et al. (2007) SILVA: A comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 7188–7196. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm864
![]() |
[24] |
Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, et al. (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: Pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 12: 118–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x
![]() |
[25] |
Stackenbrandt E, Goebel BM (1994) Taxonomic note: A place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Micr 44: 846–849. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-846
![]() |
[26] |
Newton RJ, Shade A (2016) Lifestyles of rarity: Understanding heterotrophic strategies to inform the ecology of the microbial rare biosphere. Aquat Microb Ecol 78: 51–63. doi: 10.3354/ame01801
![]() |
[27] | Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (2010a) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Part B: The Gammaproteobacteria, New York: Springer, 1106. |
[28] | Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (2010b) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Part C: The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria, New York: Springer, 1388. |
[29] | Krieg NR, Staley JT, Brown DR, et al. (2010) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. The Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Tenericutes (Mollicutes), Acidobacteria, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Dictyoglomi, Gemmatimonadetes, Lentisphaerae, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae, and Planctomycetes, New York: Springer, 949. |
[30] |
Roller BRK, Stoddard SF, Schmidt TM (2016) Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nat Microbiol 1: 16160. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.160
![]() |
[31] | Yan YY, Zhu FF, Sun QQ, Pseudoalteromonas porphyrae sp. nov., a marine bacterium that is the causative agent of bud blight disease of Porphyrae yezoensis, 2002. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. |
[32] |
Dimitrieva GY, Crawford RL, Yüksel GÜ (2006) The nature of plant growth-promoting effects of a pseudoalteromonad associated with the marine algae Laminaria japonica and linked to catalase excretion. J Appl Microbiol 100: 1159–1169. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02831.x
![]() |
[33] | Kacar A, Kocyigit A, Ozdemir G, et al. (2009) The development of biofilm bacteria on panels coated by different antifouling paints in the marinas. Fresen Environ Bull 18: 2004–2012. |
[34] | Lee RD, Jospin G, Lang JM, et al. (2016) Draft genome sequences of two Pseudoalteromonas porphyrae strains isolated from seagrass sediment. Genome Announc 4: e00092–e00116. |
[35] |
Offret C, Desriac F, Le Chevalier P, et al. (2016) Spotlight on antimicrobial metabolites from the marine bacteria Pseudoalteromonas: Chemodiversity and ecological significance. Mar Drugs 14: 129. doi: 10.3390/md14070129
![]() |
[36] | Valdenegro-Vega V, Naeem S, Carson J, et al. (2013) Culturable microbiota of ranched southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii Castelnau). J Appl Microbiol 115: 923–932. |
[37] |
Li J, Tan B, Mai K (2011) Isolation and identification of a bacterium from marine shrimp digestive tract: A new degrader of starch and protein. J Ocean U China 10: 287–292. doi: 10.1007/s11802-011-1849-7
![]() |
[38] | Ivanova EP, Sawabe T, Lysenko AM, et al. (2002) Pseudoalteromonas ruthenica sp. nov., isolated from marine invertebrates. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52: 235–240. |
[39] |
Vynne NG, Mansson M, Nielsen KF, et al. (2011) Bioactivity, chemical profiling, and 16S rRNA-based phylogeny of Pseudoalteromonas strains collected on a global research cruise. Mar Biotechnol 13: 1062–1073. doi: 10.1007/s10126-011-9369-4
![]() |
[40] | Ahmad A, Sulieman MFI, Usup G (2016) Anti-biofilm activity of the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas ruthenica KLPp3 against Serratia marcescens and Vibrio alginolyticus. Malays J Microbiol 12: 30–34. |
[41] |
Sass AM, Sass H, Coolen MJL, et al. (2001) Microbial communities in the chemocline of a hypersaline deep-sea basin (Urania Basin, Mediterranean Sea). Appl Environ Microb 67: 5392–5402. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5392-5402.2001
![]() |
[42] |
Ettoumi B, Bouhajja E, Borin S, et al. (2010) Gammaproteobacteria occurrence and microdiversity in Tyrrhenian Sea sediments as revealed by cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches. Syst Appl Microbiol 33: 222–231. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.02.005
![]() |
[43] |
De Vitis V, Guidi B, Contente ML, et al. (2015) Marine microorganisms as source of stereoselective esterases and ketoreductases: Kinetic resolution of a prostaglandin intermediate. Mar Biotechnol 17: 144–152. doi: 10.1007/s10126-014-9602-z
![]() |
[44] |
Qurashi AW, Sabri AN (2012) Biofilm formation in moderately halophilic bacteria is influenced by varying salinity levels. J Basic Microbiol 52: 566–572. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201100253
![]() |
[45] |
Kasan NA, Ghazali NA, Ikhwanuddin M, et al. (2017) Isolation of potential bacteria as inoculum for biofloc formation in pacific whiteleg shrimp, litopenaeus vannamei culture ponds. Pak J Biol Sci 20: 306–313. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2017.306.313
![]() |
[46] | Suantika G, Aditiawati P, Astuti DI, et al. (2013) The use of indigenous probiotic halomonas aquamarina and shewanella algae for white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei boone) hatchery productivity in zero water discharge system. J Aquac Res Dev 4: 194. |
[47] |
Inbakandan D, Murthy PS, Venkatesan R, et al. (2010) 16S rDNA sequence analysis of culturable marine biofilm forming bacteria from a ship's hull. Biofouling 26: 893–899. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2010.530347
![]() |
[48] |
Sorkhoh NA, Alawadhi H, Almailem DM, et al. (2010) Agarolytic bacteria with hydrocarbon-utilization potential in fouling material from the Arabian Gulf coast. Int Biodeter Biodegr 64: 554–559. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.06.007
![]() |
[49] |
Al-Mailem DM, Eliyas M, Radwan SS (2012) Enhanced haloarchaeal oil removal in hypersaline environments via organic nitrogen fertilization and illumination. Extremophiles 16: 751–758. doi: 10.1007/s00792-012-0471-y
![]() |
[50] | Choi A, Cho JC (2010) Reinekea aestuarii sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60: 2813–2817. |
[51] |
Avci B, Hahnke RL, Chafee M, et al. (2017) Genomic and physiological analyses of "Reinekea forsetii" reveal a versatile opportunistic lifestyle during spring algae blooms. Environ Microbiol 19: 1209–1221. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13646
![]() |
[52] | Choi EJ, Kwon HC, Koh HY, et al. (2010) Colwellia asteriadis sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from the starfish Asterias amurensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60: 1952–1957. |
[53] | Gillan DC, Speksnijder AG, Zwart G, et al. (1998) Genetic diversity of the biofilm covering Montacuta ferruginosa (Mollusca, bivalvia) as evaluated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis and cloning of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microb 64: 3464–3472. |
[54] |
Schwermer CU, Lavik G, Abed RM, et al. (2008) Impact of nitrate on the structure and function of bacterial biofilm communities in pipelines used for injection of seawater into oil fields. Appl Environ Microb 74: 2841–2851. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02027-07
![]() |
[55] | Finnegan L, Garciamelgares M, Gmerek T, et al. (2011) A survey of culturable aerobic and anaerobic marine bacteria in de novo biofilm formation on natural substrates in St. Andrews Bay, Scotland. Anton Leeuw 100: 399–404. |
[56] |
Casillo A, Lanzetta R, Parrilli M, et al. (2018) Exopolysaccharides from marine and marine extremophilic bacteria: Structures, properties, ecological roles and applications. Mar Drugs 16: 69. doi: 10.3390/md16020069
![]() |
[57] | Kim SJ, Tamura T, Hamada M, et al. (2012) Compostimonas suwonensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from spent mushroom compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62: 2410–2416. |
[58] |
Tiwari K, Gupta RK (2013) Diversity and isolation of rare actinomycetes: An overview. Crit Rev Microbiol 39: 256–294. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2012.709819
![]() |
[59] | Bernardet JF, Bowman JP (2006) The Genus Flavobacterium, In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E, Editors, The Prokaryotes, New York: Springer, 2006. |
[60] |
Doghri I, Rodrigues S, Bazire A, et al. (2015) Marine bacteria from the French Atlantic coast displaying high forming-biofilm abilities and different biofilm 3D architectures. BMC Microbiol 15: 231. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0568-4
![]() |
[61] |
Martins P, Cleary DFR, Pires ACC, et al. (2013) Molecular analysis of bacterial communities and detection of potential pathogens in a recirculating aquaculture system for Scophthalmus maximus and Solea senegalensis. PLoS One 8: e80847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080847
![]() |
[62] |
Fernández-Álvarez C, Torres-Corral Y, Saltos-Rosero N, et al. (2017) MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for rapid differentiation of Tenacibaculum species pathogenic for fish. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101: 5377–5390. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8324-3
![]() |
[63] | Banning EC, Casciotti KL, Kujawinski EB (2010) Novel strains isolated from a coastal aquifer suggest a predatory role for flavobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73: 254–270. |
[64] | Faury N, Saulnier D, Thompson FL, et al. (2004) Vibrio crassostreae sp. nov., isolated from the haemolymph of oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 2137–2140. |
[65] | Poli A, Romano I, Mastascusa V, et al. (2018) Vibrio coralliirubri sp. nov., a new species isolated from mucus of red coral (Corallium rubrum) collected at Procida island, Italy. Anton Leeuw 2018: 1–11. |
[66] |
Rizzo L, Fraschetti S, Alifano P, et al. (2016) Association of Vibrio community with the Atlantic Mediterranean invasive alga Caulerpa cylindracea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 475: 129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.11.013
![]() |
[67] | Romalde JL, Dieguez AL, Lasa A, et al. (2013) New Vibrio species associated to molluscan microbiota: A review. Front Microbiol 4: 413. |
[68] |
Stabili L, Giangrande A, Pizzolante G, et al. (2014) Characterization of vibrios diversity in the mucus of the polychaete Myxicola infundibulum (Annellida, Polichaeta). Microb Ecol 67: 186–194. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0312-2
![]() |
[69] |
Bruto M, James A, Petton B, et al. (2017) Vibrio crassostreae, a benign oyster colonizer turned into a pathogen after plasmid acquisition. ISME J 11: 1043–1052. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.162
![]() |
[70] | Huang D, Liang X, Peng L, et al. (2017) Effects of Vibrio biofilms of different sources on settlement of plantigrades of the mussel Mytilus coruscus. J Fish China 41: 1149–1147. |
[71] |
Sugita H, Mizuki H, Itoi S (2012) Diversity of siderophore-producing bacteria isolated from the intestinal tracts of fish along the Japanese coast. Aquac Res 43: 481–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02851.x
![]() |
[72] | Hatje E, Neuman C, Stevenson H, et al. (2014) Population dynamics of Vibrio and Pseudomonas species isolated from farmed Tasmanian Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): A seasonal study. Microb Ecol 68: 679–687. |
[73] |
Foulon V, Le Roux F, Lambert C, et al. (2016) Colonization of polystyrene microparticles by Vibrio crassostreae: Light and electron microscopic investigation. Environ Sci Technol 50: 10988–10996. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02720
![]() |
[74] | Zha H, Jeffs A, Dong Y, et al. (2018) Potential virulence factors of bacteria associated with tail fan necrosis in the spiny lobster, Jasus edwardsii. J Fish Dis 31: 817–828. |
[75] | Fontanez KM, Eppley JM, Samo TJ, et al. (2015) Microbial community structure and function on sinking particles in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Front Microbiol 6: 469. |
[76] | Vandecandelaere I, Nercessian O, Segaert E, et al. (2008) Ruegeria scottomollicae sp. nov., isolated from a marine electroactive biofilm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 2726–2733. |
[77] |
Magalhães C, Kiene RP, Buchan A, et al. (2012) A novel inhibitory interaction between dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and the denitrification pathway. Biogeochemistry 107: 393–408. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9560-0
![]() |
[78] |
Smedile F, Messina E, La Cono V, et al. (2013) Metagenomic analysis of hadopelagic microbial assemblages thriving at the deepest part of Mediterranean Sea, Matapan-Vavilov Deep. Environ Microbiol 15: 167–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02827.x
![]() |
[79] |
Luna G (2015) Diversity of marine microbes in a changing Mediterranean Sea. Rend Lincei 26: 49–58. doi: 10.1007/s12210-014-0333-x
![]() |
[80] |
Pukall R, Päuker O, Buntefuß D, et al. (1999) High sequence diversity of Alteromonas macleodii-related cloned and cellular 16S rDNAs from a Mediterranean seawater mesocosm experiment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28: 335–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1999.tb00588.x
![]() |
[81] |
Garcia-Martinez J, Acinas SG, Massana R, et al. (2002) Prevalence and microdiversity of Alteromonas macleodii-like microorganisms in different oceanic regions. Environ Microbiol 4: 42–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00255.x
![]() |
[82] |
Ivars-Martinez E, D'Auria G, Rodriguez-Valera F, et al. (2008) Biogeography of the ubiquitous marine bacterium Alteromonas macleodii determined by multilocus sequence analysis. Mol Ecol 17: 4092–4106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03883.x
![]() |
[83] |
Klochko V, Zelena L, Ivoychuk S, et al. (2012) Peculiarities of Alteromonas macleodii strains reflects their deep/surface habitation rather than geographical distribution. J Gen Appl Microbiol 58: 129–135. doi: 10.2323/jgam.58.129
![]() |
[84] | López-Pérez M, Rodriguez-Valera F, (2014) The family Alteromonadaceae, In: The Prokaryotes: Gammaproteobacteria, 69–92. |
[85] | Hou S, López-Pérez M, Pfreundt U, et al. (2018) Benefit from decline: The primary transcriptome of Alteromonas macleodii str. Te101 during Trichodesmium demise. ISME J 12: 981–996. |
[86] |
Lee MD, Walworth NG, Mcparland EL, et al. (2017) The Trichodesmium consortium: Conserved heterotrophic co-occurrence and genomic signatures of potential interactions. ISME J 11: 1813–1824. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.49
![]() |
[87] |
Chi WJ, Lim JH, Park DY, et al. (2013) Isolation and characterization of a novel agar degrading bacterium, Alteromonas macleodii subsp. GNUM08120, from red macroalgae. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol 41: 8–16. doi: 10.4014/kjmb.1208.08001
![]() |
[88] |
Neumann AM, Balmonte JP, Berger M, et al. (2015) Different utilization of alginate and other algal polysaccharides by marine Alteromonas macleodii ecotypes. Environ Microbiol 17: 3857–3868. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12862
![]() |
[89] |
Mitulla M, Dinasquet J, Guillemette R, et al. (2016) Response of bacterial communities from California coastal waters to alginate particles and an alginolytic Alteromonas macleodii strain. Environ Microbiol 18: 4369–4377. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13314
![]() |
[90] |
Allers E, Niesner C, Wild C, et al. (2008) Microbes enriched in seawater after addition of coral mucus. Appl Environ Microb 74: 3274–3278. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01870-07
![]() |
[91] |
O'Connor NJ, Richardson DL (1998) Attachment of barnacle (Balanus amphitrite Darwin) larvae: Responses to bacterial films and extracellular materials. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 226: 115–129. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00242-6
![]() |
[92] | Goto S, Tada Y, Suzuki K, et al. (2017) Production and reutilization of fluorescent dissolved organic matter by a marine bacterial strain, Alteromonas macleodii. Front Microbiol 8: 507. |
[93] | Varbanets LD, Avdeeva LV, Borzova NV, et al. (2011) The Black Sea bacteria-producers of hydrolytic enzymes. Mikrobiol Z 73: 9–15. |
[94] | Kesarcodi-Watson A, Kaspar H, Lategan MJ, et al. (2010) Alteromonas macleodii 0444 and Neptunomonas sp. 0536, two novel probiotics for hatchery-reared Greenshell™ mussel larvae, Perna canaliculus. Aquaculture 309: 49–55. |
[95] |
Raguénès G, Cambon-Bonavita MA, Lohier JF, et al. (2003) A novel, highly viscous polysaccharide excreted by an Alteromonas isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent shrimp. Curr Microbiol 46: 448–452. doi: 10.1007/s00284-002-3922-3
![]() |
[96] |
Cambon-Bonavita MA, Raguenes G, Jean J, et al. (2002) A novel polymer produced by a bacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent polychaete annelid. J Appl Microbiol 93: 310–315. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01689.x
![]() |
[97] | Khandeparker L, Gaonkar CC, Desai DV (2013) Degradation of barnacle nauplii: Implications to chitin regulation in the marine environment. Biologia 68: 696–706. |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | Jinhong KE, Bo WANG, Effects of aerobic exercise on memory and its neurobiological mechanism, 2022, 30, 1671-3710, 115, 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00115 | |
2. | James W. Dias, Carolyn M. McClaskey, Jeffrey A. Rumschlag, Kelly C. Harris, Sensory tetanisation to induce long‐term‐potentiation‐like plasticity: A review and reassessment of the approach, 2022, 56, 0953-816X, 6115, 10.1111/ejn.15847 |
Metal ions | Concentration (mM) | Relative activity (%) | Environmental concentrations (mM)* | ||
Est1 | Est2 | Cellulase | |||
Control | 100.0 ± 4.1 | 100.0 ± 6.0 | 100.0 ± 5.8 | ||
Zn 2+ | 1 | 69.9 ± 7.4 | 76.1 ± 6.3 | 73.5 ± 7.9 | 0.54/0.11 |
10 | 24.7 ± 8.3 | 50.2 ± 7.1 | 29.0 ± 6.0 | ||
Cu 2+ | 1 | 65.8 ± 6.2 | 59.0 ± 8.1 | 41.6 ± 4.6 | 0.21/0.05 |
10 | 26.0 ± 7.9 | 17.5 ± 6.8 | 6.9 ± 5.6 | ||
Fe 2+ | 1 | 67.8 ± 4.5 | 72.9 ± 6.6 | 70.2 ± 8.2 | 392.18/152.15 |
10 | 40.4 ± 7.6 | 59.0 ± 8.1 | 30.8 ± 5.6 | ||
Co 2+ | 1 | 94.9 ± 8.7 | 91.6 ± 5.2 | 55.3 ± 4.2 | 0.08/0.05 |
10 | 57.5 ± 5.4 | 46.6 ± 15.4 | 40.1 ± 5.8 | ||
Ba 2+ | 1 | 111.3 ± 6.5 | 106.8 ± 5.6 | 96.9 ± 4.4 | 0.58/0.42 |
10 | 179.1 ± 5.7 | 128.3 ± 7.5 | 153.7 ± 2.8 | ||
Ni 2+ | 1 | 80.8 ± 6.4 | 102.0 ± 11.7 | 68.9 ± 5.6 | 0.11/0.06 |
10 | 69.2 ± 8.9 | 59.8 ± 8.0 | 50.4 ± 7.7 | ||
*: Concentration (mM) of ions in the environmental samples where the enzymes were retrieved. Values on the left are for the sample collected on September 2011 and values on the right of the dash was for a sample collected on May 2012. |
Metal ions | Concentration (mM) | Relative activity (%) | Environmental concentrations (mM)* | ||
Est1 | Est2 | Cellulase | |||
Control | 100.0 ± 4.1 | 100.0 ± 6.0 | 100.0 ± 5.8 | ||
Zn 2+ | 1 | 69.9 ± 7.4 | 76.1 ± 6.3 | 73.5 ± 7.9 | 0.54/0.11 |
10 | 24.7 ± 8.3 | 50.2 ± 7.1 | 29.0 ± 6.0 | ||
Cu 2+ | 1 | 65.8 ± 6.2 | 59.0 ± 8.1 | 41.6 ± 4.6 | 0.21/0.05 |
10 | 26.0 ± 7.9 | 17.5 ± 6.8 | 6.9 ± 5.6 | ||
Fe 2+ | 1 | 67.8 ± 4.5 | 72.9 ± 6.6 | 70.2 ± 8.2 | 392.18/152.15 |
10 | 40.4 ± 7.6 | 59.0 ± 8.1 | 30.8 ± 5.6 | ||
Co 2+ | 1 | 94.9 ± 8.7 | 91.6 ± 5.2 | 55.3 ± 4.2 | 0.08/0.05 |
10 | 57.5 ± 5.4 | 46.6 ± 15.4 | 40.1 ± 5.8 | ||
Ba 2+ | 1 | 111.3 ± 6.5 | 106.8 ± 5.6 | 96.9 ± 4.4 | 0.58/0.42 |
10 | 179.1 ± 5.7 | 128.3 ± 7.5 | 153.7 ± 2.8 | ||
Ni 2+ | 1 | 80.8 ± 6.4 | 102.0 ± 11.7 | 68.9 ± 5.6 | 0.11/0.06 |
10 | 69.2 ± 8.9 | 59.8 ± 8.0 | 50.4 ± 7.7 | ||
*: Concentration (mM) of ions in the environmental samples where the enzymes were retrieved. Values on the left are for the sample collected on September 2011 and values on the right of the dash was for a sample collected on May 2012. |