Review Special Issues

Involvement of CXCL12 Pathway in HPV-related Diseases

  • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer in women worldwide. However, the HPV infection is not sufficient to cause neoplasia, and immune mediators, such as chemokines, are important in this context, since they are involved in the regulation of leukocyte trafficking in many essential biological processes, including inflammation. Prolonged inflammation is thought to facilitate carcinogenesis by providing a microenvironment that is ideal for tumor cell development and growth. Chemokines also contribute to tumor development by promoting angiogenesis and metastasis. Among these molecules we highlight the chemokine CXCL12, also called stromal-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF1-α), a pleiotropic chemokine capable of eliciting multiple signal transduction cascades and functions, via interaction with either CXCR4 or CXCR7, which have been implicated in malignant cell survival, proliferation and migration. This review will focus on our current knowledge in the pathogenesis of HPV infection, the main aspects of CXCL12 signaling, its participation in tumor development and immunodeficiencies that may enable the HPV infection. We also discuss how CXCL12 gene expression and polymorphisms may influence tumor development, especially cervical cancer. Finally, we highlight how the inhibition of CXCL12 pathway may be an attractive alternative for cancer therapeutics.

    Citation: Nádia C. M. Okuyama, Fernando Cezar dos Santos, Kleber Paiva Trugilo, Karen Brajão de Oliveira. Involvement of CXCL12 Pathway in HPV-related Diseases[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(4): 417-440. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.4.417

    Related Papers:

    [1] Sara S. Alzaid, Pawan Kumar Shaw, Sunil Kumar . A study of Ralston's cubic convergence with the application of population growth model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 11320-11344. doi: 10.3934/math.2022632
    [2] R. Marcinkevicius, I. Telksniene, T. Telksnys, Z. Navickas, M. Ragulskis . The construction of solutions to CD(1/n) type FDEs via reduction to (CD(1/n))n type FDEs. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16536-16554. doi: 10.3934/math.2022905
    [3] Khalid K. Ali, Mohamed A. Abd El Salam, Mohamed S. Mohamed . Chebyshev fifth-kind series approximation for generalized space fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7759-7780. doi: 10.3934/math.2022436
    [4] Sara S. Alzaid, Pawan Kumar Shaw, Sunil Kumar . A numerical study of fractional population growth and nuclear decay model. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 11417-11442. doi: 10.3934/math.2022637
    [5] K. Ali Khalid, Aiman Mukheimer, A. Younis Jihad, Mohamed A. Abd El Salam, Hassen Aydi . Spectral collocation approach with shifted Chebyshev sixth-kind series approximation for generalized space fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8622-8644. doi: 10.3934/math.2022482
    [6] M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Humaira Yasmin, Ali M. Mahnashi . Kink phenomena of the time-space fractional Oskolkov equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31163-31179. doi: 10.3934/math.20241502
    [7] Fawaz K. Alalhareth, Seham M. Al-Mekhlafi, Ahmed Boudaoui, Noura Laksaci, Mohammed H. Alharbi . Numerical treatment for a novel crossover mathematical model of the COVID-19 epidemic. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5376-5393. doi: 10.3934/math.2024259
    [8] Kirti Kaushik, Anoop Kumar, Aziz Khan, Thabet Abdeljawad . Existence of solutions by fixed point theorem of general delay fractional differential equation with p-Laplacian operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10160-10176. doi: 10.3934/math.2023514
    [9] Shams A. Ahmed, Tarig M. Elzaki, Abdelgabar Adam Hassan, Husam E. Dargail, Hamdy M. Barakat, M. S. Hijazi . Applications of Elzaki transform to non-conformable fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5264-5284. doi: 10.3934/math.2025243
    [10] Alessandra Jannelli, Maria Paola Speciale . On the numerical solutions of coupled nonlinear time-fractional reaction-diffusion equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 9109-9125. doi: 10.3934/math.2021529
  • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer in women worldwide. However, the HPV infection is not sufficient to cause neoplasia, and immune mediators, such as chemokines, are important in this context, since they are involved in the regulation of leukocyte trafficking in many essential biological processes, including inflammation. Prolonged inflammation is thought to facilitate carcinogenesis by providing a microenvironment that is ideal for tumor cell development and growth. Chemokines also contribute to tumor development by promoting angiogenesis and metastasis. Among these molecules we highlight the chemokine CXCL12, also called stromal-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF1-α), a pleiotropic chemokine capable of eliciting multiple signal transduction cascades and functions, via interaction with either CXCR4 or CXCR7, which have been implicated in malignant cell survival, proliferation and migration. This review will focus on our current knowledge in the pathogenesis of HPV infection, the main aspects of CXCL12 signaling, its participation in tumor development and immunodeficiencies that may enable the HPV infection. We also discuss how CXCL12 gene expression and polymorphisms may influence tumor development, especially cervical cancer. Finally, we highlight how the inhibition of CXCL12 pathway may be an attractive alternative for cancer therapeutics.


    1. Introduction

    Many dyes that are being widely used in various industries such as paper, leather and textiles have become major source of environment pollution. The discharged industrial wastewaters containing dyes are source of serious threat to environment and health due to their toxicity, biodegradation and chemical stability [1]. Various technologies are developed for the removal of dye effluents from wastewater including membrane filtration, chemical oxidation, coagulation, adsorption and extraction [2]. Unfortunately, most of the present strategies developed for treatment of industrial wastewater still have problems like low stability, high cost, poor efficiency [3]. Recent studies are devoted to the major use of photocatalysis for the treatment of dyes from wastewaters because of the advantage of this method over others.

    Metal tungstates are one of the most used materials for photocatalysis. Among metal tungstates, owing to its stability, reactivity and molecular versatility, ZnWO4 has been used widely in various fields such as gas sensor, X-ray, solid-state laser, g-scintillator, photocatalyst [4]. The photocatalytic performance of the semiconductor materials can be improved by compositing them with carbon materials [5]. Graphene, CNT and activated carbon are the carbonaceous material which have been widely used in various applications like electronics, optics, catalysts and biomaterials field [6]. Among them graphene has attracted more attention in developing materials for photocatalysis because of their excellent mechanical, thermal strength, highly ordered structure and high specific surface area [7]. For example, Wang et al. have reported the synthesis of RGO-ZnWO4 nanocomposite for photocatalysis [8] and a recently reported synthesis of RGO-ZnWO4-Fe3O4 nanocomposite for visible light photocatalysis from our group [9,10,11]. Inspired by these publications and as a part of our ongoing research work on tungstate based photocatalysts, we report herein investigation on the photocatalytic activity of the ZnWO4/RGO nanocomposite photocatalyst with varied amount of RGO for the photodegradation of organic dyes MB, MO and RB in a suspension system. The synthesis method used here is more simple and the observed results are also two times better than the reported one [8].


    2. Materials and Method


    2.1. Materials

    All the chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and were of analytical grade. These materials were used as received without any further purification. All the reactions were carried out using deionized water.


    2.2. Synthesis of ZnWO4/RGO Nanocomposites

    One step microwave irradiation method was used to synthesize the ZnWO4/RGO-x (x = 1, 2, 3 and 4 wt% GO) nanocomposite. Typically, the nomenclature ZnWO4/RGO-3% refers to 100 g of ZnWO4 and 3 g of GO respectively in the composite. GO was synthesized by modified Hummers method [12]. To prepare ZnWO4/RGO nanocomposites, a given quantity of GO was dispersed in ethylene glycol solution using sonication for 30 minutes and 0.05 M of zinc acetate solution (50 mL) was slowly added to the dispersed GO solution. Later 0.05 M sodium tungstate solution (50 mL) was added to the above mixture under constant stirring for about 2 hours and maintained at pH = 9 using ammonia. Subsequently, the mixture was irradiated with microwave at 350 W for 10 minutes and the reaction mixture was cool down to room temperature naturally. The blackish precipitate collected was washed with 10% ethanol and dried in vacuum oven at 80 °C for 12 hours. The prepared samples were denoted as ZWRG-1%, ZWRG-2%, ZWRG-3% and ZWRG-4%, respectively, with the number referring to the weight ratios of added GO. Similar approach was carried out to synthesize pure ZnWO4 (denoted as ZW) without adding GO solution and reduced graphene oxide (denoted as RGO) without adding ZnWO4. Among the samples, ZWRG-3% showed the best results for photodegradation of dyes. Hence this sample was adjudged as optimized sample and subjected for further characterizations.


    2.3. Characterization

    The purity and phase structure was determined by XRD (Rigaku, Japan) using Cu Kα (λ = 0.154 nm) radiation with a nickel filter over a 2θ range of 5-60° with a scan rate of 1°·min−1. The morphology and elemental compositions of the prepared catalyst were examined by TEM (JEOL, USA), EDX analysis (SEM equipped with EDX, JEOL, USA) operated at 20 kV and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Multilab 2000, UK). FT-IR spectra were recorded using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker). Room temperature photoluminescence spectrum was measured with 380 nm excitation wavelength source (LS-55, Perkin Elmer Instruments). Absorbance spectrum of the catalyst was obtained by using UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Analytik Jena).


    2.4. Determination of Photocatalytic Activity

    The photocatalytic activities of ZWRG nanocomposites were investigated using an aqueous solution of MB. The catalytic reactions were carried out using 500 mL Pyrex glass beaker with 100 mL of aqueous solution of 10 mg/L of MB in a photoreactor equipped with a 250 W Hg lamp (cut off filter 400 nm) as a source of visible light irradiation. To avoid heating of solutions during experiments, water was circulated around the photoreactor. 10 mg of the photocatalyst was added to the dye solution and stirred for about 30 minutes to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium. For photocatalytic studies, at specified time intervals, 4 mL of the reacted MB solution was withdrawn, centrifuged and UV-Visible spectrum was recorded at a wavelength of 664 nm. Further, to investigate the practical applications of the obtained samples on different organic pollutants such as MO and RB dyes, photocatalytic degradation studies were carried out with these dyes and the prepared nanocomposite employing same experimental procedure at wavelengths 554 nm and 464 nm, respectively. The percentage of degradation of dye was calculated from the following equation.

    Percentage of degradation of dye = (C0 - C)/C × 100

    where, C0 is the initial absorbance of the dye solution and C is the absorbance at interval time "t".


    3. Results and Discussion


    3.1. Characterization of Nanocomposites

    The XRD patterns of RGO, ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposites are shown in Figure 1. The diffraction peaks at 22.6° and 42.6° could be ascribed to reflections from (002) and (100) planes of RGO sheets conforming to JCPDS No. 01-0646. In the case of ZnWO4, the diffraction peaks can be indexed to the monoclinic sanmartinite phase (JCPDS card no. 15-0774) of ZnWO4, with space group P2/c (no. 13) with lattice parameter a = 4.691 Å, b = 5.720 Å, c = 4.925 Å and β = 90.64°. However, the ZWRG-3% nanocomposite did not show any diffraction peak corresponding to RGO. This may be due to the small percentage (3%) of RGO present in the sample. Further, no other impurity peaks were observed in the XRD pattern. The existence of RGO in the composites could be confirmed by FTIR, TEM and XPS results shown later.

    Figure 1. XRD patterns of RGO, ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposites.

    Figure 2 reveals the morphological features of the as-prepared nanocomposites. Layered feature of RGO sheets can be seen in Figure 2a. TEM image in Figure 2b shows rod like ZW particles and in Figure 2c the ZW particles being anchored on the surface of the RGO sheets can be observed. The particles had their length in the range of 40 to 120 nm and width in the range of 10 to 20 nm with an average aspect ratio of 4. Figure 2d shows the HRTEM image of ZWRO-3% wherein, the incorporated ZW on the surface of the RGO nanosheets can be seen. The lattice fringes of 0.47 nm correspond to the (100) plane of ZnWO4. Thus, it is evident that the interface is formed by the ZnWO4 (100) plane on the surface of the RGO sheets. Further, the elemental analysis of the nanocomposites carried out by EDX analysis is shown in Figure S1. In the EDX spectra only C, O, Zn and W elements are found indicating that no impurities are present in the prepared nanocomposites.

    Figure 2. TEM images of (a) RGO, (b) ZW, (c) ZWRG-3% and (d) HRTEM image of ZWRG-3% nanocomposite.

    FTIR spectra of the as-prepared RGO, ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposites are shown in Figure 3. The absorption band at 588 cm−1 corresponds to symmetric deformations of W-O in WO6 octahedron structure [13]. The band at 722 cm−1 can be indexed to symmetrical vibration of bridged O atoms of the Zn-O-W [14]. The absorption bands at 823, 891 and 997 cm−1 are due to the vibration of the WO2 units in the W2O8 group [14]. Further, absorption bands at 1367 and 1720 cm−1 can be attributed to bending vibrations of O-H corresponds to surface adsorbed water molecules on ZnWO4, respectively [15,16]. In the spectra of RGO, the broad bands centred at 1225 cm−1 can be attributed to the C-O stretching vibration of the epoxy groups from the reduced GO sheets [17]. Moreover, the broad band at 1563 cm−1 corresponding to C=C skeletal vibration of RGO sheets can be a support for reduction of GO to RGO sheets [18]. The absorption frequencies observed in neat ZW slightly decreased in the composite due to physical adsorption interactions with the RGO. Similarly, the frequencies of neat RGO get slightly increased in the composite due to same reason. Thus, the FTIR spectral studies establish the interactions occurring in the composite formed.

    Figure 3. FTIR spectra of RGO, ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposites.

    XPS survey spectra of ZWRG-3% (Figure 4) exhibits the elemental peaks for C, Zn, W and O, respectively.

    Figure 4. XPS survey spectra of ZWRG-3% nanocomposite.

    The high resolution deconvoluted C 1s spectra (Figure 5a) shows four peaks located at 284.7 eV, 286.7 eV, 288.4 eV and 290.1 eV, which can be attributed to the C-C (sp2 bonded carbon), C-O (hydroxyls), C=O (carbonyls) and O-C=O (carboxyl) groups respectively. The reduced intensities of oxygenated peaks suggest that the GO has been sufficiently reduced to RGO [19]. The C 1s spectra of GO is given in Figure S2 [ESI] for comparison. The high-resolution Zn 2p spectra shown in Figure 5b consist of two peaks at 1018.9 eV and 1041.8 eV which corresponds to the Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p1/2 belongs to the Zn2+ ions on ZnWO4, respectively [20]. The high-resolution W 4f spectra shown in Figure 5c consist of two peaks at 35.1 eV of W 4f7/2 and 37.2 eV of W 4f5/2. The difference of 2.1 eV in binding energy shows that it belongs to the W+6 ions [21]. Similarly, the high-resolution O 1s spectra shown in Figure 5d consist of three peaks at 531.2 eV, 532.2 eV and 534 eV corresponding to the W-O-W of ZnWO4, hydroxyl/epoxy groups of RGO and Zn-O-C bonds between ZnWO4 and RGO surfaces respectively [22]. Thus, the XPS studies further verifies the interaction between ZW and RGO in the prepared composites complimenting the results of FTIR.

    Figure 5. High resolution XPS spectra of (a) C 1s, (b) Zn 2p, (c) W 4f and (d) O 1s of ZWRG-3% nanocomposite.

    Figure 6 shows the UV-Vis absorption spectrum of GO, RGO, ZW and ZWRG-3% composite. The composite shows higher absorption in the visible range compared to that of GO, RGO and ZW. This may be due to the synergic interactions of RGO and ZW in the composite.

    Figure 6. Absorbance spectra for GO, RGO, ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposite and Tauc plots (a) for pure ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposite.

    To calculate the band gap of the materials, the Tauc relation [23] given below was used.

    αhν = K (hν − Eg)n

    where, α is the absorption coefficient, hν is the energy of photon, K is a constant, Eg is the band gap of semiconductor (n = 1/2, 2, 3/2 and 3 for direct-allowed, indirect-allowed, direct-forbidden and indirect-forbidden transition). In this experiment, the direct band gap for pure ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposite was calculated by making use of (αhν)2 vs. hν plot (inset of Figure 6). The measured band gaps are 3.35 eV and 3.0 eV for ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposite respectively.

    The reduction in the band gap may be attributed to the delocalization of surface charges resulted by the interactions of RGO in the composite. It is believed that such interactions lead to the formation of new molecular orbitals of lower energy which in turn facilitates the reduction in the bandgap. Such observations for semiconductor composites are reported in the literature [9,11,24,25,26]. May be more detailed investigations are required to arrive at precise conclusions on the mechanism of this process. The unique light absorbance performance of the binary composites in the visible light region is of great importance for its photocatalytic application since it can be easily activated by visible light [26].

    PL spectra of ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposites are measured using an excitation wavelength of about 380 nm (Figure 7). The PL emission peak was observed at wavelength of 441 nm for ZW material. However, after the addition of RGO, the intensity of emission peak is significantly decreased. This is due to transfer of electrons from the ZW conduction band to RGO sheets leading to the separation of electron-hole pairs and quenching of luminescence [27]. The results suggest that the combination of RGO and ZW in the composite brings about the synergistic activity in the prepared nanocomposite towards the separation of electron hole pairs and in turn prevents the recombination of photoinduced electron hole pairs facilitating the further energy absorption and enhanced catalytic photodegradation of the substrate [28].

    Figure 7. PL spectra for pure ZW and ZWRG-3% nanocomposite.

    3.2. Photocatalytic Degradation of MB

    MB was taken as a model dye to evaluate the photocatalytic degradation performance of ZWRG nanocomposites. Before switching on the visible light source, the suspension of MB and ZWRG was stirred for 30 minutes in order to achieve the absorption and desorption equilibrium between MB and ZWRG. The result of photocatalytic degradation of MB using ZWRG nanocomposites, with varied concentration of RGO suggests that there is significant enhancement in efficiency compared to pure ZW (Figure 8). In the absence of catalyst there was no change in the concentration of MB even after 150 minutes indicating that self-degradation of MB is negligible and that the degradation occurs only with the aid of the photocatalysts. It is observed that RGO is essential for increasing the efficiency of photocatalytic activities of ZW. Even with a small quantity of RGO (ZWRG-1%) the photocatalytic degradation efficiency increases extensively. With increase in the RGO content, initially the efficiency of photocatalytic activity increases (up to 3%) and decreases then onwards. When the quantity of RGO is 3%, the nanocomposite showed higher efficiency compared to other samples. The photocatalytic degradation efficiencies are 8.27%, 19.37%, 63.46%, 72.23%, 79.20%, 82.85% and 76.68% for Blank (MB), RGO, ZW, ZWRG-1%, ZWRG-2%, ZWRG-3%, and ZWRG-4%, respectively. The decrease in the activity above 3% RGO content may be ascribed to the coverage of RGO on ZW and hence preventing the latter from effective absorption of incident light radiation and causing low activity [29]. The results are also compared with reported ZnWO4 based ones and other nanocomposites (Table S1).

    Figure 8. Photocatalytic degradation of MB dye.

    The bar diagram given in Figure 9 shows pseudo first-order rate constants for the photocatalytic degradation of MB dye calculated according to the equation,

    ln (C0/C) = −kt

    where, C0 is the initial concentration, C is the concentration at irradiation time (t) and k is the first order rate constants. k value was measured from slope of the linear line. The rate constants for photocatalytic degradation (Figure 8) are 0.006 min−1, 0.0013 min−1, 0.005 min−1, 0.009 min−1, 0.0114 min−1, 0.0127 min−1 and 0.0103 min−1 for Blank (MB), RGO, ZW, ZWRG-1%, ZWRG-2%, ZWRG-3%, and ZWRG-4% respectively. The results show that ZWRG-3% exhibit highest rate constant for photocatalytic degradation amongst all the samples towards MB.

    Figure 9. First order rate constants for the degradation of MB dye.

    Further, the activity of the catalyst towards an anionic dye, methyl orange (MO) and a cationic dye, rhodamine B (RB) has also been studied under the same conditions (Figure S3 and Figure S4). Figure 10 shows the comparison of degradation efficiencies of the catalyst ZWRG-3% on MB, RB and MO. As can be seen from the figure, MB (82.85%) and RB (77.06%) degraded to a greater extent than that of MO (61.81%). The MB and RB being cationic dyes can be adsorbed on to the catalyst surface to a better extent because of the fact that the RGO provides a slightly negatively charged surface. Due to the same reason the MO cannot be adsorbed efficiently on to the catalyst surface and this has resulted in the observed variation in the degradation of the dyes. The lesser degradation of RB compared to MB may be due to its larger molecular size compared to the former. The efficiency of the catalyst has also been compared with commercial P25 photocatalyst using MB as the substrate. The performance of ZWRG-3% is found to be much better than that of commercial P25 (Figure S5 and Figure S6) and those reported in the literature [30,31].

    Figure 10. Comparison of degradation efficiency of ZWRG-3% over different dyes.

    The stability and reusability of the catalyst is an important factor for practical applications. The catalyst ZWRG-3% is tested for this property and Figure 11, shows the first five continuous cycles of its performance. As can be observed from the figure, the catalyst has good stability and reusability.

    Figure 11. Plot of C/C0 vs. time for ZWRG-3% with MB over five cycles.

    To identify the major active species of the photocatalytic reactions, the trapping experiments are carried out under the conditions followed for regular photocatalytic degradation processes. Quenchers consisting of benzoquinone (1 mM, BQ) as a scavenger for O2, potassium iodide (10 mM, KI) as a scavenger of h+, silver nitrate (10 mM, AgNO3) as a scavenger of e and ternary butanol (10 mM, TBA) as a scavenger of OH⋅ are added to the MB solution before the addition of nanocomposite to determine the presiding active species and the obtained results are given in Figure 12. As can be understood from the results, in this case, hydroxyl radicals are not the main active species. This is because the corresponding scavenger TBA did not decrease the photo degradation efficiency appreciably. Whereas, the addition of KI (holes scavenger) decreased the rate drastically suggesting that holes are the major active species here followed by electrons and superoxide radical anions, O2.

    Figure 12. Effect of scavengers for ZWRG-3% nanocomposite.

    The schematic representation of the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of MB dye by the ZWRG-3% nanocomposite is shown in Figure 13. In the case of neat ZW, excitation by visible light irradiation is not possible due to its wide energy gap. However, when RGO is introduced, the interactions between ZW and RGO decrease the band gap of the composite enabling it to absorb the visible light and to excite the electrons from VB to CB. The excited electrons in CB and the holes in the VB would get separated efficiently and easily get transferred via RGO interlayer and subsequently react with water and oxygen to generate hydroxyl and superoxide radicals. The radicals would subsequently oxidize the MB to harmless degraded products.

    Figure 13. Photocatalytic degradation mechanism for MB by ZWRG-3% nanocomposite.

    4. Conclusions

    A facile microwave method has been used to synthesize ZWRG nanocomposites. The phase structure, surface morphology and optical properties of the as-synthesized nanocomposites were studied through XRD, FTIR, TEM, EDX, XPS, PL and UV-Visible spectroscopic techniques. The visible light photocatalytic degradation studies of MB with the nanocomposites revealed that the ZWRG-3% nanocomposite exhibits higher performance. The high efficiency of this catalyst is ascribed to the synergic effect of RGO sheets with ZW. The activity was much better than the commercial P25 photocatalyst. Further, the ZWRG-3% nanocomposite catalyst has excellent stability and reusability which can make it a promising eco-friendly catalyst for degradation of dyes or for wastewater treatment.


    Acknowledgment

    M.J.S.M. is grateful to the National Institute of Technology Karnataka-Surathkal, Mangalore, for the award of Institute fellowship.


    Conflict of Interest

    Authors declare that there is not conflict of interest.


    [1] BRASIL. Estimativa 2016: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. INCA 2015.
    [2] Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. (2015) Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA a cancer J Clin 65: 87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262
    [3] Walboomers JMM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. (1999) Human Papillomavirus Is a Necessary Cause Of Invasive Cervical Cancer Worldwide. J Patholgy 189: 12-19.
    [4] Woodman CBJ, Collins SI, Young LS (2007) The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nat Rev Cancer 7: 11-22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2050
    [5] Smith JS, Lindsay L, Hoots B, et al. (2007) Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: A meta-analysis update. Int J Cancer 121: 621-632. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22527
    [6] Lee LJ, Howitt B, Catalano P, et al. (2016) Gynecologic Oncology Prognostic importance of human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 positivity in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 142: 293-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.019
    [7] Levovitz C, Chen D, Ivansson E, et al. (2014) TGFβ Receptor 1: An immune susceptibility gene in HPV-associated cancer. Cancer Res 74: 6833-6844. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0602-T
    [8] Mai S, Welzel G, Ottstadt M, et al. (2015) Prognostic relevance of HPV infection and p16 overexpression in squamous cell anal cancer. Radiat Oncol Biol 93: 819-827. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.004
    [9] Egawa N, Egawa K, Griffin H, et al. (2015) Human Papillomaviruses; epithelial tropisms, and the development of neoplasia. Viruses 7: 3863-3890. doi: 10.3390/v7072802
    [10] Arbyn M, Sanjosé S de, Saraiya M, et al. (2011) EUROGIN 2011 roadmap on prevention and treatment of HPV- related disease. Int J Cancer 131: 1969-1982.
    [11] Doorbar J (2006) Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clin Sci 110: 525-541. doi: 10.1042/CS20050369
    [12] Moody CA, Laimins LA (2010) Human papillomavirus oncoproteins : pathways to transformation. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 550-560. doi: 10.1038/nrc2886
    [13] Doorbar J (2013) The E4 protein —structure , function and patterns of expression. Virology 445: 80-98. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.008
    [14] DiMaio D, Petti LM (2013) The E5 proteins. Virology 445: 99-114. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.05.006
    [15] Beaudenon S, Huibregtse JM (2008) HPV E6 , E6AP and cervical cancer. BMC Biochem 7: 1-7.
    [16] Zhou W, Slingerland JM (2014) Links between oestrogen receptor activation and proteolysis : relevance to hormone-regulated cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 14: 26-38.
    [17] zur Hausen H (2009) Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers—a brief historical account. Virology 384: 260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.11.046
    [18] Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, et al. (2007) Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 370: 890-907. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0
    [19] Schiffman M, Wentzensen N (2013) Human Papillomavirus Infection and the Multistage Carcinogenesis of Cervical Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22: 553-560. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1406
    [20] Castellsagué X, Muñoz N (2003) Chapter 3: Cofactors in human papillomavirus carcinogenesis—role of parity, oral contraceptives, and tobacco smoking. J Nation Cancer Institute Monographs 31: 20-28.
    [21] Patel S, Chiplunkar S (2009) Host immune responses to cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21: 54-59.
    [22] Mbeunkui F, Johann DJJr (2010) Cancer and the tumor microenvironment: a review of an essential relationship. Cancer Chemoter Pharmacol 63: 571-582.
    [23] Vandercappellen J, Van Damme J, Struyf S (2008) The role of CXC chemokines and their receptors in cancer. Cancer Lett 267: 226-244.
    [24] Baggiolini M (2001) Chemokines in pathology and medicine. J Intern Med 250: 91-104.
    [25] Griffith JW, Sokol CL, Luster AD (2014) Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 32: 659-702. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145
    [26] Pozzobon T, Goldoni G, Viola A, et al. (2016) CXCR4 signaling in health and disease. Immunol Lett 177: 6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.06.006
    [27] Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646-674.
    [28] Wani N, Nasser MW, Ahirwar DK, et al. (2014) C-X-C motif chemokine 12/C-X-C chemokine receptor type 7 signaling regulates breast cancer growth and metastasis by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Breast Cancer Res16: R54.
    [29] Bergers G, Benjamin LE (2003) Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 401-410. doi: 10.1038/nrc1093
    [30] Tachibana K, Hirota S, Iizasa H, et al. (1998). The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is essential for vascularization of the gastrointestinal tract. Nature 393: 591-594. doi: 10.1038/31261
    [31] Funakoshi A, Jimi A, Yasunami Y, et al. (1989) CXCL8/IL8 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and the autocrine activation of VEGFR2 in endothelial cells by activating NFkappaB through the CBM (Carma3/Bcl10/Malt1) complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 159: 913-918. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(89)92195-5
    [32] Martin D, Galisteo R, Gutkind JS (2009) CXCL8/IL8 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and the autocrine activation of VEGFR2 in endothelial cells by activating NF-κB through the CBM (Carma3/Bcl10/Malt1) complex. J Biol Chem 284: 6038-6042. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800207200
    [33] Nguyen DX, Bos PD, Massagué J (2009) Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 274-284. doi: 10.1038/nrc2622
    [34] Zlotnik A, Burkhardt AM, Homey B (2011) Homeostatic chemokine receptors and organ-specific metastasis. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 597-606.
    [35] Muller A, Homey B, Soto H, et al. (2001) Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 410: 50-56.
    [36] Terasaki M, Sugita Y, Arakawa F, et al. (2011) CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in malignant brain tumors: a potential pharmacological therapeutic target. Brain Tumor Pathol 28: 89-97.
    [37] Balkwill F (2004) Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 540-550. doi: 10.1038/nrc1388
    [38] Zou W, Machelon V, Coulomb-L'Hermin A, et al. (2001) Stromal-derived factor-1 in human tumors recruits and alters the function of plasmacytoid precursor dendritic cells. Nat Med 7: 1339-1346. doi: 10.1038/nm1201-1339
    [39] Maksym RB, Tarnowski M, Grymula K, et al. (2009) The role of stromal derived factor-1-CXCR7 axis in development and cancer. Eur J Pharmacol 625: 31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.04.071
    [40] Wang J, Knaut H (2014) Chemokine signaling in development and disease. Development 12: 4199-4205.
    [41] Wang Z, Ma Q, Liu Q, et al. (2008) Blockade of SDF-1/CXCR4 signalling inhibits pancreatic cancer progression in vitro via inactivation of canonical Wnt pathway. Br J Cancer 99: 1695-1703. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604745
    [42] Ganju RK, Brubaker SA, Meyer J, et al. (1998) The a-Chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1a, binds to the transmembrane G-protein-coupled CXCR-4 receptor and activates multiple signal transduction pathways. J Biol Chem 273: 23169-23175. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.36.23169
    [43] Bhandari D, Robia SL, Marchese A (2009) The E3 ubiquitin ligase atrophin interacting protein 4 binds directly to the chemokine receptor CXCR4 via a novel WW domain-mediated interaction. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1324-1339. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0308
    [44] Mines MA, Goodwin JS, Limbird LE, et al. (2009) Deubiquitination of CXCR4 by USP14 is critical for both CXCL12-induced CXCR4 degradation and chemotaxis but not ERK activation. J Biol Chem 284: 5742-5752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808507200
    [45] Busillo JM, Benovic JL (2007) Regulation of CXCR4 signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768: 952-963. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.11.002
    [46] Cojoc M, Peitzsch C, Trautmann F, et al. (2013) Emerging targets in cancer management: role of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. Onco Targets Ther 6: 1347-1361.
    [47] Mellado M, Rodríguez-Frade JM, Mañes S, et al. (2001) Chemokine signaling and functional responses: the role of receptor dimerization and TK pathway activation. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 397-421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.397
    [48] Teicher BA, Fricker SP (2010) CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16: 2927-2931.
    [49] Graham GJ, Locati M, Mantovani A, et al. (2012) The biochemistry and biology of the atypical chemokine receptors. Immunol Lett 145: 30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2012.04.004
    [50] Freitas C, Desnoyer A, Meuris F, et al. (2014) The relevance of the chemokine receptor ACKR3/CXCR7 on CXCL12-mediated effects in cancers with a focus on virus-related cancers. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 25: 307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.04.006
    [51] Veldkamp CT, Peterson FC, Pelzek AJ, et al. (2005) The monomer—dimer equilibrium of stromal cell-derived factor-1 ( CXCL 12 ) is altered by pH , phosphate , sulfate , and heparin. Protein Sci 1: 1071-1081.
    [52] Ray P, Lewin SA, Mihalko LA, et al. (2012) Secreted CXCL12 (SDF-1) forms dimers under physiological conditions. Biochem J 442: 433-442.
    [53] Wu B, Chien EY, Mol CD, et al. (2010) Structures of the CXCR4 Chemokine. Science 330: 1066-1071.
    [54] Kramp BK, Sarabi A, Koenen RR, et al. (2011) Heterophilic chemokine receptor interactions in chemokine signaling and biology. Exp Cell Res 317: 655-663.
    [55] Thelen M, Thelen S (2008) CXCR7, CXCR4 and CXCL12: An eccentric trio? J Neuroimmunol 198: 9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.020
    [56] Laguri C, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Lortat-Jacob H (2008) Relationships between glycosaminoglycan and receptor binding sites in chemokines-the CXCL12 example. Carbohydr Res 343: 2018-2023. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.047
    [57] Rueda P, Balabanian K, Lagane B, et al. (2008) The CXCL12γ Chemokine Displays Unprecedented Structural and Functional Properties that Make It a Paradigm of Chemoattractant Proteins. Gold JA, editor. PLoS One 3: e2543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002543
    [58] Sadir R, Imberty A, Baleux F, et al. (2004) Heparan Sulfate/Heparin oligosaccharides protect stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCL12 against proteolysis induced by CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV. J Biol Chem 279: 43854-43860.
    [59] Brule S, Friand V, Sutton A, et al. (2009) Glycosaminoglycans and syndecan-4 are involved in SDF-1/CXCL12-mediated invasion of human epitheloid carcinoma HeLa cells. Biochim Biophys Acta-Gen Subj 1790: 1643-1650.
    [60] Shirozu M, Nakano T, Inazawa J, et al. (1995) Struture and chromosomal localization of the human stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1) gene. Genomics 28: 495-500.
    [61] Winkler C, Modi W, Smith MW, et al. (1998) Genetic restriction of AIDS pathogenesis by an SDF-1 chemokine gene variant. ALIVE Study, Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS), Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study (MHCS), San Francisco City Cohort (SFCC). Science 279: 389-393.
    [62] Feng L, Nian S, Hao Y, et al. (2014) A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1 Gene Is Associated with Coronary Heart Disease in Chinese Patients. Int J Mol Sci 15: 11054-11063. doi: 10.3390/ijms150611054
    [63] Reiche EMV, Ehara Watanabe MA, et al. (2006) The effect of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1/CXCL12) genetic polymorphism on HIV-1 disease progression. Int J Mol Med 18 785-793.
    [64] de Oliveira KB, Oda JMM, Voltarelli JC, et al. (2009) CXCL12 rs1801157 polymorphism in patients with breast cancer, hodgkin’s lymphoma, and non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Lab Anal 23: 387-393. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20346
    [65] Cai C, Wang L-H, Dong Q, et al. (2013) Association of CXCL12 and CXCR4 gene polymorphisms with the susceptibility and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma. Tissue Antigens 82: 165-170. doi: 10.1111/tan.12170
    [66] Schimanski C, Jordan M, Schlaegel F (2011) SNP rs1801157 significantly correlates with distant metastasis in CXCL12 expressing esophagogastri c cancer. Int J Oncol 39: 515-920.
    [67] Razmkhah M, Doroudchi M, Ghayumi SMA, et al. ( 2005) Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) gene and susceptibility of Iranian patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer 49: 311-315.
    [68] Hassan S, Baccarelli A, Salvucci O, et al. (2008) Plasma stromal cell-derived factor-1: host derived marker predictive of distant metastasis in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 446-454.
    [69] Phillips RJ, Burdick MD, Lutz M, et al. ( 2003) The stromal derived factor–1/CXCL12–CXC chemokine receptor 4 biological axis in non–small cell lung cancer metastases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167: 1676-1686.
    [70] Dehghani M, Kianpour S, Zangeneh A, et al. (2014) CXCL12 modulates prostate cancer cell adhesion by altering the levels or activities of  β1-containing integrins. Int J Cell Biol 2014: 981750.
    [71] Beider K, Bitner H, Leiba M, et al. (2014) Multiple myeloma cells recruit tumor-supportive macrophages through the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis and promote their polarization toward the M2 phenotype. Oncotarget 5: 11283-11296. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2207
    [72] Sei S, O’Neill DP, Stewart SK, et al. (2001) Increased level of stromal cell-derived factor-1 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from children with AIDS-related lymphoma. Cancer Res 61: 5028-5037.
    [73] de Oliveira KB, Guembarovski RL, Oda JMM, et al. (2011) CXCL12 rs1801157 polymorphism and expression in peripheral blood from breast cancer patients. Cytokine 55: 260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.04.017
    [74] Leiding JW, Holland SM (2012) Warts and all: human papillomavirus in primary immunodeficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130: 1030-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.049
    [75] Chow KYC, Brotin É, Ben Khalifa Y, et al. (2010) A Pivotal Role for CXCL12 Signaling in HPV-Mediated Transformation of Keratinocytes: Clues to Understanding HPV-Pathogenesis in WHIM Syndrome. Cell Host Microbe 8: 523-533.
    [76] Bachelerie F (2010) CXCL12/CXCR4-axis dysfunctions: Markers of the rare immunodeficiency disorder WHIM syndrome. Dis Markers 29: 189-198. doi: 10.1155/2010/475104
    [77] Maciejewski-Duval A, Meuris F, Bignon A, et al. (2016) Altered chemotactic response to CXCL12 in patients carrying GATA2 mutations. J Leukoc Biol 99: 1065-1076.
    [78] Bignon A, Biajoux V, Bouchet-Delbos L, et al. (2011) CXCR4, a therapeutic target in rare immunodeficiencies? Med Sci (Paris) 27: 391-397. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2011274015
    [79] Maley SN, Schwartz SM, Johnson LG, et al. (2009) Genetic variation in CXCL12 and risk of cervical carcinoma: a population-based case-control study. Int J Immunogenet 36: 367-375. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313X.2009.00877.x
    [80] Tee Y, Yang S-F, Wang P, et al. (2012) G801A Polymorphism of Human Stromal Cell–Derived Factor 1 Gene Raises No Susceptibility to Neoplastic Lesions of Uterine Cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22: 1297-1302. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318265d334
    [81] Roszak A, Misztal M, Sowińska A, et al. (2015) Stromal cell-derived factor-1 G801A polymorphism and the risk factors for cervical cancer. Mol Med Rep 11: 4633-4638.
    [82] Jaafar F, Righi E, Lindstrom V, et al. (2009) Correlation of CXCL12 expression and FoxP3+ cell infiltration with human papillomavirus infection and clinicopathological progression of cervical cancer. Am J Pathol 175: 1525-1535. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090295
    [83] Huang Y, Zhang J, Cui Z-M, et al. (2013) Expression of the CXCL12/CXCR4 and CXCL16/CXCR6 axes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. Chin J Cancer 32: 289-296.
    [84] Kurban S, Tursun M, Kurban G, et al. (2014) Role of CXCR7 and effects on CXCL12 in SiHa cells and upregulation in cervical squamous cell carcinomas in Uighur women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15: 9211-9216 doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.21.9211
    [85] Zanotta N, Tornesello ML, Annunziata C, et al. (2016) Candidate soluble immune mediators in young women with high-risk human papillomavirus infection: high expression of chemokines promoting angiogenesis and cell proliferation. PLoS One 11: e0151851.
    [86] Baker R, Dauner JG, Rodriguez AC, et al. (2011) Increased plasma levels of adipokines and inflammatory markers in older women with persistent HPV infection. Cytokine 53: 282-285. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.11.014
    [87] Shen X, Wang S-H, Liang M, et al. (2008) The role and mechanism of CXCR4 and its ligand SDF-1 in the development of cervical cancer metastasis. Ai Zheng 27: 1044-1049.
    [88] Yadav SS, Prasad SB, Das M, et al. (2014) Epigenetic silencing of CXCR4 promotes loss of cell adhesion in cervical cancer. Biomed Res Int 2014: 581403.
    [89] Donzella GA, Schols D, Lin SW, et al. (1998) AMD3100, a small molecule inhibitor of HIV-1 entry via the CXCR4 co-receptor. Nat Med 4: 72-77. doi: 10.1038/nm0198-072
    [90] Burger JA, Stewart DJ (2009) CXCR4 chemokine receptor antagonists: perspectives in SCLC. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18: 481-490.
    [91] Sayyed SG, Hägele H, Kulkarni OP, et al. (2009) Podocytes produce homeostatic chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCL12, which contributes to glomerulosclerosis, podocyte loss and albuminuria in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52: 2445-2454.
    [92] Miao Z, Luker KE, Summers BC, et al. (2007) CXCR7 (RDC1) promotes breast and lung tumor growth in vivo and is expressed on tumor-associated vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 15735-15740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610444104
    [93] Wang J, Wang J, Sun Y, et al. (2005) Diverse signaling pathways through the SDF-1/CXCR4 chemokine axis in prostate cancer cell lines leads to altered patterns of cytokine secretion and angiogenesis. Cell Signal 17: 1578-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.03.022
    [94] Sowińska A, Jagodzinski PP (2007) RNA interference-mediated knockdown of DNMT1 and DNMT3B induces CXCL12 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer and AsPC1 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Lett 255: 153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.04.004
    [95] Uchida D, Onoue T, Kuribayashi N, et al. (2011) Blockade of CXCR4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma inhibits lymph node metastases. Eur J Cancer 47: 452-459. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.028
    [96] Gupta S, Gupta S (2015) Role of human papillomavirus in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: A review of the literature. Indian J Dent 6: 91-98. doi: 10.4103/0975-962X.155877
    [97] Meuris F, Gaudin F, Aknin M-L, et al. (2016) Symptomatic Improvement in Human Papillomavirus-Induced Epithelial Neoplasia by Specific Targeting of the CXCR4 Chemokine Receptor. J Invest Dermatol 136: 473-480.
    [98] von Knebel Doeberitz M (2001) New molecular tools for efficient screening of cervical cancer. Dis Markers 17: 123-128.
    [99] Sun Y, Schneider A, Jung Y, et al. (2005) Skeletal localization and neutralization of the SDF-1(CXCL12)/CXCR4 axis blocks prostate cancer metastasis and growth in osseous sites in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 20: 318-329.
    [100] Huang EH, Singh B, Cristofanilli M, et al. (2009) A CXCR4 Antagonist CTCE-9908 Inhibits Primary Tumor Growth and Metastasis of Breast Cancer. J Surg Res 155: 231-236.
    [101] Matsusue R, Kubo H, Hisamori S, et al. (2009) Hepatic stellate Cells cromote liver metastasis of colon cancer cells by the action of SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 2645-2653. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0599-x
    [102] Rubin JB, Kung AL, Klein RS, et al. (2003) A small-molecule antagonist of CXCR4 inhibits intracranial growth of primary brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13513-13518.
    [103] Porvasnik S, Sakamoto N, Kusmartsev S, et al. (2009) Effects of CXCR4 antagonist CTCE-9908 on prostate tumor growth. Prostate 69: 1460-1469. doi: 10.1002/pros.21008
    [104] Epstein RJ (2004) The CXCL12-CXCR4 chemotactic pathway as a target of adjuvant breast cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 901-909. doi: 10.1038/nrc1473
    [105] Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, et al. (2007) AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 11: 83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.021
    [106] Kamoun WS, Ley CD, Farrar CT, et al. (2009) Edema control by cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted kinase inhibitor, prolongs survival despite persistent brain tumor growth in mice. J Clin Oncol 27: 2542-2552. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9356
    [107] Shaked Y, Henke E, Roodhart JML, et al. (2008) Rapid chemotherapy-induced acute endothelial progenitor cell mobilization: implications for antiangiogenic drugs as chemosensitizing agents. Cancer Cell 14: 263-273.
    [108] Shaked Y, Tang T, Woloszynek J, et al. (2009) Contribution of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to the acute mobilization of endothelial precursor cells by vascular disrupting agents. Cancer Res 69: 7524-7528. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0381
    [109] Kozin S V., Kamoun WS, Huang Y, et al. (2010) Recruitment of myeloid but not endothelial precursor cells facilitates tumor regrowth after local irradiation. Cancer Res 70: 5679-5685. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4446
    [110] Kioi M, Vogel H, Schultz G, et al. (2010) Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice. J Clin Invest 120: 694-705. doi: 10.1172/JCI40283
    [111] Hattermann K, Held-Feindt J, Lucius R, et al. (2010) The Chemokine Receptor CXCR7 Is Highly Expressed in Human Glioma Cells and Mediates Antiapoptotic Effects. Cancer Res 70: 3299-3308.
    [112] Zagzag D, Esencay M, Mendez O, et al. (2008) Hypoxia and vascular endothelial growth factor-induced stromal cell-derived factor-1α/CXCR4 expression in glioblastomas. Am J Pathol 173: 545-560. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071197
    [113] Batchelor TT, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, et al. (2010) Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28: 2817-2823. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3988
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. M. Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq, Sankararao Mutyala, Jayaraman Mathiyarasu, D. Krishna Bhat, RGO/ZnWO 4 /Fe 3 O 4 nanocomposite as an efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction, 2017, 799, 15726657, 102, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.05.051
    2. Wen Yan, Xiangchun Liu, Shan Hou, Xiao Wang, Study on micro-nanocrystalline structure control and performance of ZnWO4 photocatalysts, 2019, 9, 2044-4753, 1141, 10.1039/C8CY02343C
    3. R. F. Gonçalves, E. Longo, A. P. A. Marques, M. D. P. Silva, L. S. Cavalcante, I. C. Nogueira, I. M. Pinatti, P. F. S. Pereira, M. J. Godinho, Structural investigation and photoluminescent properties of ZnWO4:Dy3+ nanocrystals, 2017, 28, 0957-4522, 15466, 10.1007/s10854-017-7434-0
    4. K. Brijesh, H. S. Nagaraja, ZnWO4/r-GO nanocomposite as high capacity anode for lithium-ion battery, 2020, 26, 0947-7047, 2813, 10.1007/s11581-020-03480-1
    5. K. Brijesh, S. Vinayraj, P.C. Dhanush, K. Bindu, H.S. Nagaraja, ZnWO4/SnO2@r-GO nanocomposite as an anode material for high capacity lithium ion battery, 2020, 354, 00134686, 136676, 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136676
    6. Ravindranadh Koutavarapu, Bathula Babu, Ch. Venkata Reddy, Kisoo Yoo, Migyung Cho, Jaesool Shim, A novel one-pot approach of ZnWO4 nanorods decorated onto g-C3N4 nanosheets: 1D/2D heterojunction for enhanced solar-light-driven photocatalytic activity, 2020, 55, 0022-2461, 1170, 10.1007/s10853-019-04022-5
    7. Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq Mohamed, Denthaje Krishna Bhat, A facile microwave approach to synthesize RGO-BaWO4 composites for high performance visible light induced photocatalytic degradation of dyes, 2017, 4, 2372-0484, 487, 10.3934/matersci.2017.2.487
    8. M. Jagadeesh Babu, Sathish Mohan Botsa, S. Jhansi Rani, B. Venkateswararao, R. Muralikrishna, Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of cationic dyes under visible light irradiation by CuWO4-RGO nanocomposite, 2020, 3, 2522-0128, 205, 10.1007/s42114-020-00149-1
    9. K. Brijesh, H. S. Nagaraja, Lower Band Gap Sb/ZnWO4/r-GO Nanocomposite Based Supercapacitor Electrodes, 2019, 48, 0361-5235, 4188, 10.1007/s11664-019-07185-8
    10. Aiguo Wang, Danielle Austin, Hui Qian, Hongbo Zeng, Hua Song, Catalytic Valorization of Furfural under Methane Environment, 2018, 6, 2168-0485, 8891, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01257
    11. M. Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq, U. Sandhya Shenoy, D. Krishna Bhat, Enhanced photocatalytic performance of N-doped RGO-FeWO 4 /Fe 3 O 4 ternary nanocomposite in environmental applications, 2017, 4, 24685194, 133, 10.1016/j.mtchem.2017.04.003
    12. M. Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq, U. Sandhya Shenoy, D. Krishna Bhat, NiWO 4 -ZnO-NRGO ternary nanocomposite as an efficient photocatalyst for degradation of methylene blue and reduction of 4-nitro phenol, 2017, 109, 00223697, 124, 10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.05.023
    13. M. Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq, D. Krishna Bhat, Novel NiWO4-ZnO-NRGO Ternary Nanocomposites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity, 2018, 5, 22147853, 22412, 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.610
    14. Chukwuka Bethel Anucha, Ilknur Altin, Zekeriya Biyiklioglu, Emin Bacaksiz, Ismail Polat, Vassilis N. Stathopoulos, Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalytic Evaluation of Manganese (III) Phthalocyanine Sensitized ZnWO4 (ZnWO4MnPc) for Bisphenol A Degradation under UV Irradiation, 2020, 10, 2079-4991, 2139, 10.3390/nano10112139
    15. Kathalingam Adaikalam, Sivalingam Ramesh, P. Santhoshkumar, Heung Soo Kim, Hyun‐Chang Park, Hyun‐Seok Kim, MnO 2 / Co 3 O 4 with N and S co‐doped graphene oxide bimetallic nanocomposite for hybrid supercapacitor and photosensor applications , 2022, 46, 0363-907X, 4494, 10.1002/er.7443
    16. Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq Mohamed, 2022, 9781119827504, 99, 10.1002/9781119827634.ch4
    17. Sahil Thareja, Anil Kumar, In Situ Wet Synthesis of N-ZnO/N-rGO Nanohybrids as an Electrode Material for High-Performance Supercapacitors and Simultaneous Nonenzymatic Electrochemical Sensing of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine, and Uric Acid at Their Interface, 2021, 125, 1932-7447, 24837, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08413
    18. Hamed Ramezanalizadeh, Ezzat Rafiee, Photoelectrochemical study of novel solar light n-p heterojunction photocatalyst including molybdates decorated on RGO nanosheets for dye degradation of wastewater, 2022, 19, 1735-207X, 2005, 10.1007/s13738-021-02440-4
    19. N. S. Pavithra, G. Nagaraju, S. B. Patil, Ionic liquid-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of ZnWO4 nanoparticles used for photocatalytic applications, 2021, 27, 0947-7047, 3533, 10.1007/s11581-021-04123-9
    20. Mohamed Jaffer Sadiq Mohamed, High bifunctional electrocatalytic activity of FeWO4/Fe3O4@NrGO nanocomposites towards electrolyzer and fuel cell technologies, 2021, 897, 15726657, 115587, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115587
    21. Hassana Ladio Abubakar, Jimoh Oladejo Tijani, Saka Ambali Abdulkareem, Abdullahi Mann, Saheed Mustapha, A review on the applications of zinc tungstate (ZnWO4) photocatalyst for wastewater treatment, 2022, 8, 24058440, e09964, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09964
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7283) PDF downloads(1307) Cited by(2)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog