Modelling the strategies for age specific vaccination scheduling during influenza pandemic outbreaks

  • Received: 01 March 2010 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 January 2011
  • MSC : Primary: 92D30.

  • Finding optimal policies to reduce the morbidity and mortality of the ongoing pandemic is a top public health priority. Using a compartmental model with age structure and vaccination status, we examined the effect of age specific scheduling of vaccination during a pandemic influenza outbreak, when there is a race between the vaccination campaign and the dynamics of the pandemic. Our results agree with some recent studies on that age specificity is paramount to vaccination planning. However, little is known about the effectiveness of such control measures when they are applied during the outbreak. Comparing five possible strategies, we found that age specific scheduling can have a huge impact on the outcome of the epidemic. For the best scheme, the attack rates were up to 10% lower than for other strategies. We demonstrate the importance of early start of the vaccination campaign, since ten days delay may increase the attack rate by up to 6%. Taking into account the delay between developing immunity and vaccination is a key factor in evaluating the impact of vaccination campaigns. We provide a general framework which will be useful for the next pandemic waves as well.

    Citation: Diána H. Knipl, Gergely Röst. Modelling the strategies for age specific vaccination scheduling during influenza pandemic outbreaks[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 123-139. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.123

    Related Papers:

    [1] Eunha Shim . Prioritization of delayed vaccination for pandemic influenza. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 95-112. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.95
    [2] Olivia Prosper, Omar Saucedo, Doria Thompson, Griselle Torres-Garcia, Xiaohong Wang, Carlos Castillo-Chavez . Modeling control strategies for concurrent epidemics of seasonal and pandemic H1N1 influenza. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 141-170. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.141
    [3] Eunha Shim . Optimal strategies of social distancing and vaccination against seasonal influenza. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(5&6): 1615-1634. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1615
    [4] Rodolfo Acuňa-Soto, Luis Castaňeda-Davila, Gerardo Chowell . A perspective on the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic in Mexico. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 223-238. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.223
    [5] Christopher S. Bowman, Julien Arino, S.M. Moghadas . Evaluation of vaccination strategies during pandemic outbreaks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 113-122. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.113
    [6] Tom Reichert . Pandemic mitigation: Bringing it home. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 65-76. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.65
    [7] Qingling Zeng, Kamran Khan, Jianhong Wu, Huaiping Zhu . The utility of preemptive mass influenza vaccination in controlling a SARS outbreak during flu season. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2007, 4(4): 739-754. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.739
    [8] Sherry Towers, Katia Vogt Geisse, Chia-Chun Tsai, Qing Han, Zhilan Feng . The impact of school closures on pandemic influenza: Assessing potential repercussions using a seasonal SIR model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(2): 413-430. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.413
    [9] Majid Jaberi-Douraki, Seyed M. Moghadas . Optimal control of vaccination dynamics during an influenza epidemic. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(5): 1045-1063. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1045
    [10] Marco Arieli Herrera-Valdez, Maytee Cruz-Aponte, Carlos Castillo-Chavez . Multiple outbreaks for the same pandemic: Local transportation and social distancing explain the different "waves" of A-H1N1pdm cases observed in México during 2009. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 21-48. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.21
  • Finding optimal policies to reduce the morbidity and mortality of the ongoing pandemic is a top public health priority. Using a compartmental model with age structure and vaccination status, we examined the effect of age specific scheduling of vaccination during a pandemic influenza outbreak, when there is a race between the vaccination campaign and the dynamics of the pandemic. Our results agree with some recent studies on that age specificity is paramount to vaccination planning. However, little is known about the effectiveness of such control measures when they are applied during the outbreak. Comparing five possible strategies, we found that age specific scheduling can have a huge impact on the outcome of the epidemic. For the best scheme, the attack rates were up to 10% lower than for other strategies. We demonstrate the importance of early start of the vaccination campaign, since ten days delay may increase the attack rate by up to 6%. Taking into account the delay between developing immunity and vaccination is a key factor in evaluating the impact of vaccination campaigns. We provide a general framework which will be useful for the next pandemic waves as well.


  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mark Mullikin, Litjen Tan, Jeroen P. Jansen, Marc Van Ranst, Norbert Farkas, Eckhardt Petri, A Novel Dynamic Model for Health Economic Analysis of Influenza Vaccination in the Elderly, 2015, 4, 2193-8229, 459, 10.1007/s40121-015-0076-8
    2. Jun-Yuan Yang, Yuming Chen, Feng-Qin Zhang, Stability analysis and optimal control of a hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) model, 2013, 41, 1598-5865, 99, 10.1007/s12190-012-0597-1
    3. Sunmi Lee, Michael Golinski, Gerardo Chowell, Modeling Optimal Age-Specific Vaccination Strategies Against Pandemic Influenza, 2012, 74, 0092-8240, 958, 10.1007/s11538-011-9704-y
    4. János Karsai, Rita Csuma-Kovács, Ágnes Dánielisz, Zsuzsanna Molnár, János Dudás, Teodóra Borsos, Gergely Röst, Modeling the transmission dynamics of varicella in Hungary, 2020, 10, 2190-5983, 10.1186/s13362-020-00079-z
    5. Jessica M Conway, Ashleigh R Tuite, David N Fisman, Nathaniel Hupert, Rafael Meza, Bahman Davoudi, Krista English, P van den Driessche, Fred Brauer, Junling Ma, Lauren Ancel Meyers, Marek Smieja, Amy Greer, Danuta M Skowronski, David L Buckeridge, Jeffrey C Kwong, Jianhong Wu, Seyed M Moghadas, Daniel Coombs, Robert C Brunham, Babak Pourbohloul, Vaccination against 2009 pandemic H1N1 in a population dynamical model of Vancouver, Canada: timing is everything, 2011, 11, 1471-2458, 10.1186/1471-2458-11-932
    6. Edwin C. Yuan, David L. Alderson, Sean Stromberg, Jean M. Carlson, James M McCaw, Optimal Vaccination in a Stochastic Epidemic Model of Two Non-Interacting Populations, 2015, 10, 1932-6203, e0115826, 10.1371/journal.pone.0115826
    7. Judith C. Maro, Dennis G. Fryback, Tracy A. Lieu, Grace M. Lee, David B. Martin, Jodie McVernon, Responding to Vaccine Safety Signals during Pandemic Influenza: A Modeling Study, 2014, 9, 1932-6203, e115553, 10.1371/journal.pone.0115553
    8. Matt J. Keeling, Andrew Shattock, Optimal but unequitable prophylactic distribution of vaccine, 2012, 4, 17554365, 78, 10.1016/j.epidem.2012.03.001
    9. Rita Csuma-Kovács, János Dudás, János Karsai, Ágnes Dánielisz, Zsuzsanna Molnár, Gergely Röst, 2019, Chapter 31, 978-3-030-27549-5, 249, 10.1007/978-3-030-27550-1_31
    10. K. Muqbel, A. Dénes, G. Röst, 2019, Chapter 19, 978-3-030-23432-4, 299, 10.1007/978-3-030-23433-1_19
    11. Githa Fungie Galistiani, Mária Matuz, Nikolett Matuszka, Péter Doró, Krisztina Schváb, Zsófia Engi, Ria Benkő, Determinants of influenza vaccine uptake and willingness to be vaccinated by pharmacists among the active adult population in Hungary: a cross-sectional exploratory study, 2021, 21, 1471-2458, 10.1186/s12889-021-10572-8
    12. Emma S. McBryde, Michael T. Meehan, Oyelola A. Adegboye, Adeshina I. Adekunle, Jamie M. Caldwell, Anton Pak, Diana P. Rojas, Bridget M. Williams, James M. Trauer, Role of modelling in COVID-19 policy development, 2020, 35, 15260542, 57, 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.013
    13. Attila Dénes, László Székely, Global dynamics of a mathematical model for the possible re-emergence of polio, 2017, 293, 00255564, 64, 10.1016/j.mbs.2017.08.010
    14. Mustafa DEMİRBİLEK, Benzetim tabanlı adaptif aşı dağıtım stratejisi, 2022, 1300-1884, 10.17341/gazimmfd.758346
    15. Oğuz Gürerk, Mustafa Akan, 2022, chapter 10, 9781799886747, 188, 10.4018/978-1-7998-8674-7.ch010
    16. Hanisha Tatapudi, Rachita Das, Tapas K. Das, Impact of vaccine prioritization strategies on mitigating COVID-19: an agent-based simulation study using an urban region in the United States, 2021, 21, 1471-2288, 10.1186/s12874-021-01458-9
    17. Elson HY Lam, Benjamin J Cowling, Alex R Cook, Jessica YT Wong, Max SY Lau, Hiroshi Nishiura, The feasibility of age-specific travel restrictions during influenza pandemics, 2011, 8, 1742-4682, 10.1186/1742-4682-8-44
    18. Mustafa DEMİRBİLEK, Tam ve Kısmi Kapanma Stratejilerinin COVID-19 Salgını Üzerinden Karşılaştırılması, 2021, 2148-3736, 10.31202/ecjse.909927
    19. Joseph L Servadio, Marc Choisy, Pham Quang Thai, Maciej F Boni, Bruce Levine, Influenza vaccine allocation in tropical settings under constrained resources, 2024, 3, 2752-6542, 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae379
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2011 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3121) PDF downloads(599) Cited by(19)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog