Time variations in the generation time of an infectious disease:
Implications for sampling to appropriately quantify transmission
potential

Hiroshi Nishiura; Hiroshi Nishiura

doi:10.3934/mbe.2010.7.851

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

2010, Volume 7, Issue 4: 851-869. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.851

Previous Article Next Article

Time variations in the generation time of an infectious disease: Implications for sampling to appropriately quantify transmission potential

Hiroshi Nishiura

1.
PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), 4-1-8 Honcho Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012

Received: 01 November 2009 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 October 2010
MSC : Primary: 00A71, 37N25; Secondary: 92C60, 92D30.

Although the generation time of an infectious disease plays a key role in estimating its transmission potential, the impact of the sampling time of generation times on the estimation procedure has yet to be clarified. The present study defines the period and cohort generation times, both of which are time-inhomogeneous, as a function of the infection time of secondary and primary cases, respectively. By means of analytical and numerical approaches, it is shown that the period generation time increases with calendar time, whereas the cohort generation time decreases as the incidence increases. The initial growth phase of an epidemic of Asian influenza A (H2N2) in the Netherlands in 1957 was reanalyzed, and estimates of the basic reproduction number,

R_{0}

$R_0$ , from the Lotka-Euler equation were examined. It was found that the sampling time of generation time during the course of the epidemic introduced a time-effect to the estimate of

R_{0}

$R_0$ . Other historical data of a primary pneumonic plague in Manchuria in 1911 were also examined to help illustrate the empirical evidence of the period generation time. If the serial intervals, which eventually determine the generation times, are sampled during the course of an epidemic, direct application of the sampled generation-time distribution to the Lotka-Euler equation leads to a biased estimate of

R_{0}

$R_0$ . An appropriate quantification of the transmission potential requires the estimation of the cohort generation time during the initial growth phase of an epidemic or adjustment of the time-effect (e.g., adjustment of the growth rate of the epidemic during the sampling time) on the period generation time. A similar issue also applies to the estimation of the effective reproduction number as a function of calendar time. Mathematical properties of the generation time distribution in a heterogeneously mixing population need to be clarified further.

Keywords:

Citation: Hiroshi Nishiura. Time variations in the generation time of an infectious disease:Implications for sampling to appropriately quantify transmissionpotential[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(4): 851-869. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.851

Related Papers:

[1]	Hiroshi Nishiura . Joint quantification of transmission dynamics and diagnostic accuracy applied to influenza. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 49-64. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.49
[2]	Salihu S. Musa, Shi Zhao, Winnie Mkandawire, Andrés Colubri, Daihai He . An epidemiological modeling investigation of the long-term changing dynamics of the plague epidemics in Hong Kong. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(10): 7435-7453. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024327
[3]	Fangyuan Chen, Rong Yuan . Reconsideration of the plague transmission in perspective of multi-host zoonotic disease model with interspecific interaction. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4422-4442. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020244
[4]	Raimund Bürger, Gerardo Chowell, Pep Mulet, Luis M. Villada . Modelling the spatial-temporal progression of the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic in Chile. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(1): 43-65. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016.13.43
[5]	Sherry Towers, Katia Vogt Geisse, Chia-Chun Tsai, Qing Han, Zhilan Feng . The impact of school closures on pandemic influenza: Assessing potential repercussions using a seasonal SIR model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(2): 413-430. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.413
[6]	Xiaomeng Wang, Xue Wang, Xinzhu Guan, Yun Xu, Kangwei Xu, Qiang Gao, Rong Cai, Yongli Cai . The impact of ambient air pollution on an influenza model with partial immunity and vaccination. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(6): 10284-10303. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023451
[7]	Eunha Shim . Optimal strategies of social distancing and vaccination against seasonal influenza. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(5&6): 1615-1634. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1615
[8]	Meili Li, Hong Wang, Baojun Song, Junling Ma . The spread of influenza-like-illness within the household in Shanghai, China. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1889-1900. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020099
[9]	Eunha Shim . Prioritization of delayed vaccination for pandemic influenza. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 95-112. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.95
[10]	Paula A. González-Parra, Sunmi Lee, Leticia Velázquez, Carlos Castillo-Chavez . A note on the use of optimal control on a discrete time model of influenza dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(1): 183-197. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.183

Abstract

Although the generation time of an infectious disease plays a key role in estimating its transmission potential, the impact of the sampling time of generation times on the estimation procedure has yet to be clarified. The present study defines the period and cohort generation times, both of which are time-inhomogeneous, as a function of the infection time of secondary and primary cases, respectively. By means of analytical and numerical approaches, it is shown that the period generation time increases with calendar time, whereas the cohort generation time decreases as the incidence increases. The initial growth phase of an epidemic of Asian influenza A (H2N2) in the Netherlands in 1957 was reanalyzed, and estimates of the basic reproduction number, $R_0$ , from the Lotka-Euler equation were examined. It was found that the sampling time of generation time during the course of the epidemic introduced a time-effect to the estimate of $R_0$ . Other historical data of a primary pneumonic plague in Manchuria in 1911 were also examined to help illustrate the empirical evidence of the period generation time. If the serial intervals, which eventually determine the generation times, are sampled during the course of an epidemic, direct application of the sampled generation-time distribution to the Lotka-Euler equation leads to a biased estimate of $R_0$ . An appropriate quantification of the transmission potential requires the estimation of the cohort generation time during the initial growth phase of an epidemic or adjustment of the time-effect (e.g., adjustment of the growth rate of the epidemic during the sampling time) on the period generation time. A similar issue also applies to the estimation of the effective reproduction number as a function of calendar time. Mathematical properties of the generation time distribution in a heterogeneously mixing population need to be clarified further.

This article has been cited by:

1.	Baoyin Yuan, Hyojung Lee, Hiroshi Nishiura, Robert C Reiner, Assessing dengue control in Tokyo, 2014, 2019, 13, 1935-2735, e0007468, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007468
2.	Giorgio Guzzetta, Claudia Minosse, Raffaella Pisapia, Emanuela Giombini, Alessia Mammone, Francesco Vairo, Anna Rosa Garbuglia, Paola Scognamiglio, Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Stefano Merler, Giuseppe Ippolito, Simone Lanini, Household transmission and disease transmissibility of a large HAV outbreak in Lazio, Italy, 2016–2017, 2019, 29, 17554365, 100351, 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100351
3.	Hiroshi Nishiura, Gerardo Chowell, Carlos Castillo-Chavez, Alessandro Vespignani, Did Modeling Overestimate the Transmission Potential of Pandemic (H1N1-2009)? Sample Size Estimation for Post-Epidemic Seroepidemiological Studies, 2011, 6, 1932-6203, e17908, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017908
4.	Michael George Roberts, Hiroshi Nishiura, Maciej F. Boni, Early Estimation of the Reproduction Number in the Presence of Imported Cases: Pandemic Influenza H1N1-2009 in New Zealand, 2011, 6, 1932-6203, e17835, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017835
5.	Claudia T. Codeço, Daniel A.M. Villela, Flavio C. Coelho, Estimating the effective reproduction number of dengue considering temperature-dependent generation intervals, 2018, 25, 17554365, 101, 10.1016/j.epidem.2018.05.011
6.	Henrik Salje, Derek A.T. Cummings, Justin Lessler, Estimating infectious disease transmission distances using the overall distribution of cases, 2016, 17, 17554365, 10, 10.1016/j.epidem.2016.10.001
7.	Christopher E. Overton, Helena B. Stage, Shazaad Ahmad, Jacob Curran-Sebastian, Paul Dark, Rajenki Das, Elizabeth Fearon, Timothy Felton, Martyn Fyles, Nick Gent, Ian Hall, Thomas House, Hugo Lewkowicz, Xiaoxi Pang, Lorenzo Pellis, Robert Sawko, Andrew Ustianowski, Bindu Vekaria, Luke Webb, Using statistics and mathematical modelling to understand infectious disease outbreaks: COVID-19 as an example, 2020, 5, 24680427, 409, 10.1016/j.idm.2020.06.008
8.	N. Hens, L. Calatayud, S. Kurkela, T. Tamme, J. Wallinga, Robust Reconstruction and Analysis of Outbreak Data: Influenza A(H1N1)v Transmission in a School-based Population, 2012, 176, 0002-9262, 196, 10.1093/aje/kws006
9.	Ping Yan, Gerardo Chowell, 2019, Chapter 7, 978-3-030-21922-2, 217, 10.1007/978-3-030-21923-9_7
10.	Bradford P. Taylor, Jonathan Dushoff, Joshua S. Weitz, Stochasticity and the limits to confidence when estimating R0 of Ebola and other emerging infectious diseases, 2016, 408, 00225193, 145, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.08.016
11.	Niels B. Kammerer, Wolfgang Stummer, Some Dissimilarity Measures of Branching Processes and Optimal Decision Making in the Presence of Potential Pandemics, 2020, 22, 1099-4300, 874, 10.3390/e22080874
12.	Hiroshi Nishiura, Ping Yan, Candace K. Sleeman, Charles J. Mode, Estimating the transmission potential of supercritical processes based on the final size distribution of minor outbreaks, 2012, 294, 00225193, 48, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.10.039
13.	Sang Woo Park, Kaiyuan Sun, David Champredon, Michael Li, Benjamin M. Bolker, David J. D. Earn, Joshua S. Weitz, Bryan T. Grenfell, Jonathan Dushoff, Forward-looking serial intervals correctly link epidemic growth to reproduction numbers, 2021, 118, 0027-8424, e2011548118, 10.1073/pnas.2011548118
14.	Íde Cremin, Oliver Watson, Alastair Heffernan, Natsuko Imai, Norin Ahmed, Sandra Bivegete, Teresia Kimani, Demetris Kyriacou, Preveina Mahadevan, Rima Mustafa, Panagiota Pagoni, Marisa Sophiea, Charlie Whittaker, Leo Beacroft, Steven Riley, Matthew C. Fisher, An infectious way to teach students about outbreaks, 2018, 23, 17554365, 42, 10.1016/j.epidem.2017.12.002
15.	Hiroshi Nishiura, Gerardo Chowell, Theoretical perspectives on the infectiousness of Ebola virus disease, 2015, 12, 1742-4682, 10.1186/1742-4682-12-1
16.	Marek Laskowski, Amy L. Greer, Seyed M. Moghadas, Alessandro Vespignani, Antiviral Strategies for Emerging Influenza Viruses in Remote Communities, 2014, 9, 1932-6203, e89651, 10.1371/journal.pone.0089651
17.	Luigi Palatella, Fabio Vanni, David Lambert, A phenomenological estimate of the true scale of CoViD-19 from primary data, 2021, 146, 09600779, 110854, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110854
18.	Keisuke Ejima, Kazuyuki Aihara, Hiroshi Nishiura, Probabilistic differential diagnosis of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) using the time from immigration to illness onset among imported cases, 2014, 346, 00225193, 47, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.12.024
19.	Yuhao Deng, Chong You, Yukun Liu, Jing Qin, Xiao‐Hua Zhou, Estimation of incubation period and generation time based on observed length‐biased epidemic cohort with censoring for COVID‐19 outbreak in China, 2020, 0006-341X, 10.1111/biom.13325
20.	Ryosuke Omori, Hiroshi Nishiura, Theoretical basis to measure the impact of short-lasting control of an infectious disease on the epidemic peak, 2011, 8, 1742-4682, 10.1186/1742-4682-8-2
21.	Hiroshi Nishiura, Akira Endo, Masaya Saitoh, Ryo Kinoshita, Ryo Ueno, Shinji Nakaoka, Yuichiro Miyamatsu, Yueping Dong, Gerardo Chowell, Kenji Mizumoto, Identifying determinants of heterogeneous transmission dynamics of the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in the Republic of Korea, 2015: a retrospective epidemiological analysis, 2016, 6, 2044-6055, e009936, 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009936
22.	Sang Woo Park, David Champredon, Jonathan Dushoff, Inferring generation-interval distributions from contact-tracing data, 2020, 17, 1742-5689, 20190719, 10.1098/rsif.2019.0719
23.	Sebastian Funk, Adam J. Kucharski, Anton Camacho, Rosalind M. Eggo, Laith Yakob, Lawrence M. Murray, W. John Edmunds, Michael A Johansson, Comparative Analysis of Dengue and Zika Outbreaks Reveals Differences by Setting and Virus, 2016, 10, 1935-2735, e0005173, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005173
24.	Matthew Biggerstaff, Simon Cauchemez, Carrie Reed, Manoj Gambhir, Lyn Finelli, Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature, 2014, 14, 1471-2334, 10.1186/1471-2334-14-480
25.	George Livadiotis, Oscar Millet, Statistical analysis of the impact of environmental temperature on the exponential growth rate of cases infected by COVID-19, 2020, 15, 1932-6203, e0233875, 10.1371/journal.pone.0233875
26.	Nicholas H. Ogden, Milka Radojevic´, Xiaotian Wu, Venkata R. Duvvuri, Patrick A. Leighton, Jianhong Wu, Estimated Effects of Projected Climate Change on the Basic Reproductive Number of the Lyme Disease VectorIxodes scapularis, 2014, 122, 0091-6765, 631, 10.1289/ehp.1307799
27.	Katrina A Lythgoe, Sheila F Lumley, Lorenzo Pellis, Jane A McKeating, Philippa C Matthews, Estimating hepatitis B virus cccDNA persistence in chronic infection†, 2021, 7, 2057-1577, 10.1093/ve/veaa063
28.	Hyojung Lee, Hiroshi Nishiura, Sexual transmission and the probability of an end of the Ebola virus disease epidemic, 2019, 471, 00225193, 1, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.03.022
29.	David Champredon, Jonathan Dushoff, Intrinsic and realized generation intervals in infectious-disease transmission, 2015, 282, 0962-8452, 20152026, 10.1098/rspb.2015.2026
30.	Kenji Mizumoto, Hiroshi Nishiura, Taro Yamamoto, Effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis coupled with contact tracing in reducing the transmission of the influenza A (H1N1-2009): a systematic review, 2013, 10, 1742-4682, 10.1186/1742-4682-10-4
31.	Shi Zhao, Yu Zhao, Biao Tang, Daozhou Gao, Zihao Guo, Marc K.C. Chong, Salihu S Musa, Yongli Cai, Weiming Wang, Daihai He, Maggie H Wang, Shrinkage in serial intervals across transmission generations of COVID-19, 2021, 529, 00225193, 110861, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110861
32.	Niayesh Afshordi, Benjamin P. Holder, Mohammad Bahrami, Daniel Lichtblau, 2022, Chapter 1, 978-3-030-85052-4, 1, 10.1007/978-3-030-85053-1_1
33.	Sang Woo Park, Benjamin M. Bolker, Sebastian Funk, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Joshua S. Weitz, Bryan T. Grenfell, Jonathan Dushoff, The importance of the generation interval in investigating dynamics and control of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, 2022, 19, 1742-5662, 10.1098/rsif.2022.0173
34.	Bastien Reyné, Quentin Richard, Christian Selinger, Mircea T. Sofonea, Ramsès Djidjou-Demasse, Samuel Alizon, Jacek Banasiak, Non-Markovian modelling highlights the importance of age structure on Covid-19 epidemiological dynamics, 2022, 17, 0973-5348, 7, 10.1051/mmnp/2022008
35.	Yiu Chung Lau, Tim K Tsang, Lee Kennedy-Shaffer, Rebecca Kahn, Eric H Y Lau, Dongxuan Chen, Jessica Y Wong, Sheikh Taslim Ali, Peng Wu, Benjamin J Cowling, Joint Estimation of Generation Time and Incubation Period for Coronavirus Disease 2019, 2021, 0022-1899, 10.1093/infdis/jiab424
36.	Dongxuan Chen, Yiu-Chung Lau, Xiao-Ke Xu, Lin Wang, Zhanwei Du, Tim K. Tsang, Peng Wu, Eric H. Y. Lau, Jacco Wallinga, Benjamin J. Cowling, Sheikh Taslim Ali, Inferring time-varying generation time, serial interval, and incubation period distributions for COVID-19, 2022, 13, 2041-1723, 10.1038/s41467-022-35496-8
37.	Fabio Vanni, David Lambert, Luigi Palatella, Paolo Grigolini, On the use of aggregated human mobility data to estimate the reproduction number, 2021, 11, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-021-02760-8
38.	Naci Balak, Deniz Inan, Mario Ganau, Cesare Zoia, Sinan Sönmez, Batuhan Kurt, Ahmet Akgül, Müjgan Tez, A simple mathematical tool to forecast COVID-19 cumulative case numbers, 2021, 12, 22133984, 100853, 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100853
39.	Natalie M. Linton, Andrei R. Akhmetzhanov, Hiroshi Nishiura, Correlation between times to SARS-CoV-2 symptom onset and secondary transmission undermines epidemic control efforts, 2022, 41, 17554365, 100655, 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100655
40.	Qihui Yang, Joan Saldaña, Caterina Scoglio, Generalized epidemic model incorporating non-Markovian infection processes and waning immunity, 2023, 108, 2470-0045, 10.1103/PhysRevE.108.014405
41.	Kris V. Parag, Benjamin J. Cowling, Ben C. Lambert, Angular reproduction numbers improve estimates of transmissibility when disease generation times are misspecified or time-varying, 2023, 290, 0962-8452, 10.1098/rspb.2023.1664
42.	2022, 10.12794/metadc1987323

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2010 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)