Coalgebraic Structure of Genetic Inheritance

  • Received: 01 December 2003 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 July 2004
  • MSC : 16W99.

  • Although in the broadly defined genetic algebra, multiplication suggests a forward direction of from parents to progeny, when looking from the reverse direction, it also suggests to us a new algebraic structure --- coalgebraic structure, which we call genetic coalgebras. It is not the dual coalgebraic structure and can be used in the construction of phylogenetic trees. Mathematically, to construct phylogenetic trees means we need to solve equations x[n] =a , or x(n)=b. It is generally impossible to solve these equations in algebras. However, we can solve them in coalgebras in the sense of tracing back for their ancestors. A thorough exploration of coalgebraic structure in genetics is apparently necessary. Here, we develop a theoretical framework of the coalgebraic structure of genetics. From biological viewpoint, we defined various fundamental concepts and examined their elementary properties that contain genetic significance. Mathematically, by genetic coalgebra, we mean any coalgebra that occurs in genetics. They are generally noncoassociative and without counit; and in the case of non-sex-linked inheritance, they are cocommutative. Each coalgebra with genetic realization has a baric property. We have also discussed the methods to construct new genetic coalgebras, including cocommutative duplication, the tensor product, linear combinations and the skew linear map, which allow us to describe complex genetic traits. We also put forward certain theorems that state the relationship between gametic coalgebra and gametic algebra. By Brower's theorem in topology, we prove the existence of equilibrium state for the in-evolution operator.

    Citation: Jianjun Tian, Bai-Lian Li. Coalgebraic Structure of Genetic Inheritance[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2004, 1(2): 243-266. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.243

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yuanyuan Huang, Yiping Hao, Min Wang, Wen Zhou, Zhijun Wu . Optimality and stability of symmetric evolutionary games with applications in genetic selection. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2015, 12(3): 503-523. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.503
    [2] Inna Samuilik, Felix Sadyrbaev . On trajectories of a system modeling evolution of genetic networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2232-2242. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023104
    [3] Yujing Qiao, Ning Lv, Baoming Jia . Multiview intelligent networking based on the genetic evolution algorithm for precise 3D measurements. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14260-14280. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023638
    [4] Yanyun Li, Juhua Liang . Models for determining the optimal switching time in chemical control of pest with pesticide resistance. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 471-494. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021026
    [5] Chun Li, Ying Chen, Zhijin Zhao . Frequency hopping signal detection based on optimized generalized S transform and ResNet. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 12843-12863. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023573
    [6] Kongfu Hu, Lei Wang, Jingcao Cai, Long Cheng . An improved genetic algorithm with dynamic neighborhood search for job shop scheduling problem. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 17407-17427. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023774
    [7] Zhilan Feng, Carlos Castillo-Chavez . The influence of infectious diseases on population genetics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2006, 3(3): 467-483. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.467
    [8] Bowen Ding, Zhaobin Ma, Shuoyan Ren, Yi Gu, Pengjiang Qian, Xin Zhang . A genetic algorithm with two-step rank-based encoding for closed-loop supply chain network design. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 5925-5956. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022277
    [9] Lorenzo Mari, Marino Gatto, Renato Casagrandi . Local resource competition and the skewness of the sex ratio: a demographic model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(4): 813-830. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.813
    [10] Jesse Berwald, Marian Gidea . Critical transitions in a model of a genetic regulatory system. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(4): 723-740. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.723
  • Although in the broadly defined genetic algebra, multiplication suggests a forward direction of from parents to progeny, when looking from the reverse direction, it also suggests to us a new algebraic structure --- coalgebraic structure, which we call genetic coalgebras. It is not the dual coalgebraic structure and can be used in the construction of phylogenetic trees. Mathematically, to construct phylogenetic trees means we need to solve equations x[n] =a , or x(n)=b. It is generally impossible to solve these equations in algebras. However, we can solve them in coalgebras in the sense of tracing back for their ancestors. A thorough exploration of coalgebraic structure in genetics is apparently necessary. Here, we develop a theoretical framework of the coalgebraic structure of genetics. From biological viewpoint, we defined various fundamental concepts and examined their elementary properties that contain genetic significance. Mathematically, by genetic coalgebra, we mean any coalgebra that occurs in genetics. They are generally noncoassociative and without counit; and in the case of non-sex-linked inheritance, they are cocommutative. Each coalgebra with genetic realization has a baric property. We have also discussed the methods to construct new genetic coalgebras, including cocommutative duplication, the tensor product, linear combinations and the skew linear map, which allow us to describe complex genetic traits. We also put forward certain theorems that state the relationship between gametic coalgebra and gametic algebra. By Brower's theorem in topology, we prove the existence of equilibrium state for the in-evolution operator.


  • This article has been cited by:

    1. I.P. Cabrera, P. Cordero, G. Gutiérrez, J. Martínez, M. Ojeda-Aciego, Finitary coalgebraic multisemilattices and multilattices, 2012, 219, 00963003, 31, 10.1016/j.amc.2011.10.081
    2. Irene Paniello, Genetic coalgebras and their cubic stochastic matrices, 2017, 16, 0219-4988, 1750239, 10.1142/S0219498817502395
    3. Manuel Arenas, Alicia Labra, Irene Paniello, Lotka–Volterra coalgebras, 2021, 0308-1087, 1, 10.1080/03081087.2021.1882372
    4. M. Hamidi, Arsham Borumand Saeid, EQ-algebras based on fuzzy hyper EQ-filters, 2019, 23, 1432-7643, 5289, 10.1007/s00500-018-3456-7
    5. Wei Wang, Xiao-Long Xin, On fuzzy filters of Heyting-algebras, 2011, 4, 1937-1179, 1611, 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.1611
    6. Irene Paniello, In-evolution operators in genetic coalgebras, 2021, 614, 00243795, 197, 10.1016/j.laa.2020.03.032
    7. I. Paniello, Evolution coalgebras, 2019, 67, 0308-1087, 1539, 10.1080/03081087.2018.1460795
    8. I. Paniello, Backwards genetic inheritance through coalgebra-graphs, 2017, 65, 0308-1087, 943, 10.1080/03081087.2016.1217824
    9. I. Paniello, Evolution coalgebras on chicken populations, 2020, 68, 0308-1087, 528, 10.1080/03081087.2018.1508408
    10. M. Hamidi, A. Broumand Saeid, EQ-algebras based on hyper EQ-algebras, 2018, 24, 1405-213X, 11, 10.1007/s40590-016-0159-x
    11. Irene Paniello, A Coalgebraic Structure on Bisexual Populations, 2020, 1386-923X, 10.1007/s10468-020-09978-6
    12. Mingze Zhao, Huilan Li, A pair of dual Hopf algebras on permutations, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 5106, 10.3934/math.2021302
    13. Baltasar Trancón y Widemann, 2013, Chapter 1483, 978-1-4419-9862-0, 434, 10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1483
    14. Peter D Jarvis, Jeremy G Sumner, Systematics and symmetry in molecular phylogenetic modelling: perspectives from physics, 2019, 52, 1751-8113, 453001, 10.1088/1751-8121/ab305b
    15. Irene Paniello, Marginal distributions of genetic coalgebras, 2014, 68, 0303-6812, 1071, 10.1007/s00285-013-0663-9
    16. Irene Paniello, On evolution operators of genetic coalgebras, 2017, 74, 0303-6812, 149, 10.1007/s00285-016-1025-1
    17. Irene Paniello, Stochastic matrices arising from genetic inheritance, 2011, 434, 00243795, 791, 10.1016/j.laa.2010.09.042
    18. Farrukh Mukhamedov, Izzat Qaralleh, On S-Evolution Algebras and Their Enveloping Algebras, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 1195, 10.3390/math9111195
    19. Manuel Ceballos, Raúl M. Falcón, Juan Núñez-Valdés, Ángel F. Tenorio, A historical perspective of Tian’s evolution algebras, 2022, 40, 07230869, 819, 10.1016/j.exmath.2021.11.004
    20. Farrukh Mukhamedov, Izzat Qaralleh, Entropy Treatment of Evolution Algebras, 2022, 24, 1099-4300, 595, 10.3390/e24050595
    21. Farrukh Mukhamedov, Izzat Qaralleh, On Extendibility of Evolution Subalgebras Generated by Idempotents, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 2764, 10.3390/math11122764
    22. Irene Paniello, Skewed comultiplications in genetic coalgebras, 2024, 23, 0219-4988, 10.1142/S0219498824500506
    23. Manuel Arenas, Alicia Labra, Irene Paniello, On the structure of Lotka-Volterra coalgebras, 2024, 0092-7872, 1, 10.1080/00927872.2023.2301516
    24. Irene Paniello, Backwards inheritance in evolution coalgebras of chicken populations, 2024, 23, 0219-4988, 10.1142/S0219498824502396
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2004 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3439) PDF downloads(673) Cited by(24)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog