We introduce and study a class of Scherk-type minimal surfaces immersed in the four-dimensional Euclidean space $ \mathbb{R}^4 $. Motivated by the classical Scherk minimal surface in $ \mathbb{R}^3 $, we construct higher-codimensional analogues using the generalized Weierstrass–Enneper representation for minimal surfaces in $ \mathbb{R}^4 $. Explicit parametrizations are derived from holomorphic null curves in $ \mathbb{C}^4 $, ensuring conformality and vanishing mean curvature. The geometric properties of the resulting surface are examined through real parametrizations, orthogonal projections, and the explicit construction of an orthonormal frame for the normal bundle. Representative special cases are presented to illustrate how the geometric structure characteristic of a Scherk surface extends naturally to higher codimension.
Citation: Magdalena Toda, Erhan Güler. On Scherk-type minimal immersion in $ \mathbb{R}^4 $ constructed by the generalized Weierstrass–Enneper representation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(3): 5456-5475. doi: 10.3934/math.2026225
We introduce and study a class of Scherk-type minimal surfaces immersed in the four-dimensional Euclidean space $ \mathbb{R}^4 $. Motivated by the classical Scherk minimal surface in $ \mathbb{R}^3 $, we construct higher-codimensional analogues using the generalized Weierstrass–Enneper representation for minimal surfaces in $ \mathbb{R}^4 $. Explicit parametrizations are derived from holomorphic null curves in $ \mathbb{C}^4 $, ensuring conformality and vanishing mean curvature. The geometric properties of the resulting surface are examined through real parametrizations, orthogonal projections, and the explicit construction of an orthonormal frame for the normal bundle. Representative special cases are presented to illustrate how the geometric structure characteristic of a Scherk surface extends naturally to higher codimension.
| [1] | E. Abbena, S. Salamon, A. Gray, Modern differential geometry of curves and surfaces with Mathematica, 3 Eds., New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315276038 |
| [2] | U. Dierkes, S. Hildebrandt, A. Küster, O. Wohlrab, Minimal surfaces Ⅰ: boundary value problems, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 295, Springer, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02791-2 |
| [3] |
D. A. Hoffman, R. Osserman, The Gauss map of surfaces in $\mathbb{R}^n$, J. Differential Geom., 18 (1983), 733–754. https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214438180 doi: 10.4310/jdg/1214438180
|
| [4] | D. A. Hoffman, R. Osserman, The geometry of the generalized Gauss map, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 28, American Mathematical Society, 1980. |
| [5] |
W. H. Meeks Ⅲ, J. Pérez, The classical theory of minimal surfaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 48 (2011), 325–407. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-2011-01334-9 doi: 10.1090/S0273-0979-2011-01334-9
|
| [6] | W. H. Meeks Ⅲ, J. Pérez, A survey on classical minimal surface theory, Vol. 60, American Mathematical Society, 2012. |
| [7] | J. C. C. Nitsche, Lectures on minimal surfaces, Volume 1: Introduction, Fundamentals, Geometry and Basic Boundary Value Problems, Cambridge University Press, 1989. |
| [8] |
H. F. Scherk, Bemerkungen über die kleinste Fläche innerhalb gegebener Grenzen, J. Reine Angew. Math., 1835 (1835), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1835.13.185 doi: 10.1515/crll.1835.13.185
|
| [9] |
M. Toda, E. Güler, Generalized Weierstrass–Enneper representation for minimal surfaces in $\mathbb{R}^4$, AIMS Math., 10 (2025), 22406–22420. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2025997 doi: 10.3934/math.2025997
|