
This paper presents a detailed procedure for deriving a Binet's type formula for the Tribonacci sequence {Tn}. We examine the limiting distribution of a Markov chain that encapsulates the entire sequence {Tn}, offering insights into its asymptotic behavior. An approximation of Tn is provided using two distinct probabilistic approaches. Furthermore, we study random sequences of the form {Z0,Z1,Z2,Zn=Zn−3+Zn−2+Zn−1,n=3,…}, referred to as the Tribonacci sequence of Random Variables. These sequences, fully defined by their initial random variables, are analyzed in terms of their distributional and limiting properties.
Citation: Skander Hachicha, Najmeddine Attia. Probabilistic approaches to exploring Binet's type formula for the Tribonacci sequence[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11957-11975. doi: 10.3934/math.2025540
[1] | Najmeddine Attia . Some remarks on recursive sequence of fibonacci type. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25834-25848. doi: 10.3934/math.20241262 |
[2] | Faik Babadağ, Ali Atasoy . A new approach to Leonardo number sequences with the dual vector and dual angle representation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14062-14074. doi: 10.3934/math.2024684 |
[3] | Adnan Karataş . Dual Leonardo numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30527-30536. doi: 10.3934/math.20231560 |
[4] | Faik Babadağ, Ali Atasoy . On hyper-dual vectors and angles with Pell, Pell-Lucas numbers. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30655-30666. doi: 10.3934/math.20241480 |
[5] | Xin-Jiang He, Sha Lin . Analytical formulae for variance and volatility swaps with stochastic volatility, stochastic equilibrium level and regime switching. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22225-22238. doi: 10.3934/math.20241081 |
[6] | Faik Babadağ . A new approach to Jacobsthal, Jacobsthal-Lucas numbers and dual vectors. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18596-18606. doi: 10.3934/math.2023946 |
[7] | Ümit Tokeşer, Tuğba Mert, Yakup Dündar . Some properties and Vajda theorems of split dual Fibonacci and split dual Lucas octonions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8645-8653. doi: 10.3934/math.2022483 |
[8] | Haichao Yu, Yong Zhang . The law of iterated logarithm for a class of random variables satisfying Rosenthal type inequality. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11076-11083. doi: 10.3934/math.2021642 |
[9] | Yixin Ren, Huaning Liu . On the correlation of $ k $ symbols. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21455-21470. doi: 10.3934/math.20241042 |
[10] | Shuang Guo, Yong Zhang . Moderate deviation principle for $ m $-dependent random variables under the sub-linear expectation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5943-5956. doi: 10.3934/math.2022331 |
This paper presents a detailed procedure for deriving a Binet's type formula for the Tribonacci sequence {Tn}. We examine the limiting distribution of a Markov chain that encapsulates the entire sequence {Tn}, offering insights into its asymptotic behavior. An approximation of Tn is provided using two distinct probabilistic approaches. Furthermore, we study random sequences of the form {Z0,Z1,Z2,Zn=Zn−3+Zn−2+Zn−1,n=3,…}, referred to as the Tribonacci sequence of Random Variables. These sequences, fully defined by their initial random variables, are analyzed in terms of their distributional and limiting properties.
One of the most famous series of numbers in number theory is the Fibonacci sequence {Fn}. This sequence, comprised of integer values, was first introduced by Leonardo Fibonacci and defined by a recurrence procedure as
F0=0,F1=1 andFn+2=Fn+1+Fn, | (1.1) |
for all n≥0. Moreover, through countless examples, this sequence illustrates the connection between mathematics and nature. To this end, researchers have studied many generalizations of this sequence through either:
(1) By preserving the original recurrence relation while modifying the initial terms: for example F0=F1=2 [1] or F0=2 and F1=1 [2].
(2) By maintaining the initial terms while introducing slight modification to the recursive relation: One can cite the k-Fibonacci numbers defined by Falcon and Plaza [3,4]. For any positive real number k, the k-Fibonacci sequence is defined recurrently by
Fk,0=0,Fk,1=1 andFk,n+2=kFk,n+1+Fk,n, |
which was intensively studied (see, for instance, [5,6,7]). One can also consult [8,9,10] when Fn+2=Fn+1+2Fn.
(3) By changing the initial terms and introducing a modification to the recursive relation. For example, one can consider the relation.
Fn+2=aFn+1−bFn, for any initial terms [11] or the k-bonacci sequence when each therm is the sum of k previous terms [12] (see also [13,14]).
The enduring fascination with the Fibonacci sequence {Fn} has prompted continuous scholarly investigation into its inherent properties and practical applications. Furthermore, Makover in [15] stands out for shedding light on the exponential growth of {Fn}n≥0 with respect to the golden ratio φ=(1+√5)/2=1.61803398…. The pivotal property of the Fibonacci-like sequence is encapsulated by Binet's formula: calculating the general terms of the sequence
Fn=φn−σnφ−σ, | (1.2) |
where σ and φ are roots of the characteristic equation x2=x+1 associated with the recurrence relation (1.1).
In the present work, we focus on one of the most important generalizations of the Fibonacci sequence, the Tribonacci sequence denoted by {Tn}n≥0 and defined as
{Tn+2=Tn+1+Tn+Tn−1,forn≥1,T0=T1=1;T2=2. | (1.3) |
This sequence was originally studied by Feinberg in 1963 as [17], [16]. Since then, numerous authors have explored its properties, highlighting various interesting aspects such as generating functions, Binet's type formulas, and summation formulas. For further details, see, for example, [18,19,20], as well as [21,22,23] for studies specifically on the Tribonacci functions. For different initial values, we construct different Tribonacci sequences. In particular, the standard one is considered when T0=0 and T1=T2=1, whereas the Tribonacci−Lucas sequence is given for T0=3, T1=1, and T2=3 [24]. Hence, the initial numbers of the Tribonacci sequence are intrinsic to establishing some properties, such as Binet's type formulas. In [25], with arbitrary initial values, the author gives a complete discussion, on Binet's formula, where he showed that
Tn=aϕn−1θ+aαcos[(n−1)γπ+π+ω3]θ√ϕn−1+(c−b)ϕnθ+(c−b)αcos[nγπ+π+ω3]θ√ϕn+bϕn+1θ+bαcos[(n+1)γπ+π+ω3]θ√ϕn+1, |
where (T0,T1,T2)=(a,b,c), ϕ=1.839286 is the real solution of the equation x3−x2−x−1=0, γπ=arccos((1−ϕ)√ϕ2)=24.688997…, θ=5.470354…, α=3.857689… and ω3 is the phase shift introduced in order to verify initial conditions. Moreover, one can use a probabilistic approach to study this recursive sequence [26] (see also [27] in the case of the Fibonacci sequence), to prove the asymptotic behavior of {ξn:=Tn+1Tn}n. We consider a Markov chain {Xi}i≥1 defined as X1=X2=X3=0 and Xi∈{0,1,2} (see transition graph of probabilities in Figure 1). We compute how rapid the convergence to the limiting distribution is, by establishing an exact formula for P(Xn+1=i) for all i=0,1,2, which allows us to deduce a Binet's type formula. Let
x1=−(p+q)/2−i√4q−(p+q)22andx2=¯x1, |
the conjugate of x1, where p is the unique solution of x+√x(x+1)−1=0 and q=p√p. In Section 2, we will prove that x1 and x2 are the roots of the characteristic polynomial PA of an appropriately chosen matrix A, which is essential for proving Binet's type formula. We set
δ0=1−x2(x2−x1)(1+p+2q),δ1=(px1+q)δ0andδ2=qδ0. | (1.4) |
Our first main result is the following, which will be proved in Section 2.
Theorem 1. Let {Tn} be the Tribonacci sequence defined by (1.3). Then, for all n≥0,
Tn=11+p+2q(1√p)n+Δ1(x1√p)n+¯Δ1¯(x1√p)n, |
where Δ1=(√pδ0x1+δ1x2q).
Let ϕ, β and ˉβ defined as
ϕ=1.839286 andβ=−0.419643+i0.606290, | (1.5) |
the roots of the equation x3−x2−x−1=0, where β and ˉβ are conjugate. One can get a simplified version of Binet's type formula from Theorem 1.
Corollary 1. For n≥0,
Tn=β¯β−(β+¯β)+2(ϕ−β)(ϕ−¯β)ϕn+ϕ¯β−(ϕ+¯β)+2(β−ϕ)(β−¯β)βn+ϕβ−(ϕ+β)+2(¯β−ϕ)(¯β−β)¯βn. |
One of the most well-known properties of the Fibonacci sequence is the identity ∑nk=0Fk=Fn+2−1. In [28], the authors extended this concept to prove that
n∑k=0Tk=Tn+Tn+2−12, |
where T0=0 and T1=T2=1. A similar result will be explored in Section 4 to analyze the Tribonacci sequence of random variables (TSRV). Let (Ω,A,P) be a probability space, and let E be the expectation with respect to P. We define Z0,Z1, and Z2 be absolutely continuous random variables, with joint probability density function (pdf) f(Z0,Z1,Z2). For n≥3, we define
Zn=Zn−1+Zn−2+Zn−3. | (1.6) |
Denote by fZ0,fZ1, and fZ2 the marginal pdf's of Z0,Z1, and Z2 respectively; we will give the pdf of Zn in general setting (Theorem 4). A special and non trivial example, when Zi,i=0,1,2 be mutually independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables having exponential distribution with parameter λ=1 (Zi∼E(1)) is given in Example 1.
In Section 3, we will delve into the concept of the color model and its application in obtaining an approximation of Tn for large values of n. An application of Binet's type formula proved in Section 2, we obtain
Tn∼α0√p−n. | (1.7) |
Our main result in Section 3 is the following.
Theorem 2. Let {Tn} be the Tribonacci sequence such that T0=1, T1=1 and T2=2. For all n≥3, one has
Tn=−Tn−1(p+√p)−Tn−2√p+√p−n. | (1.8) |
In particular, (1.7) holds.
Our study explores how the inherent properties of the model can be leveraged to simplify complex computations and gain insights into its asymptotic behavior. Our approach is rooted in probabilistic methods, which offer a robust framework and derive an approximation that accurately reflects the behavior of Tn as n grows large. This probabilistic perspective not only provides a pathway to approximate Tn but also facilitates a deeper understanding of the interplay between randomness and structure within the color model. Moreover, it gives an interesting relation, such as (1.8) and (3.1) below. First, combining Proposition 1 and (2.3), one has
Tn=P(An+2)√pn+1=1−p−q(2q+p+1)√pn+1∼α01−p−q√pn+1=α0√p−n, |
where α0 is defined in (2.1). This implies, in particular, that (1.7) holds.
When studying sequences of random variables, it is common to encounter asymptotic (or limit) theorems. These theorems are often used to approximate the distribution of large-sample statistics with a limiting distribution, which is typically much simpler to analyze. One of the most well-known theorems in the field of asymptotic probability theory is the central limit theorem (CLT). It states that, under certain conditions (independence and same distribution), the distribution of a properly normalized sample mean converges to a standard normal distribution, even if the original variables are not normally distributed. In fact, there are various ways in which the CLT can fail, depending on which hypotheses are violated. In Section 4, we study the asymptotic distribution of the random variables {Zn}. A crucial observation is that these random variables are neither independent nor identically distributed (i.i.d.), which introduces additional complexity into their analysis. However, we will establish specific limit results that shed light on the long-run behavior of {Zn}. These results, presented in Theorem 5, highlight the asymptotic characteristics of {Zn} Specifically, define
Sn=n∑k=0Zn, |
and assume that the random variables Z0, Z1, and Z2 are i.i.d. Then, the sequence of random variables
Sn=Sn−E(Sn)√V(Sn)converges pointwise toS:=L−E(L)√V(L), |
where L=Z0+ϕZ1+ϕ2Z2. In particular, when Z0, Z1, and Z2 are normally distributed, then the sequence {Zn} satisfies the CLT.
We consider Γ=(X0,X1,…), a family of random variables. Then, Γ is called a Markov chain if the variables (X0,X1,…,Xk−1) and (Xk+1,…,) are independent of each other for any given k. Thus, describing the distribution of Xn−1 for each n allows us to describe the entire Markov chain. We define the random variables {Xn} by
(1) X1=X2=X3=0.
(2) P(Xi+1=0|Xi=0)=1−p−q, P(Xi+1=1|Xi=0)=p, and P(Xi+1=2|Xi=0)=q.
(3) P(Xi+1=0|Xi=1)=1.
(4) P(Xi+1=1|Xi=2)=1.
Since the Markov chain {Xn} is aperiodic, meaning that there exists a state with a positive probability of returning to itself, and irreducible, meaning that it is possible to transition from any state to any other state with positive probability, it follows that limn→∞P(Xn=i) exists for i=0,1,2.
Lemma 1. Let, for i=0,1,2, αi=limn→∞P(Xn=i) and p,q∈(0,1) such that 1−p−q>0. Then
{α0=12q+1+pα1=1−α0(q+1)=p+q2q+p+1.α2=1−α0−α1=α0q=q2q+1+p. | (2.1) |
In addition limn→∞P(An)=(1−p−q)/(2q+p+1), where An={Xn+1=Xn+2=0}.
Proof. Observe that
P(Xn+1=1)=pP(Xn=0)+P(Xn=2)=pP(Xn=0)+1−P(Xn=0)−P(Xn=1). |
Therefore, we have
{P(Xn+1=1)=1−(1−p)P(Xn=0)−P(Xn=1)P(Xn+1=0)=√qP(Xn=0)+P(Xn=1). | (2.2) |
Letting n tend to infinity to obtain
{α1=1−(1−p)α0−α1α0=√qα0+α1and then{α0=12q+1+pα1=1−α0(q+1). |
Let us consider An={Xn+1=Xn+2=0}. It follows that
P(An)=P(Xn+2=0|Xn+1=0)P(Xn+1=0)=√q(√qP(Xn=0)+P(Xn=1))=√q2P(Xn=0)+√qP(Xn=1). |
Then, limn→∞P(An) exists and depends on p and q. It follows that
limn→∞P(An)=√q2α0+√qα1=√q22q+p+1+√q−√q(q+1)2q+p+1=√q2q+p+1. | (2.3) |
Lemma 2. Let, An={Xn+1=Xn+2=0}. Then,
P(An+3)=√pP(An+2)+pP(An+1)+p√pP(An),n≥3. |
Proof. Notice, for k=0,1,…, that
P(An+k)=P(Xn+k+2=0|Xn+k+1=0)P(Xn+k+1=0)=√pP(Xn+k+1=0). | (2.4) |
Then
P(An+3)=√pP(Xn+4=0)=√p(√pP(Xn+3=0)+P(Xn+3=1))=(2.4)√p(P(An+2)+P(Xn+3=1))=√pP(An+2)+√p(pP(Xn+2=0)+P(Xn+2=2))=(2.4)√pP(An+2)+pP(An+1)+√pp√pP(Xn+1=0)=(2.4)√pP(An+2)+pP(An+1)+p√pP(An). |
Remark 1. Lemma 2 shows, in particular, that the event An is adequate to study the sequences {Tn}n. Indeed, for any sequence {Υn}n defined as Υn=αP(An)√pn−1 Tribonacci sequence, where α is a positive integer. Indeed,
Υn+3=αP(An+2)√pn+1+αP(An+1)√pn+αP(An)√pn−1=Υn+2+Υn+1+Υn,n≥3 |
which implies that {Υn}n is Tribonacci sequence.
As a consequence of Lemma 2, one can prove Binet's type formula. More precisely, we have the following result:
Proposition 1. Let {Tn} be the Tribonacci sequence defined by (1.3). Then, for all n≥0,
Tn=P(An+2)√pn+1, |
where p is the unique solution of x+√x(x+1)−1=0 and q=p√p.
Proof. We will prove this result by induction. To do this, we calculate the first values of P(An) in Table 1.
n | P(Xn=0) | P(Xn=1) | P(An) |
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 1 | 0 | √p |
3 | 1 | 0 | p |
4 | √p | p | 2√pp |
5 | 2p | 2p√p | 4p2 |
Hence, T0=P(A2)/√p=1 and similarly, T1=1, T2=2 and T3=4. Then, the result follows using Remark 1.
In order to compute the general term of the sequence {Tn}n, using Proposition 1 and since
P(An+2)=pP(Xn+2=0)+√pP(Xn+2=1), |
it will be useful to introduce the following matrices:
πn=(P(Xn=0)P(Xn=1)P(Xn=2))andA=((1−p−q)10p01q00), |
where n≥4. Hence, using (2.2), πn+1=Aπn.
Proposition 2. The only invariant probability measure π of the Markov chain {Xn} defined above is
π=(α0,α1,α2)t, |
where vt is the transpose of the vector v.
Proof. To get the invariant probability measure π of the chain, we solve the equation π=Aπ,. However, for π=(α0,α1,α2)t we obtain
{α0=(1−p−q)α0+α1,α1=pα0+α2,α2=qα0, |
where, we have used (2.2) and (2.1). Then, we deduce
π=(12q+1+p,p+q2q+1+p,q2q+1+p)t |
the only invariant measure.
Let PA (or simply P when no confusion arises) denote the characteristic polynomial of the matrix A then
PA(x)= det(A−xI)=−(x−1)(x2+(p+q)x+q)=−x3+(1−p−q)x2+px+q. |
Let x1 and x2 be the roots of PA distinct from 1, that is:
PA(x)=−(x−1)(x−x1)(x−x2). |
Lemma 3. (1) x1x2=x1¯x1=q.
(2) x2−x1=i√4q−(p+q)2.
(3) x21=−q+(p+q)i√4q−(p+q)2.
(4) x22=−q−(p+q)i√4q−(p+q)2.
In this paragraph, we will prove the following result.
Theorem 3. For n≥0,
{P(Xn=0)=11+p+2q+δ0xn−11+¯δ0xn−11,P(Xn=1)=p+q1+p+2q+δ1xn−31+¯δ1xn−31,P(Xn=2)=q1+p+2q+δ2xn−21+¯δ2xn−21, |
where δ0, δ1, and δ2 are defined in (1.4).
Proof. A simple calculation proves that the eigenvectors associated with the eigenvalues 1,x1, and x2 respectively are (1,p+q,q)t, (1,px1+qx21,qx1)t and (1,px2+qx22,qx2)t. It follows that
A=P(1000x1000x2)⏟DP−1andAn=P(1000x1000x2)nP−1, |
where
P=(111(p+q)px1+qx21px2+qx22qqx1qx2) |
and
P−1=1(x2−x1)(1+p+2q)(x2−x1x2−x1x2−x1x21(1−x2)x1(1−x2)1−x2x22(x1−1)x2(x1−1)x1−1). |
Notice, using Lemma 3, that
det(P)=[pqx1+q2x21x2−qpx2+q2x1x22]−[pq+q2x2−qpx2+q2x22]+[pq+q2x1−qpx1+q2x21]=q2x2−x1x21x22−q2x2−1x22+q2x1−1x21=x2−x1−qx1+x21+qx2−x22=i√4q−(p+q)2(1+p+2q). |
Since X1=X2=X3=0, then πn=An−4π4, for all n≥4, which implies that
πn=[PDn−4P−1]π4. |
It follows that
{P(Xn=0)=11+p+2q+1−x2(x2−x1)(1+p+2q)xn−11+x1−1(x2−x1)(1+p+2q)xn−12,P(Xn=1)=p+q1+p+2q+(1−x2)(px1+q)(x2−x1)(1+p+2q)xn−31+(x1−1)(px2+q)(x2−x1)(1+p+2q)xn−32,P(Xn=2)=q1+p+2q+q(1−x2)(x2−x1)(1+p+2q)xn−21+q(x1−1)(x2−x1)(1+p+2q)xn−22, |
as required in Theorem 3.
As a consequence, since |x1|=|x2|=√q, we obtain the following result.
Corollary 2. For all n≥4, one has
|P(Xn=0)−α0|=2√α0√4q−(p+q)2√qn−1, |
where α0 is defined by (2.1).
The previous corollary explains the convergence of the Markov chain P(Xn=0) to α0. Moreover, the extra term 2√α0√4q−(p+q)2√qn−1 tells us exactly how far away the Markov chain is from converging.
Here, we will prove our main result (Theorem 1). Recall the event An introduced in Lemma 2.1; our result is essentially based on the following relation proved in Proposition 1:
Tn=P(An+2)√pn+1, | (2.5) |
when p is the unique solution of x+√x(x+1)−1=0 and q=p√p. Notice that
P(An+2)=pP(Xn+2=0)+√pP(Xn+2=1)=p(11+p+2q+δ0xn+11+¯δ0xn+11)+√p(p+q1+p+2q+δ1xn−11+¯δ1xn−11)=√p1+p+2q+(pδ0x1+δ1x2p)xn1+¯(pδ0x1+δ1x2p)xn1. |
Thus, using (2.5), we have
Tn=P(An+2)√pn+1=11+p+2q(1√p)n+Δ1(x1√p)n+¯Δ1¯(x1√p)n, |
where
Δ1=(√pδ0x1+δ1x2q). |
Recall ϕ, β and ˉβ, the roots of the equation x3−x2−x−1=0 defined in (1.5). Before giving the proof of Corollary 1, we start by proving the following lemma.
Lemma 4. Let ϕ, β and ˉβ defined in (1.5). Then
(1) βˉβ=1ϕ=ϕ−2 and β+ˉβ=1−ϕ,
(2) ϕ=1/√p,
(3) β=x1/√p and ˉβ=x2/√p.
Proof. (1) Since
x3−x2−x−1=(x−ϕ)(x2+(ϕ−1)x+ϕ−2). |
Then β and ˉβ are the solutions of x2+(ϕ−1)x+ϕ−2=0.
(2) Observe that,
ϕ−2+ϕ−1(ϕ−2+1)=ϕ2+ϕ+1ϕ3=ϕ3ϕ3=1. |
It follows that ϕ−2∈(0,1) is a solution of f(x)=x+√x(x+1)−1=0, which implies that p=ϕ−2=0.295597… and then q=0.160713….
(3) Define t=x1√p and then t√p=x1. Since P(x1)=0, then we have
P(x1)=−(x1)3+(1−p−q)(x1)2+px1+q=−(t√p)3+√p(t√p)2+pt√p+q=p√p(−t3+t2+t+1)=0. |
It follows that t is the solution of −x3+x2+x+1=0 and t=β. Similarly, if we consider t=x2√p then
P(x2)=p√p(−t3+t2+t+1)=0. |
Thus, we deduce that t=ˉβ.
It follows [25] that the Tribonacci sequence {Tn} can be written as
Tn=aϕn+bβn+c¯βn. |
Since we choose T0=T1=1 and T2=2, one has
{1=a+b+c,1=aϕ+bβ+c¯β,2=aϕ2+bβ2+c¯β2. |
By inverting the Vandermonde matrix, we obtain the desired result, that is,
Tn=β¯β−(β+¯β)+2(ϕ−β)(ϕ−¯β)ϕn+ϕ¯β−(ϕ+¯β)+2(β−ϕ)(β−¯β)βn+ϕβ−(ϕ+β)+2(¯β−ϕ)(¯β−β)¯βn. |
In this section, we investigate how the intrinsic properties of the model can be utilized to streamline complex computations and reveal insights into its asymptotic behavior. Grounded in probabilistic methods, we will prove Theorem 1.2, which may give an approximation of Tn as n becomes large. Let {sn}n≥1 denotes the number of sequences of 1's, 2's, and 3's that sum to n. It is easy to see that s1=1=T1, s2=2=T2, and s3=4=T3. Additionally, since
sn=sn−3+sn−2+sn−1, |
we conclude that sn=Tn. Therefore, for n≥4, Tn can be combinatorially interpreted as the number of ways to tile a board of length n−1 using tiles of size 1, 2, and 3 cells. To illustrate this, consider an infinite board with cells labeled 1,2,3,…, where each cell is independently colored black, white, or gray with probability 1/3, as shown in Figure 2. Moreover, any coloring of the first n cells has a probability of (1/3)n.
An infinite tiling can be represented as alternating sequences of black, white, and gray cells of varying lengths. For instance, the tiling shown in Figure 2 consists of a gray sequence of length 3, followed by a black sequence of length 2, then another gray sequence of length 3, a white sequence of length 1, a black sequence of length 2, and so on.
Let the random variable X repre sent the position of the end of the first black string that is not a multiple of two, or the first gray string that is not a multiple of three. We now ask: For n≥1, what is the probability that X=n? To answer this, note that X=n occurs if and only if:
(1) Cell n is covered by B (a black cell), and cell n+1 is covered by ¯B (a white or gray cell), or Cell n is covered by G (a gray cell), and cell n+1 is covered by ¯G (a white or black cell), and
(2) cells 1 through n−1 are covered using any combination of white cells, black double cells, and gray triple cells.
It follow that
(i) If tile number n is black, we will have Tn−1 ways from 1 to n−1.
(ii) If tile number n is gray and if the number of tiles has a remainder of 2 when divided by 3, we will have Tn−2 ways from 1 to n−2. However, if the number of last gray tiles admits a remainder of 1 when divided by 3, we will have Tn−1 ways from 1 to n−1.
Proposition 3. Let {Tn} be a Tribonacci sequence defined by (1.3); then
+∞∑n=14Tn−1+2Tn−23n+1=1, | (3.1) |
where {Tn}n≥0 is naturally extended forward by putting T−1=0.
Proof. Let X be the random variable introduced above. Then, for all n≥1, one has
P(X=n)=Tn−13n−11323+Tn−23n−2131323+Tn−13n−11323=4Tn−1+2Tn−23n+1. |
Since X is finite with probability 1, this gives a combinatorial explanation of the identity
Corollary 3. Let {Tn} be a Tribonacci sequence defined by (1.3); then
+∞∑n=01427Tn3n=1. | (3.2) |
Now, we tile an infinite board by independently placing cells, double cells, and triple cells with probability √p,p and q=p√p. Conveniently, p+√p(p+1)=1. In this model, the probability that a tiling begins with any particular length n of cells, double cells and triple cells is √pn. Let ςn be the probability that a random tiling is breakable at cell n, i.e., that a cell or double cell, or triple cell begins at cell n. The example in Figure 2 is breakable at cells
3,5,8,9,11,…. |
Since there are Tn−1 different ways to tile the first n−1 cells,
ςn=Tn−1√pn−1. | (3.3) |
For a tilling to be unbreakable at n, it must be
(i) breakable at n−1 followed by a double cell or triple cell,
(i) breakable at n−2 followed by a triple cell.
Thus, for n≥3, one has
1−ςn=ςn−1p+ςn−1p√p+ςn−2p√p, | (3.4) |
which implies in particular Theorem 2. Let ς=limn→+∞ςn. Taking a limit in (3.4) gives
1−ς=pς+p√pς+p√pς, |
then ς=α0=11+p+2p√p and Tn∼α0√p−n.
In this section we focus on the asymptotic distribution of the TSRV {Zn}, defined by (1.6). As mentioned above, these random variables are neither independent nor identically distributed. In fact, unlike classical scenarios where i.i.d. assumptions simplify the derivation of limiting behavior, here we must account for potential dependencies and non-uniform distributional properties within the sequence. Our main result will be presented in Theorem 5. We denote, for k=0,1,…,
μk=E(Zk)andσ2k=V(Zk), |
the expectation and the variance of Zk, respectively. First, observe that one can easily establish the following two lemmas.
Lemma 5. There exists a Tribonacci sequence {tn}n≥0 with t0=t1=t2=1 such that
Zn=tn−2Z0+tn−1Z1+tnZ2. |
In particular, we have μn=tn−2μ0+tn−1μ1+tnμ2, and if the random variables Z0, Z1, and Z2 are independent, then
σ2n=t2n−2σ20+t2n−1σ21+t2nσ22, |
for all n≥3.
Lemma 6. Let {tn} be a Tribonacci sequence such that t0=t1=t2=1, then
n∑k=0tk=(tn+2+tn)/2. | (4.1) |
Proof. The result is trivial for n=0,1 and 2. In addition, assume that (4.1) holds, then
n+1∑k=0tk=tn+2+tn2+tn+1=tn+3+tn+12. |
Thus the result follows by induction.
Remark 2. Lemma 6, will be used in the proof of the convergence of the sequence {Sn} defined in Theorem 5.
Recall that Z0,Z1, and Z2 are absolutely continuous random variables with joint pdf f(Z0,Z1,Z2). In the following, we will give the pdf of the random variable Zn.
Theorem 4. Let {Zn} be a TSRV defined by (1.6),
(1) The pdf of Zn is given by
fZn(x)=1tntn−1tn−2∫R2f(Z0,Z1,Z2)(ttn−2,utn−1,x−t−utn)dtdu. | (4.2) |
Moreover, if Z0,Z1 and Z2 are mutually independent, then
fZn(x)=1tntn−1tn−2∫R2fZ0(ttn−2)fZ1(utn−1)fZ2(x−t−utn)dtdu, | (4.3) |
where fZ0,fZ1 and fZ2 are the marginal pdf's of Z0,Z1 and Z2 respectively.
(2) The joint pdf of Zn and Zn+k is given by
fZn,Zn+k(y0,y1)=J−1n,k⋅ |
∫Rf(Z0,Z1,Z2)(y0tn+k−1−y1tn−1+y2Jn+1,kJn,k,−y0tn+k−2+y1tn−2−y2(tn+ktn−2−tntn+k−2)Jn,k,y2)dy2, |
where
Jn,k:=tn+k−1tn−2−tn−1tn+k−2. |
Proof. (1) Equations (4.2) and (4.3) are straightforward results of distributions of linear functions of random variables (see, for instance, [29,30,31]).
(2) We can write
fZn,Zn+k(y0,y1)=∫Rf(Zn,Zn+k,Z2)(y0,y1,y2)dy2, |
and let
{y0=tnx2+tn−1x1+tn−2x0,y1=tn+kx2+tn+k−1x1+tn+k−2x0,y2=x2. |
Notice that, the Jacobian of this linear transformation is Jn,k, and the solution of the previous system of equations is given by
{x0=y0tn+k−1−y1tn−1+y2(tn+ktn−1−tntn+k−1)Jn,k,x1=−y0tn+k−2+y1tn−2−y2(tn+ktn−2−tntn+k−2)Jn,k,x2=y2. |
Therefore, the joint pdf of Zn and Zn+k is
fZn,Zn+k(y0,y1)=1Jn,k∫Rf(Z0,Z1,Z2)(x0Jn,k,x1Jn,k,y2)dy2. |
Remark 3. Notice, with respect to squared error loss, the best unbiased predictor of Zn+k, given Zn, is
E(Zn+k|Zn)=g(Zn), |
where g(x) provides the conditional expectation of Zn+k given Zn=x; that is,
g(x)=E(Zn+k|Zn=x)=1fZn(x)∫RyfZn,Zn+k(x,y)dy. |
Hence, Theorem 4 offers a way to obtain a good approximation of Zn, as we can see in the following example.
Example 1. In this example, we will consider the case when the random variables Z0, Z1, and Z2 are i.i.d. with exponential distribution with parameter 1 (E(1)). Under the above notation we have fZ3(x)=x22exp(−x)I{x≥0} and for all n≥4,
fZn(x)=(tn−2exp(−xtn−2)(tn−2−tn)(tn−2−tn−1)+tn−1exp(−xtn−1)(tn−1−tn)(tn−1−tn−2)+tnexp(−xtn)(tn−tn−2)(tn−tn−1))I{x≥0}. |
Choose n=3 and k=4, so that t0=t1=t2=1,t3=3,t4=5,t5=9,t6=17, and tn+k=t7=31. Using Theorem 4, since J3,4=t6t1−t2t5=8, we obtain
E(Z7|Z3=x)=18fZ3(x)∫Ry∫RfZ0(17x−y−20z8)fZ1(−9x+y−20z8)fZ2(z)dzdy=2ex8x2I{x>0}∫Ry∫Rexp(−17x−y−20z8)I{17x−y−20z>0}⋅exp(−−9x+y−20z8)I{−9x+y−20z>0}exp(−z)I{z>0}dzdy=132xexp(4x−1)I{x>0}. |
Then
E(Z7|Z3)=132Z3exp(4Z3−1)I{Z3>0}. |
This gives, in particular, an estimation of Z3.
In the following, we will study some useful asymptotic properties of the TSRV. To this end, we define the random variable L:Z0+ϕZ1+ϕ2Z2, and, for all n≥3,
χn:=Zn+1Zn,Yn=Zn−μnσnandSn=Sn−E(Sn)√V(Sn), |
where ϕ is the real solution of the equation x3−x2−x−1=0, and Sn=∑nk=0Zk. In particular, one can expect that the sequence {χn} converges to ϕ. To this end, we define the event S={ω∈Ω, such that L(ω)≠0}.
Theorem 5. We consider the TSRV defined by (1.6). Then
(1) The sequence of random variables {χn} converges pointwise to ϕ on S.
(2) Assume that (σ0,σ1,σ2)≠(0,0,0), then Yn converges pointwise to
S:=L−E(L)√V(L). |
(3) Assume that Z0, Z2, and Z3 are i.i.d., then the sequence of random variables {Sn} converges pointwise to S.
Proof. (1) Using Lemma 5, for all ω∈S, we have
χn(ω)=tn−1Z0+tnZ1+tn+1Z2tn−2Z0+tn−1Z1+tnZ2=(ξn−1)−1Z0+Z1+ξnZ2(ξn−1ξn−2)−1Z0+(ξn−1)−1Z1+Z2, |
where ξn=tn+1tn. It follows, since limn→∞ξn=ϕ, that
limn→∞χn(ω)=ϕ−1Z0+Z1+ϕZ2ϕ−2Z0+ϕ−1Z1+Z2=ϕ. |
(2) Clearly, one has
Yn=Z0+ξn−2Z1+ξn−2ξn−1Z2−(μ0+ξn−2μ1+ξn−1ξn−2μ2)√σ20+ξ2n−2σ21+ξ2n−1ξ2n−2σ22⟶L−(μ0+ϕμ1+ϕ2μ2)√σ20+ϕ2σ21+ϕ4σ22=L−E(L)√V(L)=S. |
(3) First, observe that
Sn=Z0+Z1+Z2+Z0(n∑k=3tk−2)+Z1(n∑k=3tk−1)+Z2(n∑k=3tk)=Z0+Z1+Z2+Z0(n−2∑k=1tk)+Z1(n−1∑k=1ak−t1)+Z2(n∑k=1tk−a1−a2). |
Using (4.1), we obtain that
Sn=Z0+Z1+Z2+Z0(tn+tn−22−1)+Z1(tn+1+tn−12−1−t1)+Z2(tn+2+tn2−1−t1−t2)=Z0(tn+tn−22)+Z1(tn+1+tn−12−t1)+Z2(tn+2+tn2−t1−t2)=12Zn+12Zn+2−Z1−2Z2=(tn+tn−22)Z0+(tn+1+tn−12−1)Z1+(tn+2+tn2−2)Z2. |
Using Lemma 5, then
E(Sn)=(tn+tn−22)μ0+(tn+1+tn−12−1)μ1+(tn+2+tn2−2)μ2,V(Sn)=(tn+tn−22)2σ20+(tn+1+tn−12−1)2σ21+(tn+2+tn2−2)2σ22, |
which implies that
Sn=(tn+tn−22)(Z0−μ0)+(tn+1+tn−12−1)(Z1−μ1)+(tn+2+tn2−2)(Z2−μ2)√(tn+tn−22)2σ20+(tn+1+tn−12−1)2σ21+(tn+2+tn2−2)2σ22=tn+tn−22[Z0−μ0+tn+1+tn−1−2tn+tn−2(Z1−μ1)+tn+2+tn−4tn+tn−2(Z2−μ2)]tn+tn−22√σ20+(tn+1+tn−1−2tn+tn−2)2σ21+(tn+2+tn−4tn+tn−2)2σ22→Z0−μ0+ϕϕ2+1ϕ2+1(Z1−μ1)+ϕ2ϕ2+1ϕ2+1(Z2−μ2)√σ20+(ϕϕ2+1ϕ2+1)2σ21+(ϕ2ϕ2+1ϕ2+1)2σ22=L−E(L)√V(L)=S. |
Remark 4. Consider the special case when the random variable Z0, Z1, and Z3 are normally distributed. Then, the CLT holds, that is Sn converges in law to L∼N(0,1).
In this work, we investigated the Tribonacci sequence {Tn}. We examined an irreducible and aperiodic Markov chain with a finite state space {Xn}. Conditioned on Xn+1=Xn+2=0, the values of (X1,…,Xn) are uniformly distributed. In Section 2, we derived Binet's type formula for the Tribonacci sequence. In Section 3 we explored the color model to approximate Tn. The probabilistic perspective offers a valuable approach to achieve this approximation. Furthermore, in Section 4, we proved that the TSRV is fully determined by the initial random values Z0, Z1, and Z2, and satisfies certain limiting properties in comparison to the Central Limit Theorem (CLT).
Both authors contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence tools in the creation of this article.
The authors acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, for financial support under the annual funding track [KFU251894].
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
[1] | B. Singh, S. Bhatnagar, O. Sikhwal, Fibonacci-like sequence, Int. J. Adv. Math. Sci., 1 (2013), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijams.v1i3.898 |
[2] | B. Singh, O. Sikhwal, S. Bhatnagar, Fibonacci-like sequence and its properties, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 5 (2010), 859–868. |
[3] |
S. Falcón, Á. Plaza, On the k-Fibonacci numbers, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 32 (2007), 1615–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.022 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.022
![]() |
[4] |
S. Falcón, Á. Plaza, The k-Fibonacci sequence and the Pascal 2-triangle, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 33 (2007), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.10.022 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.10.022
![]() |
[5] |
Y. K. Panwar, G. P. S. Rathore, R. Chawla, On the k-Fibonacci-like numbers, Turk. J. Anal. Number Theory, 2 (2014), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.12691/tjant-2-1-3 doi: 10.12691/tjant-2-1-3
![]() |
[6] | S. S. Rao, M. Srinivas, Some remarks concerning k-Fibonacci-like numbers, Int. J. Math. Sci. Comput., 51 (2015), 8–10. |
[7] |
Y. K. Panwar, A note on the generalized k-Fibonacci sequence, NATURENGS, 2 (2021), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.46572/naturengs.937010 doi: 10.46572/naturengs.937010
![]() |
[8] | Ş. Uygun, H. Eldogan, Properties of k-Jacobsthal and k-Jacobsthal Lucas sequences, Gen. Math. Notes, 36 (2016), 34–47. |
[9] | Ş. Uygun, Bi-periodic Jacobsthal Lucas matrix sequence, Acta Univ. Apulensis, 66 (2021), 53–69. |
[10] | Ş. Uygun, The (s,t)-Jacobsthal and (s,t)-Jacobsthal Lucas Sequences, Appl. Math. Sci., 9 (2015), 3467–3476. |
[11] | J. H. McCabe, G. M. Phillips, Aitken sequences and generalized Fibonacci numbers, Math. Comp., 45(172) (1985), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1985-0804944-8 |
[12] |
N. Attia, C. Souissi, N. Saidi, R. Ali, A note on k-Bonacci random walks, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7040280 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7040280
![]() |
[13] |
H. Belbachir, I. E. Djellas, Determinantal and permanental representations of companion sequences associated to the r-Fibonacci sequence, Notes Number Theory Discrete Math., 28 (2022), 64–74, https://doi.org/10.7546/nntdm.2022.28.1.64-74 doi: 10.7546/nntdm.2022.28.1.64-74
![]() |
[14] | T. Abdelhak, I. E. Djellas, M. Mekkaoui, On some nested sums involving q-Fibonacci numbers, Palest. J. Math., 12 (2023), 183–193. |
[15] |
E. Makover, J. McGowan, An elementary proof that random Fibonacci sequences grow exponentially, J. Number Theory, 121 (2006), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2006.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2006.01.002
![]() |
[16] |
K. Alladi, V. E. Hoggatt, On Tribonacci numbers and related functions, Fibonacci Q., 15 (1977), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150517.1977.12430503 doi: 10.1080/00150517.1977.12430503
![]() |
[17] | M. Feinberg, Fibonacci-Tribonacci, Fibonacci Q., 1 (1963), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150517.1963.12431573 |
[18] |
K. K. Sharma, Generalized Tribonacci function and Tribonacci numbers, Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., 9 (2020), 1313–1316. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.F7640.059120 doi: 10.35940/ijrte.F7640.059120
![]() |
[19] |
Y. Soykan, Summing formulas for generalized Tribonacci numbers, Univ. J. Math. Appl., 3 (2020), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32323/ujma.637876 doi: 10.32323/ujma.637876
![]() |
[20] |
Y. Taşyurdu, On the sums of Tribonacci and Tribonacci-Lucas numbers, Appl. Math. Sci., 13 (2019), 1201–1208. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2019.910144 doi: 10.12988/ams.2019.910144
![]() |
[21] |
S. Arolkar, Y. S. Valaulikar, Hyers-Ulam stability of generalized Tribonacci functional equation, Turk. J. Anal. Number Theory, 5 (2017), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.12691/tjant-5-3-1 doi: 10.12691/tjant-5-3-1
![]() |
[22] |
K. E. Magnani, On third-order linear recurrent functions, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2019 (2019), 9489437. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9489437 doi: 10.1155/2019/9489437
![]() |
[23] | M. N. Parizi, M. E. Gordji, On Tribonacci functions and Tribonacci numbers, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 11 (2016), 23–32. |
[24] |
S. Crvenković, I. Tanackov, N. M. Ralević, I. Pavkov, Initial number of Lucas' type series for the generalized Fibonacci sequence, Filomat, 35 (2021), 3891–3900. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2111891C doi: 10.2298/FIL2111891C
![]() |
[25] |
I. Tanackov, Binet type formula for Tribonacci sequence with arbitrary initial numbers, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 114 (2018), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.023 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.06.023
![]() |
[26] |
N. Attia, Some remarks on recursive sequence of Fibonacci type, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 25834–25848. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241262 doi: 10.3934/math.20241262
![]() |
[27] |
M. Huber, A probabilistic approach to the Fibonacci sequence, Math. Intell., 42 (2020), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-019-09950-33 doi: 10.1007/s00283-019-09950-33
![]() |
[28] | E. Kiliç, Tribonacci sequences with certain indices and their sums, Ars Comb., 86 (2008), 13–22. |
[29] | B. V. Gnedenko, Theory of probability, Mocow: Mir Publishers, 1978. |
[30] | A. V. Skorokhod, Basic principles and applications of probability theory, Springer, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/b137401 |
[31] | W. Feller, An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. 2, 2 Eds., John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1971. |
n | P(Xn=0) | P(Xn=1) | P(An) |
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 1 | 0 | √p |
3 | 1 | 0 | p |
4 | √p | p | 2√pp |
5 | 2p | 2p√p | 4p2 |