A surface M2 with position vector r=r(s,t) is called a Hasimoto surface if the relation rt=rs∧rss holds. In this paper, we first define the Beltrami-Laplace operator according to the three fundamental forms of the surface, then we classify the J-harmonic Hasimoto surfaces and their Gauss map in E3, for J=II and III.
Citation: Hassan Al-Zoubi, Bendehiba Senoussi, Mutaz Al-Sabbagh, Mehmet Ozdemir. The Chen type of Hasimoto surfaces in the Euclidean 3-space[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16062-16072. doi: 10.3934/math.2023819
[1] | Yanlin Li, Kemal Eren, Kebire Hilal Ayvacı, Soley Ersoy . The developable surfaces with pointwise 1-type Gauss map of Frenet type framed base curves in Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2226-2239. doi: 10.3934/math.2023115 |
[2] | Ayman Elsharkawy, Clemente Cesarano, Abdelrhman Tawfiq, Abdul Aziz Ismail . The non-linear Schrödinger equation associated with the soliton surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17879-17893. doi: 10.3934/math.2022985 |
[3] | Mutaz Al-Sabbagh . Surfaces of coordinate finite $ II $-type. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6258-6269. doi: 10.3934/math.2025285 |
[4] | Mutaz Al-Sabbagh . Quadric surfaces of finite Chen Ⅱ-type. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34435-34446. doi: 10.3934/math.20241640 |
[5] | Ibrahim AL-Dayel, Emad Solouma, Meraj Khan . On geometry of focal surfaces due to B-Darboux and type-2 Bishop frames in Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13454-13468. doi: 10.3934/math.2022744 |
[6] | Jinhua Qian, Jie Liu, Xueshan Fu, Seoung Dal Jung . Geometric characterizations of canal surfaces with Frenet center curves. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9476-9490. doi: 10.3934/math.2021551 |
[7] | Tong Wu, Yong Wang . Gauss-Bonnet theorems in the generalized affine group and the generalized BCV spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 11655-11685. doi: 10.3934/math.2021678 |
[8] | Fatemah Mofarreh, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky . Singularities of swept surfaces in Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 26049-26064. doi: 10.3934/math.20241272 |
[9] | M. Khalifa Saad, Nural Yüksel, Nurdan Oğraş, Fatemah Alghamdi, A. A. Abdel-Salam . Geometry of tubular surfaces and their focal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12479-12493. doi: 10.3934/math.2024610 |
[10] | Nevin Gürbüz, Dae Won Yoon . Geometry of curve flows in isotropic spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3434-3445. doi: 10.3934/math.2020222 |
A surface M2 with position vector r=r(s,t) is called a Hasimoto surface if the relation rt=rs∧rss holds. In this paper, we first define the Beltrami-Laplace operator according to the three fundamental forms of the surface, then we classify the J-harmonic Hasimoto surfaces and their Gauss map in E3, for J=II and III.
In the theory of curves in Riemannian manifolds, one of the important and interesting problems is the characterizations of a regular curve. The authors in [1] examined the curvatures of the Hasimoto surface according to Bishop's frame and gave some characterization of the parameter curves for these surfaces. The geometric properties of Hasimoto surfaces are investigated by [2]. In [3], Schief and Rogers studied the binormal motion of curves with constant curvatures. In [4], the authors studied the intrinsic geometry of the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation in E3.
Hasimoto surfaces, also known as Frenet frames surfaces, are a class of surfaces in Euclidean 3-space that arise from solutions to the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics. Specifically, they are associated with the motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field.
The construction of Hasimoto surfaces involves the use of the Frenet-Serret frame, which is a set of orthonormal vectors that describe the local geometry of a curve or surface. In the case of Hasimoto surfaces, the Frenet-Serret frame is used to describe the motion of a curve in Euclidean 3-space under the influence of a magnetic field. This leads to the construction of a surface in 3-space that has certain interesting properties, such as having a constant mean curvature.
In [5], authors studied Hasimoto surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. On the other hand, M. Elzawy in [6] investigated Hasimoto surfaces in Galilean space G3.
In this work, we briefly give the geometric properties of Hasimoto surfaces in the Euclidean 3-space. Especially, we obtain the curvatures of Hasimoto surface according to Bishop's frame. Then, we investigate the second Laplace operator for the first, second, and third fundamental forms of Hasimoto surfaces.
Further, one can follow the idea in [7] by defining the first and second Beltrami operators using the definition of the fractional vector operators. It is also interesting, as future work, to do interdisciplinary research, apply a mix or a blend of the techniques followed in [8,9,10,11] and combine them with the methods of this paper to obtain more new properties of Hasimoto surfaces.
Let ϕ:I→M2 be a regular unit speed curve on the orientable surface M2. Let {T,N,B} be the orthonormal moving Frenet frame along the curve ϕ in M2 such that T=ϕ′ is the unit vector field tangent to ϕ, N is the unit vector field in the direction T′ normal to ϕ (principal normal) and B=T∧N (binormal vector). Then we have the following Frenet equations
(T′N′B′)=(0k0−k0τ0−τ0)(TNB). | (2.1) |
Functions k and τ are the curvature and the torsion of ϕ.
Introduce a new frame, called Darboux frame {T,η,g} with
(Tηg)=(1000cosβsinβ0−sinβcosβ)(TNB), | (2.2) |
where g=η∧T and β is the angle between the vector fields N and η.
The derivative formulas of (2.2) can be given as follows:
(Tsηsgs)=(T′η′g′)=(0kηkg−kη0−tr−kgtr0)(Tηg), | (2.3) |
where kg is the geodesic curvature, kη is the normal curvature, tr is the geodesic torsion of the curve ϕ and Ts=dTds. From now on we will use the prime ′ to denote the derivative with respect to the parameter s.
Here Darboux curvatures are defined by
kη(s)=k(s)cosβ(s),kg(s)=−k(s)sinβ(s),tr(s)=−τ(s)−β′(s). | (2.4) |
Theorem 1. [12] Suppose r=r(s,t) is an NLS surface such that r=r(s,t) is a unit speed curve with a normal vector field for all t. Then the following is satisfied:
(Ttηtgt)=(0αλ−α0−γ−λγ0)(Tηg), | (2.5) |
where α, λ and γ are smooth functions given by
{α=k′g−kηtr,λ=−k′η−kgtr,k2γ=(kk′)′−α2−λ2+δ, | (2.6) |
where δ=kgtkη−kηtkg and Tt=dTdt.
From (2.4) and (2.6) we obtain
δ=−βtk2, |
α2+λ2=k2τ2+k′2, |
αkg−λkη=kk′. |
Using compatibility conditions Tst=Tts, ηst=ηts and gst=gts, we get
(α′λ′γ′)=(0−trkgtr0−kη−kgkη0)(αλγ)+(kηtkgttrt). |
The mean curvature Hmean and the Gaussian curvature KG are, respectively, defined by
Hmean=EN+GL−2FM2(EG−F2), |
and
KG=LN−M2EG−F2. |
The Laplace-Beltrami operator of a smooth function φ: M2→R, with respect to the first fundamental form I of the surface M2 is the operator ΔI, defined in [13,14,15] as follows:
ΔIφ=−1√EG−F2[∂∂s(Gφs−Fφt√EG−F2)−∂∂t(Fφs−Eφt√EG−F2)]. | (2.7) |
The second differential parameter of Beltrami of a function φ: M2→R,(s,t)→φ(s,t) with respect to the second fundamental form II of M2 is the operator ΔII which is defined by [13,14,15]
ΔIIφ=−1√|LN−M2|[∂∂s(Nφs−Mφt√|LN−M2|)+∂∂t(Lφt−Mφs√|LN−M2|)], | (2.8) |
where LN−M2≠0 since the surface has no parabolic points.
In classical literature, one writes the third fundamental form as
III(s,t)=e11ds2+2e12dsdt+e22dt2, |
where
e11=<Ns,Ns>=EM2−2FLM+GL2EG−F2, |
e12=<Ns,Nt>=EMN−FLN+GLM−FM2EG−F2, |
e22=<Nt,Nt>=GM2−2FNM+EN2EG−F2. |
The second Beltrami differential operator with respect to the third fundamental form III is defined by [13,14,15]
ΔIII=−1√|e|(∂∂xi(√|e|eij∂∂xj)), | (2.9) |
where e=det(eij) and eij denote the components of the inverse tensor of eij.
In this section, Hasimoto surfaces are investigated by using the Darboux frame and discussing the geometric properties of Hasimoto surfaces. We find the Gaussian KG and mean curvatures Hmean of this surface.
Let r=r(s,t) be the position vector of a curve ϕ moving on a surface M2 in E3 such that r(s,t) is a unit speed curve for all t. If the surface M2 is a Hasimoto surface, then, the position vector r satisfies the following condition
rt=rs∧rss. | (3.1) |
This is called the vortex filament or smoke ring equation.
Lemma 1. [16] The evolution equations for curvature and torsion are
kt=kτ′+2τk′,τt=−(k′′k−τ2)′−kk′,βt=k′′k−τ2−γ. |
The coefficients of the first fundamental form of the surface r=r(s,t) are
E=1,F=0,G=k2. | (3.2) |
The unit normal vector of the Hasimoto surface is given by
N=−cosβ(s)η+sinβ(s)g. | (3.3) |
Lemma 2. The components bij and eij of the second and the third fundamental tensors in coordinates are the following
b11=L=−k,b12=M=−kτ,b22=N=−kτ2+k′′, | (3.4) |
e11=k2+τ2,e12=τ(k2+τ2)−k′′τk,e22=k2τ2+(k′′k−τ2)2. | (3.5) |
From (3.2) and (3.4) we have
KG=−k′′k, | (3.6) |
Hmean=k′′−k(k2+τ2)2k2, | (3.7) |
where k≠0, since the surface has no parabolic points.
We consider a surface M2 in E3 parametrized by
r(s,t)=(r1(s,t),r2(s,t),r3(s,t)). | (4.1) |
Definition 1. A surface in the three-dimensional Euclidean space is said to be J-harmonic if it satisfies the condition ΔJr=0, where ΔJ denotes the Laplace operator with respect to the fundamental forms I–III.
Theorem 2. [16] The Laplacian ΔI of the Hasimoto surface r=r(s,t) can be expressed as
ΔIr(s,t)=−1k[Q(s,t)η+P(s,t)g], | (4.2) |
where
Q(s,t)=−ktkgk2+kkη+kgtk−γkηk,P(s,t)=ktkηk2+kkg−kηtk−γkgk, |
kgt=∂kg∂t, kηt=∂kη∂t.
Remark 1.
kηQ(s,t)+kgP(s,t)=k(k2+τ2)−k′′. |
Corollary 1. [16] Therefore, r is I-harmonic if and only if Hmean=0.
In this section, we classify Hasimoto surface with non-degenerate second fundamental form in E3 satisfying the equation
ΔIIr=0. | (4.3) |
By a straightforward computation, the Laplacian ΔII of the second fundamental form II on M2 with the help of (2.8) and (3.4) turns out to be
ΔII=−ε2k2k′′2[Λ1(s,t)∂∂t+Λ2(s,t)∂∂s+Λ3(s,t)∂2∂s2+Λ4(s,t)∂2∂s∂t+Λ5(s,t)∂2∂t2], | (4.4) |
where
Λ1(s,t)=6k2k′′τ′+τk2k′′′+k3τ′′′−τkk′k′′+4k2k′τ′′,Λ2(s,t)=−4k2τ(k′′τ′+τ′′k′)+k′k′′2+kk′k′′τ2−k3ττ′′′−τ2k2k′′′−kk′′k′′′−2k3k′k′′,Λ3(s,t)=2kk′′(k′′−kτ2),Λ4(s,t)=4τk2k′′,Λ5(s,t)=−2k2k′′. |
Theorem 3. The formula of the Laplacian ΔII takes the following form
ΔIIr(s,t)=−ε2k2k′′2[Γ1(s,t)T+Γ2(s,t)η+Γ3(s,t)g], | (4.5) |
where
Γ1(s,t)=−4k2τ(k′′τ′+τ′′k′)−k2τ(kτ′′′+τk′′′)+k′k′′2+kk′k′′τ2−kk′′k′′′,Γ2(s,t)=(−4k3(k′′τ′+τ′′k′)+τk2(k′k′′−kk′′′)−k4τ′′′)sinβ+(4k2k′′2)cosβ,Γ3(s,t)=(−4k3(k′′τ′+τ′′k′)+τk2(k′k′′−kk′′′)−k4τ′′′)cosβ−(4k2k′′2)sinβ, |
and |LN−M2|=εkk′′≠0, ε=±1 since the surface has no parabolic points.
Proof. From (3.1), we have
rs=T,rt=−ksinβη−kcosβg,rss=kcosβη−ksinβg,rtt=−(kk′)T+((kτ2−k′′)cosβ−(kτ′+2τk′)sinβ)η−((kτ2−k′′)sinβ+(kτ′+2τk′)cosβ)g,rst=(kτcosβ−k′sinβ)η−(k′cosβ+kτsinβ)g. |
Substituting the last equations into (4.4) gives (4.5).
If ΔIIr(s,t)=0, then we get k2k′′2=0. It contradicts the non-degeneracy of the second fundamental form on M2.
Theorem 4. There do not exist Hasimoto surfaces in E3 which satisfy the condition ΔIIr(s,t)=0.
In this section, we classify Hasimoto surface with non-degenerate third fundamental form in E3 satisfying the equation
ΔIIIr=0. | (4.6) |
Theorem 5. The formula of the Laplacian ΔIII takes the following form
ΔIIIr(s,t)=−1k′′3[Θ1(s,t)T+Θ2(s,t)η+Θ3(s,t)g], | (4.7) |
where
Θ1(s,t)=(k2+τ2)(τ2k′′′+kττ′′′+3ττ′k′′+4τk′τ′′)+kk′′k′′′−2k′k′′2−k′k′′3k3−3ττ′k′′2k−3τ2k′k′′2k2+3τ2k′′k′′′k, |
Θ2(s,t)=sin(β(k2+τ2)(3kτ′k′′+kτk′′′+k2τ′′′+4kk′τ′′)−τ′k′′2+2τk′′k′′′−3τk′k′′2k)−cosβ(k′′2(k2+τ2)−k′′3k), |
Θ3(s,t)=cosβ((k2+τ2)(3kτ′k′′+kτk′′′+k2τ′′′+4kk′τ′′)−τ′k′′2+2τk′′k′′′−3τk′k′′2k)+sinβ(k′′2(k2+τ2)−k′′3k). |
Proof. By (2.9), the Laplacian operator ΔIII of r can be expressed as
ΔIIIr(s,t)=−1k′′3[(k′′((e22)s−(e12)t)−k′′′e22+(k′′)te12)rs+(k′′((e11)t−(e12)s)+k′′′e12−(k′′)te11)rt+(k′′e22)rss−2(k′′e12)rst+(k′′e11)rtt]. |
Using (3.5), we have (4.7).
Remark 2. We observe that
(ksinβ)Θ1(s,t)−τΘ2(s,t)=k′′3τ(2HmeanKG)cosβ−k′′3(2HmeanKG)′sinβ, | (4.8) |
(cosβ)Θ2(s,t)−(sinβ)Θ3(s,t)=2k3HmeanK2G. | (4.9) |
S. Stamatakis, H. Al-Zoubi proved in [14] the relation
ΔIIIr=∇III(2HmeanKG,N)−2HmeanKGN. | (4.10) |
From (4.8)–(4.10) we have
Theorem 6. Let M2 be a Hasimoto surface in E3. Then M2 is III-harmonic if and only if M2 has zero mean curvature.
In this section, we consider the Gauss map N of the surface M2 with parametric representation (3.3).
Let r=r(s,t) be a Hasimoto surface. From (2.7), (3.3) and (3.2), we write the Laplacian operator of the Gauss map as [16]
ΔIN=−1k3Λ1T−1k4Λ2η−1k4Λ3g, | (5.1) |
where
Λ1=kk′(k2+τ2)−kk′τ+3k2ττ′−kk′′′+2k′k′′,Λ2=(k2τ′′′−k4τ′−k′k′′+kk′τ2+4kk′′τ′+4kk′τ′′−4k′k′′τ+4kτk′′′−4k2τ2τ′)sinβ+(k4(k2+2τ2)+(k′′−kτ2)2)cosβ,Λ3=(k2τ′′′−k4τ′−k′k′′+kk′τ2+4kk′′τ′+4kk′τ′′−4k′k′′τ+4kτk′′′−4k2τ2τ′)cosβ−(k4(k2+2τ2)+(k′′−kτ2)2)sinβ. |
Theorem 7. [16] Let r=r(s,t) be a Hasimoto surface. There are no Hasimoto surfaces in E3, satisfying the condition ΔIN=0.
Using (3.3) and (4.4), we obtain
Theorem 8.
ΔIIN=ε2k2k′′ˆΛ1T+ε2k2k′′ˆΛ2η+ε2k2k′′ˆΛ3g, | (5.2) |
where
ˆΛ1=k(k′k′′−kk′′′)=kK′G,ˆΛ2=ˆD0sinβ+ˆD1cosβ,ˆΛ3=ˆD0cosβ−ˆD1sinβ,ˆD0=4k(τ′k′′+k′τ′′)+2τ(kk′′′−k′k′′)+k2τ′′′=−k2(KG)t,ˆD1=2k′′(k′′−k(τ2+k2))=4k′′k2Hmean. |
Proof. Using (4.4) and
Ns=kT−τsinβη−τcosβg,Nt=kτT+sinβ(k′′k−τ2)η+cosβ(k′′k−τ2)g,Nss=k′T+((k2+τ2)cosβ−τ′sinβ)η−((k2+τ2)sinβ+τ′cosβ)g,Ntt=D0T+(D1cosβ+D2sinβ)η−(D1sinβ−D2cosβ)g,Nst=D3T+(D4sinβ+D5cosβ)η−(D5sinβ−D4cosβ)g, |
where
D0=3kττ′+k′(τ2−k2)−k′′′+2k′k′′k,D1=τ2(τ2+k2)+k′′2k2−2k′′τ2k,D2=−4τ′τ2+τkk′+τ′′′+4(τ′k′′+k′τ′′)k+4τ(kk′′′−k′k′′)k2,D3=k′τ+τ′k,D4=k′′′k−k′k′′k2−2ττ′,D5=−τk′′k+τ(τ2+k2)=−2τkHmean. |
we have (5.2).
Suppose that the Hasimoto surface has a II- harmonic Gauss map. Then, the vector ΔIIN given from (5.2) is zero. Thus, we have
K′G=0,(KG)t=0,Hmean=0. |
Therefore
−k′′k=c,c∈R;k′′=k(k2+τ2). |
Case Ⅰ. Suppose c>0. Then from −k′′k=c we have k2+τ2<0, it is impossible.
Case Ⅱ. Suppose c<0. Then k′′=α2k, where c=−α2.
The solution of the last equation is
k=δ1(t)cosαs+δ2(t)sinαs, |
where δ1 and δ2 are smooth functions on open set of R.
Hence, the equation k′′=k(k2+τ2) implies that
τ=ε√α2−k2, ε=∓1. |
Theorem 9. Let r=r(s,t) be a Hasimoto surface. ΔIIN=0 if and only if
k=δ1(t)cosαs+δ2(t)sinαs, |
and
τ=ε√α2−k2, |
where ε=∓1 and δ1 and δ2 are smooth functions on open set of R.
In [14] S. Stamatakis, H. Al-Zoubi proved the relation
ΔIIIN=2N. | (5.3) |
From (5.3), it can be seen that the Gauss map N of M2 in E3 is of finite III-type 1, the corresponding eigenvalue is 2. Then
Theorem 10. The Gauss map N of a Hasimoto surface M2 in E3 is of finite III-type 1, the corresponding eigenvalue is 2.
In the beginning, a brief introduction and definition for the Hasimoto surfaces were given in the Euclidean 3-space. Then, we investigate Hasimoto surfaces by using the Darboux frame and discuss its geometric properties of it. Consequentially, we define a formula for the Laplace operator regarding the first, second, and third fundamental forms. Finally, we classify the Hasimoto surfaces satisfying the relations ΔJr=0, and ΔJN=0 for J=I,II and III, where N is the Gauss map of M2 in E3. We distinguish three types according to whether these surfaces are determined, with each type investigated in a subsection of section 4 and for the Gauss map in Section 5. An interesting study can be drawn, if this type of study can be applied to the general definition of surfaces of finite Chen k-type.
Most of this work was done by Dr. Bendehiba Senoussi and I the correspondence author would like to thank him for the great work he did.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] | A. Kelleci, M. Bektaş, M. Ergüt, The Hasimoto surface according to bishop frame, Adıyaman University Journal of Science, 9 (2019), 13–22. |
[2] | N. Abdel-All, R. Hussien, T. Youssef, Hasimoto surfaces, Life Sci. J., 9 (2012) 556–560. |
[3] |
W. Schief, C. Rogers, Binormal motion of curves of constant curvature and torsion. generation of soliton surfaces, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 455 (1999), 3163–3188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1999.0445 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1999.0445
![]() |
[4] |
C. Rogers, W. Schief, Intrinsic geometry of the NLS equation and its backlund transformation, Stud. Appl. Math., 101 (1998), 267–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9590.00093 doi: 10.1111/1467-9590.00093
![]() |
[5] |
M. Erdogdu, M. Özdemir, Geometry of Hasimoto surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 17 (2014), 169–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11040-014-9148-3 doi: 10.1007/s11040-014-9148-3
![]() |
[6] |
M. Elzawy, Hasimoto surfaces in Galilean space G3, J. Egypt. Math. Soc., 29 (2021), 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42787-021-00113-y doi: 10.1186/s42787-021-00113-y
![]() |
[7] | M. Mhailan, M. Abu Hammad, M. Al Horani, R. Khalil, On fractional vector analysis, Journal of Mathematical and Computational Science, 10 (2020), 2320–2326. |
[8] |
Y. Li, Z. Chen, S. Nazra, R. Abdel-Baky, Singularities for timelike developable surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 277. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15020277 doi: 10.3390/sym15020277
![]() |
[9] |
Y. Li, M. Aldossary, R. Abdel-Baky, Spacelike circular surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym15010173 doi: 10.3390/sym15010173
![]() |
[10] | Y. Li, O. Tuncer, On (contra)pedals and (anti)orthotomics of frontals in de Sitter 2-space, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.9173 |
[11] |
Y. Li, A. Alkhaldi, A. Ali, R. Abdel-Baky, M. Khalifa Saad, Investigation of ruled surfaces and their singularities according to Blaschke frame in Euclidean 3-space, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 13875–13888. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2023709 doi: 10.3934/math.2023709
![]() |
[12] |
M. Erdo˜gdu, A. Yavuz, Differential geometric aspects of nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ., 70 (2021), 510–521. http://dx.doi.org/10.31801/cfsuasmas.724634 doi: 10.31801/cfsuasmas.724634
![]() |
[13] | B. Senoussi, M. Bekkar, Helicoidal surfaces with ΔJr=Ar in 3-dimensional Euclidean space, Stud. Univ. Babes-Bol. Math., 60 (2015), 437–448. |
[14] |
S. Stamatakis, H. Al-Zoubi, On surfaces of finite Chen-type, Results Math., 43 (2003), 181–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03322734 doi: 10.1007/BF03322734
![]() |
[15] | S. Stamatakis, H. Al-Zoubi, Surfaces of revolution satisfying ΔIIIx=Ax, J. Geom. Graph., 14 (2010), 181–186. |
[16] |
B. Senoussi, A. Akbay, Characterizations of Hasimoto surfaces in Euclidean 3-spaces E3, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 16 (2022), 689–694. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/160504 doi: 10.18576/amis/160504
![]() |
1. | Mohammad Al-kafaween, Hamza Alzaareer, Hassan Alzoubi, 2023, Quadrics of Coordinate Finite Type, 979-8-3503-2006-0, 495, 10.1109/ICIT58056.2023.10225914 | |
2. | Mutaz Al-Sabbagh, Quadric surfaces of finite Chen Ⅱ-type, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 34435, 10.3934/math.20241640 | |
3. | Ayman Elsharkawy, Exploring Hasimoto surfaces within equiform geometry in Minkowski space, 2025, 100, 0031-8949, 016101, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad954e |