On the solution of fractional modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations with non-singular kernel operators

Thongchai Botmart; Ravi P. Agarwal; Muhammed Naeem; Adnan Khan; Rasool Shah; Thongchai Botmart; Ravi P. Agarwal; Muhammed Naeem; Adnan Khan; Rasool Shah

doi:10.3934/math.2022693

AIMS Mathematics

2022, Volume 7, Issue 7: 12483-12513. doi: 10.3934/math.2022693

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

On the solution of fractional modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations with non-singular kernel operators

1.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2.
Department of Mathematics, Texas A & M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA
3.
Deanship of Joint First Year Umm Al-Qura University Makkah, Saudi Arabia
4.
Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali khan university Mardan 23200, Pakistan

Received: 09 February 2022 Revised: 01 April 2022 Accepted: 10 April 2022 Published: 26 April 2022
MSC : 26A33, 34A25, 35M13, 35R11

In this paper, we used the Natural decomposition approach with nonsingular kernel derivatives to explore the modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations. These equations are crucial in defining the features of shallow water waves using a specific dispersion relationship. In this research, the convergence analysis and error analysis have been provided. The fractional derivatives Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio are utilised throughout the paper. To obtain the equations results, we used Natural transform on fractional-order modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations, followed by inverse Natural transform. To verify the approach, we focused on two systems and compared them to the exact solutions. We compare exact and analytical results with the use of graphs and tables, which are in strong agreement with each other, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the suggested approaches. Also compared are the results achieved by implementing the suggested approaches at various fractional orders, confirming that the result comes closer to the exact solution as the value moves from fractional to integer order. The numerical and graphical results show that the suggested scheme is computationally very accurate and simple to investigate and solve fractional coupled nonlinear complicated phenomena that exist in science and technology.

Keywords:

Citation: Thongchai Botmart, Ravi P. Agarwal, Muhammed Naeem, Adnan Khan, Rasool Shah. On the solution of fractional modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations with non-singular kernel operators[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12483-12513. doi: 10.3934/math.2022693

Related Papers:

[1]	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Rasool Shah, Adnan Khan, Osama Y. Ababneh, Thongchai Botmart . Fractional view analysis of Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems with non-singular kernel derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18334-18359. doi: 10.3934/math.20221010
[2]	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Osama Y. Ababneh, Rasool Shah, Amjad khan, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Numerical analysis of fractional-order Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations with non-singular kernel operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2308-2336. doi: 10.3934/math.2023120
[3]	Reetika Chawla, Komal Deswal, Devendra Kumar, Dumitru Baleanu . A novel finite difference based numerical approach for Modified Atangana- Baleanu Caputo derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17252-17268. doi: 10.3934/math.2022950
[4]	Naveed Iqbal, Saleh Alshammari, Thongchai Botmart . Evaluation of regularized long-wave equation via Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20401-20419. doi: 10.3934/math.20221118
[5]	Gulalai, Shabir Ahmad, Fathalla Ali Rihan, Aman Ullah, Qasem M. Al-Mdallal, Ali Akgül . Nonlinear analysis of a nonlinear modified KdV equation under Atangana Baleanu Caputo derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7847-7865. doi: 10.3934/math.2022439
[6]	Khalid Khan, Amir Ali, Manuel De la Sen, Muhammad Irfan . Localized modes in time-fractional modified coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1580-1602. doi: 10.3934/math.2022092
[7]	Ahu Ercan . Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13325-13343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022736
[8]	Saima Rashid, Rehana Ashraf, Fahd Jarad . Strong interaction of Jafari decomposition method with nonlinear fractional-order partial differential equations arising in plasma via the singular and nonsingular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7936-7963. doi: 10.3934/math.2022444
[9]	Changdev P. Jadhav, Tanisha B. Dale, Vaijanath L. Chinchane, Asha B. Nale, Sabri T. M. Thabet, Imed Kedim, Miguel Vivas-Cortez . On solutions of fractional differential equations for the mechanical oscillations by using the Laplace transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32629-32645. doi: 10.3934/math.20241562
[10]	Saima Rashid, Sobia Sultana, Bushra Kanwal, Fahd Jarad, Aasma Khalid . Fuzzy fractional estimates of Swift-Hohenberg model obtained using the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16067-16101. doi: 10.3934/math.2022880

Abstract

1. Introduction

In a letter to L'Hospital in 1695, the famous mathematician Leibniz introduced the concept of fractional derivative for the first time. Fractional calculus is concerned with non-integral differential and integral operators. The integer-order differential operator is a local operator, but the fractional-order differential operator is non-local, indicating that a system's next state is determined not only by its current state but also by all of its past states. It is more realistic, which is one of the main reasons for the popularity of fractional calculus. Fractional calculus was found to be more suitable for modelling real-world problems than classical calculus. The theory of fractional calculus provides an effective and systematic interpretation of nature's reality. The following are some basic works on fractional calculus on various topics, such as Podlubny ^[1], Caputo ^[2], Kiryakova ^[3], Jafari and Seifi ^[4,5], Momani and Shawagfeh ^[6], Oldham and Spanier ^[7], Diethelm et al. ^[8], Miller and Ross ^[9], Kemple and Beyer ^[10], Kilbas and Trujillo ^[11].

Fractional differential equations (FDEs) are widely widely used in various fields of science. FDEs have attracted a lot of attention in the last few years because of their diverse uses in physics and engineering. Due to its proven usefulness in a wide range of very diverse disciplines of science and engineering, fractional partial differential equations (PDEs) have gained importance and reputation among FDEs in recent years. For example, fractional derivatives in a fluid-dynamic traffic model can be utilised to overcome the insufficiency produced by the assumption of a continuous flow of traffic. Nonlinear FPDE solutions are of tremendous interest in both mathematics and practical applications ^{[12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]}. The world's most important processes are represented by nonlinear equations. Manipulation of nonlinear processes is essential in physics, applied mathematics, and engineering problems. The significance of finding the exact solution to nonlinear partial differential equations is still a prominent issue in physics and applied mathematics, requiring implemented using different techniques to determine new approximate or exact solutions ^{[22,23,24,25]}.

In order to obtain explicit solutions for nonlinear equations of integer order, various techniques have been used. To solve FPDEs, however, only a less numerous approaches are used. such as Laplace variational iteration method (LVIM) ^[26], iterative Laplace transform method (ILTM) ^[27], optimal Homotopy asymptotic method (OHAM)^[28], approximate-analytical method (AAM) ^[29], reduced differential transform method (RDTM) ^[30], Laplace-Adomian decomposition method (LADM) ^[31], natural transform decomposition method (NTDM) ^[32], Elzaki transform decomposition method (ETDM) ^[33,34,35], new meshfree technique (NMT) ^{[36,37,38,39,40]}, Homotopy analysis method (HAM) ^[41], generalized exponential rational function method (GERFM) ^[42,43] and much more ^{[44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]}. The goal of this paper is to implement the natural decomposition approach to solve modified Boussinesq equations and approximate long wave equations having fractional-order. Natural decomposition methods avoid roundoff errors by not requiring prescriptive assumptions, linearization, discretization, or perturbation.

Whitham ^[52], Broer ^[53], and Kaup ^[54] discovered the Whitham-Broer-Kaup (WBK) equations in the twentieth century, which describe the propagation of shallow water waves with various dispersion relations. Consider the fractional order coupled WBK equations ^[55]:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{\partial^\wp{u}}{\partial{\Im^\wp}}&+u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}+b\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial {\xi}^{2}} = 0, \\ \frac{\partial^\wp{v}}{\partial{\Im^\wp}}&+u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}+v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}+a\frac{\partial^{3} u}{\partial {\xi}^{3}}-b\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}} = 0, 0 < \wp\leq 1. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(1.1)

where $v = v(\xi, \tau)$ is the height that deviates from the liquid's equilibrium position and $u = u(\xi, \tau)$ is the horizontal velocity. The order of the time-fractional derivative is in this case. Furthermore, a and b are constants that represent different diffusion strengths, therefore Eq (1.1) becomes a modified Boussinesq equation if $a = 1$ and $b = 0$ . Similarly, the system denotes the standard long wave equation for $a = 0$ and $b = 1.$ These equations are used in ocean and coastal engineering to explain the propagation of waves in dissipative and nonlinear media. They are recommended for situations involving water leakage in porous subsurface stratum and are frequently used in hydrodynamics. Furthermore, Eq (1.1) serves as the foundation for a number of models that represent the unconfined subsurface, such as drainage and groundwater problems ^[56,57].

The following is a summary of the paper's structure. The essential definitions related to fractional calculus are briefly discussed in Section 2. The NTDM is a method implemented to solve coupled WBK equations having fractional order with non-singular definitions are given in Section 3. In Section 4, we discussed the uniqueness and convergence results. Two examples of fractional-order modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations are given in Section 5 to validate the approaches. The article's brief conclusions are offered in Section 6.

2. Basic preliminaries

In the literature, there are various fractional derivative definitions; for additional details, see ^[58,59,60]. This section includes Caputo, Riemann-Liouville, Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio definitions for the benefit of the readers.

Definition 2.1. For a function $h\in C_{v}, v\geq-1$ , the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator is given as ^[61]

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} I^{{{\wp}}}h(\eta) = &\frac{1}{\Gamma({{\wp}})}\int_{0}^{\eta}(\eta-\zeta)^{{{\wp}}-1}h(\zeta)d\zeta, \ \ {{\wp}} > 0, \ \ \eta > 0.\\ \ \ I^{0}h(\eta) = &h(\eta). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.1)

Definition 2.2. The fractional derivative $h(\eta)$ in Caputo manner is given as ^[61]

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_{\eta}^{{{\wp}}}h(\eta) = I^{{m}-{{\wp}}}D^{{m}}h(\eta) = \frac{1}{{m}-{{\wp}}}\int_{0}^{\eta}(\eta-\zeta)^{{m}-{{\wp}}-1}h^{{m}}(\zeta)d\zeta, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.2)

for ${m}-1 < {{\wp}}\leq {m}, \ \ {m}\in N, \ \ \eta > 0, h\in C^{{m}}_{v}, v\geq-1$ .

Definition 2.3. Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative for $h(\eta)$ is given as ^[61]

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_{\eta}^{{{\wp}}}h(\eta) = \frac{F({{\wp}})}{1-{{\wp}}}\int^{\eta}_{0}\exp\left(\frac{-{{\wp}}(\eta-\zeta)}{1-{{\wp}}}\right)D(h(\zeta))d\zeta, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.3)

where $0 < {{\wp}} < 1$ and $F({{\wp}})$ is a normalization function with $F(0) = F(1) = 1$ .

Definition 2.4. The Atangana-Baleanu Caputo derivative of fractional-order for $h(\eta)$ is defined as ^[61]

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_{\eta}^{{{\wp}}}h(\eta) = \frac{B({{\wp}})}{1-{{\wp}}}\int^{\eta}_{0}E_{{{\wp}}}\left(\frac{-{{\wp}}(\eta-\zeta)}{1-{{\wp}}}\right)D(h(\zeta))d\zeta, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.4)

where $0 < {{\wp}} < 1$ , where $B(\wp)$ is Normalization function and $E_{{{\wp}}}(z) = \sum_{m = 0}^{\infty}\frac{z^{m}}{\Gamma({{\wp}}^{m}+1)}$ is the Mittag-Leffler function.

Definition 2.5. For a function $u(\Im)$ , the Natural transformation is defined as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}(u(\Im)) = \mathcal{U}({s}, {{\vartheta}}) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-s\Im}u(\vartheta\Im)d\Im, \ \ s, {\vartheta}\in (-\infty, \infty). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.5)

Natural transformation of $u(\Im)$ for $\Im\in(0, \infty)$ is given as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}(u(\Im)H(\Im)) = \mathcal{N}^{+} = \mathcal{U}^{+}({s}, {{\vartheta}}) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-s\Im}u(\vartheta\Im)d\Im, \ \ s, {\vartheta}\in (0, \infty). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.6)

here $H(\Im)$ is the Heaviside function.

Definition 2.6. For a function $\mathcal{U}({s}, {{\vartheta}})$ , the Natural inverse transformation is given as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}^{-1}[\mathcal{U}({s}, {{\vartheta}})] = u(\Im), \ \ \forall \Im\geq0. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.7)

Lemma 2.1. If linearity property having Natural transformation for $u_{1}(\Im)$ is $u_{1}({s}, {{\vartheta}})$ and $u_{2}(\Im)$ is $u_{2}({s}, {{\vartheta}})$ , then

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}[c_{1}u_{1}(\Im)+c_{2}u_{2}(\Im)] = c_{1}\mathcal{N}[u_{1}(\Im)]+c_{2}\mathcal{N}[u_{2}(\Im)] = c_{1}\mathcal{U}_{1}({s}, {{\vartheta}})+c_{2}\mathcal{U}_{2}({s}, {{\vartheta}}), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.8)

where $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ are constants.

Lemma 2.2. If Natural inverse transformation of $\mathcal{U}_{1}({s}, {{\vartheta}})$ and $\mathcal{U}_{2}({s}, {{\vartheta}})$ are $u_{1}(\Im)$ and $u_{2}(\Im)$ respectivelythen

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}^{-1}[c_{1}\mathcal{U}_{1}({s}, {{\vartheta}})+c_{2}\mathcal{U}_{2}({s}, {{\vartheta}})] = c_{1}\mathcal{N}^{-1}[\mathcal{U}_{1}({s}, {{\vartheta}})]+c_{2}\mathcal{N}^{-1}[\mathcal{U}_{2}({s}, {{\vartheta}})] = c_{1}u_{1}(\Im)+c_{2}u_{2}(\Im), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.9)

where $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ are constants.

Definition 2.7. The Natural transformation of Caputo operator $D_{\Im}^{{{\wp}}}u(\Im)$ is define as ^[61]

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}[D_{\Im}^{{{\wp}}}u(\Im)] = \left(\frac{s}{{\vartheta}}\right)^{{{\wp}}}\left(\mathcal{N}[u(\Im)]-\left(\frac{1}{s}\right)u(0)\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.10)

Definition 2.8. In terms of Caputo-Fabrizio, the Natural transformation of $D_{\Im}^{{{\wp}}}u(\Im)$ is given as ^[61]

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}[D_{\Im}^{{{\wp}}}u(\Im)] = \frac{1}{1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}(\frac{{\vartheta}}{s})}\left(\mathcal{N}[u(\Im)]-\left(\frac{1}{s}\right)u(0)\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.11)

Definition 2.9. In terms of Atangana-Baleanu Caputo derivative, the Natural transformation of $D_{\Im}^{{{\wp}}}u(\Im)$ is defined as ^[61]

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathcal{N}[D_{\Im}^{{{\wp}}}u(\Im)] = \frac{M[{{\wp}}]}{1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}(\frac{{\vartheta}}{s})^{{{\wp}}}}\left(\mathcal{N}[u(\Im)]-\left(\frac{1}{s}\right)u(0)\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.12)

3. Methodology

This section introduces a general numerical methodology based on the Natural transform for the following equation.

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_{\Im}^{{{\wp}}}\nu(\xi, \Im) = \mathcal{L}(\nu(\xi, \Im))+\mathbb{N}(\nu(\xi, \Im))+h(\xi, \Im), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.1)

with initial source

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu(\xi, 0) = \phi(\xi), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.2)

here $\mathcal{L}$ is linear, $\mathbb{N}$ is nonlinear and $h(\xi, \Im)$ represents source term.

3.1. Case Ⅰ $(NTDM_{CF}):$

We get this by applying Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative with the aid of Natural transformation of Eq (3.1),

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{1}{p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})}\left(\mathcal{N}[\nu(\xi, \Im)]-\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}\right) = \mathcal{N}[M(\xi, \Im)], \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.3)

where

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s}) = 1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}(\frac{{\vartheta}}{s}). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.4)

We may express Eq (3.3) as, using the inverse Natural transformation

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu(\xi, \Im) = \mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}+p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[M(\xi, \Im)]\right), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.5)

$\mathbb{N}(\nu(\xi, \Im))$ can be decomposed into

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathbb{N}(\nu(\xi, \Im)) = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}A_{i}, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.6)

where the Adomian polynomials is represented by $A_{\Im}$ .We assume that the numerical solution of Eq (3.1) exists

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu(\xi, \Im) = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\nu_{i}(\xi, \Im). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.7)

By putting Eqs (3.6) and (3.7) into (3.5), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\nu_{i}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}+p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[h(\xi, \Im)]\right)\\ &+\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{L}(\nu_{i}(\xi, \Im))+A_{\Im}\right]\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.8)

From (3.8), we obtain

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu_{0}^{CF}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}+p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[h(\xi, \Im)]\right), \\ \nu_{1}^{CF}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\mathcal{L}(\nu_{0}(\xi, \Im))+A_{0}\right]\right), \\ &\vdots\\ \nu_{l+1}^{CF}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\mathcal{L}(\nu_{l}(\xi, \Im))+A_{l}\right]\right), \ \ l = 1, 2, 3, \cdots\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.9)

we obtain the $NTDM_{CF}$ solution of (3.1) by putting (3.9) into (3.7),

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu^{CF}(\xi, \Im) = \nu_{0}^{CF}(\xi, \Im)+\nu_{1}^{CF}(\xi, \Im)+\nu_{2}^{CF}(\xi, \Im)+\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.10)

3.2. Case Ⅱ $(NTDM_{ABC}):$

We get this by applying Atangana-Baleanu derivative with the aid of Natural transformation of Eq (3.1),

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{1}{q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})}\left(\mathcal{N}[\nu(\xi, \Im)]-\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}\right) = \mathcal{N}[M(\xi, \Im)], \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.11)

where

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s}) = \frac{1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}(\frac{{\vartheta}}{s})^{{{\wp}}}}{B({{\wp}})}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.12)

On applying inverse Natural transformation (2.7), we express (3.11) as,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu(\xi, \Im) = \mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}+q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[M(\xi, \Im)]\right), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.13)

$\mathbb{N}(\nu(\xi, \Im))$ can be decomposed into

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \mathbb{N}(\nu(\xi, \Im)) = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}A_{i}, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.14)

where the Adomian polynomials^[62,63] is represented by $A_{\Im}$ .We assume that the numerical solution of Eq (3.1) exists

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu(\xi, \Im) = \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\nu_{i}(\xi, \Im). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.15)

By putting Eqs (3.14) and (3.15) into (3.13), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\nu_{i}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}+q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[h(\xi, \Im)]\right)\\ &+\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal{L}(\nu_{i}(\xi, \Im))+A_{\Im}\right]\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.16)

From (3.8), we get

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu_{0}^{ABC}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(\frac{\phi(\xi)}{s}+q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[h(\xi, \Im)]\right), \\ \nu_{1}^{ABC}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\mathcal{L}(\nu_{0}(\xi, \Im))+A_{0}\right]\right), \\ &\vdots\\ \nu_{l+1}^{ABC}(\xi, \Im) = &\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left(q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\mathcal{L}(\nu_{l}(\xi, \Im))+A_{l}\right]\right), \ \ l = 1, 2, 3, \cdots, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.17)

we obtain the $NTDM_{ABC}$ solution of (3.1) by putting (3.17) into (3.15),

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \nu^{ABC}(\xi, \Im) = \nu_{0}^{ABC}(\xi, \Im)+\nu_{1}^{ABC}(\xi, \Im)+\nu_{2}^{ABC}(\xi, \Im)+\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.18)

4. Convergence analysis

Here we discuss uniqueness and convergence and of the $NTDM_{CF}$ and $NTDM_{ABC}$ .

Theorem 4.1. The result of (3.1) is unique for $NTDM_{CF}$ when $0 < (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}} \Im) < 1.$

Proof. Let $H = (C[J], ||.||)$ with the norm $||\phi(\Im)|| = {max}_{\Im\in J}|\phi(\Im)|$ is Banach space, $\forall$ continuous function on $J.$ Let $I:H\rightarrow H$ is a non-linear mapping, where

$\nu^{C}_{l+1} = \nu^{C}_{0}+\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[\mathcal{L}(\nu_{l}(\zeta, \Im))+\mathbb{N}(\nu_{l}(\zeta, \Im))]], \ \ l\geq0.$

Suppose that $|\mathcal{L}(\nu)-\mathcal{L}(\nu^{*})| < \lambda_{1}|\nu-\nu^{*}|$ and $|\mathbb{N}(\nu)-\mathbb{N}(\nu^{*})| < \lambda_{2}|\nu-\nu^{*}|$ , where $\nu: = \nu(\zeta, \Im)$ and $\nu^{*}: = \nu^{*}(\zeta, \Im)$ are are two different function values and $\lambda_{1}$ , $\lambda_{2}$ are Lipschitz constants.

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||I\nu-I\nu^{*}||&\leq max_{t\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}\Big[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[\mathcal{L}(\nu)-\mathcal{L}(\nu^{*})]\\ &+p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[\mathbb{N}(\nu)-\mathbb{N}(\nu^{*})]|\Big]\\ &\leq max_{\Im\in J}\Big[\lambda_{1}\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[|\nu-\nu^{*}|]]\\ &+\lambda_{2}\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[|\nu-\nu^{*}|]]\Big]\\ &\leq max_{t\in J}(\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})\left[\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}|\nu-\nu^{*}|]\right]\\ &\leq(\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})\left[\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}||\nu-\nu^{*}||]\right]\\ & = (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}} \Im)||\nu-\nu^{*}||. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.1)

I is contraction as $0 < (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}} \Im) < 1$ . From Banach fixed point theorem the result of (3.1) is unique.

Theorem 4.2. The result of (3.1) is unique for $NTDM_{ABC}$ when $0 < (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}\frac{\Im^{mu}}{\Gamma(mu+1)}) < 1.$

Proof. Let $H = (C[J], ||.||)$ with the norm $||\phi(\Im)|| = {max}_{\Im\in J}|\phi(\Im)|$ be the Banach space, $\forall$ continuous function on $J.$ Let $I:H\rightarrow H$ is a non-linear mapping, where

$\nu^{C}_{l+1} = \nu^{C}_{0}+\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[\mathcal{L}(\nu_{l}(\zeta, \Im))+\mathbb{N}(\nu_{l}(\zeta, \Im))]], \ \ l\geq0.$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||I\nu-I\nu^{*}||&\leq max_{t\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}\Big[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[\mathcal{L}(\nu)-\mathcal{L}(\nu^{*})]\\ &+q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[\mathbb{N}(\nu)-\mathbb{N}(\nu^{*})]|\Big]\\ &\leq max_{t\in J}\Big[\lambda_{1}\mathcal{N}^{-1}[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[|\nu-\nu^{*}|]]\\ &+\lambda_{2}\mathcal{N}^{-1}[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[|\nu-\nu^{*}|]]\Big]\\ &\leq max_{t\in J}(\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})\left[\mathcal{N}^{-1}[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}|\nu-\nu^{*}|]\right]\\ &\leq(\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})\left[\mathcal{N}^{-1}[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}||\nu-\nu^{*}||]\right]\\ & = (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}\frac{\Im^{{{\wp}}}}{\Gamma{{{\wp}}+1}})||\nu-\nu^{*}||. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.2)

$I$ is contraction as $0 < (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}\frac{\Im^{{{\wp}}}}{\Gamma{{{\wp}}+1}}) < 1$ . From Banach fixed point theorem the result of (3.1) is unique.

Theorem 4.3. The $NTDM_{CF}$ result of (3.1) is convergent.

Proof. Let $\nu_{m} = \sum_{r = 0}^{m}\nu_{r}(\zeta, \Im)$ . To show that $\nu_{m}$ is a Cauchy sequence in H. Let,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||\nu_{m}-\nu_{n}||& = max_{\Im\in J}|\sum\limits_{r = n+1}^{m}\nu_{r}|, \ \ n = 1, 2, 3, \cdots\\ &\leq max_{\Im\in J} \left|\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\sum\limits_{r = n+1}^{m}(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{r-1})+\mathbb{N}(\nu_{r-1}))\right]\right]\right|\\ & = max_{\Im\in J} \left|\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\sum\limits_{r = n+1}^{m-1}(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{r})+\mathbb{N}(\nu_{r}))\right]\right]\right|\\ &\leq max_{\Im\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathcal{L}(\nu_{n-1})+\mathbb{N}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathbb{N}(\nu_{n-1}))]]|\\ &\leq\lambda_{1}max_{\Im\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathcal{L}(\nu_{n-1}))]]|\\ &+\lambda_{2}max_{\Im\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[(\mathbb{N}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathbb{N}(\nu_{n-1}))]]|\\ & = (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}} \Im)||\nu_{m-1}-\nu_{n-1}||. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.3)

Let $m = n+1$ , then

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||\nu_{n+1}-\nu_{n}||\leq \lambda||\nu_{n}-\nu_{n-1}||\leq \lambda^{2}||\nu_{n-1}\nu_{n-2}||\leq \cdots \leq \lambda^{n}||\nu_{1}-\nu_{0}||, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.4)

where $\lambda = (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}} \Im)$ . Similarly, we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||\nu_{m}-\nu_{n}||&\leq||\nu_{n+1}-\nu_{n}||+||\nu_{n+2}\nu_{n+1}||+\cdots+||\nu_{m}-\nu_{m-1}||, \\ &(\lambda^{n}+\lambda^{n+1}+\cdots+\lambda^{m-1})||\nu_{1}-\nu_{0}||\\ &\leq \lambda^{n}\left(\frac{1-\lambda^{m-n}}{1-\lambda}\right)||\nu_{1}||, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.5)

As $0 < \lambda < 1$ , we get $1-\lambda^{m-n} < 1$ . Therefore,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||\nu_{m}-\nu_{n}||\leq \frac{\lambda^{n}}{1-\lambda}max_{\Im\in J}||\nu_{1}||. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.6)

Since $||\nu_{1}|| < \infty, \ \ ||\nu_{m}-\nu_{n}||\rightarrow 0$ when $n \rightarrow \infty$ . As a result, $\nu_m$ is a Cauchy sequence in H, implying that the series $\nu_m$ is convergent.

Theorem 4.4. The $NTDM_{ABC}$ result of (3.1) is convergent.

Proof. Let $\nu_{m} = \sum_{r = 0}^{m}\nu_{r}(\zeta, \Im)$ . To show that $\nu_{m}$ is a Cauchy sequence in H. Let,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||\nu_{m}-\nu_{n}||& = max_{\Im\in J}|\sum\limits_{r = n+1}^{m}\nu_{r}|, \ \ n = 1, 2, 3, \cdots\\ &\leq max_{\Im\in J} \left|\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\sum\limits_{r = n+1}^{m}(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{r-1})+\mathbb{N}(\nu_{r-1}))\right]\right]\right|\\ & = max_{\Im\in J} \left|\mathcal{N}^{-1}\left[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}\left[\sum\limits_{r = n+1}^{m-1}(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{r})+\mathbb{N}(u_{r}))\right]\right]\right|\\ &\leq max_{\Im\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathcal{L}(\nu_{n-1})+\mathbb{N}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathbb{N}(\nu_{n-1}))]]|\\ &\leq\lambda_{1}max_{\Im\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}[q({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[(\mathcal{L}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathcal{L}(\nu_{n-1}))]]|\\ &+\lambda_{2}max_{\Im\in J}|\mathcal{N}^{-1}[p({{\wp}}, {{\vartheta}}, {s})\mathcal{N}[(\mathbb{N}(\nu_{m-1})-\mathbb{N}(\nu_{n-1}))]]|\\ & = (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}\frac{\Im^{{{\wp}}}}{\Gamma({{\wp}}+1)})||\nu_{m-1}-\nu_{n-1}|| \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.7)

Let $m = n+1$ , then

(4.8)

where $\lambda = (\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})(1-{{\wp}}+{{\wp}}\frac{\Im^{{{\wp}}}}{\Gamma({{\wp}}+1)})$ . Similarly, we have

(4.9)

As $0 < \lambda < 1$ , we get $1-\lambda^{m-n} < 1$ . Therefore,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} ||\nu_{m}-\nu_{n}||\leq \frac{\lambda^{n}}{1-\lambda}max_{t\in J}||\nu_{1}||. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(4.10)

Since $||\nu_{1}|| < \infty, \ \ ||\nu_{m}-\nu_{n}||\rightarrow 0$ when $n \rightarrow \infty$ . As a result, $\nu_m$ is a Cauchy sequence in H, implying that the series $\nu_m$ is convergent.

5. Numerical examples

In this section we investigate the analytical solution for a few problems of fractional order coupled WBK equations. We chose these equations because they contain closed form solutions and are well-known methods for analysing results in the literature.

5.1. Example 1

Consider the modified Boussinesq (MB) equations of fractional order

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &D_{{\Im}}^{\wp}u = -u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}, \\ &D_{\Im}^{\wp}v = -u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial^{3} u}{\partial {\xi}^{3}}, \ \ 0 < \wp\leq 1, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.1)

with initial source

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, 0)& = \omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)], \\ v({\xi}, 0)& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.2)

By applying the Natural transform to Eq (5.1), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} {\mathcal{N}}[D_{\Im}^{\wp}u({\xi}, {\Im})]& = -{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg\{u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg\}-{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg\{\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg\}, \\ {\mathcal{N}}[D_{\Im}^{\wp}v({\xi}, {\Im})]& = -{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg\{u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg\}-{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg\{v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg\}-{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg\{\frac{\partial^{3} u}{\partial {\xi}^{3}}\Bigg\}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.3)

Define the non-linear operator as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{1}{s^{\wp}}{\mathcal{N}}[u({\xi}, {\Im})]-{s}^{2-\wp}{{u}({\xi}, 0)}& = {\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[-u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg], \\ \frac{1}{s^{\wp}}{\mathcal{N}}[v({\xi}, {\Im})]-{s}^{2-\wp}{{{v}}({\xi}, 0)}& = {\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[-u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial^{3} u}{\partial {\xi}^{3}}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.4)

The above equation is reduced to by simplifying it

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} {\mathcal{N}}[u({\xi}, {\Im})]& = {{s}^{2}}\Bigg[\omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]+\frac{{{\wp}}(s-\wp({s}-{{\wp}}))}{{s}^2}{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[-u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg], \\ {\mathcal{N}}[v({\xi}, {\Im})]& = {{s}^{2}}\Bigg[-2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]+\frac{{{\wp}}(s-\wp({s}-{{\wp}}))}{{s}^2}{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[-u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial^{3} u}{\partial {\xi}^{3}}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.5)

We get by applying inverse $NT$ to Eq (5.5)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, {\Im})& = \Bigg[\omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{{{\wp}}(s-\wp({s}-{{\wp}}))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg], \\ v({\xi}, {\Im})& = \Bigg[-2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{{{\wp}}(s-\wp({s}-{{\wp}}))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial^{3} u}{\partial {\xi}^{3}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.6)

5.1.1. Now we implementing $NTDM_{CF}$

Assume that the unknown functions $u(\xi, \Im)$ and $v(\xi, \Im)$ yield the infinite series result as follows

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, {\Im}) = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im})\ \ and\ \ v({\xi}, {\Im}) = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im}) \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.7)

The Adomian polynomials represent the non-linear terms and are denoted by $uu_{{\xi}} = \sum_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal A_{{l}}$ , $uv_{{\xi}} = \sum_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal B_{{l}}$ and $vu_{{\xi}} = \sum_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal C_{{l}}$ . We can write the Eq (5.6) as a result of applying these terms,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}+1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{{{\wp}}(s-\wp({s}-{{\wp}}))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal A_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg], \\ \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}+1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{{{\wp}}(s-\wp({s}-{{\wp}}))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal B_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal C_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}{\xi}{\xi}{\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.8)

We can write as follows by comparing both sides of Eq (5.8)

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} u_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)], \\ v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]. \end{split} \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right), \\ v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right) \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.9)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = 2\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)-4\ell^{3}\omega^{2}\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big((1-\wp)^{2}+2\wp(1-\wp)\Im+\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^2}{2}\Big), \\ v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = 4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)-4\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)])\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big((1-\wp)^{2}+2\wp(1-\wp)\Im+\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^2}{2}\Big). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.10)

The remaining components of the Natural decomposition technique result $u_{{l}}$ and $v_{{l}}for ({l}\geq3)$ can be performed easily. The series form result is calculated as follows:

(5.11)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} v({\xi}, {\Im})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im}) = v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})+\cdots, \\ v({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]-4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)\\ &+4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)-4\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)])\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big((1-\wp)^{2}+2\wp(1-\wp)\Im+\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^2}{2}\Big)+\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.12)

5.1.2. Now we implementing $NTDM_{ABC}$

Assume that the unknown functions $u({\xi}, {\Im})$ and $v({\xi}, {\Im})$ yield the infinite series result as follows

(5.13)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}+1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\vartheta^\wp(s^\wp+\wp(\vartheta^\wp-{s}^\wp))}{{s}^{2\wp}}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal A_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}}\}\Bigg], \\ \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}+1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\vartheta^\wp(s^\wp+\wp(\vartheta^\wp-{s}^\wp))}{{s}^{2\wp}}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal B_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal C_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}{\xi}{\xi}{\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.14)

We can write as follows by comparing both sides of Eq (5.14)

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} u_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)], \\ v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)].\\ \end{split} \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right), \\ v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right).\\ \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.15)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = 2\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-4\ell^{3}\omega^{2}\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &\left[\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^{2\wp}}{\Gamma(2\wp+1)}+2\wp(1-\wp)\frac{\Im^{\wp}}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}+(1-\wp)^{2}\right], \\ v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = 4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-4\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)])\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left[\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^{2\wp}}{\Gamma(2\wp+1)}+2\wp(1-\wp)\frac{\Im^{\wp}}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}+(1-\wp)^{2}\right]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.16)

The remaining components of the natural decomposition technique result $u_{{l}}$ and $v_{{l}} for ({l}\geq3)$ can be performed easily. The series form result is calculated as follows:

(5.17)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} v({\xi}, {\Im})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im}) = v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})+\cdots, \\ v({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]-4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)\\ &+4\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-4\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)])\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left[\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^{2\wp}}{\Gamma(2\wp+1)}+2\wp(1-\wp)\frac{\Im^{\wp}}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}+(1-\wp)^{2}\right]+\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.18)

For Eq (5.1), the exact result is obtained at $\wp = 1$ ,

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-2\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c-\omega\Im)], \\ v({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c-\omega\Im)]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.19)

5.2. Example 2

Consider the approximate long wave (ALW) equations with arbitrary order

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} D_{\Im}^{\wp}u& = -u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}, \\ D_{\Im}^{\wp}v& = -u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}, \ \ 0 < \wp\leq 1, \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.20)

with initial source

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, 0)& = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)], \\ v({\xi}, 0)& = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.21)

By applying the Natural transform to Eq (5.20), we have

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} {\mathcal{N}}[D_{\Im}^{\wp}u({\xi}, {\Im})]& = -{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg]-{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg]-\frac{1}{2}{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}\Bigg], \\ {\mathcal{N}}[D_{\Im}^{\wp}v({\xi}, {\Im})]& = -{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg]-{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}\Bigg]+\frac{1}{2}{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.22)

Define the non-linear operator as

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{1}{s^{\wp}}{\mathcal{N}}[u({\xi}, {\Im})]-{s}^{2-\wp}{{u}({\xi}, 0)}& = {\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[-u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}\Bigg], \\ \frac{1}{s^{\wp}}{\mathcal{N}}[v({\xi}, {\Im})]-{s}^{2-\wp}{{v}({\xi}, 0)}& = {\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[-u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}} \Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.23)

The above equation is reduced to by simplifying it

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} {\mathcal{N}}[u({\xi}, {\Im})]& = {{s}^{2}}\Bigg[\omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]+\frac{\wp(s-\wp({s}-\wp))}{{s}^2}{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[-u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}\Bigg], \\ {\mathcal{N}}[v({\xi}, {\Im})]& = {{s}^{2}}\Bigg[-\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]+\frac{\wp(s-\wp({s}-\wp))}{{s}^2}{\mathcal{N}}\Bigg[ -u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.24)

We get by applying inverse $NT$ to Eq (5.24)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\wp(s-\wp({s}-\wp))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-u\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}\Bigg\}\Bigg], \\ v({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\wp(s-\wp({s}-\wp))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-u\frac{\partial v}{\partial {\xi}}-v\frac{\partial u}{\partial {\xi}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial {\xi}^{2}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.25)

5.2.1. Now we apply $NTDM_{CF}$

Assume that the unknown functions $u(\xi, \Im)$ and $v(\xi, \Im)$ yield the infinite series result as follows

(5.26)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\wp(s-\wp({s}-\wp))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal A_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}}-\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}{\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg], \\ \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\wp(s-\wp({s}-\wp))}{{s}^2}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal B_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal C_{{l}}+\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}{\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.27)

We can write as follows by comparing both sides of Eq (5.27)

$\begin{equation*} \label{c9} \begin{split} u_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)], \\ v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)].\\ u_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right), \\ v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right). \end{split} \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} u_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)-2\ell^{3}\omega^{2}\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big((1-\wp)^{2}+2\wp(1-\wp)\Im+\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^2}{2}\Big), \\ v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)-2\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)])\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big((1-\wp)^{2}+2\wp(1-\wp)\Im+\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^2}{2}\Big). \end{split} \end{equation*}$

The remaining components of the Natural decomposition technique result $u_{{l}}$ and $v_{{l}}for ({l}\geq3)$ can be performed easily. The series form result is calculated as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, {\Im})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im}) = u_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})+u_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})+u_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})+\cdots, \\ u({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]-\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)-\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)\\ &-2\ell^{3}\omega^{2}\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big((1-\wp)^{2}+2\wp(1-\wp)\Im+\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^2}{2}\Big)+\cdots, \\ v({\xi}, {\Im})& = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im}) = v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})+\cdots, \\ v({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]-2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)\\ &-2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(\wp(\Im-1)+1\right)-2\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)])\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big((1-\wp)^{2}+2\wp(1-\wp)\Im+\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^2}{2}\Big)\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.28)

5.2.2. Now we apply $NTDM_{ABC}$

Assume that the unknown functions $u(\xi, \Im)$ and $v(\xi, \Im)$ yield the infinite series result as follows

(5.29)

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \Bigg[\omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\vartheta^\wp(s^\wp+\wp(\vartheta^\wp-{s}^\wp))}{{s}^{2\wp}}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal A_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}}-\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}{\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg], \\ \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \Bigg[-\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Bigg]\\ &+{\mathcal{N}}^{-1}\Bigg[\frac{\vartheta^\beta(s^\wp+\wp(\vartheta^\wp-{s}^\wp))}{{s}^{2\wp}}\mathcal{N}\Bigg\{-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal B_{{l}}-\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}\mathcal C_{{l}}+\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}{\xi}{\xi}}\Bigg\}\Bigg]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.30)

We can write as follows by comparing both sides of Eq (5.30)

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} u_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)], \\ v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)].\\ u_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right), \\ v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right).\\ \end{split} \end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*} \begin{split} u_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-2\ell^{3}\omega^{2}\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big[\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^{2\wp}}{\Gamma(2\wp+1)}+2\wp(1-\wp)\frac{\Im^{\wp}}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}+(1-\wp)^{2}\Big]\\ v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})& = -2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-2\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)])\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left[\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^{2\wp}}{\Gamma(2\wp+1)}+2\wp(1-\wp)\frac{\Im^{\wp}}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}+(1-\wp)^{2}\right]. \end{split} \end{equation*}$

The remaining components of the Natural decomposition technique result $u_{{l}}$ and $v_{{l}}({l}\geq3)$ can be performed easily. The series form result is calculated as follows:

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &u({\xi}, {\Im}) = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}u_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im}) = u_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})+u_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})+u_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})+\cdots, \\ &u({\xi}, {\Im}) = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]-2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)\\ &-\ell^{2}\omega{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-2\ell^{3}\omega^{2}\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big[\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^{2\wp}}{\Gamma(2\wp+1)}\\ &+2\wp(1-\wp)\frac{\Im^{\wp}}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}+(1-\wp)^{2}\Big]+\cdots, \\ &v({\xi}, {\Im}) = \sum\limits_{{l} = 0}^{\infty}v_{{l}}({\xi}, {\Im}) = v_{0}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{1}({\xi}, {\Im})+v_{2}({\xi}, {\Im})+\cdots, \\ &v({\xi}, {\Im}) = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]-2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-2\ell^{3}\omega\coth[\ell(\xi+c)]\\ &{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c)]\left(1-\wp+\frac{\wp\Im^\wp}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}\right)-2\ell^{4}\omega^{2}(2+\cosh[2\ell(\xi+c)]){\rm{csch}}^{4}[\ell(\xi+c)]\Big[\frac{\wp^{2}\Im^{2\wp}}{\Gamma(2\wp+1)}\\ &+2\wp(1-\wp)\frac{\Im^{\wp}}{\Gamma(\wp+1)}+(1-\wp)^{2}\Big]+\cdots. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.31)

For Eq (5.20), the exact result is obtained at $\wp = 1$

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u({\xi}, {\Im}) = \omega-\ell\coth[\ell(\xi+c-\omega\Im)], \\ v({\xi}, {\Im}) = -\ell^{2}{\rm{csch}}^{2}[\ell(\xi+c-\omega\Im)]. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(5.32)

5.3. Numerical results and discussion

We used two unique methods to investigate the numerical solution of systems of coupled modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations with fractional order in this work. Through Maple, you can find numerical data for the system of coupled modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations for any order at various values of space and time variables. For the system in Problem 1, we construct numerical simulations at various values of $\xi$ and $\Im$ in Tables 1 and 2. Tables 3 and 4 show a numerical comparison of the variational iteration method, Adomian decomposition method and Natural decomposition method in terms of absolute error for Eq (5.1).

Table 1. The exact,

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ results of

$u(\xi, \Im)$ for Problem 1 at various fractional-order of

$\wp$ having different values of

${\xi}$ and

$\Im$ .

${{\Im}}$	${\xi}$	$\wp=0.4$	$\wp=0.6$	$\wp=0.8$	$\wp=1(approx)$	$\wp=1(exact)$
	0.2	$-$ 0.254859	$-$ 0.254834	$-$ 0.254820	$-$ 0.254801	$-$ 0.254799
	0.4	$-$ 0.252178	$-$ 0.252154	$-$ 0.252140	$-$ 0.252122	$-$ 0.252119
0.2	0.6	$-$ 0.249632	$-$ 0.249608	$-$ 0.249595	$-$ 0.249577	$-$ 0.249574
	0.8	$-$ 0.247212	$-$ 0.247188	$-$ 0.247176	$-$ 0.247158	$-$ 0.247155
	1	$-$ 0.244911	$-$ 0.244888	$-$ 0.244876	$-$ 0.244859	$-$ 0.244855
	0.2	$-$ 0.254864	$-$ 0.254850	$-$ 0.254838	$-$ 0.254818	$-$ 0.254812
	0.4	$-$ 0.252183	$-$ 0.252169	$-$ 0.252158	$-$ 0.252138	$-$ 0.252132
0.4	0.6	$-$ 0.249637	$-$ 0.249623	$-$ 0.249612	$-$ 0.249593	$-$ 0.249586
	0.8	$-$ 0.247217	$-$ 0.247203	$-$ 0.247193	$-$ 0.247174	$-$ 0.247167
	1	$-$ 0.244915	$-$ 0.244902	$-$ 0.244892	$-$ 0.244874	$-$ 0.244866
	0.2	$-$ 0.254868	$-$ 0.254861	$-$ 0.254853	$-$ 0.254835	$-$ 0.254826
	0.4	$-$ 0.252187	$-$ 0.252180	$-$ 0.252172	$-$ 0.252154	$-$ 0.252145
0.6	0.6	$-$ 0.249640	$-$ 0.249634	$-$ 0.249626	$-$ 0.249609	$-$ 0.249599
	0.8	$-$ 0.247220	$-$ 0.247214	$-$ 0.247206	$-$ 0.247189	$-$ 0.247178
	1	$-$ 0.244918	$-$ 0.244912	$-$ 0.244905	$-$ 0.244889	$-$ 0.244877
	0.2	$-$ 0.254874	$-$ 0.254870	$-$ 0.254866	$-$ 0.254851	$-$ 0.254840
	0.4	$-$ 0.252192	$-$ 0.252189	$-$ 0.252185	$-$ 0.252171	$-$ 0.252158
0.8	0.6	$-$ 0.249644	$-$ 0.249642	$-$ 0.249638	$-$ 0.249624	$-$ 0.249611
	0.8	$-$ 0.247226	$-$ 0.247222	$-$ 0.247218	$-$ 0.247204	$-$ 0.247190
	1	$-$ 0.244923	$-$ 0.244921	$-$ 0.244917	$-$ 0.244904	$-$ 0.244889
	0.2	$-$ 0.254882	$-$ 0.254879	$-$ 0.254878	$-$ 0.254868	$-$ 0.254854
	0.4	$-$ 0.252199	$-$ 0.252197	$-$ 0.252196	$-$ 0.252187	$-$ 0.252171
1	0.6	$-$ 0.249654	$-$ 0.249650	$-$ 0.249649	$-$ 0.249640	$-$ 0.249623
	0.8	$-$ 0.247234	$-$ 0.247230	$-$ 0.247229	$-$ 0.247220	$-$ 0.247202
	1	$-$ 0.244932	$-$ 0.244928	$-$ 0.244927	$-$ 0.244919	$-$ 0.244900

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 2. The exact,

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ results of

$v(\xi, \Im)$ for Problem 1 at various fractional-order of

$\wp$ having different values of

${\xi}$ and

$\Im$ .

${{\Im}}$	${\xi}$	$\wp=0.4$	$\wp=0.6$	$\wp=0.8$	$\wp=1(approx)$	$\wp=1(exact)$
	0.2	$-$ 0.013760	$-$ 0.013754	$-$ 0.013751	$-$ 0.013747	$-$ 0.013747
	0.4	$-$ 0.013066	$-$ 0.013061	$-$ 0.013058	$-$ 0.013055	$-$ 0.013055
0.2	0.6	$-$ 0.012414	$-$ 0.012410	$-$ 0.012407	$-$ 0.012404	$-$ 0.012404
	0.8	$-$ 0.011801	$-$ 0.011796	$-$ 0.011794	$-$ 0.011791	$-$ 0.011791
	1	$-$ 0.011223	$-$ 0.011219	$-$ 0.011217	$-$ 0.011213	$-$ 0.011213
	0.2	$-$ 0.013761	$-$ 0.013758	$-$ 0.013755	$-$ 0.013751	$-$ 0.013751
	0.4	$-$ 0.013067	$-$ 0.013064	$-$ 0.013062	$-$ 0.013058	$-$ 0.013058
0.4	0.6	$-$ 0.012415	$-$ 0.012413	$-$ 0.012411	$-$ 0.012407	$-$ 0.012407
	0.8	$-$ 0.011802	$-$ 0.011799	$-$ 0.011797	$-$ 0.011794	$-$ 0.011794
	1	$-$ 0.011224	$-$ 0.011221	$-$ 0.011220	$-$ 0.011216	$-$ 0.011216
	0.2	$-$ 0.013762	$-$ 0.013760	$-$ 0.013758	$-$ 0.013754	$-$ 0.013754
	0.4	$-$ 0.013068	$-$ 0.013067	$-$ 0.013065	$-$ 0.013061	$-$ 0.013061
0.6	0.6	$-$ 0.012416	$-$ 0.012415	$-$ 0.012413	$-$ 0.012410	$-$ 0.012410
	0.8	$-$ 0.011803	$-$ 0.011801	$-$ 0.011800	$-$ 0.011797	$-$ 0.011797
	1	$-$ 0.011225	$-$ 0.011223	$-$ 0.011222	$-$ 0.011219	$-$ 0.011219
	0.2	$-$ 0.013764	$-$ 0.013762	$-$ 0.013761	$-$ 0.013758	$-$ 0.013758
	0.4	$-$ 0.013071	$-$ 0.013069	$-$ 0.013068	$-$ 0.013065	$-$ 0.013065
0.8	0.6	$-$ 0.012419	$-$ 0.012417	$-$ 0.012416	$-$ 0.012413	$-$ 0.012413
	0.8	$-$ 0.011805	$-$ 0.011803	$-$ 0.011802	$-$ 0.011800	$-$ 0.011800
	1	$-$ 0.011228	$-$ 0.011225	$-$ 0.011224	$-$ 0.011222	$-$ 0.011222
	0.2	$-$ 0.013768	$-$ 0.013766	$-$ 0.013764	$-$ 0.013762	$-$ 0.013762
	0.4	$-$ 0.013074	$-$ 0.013071	$-$ 0.013070	$-$ 0.013068	$-$ 0.013068
1	0.6	$-$ 0.012422	$-$ 0.012420	$-$ 0.012418	$-$ 0.012416	$-$ 0.012416
	0.8	$-$ 0.011808	$-$ 0.011806	$-$ 0.011804	$-$ 0.011803	$-$ 0.011803
	1	$-$ 0.011230	$-$ 0.011228	$-$ 0.011226	$-$ 0.011225	$-$ 0.011225

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 3. Error comparison between ADM^[64], VIM^[65],

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ for

$u({\xi}, {\Im})$ of problem

$1$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

${\Im}$	${{\xi}}$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{ADM}\|$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{VIM}\|$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{NTDM_{CF}}\|$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{NTDM_{ABC}}\|$
	0.1	8.16297E-7	6.35269 E-5	9.0000E-10	9.0000E-10
0.1	0.3	7.64245E-7	1.90854 E-4	9.0000E-10	9.0000E-10
	0.5	7.16083E-7	3.18549 E-4	9.0000E-10	9.0000E-10
	0.1	3.26243E-6	6.18930 E-5	1.9000E-9	1.90000E-9
0.2	0.3	3.05458E-6	1.85945 E-4	1.9000E-9	1.90000E-9
	0.5	2.86226E-6	3.10352 E-4	1.8000E-9	1.90000E-9
	0.1	7.33445E-6	6.03095 E-5	2.90000E-9	2.90000E-9
0.3	0.3	6.86758E-6	1.81187 E-4	2.80000E-9	2.80000E-9
	0.5	6.43557E-6	3.02408 E-4	2.70000E-9	2.70000E-9
	0.1	1.30286E-5	5.87746 E-5	3.9000E-9	3.9000E-9
0.4	0.3	1.22000E-5	1.76574 E-4	3.7000E-9	3.7000E-9
	0.5	1.14333E-5	2.94707E-4	3.6000E-9	3.6000E-9
	0.1	2.03415E-5	5.72867 E-5	4.9000E-9	4.9000E-9
0.5	0.3	1.90489E-5	1.72102 E-4	4.7000E-9	4.7000E-9
	0.5	1.78528E-5	2.87241 E-4	4.5000E-9	4.5000E-9

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 4. Error comparison between ADM^[64], VIM^[65],

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ for

$v({\xi}, {\Im})$ of problem

$1$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

${\Im}$	${{\xi}}$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{ADM}\|$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{VIM}\|$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{NTDM_{CF}}\|$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{NTDM_{ABC}}\|$
	0.1	5.88676E-5	1.65942 E-5	5.8000E-10	5.8000E-10
0.1	0.3	5.56914E-5	4.98691 E-5	5.4000E-10	5.4000E-10
	0.5	5.27169E-5	8.32598 E-5	4.9000E-10	4.9000E-10
	0.1	1.18213E-4	1.06813E-5	2.3200E-9	2.3200E-9
0.2	0.3	1.11833E-4	4.83269E-5	2.1400E-9	2.1400E-9
	0.5	1.05858E-4	8.06837E-5	1.9900E-9	1.9900E-9
	0.1	1.78041E-4	1.55880E-5	5.2300E-9	5.2300E-9
0.3	0.3	1.68429E-4	4.68440E-5	4.8300E-9	4.8300E-9
	0.5	1.59428E-4	7.82068E-5	4.4700E-9	4.4700E-9
	0.1	2.38356E-4	1.51135E-5	9.3000E-9	9.3000E-9
0.4	0.3	2.25483E-4	4.54174E-5	8.5800E-9	8.5800E-9
	0.5	2.13430E-4	7.58243E-5	7.9600E-9	7.9600E-9
	0.1	2.99162E-4	1.46569E-5	1.4530E-8	1.4530E-8
0.5	0.3	2.83001E-4	4.40448E-5	1.3430E-8	1.3430E-8
	0.5	2.67868E-4	7.35317E-5	1.2430E-8	1.2430E-8

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

The outcomes of a calculations for the coupled system considered in Problem 2 are shown in Tables 5 and 6. Similarly, in Tables 7 and 8, we compare the Adomian decomposition method, natural decomposition method and variational iteration method solutions to Eq (5.20).

Table 5. The exact,

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ results of

$u(\xi, \Im)$ for Problem 2 at various fractional-order of

$\wp$ having different values of

${\xi}$ and

$\Im$ .

${{\xi}}$	${\Im}$	$\wp=0.4$	$\wp=0.6$	$\wp=0.8$	$\wp=1(approx)$	$\wp=1(exact)$
	0.2	$-$ 0.124923	$-$ 0.124912	$-$ 0.124907	$-$ 0.124899	$-$ 0.124899
	0.4	$-$ 0.123582	$-$ 0.123572	$-$ 0.123567	$-$ 0.123559	$-$ 0.123559
0.2	0.6	$-$ 0.122308	$-$ 0.122299	$-$ 0.122294	$-$ 0.122287	$-$ 0.122287
	0.8	$-$ 0.121098	$-$ 0.121089	$-$ 0.121084	$-$ 0.121077	$-$ 0.121077
	1	$-$ 0.119947	$-$ 0.119938	$-$ 0.119934	$-$ 0.119927	$-$ 0.119927
	0.2	$-$ 0.124925	$-$ 0.124919	$-$ 0.124914	$-$ 0.124906	$-$ 0.124906
	0.4	$-$ 0.123584	$-$ 0.123578	$-$ 0.123574	$-$ 0.123566	$-$ 0.123566
0.4	0.6	$-$ 0.122310	$-$ 0.122305	$-$ 0.122300	$-$ 0.122293	$-$ 0.122293
	0.8	$-$ 0.121100	$-$ 0.121094	$-$ 0.121090	$-$ 0.121083	$-$ 0.121083
	1	$-$ 0.119948	$-$ 0.119943	$-$ 0.119940	$-$ 0.119933	$-$ 0.119933
	0.2	$-$ 0.124926	$-$ 0.124924	$-$ 0.124920	$-$ 0.124913	$-$ 0.124913
	0.4	$-$ 0.123585	$-$ 0.123583	$-$ 0.123580	$-$ 0.123572	$-$ 0.123572
0.6	0.6	$-$ 0.122311	$-$ 0.122309	$-$ 0.122306	$-$ 0.122299	$-$ 0.122299
	0.8	$-$ 0.121101	$-$ 0.121098	$-$ 0.121096	$-$ 0.121089	$-$ 0.121089
	1	$-$ 0.119950	$-$ 0.119947	$-$ 0.119945	$-$ 0.119938	$-$ 0.119938
	0.2	$-$ 0.124927	$-$ 0.124928	$-$ 0.124926	$-$ 0.124920	$-$ 0.124920
	0.4	$-$ 0.123588	$-$ 0.123586	$-$ 0.123585	$-$ 0.123579	$-$ 0.123579
0.8	0.6	$-$ 0.122315	$-$ 0.122312	$-$ 0.122311	$-$ 0.122305	$-$ 0.122305
	0.8	$-$ 0.121104	$-$ 0.121102	$-$ 0.121100	$-$ 0.121095	$-$ 0.121095
	1	$-$ 0.119953	$-$ 0.119950	$-$ 0.119949	$-$ 0.119944	$-$ 0.119944
	0.2	$-$ 0.124935	$-$ 0.124933	$-$ 0.124931	$-$ 0.124927	$-$ 0.124927
	0.4	$-$ 0.123592	$-$ 0.123590	$-$ 0.123589	$-$ 0.123585	$-$ 0.123585
1	0.6	$-$ 0.122319	$-$ 0.122316	$-$ 0.122315	$-$ 0.122311	$-$ 0.122311
	0.8	$-$ 0.121107	$-$ 0.121106	$-$ 0.121104	$-$ 0.121101	$-$ 0.121101
	1	$-$ 0.119958	$-$ 0.119955	$-$ 0.119953	$-$ 0.119950	$-$ 0.119950

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 6. The exact,

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ results of

$u(\xi, \Im)$ for Problem 2 at various fractional-order of

$\wp$ having different values of

${\xi}$ and

$\Im$ .

${{\xi}}$	${\Im}$	$\wp=0.4$	$\wp=0.6$	$\wp=0.8$	$\wp=1(approx)$	$\wp=1(exact)$
	0.2	$-$ 0.006880	$-$ 0.006877	$-$ 0.006875	$-$ 0.006873	$-$ 0.006873
	0.4	$-$ 0.006533	$-$ 0.006530	$-$ 0.006529	$-$ 0.006527	$-$ 0.006527
0.2	0.6	$-$ 0.006207	$-$ 0.006205	$-$ 0.006203	$-$ 0.006202	$-$ 0.006202
	0.8	$-$ 0.005900	$-$ 0.005898	$-$ 0.005897	$-$ 0.005895	$-$ 0.005895
	1	$-$ 0.005611	$-$ 0.005609	$-$ 0.005608	$-$ 0.005606	$-$ 0.005606
	0.2	$-$ 0.006880	$-$ 0.006879	$-$ 0.006877	$-$ 0.006875	$-$ 0.006875
	0.4	$-$ 0.006533	$-$ 0.006532	$-$ 0.006531	$-$ 0.006529	$-$ 0.006529
0.4	0.6	$-$ 0.006207	$-$ 0.006206	$-$ 0.006205	$-$ 0.006203	$-$ 0.006203
	0.8	$-$ 0.005901	$-$ 0.005899	$-$ 0.005898	$-$ 0.005897	$-$ 0.005897
	1	$-$ 0.005612	$-$ 0.005610	$-$ 0.005610	$-$ 0.005608	$-$ 0.005608
	0.2	$-$ 0.006881	$-$ 0.006880	$-$ 0.006879	$-$ 0.006877	$-$ 0.006877
	0.4	$-$ 0.006534	$-$ 0.006533	$-$ 0.006532	$-$ 0.006530	$-$ 0.006530
0.6	0.6	$-$ 0.006208	$-$ 0.006207	$-$ 0.006206	$-$ 0.006205	$-$ 0.006205
	0.8	$-$ 0.005901	$-$ 0.005900	$-$ 0.005900	$-$ 0.005898	$-$ 0.005898
	1	$-$ 0.005612	$-$ 0.005611	$-$ 0.005611	$-$ 0.005609	$-$ 0.005609
	0.2	$-$ 0.006881	$-$ 0.006881	$-$ 0.006880	$-$ 0.006879	$-$ 0.006879
	0.4	$-$ 0.006534	$-$ 0.006534	$-$ 0.006534	$-$ 0.006532	$-$ 0.006532
0.8	0.6	$-$ 0.006208	$-$ 0.006208	$-$ 0.006208	$-$ 0.006206	$-$ 0.006206
	0.8	$-$ 0.005901	$-$ 0.005901	$-$ 0.005901	$-$ 0.005900	$-$ 0.005900
	1	$-$ 0.005612	$-$ 0.005612	$-$ 0.005612	$-$ 0.005611	$-$ 0.005611
	0.2	$-$ 0.006881	$-$ 0.006882	$-$ 0.006882	$-$ 0.006881	$-$ 0.006881
	0.4	$-$ 0.006534	$-$ 0.006535	$-$ 0.006535	$-$ 0.006534	$-$ 0.006534
1	0.6	$-$ 0.006208	$-$ 0.006209	$-$ 0.006209	$-$ 0.006208	$-$ 0.006208
	0.8	$-$ 0.005901	$-$ 0.005902	$-$ 0.005902	$-$ 0.005901	$-$ 0.005901
	1	$-$ 0.005612	$-$ 0.005613	$-$ 0.005613	$-$ 0.005612	$-$ 0.005612

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 7. Error comparison between ADM^[64], VIM^[65],

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ for

$u({\xi}, {\Im})$ of Problem

$2$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

${\Im}$	${{\xi}}$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{ADM}\|$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{VIM}\|$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{NTDM_{CF}}\|$	$\|u_{Exact}-u_{NTDM_{ABC}}\|$
	0.1	8.02989E-6	1.23033E-4	8.0000E-10	8.000E-10
0.1	0.3	7.38281E-6	3.69597E-4	9.0000E-10	9.000E-10
	0.5	6.79923E-6	4.92780E-4	8.0000E-10	8.000E-10
	0.1	3.23228E-5	1.69274E-5	3.7000E-9	3.7000E-9
0.2	0.3	2.97172E-5	1.89210E-4	3.4000E-9	3.4000E-9
	0.5	2.73673E-5	1.55176E-4	3.3000E-9	3.3000E-9
	0.1	7.32051E-5	1.12345E-5	8.2000E-9	8.2000E-9
0.3	0.3	6.73006E-5	6.55176E-5	7.70000E-9	7.70000E-9
	0.5	6.19760E-5	2.12346E-5	7.3000E-9	7.3000E-9
	0.1	1.31032E-4	7.36513E-5	1.4700E-8	1.4700E-8
0.4	0.3	1.20455E-4	9.50160E-5	1.3800E-8	1.3800E-8
	0.5	1.10919E-4	8.23160E-4	1.3000E-8	1.3000E-8
	0.1	2.06186E-4	5.55176E-5	2.3000E-8	2.3000E-8
0.5	0.3	1.89528E-4	3.21715E-6	2.1700E-8	2.1700E-8
	0.5	1.74510E-4	2.00176E-5	2.0400E-8	2.0400E-8

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

Table 8. Error comparison between ADM^[64], VIM^[65],

$NTDM_{CF}$ and

$NTDM_{ABC}$ for

$v({\xi}, {\Im})$ of Problem

$2$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

${\Im}$	${{\xi}}$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{ADM}\|$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{VIM}\|$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{NTDM_{CF}}\|$	$\|v_{Exact}-v_{NTDM_{ABC}}\|$
	0.1	4.81902E-4	1.23033E-4	2.9100E-10	2.9100E-10
0.1	0.3	4.50818E-4	1.76000E-4	2.6800E-10	2.6800E-10
	0.5	4.22221E-4	2.69597E-4	2.4900E-10	2.4900E-10
	0.1	9.76644E-4	2.69597E-4	1.1620E-9	1.1620E-9
0.2	0.3	9.13502E-4	2.69597E-4	1.0730E-9	1.0730E-9
	0.5	8.55426E-4	2.69597E-4	9.9400E-10	9.9400E-10
	0.1	1.48482E-3	2.69597E-4	2.6150E-9	2.6150E-9
0.3	0.3	1.38858E-3	2.69597E-4	2.4170E-9	2.4170E-9
	0.5	1.30009E-3	2.69597E-4	2.2380E-9	2.2380E-9
	0.1	2.00705E-3	2.69597E-4	4.6480E-9	4.6480E-9
0.4	0.3	1.87661E-3	2.69597E-4	4.2960E-9	4.2960E-9
	0.5	1.75670E-3	2.69597E-4	3.9800E-9	3.9800E-9
	0.1	2.54396E-3	2.69597E-4	7.2650E-9	7.2650E-9
0.5	0.3	2.37815E-3	2.69597E-4	6.7150E-9	6.7150E-9
	0.5	2.22578E-3	2.69597E-4	6.2190E-9	6.2190E-9

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

On the basis of the information in the above tables, we may say that the Natural decomposition approach produces more accurate results.

illustrates the behaviour of the exact and Natural decomposition technique result for $u(\xi, \Im)$ of Problem 1, while displays the behavior of the analytical result at different fractional-orders of $\wp$ . illustrates the solution for $u(\xi, \Im)$ in various fractional-orders. demonstrates the behaviour of the exact and analytical solutions for $v(\xi, \Im)$ and Figure 5 shows the absolute error for Example 1.

Figure 1. Example 1 exact and numerical solutions for

$u(\xi, \Im)$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 2. Example 1 analytical solution graph for

$u(\xi, \Im)$ at

$\wp = 0.8$ and

$0.6$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. Example 1 analytical solution graph for

$u(\xi, \Im)$ at various values of

$\wp$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 4. Example 1 exact and analytical solution of

$v(\xi, \Im)$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 5. Example 1 analytical solution graph for

$v(\xi, \Im)$ at various values of

$\wp$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

shows the behaviour of the exact and Natural decomposition technique results for $u(\xi, \Im)$ of Problem 2, whereas displays the nature of the analytical solution at various fractional-orders of $\wp$ . shows the solution graph for Problem 2 at various fractional-orders of $u(\xi, \Im)$ . shows the behavior of the exact and analytical solution for $v(\xi, \Im)$ whereas shows the absolute error of Problem 2. We draw the given graphs within domain $-100\leq\xi\leq100$ having $c = 10,$ $\omega = 0.005$ and $\ell = 0.15.$

Figure 6. Example 2 exact and numerical solutions for

$u(\xi, \Im)$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 7. Example 2 analytical solution graph for

$u(\xi, \Im)$ at

$\wp = 0.8$ and

$0.6$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 8. Example 2 analytical solution graph for

$u(\xi, \Im)$ at various values of

$\wp$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 9. Example 2 exact and analytical solution of

$v(\xi, \Im)$ at

$\wp = 1$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 10. Absolute error graph for

$v(\xi, \Im)$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

6. Conclusions

The natural decomposition technique is used to solve the coupled modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations in this paper. Two examples are solved to demonstrate and validate the effectiveness of the suggested technique. In comparison to existing analytical approaches for determining approximate solutions of nonlinear coupled fractional partial differential equations, the present method is efficient and straightforward. The derived results have been shown in graphical and tabular form. The proposed method generates a sequence of results in the form of a recurrence relation having greater accuracy and less calculations. In terms of absolute error, calculations were performed for both fractional coupled systems. At $\wp = 1$ , a number of computational solutions are compared to well-known analytical techniques and the exact results. The benefits of the current methods include less calculations and greater accuracy. Moreover, the proposed method is shown to be simple and effective, and it may be applied to solve various fractional-order differential equation systems.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by Grant Code: (22UQU4310396DSR07).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1]	I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, New York: Academic Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0076-5392(99)x8001-5
[2]	M. Caputo, Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent, Geophys. J. Int., 13 (1967), 529–539. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x
[3]	V. Kiryakova, Multiple (multiindex) Mittag-Leffler functions and relations to generalized fractional calculus, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 118 (2000), 241–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00292-2 doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00292-2
[4]	H. Jafari, S. Seifi, Homotopy analysis method for solving linear and nonlinear fractional diffusion-wave equation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 14 (2009), 2006–2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.05.008
[5]	H. Jafari, S. Seifi, Solving a system of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations using homotopy analysis method, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 14 (2009), 1962–1969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.06.019 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.06.019
[6]	S. Momani, N. Shawagfeh, Decomposition method for solving fractional Riccati differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 182 (2006), 1083–1092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.05.008
[7]	K. Oldham, J. Spanier, The fractional calculus: theory and applications of differentiation and integration to arbitrary order, New York: Academic Press, 1974.
[8]	K. Diethelm, N. Ford, A. Freed, A predictor-corrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equation, Nonlinear Dynam., 29 (2002), 3–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016592219341 doi: 10.1023/A:1016592219341
[9]	K. Millerand, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Wiley, 1993.
[10]	S. Kemple, H. Beyer, Global and causal solutions of fractional differential equations, Proceedings of 2nd international workshop, 1997,210–216.
[11]	A. Kilbas, J. Trujillo, Differential equations of fractional order: methods, results and problem, Appl. Anal., 78 (2001), 153–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036810108840931 doi: 10.1080/00036810108840931
[12]	R. Hilfer, Fractional calculus and regular variation in thermodynamics, In: Applications of fractional calculus in physics, Singapore: World Scientific, 2000,429–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812817747_0009
[13]	S. Saha Ray, B. Poddar, R. Bera, Analytical solution of a dynamic system containing fractional derivative of order one-half by Adomian decomposition method, J. Appl. Mech., 72 (2005), 290–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1839184 doi: 10.1115/1.1839184
[14]	S. Saha Ray, R. Bera, An approximate solution of a nonlinear fractional differential equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 167 (2005), 561–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.07.020 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.07.020
[15]	S. Saha Ray, R. Bera, Analytical solution of a fractional diffusion equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 174 (2006), 329–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.082 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.082
[16]	S. Saha Ray, Exact solutions for time-fractional diffusion-wave equations by decomposition method, Phys. Scr., 75 (2007), 53–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/75/1/008 doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/75/1/008
[17]	S. Saha Ray, A new approach for the application of Adomian decomposition method for the solution of fractional space diffusion equation with insulated ends, Appl. Math. Comput., 202 (2008), 544–549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2008.02.043 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.02.043
[18]	S. Saha Ray, R. Bera, Analytical solution of the Bagley Torvik equation by Adomian decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comput., 168 (2005), 398–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.09.006 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.09.006
[19]	K. Nisar, K. Ali, M. Inc, M. Mehanna, H. Rezazadeh, L. Akinyemi, New solutions for the generalized resonant nonlinear Schrodinger equation, Results Phys., 53 (2002), 105153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105153 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105153
[20]	M. Alesemi, N. Iqbal, A. Hamoud, The analysis of fractional-order proportional delay physical models via a novel transform, Complexity, 2022 (2022), 2431533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2431533 doi: 10.1155/2022/2431533
[21]	H. Yepez-Martinez, M. Khater, H. Rezazadeh, M. Inc, Analytical novel solutions to the fractional optical dynamics in a medium with polynomial law nonlinearity and higher order dispersion with a new local fractional derivative, Phy, Lett, A, 420 (2021), 127744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127744 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127744
[22]	P. Sunthrayuth, A, Zidan, S, Yao, R. Shah, M. Inc, The comparative study for solving fractional-order Fornberg-Whitham equation via $\rho$ -Laplace transform, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 784. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13050784 doi: 10.3390/sym13050784
[23]	K. Nonlaopon, A. Alsharif, A. Zidan, A. Khan, Y. Hamed, R. Shah, Numerical investigation of fractional-order Swift-Hohenberg equations via a novel transform, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 1263. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13071263 doi: 10.3390/sym13071263
[24]	M. Naeem, A. Zidan, K. Nonlaopon, M. Syam, Z. Al-Zhour, R. Shah, A new analysis of fractional-order equal-width equations via novel techniques, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 886. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13050886 doi: 10.3390/sym13050886
[25]	R. Agarwal, F. Mofarreh, R. Shah, W. Luangboon, K. Nonlaopon, An analytical technique, based on natural transform to solve fractional-order parabolic equations, Entropy, 23 (2021), 1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23081086 doi: 10.3390/e23081086
[26]	M. Areshi, A. Khan, R. Shah, K. Nonlaopon, Analytical investigation of fractional-order Newell-Whitehead-Segel equations via a novel transform, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 6936–6958. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022385 doi: 10.3934/math.2022385
[27]	H. Khan, A. Khan, M. Al-Qurashi, R. Shah, D. Baleanu, Modified modelling for heat like equations within Caputo operator, Energies, 13 (2020), 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en13082002 doi: 10.3390/en13082002
[28]	M. Alesemi, N. Iqbal, M. Abdo, Novel investigation of fractional-order Cauchy-reaction diffusion eEquation involving Caputo-Fabrizio operator, J. Funct. Space., 2022 (2022), 4284060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4284060 doi: 10.1155/2022/4284060
[29]	H. Thabet, S. Kendre, J. Peters, Travelling wave solutions for fractional Korteweg-de Vries equations via an approximate-analytical method, AIMS Mathematics, 4 (2019), 1203–1222. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2019.4.1203 doi: 10.3934/math.2019.4.1203
[30]	A. Iqbal, A. Akgul, R. Shah, A. Bariq, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, A. Ali, On solutions of fractional-order gas dynamics equation by effective techniques, J. Funct. Space., 2022 (2022), 3341754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3341754 doi: 10.1155/2022/3341754
[31]	W. Mohammed, N. Iqbal, Impact of the same degenerate additive noise on a coupled system of fractional space diffusion equations, Fractals, 30 (2022), 22400333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22400333 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X22400333
[32]	H. Eltayeb, Y. Abdalla, I. Bachar, M. Khabir, Fractional telegraph equation and its solution by natural transform decomposition method, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 334. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym11030334 doi: 10.3390/sym11030334
[33]	Hajira, H. Khan, A. Khan, P. Kumam, D. Baleanu, M. Arif, An approximate analytical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations within Caputo operator and Elzaki transform decomposition method, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03058-1 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03058-1
[34]	P. Sunthrayuth, F. Ali, A. Alderremy, R. Shah, S. Aly, Y. Hamed, J. Katle, The numerical investigation of fractional-order Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations, Complexity, 2021 (2021), 4570605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4570605 doi: 10.1155/2021/4570605
[35]	M. Naeem, O. Azhar, A. Zidan, K. Nonlaopon, R. Shah, Numerical analysis of fractional-order parabolic equations via Elzaki transform, J. Funct. Space., 2021 (2021), 3484482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3484482 doi: 10.1155/2021/3484482
[36]	F. Mirzaee, S. Rezaei, N. Samadyar, Application of combination schemes based on radial basis functions and finite difference to solve stochastic coupled nonlinear time fractional sine-Gordon equations, Comp. Appl. Math., 41 (2022), 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01725-x doi: 10.1007/s40314-021-01725-x
[37]	F. Mirzaee, S. Rezaei, N. Samadyar, Solution of time-fractional stochastic nonlinear sine-Gordon equation via finite difference and meshfree techniques, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 3426–3438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.7988 doi: 10.1002/mma.7988
[38]	F. Mirzaee, S. Rezaei, N. Samadyar, Solving one-dimensional nonlinear stochastic Sine-Gordon equation with a new meshfree technique, Int. J. Numer. Model. El., 34 (2021), 2856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2856 doi: 10.1002/jnm.2856
[39]	F. Mirzaee, N. Samadyar, Combination of finite difference method and meshless method based on radial basis functions to solve fractional stochastic advection-diffusion equations, Eng. Comput., 36 (2020), 1673–1686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00789-y doi: 10.1007/s00366-019-00789-y
[40]	F. Mirzaee, N. Samadyar, Numerical solution of time fractional stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation via implicit meshless approach, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci., 43 (2019), 2905–2912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40995-019-00763-9 doi: 10.1007/s40995-019-00763-9
[41]	S. Abbasbandy, The application of homotopy analysis method to nonlinear equations arising in heat transfer, Phys. Lett. A, 360 (2006), 109–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2006.07.065 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2006.07.065
[42]	M. Khater, A. Jhangeer, H. Rezazadeh, L. Akinyemi, M. Ali Akbar, M. Inc, et al., New kinds of analytical solitary wave solutions for ionic currents on microtubules equation via two different techniques, Opt. Quant. Electron., 53 (2021), 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-03267-2 doi: 10.1007/s11082-021-03267-2
[43]	F. Samsami Khodadad, S. Mirhosseini-Alizamini, B. Günay, L. Akinyemi, H. Rezazadeh, M. Inc, Abundant optical solitons to the Sasa-Satsuma higher-order nonlinear Schrodinger equation, Opt. Quant. Electron., 53 (2021), 702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-03338-4 doi: 10.1007/s11082-021-03338-4
[44]	A. Kanwal, C. Phang, J. Loh, New collocation scheme for solving fractional partial differential equations, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 49 (2020), 1107–1125. http://dx.doi.org/10.15672/hujms.459621 doi: 10.15672/hujms.459621
[45]	Y. Ng, C. Phang, J. Loh, A. Isah, Analytical solutions of incommensurate fractional differential equation systems with fractional order $1 < \alpha, \beta < 2$ via bivariate Mittag-Leffler functions, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 2281–2317. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022130 doi: 10.3934/math.2022130
[46]	N. Samadyara, Y. Ordokhania, F. Mirzaee, The couple of Hermite-based approach and Crank-Nicolson scheme to approximate the solution of two dimensional stochastic diffusion-wave equation of fractional order, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 118 (2020), 285–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.05.010 doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.05.010
[47]	N. Samadyara, Y. Ordokhania, F. Mirzaee, Hybrid Taylor and block-pulse functions operational matrix algorithm and its application to obtain the approximate solution of stochastic evolution equation driven by fractional Brownian motion, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 90 (2020), 105346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105346 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105346
[48]	N. Samadyar, F. Mirzaee, Orthonormal Bernoulli polynomials collocation approach for solving stochastic Volterra integral equations of Abel type, Int. J. Numer. Model. El., 33 (2020), 2688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2688 doi: 10.1002/jnm.2688
[49]	F. Mirzaee, K. Sayevand, S. Rezaei, N. Samadyar, Finite difference and spline approximation for solving fractional stochastic advection-diffusion equation, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci., 45 (2021), 607–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40995-020-01036-6 doi: 10.1007/s40995-020-01036-6
[50]	F. Mirzaee, S. Rezaei, N. Samadyar, Numerical solution of two-dimensional stochastic time-fractional Sine-Gordon equation on non-rectangular domains using finite difference and meshfree methods, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 127 (2021), 53–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.03.009 doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.03.009
[51]	H. Halidoua, S. Abbagariab, A. Houwec, M. Incdef, B. Thomasg, Rational W-shape solitons on a nonlinear electrical transmission line with Josephson junction, Phys. Lett. A, 430 (2022), 127951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2022.127951 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2022.127951
[52]	G. Whitham, Variational methods and applications to water waves, In: Hyperbolic equations and waves, Berlin: Springer, 1970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87025-5_16
[53]	L. Broer, Approximate equations for long water waves, Appl. sci. Res., 31 (1975), 377–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00418048 doi: 10.1007/BF00418048
[54]	D. Kaup, A higher-order water-wave equation and the method for solving it, Prog. Theor. Phys., 54 (1975), 396–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.54.396 doi: 10.1143/PTP.54.396
[55]	S. Saha Ray, A novel method for travelling wave solutions of fractional Whitham-Broer-Kaup, fractional modified Boussinesq and fractional approximate long wave equations in shallow water, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 38 (2015), 1352–1368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mma.3151 doi: 10.1002/mma.3151
[56]	K. Nonlaopon, M. Naeem, A. Zidan, R. Shah, A. Alsanad, A. Gumaei, Numerical investigation of the time-fractional Whitham-Broer-Kaup equation involving without singular kernel operators, Complexity, 2021 (2021), 7979365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7979365 doi: 10.1155/2021/7979365
[57]	R. Shah, H. Khan, D. Baleanu, Fractional Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations within modified analytical approaches, Axioms, 8 (2019), 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/axioms8040125 doi: 10.3390/axioms8040125
[58]	K. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Wiley, 1993.
[59]	I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, In: Mathematics in science and engineering, San Diego: Academic Press, 1999, 1–340.
[60]	K. Diethelm, The analysis of fractional differential equations, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14574-2
[61]	M. Zhou, A. Ravi Kanth, K. Aruna, K. Raghavendar, H. Rezazadeh, M. Inc, et al., Numerical solutions of time fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation via natural transform decomposition method with nonsingular kernel derivatives, J. Funct. Space., 2021 (2021), 9884027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9884027 doi: 10.1155/2021/9884027
[62]	G. Adomian, A new approach to nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 102 (1984), 420–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(84)90182-3 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(84)90182-3
[63]	G. Adomian, Solving frontier problems of physics: the decomposition method, Dordrecht: Springer, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8289-6
[64]	S. El-Sayed, D. Kaya, Exact and numerical travelling wave solutions of Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 167 (2005), 1339–1349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.08.012 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.08.012
[65]	M. Rafei, H. Daniali, Application of the variational iteration method to the Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 54 (2007), 1079–1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.054 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.12.054

This article has been cited by:

1.	Muhammad Naeem, Humaira Yasmin, Rasool Shah, Nehad Ali Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Investigation of Fractional Nonlinear Regularized Long-Wave Models via Novel Techniques, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 220, 10.3390/sym15010220
2.	Muhammad Naeem, Humaira Yasmin, Nehad Ali Shah, Jeevan Kafle, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Analytical Approaches for Approximate Solution of the Time-Fractional Coupled Schrödinger–KdV Equation, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2602, 10.3390/sym14122602
3.	Badriah M. Alotaibi, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Sherif. M. E. Ismaeel, Samir A. El-Tantawy, Investigation of the Time-Fractional Generalized Burgers–Fisher Equation via Novel Techniques, 2022, 15, 2073-8994, 108, 10.3390/sym15010108
4.	Meshari Alesemi, Jameelah S. Al Shahrani, Naveed Iqbal, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Analysis and Numerical Simulation of System of Fractional Partial Differential Equations with Non-Singular Kernel Operators, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 233, 10.3390/sym15010233
5.	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Rasool Shah, Adnan Khan, Osama Y. Ababneh, Thongchai Botmart, Fractional view analysis of Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems with non-singular kernel derivatives, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 18334, 10.3934/math.20221010
6.	Naveed Iqbal, Saleh Alshammari, Thongchai Botmart, Evaluation of regularized long-wave equation via Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 20401, 10.3934/math.20221118
7.	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Osama Y. Ababneh, Rasool Shah, Amjad khan, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Numerical analysis of fractional-order Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations with non-singular kernel operators, 2022, 8, 2473-6988, 2308, 10.3934/math.2023120
8.	Muhammed Naeem, Noufe H. Aljahdaly, Rasool Shah, Wajaree Weera, The study of fractional-order convection-reaction-diffusion equation via an Elzake Atangana-Baleanu operator, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 18080, 10.3934/math.2022995
9.	Nehad Ali Shah, Essam R. El-Zahar, Ali Akgül, Adnan Khan, Jeevan Kafle, Yusuf Gurefe, Analysis of Fractional-Order Regularized Long-Wave Models via a Novel Transform, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/2754507
10.	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Osama Y. Ababneh, Numerical investigation of fractional-order wave-like equation, 2022, 8, 2473-6988, 5281, 10.3934/math.2023265
11.	Azzh Saad Alshehry, Muhammad Imran, Adnan Khan, Rasool Shah, Wajaree Weera, Fractional View Analysis of Kuramoto–Sivashinsky Equations with Non-Singular Kernel Operators, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1463, 10.3390/sym14071463
12.	Azzh Saad Alshehry, Roman Ullah, Nehad Ali Shah, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Implementation of Yang residual power series method to solve fractional non-linear systems, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 8294, 10.3934/math.2023418
13.	Nidhish Kumar Mishra, Mashael M. AlBaidani, Adnan Khan, Abdul Hamid Ganie, Numerical Investigation of Time-Fractional Phi-Four Equation via Novel Transform, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 687, 10.3390/sym15030687
14.	Sultan Alyobi, Rasool Shah, Adnan Khan, Nehad Ali Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Fractional Analysis of Nonlinear Boussinesq Equation under Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo Operator, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2417, 10.3390/sym14112417
15.	Aisha Abdullah Alderremy, Rasool Shah, Naveed Iqbal, Shaban Aly, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Fractional Series Solution Construction for Nonlinear Fractional Reaction-Diffusion Brusselator Model Utilizing Laplace Residual Power Series, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1944, 10.3390/sym14091944
16.	Naveed Iqbal, Mohammad Alshammari, Wajaree Weera, Numerical analysis of fractional-order nonlinear Gardner and Cahn-Hilliard equations, 2022, 8, 2473-6988, 5574, 10.3934/math.2023281
17.	Thongchai Botmart, Badriah Alotaibi, Rasool Shah, Lamiaa El-Sherif, Samir El-Tantawy, A Reliable Way to Deal with the Coupled Fractional Korteweg-De Vries Equations within the Caputo Operator, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2452, 10.3390/sym14112452
18.	Saleh Alshammari, Naveed Iqbal, Mohammad Yar, Yusuf Gurefe, Analytical Investigation of Nonlinear Fractional Harry Dym and Rosenau-Hyman Equation via a Novel Transform, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/8736030
19.	Naveed Iqbal, Moteb Fheed Saad Al Harbi, Saleh Alshammari, Shamsullah Zaland, Muhammad Nadeem, Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations with the Help of Different Operators, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/1333109
20.	Muhammad Naeem, Humaira Yasmin, Rasool Shah, Nehad Ali Shah, Jae Dong Chung, A Comparative Study of Fractional Partial Differential Equations with the Help of Yang Transform, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 146, 10.3390/sym15010146
21.	Aisha Abdullah Alderremy, Rasool Shah, Nehad Ali Shah, Shaban Aly, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Comparison of two modified analytical approaches for the systems of time fractional partial differential equations, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 7142, 10.3934/math.2023360
22.	Dowlath Fathima, Reham A. Alahmadi, Adnan Khan, Afroza Akhter, Abdul Hamid Ganie, An Efficient Analytical Approach to Investigate Fractional Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon Equations with Non-Singular Kernel Derivatives, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 850, 10.3390/sym15040850
23.	M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Humaira Yasmin, Rasool Shah, Abdul Hamid Ganie, Khaled Moaddy, Unraveling the Dynamics of Singular Stochastic Solitons in Stochastic Fractional Kuramoto–Sivashinsky Equation, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 753, 10.3390/fractalfract7100753
24.	Abdulrahman B. M. Alzahrani, Examining the role of activation energy and convective boundary conditions in nanofluid behavior of Couette-Poiseuille flow, 2023, 21, 2391-5471, 10.1515/phys-2023-0176
25.	Abdulrahman B. M. Alzahrani, Ghadah Alhawael, Novel Computations of the Time-Fractional Coupled Korteweg–de Vries Equations via Non-Singular Kernel Operators in Terms of the Natural Transform, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 2010, 10.3390/sym15112010
26.	Yousef Jawarneh, Zainab Alsheekhhussain, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Fractional View Analysis System of Korteweg–de Vries Equations Using an Analytical Method, 2024, 8, 2504-3110, 40, 10.3390/fractalfract8010040
27.	Humaira Yasmin, Aljawhara H. Almuqrin, Efficient solutions for time fractional Sawada-Kotera, Ito, and Kaup-Kupershmidt equations using an analytical technique, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 20441, 10.3934/math.2024994
28.	Azzh Saad Alshehry, Humaira Yasmin, Manzoor Ali Shah, Rasool Shah, Analyzing fuzzy fractional Degasperis–Procesi and Camassa–Holm equations with the Atangana–Baleanu operator, 2024, 22, 2391-5471, 10.1515/phys-2023-0191
29.	Humaira Yasmin, Analytical investigation of convective phenomena with nonlinearity characteristics in nanostratified liquid film above an inclined extended sheet, 2024, 13, 2191-9097, 10.1515/ntrev-2024-0064
30.	Liaqat Ali, Guang Zou, Na Li, Kashif Mehmood, Pan Fang, Adnan Khan, Analytical treatments of time-fractional seventh-order nonlinear equations via Elzaki transform, 2024, 145, 0022-0833, 10.1007/s10665-023-10326-y
31.	Abdul Hamid Ganie, Mashael M. AlBaidani, Adnan Khan, A Comparative Study of the Fractional Partial Differential Equations via Novel Transform, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1101, 10.3390/sym15051101
32.	Abdul Hamid Ganie, Humaira Yasmin, A A Alderremy, Rasool Shah, Shaban Aly, An efficient semi-analytical techniques for the fractional-order system of Drinfeld-Sokolov-Wilson equation, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 015253, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad1796
33.	Humaira Yasmin, Haifa A. Alyousef, Sadia Asad, Imran Khan, R. T. Matoog, S. A. El-Tantawy, The Riccati-Bernoulli sub-optimal differential equation method for analyzing the fractional Dullin-Gottwald-Holm equation and modeling nonlinear waves in fluid mediums, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 16146, 10.3934/math.2024781
34.	Humaira Yasmin, A. A. Alderremy, Rasool Shah, Abdul Hamid Ganie, Shaban Aly, Iterative solution of the fractional Wu-Zhang equation under Caputo derivative operator, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1333990
35.	Meshari Alesemi, Innovative approaches of a time-fractional system of Boussinesq equations within a Mohand transform, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 29269, 10.3934/math.20241419
36.	Abdul Hamid Ganie, Fatemah Mofarreh, Adnan Khan, A novel analysis of the time-fractional nonlinear dispersive K(m, n, 1) equations using the homotopy perturbation transform method and Yang transform decomposition method, 2023, 9, 2473-6988, 1877, 10.3934/math.2024092
37.	Khudhayr A. Rashedi, Saima Noor, Tariq S. Alshammari, Imran Khan, Lump and kink soliton phenomena of Vakhnenko equation, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 21079, 10.3934/math.20241024
38.	Abdul Hamid Ganie, Saurav Mallik, Mashael M. AlBaidani, Adnan Khan, Mohd Asif Shah, Novel analysis of nonlinear seventh-order fractional Kaup–Kupershmidt equation via the Caputo operator, 2024, 2024, 1687-2770, 10.1186/s13661-024-01895-7
39.	Abdul Hamid Ganie, Fatemah Mofarreh, Adnan Khan, A Fractional Analysis of Zakharov–Kuznetsov Equations with the Liouville–Caputo Operator, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 609, 10.3390/axioms12060609
40.	Elkhateeb Sobhy Aly, Manoj Singh, Mohammed Ali Aiyashi, Mohammed Daher Albalwi, Modeling monkeypox virus transmission: Stability analysis and comparison of analytical techniques, 2024, 22, 2391-5471, 10.1515/phys-2024-0056
41.	Humaira Yasmin, Yousuf Alkhezi, Khaled Alhamad, A New Iterative Method for Investigating Modified Camassa–Holm and Modified Degasperis–Procesi Equations within Caputo Operator, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 2172, 10.3390/sym15122172
42.	Mashael M. AlBaidani, Fahad Aljuaydi, N. S. Alharthi, Adnan Khan, Abdul Hamid Ganie, Study of fractional forced KdV equation with Caputo–Fabrizio and Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo differential operators, 2024, 14, 2158-3226, 10.1063/5.0185670
43.	Mashael M. AlBaidani, Abdul Hamid Ganie, Fahad Aljuaydi, Adnan Khan, Application of Analytical Techniques for Solving Fractional Physical Models Arising in Applied Sciences, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 584, 10.3390/fractalfract7080584
44.	Saurabh Kumar, Vikas Gupta, An Efficient Numerical Approach to Solve Fractional Coupled Boussinesq Equations, 2024, 19, 1555-1415, 10.1115/1.4066389
45.	Mohammad Alqudah, A A Alderremy, M Mossa Al-Sawalha, Imran Khan, Shaban Aly, Fractional Fokas-Lenells equation: analyzing travelling waves via advanced analytical method, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 065264, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad4c9e
46.	Hami Gündoǧdu, Hardik Joshi, Numerical Analysis of Time-Fractional Cancer Models with Different Types of Net Killing Rate, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 536, 10.3390/math13030536
47.	Shams A. Ahmed, Tarig M. Elzaki, Abdelgabar Adam Hassan, Husam E. Dargail, Hamdy M. Barakat, M. S. Hijazi, Applications of Elzaki transform to non-conformable fractional derivatives, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 5264, 10.3934/math.2025243
48.	Aditya Lochab, Chandni Gupta, Vikram Palimar, Real Versus Virtual Classes: A Perspective from Medical Undergraduate Student’s Point of View with Their Effectiveness in Learning, 2025, 36, 1300056X, 131, 10.12996/gmj.2024.3864

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Mathematics

1.8 3.4

Metrics

Article views(2618) PDF downloads(141) Cited by(48)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(10) / Tables(8)

AIMS Mathematics

On the solution of fractional modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations with non-singular kernel operators

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Basic preliminaries

3. Methodology

3.1. Case Ⅰ $(NTDM_{CF}):$

3.2. Case Ⅱ $(NTDM_{ABC}):$

4. Convergence analysis

5. Numerical examples

5.1. Example 1

5.1.1. Now we implementing $NTDM_{CF}$

5.1.2. Now we implementing $NTDM_{ABC}$

5.2. Example 2

5.2.1. Now we apply $NTDM_{CF}$

5.2.2. Now we apply $NTDM_{ABC}$

5.3. Numerical results and discussion

6. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Mathematics

On the solution of fractional modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations with non-singular kernel operators

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Basic preliminaries

3. Methodology

3.1. Case Ⅰ (NTDMCF): (NTDM_{CF}):

3.2. Case Ⅱ (NTDMABC): (NTDM_{ABC}):

4. Convergence analysis

5. Numerical examples

5.1. Example 1

5.1.1. Now we implementing NTDMCF NTDM_{CF}

5.1.2. Now we implementing NTDMABC NTDM_{ABC}

5.2. Example 2

5.2.1. Now we apply NTDMCF NTDM_{CF}

5.2.2. Now we apply NTDMABC NTDM_{ABC}

5.3. Numerical results and discussion

6. Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog

3.1. Case Ⅰ $(NTDM_{CF}):$

3.2. Case Ⅱ $(NTDM_{ABC}):$

5.1.1. Now we implementing $NTDM_{CF}$

5.1.2. Now we implementing $NTDM_{ABC}$

5.2.1. Now we apply $NTDM_{CF}$

5.2.2. Now we apply $NTDM_{ABC}$