Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Monotonicity, convexity and inequalities involving zero-balanced Gaussian hypergeometric function

  • Received: 04 January 2022 Revised: 16 April 2022 Accepted: 21 April 2022 Published: 26 April 2022
  • MSC : 33C05, 26D20

  • We generalize several monotonicity and convexity properties as well as sharp inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals to the zero-balanced Gaussian hypergeometric function F(a,b;a+b;x).

    Citation: Li Xu, Lu Chen, Ti-Ren Huang. Monotonicity, convexity and inequalities involving zero-balanced Gaussian hypergeometric function[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12471-12482. doi: 10.3934/math.2022692

    Related Papers:

    [1] Georgia Irina Oros, Gheorghe Oros, Daniela Andrada Bardac-Vlada . Certain geometric properties of the fractional integral of the Bessel function of the first kind. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7095-7110. doi: 10.3934/math.2024346
    [2] Ekram E. Ali, Georgia Irina Oros, Rabha M. El-Ashwah, Abeer M. Albalahi . Applications of fuzzy differential subordination theory on analytic p -valent functions connected with q-calculus operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21239-21254. doi: 10.3934/math.20241031
    [3] Jianhua Gong, Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Hala Alaqad, Bilal Khan . Sharp inequalities for q-starlike functions associated with differential subordination and q-calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28421-28446. doi: 10.3934/math.20241379
    [4] Ekram E. Ali, Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Rabha M. El-Ashwah . New results about fuzzy γ-convex functions connected with the q-analogue multiplier-Noor integral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5451-5465. doi: 10.3934/math.2024263
    [5] Alina Alb Lupaş, Georgia Irina Oros . Differential sandwich theorems involving Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of q-hypergeometric function. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4930-4943. doi: 10.3934/math.2023246
    [6] Shuhai Li, Lina Ma, Huo Tang . Meromorphic harmonic univalent functions related with generalized (p, q)-post quantum calculus operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 223-234. doi: 10.3934/math.2021015
    [7] Caihuan Zhang, Shahid Khan, Aftab Hussain, Nazar Khan, Saqib Hussain, Nasir Khan . Applications of q-difference symmetric operator in harmonic univalent functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 667-680. doi: 10.3934/math.2022042
    [8] Shujaat Ali Shah, Ekram Elsayed Ali, Adriana Cătaș, Abeer M. Albalahi . On fuzzy differential subordination associated with q-difference operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6642-6650. doi: 10.3934/math.2023336
    [9] Lina Ma, Shuhai Li, Huo Tang . Geometric properties of harmonic functions associated with the symmetric conjecture points and exponential function. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6800-6816. doi: 10.3934/math.2020437
    [10] Mohammad Faisal Khan . Certain new applications of Faber polynomial expansion for some new subclasses of υ-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions associated with q-calculus. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10283-10302. doi: 10.3934/math.2023521
  • We generalize several monotonicity and convexity properties as well as sharp inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals to the zero-balanced Gaussian hypergeometric function F(a,b;a+b;x).



    The hypothesis of fractional calculus, which is primarily due to its proven developments in many branches of science and engineering over the past three decades or so, has gained considerable prominence and recognition in recent times. Most of the theory of fractional calculus is specifically based upon the familiar Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative (or integral). The fractional q-calculus is the extension of the ordinary fractional calculus in the q-theory. Recently, there was notable increase of articles written in the area of the q-calculus due to significant applications of the q-calculus in mathematics, statistics and physics. For more details, interested readers may refer to the books of [1,2,4,5,6,8,9,14] on the subject.

    Indeed the fourth author of this article with Raina in [11] have used the fractional q-calculus operators in investigating certain classes of functions which are analytic in the open disk D. Recently, many authors have introduced new classes of analytic functions using q-calculus operators. For some recent investigations on the classes of analytic functions defined by using q-calculus operators and related topics, we refer the reader to [12,13,17,18] and the references cited therein. In the present paper, we aim at introducing a new class of Bazilevič functions involving the fractional q-calculus operators, which is analytic in the open unit disk. Certain interesting subordination results are also derived for the functions belonging to this class.

    We first give various definitions and notations in q-calculus which are useful to understand the subject of this paper.

    For any complex number α, the q-shifted factorials are defined as

    (α;q)0=1,(α;q)n=n1k=0(1αqk),nN, (1.1)

    and in terms of the basic analogue of the gamma function

    (qα;q)n=Γq(α+n)(1q)nΓq(α),(n>0),

    where the q-gamma function is defined by

    Γq(x)=(q,q)(1q)1x(qx;q),(0<q<1).

    If |q|<1, the definition (1.1) remains meaningful for n= as a convergent infinite product

    (α;q)=j=0(1αqj).

    In view of the relation

    limq1(qα;q)n(1q)n=(α)n,

    we observe that the q-shifted factorial (1.1) reduces to the familiar Pochhammer symbol (α)n, where (α)n=α(α+1)(α+n1).

    Also, the q-derivative and q-integral of a function on a subset of C are, respectively, given by (see [6] pp.19-22)

    Dqf(z)=f(z)f(zq)(1q)z,(z0,q0) (1.2)

    and

    z0f(t)dqt=z(1q)k=0qkf(zqk). (1.3)

    Therefore, the q-derivative of f(z)=zn, where n is a positive integer is given by

    Dqzn=zn(zq)n(1q)z=[n]qzn1,

    where

    [n]q=1qn1q=qn1++1

    and is called the q-analogue of n. As q1, we have [n]q=qn1++11++1=n. The q-derivative of f(z)=lnz is given by

    Dqlnz=lnq1(1q)z.

    We now define the fractional q-calculus operators of a complex-valued function f(z), which were recently studied by Purohit and Raina [11].

    Definition 1.1. (Fractional q-integral operator) The fractional q-integral operator Iδq,z of a function f(z) of order δ is defined by

    Iδq,zf(z)Dδq,zf(z)=1Γq(δ)z0(ztq)δ1f(t)dqt,(δ>0), (1.4)

    where f(z) is analytic in a simply connected region of the z-plane containing the origin and the q-binomial function (ztq)δ1 is given by

    (ztq)δ1=zδ11Φ0[qδ+1;;q,tqδ/z].

    The series 1Φ0[δ;;q,z] is single valued when |arg(z)|<π and |z|<1 (see for details [6], pp.104-106), therefore, the function (ztq)δ1 in (1.4) is single valued when |arg(tqδ/z)|<π, |tqδ/z|<1 and |arg(z)|<π.

    Definition 1.2. (Fractional q-derivative operator) The fractional q-derivative operator Dδq,z of a function f(z) of order δ is defined by

    Dδq,zf(z)Dq,zI1δq,zf(z)=1Γq(1δ)Dq,zz0(ztq)δf(t)dqt,(0δ<1), (1.5)

    where f(z) is suitably constrained and the multiplicity of (ztq)δ is removed as in Definition 1.1.

    Definition 1.3. (Extended fractional q-derivative operator) Under the hypotheses of Definition 1.2, the fractional q-derivative for a function f(z) of order δ is defined by

    Dδq,zf(z)=Dmq,zImδq,zf(z), (1.6)

    where m1δ<1,mN0=N{0}, and N denotes the set of natural numbers.

    Remark 1.1. It can be easily seen from Definition 1.2 that

    Dδq,zzn=Γq(n+1)Γq(n+1δ)znδ(δ0,andn>1).

    Let H(a,n) denote the class of functions f(z) of the form

    f(z)=a+anzn+an+1zn+1+,(zD), (2.1)

    which are analytic in the unit disk D={zC:|z|<1}. In particular, let A be the subclass of H(0,1) containing functions of the form

    f(z)=z+n=2anzn. (2.2)

    We denote by S,S,C and K, the classes of all functions in A which are, respectively, univalent, starlike, convex and close-to-convex in D. Let f(z) and g(z) be analytic in D. A function f is subordinate to g in D, if there exists an analytic function w(z) in D with

    w(0)=0,|w(z)|<1(zD),

    such that

    f(z)=g(w(z))(zD).

    We denote this subordination by f(z)g(z). Further, if the function g(z) is univalent in D, then f(z)g(z)(zD)f(0)=g(0) and f(D)g(D).

    Let k be a positive integer and let εk=exp(2πik). For fA, let

    fk(z)=1kk1j=0εjkf(εjkz). (2.3)

    The function f is said to be starlike with respect to k-symmetric points if it satisfies

    (zf(z)fk(z))>0,zD. (2.4)

    We denote by S(k)s the subclass of A consisting of all functions starlike with respect to k-symmetric points in D. The class S(2)s was introduced and studied by Sakaguchi [15]. We also note that different subclasses of S(k)s can be obtained by replacing condition (2.4) by

    zf(z)fk(z)h(z),

    where h(z) is a given convex function, with h(0)=1 and {h(z)}>0.

    Using Dδq,z, we define a fractional q-differintegral operator Ωδq,z:AA, as follows:

    Ωδq,zf(z)=Γq(2δ)Γq(2)zδDδq,zf(z)=z+n=2Γq(2δ)Γq(n+1)Γq(2)Γq(n+1δ)anzn,(δ<2;nN;0<q<1;zD), (2.5)

    where Dδq,zf(z) in (2.5) represents, respectively, a fractional q-integral of f(z) of order δ when <δ<0 and a fractional q-derivative of f(z) of order δ when 0δ<2. Here we note that Ω0q,zf(z)=f(z).

    We now define a linear multiplier fractional q-differintegral operator Dδ,mq,λ as follows:

    Dδ,0q,λf(z)=f(z),Dδ,1q,λf(z)=(1λ)Ωδq,zf(z)+λz(Ωδq,zf(z)),(λ0),Dδ,2q,λf(z)=Dδ,1q,λ(Dδ,1q,λf(z)),Dδ,mq,λ  f(z)=Dδ,1q,λ(Dδ,m1q,λf(z)),mN. (2.6)

    If f(z) is given by (2.2), then by (2.6), we have

    Dδ,mq,λ  f(z)=z+n=2(Γq(2δ)Γq(n+1)Γq(2)Γq(n+1δ)[1λ+nλ])manzn.

    It can be seen that, by specializing the parameters the operator Dδ,mq,λ   reduces to many known and new integral and differential operators. In particular, when δ=0 the operator Dδ,mq,λ   reduces to the operator introduced by Al-Oboudi [3] and for δ=0,λ=1 it reduces to the operator introduced by Sălăgean [16].

    Throughout this paper, we assume that

    fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)=1kk1j=0εjk(Dδ,mq,λ  f(εjkz))=z+,(fA). (2.7)

    Clearly, for k=1, we have

    fmq,1(λ,δ;z)=Dδ,mq,λ  f(z).

    Let P denote the class of analytic functions h(z) with h(0)=1, which are convex and univalent in D and for which {h(z)}>0,(zD).

    In the present article, a new subclass Bmq,k(λ,δ,γ;ϕ) of analytic functions, using the linear multiplier q-fractional differintegral operator Dδ,mq,λ   defined by (2.6) is introduced. It is interesting to note that the class Bmq,k(λ,δ,γ;ϕ) is a generalization of the class of Bazilevič functions.

    Definition 2.1. A function fA is said to be in the class Bmq,k(λ,δ,γ;ϕ) if and only if

    z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]γϕ(z),(gS,zD),

    where γ[0,),ϕP, fmq,k  (λ,δ;z) and gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)0 for all zD{0} are defined as in (2.7).

    It is easy to see to verify the following relations: If q1, then

    1.B0q,1(λ,δ,0;1+z1z)=S;

    2.B0q,k(λ,δ,0;1+z1z)=S(k)s;

    3.B0q,1(λ,δ,1;1+z1z)=K;

    4.B0q,1(λ,δ,γ;1+z1z)=B(γ), the class of Bazilevič functions of type γ.

    Now, we derive some sufficient conditions for functions belonging to the class Bmq,k(λ,δ,γ;ϕ). In order to prove our results we need the following results.

    Lemma 2.1. ([10], see also [7]) Let h be convex in D, with h(0)=a,β0and(β)0. If gH(a,n) and

    g(z)+zg(z)βh(z),

    then

    g(z)ϕ(z)h(z),

    where

    ϕ(z)=βnzβ/nz0h(t)t(β/n)1dt.

    The function ϕ is convex and is the best (a, n)-dominant.

    Lemma 2.2. ([10], see also [19]) Let h be starlike in D, with h(0)=0. If gH(a,n) satisfies

    zg(z)h(z),

    then

    g(z)ϕ(z)=a+n1z0h(t)t1dt.

    The function ϕ is convex and is the best (a, n)-dominant.

    In this section, we establish some sufficient conditions of subordination for analytic functions defined above involving the q-differential operator.

    Theorem 3.1. Let f,gA with fmq,k  (λ,δ;z) and gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)0 for all zD{0} and let h be convex in D, with h(0)=1and{h(z)}>0. Further suppose that gS and

    {z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]γ}2[3+2z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))2(1γ)z(fmq,k  (λ,δ;z))fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)2γz(gmq,k  (λ,δ;z))gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]h(z). (3.1)

    Then

    z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]γq(z)=Q(z), (3.2)

    where

    Q(z)=1zz0h(t)dt, (3.3)

    and the function q(z) is the best dominant.

    Proof. Let p(z)=z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]γ(zD;z0).

    Then p(z)0 in D. Further, p(z)H(1,1). Differentiating (3.3) we obtain

    Q(z)+zQ(z)=h(z) (3.4)

    If we let

    p1(z)=1+zQ(z)Q(z),

    then p1 is analytic and p1(0)=1. From (3.4) we obtain

    Q(z)[p1(z)+1]=h(z)

    and

    p1(z)+zp1(z)p1(z)+1=1+zh(z)h(z).

    Since h is convex, we have

    (p1(z)+zp1(z)p1(z)+1)>0

    which implies (p1(z))>0 ([10], Theorem 3.2a) and therefore, Q(z) is convex and univalent. We now set P(z)=p2(z). Then P(z)H(1,1) with P(z)0 in D. By logarithmic differentiation we have,

    zP(z)P(z)=2[1+z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(1γ)z(fmq,k  (λ,δ;z))fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)γz(gmq,k  (λ,δ;z))gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)].

    Therefore, by (3.1) we have

    P(z)+zP(z)h(z). (3.5)

    Now, by Lemma 2.1 with β=1, we deduce that

    P(z)Q(z)h(z),

    and Q is the best dominant of (3.5). Since {h(z)}>0 and Q(z)h(z) we also have {Q(z)}>0. Hence, the univalence of Q implies the univalence of q(z)=Q(z), and

    p2(z)=P(z)Q(z)=q2(z),

    which implies that p(z)q(z). Since Q is the best dominant of (3.5), we deduce that q(z) is the best dominant of (3.2). This completes the proof.

    Corollary 3.2. Let f,gA with fmq,k  (λ,δ;z) and gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)0 for all zD{0}. If gS and (Ψ(z))>α,(0α<1), where

    Ψ(z)={z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]γ}2×[3+2z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))2(1γ)z(fmq,k  (λ,δ;z))fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)2γz(gmq,k  (λ,δ;z))gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)],

    then {z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]γ}>μ(α),

    where μ(α)=[2(1α)ln2+(2α1)]12, and this result is sharp.

    Proof. Let h(z)=1+(2α1)z1+z with 0α<1. Then from Theorem 3.1, it follows that Q(z) is convex and {Q(z)}>0. Also we have,

    min|z|1q(z)=min|z|1Q(z)=Q(1)=[2(1α)ln2+(2α1)]12.

    This completes the proof the corollary.

    By setting m=0 in Corollary 3.2, we have the following corollary.

    Corollary 3.3. Let f,gA with f(z),fk(z) and gk(z)0 for all zD{0}. If gS and

    {(zf(z)(fk(z))1γ  (gk(z))γ)2[3+2zf(z)f(z)2(1γ)zfk(z)fk(z)2γzgk(z)gk(z)]}>α,(0α<1),

    then

    {zf(z)(fk(z))1γ  (gk(z))γ}>μ(α),

    where μ(α)=[2(1α)ln2+(2α1)]12, and this result is sharp.

    Also, taking γ=0 in Corollary 3.3, we obtain

    Corollary 3.4. Let fA with f(z) and fk(z)0 for all zD{0}. If

    {(zf(z)fk(z))2[3+2zf(z)f(z)2zfk(z)fk(z)]}>α,(0α<1),

    then

    {zf(z)fk(z)}>μ(α),

    where μ(α)=[2(1α)ln2+(2α1)]12, and this result is sharp.

    Further, setting γ=1 in Corollary 3.3, we obtain the following corollary.

    Corollary 3.5. Let f,gA with f(z) and gk(z)0 for all zD{0}. If gS and

    {(zf(z)gk(z))2[3+2zf(z)f(z)2zgk(z)gk(z)]}>α,(0α<1),

    then

    {zf(z)gk(z)}>μ(α),

    where μ(α)=[2(1α)ln2+(2α1)]12, and this result is sharp.

    Next, we prove the following result.

    Theorem 3.6. Let f,gA with fmq,k  (λ,δ;z) and gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)0 for all zD{0}. Further suppose that h is starlike with h(0)=0, in the unit disk D,gS and

    [1+z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(1γ)z(fmq,k  (λ,δ;z))fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)γz(gmq,k  (λ,δ;z))gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]h(z),
    (zD;γ0).

    Then

    z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmk(λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmk(λ,δ;z)]γϕ(z)=exp(z0h(t)tdt),

    where ϕ is convex and is the best dominant.

    Proof. Let p(z)=z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))[fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]1γ  [gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)]γ(zD;z0).

    Since p(z)H(1,1) with p(z)0 in D, we can define the analytic function P(z)lnp(z). Clearly P(z)H(0,1). Now by logarithmic differentiation we have,

    zp(z)p(z)=[1+z(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(Dδ,mq,λ  f(z))(1γ)z(fmq,k  (λ,δ;z))fmq,k  (λ,δ;z)γz(gmq,k  (λ,δ;z))gmq,k  (λ,δ;z)].

    Thus we have

    zP(z)h(z)(zD).

    Now by Lemma 2.2, we deduce that

    lnp(z)z0h(t)tdt.

    This completes the proof of Theorem 3.6.

    By putting m=0 in Theorem 3.6, we arrive at the following corollary.

    Corollary 3.7. Let f,gA with f(z),fk(z) and gk(z)0 for all zD{0}. Further suppose that h is starlike with h(0)=0, in the unit disk D,gS and

    1+zf(z)f(z)(1γ)zfk(z)fk(z)γzgk(z)gk(z)h(z),(zD;γ0).

    Then

    zf(z)(fk(z))1γ  (gk(z))γϕ(z)=exp(z0h(t)tdt),

    where ϕ is convex and is the best dominant.

    Also, specializing γ=0 and γ=1 in Corollary 3.7, we obtain the following interesting two corollaries as given below.

    Corollary 3.8. Let f,gA with f(z) and fk(z)0 for all zD{0}. Further suppose that h is starlike with h(0)=0, in the unit disk D and

    1+zf(z)f(z)zfk(z)fk(z)h(z),(zD).

    Then

    zf(z)fk(z)ϕ(z)=exp(z0h(t)tdt),

    where ϕ is convex and is the best dominant.

    Corollary 3.9. Let f,gA with f(z) and gk(z)0 for all zD{0}. Further suppose that h is starlike with h(0)=0, in the unit disk D,gS and

    1+zf(z)f(z)zgk(z)gk(z)h(z),(zD).

    Then

    zf(z)gk(z)ϕ(z)=exp(z0h(t)tdt),

    where ϕ is convex and is the best dominant.

    By suitably choosing the parameters, one can further easily obtain a number of inequalities from the main results stated in Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.6. Moreover, the class Bmq,k(λ,δ,γ;ϕ) defined in this article can also be used in the investigation of various geometric properties like, the coefficient estimates, distortion bounds, radii of starlikeness, convexity and close to convexity etc. in the unit disk.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    The authors would like to thank the referee(s) for his/her suggestions that essentially corrected few of the conditions in the theorem. The research of corresponding author (Huo Tang) was partly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China under Grant 11561001, the Program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region under Grant NJYT-18-A14, the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia of the People's Republic of China under Grant 2018MS01026, the Natural Science Foundation of Chifeng of Inner Mongolia, the Program for Key Laboratory Construction of Chifeng University (No.CFXYZD202004) and The Research and Innovation Team of Complex Analysis and Nonlinear Dynamic Systems of Chifeng University (No.cfxykycxtd202005) and the Youth Science Foundation of Chifeng University (No.cfxyqn202133). The work of third-named author is supported by a grant from the Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India under Mathematical Research Impact Centric Support of Department of Science and Technology (DST)(vide ref: MTR/2017/000607).



    [1] G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, R. Roy, Special functions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and ite Applications, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    [2] H. Alzer, K. Richards, A note on a function involving complete elliptic integrals: Monotonicity, convexity, inequalities, Anal. Math., 41 (2015), 133–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10476-015-0201-7 doi: 10.1007/s10476-015-0201-7
    [3] M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables, New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1965.
    [4] G. D. Anderson, M. K. Vamanamurthy, M. Vuorinen, Conformal invariants, inequalities, and quasiconformal mappings, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
    [5] G. D. Anderson, S. L. Qiu, M. K. Vamanamurthy, Elliptic integral inequalities, with applications, Constr. Approx., 14 (1998), 195–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003659900070 doi: 10.1007/s003659900070
    [6] G. D. Anderson, S. L. Qiu, M. K. Vamanamurthy, M. Vuorinen, Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations, Pacific J. Math., 192 (2000), 1–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2000.192.1 doi: 10.2140/pjm.2000.192.1
    [7] R. Balasubramanian, S. Ponnusamy, M. Vuorinen, Functional inequalities for quotients of hypergeometric functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 218 (1998), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1997.5776 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5776
    [8] Y. C. Han, C. Y. Cai, T. R. Huang, Monotonicity, convexity properties and inequalities involving Gaussian hypergeometric functions with applications, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 4974–4991. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2022277 doi: 10.3934/math.2022277
    [9] W. A. Day, On monotonicity of the relaxation functions of viscoelastic materials, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 67 (1970), 503–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100045771 doi: 10.1017/S0305004100045771
    [10] J. F. C. Kingman, An introduction to probability theory and its applications, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A, 135 (1972), 430. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344620 doi: 10.2307/2344620
    [11] T. R. Huang, S. L. Qiu, X. Y. Ma, Monotonicity properties and Inequalities for the generalized elliptic integral of the first of kind, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 469 (2019), 95–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.08.061 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.08.061
    [12] T. R. Huang, S. Y. Tan, X. H.Zhang, Monotonicity, convexity, and inequalities for the generalized elliptic integrals, J. Inequal. Appl., 2017 (2017), 278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13660-017-1556-z doi: 10.1186/s13660-017-1556-z
    [13] T. R. Huang, L. Chen, S. Y. Tan, Y. M. Chu, Monotonicity, Convexity and Bounds Involving the Beta and Ramanujan R-function, J. Math. Inequal., 15 (2021), 615–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.7153/jmi-2021-15-45 doi: 10.7153/jmi-2021-15-45
    [14] T. R. Huang, S. Y. Tan, X. Y. Ma, Y. M. Chu, Monotonicity properties and bounds for the complete p-elliptic integrals, J. Inequal. Appl., 2018 (2018), 239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1828-2 doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1828-2
    [15] S. Ponnusamy, M. Vuorinen, Asymptotic expansions and inequalities for hypergeometric function, Mathematika, 44 (1997), 278–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S0025579300012602 doi: 10.1112/S0025579300012602
    [16] S. L. Qiu, X. Y. Ma, Y. M. Chu, Sharp Landen transformation inequalities for hypergeometric functions, with applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 474 (2019), 1306–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.02.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.02.018
    [17] S. Simiˊc, M. Vuorinen, Landen inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2012 (2012), 932061. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/932061 doi: 10.1155/2012/932061
    [18] Y. Q. Song, P. G. Zhou, Y. M. Chu, Inequalities for the Gaussian hypergeometric function, Sci. China Math., 57 (2014), 2369–2380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-014-4858-3 doi: 10.1007/s11425-014-4858-3
    [19] Y. L. Luke, Book review, In: J. Wimp, Sequence transformations and their applications, SIAM Review, 24 (1982), 489–490. https://doi.org/10.1137/1024115
    [20] M. K. Wang, Y. M. Chu, Landen inequalities for a class of hypergeometric functions with applications, Math. Inequal. Appl., 21 (2018), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-2018-21-38 doi: 10.7153/mia-2018-21-38
    [21] M. K. Wang, Y. M. Chu, Y. P. Jiang, Ramanujan's cubic transformation inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions, Rocky Mountain J. Math., 46 (2016), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-2016-46-2-679 doi: 10.1216/RMJ-2016-46-2-679
    [22] M. K. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. M. Chu, Monotonicity, convexity and inequalities involving the generalized elliptic integrals, Acta. Math. Sci., 39 (2019), 1440–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-019-0520-z doi: 10.1007/s10473-019-0520-z
    [23] T. H. Zhao, M. K. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. M. Chu, Quadratic transformation inequalities for Gaussian hypergeometric function, J. Inequal. Appl., 2018 (2018), 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1848-y doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1848-y
    [24] T. H. Zhao, M. K. Wang, Y. M. Chu, A sharp double inequality involving generalized complete elliptic integral of the first kind, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 4512–4528. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020290 doi: 10.3934/math.2020290
    [25] T. H. Zhao, Z. Y. He, Y. M. Chu, On some refinements for inequalities involving zero-balanced hypergeometric function, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 6479–6495. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020418 doi: 10.3934/math.2020418
    [26] S. S. Zhou, G. Farid, C. Y. Jung, Convexity with respect to strictly monotone function and Riemann-Liouville fractional Fejér-Hadamard inequalities, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 6975–6985. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021409 doi: 10.3934/math.2021409
    [27] X. H. Zhang, Monotonicity and functional inequalities for the complete p-elliptic integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 453 (2017), 942–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.04.025 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.04.025
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Kadhavoor R. Karthikeyan, Sakkarai Lakshmi, Seetharam Varadharajan, Dharmaraj Mohankumar, Elangho Umadevi, Starlike Functions of Complex Order with Respect to Symmetric Points Defined Using Higher Order Derivatives, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 116, 10.3390/fractalfract6020116
    2. S. D. Purohit, M. M. Gour, S. Joshi, D. L. Suthar, V. Ravichandran, Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Bound with Kober Operators in q -Calculus, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/3161275
    3. Yuancheng Xie, Ahmad Saleh Shatat, Calculus Logic Function in Integrated Manufacturing Automation of Single Chip Microcomputer, 2022, 0, 2444-8656, 10.2478/amns.2022.2.0060
    4. Yashoverdhan Vyas, Shivani Pathak, Kalpana Fatawat, 2023, Chapter 24, 978-3-031-29958-2, 380, 10.1007/978-3-031-29959-9_24
    5. Alina Alb Lupaş, Mugur Acu, Properties of a subclass of analytic functions defined by Riemann-Liouville fractional integral applied to convolution product of multiplier transformation and Ruscheweyh derivative, 2023, 56, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2022-0249
    6. Alina Alb Lupaş, Strong Sandwich-Type Results for Fractional Integral of the Extended q-Analogue of Multiplier Transformation, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2830, 10.3390/math12182830
    7. Muhammmad Ghaffar Khan, Wali Khan Mashwani, Lei Shi, Serkan Araci, Bakhtiar Ahmad, Bilal Khan, Hankel inequalities for bounded turning functions in the domain of cosine Hyperbolic function, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 21993, 10.3934/math.20231121
    8. Murli Manohar Gour, Deepak Kumar Sharma, Govind Shay Sharma, 2024, Chapter 21, 978-3-031-56303-4, 315, 10.1007/978-3-031-56304-1_21
    9. Sudhansu Palei, Madan Mohan Soren, Daniel Breaz, Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlǎ, Sandwich-Type Results and Existence Results of Analytic Functions Associated with the Fractional q-Calculus Operator, 2024, 9, 2504-3110, 4, 10.3390/fractalfract9010004
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2283) PDF downloads(79) Cited by(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog