It is the objective to provide a mathematical treatment of a model to predict the behaviour of an invasive specie proliferating in a domain, but with a certain hostile zone. The behaviour of the invasive is modelled in the frame of a non-linear diffusion (of Porous Medium type) equation with non-Lipschitz and heterogeneous reaction. First of all, the paper examines the existence and uniqueness of solutions together with a comparison principle. Once the regularity principles are shown, the solutions are studied within the Travelling Waves (TW) domain together with stability analysis in the frame of the Geometric Perturbation Theory (GPT). As a remarkable finding, the obtained TW profile follows a potential law in the stable connection that converges to the stationary solution. Such potential law suggests that the pressure induced by the invasive over the hostile area increases over time. Nonetheless, the finite speed, induced by the non-linear diffusion, slows down a possible violent invasion.
Citation: José L. Díaz. Existence, uniqueness and travelling waves to model an invasive specie interaction with heterogeneous reaction and non-linear diffusion[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5768-5789. doi: 10.3934/math.2022319
[1] | José Luis Díaz Palencia, Saeed ur Rahman, Antonio Naranjo Redondo . Analysis of travelling wave solutions for Eyring-Powell fluid formulated with a degenerate diffusivity and a Darcy-Forchheimer law. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15212-15233. doi: 10.3934/math.2022834 |
[2] | S. Rahman, J. L. Díaz Palencia, J. Roa González . Analysis and profiles of travelling wave solutions to a Darcy-Forchheimer fluid formulated with a non-linear diffusion. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6898-6914. doi: 10.3934/math.2022383 |
[3] | José Luis Díaz Palencia, Abraham Otero . Instability analysis and geometric perturbation theory to a mutual beneficial interaction between species with a higher order operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17210-17224. doi: 10.3934/math.2022947 |
[4] | Yujuan Jiao, Jinmiao Yang, Hang Zhang . Traveling wave solutions to a cubic predator-prey diffusion model with stage structure for the prey. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16261-16277. doi: 10.3934/math.2022888 |
[5] | Chaohong Pan, Xiaowen Xu, Yong Liang . Speed determinacy of traveling waves for a lattice stream-population model with Allee effect. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18763-18776. doi: 10.3934/math.2024913 |
[6] | Minzhi Wei, Liping He . Existence of periodic wave for a perturbed MEW equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11557-11571. doi: 10.3934/math.2023585 |
[7] | M. Sivakumar, M. Mallikarjuna, R. Senthamarai . A kinetic non-steady state analysis of immobilized enzyme systems with external mass transfer resistance. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18083-18102. doi: 10.3934/math.2024882 |
[8] | Hui-Ling Niu . Multidimensional stability of V-shaped traveling fronts in bistable reaction-diffusion equations with nonlinear convection. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 314-332. doi: 10.3934/math.2021020 |
[9] | Yanxia Hu, Qian Liu . On traveling wave solutions of a class of KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto type equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1450-1465. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1450 |
[10] | Feiting Fan, Xingwu Chen . Dynamical behavior of traveling waves in a generalized VP-mVP equation with non-homogeneous power law nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17514-17538. doi: 10.3934/math.2023895 |
It is the objective to provide a mathematical treatment of a model to predict the behaviour of an invasive specie proliferating in a domain, but with a certain hostile zone. The behaviour of the invasive is modelled in the frame of a non-linear diffusion (of Porous Medium type) equation with non-Lipschitz and heterogeneous reaction. First of all, the paper examines the existence and uniqueness of solutions together with a comparison principle. Once the regularity principles are shown, the solutions are studied within the Travelling Waves (TW) domain together with stability analysis in the frame of the Geometric Perturbation Theory (GPT). As a remarkable finding, the obtained TW profile follows a potential law in the stable connection that converges to the stationary solution. Such potential law suggests that the pressure induced by the invasive over the hostile area increases over time. Nonetheless, the finite speed, induced by the non-linear diffusion, slows down a possible violent invasion.
Biological invasion has been precisely defined by the Convection of Biological Diversity [19] as those species capable of threaten other species living peacefully in their ecosystem.
The invaded-invasive interaction between species has been discussed with an advection, that elucidates a non-linear diffusion, in [21]. The system derived in such reference was intended to describe the haptotactic cell invasion in a model for melanoma. In addition, [14] examines the spectral stability of travelling waves of the haptotaxis model studied in cancer invasion. The model has been analyzed making use of Evans function to a linearised operator. In [11], an invasive propagating front, driven by diffusion, is characterized together with the dynamics of the invaded specie. In these last cited cases, the proposed models interpreted the advection as part of the complete random movement (no preferred direction) induced by the haptotactic evolution, as well as (see [11]) a pure advection to model the dynamic spatial preferred direction of motion.
Note that even when invasive-invaded systems are not precisely speaking predator-prey models, it is worth mentioning that once and invasive occupies a domain (for example a biological organ) the invaded specie extinguishes. Such extinguishing may lead the invasive to vanish (or even die if the organ fails) as there is not further specie to invade. This a-priori dynamic constitutes a link between invasive-invaded dynamic and predator-prey. In [22], the authors study the existence of invasion waves of a diffusive predator–prey model with two preys and one predator using the Schauder's fixed-point theorem together with LaSalle's invariant theorem to prove the existence of solutions between two equilibrium conditions. Recently the Hopf bifurcation method has been employed in [3] to study the harvesting effect in the predator and the density-dependent mortality in the prey. Additionally, [15] proposes a Hopf bifurcation to study a delayed density-dependent predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response. Stability and bifurcation methods have been employed as well in [16,20,27] for different functional responses.
There exists a mathematical connection among the different bifurcation and stability methods mentioned and the geometric perturbation theory employed in this paper, as such theories are intended to search for stable solutions, for example in the form of Travelling Waves (TW), connecting stationary conditions.
As it will be shown, the non-linear diffusion drives the mathematical methods employed in this paper. Within the mathematical applications to biology, Keller and Segel [18] proposed a non-linear diffusion to study the cells movement by chemotaxis:
ut=∇⋅(d(u)u−χ(v)u∇u)x∈Ω,t>0vt=dvΔv−uvx∈Ω,t>0, | (1.1) |
where u represents the cell density and v the chemical concentration. Note that d(u) is the media diffusivity and χ(v) the distribution of chemical agent to which the cells are sensitive. The Keller and Segel model has been extended to account for certain regular reaction-absorption dynamics [1,7,23,26].
In other research areas, the non-linear diffusion in the form of Porous Medium Equation has been used to model the coagulation effect in an electromagnetic blood flow with annular vessel geometries [5] or to simulate the effect of porosity in a peristaltic transport in a Jeffrey fluid [12].
The analyzed problem P is:
vt=Δvm+|x|σvq(1−v),m>1,0<q<1,0≤v0(x)∈L1loc(Rd)∩L∞(Rd). | (2.1) |
The problem P justification is based on studying the invasive dynamic as a single specie and the mathematical properties introduced by the spatial operator and the heterogeneous reaction term. Typically, the behaviour of an invasive specie has been modelled together with the specie to be invaded. In [22], the authors study the existence of invasion waves to a linear diffusion predator–prey model with two preys and one predator. The existence of travelling semi-fronts connecting invasion-free equilibrium are shown based on the Schauder's fixed-point theorem for certain travelling waves speeds above one critical. In [25], the authors are concerned with the existence and asymptotic behavior of invasion wave solutions and non-quasimonotone conditions to an upper solution. To this end, the Schauder's fixed point theorem is employed. Further, in [24], the invasion traveling waves are shown to state exponentially stable for an exponentially weighted space by using the weighted energy. Along the presented, the invasive specie is modeled along its conquering state, for this purpose:
Consider that for |x|<γ→0+, the invasive growing rate vt∼0, in other words, the small area given by |x|<γ represents a hostile zone in which the invasive accounts for difficulties to get into. Nonetheless, the fact of having vt∼0 with quasi-null initial data in |x|<γ indicates the slow motion on the invasive in such spatial domain. This slow motion is associated with the property known as finite propagation in the Porous Medium Equation theory. Therefore, the intention is to model two different domains:
● |x|<γ→0+: The invasive specie has difficulties to get into the hostile domain. Nonetheless, the quasi-null initial data indicates the existence of a finite propagation that is kept along the invasive excursion in such domain. The fact of modelling with a non-linear diffusion permits to avoid the positivity condition typical in the gaussian-fickian diffusion. In addition, the non-Lipschitz condition introduces the existence of a null minimal solution that represents the impossibility of the invasive to invade the hostile zone. Nonetheless and in case the invasive penetrates the hostile area, the initial population growth is relatively high in accordance with the derivative of vq,q<1.
● |x|>>γ: The invasive reproduction rate is high as the environment can feed the invasive until it reaches the maximum concentration or saturation at equilibrium established at v=1. This behaviour is introduced by a weak Allee effect (1−v).
The methods employed along this article consist on showing exitence of solutions to an equivalent Lipschitz problem via maximal and minimal monotone sequences. In addition, uniqueness and comparison are shown based on a generalization to weak solutions and the definition of a test function ϕ∈C∞(Rd) to account for the degenerate diffusivity in the non-linear diffusion. Finally, the Geometric Perturbation theory is employed to show the existence and to determine Travelling Waves profiles.
The theory developed to solve P (2.1) holds for initial data 0≤v0(x)∈L1(Rd)∩L∞(Rd). A generalization to consider functions of the form:
0≤v0(x)∈L1loc(Rd)∩L∞(Rd), | (3.1) |
can be considered provided a condition is set for the growing behavior in the initial data in the spirit of [9,10].
The baseline integrability condition requires to introduce the following Banach space:
E0={ϕ∈L1loc(Rd):‖ϕ‖r<∞}, | (3.2) |
where the norm ‖ϕ‖r(r≥1) is defined as:
‖ϕ‖r=supR≥rR−d−aσ∫Rd|ϕ(x)|dx, | (3.3) |
with
aσ=max{σ1−q,2m−1}, | (3.4) |
BR={x∈Rd;|x|<R} and ‖ϕ‖∗=limr→∞‖ϕ‖r
The aσ expression in (3.4) is given as per two separated problems with different growing conditions in Rd. The first problem is the homogeneous vt=Δvm which provides the following growing order in Rd:
v∼|x|2m−1,|x|>>1. | (3.5) |
The mentioned second problem is related with the forcing term solved independently to the diffusion:
vt=|x|σvq(1−v)≤|x|σvq,v≤|x|σ1−p. | (3.6) |
Any initial data v0(x)∈L1loc(Rd)∩L∞(Rd) shall be weighted with the exponent aσ to account for preliminary regular solutions.
As part of the strategy followed to show existence of solutions, firstly the following Lipschitz problem (P′) is analyzed:
vt=Δvm+flip(x,v)inQT=Rd×[0,T],v(x,0)=v0(x)≥0∈E0, | (3.7) |
where 0<T≤∞ and flip(x,v) is a Lipschitz function flip(v):[0,∞)→[0,∞) with constant L.
The following truncation is defined so that certain techniques in the spirit of [8,9,10] are applicable:
|x|σϵ=[|x|σwhen0≤|x|<ϵϵσwhen|x|≥ϵ]. | (3.8) |
Then, the following problem P′ϵ is defined accordingly:
vt=Δvm+|x|σϵf(v)≤Δvm+ϵσf(v)inQTϵ=Rd×[0,Tϵ],v(x,0)=v0(x)≥0∈E0. | (3.9) |
Based on the problem P′ϵ, the following existence theorem holds.
Theorem 3.2.1. For a given ϵ>0 and v0∈E0, there exists a unique vϵ in QTϵ (existing for each ϵ) continuous weak solution to the problem P′ϵ in a time interval (0,Tϵ).
Proof. Note that [9] has showed existence of solutions for the problem
vt=(vm)xx+λvq,λ>0,m>1,q∈R. | (3.10) |
In P′ϵ the truncated term |x|σϵ, bounded by ϵσ, plays the role of the parameter λ and the independent term is vq(1−v)∼vq in the proximity of zero where the non-Lipschitz condition imposes non-regularity. Thus, the aim is to prove the existence of solutions for the problem P′ϵ within the time interval (0,Tϵ) to be determined and considering the loss of regularity due to the non-Lipschitz codition. For this purpose, define the truncation in the initial data for v0∈E0 and n≥1 as:
v0n(x)={v0(x)when|x|≤n,v0(x)<n,nwhen|x|≤n,v0(x)≥n,0when|x|>n}. | (3.11) |
The problem P′ϵ with a Lipschitz forcing term and with bounded initial (3.11) has existence and uniqueness of solutions (Theorem 3.1 in [6]).
The intention is, now, to have a global bound for a subsolution (w) of P′ϵ so that a value for Tϵ is obtained. For this purpose, the following change is defined inspired in [9]:
x→x,t→τ=eϵσL(m−1)t−1ϵσL(m−1),v(x,t)→w(x,τ). | (3.12) |
Note that w is a subsolution given by an exponential decay:
vt=wττt=wτeϵσL(m−1)t,eϵσL(m−1)twτ=Δwm,wτ=e−ϵσL(m−1)tΔwm⏟Δum. | (3.13) |
The temporal evolution w is driven by the decaying exponential term. Given a particular value for Δvm, the evolution of the homogeneous v is given by vt=Δvm, while the evolution of w is:
wτ=e−ϵσL(m−1)tΔvm. | (3.14) |
Thus, for a T>>1, w is indeed a subsolution, i.e., wτ≤Δvm. Note that to recover the original solution for the non-linear diffusion (also called Porous Medium Equation or PME), it suffices to consider:
v(x,t)=eϵσL(m−1)tw(x,τ(t)). | (3.15) |
Having such exponential decrease rate in (3.14) allows the bound of w by an already known estimation [4]:
w(x,τ)≤cR2/(m−1)τ−α‖w(⋅,0)‖2α/dr, | (3.16) |
where,
α=dd(m−1)+2,|x|<R,1≤r≤R,0<τ=eϵσL(m−1)t−1ϵσL(m−1)≤c‖w(⋅,0)‖(1−m)r, | (3.17) |
and c∈R+.
Note that the intention is to determine the existence time Tϵ based on the bound estimation in (3.16).
From now on, consider the solution for the PME as vϵn(x,t). Indeed such solution is obtained for a given n in the truncation of the initial data and for a given ϵ in the truncation for the term |x|σ.
Based on the expression (3.16), the following estimation applies for vϵn(x,t) considering that for t sufficiently large:
v(x,t)∼eϵσLmtw(x,τ(t)), | (3.18) |
so that,
vϵn(x,t)≤cR2/(m−1)eLmϵσtτ−α‖vn(⋅,0)‖2α/dr, | (3.19) |
which can be re-written as:
vϵn(x,t)≤cR2/(m−1)eLmϵσt(eLϵσ(m−1)t−1Lϵσ(m−1))−α‖vn(⋅,0)‖2α/dr, | (3.20) |
where:
|x|<R,1≤r≤R,0<t≤Tr,ϵ. | (3.21) |
The time Tr,ϵ can be obtained operating the expression:
τ=eϵσL(m−1)t−1ϵσL(m−1)≤c‖vn(⋅,0)‖(1−m)r. | (3.22) |
And upon operation:
Tr,ϵ=1Lϵσ(m−1)log(1+cLϵσ(m−1)‖v0,n‖1−mr). | (3.23) |
For a given ϵ, consider the limit n→∞ to account for the whole initial data that is controlled by the norm ‖v0,n‖r. Thus:
0<t≤Tϵ=1Lϵσ(m−1)log(1+cLϵσ(m−1)‖v0‖1−m∗), | (3.24) |
where r→∞.
Finally, solutions exist for 0<t≤Tϵ as the problem is Lipschitz with spacial-bounded forcing term (3.8) and with initial data increasing rate controlled by the norm ‖v0‖∗ (see (3.3) together with the ‖⋅‖∗ definition).
Based on (3.24), two cases of existence shall be distinguished:
● ϵ→0⇒cLϵσ(m−1)‖v0‖1−m∗Lϵσ(m−1)=c‖v0‖1−m∗.
This case corresponds to a finite existence time given by the weighted norm in the initial data (3.3).
● ϵ→∞⇒log(cLϵσ(m−1)‖v0‖1−m∗)Lϵσ(m−1)→0.
This case does not provide information about the existence time due to the globally not bounded evolution of |x|σ. In this case, given |x|=ϵ, it is possible to ensure existence of solutions, as the expression (3.24) provides a finite value for Tϵ. Then and at least, there exists local solutions for finite values of |x| in the proximity of ϵ. Note that the fact of losing a existence criteria when ϵ→∞ can be considered as a condition in which blow-up may be given. The blow-up behaviour is characterized in Section. 3.3.2.
Consider the following non-Lipschitz problem, named as Pϵ:
vt=Δvm+|x|σϵvq(1−v)≤Δvm+|x|σϵvq≤Δvm+ϵσvq,QTϵ=Rd×[0,Tϵ],v(x,0)=v0(x),v0(x)≥0∈E0,q<1;m>1N≥1 | (3.25) |
The non-Lipschitz reaction term makes the problem non regular as it is not possible to show uniqueness for any value of v, particularly when v=0 or when v increases from zero to positivity. Our effort is, hence, focused on determining the existence and characterizing two particular solutions, the maximal and the minimal, so that any other solution exists between them.
Theorem 3.3.1. There exist one maximal solution (vM) to Pϵ and one minimal (vm) existing in [0,Tϵ] with Tϵ(ϵ,‖v0‖∗) such that any solution existing between them vm≤vϵ≤vM.
Proof. With the objective of applying Theorem 3.2.1, the following Lipschitz function is defined:
fδ(s)=[ϵσδ(q−1)sfor0≤s<δϵσsqfors≥δ], | (3.26) |
so that in the limit for δ→0, the original term vq(q<1) is recovered.
For building the maximal solution, consider the following problem PMϵ:
vt=Δvm+fδ(v)inQTϵ,δ=Rd×[0,Tϵ,δ],v(x,0)=v0(x)+νforx∈Rd,ν>0. | (3.27) |
ν is selected such that:
fδ(v0+ν)>f(v0), | (3.28) |
which gives:
ν>|f−1δf(v0)−v0|. | (3.29) |
The Lipschitz constant for the expression fδ(s) is:
ϵσ(sq1−sq2)≤ϵσL(s1−s2)≤ϵσδ(q−1)L(s1−s2). |
With q<1. Therefore the last inequality holds for |δ|<1. The Lipschitz constant is then ϵσLδ(q−1).
The problem PMϵ has a unique solution, in virtue of Theorem 3.2.1, existing for a time interval Tϵ,δ given by:
Tϵ,δ≥1Lδ(q−1)ϵσ(m−1)log(1+Lcδ(q−1)ϵσ(m−1)‖v0+ν‖1−m∗). | (3.30) |
The problem has, now, three different parameters: ϵ used to bound the forcing term, δ used to approximate the non-Lipschitz problem by a Lipschitz one and the paremeter ν that shall be chosen to ensure the maximality of vM.
For a given ϵ and δ→0 the non-Lipschitz problem is recovered. Then, it is possible to determine the following condition for the existence time:
Tϵ,δ→0≥0. | (3.31) |
Or explicitly with δ:
Tϵ,δ→0≥1Lϵσ(m−1)δ1−q. | (3.32) |
This condition means that the existence time is given in the proximity of any δ.
To recover the forcing term |x|σ, make ϵ→∞, while to recover the non-Lipschitz problem impose δ→0. To account for both effects simultaneously, consider:
ϵ=1δa,a>0. | (3.33) |
Previously and first of all, make δ→∞ and ϵ→0. In this case, the result obtained in the Lipschitz case (with σ>0) applies.
Tϵ,δ≥δ(1−q)δaσL(m−1)log(1+c1δ(1−q)δaσL(m−1)‖v0+ν‖1−m∗), | (3.34) |
Tϵ→0,δ→∞≥c‖v0+ν‖1−m∗, | (3.35) |
for any a>0.
Even when the value for Tϵ,δ has been obtained in the limit for ϵ→0, it can be applied for any positive ϵ and by extension for any local single point in x∈Rd as the function |x|σ∈L∞loc.
Nonetheless, to recover the original problem δ→0 and ϵ→∞. Operating with the term δ→0:
Tϵ,δ≥δ(1−q)δaσL(m−1)log(c1δ(1−q)δaσL(m−1)‖v0+ν‖1−m∗),Tϵ,δ≥0. | (3.36) |
Or explicitly with δ:
Tϵ,δ→0≥1L(m−1)δ1−q+aσ. | (3.37) |
for any a>0.
Given a value for δ small and other one for ϵ large, a value for Tϵ,δ is determined so that a maximal local solution exists.
For building the minimal solution, consider the following problem Pmϵ:
vt=Δvm+fδ(v)QTϵ,δ=Rd×[0,Tϵ,δ],v(x,0)=v0(x)forx∈Rd,δ>0. | (3.38) |
The problem Pmϵ has a unique solution (Theorem 3.2.1) existing for a time interval (0, Tϵ,δ). Any solution, vm,δ, to the problem Pmϵ is a subsolution to the problem Pϵ and to the original problem P. In the proximity of v null the non-Lipschitz reaction satisfies
fδ(v)≤ϵσvq(1−v)≤ϵσvq≤|x|σvq,vm,δ≤v. | (3.39) |
Given δ1>δ2, fδ1(v)<fδ2(v). For an arbitrary decreasing sequence of δ′s, vm,δ is a non-decreasing sequence that satisfies vm,δ≤v. Then, in the limit with δ→0:
vm=limδ→0vm,δ. | (3.40) |
Each vm,δ does exist (Theorem 3.2.1), therefore, vm is a minimal solution to the problem Pϵ and to the problem P as vm has been obtained under the change of the reaction original term vq(1−v) by a Lipschitz function from below fδ(v) in the proximity of v null.
A sharp estimation of each maximal and minimal solution, with a classification in accordance with the problem data, is done in the following section.
Admit quasi-null initial data: v0=0, a.e. in BR={|x−x0|<R}, such that the non-Lipschitz imposes non-uniqueness. An elementary minimal solution to P is vm=0 while a maximal solution, influenced by the reaction term, adopts the general form:
vMT=|x|σ1−q(1−q)11−q(t−T)11−q, | (3.41) |
T>0. To show this, consider:
vMT=|x|θA(t−T)α. | (3.42) |
Replacing into P in the proximity of null v such that vq(1−v)∼vq:
|x|θAα(t−T)α−1=mθ(mθ−1)|x|mθ−2Am(t−T)mα+|x|qθ+σAq(t−T)qα. | (3.43) |
With a predominant reaction:
θ=σ1−q,α=11−q,A=(1−q)11−q. | (3.44) |
vMT→0+=|x|σ1−q(1−q)11−q(t)1/(1−q). | (3.45) |
The reaction shall be relevant in the proximity of v=0. For this purpose, t→T→0+ so that qα<mα, in the right hand term of (3.43), i.e., q<m, which leads to recover the original data 0<q<m.
The local time evolution provides a positive and growing solution departing from the positive set supplementary to BR. The spatial term shall not contradict such evolution when the reaction predominates over the diffusion, then returning to (3.43):
qθ+σ>mθ−2→mσ+2(1−σ)q+σ<2, | (3.46) |
which shall be considered as a parameter condition to account for a maximal solution as expressed in (3.45). As a consequence of (3.46) the following behaviour is expected in accordance with the parameters data: If mσ+2(1−σ)q+σ≥2, the diffusion influences further compare to the reaction and finite speed of propagation shall be considered whenever the solution is null in a certain ball BR or in the proximity of |x|<<γ. Nontheless, if mσ+2(1−σ)q+σ<2, the reaction predominates, and the non-Lipschtiz condition provides non-uniqueness so that the obtained minimal and maximal solutions obtained apply.
The next intention is to provide a condition to distinguish between the existence of global in time solutions and the explosion in finite time. For this purpose, a critical exponent q∗ is proved to exist. If the solution blows-up, the invasive specie proliferates in the domain inducing pressure over the hostile region |x|<γ→0+.
Theorem 3.3.2. Consider the critical exponent 0≤q∗<1 defined as:
q∗=sign+(1−σ(m−1)2), | (3.47) |
For:
q>q∗, | (3.48) |
blow up or explosion in finite time exists, while for:
q≤q∗, | (3.49) |
a global solution exists.
Proof. Consider the self-similar profile:
G(x,t)=t−αf(|x|tβ),ξ=|x|tβ. | (3.50) |
With d=1 in the sake of simplicity. Upon substitution into P:
−αt−α−1f+β|x|tβ⏟ξt−α−1f′=t−αmt2βfmxx+ξσt−σβ−αqfq. | (3.51) |
Making the following equalities in (3.51):
−α−1=−αm+2β,αm−2β=αq+βσ. | (3.52) |
So that:
α=σ+2σ(m−1)+2(q−1),β=m−pσ(m−1)+2(q−1). | (3.53) |
As the time exponent in (3.50) is given by −α, the previous α expression in (3.53) shall be positive for the existence of finite time blow up, then:
σ(m−1)+2(q−1)>0, | (3.54) |
so that, the critical exponent is defined as:
q∗=sign+(1−σ(m−1)2), | (3.55) |
and blow up exists if q>q∗ while global solutions exists if q≤q∗.
Uniqueness of solutions leads to consider only positive initial data v0≥ϕ>0, so that the reaction term, R(x,v)=|x|σvq(1−v), is Lipschitz in the interval [ϕ,∞). The following lemma holds:
Theorem 3.3.3. Consider:
v0≥ϕ>0, | (3.56) |
such that the reaction term is Lipschitz with constant qϕ1−q, then uniqueness of solutions holds in QT=Rd×[0,T].
Proof. The non-linear diffusion term is associated to a degenerate diffusivity (D(v)=mvm−1). In case v→0, for example if ϕ→0, the degeneracy does not lead to positivity, and thus, solutions cannot be classical locally in time as v(x,t→0)→0. Then, uniqueness is shown for weak solutions defined in accordance with a test function ψ(x,t)∈C∞(QT). For this purpose, consider the existence of two solutions v1(x,t) and v2(x,t). By initial assumption, and without loss of generality, consider that v1≥v2. Both solutions have the same initial positive data:
v1(x,0)=v2(x,0)=v0(x)≥ϕ>0. | (3.57) |
A weak solutions is defined as:
∫Rdv1(t)ψ(t)dx=∫Rdv(0)ψ(0)dx+∫t0∫Rd[v1ψt+vm1Δψ+|x|σvq1(1−v1)ψ]dxds, | (3.58) |
∫Rdv2(t)ψ(t)dx=∫Rdv(0)ψ(0)dx+∫t0∫Rd[v2ψt+vm2Δψ+|x|σvq2(1−v2)ψ]dxds, | (3.59) |
and making the substraction:
∫Rd(v1−v2)(t)ψ(t)dx=∫t0∫Rs[(v1−v2)ψt+(vm1−vm2)Δψ+|x|σ(vq1(1−v1)−vq2(1−v2)ψ]dxds. | (3.60) |
Under the Lipschitz condition and v1≥v2:
(vq1(1−v1)−vq2(1−v2))≤|vq1−vq2|≤qϕ1−q|v1−v2|. | (3.61) |
Where the Lipschitz constant is obtained as Kl=qvq−1=q1v1−q≤qϕ1−q. Now:
(vm1−vm2)≤mvm−11|v1−v2|≤κm−1|v1−v2|. | (3.62) |
Where: κ=max(x,t)∈QT{v1}.
Consider the test function ψ(x,t)∈C∞(QT):
ψ(x,s)=e−ls(1+|x|2)γ, | (3.63) |
where γ is such that:
els∫Rd|x|σψ(x,s)dx<∞. | (3.64) |
Consider for simplicity and without loss of generality:
els∫Rd|x|σψ(x,s)dx=1. | (3.65) |
For this purpose, the mass shall be null when |x|→∞. This can be expressed considering that for R>>1:
∫|(|x|−R)|→∞|x|σψ(x,s)dx=0. | (3.66) |
In the asymptotic |x|→∞:
|x|−2γ|x|σ|x|d→0. | (3.67) |
Then:
−2γ+σ+d<0,γ>σ+d2>0. | (3.68) |
Define:
∫Rdψ(x,s)dx=e−ls∫Rd1(1+|x|2)γdx=e−lsΨ(x), | (3.69) |
where:
Ψ(x)=∫x→∞1(1+|β|2)γdβ. | (3.70) |
The integral (3.70) is finite in virtue of the condition for γ in (3.68).
In the same way:
∫RdΔψ(x,s)dx≤∫RdK1(γ)ψ(x,s)dx=K1(γ)e−lsΨ(x). | (3.71) |
Where K1(γ) is obtained as:
e−lsΔψ=e−lsγ(γ+1)4x21(1+|x|2)γ+2−2γ1(1+|x|2)γ+1≤e−lsγ(γ+1)4x21(1+|x|2)γ+2. | (3.72) |
In the limit with |x|→∞:
e−lsγ(γ+1)4x21(1+|x|2)γ+2∼e−lsγ(γ+1)4(1+|x|2)γ1|x|2≤e−lsγ(γ+1)4(1+|x|2)γ=γ(γ+1)4ψ(x). | (3.73) |
Then K1=γ(γ+1)4. Assessing each integral in (3.60):
∫t0∫Rd(v1−v2)ψtdxds=∫t0∫Rd−l(v1−v2)ψdxds=∫t0∫Rdl(v2−v1)ψdxds≤lsup|v2−v1|Ψ(x)∫t0e−lsds=lsup|v2−v1|Ψ(x)(1l)(1−e−lt). | (3.74) |
∫t0∫Rd(vm1−vm2)Δψdxds≤sup|v1−v2|∫t0κm−1K1(γ)∫Rdψ(x,s)dxds=sup|v1−v2|∫t0κm−1K1(γ)e−lsΨ(x)sup|v1−v2|κm−1K1(γ)(1−e−lt). | (3.75) |
∫t0∫Rd|x|σ(vq1(1−v1)−vq2(1−v2))ψ(x,s)dxds≤qϕ1−qsup|v1−v2|∫t0e−ls∫Rdels|x|σψ(x,s)dxds=qϕ1−qsup|v1−v2|(1−e−lt). | (3.76) |
After compilation in (3.60):
∫Rd(v1−v2)(t)ψ(t)dx≤sup|v2−v1|Ψ(x)(1−e−lt)+sup|v1−v2|κm−1K1(γ)(1−e−lt)+qϕ1−qsup|v1−v2|(1−e−lt). | (3.77) |
For a given t>0 such that sup|v1−v2|→0 and knowing that ϕ>0, |Ψ(x)|<∞:
∫Rd(v1−v2)(t)ψ(t)dx≤0→v1(t)≤v2(t). | (3.78) |
Initially, it was assumed u1(t)≥u2(t), the only compatible result is to consider:
v1(t)=v2(t), | (3.79) |
showing, then, the uniqueness of solutions.
Theorem 3.3.4. Let u and v be two solutions to the problem P in QT, such that 0<u0≤v0 in Rd and u0,v0∈E0, then the following comparison principle holds:
0<u≤vinQT | (3.80) |
Proof. Considering the definition of a weak solution with a test function ϕ(x,t)∈C∞(QT) and for 0≤τ<t<T:
∫Rdu(t)ϕ(t)dx=∫Rdu0(τ)ϕ(τ)dx+∫tτ∫Rd[(u)ϕt+(um)Δϕ+|x|σuq(1−u)ϕ]dxds. | (3.81) |
∫Rdv(t)ϕ(t)dx=∫Rdv0(τ)ϕ(τ)dx+∫tτ∫Rd[(v)ϕt+(vm)Δϕ+|x|σvq(1−v)ϕ]dxds, | (3.82) |
where u0(τ) and v0(τ) are the initial data time translation in τ.
After subtraction:
∫Rd(u−v)(t)ϕ(t)dx=∫Rd(u0−v0)(τ)ϕ(τ)dx+∫tτ∫Rd[(u−v)ϕt+(um−vm)Δϕ+|x|σ(uq(1−u)−vq(1−v))ϕ]dxds. | (3.83) |
Note that the functions uq,vq are positive by initial assumption.
The intention is to assess each of the integrals involved in (3.83), making use of the norm defined in (3.3) and using the same test function structure than in (3.63), but probably with a different exponent γ, namely:
ϕ(x,s)=e−ls(1+|x|2)γ. | (3.84) |
Then:
∫Rd(u0−v0)(τ)ϕ(τ)dx≤‖u0−v0‖∗⋅‖ϕ‖∗, | (3.85) |
where:
‖ϕ‖∗=limR→∞R−d−aσ∫Rd|ϕ(x)|dx∼|x|−d−aσ∫Rde−ls(1+|x|2)γdx. | (3.86) |
Assume |x|→∞ and γ selected as:
|x|−d−aσ∫Rd;|x|→∞dx(1+|x|2)γ=0. | (3.87) |
For this purpose:
|x|−d−aσ|x|−2γ|x|d=0, | (3.88) |
when |x|→∞.
This condition implies that:
−d−aσ−2γ+d<0, | (3.89) |
for which it suffices to consider:
γ>−aσ2, | (3.90) |
where aσ>0 as shown in (3.4).
With the intention of preserving the decreasing behaviour with |x| in (3.84), it is required γ>0, so that (3.90) is satisfied as well.
As the function ϕ(x) is monotone decreasing with |x|, the maximum value for ϕ corresponds to |x|=0, maxx∈Rdϕ(x,s)=e−ls. And returning to the integral (3.85):
∫Rd(u0−v0)(τ)ϕ(τ)dx≤‖u0−v0‖∗⋅‖ϕ‖∗=‖u0−v0‖∗limR→∞R−d−aσ∫Rd|ϕ(x)|dx≤‖u0−v0‖∗limR→∞R−d−aσmax|ϕ(x)|Rd=‖u0−v0‖∗e−lτlimR→∞R−aσ, | (3.91) |
where aσ>0.
Assessing the rest of the integrals involved on (3.83):
∫tτ∫Rd[(u−v)ϕtdxds=∫tτ∫Rd(u−v)(−l)ϕ≤∫tτ|−l|‖u−v‖∗⋅‖ϕ‖∗ds≤‖u−v‖∗(e−lτ−e−lt)limR→∞R−aσ. | (3.92) |
The assessment in the integral associated to the diffusion term is based on (3.75):
∫tτ∫Rd(um−vm)Δϕ≤∫tτκm−1‖u−v‖∗K1(γ)‖ϕ‖∗ds≤∫tτκm−1‖u−v‖∗K1(γ)e−lsdslimR→∞R−aσ=κm−1‖u−v‖∗K1(γ)1l(e−lτ−e−lt)limR→∞R−aσ. | (3.93) |
Before proceeding with the reaction term integral, the following shall be considered:
∫Rd|x|σϕ(x)dx≤‖ϕ‖∗∫Rd|x|σdx=limR→∞R−d−aσ∫Rd|ϕ(x)|dx∫Rd|x|σdx∼limR→∞R−d−aσe−ls∫Rd|x|−2γdx∫Rd|x|σdx∼e−ls1σ+11(−2γ+1)limR→∞R−d−aσR−2γ+1Rσ+1. | (3.94) |
Therefore, γ needs to satisfy the following inequality for convergence:
−d−aσ+σ+2−2γ<0, | (3.95) |
so that,
γ>−d−aσ+σ+22. | (3.96) |
Aiming a single value of γ and considering (3.90), (3.96):
γ>max{−d−aσ+σ+22,−aσ2,0}. | (3.97) |
The assessment in the reaction terms leads to (with Kl the Lipschitz constant (3.61)):
∫tτ∫Rd(uq(1−u)−vq(1−v))ϕdxds≤Kl∫tτ‖u−v‖∗∫Rd|x|σϕds≤Kl‖u−v‖∗1σ+11(−2γ+1)limR→∞R−d−aσR−2γ+1Rσ+1∫tτe−lsds≤Kl‖u−v‖∗1l1σ+11|−2γ+1|limR→∞R−d−aσR−2γ+1Rσ+1(e−lτ−e−lt). | (3.98) |
Finally, and after compilation:
∫Rd(u−v)(t)ϕ(t)dx≤‖u0−v0‖∗e−lτlimR→∞R−aσ+‖u−v‖∗(e−lτ−e−lt)limR→∞R−aσ+κm−1‖u−v‖∗K1(γ)1l(e−lτ−e−lt)limR→∞R−aσ+Kl‖u−v‖∗1l1σ+11|−2γ+1|limR→∞R−d−aσR−2γ+1Rσ+1(e−lτ−e−lt). | (3.99) |
Note that limR→∞R−aσ=0 and limR→∞R−d−aσR−2γ+1Rσ+1=0. Where γ is as per expression (3.97).
In terms of the time variable with τ→∞ and knowing that τ→∞<s<t, then s,t→∞. Under this condition in the time variables:
∫Rd(u−v)(t)ϕ(t)dx≤0→u(t)≤v(t),t→∞. | (3.100) |
Given a solution with positive initial data, the solution is unique (see Theorem 3.3.3). The ordered properties expressed at the initial conditions are preserved upon evolution with t→∞ (3.100), hence for any finite time u(t)≤v(t),t>0,inQT
The TW profiles are expressed as v(x,t)=f(ξ),ξ=x⋅nd−at∈R, where nd is a unitary vector in Rd that defines the TW-propagation direction. a is the TW-speed and f:R→(0,∞) belongs to L∞(Rd). Note that two TW are equivalent under translation ξ→ξ+ξ0 and symmetry ξ→−ξ. For the sake of simplicity, the vector nd is nd=(1,0,...,0), then v(x,t)=f(ξ),ξ=x−at∈R.
Consider v(x,t)=f(ξ), then the problem P (2.1) in the TW domain:
−af′=(fm)′+|ξ+at|σfq(1−f),f∈L∞(R),f′(ξ)>0,f(∞)=1. | (4.1) |
Working with the density and flux variables
X=f,Y=−(fm)′, | (4.2) |
the following system holds:
X′=1mX1−mY,Y′=amX1−mY+|ξ+at|σXq(1−X), | (4.3) |
with the critical point (1,0) that represents a situation in which the invasive reaches the maximum concentration at v=f=X=1 in the given domain. The analysis of the TW features in the proximity of the critical point permits to ennunciate:
Lemma 1. The critical point (1,0) is a degenerate node with:
● One null eigenvalue,
● One real eigenvalue related to the TW speed a.
Proof. In the proximity of the critical point, the system (4.3) is rewritten in the compact form:
(X′Y′)=(01m0am)(XY), | (4.4) |
with eigenvalues (0,am). This shows the existence of monotone stable TW solutions. The null eigenvalue corresponds to the equilibrium solution X=1,Y=0.
Based on the computation of the associated monotone eigenvectors, it is possible to obtain the following leading front behaviour in the proximity of the critical point:
X=c1−c2eamξ,c1>0,c2>0. | (4.5) |
or equivalently ξ→−ξ which shows the regularity towards convergence in the TW solutions approaching the critical point.
The geometric perturbation theory permits to show the asymptotic evolution of a hyperbolic manifold defined to determine a TW profile. For this purpose, consider the manifold:
M0={X,Y/X′=1mX1−mY;Y′=amX1−mY+|ξ+at|σXq(1−X)}, | (4.6) |
so that the stationary condition (1,0) holds.
The perturbed manifold Mϵ close to M0 is defined as:
Mϵ={X∼1,Y/X′=1mY;Y′=amY}. | (4.7) |
The intention is to use the Fenichel invariant manifold theorem [13] as formulated in [2] and [17]. Then, the manifold Mϵ shall be proved to be a normally hyperbolic manifold, i.e., the eigenvalues of Mϵ close to the critical point, and transversal to the tangent space shall have non-zero real part. This is shown based on the following system for Mϵ:
(X′Y′)=(01m0am)(XY), | (4.8) |
with eigenvalues (0,a/m). For λ=0, the eigenvector is [1,0] tangent to Mϵ. Therefore, Mϵ is a hyperbolic manifold. The next intention is to show that the manifold Mϵ is locally invariant under the flow given by the set of equations (4.3). For this purpose, it is required [17] that for all R>0, for all open interval J with a∈J and for any value of i∈N, there exists a δ such that for ϵ∈(0,δ) the manifold Mϵ is invariant. Hence, consider i≥1 and the functions:
ϕM01=1mX1−mY,ϕM02=amX1−mY+|ξ+at|σXq(1−X),ϕMϵ1=1mY,ϕMϵ2=amY, | (4.9) |
which are Ci(¯BR(0)ׯI×[0,δ]) in the proximity of the critical point (1,0).
A value for R>0 can be chosen considering that Mϵ∩BR(0) is large enough so as to study the complete TW evolution along the domain. The determination of δ is based on assessing the distance between the flows in M0 and Mϵ. For this purpose, assume that the involved functions in such flows are measurable a.e. in BR(0):
‖ϕM01−ϕMϵ1‖≤1m‖Y‖‖X1−m−1‖≤δ1‖X1−m−1‖, | (4.10) |
In addition,
‖ϕM02−ϕMϵ2‖≤am‖Y‖‖X1−m−1‖+|ξ+at|σ|Xq|(1−X)≤δ2‖X1−m−1‖, | (4.11) |
which keeps the normal hyperbolic condition for X↗1 for δ=max{δ1,δ2}∈(0,∞).
Once Mϵ has been shown to remain invariant with regards to the M0 under the flow (4.3), the TW profiles can be obtained operating in Mϵ.
Based on the normal hyperbolic condition of Mϵ under the flow (4.3), asymptotic TW profiles are obtained:
Y′=amY→(fm)′′=am(fm)′ | (5.1) |
The last equation can be solved with standard methods:
(fm)′−am(fm)=K, | (5.2) |
where K can be solved in the stationary f=1, so that K=1−am. Hence:
f(ξ)=(1−mmξ+‖v0‖1−m)1m−1+B, | (5.3) |
where B=(1−ma)1m and the norm in v0 is defined as per (3.2). The positivity evolution for f permits to conclude on some regularity results in the quasilinear parabolic operator (see Section 3). Nonetheless, whenever:
f→ϵ→0+inBTR=BR(x0.R)×[T−ϵ,T+ϵ], | (5.4) |
for T>0, the non-linear diffusion elucidates the existence of a finite propagation speed. Cases of f→ϵ→0+ may happen for null initial conditions or in the borders of the hostile zone. The characterization of such finite propagation speed is the purpose of the following theorem:
Theorem 5.0.1. There exists finite propagation speed when
v→ϵ→0+inBTR=BR(x0.R)×[T−ϵ,T+ϵ], | (5.5) |
T>>1, where finite propagation refers to the existence of a positive convergent tail approaching the null solution.
Proof. Consider the pressure variable w:
w=mm−1vm−1, | (5.6) |
so that the equation v in P reads:
wt=(m−1)wΔw+|∇w|2+μ|x|σwδ, | (5.7) |
where δ=q+m−2m−1 and μ=m(m−1m)δ. Note that w→0 then:
wt∼|∇w|2+μ|x|σwδ. | (5.8) |
A solution to a similar equation has been provided in [8]. For this purpose, define the following solution:
W(x,t)=a(bt+r−1n)+,r=|x|,n∈N, | (5.9) |
where each of the coefficients shall be assessed to ensure W is a maximal solution. The determination of each of the constant involved follows a similar approach to that in [11] but with the required modification. For 0≤τ≤1, impose bτ=12n. Under this condition:
W(x,t)≡0 forr<12nand0≤t≤τ. | (5.10) |
Any solution to the equation (5.8) is bounded when 0<v<1, then:
v(x,t)≤K1<1forx∈Rd,0≤t≤τandK1(p,‖u0‖∞). | (5.11) |
W(x,t) is required to be a maximal solution:
W(x,t)≥v(x,t), | (5.12) |
then
a(bt+r−1n)+≥K1. | (5.13) |
For r>1n, consider r=2n and for t=0:
a(2n−1n)+≥K1,a≥nK1. | (5.14) |
Note that:
W(x,t)≥v(x,t), | (5.15) |
in r=2n and 0≤t≤τ. A condition for b is obtained considering that W(x,t) is a supersolution in 0<r<2n,0≤t≤τ:
Wt≥m−1m|∇W|2+c⋅∇W1m−1. | (5.16) |
In addition:
Wt=ab;Wr=a, | (5.17) |
then:
b≥m−1ma+c1m−1 | (5.18) |
For the values of a and b in expressions (5.14) and (5.18) respectively, the function W(x,t) is a supersolution locally:
W(x,t)≥w(x,t), 0<|x|<2n,0≤t≤τ. | (5.19) |
The inequality (5.19) reflects the null condition of W in BTR, then, any minimal solution w(x,t) satisfies such null condition and, hence, it exhibits finite propagation in BTR.
The expression (5.3) provides the characteristic profile in relation with the diffusion front (note the parameter m). The invasive TW profile follows a potential law ∼ξ1m−1(m>1) in the convergence to the stationary condition as a result of the invasive proliferation. Such potential law reflects the behaviour of the invasive in the proximity of the hostile zone ξ→0+ where the derivative is not bounded. The invasive pressure increases in the hostile zone, nonetheless the finite propagation feature in the border of such hostile area due to the non-linear diffusion slows down the invasive pressure and preserves the hostile area.
The proposed problem P (2.1) has been discussed stressing existence, uniqueness, comparison of solutions and Travelling Waves supported by the Geometric Perturbation Theory. In addition, the finite speed of propagation, induced by the porous medium diffusion, has been shown and a characterization of such property has been explored. The potential law in the TW profile suggests that the pressure induced by the invasive over the hostile area increases along the evolution. Nonetheless, the finite speed induced by the non-linear diffusion avoids a violent invasion of the specie in such hostile zone.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
[1] |
J. Ahn, C. Yoon, Global well-posedness and stability of constant equilibria in parabolic–elliptic chemotaxis system without gradient sensing, Nonlinearity, 32 (2019), 1327–1351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/aaf513 doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/aaf513
![]() |
[2] |
M. E. Akveld, J. Hulshof, Travelling wave solutions of a fourth-order semilinear diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 11 (1998), 115–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00042-1 doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00042-1
![]() |
[3] |
R. Banani, K. R. Sankar, M. H. A. Biswas, Effects on prey–predator with different functional responses, Int. J. Biomath., 10 (2017), 1750113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793524517501133 doi: 10.1142/S1793524517501133
![]() |
[4] |
P. Bénilan, M. G. Crandall, M. Pierre, Solutions of the porous medium equation in RN under optimal conditions on inital values, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 33 (1984), 51–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1984.33.33003 doi: 10.1512/iumj.1984.33.33003
![]() |
[5] |
M. Bhatti, A. Zeeshan, R. Ellahi, O. A. Bég, A. Kadir, Effects of coagulation on the two-phase peristaltic pumping of magnetized prandtl biofluid through an endoscopic annular geometry containing a porous medium, Chin. J. Phys., 58 (2019), 222–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2019.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2019.02.004
![]() |
[6] | H. Brézis, M. G. Crandall, Uniqueness of solution of the initial value problem for ut−Δϕ(u)=0, J. Math. Pures Appl., 58 (1979), 153–163. |
[7] |
E. Cho, Y. J. Kim, Starvation driven diffusion as a survival strategy of biological organisms, Bull. Math. Biol., 75 (2013), 845–870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-013-9838-1 doi: 10.1007/s11538-013-9838-1
![]() |
[8] | A. De Pablo, Estudio de una ecuación de reacción-difusión, Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 1989. |
[9] |
A. De Pablo, J. L. Vázquez, Travelling waves and finite propagation in a reaction-diffusion Equation, J. Differ. Equations, 93 (1991), 19–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(91)90021-Z doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(91)90021-Z
![]() |
[10] |
A. De Pablo, J. L. Vázquez, The balance between strong reaction and slow diffusion, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 15 (1990), 159–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605309908820682 doi: 10.1080/03605309908820682
![]() |
[11] |
J. L. Díaz, Invasive-invaded system of non-Lipschitz porous medium equations with advection, Int. J. Biomath. 14 (2021), 2150061. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524521500613 doi: 10.1142/S1793524521500613
![]() |
[12] |
R. Ellahi, F. Hussain, F. Ishtiaq, A. Hussain, Peristaltic transport of Jeffrey fluid in a rectangular duct through a porous medium under the effect of partial slip: An application to upgrade industrial sieves/filters, Pramana-J. Phys., 93 (2019), 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12043-019-1781-8 doi: 10.1007/s12043-019-1781-8
![]() |
[13] |
N. Fenichel, Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 21 (1972), 193–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1972.21.21017 doi: 10.1512/iumj.1972.21.21017
![]() |
[14] |
K. E. Harley, P. Van Heijster, R. Marangell, G. J. Pettet, T. V. Roberts, M. Wechselberger, (In)stability of travelling waves in a model of haptotaxis, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 80 (2020), 1629–1653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/19M1259705 doi: 10.1137/19M1259705
![]() |
[15] | L. Haiyin, Hopf bifurcation of delayed density-dependent predator-prey model, Acta Math. Sci. Series A, 39 (2019), 358–371. |
[16] |
C. Huang, H. Zhang, J. Cao, H. Hu, Stability and Hopf bifurcation of a delayed prey–predator model with disease in the predator, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 29 (2019), 1950091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218127419500913 doi: 10.1142/S0218127419500913
![]() |
[17] | C. K. R. T. Jones, Geometric singular perturbation theory, In: Dynamical systems, Berlín: Springer-Verlag, 1995, 44–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095239 |
[18] |
E. F. Keller, L. A. Segel, Traveling bands of chemotactic bacteria: a theoretical analysis, J. Theor. Biol., 30 (1971), 235–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90051-8 doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90051-8
![]() |
[19] | C. Perrings, H. Mooney, M. Williamson, The problem of biological invasions, Oxford Scholarship, 2010. |
[20] |
S. Pal, S. K. Sasmal, N. Pal, Chaos control in a discrete-time predator–prey model with weak Allee effect, Int. J. Biomath., 11 (2018), 1850089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793524518500894 doi: 10.1142/S1793524518500894
![]() |
[21] |
A. J. Perumpanani, J. A. Sherratt, J. Norbury, H. M. Byrne, A two parameter family of travelling waves with a singular barrier arising from the modelling of extracellular matrix mediated cellular invasion, Physica D, 126 (1999), 145–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00272-3 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00272-3
![]() |
[22] |
X. Ren, T. Zhang, X. Liu, Invasion waves for a diffusive predator–prey model with two preys and one predator, Int. J. Biomath., 13 (2020).2050081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793524520500813 doi: 10.1142/S1793524520500813
![]() |
[23] |
Y. Tao, M. Winkler, Effects of signal-dependent motilities in a keller–segel-type reactiondiffusion system, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 27 (2017), 1645–1683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218202517500282 doi: 10.1142/S0218202517500282
![]() |
[24] |
J. Wang, Z. Yu, Y. Meng, Existence and stability of invasion traveling waves for a competition system with random vs. nonlocal dispersals, Int. J. Biomath., 12 (2019), 1950004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793524519500049 doi: 10.1142/S1793524519500049
![]() |
[25] |
H. Xue, J. Huang, Z. Yu, Existence and asymptotic behavior of invasion wave solutions in temporally discrete diffusion systems with delays, Int. J. Biomath., 11 (2018), 1850016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S179352451850016X doi: 10.1142/S179352451850016X
![]() |
[26] |
C. Yoon, Y. J. Kim, Global existence and aggregation in a Keller–Segel model with Fokker-Planck diffusion, Acta Appl. Math., 149 (2016), 101–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10440-016-0089-7 doi: 10.1007/s10440-016-0089-7
![]() |
[27] |
L. Zu, D. Jiang, D. O'Regan, Periodic solution for a stochastic non-autonomous predator-prey model with Holling II functional response, Acta Appl. Math., 161 (2019), 89–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10440-018-0205-y doi: 10.1007/s10440-018-0205-y
![]() |
1. | William E. Fitzgibbon, Jeff Morgan, John Ryan, Global Existence for Reaction-Diffusion Systems on Multiple Domains, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 335, 10.3390/axioms11070335 | |
2. | Haiqin Zhao, Xue Li, Pulsating traveling fronts of a discrete periodic system with a quiescent stage, 2025, 18, 1793-5245, 10.1142/S1793524523500997 |