
This paper examines our understanding of climate change, as well as the reluctance of industrial societies to deal with the drivers, especially the burning of the fossil fuels, before the future consequences become catastrophic. We describe how the energy balance of the Earth, oceans, land and Arctic sea ice are maintained, and how climate is warming and changing with increases in the three most important greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, water vapor from evaporation off a warmer ocean, and methane from several sources. We discuss the Earth's water cycle and the role of evaporation, latent heat and condensation in driving storms, transporting energy poleward and giving increasing precipitation extremes, floods, droughts and fires. We review the increasing challenge of meeting human demand for water as water tables are falling globally from increased pumping, and winter snowpack storage is shrinking. We discuss rising sea level, the challenges of long-term carbon storage and the lessons from the past four ice age cycles. The text is written for scientific and public audiences, both global and in the US, so metric and US units are given. The social, moral and ethical choices are mapped by contrasting the Earth-centered indigenous worldview needed for our survival with the industrial mindset that is willing to destroy a stable climate to keep the profits of the current economy growing. We review the long history of the misuse of human power, the rise of science and technology without a guiding moral framework, and how neoliberal capitalism by default makes choices that are driving rapid climate change. We outline how deceit by the matrix of corporations and fossil fuel interests that we call the Fossil Empire has prevented government regulation for decades and accelerated the climate crisis.
Citation: Alan K Betts. Climate change and society[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2021, 7(2): 194-218. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2021012
[1] | Nhung Thi-Tuyet Hoang, Anh Thi-Kim Tran, Nguyen Van Suc, The-Vinh Nguyen . Antibacterial activities of gel-derived Ag-TiO2-SiO2 nanomaterials under different light irradiation. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 339-348. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.339 |
[2] | Miguel García-Tecedor, Félix del Prado, Carlos Bueno, G. Cristian Vásquez, Javier Bartolomé, David Maestre, Tomás Díaz, Ana Cremades, Javier Piqueras . Tubular micro- and nanostructures of TCO materials grown by a vapor-solid method. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 434-447. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.434 |
[3] | Ahmed Al-Ramthan, Ruaa Al Mezrakchi . Investigation of cementitious composites reinforced with metallic nanomaterials, boric acid, and lime for infrastructure enhancement. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(3): 495-514. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024025 |
[4] | Ahmed Z. Abdullah, Adawiya J. Haider, Allaa A. Jabbar . Pure TiO2/PSi and TiO2@Ag/PSi structures as controllable sensor for toxic gases. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 522-533. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022031 |
[5] | Iryna Markevich, Tetyana Stara, Larysa Khomenkova, Volodymyr Kushnirenko, Lyudmyla Borkovska . Photoluminescence engineering in polycrystalline ZnO and ZnO-based compounds. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 508-524. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.508 |
[6] | Anita Haeussler, Stéphane Abanades, Julien Jouannaux, Martin Drobek, André Ayral, Anne Julbe . Recent progress on ceria doping and shaping strategies for solar thermochemical water and CO2 splitting cycles. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(5): 657-684. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.5.657 |
[7] | Akira Nishimura, Ryuki Toyoda, Daichi Tatematsu, Masafumi Hirota, Akira Koshio, Fumio Kokai, Eric Hu . Optimum reductants ratio for CO2 reduction by overlapped Cu/TiO2. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(2): 214-233. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.2.214 |
[8] | Akira Nishimura, Tadaki Inoue, Yoshito Sakakibara, Masafumi Hirota, Akira Koshio, Fumio Kokai, Eric Hu . Optimum molar ratio of H2 and H2O to reduce CO2 using Pd/TiO2. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(4): 464-483. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.4.464 |
[9] | Pham Van Viet, Le Van Hieu, Cao Minh Thi . The directed preparation of TiO2 nanotubes film on FTO substrate via hydrothermal method for gas sensing application. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(2): 460-469. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.460 |
[10] | Khang Duy Vu Nguyen, Khoa Dang Nguyen Vo . Magnetite nanoparticles-TiO2 nanoparticles-graphene oxide nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic degradation for Rhodamine-B dye. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(3): 288-301. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.3.288 |
This paper examines our understanding of climate change, as well as the reluctance of industrial societies to deal with the drivers, especially the burning of the fossil fuels, before the future consequences become catastrophic. We describe how the energy balance of the Earth, oceans, land and Arctic sea ice are maintained, and how climate is warming and changing with increases in the three most important greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, water vapor from evaporation off a warmer ocean, and methane from several sources. We discuss the Earth's water cycle and the role of evaporation, latent heat and condensation in driving storms, transporting energy poleward and giving increasing precipitation extremes, floods, droughts and fires. We review the increasing challenge of meeting human demand for water as water tables are falling globally from increased pumping, and winter snowpack storage is shrinking. We discuss rising sea level, the challenges of long-term carbon storage and the lessons from the past four ice age cycles. The text is written for scientific and public audiences, both global and in the US, so metric and US units are given. The social, moral and ethical choices are mapped by contrasting the Earth-centered indigenous worldview needed for our survival with the industrial mindset that is willing to destroy a stable climate to keep the profits of the current economy growing. We review the long history of the misuse of human power, the rise of science and technology without a guiding moral framework, and how neoliberal capitalism by default makes choices that are driving rapid climate change. We outline how deceit by the matrix of corporations and fossil fuel interests that we call the Fossil Empire has prevented government regulation for decades and accelerated the climate crisis.
Integrable systems have been studied for over 50 years in which there is an increasing interest in acquiring the nonlocal systems of integrable equations and analyzing their solutions and properties. The pioneering work for the nonlocal integrable system has been done by Ablowitz and Musslimani [1] when they investigated the nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨odinger (NLS) equation through inverse scattering transform. It should be noted that the NLS equation is parity-time-symmetric (PT-symmetry), which has become an interesting topic in quantum mechanics [2], optics [3,4,5,6] and Bose-Einstein condensates [7,8], etc. The nonlocal integrable systems are of important significance in the theoretical study of mathematical physics and applications in the fields of nonlinear science [9]. In the past few years, this research field started to attract a lot of attention [10,11,12,13,14]. For instance, Xu and Chow [15] derived the breathers and rogue waves solutions of a third order nonlocal partial differential equation by bilinear transformation. Lou [16] derived multi-place nonlocal integrable systems, especially for the two-place and four-place nonlocal NLS equations and Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) equations. Chen et al. [17] collected the nonlocal NLS hierarchy, nonlocal modified Korteweg-de Vries (mKdV) hierarchy and nonlocal versions of the sine-Gordon equation in nonpotential form. Rao et al. [18,19] showed the PT-symmetric nonlocal Davey-Stewartson I equation by using the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili hierarchy reduction method. Yu and Fan [20] studied the coupled nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨odinger equations with the self-induced PT-symmetric potential using the Hirota bilinear method.
The KdV equation [21,22,23] and the mKdV equation [24] describe the evolution of small amplitude and weakly dispersive waves which occur in the shallow water. The complex mKdV equation is the next member of the nonlinear Schr¨odinger hierarchy, which possesses all the basic characters of integrable models. In physical application, the nonlocal mKdV possesses the shifted parity and/or delayed time reversal symmetry, and thus it could be related to the Alice-Bob system [25]. For instance, a special solution of the nonlocal mKdV was applied to theoretically capture the salient features of two correlated dipole blocking events in atmospheric and oceanic dynamical systems [26]. Since the nonlocal NLS was found, the nonlocal mKdV equation has attracted much attention. Ablowitz and Musslimani analyzed Lax pairs, conservation laws, inverse scattering transform and obtained one-soliton solutions of many nonlocal nonlinear integrable equations, such as nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨odinger equation, cmKdV and mKdV equtions, sine-Gordon equation and so on [27,28]. B. Yang and J. K. Yang [29] proposed variable transformations between nonlocal and local integrable equations and derived new integrable equations. By constructing the DT for nonlocal complex mKdV equation, Ma, Shen and Zhu [30] derived dark soliton, W-type soliton, M-type soliton and periodic solutions. Li et al.[31] derived single soliton solution and two soliton solution using Hirota bilinear method for reverse space nonlocal cmKdV equation. G¨urses and Pekcan [32] studied the nonlocal mKdV equations obtained from AKNS scheme by Ablowitz-Musslimani type nonlocal reductions, and found soliton solutions of the coupled mKdV system by using the Hirota bilinear method. He, Fan and Xu formulated the Riemann-Hilbert problem associated with the Cauchy problem of the nonlocal mKdV equation and applied the Deift-Zhou nonlinear steepest-descent method analyzed the long-time asymptotics for the solution of the nonlocal mKdV equation [33]. Both focusing and defocusing nonlocal (reverse-space-time) mKdV equations were studied by using inverse scattering transform in [34]. The soliton solutions of nonlocal mKdV equations are derived though inverse scattering transform in[35,36,37,38]. However, there has been still not much work on the Hirota bilinear method to three types of the nonlocal cmKdV equations. Hirota bilinear method is an important and direct method to solve integrable equations. The advantage of the Hirota bilinear method [39,40] is an algebraic rather than analytical method, and it has been successfully applied to solve a large number of soliton equations.
Based on the above mentioned works, we can structure reverse space cmKdV equation, reverse time cmKdV equation and reverse space-time cmKdV equation form classical cmKdV equation. Local cmKdV equation is given by
ut(x,t)+uxxx(x,t)−6σu(x,t)u∗(x,t)ux(x,t)=0, | (1.1) |
where u(x,t) is a complex function and u∗(x,t) is its complex conjugation, σ=±1 denote the defocusing and focusing cases.
Here we make three different variable transformations:
a) x=−iˆx,t=−ˆt,u(x,t)=iˆu(ˆx,ˆt), | (1.2) |
b) x=ˆx,t=iˆt,u(x,t)=iˆu(ˆx,ˆt), | (1.3) |
c) x=−iˆx,t=iˆt,u(x,t)=iˆu(ˆx,ˆt). | (1.4) |
Then we put ˆx→x, ˆt→t, ˆu→u. Through these transformations, local cmKdV equation transforms into reverse space cmKdV equation, reverse time cmKdV equation and reverse space-time cmKdV equation:
ut(x,t)+iuxxx(x,t)+6iσu(x,t)u∗(−x,t)ux(x,t)=0, | (1.5) |
ut(x,t)+iuxxx(x,t)−6iσu(x,t)u∗(x,−t)ux(x,t)=0, | (1.6) |
ut(x,t)+uxxx(x,t)+6σu(x,t)u∗(−x,−t)ux(x,t)=0. | (1.7) |
These nonlocal equations are obviously different from local equations for their space and/or time coupling, which could induce new physical phenomena and thus inspire novel physical applications.
The main purpose of this work is to search for the integrability of three types nonlocal cmKdV Eqs (1.5)–(1.7) and find their soliton solutions by the Hirota bilinear method. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. We study one-soliton solution and two-soliton solution of the nonlocal mKdV equations of all types by using the improved Hirota bilinear method, and provide some figures to describe the defocusing case and focusing case of nonlocal cmKdV equations. Then we analyse the difference of nonlinear wave structure of three types equations. Moreover, by applying the transformation relationship between local and nonlocal equations, we obtain the Lax pair of nonlocal equations. Some conclusions are given in the last section.
The reverse space cmKdV equation is given by
ut(x,t)+iuxxx(x,t)+6iσu(x,t)u∗(−x,t)ux(x,t)=0, | (2.1) |
where u=u(x,t) is a complex-valued function of x and t, the ∗ denotes complex conjugation.
We first present the dependent variable transformations in order to take an Hirota bilinear method [31] to Eq (2.1). The transformations are
u(x,t)=G(x,t)F(x,t), u∗(−x,t)=G∗(−x,t)F∗(−x,t), | (2.2) |
where the G(x,t) and G∗(−x,t) are complex functions, the F(x,t) and F∗(−x,t) are also in general complex functions, and all of them are distinct.
We substitute the transformations Eq (2.2) into Eq (2.1) and introduce bilinear operators of the functions F and G. We get a novel equation as follows
1F2(Dt+iD3x)G⋅F+(GxF−GFx)[6iσGG∗F3F∗−3iF4D2xF⋅F]=0, | (2.3) |
it can be decoupled into the following system of bilinear equations for the functions F and G,
(Dt+iD3x)G⋅F=0, | (2.4) |
D2xF⋅F=2σSF, | (2.5) |
SF∗=GG∗, | (2.6) |
the Dx and Dt are defined as
DmxDnt(G⋅F)=(∂∂x−∂∂x1)m(∂∂t−∂∂t1)nG(x,t)F(x1,t1)|(x=x1,t=t1). | (2.7) |
Solving the above series of bilinear Eqs (2.4)–(2.6), and coupling with Eq (2.2), we can get some soliton solutions. In this section, we expand the unknown functions G(x,t), G∗(−x,t), F(x,t) and F∗(−x,t) in terms of a small parameter ϵ
G(x,t)=ϵG1+ϵ3G3+...,G∗(−x,t)=ϵG∗1+ϵ3G∗3+...,F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2+ϵ4F4+...,F∗(−x,t)=1+ϵ2F∗2+ϵ4F∗4+..., | (2.8) |
where the G1, G3, F2, F4 are functions with spatial variable x and temporal variable t, and the fuctions G∗1, G∗3, F∗2, F∗4 have variables −x and t. Substituting the above expansions into Eqs (2.4)–(2.6), and comparing the coefficients of ϵ, we obtain the unknown functions G(x,t), G∗(−x,t), F(x,t) and F∗(−x,t) by selecting the appropriate functions G1, G∗1, F2, F∗2, G3, G∗3, F4, F∗4, etc.
Now we want to find one-soliton of Eq (2.1). First of all, we take the following expansions of the functions G, G∗, F and F∗:
G(x,t)=ϵG1,G∗(−x,t)=ϵG∗1,F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2,F∗(−x,t)=1+ϵ2F∗2. | (2.9) |
Substituting the above expansions of Eq (2.9) into the bilinear Eqs (2.4)–(2.6), and comparing the coefficients of same powers of ϵ to zero, we obtain a set of equations
G1t+iG1xxx=0, | (2.10) |
F2xx=σG1G∗1, | (2.11) |
where G1, G∗1, F2 and F∗2 are given rise to as follows
G1=eη1,G∗1=eη∗1,F2=A1eη1+η∗1,F∗2=A∗1eη1+η∗1, | (2.12) |
where η1=k1x−ω1t+η10, η∗1=−k∗1x−ω∗1t+η∗10, and k1, k∗1, A1, A∗1 are arbitrary complex constants.
From Eqs (2.10) and (2.11), we know the relation about ω1, k1 and A1 as follows
ω1=ik31, | (2.13) |
A1=σ(k1−k∗1)2. | (2.14) |
Since the ω∗1 is the complex conjugate of ω1, so
ω∗1=−ik∗31. | (2.15) |
In the same way, we obtain
A∗1=σ(k1−k∗1)2. | (2.16) |
Then, the general nonlocal one-soliton solution of the reverse space cmKdV Eq (2.1) is
u(x,t)=eη11+A1eη1+η∗1. | (2.17) |
According to the bilinear form of parity transformed complex conjugate equation, the parity transformed complex conjugate field is derived in the form
u∗(−x,t)=eη∗11+A∗1eη1+η∗1. | (2.18) |
Here we provide some figures to describe the nonlocal single soliton solutions Eqs (2.17) and (2.18)(see Figure 1). Figure 1(a), (b) are the profiles of focusing cmKdV equation, and Figure 1(c), (d) are the profiles of defocusing cmKdV equation with the same parameters ϵ, k1, k∗1. Figure 1 shows that |u(x,t)| and |u∗(−x,t)| have the same shapes as spatial evolution, but their enhancing shapes are antipodal.
The nonlocal two-soliton solution of the reverse space cmKdV Eq (2.1) can also be obtained with Hirota bilinear method. We consider the truncating of the following expansions G(x,t)=ϵG1+ϵ3G3, G∗(−x,t)=ϵG∗1+ϵ3G∗3, F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2+ϵ4F4, F∗(−x,t)=1+ϵ2F∗2+ϵ4F∗4.
Substituting these expansions into the bilinear Eqs (2.4)–(2.6), and collecting the coefficients of same powers of ϵ to zero, we obtain a set of equations
G1t+iG1xxx=0, | (2.19) |
G1tF2+G3t−G1F2t+i(G1xxxF2+G3xxx−3G1xxF2x+3G1xF2xx−G1F2xxx)=0, | (2.20) |
F2xx=σG1G∗1, | (2.21) |
F4xx+F2F2xx+F∗2F2xx−F22x=σG1G∗1F2+σG1G∗3+σG3G∗1, | (2.22) |
where G1, G∗1, F2 and F∗2 are given rise to as follows
G1=eη1+eη2,G∗1=eη∗1+eη∗2,F2=A1eη1+η∗1+A2eη1+η∗2+A3eη∗1+η2+A4eη2+η∗2,F∗2=A∗1eη1+η∗1+A∗2eη∗1+η2+A∗3eη1+η∗2+A∗4eη2+η∗2, | (2.23) |
where η1=k1x−ω1t+η10, η∗1=−k∗1x−ω∗1t+η∗10, η2=k2x−ω2t+η20, η∗2=−k∗2x−ω∗2t+η∗20. And k1, k∗1, k2, k∗2, A1, A∗1, A2, A∗2, A3, A∗3, A4, A∗4 are arbitrary complex constants.
From Eqs (2.19) and (2.21), we know
ω1=ik31, ω∗1=−ik∗31,ω2=ik32, ω∗2=−ik∗32, | (2.24) |
and
A1=σ(k1−k∗1)2, A∗1=σ(k1−k∗1)2,A2=σ(k1−k∗2)2, A∗2=σ(k∗1−k2)2,A3=σ(−k∗1+k2)2, A∗3=σ(−k1+k∗2)2,A4=σ(k2−k∗2)2, A∗4=σ(k2−k∗2)2. | (2.25) |
So, the functions G1(x,t), G∗1(−x,t), F2(x,t) and F∗2(−x,t) are obtained. Substituting the expressions of G1 and F2 into the Eq (2.20), we obtain the function G3 and the parity transformed complex conjugate G∗3 in the form
G3=B1e2η1+η∗1+B2e2η1+η∗2+B3eη1+η2+η∗1+B4eη1+η2+η∗2+B5e2η2+η∗1+B6e2η2+η∗2, | (2.26) |
G∗3=B∗1e2η∗1+η1+B∗2e2η∗1+η2+B∗3eη∗1+η∗2+η1+B∗4eη∗1+η∗2+η2+B∗5e2η∗2+η1+B∗6e2η∗2+η2, | (2.27) |
where
B1=0, B2=0,B3=(−i(k∗1−k1+k2)3−ω1+ω2−ω∗1)A1+(−i(k∗1+k1−k2)3+ω1−ω2−ω∗1)A3−i(k∗1−k1−k2)3−ω1−ω2−ω∗1,B4=(−i(k∗2−k1+k2)3−ω1+ω2−ω∗2)A2+(−i(k∗2+k1−k2)3+ω1−ω2−ω∗2)A4−i(k∗2−k1−k2)3−ω1−ω2−ω∗2,B5=0, B6=0, |
and
B∗1=0, B∗2=0,B∗3=(i(k1−k∗1+k∗2)3−ω∗1+ω∗2−ω1)A∗1+(i(k1+k∗1−k∗2)3+ω∗1−ω∗2−ω1)A∗3i(k1−k∗1−k∗2)3−ω∗1−ω∗2−ω1,B∗4=(i(k2−k∗1+k∗2)3−ω∗1+ω∗2−ω2)A∗2+(i(k2+k∗1−k∗2)3+ω∗1−ω∗2−ω2)A∗4i(k2−k∗1−k∗2)3−ω∗1−ω∗2−ω2,B∗5=0, B∗6=0. |
Then we substitute the expressions for G1, G∗1, G3, G∗3, F2 and F∗2 into the Eq (2.22) and obtain the functions F4 and F∗4 as follows
F4=C1e2η1+2η∗1+C2e2η2+2η∗2+C3eη1+2η∗1+η2+C4e2η1+η∗1+η∗2+C5eη1+η2+η∗2+η∗1+C6e2η1+2η∗2+C7eη1+η2+2η∗2+C8eη∗1+η∗2+2η2+C9e2η2+2η∗1, | (2.28) |
F∗4=C∗1e2η∗1+2η1+C∗2e2η∗2+2η2+C∗3eη∗1+2η1+η∗2+C∗4e2η∗1+η1+η2+C∗5eη∗1+η∗2+η2+η1+C∗6e2η∗1+2η2+C∗7eη∗1+η∗2+2η2+C∗8eη1+η2+2η∗2+C∗9e2η∗2+2η1, | (2.29) |
where
C1=−A1A∗1(k1−k∗1)2−σ(A1+B1+B∗1)4(k1−k∗1)2, C2=−A4A∗4(k2−k∗2)2−σ(A4+B6+B∗6)4(k2−k∗2)2,C3=−A1A∗2(k1−k∗1)2+A1A3(k1−k2)2+A∗1A3(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A1+A3+B∗1+B∗2+B3)(k1+k2−2k∗1)2,C4=−A1A2(k∗1−k∗2)2+A1A∗3(k1−k∗1)2+A∗1A2(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A1+A2+B1+B2+B∗3)(k∗1+k∗2−2k1)2,C5=−A1A4a1+A2A3a2−σa3+a4(k1−k∗1+k2−k∗2)2. |
In C5, a1, a2, a3, a4 are denoted as follows
a1=(k1−k∗1)2−(k1+k2)2+(k1+k∗2)2+(k∗1+k2)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k2−k∗2)2,a2=(k1+k∗1)2−(k1+k2)2+(k1−k∗2)2+(k∗1−k2)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k2+k∗2)2,a3=A1+A2+A3+A4+B3+B∗3+B4+B∗4,a4=A1A∗4(k1−k∗1)2+A∗1A4(k2−k∗2)2+A2A∗2(k1−k∗2)2+A3A∗3(k∗1−k2)2. |
C6=−A2A∗3(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A2+B2+B∗5)4(k1−k∗2)2,C7=−A2A4(k1−k2)2+A2A∗4(k1−k∗2)2+A∗3A4(k2−k∗2)2−σ(A2+A4+B4+B∗5+B∗6)(k1+k2−2k∗2)2,C8=−A∗2A4(k2−k∗2)2+A3A4(k∗1−k∗2)2+A3A∗4(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A3+A4+B∗4+B5+B6)(k∗1+k∗2−2k2)2,C9=−A∗2A3(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A3+B∗2+B5)4(k∗1−k2)2, |
and
C∗1=−A∗1A1(k∗1−k1)2−σ(A∗1+B∗1+B1)4(k∗1−k1)2, C∗2=−A∗4A4(k∗2−k2)2−σ(A∗4+B∗6+B6)4(k∗2−k2)2,C∗3=−A∗1A2(k∗1−k1)2+A∗1A∗3(k∗1−k∗2)2+A1A∗3(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A∗1+A∗3+B1+B2+B∗3)(k∗1+k∗2−2k1)2,C∗4=−A∗1A∗2(k1−k2)2+A∗1A3(k∗1−k1)2+A1A∗2(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A∗1+A∗2+B∗1+B∗2+B3)(k1+k2−2k∗1)2,C∗5=−A∗1A∗4a∗1+A∗2A∗3a∗2−σa∗3+a∗4(k∗1−k1+k∗2−k2)2. |
In C∗5, a∗1, a∗2, a∗3, a∗4 are denoted as follows
a∗1=(k∗1−k1)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k∗1+k2)2+(k1+k∗2)2−(k1+k2)2+(k∗2−k2)2,a∗2=(k1+k∗1)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k∗1−k2)2+(k1−k∗2)2−(k1+k2)2+(k2+k∗2)2,a∗3=A∗1+A∗2+A∗3+A∗4+B∗3+B3+B4+B∗4,a∗4=A∗1A4(k1−k∗1)2+A1A∗4(k2−k∗2)2+A∗2A2(k∗1−k2)2+A3A∗3(k1−k∗2)2. |
C∗6=−A∗2A3(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A∗2+B∗2+B5)4(k∗1−k2)2,C∗7=−A∗2A∗4(k∗1−k∗2)2+A∗2A4(k∗1−k2)2+A3A∗4(k2−k∗2)2−σ(A∗2+A∗4+B∗4+B5+B6)(k∗1+k∗2−2k2)2,C∗8=−A2A∗4(k2−k∗2)2+A∗3A∗4(k1−k2)2+A∗3A4(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A∗3+A∗4+B4+B∗5+B∗6)(k1+k2)2−4k∗2k1+4k∗22−4k2k∗2,C∗9=−A2A∗3(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A∗3+B2+B∗5)4(k1−k∗2)2. |
So, the general nonlocal two-soliton solution of the reverse space cmKdV Eq (2.1) is
u(x,t)=G1+G31+F2+F4. | (2.30) |
According to the bilinear form of parity transformed complex conjugate equation, the parity transformed complex conjugate field is derived in the form
u∗(−x,t)=G∗1+G∗31+F∗2+F∗4. | (2.31) |
Here we provide some figures to describe the nonlocal two-soliton solutions Eqs (2.30) and (2.31) of the reverse space cmKdV Eq (2.1), see Figures 2 and 3. In Figure 2, the focusing and defocusing cmKdV equations have entirely different solitary wave structure with the same parameters ϵ=1, k1=0.7+0.7i, k2=−0.64−0.8i, which are novel phenomenon in nonlocal cmKdV equation. Profiles Figure 2(a), (b) present the breather-like style only in the vicinity of t=0. Profiles Figure 2(c), (d) show the elastic interactions between two bright-bright solitons with different amplitudes. When the time t is near zero, amplitudes of the two solitary waves reach maximum, while the widths reach the minimum. Figure 3 shows the collision interactions between two breathers with parameters ϵ=1, k1=0.2+0.7i, k2=−0.7−0.8i. The focusing and defocusing cmKdV equations have the same solitary wave structure, but with different amplitudes. The profiles of u(x,t) and u∗(−x,t) are on x-axis symmetric.
The reverse time cmKdV equation is given by
ut(x,t)+iuxxx(x,t)−6iσu(x,t)u∗(x,−t)ux(x,t)=0, | (3.1) |
where u=u(x,t) is a complex-valued function of x and t, the ∗ denotes complex conjugation.
We present the dependent variable transformations which is similar to the previous section in order to take an Hirota bilinear method to Eq (3.1). The transformations are
u(x,t)=G(x,t)F(x,t), u∗(x,−t)=G∗(x,−t)F∗(x,−t), | (3.2) |
where the G(x,t), G∗(x,−t), F(x,t) and F∗(x,−t) are complex functions, and all of them are distinct.
Substituting the transformations Eq (3.2) into Eq (3.1) and introducing bilinear operators of the functions f and g, we get a novel equation as follows
1F2(Dt+iD3x)G⋅F+(GxF−GFx)[−6iσGG∗F3F∗−3iF4(2FxxF−2FxFx)]=0, | (3.3) |
it can be decoupled into the following system of bilinear equations for the functions F and G,
(Dt+iD3x)G⋅F=0, | (3.4) |
D2xF⋅F=−2σSF, | (3.5) |
SF∗=GG∗, | (3.6) |
the Dx and Dt are defined as same as in the previous section. Solving the above series of bilinear Eqs (3.4)–(3.6) and coupling with Eq (3.2), some soliton solutions can be obtained.
We expand the unknown functions G(x,t), G∗(x,−t), F(x,t) and F∗(x,−t) in terms of a small parameter ϵ
G(x,t)=ϵG1+ϵ3G3+...,G∗(x,−t)=ϵG∗1+ϵ3G∗3+...,F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2+ϵ4F4+...,F∗(x,−t)=1+ϵ2F∗2+ϵ4F∗4+..., | (3.7) |
where the G1, G3, F2, F4 are functions with spatial variable x and temporal variable t, the functions G∗1, G∗3, F∗2, F∗4 have variables x and −t. Substituting the above expansions into Eqs (3.4)–(3.6), and comparing the coefficients of ϵ, we obtain the unknown functions G(x,t), G∗(x,−t), F(x,t) and F∗(x,−t) by selecting the appropriate functions G1, G∗1, F2, F∗2, G3, G∗3, F4, F∗4, etc.
For one-soliton of Eq (3.1), we take the following expansions of the functions G, G∗, F and F∗:
G(x,t)=ϵG1,G∗(x,−t)=ϵG∗1,F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2,F∗(x,−t)=1+ϵ2F∗2. | (3.8) |
Substituting the above expansions of Eq (3.8) into the bilinear Eqs (3.4)–(3.6), and comparing the coefficients of same powers of ϵ to zero, we obtain a set of equations
G1t+iG1xxx=0, | (3.9) |
F2xx=−σG1G∗1, | (3.10) |
where G1, G∗1, F2 and F∗2 are given rise to as follows
G1=eξ1,G∗1=eξ∗1,F2=A1eξ1+ξ∗1F∗2=A∗1eξ1+ξ∗1, | (3.11) |
where ξ1=k1x−ω1t+ξ10, ξ∗1=k∗1x+ω∗1t+ξ∗10, and k1, k∗1, A1, A∗1 are arbitrary complex constants.
From Eqs (3.9) and (3.10), we know the relation about ω1, k1 and A1 as follows
ω1=ik31, | (3.12) |
A1=−σ(k1+k∗1)2. | (3.13) |
Since the ω∗1 is the complex conjugate of ω1, so
ω∗1=−ik∗31. | (3.14) |
In the same way, we have
A∗1=−σ(k1+k∗1)2. | (3.15) |
So, the general nonlocal one-soliton solution of the reverse space cmKdV Eq (3.1) is
u(x,t)=eξ11+A1eξ1+ξ∗1. | (3.16) |
According to the bilinear form of parity transformed complex conjugate equation, the parity transformed complex conjugate field is derived in the form
u∗(x,−t)=eξ∗11+A∗1eξ1+ξ∗1. | (3.17) |
The figures of nonlocal single soliton solutions Eqs (3.16) and (3.17) of the reverse time cmKdV equation Eq (3.1) are given in Figure 4. The results show that the defocusing and focusing cmKdV equations have the same solitary wave structure and enhancing shape as time envolution. However, they have different wavelengths. The wavelength of focusing cmKdV equation is longer than the defocusing one with the same parameters ϵ,k1,k∗1.
The nonlocal two-soliton solution of the reverse time cmKdV Eq (3.1) can also be obtained with Hirota bilinear method. We consider the truncating of the following expansions G(x,t)=ϵG1+ϵ3G3, G∗(x,−t)=ϵG∗1+ϵ3G∗3, F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2+ϵ4F4, F∗(x,−t)=1+ϵ2F∗2+ϵ4F∗4.
Substituting these expansions into the bilinear Eqs (3.4)–(3.6), and collecting the coefficients of same powers of ϵ to zero, we obtain a set of equations
G1t+iG1xxx=0, | (3.18) |
G1tF2+G3t−G1F2t+i(G1xxxF2+G3xxx−3G1xxF2x+3G1xF2xx−G1F2xxx)=0, | (3.19) |
F2xx=−σG1G∗1, | (3.20) |
F4xx+F2F2xx+F∗2F2xx−F22x=−σG1G∗1F2−σG1G∗3−σG3G∗1, | (3.21) |
where G1, G∗1, F2 and F∗2 are given rise to as follows
G1=eξ1+eξ2,G∗1=eξ∗1+eξ∗2,F2=A1eξ1+ξ∗1+A2eξ1+ξ∗2+A3eξ∗1+ξ2+A4eξ2+ξ∗2,F∗2=A∗1eξ1+ξ∗1+A∗2eξ∗1+ξ2+A∗3eξ1+ξ∗2+A∗4eξ2+ξ∗2, | (3.22) |
where ξ1=k1x−ω1t+ξ10, ξ∗1=k∗1x+ω∗1t+ξ∗10, ξ2=k2x−ω2t+ξ20, ξ∗2=k∗2x+ω∗2t+ξ∗20. And k1, k∗1, k2, k∗2, A1, A∗1, A2, A∗2, A3, A∗3, A4, A∗4 are arbitrary complex constants.
From Eqs (3.18) and (3.20), we know
ω1=ik31, ω∗1=−ik∗31,ω2=ik32, ω∗2=−ik∗32, | (3.23) |
and
A1=σ(k1−k∗1)2, A∗1=σ(k1−k∗1)2,A2=σ(k1−k∗2)2, A∗2=σ(k∗1−k2)2,A3=σ(−k∗1+k2)2, A∗3=σ(−k1+k∗2)2,A4=σ(k2−k∗2)2, A∗4=σ(k2−k∗2)2. | (3.24) |
So, the functions G1(x,t), G∗1(x,−t), F2(x,t) and F∗2(x,−t) are obtained. Substituting the expressions of G1 and F2 into Eq (3.19), we obtain the function G3 and the parity transformed complex conjugate G∗3 in the form
G3=B1e2ξ1+ξ∗1+B2e2ξ1+ξ∗2+B3eξ1+ξ2+ξ∗1+B4eξ1+ξ2+ξ∗2+B5e2ξ2+ξ∗1+B6e2ξ2+ξ∗2, | (3.25) |
G∗3=B∗1e2ξ∗1+ξ1+B∗2e2ξ∗1+ξ2+B∗3eξ∗1+ξ∗2+ξ1+B∗4eξ∗1+ξ∗2+ξ2+B∗5e2ξ∗2+ξ1+B∗6e2ξ∗2+ξ2, | (3.26) |
where
B1=0, B2=0,B3=(i(k∗1+k1−k2)3−ω1+ω2+ω∗1)A1+(i(k∗1−k1+k2)3+ω1−ω2+ω∗1)A3i(k∗1+k1+k2)3−ω1−ω2+ω∗1,B4=(i(k∗2+k1−k2)3−ω1+ω2+ω∗2)A2+(i(k∗2−k1+k2)3+ω1−ω2+ω∗2)A4i(k∗2+k1+k2)3−ω1−ω2+ω∗2,B5=0, B6=0, |
and
B∗1=0, B∗2=0,B∗3=(−i(k1+k∗1−k∗2)3−ω∗1+ω∗2+ω1)A∗1+(−i(k1−k∗1+k∗2)3+ω∗1−ω∗2+ω1)A∗3−i(k1+k∗1+k∗2)3−ω∗1−ω∗2+ω1,B∗4=(−i(k2+k∗1−k∗2)3−ω∗1+ω∗2+ω2)A∗2+(−i(k2−k∗1+k∗2)3+ω∗1−ω∗2+ω2)A∗4−i(k2+k∗1+k∗2)3−ω∗1−ω∗2+ω2,B∗5=0, B∗6=0. |
Then we substitute the expressions for G1, G∗1, G3, G∗3, F2 and F∗2 into the Eq (3.21) and obtain the functions F4 and F∗4 as follows
F4=C1e2ξ1+2ξ∗1+C2e2ξ2+2ξ∗2+C3eξ1+2ξ∗1+ξ2+C4e2ξ1+ξ∗1+ξ∗2+C5eξ1+ξ2+ξ∗2+ξ∗1+C6e2ξ1+2ξ∗2+C7eξ1+ξ2+2ξ∗2+C8eξ∗1+ξ∗2+2ξ2+C9e2ξ2+2ξ∗1, | (3.27) |
F∗4=C∗1e2ξ∗1+2ξ1+C∗2e2ξ∗2+2ξ2+C∗3eξ∗1+2ξ1+ξ∗2+C∗4e2ξ∗1+ξ1+ξ2+C∗5eξ∗1+ξ∗2+ξ2+ξ1+C∗6e2ξ∗1+2ξ2+C∗7eξ∗1+ξ∗2+2ξ2+C∗8eξ1+ξ2+2ξ∗2+C∗9e2ξ∗2+2ξ1, | (3.28) |
where
C1=−A1A∗1(k1+k∗1)2+σ(A1+B1+B∗1)4(k1+k∗1)2, C2=−A4A∗4(k2+k∗2)2+σ(A4+B6+B∗6)4(k2+k∗2)2,C3=−A1A∗2(k1+k∗1)2+A1A3(k1−k2)2+A∗1A3(k∗1+k2)2+σ(A1+A3+B∗1+B∗2+B3)(k1+k2+2k∗1)2,C4=−A1A2(k∗1−k∗2)2+A1A∗3(k1+k∗1)2+A∗1A2(k1+k∗2)2+σ(A1+A2+B1+B2+B∗3)(k∗1+k∗2+2k1)2,C5=−A1A4b1+A2A3b2+σb3+b4(k1+k∗1+k2+k∗2)2. |
In C5, b1, b2, b3, b4 are denoted as follows
b1=(k1+k∗1)2+(k1−k2)2−(k1+k∗2)2−(k∗1+k2)2+(k∗1−k∗2)2+(k2+k∗2)2,b2=(k1−k∗1)2−(k1+k2)2+(k1+k∗2)2+(k∗1+k2)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k2−k∗2)2,b3=A1+A2+A3+A4+B3+B∗3+B4+B∗4,b4=A1A∗4(k1+k∗1)2+A∗1A4(k2+k∗2)2+A2A∗2(k1+k∗2)2+A3A∗3(k∗1+k2)2. |
C6=−A2A∗3(k1+k∗2)2+σ(A2+B2+B∗5)4(k1+k∗2)2,C7=−A2A4(k1−k2)2+A2A∗4(k1+k∗2)2+A∗3A4(k2+k∗2)2+σ(A2+A4+B4+B∗5+B∗6)(k1+k2+2k∗2)2,C8=−A∗2A4(k2+k∗2)2+A3A4(k∗1−k∗2)2+A3A∗4(k∗1+k2)2+σ(A3+A4+B∗4+B5+B6)(k∗1+k∗2+2k2)2, |
C9=−A∗2A3(k∗1+k2)2+σ(A3+B∗2+B5)4(k∗1+k2)2, |
and
C∗1=−A1A∗1(k1+k∗1)2+σ(A∗1+B1+B∗1)4(k1+k∗1)2, C∗2=−A4A∗4(k2+k∗2)2+σ(A∗4+B6+B∗6)4(k2+k∗2)2,C∗3=−A∗1A2(k∗1+k1)2+A∗1A∗3(k∗1−k∗2)2+A1A∗3(k1+k∗2)2+σ(A∗1+A∗3+B1+B2+B∗3)(k∗1+k∗2+2k1)2,C∗4=−A∗1A∗2(k1−k2)2+A∗1A3(k1+k∗1)2+A1A∗2(k∗1+k2)2+σ(A∗1+A∗2+B∗1+B∗2+B3)(k1+k2+2k∗1)2,C∗5=−A∗1A∗4b∗1+A∗2A∗3b∗2+σb∗3+b∗4(k1+k∗1+k2+k∗2)2. |
In C∗5, b∗1, b∗2, b∗3, b∗4 are denoted as follows
b∗1=(k1+k∗1)2+(k∗1−k∗2)2−(k∗1+k2)2−(k1+k∗2)2+(k1−k2)2+(k2+k∗2)2,b∗2=(k1−k∗1)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k∗1+k2)2+(k1+k∗2)2−(k1+k2)2+(k2−k∗2)2,b∗3=A∗1+A∗2+A∗3+A∗4+B3+B∗3+B4+B∗4,b∗4=A∗1A4(k1+k∗1)2+A1A∗4(k2+k∗2)2+A2A∗2(k∗1+k2)2+A3A∗3(k1+k∗2)2. |
C∗6=−A∗2A3(k∗1+k2)2+σ(A∗2+B∗2+B5)4(k∗1+k2)2,C∗7=−A∗2A∗4(k∗1−k∗2)2+A∗2A4(k∗1+k2)2+A3A∗4(k2+k∗2)2+σ(A∗2+A∗4+B∗4+B5+B6)(k∗1+k∗2+2k2)2,C∗8=−A2A∗4(k2+k∗2)2+A∗3A∗4(k1−k2)2+A∗3A4(k1+k∗2)2+σ(A∗3+A∗4+B4+B∗5+B∗6)(k1+k2+2k∗2)2,C∗9=−A2A∗3(k1+k∗2)2+σ(A∗3+B2+B∗5)4(k1+k∗2)2. |
So, the general nonlocal two-soliton solution of the reverse time cmKdV Eq (3.1) is
u(x,t)=G1+G31+F2+F4. | (3.29) |
According to the bilinear form of parity transformed complex conjugate equation, the parity transformed complex conjugate field is derived in the form
u∗(x,−t)=G∗1+G∗31+F∗2+F∗4. | (3.30) |
The figures of the nonlocal two-soliton solutions Eqs (3.29) and (3.30) of the reverse time cmKdV Eq (3.1) are given in Figures 5 and 6. Figure 5 shows X-type with longer stem interaction of two breather. In near the origin, the focusing cmKdV equation is triple parallel breather wave structure, while the defocusing cmKdV equation is double parallel breather wave structure. The profiles of u(x,t) and u∗(x,−t) of defocusing and focusing cmKdV equations have opposite wave structure with time envolution, but they are all symmetric about the t-axis. From Figure 6, we see that the H-type interaction between two breather wave of defocusing and focusing cmKdV equations has different amplitudes, and the amplitudes reach zero in the vicinity of the crossing point.
The reverse space-time cmKdV equation is given by
ut(x,t)+uxxx(x,t)+6σu(x,t)u∗(−x,−t)ux(x,t)=0, | (4.1) |
where u=u(x,t) is a complex-valued function of x and t, the ∗ denotes complex conjugation.
We first present the dependent variable transformations in order to take an Hirota bilinear method to Eq (4.1). The transformations are
u(x,t)=G(x,t)F(x,t), u∗(−x,−t)=G∗(−x,−t)F∗(−x,−t), | (4.2) |
where the G(x,t) and G∗(−x,−t) are complex functions, the F(x,t) and F∗(−x,−t) are also in general complex functions, and all of them are distinct.
Substituting the transformations Eq (4.2) into Eq (4.1) and introducing bilinear operators of the functions F and G, we get a novel equation as follows
1F2(Dt+D3x)G⋅F+(GxF−GFx)[6σGG∗F3F∗−3F4(2FxxF−2FxFx)]=0, | (4.3) |
it can be decoupled into the following system of bilinear equations for the functions F and G,
(Dt+D3x)G⋅F=0, | (4.4) |
D2xF⋅F=2σSF, | (4.5) |
SF∗=GG∗, | (4.6) |
the Dx and Dt are defined as same as the Section 2. Solving the above series of bilinear Eqs (4.4)–(4.6) and coupling with Eq (4.2), the soliton solutions can be obtained.
We expand the unknown functions G(x,t), G∗(−x,−t), F(x,t) and F∗(−x,−t) in terms of a small parameter ϵ
G(x,t)=ϵG1+ϵ3G3+..., G∗(−x,−t)=ϵG∗1+ϵ3G∗3+...,F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2+ϵ4F4+..., F∗(−x,−t)=1+ϵ2F∗2+ϵ4F∗4+..., | (4.7) |
where the G1, G3, F2, F4 are functions with spatial variable x and temporal variable t, the functions G∗1, G∗3, F∗2, F∗4 have variables −x and −t. Substituting the above expansions into Eqs (4.4)–(4.6), and comparing the coefficients of ϵ, we obtain the unknown functions G(x,t), G∗(−x,−t), F(x,t) and F∗(−x,−t) by selecting the appropriate functions G1, G∗1, F2, F∗2, G3, G∗3, F4, F∗4, etc.
In this section, one-soliton of Eq (4.1) can be obtained with Hirota bilinear method. First of all, we take the following expansions of the functions G, G∗, F and F∗:
G(x,t)=ϵG1,G∗(−x,−t)=ϵG∗1,F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2,F∗(−x,−t)=1+ϵ2F∗2. | (4.8) |
Substituting the above expansions of Eq (4.8) into the bilinear Eqs (4.4)–(4.6), and comparing the coefficients of same powers of ϵ to zero, we obtain a set of equations
G1t+G1xxx=0, | (4.9) |
F2xx=σG1G∗1, | (4.10) |
where G1, G∗1, F2 and F∗2 are given rise to as follows
G1=eζ1,G∗1=eζ∗1,F2=A1eζ1+ζ∗1,F∗2=A∗1eζ1+ζ∗1, | (4.11) |
where ζ1=k1x−ω1t+ζ10, ζ∗1=−k∗1x+ω∗1t+ζ∗10, and k1, k∗1, A1, A∗1 are arbitrary complex constants.
From Eqs (4.9) and (4.10), we know the relation about ω1, k1 and A1 as follows
ω1=k31, | (4.12) |
A1=σ(k1−k∗1)2. | (4.13) |
Since the ω∗1 is the complex conjugate of ω1, so
ω∗1=k∗31. | (4.14) |
In the same way, we can get
A∗1=σ(k1−k∗1)2. | (4.15) |
Then, the general nonlocal one-soliton solution of the reverse space-time cmKdV Eq (4.1) is
u(x,t)=eζ11+A1eζ1+ζ∗1. | (4.16) |
According to the bilinear form of parity transformed complex conjugate equation, the parity transformed complex conjugate field is derived in the form
u∗(−x,−t)=eζ∗11+A∗1eζ1+ζ∗1. | (4.17) |
Here we provide some figures to describe the nonlocal single soliton solutions Eqs (4.16) and (4.17) of the reverse space-time cmKdV Eq (4.1) in the Figure 7. The results show that the solutions of focusing and defocusing nonlocal cmKdV equations are periodic, but the crests and troughs are located in different places, and u(x,t) and u∗(−x,−t) have the opposite enhancing directions as time envolution.
The nonlocal two-soliton solution of the reverse space-time cmKdV Eq (4.1) can also be obtained with Hirota bilinear method. We consider the truncating of the following expansions G(x,t)=ϵG1+ϵ3G3, G∗(−x,−t)=ϵG∗1+ϵ3G∗3, F(x,t)=1+ϵ2F2+ϵ4F4, F∗(−x,−t)=1+ϵ2F∗2+ϵ4F∗4.
Substituting these expansions into the bilinear Eqs (4.4)–(4.6), and collecting the coefficients of same powers of ϵ to zero, we obtain a set of equations
G1t+G1xxx=0, | (4.18) |
G1tF2+G3t−G1F2t+G1xxxF2+G3xxx−3G1xxF2x+3G1xF2xx−G1F2xxx=0, | (4.19) |
F2xx=σG1G∗1, | (4.20) |
F4xx+F2F2xx+F∗2F2xx−F22x=σG1G∗1F2+σG1G∗3+σG3G∗1, | (4.21) |
where G1, G∗1, F2 and F∗2 are given rise to as follows
G1=eζ1+eζ2,G∗1=eζ∗1+eζ∗2,F2=A1eζ1+ζ∗1+A2eζ1+ζ∗2+A3eζ∗1+ζ2+A4eζ2+ζ∗2,F∗2=A∗1eζ1+ζ∗1+A∗2eζ∗1+ζ2+A∗3eζ1+ζ∗2+A∗4eζ2+ζ∗2, | (4.22) |
where ζ1=k1x−ω1t+ζ10, ζ∗1=−k∗1x+ω∗1t+ζ∗10, ζ2=k2x−ω2t+ζ20, ζ∗2=−k∗2x+ω∗2t+ζ∗20. And k1, k∗1, k2, k∗2, A1, A∗1, A2, A∗2, A3, A∗3, A4, A∗4 are arbitrary complex constants.
From Eqs (4.18) and (4.20), we know
ω1=k31, ω∗1=k∗31, ω2=k32, ω∗2=k∗32,A1=σ(k1−k∗1)2, A∗1=σ(k1−k∗1)2, A2=σ(k1−k∗2)2, A∗2=σ(k∗1−k2)2,A3=σ(−k∗1+k2)2, A∗3=σ(−k1+k∗2)2, A4=σ(k2−k∗2)2, A∗4=σ(k2−k∗2)2. | (4.23) |
So the functions G1(x,t), G∗1(−x,−t), F2(x,t) and F∗2(−x,−t) are obtained. When we substitute the expressions of G1 and F2 into Eq (4.19), and obtain the function G3 and the parity transformed complex conjugate G∗3 in the form
G3=B1e2ζ1+ζ∗1+B2e2ζ1+ζ∗2+B3eζ1+ζ2+ζ∗1+B4eζ1+ζ2+ζ∗2+B5e2ζ2+ζ∗1+B6e2ζ2+ζ∗2, | (4.24) |
G∗3=B∗1e2ζ∗1+ζ1+B∗2e2ζ∗1+ζ2+B∗3eζ∗1+ζ∗2+ζ1+B∗4eζ∗1+ζ∗2+ζ2+B∗5e2ζ∗2+ζ1+B∗6e2ζ∗2+ζ2, | (4.25) |
where
B1=0, B2=0,B3=((−k∗1+k1−k2)3−ω1+ω2+ω∗1)A1+((−k∗1−k1+k2)3+ω1−ω2+ω∗1)A3(−k∗1+k1+k2)3−ω1−ω2+ω∗1,B4=((−k∗2+k1−k2)3−ω1+ω2+ω∗2)A2+((−k∗2−k1+k2)3+ω1−ω2+ω∗2)A4(−k∗2+k1+k2)3−ω1−ω2+ω∗2,B5=0, B6=0, |
and
B∗1=0, B∗2=0,B∗3=((−k1+k∗1−k∗2)3−ω∗1+ω∗2+ω1)A∗1+((−k1−k∗1+k∗2)3+ω∗1−ω∗2+ω1)A∗3(−k1+k∗1+k∗2)3−ω∗1−ω∗2+ω1,B∗4=((−k2+k∗1−k∗2)3−ω∗1+ω∗2+ω2)A∗2+((−k2−k∗1+k∗2)3+ω∗1−ω∗2+ω2)A∗4(−k2+k∗1+k∗2)3−ω∗1−ω∗2+ω2,B∗5=0, B∗6=0. |
Substituting the expressions of G1, G∗1, G3, G∗3, F2 and F∗2 into Eq (4.21), we obtain the functions F4 and F∗4 as follows
F4=C1e2ζ1+2ζ∗1+C2e2ζ2+2ζ∗2+C3eζ1+2ζ∗1+ζ2+C4e2ζ1+ζ∗1+ζ∗2+C5eζ1+ζ2+ζ∗2+ζ∗1+C6e2ζ1+2ζ∗2+C7eζ1+ζ2+2ζ∗2+C8eζ∗1+ζ∗2+2ζ2+C9e2ζ2+2ζ∗1, | (4.26) |
F∗4=C∗1e2ζ∗1+2ζ1+C∗2e2ζ∗2+2ζ2+C∗3eζ∗1+2ζ1+ζ∗2+C∗4e2ζ∗1+ζ1+ζ2+C∗5eζ∗1+ζ∗2+ζ2+ζ1+C∗6e2ζ∗1+2ζ2+C∗7eζ∗1+ζ∗2+2ζ2+C∗8eζ1+ζ2+2ζ∗2+C∗9e2ζ∗2+2ζ1, | (4.27) |
where
C1=−A1A∗1(k1−k∗1)2−σ(A1+B1+B∗1)4(k1−k∗1)2, C2=−A4A∗4(k2−k∗2)2−σ(A4+B6+B∗6)4(k2−k∗2)2,C3=−A1A∗2(k1−k∗1)2+A1A3(k1−k2)2+A∗1A3(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A1+A3+B∗1+B∗2+B3)(k1+k2−2k∗1)2,C4=−A1A2(k∗1−k∗2)2+A1A∗3(k1−k∗1)2+A∗1A2(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A1+A2+B1+B2+B∗3)(k∗1+k∗2−2k1)2,C5=−A1A4c1+A2A3c2−σc3+c4(k1−k∗1+k2−k∗2)2. |
In C5, c1, c2, c3, c4 are denoted as follows
c1=(k1−k∗1)2−(k1+k2)2+(k1+k∗2)2+(k∗1+k2)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k2−k∗2)2,c2=(k1+k∗1)2−(k1+k2)2+(k1−k∗2)2+(k∗1−k2)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k2+k∗2)2,c3=A1+A2+A3+A4+B3+B∗3+B4+B∗4,c4=A1A∗4(k1−k∗1)2+A∗1A4(k2−k∗2)2+A2A∗2(k1−k∗2)2+A3A∗3(k∗1−k2)2. |
C6=−A2A∗3(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A2+B2+B∗5)4(k1−k∗2)2,C7=−A2A4(k1−k2)2+A2A∗4(k1−k∗2)2+A∗3A4(k2−k∗2)2−σ(A2+A4+B4+B∗5+B∗6)(k1+k2−2k∗2)2,C8=−A∗2A4(k2−k∗2)2+A3A4(k∗1−k∗2)2+A3A∗4(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A3+A4+B∗4+B5+B6)(k∗1+k∗2−2k2)2,C9=−A∗2A3(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A3+B∗2+B5)4(k∗1−k2)2, |
and
C∗1=−A∗1A1(k∗1−k1)2−σ(A∗1+B∗1+B1)4(k∗1−k1)2, C∗2=−A∗4A4(k∗2−k2)2−σ(A∗4+B∗6+B6)4(k∗2−k2)2,C∗3=−A∗1A2(k∗1−k1)2+A∗1A∗3(k∗1−k∗2)2+A1A∗3(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A∗1+A∗3+B1+B2+B∗3)(k∗1+k∗2−2k1)2,C∗4=−A∗1A∗2(k1−k2)2+A∗1A3(k∗1−k1)2+A1A∗2(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A∗1+A∗2+B∗1+B∗2+B3)(k1+k2−2k∗1)2,C∗5=−A∗1A∗4c∗1+A∗2A∗3c∗2−σc∗3+c∗4(k∗1−k1+k∗2−k2)2, |
In C∗5, c∗1, c∗2, c∗3, c∗4 are denoted as follows
c∗1=(k∗1−k1)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k∗1+k2)2+(k1+k∗2)2−(k1+k2)2+(k∗2−k2)2,c∗2=(k1+k∗1)2−(k∗1+k∗2)2+(k∗1−k2)2+(k1−k∗2)2−(k1+k2)2+(k2+k∗2)2,c∗3=A∗1+A∗2+A∗3+A∗4+B∗3+B3+B4+B∗4,c∗4=A∗1A4(k1−k∗1)2+A1A∗4(k2−k∗2)2+A∗2A2(k∗1−k2)2+A3A∗3(k1−k∗2)2. |
C∗6=−A∗2A3(k∗1−k2)2−σ(A∗2+B∗2+B5)4(k∗1−k2)2,C∗7=−A∗2A∗4(k∗1−k∗2)2+A∗2A4(k∗1−k2)2+A3A∗4(k2−k∗2)2−σ(A∗2+A∗4+B∗4+B5+B6)(k∗1+k∗2−2k2)2,C∗8=−A2A∗4(k2−k∗2)2+A∗3A∗4(k1−k2)2+A∗3A4(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A∗3+A∗4+B4+B∗5+B∗6)(k1+k2−2k∗2)2,C∗9=−A2A∗3(k1−k∗2)2−σ(A∗3+B2+B∗5)4(k1−k∗2)2. |
Then, the general nonlocal two-soliton solution of the reverse space-time cmKdV Eq (4.1) is
u(x,t)=G1+G31+F2+F4. | (4.28) |
According to the bilinear form of parity transformed complex conjugate equation, the parity transformed complex conjugate field is derived in the form
u∗(−x,−t)=G∗1+G∗31+F∗2+F∗4. | (4.29) |
The figures of nonlocal two-soliton solutions Eqs (4.28) and (4.29) of the reverse space-time cmKdV Eq (4.1) are given in Figure 8. The results show that focusing and defocusing nonlocal cmKdV equations have different characteristics of solitary wave structure with the same parameters ϵ=1, k1=0.7+0.7i, k2=−0.64−0.8i. The solution u(x,t) and u∗(−x,−t) of focusing cmKdV equations exhibit the periodic oscillations with exponential growth, while the defocusing ones show twisted solitons.
The local cmKdV Eq (1.1) is integrabel, which has the Lax pair as follows
Φx=MΦ=(−iλuσu∗iλ)Φ, | (5.1) |
and
Φt=NΦ=(−4iλ3−2iλσ|u|2+σuxu∗−σuu∗x4λ2u+2iλux+2σu2u∗−uxx4σλ2u∗−2iλσu∗x+2σ2uu∗2−σu∗xx4iλ3+2iλσ|u|2−σuxu∗+σuu∗x)Φ. | (5.2) |
The compatibility condition of the Lax pair, that is zero curvature equation Mt−Nx+[M,N]=0, leads to Eq (1.1). These transformations Eqs (1.2)–(1.4) allow us to derive the Lax pair of the nonlocal equations from those of the local ones. The Lax pair of reverse space cmKdV Eq (1.5) as
ΦS,x=(−iλu−σu∗iλ)Φ, | (5.3) |
and
ΦS,t=(4λ3−2λσ|u|2−iσuxu∗+iσuu∗x4iλ2u−2λux−2iσu2u∗−iuxx−4iσλ2u∗−2λσu∗x+2iσ2uu∗2+iσu∗xx−4λ3+2λσ|u|2+iσuxu∗−iσuu∗x)Φ. | (5.4) |
The Lax pair of reverse time cmKdV Eq (1.6) as
ΦT,x=(λiu−iσu∗−λ)Φ, | (5.5) |
and
ΦT,t=(−4iλ3+2iλσ|u|2+iσuxu∗−iσuu∗x4λ2u+2λux−2σu2u∗+uxx−4σλ2u∗+2λσu∗x+2σ2uu∗2−σu∗xx4iλ3−2iλσ|u|2−iσuxu∗+iσuu∗x)Φ. | (5.6) |
The Lax pair of reverse space-time cmKdV Eq (1.7) as
ΦST,x=(−iλu−σu∗iλ)Φ, | (5.7) |
and
ΦST,t=(−4iλ3+2iλσ|u|2−σuxu∗+σuu∗x4λ2u+2iλux−2σu2u∗−uxx−4σλ2u∗+2iσu∗x+2σ2uu∗2+σu∗xx4iλ3−2iλσ|u|2+σuxu∗−σuu∗x)Φ. | (5.8) |
The transformation relationship between local and nonlocal equations provides an effective method for us to study nonlocal equations. In fact, given the solutions of local equations, the solutions of nonlocal counterparts can be derived from the principle. However, if not, then the solutions of nonlocal equations may be derive desired solutions by other methods.
In this paper, three types of nonlocal cmKdV equation were converted from local cmKdV equation. A variety of exact solutions are derived via constructing an improved Hirota bilinear method. We obtained various kinds of solitary waves by choosing appropriate parameters. The figures of the one- and two-soliton solutions of the reverse space cmKdV equation (see Figures 1 and 3), the reverse time cmKdV equation (see Figures 4–6) and the reverse space-time cmKdV equation(see Figures 7 and 8) shown the difference between defocusing case and focusing case. Furthermore, the Lax integrability of three types of nonlocal cmKdV equations are investigated using variable transformations from local equation. It should be pointed out that through the variable transformations, many integrable nonlocal equations can be converted from local equations. These results obtained in this paper might be useful to comprehend some physical phenomena and inspire some novel physical applications.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11905013 and 11772063), Qin Xin Talents Cultivation Program of Beijing Information Science and Technology University (QXTCP C202118), the Scientific Research Common Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education under Grant (No. KM201911232011).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | Betts AK (1976) Letter to the Editor on "Scientists in Society". Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 57: 460. Available from: https://alanbetts.com/research/paper/letter-to-the-editor-on-scientists-in-society/#abstract. |
[2] | UNFCCC (1992) Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Framework_Convention_on_Climate_Change. |
[3] | Blue River Declaration (2011) Available from: https://liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/sites/liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/files/blue_river_declaraton.dec.2011_.pdf. |
[4] | Mann ME (2021) The New Climate War: the fight to take back our planet. Public Affairs, New York. |
[5] |
Mann ME, Bradley RS, Hughes MK (1999) Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations Geophys Res Lett 26: 759-762. doi: 10.1029/1999GL900070
![]() |
[6] | Watson RT, Albritton DL, Barker T, et al. (2001) Climate Change 2001, Summary for Policy Makers, IPCC Third Assessment Report. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/spm.pdf. |
[7] |
Betts AK, Desjardins R, Worth D (2016) The Impact of Clouds, Land use and Snow Cover on Climate in the Canadian Prairies. Adv Sci Res 13: 37-42. doi: 10.5194/asr-13-37-2016
![]() |
[8] |
Kwok R, Rothrock DA (2009) Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958-2008. Geophys Res Lett 36: 5. doi: 10.1029/2009GL039035
![]() |
[9] |
Hansen J, Nazarenko L (2004) Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 423-428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2237157100
![]() |
[10] | Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon FM, et al. (2013) Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. |
[11] |
Lacis AA, Schmidt GA, Rind D, et al (2010) Atmospheric CO2: Principal Control Knob Governing Earth's Temperature. Science 330: 356-359. doi: 10.1126/science.1190653
![]() |
[12] | Keeling CD, Bacastow RB, Bainbridge AE, et al. (1976) Atmospheric carbon dioxide variations at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. Tellus 28: 538-551. |
[13] |
Karion A, Sweeney C, Pétron G, et al. (2013) Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field. Geophy Res Lett 40: 1-5. doi: 10.1002/grl.50811
![]() |
[14] |
Johnson MR, Tyner DR, Conley S, et al. (2017) Comparison of airborne measurements and inventory estimates of methane emissions in the Alberta upstream oil and gas sector. Environ Sci Technol 51: 13008-13017. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03525
![]() |
[15] | Cai Y, Cai XH, Desjardins RL, et al. (2020) Methane emissions from a waste treatment site: Numerical analysis of aircraft-based data. Agric For Meteorol 292-293. |
[16] | Dyer J, Desjardins R (2020) Protein as a Unifying Metric for Carbon Footprinting Livestock. Available from: https://researchoutreach.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/James-Dyer-and-Raymond-Desjardins.pdf. |
[17] |
Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, et al. (2008) Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim? Open Atmos Sci J 2: 217-231. doi: 10.2174/1874282300802010217
![]() |
[18] |
Betts AK, Ridgway W (1989) Climatic equilibrium of the atmospheric convective boundary layer over a tropical ocean. J Atmos Sci 46: 2621-2641. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<2621:CEOTAC>2.0.CO;2
![]() |
[19] | Betts AK, Betts H (2017) From Inside the Eye of the Storm: Hurricane Irma. Rutland Herald. Available from: https://alanbetts.com/writings/articles/from-inside-the-eye-of-the-storm-hurricane-irma/. |
[20] | Betts AK (2017) Surviving Maria in Puerto Rico. Rutland Herald. Available from: https://alanbetts.com/writings/articles/surviving-maria-in-puerto-rico/. |
[21] | IPCC (2007) Regional Climate Projections. AR4-WG1. Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch11.html. |
[22] |
Francis JA, Vavrus SJ, Cohen J (2017) Amplified Arctic warming and mid-latitude weather: new perspectives on emerging connections. WIREs Clim Change 8: e474. doi: 10.1002/wcc.474
![]() |
[23] | Hayhoe K. Kossin J, Kunkel K, et al. (2014) NCA4 report, Figure 2.18. Available from: https://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/our-changing-climate/heavy-downpours-increasing. |
[24] |
Guilbert J, Betts AK, Rizzo DM, et al. (2015) Characterization of increased persistence and intensity of precipitation in the Northeastern United States. Geophys Res Lett 42: 1888-1893. doi: 10.1002/2015GL063124
![]() |
[25] | Betts AK (2012) Climate change: Taking a Local Perspective to the Global Level. Earthzine. Available from: https://earthzine.org/climate-change-taking-a-local-perspective-to-the-global-level/. |
[26] |
Famiglietti JS (2014) The global groundwater crisis. Nature Clim Change 4: 945-948. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2425
![]() |
[27] |
Nicholls RJ, Lincke D, Hinkel J, et al. (2021) A global analysis of subsidence, relative sea level change and coastal flood exposure. Nature Clim Change 11: 338-342. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-00993-z
![]() |
[28] | Madani N, Parazoo NC, Kimball JS, et al. (2020) Recent Amplified Global Gross Primary Productivity Due to Temperature Increase Is Offset by Reduced Productivity Due to Water Constraints. AGU Advances 1. |
[29] | Petit JR (2001) Vostok Ice Core Data for 420,000 Years, IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series #2001-076. NOAA/NGDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USA. |
[30] |
Siddall M, Rohling E, Almogi-Labin A, et al. (2003) Sea level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle. Nature 423: 853-858. doi: 10.1038/nature01690
![]() |
[31] | Betts AK (2021) Truth and the Earth. Rutland Herald. Available from: https://alanbetts.com/writings/articles/truth-and-the-earth/. |
[32] | Douglas-Klotz N (2001) The Hidden Gospel: Decoding the Spiritual Message of the Aramaic Jesus. Quest Books, US. |
[33] | Freedman B (2021) Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. |
[34] | Weintrobe S (2021) Psychological Roots of the Climate Crisis. Bloomsbury Academic. |
[35] | Pope Francis (2015) Laudate Siʹ. Papal Encyclical, Vatican. Available from: http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.pdf. |
[36] | Hall S (2015) Exxon Knew about Climate Change almost 40 years ago. Sci American. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/. |
[37] |
Supran G, Oreskes N (2021) Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil's climate change communications. One Earth 4: 696-719. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014
![]() |
[38] | Auzanneau M (2018) Oil, Power, and War: A Dark History. Chelsea Green Publishing, US. |
[39] | Breslow JM (2012) Robert Brulle: Inside the Climate Change "Countermovement". Available from: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/robert-brulle-inside-the-climate-change-countermovement/. |
[40] |
Almiron N, Boykoff M, Narberhaus M, et al, (2020). Dominant counter-frames in influential climate contrarian European think tanks, Clim Change 162, 2003-2020. doi: 10.1007/s10584-020-02820-4
![]() |
[41] | Drennen A, Hardin S (2021) Climate Deniers in the 117th Congress. Available from: https://www.american progress.org/issues/green/news/2021/03/30/497685/climate-deniers-117th-congress. |
[42] | Dyke J, Watson R, Knorr W (2021) Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap. Available from: https://theconversation.com/climate-scientists-concept-of-net-zero-is-a-dangerous-trap-157368. |
1. | Yang Cao, Hongte Wu, Preparation and performance analysis of polycarboxylate superplasticizer modified with fluorine-containing monomer and silicon dioxide nanoparticles, 2024, 14, 2158-5849, 605, 10.1166/mex.2024.2665 |