This paper investigates a class of dissipative boundary value problems arising from a third-order differential equation with distributional potentials and eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions. Initially, we transform the boundary value problem into the corresponding operator problem. We then demonstrate that the operator is dissipative and examine certain eigenvalue properties of the operator. Furthermore, by applying Krein's theorem, we establish the completeness theorems for both the boundary value problem and the corresponding operator.
Citation: Fei-fan Li, Ji-jun Ao. A dissipative third-order boundary value problem with distributional potentials and eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(5): 3378-3393. doi: 10.3934/era.2025149
[1] | Meilan Qiu, Dewang Li, Zhongliang Luo, Xijun Yu . Huizhou GDP forecast based on fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey bernoulli markov model. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 947-960. doi: 10.3934/era.2023047 |
[2] | Qiang Guo, Zimeng Zhou, Jie Li, Fengwei Jing . Mechanism- and data-driven algorithms of electrical energy consumption accounting and prediction for medium and heavy plate rolling. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 381-408. doi: 10.3934/era.2025019 |
[3] | Yi Deng, Zhanpeng Yue, Ziyi Wu, Yitong Li, Yifei Wang . TCN-Attention-BIGRU: Building energy modelling based on attention mechanisms and temporal convolutional networks. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 2160-2179. doi: 10.3934/era.2024098 |
[4] | Sanqiang Yang, Zhenyu Yang, Leifeng Zhang, Yapeng Guo, Ju Wang, Jingyong Huang . Research on deformation prediction of deep foundation pit excavation based on GWO-ELM model. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5685-5700. doi: 10.3934/era.2023288 |
[5] | Ruyang Yin, Jiping Xing, Pengli Mo, Nan Zheng, Zhiyuan Liu . BO-B&B: A hybrid algorithm based on Bayesian optimization and branch-and-bound for discrete network design problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(11): 3993-4014. doi: 10.3934/era.2022203 |
[6] | Weishang Gao, Qin Gao, Lijie Sun, Yue Chen . Design of a novel multimodal optimization algorithm and its application in logistics optimization. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 1946-1972. doi: 10.3934/era.2024089 |
[7] | Yiwei Wu, Yadan Huang, H Wang, Lu Zhen . Nonlinear programming for fleet deployment, voyage planning and speed optimization in sustainable liner shipping. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(1): 147-168. doi: 10.3934/era.2023008 |
[8] | Ruini Zhao . Nanocrystalline SEM image restoration based on fractional-order TV and nuclear norm. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(8): 4954-4968. doi: 10.3934/era.2024228 |
[9] | Shuang Zhang, Songwen Gu, Yucong Zhou, Lei Shi, Huilong Jin . Energy efficient resource allocation of IRS-Assisted UAV network. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(7): 4753-4771. doi: 10.3934/era.2024217 |
[10] | Lijie Liu, Xiaojing Wei, Leilei Wei . A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method based on generalized numerical fluxes to variable-order time-fractional reaction-diffusion problem with the Caputo fractional derivative. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5701-5715. doi: 10.3934/era.2023289 |
This paper investigates a class of dissipative boundary value problems arising from a third-order differential equation with distributional potentials and eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions. Initially, we transform the boundary value problem into the corresponding operator problem. We then demonstrate that the operator is dissipative and examine certain eigenvalue properties of the operator. Furthermore, by applying Krein's theorem, we establish the completeness theorems for both the boundary value problem and the corresponding operator.
In this paper we study a class of third order dissipative differential operators. Dissipative operators are of general interest in mathematics, for example in the study of the Cauchy problems in partial differential equations and in infinite dimensional dynamical systems. Even order dissipative operators and the boundary conditions generating them have been investigated by many authors, see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] and their references. Odd order problems arise in physics and other areas of applied mathematics and have also been studied, e.g., in [10,11,12,13,14,16,15].
Non-self-adjointness of spectral problems can be caused by one or more of the following factors: the non-linear dependence of the problems on the spectral parameter, the non-symmetry of the differential expressions used, and the non-self-adjointness of the boundary conditions(BCs) involved. Many scholars focus on the non-self-adjoint differential operators caused by non-self-adjoint BCs. Bairamov, Uğurlu, Tuna and Zhang et al. considered the even order dissipative operators and their spectral properties in [5,6,7,8,9], respectively. However, these results all restricted in some special boundary conditions. In 2012, Wang and Wu [2] found all boundary conditions which generate dissipative operators of order two and proved the completeness of eigenfunctions and associated functions for these operators. In [3] the authors studied a class of non-self-adjoint fourth order differential operators in Weyl's limit circle case with general separated BCs, and they proved the completeness of eigenfunctions and associated functions. Here we find a class of such general conditions for the third order case, which may help to classify the dissipative boundary conditions of third order differential operators.
As is mentioned above, there are many results for dissipative Sturm-Liouville operators and fourth order differential operators, however, there are few studies on the odd order dissipative operators. Thus, in this paper, we study a class of non-self-adjoint third order differential operators generated by the symmetric differential expression in Weyl's limit circle case together with non-self-adjoint BCs.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce third order dissipative operators and develop their properties. Section 3 discusses some general properties of dissipative operators in Hilbert space and some particular properties of the third order operators studied here. The completeness of eigenfunctions and associated functions is given in Section 4. Brief concluding remarks on the obtained results in this present paper and the comparison with other works are reported in Section 5.
Consider the third order differential expression
l(u)=iu(3)+q(x)u,x∈I=(a,b), | (2.1) |
where −∞≤a<b≤+∞, q(x) is a real-valued function on I and q(x)∈L1loc(I). Suppose that the endpoints a and b are singular, i.e., a=−∞ or for any c∈(a,b) q(x) is not absolutely integrable in (a,c] (the same statement holds for endpoint b), and Weyl's limit-circle case holds for the differential expression l(u), i.e., the deficiency indices at both endpoints are (3,3).
Let
Ω={u∈L2(I):u,u′,u′′∈ACloc(I),l(u)∈L2(I)}. |
For all u,v∈Ω, we set
[u,v]x=iu¯v′′−iu′¯v′+iu′′¯v=R¯v(x)QCu(x),x∈I, |
where the bar over a function denotes its complex conjugate, and
Q=(00i0−i0i00), Rv(x)=(v(x),v′(x),v′′(x)), C¯v(x)=R∗v(x), |
and R∗v(x) is the complex conjugate transpose of Rv(x).
Let ψj(x,λ),j=1,2,3 represent a set of linearly independent solutions of the equation l(u)=λu, where λ is a complex parameter. Then ψj(x,0),j=1,2,3 represent the linearly independent solutions of the equation l(u)=0. From Naimark's Patching Lemma, we can choose the solutions above mentioned satisfying any initial conditions, for future conveniences, here we set zj(x)=ψj(x,0),j=1,2,3 satisfying the condition
([zj,zk]a)=J,j,k=1,2,3, | (2.2) |
where
J=(0i0i0000−i). |
From [17], the solutions zj(x),j=1,2,3 as described above exist and are linearly independent. Since Weyl's limit-circle case holds for the differential expression l(u) on I, the solutions zj(x),j=1,2,3 must belong to L2(I). Furthermore, because zj(x),j=1,2,3 are solutions of equation l(u)=0, thus according to the Green's formula, it is easy to get [zj,zk]x=const for any x∈I, hence for any x∈I,([zj,zk]x)=J.
Let l(u)=λu and we consider the boundary value problem consisting of the differential equation
iu(3)+q(x)u=λu,x∈I, | (2.3) |
and the boundary conditions:
l1(u)=[u,z1]a+γ1[u,z2]a+γ2[u,z3]a=0, | (2.4) |
l2(u)=¯γ2[u,z2]a+[u,z3]a+r¯γ4e−2iθ[u,z2]b+re−2iθ[u,z3]b=0, | (2.5) |
l3(u)=[u,z1]b+γ3[u,z2]b+γ4[u,z3]b=0, | (2.6) |
where λ is a complex parameter, r is a real number with |r|≥1, θ∈(−π,π], γj,j=1,2,3,4 are complex numbers with 2ℜγ1≥|γ2|2 and 2ℜγ3≤|γ4|2, here ℜ denotes the real part of a value.
In L2(I), let us define the operator L as Lu=l(u) on D(L), where the domain D(L) of L is given by
D(L)={u∈Ω:lj(u)=0,j=1,2,3}. |
Let Ψ(x) be the Wronskian matrix of the solutions zj(x),j=1,2,3 in I, then ones have
Ψ(x)=(Cz1(x),Cz2(x),Cz3(x)). |
Now let us introduce several lemmas.
Lemma 1.
Q=(Ψ∗(x))−1JΨ−1(x),x∈I. |
Proof. From
[zj,zk]x=R¯zk(x)QCzj(x),j,k=1,2,3, |
we have
J=JT=([zj,zk]x)T=Ψ∗(x)QΨ(x),j,k=1,2,3. |
Then the conclusion can be obtained by left multiplying (Ψ∗(x))−1 and right multiplying Ψ−1(x) on the two ends of the above equality.
Lemma 2. For arbitrary u∈D(L)
([u,z1]x,[u,z2]x,[u,z3]x)T=JΨ−1(x)Cu(x),x∈I. |
Proof. From
[u,zj]x=R¯zj(x)QCu(x),j=1,2,3, |
one has
([u,z1]x,[u,z2]x,[u,z3]x)T=Ψ∗(x)QCu(x)=Ψ∗(x)(Ψ∗(x))−1JΨ−1(x)Cu(x)=JΨ−1(x)Cu(x). |
This complete the proof.
Corollary 1. For arbitrary y1,y2,y3∈D(L), let Y(x)=(Cy1(x),Cy2(x),Cy3(x)) be the Wronskian matrix of y1,y2,y3, then
JΨ−1(x)Y(x)=([y1,z1]x[y2,z1]x[y3,z1]x[y1,z2]x[y2,z2]x[y3,z2]x[y1,z3]x[y2,z3]x[y3,z3]x),x∈I. |
Lemma 3. For arbitrary u,v∈D(L), we have
[u,v]x=i([u,z1]x¯[v,z2]x+[u,z2]x¯[v,z1]x−[u,z3]x¯[v,z3]x),x∈I. | (2.7) |
Proof. From Lemma 1 and Lemma 2, it is easy to calculate that
[u,v]x=R¯v(x)QCu(x)=R¯v(x)(Ψ∗(x))−1JΨ−1(x)Cu(x)=(JΨ−1(x)Cv(x))∗J(JΨ−1(x)Cu(x))=(¯[v,z1]x,¯[v,z2]x,¯[v,z3]x)J([u,z1]x,[u,z2]x,[u,z3]x)T=i([u,z1]x¯[v,z2]x+[u,z2]x¯[v,z1]x−[u,z3]x¯[v,z3]x). |
This completes the proof.
We start with the definition of dissipative operators.
Definition 1. A linear operator L, acting in the Hilbert space L2(I) and having domain D(L), is said to be dissipative if ℑ(Lf,f)≥0,∀f∈D(L), where ℑ denotes the imaginary part of a value.
Theorem 1. The operator L is dissipative in L2(I).
Proof. For u∈D(L), we have
2iℑ(Lu,u)=(Lu,u)−(u,Lu)=[u,u](b)−[u,u](a), | (3.1) |
then, applying (2.7), it follows that
2iℑ(Lu,u)=i([u,z1]b¯[u,z2]b+[u,z2]b¯[u,z1]b−[u,z3]b¯[u,z3]b)−i([u,z1]a¯[u,z2]a+[u,z2]a¯[u,z1]a−[u,z3]a¯[u,z3]a). | (3.2) |
From (2.4)–(2.6), it has
[u,z1]a=(γ2¯γ2−γ1)[u,z2]a+rγ2¯γ4e−2iθ[u,z2]b+rγ2e−2iθ[u,z3]b, | (3.3) |
[u,z3]a=−¯γ2[u,z2]a−r¯γ4e−2iθ[u,z2]b−re−2iθ[u,z3]b, | (3.4) |
[u,z1]b=−γ3[u,z2]b−γ4[u,z3]b, | (3.5) |
substituting (3.3)–(3.5) into (3.2) one obtains
2iℑ(Lu,u)=(Lu,u)−(u,Lu)=i(¯[u,z2]a,¯[u,z2]b,¯[u,z3]b) | (3.6) |
(−γ2¯γ2+γ1+¯γ1000r2γ4¯γ4−γ3−¯γ3γ4(r2−1)0¯γ4(r2−1)(r2−1))([u,z2]a[u,z2]b[u,z3]b), |
and hence
2ℑ(Lu,u)=(¯[u,z2]a,¯[u,z2]b,¯[u,z3]b)(s000cf0¯fd)([u,z2]a[u,z2]b[u,z3]b), | (3.7) |
where
s=2ℜγ1−|γ2|2,f=γ4(r2−1),c=r2|γ4|2−2ℜγ3,d=r2−1. |
Note that the 3 by 3 matrix in (3.7) is Hermitian, its eigenvalues are
s,c+d±√(c−d)2+4|f|22, |
and they are all non-negative if and only if
s≥0, c+d≥0, cd≥|f|2. |
Since |r|≥1, 2ℜγ1≥|γ2|2 and 2ℜγ3≤|γ4|2, we have
ℑ(Lu,u)≥0,∀u∈D(L). |
Hence L is a dissipative operator in L2(I).
Theorem 2. If |r|>1, 2ℜγ1>|γ2|2 and 2ℜγ3<|γ4|2, then the operator L has no real eigenvalue.
Proof. Suppose λ0 is a real eigenvalue of L. Let ϕ0(x)=ϕ(x,λ0)≠0 be a corresponding eigenfunction. Since
ℑ(Lϕ0,ϕ0)=ℑ(λ0‖ϕ0‖2)=0, |
from (3.7), it follows that
ℑ(Lϕ0,ϕ0)=12(¯[ϕ0,z2]a,¯[ϕ0,z2]b,¯[ϕ0,z3]b)(s000cf0¯fd)([ϕ0,z2]a[ϕ0,z2]b[ϕ0,z3]b)=0, |
since |r|>1, 2ℜγ1>|γ2|2 and 2ℜγ3<|γ4|2, the matrix
(s000cf0¯fd) |
is positive definite. Hence [ϕ0,z2]a=0, [ϕ0,z2]b=0 and [ϕ0,z3]b=0, and by the boundary conditions (2.4)–(2.6), we obtain that [ϕ0,z1]b=0. Let ϕ0(x)=ϕ(x,λ0), τ0(x)=τ(x,λ0)andη0(x)=η(x,λ0) be the linearly independent solutions of l(y)=λ0y. Then from Corollary 1 one has
([ϕ0,z1]b[τ0,z1]b[η0,z1]b[ϕ0,z2]b[τ0,z2]b[η0,z2]b[ϕ0,z3]b[τ0,z3]b[η0,z3]b)=QΨ−1(b)(Cϕ0(b),Cτ0(b),Cη0(b)). |
It is evident that the determinant of the left hand side is equal to zero, the value of the Wronskian of the solutions ϕ(x,λ0), τ(x,λ0) and η(x,λ0) is not equal to zero, therefore the determinant on the right hand side is not equal to zero. This is a contradiction, hence the operator L has no real eigenvalue.
In this section we start with a result of Gasymov and Guseinov [18]. It also can be found in many literatures, for instance in [19] and [20].
Lemma 4. For all x∈[a,b], the functions ϕjk=[ψk(⋅,λ),zj](x), j,k=1,2,3, are entire functions of λ with growth order ≤1 and minimal type: for any j,k=1,2,3 and ε≥0, there exists a positive constant Cj,k,ε such that
|ϕjk|≤Cj,k,εeε|λ|,λ∈C. |
Let
A=(1γ1γ20¯γ21000),B=(0000r¯γ4e−2iθre−2iθ1γ3γ4) |
denote the boundary condition matrices of boundary conditions (2.4)–(2.6), and set Φ=(ϕjk)3×3. Then, a complex number is an eigenvalue of the operator L if and only if it is a zero of the entire function
Δ(λ)=|l1(ψ1(⋅,λ))l1(ψ2(⋅,λ))l1(ψ3(⋅,λ))l2(ψ1(⋅,λ))l2(ψ2(⋅,λ))l2(ψ3(⋅,λ))l3(ψ1(⋅,λ))l3(ψ2(⋅,λ))l3(ψ3(⋅,λ))|=det(AΦ(a,λ)+BΦ(b,λ)). | (4.1) |
Remark 1. Note that a=−∞ or b=∞ have not been ruled out. Since the limit circle case holds, the functions ϕjk and Φ(a,λ),Φ(b,λ) are well defined at a=−∞ and b=∞, i.e., ϕjk(±∞)=[ψk(⋅,λ),zj](±∞)=limx→±∞=[ψk(⋅,λ),zj](x) exist and are finite.
Corollary 2. The entire function Δ(λ) is also of growth order ≤1 and minimal type: for any ε≥0, there exists a positive constant Cε such that
|Δ(λ)|≤Cεeε|λ|,λ∈C, | (4.2) |
and hence
lim sup|λ|→∞ln|Δ(λ)||λ|≤0. | (4.3) |
From Theorem 2 it follows that zero is not an eigenvalue of L, hence the operator L−1 exists. Let's give an analytical representation of L−1.
Consider the non-homogeneous boundary value problem composed of the equation l(u)=f(x) and the boundary conditions (2.4)–(2.6), where x∈I=(a,b), f(x)∈L2(I).
Let u(x) be the solution of the above non-homogeneous boundary value problem, then
u(x)=C1z1(x)+C2z2(x)+C3z3(x)+u∗(x), |
where Cj, j=1,2,3 are arbitrary constants and u∗(x) is a special solution of l(u)=f(x).
It can be obtained by the method of constant variation,
u∗(x)=C1(x)z1(x)+C2(x)z2(x)+C3(x)z3(x), |
where Cj, j=1,2,3 satisfies
{C′1(x)z1(x)+C′2(x)z2(x)+C′3(x)z3(x)=0,C′1(x)z′1(x)+C′2(x)z′2(x)+C′3(x)z′3(x)=0,i(C′1(x)z″1(x)+C′2(x)z″2(x)+C′3(x)z″3(x))=f(x). |
By proper calculation, we have
u∗(x)=∫baK(x,ξ)f(ξ)dξ, |
where
K(x,ξ)={1i|Ψ(x)||z1(ξ)z2(ξ)z3(ξ)z′1(ξ)z′2(ξ)z′3(ξ)z1(x)z2(x)z3(x)|, a<ξ≤x<b,0, a<x≤ξ<b, | (4.4) |
then the solution can be written as
u(x)=C1z1(x)+C2z2(x)+C3z3(x)+∫baK(x,ξ)f(ξ)dξ, |
substituting u(x) into the boundary conditions one obtains
Cj(x)=1Δ(0)∫baFj(ξ)f(ξ)dξ,j=1,2,3, |
where
F1(ξ)=−|l1(K)l1(z2)l1(z3)l2(K)l2(z2)l2(z3)l3(K)l3(z2)l3(z3)|, | (4.5) |
F2(ξ)=−|l1(z1)l1(K)l1(z3)l2(z1)l2(K)l2(z3)l3(z1)l3(K)l3(z3)|, | (4.6) |
F3(ξ)=−|l1(z1)l1(z2)l1(K)l2(z1)l2(z2)l2(K)l3(z1)l3(z2)l3(K)|, | (4.7) |
thus
u(x)=∫ba1Δ(0)[F1(ξ)z1(x)+F2(ξ)z2(x)+F3(ξ)z3(x)+K(x,ξ)Δ(0)]f(ξ)dξ. |
Let
G(x,ξ)=−1Δ(0)|z1(x)z2(x)z3(x)K(x,ξ)l1(z1)l1(z2)l1(z3)l1(K)l2(z1)l2(z2)l2(z3)l2(K)l3(z1)l3(z2)l3(z3)l3(K)|, | (4.8) |
then one obtains
u(x)=∫baG(x,ξ)f(ξ)dξ. |
Now define the operator T as
Tu=∫baG(x,ξ)u(ξ)dξ,∀u∈L2(I), | (4.9) |
then T is an integral operator and T=L−1, this implies that the root vectors of the operators T and L coincide, since zj(x)∈L2(I), j=1,2,3, then the following inequality holds
∫ba∫ba|G(x,ξ)|2dxdξ<+∞, | (4.10) |
this implies that the integral operator T is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator [21].
The next theorem is known as Krein's Theorem.
Theorem 3. Let S be a compact dissipative operator in L2(I) with nuclear imaginary part ℑS. The system of all root vectors of S is complete in L2(I) so long as at least one of the following two conditions is fulfilled:
limm→∞n+(m,ℜS)m=0,limm→∞n−(m,ℜS)m=0, | (4.11) |
where n+(m,ℜS) and n−(m,ℜS) denote the number of characteristic values of the real component ℜS of S in the intervals [0,m] and [−m,0], respectively.
Proof. See [22].
Theorem 4. If an entire function h(μ) is of order ≤1 and minimal type, then
limρ→∞n+(ρ,h)ρ=0,limρ→∞n−(ρ,h)ρ=0, | (4.12) |
where n+(ρ,h) and n−(ρ,h) denote the number of the zeros of the function h(μ) in the intervals [0,ρ] and [−ρ,0], respectively.
Proof. See [23].
The operator T can be written as T=T1+iT2, where T1=ℜT and T2=ℑT, T and T1 are Hilbert-Schmidt operators, T1 is a self-adjoint operator in L2(I), and T2 is a nuclear operator (since it is a finite dimensional operator)[22]. It is easy to verify that T1 is the inverse of the real part L1 of the operator L.
Since the operator L is dissipative, it follows that the operator −T is dissipative. Consider the operator −T=−T1−iT2, the eigenvalues of the operator −T1 and L1 coincide. Since the characteristic function of L1 is an entire function, therefore using Theorem 4 and Krein's Theorem we arrive at the following results.
Theorem 5. The system of all root vectors of the operator −T (also of T) is complete in L2(I).
Theorem 6. The system of all eigenvectors and associated vectors of the dissipative operator L is complete in L2(I).
This paper considered a class of third order dissipative operator generated by symmetric third order differential expression and a class of non-self-adjoint boundary conditions. By using the well known Krein's Theorem and theoretical analysis the completeness of eigenfunctions system and associated functions is proved.
The similar results already exist for second order S-L operators and fourth order differential operators, see e.g., [2] and [3]. For third order case, the corresponding discussions about dissipative operators can be found in most recent works in [15,19], where the maximal dissipative extension and the complete theorems of eigenvectors system are given. The boundary conditions at the present work are much general and the methods are different from those in [15,19]. These boundary conditions may help us to classify all the analytical representations of dissipative boundary conditions of third order differential operators.
The authors thank the referees for their comments and detailed suggestions. These have significantly improved the presentation of this paper. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11661059), Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (Grant No. 2017JQ07). The third author was supported by the Ky and Yu-fen Fan US-China Exchange fund through the American Mathematical Society.
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] | S. Albeverio, F. Gesztesy, R. Hoegh-Krohn, H. Holden, Solvable Models in Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition, AMS Chelsea Publ., Providence, RI, 2005. |
[2] |
P. Kurasov, On the Coulomb potential in one dimension, J. Phys. A Math. Gen., 29 (1996), 1767. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/29/8/023 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/29/8/023
![]() |
[3] |
N. J. Guliyev, Schrödinger operators with distributional potentials and boundary conditions dependent on the eigenvalue parameter, J. Math. Phys., 60 (2019), 063501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5048692 doi: 10.1063/1.5048692
![]() |
[4] |
J. Yan, G. L. Shi, Inequalities among eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems with distribution potentials, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 409 (2014), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.07.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.07.024
![]() |
[5] |
H. Y. Zhang, J. J. Ao, F. Z. Bo, Eigenvalues of fourth-order boundary value problems with distributional potentials, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 7294–7317. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022407 doi: 10.3934/math.2022407
![]() |
[6] |
J. Eckhardt, F. Gesztesy, R. Nichols, G. Teschl, Inverse spectral theory for Sturm-Liouville operators with distributional potentials, J. London Math. Soc. Second Ser., 88 (2013), 801–828. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/jdt041 doi: 10.1112/jlms/jdt041
![]() |
[7] |
E. L. Korotyaev, Resonances of third order differential operators, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 478 (2019), 82–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.05.007
![]() |
[8] |
A. Badanin, E. L. Korotyaev, Third-order operators with three-point conditions associated with Boussinesqs equation, Appl. Anal., 100 (2021), 527–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2019.1610941 doi: 10.1080/00036811.2019.1610941
![]() |
[9] |
H. Y. Zhang, J. J. Ao, Some eigenvalue properties of third-order boundary value problems with distributional potentials, Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser., 41 (2025), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10255-023-1064-5 doi: 10.1007/s10255-023-1064-5
![]() |
[10] |
N. P. Bondarenko, Inverse spectral problem for the third-order differential equation, Results Math., 78 (2023), 179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-023-01955-x doi: 10.1007/s00025-023-01955-x
![]() |
[11] | M. Gregus, Third Order Linear Differential Equations, Mathematics and Its Applications, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987. |
[12] |
F. Bernis, L. A. Peletier, Two problems from draining flows involving third-order ordinary differential equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 27 (1996), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141093260847 doi: 10.1137/S0036141093260847
![]() |
[13] |
E. O. Tuck, L. W. Schwartz, A numerical and asymptotic study of some third-order ordinary differential equations relevant to draining and coating flows, SIAM Rev., 32 (1990), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1137/1032079 doi: 10.1137/1032079
![]() |
[14] |
C. Tretter, Boundary eigenvalue problems with differential equations Nη=λPη with λ-polynomial boundary conditions, J. Differ. Equations, 170 (2001), 408–471. https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.2000.3829 doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3829
![]() |
[15] |
C. Fulton, S. Pruess, Numerical methods for a singular eigenvalue problem with eigenparameter in the boundary conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 71 (1979), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(79)90203-8 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(79)90203-8
![]() |
[16] |
J. Walter, Regular eigenvalue problems with eigenvalue parameter in the boundary conditions, Math. Z., 133 (1973), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01177870 doi: 10.1007/BF01177870
![]() |
[17] |
Z. S. Aliyev, A. A. Dunyamalieva, Defect basis property of a system of root functions of a Sturm-Liouville problem with spectral parameter in the boundary conditions, Differ. Equations, 51 (2015), 1249–1266. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266115100018 doi: 10.1134/S0012266115100018
![]() |
[18] |
R. S. Phillips, Dissipative operators and hyperbolic systems of partial differential equations, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 90 (1959), 193–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1993202 doi: 10.2307/1993202
![]() |
[19] |
P. D. Lax, R. S. Phillips, Scattering theory for dissipative hyperbolic systems, J. Funct. Anal., 14 (1973), 172–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(73)90049-9 doi: 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90049-9
![]() |
[20] |
E. Bairamov, A. M. Krall, Dissipative operators generated by the Sturm-Liouville differential expression in the Weyl limit circle case, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 254 (2001), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2000.7233 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7233
![]() |
[21] |
Z. Wang, H. Wu, Dissipative non-self-adjoint Sturm-Liouville operators and completeness of their eigenfunctions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 394 (2012), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.071 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.071
![]() |
[22] |
E. Bairamov, E. Uǧurlu, The determinants of dissipative Sturm-Liouville operators with transmission conditions, Math. Comput. Modell., 53 (2011), 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.10.017 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.10.017
![]() |
[23] |
E. Bairamov, E. Uǧurlu, On the characteristic values of the real component of a dissipative boundary value transmission problem, Appl. Math. Comput., 218 (2012), 9657–9663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.02.079 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.02.079
![]() |
[24] |
E. Bairamov, E. Uǧurlu, Krein's theorems for a dissipative boundary value transmission problem, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory, 7 (2013), 831–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11785-011-0180-z doi: 10.1007/s11785-011-0180-z
![]() |
[25] |
B. P. Allahverdiev, H. Tuna, Y. Yalçınkaya, A completeness theorem for dissipative conformable fractional Sturm-Liouville operator in singular case, Filomat, 36 (2022), 2461–2474. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2207461A doi: 10.2298/FIL2207461A
![]() |
[26] |
T. Wang, J. J. Ao, A. Zettl, A class of dissipative differential operators of order three, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 7034–7043. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021412 doi: 10.3934/math.2021412
![]() |
[27] |
X. Y. Zhang, J. Sun, The determinants of fourth order dissipative operators with transmission conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 410 (2014), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.08.004
![]() |
[28] |
E. Uǧurlu, Extensions of a minimal third-order formally symmetric operator, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 43 (2020), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-018-0696-8 doi: 10.1007/s40840-018-0696-8
![]() |
[29] |
B. P. Allahverdiev, A nonself-adjoint singular Sturm-Liouville problem with a spectral parameter in the boundary condition, Math. Nachr., 278 (2005), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.200310269 doi: 10.1002/mana.200310269
![]() |
[30] |
H. Tuna, On spectral properties of dissipative fourth order boundary-value problem with a spectral parameter in the boundary condition, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2013), 9377–9387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.010
![]() |
[31] | I. Gohberg, M. G. Krein, Introduction to the Theory of Linear Nonselfadjoint Operators, American Mathematical Soc., Providence R.I., 1969. |
[32] | M. G. Krein, On the indeterminate case of the Sturm-Liouville boundary problem in the interval (0,∞), Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Matematicheskaya, 16 (1952), 293–324. |
1. | Cheng-Wen Lee, Peiyi Kong, Wendong Yang, Forecasting Travel Sentiment under the Shock Effects of COVID-19 and Vaccination Using Grey Prediction Models, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/7334544 | |
2. | Meilan Qiu, Dewang Li, Zhongliang Luo, Xijun Yu, Huizhou GDP forecast based on fractional opposite-direction accumulating nonlinear grey bernoulli markov model, 2023, 31, 2688-1594, 947, 10.3934/era.2023047 | |
3. | Yuzhen Chen, Suzhen Li, Shuangbing Guo, Wendong Yang, A Novel Fractional Hausdorff Discrete Grey Model for Forecasting the Renewable Energy Consumption, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/8443619 | |
4. | Haoqing Wang, Wen Yi, Yannick Liu, An innovative approach of determining the sample data size for machine learning models: a case study on health and safety management for infrastructure workers, 2022, 30, 2688-1594, 3452, 10.3934/era.2022176 | |
5. | Yi Deng, Zhanpeng Yue, Ziyi Wu, Yitong Li, Yifei Wang, TCN-Attention-BIGRU: Building energy modelling based on attention mechanisms and temporal convolutional networks, 2024, 32, 2688-1594, 2160, 10.3934/era.2024098 |