With the proposal of the new power system, power supply from renewable energy sources and traditional power supply have emerged as the future development directions of the power grid, while the traditional pricing mechanisms are facing new challenges. Considering the different characteristics of renewable energy power supply and traditional power supply, such as being clean and sustainable, but unstable, for renewable energy power supply, and being stable and technologically mature, but causing significant pollution, for traditional power supply, a multi-price model with the cost of pollution treatment under the multi-energy electricity generation was established in this paper. A distributed algorithm with the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-Ⅱ) was also proposed. In the model, the power supply side includes traditional energy generation, renewable energy generation, and the energy storage device. The proposed algorithm was designed using Lagrangian duality theory, and the multi-price is obtained by solving the different lagrange multipliers. Finally, the numerical results show that the model is reasonable when comparing the obtained price and social welfare with that untreated-pollution model, as well as a single supply model. Also, the proposed algorithm always has better computational efficiency, when compared with PSO, HS, and GA algorithms. The proposed model and algorithm provide a new idea and method for the optimal scheduling of a smart grid.
Citation: Linsen Song, Yichen Du. A real-time pricing dynamic algorithm for a smart grid with multi-pricing and multiple energy generation[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(5): 2989-3006. doi: 10.3934/era.2025131
With the proposal of the new power system, power supply from renewable energy sources and traditional power supply have emerged as the future development directions of the power grid, while the traditional pricing mechanisms are facing new challenges. Considering the different characteristics of renewable energy power supply and traditional power supply, such as being clean and sustainable, but unstable, for renewable energy power supply, and being stable and technologically mature, but causing significant pollution, for traditional power supply, a multi-price model with the cost of pollution treatment under the multi-energy electricity generation was established in this paper. A distributed algorithm with the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-Ⅱ) was also proposed. In the model, the power supply side includes traditional energy generation, renewable energy generation, and the energy storage device. The proposed algorithm was designed using Lagrangian duality theory, and the multi-price is obtained by solving the different lagrange multipliers. Finally, the numerical results show that the model is reasonable when comparing the obtained price and social welfare with that untreated-pollution model, as well as a single supply model. Also, the proposed algorithm always has better computational efficiency, when compared with PSO, HS, and GA algorithms. The proposed model and algorithm provide a new idea and method for the optimal scheduling of a smart grid.
| [1] | IEA, World Energy Outlook 2022, 2022. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022 |
| [2] |
H. Song, Z. Wang, Y. Gao, Bi-level real-time pricing model in multitype electricity users for welfare equilibrium: A reinforcement learning approach, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 17 (2025), 015501. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0242836 doi: 10.1063/5.0242836
|
| [3] | K. Dheeraja, R. Padma Priya, T. Ritika, Real-time pricing and sustainable load scheduling model for smart homes using stackelberg game theory, inProceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Data Engineering: ICCIDE 2021, 19 (2022), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7182-1_22 |
| [4] |
Y. Dai, W. Yu, M. Leng, A hybrid ensemble optimized BiGRU method for short-term photovoltaic generation forecasting, Energy, 299 (2024), 131458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131458 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131458
|
| [5] |
Z. Zhou, Y. Dai, M. Leng, A photovoltaic power forecasting framework based on Attention mechanism and parallel prediction architecture, Appl. Energy, 391 (2025), 125869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125869 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125869
|
| [6] |
T. Namerikawa, N. Okubo, R. Sato, Y. Okawa, M. Ono, Real-Time pricing mechanism for electricity market with built-in incentive for participation, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 6 (2015), 2714–2724. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2447154 doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2447154
|
| [7] |
Y. Dai, X. Sun, L. Li, H. Gao, Real-time demand response mechanism for smart grid residential electricity based on multi-layer game, Oper. Res. Manage., 30 (2021), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.12005/orms.2021.0307 doi: 10.12005/orms.2021.0307
|
| [8] | P. Samadi, A. Mohsenian-Rad, R. Schober, V. W. S. Wong, J. Jatskevich, Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid, in 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, (2010), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622077 |
| [9] |
G. Yuan, Y. Gao, H. Wang, Utility classification based real time pricing algorithm for smart grid, J. Shanghai Univ. Technol., 42 (2020), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.13255/j.cnki.jusst.2020.01.006 doi: 10.13255/j.cnki.jusst.2020.01.006
|
| [10] |
D. Qu, J. Li, Y. Shang, Y. Li, S. Luo, Smart grid smoothing approaches real-time pricing, Syst. Sci. Math., 45 (2025), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.12341/jssms23009 doi: 10.12341/jssms23009
|
| [11] |
H. Zhu, G. Yan, Y. Dai, A real time pricing strategy for smart grid considering risk, J. Syst. Simul., 30 (2018), 1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201804020 doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201804020
|
| [12] |
L. Song, G. Sheng, A nonsmooth Levenberg-Marquardt method based on KKT conditions for real-time pricing in smart grid, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 162 (2024), 110235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110235 doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110235
|
| [13] |
H. Wang, Y. Gao, Real-time pricing method for smart grids based on complementarity problem, J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, 7 (2019), 1280–1293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-019-0508-7 doi: 10.1007/s40565-019-0508-7
|
| [14] |
Y. Yang, S. Q. Du, Y. Chen, Real-time pricing method for smart grid based on social welfare maximization model, J. Ind. Manage. Optim., 19 (2023), 2206–2225. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2022039 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022039
|
| [15] |
Y. Li, J. Li, Z. Yu, J. Dong, T. Zhou, A cosh-based smoothing Newton algorithm for the real-time pricing problem in smart grid, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 135 (2022), 107296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107296 doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107296
|
| [16] |
N. Li, Y. Gao, Real-time pricing based on convex hull method for smart grid with multiple generating units, Energy, 285 (2023), 129543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129543 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129543
|
| [17] |
G. Yuan, Y. Gao, B. Ye, Optimal dispatching strategy and real-time pricing for multi-regional integrated energy systems based on demand response, Renewable Energy, 179 (2021), 1424–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.036 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.036
|
| [18] |
D. Qu, J. Li, M. Yong, Real-time pricing for smart grid considering energy complementarity of a microgrid interacting with the large grid, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 141 (2022), 108217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108217 doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108217
|
| [19] |
Y. Luo, Y. Gao, D. Fan, Real-time demand response strategy base on price and incentive considering multi-energy in smart grid: A bi-level optimization method, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 153 (2023), 109354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109354 doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109354
|
| [20] |
N. Zhao, J. Lv, Y. Gao, J. Tang, F. Zhou, Real-time pricing for smart grid with multiple energy coexistence on the user side, IET Renewable Power Gener., 18 (2024), 2162–2176. https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.13051 doi: 10.1049/rpg2.13051
|
| [21] |
L. Zhang, Y. Gao, H. Zhu, L. Tao, Bi-level stochastic real-time pricing model in multi-energy generation system: A reinforcement learning approch, Energy, 239 (2022), 121926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121926 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121926
|
| [22] |
A. Alzahrani, M. U. Rahman, G. Hafeez, G. Rukh, S. Ali, S. Murawwat, et al., A strategy for multi-objective energy optimization in smart grid considering renewable energy and batteries energy storage system, IEEE Access, 11 (2023), 33872–33886. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3263264 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3263264
|
| [23] |
B. S. Mahdi, N. Sulaiman, M. Abd Shehab, S. Shafie, H. Hizam, S. L. B. M. Hassan, Optimization of operating cost and energy consumption in a smart grid, IEEE Access, 12 (2024), 18837–18850. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3354065 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3354065
|
| [24] | P. Mundra, A. Arya, S. Gawre, S. Mehroliya, Independent demand side management system based on energy consumption scheduling by NSGA-Ⅱ for futuristic smart grid, in 2020 IEEE-HYDCON, (2020), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/HYDCON48903.2020.9242816 |
| [25] |
Y. Wang, Z. Zhu, Z. Yu, Z. Wang, NSGA-Ⅱ-based load resource management for frequency and voltage support, Global Energy Interconnect., 2025 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloei.2025.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.gloei.2025.01.005
|
| [26] | H. Gao, Y. Gao, Real-time pricing strategy for smart grid with dual-source power supply, Intell. Comput. Appl., 13 (2023), 44–50+58. |
| [27] |
Q. Zhang, Y. Sun, Real-time pricing model of smart grid under dual-carbon target based on social welfare maximisation, Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Studies Res., 58 (2024), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/58.2.24.18 doi: 10.24818/18423264/58.2.24.18
|
| [28] | J. Tao, Y. Gao, Identifying and computing shadow price in case of multiple Lagrange multipliers, J. Manage. Sci. China, 24 (2021), 32–44. |
| [29] |
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6 (2002), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017 doi: 10.1109/4235.996017
|
| [30] |
X. Lu, K. Zhou, S. Yang, Multi-objective optimal dispatch of microgrid containing electric vehicles, J. Cleaner Prod., 165 (2017), 1572–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.221 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.221
|