Citation: Shouyun Cheng, Lin Wei, Mustafa Alsowij, Fletcher Corbin, Eric Boakye, Zhengrong Gu, Douglas Raynie. Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of biomass for bio-crude production using Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(3): 417-430. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.417
[1] | Alaa E. Al-Ahmad, Stéphanie D. Lambert, Julien G. Mahy, Benoît Heinrichs, Wissal Wannoussa, Ludivine Tasseroul, Frédéric Weekers, Philippe Thonart, Serge Hiligsmann . Investigation of the potential effect of encapsulated metal nanoparticles on enhancement of thermophilic anaerobic digestion. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(6): 764-793. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023042 |
[2] | TsungYu Lee, Hsunling Bai . Low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over Mn-based catalyst: A review. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(2): 261-289. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.2.261 |
[3] | Pailin Srisuratsiri, Ketsarin Chantarasunthon, Wanutsanun Sudsai, Pichet Sukprasert, Laksamee Chaicharoenwimolkul Chuaitammakit, Wissawat Sakulsaknimitr . Sustainable plastic bottle recycling: employing zinc-deposited SBA-15 as a catalyst for glycolysis of polyethylene terephthalate. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(1): 90-106. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024006 |
[4] | Isabel Pariente María, Martínez Fernando, ÁngelBotas Juan, AntonioMelero Juan . Extrusion of Fe2O3/SBA-15 mesoporous material for application as heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 1(2): 154-168. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.154 |
[5] | Zainuddin Ginting, Adi Setiawan, Khairul Anshar, Ishak Ibrahin, Jalaluddin, Indri Riski Hasanah, Fitriyaningsih, Zetta Fazira . Optimization of the production of grade A liquid smoke from Patchouli solid residue using a distillation-adsorption process. AIMS Environmental Science, 2025, 12(1): 106-119. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2025005 |
[6] | Lukluatus Syavika, Anugrah Ricky Wijaya, Alif Alfarisyi Syah . Synthesis and development of Fe3O4/SiO2/CaCO3 nanocomposite adsorbents for ammonia adsorption in the shrimp pond waste. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(6): 883-899. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024044 |
[7] | Katie Lewis, Jamie Foster, Frank Hons, Thomas Boutton . Initial aggregate formation and soil carbon storage from lipid-extracted algae amendment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(6): 743-762. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.6.743 |
[8] | Yang Wang, Chenhui Liang, Shijie Liu . Ethanol production from hot-water sugar maple wood extract hydrolyzate: fermentation media optimization for Escherichia coli FBWHR. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(2): 269-281. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.269 |
[9] | Li Ma, Likun Zhan, Qingdan Wu, Longcheng Li, Xiaochen Zheng, Zhihua Xiao, Jingchen Zou . Optimization of liquefaction process based on global meta-analysis and machine learning approach: Effect of process conditions and raw material selection on remaining ratio and bioavailability of heavy metals in biochar. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(3): 342-359. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024016 |
[10] | Sayali Sandbhor, Sayali Apte, Vaishnavi Dabir, Ketan Kotecha, Rajkumar Balasubramaniyan, Tanupriya Choudhury . AI-based carbon emission forecast and mitigation framework using recycled concrete aggregates: A sustainable approach for the construction industry. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(6): 894-910. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023048 |
The exploitation of renewable energy has attracted great interest in responding to the depletion of fossil fuels and the growing greenhouse effect. Biomass has proven to be a potential and alternative energy resource due to its renewable and environmentally friendly properties [1]. Biomass conversion methods are mainly consisted of biochemical methods such as fermentation and thermochemical methods including combustion, pyrolysis, gasification and liquefaction [2]. Among these methods, thermochemical liquefaction is one efficient and promising method that converts biomass into liquid fuel (named bio-crude), gas and solid residue [3]. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is the thermochemical process treating wet biomass under high temperature (250–350 ℃) and pressure (5–15 MPa) in the presence of solvent (water or alcohols) with or without using a catalyst [4].
Catalysts had a significant influence on bio-crude yield and quality during HTL process [5,6,7,8]. Acids catalyst such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid and alkali catalysts such as Na2CO3, K2CO3, KOH, NaOH and Ca (OH)2 were widely used in biomass liquefaction [6,9,10]. However, the use of homogeneous acid and alkali catalysts had a corrosion effects on liquefaction equipments [11]. Besides, additional separation steps with high cost and energy consumption are required for catalyst recovery when using the homogeneous catalysts [5]. Conventional catalysts were expected to be replaced by more environmentally friendly heterogeneous catalysts to improve bio-crude yield and quality in biomass liquefaction [12]. The heterogeneous Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst was a hydrothermally stable catalyst for pyrolysis bio-oil upgrading. Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst showed a high stability that can be used in reaction-regeneration cycles for hydrocarbons production [13]. The heterogeneous solid catalysts were almost fully separated and recovered from reaction products, and they were easy and safe to dispose of [11]. However, there is very little information of using bifunctional Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst in biomass HTL process in literature.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of heterogeneous Ni/HZSM-5 and homogeneous K2CO3 catalyst on bio-crude production in pine sawdust HTL in the batch reactor. The catalytic effect of K2CO3 and Ni/HZSM-5catalysts with different Ni loading ratios on yields and properties of bio-crude and gas were determined.
Pine sawdust (PSD) was provided by the Rushmore Forest Products company (Rapid City, South Dakota). Pine sawdust was further ground into powder with a particle size of less than 1 mm using a hammer mill (Thomas-wiley).
Zinc metal with zero valence was purchased from Fisher Scientific Inc. The HZSM-5 (Si/Al molar ratio = 30) was purchased from Zeolite International Company. Nickel (Ⅱ) nitrate hexahydrate and K2CO3 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts with different Ni loading (6 wt% and 12 wt%) were impregnated with aqueous solutions of nickel (Ⅱ) nitrate hexahydrate. The prepared Ni/HZSM-5 and HZSM-5 catalysts were dried at 120 ℃ for 4 h and then calcined at 550 ℃ for 6 h.
The pine sawdust HTL experiments were carried out in a 500 mL Parr 4575 autoclave reactor equipped with a stirrer. An electric heater was used to heat the reactor. 20.0 g pine sawdust, 4.0 g zinc metal, 4.0 g catalyst (HZSM-5, Ni/HZSM-5 or K2CO3), 80.0 g ethanol and 30.0 g deionized water were loaded in the reactor for each test.
Ethanol can be produced from lignocellulosic biomass by hydrolysis and subsequent fermentation [14]. Ethanol was one promising solvent for biomass liquefaction [15], and it has been widely adopted as solvent for liquefaction of various biomasses such as lignocelluloses [16,17], microalgae [18], and sewage sludge [19]. Ethanol has several advantages in biomass liquefaction process including acting as hydrogen-donor to provide hydrogen, reacting with acidic compounds to form esters through esterification reactions and dissolving high-molecular weight products derived from biomass [15]. Besides, higher ethanol/biomass ratio has positive impacts to increase the bio-crude yield, since it can improve the stability and solubility of fragmented components [20,21]. Finally, the residual ethanol after reaction can be separated from bio-crude product through rotary evaporation at reduced pressure [15,22]. Therefore, ethanol/biomass ratio of 4 (80 g ethanol and 20 g PSD) was loaded as reactants for PSD liquefaction according to these factors and related reference [22].
However, a certain proportion of the added ethanol reacted with the decomposition fragments of PSD and formed more substituted compounds such as esters in PSD liquefaction [3,23]. Besides, some ethanol decomposed to gases such as C2H4 and C2H6[22]. This resulted in the consumption of the added ethanol. Therefore, some of the added ethanol can be considered as a source that involved in liquefaction reactions that formed organic products [18]. The sources of organic products that were parts of bio-crude, solid residue and gas in the system resulted from both PSD and alcohol that was loaded.
Water-ethanol co-solvent is more efficient in biomass liquefaction reactions than either water or pure ethanol [24]. Similar low water to ethanol ratio (3:8) of this study was used in the liquefaction of woody biomass in the research of Cheng et al. [25], since the the addition of water as a co-solvent into ethanol would enhance the liquefaction of biomass and improve bio-crude yield [25]. The biomass/ethanol loading ratio of 1:4 was determined according to our preliminary tests and referred to biomass liquefaction conducted by Brand et al. [22], because this biomass loading ratio was beneficial for improving bio-crude yield [22]. The biomass and total solvent loading ratio (biomass/total solvent ratio of 2:11) was determined according to the liquefaction of rice husk performed by Huang et al. [15,25]. This biomass loading ratio can increase the bio-crude yield and improve the stability and solubility of fragmented components derived from biomass [15].
The reactor was purged with 100 psig N2for 6 times to remove the inside air. Then, the initial pressure for the reactor was charged to 10 psig with N2.The reactor was heated to 300 ℃ at a heating rate of 5.0 ℃ min−1. The reaction temperature was kept for 1 h at a stirring rate of 1000 rpm. There were some solvolysis reactions occurred at 300 ℃ that consumed ethanol in this study, but the solvolysis reactions at 300 ℃ were not significant. This is because solvolysis reactions were significant at temperatures above 350 ℃ in biomass liquefaction [26]. Besides, the low solvent/biomass ratio (11:2) in this study restricted solvolysis reactions [25]. Finally, the reactor was rapidly cooled to room temperature (20 ℃) by an electric fan. The liquid-solid suspension in the reactor was poured out and filtered using a pre-weighed filter paper at a reduced pressure, and the solid product remaining on the filter paper was dried at 105 ℃ for 24 h in a drying oven and weighed [15]. The dried solid sample contained unreacted pine sawdust, ash, coke, generated ZnO and used catalyst is designated as mixed solid residue (SR1). The residual ethanol-water mixture was evaporated from the liquid filtrate using a rotary evaporator at 90 ℃ in a reduced pressure [15,22]. The recovered ethanol can be reused for PSD liquefaction [27]. The resulted liquid product (bio-crude) was weighed. The yield of products (Y product) including solid residue and bio-crude were determined based on equation (2) and gas yield (Y gas) was calculated following equation (3):
Msolidresidue=MSR1−MgeneratedZnO−Musedcatalyst | (1) |
Yproduct=Mproduct/(Mpinesawdust)×100% | (2) |
Ygas=(1−Ysolidresidue−Ybio−crude)×100% | (3) |
where M product represents the mass of solid residue and bio-crude, respectively.
Moisture content of pine sawdust was determined following the ASABE standard (ASAES358.2 DEC1988 (R2008)) [28]. Ash content of pine sawdust was determined by heating samples at 575 ℃ until its weight remained constant in a muffle furnace according to NREL standard procedure [29]. High heating value (HHV) of pine sawdust samples was tested by the bomb calorimeter (IEA C2000) [30,31]. Elemental compositions (carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen) of pine sawdust and bio-crude were analyzed by CE-440 Elemental Analyzer [32]. Moisture content, ash content, elemental analysis and HHV properties of pine sawdust are presented in Table 1.
Analysis | Pine sawdust |
Moisture content (wt%) | 7.23 ± 0.12 |
Ash content (wt%) | 0.56 ± 0.03 |
Elemental analysis (wt%) | |
Carbon | 47.64 ± 0.02 |
Hydrogen | 6.25 ± 0.07 |
Nitrogen | 1.24 ± 0.02 |
Oxygena | 44.87 ± 0.04 |
Higher heating value (MJ Kg-1) | 19.19 ± 0.15 |
O/C (molar ratio) | 0.71 ± 0.01 |
H/C (molar ratio) | 1.57 ± 0.02 |
a Calculated by the difference |
Gas chromatography (Agilent GC-7890A with a DB-5 column: 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) and mass spectrometry (MSD-5975C with electron ionization at 70 eV, mass range of 50–500 m z−1) was employed to determine chemical compositions of bio-crude samples [33,34]. The samples were dissolved in methanol before test. The injection temperature and injection volume were 300 ℃ and 1 μL respectively. An oven temperature program was firstly set at 60 ℃ and then increased following ramp 1 at 3 ℃ min−1 to 140 ℃, ramp 2 at 10 ℃ min−1 to 180 ℃, ramp 3 at 3 ℃ min−1 to 260 ℃ and ramp 4 at 10 ℃ min−1 to 300 ℃. The main chemical compounds present in bio-crudes were identified from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) mass spectral library and related literature [35].
Gas compositions was analyzed by gas chromatography system (Agilent GC 7890A with a 50 m × 0.53 mm × 15 μm 19095P-S25 column) [36]. H2, CO, CO2 and N2 were identified by thermal conductivity detector (TCD) [37]. Light hydrocarbons (C1-C3) were determined by flame ionization detector (FID) [38]. The carrier gas used in GC was argon, and calibration was conducted by using standard gas mixtures [39].
Pine sawdust HTL products were distributed in gas, liquid (bio-crude) and solid residue. Figure 1 summarizes the yields of bio-crude, solid residue and gas products of different treatments. Compared to non-catalytic treatment, the use of zeolite catalysts (HZSM-5 and Ni/HZSM-5) increased yields of bio-crude and gas, and decreased solid residue yields. This is consisted with the study of Wang and Saber et al. [6,8]. Ni/HZSM-5 induced a better catalytic effect than HZSM-5, which indicated that Ni modification not only maintained the role of zeolite-cracking, but also had the function of hydrocracking that increased conversion of large molecules compounds in bio-crude to gaseous low-carbon small-molecules [40,41]. This resulted in the higher yields of gas and lower yields of bio-crude for Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts in comparison with HZSM-5 catalyst. Lignin conversion was relatively unaffected by pH in the thermal process. Alkaline catalysts such as K2CO3 was effective in biomass liquefaction to enhance the yield of bio-crude products and suppress the formation of char [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. K2CO3 showed higher catalytic activity to improve biomass conversion and bio-crude yield than other alkaline catalyts such as KOH, Na2CO3 and NaOH in biomass HTL process [47]. K2CO3produced higher bio-crude yield and lower solid residue yield compared to HZSM-5 and Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts in this study. K2CO3 can react with water to form the bases and bicarbonates which acted as a secondary catalyst to improve bio-crude yield during the liquefaction reactions [47,50]. The bio-crude yield of K2CO3 in this studywas higher than the study of Wang et al. [50]. This was due to the lower reaction temperature (300 ℃) that led to lower degree of condensation and redecomposition reactions of bio-crude products compared to their study (375 ℃) [51,52].
The yields of solid residues of HZSM-5 based catalysts was higher than that obtained by K2CO3 catalyst. This indicated that the acidity of zeolites enhanced coke formation that resulted in catalysts deactivation, which in turn caused lower PSD conversions to bio-crude and gas products compared to alkaline catalysts. Similar results were found in the batch PSD liquefaction study of Wang et al. [50].
Biomass decomposition reactions occured to some extent due to the slow heating rate [22]. The slow heating rate had no effect on the individual compounds of bio-crude product [53]. The slow heating rate reduced bio-crude yield and improved gas yield compared to high heating rate [22,53]. The slow heating rate increased solid residue yield due to the increased coke formation compared to high heating rate [53,54]. The slow heating rate decreased the relative concentrations of chemical compounds present in bio-crudes in comparison with high heating rate [54].
Properties of the bio-crude products including elemental compositions (C, H, and N) and higher heating value (HHV) are presented in Table 2. Compared to PSD, all bio-crude samples obtained from PSD liquefaction had much higher contents of carbon and hydrogen, and much lower contents of oxygen, leading to a significantly increased HHV. Compared to no catalyst treatment, the use of catalyst improved the contents of carbon and hydrogen and reduced the oxygen content. This was due to deoxygenation activities of used catalysts that removed partial amount of oxygen in the bio-crude products [50]. HHV (26.78–27.93 MJ/kg) of K2CO3and HZSM-5 produced bio-crudes was in the range of biocrude produced in pure ethanol (25.8 MJ/kg) and pure water (30.8 MJ/kg) in pinewood sawdust K2CO3 liquefaction of Wang et al. [50]. This was due to the mixed solvents (ethanol and water) used in this study. The oxygen content of catalytic bio-crudes (27.60–29.32 wt%) was in the range of the oxygen content of K2CO3 produced bio-crude using ethanol and water (30.42 wt% and 23.38 wt% respectively) conducted by Wang et al. [50]. The molar ratios of O/C (0.32–0.35) and H/C (1.48–1.49) were in the range of the K2CO3 liquefaction using ethanol and water (0.26–0.37 and 1.42–1.67 respectively) of Wang et al. [50]. However, there was no significant difference in the properties (elemental compositions and HHV) of K2CO3 and Ni/HZSM-5 produced bio-crudes. The recovery ratio of carbon and hydrogen were 71.03–85.44 wt% and 61.26–80.36 wt% respectively. It was lower than the carbon recovery ratio of Yang et al. [55]. This was due to the loss of higher amount of some low boiling points organic compounds in rotary evaporation of bio-crude product at higher temperature (90 ℃) than their study (50 ℃). However, the carbon and hydrogen recovery ratio of K2CO3treatment were a bit lower than that of HZSM-5 and Ni/HZSM-5 treatments. The O/C (molar ratio) of bio-crude (0.32–0.44) decreased to some extent compared to that of PSD (0.71). However, the oxygen content of bio-crude products was still high (27.60–33.99 wt%) compared to PSD (44.87 wt%). This indicated that only small amount of oxygen was removed in the bio-crude product. These results indicated that the high bio-crude yields were due to high oxygen content in bio-crude products.
Relative content (%) | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Carbon (wt%) | 58.42 ± 0.12 | 62.15 ± 0.14 | 63.29 ± 0.24 | 63.78 ± 0.12 | 63.13 ± 0.13 |
Hydrogen (wt%) | 6.61 ± 0.10 | 7.71 ± 0.07 | 7.81 ± 0.06 | 7.92 ± 0.07 | 7.76 ± 0.14 |
Nitrogen (wt%) | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.70 ± 0.08 | 0.73 ± 0.08 |
Oxygena(wt%) | 33.99 ± 0.14 | 29.32 ± 0.07 | 28.18 ± 0.07 | 27.60 ± 0.09 | 28.38 ± 0.05 |
HHV (MJ/kg) | 23.12 ± 0.08 | 26.78 ± 0.19 | 27.51 ± 0.07 | 27.93 ± 0.16 | 27.35 ± 0.13 |
Carbon recovery ratio (wt%) | 71.03 ± 0.12 | 81.24 ± 0.06 | 85.44 ± 0.08 | 82.17 ± 0.09 | 83.54 ± 0.12 |
Hydrogen recovery ratio (wt%) | 61.26 ± 0.08 | 76.82 ± 0.04 | 80.36 ± 0.07 | 77.78 ± 0.07 | 78.27 ± 0.07 |
O/C (molar ratio) | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.15 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
H/C (molar ratio) | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.03 |
Ethanol consumption rate (wt%) | 5.01 ± 0.14 | 4.76 ± 0.23 | 5.61 ± 0.34 | 4.89 ± 0.21 | 6.03 ± 0.18 |
a Calculated by the difference |
The ethanol consumption rate responding to different catalysts was ranging from 4.76 wt% to 6.03 wt%. This indicated that some ethanol was consumed in PSD HTL process which increased the cost of HTL process. However, the main objective of this study was to explore the application of heterogeneous Ni/HZSM-5 and alkaline K2CO3catalysts in biomass HTL process.
In order to evaluate the change of chemical compositions of bio-crudes produced by different catalysts, bio-crude products derived from different treatments were determined by GC-MS. The main chemical components detected in bio-crudes are present in Table 3.
Relative content (%) | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Phenols | 10.8 | 9.84 | 9.94 | 8.64 | 8.93 |
Furans | 2.63 | 1.25 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 2.46 |
Ethers | 4.9 | 5.4 | 6.31 | 4.17 | 1.1 |
Aldehydes | 0.2 | 3.76 | 2.16 | 0.12 | 2.9 |
Ketones | 15.91 | 7.23 | 8.9 | 12.09 | 13.84 |
Esters | 35.74 | 21.06 | 28.35 | 26.39 | 26.52 |
Alcohols | 8.28 | 5.74 | 2.07 | 5.28 | 6.77 |
Acids | 5.57 | 0 | 1.95 | 0.88 | 1.27 |
Hydrocarbons | 3.04 | 6.63 | 8.26 | 11.02 | 6.49 |
Others | 12.93 | 39.09 | 31.63 | 30.84 | 29.72 |
The main components detected in the bio-crude produced from no catalyst treatment were undesirable oxygenated compounds including esters (35.74%), ketones (15.91%), phenols (10.80%), alcohols (8.28%) and acids (5.57%). These oxygenated compounds resulted in the corrosiveness and low heating value of bio-crude products. Only minor amounts of desirable hydrocarbons (3.04%) was observed in non-catalytic bio-crude.
For the produced bio-crudes in the presence of catalysts, the chemical compositions of bio-crude products changed deeply in comparison with non-catalytic bio-crude. The contents of acids in bio-crudes produced by catalysts were significantly decreased. One reason is that some acidic compounds were converted to esters through esterification reactions with alcohols [56]. Another reason was that some acidic compounds were transformed to hydrocarbons through decarboxylation reactions [56]. There were no acid compounds detected in the bio-crude produced by K2CO3treatment [55]. The contents of ketones in bio-crudes were also decreased by tested catalysts. This is consistent with the research results of Iliopoulou et al. [57]. Ketones were transformed to hydrocarbons through decarbonylation, cracking and aromatization reactions [58].
The alcohols content in bio-crudes decreased in all catalytic treatments. Some alcohols were transformed to hydrocarbons through dehydration, cracking and aromatization reactions [48,58], and some alcohols were converted to esters through esterification reactions [46,56]. The contents of phenols decreased in catalytic bio-crude products, because they were transformed into hydrocarbons through dehydration, dehydroaromatization, hydrogenolysis and hydrogenation reactions in the presence of zeolite catalysts [59]. Similar decrease of phenols content in upgraded bio-crudes from biomass liquefaction using HZSM-5 catalyst was observed by Torri et al. [60]. The contents of esters in the bio-crude of catalytic treatments reduced compared to no catalyst treatment. This was due to the transformation of esters to hydrocarbons due to dehydration, cracking and oligomerization reactions that occurred over HZSM-5 and Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts [28].
The content of desirable hydrocarbons in biofuel produced by all catalysts increased significantly in comparison with non-catalytic bio-crude. This was due to the catalytic reactions of cracking, decarbonylation, decarboxylation, hydrocracking, hydrodeoxygenation and hydrogenation that transformed oxygenated organic compounds to hydrocarbons over HZSM-5 basedcatalysts [50,61,62]. Compared to bio-crude produced from HZSM-5catalyst, 6%Ni/HZSM-5catalyst produced bio-crude with the higher hydrocarbons content at 11.02%. This increase was due to the Ni promoted hydrogenation and dehydro-aromatization reactions [63]. Compared to the 6%Ni/HZSM-5 treatment, 12%Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst produced lower hydrocarbons content in the bio-crude product. When more NiO was loaded on the HZSM-5, the Ni reduced from NiO preferentially aggregated and replaced the Brønsted acid sites that were responsible for catalyst activity [64]. This led to the lower formation of hydrocarbons over higher Ni loading HZSM-5 catalyst [65]. The hydrocarbons content of 6%Ni/HZSM-5 and HZSM-5 produced bio-crude were higher than bio-crude produced by K2CO3catalyst. This indicated the enhanced deoxygenation reactions on HZSM-5 based catalysts than K2CO3.
The XRD characterization of fresh catalysts (HZSM-5 and Ni/HZSM-5) has been conducted in our published paper [66]. The XRD characterization of spent catalysts in bio-oil upgrading was performed in other published papers [35,57].
HZSM-5 contained mainly Brönsted acid sites with high acidic strength and few Lewis acid sites [57]. Brönsted acid sites catalyzed different hydrocarbon conversion reactions such as cracking, dehydrogenation, cyclization and aromatization [67]. This resulted in the increased hydrocarbons content in the bio-crudes produced by HZSM-5 based catalysts. NiO particles were formed in the fresh Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts in this study [66,68]. The loading of NiO reduced the number of Brönsted acid sites on Ni/HZSM-5 [57]. In contrast to the Brönsted acid sites, the formation of nickel oxides functioned as Lewis acidic centers that increased the number of Lewis acid sites on Ni/HZSM-5 [57]. The following reaction pathway on Ni/HZSM-5 was proposed from the PSD liquefaction results. Firstly, the de-oxygenation of bio-crude was conducted through decarboxylation reactions, and the in situ produced hydrogen from zinc hydrolysis was saved in the reactor [57]. Secondly, the saved hydrogen atoms promoted hydrogen transfer reactions on the Ni metals through carbenium ion intermediates formed on zeolitic acid sites. This resulted in increased formation of hydrocarbons through hydro-deoxygenation reactions on Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst [57]. The Ni particles were reduced from NiO on Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts in the reductive atmosphere at high reaction temperature in bio-crude upgrading reactions [57,68].
The yields of bio-crudes produced by catalysts (HZSM-5, Ni/HZSM-5 and K2CO3) improved compared to no catalyst treatment. K2CO3 produced higher bio-crude yield compared to other catalysts. The oxygen content of catalytic bio-crudes was lower than non-catalytic bio-crude. The heating value of catalytic bio-crude was higher than non-catalytic bio-crude. The undesirable contents of acids in catalytic bio-crudes decreased compared to non-catalytic bio-crude. This is beneficial to decrease the acidity and corrosiveness of catalytic bio-crudes [67]. The valuable hydrocarbons content of catalytic bio-crude improved compared to that of non-catalytic bio-crude. 6%Ni/HZSM-5catalyst produced bio-crude with higher hydrocarbons content in comparison with other catalysts. Therefore, these results indicted that the use of catalysts (especially 6%Ni/HZSM-5 and K2CO3) was effective for improving bio-crude yield and properties in PSD liquefaction.
After HTL, the gas products were collected and determined by GC. The compositions of produced gases are shown in Figure 2. Nine gas compounds (H2, N2, CO2, CO, CH4, C2H4,C2H6, C3H6,C3H8) were observed in the gas product. One main gas product was hydrogen that was produced from zinc hydrolysis reaction [69], and the existence of unreacted hydrogen indicated that the generated hydrogen was abundant for the HTL reactions. Another main component in gas product was CO2, and this indicated that the oxygen in oxygenated compounds in bio-crude was predominantly removed in the form of CO2 through decarboxylation [70]. The presence of CO indicated decarbonylation of oxygenated compounds or reaction intermediates (C=O, C-O-C, COOH, etc.) in HTL processes [6,22]. The formation of CH4 was due to the decomposition of methoxyl groups (-O-CH3) during liquefaction process [22]. C2-C3 hydrocarbons were also observed in the gas product, and they were produced from secondary cracking of reaction intermediates and/or decompositions of alcohols in the presence of H2 in PSD liquefaction process [22].
Reactor pressures of different treatments are listed in Table 4. Although the initial pressure of all treatments was the same, the maximum and final pressures for bifunctional Ni/HZSM-5 and K2CO3 catalysts was higher than no catalyst or HZSM-5 treatments. The enhanced cracking performance of catalysts resulted in higher gas production that increased reactor pressure. This indicated that the Ni/HZSM-5 and K2CO3 catalysts led to the promoted conversion of oxygenated compounds to light gases such as CO, CO2 and C1-C3 hydrocarbons.
Catalysts | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Initial (psig) | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 |
Maximum (psig) | 1680 ± 20 | 1945 ± 10 | 1875 ± 15 | 1925 ± 25 | 1900 ± 20 |
Final (psig) | 65 ± 5 | 120 ± 5 | 110 ± 0 | 130 ± 0 | 120 ± 0 |
The N2 partial pressure in final gas (25–28 psi, absolute pressure) is slightly higher than the initial N2 pressure (25 psi, absolute pressure). The increase of N2 between final N2 and initial N2 in the reactor was only 0–0.0049 moles compared to the initial total N2 amount of 0.0349 moles. The slightly increased amount of N2 formed from nitrogen atoms in PSD after PSD liquefaction process [71].
HTL of pine sawdust on HZSM-5, K2CO3 and Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts were carried out in the batch autoclave reactor at 300 ℃. The catalytic effects of different catalysts are investigated in products (bio-crude and gas) yield and quality. K2CO3produced higher bio-crude yield and lower solid residue yield compared to other catalysts. The use of catalysts improved bio-crude and gas yields in comparison with no catalyst treatment. The catalysts reduced the contents of undesirable acids, ketones, phenols, esters and alcohols of bio-crudes, and increased the desirable hydrocarbons contents. Bifunctional Ni/HZSM-5 catalysts exhibited higher catalyst activities to improve bio-crude quality compared to parent HZSM-5 catalyst. Ni/HZSM-5 was more effective to convert oxygenated compounds to hydrocarbons due to the integrated cracking and hydrodeoxygenation reactions. Compared to HZSM-5, 6%Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst produced the bio-crude product with the highest hydrocarbon content at 11.02%.
Although the 6% Ni loading HZSM-5 catalyst was initial determined in this research, different Ni loading levels near 6% still need to be tested to identity optimized Ni loading level Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst for improving hydrocarbons selectivity in bio-crude product in the future studies.
This work was supported by Department of Transportation (Award No. SA0700149) through the North Central Center of Sun Grant Initiative. The USDA NIFA (Award No. SA1600855) also partially supported this study.
All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Li J, Wu L, Yang Z (2008) Analysis and upgrading of bio-petroleum from biomass by direct deoxy-liquefaction. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 81: 199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2007.11.004
![]() |
[2] |
Qian Y, Zuo C, Tan J, et al. (2007) Structural analysis of bio-oils from sub-and supercritical water liquefaction of woody biomass. Energy 32: 196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.027
![]() |
[3] | Liu Z, Zhang FS (2008) Effects of various solvents on the liquefaction of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energy Convers Manage 49: 3498-3504. |
[4] | Vardon DR, Sharma BK, Blazina GV, et al. (2012) Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 109: 178-187. |
[5] |
Chen Y, Mu R, Yang M, et al. (2017) Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction for bio-oil production over CNTs supported metal catalysts. Chem Eng Sci 161: 299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.12.010
![]() |
[6] |
Wang Y, Wang H, Lin H, et al. (2013) Effects of solvents and catalysts in liquefaction of pinewood sawdust for the production of bio-oils. Biomass Bioenerg 59: 158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.10.022
![]() |
[7] |
Toor SS, Rosendahl L, Rudolf A (2011) Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a review of subcritical water technologies. Energy 36: 2328-2342. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.013
![]() |
[8] | Saber M, Golzary A, Hosseinpour M, et al. (2016) Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae using nanocatalyst. Appl Energy 183: 566-576. |
[9] | Jiang J, Junming XU, Zhanqian, S (2015) Review of the direct thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass for liquid fuels. Front Agr Sci Eng 2: 13-27. |
[10] |
Okuda K, Umetsu M, Takami S, et al. (2004) Disassembly of lignin and chemical recovery-rapid depolymerizatin of lignin without char formation in water-phenol mixtures. Fuel Process Technol 85: 803-813. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.027
![]() |
[11] | Yang C, Jia L, Chen C, et al. (2011) Bio-oil from hydro-liquefaction of Dunaliella salina over Ni/REHY catalyst. Bioresour Technol 102: 4580-4584. |
[12] |
Perego C, Bianchi D (2010) Biomass upgrading through acid–base catalysis. Chem Eng J 161: 314-322. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.036
![]() |
[13] |
Gayubo AG, Alonso A, Valle B, et al. (2010) Hydrothermal stability of HZSM-5 catalysts modified with Ni for the transformation of bioethanol into hydrocarbons. Fuel 89: 3365-3372. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.03.002
![]() |
[14] |
Hamelinck CN, Van Hooijdonk G, Faaij AP (2005). Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass Bioenerg 28: 384-410. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.09.002
![]() |
[15] |
Huang HJ, Yuan XZ, Zeng GM, et al. (2013) Thermochemical liquefaction of rice husk for bio-oil production with sub-and supercritical ethanol as solvent. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 102: 60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.04.002
![]() |
[16] |
Fan SP, Zakaria S, Chia CH, et al. (2011) Comparative studies of products obtained from solvolysis liquefaction of oil palm empty fruit bunch fibres using different solvents. Bioresour Technol 102: 3521-3526. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.046
![]() |
[17] |
Aysu T, Turhan M, Küçük MM (2012) Liquefaction of Typha latifolia by supercritical fluid extraction. Bioresour Technol 107: 464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.069
![]() |
[18] |
Huang H, Yuan X, Zeng G, et al. (2011) Thermochemical liquefaction characteristics of microalgae in sub-and supercritical ethanol. Fuel Process Technol 92: 147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.09.018
![]() |
[19] |
Li H, Yuan X, Zeng G, et al. (2010) The formation of bio-oil from sludge by deoxy-liquefaction in supercritical ethanol. Bioresour Technol 101: 2860-2866. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.084
![]() |
[20] |
Leng S, Wang X, He X, et al. (2013) NiFe/γ-Al 2 O 3: a universal catalyst for the hydrodeoxygenation of bio-oil and its model compounds.Catal Commun 41: 34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2013.06.037
![]() |
[21] |
Vishnevetsky I, Epstein M (2007) Production of hydrogen from solar zinc in steam atmosphere. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32: 2791-2802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.004
![]() |
[22] |
Brand S, Susanti RF, Kim SK, et al. (2013) Supercritical ethanol as an enhanced medium for lignocellulosic biomass liquefaction: Influence of physical process parameters. Energy 59: 173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.049
![]() |
[23] |
Xu C, Etcheverry T (2008) Hydro-liquefaction of woody biomass in sub-and super-critical ethanol with iron-based catalysts. Fuel 87: 335-345. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.013
![]() |
[24] |
Zhou C, Zhu X, Qian F, et al. (2016) Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of rice straw in water/ethanol mixtures for high yields of monomeric phenols using reductive CuZnAl catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 154: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.08.010
![]() |
[25] |
Cheng S, D'cruz I, Wang M, et al. (2010) Highly efficient liquefaction of woody biomass in hot-compressed alcohol− water co-solvents. Energ Fuel 24: 4659-4667. doi: 10.1021/ef901218w
![]() |
[26] |
Brand S, Hardi F, Kim J, et al. (2014) Effect of heating rate on biomass liquefaction: differences between subcritical water and supercritical ethanol. Energy 68: 420-427. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.086
![]() |
[27] |
Zhai Y, Chen Z, Chen H, et al. (2015) Co-liquefaction of sewage sludge and oil-tea-cake in supercritical methanol: yield of bio-oil, immobilization and risk assessment of heavy metals. Environ Technol 36: 2770-2777. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1049210
![]() |
[28] |
Cheng S, Wei L, Zhao X, et al. (2016) Conversion of Prairie Cordgrass to Hydrocarbon Biofuel over Co-Mo/HZSM-5 Using a Two-Stage Reactor System. Energy Technol 4: 706-713. doi: 10.1002/ente.201500452
![]() |
[29] | Maddi B, Viamajala S, Varanasi S (2011) Comparative study of pyrolysis of algal biomass from natural lake blooms with lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 102: 11018-11026. |
[30] | Zhao X, Wei L, Cheng S, et al. (2015) Catalytic cracking of carinata oil for hydrocarbon biofuel over fresh and regenerated Zn/Na-ZSM-5. Appl Catal A 507: 44-55. |
[31] | Cheng S, Wei L, Alsowij MR, et al.(2017) In-situ hydrodeoxygenation upgrading of pine sawdust bio-oil to hydrocarbon biofuel using Pd/C catalyst. J Energy Inst: In press. |
[32] |
Cheng S, Wei L, Zhao X, et al. (2016) Hydrodeoxygenation of prairie cordgrass bio-oil over Ni based activated carbon synergistic catalysts combined with different metals. New Biotechnol 33: 440-448. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.02.004
![]() |
[33] | Zhao X, Wei L, Cheng S, et al. (2016) Hydroprocessing of carinata oil for hydrocarbon biofuel over Mo-Zn/Al2O3. Appl Catal B 196: 41-49. |
[34] |
Huang Y, Wei L, Zhao X, et al. (2016) Upgrading pine sawdust pyrolysis oil to green biofuels by HDO over zinc-assisted Pd/C catalyst. Energy Convers Manage 115: 8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.049
![]() |
[35] |
Cheng S, Wei L, Zhao X, et al. (2015) Directly catalytic upgrading bio-oil vapor produced by prairie cordgrass pyrolysis over Ni/HZSM-5 using a two stage reactor. AIMS Energy 3: 227-240. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.2.227
![]() |
[36] |
Wei L, Gao Y, Qu W, et al. (2016) Torrefaction of Raw and Blended Corn Stover, Switchgrass, and Prairie Grass. Trans ASABE 59: 717-726. doi: 10.13031/trans.59.10739
![]() |
[37] | Zhao X, Wei L, Cheng S, et al. (2015) Catalytic cracking of camelina oil for hydrocarbon biofuel over ZSM-5-Zn catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 139: 117-126. |
[38] | Zhao X, Wei L, Cheng S, et al. (2015) Optimization of catalytic cracking process for upgrading camelina oil to hydrocarbon biofuel. Ind Crops Prod 77: 516-526. |
[39] |
Zhao X, Wei L, Cheng S, et al. (2016) Development of hydrocarbon biofuel from sunflower seed and sunflower meat oils over ZSM-5. J Renew Sust Energ 8: 013109. doi: 10.1063/1.4941911
![]() |
[40] | Xu Y, Zheng X, Yu H, et al. (2014) Hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlorella pyrenoidosa for bio-oil production over Ce/HZSM-5. Bioresour Technol 156: 1-5. |
[41] | Duan P, Savage PE (2010) Hydrothermal liquefaction of a microalga with heterogeneous catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 50: 52-61. |
[42] |
Akhtar J, Kuang SK, Amin NS (2010) Liquefaction of empty palm fruit bunch (EPFB) in alkaline hot compressed water. Renew Energ 35: 1220-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.003
![]() |
[43] |
Karagöz S, Bhaskar T, Muto A, et al. (2006) Hydrothermal upgrading of biomass: effect of K 2 CO 3 concentration and biomass/water ratio on products distribution. Bioresour Technol 97: 90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.051
![]() |
[44] |
Bhaskar T, Sera A, Muto A, et al. (2008) Hydrothermal upgrading of wood biomass: influence of the addition of K 2 CO 3 and cellulose/lignin ratio. Fuel 87: 2236-2242. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.10.018
![]() |
[45] | Liu HM, Xie XA, Feng B, et al. (2011) Effect of catalysts on 5-lump distribution of cornstalk liquefaction in sub-critical ethanol. BioResour 6: 2592-2604. |
[46] | Xu CC, Su H, Cang D (2008) Liquefaction of corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) in hot-compressed phenol. BioResour 3: 363-382. |
[47] |
Karagöz S, Bhaskar T, Muto A, et al. (2005) Low-temperature catalytic hydrothermal treatment of wood biomass: analysis of liquid products. Chem Eng J 108: 127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2005.01.007
![]() |
[48] |
Hammerschmidt A, Boukis N, Hauer E, et al. (2011) Catalytic conversion of waste biomass by hydrothermal treatment. Fuel 90: 555-562. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.007
![]() |
[49] |
Tymchyshyn M, Xu CC (2010) Liquefaction of bio-mass in hot-compressed water for the production of phenolic compounds. Bioresour Technol 101: 2483-2490. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.091
![]() |
[50] |
Wang Y, Wang H, Lin H, et al. (2013) Effects of solvents and catalysts in liquefaction of pinewood sawdust for the production of bio-oils. Biomass Bioenergy 59: 158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.10.022
![]() |
[51] | Zhu Z, Toor SS, Rosendahl L, et al. (2014) Analysis of product distribution and characteristics in hydrothermal liquefaction of barley straw in subcritical and supercritical water. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 33: 737-743. |
[52] |
Xue Y, Chen H, Zhao W, et al. (2016) A review on the operating conditions of producing bio‐oil from hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Int J Energy Res 40: 865-877. doi: 10.1002/er.3473
![]() |
[53] |
Zhang B, von Keitz M, Valentas K (2008) Thermal effects on hydrothermal biomass liquefaction. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 147: 143-150. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8131-5
![]() |
[54] |
Kruse ANDREA, Henningsen T, Sinag A, et al. (2003) Biomass gasification in supercritical water: influence of the dry matter content and the formation of phenols. Ind Eng Chem Res 42: 3711-3717. doi: 10.1021/ie0209430
![]() |
[55] |
Yang Y, Gilbert A, Xu CC (2009) Production of bio-crude from forestry waste by hydro-liquefaction in sub-/super- critical methanol. AIChE J 55: 807-819. doi: 10.1002/aic.11701
![]() |
[56] | Zhang J, Chen WT, Zhang P, et al. (2013) Hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlorella pyrenoidosa in sub-and supercritical ethanol with heterogeneous catalysts. Bioresour Technol 133: 389-397. |
[57] |
Iliopoulou EF, Stefanidis SD, Kalogiannis KG, et al. (2012). Catalytic upgrading of biomass pyrolysis vapors using transition metal-modified ZSM-5 zeolite. Appl Catal B 127: 281-290. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.030
![]() |
[58] |
Adjaye JD, Bakhshi NN (1995) Catalytic conversion of a biomass-derived oil to fuels and chemicals I: Model compound studies and reaction pathways. Biomass Bioenerg 8: 131-149. doi: 10.1016/0961-9534(95)00018-3
![]() |
[59] |
Zhao C, Lercher JA (2012) Upgrading Pyrolysis Oil over Ni/HZSM-5 by Cascade Reactions. Angew Chem 124: 6037-6042. doi: 10.1002/ange.201108306
![]() |
[60] | Torri C, Fabbri D, Garcia-Alba L, et al. (2013) Upgrading of oils derived from hydrothermal treatment of microalgae by catalytic cracking over H-ZSM-5: A comparative Py–GC–MS study. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 101: 28-34. |
[61] |
Huynh TM, Armbruster U, Nguyen LH, et al. (2015) Hydrodeoxygenation of Bio-Oil on Bimetallic Catalysts: From Model Compound to Real Feed. J Sustainable Bioenergy Syst 5: 151-160. doi: 10.4236/jsbs.2015.54014
![]() |
[62] |
Zhang X, Wang T, Ma L, et al. (2013) Hydrotreatment of bio-oil over Ni-based catalyst. Bioresour Technol 127: 306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.119
![]() |
[63] |
Thangalazhy-Gopakumar S, Adhikari S, Gupta RB (2012) Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass over H+ ZSM-5 under hydrogen pressure. Energ Fuel 26: 5300-5306. doi: 10.1021/ef3008213
![]() |
[64] |
Weng Y, Qiu S, Ma L, et al. (2015) Jet-Fuel Range Hydrocarbons from Biomass-Derived Sorbitol over Ni-HZSM-5/SBA-15 Catalyst. Catalysts 5: 2147-2160. doi: 10.3390/catal5042147
![]() |
[65] |
Li X, Su L, Wang Y, et al. (2012) Catalytic fast pyrolysis of Kraft lignin with HZSM-5 zeolite for producing aromatic hydrocarbons. Front Environ Sci Eng 6: 295-303. doi: 10.1007/s11783-012-0410-2
![]() |
[66] |
Cheng S, Wei L, Zhao X (2016) Development of a bifunctional Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst for converting prairie cordgrass to hydrocarbon biofuel. Energy Sources Part A 38: 2433-2437. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2015.1065298
![]() |
[67] | Mortensen PM, Grunwaldt JD, Jensen PA, et al. (2011) A review of catalytic upgrading of bio-oil to engine fuels. Appl Catal A 407: 1-19. |
[68] |
Ganjkhanlou Y, Groppo E, Bordiga S, et al. (2016) Incorporation of Ni into HZSM-5 zeolites: Effects of zeolite morphology and incorporation procedure. Micropor Mesopor Mat 229: 76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.04.002
![]() |
[69] |
Lv M, Zhou J, Yang W, et al. (2010) Thermogravimetric analysis of the hydrolysis of zinc particles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35: 2617-2621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.017
![]() |
[70] |
Balat M (2008) Mechanisms of thermochemical biomass conversion processes. Part 3: reactions of liquefaction. Energy Sources Part A 30: 649-659. doi: 10.1080/10407780600817592
![]() |
[71] |
Brown TM, Duan P, Savage PE (2010) Hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification of Nannochloropsis sp. Energ Fuel 24: 3639-3646. doi: 10.1021/ef100203u
![]() |
1. | Shusheng Pang, Advances in thermochemical conversion of woody biomass to energy, fuels and chemicals, 2019, 37, 07349750, 589, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.004 | |
2. | Wenchao Yang, Zhaowei Wang, Shuang Song, Hong Chen, Xiaomeng Wang, Jiayi Cheng, Ruijun Sun, Jianbo Han, Understanding catalytic mechanisms of HZSM-5 in hydrothermal liquefaction of algae through model components: Glucose and glutamic acid, 2019, 130, 09619534, 105356, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105356 | |
3. | Yufu Xu, Kai Liu, Yuanhua Hu, Yinghui Dong, Lulu Yao, Experimental investigation and comparison of bio-oil from hybrid microalgae via super/subcritical liquefaction, 2020, 279, 00162361, 118412, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118412 | |
4. | B. de Caprariis, M.P. Bracciale, I. Bavasso, G. Chen, M. Damizia, V. Genova, F. Marra, L. Paglia, G. Pulci, M. Scarsella, L. Tai, P. De Filippis, Unsupported Ni metal catalyst in hydrothermal liquefaction of oak wood: Effect of catalyst surface modification, 2020, 709, 00489697, 136215, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136215 | |
5. | Batul Diwan, Pratima Gupta, 2019, Chapter 14, 978-3-030-14845-4, 407, 10.1007/978-3-030-14846-1_14 | |
6. | Gopalakrishnan Govindasamy, Rohit Sharma, Sunu Subramanian, Studies on the effect of heterogeneous catalysts on the hydrothermal liquefaction of sugarcane bagasse to low-oxygen-containing bio-oil, 2019, 10, 1759-7269, 665, 10.1080/17597269.2018.1433967 | |
7. | Feng Cheng, Geoffrey A. Tompsett, Daniela Valeska Fraga Alvarez, Carla I. Romo, Amy M. McKenna, Sydney F. Niles, Robert K. Nelson, Christopher M. Reddy, Sergio Granados-Fócil, Alex D. Paulsen, Ruihan Zhang, Michael T. Timko, Metal oxide supported Ni-impregnated bifunctional catalysts for controlling char formation and maximizing energy recovery during catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of food waste, 2021, 5, 2398-4902, 941, 10.1039/D0SE01662D | |
8. | Shouyun Cheng, Lin Wei, James Julson, Muhammad Rabnawaz, Upgrading pyrolysis bio-oil through hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) using non-sulfided Fe-Co/SiO2 catalyst, 2017, 150, 01968904, 331, 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.024 | |
9. | Ziyun Liu, Hao Li, Jianli Zeng, Minsheng Liu, Yuanhui Zhang, Zhidan Liu, Influence of Fe/HZSM-5 catalyst on elemental distribution and product properties during hydrothermal liquefaction of Nannochloropsis sp., 2018, 35, 22119264, 1, 10.1016/j.algal.2018.08.011 | |
10. | I. Nava Bravo, S.B. Velásquez-Orta, R. Cuevas-García, I. Monje-Ramírez, A. Harvey, M.T. Orta Ledesma, Bio-crude oil production using catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) from native microalgae harvested by ozone-flotation, 2019, 241, 00162361, 255, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.071 | |
11. | Oscar D. González-Gálvez, Isaac Nava Bravo, Rogelio Cuevas-García, Sharon B. Velásquez-Orta, Adam P. Harvey, Luis Cedeño Caero, María Teresa Orta Ledesma, Bio-oil production by catalytic solvent liquefaction from a wild microalgae consortium, 2020, 2190-6815, 10.1007/s13399-020-00716-y | |
12. | Xiaoxia He, Yu Chen, Ya Liu, Lina Fang, Zeng Chen, Hongbing Ji, Distribution of Products from Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose Over Metal-Modified Hierarchical H-ZSM-5 in Aqueous Media, 2019, 149, 1011-372X, 2078, 10.1007/s10562-019-02795-7 | |
13. | Tahir H. Seehar, Saqib S. Toor, Ayaz A. Shah, Thomas H. Pedersen, Lasse A. Rosendahl, Biocrude Production from Wheat Straw at Sub and Supercritical Hydrothermal Liquefaction, 2020, 13, 1996-1073, 3114, 10.3390/en13123114 | |
14. | Shouyun Cheng, Lin Wei, Muhammad Rabnawaz, Catalytic liquefaction of pine sawdust and in-situ hydrogenation of bio-crude over bifunctional Co-Zn/HZSM-5 catalysts, 2018, 223, 00162361, 252, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.043 | |
15. | Hwai Chyuan Ong, Wei-Hsin Chen, Abid Farooq, Yong Yang Gan, Keat Teong Lee, Veeramuthu Ashokkumar, Catalytic thermochemical conversion of biomass for biofuel production: A comprehensive review, 2019, 113, 13640321, 109266, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109266 | |
16. | Fang Deng, Ananda S. Amarasekara, Iron(0)-Catalyzed Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Switchgrass: the Effects of Co-Catalysts and Reductive Conditions, 2020, 13, 1939-1234, 1171, 10.1007/s12155-020-10140-9 | |
17. | Lixin Qian, Bojun Zhao, Haoyu Wang, Guangda Bao, Yulin Hu, Chunbao Charles Xu, Hongming Long, Valorization of the spent catalyst from flue gas denitrogenation by improving bio-oil production from hydrothermal liquefaction of pinewood sawdust, 2022, 312, 00162361, 122804, 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122804 | |
18. | Vahid Haseltalab, Animesh Dutta, Sheng Yang, On the 3D printed catalyst for biomass-bio-oil conversion: Key technologies and challenges, 2023, 417, 00219517, 286, 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.12.013 | |
19. | Yingyuan Wei, Sandile Fakudze, Yu Zhang, Min Song, Tianjiao Xue, Ruiyan Xie, Jianqiang Chen, Low-temperature hydrothermal liquefaction of pomelo peel for production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural-rich bio-oil using ionic liquid loaded ZSM-5, 2022, 352, 09608524, 127050, 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127050 | |
20. | Harshica Fernando, Ananda S. Amarasekara, Interactions of Cellulose Model Compound D‐Cellobiose with Selected Metal Chlorides in Water: Identification of Chelating Oxygen Atoms, 2021, 2021, 1434-193X, 4968, 10.1002/ejoc.202100972 | |
21. | Yuliya Kulikova, Marina Krasnovskikh, Natalia Sliusar, Nikolay Orlov, Olga Babich, Analysis and Comparison of Bio-Oils Obtained by Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Organic Waste, 2023, 15, 2071-1050, 980, 10.3390/su15020980 | |
22. | Erasmus Muh, Fouzi Tabet , Sofiane Amara, Biomass Conversion to Fuels and Value-Added Chemicals: A Comprehensive Review of the Thermochemical Processes, 2021, 4, 24054631, 3, 10.2174/2405463103666191022121648 | |
23. | Fernando Gomes Souza, Kaushik Pal, Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah, Maria Clara Dantas, Aruzza Araújo, Fabíola Maranhão, Priscila Domingues, Biofuels and Nanocatalysts: Python Boosting Visualization of Similarities, 2023, 16, 1996-1944, 1175, 10.3390/ma16031175 | |
24. | Haibin Guan, Wenran Ding, Suxiang Liu, Baofeng Zhao, Heming Zhang, Cunqing Zhong, Bingtong Chen, Angang Song, Di Zhu, Huan Li, Xiangyu Feng, Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Chinese herb residue for the production of high-quality bio-oil, 2022, 03603199, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.099 | |
25. | Gargi Goswami, Ratan Kumar, Ankan Sinha, Boudhnath Birazee, Babul Chandra Dutta, Sanjay Bhutani, Debasish Das, ALGLIQOL: A two stage integrated process towards synthesis of renewable transportation fuel via catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lipid enriched microalgae biomass and distillation, 2022, 263, 01968904, 115696, 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115696 | |
26. | Noor Hadi Hasan, Ali A. Jazie, Hydrothermal Liquefaction Conversion of Lignocelluloses and waste Biomass Using Zeolite Catalyst, 2021, 790, 1755-1307, 012036, 10.1088/1755-1315/790/1/012036 | |
27. | Tianyi Bao, Yuanyuan Shao, Haiping Zhang, Jesse Zhu, Nitrogen distribution in the products from the hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlorella sp. and Spirulina sp., 2022, 16, 2095-0179, 985, 10.1007/s11705-021-2126-y | |
28. | Yuzhen Wang, Zhuan Liu, Chunxing Guan, Xiuyu Zong, Pu Zhang, Pan Hui, Hao Gong, Hydrothermal liquefaction of waste Al-PE-Pa laminated packaging: Effect of Ni:Ce in Ni10Cex/Al2O3 catalyst, 2023, 2430, 1742-6588, 012008, 10.1088/1742-6596/2430/1/012008 | |
29. | Yuzhen Wang, Zhuan Liu, Ying Wang, Changqing Fang, Donghai Xu, Liang Liu, Xing Zheng, Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Tetra Pak with Ni-xCe/CNTs, 2022, 261, 03605442, 125302, 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125302 | |
30. | Ishaq Kariim, Yusuf Olatunji Waidi, Hulda Swai, Thomas Kivevele, Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of orange peels into biocrude: An optimization approach by Central Composite Design, 2023, 01652370, 106032, 10.1016/j.jaap.2023.106032 | |
31. | Mortaza Gholizadeh, Cristina Castro, Sandra Meca Fabrega, Frederic Clarens, A review on thermochemical based biorefinery catalyst development progress, 2023, 2398-4902, 10.1039/D3SE00496A | |
32. | Paulina Kosmela, Paweł Kazimierski, Comparison of the Efficiency of Hetero- and Homogeneous Catalysts in Cellulose Liquefaction, 2023, 16, 1996-1944, 6135, 10.3390/ma16186135 | |
33. | Janaki Komandur, Anindita Das, Kaustubha Mohanty, 2024, 9780323911870, 125, 10.1016/B978-0-323-91187-0.00006-0 | |
34. | Kitirote Wantala, Warangkana Klangwichian, Totsaporn Suwannaruang, Siriwan Praphatsaraphiwat, Rangsima Taksungnern, Prae Chirawatkul, Sommas Kaewluan, Harikaranahalli Puttaiah Shivaraju, In situ hydro-deoxygenation onto nickel-doped HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst for upgrading pyrolytic oil, 2023, 1614-7499, 10.1007/s11356-023-30528-2 | |
35. | Thandiswa Jideani, Emmanuel Chukwuchendo, Lindiwe Khotseng, An Approach towards the Conversion of Biomass Feedstocks into Biofuel Using a Zeolite Socony Mobil-5-Based Catalysts via the Hydrothermal Liquefaction Process: A Review, 2023, 13, 2073-4344, 1425, 10.3390/catal13111425 | |
36. | Jude A. Onwudili, Paul T. Williams, Catalytic and non-catalytic low-pressure hydrothermal liquefaction of pinewood sawdust, polyolefin plastics and their mixtures, 2023, 09596526, 139733, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139733 | |
37. | Noor Hadi Hasan, Nabeel Ibrahim Hasan, Agricultural Waste Liquefied Hydrothermally using Heterogeneous Catalyst, 2023, 1259, 1755-1307, 012032, 10.1088/1755-1315/1259/1/012032 | |
38. | Saeed Ranjbar, Francisco Xavier Malcata, Hydrothermal Liquefaction: How the Holistic Approach by Nature Will Help Solve the Environmental Conundrum, 2023, 28, 1420-3049, 8127, 10.3390/molecules28248127 | |
39. | Nakarin Duangkaew, Carl Francis Z. Lacson, Nurak Grisdanurak, Mark Daniel G. de Luna, Sutasinee Neramittagapong, Bi-functional and bi-metallic catalytic Solvo-hydrothermal liquefaction for upgrading hydrocarbon of phenol-rich oil from kraft black liquor lignin, 2024, 09575820, 10.1016/j.psep.2024.06.067 | |
40. | Isaac Nava-Bravo, Carlos Escamilla-Alvarado, José Julián Cano-Gómez, Roberto Valencia-Vázquez, Uriel Galván-Arzola, Rogelio Cuevas-García, Bio-crude and biochar production and properties from corn stover at low energy-intensive hydrothermal liquefaction, 2024, 2190-6815, 10.1007/s13399-024-05977-5 | |
41. | Thu-Huong Le, Shuang Wang, Beom-Sik Kim, Hyungseok Nam, Doyeon Lee, Advancements and challenges in catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass: A comprehensive review, 2024, 13858947, 155559, 10.1016/j.cej.2024.155559 | |
42. | Fiaz Ahmad, Tharaka Rama Krishna C. Doddapaneni, Saqib Sohail Toor, Timo Kikas, Reaction Mechanism and Kinetics of Hydrothermal Liquefaction at Sub- and Supercritical Conditions: A Review, 2025, 5, 2673-8783, 9, 10.3390/biomass5010009 |
Analysis | Pine sawdust |
Moisture content (wt%) | 7.23 ± 0.12 |
Ash content (wt%) | 0.56 ± 0.03 |
Elemental analysis (wt%) | |
Carbon | 47.64 ± 0.02 |
Hydrogen | 6.25 ± 0.07 |
Nitrogen | 1.24 ± 0.02 |
Oxygena | 44.87 ± 0.04 |
Higher heating value (MJ Kg-1) | 19.19 ± 0.15 |
O/C (molar ratio) | 0.71 ± 0.01 |
H/C (molar ratio) | 1.57 ± 0.02 |
a Calculated by the difference |
Relative content (%) | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Carbon (wt%) | 58.42 ± 0.12 | 62.15 ± 0.14 | 63.29 ± 0.24 | 63.78 ± 0.12 | 63.13 ± 0.13 |
Hydrogen (wt%) | 6.61 ± 0.10 | 7.71 ± 0.07 | 7.81 ± 0.06 | 7.92 ± 0.07 | 7.76 ± 0.14 |
Nitrogen (wt%) | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.70 ± 0.08 | 0.73 ± 0.08 |
Oxygena(wt%) | 33.99 ± 0.14 | 29.32 ± 0.07 | 28.18 ± 0.07 | 27.60 ± 0.09 | 28.38 ± 0.05 |
HHV (MJ/kg) | 23.12 ± 0.08 | 26.78 ± 0.19 | 27.51 ± 0.07 | 27.93 ± 0.16 | 27.35 ± 0.13 |
Carbon recovery ratio (wt%) | 71.03 ± 0.12 | 81.24 ± 0.06 | 85.44 ± 0.08 | 82.17 ± 0.09 | 83.54 ± 0.12 |
Hydrogen recovery ratio (wt%) | 61.26 ± 0.08 | 76.82 ± 0.04 | 80.36 ± 0.07 | 77.78 ± 0.07 | 78.27 ± 0.07 |
O/C (molar ratio) | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.15 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
H/C (molar ratio) | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.03 |
Ethanol consumption rate (wt%) | 5.01 ± 0.14 | 4.76 ± 0.23 | 5.61 ± 0.34 | 4.89 ± 0.21 | 6.03 ± 0.18 |
a Calculated by the difference |
Relative content (%) | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Phenols | 10.8 | 9.84 | 9.94 | 8.64 | 8.93 |
Furans | 2.63 | 1.25 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 2.46 |
Ethers | 4.9 | 5.4 | 6.31 | 4.17 | 1.1 |
Aldehydes | 0.2 | 3.76 | 2.16 | 0.12 | 2.9 |
Ketones | 15.91 | 7.23 | 8.9 | 12.09 | 13.84 |
Esters | 35.74 | 21.06 | 28.35 | 26.39 | 26.52 |
Alcohols | 8.28 | 5.74 | 2.07 | 5.28 | 6.77 |
Acids | 5.57 | 0 | 1.95 | 0.88 | 1.27 |
Hydrocarbons | 3.04 | 6.63 | 8.26 | 11.02 | 6.49 |
Others | 12.93 | 39.09 | 31.63 | 30.84 | 29.72 |
Catalysts | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Initial (psig) | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 |
Maximum (psig) | 1680 ± 20 | 1945 ± 10 | 1875 ± 15 | 1925 ± 25 | 1900 ± 20 |
Final (psig) | 65 ± 5 | 120 ± 5 | 110 ± 0 | 130 ± 0 | 120 ± 0 |
Analysis | Pine sawdust |
Moisture content (wt%) | 7.23 ± 0.12 |
Ash content (wt%) | 0.56 ± 0.03 |
Elemental analysis (wt%) | |
Carbon | 47.64 ± 0.02 |
Hydrogen | 6.25 ± 0.07 |
Nitrogen | 1.24 ± 0.02 |
Oxygena | 44.87 ± 0.04 |
Higher heating value (MJ Kg-1) | 19.19 ± 0.15 |
O/C (molar ratio) | 0.71 ± 0.01 |
H/C (molar ratio) | 1.57 ± 0.02 |
a Calculated by the difference |
Relative content (%) | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Carbon (wt%) | 58.42 ± 0.12 | 62.15 ± 0.14 | 63.29 ± 0.24 | 63.78 ± 0.12 | 63.13 ± 0.13 |
Hydrogen (wt%) | 6.61 ± 0.10 | 7.71 ± 0.07 | 7.81 ± 0.06 | 7.92 ± 0.07 | 7.76 ± 0.14 |
Nitrogen (wt%) | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.70 ± 0.08 | 0.73 ± 0.08 |
Oxygena(wt%) | 33.99 ± 0.14 | 29.32 ± 0.07 | 28.18 ± 0.07 | 27.60 ± 0.09 | 28.38 ± 0.05 |
HHV (MJ/kg) | 23.12 ± 0.08 | 26.78 ± 0.19 | 27.51 ± 0.07 | 27.93 ± 0.16 | 27.35 ± 0.13 |
Carbon recovery ratio (wt%) | 71.03 ± 0.12 | 81.24 ± 0.06 | 85.44 ± 0.08 | 82.17 ± 0.09 | 83.54 ± 0.12 |
Hydrogen recovery ratio (wt%) | 61.26 ± 0.08 | 76.82 ± 0.04 | 80.36 ± 0.07 | 77.78 ± 0.07 | 78.27 ± 0.07 |
O/C (molar ratio) | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.15 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
H/C (molar ratio) | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.02 | 1.49 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.03 |
Ethanol consumption rate (wt%) | 5.01 ± 0.14 | 4.76 ± 0.23 | 5.61 ± 0.34 | 4.89 ± 0.21 | 6.03 ± 0.18 |
a Calculated by the difference |
Relative content (%) | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Phenols | 10.8 | 9.84 | 9.94 | 8.64 | 8.93 |
Furans | 2.63 | 1.25 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 2.46 |
Ethers | 4.9 | 5.4 | 6.31 | 4.17 | 1.1 |
Aldehydes | 0.2 | 3.76 | 2.16 | 0.12 | 2.9 |
Ketones | 15.91 | 7.23 | 8.9 | 12.09 | 13.84 |
Esters | 35.74 | 21.06 | 28.35 | 26.39 | 26.52 |
Alcohols | 8.28 | 5.74 | 2.07 | 5.28 | 6.77 |
Acids | 5.57 | 0 | 1.95 | 0.88 | 1.27 |
Hydrocarbons | 3.04 | 6.63 | 8.26 | 11.02 | 6.49 |
Others | 12.93 | 39.09 | 31.63 | 30.84 | 29.72 |
Catalysts | No catalyst | K2CO3 | HZSM-5 | 6%Ni/HZSM-5 | 12%Ni/HZSM-5 |
Initial (psig) | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 | 10 ± 0 |
Maximum (psig) | 1680 ± 20 | 1945 ± 10 | 1875 ± 15 | 1925 ± 25 | 1900 ± 20 |
Final (psig) | 65 ± 5 | 120 ± 5 | 110 ± 0 | 130 ± 0 | 120 ± 0 |