Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

Generation expansion planning considering renewable energy integration and optimal unit commitment: A case study of Afghanistan

  • The main focus of the proposed framework is to examine the importance of electricity interconnections with a high share of intermittent Renewable Energy (RE) sources and attempts to link the gap between planning model and operation with considering realistic operating details. Therefore optimal Unit Commitment (UC) is considered to analyze how operational aspects are appropriately done over the planning period. More specifically, a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model is developed to address the specific challenges of the underlying UC problem. For modelling purposes, demand forecast, applicable RE potentials and the cost of RE technologies are estimated. To reduce the expenses and improve system stability, energy storage systems (pump storage hydro and thermal energy storage) are considered as well. For optimal UC, a typical day (24 h) is employed to determine the capacity expansion and daily operational planning. Each selected day expresses a part of the year (e.g., a season). Incorporation of short-term decisions into the long-term planning framework can strengthen the accuracy of the decisions and guaranty the stability of power networks. The proposed approach can provide valuable insights into the appropriate energy strategies followed by the investors and policymakers at a national and regional level.

    Citation: Abdul Matin Ibrahimi, Mohammad Masih Sediqi, Harun Or Rashid Howlader, Mir Sayed Shah Danish, Shantanu Chakraborty, Tomonobu Senjyu. Generation expansion planning considering renewable energy integration and optimal unit commitment: A case study of Afghanistan[J]. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(4): 441-464. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.4.441

    Related Papers:

    [1] Van Duong Nguyen, Duy Duc Ha, Thi Hoai Thu Nguyen, Duc Huy Nguyen . Generation expansion planning toward Net Zero target considering co-firing green fuel, CCUS installation and early decommissioning in thermal power plants: A case study of Vietnam. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(3): 540-568. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025021
    [2] María P. Pablo-Romero, Antonio Sánchez-Braza, Manuel González-Pablo Romero . Renewable energy in Latin America. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 695-717. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022033
    [3] Vishal Chaudhary, Hari Mohan Dubey, Manjaree Pandit, Surender Reddy Salkuti . A chaotic Jaya algorithm for environmental economic dispatch incorporating wind and solar power. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(1): 1-30. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024001
    [4] Zubairu Ismaila, Olugbenga A. Falode, Chukwuemeka J. Diji, Omolayo M. Ikumapayi, Adetokunbo A. Awonusi, Sunday A. Afolalu, Esther T. Akinlabi . A global overview of renewable energy strategies. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 718-775. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022034
    [5] Shota Tobaru, Ryuto Shigenobu, Foday Conteh, Naomitsu Urasaki, Abdul Motin Howlader, Tomonobu Senjyu, Toshihisa Funabashi . Optimal operation method coping with uncertainty in multi-area small power systems. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(4): 718-734. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.4.718
    [6] Mohamed G Moh Almihat . An overview of AC and DC microgrid energy management systems. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(6): 1031-1069. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023049
    [7] Mohamed M. Abdelzaher, Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz, Hassan M. Mahmoud, Said F. Mekhamer, Samia G. Ali, Hassan H. Alhelou . Generation expansion planning with high shares of variable renewable energies. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(2): 272-298. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.2.272
    [8] Surender Reddy Salkuti . Sustainable energy technologies for emerging renewable energy and electric vehicles. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(6): 1264-1270. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024057
    [9] Yassine Charabi, Sabah Abdul-Wahab . The optimal sizing and performance assessment of a hybrid renewable energy system for a mini-gird in an exclave territory. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(4): 669-685. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.4.669
    [10] Arben Gjukaj, Rexhep Shaqiri, Qamil Kabashi, Vezir Rexhepi . Renewable energy integration and distributed generation in Kosovo: Challenges and solutions for enhanced energy quality. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(3): 686-705. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024032
  • The main focus of the proposed framework is to examine the importance of electricity interconnections with a high share of intermittent Renewable Energy (RE) sources and attempts to link the gap between planning model and operation with considering realistic operating details. Therefore optimal Unit Commitment (UC) is considered to analyze how operational aspects are appropriately done over the planning period. More specifically, a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model is developed to address the specific challenges of the underlying UC problem. For modelling purposes, demand forecast, applicable RE potentials and the cost of RE technologies are estimated. To reduce the expenses and improve system stability, energy storage systems (pump storage hydro and thermal energy storage) are considered as well. For optimal UC, a typical day (24 h) is employed to determine the capacity expansion and daily operational planning. Each selected day expresses a part of the year (e.g., a season). Incorporation of short-term decisions into the long-term planning framework can strengthen the accuracy of the decisions and guaranty the stability of power networks. The proposed approach can provide valuable insights into the appropriate energy strategies followed by the investors and policymakers at a national and regional level.


    Long term energy planning has become a pressing issue since the future happenings depended on today's decision. Historically, while energy provided by biomass proved inadequate to supply the growing economies, people turned to hydropower later on to coal and then to oil, natural gas, and nuclear power. The twenty-first century is the time for the next transition from fossil fuels towards RE and climate change is one of the critical driving forces. Shifting toward RE sources is accelerated by rising fossil fuel costs, improving renewable energy technologies and implementing policies (reflected the real expense and negative impacts of fossil fuels) [1,2,3]. Transition to a low or zero carbon economy is strongly related to the integration of RE sources not only from the growing environmental concerns but also from the market due to the rapid reduction of the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE). RE contributes to the sustainable development goals by providing environmental, social, and economic benefits. Some of the RE sources, such as wind and solar photo voltaic, have an intermittent character which is highly variable and have limited predictability which can have a significant impact on the operation of the electric power system [4,5]. With the recent technological advancements and rapid cost reductions, electrical energy storage is deployed which enhanced the system's performance and stability. The energy storage system aims to provide better energy management and improve supply and demand balance. Unlike conventional generators which only are used in creating electrical power and situates at the generation level, the energy storage systems have a variety of applications. They could be found in generation, transmission and distribution levels of a power system. Under the existence of intermittent RE resource, energy storage systems can maintain the stability of the power grid in an effectively feasible manner [6,7].

    Concerning energy systems, there is a need to consider a comprehensive and detailed evaluation for providing a road-map towards sustainable and secure energy planning. In this context, a modelling framework is necessary to optimally determine the technologies to be utilized in the power sector according to specific projections and policy targets [8]. Generation expansion planning is a complicated task, combining techno-economic and environmental characteristics. For electricity systems with high shares of intermittent RE sources, numerous approaches attempt to link the gap between planning models and operation considering realistic operating details such as start-up cost, shut-down cost, ramp rates operating reserves, etc. These issues are typically addressed by models developed for the solution of the UC problem to meet the demand at a minimum operating cost. Due to rapid penetration of intermittent RE sources, the incorporation of short-term operational constraints in the generation expansion planning is considered as a methodological framework to address the power market dynamics and result in robust expansion plan ensuring the system reliability. Incorporation of short-term decisions into the long-term planning framework can strengthen the accuracy of the decisions and guaranty the stability of power networks [9,10]. Using this approach for a limited number of time slices can lead to averaging of intermittent RE generation by strongly underestimating their variability. An alternative approach to assigning a value to each time slice is to select a set of historical days for representing the whole year. Each selected day expresses a part of the year (e.g., a season or a month).

    UC is an optimization problem which determines the operating schedule of a set of power generating units to satisfy the amount of electricity demand, considering a set of physical and operational constraints [11,12,13]. The objective of UC is to minimize the total operational cost over a time horizon, while a number of system and generator constraints must be met [14]. Typically, UC problem is a mixed integer and linear program (MILP), where the commitment decision variables are an integer, and the objective function and constraints are linear in both the commitment and the dispatch decision variables [15,16]. UC is rarely used in real system operation to realize uncertainty by a large number of scenarios dramatically increases the dimension of the optimization model [17]. Base on some studies, UC is employed for the determination of optimal operational scheduling in microgrids that consists a group of dispatchable and non-dispatchable generations in both grid-connected and isolated modes [18]. UC is also applied for the optimal schedule of combined heat and power, as well as for the systems consisting of controllable distributed generators and battery storage systems [19,20,21]. UC is not only necessary for the short-term dispatching of the power units, but also the midterm and long term interconnection issues. The combination of UC-based constraints into generation expansion planning can alter the optimal generation mix results to a significant extent [22].

    The considering approach combining long term generation expansion planning, along with short-term optimal UC, can directly affect socioeconomic growth in Afghanistan. Sustainable energy supply is closely linked to climate change, economic development, agricultural productivity, food security, etc. Access to clean energy plays a critical role in achieving sustainable development goals. Indeed, there is a close connection between energy insufficiency and poverty indicators like illiteracy, life expectancy, and infant mortality. Afghanistan has an excellent renewable energy potential (estimated 300 GW) but is not appropriately utilized [23,24]. The existing electrical system of the country is state-owned with small private sectors participation and it is not secure, sufficient and sustainable. Per capita, power consumption is 195 kWh, which is among the lowest in the world. Afghanistan severely depends on politically unstable import power, which makes 78% of the total supply. The rural electrification rate is remarkably low despite forming 75% of the population and contributing 67% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Afghanistan's energy sector seeks to increase the share of renewable energy, particularly solar and wind, by addressing the technological challenges, institutional barriers, along with the market restrictions. The development of renewable energy along optimal operation has the potential to assure energy security, while mitigating climate change impacts [25,26,27].

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 details the electricity demand forecast for the long-term planning horizon in Afghanistan. Section 3 evaluates the capacity of renewable energy. The cost reduction of renewable energy technologies is demonstrated in Section 4. Section 5 presents the proposed expansion planning model. In Section 6, an optimal UC is calculated to estimate operational aspects of the system. Section 7 is discussion and analysis, and finally, the conclusion is drawn in Section 8.

    Energy planning is usually performs according to studies base on demand forecasts and supply-side capabilities. Long-term load forecasting plays an essential role in the preparation, scheduling for construction of new generating plants, energy trade and sustainable economic development. For this study, demand-side is evaluated according to the historical data and forecasted energy need. The original set of electricity demand in Afghanistan are residential, commercial, registered and unregistered industries, governmental organizations, non-governmental organizations, and worshipping places. Base on assumptions and key parameters such as GDP growth, average tariff level, household consumption level, and connection rates, gross demand is expected to increase to 18,400 GWh from the current level of 7,769 GWh, and peak demand is expected to stand at around 3,500 MW by 2032. Forecasted electricity demand for each province and the total for the whole country is illustrated in Table 1 [28].

    Table 1.  Forecasted electricity demand from 2018 to 2032 [MW].
    Province 2018 2024 2032 Province 2018 2024 2032
    Badakhshan 16.9 37.7 76.4 Kunar 7.3 17.8 36.1
    Badghis 8.0 19.5 39.5 Kunduz 52.5 70.3 103.7
    Baghlan 38.1 54.6 83.1 Laghman 8.0 17.4 35.3
    Balkh 86.5 117.2 169.9 Logar 6.2 15.4 31.3
    Bamyan 2.9 13.5 28.3 Nangarhar 38.8 64.4 98.6
    Daykundi 3.0 13.7 28.9 Nimroz 29.2 36.7 51.7
    Farah 8.5 20.6 41.7 Nuristan 1.0 4.4 9.2
    Faryab 46.0 63.2 92.6 Paktika 6.9 16.9 34.3
    Ghazni 20.0 49.1 99.5 Paktiya 2.8 12.9 27.2
    Ghor 10.9 26.9 54.6 Panjsher 1.0 4.5 9.6
    Helmand 33.6 48.2 69.3 Parwan 26.2 43.9 65.0
    Herat 203.3 280.5 438.1 Samangan 15.3 25.4 37.7
    Jowzjan 24.5 33.3 48.3 Sar‐e Pul 22.7 36.7 54.4
    Kabul 675.5 837 1,216 Takhar 16.9 41.2 83.6
    Kandahar 82.9 111.6 166 Uruzgan 6.0 13.8 28.0
    Kapisa 2.8 13.1 27.5 Wardak 14.5 28.7 47.1
    Khost 9.1 22.6 45.8 Zabul 7.6 15.0 24.5
    Total capacity 1,272.5 1,762.3 2,725.5 Total capacity 262.9 465.4 777.3

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Supply-side for considered study is fulfilled based on the estimated RE potential and cost reduction of renewable energy technologies. Afghanistan enjoys an abundance of renewable energies, whose exploitation could help to meet future demand at cost levels that is economically attractive. Presently, there are few hydropower plants and small-scale solar and wind power projects. Based on the preliminary survey accomplished by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) of the United States, the country has huge RE resources (presented in Figure 1). Solar with average radiation of 6.5 kWh/m2/day and more than 300 sunny days is preferred as the main option to meet future energy demand. Windy lands are estimated to be 31,600 km2 which form almost 5% of the country [29,30]. Solar radiation and wind speed measured for a different part of the country are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. Hydropower dominates the present domestic power generation by total installed capacity of 300 MW. Besides grid-connected, there are some off-grid networks based on micro-hydro which are mostly available in the rural area. The feasible hydro potential is mainly estimated on Kokcha, Amu, Panj, Kabul, Panjshir and Kunar rivers. The country has biomass and geothermal potential to use as clean energy as well. Based on statistics, 6.8 million ton of crop residues were produced during 2008–2009, which could be a source of renewable energy if converted into biogas or biofuels [31]. Geothermal is determined in 70 spots with an estimated capacity of (4–100) MW. Anticipated fields are along the Hindukush mountain range and fault systems, such as Harirud, Badakhshan, Helmand, Arghandab and Farahrud [32].

    Figure 1.  Estimated renewable energy potential in Afghanistan.
    Figure 2.  Solar irradiation evaluated for different provinces in Afghanistan [33].
    Figure 3.  Wind speed measured for different provinces in Afghanistan [33].

    Availability of different energy sources at a reasonable cost is a significant factor to manipulate the expansion planning, appropriately. Several factors, including supported policies, continuous progression of technologies as well as competitive pressures, are contributing to the costs reduction of RE technologies. For renewable energies, the price generally needs to fall at the level which fossil-fuel power plants sell electricity. For such, as hydropower and biomass have already occurred, wind and geothermal have gotten closer [1]. RE based on solar, wind, and hydro can provide all new power globally by 2030, and replace all current non-renewable energies by 2050 [2]. Global average costs for the solar Photo Voltaic (PV) and the wind is expected to decline to about 0.05 $/kWh and 0.06 $/kWh, respectively. Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) is also indicated to achieve cost competitiveness for projects commissioned between 2020 and 2022 [34,35,36]. Fossil fuel may currently look with a cost advantage over RE but if externalities are added RE would be more affordable. Externalities associated with RE is much lower, less than 1 ȼ/kWh compare to the coal ranging between 2 to 15 ȼ/kWh. Figure 4 presents the range of external costs associated with different electricity sources. LCOE is an economic assessment of the total cost to build and operate a power generating over its lifetime energy output. It aims to provide comparisons of different technologies with different project size, lifetime, capital cost, and capacities [37,38]. In the case of RE, the assumed capacity factor of a facility has a significant impact on the LCOE. It is generally dependant on the quality of the renewable resource as based on resource for Australian conditions is summarized in Table 2 [39].

    Table 2.  Parameters can affect LCOE in the wind and solar projects.
    Technology Resource quailty Capacity factor Construction period Economic life time
    Wind 6.8 m/s 30% 2 year 30 years
    PV 2445 kWh/m2/year 20% 1 year 30 years
    CSP 2400 kWh/m2/year vary by size of storage and plant configuration 2 year 30 years

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 4.  External cost imposes by different power generating technologies [1].

    The multiple advantages of solar radiation such as light, heat, and electricity placed solar energy as an indispensable option around the globe. PV is one of the fastest growing technology used in a wide range from a small consumer to large power stations globally. The installed capacity of PV had grown at the rate of 40% over the last decade, with cost reductions of 22% for each doubling of cumulative capacity [40,41,42]. Beside PV, CSP technologies are gaining interest due to advantages of higher efficiency, lower operating costs, and good scale-up potential. The incorporation of thermal energy storage and backup systems increased CSP potential in competitiveness towards conventional energy systems. Cost reductions for CSP technologies is expected due to market growth, project experience, and use of advanced materials and components in upcoming years [43,44].

    Wind energy has been used for thousands of years and from about 120 years started to generate electricity. Continuous technological improvements caused a significant cost reduction of wind technology and it is already competing with fossil fuel power generation [45,46,47]. Low-cost power generation placed wind as a significant source of energy for the present and future planning [48]. Cost reduction predicted for different renewable energy technologies is presented in Figure 5.

    Figure 5.  Cost reduction predicted for different renewable energy technologies [49].

    Expansion planning is essential for ensuring the security of supply and efficient functioning of the electricity market. This study proposes long term demand and supply balance model with a vast influence of renewable energy sources as presented in Figure 6. Through considered model, the capacity of additional thermal base import power is limited, and the domestic coal-fired power plants options are replaced with alternative RE sources. Solar, wind and hydro are the primary RE sources considered to meet the future demand. Besides PV, CSP is evaluated as the most suitable solar technology in Afghanistan climatic condition. Through CSP, solar radiation concentrates on a receiver by using mirrors instead of burning fossil fuel to produce steam and generate electricity. CSP technologies with higher efficiency, lower operating costs, and good scale-up potential have the advantage of low-cost thermal energy storage, allow providing dispatchable renewable power. The Life Cycle Cost (LCC) of each component is the sum of capital cost, operating and maintenance cost and replacement cost minus salvage cost as formulated in Eq 5.1 [50].

    LCC=C+OMnpv+RnpvSnpv (5.1)

    where C is capital cost, OM is the operation and maintenance cost, R is the replacement cost, and S is the salvage value, all in $. The subscript of npv denotes the net present value of each factor.

    Alongside numerous advantages, RE integration may create some challenges as might cannot match the demand appropriately since in some days, the wind may not blow, or sun may not shine. Seasonal variation also will increase intermittency as solar irradiation is most influential in the summer while in some places wind is most effective in the winter. To overcome the challenges and to improve power system stability, a grid-scale energy storage system is considered as well. There are many ways, which can store energy through that Pump Storage Hydro (PSH) and Thermal Energy Storage (TES) are preferred as the most appropriate technologies in Afghanistan. Through PSH, the electricity will be stored during times when generation, especially from RE sources, exceeds consumption and return to the grid when production falls below consumption. Conversion from electric energy to the net output power by PSH and from thermal energy to the net electricity by CSP is described in Eqs 5.2 and 5.3 respectively.

    PSHmaxPnet(t){{(ηPSH×Wur×m×g×hur)÷106JMJ/s}÷[(60secmin)×(60minhour)]}÷PmaxPSH (5.2)
    EnetCSP={{[ MSS×m×cofc×(HMTCMT)]×(1STRlos)×ηCSP}÷106JMJ/s}÷[(60secmin)×(60minhour)] (5.3)

    where in Eq 5.2, ηPSH is efficiency of PSH, Wur is water in upper reservoir, m is mass, g is gravity, hur is height of upper reservoir, and PmaxPSH is maximum output power of PSH. In Eq 5.3, EnetCSP is net output energy stored by CSP in MWh, MSS is molten storage slat, cofc is heat co-efficient, HMT is temperature of hot molten salt CMT is temperature of cold molten salt, STRlos is storage loss, and ηCSP is efficiency of the CSP.

    Afghanistan is a key country between energy surplus areas (Central Asian Republics and Iran) and energy deficit regions (Pakistan and India). The country is in a position that can facilitate and launch regional electricity trade for the benefit of the region and derive significant gains for its economy from energy imports and exports. At present, there are ongoing regional efforts by multilateral institutions to establish regional energy trading agreements between Central Asian and South Asian countries. Afghanistan, with its geographical location, can be a bridge in between and gain significance revenues for its economy from energy imports and exports and supply its energy need due to some planned and/or unplanned power outages [51].

    Figure 6.  Proposed model for electricity demand and supply balance projected from 2018 to 2032 in Afghanistan.

    To evaluate seasonal demand with supply from variable RE resources, evaluation performed for both winter and summer as graphically presented in Figures 7 and 8 respectively.

    Figure 7.  Demand and supply balance scenario, integrating RE during winter over the planning period.
    Figure 8.  Demand and supply balance scenario, integrating RE during summer over the planning period.

    Future systems with a larger share of renewable generation require flexible production mix. Operational flexibility is equally important for long-term capacity expansion planning [52,53]. Unit commitment is an optimization problem used to determine the operation schedule of the generating units with varying demand under different constraints and environmental conditions [54,55,56]. UC performed in this study considers the main technical and operational characteristics like start-up costs, ramp limits and system coupling constraints like energy balance and reserve requirements. To assign the incorporation of short-term decisions into the long-term planning framework a set of historical days for representing the whole year are selected. Using this approach for a limited number of time slices can lead to averaging of intermittent RE generation by strongly underestimating their variability.

    Existing electrical system in Afghanistan is consisted of import power and domestic hydro and thermal resources. Import power from neighboring countries are obtained at the maximum agreed amounts all year-round except for Tajikistan which only exports surplus power. The total import power capacity reaches to 841 MW that expected to increase to 1,341 MW by 2024. Cost for import power varies upon the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with a power exporter country as depicted in Figure 9. Domestic thermal units fired by imported diesel fuel, are mostly reciprocating engines except for Kabul-NW power plant which consists, two diesel-fired gas turbines [28]. Power generating capacity and fuel coefficient of existing and planned thermal units are presented in Table 3 [57,58].

    Figure 9.  Import power cost (cents/kWh) from neighboring countries.
    Table 3.  Output capacity and fuel coefficient parameters of thermal units [57].
    Unit Pmax [MW] Pmin [MW] a [$/h] b [$/MWh] c [$/MWh] SUC[$]
    Tarakhil DG 105 20 680 16.51 0.0021 1,120
    Kabul NW 42 8 660 25.9 0.0041 1,300
    Small-DGs 65 3 706 18.22 0.0047 1,400
    Sheberghan-GT 400 50 800 14.31 0.0015 1,000

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The objective function for considered UC is indicated in Eq 6.1.

    minf=NTt=1{NTGi=1[Fcosti(PGi(t))]+[SUC(PGi)(t)]} (6.1)

    where NT is total scheduling period in hours and NTG is the total number of power generating units. F is fuel cost function of unit i at hour t in $, PGi is output power of unit i at hour t in MW and SUC is start-up cost of unit i at hour t in $.

    Equation (6.2) illustrates the quadratic fuel cost function where, a, b and c are the fuel coefficients. Fuel costs quadratic equation is implemented after modifying piecewise linear blocks as the quadratic equation is non-linear. Reference [59] describes the conversion of fuel cost quadratic equation to the piecewise linear equation.

    Fcosti(PGi(t))=ai+biPGi(t)+ciPGi2(t) (6.2)

    UC aims to identify the best possible scheme such that the overall generation cost has reduced. The problem involves deciding the hourly operation while satisfying a set of constraints. The main constraints for UC calculation considered in this study are as the following:

    The total capacity of supply should satisfy the demand for each hour. Supply-side consist of thermal generators (TGs), HPP, Import Power (IP), PVs, CSPs and PSHs. The demand and supply balance for this study is expressed by Eq 6.3.

    ni=1PTGi(t)+ni=1PIPi(t)+ni=1PHPi(t)+ni=1PCSPi(t)+ni=1PPVi(t)+ni=1PWi(t)+ni=1PPSHi(t)=ni=1PLd(t) (6.3)

    where n is the number of power generating units, PTGi(t), PIPi(t), PHPi(t), PCSPi(t), PPVi(t), PWi(t), and PPSHi(t) are the output power by thermal, import, hydro, CSP, PV, wind and PSH of unit i at hour t respectively. PLd(t) is total demand at hour t.

    The power output of each generating units, limited with a specified range of production.

    PGi(t)minPGi(t)PGi(t)max (6.4)

    where PGi(t)min, PGi(t) and PGi(t)max are the minimum, reasonable and the maximum output capacity of unit i at hour t in MW respectively.

    The operating duration is determined by considering the minimum up and down time constraints. Once a unit is committed/decommitted, it should be kept stable for a minimum period before a transition.

    ToniXoni(t) (6.5)
    ToffiXoffi(t) (6.6)

    where, Toni, Xoni, Toffi and Xoffi are the minimum uptime of unit i, duration of unit i being continuously on, minimum downtime of unit i and duration of unit i being continuously off, respectively.

    The minimum ramp rate of power generating units has to be higher or equal to determined ramp rate as indicated in Eq 6.7.

    Rri(t)Rri(t)min (6.7)

    where, Rri(t) is the ramp rate of unit i at hour t and Rri(t)min is the minimum ramp rate of unit i at hour t.

    PmaxCSPNC×CFA (6.8)
    PCSP(t)PCSP(t)max (6.9)
    PPV(t)PPV(t)max (6.10)

    where, PCSP(t) and PmaxCSP are output power and maximum output power of CSPs in MW. NC and CFA are the nameplate capacity and annual capacity factor of CSPs respectively. PPV(t) and PPV(t)max are output power and maximum output power of PV at hour t in MW respectively.

    PW(t)PW(t)max (6.11)

    where, PW(t) and PW(t)max are output power and maximum output power of wind plants at hour t in MW respectively.

    The simulation result obtained by using MATLAB (INTLINPROG) optimization toolbox presents the total daily energy mix with a scheduling time horizon of 24 hours. The primary difference regarding the structure of the chosen days is demand and supply level, which is affected by seasonal characteristics. Figures 1012 highlight the operational scheduling, each box corresponds to a specific power unit of a particular technology type and hourly period.

    Figure 10.  Optimal UC for 24 hours operation in 2024.
    Figure 11.  Optimal UC for 24 hours operation in 2028.
    Figure 12.  Optimal UC for 24 hours operation in 2032.

    Many factors contribute to achieving sustainable development goals and one of the essential requirement is a sustainable energy supply. The positive consequences of an increasing share of RE on the mitigation of CO2 emissions as well as on reduced energy import dependency are undeniable facts [60]. Afghanistan is struggling with plenty of problems such as fast population increase, unstable economic growth and an increase in poverty. Clean energy access as a key element can reduce the environmental effects of conventional generators, diversify energy supply, improve household incomes, create job opportunities as well as increase health and educational achievements [61]. Direct and indirect benefits through energy services can significantly reduce the high poverty level (54%) and the unemployment rate (30%) in Afghanistan [62,63,64]. The proposed model can bring more benefits, especially if the construction materials for energy infrastructures locally get process. It also will limit the capacity of additional thermal base import power and coal-fired power plants options. The CO2 emission amount prevented by the alternative RE sources, considered in expansion planning model is presented in Figure 13.

    Figure 13.  CO2 emission prevented by the proposed demand and supply balance model.

    UC analysis into the demand and supply planning model made essential changes to the optimal generation mix and increased the operational flexibility of the system. The UC model estimated more operational details during capacity variation such as the quantity of import power, existing flexible units, RE sources and the sufficient inclusion of new technologies such as the energy storage systems. A temporal representation based on using a set of typical days is better suited to assess the potential of different options. The method reduced per MWh production cost as determined in Eq 7.1 and mitigated CO2 emission as for a typical 24 hours operation is presented in Table 4.

    Mi=TOCNAi=1(PTGi+PHPi+PCSPi+PPVi+PWi+PPSHi) (7.1)

    where, TOC is the total operation cost, Mi and NA are the per MWh cost and the number of all generating units.

    Table 4.  CO2 emission (Ton) per 24 hours operation for considered periods.
    Generating Unit 2024 2028 2032
    Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer
    Import power 3,434.262 3,462.1779 3,865.9 3,785.71 4,972.73 4,623.93
    Tarakhi-DG 65.949 0 63.813 0 392.49 171.948
    Kabul-NW 8.484 0 0 0 8.484 0
    Small-DGs 6.675 0 16.02 0 180.332 62.5848
    Sheberghan-GPP 969.6 969.6 1,939.2 1,939.2 1,939.2 1,939.2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    This study provides an extensive analysis of long-term energy expansion planning towards self-sufficiency and sustainable energy supply in Afghanistan. The penetration of RE sources in the generation expansion planning is a significant factor towards tackling critical challenges, specifically the climate change and energy security. The study extensively analyzed the operational dimension of the electric power system that affected the results of system planning models. A detailed modelling analysis quantified the impact of both the temporal and techno-economic representation typically used for increasing penetration of RE sources. It allowed improving planning models by extending the operational time dimension. The UC approached in this study enhanced the ability to obtain decisions with intertemporal (hourly) constraints, which is embedded within the long-term planning. The proposed approach covered the forecasted electricity demand in a cost-effective way while satisfied a series of technical, economic and other logical constraints. By application of the proposed model, domestic energy production can cover 68.8% of forecasted demand, which 51.3% will provide from renewable energy sources. Connection rate is expected to increase to 65% in the rural area and the high level of near 100% for the urban regions. The CO2 emission prevented by limiting thermal base import power and domestic coal-fired power plants options stand at 22,392,396 ton. And the total number of jobs along with the RE projects expected to reach 12,544.

    For this paper, the authors acknowledge the support of the University of the Ryukyus through JICA (PEACE project).

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] Timmons D, Harris JM, Roach B (2014) The economics of renewable energy. Global Development And Environment Institute, Tufts University 52: 1–52.
    [2] Sen S, Ganguly S (2017) Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development–A discussion. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 69: 1170–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.137
    [3] Moncecchi M, Falabretti D, Merlo M (2019) Regional energy planning based on distribution grid hosting capacity. AIMS Energy 7: 264–284.
    [4] Poncelet K, Delarue E, Six D, et al. (2016) Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models. Appl Energy 162: 631–643. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.100
    [5] Wang X, Chang J, Meng X, et al. (2018) Short-term hydro-thermal-wind-photovoltaic complementary operation of interconnected power systems. Appl Energy 229: 945–962. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.034
    [6] Lai CS, Jia Y, Lai LL, et al. (2017) A comprehensive review on large-scale photovoltaic system with applications of electrical energy storage. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 78: 439–451. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.078
    [7] Thang VV, Thanhtung Ha (2019) Optimal siting and sizing of renewable sources in distribution system planning based on life cycle cost and considering uncertainties. AIMS Energy 7: 211–226. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.211
    [8] Dagoumas AS, Koltsaklis NE (2019) Review of models for integrating renewable energy in the generation expansion planning. Appl energy 242: 1573–1587. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.194
    [9] Koltsaklis NE, Georgiadis MC (2015) A multi-period, multi-regional generation expansion planning model incorporating unit commitment constraints. Appl energy 158: 310–331. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.054
    [10] Palmintier BS, Webster MD (2013) Heterogeneous unit clustering for efficient operational flexibility modeling. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29: 1089–1098.
    [11] Li Z, Jin T, Zhao S, et al. (2018) Power system day-ahead unit commitment based on chance-constrained dependent chance goal programming. Energies 11: 1718. doi: 10.3390/en11071718
    [12] Koltsaklis NE, Gioulekas I, Georgiadis MC (2018) Optimal scheduling of interconnected power systems. Comput Chem Eng 111: 164–182. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.01.004
    [13] Palmintier B, Webster M (2011) Impact of unit commitment constraints on generation expansion planning with renewables. In 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 1–7.
    [14] Zheng H, Jian J, Yang L, et al. (2016) A deterministic method for the unit commitment problem in power systems. Comput Oper Res 66: 241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.01.012
    [15] Melamed M, Ben-Tal A, Golany B (2018) A multi-period unit commitment problem under a new hybrid uncertainty set for a renewable energy source. Renewable energy 118: 909–917. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.095
    [16] Alemany J, Kasprzyk L, Magnago F (2018) Effects of binary variables in mixed integer linear programming based unit commitment in large-scale electricity markets. Electr Power Syst Res 160: 429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2018.03.019
    [17] Liu G, Tomsovic K (2015) Robust unit commitment considering uncertain demand response. Electr Power Syst Res 119: 126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2014.09.006
    [18] Alabedin AZ, El-Saadany EF, Salama MMA (2012) Generation scheduling in microgrids under uncertainties in power generation. In 2012 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference 133–138.
    [19] Kia M, Nazar MS, Sepasian MS, et al. (2017) Optimal day ahead scheduling of combined heat and power units with electrical and thermal storage considering security constraint of power system. Energy 120: 241–252. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.079
    [20] Nemati M, Zöller T, Tenbohlen S, et al. (2015) Optimal energy management system for future microgrids with tight operating constraints. In 2015 12th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) 1–6.
    [21] Haddadian G, Khalili N, Khodayar M, et al. (2015) Security-constrained power generation scheduling with thermal generating units, variable energy resources, and electric vehicle storage for V2G deployment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 73: 498–507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.05.020
    [22] Koltsaklis NE, Dagoumas AS (2018) Incorporating unit commitment aspects to the European electricity markets algorithm: An optimization model for the joint clearing of energy and reserve markets. Appl energy 231: 235–258. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.098
    [23] Rostami R, Khoshnava SM, Lamit H, et al. (2017) An overview of Afghanistan's trends toward renewable and sustainable energies. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 76: 1440–1464. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.172
    [24] Asumadu-Sarkodie S,Owusu PA (2016) A review of Ghana's solar energy potential. AIMS Energy 4: 675–696. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.5.675
    [25] Aminjonov F (2016) Afghanistan's energy security. Tracing Central Asian countries'contribution 1–30.
    [26] December (2014) Renewable energy development. Asian Development Bank Technical Assistance Report 1–11.
    [27] November (2014) Afghanistan national renewable energy policy. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Ministry of Energy and Water 1–20.
    [28] April (2013) Power sector master plan. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Ministry of Energy and Water.
    [29] Ibrahimi AM, Howlader HOR, Danish MSS, et al. (2019) Optimal unit commitment with concentrated solar power and thermal energy storage in Afghanistan electrical system. Int J Emerging Electr Power Syst 20: 1–16.
    [30] Elliott D (2011) Wind resource assessment and mapping for Afghanistan and Pakistan. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, Color, USA.
    [31] Milbrandt A, Overend R (2011) Assessment of biomass resources in Afghanistan. National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
    [32] Anwarzai MA, Nagasaka K (2017) Prospect area mapping for geothermal energy exploration in Afghanistan. J Clean Energy Technol 5: 501–506. doi: 10.18178/JOCET.2017.5.6.424
    [33] Jahangiri M, Haghani A, Mostafaeipour A, et al. (2019) Assessment of solar-wind power plants in Afghanistan: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 99: 169–190. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.003
    [34] Salvatore J (2013) World energy perspective: cost of energy technologies. World Energy Council.
    [35] Kost C, Shammugam S, Julch V, et al. (2018) Levelized cost of electricity renewable energy technologies. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE.
    [36] Ilas A, Ralon P, Rodriguez A, et al. (2018) Renewable power generation costs in 2017. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
    [37] Biegler T, Zhang DK (2009) The hidden costs of electricity: externalities of power generation in Australia. Australian Academy of Technological Science and Engineering.
    [38] Lai CS, McCulloch MD (2017) Levelized cost of electricity for solar photovoltaic and electrical energy storage. Appl Energy 190: 191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.153
    [39] Mcconnell D (2011) Renewable energy technology cost review. Melbourne Energy Inst.
    [40] Branker K, Pathak MJ, Pearce JM (2011) A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renewable sustainable energy rev 15: 4470–4482. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104
    [41] Celik AN, Muneer T, Clarke P (2009) A review of installed solar photovoltaic and thermal collector capacities in relation to solar potential for the EU-15. Renewable Energy 34: 849–856. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.025
    [42] Chung D, Davidson C, Fu R, et al. (2015) US photovoltaic prices and cost breakdowns. Q1 2015 benchmarks for residential, commercial, and utility-scale systems. National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
    [43] Zhang HL, Baeyens J, Degrève J, et al. (2013) Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renewable sustainable energy rev 22: 466–481. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.032
    [44] Gielen D (2012) Renewable energy technologies: Cost analysis series. Volume 1: Power Sector, Issue 2/5, Concentrating Solar Power [2014-11-20]. Available from: http://www. researchgate. net/profile/Dolf Gielen/publications/6.
    [45] Díaz-González F, Sumper A, Gomis-Bellmunt O, et al. (2012) A review of energy storage technologies for wind power applications. Renewable sustainable energy rev 16: 2154–2171. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.029
    [46] Herbert GJ, Iniyan S, Sreevalsan E, et al. (2007) A review of wind energy technologies. Renewable sustainable energy rev 11: 1117–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.08.004
    [47] Kaldellis JK, Zafirakis D (2011) The wind energy (r) evolution: A short review of a long history. Renewable energy 36: 1887–1901. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.002
    [48] Leung DY, Yang Y (2012) Wind energy development and its environmental impact: A review. Renewable sustainable energy rev 16: 1031–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.024
    [49] Miketa A, Merven B (2013) West African power pool: Planning and prospects for renewable energy. IRENA, Abu Dhabi.
    [50] Askarzadeh A, dos Santos Coelho L (2015) A novel framework for optimization of a grid independent hybrid renewable energy system: A case study of Iran. Solar Energy 112: 383–396. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.12.013
    [51] Sediqi MM, Howlader HOR, Ibrahimi AM, et al. (2017) Development of renewable energy resources in Afghanistan for economically optimized cross-border electricity trading. AIMS Energy 5: 691–717. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.4.691
    [52] Palmintier BS, Webster MD (2015) Impact of operational flexibility on electricity generation planning with renewable and carbon targets. IEEE Trans Sust Energy 7: 672–684.
    [53] Howlader HO, Sediqi MM, Ibrahimi AM, et al. (2018) Optimal thermal unit commitment for solving duck curve problem by introducing CSP, PSH and demand response. IEEE Access 6: 4834–4844. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2790967
    [54] Chakraborty S, Senjyu T, Saber AY, et al. (2009) Optimal thermal unit commitment integrated with renewable energy sources using advanced particle swarm optimization. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng 4: 609–617. doi: 10.1002/tee.20453
    [55] Sivasakthi S, Santhi RK, Krishnan NM, et al. (2017) Optimal thermal unit commitment solution integrating renewable energy with generator outage. Iran J Electr Electron Eng 13: 112–122.
    [56] Marneris I, Biskas P, Bakirtzis A (2017) Stochastic and deterministic unit commitment considering uncertainty and variability reserves for high renewable integration. Energies 10: 140. doi: 10.3390/en10010140
    [57] Sediqi MM, Furukakoi M, Lotfy ME, et al. (2017) An optimization approach for unit commitment of a power system integrated with renewable energy sources: A case study of afghanistan. J Energy Power Eng 11: 528–536.
    [58] Furukakoi M, Adewuyi OB, Matayoshi H, et al. (2018) Multi objective unit commitment with voltage stability and PV uncertainty. Appl Energy 228: 618–623. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.074
    [59] Carrión M, Arroyo JM (2006) A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans power syst 21: 1371–1378. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.876672
    [60] Zhang Q, Ishihara KN, Mclellan BC, et al. (2012) Scenario analysis on future electricity supply and demand in Japan. Energy 38: 376–385. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.046
    [61] Sooriyaarachchi TM, Tsai IT, El Khatib S, et al. (2015) Job creation potentials and skill requirements in, PV, CSP, wind, water-to-energy and energy efficiency value chains. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 52: 653–668. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.143
    [62] Akella AK, Saini RP, Sharma MP (2009) Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renewable Energy 34: 390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.002
    [63] Available from: https://www.adb.org/countries/afghanistan/poverty.
    [64] Available from: https://www.tolonews.com/business/afghanistan-has-highest-unemployed-work-force-ilo.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Mozhdah Hafizyar, Ahmad Rasa Arsallan, Najib Rahman Sabory, Mir Sayed Shah Danish, Tomonobu Senjyu, 2021, Chapter 5, 978-981-15-7178-7, 65, 10.1007/978-981-15-7179-4_5
    2. Mir Sayed Shah Danish, Najib Rahman Sabory, Abdul Matin Ibrahimi, Tomonobu Senjyu, Mohammad Hamid Ahadi, Mohammad Zubair Stanikzai, 2021, Chapter 2, 978-981-15-7178-7, 15, 10.1007/978-981-15-7179-4_2
    3. Mir Sayed Shah Danish, Najib Rahman Sabory, Mikaeel Ahmadi, Tomonobu Senjyu, Himayatullah Majidi, Milad Ahmad Abdullah, Fahim Momand, 2021, Chapter 1, 978-981-15-7178-7, 1, 10.1007/978-981-15-7179-4_1
    4. Abdul Matin Ibrahimi, K Narayanan, Mohammed Elsayed Lotfy, Mir Sayed Shah Danish, Mikaeel Ahmadi, Tomonobu Senjyu, Transients outrush current analysis and mitigation: A Case study of Afghanistan North East power system, 2019, 7, 2333-8334, 493, 10.3934/energy.2019.4.493
    5. Omar H. Abdalla, Maged A. Abu Adma, Abdelmonem S. Ahmed, Generation expansion planning considering unit commitment constraints and data‐driven robust optimization under uncertainties , 2021, 2050-7038, 10.1002/2050-7038.12878
    6. Vineet Kumar, Ram Naresh, Veena Sharma, Stochastic profit‐based unit commitment problem considering renewable energy sources with battery storage systems and plug‐in hybrid electric vehicles, 2022, 46, 0363-907X, 16445, 10.1002/er.8308
    7. Qi Wang, Xianjue Luo, Honglian Ma, 2022, Optimal Planning of Energy Storage Using a Sequence Representative Period Method, 978-1-6654-9993-4, 370, 10.1109/PSGEC54663.2022.9881122
    8. Mir Sayed Shah Danish, Abdul Matin Ibrahimi, Mikaeel Ahmadi, Shawkatullah Shams, Habibullah Fedayi, Tomonobu Shah Senjyu, 2022, chapter 1, 9781799895022, 1, 10.4018/978-1-7998-9502-2.ch001
    9. Amita Singh, Veena Sharma, Vineet Kumar, Ram Naresh, Om Prakash Rahi, Vineet Kumar, Investigation of PBUC problem with RES and EV in restructured environment, 2023, 47, 0309-524X, 1096, 10.1177/0309524X231185492
    10. Mohammad Hamid Ahadi, 2024, Chapter 4, 978-3-031-53573-4, 87, 10.1007/978-3-031-53574-1_4
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5503) PDF downloads(932) Cited by(10)

Figures and Tables

Figures(13)  /  Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog