Numerical comparison between deep water and intermediate water depth expressions applied to a wave energy converter

Pedro Beirão; Duarte Valério; Pedro Beirão; Duarte Valério

doi:10.3934/energy.2015.4.525

AIMS Energy

2015, Volume 3, Issue 4: 525-546. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.525

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Numerical comparison between deep water and intermediate water depth expressions applied to a wave energy converter

Pedro Beirão ^{1,2
,
,},
Duarte Valério ²

1.
Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ISEC, DEM, Coimbra, Portugal;
2.
LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

Received: 05 June 2015 Accepted: 22 September 2015 Published: 25 September 2015

The energy that can be captured from the sea waves and converted into electricity should be seen as a contribution to decrease the excessive dependency and growing demand of fossil fuels. Devices suitable to harness this kind of renewable energy source and convert it into electricity—wave energy converters (WECs)—are not yet commercially competitive. There are several types of WECs, with different designs and working principles. One possible classification is their distance to the shoreline and thus their depth. Near-shore devices are one of them since they are typically deployed at intermediate water depth (IWD). The selection of the WEC deployment site should be a balance between several parameters; water depth is one of them. Another way of classifying WECs is grouping them by their geometry, size and orientation. Considering a near-shore WEC belonging to the floating point category, this paper is focused on the numerical study about the differences arising in the power captured from the sea waves when the typical deep water (DW) assumption is compared with the more realistic IWD consideration. Actually, the production of electricity will depend, among other issues, on the depth of the deployment site. The development of a dynamic model including specific equations for the usual DW assumption as well as for IWD is also described. Derived equations were used to build a time domain simulator (TDS). Numerical results were obtained by means of simulations performed using the TDS. The objective is to simulate the dynamic behavior of the WEC due to the action of sea waves and to characterize the wave power variations according with the depth of the deployment site.
- wave energy converter,
- deep water,
- intermediate water depth,
- relative depth criterion,
- dynamic model,
- simulation
Citation: Pedro Beirão, Duarte Valério. Numerical comparison between deep water and intermediate water depth expressions applied to a wave energy converter[J]. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 525-546. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.525

Related Papers:

Abstract

The energy that can be captured from the sea waves and converted into electricity should be seen as a contribution to decrease the excessive dependency and growing demand of fossil fuels. Devices suitable to harness this kind of renewable energy source and convert it into electricity—wave energy converters (WECs)—are not yet commercially competitive. There are several types of WECs, with different designs and working principles. One possible classification is their distance to the shoreline and thus their depth. Near-shore devices are one of them since they are typically deployed at intermediate water depth (IWD). The selection of the WEC deployment site should be a balance between several parameters; water depth is one of them. Another way of classifying WECs is grouping them by their geometry, size and orientation. Considering a near-shore WEC belonging to the floating point category, this paper is focused on the numerical study about the differences arising in the power captured from the sea waves when the typical deep water (DW) assumption is compared with the more realistic IWD consideration. Actually, the production of electricity will depend, among other issues, on the depth of the deployment site. The development of a dynamic model including specific equations for the usual DW assumption as well as for IWD is also described. Derived equations were used to build a time domain simulator (TDS). Numerical results were obtained by means of simulations performed using the TDS. The objective is to simulate the dynamic behavior of the WEC due to the action of sea waves and to characterize the wave power variations according with the depth of the deployment site.

References

[1]	Li Y, Yu Y-H (2012) A synthesis of numerical methods for modeling wave energy converter-point absorbers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16: 4352-4364 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.008
[2]	Falcão A (2010) Wave Energy Utilization: A Review of the Technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14: 899-918. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.003
[3]	Falnes J (2007) A review of wave-energy extraction. Mar Struct 20: 185-201. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.09.001
[4]	Fernandes A, Fonseca N (2013) Finite depth effects on the wave energy resource and the energy captured by a point absorber. Ocean Eng 67: 13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.04.001
[5]	Nieuwkoop-McCall J, Smith H, Smith G, Edwards K, Effect of water depth on the wave energy resource and extreme wave conditions. 4^th International Conference on Ocean Energy; 2012 Oct 17, Dublin, Ireland.
[6]	Folley M, Whittaker T (2009) Analysis of the nearshore wave energy resource. Renew Energy 34: 1709-1715. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.01.003
[7]	Stratigaki V, Troch P, Stallard T, et al. (2014) Wave Basin Experiments with Large Wave Energy Converter Arrays to Study Interactions between the Converters and Effects on Other Users in the Sea and the Coastal Area. Energies 7: 701-734. doi: 10.3390/en7020701
[8]	Falnes J (2002) Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems: Linear Interactions Including Wave-Energy Extraction, 1 Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9]	Drew B, Plummer A, Sahinkaya M (2009) A review of wave energy converter technology. J Power Energy 223: 887-902. doi: 10.1243/09576509JPE782
[10]	Prado M, Polinder H (2011) Direct Drive in Wave Energy Conversion-AWS Full Scale Prototype Case Study. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting; 2011 July 24-29; Detroit, USA.
[11]	Beirão P, Malça C (2014) Design and analysis of buoy geometries for a wave energy converter. Int J Energy Environ Eng 5: 1-11.
[12]	Bozzi S, Miquel A, Antonini A, et al. (2013) Modeling of a Point Absorber for Energy Conversion in Italian Seas. Energies 6: 3033-3051. doi: 10.3390/en6063033
[13]	Sarlak H, Seif M, Abbaspour M (2010) Experimental Investigation of Offshore Wave Buoy Performance. J Mar Eng 6: 1-11.
[14]	Tyrberg S, Waters R, Leijon M (2010) Wave power absorption as a function of water level and wave height: theory and experiment. IEEE J Ocean Eng 35: 558-564. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2010.2052692
[15]	Biesheuvel A, Spoelstra S (1989) The added mass coefficient of a dispersion of cylindrical gas bubbles in liquid. Int J Multiphase Flow 15: 911-924. doi: 10.1016/0301-9322(89)90020-7
[16]	Vu K, Chenu B, Thiagarajan K, Hydrodynamic Damping due to Porous Plates. WSEAS International Conference on Fluid Mechanics; 2004 Aug 17-19; Corfu, Greece.
[17]	U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Water Wave Mechanics Coastal Engineering Manual (EM 1110-2-1100) U.S. Army Corps Engineers, 2002. Available from: http://smos.ntou.edu.tw/CEM.htm.
[18]	Eriksson M, Waters R, Svensson O, et al. (2007) Wave power absorption: Experiments in open sea and simulation. J Appl Phys 102: 084910. doi: 10.1063/1.2801002
[19]	Engström J, Kurupath V, Isberg J, et al. (2011) A resonant two body system for a point absorbing wave energy converter with direct driven linear generator. J Appl Phys 110: 124904. doi: 10.1063/1.3664855
[20]	Finnegan W, Meere M, Goggins J (2013) The wave excitation forces on a truncated vertical cylinder in water of infinite depth. J Fluids Struct 40: 201-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.04.007
[21]	Falnes J, Bjarte-Larsson T (2006) Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Wave Energy Conversion by a Phase-Controlled Heaving Body. J Eng Marit Environ 220: 175-183.
[22]	Thorburn K, Leijon M (2007) Farm size comparison with analytical model of linear generator wave energy converters. Ocean Eng 34: 908-916. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.05.017
[23]	Pontes M, Aguiar R, Pires HO (2005) A nearshore wave energy atlas for Portugal. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 127: 249-255. doi: 10.1115/1.1951779
[24]	Valério D, Beirão P, Sá da Costa J (2007) Optimisation of wave energy extraction with the Archimedes Wave Swing. Ocean Eng 34: 2330-2344. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.05.009
[25]	Valério D, Mendes M, Beirão P, et al. (2008) Identification and control of the AWS using neural network models. Appl Ocean Res 30: 178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2008.11.002
[26]	Nunes G, Valério D, Beirão P, et al. (2011) Modelling and control of a wave energy converter. Renew Energy 36: 1913-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.12.018
[27]	Malça C, Beirão P, Felismina R (2014) Influence of material selection on the structural behavior of a wave energy converter. AIMS Energy 1: 359-372.
[28]	Sá da Costa J, Sarmento A, Gardner F, Beirão P, Brito-Melo A, Time Domain Model of the AWS Wave Energy Converter. 6^th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference; 2005 Aug 30-Sep 2; Glasgow, United Kingdom.
[29]	Beirão P, Malça C, Dynamic simulation in the time domain of a wave energy converter. 5^th International Congress of Energy and Environment Engineering and Management; 2013 Jul 17-19, Lisbon, Portugal.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)