The main research topics in 2020 and 2022 were the relationship between the frequency of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and air pollutants, such as suspended dust (PM2.5 and PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and the relationship between EHS and weather factors or parameters (station-level pressure, relative humidity, duration of sunshine), wind speed, wind gusts, cloud cover, average winter air temperature, and average summer air temperature) that describe the environmental levels of electromagnetic fields from the telecommunications infrastructure. The research was carried out in the form of surveys among residents of selected Polish cities. The strongest qualification criterion for the group of people declaring themselves hyperelectrosensitive allowed us to estimate the maximum incidence of EHS in the Polish population at 1.8% among the 2020 study group and 1.6% in 2022. The results showed no strong correlation between EHS and sensitivity to weather factors or air pollution. The causal relationship between environmental parameters and the number of individuals classified as EHS+ with the highest probability cannot be expected. The results showed that, among people who declare themselves hyperelectrosensitive, there is a significantly higher percentage of those who declare themselves hypersensitive to environmental pollution and weather.
Citation: Dorota Kantor, Gabriela Kanclerz, Grzegorz Tatoń. Is the occurrence of electromagnetic hypersensitivity related to sensitivity to air pollution and weather factors?[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2025, 12(2): 258-271. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2025014
The main research topics in 2020 and 2022 were the relationship between the frequency of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and air pollutants, such as suspended dust (PM2.5 and PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and the relationship between EHS and weather factors or parameters (station-level pressure, relative humidity, duration of sunshine), wind speed, wind gusts, cloud cover, average winter air temperature, and average summer air temperature) that describe the environmental levels of electromagnetic fields from the telecommunications infrastructure. The research was carried out in the form of surveys among residents of selected Polish cities. The strongest qualification criterion for the group of people declaring themselves hyperelectrosensitive allowed us to estimate the maximum incidence of EHS in the Polish population at 1.8% among the 2020 study group and 1.6% in 2022. The results showed no strong correlation between EHS and sensitivity to weather factors or air pollution. The causal relationship between environmental parameters and the number of individuals classified as EHS+ with the highest probability cannot be expected. The results showed that, among people who declare themselves hyperelectrosensitive, there is a significantly higher percentage of those who declare themselves hypersensitive to environmental pollution and weather.
| [1] | World Health Organization WHO, WHO Electromagnetic fields and public health: Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, 2005. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/radiation-and-health/non-ionizing/hypersensitivity |
| [2] | Leitgeb N, Schröttner J (2003) Electrosensibility and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, The Society for Physical Regulation in Biology and Medicine, The European Bioelectromagnetics Association 24: 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10138 |
| [3] |
England SJ, Robert D (2022) The ecology of electricity and electroreception. Biol Rev 97: 383-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12804
|
| [4] |
Eltiti S, Wallace D, Russo R, et al. (2018) Symptom presentation in idiopathic environmental intolerance with attribution to electromagnetic fields: evidence for a nocebo effect based on data Re-analyzed from two previous provocation studies. Front Psychol 9: 1563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01563
|
| [5] |
Tatoń G, Kacprzyk A, Rok T, et al. (2022) A survey on electromagnetic hypersensitivity: the example from Poland. Electromagn Biol Med 41: 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2021.1995873
|
| [6] |
Mirković A, Savić N (2022) Influence of meteorological factors on human health. Sestrinska Vizija 6: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.5937/SESTRVIZ2210017M
|
| [7] |
Mazza M, Di Nicola M, Catalano V, et al. (2012) Description and validation of a questionnaire for the detection of meteoropathy and meteorosensitivity: the METEO-Q. Compr Psychiat 53: 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.02.002
|
| [8] |
Licanin I, Fisekovic S, Babić S (2012) Admission rate of patients with most common psychiatric disorders in relation to seasons and climatic factors during 2010/2011. Mater Sociomed 24: 94-99. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2012.24.94-99
|
| [9] |
Cui Y, Gong Q, Huang C, et al. (2021) The relationship between sunlight exposure duration and depressive symptoms: A cross-sectional study on elderly Chinese women. Plos One 16: e0254856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254856
|
| [10] |
Hoxha M, Zappacosta B (2023) Meteoropathy: a review on the current state of knowledge. J Med Life 16: 837. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0097
|
| [11] | Penders TM, Stanciu CN, Schoemann AM, et al. (2016) Bright light therapy as augmentation of pharmacotherapy for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 18: 26717. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.15r01906 |
| [12] |
Peng Z, Wang Q, Kan H, et al. (2017) Effects of ambient temperature on daily hospital admissions for mental disorders in Shanghai, China: a time-series analysis. Sci Total Environ 590: 281-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.237
|
| [13] | General Inspectorate of Environmental Protection GIEP, “Measurement Data Base”, 2021. Available from: https://powietrze.gios.gov.pl/pjp/archives# |
| [14] | General Inspectorate of Environmental Protection GIEP, Five-year assessment of air quality in zones in Poland carried out for the years 2014-2018 according to the principles set out in Art. 88 section 2 of the Act-Environmental Protection Law. Summary national report with evaluation results, 2019. Available from: http://powietrze.gios.gov.pl/pjp/publications/card/19053 |
| [15] | Institute of Meteorology and Water Management IMWM-National Research Institute Data base. Available from: https://danepubliczne.imgw.pl/data/dane_pomiarowo_obserwacyjne/dane_meteorologiczne/ |
| [16] |
Schröttner J, Leitgeb N (2008) Sensitivity to electricity–temporal changes in Austria. BMC Public Health 8: 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-310
|
| [17] |
Dieudonné M (2020) Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses. Environ Health 19: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00602-0
|
| [18] |
Li Y, Guan D, Tao S, et al. (2018) A review of air pollution impact on subjective well-being: survey versus visual psychophysics. J Clean Prod 184: 959-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.296
|
| [19] |
Du G, Shin KJ, Managi S (2018) Variability in impact of air pollution on subjective well-being. Atmos Environ 183: 175-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.0184
|
| [20] |
Oniszczenko W (2020) Affective temperaments and meteoropathy among women: a cross-sectional study. Plos One 15: e0232725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232725
|
| [21] |
Rzeszutek M, Oniszczenko W, Zalewska I, et al. (2020) Personality profiles and meteoropathy intensity: a comparative study between young and older adults. Plos One 15: e0241817. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241817
|
| [22] |
Murray GW, Hay DA, Armstrong SM (1995) Personality factors in seasonal affective disorder: is seasonality an aspect of neuroticism?. Pers Indiv Differ 19: 613-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00105-F
|