
By using the recently generalized version of Newton's Shell Theorem
Citation: István P. Sugár. Electric energies of a charged sphere surrounded by electrolyte[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(2): 157-164. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021012
[1] | István P. Sugár . Density of electric field energy around two surface-charged spheres surrounded by electrolyte I. The spheres are separated from each other. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(2): 86-95. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022008 |
[2] | István P. Sugár . Density of electric field energy around two surface-charged spheres surrounded by electrolyte II. The smaller sphere is inside the larger one. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(1): 61-71. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022006 |
[3] |
István P. Sugár .
A generalization of the Shell Theorem. Electric potential of charged spheres and charged vesicles surrounded by electrolyte. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(2): 76-89. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020007 |
[4] |
István P. Sugár .
A generalization of the Shell Theorem. Electric potential of charged spheres and charged vesicles surrounded by electrolyte. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(1): 23-24. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023003 |
[5] | Ganesh Prasad Tiwari, Santosh Adhikari, Hari Prasad Lamichhane, Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary . Natural bond orbital analysis of dication magnesium complexes [Mg(H2O)6]2+ and [[Mg(H2O)6](H2O)n]2+; n=1-4. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(1): 121-131. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023009 |
[6] | Piotr H. Pawłowski . Charged amino acids may promote coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 fusion with the host cell. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(1): 111-120. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021008 |
[7] | Klemen Bohinc, Leo Lue . On the electrostatics of DNA in chromatin. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(1): 75-87. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.1.75 |
[8] | Piotr H. Pawłowski, Piotr Zielenkiewicz . The role of electric charge in SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections. AIMS Biophysics, 2024, 11(2): 166-188. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024011 |
[9] | István P. Sugár, Parkson Lee-Gau Chong . Monte Carlo simulations of the distributions of intra- and extra-vesicular ions and membrane associated charges in hybrid liposomes composed of negatively charged tetraether and zwitterionic diester phospholipids. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(2): 316-336. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.2.316 |
[10] | Roman Marks . Bubble mediated polymerization of RNA and DNA. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(2): 96-107. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022009 |
By using the recently generalized version of Newton's Shell Theorem
The head groups of membrane lipids have either single charge (e.g. tetraether lipids [1],[2]) or electric dipole (e.g. phospholipids [3]). Theoretical models of lipid membranes usually focus on short range (Van der Waals) lateral interactions between nearest neighbor lipids and ignore the long range charge-charge interactions [3],[4]. This is because in the case of long range interactions one has to consider the entire system rather than the interactions between the nearest neighbor lipids. In order to get closer to the solution of this problem recently we developed a generalized version of Newton's Shell Theorem [5],[6]. According to the generalized Shell Theorem the potential around a charged sphere of radius R is (see Eq.9 in ref.6)
where Z is the distance from the center of the charged sphere (see Figure 1) and the potential at Z ≤ R is (see Eq.10 in ref.6)
where Q = 4R2πρs is the total charge of the sphere and ρs is the surface charge density, λD is the Debye length in the electrolyte that is inside and around the charged sphere, ke is the Coulomb's constant and ϵr is the relative static permittivity of the electrolyte. In ref.6 we also calculated the electric potential of two concentric charged spheres surrounded by electrolyte, and the membrane potential of a charged lipid vesicle surrounded by electrolyte with high ion concentration. At any electrolyte concentration one can calculate the electric potential of the charged lipid vesicle by numerical integration (see ref.6).
In this paper we consider a single charged sphere (as in ref.6) and by using Eqs.1,2 analytical equations are derived to calculate the work needed to build up the charged sphere and the electrolyte's field energy inside and around the charged sphere. By means of these analytical equations one can also calculate the dependence of these energies from Q, R, C (electrolyte ion concentration) and T (absolute temperature).
By using the potential V(Z, Q) of the charged sphere (Eqs.1,2) the electrolyte's field energy can be calculated in these two regions by the following equation [7]:
where
To build a charged sphere it requires energy to overcome the repulsive forces between the charges already on the sphere and the charge approaching the surface of the sphere. Once the charge is on the surface of the sphere it is kept there by short range attractive forces. For example the charged lipids of a vesicle are kept in the membrane of the vesicle by the attractive, lateral, short-range interactions (Van der Waals interactions) with the surrounding lipid molecules [3],[4]. According to the generalized Shell Theorem, Eqs.1,2, the potential on the surface of the partially charged sphere of radius R with charge q is:
The electric potential energy needed to build a sphere of total charge Q is:
The electric field energy of the electrolyte inside the charged sphere, Z ≤ R, is calculated by using Eqs.2,3 (see Appendix 1):
The electric field energy of the electrolyte around the charged sphere, Z > R, is calculated by using Eqs.1,3 (see Appendix 2):
Here we calculate two types of electric energies: 1) ECC, the electric potential energy needed to build up the charged sphere and 2) Ein and Eout, the electrolyte's field energy inside and around the charged sphere, respectively. We assume that the overall neutral electrolyte contains only monovalent positive and negative ions and calculate the electric energies in the following range of monovalent ion concentrations: 0.0001–100.0mol/m3. Note, that the relative static permittivity of the electrolyte decreases with increasing ion concentration. However in the above concentration region the decrease is within one percent [8],[9]. Thus in our calculations the relative static permittivity is taken as constant (ϵr = 78). In this case, i.e. in the case of monovalent ions, the Debye length (in m) is [10]:
where
Based on
The field energy of the electrolyte inside (Ein) and around (Eout) the charged sphere is calculated by Eq.6 and Eq.7, respectively. These calculated energies are plotted against the ion concentration of the electrolyte (see Figures 3B and 3A).
By using Eqs.5,6 and 7 one can calculate the energy needed to build a charged sphere and the field energy of the electrolyte surrounding the sphere inside and around. In the case of zero ion concentration these energies can be obtained from the above mentioned equations by taking infinite long Debye length (see Appendix 3):
The results in
With increasing electrolyte ion concentration the electrical screening increases while the Debye length is approaching zero. As a consequence the energies, ECC, Ein and Eout, approach zero too (see Appendix 4).
In Figure 4 we compare the electric potential energy, ECC with the electrolyte's field energy within and around the sphere (i.e.: Ein/ECC (dashed lines) and Eout/ECC (solid lines)) and with the polarization energy Epol/ECC (dotted lines, see explanation below).
According to
However when the ion concentration of the electrolyte is higher than zero the work is expended also on the polarization of the electrolyte, Epol. Namely, when the surface charge of the sphere is zero the average charge density in the electrolyte is zero everywhere. At negative surface charge of the sphere the average charge density close to the surface of the sphere is positive and it is decreasing with increasing distance from the surface. In this case the energy available to build up the electrolyte's field energy inside and around the charged sphere is:
With increasing electrolyte ion concentration the Debye length decreases (see Eq.8) while the screening effect of the electrolyte increases and thus the work to build up the charged sphere, ECC decreases considerably (see Figure 2). From about 10 mol/m3 electrolyte ion concentration close to one quarter of the energy for building up the charged sphere appears as the electrolyte's field energy inside the sphere, while another quarter appears as the electrolyte's field energy around the sphere, and half of it appears as the polarization energy (see Figure 4).
The electrolyte's field energy around the charged sphere Eout also decreases with increasing electrolyte ion concentration (see Figure 3A) because the screening increases. But as it was mentioned above Eout decreases more than ECC with increasing electrolyte ion concentration (see Figure 4, solid lines).
Finally,
In this paper we considered a charged sphere surrounded by electrolyte. By using the generalized Shell Theorem
[1] |
Gabriel JL, Chong PLG (2000) Molecular modeling of archaebacterial bipolar tetraether lipid membranes. Chem Phys Lipids 105: 193-200. doi: 10.1016/S0009-3084(00)00126-2
![]() |
[2] |
Chong PLG (2010) Archaebacterial bipolar tetraether lipids: Physico-chemical and membrane properties. Chem Phys Lipids 163: 253-265. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2009.12.006
![]() |
[3] | Almeida PFF (2009) Thermodynamics of lipid interactions in complex bilayers. BBA-Biophys 1788: 72-85. |
[4] |
Sugár IP, Thompson TE, Biltonen RL (1999) Monte Carlo simulation of two-component bilayers: DMPC/DSPC mixtures. Biophys J 76: 2099-2110. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77366-2
![]() |
[5] | Newton I (1999) A New Translation. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy Berkeley: University of California Press, 590. |
[6] |
Sugár IP (2020) A generalization of the shell theorem. Electric potential of charged spheres and charged vesicles surrounded by electrolyte. AIMS Biophys 7: 76-89. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020007
![]() |
[7] | Griffiths DJ (2005) Introduction to Electrodynamics Cambridge University Press. |
[8] |
Hasted JB, Ritson DM, Collie CH (1948) Dielectric properties of aqueous ionic solutions. Parts I and II. J Chem Phys 16: 1-21. doi: 10.1063/1.1746645
![]() |
[9] |
Gavish N, Promislow K (2016) Dependence of the dielectric constant of electrolyte solutions on ionic concentration: a microfield approach. Phys Rev E 94: 012611. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.012611
![]() |
[10] | Suslick KS (2001) Encyclopedia of physical science and technology. Sonoluminescence and Sonochemistry Massachusetts: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1-20. |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | István P. Sugár, Interaction Energy between Two Separated Charged Spheres Surrounded Inside and Outside by Electrolyte, 2022, 12, 2077-0375, 947, 10.3390/membranes12100947 |