Citation: Emmanuel Reyes-Uribe, Nathalia Serna-Marquez, Eduardo Perez Salazar. DDRs: receptors that mediate adhesion, migration and invasion in breast cancer cells[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(3): 303-317. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.3.303
[1] | José Luis Alonso, Wolfgang H. Goldmann . Cellular mechanotransduction. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(1): 50-62. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.1.50 |
[2] | Nicholas Spellmon, Xiaonan Sun, Wen Xue, Joshua Holcomb, Srinivas Chakravarthy, Weifeng Shang, Brian Edwards, Nualpun Sirinupong, Chunying Li, Zhe Yang . New open conformation of SMYD3 implicates conformational selection and allostery. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.1.1 |
[3] | Claudia Tanja Mierke . Physical role of nuclear and cytoskeletal confinements in cell migration mode selection and switching. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(4): 615-658. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.4.615 |
[4] | Shaimaa A. M. Abdelmohsen, D. Sh. Mohamed, Haifa A. Alyousef, M. R. Gorji, Amr M. S. Mahdy . Mathematical modeling for solving fractional model cancer bosom malignant growth. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(3): 263-280. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023018 |
[5] | Mikayel Ginovyan, Agnieszka Bartoszek, Izabela Koss-Mikołajczyk, Barbara Kusznierewicz, Pierre Andreoletti, Mustapha Cherkaoui-Malki, Naira Sahakyan . Growth inhibition of cultured cancer cells by Ribes nigrum leaf extract. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(3): 282-293. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022024 |
[6] | Hadi Sajid Abdulabbas, Yasir Haider Al-Mawlah . Effect of Rs5746136 genotypes on SOD activity and biomarkers levels in breast cancer patients. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023001 |
[7] | Sarada Ghosh, Guruprasad Samanta, Manuel De la Sen . Predicting factors and top gene identification for survival data of breast cancer. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(1): 67-89. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023006 |
[8] | Ahmad Sohrabi Kashani, Muthukumaran Packirisamy . Cellular deformation characterization of human breast cancer cells under hydrodynamic forces. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(3): 400-414. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.3.400 |
[9] | Sarada Ghosh, Guruprasad Samanta, Manuel De la Sen . Feature selection and classification approaches in gene expression of breast cancer. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(4): 372-384. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021029 |
[10] | Min Zhang, Shijun Lin, Wendi Xiao, Danhua Chen, Dongxia Yang, Youming Zhang . Applications of single-cell sequencing for human lung cancer: the progress and the future perspective. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(2): 210-221. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.2.210 |
The mammary gland is an organ which is restricted to mammals, the physiological function is milk production to feed new born offspring during lactation [1]. The mammary gland is organized into a network of branched ducts that are composed of an outer layer of myoepithelial cells and an inner layer of luminal epithelial cells, which build the ductal lumen and are able to differentiate into milk-producing alveoli [2]. The mammary ducts are embedded within a stroma consisting mainly of adipocytes, fibroblasts, blood vessels, nerves and immune cells (Figure 1A) [3]. In the mammary gland, myoepithelial cells are surrounded by the basement membrane (BM), which is a specialized extracellular matrix (ECM) composed mainly of type IV collagen, laminins, fibronectin, and different binding proteins, such as nidogen and entactin. The primary function of the BM is to separate the epithelium and the endothelium from connective tissue and connect the different types of collagens with other ECM components. Moreover, BM constitutes a platform for transmission of mechanical forces and induces the activation of signal transduction pathways [4,5,6].
The mammary gland is the only organ that completes its maturation during adulthood in women, however it undergoes several morphological changes from the embryonic stage until puberty and pregnancy [1,7]. In pregnancy, mammary luminal epithelium proliferates and differentiates into milk-producing alveoli; however after lactation it undergoes involution by apoptosis. The apoptosis removes up to 80% of the epithelium and the mammary gland returns back to pre-pregnancy volume and morphology [8,9,10,11]. All of these biological processes are mediate by signal transduction pathways which are activated by several bioactive molecules including proteases, hormones, growth factors, ECM components, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)[1,12,13]. The dysregulation of these signal transduction pathways contributes to development of different pathologies, including breast cancer.
Collagens are the most abundant proteins in vertebrates and the main component of ECM. Currently, 27 types of collagen has been described and their main functions are structural [14,15]. According to their organization and properties, collagens are classified in fibrillar (types I, II, III) and non-fibrillar (types IV, X) [15,16,17]. Collagens have a typical triple helix molecular conformation characterized as Gly-X-Y motifs, where X- and Y-positions are proline and hydroxyproline respectively. Collagens are usually composed of three identical alpha helices, however certain collagens contain two or three different alpha helices [15]. The function of collagens is not only limited to a structural role in tissues, because they also play important roles in various biological processes such as cell adhesion, migration, growth, differentiation, morphogenesis, chemotaxis, wound healing, and in several pathologies [14,18,19,20].
Epithelial cells are surrounded by an intact BM composed mainly of type IV collagen, and during tissue fibrosis or cancer this BM undergoes remodeling by the action of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), whereas fibroblast, myofibroblast and transformed epithelial cells secrete specific ECM components [15,21,22]. The secretion of MMPs mediate BM degradation and cell processes that promote migration and invasion of tumor cells, such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process (Figure 1B) [21,23].
Collagens present several cryptic domains inside of the quaternary structure that are able to bind and activate membrane receptors such as integrins and discoidin domain receptors (DDRs) [24,25]. It has been proposed that ECM degradation exposes cryptic domains on collagen, which are recognized for membrane receptors, which are then activated and induce signal transduction pathways that mediate cell behavior. In breast cancer, integrins and DDRs activated by collagens are able to induce an EMT process and invasion and that, it has been proposed, may contribute to progression and metastasis of tumor cells (Figure 1C) [24,26].
DDRs are RTKs expressed in vertebrates and invertebrates that exist as pre-formed dimers, which are activated by native triple-helical collagens but are not activated by denatured collagens and other ECM components [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Unlike typical RTKs, DDRs present a slow activation (phosphorylation) process and are able to maintain their activated state for several days [30,31]. The DDRs are a family with two members, DDR1 and DDR2. DDR1 is composed of five isoforms, which are generated by alternative splicing. DDR1a, DDR1b and DDR1c are functional, however DDR1d and DDRe are truncated isoforms which do not have a functional kinase domain. Recently, two DDR1 variants which are secreted have been described, but their functions have not been elucidated. DDR1 is expressed during embryonic development and in skin, lung, liver, kidney, intestine, colon, brain pancreas, and mammary epithelium; whereas DDR2 is mainly expressed in cardiac, muscular and connective tissues [4,33,34,35,36,37].
DDRs regulate several biological processes including development, differentiation, cell adhesion, and proliferation. However, DDRs also play an important role in pathological processes such as tumor growth and invasion/metastasis of several cancers [17,38].
DDRs are type I transmembrane receptors composed of an extracellular discoidin domain (DS), an extracellular discoidin-like domain (DS-like), an outer juxtamembrane region (EJXM), a single-pass transmembrane domain (TM), a large inner juxtamembrane region (IJXM) and one intracellular kinase domain (KD) (Figure 2)[36]. DDRs are present as preformed dimers in the plasma membrane and they are essential for ligand binding. The DS domain contains the motifs that recognize collagen binding sequences and confer the specificity of binding to collagens [36,39,40,41,42,43]. It is proposed that the DS-like domain is involved in the activation of DDRs by collagen, however the specific function remains to be described [44]. The EJXM region contains several N- and O- glycosylation sites that regulate receptor traffic, turnover and activation induced by ligands [39]. The TM domain has a leucine zipper motif that is required for receptor signaling and it plays an important role in receptor dimerization [28]. The IJXM region is large (130-140 residues) and together with KD domain, constitutes the cytoplasmic domain, which presents tyrosine residues that are phosphorylated during DDR activation [17]. The KD domain is composed for a kinase catalytic domain that mediates phosphorylation of target proteins. The phosphorylated tyrosine residues in the IJXM region and KD domain function as attachment sites for different cytoplasmic effector and adaptor proteins that are required for signaling [36]. Additionally, DDR1b and DDR1c have 15 phosphotyrosine residues in their cytoplasmic domain; whereas DDR1a has 13- and DDR2 has 14-phoshphotyrosine residues [17,38].
DDRs have different binding affinities to collagens and are activated by specific collagens. DDR1 and DDR2 are activated by collagen types I, II and III, whereas collagen type IV activates only DDR1. DDR2 binds preferentially to collagen type X and it is not activated by collagen type IV [31,39,45]. Collagens form supramolecular structures; however these structures are not required for DDR activation. DDRs are activated by specific triple-helical peptides containing specific collagen-binding motifs, which are absent in denatured collagens [31,41,43,46].
Upon binding to collagen, several tyrosine residues are autophosphorylated in the cytosolic domains of the DDRs; these are docking sites for different proteins with Src homology 2/3 (SH2/3) and phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains that promote the formation of protein complexes and the activation of signal transduction pathways [17,47,48,49]. DDR1 phosphorylation induces its association with several proteins including adaptor proteins (Nck2, ShcA, Csk, Crk-II), regulatory subunits of PI3K (p85), kinases (c-Src, Pyk2), motor proteins (NMHC-IIA), Stat proteins (Stat1a/b, Stat3, Stat5), GEFs (Vav 2/3) and SHIP2 phosphatase [47,49,50,51,52,53]. Moreover, non-phosphorylated DDRs are associated with other proteins including DARP32 phosphatase, KIBRA regulator protein, Syk kinase, Notch1 transcription factor, E-cadherin cell-cell adhesion protein, and Par3/Par6 cell-polarity proteins [54,55,56,57,58].
DDR1 phosphorylation promotes the activation of PI3K/Akt and Ras/MAPK signaling pathways, which mediate activation of transcription factors such as NFκB, Hes1, Hey2 and Notch [58,59,60,61]. DDR2 maximum activation requires Src activity in COS7 cells, whereas in vitro studies demonstrate that Src phosphorylates DDR2 at tyrosine (Y)736, Y740 and Y741 and promotes autophosphorylation of DDR2 at other tyrosine residues [62,63]. In addition, DDR2 promotes proliferation and migration of mouse skin fibroblasts, whereas DDR2 activation induced by collagen I promotes expression of DDR1 and MMP-10 through a JAK2/ERK1/2-dependent pathway in primary human lung fibroblasts [50,64].
The tumor suppressor gene p53 is activated in response to cell damage and stress; activation promotes cell cycle arrest, limits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis or senescence, p53 is inactivated in most human tumors [65,66]. DDR1 is also activated in response to cell damage, and promotes survival through a p53-dependent manner and it does not require the binding of a ligand [60].
DDR regulation has been poorly studied. It is proposed that some activated DDR isoforms are internalized, because DDR1b and DDR1c present NPXY motifs at the IJXM region and these motifs are associated to clathrin-mediated internalization. The absence of NPXY motifs in other DDR1 isoforms and DDR2 suggests that other mechanisms of regulation are utilized [29,36]. However, it is proposed that receptor internalization does not negatively regulate DDR activation, because activation of these receptors persists for long periods of time. It is suggested that DDR1 is phosphorylated during internalization and then it is recycled back to the cell surface [17]. Moreover, DDRs exist as stable dimers which is required for their activation, and therefore the structural changes in the TM domain of dimers are able to modify the activation of DDRs [28].
Another mechanism of regulation involves the EJXM region in DDR1, because this region is processed by some members of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs) such as MT-MMP-14, -15 and -16, which release receptor ectodomain and regulate receptor activation induced by ligands [17,67,68]. In contrast, DDR2 is not regulated for MT-MMPs activity, because EJXM region does not present the recognized sequences for MT-MMPs [69,70]. In addition, phosphatases are implicated in DDR activation, because treatment of cells with pervanadate, a phosphatase inhibitor, in absence of collagen induces phosphorylation of DDR1 [51].
DDR1 is highly expressed in epithelial cells and is associated with E-cadherin. The glycoprotein E-cadherin regulates intercellular junctions, maintenance of cell polarity, and cell architecture; however, loss of E-cadherin expression is associated with EMT processes and tumor progression [54,71,72]. In normal epithelial cells, DDR1 expression induces an increase of E-cadherin levels through a decrease in its degradation rate, which is mediated by inactivation of Cdc42 GTPase. It promotes epithelial differentiation and a reduction of mesenchymal markers expression [73]. E-cadherin also regulates DDR1 activity through sequestration at cell junctions, which prevents DDR1 binding to collagen [74]. In MDCK cells, DDR1 activation mediated by type I collagen inhibits FAK activity and cell spreading through suppression of α2β1 integrin-mediated Cdc42 activity [75].
Integrins are the most studied collagen receptors in mammalian cells. During tumor establishment, there is an aberrant expression of integrins and their dysregulation is associated to cancer progression. Particularly, β1 integrin is the major adhesion receptor for several ECM components [15]. Although DDR1 activation induced by collagens is independent of β1 integrin activity, it has been described that several signaling pathways downstream of DDR1 converge with integrin signaling [76]. In epithelial cells, DDR1 and integrins maintain a close communication in order to maintain morphology, adhesion, differentiation, growth and survival [15]. In MDCK cells, DDR1 prevents adhesion and migration through inhibition of α2β1 and Stat1/3 activity and suppression of SHP2 phosphatase expression [48]. In contrast, collagen I, through activation of DDR1 and α2β1, mediates an EMT process, tumor growth, invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer cells [53].
EMT process is characterized by a decrease of E-cadherin and an increase of N-cadherin and vimentin expression, as well as an increase in motility and invasion [53]. In tumor epithelial cells, DDR1 upregulates N-cadherin expression whereas α2β1 integrin promotes a reduction in E-cadherin levels, and these processes induce an increase of migration and invasion [53,75,77]. In 3T3 cells, DDR1 overexpression induces an increase of β1 glycosylation and its recruitment to focal adhesions, also enhancing binding/adhesion to fibrillar collagen, and it is crucial for connective tissue homeostasis [78].
TGFβ dysregulation is associated with tumor progression and its expression in several types of cancers correlates with a decrease of metastatic potential. In pancreatic cells, DDR1 expression promotes a downregulation of TGFβ expression and induces a more aggressive phenotype of cancer; whereas an increase in TGFβ levels downregulates DDR1 expression [79]. In contrast, TGFβ is a promoter of EMT processes in late-stages carcinomas, because it induces Par6 and Smurf1 E3-ubiquitin ligase expression which mediate GTPase RhoA degradation, removal of tight junctions and actin cytoskeleton remodeling and then invasion/metastasis [80,81]. Moreover, high expression levels of TGFβ are detected in early and advanced stages of breast cancer when compared to normal epithelium; whereas it is also associated with an increase of angiogenic potential and metastasis to lung and bone [80,82,83].
TGFβ induces an increase of DDR2 expression and promotes an EMT process through a mechanism that involves collagen I, NFκB and LEF-1 in HK-2 epithelial cells [84]. In addition DDR2 is upregulated in several pathologies including cancer [38]. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, DDR2 increases migration and promotes invasion, and its overexpression correlates with lung metastasis [85]. In contrast, DDR1 induces cell cycle arrest and maintains epithelial characteristics, while type I collagen increases DDR2 expression with an increase of proliferation and an EMT process, as well as decrease of DDR1 expression in MDCK epithelial cells [86].
Breast cancer is the most frequent carcinoma in women worldwide. Invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas are the most common histological types of breast cancer, with an average of 70-85 % of all reported cases, whereas 15-30% corresponds to in situ carcinomas [87,88]. Invasive carcinomas arise as a result of loss or gain of genes involved in the expression of tumor suppressors, mutations in GPCRs, RTKs and proteins that mediate adhesion, differentiation, growth and survival [88].
DDRs present differential expression during mammary gland development and breast cancer stages. In normal mammary epithelium, DDR1 is highly expressed and is frequently upregulated in both invasive and in situ ductal carcinomas, while it is downregulated in lobular carcinomas [88,89]. Moreover, knockout mice for DDR1 have defects in the morphology and function of the mammary glands [90]. In normal mammary epithelium DDR2 is not expressed, however it is overexpressed in invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas and is related with node invasion and poor prognosis [91,92]. DDR2 is mainly expressed in mesenchymal cells, and promotes Snail transcription factor stability in ERK1/2 and c-Src pathways-dependent manner, which induce EMT processes, migration and invasion in mammary ductal carcinoma cells [93]. DDRs play an important role in breast cancer progression through regulation of various biological processes including EMT, survival, growth, migration and invasion [17].
The BM is a structure that delimits epithelial cells with the stroma and is mainly composed of type IV collagen. The degradation of BM is a crucial step in invasion/metastasis of cancer cells [94]. In particular, type IV collagen induces expression of mesenchymal markers, activation of transcription factors (Snail1/2, NFκB), migration/invasion and therefore an EMT process in mammary epithelial cells MCF10A [26]. In addition, patients with aggressive breast cancer present an upregulation of NFκB and ZEB1; whereas ZEB1 promotes an EMT process and inhibition of DDR1 expression in mammary epithelial cells [95,96,97].
Invasive cancers show a collective migration pattern that is mediated by integrins, GTPases, and MMP secretion. Particularly, MMPs induce ECM remodeling and promote the invasion process [98]. DDR1 is associated with collective migration because it mediates cell polarity through regulation of Par3/Par6 activity and actomyosin activity suppression at cell-cell contacts [54]. In mammary epithelial cells, Syk kinase inhibits migration, however in breast cancer cells it is reported that a downregulation of Syk expression and its role on inhibition of migration is blocked for DDR1 expression [99]. In breast cancer cells, NMHC-IIA, a protein involved in cell spreading and directional migration, is constitutively associated with DDR1, and treatment with collagen I enhances this association [52].
The Wnt signaling pathway plays an important role in embryogenesis and mammary gland development [100,101]. In mammary epithelial cells Wnt-5a and its receptor, Fz-5, are required for DDR1 phosphorylation induced by type I collagen; however it also requires Gαi/0 and PI3K activity [100,102]. In addition, TGFβ induces Wnt-5a transcription and regulates DDR1 activity [103]. In breast cancer patients, it has been demonstrated that there is a correlation between Wnt-5 downregulation and a poor survival prognosis [103]. However, the relationship between TGFβ, Wnt-5a and DDR1 in breast cancer progression is still unclear.
The Notch signaling pathway is a mediator of breast cancer progression because it participates in various biological processes such as differentiation, proliferation, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and survival [104,105]. In triple negative breast cancer cells, Notch mediates an EGFR transactivation process and its hyperactivation has been associated with a poor survival prognosis [106]. In T47D breast cancer cells, collagen I promotes a functional association between DDR1 and Notch that maintains a constitutive activation of Notch [58]. Angiogenesis is a vital process in tumors, because they require nutrients and oxygen [107]. Angiogenesis involves new blood vessels formation from pre-existing ones, and represents an essential step during tumor growth and metastasis [108]. In angiogenesis induced by hypoxia, the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) transcription factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) play an important role in angiogenesis promotion [108]. In breast cancer cells, hypoxia induces an increase of DDR2 expression and promotes an EMT process, migration, invasion, and metastasis [109].
CD9 is a tetraspanin family member widely expressed in the plasma membrane of several cell types including malignant cells. Tetraspanins are implicated in a variety of physiological and pathological processes and are adapter proteins that mediate signal transduction pathways [110]. Particularly, CD9 is associated with and regulates the signaling of several integrins, such as: α3β1, α4β1, α5β1, α6β1, α6β4, and αIIbβ3 [111]. Furthermore, CD9 is associated with EWI family proteins and EGFR and participates in cytoskeleton remodeling [112], whereas CD9 is able to act like a metastasis suppressor because an inverse correlation between CD9 expression and the malignancy grade/metastasis in several cancers including breast cancer have been described [113]. In contrast, type IV collagen induces a transient CD9 expression at the plasma membrane and promotes migration through a DDR1-dependent pathway in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells [114].
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and affects women worldwide. Metastasis is the principal cause of death in breast cancer patients and BM degradation plays a crucial role during breast cancer progression and metastasis. BM is composed by collagen type IV, laminins, fibronectin and linker proteins. During BM degradation cryptic domains inside of quaternary structure of collagens can activate two classes of receptors, integrins and DDRs. DDRs are activated by native triple-helical collagen and are involved in several cancer-related biological processes. In the case of breast cancer, DDRs regulate cell adhesion, proliferation, EMT process, migration, invasion, and survival.
Finally, we can summarize that DDRs are expressed and regulated in a differential manner in breast cancer cells and their function depends on the tumor stage and the type of ligands that induce their activation. The crosstalk of DDRs with other receptors such as integrins or Notch and their association with other proteins as Wnt-5a and CD9 tetraspanin shows the great complexity in cell communication mediated by DDRs in breast cancer cells.
This work is partly supported by a grant from ICYTDF (224/2012). E. R-U and N. S-M. are supported by a CONACYT predoctoral training grant.
All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
Gjorevski N, Nelson CM (2011) Integrated morphodynamic signalling of the mammary gland. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 581-593. doi: 10.1038/nrm3168
![]() |
[2] |
Forsyth IA, Neville MC (2009) Introduction: hormonal regulation of mammary development and milk protein gene expression at the whole animal and molecular levels. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 14: 317-319. doi: 10.1007/s10911-009-9146-4
![]() |
[3] | Polyak K, Kalluri R (2010) The role of the microenvironment in mammary gland development and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a003244. |
[4] |
Vogel WF, Abdulhussein R, Ford CE (2006) Sensing extracellular matrix: an update on discoidin domain receptor function. Cell Signal 18: 1108-1116. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.02.012
![]() |
[5] |
Ozbek S, Balasubramanian PG, Chiquet-Ehrismann R, et al. (2010) The evolution of extracellular matrix. Mol Biol Cell 21: 4300-4305. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-03-0251
![]() |
[6] |
Egeblad M, Rasch MG, Weaver VM (2010) Dynamic interplay between the collagen scaffold and tumor evolution. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 697-706. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.08.015
![]() |
[7] |
McNally S, Martin F (2011) Molecular regulators of pubertal mammary gland development. Ann Med 43: 212-234. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2011.554425
![]() |
[8] |
Hinck L, Silberstein GB (2005) Key stages in mammary gland development: the mammary end bud as a motile organ. Breast Cancer Res 7: 245-251. doi: 10.1186/bcr1331
![]() |
[9] | Watson CJ (2006) Post-lactational mammary gland regression: molecular basis and implications for breast cancer. Expert Rev Mol Med 8: 1-15. |
[10] |
Brisken C, Kaur S, Chavarria TE, et al. (1999) Prolactin controls mammary gland development via direct and indirect mechanisms. Dev Biol 210: 96-106. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9271
![]() |
[11] |
Oakes SR, Rogers RL, Naylor MJ, et al. (2008) Prolactin regulation of mammary gland development. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 13: 13-28. doi: 10.1007/s10911-008-9069-5
![]() |
[12] |
Sternlicht MD, Kouros-Mehr H, Lu P, et al. (2006) Hormonal and local control of mammary branching morphogenesis. Differentiation 74: 365-381. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00105.x
![]() |
[13] | Fata JE, Werb Z, Bissell MJ (2004) Regulation of mammary gland branching morphogenesis by the extracellular matrix and its remodeling enzymes. Breast Cancer Res 6: 1-11. |
[14] |
Myllyharju J, Kivirikko KI (2004) Collagens, modifying enzymes and their mutations in humans, flies and worms. Trends Genet 20: 33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.11.004
![]() |
[15] |
Yeh YC, Lin HH, Tang MJ (2012) A tale of two collagen receptors, integrin beta1 and discoidin domain receptor 1, in epithelial cell differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 303: C1207-1217. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00253.2012
![]() |
[16] |
Carafoli F, Hohenester E (2013) Collagen recognition and transmembrane signalling by discoidin domain receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1834: 2187-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.10.014
![]() |
[17] |
Valiathan RR, Marco M, Leitinger B, et al. (2012) Discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinases: new players in cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev 31: 295-321. doi: 10.1007/s10555-012-9346-z
![]() |
[18] |
Ortega N, Werb Z (2002) New functional roles for non-collagenous domains of basement membrane collagens. J Cell Sci 115: 4201-4214. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00106
![]() |
[19] | Acerbi I, Cassereau L, Dean I, et al. Human breast cancer invasion and aggression correlates with ECM stiffening and immune cell infiltration. Integr Biol (Camb). [in press] |
[20] | Tao G, Levay AK, Peacock JD, et al. Collagen XIV is important for growth and structural integrity of the myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol 53: 626-638. |
[21] |
Mehner C, Radisky DC (2013) Triggering the landslide: The tumor-promotional effects of myofibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 319: 1657-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.03.015
![]() |
[22] |
Gehler S, Ponik SM, Riching KM, et al. (2013) Bi-directional signaling: extracellular matrix and integrin regulation of breast tumor progression. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 23: 139-157. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.2013006647
![]() |
[23] | Nistico P, Bissell MJ, Radisky DC (2012) Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: general principles and pathological relevance with special emphasis on the role of matrix metalloproteinases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4. |
[24] |
Favreau AJ, Vary CP, Brooks PC, et al. (2014) Cryptic collagen IV promotes cell migration and adhesion in myeloid leukemia. Cancer Med 3: 265-272. doi: 10.1002/cam4.203
![]() |
[25] |
Emsley J, Knight CG, Farndale RW, et al. (2000) Structural basis of collagen recognition by integrin alpha2beta1. Cell 101: 47-56. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80622-4
![]() |
[26] |
Espinosa Neira R, Salazar EP (2012) Native type IV collagen induces an epithelial to mesenchymal transition-like process in mammary epithelial cells MCF10A. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44: 2194-2203. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.08.018
![]() |
[27] |
Leitinger B (2011) Transmembrane collagen receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 265-290. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154013
![]() |
[28] |
Noordeen NA, Carafoli F, Hohenester E, et al. (2006) A transmembrane leucine zipper is required for activation of the dimeric receptor tyrosine kinase DDR1. J Biol Chem 281: 22744-22751. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603233200
![]() |
[29] |
Mihai C, Chotani M, Elton TS, et al. (2009) Mapping of DDR1 distribution and oligomerization on the cell surface by FRET microscopy. J Mol Biol 385: 432-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.067
![]() |
[30] |
Shrivastava A, Radziejewski C, Campbell E, et al. (1997) An orphan receptor tyrosine kinase family whose members serve as nonintegrin collagen receptors. Mol Cell 1: 25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80004-0
![]() |
[31] |
Vogel W, Gish GD, Alves F, et al. (1997) The discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinases are activated by collagen. Mol Cell 1: 13-23. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80003-9
![]() |
[32] |
Canning P, Tan L, Chu K, et al. (2014) Structural mechanisms determining inhibition of the collagen receptor DDR1 by selective and multi-targeted type II kinase inhibitors. J Mol Biol 426: 2457-2470. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.014
![]() |
[33] | Barker KT, Martindale JE, Mitchell PJ, et al. (1995) Expression patterns of the novel receptor-like tyrosine kinase, DDR, in human breast tumours. Oncogene 10: 569-575. |
[34] | Di Marco E, Cutuli N, Guerra L, et al. (1993) Molecular cloning of trkE, a novel trk-related putative tyrosine kinase receptor isolated from normal human keratinocytes and widely expressed by normal human tissues. J Biol Chem 268: 24290-24295. |
[35] | Karn T, Holtrich U, Brauninger A, et al. (1993) Structure, expression and chromosomal mapping of TKT from man and mouse: a new subclass of receptor tyrosine kinases with a factor VIII-like domain. Oncogene 8: 3433-3440. |
[36] |
Fu HL, Valiathan RR, Arkwright R, et al. (2013) Discoidin domain receptors: unique receptor tyrosine kinases in collagen-mediated signaling. J Biol Chem 288: 7430-7437. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R112.444158
![]() |
[37] |
Jin P, Zhang J, Sumariwalla PF, et al. (2008) Novel splice variants derived from the receptor tyrosine kinase superfamily are potential therapeutics for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 10: R73. doi: 10.1186/ar2447
![]() |
[38] |
Leitinger B (2014) Discoidin domain receptor functions in physiological and pathological conditions. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 310: 39-87. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800180-6.00002-5
![]() |
[39] |
Curat CA, Eck M, Dervillez X, et al. (2001) Mapping of epitopes in discoidin domain receptor 1 critical for collagen binding. J Biol Chem 276: 45952-45958. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104360200
![]() |
[40] |
Abdulhussein R, McFadden C, Fuentes-Prior P, et al. (2004) Exploring the collagen-binding site of the DDR1 tyrosine kinase receptor. J Biol Chem 279: 31462-31470. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400651200
![]() |
[41] | Leitinger B (2003) Molecular analysis of collagen binding by the human discoidin domain receptors, DDR1 and DDR2. Identification of collagen binding sites in DDR2. J Biol Chem 278: 16761-16769. |
[42] |
Ichikawa O, Osawa M, Nishida N, et al. (2007) Structural basis of the collagen-binding mode of discoidin domain receptor 2. EMBO J 26: 4168-4176. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601833
![]() |
[43] |
Xu H, Raynal N, Stathopoulos S, et al. (2011) Collagen binding specificity of the discoidin domain receptors: binding sites on collagens II and III and molecular determinants for collagen IV recognition by DDR1. Matrix Biol 30: 16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.10.004
![]() |
[44] |
Carafoli F, Mayer MC, Shiraishi K, et al. (2012) Structure of the discoidin domain receptor 1 extracellular region bound to an inhibitory Fab fragment reveals features important for signaling. Structure 20: 688-697. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.02.011
![]() |
[45] |
Leitinger B, Kwan AP (2006) The discoidin domain receptor DDR2 is a receptor for type X collagen. Matrix Biol 25: 355-364. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2006.05.006
![]() |
[46] |
Konitsiotis AD, Raynal N, Bihan D, et al. (2008) Characterization of high affinity binding motifs for the discoidin domain receptor DDR2 in collagen. J Biol Chem 283: 6861-6868. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709290200
![]() |
[47] |
Koo DH, McFadden C, Huang Y, et al. (2006) Pinpointing phosphotyrosine-dependent interactions downstream of the collagen receptor DDR1. FEBS Lett 580: 15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.035
![]() |
[48] |
Wang CZ, Su HW, Hsu YC, et al. (2006) A discoidin domain receptor 1/SHP-2 signaling complex inhibits alpha2beta1-integrin-mediated signal transducers and activators of transcription 1/3 activation and cell migration. Mol Biol Cell 17: 2839-2852. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1068
![]() |
[49] |
Lemeer S, Bluwstein A, Wu Z, et al. (2012) Phosphotyrosine mediated protein interactions of the discoidin domain receptor 1. J Proteomics 75: 3465-3477. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.10.007
![]() |
[50] |
Ruiz PA, Jarai G (2011) Collagen I induces discoidin domain receptor (DDR) 1 expression through DDR2 and a JAK2-ERK1/2-mediated mechanism in primary human lung fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 286: 12912-12923. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.143693
![]() |
[51] | L'Hote C G, Thomas PH, Ganesan TS (2002) Functional analysis of discoidin domain receptor 1: effect of adhesion on DDR1 phosphorylation. FASEB J 16: 234-236. |
[52] |
Huang Y, Arora P, McCulloch CA, et al. (2009) The collagen receptor DDR1 regulates cell spreading and motility by associating with myosin IIA. J Cell Sci 122: 1637-1646. doi: 10.1242/jcs.046219
![]() |
[53] |
Shintani Y, Fukumoto Y, Chaika N, et al. (2008) Collagen I-mediated up-regulation of N-cadherin requires cooperative signals from integrins and discoidin domain receptor 1. J Cell Biol 180: 1277-1289. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200708137
![]() |
[54] |
Hidalgo-Carcedo C, Hooper S, Chaudhry SI, et al. (2011) Collective cell migration requires suppression of actomyosin at cell-cell contacts mediated by DDR1 and the cell polarity regulators Par3 and Par6. Nat Cell Biol 13: 49-58. doi: 10.1038/ncb2133
![]() |
[55] |
Hansen C, Greengard P, Nairn AC, et al. (2006) Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 regulates breast cancer cell migration downstream of the receptor tyrosine kinase DDR1. Exp Cell Res 312: 4011-4018. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.09.003
![]() |
[56] |
Hilton HN, Stanford PM, Harris J, et al. (2008) KIBRA interacts with discoidin domain receptor 1 to modulate collagen-induced signalling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783: 383-393. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.12.007
![]() |
[57] | Dejmek J, Leandersson K, Manjer J, et al. (2005) Expression and signaling activity of Wnt-5a/discoidin domain receptor-1 and Syk plays distinct but decisive roles in breast cancer patient survival. Clin Cancer Res 11: 520-528. |
[58] |
Kim HG, Hwang SY, Aaronson SA, et al. (2011) DDR1 receptor tyrosine kinase promotes prosurvival pathway through Notch1 activation. J Biol Chem 286: 17672-17681. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.236612
![]() |
[59] |
Lu KK, Trcka D, Bendeck MP (2011) Collagen stimulates discoidin domain receptor 1-mediated migration of smooth muscle cells through Src. Cardiovasc Pathol 20: 71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2009.12.006
![]() |
[60] |
Ongusaha PP, Kim JI, Fang L, et al. (2003) p53 induction and activation of DDR1 kinase counteract p53-mediated apoptosis and influence p53 regulation through a positive feedback loop. EMBO J 22: 1289-1301. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg129
![]() |
[61] |
Das S, Ongusaha PP, Yang YS, et al. (2006) Discoidin domain receptor 1 receptor tyrosine kinase induces cyclooxygenase-2 and promotes chemoresistance through nuclear factor-kappaB pathway activation. Cancer Res 66: 8123-8130. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1215
![]() |
[62] |
Ikeda K, Wang LH, Torres R, et al. (2002) Discoidin domain receptor 2 interacts with Src and Shc following its activation by type I collagen. J Biol Chem 277: 19206-19212. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201078200
![]() |
[63] |
Yang K, Kim JH, Kim HJ, et al. (2005) Tyrosine 740 phosphorylation of discoidin domain receptor 2 by Src stimulates intramolecular autophosphorylation and Shc signaling complex formation. J Biol Chem 280: 39058-39066. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506921200
![]() |
[64] |
Olaso E, Labrador JP, Wang L, et al. (2002) Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates fibroblast proliferation and migration through the extracellular matrix in association with transcriptional activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2. J Biol Chem 277: 3606-3613. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107571200
![]() |
[65] | Marcel V, Catez F, Diaz JJ (2015) p53, a translational regulator: contribution to its tumour-suppressor activity. Oncogene. [in press] |
[66] |
Petitjean A, Achatz MI, Borresen-Dale AL, et al. (2007) TP53 mutations in human cancers: functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes. Oncogene 26: 2157-2165. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210302
![]() |
[67] |
Vogel WF (2002) Ligand-induced shedding of discoidin domain receptor 1. FEBS Lett 514: 175-180. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02360-8
![]() |
[68] |
Slack BE, Siniaia MS, Blusztajn JK (2006) Collagen type I selectively activates ectodomain shedding of the discoidin domain receptor 1: involvement of Src tyrosine kinase. J Cell Biochem 98: 672-684. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20812
![]() |
[69] |
Fu HL, Sohail A, Valiathan RR, et al. (2013) Shedding of discoidin domain receptor 1 by membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem 288: 12114-12129. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.409599
![]() |
[70] |
Shitomi Y, Thogersen IB, Ito N, et al. (2015) ADAM10 controls collagen signaling and cell migration on collagen by shedding the ectodomain of discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1). Mol Biol Cell 26: 659-673. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-10-1463
![]() |
[71] |
Huber MA, Kraut N, Beug H (2005) Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17: 548-558. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.001
![]() |
[72] |
Knust E, Bossinger O (2002) Composition and formation of intercellular junctions in epithelial cells. Science 298: 1955-1959. doi: 10.1126/science.1072161
![]() |
[73] |
Yeh YC, Wu CC, Wang YK, et al. (2011) DDR1 triggers epithelial cell differentiation by promoting cell adhesion through stabilization of E-cadherin. Mol Biol Cell 22: 940-953. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0678
![]() |
[74] |
Wang CZ, Yeh YC, Tang MJ (2009) DDR1/E-cadherin complex regulates the activation of DDR1 and cell spreading. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 297: C419-429. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00101.2009
![]() |
[75] |
Yeh YC, Wang CZ, Tang MJ (2009) Discoidin domain receptor 1 activation suppresses alpha2beta1 integrin-dependent cell spreading through inhibition of Cdc42 activity. J Cell Physiol 218: 146-156. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21578
![]() |
[76] |
Xu H, Bihan D, Chang F, et al. (2012) Discoidin domain receptors promote alpha1beta1- and alpha2beta1-integrin mediated cell adhesion to collagen by enhancing integrin activation. PLoS One 7: e52209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052209
![]() |
[77] |
Imamichi Y, Menke A (2007) Signaling pathways involved in collagen-induced disruption of the E-cadherin complex during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cells Tissues Organs 185: 180-190. doi: 10.1159/000101319
![]() |
[78] |
Staudinger LA, Spano SJ, Lee W, et al. (2013) Interactions between the discoidin domain receptor 1 and beta1 integrin regulate attachment to collagen. Biol Open 2: 1148-1159. doi: 10.1242/bio.20135090
![]() |
[79] |
Rudra-Ganguly N, Lowe C, Mattie M, et al. (2014) Discoidin domain receptor 1 contributes to tumorigenesis through modulation of TGFBI expression. PLoS One 9: e111515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111515
![]() |
[80] |
Park CY, Min KN, Son JY, et al. (2014) An novel inhibitor of TGF-beta type I receptor, IN-1130, blocks breast cancer lung metastasis through inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Lett 351: 72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.05.006
![]() |
[81] |
Ozdamar B, Bose R, Barrios-Rodiles M, et al. (2005) Regulation of the polarity protein Par6 by TGFbeta receptors controls epithelial cell plasticity. Science 307: 1603-1609. doi: 10.1126/science.1105718
![]() |
[82] |
Buijs JT, Stayrook KR, Guise TA (2011) TGF-beta in the Bone Microenvironment: Role in Breast Cancer Metastases. Cancer Microenviron 4: 261-281. doi: 10.1007/s12307-011-0075-6
![]() |
[83] | de Jong JS, van Diest PJ, van der Valk P, et al. (1998) Expression of growth factors, growth-inhibiting factors, and their receptors in invasive breast cancer. II: Correlations with proliferation and angiogenesis. J Pathol 184: 53-57. |
[84] |
Walsh LA, Nawshad A, Medici D (2011) Discoidin domain receptor 2 is a critical regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Matrix Biol 30: 243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2011.03.007
![]() |
[85] |
Xu J, Lu W, Zhang S, et al. (2014) Overexpression of DDR2 contributes to cell invasion and migration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 15: 612-622. doi: 10.4161/cbt.28181
![]() |
[86] |
Maeyama M, Koga H, Selvendiran K, et al. (2008) Switching in discoid domain receptor expressions in SLUG-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer 113: 2823-2831. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23900
![]() |
[87] |
Siziopikou KP (2013) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: current concepts and future directions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137: 462-466. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0078-RA
![]() |
[88] |
Turashvili G, Bouchal J, Ehrmann J, et al. (2007) Novel immunohistochemical markers for the differentiation of lobular and ductal invasive breast carcinomas. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 151: 59-64. doi: 10.5507/bp.2007.010
![]() |
[89] |
Toy KA, Valiathan RR, Nunez F, et al. (2015) Tyrosine kinase discoidin domain receptors DDR1 and DDR2 are coordinately deregulated in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150: 9-18. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3285-7
![]() |
[90] |
Vogel WF, Aszodi A, Alves F, et al. (2001) Discoidin domain receptor 1 tyrosine kinase has an essential role in mammary gland development. Mol Cell Biol 21: 2906-2917. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.8.2906-2917.2001
![]() |
[91] |
Ren T, Zhang J, Liu X, et al. (2013) Increased expression of discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2): a novel independent prognostic marker of worse outcome in breast cancer patients. Med Oncol 30: 397. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0397-3
![]() |
[92] |
Morikawa A, Takeuchi T, Kito Y, et al. (2015) Expression of Beclin-1 in the Microenvironment of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Correlation with Prognosis and the Cancer-Stromal Interaction. PLoS One 10: e0125762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125762
![]() |
[93] |
Zhang K, Corsa CA, Ponik SM, et al. (2013) The collagen receptor discoidin domain receptor 2 stabilizes SNAIL1 to facilitate breast cancer metastasis. Nat Cell Biol 15: 677-687. doi: 10.1038/ncb2743
![]() |
[94] | Lodillinsky C, Infante E, Guichard A, et al. (2015) p63/MT1-MMP axis is required for in situ to invasive transition in basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene. [in press] |
[95] |
Xiang S, Liu YM, Chen X, et al. (2015) ZEB1 Expression Is Correlated With Tumor Metastasis and Reduced Prognosis of Breast Carcinoma in Asian Patients. Cancer Invest 33: 225. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2015.1022258
![]() |
[96] |
Ling J, Kumar R (2012) Crosstalk between NFkB and glucocorticoid signaling: a potential target of breast cancer therapy. Cancer Lett 322: 119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.02.033
![]() |
[97] |
Koh M, Woo Y, Valiathan RR, et al. (2015) Discoidin domain receptor 1 is a novel transcriptional target of ZEB1 in breast epithelial cells undergoing H-Ras-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Int J Cancer 136: E508-520. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29154
![]() |
[98] |
Wolf K, Wu YI, Liu Y, et al. (2007) Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion. Nat Cell Biol 9: 893-904. doi: 10.1038/ncb1616
![]() |
[99] |
Neuhaus B, Buhren S, Bock B, et al. (2011) Migration inhibition of mammary epithelial cells by Syk is blocked in the presence of DDR1 receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 3757-3770. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0676-8
![]() |
[100] | Jonsson M, Andersson T (2001) Repression of Wnt-5a impairs DDR1 phosphorylation and modifies adhesion and migration of mammary cells. J Cell Sci 114: 2043-2053. |
[101] | Gavin BJ, McMahon AP (1992) Differential regulation of the Wnt gene family during pregnancy and lactation suggests a role in postnatal development of the mammary gland. Mol Cell Biol 12: 2418-2423. |
[102] |
Dejmek J, Dib K, Jonsson M, et al. (2003) Wnt-5a and G-protein signaling are required for collagen-induced DDR1 receptor activation and normal mammary cell adhesion. Int J Cancer 103: 344-351. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10752
![]() |
[103] |
Roarty K, Serra R (2007) Wnt5a is required for proper mammary gland development and TGF-beta-mediated inhibition of ductal growth. Development 134: 3929-3939. doi: 10.1242/dev.008250
![]() |
[104] |
Ribatti D, Crivellato E (2012) “Sprouting angiogenesis”, a reappraisal. Dev Biol 372: 157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.09.018
![]() |
[105] |
Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ (1999) Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 284: 770-776. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5415.770
![]() |
[106] |
Dong Y, Li A, Wang J, et al. (2010) Synthetic lethality through combined Notch-epidermal growth factor receptor pathway inhibition in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Res 70: 5465-5474. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0173
![]() |
[107] |
Thairu N, Kiriakidis S, Dawson P, et al. (2011) Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target in arthritis in 2011: learning the lessons of the colorectal cancer experience. Angiogenesis 14: 223-234. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9208-2
![]() |
[108] |
Yang Y, Sun M, Wang L, et al. (2013) HIFs, angiogenesis, and cancer. J Cell Biochem 114: 967-974. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24438
![]() |
[109] |
Ren T, Zhang W, Liu X, et al. (2014) Discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) promotes breast cancer cell metastasis and the mechanism implicates epithelial-mesenchymal transition programme under hypoxia. J Pathol 234: 526-537. doi: 10.1002/path.4415
![]() |
[110] |
Rubinstein E (2011) The complexity of tetraspanins. Biochem Soc Trans 39: 501-505. doi: 10.1042/BST0390501
![]() |
[111] | Berditchevski F (2001) Complexes of tetraspanins with integrins: more than meets the eye. J Cell Sci 114: 4143-4151. |
[112] |
Powner D, Kopp PM, Monkley SJ, et al. (2011) Tetraspanin CD9 in cell migration. Biochem Soc Trans 39: 563-567. doi: 10.1042/BST0390563
![]() |
[113] | Miyake M, Nakano K, Ieki Y, et al. (1995) Motility related protein 1 (MRP-1/CD9) expression: inverse correlation with metastases in breast cancer. Cancer Res 55: 4127-4131. |
[114] |
Castro-Sanchez L, Soto-Guzman A, Navarro-Tito N, et al. (2010) Native type IV collagen induces cell migration through a CD9 and DDR1-dependent pathway in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Eur J Cell Biol 89: 843-852. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.07.004
![]() |
[115] |
Hansen RK, Bissell MJ (2000) Tissue architecture and breast cancer: the role of extracellular matrix and steroid hormones. Endocr Relat Cancer 7: 95-113. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0070095
![]() |
1. | Andrés Martin Toscani, Pablo Aguilera, Federico Coluccio Leskow, Discoidin domain receptor 1 regulates ErbB2/ErbB3 signaling in mammary epithelial cells, 2022, 596, 0014-5793, 2795, 10.1002/1873-3468.14522 |