Research article

Differences in retailer interfaces in assortment planning and communication strategies for homogenized baby food products

  • Received: 19 October 2022 Revised: 19 December 2022 Accepted: 16 January 2023 Published: 03 March 2023
  • This research analyzed the assortment size and depth, marketing characteristics, price policies and communication strategies in large-retail chains and online distributions for homogenized baby food. Comparisons of the assortment composition were made considering defined product categories based on the composition formula, specialty product, claims, product origin and packaging material. Prices differences were also assessed comparing the different retailer formats (supermarket, hypermarket, convenience store and discount). The main findings highlighted significant differences in the assortment planning decisions. In particular, direct sales seem to be more oriented towards providing a wide range of products together with more information on products healthiness and origin; online sales, on the other hand, focus its assortment planning decision on supplying products with high added value in composition and price: in fact, the extra communication of additional information regarding the product nutritional characteristics and certifications, as well as expert advice, characterized the majority of the explored websites. About the promotion, in the physical stores, more convenience packs have been used, while more discounts were applied directly to the online sale price. This research provides concrete tools to marketing managers to improve the planning and communication strategies of infant formula of homogenized products for a differentiated and successful sales policy. At the same time, producers can make a more informed and dynamic choice on the distribution chain that can best match the company's offer.

    Citation: Stefano Massaglia, Valentina Maria Merlino, Antonina Sparacino, Giulia Mastromonaco, Danielle Borra. Differences in retailer interfaces in assortment planning and communication strategies for homogenized baby food products[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 305-328. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023017

    Related Papers:

    [1] Li Wang, Yuanyuan Meng . Generalized polynomial exponential sums and their fourth power mean. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 4313-4323. doi: 10.3934/era.2023220
    [2] Jianghua Li, Zepeng Zhang, Tianyu Pan . On two-term exponential sums and their mean values. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5559-5572. doi: 10.3934/era.2023282
    [3] Zhefeng Xu, Xiaoying Liu, Luyao Chen . Hybrid mean value involving some two-term exponential sums and fourth Gauss sums. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1510-1522. doi: 10.3934/era.2025071
    [4] Li Rui, Nilanjan Bag . Fourth power mean values of one kind special Kloosterman's sum. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6445-6453. doi: 10.3934/era.2023326
    [5] Hongjian Li, Kaili Yang, Pingzhi Yuan . The asymptotic behavior of the reciprocal sum of generalized Fibonacci numbers. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 409-432. doi: 10.3934/era.2025020
    [6] Li Yu, Xiaofeng Wang . Semi-local convergence of a sixth-order iterative method for solving nonlinear systems. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(6): 3794-3810. doi: 10.3934/era.2025168
    [7] Jiafan Zhang . On the distribution of primitive roots and Lehmer numbers. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6913-6927. doi: 10.3934/era.2023350
    [8] Meenakshi Rana, Shruti Sharma . Combinatorics of some fifth and sixth order mock theta functions. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(1): 1803-1818. doi: 10.3934/era.2020092
    [9] Jing Huang, Qian Wang, Rui Zhang . The short interval results for power moments of the Riesz mean error term. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5917-5927. doi: 10.3934/era.2023300
    [10] Shufen Zhao . The S-asymptotically -periodic solutions for stochastic fractional differential equations with piecewise constant arguments. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7125-7141. doi: 10.3934/era.2023361
  • This research analyzed the assortment size and depth, marketing characteristics, price policies and communication strategies in large-retail chains and online distributions for homogenized baby food. Comparisons of the assortment composition were made considering defined product categories based on the composition formula, specialty product, claims, product origin and packaging material. Prices differences were also assessed comparing the different retailer formats (supermarket, hypermarket, convenience store and discount). The main findings highlighted significant differences in the assortment planning decisions. In particular, direct sales seem to be more oriented towards providing a wide range of products together with more information on products healthiness and origin; online sales, on the other hand, focus its assortment planning decision on supplying products with high added value in composition and price: in fact, the extra communication of additional information regarding the product nutritional characteristics and certifications, as well as expert advice, characterized the majority of the explored websites. About the promotion, in the physical stores, more convenience packs have been used, while more discounts were applied directly to the online sale price. This research provides concrete tools to marketing managers to improve the planning and communication strategies of infant formula of homogenized products for a differentiated and successful sales policy. At the same time, producers can make a more informed and dynamic choice on the distribution chain that can best match the company's offer.



    Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) are induced by the immunogenicity of a drug itself, drug metabolites or dressings. The main clinical manifestations of IHRs are dermatitis, urticaria, asthma, angioneurotic oedema, gastrointestinal allergy, anaphylactic shock and death [1],[2]. Therefore, evaluation of the potential immunosensitization of candidate compounds is essential for the study and development of new drugs. However, due to the lack of ideal preclinical experimental models, it is currently impossible to accurately predict the potential immunotoxicity of drugs, especially the sensitization of low-molecular-weight compounds (LMWCs), which is a global problem. To improve the ability to predict the sensitization of LMWC, researchers must establish a more effective and novel model.

    The basophil activation test (BAT) has been widely used in the clinic and shows high sensitivity in the diagnosis of allergic diseases [3],[4]. Evidence has shown that the mechanisms of IHRs in brown Norway (BN) rats are similar to those in humans, so BN rats are widely used as drug allergy models for immunological studies domestically and abroad [5],[6]. Based on these findings, the aim of this project was to establish a suitable model for the BAT to predict the potential immunosensitization of LMWCs. First, identification of the basophil population in the peripheral blood of rats was necessary. Second, the expression of CD63, an activation marker for rat basophils, was detected by flow cytometry. Finally, the mechanism of PG-induced IHR was simulated, and the blood of penicillin G-conjugated BSA (PG/BSA)-sensitized BN rats was incubated with penicillin G-conjugated OVA (PG/OVA) in vitro. The expression of CD63 was observed to verify that the BAT model was effective.

    SPF 6- to 8-week-old BN rats weighing 160–200 g were purchased from Beijing Wei Tong Li Hua Experimental Animal Technology Company (Animal Certificate № 11400700176123). All animals were killed by carbon dioxide after the project was completed.

    Penicillin G-conjugated OVA (PG/OVA), penicillin G-conjugated BSA (PG/BSA) (China Bioss), ovalbumin (OVA) (USA Sigma), anti-rat CD45 APC (USA Biolegend), rat IgE (heavy chain) [marker-1] (FITC) (USA GenTex), PE rat anti-mouse CD63, (Germany Miltenyi), Evans blue (USA Sigma) and pentobarbital sodium (Germany Merck) were obtained.

    BN rats were subcutaneously injected with 1 ml of 1 mg/ml OVA solution (0.5 ml Al(OH)3) on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days. In the control group, normal saline (NS) was used instead of OVA.

    Blood was taken on the 10th day after the last sensitization, and blood samples were incubated and analysed within 8 h. 100 µl peripheral heparinized blood was added to 1 µl of anti-rat CD45 APC and rat IgE and stained in the dark for 30 min at 4 °C. 2 ml of ammonium chloride lysate was added, lysed at room temperature for 10 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 r/min, and the supernatant was removed and lysed 2 times. The cells were washed 2 times with PBS. The cells were resuspended in 100 µl of PBS before testing. Originally, the typical leukocyte region was gated on forward and side scatter (approximately 100000). Basophil populations were identified as CD45 APClow/IgE FITChigh cells.

    Antiserum preparation: On the 10th day after the last sensitization, the blood of sensitized rats was taken to prepare serum and stored at −20 °C.

    Passive cutaneous sensitization: The 10 normal rats were randomly divided into 2 groups and anaesthetized with 45 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium by intraperitoneal injection. The fur on the back of the rats was removed from an approximately 3 cm × 4 cm region. The antiserum prepared in each group was diluted 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32, and 0.1 ml from each group of antiserum was intradermally injected into the area with no fur on the rats.

    Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis challenge: After 24 h of passive cutaneous sensitization, the rats in each group were injected with 1.0 ml of OVA (1 mg/ml) and 1% Evans blue.

    Results: The rats were sacrificed after 30 min of challenge, and the dorsal skin was removed to measure the size of the blue spots. Those with a diameter greater than 5.0 mm were judged to be positive. Irregular spots were half the diameter of the sum of the major and minor diameters.

    Heparin complete anticoagulation blood (200 µl) was added to 2 tubes, each 100 µl. One tube was added to 10 µl of PBS, and the other was added to 10 µl of OVA (10 µg/ml), incubated at 37°C for 15 min, and placed on ice for 5 min, and degranulation was stopped. Then, 1 µl each of anti-rat CD45 APC, rat IgE and PE rat anti-mouse CD63 was added and stained for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. Then, 2 ml of ammonium chloride lysate was added, and the sample was lysed for 10 min at room temperature and centrifuged at 1500 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and lysed 2 times. The cells were washed with PBS 2 times. The cells were resuspended in 100 µl of PBS. First, the typical leukocyte population on the forward and side scatter was gated (approximately 100000), and CD45low/IgEhigh-labelled cells were identified as basophils. The expression of CD63 was measured after basophils were stimulated in vitro.

    BN rats were subcutaneously injected with 1 ml of 1 mg/ml PG/BSA (0.5 ml of Al(OH)3) solution on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days. In the control group, NS was used instead of PG/BSA.

    The method of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) was the same as in 2.5.1. Twenty-four hours after passive cutaneous sensitization, the rats in the control group and the PG/BSA-sensitized group were injected with NS and PG/OVA (1 mg/ml) plus 1% Evans blue, respectively.

    Complete blood with the heparin anticoagulant (200 µl) was added to 2 tubes, each 100 µl. One tube was added to 10 µl of PBS, and the other was added to 10 µl of PG/OVA (10 µg/ml). The method of flow cytometry detection was the same as in 2.5.2.

    All animal experimental procedures and protocols of the study were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments of the Shandong University Institute of Preventive Medicine (Permit Number: 20111231) in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

    With GraphPad Prism 5 for Windows statistical software, the numbers of basophils and CD63, after the data conformed to the normal distribution, expressed as x ± s, were compared using two independent samples t tests, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Flow cytometry showed that the CD45 APClow/IgE FITChigh-labelled rat basophils were grouped together (Figure 1a,b). The percentages of basophils in the control group and the sensitized group were 0.25 ± 0.07% and 0.24 ± 0.10%, respectively, with no significant difference (P > 0.05, Figure 1c).

    Figure 1.  The gating strategy of basophils was determined by flow cytometry. (a) Original, the typical leukocyte region was gated on forward and side scatter (approximately 100000 white cells). (b) Basophil populations were identified as CD45 APClow/IgE FITChigh. (c) Automated basophil counting using flow cytometry between the control (NS) and OVA-sensitized groups, mean ± SD, n = 5, the OVA-sensitized group compared with the control group, P > 0.05.

    The rat peripheral blood smears were stained by Wright–Giemsa. The morphology of the rat basophils was examined, and dark purple black basophilic granules were observed in the cytoplasm, often covering the nucleus. The nucleus was mostly lobulated, which was not easily observed. There were no morphological changes between the control and OVA-sensitized groups (Figure 2a). The percentages of basophils in both groups were 0.3 ± 0.24% and 0.4 ± 0.37%, with no significant difference (P > 0.05) (Figure 2b).

    Figure 2.  Blood smears identified basophils. Manual basophil counts in whole blood stained with Wright–Giemsa, × 1000. (a) The morphology of rat basophils and the numbers of dark purple black basophilic granules were not significantly different between the control (NS) and OVA-sensitized groups. (b) There was no significant difference in the number of basophils between the control and OVA-sensitized BN rats, mean ± SD, n = 5, the OVA-sensitized group compared with the control group, P > 0.05.

    Two counting methods yielded t-test P values of 0.36 (P > 0.05), indicating that CD45 APClow/IgE FITChigh can be used as markers to gate rat basophils.

    After verification with PCA, the rats were sensitized, OVA was combined with adjuvant to sensitize the rats, and the results of PCA were positive (Figure 3), suggesting that the rats produced the specific OVA-IgE.

    Figure 3.  Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) results of BN rats. n = 5, the control (NS) and OVA-sensitized rats were negative and positive (blue spot).

    After verification of PCA, the basophils in the control group were incubated with PBS and OVA for 15 min in vitro, and the expression of CD63 on the surface of basophils was not induced, with percentages of 3.60 ± 2.82% and 3.51 ± 3.30% (P > 0.05), respectively.

    The OVA-sensitized basophils were incubated with PBS and OVA for 15 min in vitro, and the expression of CD63 on the basophils was 1.78 ± 1.08% and 35.00 ± 23.90%, respectively. Compared with PBS, OVA significantly increased the expression of CD63 on basophils in vitro (P < 0.05 Figure 4), indicating that the BAT of rats was successfully built.

    Figure 4.  (a) Percentages of CD63 measured in the blood of BN rats sensitized with NS and OVA and incubated with the control (PBS) and OVA, respectively. Mean ± SD, n = 5, OVA compared with the control *P < 0.05. (b) Flow diagram of Figure 4a: effect of CD63 expression in vitro.

    To verify that BAT can be used to detect the sensitization of LMWCs, we verified the effectiveness of BAT by using PG, which often causes allergic reactions in clinical practice.

    In rats sensitized with PG/BSA and challenged with PG/OVA, the PCA showed negative results (Figure 5). For a high sensitivity of the BAT, the BAT was continued in vitro.

    Figure 5.  Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis results in BN rats. n = 5, control (NS) and PG/BSA-sensitized rats were negative and negative.

    After the control group of rat basophils was incubated with PBS and PG/OVA for 15 min in vitro, the expression of CD63 in basophils was 4.7 ± 2.22% and 3.06 ± 1.18, respectively, with no significant difference (P > 0.05).

    After the PG/BSA-sensitized rat basophils were incubated with PBS and PG/OVA for 15 min in vitro, the expression of CD63 on the basophils was 2.74 ± 2.10% and 31.10 ± 20.04%, respectively. Compared with PBS, PG/OVA significantly increased the expression of CD63 on the basophils in vitro (P < 0.05 Figure 6), suggesting that BAT has higher sensitivity than PCA.

    Figure 6.  (a) Percentages of CD63 that were measured in the blood of BN rats sensitized with NS and incubated with control (PBS) or PG/OVA. Mean ± SD, n = 5, PG/OVA compared with the control *P < 0.05. (b) Flow diagram of Figure 6a: Effect of CD63 expression in vitro.

    BAT is widely used in the clinical diagnosis and research of allergic diseases [3],[4], but little research has been conducted in animals. The first step in establishing a rat BAT model is to determine the basophil population in whole blood using classic blood smear methods and flow cytometry. CD45 APClow/IgE FITChigh were used as markers for the identification of rat basophils based on the clinically common BAT protocol in flow cytometry for CD45/IgE [7]. The results showed that CD45 APClow/IgE FITChigh could be used to obtain rat basophils.

    Since the blood smear count is a clinically reliable cell counting method [8], this technique was used in this project to observe the morphology of basophilic granulocytes and determine the count in rats. A significant increase in the number of basophils in the peripheral blood of allergic patients has been confirmed, but whether basophils show changes before and after sensitization has not been studied. Flow cytometry and blood smears have been used for research in rats in this project. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the control and sensitized groups in morphology and quantity. There was also no significant difference between the two counting methods, consistent with previous studies [9], indicating that CD45 APClow/IgE FITChigh can be used as markers to gate rat basophils.

    CD63 has been widely used as a marker of human basophil activation in clinical BAT [10][12], but studies on rats have not been performed. Therefore, the rats were sensitized with OVA, and the peripheral blood was incubated with OVA in vitro to observe the expression of CD63. First, PCA was used to verify whether the rat was sensitized. The results of the control group were negative for PCA, and CD63 expression in basophils was not stimulated by PBS or OVA in vitro. The positive results of PCA in the OVA-sensitized rats indicated that OVA-IgE was produced in rats, basophils were activated after OVA incubation in vitro, and CD63 expression was significantly increased, indicating that the expression of CD63 was dependent on basophils activated by the antigen-specific IgE pathway. The BAT of rats was successfully constructed, providing an experimental basis for evaluating the sensitization of LMWCs.

    PCA is a preclinical method for evaluating drug sensitization, and various experimental factors may affect the occurrence of allergic reactions, thereby affecting the blue spot size. For example, the size of the PCA is affected by the serum IgE content [13]. BAT relies on cell surface-specific IgE binding and subsequent agammaegation of the receptor (FcεRI) to activate the expression of markers. There is no strict requirement on the size of receptor agammaegation [14],[15].

    The BAT of rats was verified by PG and the PG/BSA-sensitized rat, and the blood was challenged by PG/OVA in vitro, consistent with the mechanism of LMWC sensitization: the mechanism of type I hypersensitivity induced by the hapten-carrier complexes [16]. In this project, we verified by PCA that basophils in the PG/BSA-sensitized rats were sensitized or that the rats produced specific PG-IgE. The PCA results were negative but could not explain why there was no IgE production in rats. However, CD63 was significantly increased after the basophils were incubated with PG/OVA in vitro. The reason may be that the amounts of PG-IgE or PG/BSA were lower with poor IgE agammaegates.

    Sometimes, skin tests of patients who are allergic to PG are negative. In contrast, the sensitization of PG can be detected with high sensitivity in BAT [17]. The sensitization of LMWCs and macromolecular proteins in rats provided new ideas for the preclinical evaluation of the sensitization of LMWCs.

    However, this project has drawbacks, and BAT cannot distinguish whether activated basophils are mediated by the IgE pathway or other mechanisms [18]. Not all CD63 is upregulated in the activation of basophils, and approximately 5% to 10% of individuals fail to increase CD63 in IgE-mediated basophil activation pathways, causing false negative results in the BAT [19]. The above issue will be noteworthy for BAT in research and application.

    This project successfully identified rat basophils and successfully established a BAT, which can detect sensitization of PG, suggesting rat BAT can be used to evaluate the potential sensitization of new drugs.



    [1] Limsuwan P (2019) The analysis of perceived value factors affecting parents' to purchase packaged baby food products in Thailand. HSSR 7: 318–326.
    [2] Statista (2021) Baby Food Report 2021.
    [3] Istat (2020) INDICATORI DEMOGRAFICI|ANNO 2020.12.
    [4] Nellas V (2020) Pharmaretail, Il mercato dei prodotti per la prima infanzia resta strategico per la farmacia, nonostante il calo degli ultimi anni, 2020. Available from: https://www.pharmaretail.it/mercato/mercato-prodotti-prima-infanzia-resta-strategico-farmacia-nonostante-calo-ultimi-anni/.
    [5] Pozzetti R (2021) Prima infanzia, quel dinamismo d'impresa che non ti aspetti. Mark Up.
    [6] Etichettatura, cos'è il Claim e suo regolamento (2020) CoFood. Available from: https://www.cofood.it/etichettatura-claim-regolamento/.
    [7] Crepaldi G (2016) Il Fatto Alimentare, Diciture in etichetta: un quarto dei prodotti alimentari vanta proprietà nutrizionali o salutistiche. I risultati di CLYMBOL. Available from: https://ilfattoalimentare.it/claim-studio-clymbol.html.
    [8] Hieke S, Kuljanic N, Pravst I, et al. (2016) Prevalence of nutrition and health-related claims on pre-packaged foods: A five-country study in Europe. Nutrients 8: 137.
    [9] Koo YC, Chang JS, Chen YC (2018) Food claims and nutrition facts of commercial infant foods. PLOS ONE 13: e0191982.
    [10] Cavaliere A, Ricci EC, Banterle A (2015) Nutrition and health claims: Who is interested? An empirical analysis of consumer preferences in Italy. Food Qual Preference 41: 44–51.
    [11] Harris JL, Thompson JM, Schwartz MB, et al. (2011) Nutrition-related claims on children's cereals: what do they mean to parents and do they influence willingness to buy? Public Health Nutr 14: 2207–2212.
    [12] Mehmet S (2020) New Food Magazine, Adult influences inspire baby food and snack innovation, reveals insights. Available from: https://www.newfoodmagazine.com/news/109035/adult-influences-inspire-baby-food-and-snack-innovation-reveals-insights/.
    [13] Lonca F (2010) Consumer preferences for the origin of ingredients and the brand types in the organic baby food market.
    [14] Governo Italiano (2019) Mipaaf - D.L. n. 104 del 21/09/2019 - Trasferimento di funzioni e per la riorganizzazione dei Ministeri per i beni e le attività culturali, delle politiche agricole alimentari, forestali e del turismo. Available from: https://www.politicheagricole.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/14463.
    [15] Ansa (2020) ANSA.it, Dai campi alla pappa, nasce marchio sicurezza del baby food - Terra & Gusto. Available from: https://www.ansa.it/canale_terraegusto/notizie/cibo_e_salute/2020/05/12/dai-campi-alla-pappa-nasce-marchio-sicurezza-del-baby-food_35a4f2b6-40ac-4a1b-b209-78941575bd29.html.
    [16] Del Bene M (2020) EVOLVE, Baby food, dopo l'emergenza coronavirus nasce un marchio sicurezza: dai campi al piatto. Available from: https://www.evolvemag.it/ambiente/2020/05/13/baby-food-dopo-lemergenza-coronavirus-nasce-un-marchio-sicurezza-dai-campi-al-piatto/.
    [17] Damante C (2020) SoloDonna, Omogeneizzati e liofilizzati per bambini: sicuri o no?. Available from: https://www.solodonna.it/mamma/omogeneizzati-e-liofilizzati-per-bambini-sicuri-o-no.php.
    [18] Marzialetti S (2020) Baby food: ricerca e nuovi prodotti. Così il settore vale mezzo miliardo. Il Sole 24 ore 3.
    [19] Dalpozzo D (2011) Il baby food estende il target age superando la barriera dei tre anni. Markup 2.
    [20] Zinola A (2003) L'ampia offerta degli omogeneizzati. Mark Up 1.
    [21] Harris JM (1997) Consumers pay a premium for organic baby foods. Food Rev/Natl Food Rev 20: 13–16.
    [22] Maguire KB, Owens N, Simon NB (2004) The price premium for organic babyfood: A hedonic analysis. J Agric Resour Econ 29: 132–149.
    [23] Smith TA, Huang CL, Lin BH (Eds.) (2009) How much are consumers paying for organic baby food?
    [24] Kim KN (2003) Health and nutrition messages in the baby food advertisements of women's magazines. J Community Nutr 5: 178–185.
    [25] Yin S, Lv S, Chen Y, et al. (2018) Consumer preference for infant milk-based formula with select food safety information attributes: Evidence from a choice experiment in China. Can J Agric Econ/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie 66: 557–569.
    [26] L.Ben (2020) Il Sole 24 ORE, La spesa online in Italia vale 2, 5 miliardi. Con il lockdown balzo del 55% nell'ecommerce alimentare. Available from: https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/la-spesa-online-italia-vale-25-miliardi-il-lockdown-balzo-55percento-nell-ecommerce-alimentare-ADHyfrT.
    [27] Youmark (2016) YM!, Il settore Baby in Italia e le sfide del mondo digitale nell'analisi GfK. Available from: https://youmark.it/ym-youmark/il-settore-baby-in-italia-e-le-sfide-del-mondo-digitale-nellanalisi-gfk/.
    [28] Harris JM (1999) The impact of changing consumer preferences on baby food consumption. J Food Distrib Res 30: 73–77.
    [29] Nielsen (2015) OH, BABY! Tendenze nei mercati globali degli alimenti per bambini e dei pannolini, Nielsen.
    [30] Bertolini A (2011) Mark Up, Gli alimenti per l'infanzia sono un mercato flessibile, sicuro, tracciabile. Available from: http://riviste.newbusinessmedia.it/markup/gli-alimenti-per-linfanzia-sono-un-mercato-flessibile-sicuro-tracciabile/.
    [31] Nielsen (2015) beverfood.com, NIELSEN: Il mercato dei prodotti per l'infanzia nell'ultimo triennio. Available from: https://www.beverfood.com/documenti/nielsen-il-mercato-dei-prodotti-per-linfanzia-nellultimo-triennio-wd50616/.
    [32] Singh M (2012) Marketing Mix of 4P'S for Competitive Advantage. IOSRJBM 3: 40–45.
    [33] Merlino VM, Mastromonaco G, Borra D, et al. (2021) Planning of the cow milk assortment for large retail chains in North Italy: A comparison of two metropolitan cities. J Retailing Consum Serv 59: 102406.
    [34] Dhar SK, Hoch SJ, Kumar N (2001) Effective category management depends on the role of the category. J Retailing 77: 165–184.
    [35] Mantrala MK, Levy M, Kahn BE, et al. (2009) Why is assortment planning so difficult for retailers? A framework and research agenda. J Retailing 85: 71–83.
    [36] McHugh ML (2013) The Chi-square test of independence. Biochem Med 23: 143–149.
    [37] Satorra A, Bentler PM (2010) Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference Chi-square Test statistic. Psychometrika 75: 243–248.
    [38] Ayele D, Zewotir T, Mwambi H (2014) Multiple correspondence analysis as a tool for analysis of large health surveys in African settings. Afr Health Sci 14: 1036–1045.
    [39] Merlino VM, Massaglia S, Blanc S, et al. (2022) Differences between Italian specialty milk in large-scale retailing distribution. Economia agro-alimentare 2022: 1–28.
    [40] Beldona S, Morrison AlastairM, O'Leary J (2005) Online shopping motivations and pleasure travel products: a correspondence analysis. Tourism Management 26: 561–570.
    [41] Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. (1998) Multivariate data analysis, Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
    [42] Ostertagova E, Ostertag O, Kováč J (2014) Methodology and Application of the Kruskal-Wallis Test. Appl Mech Mater 611: 115–120.
    [43] Theodorsson-Norheim E (1986) Kruskal-Wallis test: BASIC computer program to perform nonparametric one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons on ranks of several independent samples. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 23: 57–62.
    [44] Fattorini L (1986) Remarks on the use of Shapiro-Wilk statistic for testing multivariate normality. Statistica 46: 209–217.
    [45] Razali NM, Wah YB (2011) Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests. J Stat Model Anal 2: 21–33.
    [46] Manicardi A (2005) Prodotti per l'infanzia: una categoria completa. 7.
    [47] Hozyasz KK, Radomyska B, Kot K (2010) The Mediterranean diet for Polish infants: a losing struggle or a battle still worth fighting? Mediterr J Nutr Metab 3: 227–232.
    [48] Theurich MA, Zaragoza-Jordana M, Luque V, et al. (2020) Commercial complementary food use amongst European infants and children: Results from the EU Childhood Obesity Project. Eur J Nutr 59: 1679–1692.
    [49] Lamberti L, Lettieri E (2009) CSR practices and corporate strategy: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. J Bus Ethics 87: 153–168.
    [50] Pascucci F (2013) Strategie di Marketing Online per il vantaggio competitivo aziendale, Società Editrice Esculapio.
    [51] Morales A, Kahn BE, McAlister L, et al. (2005) Perceptions of assortment variety: The effects of congruency between consumers' internal and retailers' external organization. J Retailing 81: 159–169.
    [52] Vairo D, Zanoli R (2009) Le caratteristiche qualitative negli alimenti dei bambini: un'indagine esplorativa sui "piccoli consumatori".
    [53] ISMEA (2021) Consumi alimentari - I consumi domestici delle famiglie italiane. Available from: https://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/11945.
    [54] BioBank (2019) Rapporto Tutto Bio 2019. Available from: https://issuu.com/biobank/docs/tutto_bio_2019.
    [55] BioBank (2020) Focus Bio Bank – Supermercati & Specializzati 2020 – Biologico by Bio Bank - Issuu. Available from: https://issuu.com/biobank/docs/focus_bio_bank_supermercati_2020.
    [56] Heyman MB, for the Committee on Nutrition (2006) Lactose intolerance in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 118: 1279–1286.
    [57] Sekar R, Selvasekaran P, Kar A, et al. (2020) Lactose-free food products for lactose intolerant children. In: Gutiérrez TJ (Ed.), Food Science, Technology and Nutrition for Babies and Children, Cham, Springer International Publishing, 143–168.
    [58] Tian Y, Peng H, Dong X, et al. (2022) Consumers' brand preferences for infant formula: A grounded theory approach. Sustainability 14: 7600.
    [59] Román S, Sánchez-Siles LM (2018) Parents' choice criteria for infant food brands: A scale development and validation. Food Qual Preference 64: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.008 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.008
    [60] Fang P (2015) Evaluating Consumer Response to Labels and Packaging in the Market for Baby Foods, Rochester, NY, Social Science Research Network.
    [61] Zitiello L (2016) "LA SOCIAL MEDIA COMMUNICATION" COME ALTERNATIVA STRATEGICA NELLE IMPRESE.
    [62] SINAB (2020) www.ismeamercati.it, Rapporto SINAB - ISMEA Bio in Cifre 2020. Available from: https://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/10861.
    [63] Maguire KB, Owens NN, Simon NB (Eds.) (2006) Focus on babies: A note on parental attitudes and preferences for organic babyfood. J Agribusiness 24: 187–195.
    [64] Maguire KB, Owens N, Simon NB (Eds.) (2004) Focus on babies: Evidence on parental attitudes towards pesticide risks.
    [65] Corriere della Sera (2021) Gli omogeneizzati. Available from: https://www.corriere.it/speciali/alimentazione/set_cibo4.html.
    [66] Sabella S (2015) Donna Moderna, Gli omogeneizzati per bambini sono sicuri?. Available from: https://www.donnamoderna.com/mamme/bambini/omogeneizzati-sono-sicuri.
    [67] La Barbera F, Amato M, Sannino G (2016) Understanding consumers' intention and behaviour towards functionalised food: The role of knowledge and food technology neophobia. Br Food J 118: 885–895.
    [68] Arfaoui L, Alkhaldy A, Alareeshi A, et al. (2021) Assessment of knowledge and self-reported use of nutrition facts labels, nutrient content, and health claims among Saudi adult consumers. J Multidiscip Healthc 14: 2959–2972.
    [69] Uriarte MLMC, Cravero RA, Urrutia AAR, et al. (2022) Research trends and innovation perspectives about sustainability and agri-food 4.0. Adv Ser Manag 27: 1–15.
    [70] Tarnavölgyi G (2003) Analysis of consumers' attitudes towards food additives using focus group survey. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 68: 193–196.
    [71] Fang P (2015) Evaluating Consumer Response to Labels and Packaging in the Market for Baby Foods, Rochester, NY, Social Science Research Network.
    [72] Klerks M, Román S, Juan Francisco Haro-Vicente, et al. (2022) Healthier and more natural reformulated baby food pouches: Will toddlers and their parents sensory accept them? Food Qual Preference 99: 104577.
    [73] Redazione (2020) Pharmaretail, Il mercato dei prodotti per la prima infanzia resta strategico per la farmacia, nonostante il calo degli ultimi anni. Available from: https://www.pharmaretail.it/mercato/mercato-prodotti-prima-infanzia-resta-strategico-farmacia-nonostante-calo-ultimi-anni/.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4645) PDF downloads(261) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(15)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog