Research article

Optimal sequencing to reform the European economic and Monetary Union: a roadmap

  • Received: 28 February 2021 Accepted: 11 May 2021 Published: 13 May 2021
  • JEL Codes: F45, C72, H77, F59

  • In this paper, we examine the political gridlock in reforming the Economic and Monetary Union. We utilize a two–stage game with imperfect information in order to study the optimal sequencing. The main results are: first, optimal sequencing requires for incompliant Member States a default option in stage–two, which in principle is related to the today's fiscal architecture (EMU-I). Second, we show that compliant countries prefer a reform equilibrium today if and only if they have a free choice about the preferred fiscal architecture at the end — either EMU-II with binding European coordination or EMU-I related to Maastricht. Noteworthy, our sequencing approach works for any design of the EMU-II architecture.

    Citation: Bodo Herzog. Optimal sequencing to reform the European economic and Monetary Union: a roadmap[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2021, 5(2): 311-324. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2021014

    Related Papers:

  • In this paper, we examine the political gridlock in reforming the Economic and Monetary Union. We utilize a two–stage game with imperfect information in order to study the optimal sequencing. The main results are: first, optimal sequencing requires for incompliant Member States a default option in stage–two, which in principle is related to the today's fiscal architecture (EMU-I). Second, we show that compliant countries prefer a reform equilibrium today if and only if they have a free choice about the preferred fiscal architecture at the end — either EMU-II with binding European coordination or EMU-I related to Maastricht. Noteworthy, our sequencing approach works for any design of the EMU-II architecture.



    加载中


    [1] Admati A, Hellwig M (2014) The Bankers' New Clothes: What's Wrong with Banking and What to Do about It, Princeton Universtiy Press.
    [2] Alesina A, Tabellini G, Trebbi F (2017) Is Europe an Optimal Political Area. BPEA 2017 Conference, 1-45.
    [3] Alesina A, Giuliano P (2015) Culture and institutions. J Econ Lit 53: 898-944. doi: 10.1257/jel.53.4.898
    [4] Alesina A, Angeloni I, Etro F (2005) International Unions. Am Econ Rev 95: 602-615. doi: 10.1257/0002828054201279
    [5] Alesina A, Perotti R, Spolaore E (1995) Together or separately? Issues on the costs and benefits of political and fiscal unions. Eur Econ Rev 39: 751-758. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00082-O
    [6] Andreozzi L, Tamborini R (2019) Models of Supranational Policymaking and the Reform of theEMU. J Policy Model 41: 819-844. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.05.009
    [7] Bandeira G (2018) Fiscal Transfers in a Monetary Union with Sovereign Risk. Documentos de Trabajo—Central Bank of Spain, No. 1807: 1-45.
    [8] Becker J, Fuest C (2017) Der Odysseus-Komplex. Hanser Veralg.
    [9] Bénassy-Quéré A, Brunnermeier MK, Enderlein H, et al. (2018) Reconciling risk sharing with market discipline: A constructive approach to euro area reform. CEPR Policy Insight, 91.
    [10] Beetsma RM, Bovenberg AL (1999) Does Monetary Unification Lead to Excessive Debt Accumulation? J Public Econ 74: 299-325.
    [11] Beetsma RM, Bovenberg AL (2000) Designing Fiscal and Monetary Institutions for a Monetary Union. Public Choice 102: 247-269. doi: 10.1023/A:1005016001877
    [12] Beetsma RM, Bovenberg AL (2003) Strategic Debt Accumulation in a Heterogeneous Monetary Union. Eur J Political Econ 19: 1-15. doi: 10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00126-X
    [13] Beetsma RM, Uhlig H (1999) An Analysis of the Stability and Growth Pact. Econ J 109: 546-571. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00462
    [14] Begg I (2017) Fiscal Rules and the Scope for Risk Sharing. Intereconomics 3: 131-137.
    [15] Begg I (2017) Fiscal and Other Rules in EU Economic Governance: Helpful, Largely Irrelevant or Unenforceable? Natl Inst Econo Rev 239: 3-13.
    [16] Belke A, Domnick C, Gros D (2017) Business Cycle Synchronization in the EMU: Core vs. Periphery. Open Econ Rev 28: 863-892.
    [17] Blanchard O, Erceg CJ, Lindé J (2017) Jump-starting the euro-area recovery: Would a rise in core fiscal spending help the periphery? NBER Macroeconomics Annual Conference, 31: 103-183.
    [18] Bolton P (2016)Presidential Address: Debt and Money: Financial Constraints and Sovereign Finance. J Financ 71: 1483-1510. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12418
    [19] Bordo MD, Lonung L (1999) The Future of EMU: What Does the History of Monetary Unions tell us? Working paper.
    [20] Brunnermeier MK, Langfield S, Pagano M, et al. (2017) ESBies: safety in the tranches. Econ Policy 32: 175-219. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eix004
    [21] Brunnermeier MK, James H, Landau JP (2016) The Euro and the battle of ideas. Princeton University Press. NBER Working Paper, No. 7365.
    [22] Castaneda J, Congdon T (2017) Have central banks forgotten about money? Research Paper - Institute of International Monetary Research, No 3: 1-28.
    [23] Delors C (1977) Report of the study group on the role of public finance in European integration studies. Commission, Economic and Fiscal Series I, A13.
    [24] Delors C (1989)Regional implications of economic and monetary integration. Commission, Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union, Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community.
    [25] de Marti J, Zenou Y (2015) Network games with incompelte information. J Math Econ 61: 221-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.10.002
    [26] Dewatripont M, Roland G (1992) Economic Reform and Dynamic Political Constraints. Rev Econ Stud 59: 703-730. doi: 10.2307/2297994
    [27] Dixit A, Lambertini L (2003) Symbiosis of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in a Monetary Union. J Int Econ 60: 235-247. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00048-X
    [28] Enderlein H, Letta E (2016) Repair and Prepare: Der Euro und Wachstum nach dem Brexit. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh.
    [29] Eyraud L, Gaspar V, Poghosyan T (2017) Fiscal Politics in the Euro Area. IMF Workinger Paper, No. 18.
    [30] Fabbrini S (2015) Which European Union? Europe After the Euro Crisis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [31] Fleming JM (1971) On Exchange Rate Unification. Econ J 81: 467-488. doi: 10.2307/2229844
    [32] Green E, Porter R (1984) Noncooperative Collusion Under Imperfect Information. Econometrica 52: 87-100. doi: 10.2307/1911462
    [33] Guiso L, Herrera H, Morelli M (2016) Cultural differences and institutional integration. J Int Econ 99: 97-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.11.005
    [34] Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2016)Monnet's error? Econ Policy 117: 60-76.
    [35] Hart O (2000) Different Approaches to Bankruptcy. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 7921.
    [36] Häusler G, Gianviti F, Geithner T (2002) Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism—Further Considerations. International Monetary Fund.
    [37] Herzog B (2020a) EZB-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts: Neue Hindernisse für die Europäische Wirtchafts- und Währungsunion? Recht und Politik 57: 26-38.
    [38] Herzog B (2020b) Hidden Blemish in European Law: Judgements on Unconventional Monetary Programmes. Law 10: 1-18.
    [39] Herzog B, Choi M (2017) Policy Rules in the Economic and Monetary Union. Intereconomics 52: 51-56. doi: 10.1007/s10272-017-0643-1
    [40] Herzog B, Ferencz M (2019) Disziplinierung ohne politische Diskriminierung: Warum es Marktkräfte in der Währungsunion bedarf! Ifo Schnelldienst 72: 20-22.
    [41] Herzog B (2016) Liquidity Management at the Zero Lower Bound and an Era of Activism in Central Banking. J Math Financ 6: 48-54. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2016.61006
    [42] Herzog B (2016) Modelling Monetary and Fiscal Governance in the Wake of the Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe. Economies 4: 1-9. doi: 10.3390/economies4010001
    [43] Herzog B (2017) Die Zukunft der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion (I) - Eine staatliche Insolvenzordnung für den Euroraum. Anal Und Argumente 243: 1-31.
    [44] Herzog B, Hengstermann K (2013) Restoring Credible Govnernance to the Eurozone. J Econ Aff 33: 2-17. doi: 10.1111/ecaf.12009
    [45] Herzog B (2016) Neujustierung der Governance der Europäischen Währungsunion. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Berlin.
    [46] Janning J (2017) Differentiation Could Become the Next EU Integration Concept. Intereconomics 3: 122-123.
    [47] Juncker JC (2017) Reform Package for the Eurozone. EU Commission.
    [48] Dombrovski V, Moscovici P (2017) Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union. EU Commission.
    [49] Juncker JC (2017) White Paper On The Future Of Europe. Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. EU Commission.
    [50] Juncker JC, Tusk D, Dijsselbloem J, et al. (2015) Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union. EU Commission.
    [51] Kehoe JP, Patorino E (2017) Fiscal Union Redux. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    [52] Kenen (1969) The optimum currency area: An elective view, Monetary Problems of the international Economy, University of Chicago Press, 41-60.
    [53] Kim J, Kim S (2017) How much to share: Welfare effects of fiscal transfers. Ca J Econ 50: 636-659. doi: 10.1111/caje.12273
    [54] Kreps D, Wilson R (1982) Sequential Equilibrium. Econometrica 50: 863-894. doi: 10.2307/1912767
    [55] Laffont J, Tirole J (1990) Adverse Selection and Renegotiation in Procurment. Rev Econ Stud 57: 597-625. doi: 10.2307/2298088
    [56] Lazear E, Rosen S (1981) Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts. J Political Econ 89: 841-864. doi: 10.1086/261010
    [57] Marinc M, Vlahu R (2012) The Economics of Bank Bankruptcy Law, Springer Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.
    [58] Martinez-Garcia E (2017)Good Policies or Good Luck? New Insights on Globalization and the International Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism. FED of Dallas, Working Paper, No. 321: 1-62.
    [59] Martinez-Garcia E (2017) Good Policies or Good Luck? New Insights on Globalization and the International Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism. FED of Dallas, Working Paper, No. 321.
    [60] McKelvey RD (1976) Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control. J Econ Theory 12: 472-482. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(76)90040-5
    [61] McKinnon R (1963) Optimum Currency Area. Am Econ Rev 52: 717-725.
    [62] Messori M, Micossi S (2018) Counterproductive Proposals on Euro Area Reform by French and German Economists. Policy Brief, School of European Political Economy, LUISS University, Rome, February 13.
    [63] Mundell R (1961)A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. Am Econ Rev 51: 657-665.
    [64] Oates WE (1999) An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. J Econ Lit 37: 1120-1149. doi: 10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
    [65] Perotti R (2014)Fiscal Policies in Recessions, What have we learned? Macroeconomic Policy after the Crisis, MIT Press.
    [66] Plociennik S (2017) Rebalancing the Fiscal Framework in the European Union: Perspectives of Germany, France and Poland. Polish Institute of International Affairs, Report.
    [67] Romer T, Rosenthal H (1972) Bureaucrats Versus Voters: On the Political Economy of Resource Allocation by Direct Democracy. Q J Econ 93: 563-587. doi: 10.2307/1884470
    [68] Rosenthal H (1989) The Setter Model, Readings in the Spatioal Theory of Elections, Cambridge University Press.
    [69] Sapir A, Wolff GB (2015) Euro-Area Governance: What To Reform And How To Do It. Bruegel Policy Brief, 01, Brussels.
    [70] Schmidt C, Feld L, Bofinger P, et al. (2016) Zeit für Reformen. German Council of Economic Experts, Wiesbaden.
    [71] Sinn HW (2016) Der schwarze Juni. Herder, Freiburg.
    [72] Smaghi LB (2014) Monetary Policy, the Only Game in Town? What have we learned? Macroeconomic Policy after the Crisis, MIT Press.
    [73] Spolaore E (2013) What is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists. J Econ Perspect 27: 125-144. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.3.125
    [74] Spolaore E (2015) The Political Economy of European Integration, Handbook of the Economics of European Integration, Routledge, 435-448.
    [75] Zhang WB (2019) Growth, environmental change and business cycles in a multi-regional economy. Green Financ 1: 205-220. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.2.205
    [76] Werning E (2017) Fiscal Unions. Working Paper, No. 198816.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1532) PDF downloads(112) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog