Research article

The baker, the bread eater, and their habitat: Self-interest and sustainability accounting in a post-Smithian world

  • Published: 06 August 2026
  • JEL Codes: B12, D62, L21, M14, Q56, Q58

  • Adam Smith's insight that economic exchange is driven by self-interest rather than benevolence remains foundational to modern economic thought. However, the institutional, social, and ecological conditions that shaped Smith's perspective have changed profoundly. This paper revisits the figures of the baker, the bread eater, and the habitat to explore how self-interest now operates in a post-Smithian world marked by globalised production, financialised capitalism, and mounting ecological constraints. It argues that, although self-interest still organises economic activities, the moral and communal restraints Smith assumed have been significantly weakened. As a result, corporate externalities have accumulated to a scale that threatens both social well-being and the integrity of our shared environment. The paper uses the "baker" as a metaphor for the self-interested economic actor who produces goods for personal gain through market exchange. The "bread eater" refers to ordinary citizens, vulnerable workers, marginalised communities, consumers, and future generations. These are the people who bear the costs of corporate self-interest but have little voice or protection. The "habitat" is a fragile socio-ecological system that sustains human life but is increasingly pushed beyond its limits. Drawing on political economy, sustainability accounting, and earth system science, the paper develops a conceptual model that links economic self-interest to social and ecological harm through the production of externalities. It then positions sustainability governance, especially sustainability accounting, as a crucial institutional response. The analysis shows how sustainability accounting can disrupt this causal chain by making externalities visible, redistributing informational power, and enabling regulatory, investor, civic, and technological pressures to change corporate behaviour. The paper examines the roles of the state, corporations, civil society, and digital technologies in a multi-level governance system designed to protect both the "bread eater" and the "habitat". Ultimately, this work contributes to accounting and sustainability scholarship by advancing a normative and conceptual framework for embedding self-interest within institutions to safeguard people and their environments in the post-Smithian era.

    Citation: Kennedy Modugu. The baker, the bread eater, and their habitat: Self-interest and sustainability accounting in a post-Smithian world[J]. National Accounting Review, 2026, 8(3): 384-408. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2026017

    Related Papers:

  • Adam Smith's insight that economic exchange is driven by self-interest rather than benevolence remains foundational to modern economic thought. However, the institutional, social, and ecological conditions that shaped Smith's perspective have changed profoundly. This paper revisits the figures of the baker, the bread eater, and the habitat to explore how self-interest now operates in a post-Smithian world marked by globalised production, financialised capitalism, and mounting ecological constraints. It argues that, although self-interest still organises economic activities, the moral and communal restraints Smith assumed have been significantly weakened. As a result, corporate externalities have accumulated to a scale that threatens both social well-being and the integrity of our shared environment. The paper uses the "baker" as a metaphor for the self-interested economic actor who produces goods for personal gain through market exchange. The "bread eater" refers to ordinary citizens, vulnerable workers, marginalised communities, consumers, and future generations. These are the people who bear the costs of corporate self-interest but have little voice or protection. The "habitat" is a fragile socio-ecological system that sustains human life but is increasingly pushed beyond its limits. Drawing on political economy, sustainability accounting, and earth system science, the paper develops a conceptual model that links economic self-interest to social and ecological harm through the production of externalities. It then positions sustainability governance, especially sustainability accounting, as a crucial institutional response. The analysis shows how sustainability accounting can disrupt this causal chain by making externalities visible, redistributing informational power, and enabling regulatory, investor, civic, and technological pressures to change corporate behaviour. The paper examines the roles of the state, corporations, civil society, and digital technologies in a multi-level governance system designed to protect both the "bread eater" and the "habitat". Ultimately, this work contributes to accounting and sustainability scholarship by advancing a normative and conceptual framework for embedding self-interest within institutions to safeguard people and their environments in the post-Smithian era.



    加载中


    [1] Adams CA (2015) The international integrated reporting council: A call to action. Crit Perspect Account 27: 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001
    [2] Bebbington J, Larrinaga C (2014) Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Account Organ Soc 39: 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003
    [3] Benayas JMR, Newton AC, Diaz A, et al. (2009) Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: A meta-analysis. Science 325: 1121–1124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172460 doi: 10.1126/science.1172460
    [4] Biermann F, Abbott K, Andresen S, et al. (2012) Navigating the anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science 335: 1306–1307. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217255 doi: 10.1126/science.1217255
    [5] Calel R, Dechezleprêtre A (2016) Environmental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from the European carbon market. Rev Econ Stat 98: 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00470 doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00470
    [6] Christensen HB, Hail L, Leuz C (2021) Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Rev Account Stud 26: 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 doi: 10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
    [7] Eccles RG, Klimenko S (2019) The investor revolution. Harv Bus Rev 97: 106–116.
    [8] Folke C, Biggs R, Norström AV, et al. (2016) Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol Soc 21: 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341 doi: 10.5751/ES-08748-210341
    [9] Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, et al. (2010) Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768
    [10] Goranova M, Ryan LV (2014) Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. J Manag 40: 1230–1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515519 doi: 10.1177/0149206313515519
    [11] Gray R (2010) Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Account Organ Soc 35: 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006 doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
    [12] Haakonssen K (2006) The Cambridge companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press.
    [13] IFRS Foundation (2023) IFRS S1 general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information and IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. Available from: https://www.ifrs.org.
    [14] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021) Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
    [15] Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2017) The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 11-100.
    [16] La Torre M, Sabelfeld S, Blomkvist M, et al. (2020) Rebuilding trust: Sustainability and non-financial reporting and the European Union regulation. Meditari Account Res 28: 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2020-0914 doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-06-2020-0914
    [17] Micheletti M, Stolle D (2012) Sustainable citizenship and the new politics of consumption. ANN Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 644: 88–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212454836 doi: 10.1177/0002716212454836
    [18] Network for Greening the Financial System (2020) Climate scenario analysis for central banks and supervisors.
    [19] Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.
    [20] Raphael DD, Macfie AL (1976) Introduction, In: Smith, A., The theory of moral sentiments, Oxford University Press, 1–52.
    [21] Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a doi: 10.1038/461472a
    [22] Saberi S, Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J, et al. (2019) Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int J Prod Res 57: 2117–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
    [23] Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
    [24] Serafeim G, Trinh K (2020) A framework for product impact-weighted accounts (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 20-076). Harvard Business School.
    [25] Smith A (1759) The theory of moral sentiments. A. Millar.
    [26] Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan & T. Cadell.
    [27] Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, et al. (2015) Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347: 55. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 doi: 10.1126/science.1259855
    [28] Stiglitz JE (2019) People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. W. W. Norton & Company.
    [29] United Nations (2021) System of environmental-economic accounting—Ecosystem accounting (SEEA EA). United Nations Statistics Division.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Metrics

Article views(815) PDF downloads(36) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog